text:
Professor Edelstein is a criminologist whose interests focus on the connection between immigration and crime, and how that relationship crosses generations. He has published dozens of articles on the subject.
Other areas of specialty include criminal careers, mass-murder, serial murder and intimate partner femicide.
Currently, Prof. Edelstein is studying the phenomenon of child prostitution and the connections between crime and terror.

tokenized:
Professor Edelstein is a criminologist whose interests focus on the connection between immigration and crime , and how that relationship crosses generations . He has published dozens of articles on the subject .
 Other areas of specialty include criminal careers , mass - murder , serial murder and intimate partner femicide .
 Currently , Prof. Edelstein is studying the phenomenon of child prostitution and the connections between crime and terror .


text:
“I could be described as a very experienced dieter, having tried everything over the years. I have managed to lose weight successfully on occasion but as soon as I let my guard down and as work stress increased it all would gradually re-accumulate.
“Being a general practitioner I am very aware of the danger of developing mature age diabetes and other health risks of being overweight. In January 2013 I decided to start with Lite n’ Easy, prompted by the fact I had developed a degree of swelling around my ankles which suggested my weight was placing my heart under stress.
“I am very glad to say that Lite n’ Easy has indeed solved all of these problems. I lost 20 kilos in 8 months, just in time for my daughter’s wedding and I feel great! My husband has been very supportive. He orders the 1800 calorie Lunch & Dinner Plan then does his own breakfast.
“I have been delighted with the quality of the food and the excellent dietary balance Lite n’ Easy provides. Having all of our food delivered has also given me freedom from the constant bother of menu planning, shopping for food and preparing meals. This in turn gives me time for much more rewarding activities.
Ready for a healthier lifestyle? Click here to start your journey today!

tokenized:
“ I could be described as a very experienced dieter , having tried everything over the years . I have managed to lose weight successfully on occasion but as soon as I let my guard down and as work stress increased it all would gradually re - accumulate .
 “ Being a general practitioner I am very aware of the danger of developing mature age diabetes and other health risks of being overweight . In January 2013 I decided to start with Lite n ’ Easy , prompted by the fact I had developed a degree of swelling around my ankles which suggested my weight was placing my heart under stress .
 “ I am very glad to say that Lite n ’ Easy has indeed solved all of these problems . I lost 20 kilos in 8 months , just in time for my daughter ’s wedding and I feel great ! My husband has been very supportive . He orders the 1800 calorie Lunch & Dinner Plan then does his own breakfast .
 “ I have been delighted with the quality of the food and the excellent dietary balance Lite n ’ Easy provides . Having all of our food delivered has also given me freedom from the constant bother of menu planning , shopping for food and preparing meals . This in turn gives me time for much more rewarding activities .
 Ready for a healthier lifestyle ? Click here to start your journey today !


text:
i love to imagine everything that i do, and what better way to do that then tell every small detail that surrounds us, expect to have a remarkable experience, an unforgettable memory and a lucid dream around me.
worst show ever....10 mins of nothing....should be banned !!!

tokenized:
i love to imagine everything that i do , and what better way to do that then tell every small detail that surrounds us , expect to have a remarkable experience , an unforgettable memory and a lucid dream around me .
 worst show ever .... 10 mins of nothing .... should be banned ! ! !


text: Andersen Todd J Attorney can be found at 13983 Clifton Blvd . The following is offered: Law Firms . In Lakewood there are 33 other Law Firms. An overview can be found here.

tokenized: Andersen Todd J Attorney can be found at 13983 Clifton Blvd . The following is offered : Law Firms . In Lakewood there are 33 other Law Firms . An overview can be found here .


text:
Algae control: AWTT floating covers will help prevent the buildup of algae.
Algae are a diverse group of aquatic organisms that have the ability to conduct photosynthesis. Certain algae are familiar to most people; for instance, seaweeds (such as kelp or phytoplankton), pond scum or the algal blooms in lakes. The term “algae” covers many different organisms capable of producing oxygen through photosynthesis (the process of harvesting light energy from the sun to generate carbohydrates).
What do algae feed on?
As a general rule, algae are capable of photosynthesis and produce their own nourishment by using light energy from the sun and carbon dioxide in order to generate carbohydrates and oxygen. In other words, most algae are autotrophs or more specifically, photoautotrophs (reflecting their use of light energy to generate nutrients).
How can we control algae?
Algae growing in a drinking water reservoir or an aerated lagoon system will increase both the TSS and the CBOD5 of the effluent, deteriorate water taste, plug filtration systems and increase chemical treatment cost. In systems treating municipal wastewaters, the effluent TSS and CBOD5 will often be much higher than if the algae had not been present. Since algae diminishes water quality and play no beneficial role in drinking water and wastewater lagoons, preventing algal growth is important to those responsible for the design and operation of these systems. Some algae are toxic to humans and dogs. Water can also become unsuitable for fish, swimming, and other animals.
A good cover will prevent light from entering the water column and will prevent the growth of algae and other noxious weeds. Solid and modular floating covers have been used to shade aerated lagoons for decades. In the case of aerated lagoons, such shades should not cover the entire lagoon surface, especially with mechanical surface aerator where leaving sufficient open area is important.
Installing a floating algae cover such as the Armor Ball® cover (91% coverage) or the Hexprotect® cover (99% coverage) will block sunlight and eliminate algae formation.

tokenized:
Algae control : AWTT floating covers will help prevent the buildup of algae .
 Algae are a diverse group of aquatic organisms that have the ability to conduct photosynthesis . Certain algae are familiar to most people ; for instance , seaweeds ( such as kelp or phytoplankton ) , pond scum or the algal blooms in lakes . The term “ algae ” covers many different organisms capable of producing oxygen through photosynthesis ( the process of harvesting light energy from the sun to generate carbohydrates ) .
 What do algae feed on ?
 As a general rule , algae are capable of photosynthesis and produce their own nourishment by using light energy from the sun and carbon dioxide in order to generate carbohydrates and oxygen . In other words , most algae are autotrophs or more specifically , photoautotrophs ( reflecting their use of light energy to generate nutrients ) .
 How can we control algae ?
 Algae growing in a drinking water reservoir or an aerated lagoon system will increase both the TSS and the CBOD5 of the effluent , deteriorate water taste , plug filtration systems and increase chemical treatment cost . In systems treating municipal wastewaters , the effluent TSS and CBOD5 will often be much higher than if the algae had not been present . Since algae diminishes water quality and play no beneficial role in drinking water and wastewater lagoons , preventing algal growth is important to those responsible for the design and operation of these systems . Some algae are toxic to humans and dogs . Water can also become unsuitable for fish , swimming , and other animals .
 A good cover will prevent light from entering the water column and will prevent the growth of algae and other noxious weeds . Solid and modular floating covers have been used to shade aerated lagoons for decades . In the case of aerated lagoons , such shades should not cover the entire lagoon surface , especially with mechanical surface aerator where leaving sufficient open area is important .
 Installing a floating algae cover such as the Armor Ball ® cover ( 91 % coverage ) or the Hexprotect ® cover ( 99 % coverage ) will block sunlight and eliminate algae formation .


text:
Business woman driven insane hitting a man. Business woman driven insane strangling a business man.
Young caucasian business man wearing a blue shirt and holding an electronic tablet to integrate technology into his presentation taking place during a meeting with a wealthy female business inverstor.
Close up image of businessman and businesswoman busy working together on an electronic tablet, the woman holding a pen and the man holding the tablet.

