This paper examines the transformation within the practice and concept of contemporary  peacebuilding.  Peacebuilding,  practically  and  conceptually, has  been  dominated  by  the  liberal  peace  paradigm.  In  this  case,  the institutionalising of its core ideas such as democratisation, human rights, the rule of law,  and liberal market system to the post-conflict states and to a socalled „fragile/failed states‟  aiming at bringing peace and security has failed to  create  a  comprehensive  and  sustainable  peace  on  the  ground  as exemplified  in  Nicaragua,  Haiti,  Bosnia,  Afghanistan,  and  other  post-war states. Scholars focused on the issue of peacebuilding have engaged  to a new approach  that challenge the domination of the liberal paradigm through the accommodation and appreciation upon the „local‟ and thus create spaces for the  interaction  between  the  liberal  and  the  „local‟  within  forms  of   hybrid peace‟ or   hybrid peacebuilding‟.