The experience of having reports reviewed is also important for building capacity and improving the quality of reporting, in part because this allows domestic resources to be channelled in support of improvements (Briner and Moarif, 2017). Under current practice, information for which reporting is mandatory is more heavily scrutinised during any review process, and in turn benefits from the recommendations and suggestions of expert review teams. If future MPGs were to include fewer mandatory reporting provisions, the review process may need to be adjusted to ensure that a broad set of relevant information is still being subject to facilitative review by experts, and not only information for which reporting provisions are mandatory.