Background Paragraph: Increases in erosion due to farming and other operations will be reflected by changes in sediment composition and increases in deposition rates elsewhere. In land areas with a depositional regime, engineered structures will tend to be buried and preserved, along with litter and debris. Litter and debris thrown from boats or carried by rivers and creeks will accumulate in the marine environment, particularly in coastal areas. Such manmade artifacts preserved in stratigraphy are known as "technofossils."Changes in biodiversity will also be reflected in the fossil record, as will species introductions. An example cited is the domestic chicken, originally the red junglefowl Gallus gallus, native to south-east Asia but has since become the world's most common bird through human breeding and consumption, with over 60 billion consumed a year and whose bones would become fossilized in landfill sites. Hence, landfills are important resources to find "technofossils". 
Story: Mike is an an archeologist. He was pondering about how human legacy would be viewed in the future. For that, he was very interested in technofossils. He located a site with ample evidence of technofossils. He noted that site as site A. To compare site A with a site with no technofossils he located another site. He noted that site as site B.
Which site would reflect less erosion due to human activities, site A or site B? Which site would reflect more erosion due to human activities, site A or site B? Which site would see less changes in biodiversity in the fossil record, site A or site B? Which site would see less litter and debris deposited, site A or site B? Which site would see more changes in biodiversity in the fossil record, site A or site B? Which site would see more litter and debris deposited, site A or site B? Would site A see less or more changes in biodiversity in the fossil record than site B? Would site A see less or more litter and debris depostied than site B? Would site B see less or more changes in biodiversity in the fossil record than site A? Would site B see less or more litter and debris depostied than site A?