tokenized:
Business woman driven insane hitting a man . Business woman driven insane strangling a business man .
 Young caucasian business man wearing a blue shirt and holding an electronic tablet to integrate technology into his presentation taking place during a meeting with a wealthy female business inverstor .
 Close up image of businessman and businesswoman busy working together on an electronic tablet , the woman holding a pen and the man holding the tablet .


text:
A research center at the University of Oregon in Eugene has struck a deal with a major publishing company to sell and support a version of its learning management system. The university's College of Education Behavioral Research and Testing (BRT) group has signed with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt's scoring and assessment imprint, Riverside, as the exclusive distributor of easyCBM.
easyCBM is a computer-administered application that helps users monitor progress of students based on specific assignments. Specifically, the program provides reporting on student performance and trends in real time to help teachers sort out where each child needs a boost in instruction. Developed in 2006, the latest version of this response to intervention program covers K-8 reading and mathematics for district wide implementation.
A "lite" version free to individual teachers is still available from the research group. According to BRT, the free version will be "streamlined with nine alternate forms per measure type." This edition will be suitable for the teacher to monitor the progress of a group of students.
The group stated in a frequently-asked-questions document on its website that the partnership was necessary because "the incredible success of easyCBM simply far exceeded BRT’s capacity to support it." Riverside's hosting will include a toll-free support number and regional representatives who can help customers deploy the program and train users.
According to a statement from the company, 6.5 million easyCBM tests are being given each year, and 163,000 teachers use the data for their instruction. easyCBM is an approved tool by the National Center for Response to Intervention, an organization funded by the US Department of Education to provide technical assistance to states and districts in improving student learning.
"With [Houghton Mifflin Harcourt] serving as the exclusive distributor of easyCBM, teachers across the nation now have available a learning management system to use in their classrooms and schools," said Gerald Tindal, director of BRT. "It allows teachers and administrators to build effective programs and collaborate with each other using student performance and progress."
More information is available at easycbm.com.

tokenized:
A research center at the University of Oregon in Eugene has struck a deal with a major publishing company to sell and support a version of its learning management system . The university 's College of Education Behavioral Research and Testing ( BRT ) group has signed with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt 's scoring and assessment imprint , Riverside , as the exclusive distributor of easyCBM .
 easyCBM is a computer - administered application that helps users monitor progress of students based on specific assignments . Specifically , the program provides reporting on student performance and trends in real time to help teachers sort out where each child needs a boost in instruction . Developed in 2006 , the latest version of this response to intervention program covers K-8 reading and mathematics for district wide implementation .
 A " lite " version free to individual teachers is still available from the research group . According to BRT , the free version will be " streamlined with nine alternate forms per measure type . " This edition will be suitable for the teacher to monitor the progress of a group of students .
 The group stated in a frequently - asked - questions document on its website that the partnership was necessary because " the incredible success of easyCBM simply far exceeded BRT ’s capacity to support it . " Riverside 's hosting will include a toll - free support number and regional representatives who can help customers deploy the program and train users .
 According to a statement from the company , 6.5 million easyCBM tests are being given each year , and 163,000 teachers use the data for their instruction . easyCBM is an approved tool by the National Center for Response to Intervention , an organization funded by the US Department of Education to provide technical assistance to states and districts in improving student learning .
 " With [ Houghton Mifflin Harcourt ] serving as the exclusive distributor of easyCBM , teachers across the nation now have available a learning management system to use in their classrooms and schools , " said Gerald Tindal , director of BRT . " It allows teachers and administrators to build effective programs and collaborate with each other using student performance and progress . "
 More information is available at easycbm.com .


text: cook with the convenience of an oven on your countertop. Convection technology provides faster, more even cooking for optimal results. Large capacity can accommodate casserole dishes and fit an entire take & bake frozen pizza. Adjustable broil for low-heat broiling, like cheesy garlic bread or high-heat broiling for meats. 150-450° temperature range. Avoid turning on your conventional oven to keep the kitchen cooler and conserve energy. With the Oster® brand, you can cook with passion and serve with pleasure.

tokenized: cook with the convenience of an oven on your countertop . Convection technology provides faster , more even cooking for optimal results . Large capacity can accommodate casserole dishes and fit an entire take & bake frozen pizza . Adjustable broil for low - heat broiling , like cheesy garlic bread or high - heat broiling for meats . 150 - 450 ° temperature range . Avoid turning on your conventional oven to keep the kitchen cooler and conserve energy . With the Oster ® brand , you can cook with passion and serve with pleasure .


text:
Every now and then I like to write up goal style posts and with December finally being with us, I thought i'd put together a festive style goals post of all of the things I want to do and experience this December. For the first time in a long time i'm really excited for Christmas and the time to just spend with my loved ones!
Putting up the Christmas tree - I mean of course this is top of the list because what else is as exciting other than Christmas day itself than decorating the Christmas tree! This year we're hosting Christmas day and i've made a point of demanding we have a real tree and by real, I mean a huge real tree! Every year I decorate the tree and every year I go for a different colour theme, so i'm excited to get experimenting!
Finishing my gift guides - If you've been following my blog for a while, then you'll know that every year I put up a few gift guides and this year the stress has been real! I finally posted my first gift guide this week, which you can read here but i'm very aware that my gift guides are a lot later than everyone else's and the stress is real! Having said that over the next two weeks you'll be getting gift guides left, right and centre from me so watch out for those.
Enjoying all of the Christmas parties/dinners - I like to think i'm very lucky to have the opportunity to celebrate Christmas more than once and this year I have four different celebrations planned. Our team at work are going for a cute Christmas meal next week at the local pub, and the following week we have our office Christmas party, which i'm so excited for (Give me all the prosecco, yass)! Also because my Dad lives in Plymouth we have a few things planned when I go to visit, and then of course Christmas day itself. I'm already accepting the fact i'm going to put back on all the weight i've lost these past few months!
Spending time with loved ones - I know Christmas isn't the only time to do this, but I love that Christmas brings everyone together. I have definitely taken for granted the years when I was younger when I was able to see family fairly often, whereas now being in a full time job it's not as easy so i'm really looking forward to seeing my family and friends over the festive period!
Giving gifts - There is nothing more that I love at Christmas than spoiling my family and friends. I'm one of those that loves giving and seeing everyone's faces beaming with happiness, as it makes me all warm and fuzzy inside!
Enjoying some down time - This kind of links into a few of these goals but I can't wait for some time off. Some time to myself to just recoup, chill and get myself geared up for the New Year!

tokenized:
Every now and then I like to write up goal style posts and with December finally being with us , I thought i 'd put together a festive style goals post of all of the things I want to do and experience this December . For the first time in a long time i 'm really excited for Christmas and the time to just spend with my loved ones !
 Putting up the Christmas tree - I mean of course this is top of the list because what else is as exciting other than Christmas day itself than decorating the Christmas tree ! This year we 're hosting Christmas day and i 've made a point of demanding we have a real tree and by real , I mean a huge real tree ! Every year I decorate the tree and every year I go for a different colour theme , so i 'm excited to get experimenting !
 Finishing my gift guides - If you 've been following my blog for a while , then you 'll know that every year I put up a few gift guides and this year the stress has been real ! I finally posted my first gift guide this week , which you can read here but i 'm very aware that my gift guides are a lot later than everyone else 's and the stress is real ! Having said that over the next two weeks you 'll be getting gift guides left , right and centre from me so watch out for those .
 Enjoying all of the Christmas parties / dinners - I like to think i 'm very lucky to have the opportunity to celebrate Christmas more than once and this year I have four different celebrations planned . Our team at work are going for a cute Christmas meal next week at the local pub , and the following week we have our office Christmas party , which i 'm so excited for ( Give me all the prosecco , yass ) ! Also because my Dad lives in Plymouth we have a few things planned when I go to visit , and then of course Christmas day itself . I 'm already accepting the fact i 'm going to put back on all the weight i 've lost these past few months !
 Spending time with loved ones - I know Christmas is n't the only time to do this , but I love that Christmas brings everyone together . I have definitely taken for granted the years when I was younger when I was able to see family fairly often , whereas now being in a full time job it 's not as easy so i 'm really looking forward to seeing my family and friends over the festive period !
 Giving gifts - There is nothing more that I love at Christmas than spoiling my family and friends . I 'm one of those that loves giving and seeing everyone 's faces beaming with happiness , as it makes me all warm and fuzzy inside !
 Enjoying some down time - This kind of links into a few of these goals but I ca n't wait for some time off . Some time to myself to just recoup , chill and get myself geared up for the New Year !


