Hvilken erklæring om økonomien i nord under borgerkrigen er sandt answers.com?
Talk:Origins of the American Civil War/Archive 1
denne side fokuserer for meget på den historisk revisionistiske opfattelse af borgerkrigen som en krig for at befri slaver. Mange er uenige. Det var i virkeligheden en krig om økonomi, og slaveriet blev bare fanget i midten. Slavekompromiser og slavestatsproblemer var blot midler til at nå et mål, og det var at finde en balance mellem to voksende synspunkter om føderal magt og økonomisk kontrol. Nordstaterne ønskede mere centralisering med mere økonomisk protektionisme, mens sydstaterne gik ind for decentralisering af magten og mere frihandel. Dette er den virkelige version af historien, som har måttet give plads til den populistiske opfattelse, der ikke er givet på denne side (hvilket den bør, blot fordi den undervises i historieundervisning i hele landet, snarere end at være faktuel i sig selv. ikke desto mindre bør den økonomiske udredning gives mere opmærksomhed. (Gibby 06:32, 7. januar 2006 (UTC))
Talk:Origins of the American Civil War/Archive 1
this page focuses too much on the historical revisionist take on the civil war as a war to free slaves. Many disagree. This was really a war about economics, slavery was just caught in the middle. Slave compromises and slave state issues were merely means to an end and that was seeking a balance between two growing views on federal power and economic control. The northern states wanted more centralization with more economic protectionism while the south favored decentralization of power and more free trade. This is the real version of history that has had to make room for the populist view no given on this page (which it should simply for the fact that it is taught in history classes nationwide rather than being factual itself. nevertheless the economic explination needs to be given more attention. (Gibby 06:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC))
Talk:Origins of the American Civil War/Archive 1