text:
In this section, you will see detailed information about the services that Translation in Birmingham has to offer for all types of Ukrainian to French legalised translation.
In this section you can find further information about Ukrainian to French medical translation provided by Translation in Birmingham.
In this section, more information about the Ukrainian to French standard translations performed by Translation in Birmingham.
In this section, Ukrainian to French technical translation services provided by Translation in Birmingham are outlined.
In this section, you can find detailed information about the services that Translation in Birmingham has to offer for all types of Ukrainian to French certified translation.
In this section, Translation in Birmingham's Ukrainian to French sworn translations are described in greater detail.
In this section, much more information about the services that Translation in Birmingham has to offer for Ukrainian to French specialised translations.
Ukrainian to French translation services offered by Birmingham Translation Services, a translation agency based in Birmingham with experience providing Ukrainian to French translations.

lowercased:
in this section, you will see detailed information about the services that translation in birmingham has to offer for all types of ukrainian to french legalised translation.
in this section you can find further information about ukrainian to french medical translation provided by translation in birmingham.
in this section, more information about the ukrainian to french standard translations performed by translation in birmingham.
in this section, ukrainian to french technical translation services provided by translation in birmingham are outlined.
in this section, you can find detailed information about the services that translation in birmingham has to offer for all types of ukrainian to french certified translation.
in this section, translation in birmingham's ukrainian to french sworn translations are described in greater detail.
in this section, much more information about the services that translation in birmingham has to offer for ukrainian to french specialised translations.
ukrainian to french translation services offered by birmingham translation services, a translation agency based in birmingham with experience providing ukrainian to french translations.


text:
Home / All BambooPlants.ca / Spiraea bumalda ‘Goldflame’.
Native to Eastern Asia, Spiraea bumalda ‘Goldflame’ is grown for its red tinged golden yellow foliage, which turns yellow/lime yellow. clusters of pale pink flowers bloom in late spring to early summer. This deciduous shrub grows to 3 ft tall and 4 ft wide making a great specimen or low hedge.

lowercased:
home / all bambooplants.ca / spiraea bumalda ‘goldflame’.
native to eastern asia, spiraea bumalda ‘goldflame’ is grown for its red tinged golden yellow foliage, which turns yellow/lime yellow. clusters of pale pink flowers bloom in late spring to early summer. this deciduous shrub grows to 3 ft tall and 4 ft wide making a great specimen or low hedge.


text:
1937 Cadillac Series 60 chassis information.
1937 Cadillac Series 60's that have appeared at auction but did not sell.
Similar sales to the $30,902 range.

lowercased:
1937 cadillac series 60 chassis information.
1937 cadillac series 60's that have appeared at auction but did not sell.
similar sales to the $30,902 range.


text:
This Small cross body messenger bag is made from buffalo leather with hunter finish that grows in character and beauty as it ages. With vintage styling, camouflage lining, and resilient leather that builds a rich patina with use, this bag is as rough and tough as it looks.
Dimensions: 8.5" x 11" x 3"

lowercased:
this small cross body messenger bag is made from buffalo leather with hunter finish that grows in character and beauty as it ages. with vintage styling, camouflage lining, and resilient leather that builds a rich patina with use, this bag is as rough and tough as it looks.
dimensions: 8.5" x 11" x 3"


text:
This programme of study focuses on the assessment of risk caused by floods, avalanches and landslides to new and existing structures and infrastructures, and on the structural and non-structural measures which can be envisaged for its mitigation.
Compulsory and elective courses are offered on a number of core subjects including hydrology, fluvial hydraulics and hydromorphology, hydraulic infrastructures, snow avalanches and landslide hazards, risk and emergency legislation, earth surface and processes. The study of these topics is preceded by a number of propaedeutic courses, which encompasses numerical analysis, probability and statistics, continuum mechanics, geomatics and geology.

lowercased:
this programme of study focuses on the assessment of risk caused by floods, avalanches and landslides to new and existing structures and infrastructures, and on the structural and non-structural measures which can be envisaged for its mitigation.
compulsory and elective courses are offered on a number of core subjects including hydrology, fluvial hydraulics and hydromorphology, hydraulic infrastructures, snow avalanches and landslide hazards, risk and emergency legislation, earth surface and processes. the study of these topics is preceded by a number of propaedeutic courses, which encompasses numerical analysis, probability and statistics, continuum mechanics, geomatics and geology.


text:
1) Delivery Time: 15-20 days after the order confirmed. Or depands on the order quantity.
Accessory clips, paper holders,faucet, ceramic sink (cupc approve), stainless steel sink (cupc approve), copper sink, granite farm sink.
Yellow Butterfly Granite Countertop , King Golden Granite Countertop , Giallo Ornamental Granite Countertop, Tiger Skin Yellow Granite Countertop, River Yellow Granite Countertop, Giallo Cecilla Granite Countertop, Golden Yellow Granite Countertop,Yellow Leopard Skin Flower Granite Countertop,Persa Gold Granite Countertop,Imperial Gold Granite Countertop,Exotic River Gold Granite Counertop,Giallo Orlando,New Venetian Gold Granite Countertop,Golden Macaubas Granite Countertop,Shivakashi Granite Countertop,Veneziano Gold Granite Countertop,Chanvre Gold Granite Countertop,Typhoon Bordeaux Granite Countertop,etc.
Q: Why is granite an excellent material for kitchen and vanity tops?
A:Granite is one of the hardest natural products on earth.It’s durable,easy to clean,resistant to molds&mildew.
Q: What’s the hotsell materials?What about pricing?
A:Hotsell iteams varies from different market(Such as Luna Pearl,G603,G654,G682,Tan Brown ,Uba Tuba,Black Pearl,Angola Black,Santa Cecilia Light/Dark,Shanxi Black,Black Galaxy,etc.Pricing is depend on your designs.
Q:Can I get drawing for my stone tops?
A:Yes,formal CAD Drawings will be sent to your confirmation after getting your detail request.
Q: :Are they packed safely?
A:We use strong seaworthy package with 3cm wooden crates outside and enough foam protection inside .

lowercased:
1) delivery time: 15-20 days after the order confirmed. or depands on the order quantity.
accessory clips, paper holders,faucet, ceramic sink (cupc approve), stainless steel sink (cupc approve), copper sink, granite farm sink.
yellow butterfly granite countertop , king golden granite countertop , giallo ornamental granite countertop, tiger skin yellow granite countertop, river yellow granite countertop, giallo cecilla granite countertop, golden yellow granite countertop,yellow leopard skin flower granite countertop,persa gold granite countertop,imperial gold granite countertop,exotic river gold granite counertop,giallo orlando,new venetian gold granite countertop,golden macaubas granite countertop,shivakashi granite countertop,veneziano gold granite countertop,chanvre gold granite countertop,typhoon bordeaux granite countertop,etc.
q: why is granite an excellent material for kitchen and vanity tops?
a:granite is one of the hardest natural products on earth.it’s durable,easy to clean,resistant to molds&mildew.
q: what’s the hotsell materials?what about pricing?
a:hotsell iteams varies from different market(such as luna pearl,g603,g654,g682,tan brown ,uba tuba,black pearl,angola black,santa cecilia light/dark,shanxi black,black galaxy,etc.pricing is depend on your designs.
q:can i get drawing for my stone tops?
a:yes,formal cad drawings will be sent to your confirmation after getting your detail request.
q: :are they packed safely?
a:we use strong seaworthy package with 3cm wooden crates outside and enough foam protection inside .