text:
Find top travel influencers in Fortaleza. Identify the most popular Instagram accounts on Heepsy.
Want to discover the 66 travel influencers we've identified in Fortaleza in 2019?

tokenized:
Find top travel influencers in Fortaleza . Identify the most popular Instagram accounts on Heepsy .
 Want to discover the 66 travel influencers we 've identified in Fortaleza in 2019 ?


text: As the newest member of the Vertx Phantom line, OPS pants deliver world-class lightweight comfort along with bonus tactical capacity for everyday on- and off-duty wear. Made of mini Rip-Stop poly/cotton fabric treated with IntelliDry moisture-wicking and stain-repelling technology, Phantom OPS pants deliver optimal ease of movement with double-reinforced knees, gusseted crotch and stretch waistband. Extra storage is delivered through triple-bellowed cargo pockets, extra slim-line pockets and dual-zipper concealed pockets. MSRP $65.

tokenized: As the newest member of the Vertx Phantom line , OPS pants deliver world - class lightweight comfort along with bonus tactical capacity for everyday on- and off - duty wear . Made of mini Rip - Stop poly / cotton fabric treated with IntelliDry moisture - wicking and stain - repelling technology , Phantom OPS pants deliver optimal ease of movement with double - reinforced knees , gusseted crotch and stretch waistband . Extra storage is delivered through triple - bellowed cargo pockets , extra slim - line pockets and dual - zipper concealed pockets . MSRP $ 65 .


text: Add 1 part Absolute New Orleans vodka, 1 part lemon juice and 2 part sour Apple Sourz to a cocktail shaker with ice. Shake well and strain into a cocktail glass. Garnish with a lemon curl.

tokenized: Add 1 part Absolute New Orleans vodka , 1 part lemon juice and 2 part sour Apple Sourz to a cocktail shaker with ice . Shake well and strain into a cocktail glass . Garnish with a lemon curl .


text:
Rockstar 500 is a wear resistant quenched and tempered steel plate having an excellent combination of hardness, formability and weldability to meet fabrication requirements.
Rockstar 500 is used for application where the components are subjected to wear. It is a popular abrasion-resistant product for mining and other highly abrasive industrial applications.
Delivery Condition Quenched/Quenched and tempered. The plates are delivered with sheared or thermally cut edges. Untrimmed edges can also be delivered after agreement. Plates can be delivered in shot blasted and primer coated surface condition.

tokenized:
Rockstar 500 is a wear resistant quenched and tempered steel plate having an excellent combination of hardness , formability and weldability to meet fabrication requirements .
 Rockstar 500 is used for application where the components are subjected to wear . It is a popular abrasion - resistant product for mining and other highly abrasive industrial applications .
 Delivery Condition Quenched / Quenched and tempered . The plates are delivered with sheared or thermally cut edges . Untrimmed edges can also be delivered after agreement . Plates can be delivered in shot blasted and primer coated surface condition .


text: This is about the mess that we leave behind after leaving life and the people who have to deal with it or merely accept and tolerate it. Bohdan's father died and Vera lost a husband; bringing them to meet each other for the first time. In the process of the funeral they find out new hidden facts about the deceased Georgy, but it cannot help them find common ground.

tokenized: This is about the mess that we leave behind after leaving life and the people who have to deal with it or merely accept and tolerate it . Bohdan 's father died and Vera lost a husband ; bringing them to meet each other for the first time . In the process of the funeral they find out new hidden facts about the deceased Georgy , but it can not help them find common ground .


text:
BTROS Electronics has a large in-house custom electronics design, manufacture and service facility. Our design capability enables fully customised solutions, covering hardware and software.
Due to undertaking full projects in-house, we’re afforded the flexibility to deliver exactly what you need, when you need it, without compromise. We utilise our supply chain, in-house engineering team, including electronics, hardware, software and mechanical and also offer ECB layouts, done in-house – we don’t contract any of it out.
In terms of project management, you benefit from our full autonomy and control over your project, with just one contact who will always know the progress and status of your order, whenever you call.
Our depth of experience in the design for our own purposes, allows us to offer our knowledge in a service that we’ve rolled out to you. Utilising the latest electronics technology and best practice, we can custom make your electronics to the highest standards.

tokenized:
BTROS Electronics has a large in - house custom electronics design , manufacture and service facility . Our design capability enables fully customised solutions , covering hardware and software .
 Due to undertaking full projects in - house , we ’re afforded the flexibility to deliver exactly what you need , when you need it , without compromise . We utilise our supply chain , in - house engineering team , including electronics , hardware , software and mechanical and also offer ECB layouts , done in - house – we do n’t contract any of it out .
 In terms of project management , you benefit from our full autonomy and control over your project , with just one contact who will always know the progress and status of your order , whenever you call .
 Our depth of experience in the design for our own purposes , allows us to offer our knowledge in a service that we ’ve rolled out to you . Utilising the latest electronics technology and best practice , we can custom make your electronics to the highest standards .


text:
Recent Examples on the Web. So, is London Fashion Week likely to be full of clothes designed for eating hoarded canned food by candlelight? — Sarah Mower, Vogue, "The Brexit Deadline Is Looming—Here’s How It Will Affect London Fashion Week," 14 Feb. 2019 Add canned tomatoes and their juices, breaking up whole tomatoes with your hands.
Welcome to FilStop Filipino Food, where you'll find one of the largest selections of authentic Filipino food online. We're passionate about sharing Filipino culture and food with the world, sourcing Filipino food straight from the Philippines and the rest of Asia. We ship internationally so you can order online and have your order shipped directly to your door.
Adapted from The New Enchanted Broccoli Forest Preparation time: 30 minutes Yield: 6 servings Tart and tangy, this easy pumpkin soup goes beautifully with fresh, warm tortillas and a spinach salad for a quick and cozy autumn dinner.
Crock-Pot 15 Bean and Ham Soup. The day before I made this super yummy recipe for Crock-Pot 15 Bean and Ham Soup I had cooked up a picnic ham in the crock-pot.Once we were done with the ham we were left with a huge ham bone with some yummy attached ham that can be sort of hard to get off.
Make sure this fits by entering your model number.; ORGANIZE YOUR FOOD PANTRY - Our patent designed FIFO Can Tracker keeps your kitchen organized by storing and rotating your canned goods on a First In First Out model saving you from expired food cost and waste!
Drain the chickpeas and combine with 2 quarts water in a large, heavy soup pot or Dutch oven. Bring to a boil, reduce the heat, cover and simmer 1 hour.
Our ready-to-eat fully cooked beef, pork, turkey and chicken premium canned meats make every meal easier. We add convenience to all of your family recipes.

