Question: JMC, a 14-year-old patient admitted to the Emergency Department. The attending physician considers a blood transfusion necessary. The parents of the patient express their refusal to be given blood, signing the corresponding document of refusal to transfusion. The doctor warns that if the transfusion is not carried out, his life is in danger. They insist on their refusal, the alleged reason for the rejection is basically religious. Which of the following options would be the most correct? 
 Options:  <1> Transfuse the patient. <2> Transfuse the patient, but only when he has lost consciousness. <3> Transfer the case to the healthcare ethics committee so that it adopts the decision. <4> Respect expressed preference and attend without transfusion <5> I would inform the judge and not administer any treatment until the latter indicated it.
5