text:
Gold, winged Optioscopes, gleaming in the sunlight and dressed with a colourful bouquet of flowers. The flower detail can be removed and exchanged for other detail patches. All of our flower patches are illuminated for dusk onwards. Lights can also be worn underneath the costumes for night-time glow show performance.
Optioscopes in stilts are a simply sensational stilt performance; glorious as 'switching on the Christmas lights' entertainment, flawless golden wedding performance, a total sensation for clients seeking to book circus entertainers with lashings of luxe.

lowercased:
gold, winged optioscopes, gleaming in the sunlight and dressed with a colourful bouquet of flowers. the flower detail can be removed and exchanged for other detail patches. all of our flower patches are illuminated for dusk onwards. lights can also be worn underneath the costumes for night-time glow show performance.
optioscopes in stilts are a simply sensational stilt performance; glorious as 'switching on the christmas lights' entertainment, flawless golden wedding performance, a total sensation for clients seeking to book circus entertainers with lashings of luxe.


text: Pin features the words "From Marti Michell" with heart-in-hand logo in purple and white enamel and gold colored metal accents. Approximately 1-1/8" x 7/8". Photo coming soon.

lowercased: pin features the words "from marti michell" with heart-in-hand logo in purple and white enamel and gold colored metal accents. approximately 1-1/8" x 7/8". photo coming soon.


cloth sheets emery cloth sheets gripper cloth dust sheets terry cloth sheets full.
cloth sheets factory price cotton polyester terry cloth laminated waterproof mattress protector terry fitted sheets ralph lauren oxford cloth sheets cloth dust sheets.
cloth sheets clothes sheets container organizer terry cloth bed sheets for sale oxford cloth sheets.
cloth sheets emery cloth sheets x mm assorted fine medium coarse 3 fiberglass cloth sheets terry cloth sheets full.
cloth sheets arc abrasives cloth sheets 9 x grit wholesale distributor buy terry cloth bed sheets queen ralph lauren oxford cloth sheets.
cloth sheets coloring cloth winter clothes coloring pages preschool sheets for cloth winter clothes coloring coloring clothes tutorial terry cloth sheets twin cloth sheets for printer.
cloth sheets 9 x 3 pack emery cloth sheets 80 grit emery cloth sheets white oxford cloth sheets.
cloth sheets emery cloth sheets emery cloth sheets for sale terry cloth sheets queen.
cloth sheets book cloth burgundy x 2 sheets acid terry cloth bed sheets queen terry cloth fitted sheets.
cloth sheets queen size terry cloth sheets gripper cloth dust sheets.
cloth sheets fabric sheet terry cloth sheets queen terry cloth fitted sheets.
cloth sheets old jean embryo padded canvas cotton tablecloth fabric cloth sheets pure white cotton cloth cloth sheets for printer ralph lauren oxford cloth sheets.
cloth sheets wool felt cloth sheets terry cloth bed sheets for sale emery cloth sheets.
cloth sheets made in japan cupboard cloth sheets washable x cm table runner tableware shelf 3m emery cloth sheets emery cloth sheets for sale.
cloth sheets cheap cloth dust sheets 80 grit emery cloth sheets.
cloth sheets non woven felt fabric sheets crafts handmade cloth colors terry cloth fitted sheets emery cloth sheets for sale.
cloth sheets heat resistant sheets queen size terry cloth sheets gripper cloth dust sheets.
cloth sheets oxford 80 grit emery cloth sheets terry cloth fitted sheets.
cloth sheets twill carbon fiber cloth non woven activated carbon fiber carbon fiber cloth buy twill carbon fiber cloth painters cloth drop sheets terry cloth sheets queen.
cloth sheets cloth inserted rubber silicone sheet rubber sheet silicone vacuum bag sponge foam rubber sheet china manufacturer supplier terry cloth fitted sheets norton cloth emery sheets.
cloth sheets full automatic sheet folding machine bed sheets table cloth terry cloth bed sheets norton cloth emery sheets.
cloth sheets book cloth blue x 2 sheets acid free norton cloth emery sheets 3m emery cloth sheets.
cloth sheets cloth sheets queen size terry cloth sheets terry cloth sheets king.
cloth sheets undefined cloth drop sheets terry cloth bed sheets.
cloth sheets 3 x emery sanding cloth sheets highest quality x terry cloth sheets twin emery cloth sheets for sale.
cloth sheets alternate image for ultra non stick cloth sheets raw painters cloth drop sheets fiberglass cloth sheets.
cloth sheets alloys terry cloth bed sheets queen fiberglass cloth sheets.
cloth sheets carborundum aluminum oxide resin cloth sheets aluminum oxide cloth terry cloth sheets twin 3m emery cloth sheets.
cloth sheets abrasive cloth sheets terry cloth sheets queen cloth drop sheets.


text:
This is not a fantasy poem, but is more a battle poem is a based on a true story about an epic battle in England in 1066 when a large viking force led by King Harald Hardrada of Norway and the English king’s younger brother tried to usurp English King Harold Godwinson, and take over the English throne. Godwinson’s army caught the vikings unprepared, and completely routed them, in somewhat of a slaughter. Attempting to retreat back to their ships by crossing Stamford Bridge — a lone viking warrior volunteered to block the bridge, and managed to hold off the English forces for almost an hour before being killed. The heroic act only delayed the inevitable, and Godwinson’s army was still able to engage the retreating vikings, as well as a rear guard — and slaughtered all but a few hundred who were allowed to surrender. While this is a battle poem, I admit taking liberty with the facts to embellish the effect of the poem.
The background image shows a Viking Warrior with battle ax in hand in full armor, and itching for battle.

lowercased:
this is not a fantasy poem, but is more a battle poem is a based on a true story about an epic battle in england in 1066 when a large viking force led by king harald hardrada of norway and the english king’s younger brother tried to usurp english king harold godwinson, and take over the english throne. godwinson’s army caught the vikings unprepared, and completely routed them, in somewhat of a slaughter. attempting to retreat back to their ships by crossing stamford bridge — a lone viking warrior volunteered to block the bridge, and managed to hold off the english forces for almost an hour before being killed. the heroic act only delayed the inevitable, and godwinson’s army was still able to engage the retreating vikings, as well as a rear guard — and slaughtered all but a few hundred who were allowed to surrender. while this is a battle poem, i admit taking liberty with the facts to embellish the effect of the poem.
the background image shows a viking warrior with battle ax in hand in full armor, and itching for battle.


text:
I was searching for a Property and found this listing (MLS® #E4148940). Please send me more information regarding 11440 97 Street Nw, Edmonton, AB, T5G 1X5. Thank you!
I'd like to request a showing of 11440 97 Street Nw, Edmonton, AB, T5G 1X5 (MLS® #E4148940). Thank you!

lowercased:
i was searching for a property and found this listing (mls® #e4148940). please send me more information regarding 11440 97 street nw, edmonton, ab, t5g 1x5. thank you!
i'd like to request a showing of 11440 97 street nw, edmonton, ab, t5g 1x5 (mls® #e4148940). thank you!


text: Whether you’re working, exercising or just enjoying the sunshine, you’ll be able to keep hydrated throughout the day with this Stainless Steel Portable Water Bottle from Room Essentials™. Perfect for enjoying all of your favorite drinks — from water to coffee to iced tea — this sleek water bottle features a shiny finish that lets you sip in style. Just toss it in your purse or stash it in your gym bag for convenient drinking wherever you are.

lowercased: whether you’re working, exercising or just enjoying the sunshine, you’ll be able to keep hydrated throughout the day with this stainless steel portable water bottle from room essentials™. perfect for enjoying all of your favorite drinks — from water to coffee to iced tea — this sleek water bottle features a shiny finish that lets you sip in style. just toss it in your purse or stash it in your gym bag for convenient drinking wherever you are.