tokenized:
Recent Examples on the Web . So , is London Fashion Week likely to be full of clothes designed for eating hoarded canned food by candlelight ? — Sarah Mower , Vogue , " The Brexit Deadline Is Looming — Here ’s How It Will Affect London Fashion Week , " 14 Feb. 2019 Add canned tomatoes and their juices , breaking up whole tomatoes with your hands .
 Welcome to FilStop Filipino Food , where you 'll find one of the largest selections of authentic Filipino food online . We 're passionate about sharing Filipino culture and food with the world , sourcing Filipino food straight from the Philippines and the rest of Asia . We ship internationally so you can order online and have your order shipped directly to your door .
 Adapted from The New Enchanted Broccoli Forest Preparation time : 30 minutes Yield : 6 servings Tart and tangy , this easy pumpkin soup goes beautifully with fresh , warm tortillas and a spinach salad for a quick and cozy autumn dinner .
 Crock - Pot 15 Bean and Ham Soup . The day before I made this super yummy recipe for Crock - Pot 15 Bean and Ham Soup I had cooked up a picnic ham in the crock - pot . Once we were done with the ham we were left with a huge ham bone with some yummy attached ham that can be sort of hard to get off .
 Make sure this fits by entering your model number . ; ORGANIZE YOUR FOOD PANTRY - Our patent designed FIFO Can Tracker keeps your kitchen organized by storing and rotating your canned goods on a First In First Out model saving you from expired food cost and waste !
 Drain the chickpeas and combine with 2 quarts water in a large , heavy soup pot or Dutch oven . Bring to a boil , reduce the heat , cover and simmer 1 hour .
 Our ready - to - eat fully cooked beef , pork , turkey and chicken premium canned meats make every meal easier . We add convenience to all of your family recipes .


text:
Welcome to Discover Gower 360 From places to stay to things to do when you're here, Discover Gower 360 is the website that really does give you the whole picture.
We are Gower’s oldest and most experienced holiday cottage agency and helping you choose where to stay and what to do when visiting the area is important to us. That’s why we’ve created this website of 360 degree images.
From beaches and restaurants to golf courses, castles and leisure centres, just click on the images for an all-the-way-round, clear view of what to expect before you book or set off.
When you've found your perfect place to stay, why not check out things to do in Gower and the surrounding area. There's plenty to make your holiday an unforgettable experience.
BOOK ONLINE. From apartments with sea views to cosy country cottages and spacious family houses – many dog-friendly - finding the perfect holiday home from home just got easier.
There’s so much to see and do in Swansea Bay, on Gower and in Mumbles. From breath taking beaches and castles to family days out and adventure activities, enjoy a 360-degree view of what you would like to do.
Our YouTube channel includes exclusive birds eye, aerial videos of Swansea Bay, Mumbles and Gower. Click ‘See All’ for some amazing ‘from the sky’ footage.

tokenized:
Welcome to Discover Gower 360 From places to stay to things to do when you 're here , Discover Gower 360 is the website that really does give you the whole picture .
 We are Gower ’s oldest and most experienced holiday cottage agency and helping you choose where to stay and what to do when visiting the area is important to us . That ’s why we ’ve created this website of 360 degree images .
 From beaches and restaurants to golf courses , castles and leisure centres , just click on the images for an all - the - way - round , clear view of what to expect before you book or set off .
 When you 've found your perfect place to stay , why not check out things to do in Gower and the surrounding area . There 's plenty to make your holiday an unforgettable experience .
 BOOK ONLINE . From apartments with sea views to cosy country cottages and spacious family houses – many dog - friendly - finding the perfect holiday home from home just got easier .
 There ’s so much to see and do in Swansea Bay , on Gower and in Mumbles . From breath taking beaches and castles to family days out and adventure activities , enjoy a 360 - degree view of what you would like to do .
 Our YouTube channel includes exclusive birds eye , aerial videos of Swansea Bay , Mumbles and Gower . Click ‘ See All ’ for some amazing ‘ from the sky ’ footage .


text:
Not a lot to report. I'm still trying to find the best times to get to the gym. I may stick with mornings, but it's hard to get any sparring then. No worries; I'll figure it out. Here's the update for the last two days.
Does your gym have later hours? If you have time in evening, I've found it's a really ideal time to get in there and build some quality muscle. Crowds are down, there's room to actually move around.

tokenized:
Not a lot to report . I 'm still trying to find the best times to get to the gym . I may stick with mornings , but it 's hard to get any sparring then . No worries ; I 'll figure it out . Here 's the update for the last two days .
 Does your gym have later hours ? If you have time in evening , I 've found it 's a really ideal time to get in there and build some quality muscle . Crowds are down , there 's room to actually move around .


text:
The Chatham County Center of North Carolina Cooperative Extension will offer a pollinator conservation workshop and garden tour as part of its Enhancing Sustainability Series on Wednesday, September 23, 2015 AND Saturday September 26, 2015 from 2:00-5:00 p.m. starting in the auditorium of the Agriculture Building in Pittsboro. This is the same workshop offered on two different dates to accommodate participants’ schedules and keep class size small.
Chatham County Agricultural Extension Agent Debbie Roos will give an overview of North Carolina pollinators and discuss the role of native bees and managed bees in crop pollination. Participants will learn about the principles of planting a pollinator garden and how to select trees, shrubs, herbaceous perennials, herbs, vines, and grasses to attract a diversity of pollinators.
Debbie will emphasize native plants but also include a few other plants that provide good resources. The workshop will conclude with a tour of Cooperative Extension’s pollinator garden at Chatham Mills, about half a mile from the Agriculture Building. The garden is comprised of 160 different species, 85% of which are native to the piedmont of North Carolina.
A group of us from SCBA went to the Union County Beekeepers meeting Monday night in Monroe, NC. We at Stanly County Beekeepers are interested in pursuing the Bee City USA designation for Albemarle and Locust NC. Hearing Ms. Phillis Stiles talk about the program was helpful.
4) We need to reapply annually by sending in our year’s activities showing what we’ve done to promote pollinators throughout the community.
The way Ms. Stiles talked it seemed easy. Next we discuss how to approach/educate our city officials. I’ll keep you posted on our progress.

tokenized:
The Chatham County Center of North Carolina Cooperative Extension will offer a pollinator conservation workshop and garden tour as part of its Enhancing Sustainability Series on Wednesday , September 23 , 2015 AND Saturday September 26 , 2015 from 2:00 - 5:00 p.m. starting in the auditorium of the Agriculture Building in Pittsboro . This is the same workshop offered on two different dates to accommodate participants ’ schedules and keep class size small .
 Chatham County Agricultural Extension Agent Debbie Roos will give an overview of North Carolina pollinators and discuss the role of native bees and managed bees in crop pollination . Participants will learn about the principles of planting a pollinator garden and how to select trees , shrubs , herbaceous perennials , herbs , vines , and grasses to attract a diversity of pollinators .
 Debbie will emphasize native plants but also include a few other plants that provide good resources . The workshop will conclude with a tour of Cooperative Extension ’s pollinator garden at Chatham Mills , about half a mile from the Agriculture Building . The garden is comprised of 160 different species , 85 % of which are native to the piedmont of North Carolina .
 A group of us from SCBA went to the Union County Beekeepers meeting Monday night in Monroe , NC . We at Stanly County Beekeepers are interested in pursuing the Bee City USA designation for Albemarle and Locust NC . Hearing Ms. Phillis Stiles talk about the program was helpful .
 4 ) We need to reapply annually by sending in our year ’s activities showing what we ’ve done to promote pollinators throughout the community .
 The way Ms. Stiles talked it seemed easy . Next we discuss how to approach / educate our city officials . I ’ll keep you posted on our progress .


Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom With HAITRAL Lamp Set Of Desk Black Night Inspirations . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom Inside Contemporary Large White Inspirations . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom Throughout To Complete The Look Of Plan . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom In InStyle Decor Com Brown Designer Ideas . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom Throughout Lamp Wood Base Cloth Lampshade Living Plan . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom Throughout Best Image Of Inspirations . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom Regarding Nightstand Bedside At Lumens Com Decorations . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom Throughout Black Lampsholden Lamp In Hericus Antique With Prepare . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom Within The Secrets To Jillian Harris S Sweet Yet Sophisticated Style Cool Idea . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom With Amazing Cheap Living Room And Prepare . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom Throughout FUMAT Bedside Desk Lamp Simple Decor . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom Pertaining To LIGHTING LAMPS In Pinterest Designs . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom In Cheap The Pictures WareHouse Plan . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom Pertaining To Contemporary Galliard Home Design Pretty And Remodel . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom Intended Creative Desk Cloth Art Lamp Black White Remodel . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom In Galliard Home Design Pretty And Designs . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom Intended Creative Design Spiral Light Acrylic Plan . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom With Regard To Bedside Lamp Decor . Modern Table Lamps For Bedroom With Decoration Inspirations .


text:
Appeal from the District Court, Dodge County, Ancy Morse, J.
Robert H. Peahl, Faribault, for appellant (C8-85-282), respondent (C1-85-754).
David J. Rice, Rochester, for respondent.
Considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., and WOZNIAK and HUSPENI, JJ., with oral argument waived.
Appellants Michael N. Andersen and Hazel E. Andersen appeal from a judgment entered November 6, 1984, which the trial court attempted to amend on February 15, 1985, after this appeal was filed. The parties dispute the court's method of partitioning a jointly-owned farming operation and raise other issues such as unjust enrichment, tortious interference with contract relations, and general abuse of discretion.
We consolidated the appeals, and now affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for entry of judgment partitioning the property.
Hazel, Norman and Michael Andersen are joint owners of a farming operation near Rochester, Minnesota. This appeal follows a lawsuit resulting from the breakdown of that family farming operation. The problem among the parties brewed for a number of years and culminated when Norman moved from the farm in October 1980. Hostility among the parties is very evident.
For clarity, the parties will be referred to by first names. Appellant Michael is the son of Norman and Hazel who were divorced in 1983. Hazel is also appealing based on a judgment entered against her.
Michael, Norman and Hazel purchased the farm in 1966. They intended that each of them would have an undivided one-third interest. The 270-acre farm cost $26,500 and was financed by a Federal Land Bank mortgage. There was conflicting testimony whether Michael paid his share of the mortgage and what constituted payments. Michael did not receive any of the farm income from 1966 to 1977.
In 1975, Hazel and Norman sold their home and moved in with Michael on farm property he owned individually. They lived with him for about two years during construction of a new home on the jointly-owned farm. This home was to be used as Norman and Hazel's homestead. The parties dispute whether Michael paid a proportionate share of construction costs. Norman testified he paid for most of the construction with proceeds from the sale of another home, a $10,000 inheritance from his mother, and current income.
Hazel and Norman entered into a contract for deed in 1977 selling an additional one-third undivided interest to Michael. As a result, Michael now owns an undivided two-thirds interest, subject to the contract payments. Since Hazel and Norman were subsequently divorced, they now each own an undivided one-sixth interest, and their interest as vendors under the Contract for Deed with Michael. There is no evidence of any agreement among the parties relating to rent, expenses, mortgage, or capital improvements.
Norman left the farm in 1980. Michael claimed that when Norman left the heating system was defective, and he spent $3,000 to replace it. In addition, he claimed to have spent $7,500 on landscaping, septic system repair, and other miscellaneous improvements. Norman testified that the house needed only routine maintenance when he left and that he gave Michael money to repair the heating system.
Michael says his parents are responsible for Federal Land Bank payments and all real estate taxes. Norman claims that Michael was to pay his proportionate share of the expenses and taxes. All parties shared equally in farm income between 1977 and 1980, but Michael claims the farm has been operating at a loss since then.
In 1982, Michael built a grain storage shed on the jointly-owned farm. He testified that economic conditions dictated he should store, rather than sell, the 1982 harvest. Norman told Michael he did not agree with the construction of the storage facility. Nevertheless, construction began on October 11, 1982 and stopped the next day after Norman talked to the excavating contractor. Excavation resumed on October 16. According to Norman, the shed was completed November 2, 1982. Michael claims it was not complete until November 15, 1982.
Michael argues that Norman's interference resulted in a $3,269 loss. Norman denies his interference caused any damage or delays, but that delays were usual and normal harvesting problems.
The parties also contradicted one another's testimony regarding Norman's counterclaim against Michael for conversion of personal property. Hazel and Michael assert gift, while Norman denies it.
Norman's cross-claim against Hazel concerns a 1983 contract for deed check from Michael payable to Hazel or Norman. Hazel cashed the check and put the proceeds in her savings account. She did not pay Norman one-half the sum as provided for in the divorce decree. She now appeals from the $3,171.70 judgment against her.
A bifurcated trial was held in June 1984. The first part determined that the value of the jointly-owned farm was $245,000 and that an undivided one-sixth interest is valued at $40,416. The parties waived a jury trial and the court tried the remaining issues June 13-18, 1984.
The court held: (1) that neither party proved entitlement to reimbursement from any other party; (2) Norman was not responsible for any improvements after October 4, 1980, including the storage shed; (3) the 1982 corn harvest was not delayed by Norman's actions in halting site preparation for the shed and construction was completed without his consent; (4) there was no specific agreement covering rent on the farm property; (5) the 1977 contract for deed obligates Michael to pay Norman and Hazel $3,500 per year, plus seven percent interest; (6) the divorce decree between Hazel and Norman requires the contract for deed payment to be split equally between them; (7) that Hazel owes Norman one-half the 1983 payment plus interest; (8) that the farm cannot be physically partitioned without detriment to each party.
The court also held that the items Norman claims Michael converted were either gifts to him or farm property acquired with farm proceeds. Therefore, Michael did not convert them to his own use and is not liable to Norman for damages. The court awarded Norman $40,416 for his one-sixth interest in the farm and $2,970.17 for his share of the 1984 contract for deed payment.
On December 13, 1984, the court heard post-trial motions. On February 4, 1985, while the motions were still under advisement, Michael filed a notice of appeal from the November 6, 1984 judgment. On February 15, 1985, the trial court issued amended findings, conclusions of law, order for judgment and judgment and decree which reduced Norman's award to $2,970.17 and ordered appraisal of the jointly-owned farm. The court denied the motion for a new trial and all other motions.
Hazel appealed from the amended judgment on April 22, 1985. On May 2, 1985 Michael appealed from the amended judgment, and on June 26, 1985 the Court of Appeals denied his motion to consolidate the two appeals. The appeals court dismissed the May 2 appeal, and consolidated Hazel's appeal with Michael's February 4 appeal.
