Besides the deprivation headcount ratios of the aggregated number of deprivations, the Bristol approach also concentrates on the analysis of single dimensions, which is examined by region. They demonstrate in their paper that countries or households with the same incidence of deprivations experience different levels of severity. They explore the deprivation distribution to measure the so-called depth (the average number of deprivations), and severity (the distribution of the total number of deprivations) of deprivation among children. Both methodologies follow a rights-based approach to child well-being and account for the number of deprivations experienced by each child. There are, however, differences between the studies: the Global Study adopts a continuum approach to deprivation within a dimension, meaning that multiple thresholds are used to measure mild, moderate, severe and extreme deprivation, while MODA uses single thresholds. The Global study lacks the life-cycle definition of the dimensions and indicators and is limited to the counting approach23 while MODA goes beyond that and incorporates analyses of deprivation indices and deprivation overlaps.