text:
As part of the Sesquicentennial year celebrations of St. Benedict�s College, the College will be organising a Swimming Championship amongst the La Sallian schools at Bro. Granville Perera Aquatic Centre, on Saturday, 23rd May 2015 from 8.30 A.M. onwards with over 200 swimmers from the age groups of under 9, 11, 13, 15, 17 and 19, from De Mazenod College, De La Salle College, St. Anthony�s College, Wattala and St. Benedict�s College are expected to participate.
Eminent Benedictine Jeyam Perumal and Mrs. Perumal will grace the occasion as chief guests at the awards ceremony at 3.00 P.M.
Apart from the Trophies, Medals and Certificates, 6 Raleigh Bicycles await the champion swimmers which is valued at over Rs. 300,000/-.
The championship is sponsored by RALEIGH and the sponsorship cheque was presented to Rev. Bro. Janaka Fonseka � Director SBC by Mr. Jeyam Perumal.

lowercased:
as part of the sesquicentennial year celebrations of st. benedict�s college, the college will be organising a swimming championship amongst the la sallian schools at bro. granville perera aquatic centre, on saturday, 23rd may 2015 from 8.30 a.m. onwards with over 200 swimmers from the age groups of under 9, 11, 13, 15, 17 and 19, from de mazenod college, de la salle college, st. anthony�s college, wattala and st. benedict�s college are expected to participate.
eminent benedictine jeyam perumal and mrs. perumal will grace the occasion as chief guests at the awards ceremony at 3.00 p.m.
apart from the trophies, medals and certificates, 6 raleigh bicycles await the champion swimmers which is valued at over rs. 300,000/-.
the championship is sponsored by raleigh and the sponsorship cheque was presented to rev. bro. janaka fonseka � director sbc by mr. jeyam perumal.


text:
We are National Insurance Markets, Inc.
Providing you with specialty Life and Health Products. We strive to find the best Insurance Products to meet the demanding needs of our clients. Though our Partners such as Assurant (Fortis) Insurance Company and International Medical Group (IMG), we provide thousands of clients with insurance products.
National Insurance Markets, Inc. is a culmination of 40+ years of continued agent and client support. We provide professional insurance agents with specialty life and health products that are not available through their Primary Company. This enables professional agents to compliment their portfolios and increase their market.
National Insurance Markets, Inc. is a Member of both the Broker's Health Network, Inc. and National Insurance Producers, Inc. These two networks are on the forefront of the life and health industry.
Here at National Insurance Markets, Inc. our goal is service. Our dedicated staff continues to search for products and sales ideas that will best meet the needs of our agents and their clients.
When you have an insurance need, we have an insurance solution.

lowercased:
we are national insurance markets, inc.
providing you with specialty life and health products. we strive to find the best insurance products to meet the demanding needs of our clients. though our partners such as assurant (fortis) insurance company and international medical group (img), we provide thousands of clients with insurance products.
national insurance markets, inc. is a culmination of 40+ years of continued agent and client support. we provide professional insurance agents with specialty life and health products that are not available through their primary company. this enables professional agents to compliment their portfolios and increase their market.
national insurance markets, inc. is a member of both the broker's health network, inc. and national insurance producers, inc. these two networks are on the forefront of the life and health industry.
here at national insurance markets, inc. our goal is service. our dedicated staff continues to search for products and sales ideas that will best meet the needs of our agents and their clients.
when you have an insurance need, we have an insurance solution.


text:
The 800 block of Cardiff Street in San Diego is seen in a Google Maps Street View image from January 2016.
Police are investigating after a 5-month-old baby boy was found in a San Diego trash can, according to KGTV in San Diego.
According to police, the baby was found on the 800 block of Cardiff Street near the Jamacha area in southeastern San Diego Wednesday afternoon and rushed to the hospital.
The location is near Audubon Elementary School, Foodland Supermarket and the Lomita Village shopping center.
The baby is still alive, according to police, but his condition is unknown. Police have not announced how the baby was found.
Detectives are currently speaking with the child’s parents. Police have not named any suspects at this time.
Family members told police that the baby had been sleeping and may have fallen out of bed into the trash can, said Officer Billy Hernandez.
Before paramedics arrived, someone performed CPR on the child.
Neighbors said the infant’s mother was hysterically crying and that, when police arrived, the baby looked grayish-blue.
Hernandez added that child abuse detectives were investigating the case as an apparent accident.

lowercased:
the 800 block of cardiff street in san diego is seen in a google maps street view image from january 2016.
police are investigating after a 5-month-old baby boy was found in a san diego trash can, according to kgtv in san diego.
according to police, the baby was found on the 800 block of cardiff street near the jamacha area in southeastern san diego wednesday afternoon and rushed to the hospital.
the location is near audubon elementary school, foodland supermarket and the lomita village shopping center.
the baby is still alive, according to police, but his condition is unknown. police have not announced how the baby was found.
detectives are currently speaking with the child’s parents. police have not named any suspects at this time.
family members told police that the baby had been sleeping and may have fallen out of bed into the trash can, said officer billy hernandez.
before paramedics arrived, someone performed cpr on the child.
neighbors said the infant’s mother was hysterically crying and that, when police arrived, the baby looked grayish-blue.
hernandez added that child abuse detectives were investigating the case as an apparent accident.


text:
– Is grandma really gone, mama?
– Yes, honey, she’s really gone.
– Do you miss her?
– I miss her every day, especially on mornings like this one.
– No, sweetie, not really sad. Just a little lost is all. I feel a little like that leaf there on the river, floating along, not real sure where I’m headed. But I’m moving. I’m getting on with things.
– I guess I am, a little.
– I’d miss you if you were gone.
– That’s enough for me, hon. That’s enough.
Convincingly heartbreaking dialogue. Really well done (reaches for tissues).
As I said to Gary above, next week’s will be upbeat. That is my mission!
I love stories that are all dialogue! This was wonderful, thank you so much for sharing it with us.
Good use of dialogue, helped/shape define the story’s two characters. Here’s mine: http://furiousfictions.com.
A melancholy-yet-sweet story of innocence and loss, with a real sense of realism in there. Well done!
well done Erin! the heart wrenching dialogue told the whole story. it is simply true and honest.
Thanks, Jeannie. I wrote a poem for my mom that has a similar feel. The picture made me think of that, then this dialogue was in my head. Funny how it all flows sometimes.
Lovely, evoked memories and thoughts for me. Now to clear the tears so I can read the others. Well done!
This was a well written, conversation illustrating a mother trying to explain death to a young child. Very realistic…and poignant. Thank you for sharing.
Nicely done. The dialogue is perfect!
This dialogue is amazing. And the insight into a woman grieving her mother’s death is so beautiful and heart breaking. Really well done.
This is very sad, but also very good. Excellent work!
What a beautiful little story, like listening in on a very private and poignant conversation. I loved it.
I found the dialog very realistic and gentle, just like the river at dawn.
Thanks! I’m heading to yours now to read.
You write dialogue superbly and use that talent here to very touching effect. On a personal level, this felt very relatable, having experienced a similar loss to that portrayed in your story. You encapsulate so much in so few words. Well done.
Very nicely done Erin. I thought the discussion between mother and child sounded very realistic and it told a story without ever breaking into prose. Loved it.
Thanks – it comes from the heart. That makes it easy to write.