1. Did the trial court err in denying Michael's claim for contribution from Norman for expenses and improvements to jointly-owned property?
2. Did the trial court err in denying Michael's claim for interference with business relations?
3. Can the trial court issue a judgment ordering both money damages for a partial interest in realty and a partition by sale?
4. Is the post-appeal order of the trial court of any effect?
5. Is the judgment against Hazel Andersen supported by the evidence?
6. Does Hazel Andersen properly appeal from the motion in limine and partition of the farm?
This dispute was tried by the court since the parties waived their right to a jury trial. "On review by an appellate court, 'a finding of the trial court is not to be disturbed unless clearly erroneous, either upon a clear demonstration that it is without substantial evidentiary support or that it was induced by an erroneous view of the law.' " Cleys v. Cleys, 363 N.W.2d 65, 69 (Minn.Ct.App. 1985) (citations omitted).
1. Michael contends the court erred when it denied his claim for contribution from Norman for expenses and improvements to the jointly-owned property. He says the expenses were incurred after October 4, 1980, the date Norman left, for such items as landscaping, installation of a septic system, heating, and a grain storage facility. Norman claims that he is not required to share in the payment because he did not authorize the improvements.
Contribution is an equitable remedy and subject to equitable considerations. Hoverson v. Hoverson, 216 Minn. 228, 235, 12 N.W.2d 501, 505 (1943). There, a co-tenant farm manager was requesting contribution from another co-tenant. The supreme court held that, since plaintiff was in possession and managing the farm, profits must first be applied to improvements and taxes. Id. at 235, 12 N.W.2d at 505. Furthermore, contribution does not mature until the party owing a liability has paid for more than his fair share. Id. at 236, 12 N.W.2d at 506.
In considering a claim for contribution the court should balance the benefits flowing to the party who occupied the property and received the rents and profits against the burden of paying the necessary taxes.
Cleys, 363 N.W.2d at 71. Clearly, Michael, as two-thirds owner of the farm, receives the greater benefit and should carry a greater burden than Norman, a one-sixth owner.
In addition, the general rule is that a tenant in common, absent agreement or understanding with a co-tenant, may not make improvements upon common property at the expense of his co-tenant so as to enable him to recover any portion of the cost or value of the improvements. Hoverson, 216 Minn. at 236, 12 N.W.2d at 506. When the rule is applied to this situation, it is clear that Michael is not entitled to recover.
There is no evidence of any agreement between Norman and Michael. In fact, Michael was aware that Norman disapproved of his building plans. All of the items for which appellant claims reimbursement can be classified as improvements and are governed by this rule.
The facts support the trial court's findings that the improvements were done without Norman's approval or consent. Thus, the trial court's failure to award contribution was not clearly erroneous and is supported by the evidence.
2. Michael's next contention is that the trial court erred in denying his claims for tortious interference with contract. The trial court found that Norman's interference with construction of the grain storage facility did not unduly delay the grain harvest and that he was justified in his involvement.
Although there is no question that Norman disagreed with the location of the storage shed, there was conflicting testimony as to when the shed was complete and the reason for the delay. The trial court found that the third parties involved independently decided not to finish the work.
The claim for wrongful interference of contract is a tort action. See Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 69 N.W.2d 667 (1955). The elements of this tort are: (1) existence of a contract; (2) the alleged wrongdoer's knowledge of the contract; (3) intentional procurement of its breach; (4) without justification; and (5) damages. Furley Sales and Associates, Inc. v. North American Automotive Warehouse, Inc., 325 N.W.2d 20, 25 (Minn. 1982). The dispute here is focused on elements four and five.
The applicable standard for justification is found in Potthoff v. Jefferson Lines, Inc., 363 N.W.2d 771 (Minn.Ct.App. 1985), as "reasonable conduct under all the circumstances of the case." Id., 363 N.W.2d at 776. Interference is not justified when it is done for the indirect purpose of injuring the plaintiff or benefitting the defendant, and the defendant has the burden of proving sufficient justification. Furley, 325 N.W.2d at 25.
The facts could reasonably lead to the conclusion that Norman was justified in discussing the shed with the contractors. The parties were already considering a partition, and Norman wanted a physical division awarding him the area around the old homesite, the site of the new storage shed. The court's findings support his contention that he was justified in his action.
The trial court further held that the damages Michael claims did not directly result from Norman's actions. The record shows that poor weather was largely responsible for the delay in the corn harvest. Therefore, there is sufficient evidentiary support for the court's conclusion that Norman was justified in the actions he took to stop construction of the storage shed and was not responsible for the harvesting delay.
3. Michael claims the trial court erred by ordering both money damages and a partition and sale for partial interest in realty. The November 6, 1984 judgment awards Norman $43,386.17; $40,416 for his interest in the property and $2,970.17 for his share of the 1984 contract for deed payment. In addition, the court noted in its findings that the sale to Michael would be an alternative to a partition and sale pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 558 (1984). Although this procedure is not found in Minn.Stat. § 558, the parties initially agreed to set the value of the farm and permit Michael to purchase Norman's one-sixth share.
It is appropriate for a trial court to permit alternative methods in fashioning a remedy.
Although the statutory procedure must be followed, once the court has taken jurisdiction of the case it may exercise its general equitable powers to effect the most advantageous plan which the particular nature of the case admits.
Carlson v. Olson, 256 N.W.2d 249, 255 (Minn. 1977).
In light of this decision and the parties' agreement, the court did not err in permitting alternative solutions. However, the court erred in entering judgment against Michael for the amount of Norman's share. The trial court correctly attempted to correct this error in an amended judgment on February 15, 1985, after the appeal to this court had been filed. Thus, the trial court did not err in fashioning the alternative solution, but erred in entering a money judgment against Michael for Norman's one-sixth share.
4. The next issue is whether the trial court's February 15, 1985 amended judgment has any effect since the appeal was filed on February 4, 1984. The general rule is that an appeal, when perfected, divests the trial court of jurisdiction. This appeal was perfected prior to the February 15, 1985 amended judgment. We have held that a post-appeal order of the trial court is null and void because the trial court lost its jurisdiction to this court once appellant filed a notice of appeal. Evans v. Blesi, 345 N.W.2d 775 (Minn.Ct.App. 1984), pet. for rev. denied (Minn. June 12, 1984). Thus, the February 15, 1985 amended judgment has no effect since jurisdiction shifted to this court at the time of filing of the notice of appeal. Id., 345 N.W.2d at 780.
Although the amended judgment is of no effect, the trial court was in a position to re-examine the judgment and properly rectified the error. Recognizing this, we order that the judgment against Michael be reduced from $43,386.17 to $2,970.17 and the property be partitioned, as the trial court attempted to do in its amended judgment.
5 and 6. Hazel claims to appeal from the February 15, 1985 amended judgment. If that is the case, her appeal is not proper because jurisdiction had already shifted to this court. In addition, her brief challenges: (1) the original judgment in favor of Norman; (2) the grant of a motion in limine prior to the 1984 trial; and (3) the property valuation established by the November 6, 1984 judgment. Her notice of appeal on these issues was filed on April 22, 1985.
Pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 104.01, "An appeal may be taken from a judgment within 90 days after its entry * * *." Hazel's appeal from the November 6, 1984 judgment is not timely and is without merit. However, considering the record, there is no doubt that she owes Norman one-half of the 1983 contract for deed payment.
The trial court's decision is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for entry of judgment consistent with this opinion.

