Policymakers may wish to know the impact of the price shocks on the welfare of households (i.e., on the incomes of the rural poor, rural non-poor, urban poor and urban non-poor households). The results of this analysis are summarized in table 13, which predicts that a price shock on the forestry and hunting sector generally leads to increases in income in all the sectors, and this echoes our earlier conclusion that increased activity in the forestry and hunting sector is in the business interests of most, if not all sectors. The sectors that would benefit the most from such a policy are: wood, paper and printing, agriculture, public administration, real estate, food processing, and livestock and fisheries. Table 13 also predicts printing sector at the same rate.