lowercased:
– is grandma really gone, mama?
– yes, honey, she’s really gone.
– do you miss her?
– i miss her every day, especially on mornings like this one.
– no, sweetie, not really sad. just a little lost is all. i feel a little like that leaf there on the river, floating along, not real sure where i’m headed. but i’m moving. i’m getting on with things.
– i guess i am, a little.
– i’d miss you if you were gone.
– that’s enough for me, hon. that’s enough.
convincingly heartbreaking dialogue. really well done (reaches for tissues).
as i said to gary above, next week’s will be upbeat. that is my mission!
i love stories that are all dialogue! this was wonderful, thank you so much for sharing it with us.
good use of dialogue, helped/shape define the story’s two characters. here’s mine: http://furiousfictions.com.
a melancholy-yet-sweet story of innocence and loss, with a real sense of realism in there. well done!
well done erin! the heart wrenching dialogue told the whole story. it is simply true and honest.
thanks, jeannie. i wrote a poem for my mom that has a similar feel. the picture made me think of that, then this dialogue was in my head. funny how it all flows sometimes.
lovely, evoked memories and thoughts for me. now to clear the tears so i can read the others. well done!
this was a well written, conversation illustrating a mother trying to explain death to a young child. very realistic…and poignant. thank you for sharing.
nicely done. the dialogue is perfect!
this dialogue is amazing. and the insight into a woman grieving her mother’s death is so beautiful and heart breaking. really well done.
this is very sad, but also very good. excellent work!
what a beautiful little story, like listening in on a very private and poignant conversation. i loved it.
i found the dialog very realistic and gentle, just like the river at dawn.
thanks! i’m heading to yours now to read.
you write dialogue superbly and use that talent here to very touching effect. on a personal level, this felt very relatable, having experienced a similar loss to that portrayed in your story. you encapsulate so much in so few words. well done.
very nicely done erin. i thought the discussion between mother and child sounded very realistic and it told a story without ever breaking into prose. loved it.
thanks – it comes from the heart. that makes it easy to write.


text:
If you want your apartment to be able to go from homey to dressy depending on how well you clean up your place, a tuft sofa is right for the job. Tuft sofas always look well put together and depending on the fabric that you select, they can be easy to sleep on. Get a soft fabric tuft sofa with a matching ottoman. You can use the ottoman to take the sectional from a seating couch to a spacious bed in one step.
A chair that cups you completely is one of the most comfortable seats in the house. A contemporary egg chair will fit into any apartment and can be used for television viewing, to work at desks, and to nap inside of in a pinch. Get an egg seat that can handle a lot of weight, so that you can elect to hold extra items such as linens, daily purses, and other items that you may need. An egg chair that is tufted on the inside to match the sofas will work well as a contemporary furniture set.
When you are low on square footage, opt for clear spaces. A clear end table that sits up high is one of the best contemporary pieces that you can select. Get one that is light and easy to move so that you can move it to a number of different areas of your home. Use it as a dining room table when you are enjoying your meals. Move the table back to the living room and use it as a coffee table to hold drinks when you have a desk. If you do any work from home, sit the table in front of the egg chair to use as a computer desk to accomplish your work. An acrylic desk or a glass desk will both work depending on your lifestyle and how light you want your furniture.

lowercased:
if you want your apartment to be able to go from homey to dressy depending on how well you clean up your place, a tuft sofa is right for the job. tuft sofas always look well put together and depending on the fabric that you select, they can be easy to sleep on. get a soft fabric tuft sofa with a matching ottoman. you can use the ottoman to take the sectional from a seating couch to a spacious bed in one step.
a chair that cups you completely is one of the most comfortable seats in the house. a contemporary egg chair will fit into any apartment and can be used for television viewing, to work at desks, and to nap inside of in a pinch. get an egg seat that can handle a lot of weight, so that you can elect to hold extra items such as linens, daily purses, and other items that you may need. an egg chair that is tufted on the inside to match the sofas will work well as a contemporary furniture set.
when you are low on square footage, opt for clear spaces. a clear end table that sits up high is one of the best contemporary pieces that you can select. get one that is light and easy to move so that you can move it to a number of different areas of your home. use it as a dining room table when you are enjoying your meals. move the table back to the living room and use it as a coffee table to hold drinks when you have a desk. if you do any work from home, sit the table in front of the egg chair to use as a computer desk to accomplish your work. an acrylic desk or a glass desk will both work depending on your lifestyle and how light you want your furniture.


text:
Discussion in 'iPhone Accessories' started by Greenman1, Aug 2, 2010.
Jusy got the email, it shipped. I live in florida, anyone else located in the US get notified that their case shipped?
My PixelSkin ships out in late September.
My order status shows shipped as of today. I also ordered the etch case.
Did yours show a later ship date and then shipped early? I ordered the Reveal Etch too and the confirmation email says Ships: Sept 28...so I'm hoping there is a chance that it could ship earlier.
Mine is prepared for shipping!
Woohoo! A month ahead of schedule. Sweet! I can't wait for it to get here as the case I have right now is all but useless!
Yes, also got notification of shipment around 8:30 local time for Griffin Reveal Etch.
Mine still says ship late august.
My bumper said it was supposed to ship late August but it arrived today?
I love in SoCal and mine has not shipped yet.
The email said that it shipped today (aug 2nd) from tennessee and is scheduled for delivery on aug 10th.
Mine was set to ship on august 30 but shipped TODAY! Woohoo!
I hope my incase ships early nd if it did how would i kno?
Mine was scheduled to ship on Oct 5 lol.
got the same email. Ordered it the day the case app was available. I love an early delivery.
any Belkin case order's getting emails?
I also ordered the Etch, although I ordered a couple days after the case app was available. Odd thing was that while the app said 3-5 weeks for it to ship, the email said delivery by October 8th. Now, 3-5 week would be delivered by early September. Oh well, can't complain about a free case, and I have a great case on now that I got free from boxwave for $4.50 shipping.
I got my email about my griffin reveal etch being shipped out. Its free so im not complaining...but... its shipping from TN I live in GA and its supposed to arrive on Aug 10. Im glad to see that they used the oregon trail delivery service.
expected to ship on 15/9.
Now Apple says prepared for shipment.
I actually bought the reveal.. I like it but was worried the back would scratch up since it has a plastic backing.. I left my Zagg shield on and it came off my iPhone and stuck to the back plastic cover of the case.

lowercased:
discussion in 'iphone accessories' started by greenman1, aug 2, 2010.
jusy got the email, it shipped. i live in florida, anyone else located in the us get notified that their case shipped?
my pixelskin ships out in late september.
my order status shows shipped as of today. i also ordered the etch case.
did yours show a later ship date and then shipped early? i ordered the reveal etch too and the confirmation email says ships: sept 28...so i'm hoping there is a chance that it could ship earlier.
mine is prepared for shipping!
woohoo! a month ahead of schedule. sweet! i can't wait for it to get here as the case i have right now is all but useless!
yes, also got notification of shipment around 8:30 local time for griffin reveal etch.
mine still says ship late august.
my bumper said it was supposed to ship late august but it arrived today?
i love in socal and mine has not shipped yet.
the email said that it shipped today (aug 2nd) from tennessee and is scheduled for delivery on aug 10th.
mine was set to ship on august 30 but shipped today! woohoo!
i hope my incase ships early nd if it did how would i kno?
mine was scheduled to ship on oct 5 lol.
got the same email. ordered it the day the case app was available. i love an early delivery.
any belkin case order's getting emails?
i also ordered the etch, although i ordered a couple days after the case app was available. odd thing was that while the app said 3-5 weeks for it to ship, the email said delivery by october 8th. now, 3-5 week would be delivered by early september. oh well, can't complain about a free case, and i have a great case on now that i got free from boxwave for $4.50 shipping.
i got my email about my griffin reveal etch being shipped out. its free so im not complaining...but... its shipping from tn i live in ga and its supposed to arrive on aug 10. im glad to see that they used the oregon trail delivery service.
expected to ship on 15/9.
now apple says prepared for shipment.
i actually bought the reveal.. i like it but was worried the back would scratch up since it has a plastic backing.. i left my zagg shield on and it came off my iphone and stuck to the back plastic cover of the case.