tokenized:
Appeal from the District Court , Dodge County , Ancy Morse , J.
 Robert H. Peahl , Faribault , for appellant ( C8 - 85 - 282 ) , respondent ( C1 - 85 - 754 ) .
 David J. Rice , Rochester , for respondent .
 Considered and decided by PARKER , P.J. , and WOZNIAK and HUSPENI , JJ . , with oral argument waived .
 Appellants Michael N. Andersen and Hazel E. Andersen appeal from a judgment entered November 6 , 1984 , which the trial court attempted to amend on February 15 , 1985 , after this appeal was filed . The parties dispute the court 's method of partitioning a jointly - owned farming operation and raise other issues such as unjust enrichment , tortious interference with contract relations , and general abuse of discretion .
 We consolidated the appeals , and now affirm in part , reverse in part , and remand for entry of judgment partitioning the property .
 Hazel , Norman and Michael Andersen are joint owners of a farming operation near Rochester , Minnesota . This appeal follows a lawsuit resulting from the breakdown of that family farming operation . The problem among the parties brewed for a number of years and culminated when Norman moved from the farm in October 1980 . Hostility among the parties is very evident .
 For clarity , the parties will be referred to by first names . Appellant Michael is the son of Norman and Hazel who were divorced in 1983 . Hazel is also appealing based on a judgment entered against her .
 Michael , Norman and Hazel purchased the farm in 1966 . They intended that each of them would have an undivided one - third interest . The 270 - acre farm cost $ 26,500 and was financed by a Federal Land Bank mortgage . There was conflicting testimony whether Michael paid his share of the mortgage and what constituted payments . Michael did not receive any of the farm income from 1966 to 1977 .
 In 1975 , Hazel and Norman sold their home and moved in with Michael on farm property he owned individually . They lived with him for about two years during construction of a new home on the jointly - owned farm . This home was to be used as Norman and Hazel 's homestead . The parties dispute whether Michael paid a proportionate share of construction costs . Norman testified he paid for most of the construction with proceeds from the sale of another home , a $ 10,000 inheritance from his mother , and current income .
 Hazel and Norman entered into a contract for deed in 1977 selling an additional one - third undivided interest to Michael . As a result , Michael now owns an undivided two - thirds interest , subject to the contract payments . Since Hazel and Norman were subsequently divorced , they now each own an undivided one - sixth interest , and their interest as vendors under the Contract for Deed with Michael . There is no evidence of any agreement among the parties relating to rent , expenses , mortgage , or capital improvements .
 Norman left the farm in 1980 . Michael claimed that when Norman left the heating system was defective , and he spent $ 3,000 to replace it . In addition , he claimed to have spent $ 7,500 on landscaping , septic system repair , and other miscellaneous improvements . Norman testified that the house needed only routine maintenance when he left and that he gave Michael money to repair the heating system .
 Michael says his parents are responsible for Federal Land Bank payments and all real estate taxes . Norman claims that Michael was to pay his proportionate share of the expenses and taxes . All parties shared equally in farm income between 1977 and 1980 , but Michael claims the farm has been operating at a loss since then .
 In 1982 , Michael built a grain storage shed on the jointly - owned farm . He testified that economic conditions dictated he should store , rather than sell , the 1982 harvest . Norman told Michael he did not agree with the construction of the storage facility . Nevertheless , construction began on October 11 , 1982 and stopped the next day after Norman talked to the excavating contractor . Excavation resumed on October 16 . According to Norman , the shed was completed November 2 , 1982 . Michael claims it was not complete until November 15 , 1982 .
 Michael argues that Norman 's interference resulted in a $ 3,269 loss . Norman denies his interference caused any damage or delays , but that delays were usual and normal harvesting problems .
 The parties also contradicted one another 's testimony regarding Norman 's counterclaim against Michael for conversion of personal property . Hazel and Michael assert gift , while Norman denies it .
 Norman 's cross - claim against Hazel concerns a 1983 contract for deed check from Michael payable to Hazel or Norman . Hazel cashed the check and put the proceeds in her savings account . She did not pay Norman one - half the sum as provided for in the divorce decree . She now appeals from the $ 3,171.70 judgment against her .
 A bifurcated trial was held in June 1984 . The first part determined that the value of the jointly - owned farm was $ 245,000 and that an undivided one - sixth interest is valued at $ 40,416 . The parties waived a jury trial and the court tried the remaining issues June 13 - 18 , 1984 .
 The court held : ( 1 ) that neither party proved entitlement to reimbursement from any other party ; ( 2 ) Norman was not responsible for any improvements after October 4 , 1980 , including the storage shed ; ( 3 ) the 1982 corn harvest was not delayed by Norman 's actions in halting site preparation for the shed and construction was completed without his consent ; ( 4 ) there was no specific agreement covering rent on the farm property ; ( 5 ) the 1977 contract for deed obligates Michael to pay Norman and Hazel $ 3,500 per year , plus seven percent interest ; ( 6 ) the divorce decree between Hazel and Norman requires the contract for deed payment to be split equally between them ; ( 7 ) that Hazel owes Norman one - half the 1983 payment plus interest ; ( 8) that the farm can not be physically partitioned without detriment to each party .
 The court also held that the items Norman claims Michael converted were either gifts to him or farm property acquired with farm proceeds . Therefore , Michael did not convert them to his own use and is not liable to Norman for damages . The court awarded Norman $ 40,416 for his one - sixth interest in the farm and $ 2,970.17 for his share of the 1984 contract for deed payment .
 On December 13 , 1984 , the court heard post - trial motions . On February 4 , 1985 , while the motions were still under advisement , Michael filed a notice of appeal from the November 6 , 1984 judgment . On February 15 , 1985 , the trial court issued amended findings , conclusions of law , order for judgment and judgment and decree which reduced Norman 's award to $ 2,970.17 and ordered appraisal of the jointly - owned farm . The court denied the motion for a new trial and all other motions .
 Hazel appealed from the amended judgment on April 22 , 1985 . On May 2 , 1985 Michael appealed from the amended judgment , and on June 26 , 1985 the Court of Appeals denied his motion to consolidate the two appeals . The appeals court dismissed the May 2 appeal , and consolidated Hazel 's appeal with Michael 's February 4 appeal .
 1 . Did the trial court err in denying Michael 's claim for contribution from Norman for expenses and improvements to jointly - owned property ?
 2 . Did the trial court err in denying Michael 's claim for interference with business relations ?
 3 . Can the trial court issue a judgment ordering both money damages for a partial interest in realty and a partition by sale ?
 4 . Is the post - appeal order of the trial court of any effect ?
 5 . Is the judgment against Hazel Andersen supported by the evidence ?
 6 . Does Hazel Andersen properly appeal from the motion in limine and partition of the farm ?
 This dispute was tried by the court since the parties waived their right to a jury trial . " On review by an appellate court , ' a finding of the trial court is not to be disturbed unless clearly erroneous , either upon a clear demonstration that it is without substantial evidentiary support or that it was induced by an erroneous view of the law . ' " Cleys v. Cleys , 363 N.W.2d 65 , 69 ( Minn. Ct . App . 1985 ) ( citations omitted ) .
 1 . Michael contends the court erred when it denied his claim for contribution from Norman for expenses and improvements to the jointly - owned property . He says the expenses were incurred after October 4 , 1980 , the date Norman left , for such items as landscaping , installation of a septic system , heating , and a grain storage facility . Norman claims that he is not required to share in the payment because he did not authorize the improvements .
 Contribution is an equitable remedy and subject to equitable considerations . Hoverson v. Hoverson , 216 Minn. 228 , 235 , 12 N.W.2d 501 , 505 ( 1943 ) . There , a co - tenant farm manager was requesting contribution from another co - tenant . The supreme court held that , since plaintiff was in possession and managing the farm , profits must first be applied to improvements and taxes . Id. at 235 , 12 N.W.2d at 505 . Furthermore , contribution does not mature until the party owing a liability has paid for more than his fair share . Id. at 236 , 12 N.W.2d at 506 .
 In considering a claim for contribution the court should balance the benefits flowing to the party who occupied the property and received the rents and profits against the burden of paying the necessary taxes .
 Cleys , 363 N.W.2d at 71 . Clearly , Michael , as two - thirds owner of the farm , receives the greater benefit and should carry a greater burden than Norman , a one - sixth owner .
 In addition , the general rule is that a tenant in common , absent agreement or understanding with a co - tenant , may not make improvements upon common property at the expense of his co - tenant so as to enable him to recover any portion of the cost or value of the improvements . Hoverson , 216 Minn. at 236 , 12 N.W.2d at 506 . When the rule is applied to this situation , it is clear that Michael is not entitled to recover .
 There is no evidence of any agreement between Norman and Michael . In fact , Michael was aware that Norman disapproved of his building plans . All of the items for which appellant claims reimbursement can be classified as improvements and are governed by this rule .
 The facts support the trial court 's findings that the improvements were done without Norman 's approval or consent . Thus , the trial court 's failure to award contribution was not clearly erroneous and is supported by the evidence .
 2 . Michael 's next contention is that the trial court erred in denying his claims for tortious interference with contract . The trial court found that Norman 's interference with construction of the grain storage facility did not unduly delay the grain harvest and that he was justified in his involvement .
 Although there is no question that Norman disagreed with the location of the storage shed , there was conflicting testimony as to when the shed was complete and the reason for the delay . The trial court found that the third parties involved independently decided not to finish the work .
 The claim for wrongful interference of contract is a tort action . See Royal Realty Co. v. Levin , 244 Minn. 288 , 69 N.W.2d 667 ( 1955 ) . The elements of this tort are : ( 1 ) existence of a contract ; ( 2 ) the alleged wrongdoer 's knowledge of the contract ; ( 3 ) intentional procurement of its breach ; ( 4 ) without justification ; and ( 5 ) damages . Furley Sales and Associates , Inc. v. North American Automotive Warehouse , Inc. , 325 N.W.2d 20 , 25 ( Minn. 1982 ) . The dispute here is focused on elements four and five .
 The applicable standard for justification is found in Potthoff v. Jefferson Lines , Inc. , 363 N.W.2d 771 ( Minn. Ct . App . 1985 ) , as " reasonable conduct under all the circumstances of the case . " Id. , 363 N.W.2d at 776 . Interference is not justified when it is done for the indirect purpose of injuring the plaintiff or benefitting the defendant , and the defendant has the burden of proving sufficient justification . Furley , 325 N.W.2d at 25 .
 The facts could reasonably lead to the conclusion that Norman was justified in discussing the shed with the contractors . The parties were already considering a partition , and Norman wanted a physical division awarding him the area around the old homesite , the site of the new storage shed . The court 's findings support his contention that he was justified in his action .
 The trial court further held that the damages Michael claims did not directly result from Norman 's actions . The record shows that poor weather was largely responsible for the delay in the corn harvest . Therefore , there is sufficient evidentiary support for the court 's conclusion that Norman was justified in the actions he took to stop construction of the storage shed and was not responsible for the harvesting delay .
 3 . Michael claims the trial court erred by ordering both money damages and a partition and sale for partial interest in realty . The November 6 , 1984 judgment awards Norman $ 43,386.17 ; $ 40,416 for his interest in the property and $ 2,970.17 for his share of the 1984 contract for deed payment . In addition , the court noted in its findings that the sale to Michael would be an alternative to a partition and sale pursuant to Minn. Stat . § 558 ( 1984 ) . Although this procedure is not found in Minn. Stat . § 558 , the parties initially agreed to set the value of the farm and permit Michael to purchase Norman 's one - sixth share .
 It is appropriate for a trial court to permit alternative methods in fashioning a remedy .
 Although the statutory procedure must be followed , once the court has taken jurisdiction of the case it may exercise its general equitable powers to effect the most advantageous plan which the particular nature of the case admits .
 Carlson v. Olson , 256 N.W.2d 249 , 255 ( Minn. 1977 ) .
 In light of this decision and the parties ' agreement , the court did not err in permitting alternative solutions . However , the court erred in entering judgment against Michael for the amount of Norman 's share . The trial court correctly attempted to correct this error in an amended judgment on February 15 , 1985 , after the appeal to this court had been filed . Thus , the trial court did not err in fashioning the alternative solution , but erred in entering a money judgment against Michael for Norman 's one - sixth share .
 4 . The next issue is whether the trial court 's February 15 , 1985 amended judgment has any effect since the appeal was filed on February 4 , 1984 . The general rule is that an appeal , when perfected , divests the trial court of jurisdiction . This appeal was perfected prior to the February 15 , 1985 amended judgment . We have held that a post - appeal order of the trial court is null and void because the trial court lost its jurisdiction to this court once appellant filed a notice of appeal . Evans v. Blesi , 345 N.W.2d 775 ( Minn. Ct . App . 1984 ) , pet . for rev . denied ( Minn. June 12 , 1984 ) . Thus , the February 15 , 1985 amended judgment has no effect since jurisdiction shifted to this court at the time of filing of the notice of appeal . Id. , 345 N.W.2d at 780 .
 Although the amended judgment is of no effect , the trial court was in a position to re - examine the judgment and properly rectified the error . Recognizing this , we order that the judgment against Michael be reduced from $ 43,386.17 to $ 2,970.17 and the property be partitioned , as the trial court attempted to do in its amended judgment .
 5 and 6 . Hazel claims to appeal from the February 15 , 1985 amended judgment . If that is the case , her appeal is not proper because jurisdiction had already shifted to this court . In addition , her brief challenges : ( 1 ) the original judgment in favor of Norman ; ( 2 ) the grant of a motion in limine prior to the 1984 trial ; and ( 3 ) the property valuation established by the November 6 , 1984 judgment . Her notice of appeal on these issues was filed on April 22 , 1985 .
 Pursuant to Minn. R.Civ . App . P. 104.01 , " An appeal may be taken from a judgment within 90 days after its entry * * * . " Hazel 's appeal from the November 6 , 1984 judgment is not timely and is without merit . However , considering the record , there is no doubt that she owes Norman one - half of the 1983 contract for deed payment .
 The trial court 's decision is affirmed in part , reversed in part , and remanded for entry of judgment consistent with this opinion .


