However, it is important to understand that despite the presence of reception statutes, much of contemporary American common law has diverged significantly from English common law. The reason is that although the courts of the various Commonwealth nations are often influenced by each other's rulings, American courts rarely follow post-Revolution Commonwealth rulings unless there is no American ruling on point, the facts and law at issue are nearly identical, and the reasoning is strongly persuasive.
A lot of American common law diverged from where? When would American courts follow post-revolution commonwealth rulings? Courts in commonwealth nations are often influenced by what? Most modern American common law came from what kind of law? Couts of commonwealth nations are often influenced by who's rulings? What rulings do American courts rarely follow? What is one reason American courts may follow a post Revolutionary Commonwealth ruling under what circumstances? How close is current American law to English law? What differs about American and English law? When would American law be more likely to follow English law? How close do the issues have to be in order for an English law to be used?