text:
See 67 S.Ct. 26. [328 U.S. 640, 641] Mr. John S. Tucker, Jr., of Birmingham, Ala., for petitioners.
Walter and Daniel Pinkerton are brothers who live a short distance from each other on Daniel's farm. They were indicted for violations of the Internal Revenue Code. The indictment contained ten substantive counts and one conspiracy count. The jury found Walter guilty on nine of the substantive counts and on the conspiracy count. It found Daniel guilty on six of the substantive counts and on the conspiracy count. Walter was fined $500 and sentenced generally on the substantive counts to imprisonment for thirty months. On the conspiracy count he was given a two year sentence to run concurrently with the other sentence. Daniel was fined $1,000 and sentenced generally on the substantive counts to imprisonment for thirty months. On the conspiracy count he was fined $500 and given a two year sentence to run concurrently with the other sentence. The judgments of conviction were affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 1 151 F.2d [328 U.S. 640, 642] 499. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted, 66 S.Ct. 702, because one of the questions presented involved a conflict between the decision below and United States v. Sall, 116 F.2d 745, decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
A single conspiracy was charged and proved. Some of the overt acts charged in the conspiracy count were the same acts charged in the substantive counts. Each of the substantive offenses found was committed pursuant to the conspiracy. Petitioners therefore contend that the substantive counts became merged in the conspiracy count, and that only a single sentence not exceeding the maximum two-year penalty provided by the conspiracy statute (Criminal Code 37, 18 U.S.C. 88, 18 U.S.C.A. 88) could be imposed. Or to state the matter differently, they contend that each of the substantive counts became a separate conspiracy count but since only a single conpsiracy was charged and proved, only single sentence for conspiracy could be imposed. They rely on Braverman v. United States, 317 U.S. 49 , 63 S.Ct. 99.
In the Braverman case the indictment charged no substantive offense. Each of the several counts charged a conspiracy to violate a different statute. But only one [328 U.S. 640, 643] conspiracy was proved. We held that a single conspiracy, charged under the general conspiracy statute, however diverse its objects may be, violates but a single statute and no penalty greater than the maximum provided for one conspiracy may be imposed. That case is not apposite here. For the offenses charged and proved were not only a conspiracy but substantive offenses as well.
And see Sneed v. United States, 5 Cir., 298 F. 911, 912, 913; Banghart v. United States, 4 Cir., 148 F.2d 521.
Moreover, it is not material that overt acts charged in the conspiracy counts were also charged and proved as substantive offenses. As stated in Sneed v. United States, supra, 298 F. at page 913, 'If the overt act be the offense which was the object of the conspiracy, and is also punished, there is not a double punishment of it.' The agreement to do an unlawful act is even then distinct from the doing of the act. 4 [328 U.S. 640, 645] It is contended that there was insufficient evidence to implicate Daniel in the conspiracy. But we think there was enough evidence for submission of the issue to the jury.
There is, however, no evidence to show that Daniel participated directly in the commission of the substantive offenses on which his conviction has been sustained,5 although there was evidence to show that these substantive offenses were in fact committed by Walter in furtherance of the unlawful agreement or conspiracy existing between the brothers. The question was submitted to the jury on the theory that each petitioner could be found guilty of the substantive offenses, if it was found at the time those offenses were committed petitioners were parties to an unlawful conspiracy and the substantive offenses charged were in fact committed in furtherance of it. 6 [328 U.S. 640, 646] Daniel relies on United States v. Sall, supra. That case held that participation in the conspiracy was not itself enough to sustain a conviction for the substantive offense even though it was committed in furtherance of the conspiracy. The court held that, in addition to evidence that the offense was in fact committed in furtherance of the conspiracy, evidence of direct participation in the commission of the substantive offense or other evidence from which participation might fairly be inferred was necessary.
We take a different view. We have here a continuous conspiracy. There is here no evidence of the affirmative action on the part of Daniel which is necessary to establish his withdrawal from it. Hyde v. United States, 225 U.S. 347, 369 , 32 S.Ct. 793, 803, Ann.Cas.1914A, 614. As stated in that case, 'having joined in an unlawful scheme, having constituted agents for its performance, scheme and agency to be continuous until full fruition be secured, until he does some act to disavow or defeat the purpose he is in no situation to claim the delay of the law. As the offense has not been terminated or accomplished, he is still offending. And we think, consciously offending,-offending as certainly, as we have said, as at the first moment of his confederation, and consciously through every moment of its existence.' Id., 225 U.S. at page 369, 32 S.Ct. at page 803. And so long as the partnership in crime continues, the partners act for each other in carrying it forward. It is settled that 'an overt act of one partner may be the act of all without [328 U.S. 640, 647] any new agreement specifically directed to that act.' United States v. Kissel, 218 U.S. 601, 608 , 31 S.Ct. 124, 126. Motive or intent may be proved by the acts or declarations of some of the conspirators in furtherance of the common objective. Wiborg v. United States, 163 U.S. 632, 657 , 658 S., 16 S.Ct. 1127, 1137, 1197. A scheme to use the mails to defraud, which is joined in by more than one person, is a conspiracy. Cochran v. United States, 8 Cir., 41 F.2d 193, 199, 200. Yet all members are responsible, though only one did the mailing. Cochran v. United States, supra; Mackett v. United States, 7 Cir., 90 F.2d 462, 464; Baker v. United States, 8 Cir., 115 F.2d 533, 540; Blue v. United States, 6 Cir., 138 F.2d 351, 359. The governing principle is the same when the substantive offense is committed by one of the conspirators in furtherance of the unlawful project. Johnson v. United States, 9 Cir., 62 F.2d 32, 34. The criminal intent to do the act is established by the formation of the conspiracy. Each conspirator instigated the commission of the crime. The unlawful agreement contemplated precisely what was done. It was formed for the purpose. The act done was in execution of the enterprise. The rule which holds responsible one who counsels, procures, or commands another to commit a crime is founded on the same principle. That principle is recognized in the law of conspiracy when the overt act of one partner in crime is attributable to all. An overt act is an essential ingredient of the crime of conspiracy under 37 of the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C. 88, 18 U.S.C.A. 88. If that can be supplied by the act of one conspirator, we fail to see why the same or other acts in furtherance of the conspiracy are likewise not attributable to the others for the purpose of holding them responsible for the substantive offense.
A different case would arise if the substantive offense committed by one of the conspirators was not in fact done in furtherance of the conspiracy, did not fall within the [328 U.S. 640, 648] scope of the unlawful project, or was merely a pat of the ramifications of the plan which could not be reasonably foreseen as a necessary or natural consequence of the unlawful agreement. But as we read this record, that is not this case.
The judgment concerning Daniel Pinkerton should be reversed. In my opinion it is without precedent here and is a dangerous precedent to establish.
Daniel and Walter, who were brothers living near each other, were charged in several counts with substantive offenses, and then a conspiracy count was added naming those offenses as overt acts. The proof showed that Walter alone committed the substantive crimes. There was none to establish that Daniel participated in them, aided and abetted Walter in committing them, or knew that he had done so. Daniel in fact was in the penitentiary, under sentence for other crimes, when some of Walter's crimes were done.
There was evidence, however, to show that over several years Daniel and Walter had confederated to commit similar crimes concerned with unlawful possession, transportation, and dealing in whiskey, in fraud of the federal revenues. On this evidence both were convicted of conspiracy. Walter also was convicted on the substantive counts on the proof of his committing the crimes charged. Then, on that evidence without more than the proof of Daniel's criminal agreement with Walter and the latter's overt acts, which were also the substantive offenses charged, the court told the jury they could find Daniel guilty of those substantive offenses. They did so. [328 U.S. 640, 649] I think this ruling violates both the letter and the spirit of what Congress did when it separately defined the three classes of crime, namely , (1) completed substantive offenses;1 (2) aiding, abetting or counseling another to commit them;2 and (3) conspiracy to commit them. 3 Not only does this ignore the distinctions Congress has prescribed shall be observed. It either convicts one man for another's crime or punishes the man convicted twice for the same offense.
The three types of offense are not identical. Bollehbach v. United States, 326 U.S. 607, 611 , 66 S.Ct. 402, 404; United States v. Sall, 3 Cir ., 116 F.2d 745. Nor are their differences merely verbal. Ibid. The gist of conspiracy is the agreement; that of aiding, abetting or counseling is in consciously advising or assisting another to commit particular offenses, and thus becoming a party to them; that of substantice crime, going a step beyond mere aiding, abetting, counseling to completion of the offense.
These general differences are well understood. But when conspiracy has ripened into completed crime, or has advanced to the stage of aiding and abetting, it becomes easy to disregard their differences and loosely to treat one as identical with the other, that is, for every purpose except the most vital one of imposing sentence. And [328 U.S. 640, 650] thus the substance, if not the technical effect, of double jeopardy or multiple punishment may be accomplished. Thus also may one be convicted of an offense not charged or proved against him, on evidence showing he o mmitted another.
