Table TABREF46 shows that our Open model achieves more than 3 points of f1-score than the state-of-the-art result, and RelAwe with DepPath&RelPath achieves the best in both Closed and Open settings. 
 Question: How big is improvement over the old  state-of-the-art performance on CoNLL-2009 dataset?
our Open model achieves more than 3 points of f1-score than the state-of-the-art result