This suggests that the current approach to counting adjustment flows may be underestimating the true value that donors and recipients place on supporting adjustment needs. It also suggests that the currently expansive definitions of TRA -such as the OECD’s suggestions that it covers all ‘contributions to the government budget to assist the implementation of trade reforms’ (OECD 2008: 2) — are, while subject to excessive overlap and lack of clarity, closer to how the AfT community actually perceives adjustment needs. The change in approach to TRA would thus involve transforming TRA from a ‘tick one box’, mutually exclusive category, into a ‘marker’ that could be applied to any AfT flow.