The old doctrine of merger of conspiracy in the substantive crime has not obtained here. But the dangers for abuse, which in part it sought to avoid, in applying the law of conspiracy have not altogether disappeared. Cf. Kotteakos v. United States, 66 S.Ct. 1239. There is some evidence that they may be increasing. The looseness with which the charge may be proved, the almost unlimited scope of vicarious responsibility for others' acts which follows once agreement is shown, the psychological advantages of such trials for securing convictions by attributing to one proof against another, these and other inducements require that the broad limits of discretion allowed to prosecuting officers in relation to such charges and trials be not expanded into new, wider and more dubious areas of choice. If the matter is not generally of constitutional proportions, it is one for the exercise of this Court's supervisory power over the modes of conducting federal criminal prosecutions within the rule of McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 , 63 S.Ct. 608.
I think that power should be exercised in this case with respect to Daniel's conviction. If it does not violate the letter of constitutional right, it fractures the spirit. United States v. Sall, supra. I think the ruling in that case was right, and for the reasons stated. 4 It should be [328 U.S. 640, 651] followed here. Daniel has been held guilty of the substantive crimes committed only by Walter on proof that he did no more than conspire with him to commit offenses of the same general character. There was no evidence that he counseled, advised or had knowledge of those particular acts or offenses. There was, therefore, none that he aided, abetted or took part in them. There was only evidence sufficient to show that he had agreed with Walter at some past time to engage in such transactions generally. As to Daniel this was only evidence of conspiracy, not of substantive crime.
The court's theory seems to be that Daniel and Walter became general partners in crime by virtue of their agreement and because of that agreement without more on his part Daniel became criminally responsible as a principal for everything Walter did thereafter in the nature of a criminal offense of the general sort the agreement contemplated, so long as there was not clear evidence that Daniel had withdrawn from or revoked the agreement. Whether or not his commitment to the penitentiary had that effect, the result is a vicarious criminal responsibility as broad as, or broader than, the vicarious civil liability of a partner for acts done by a co-partner in the course of the firm's business.
Such analogies from private commercial law and the law of torts are dangerous, in my judgment, for transfer to the criminal field. See Sen.Rep. No.163, 72d Cong., 1st Sess., 20. Guilt there with us remains personal, not vicarious, for the more serious offenses. It should be kept so. The effect of Daniel's conviction in this case, to [328 U.S. 640, 652] repeat, is either to attribute to him Walter's guilt or to punish him twice for the same offense, namely, agreeing with Walter to engage in crime. Without the agreement Daniel was guilty of no crime on this record. With it and no more, so far as his own conduct is concerned,h e was guilty of two.
In another aspect of the case, this effect is thrown into even clearer light. The indictment here was filed after a prior one for conspiracy alone had been dismissed. This in turn came after petitioners had been convicted and had been successful in securing reversal on appeal for errors in the charge. Pinkerton v. United States, 5 Cir., 145 F.2d 252. Following this reversal they were reindicted and tried in the present case. The Government now says, as to the plea of double jeopardy on this account ( which the trial court overruled on demurrer), that the two indictments were for different conspiracies since the first one charged a different period of time as covered by the conspiracy; charged 16 as compared with 19 overt acts in the second; and an additional object was added in the latter, that is, intent to violate another section of the revenue act. In other words, there were two different conspiracies by virtue of these minute differences in the detail of the allegations. Hence, there was no double jeopardy by the second indictment.
But later, in support of the conviction here, relative to the bearing of the various statutes of limitations upon proof of the acts, charged also as substantive offenses, the Government points out that the earlier indictment was framed on the assumption that a three-year statute of limitations applied to the conspiracy as first charged; and the convictions were reversed for failure of the trial court to instruct the jury on that basis. Then the District Attorney discovered the decision in Braverman v. United States, 317 U.S. 49, 54 , 55 S., 63 S.Ct. 99, 102, and decided to revamp the [328 U.S. 640, 653] indictment to include details making the six-year period applicable. He did so, and added the substantive counts because, so it is said, in the view that a six-year period applied he felt there were enough substantive offenses within that time which he could successfully prove to justify including them.
It would seem, from this history, that to sustain this conviction as against the plea of former jeopardy by virtue of the earlier indictment and what followed, the Government stands, and must stand, upon the idea that two separate and distinct conspiracies were charged, one by the first and one by the later indictment. See United States v. Oppenheimer, 242 U.S. 85, 87 , 88 S., 37 S.Ct. 68, 69, 3 L.R.A. 516. But to sustain Daniel's conviction for the substantive offenses, via the conspiracy route, there was only a single continuing conspiracy extending over the longer period, in the course of which Walter committed crimes, which were also overt acts, some of them running back of the period charged in the former indictment, others being the same but later acts which it had charged as overt acts against both.
For these now Daniel is held responsible, not merely as a conspirator, as the prior indictment charged, but as both a conspirator and a substantive offender.
What this lacks by way of being put twice in jeopardy for the same offense, I am unable to understand. For not only has Daniel been convicted for conspiracy for the same overt acts, and illegal ends, as the first indictment charged. He has had those acts converted into substantive offenses. I do not think the prosecutor's technical, and it would seem insubstantial, variations in the details of the indictment should be permitted to achieve so much. 5 [328 U.S. 640, 654] This, of course, should not relieve Walter of the conviction for the substantive offenses. But his sentence for conspiracy should be annulled. So also should Daniel's sentence on all counts.
Mr. JusticeF RANKFURTER, reserving judgment on the question of double jeopardy, agrees in substance with the views expressed in this dissent.
The same rule obtains in the case of concurrent sentences. Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81, 85 , 63 S.Ct. 1375, 1378, and cases cited.
[ Footnote 2 ] See May's Law of Crimes (4th ed. 1938) 126; 17 Corn.L.Q. (1931) 136; People v. Tavormina, 257 N.Y. 84, 89, 90, 177 N.E. 317, 318, 75 A.L.R. 1405.
[ Footnote 3 ] The cases are collected in 37 A.L.R. 778, 75 A.L.R. 1411.
'We note the prevalent use of conspiracy indictments for converting a joint misdemeanor into a felony; and we express our conviction that both for this purpose and for the purpose-or at least with the effect-of bringing in much improper evidence, the conspiracy statute is being much abused.
'Although in a particular case there may be no preconcert of plan, excepting that necessarily inherent in mere joint action, it is difficult to exclude that situation from the established definitions of conspiracy; yet the theory which permits us to call the aborted plan a greater offense than the completed crime supposes a serious and substantially continued group scheme for cooperative law breaking. We observe so many conspiracy prosecutions which do not have this substantial base that we fear the creation of a general impression, very harmful to law enforcement, that this method of prosecution is used arbitrarily and harshly. Further the rules of evidence in conspiracy cases make them most difficult to try without prejudice to an innocent defendant.' Annual Report of the Attorney General for 1925, pp. 5-6.
But we do not find that practice reflected in this present case.
[ Footnote 5 ] This question does not arise as to Walter. He was the direct actor in some of the substantive offenses on which his conviction rests. So the general sentence and fine are supportable under any one of those. See note 1, supra.
[ Footnote 6 ] The trial court charged: '... after you gentlemen have considered all the evidence in this case, if you are satisfied from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that at the time these particular substantive offenses were committed, that is, the offenses charged in the first ten counts of this indictment if you are satisfied from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the two defendants were in an unlawful conspiracy, as I have heretofore defined unlawful conspiracy to you, then you would have a right, if you found that to be true to your satisfaction beyond a reasonable doubt, to convict each of these defendants on all these substantive counts, provided the acts referred to in the substantive counts were acts in furtherance therance of the unlawful conspiracy or object of the unlawful conspiracy, which you have found from the evidence existed'. Daniel was not indicted as an aider or abettor (see Criminal Code, 332, 18 U.S.C. 550, 18 U.S.C.A. 550), nor was his case submitted to the jury on that theory.
[ Footnote 1 ] These of course commrehend the vast variety of offenses prescribed by federal law, conspiracies for accomplishing which may be charged under the catchall conspiracy statute, note 3.
[ Footnote 2 ] 'Whoever directly commits any act constituting an offense defined in any law of the United States, or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces, or procures its commission, is a principal.' 18 U.S.C. 550, 18 U.S.C.A. 550.
[ Footnote 3 ] 'If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such parties do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be fined not more than $10,000, or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.' 18 U.S.C. 88, 18 U.S.C.A. 88.
[ Footnote 4 ] In the substantially identical situation presented in the Sall case as to the indictment and the proof, the Government argued that the conviction on the substantive counts should stand because the proof that the accused had entered the conspiracy amounted to proof that he had 'aided and abetted' the commission of the substantive crimes within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. 550, 18 U.S.C.A. 550. The court rejected the idea, apparently now accepted here, that 'aiding and abetting' and 'conspiring' are, and are intended by Congress to be the same thing, differing only in the form of the descriptive words. But if that is the only difference, then conviction for both 'offenses' on account of the same act is clearly double punishment.
[ Footnote 5 ] The situation is essentially the same as when crimes are defined with such minute distinction as to make them different only in the most technical sense. See District of Columbia v. Buckley, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 301, 128 F.2d 17, concurring opinion at page 21; cf. Ex parte Nielsen, 131 U.S. 176 , 9 S.Ct. 672; Ex parte Snow, 120 U.S. 274 , 7 S.Ct. 556.

