The ECCC are bound by their mandate to comply fully with domestic and international standards of the rule of law. This entails that, even though the ECCC must engage with a setting in which torture was rife, they must not admit into evidence any statements established to have been made as a result of torture. The case law of the ECCC has been mindful of this principle. In this chapter, the relevant case law of the ECCC will be presented and assessed. It will be shown that the case law of the ECCC is in line with the international discussion, but that some questions remain open to further discussion, in the ECCC as in international law more generally.