text:
We provide excellent toughness in excellent and advancement,merchandising,gross sales and promoting and operation for Cosmetic Bottles And Jars , cosmetic bottles and jars , cosmetic pots and jars , efficient production time and good after-sales service" as our tenet. We hope to cooperate with more customers for mutual development and benefits. We welcome potential buyers to contact us.
"It is a good way to enhance our products and solutions and repair. Our mission will be to build creative solutions to consumers with a great experience for Cosmetic Bottles And Jars , cosmetic bottles and jars , cosmetic pots and jars , If you are interested in any of our products and services please don't hesitate to contact us. We are ready to reply you within 24 hours after receipt of your request and to create mutual un-limited benefits and business in near future.

tokenized:
We provide excellent toughness in excellent and advancement , merchandising , gross sales and promoting and operation for Cosmetic Bottles And Jars , cosmetic bottles and jars , cosmetic pots and jars , efficient production time and good after - sales service " as our tenet . We hope to cooperate with more customers for mutual development and benefits . We welcome potential buyers to contact us .
 " It is a good way to enhance our products and solutions and repair . Our mission will be to build creative solutions to consumers with a great experience for Cosmetic Bottles And Jars , cosmetic bottles and jars , cosmetic pots and jars , If you are interested in any of our products and services please do n't hesitate to contact us . We are ready to reply you within 24 hours after receipt of your request and to create mutual un - limited benefits and business in near future .