Passage: In the Vietnam air war radar missile kill reliability was approximately 10% at shorter ranges, and even worse at longer ranges due to reduced radar return and greater time for the target aircraft to detect the incoming missile and take evasive action. At one point in the Vietnam war, the U.S. Navy fired 50 AIM-7 Sparrow radar guided missiles in a row without a hit. Between 1958 and 1982 in five wars there were 2,014 combined heat-seeking and radar guided missile firings by fighter pilots engaged in air-to-air combat, achieving 528 kills, of which 76 were radar missile kills, for a combined effectiveness of 26%. However, only four of the 76 radar missile kills were in the beyond-visual-range mode intended to be the strength of radar guided missiles. The United States invested over $10 billion in air-to-air radar missile technology from the 1950s to the early 1970s. Amortized over actual kills achieved by the U.S. and its allies, each radar guided missile kill thus cost over $130 million. The defeated enemy aircraft were for the most part older MiG-17s, -19s, and -21s, with new cost of $0.3 million to $3 million each. Thus, the radar missile investment over that period far exceeded the value of enemy aircraft destroyed, and furthermore had very little of the intended BVR effectiveness.
Between 1958 and 1982 in 5 wars, how many percent of the missle firings were not effective? How many of the kills made by the combined heat-seeking and radar guided missiles were not radar missile kills? How many of the radar missile kills were not in the beyond-visual-range mode? How many of the radar missle kills were not in the beyond-visual-range mode? How many years was the time span where in five wars there were 2014 combined heat-seeking and radar guided missile firings by fighter pilots engaged in air-to-air combat? Which were radar missile kills more reliable in Vietnam, shorter ranges or longer ranges?