lowercased:
see 67 s.ct. 26. [328 u.s. 640, 641] mr. john s. tucker, jr., of birmingham, ala., for petitioners.
walter and daniel pinkerton are brothers who live a short distance from each other on daniel's farm. they were indicted for violations of the internal revenue code. the indictment contained ten substantive counts and one conspiracy count. the jury found walter guilty on nine of the substantive counts and on the conspiracy count. it found daniel guilty on six of the substantive counts and on the conspiracy count. walter was fined $500 and sentenced generally on the substantive counts to imprisonment for thirty months. on the conspiracy count he was given a two year sentence to run concurrently with the other sentence. daniel was fined $1,000 and sentenced generally on the substantive counts to imprisonment for thirty months. on the conspiracy count he was fined $500 and given a two year sentence to run concurrently with the other sentence. the judgments of conviction were affirmed by the circuit court of appeals. 1 151 f.2d [328 u.s. 640, 642] 499. the case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted, 66 s.ct. 702, because one of the questions presented involved a conflict between the decision below and united states v. sall, 116 f.2d 745, decided by the circuit court of appeals for the third circuit.
a single conspiracy was charged and proved. some of the overt acts charged in the conspiracy count were the same acts charged in the substantive counts. each of the substantive offenses found was committed pursuant to the conspiracy. petitioners therefore contend that the substantive counts became merged in the conspiracy count, and that only a single sentence not exceeding the maximum two-year penalty provided by the conspiracy statute (criminal code 37, 18 u.s.c. 88, 18 u.s.c.a. 88) could be imposed. or to state the matter differently, they contend that each of the substantive counts became a separate conspiracy count but since only a single conpsiracy was charged and proved, only single sentence for conspiracy could be imposed. they rely on braverman v. united states, 317 u.s. 49 , 63 s.ct. 99.
in the braverman case the indictment charged no substantive offense. each of the several counts charged a conspiracy to violate a different statute. but only one [328 u.s. 640, 643] conspiracy was proved. we held that a single conspiracy, charged under the general conspiracy statute, however diverse its objects may be, violates but a single statute and no penalty greater than the maximum provided for one conspiracy may be imposed. that case is not apposite here. for the offenses charged and proved were not only a conspiracy but substantive offenses as well.
and see sneed v. united states, 5 cir., 298 f. 911, 912, 913; banghart v. united states, 4 cir., 148 f.2d 521.
moreover, it is not material that overt acts charged in the conspiracy counts were also charged and proved as substantive offenses. as stated in sneed v. united states, supra, 298 f. at page 913, 'if the overt act be the offense which was the object of the conspiracy, and is also punished, there is not a double punishment of it.' the agreement to do an unlawful act is even then distinct from the doing of the act. 4 [328 u.s. 640, 645] it is contended that there was insufficient evidence to implicate daniel in the conspiracy. but we think there was enough evidence for submission of the issue to the jury.
there is, however, no evidence to show that daniel participated directly in the commission of the substantive offenses on which his conviction has been sustained,5 although there was evidence to show that these substantive offenses were in fact committed by walter in furtherance of the unlawful agreement or conspiracy existing between the brothers. the question was submitted to the jury on the theory that each petitioner could be found guilty of the substantive offenses, if it was found at the time those offenses were committed petitioners were parties to an unlawful conspiracy and the substantive offenses charged were in fact committed in furtherance of it. 6 [328 u.s. 640, 646] daniel relies on united states v. sall, supra. that case held that participation in the conspiracy was not itself enough to sustain a conviction for the substantive offense even though it was committed in furtherance of the conspiracy. the court held that, in addition to evidence that the offense was in fact committed in furtherance of the conspiracy, evidence of direct participation in the commission of the substantive offense or other evidence from which participation might fairly be inferred was necessary.
we take a different view. we have here a continuous conspiracy. there is here no evidence of the affirmative action on the part of daniel which is necessary to establish his withdrawal from it. hyde v. united states, 225 u.s. 347, 369 , 32 s.ct. 793, 803, ann.cas.1914a, 614. as stated in that case, 'having joined in an unlawful scheme, having constituted agents for its performance, scheme and agency to be continuous until full fruition be secured, until he does some act to disavow or defeat the purpose he is in no situation to claim the delay of the law. as the offense has not been terminated or accomplished, he is still offending. and we think, consciously offending,-offending as certainly, as we have said, as at the first moment of his confederation, and consciously through every moment of its existence.' id., 225 u.s. at page 369, 32 s.ct. at page 803. and so long as the partnership in crime continues, the partners act for each other in carrying it forward. it is settled that 'an overt act of one partner may be the act of all without [328 u.s. 640, 647] any new agreement specifically directed to that act.' united states v. kissel, 218 u.s. 601, 608 , 31 s.ct. 124, 126. motive or intent may be proved by the acts or declarations of some of the conspirators in furtherance of the common objective. wiborg v. united states, 163 u.s. 632, 657 , 658 s., 16 s.ct. 1127, 1137, 1197. a scheme to use the mails to defraud, which is joined in by more than one person, is a conspiracy. cochran v. united states, 8 cir., 41 f.2d 193, 199, 200. yet all members are responsible, though only one did the mailing. cochran v. united states, supra; mackett v. united states, 7 cir., 90 f.2d 462, 464; baker v. united states, 8 cir., 115 f.2d 533, 540; blue v. united states, 6 cir., 138 f.2d 351, 359. the governing principle is the same when the substantive offense is committed by one of the conspirators in furtherance of the unlawful project. johnson v. united states, 9 cir., 62 f.2d 32, 34. the criminal intent to do the act is established by the formation of the conspiracy. each conspirator instigated the commission of the crime. the unlawful agreement contemplated precisely what was done. it was formed for the purpose. the act done was in execution of the enterprise. the rule which holds responsible one who counsels, procures, or commands another to commit a crime is founded on the same principle. that principle is recognized in the law of conspiracy when the overt act of one partner in crime is attributable to all. an overt act is an essential ingredient of the crime of conspiracy under 37 of the criminal code, 18 u.s.c. 88, 18 u.s.c.a. 88. if that can be supplied by the act of one conspirator, we fail to see why the same or other acts in furtherance of the conspiracy are likewise not attributable to the others for the purpose of holding them responsible for the substantive offense.
a different case would arise if the substantive offense committed by one of the conspirators was not in fact done in furtherance of the conspiracy, did not fall within the [328 u.s. 640, 648] scope of the unlawful project, or was merely a pat of the ramifications of the plan which could not be reasonably foreseen as a necessary or natural consequence of the unlawful agreement. but as we read this record, that is not this case.
the judgment concerning daniel pinkerton should be reversed. in my opinion it is without precedent here and is a dangerous precedent to establish.
daniel and walter, who were brothers living near each other, were charged in several counts with substantive offenses, and then a conspiracy count was added naming those offenses as overt acts. the proof showed that walter alone committed the substantive crimes. there was none to establish that daniel participated in them, aided and abetted walter in committing them, or knew that he had done so. daniel in fact was in the penitentiary, under sentence for other crimes, when some of walter's crimes were done.
there was evidence, however, to show that over several years daniel and walter had confederated to commit similar crimes concerned with unlawful possession, transportation, and dealing in whiskey, in fraud of the federal revenues. on this evidence both were convicted of conspiracy. walter also was convicted on the substantive counts on the proof of his committing the crimes charged. then, on that evidence without more than the proof of daniel's criminal agreement with walter and the latter's overt acts, which were also the substantive offenses charged, the court told the jury they could find daniel guilty of those substantive offenses. they did so. [328 u.s. 640, 649] i think this ruling violates both the letter and the spirit of what congress did when it separately defined the three classes of crime, namely , (1) completed substantive offenses;1 (2) aiding, abetting or counseling another to commit them;2 and (3) conspiracy to commit them. 3 not only does this ignore the distinctions congress has prescribed shall be observed. it either convicts one man for another's crime or punishes the man convicted twice for the same offense.
the three types of offense are not identical. bollehbach v. united states, 326 u.s. 607, 611 , 66 s.ct. 402, 404; united states v. sall, 3 cir ., 116 f.2d 745. nor are their differences merely verbal. ibid. the gist of conspiracy is the agreement; that of aiding, abetting or counseling is in consciously advising or assisting another to commit particular offenses, and thus becoming a party to them; that of substantice crime, going a step beyond mere aiding, abetting, counseling to completion of the offense.
these general differences are well understood. but when conspiracy has ripened into completed crime, or has advanced to the stage of aiding and abetting, it becomes easy to disregard their differences and loosely to treat one as identical with the other, that is, for every purpose except the most vital one of imposing sentence. and [328 u.s. 640, 650] thus the substance, if not the technical effect, of double jeopardy or multiple punishment may be accomplished. thus also may one be convicted of an offense not charged or proved against him, on evidence showing he o mmitted another.
the old doctrine of merger of conspiracy in the substantive crime has not obtained here. but the dangers for abuse, which in part it sought to avoid, in applying the law of conspiracy have not altogether disappeared. cf. kotteakos v. united states, 66 s.ct. 1239. there is some evidence that they may be increasing. the looseness with which the charge may be proved, the almost unlimited scope of vicarious responsibility for others' acts which follows once agreement is shown, the psychological advantages of such trials for securing convictions by attributing to one proof against another, these and other inducements require that the broad limits of discretion allowed to prosecuting officers in relation to such charges and trials be not expanded into new, wider and more dubious areas of choice. if the matter is not generally of constitutional proportions, it is one for the exercise of this court's supervisory power over the modes of conducting federal criminal prosecutions within the rule of mcnabb v. united states, 318 u.s. 332 , 63 s.ct. 608.
i think that power should be exercised in this case with respect to daniel's conviction. if it does not violate the letter of constitutional right, it fractures the spirit. united states v. sall, supra. i think the ruling in that case was right, and for the reasons stated. 4 it should be [328 u.s. 640, 651] followed here. daniel has been held guilty of the substantive crimes committed only by walter on proof that he did no more than conspire with him to commit offenses of the same general character. there was no evidence that he counseled, advised or had knowledge of those particular acts or offenses. there was, therefore, none that he aided, abetted or took part in them. there was only evidence sufficient to show that he had agreed with walter at some past time to engage in such transactions generally. as to daniel this was only evidence of conspiracy, not of substantive crime.
the court's theory seems to be that daniel and walter became general partners in crime by virtue of their agreement and because of that agreement without more on his part daniel became criminally responsible as a principal for everything walter did thereafter in the nature of a criminal offense of the general sort the agreement contemplated, so long as there was not clear evidence that daniel had withdrawn from or revoked the agreement. whether or not his commitment to the penitentiary had that effect, the result is a vicarious criminal responsibility as broad as, or broader than, the vicarious civil liability of a partner for acts done by a co-partner in the course of the firm's business.
such analogies from private commercial law and the law of torts are dangerous, in my judgment, for transfer to the criminal field. see sen.rep. no.163, 72d cong., 1st sess., 20. guilt there with us remains personal, not vicarious, for the more serious offenses. it should be kept so. the effect of daniel's conviction in this case, to [328 u.s. 640, 652] repeat, is either to attribute to him walter's guilt or to punish him twice for the same offense, namely, agreeing with walter to engage in crime. without the agreement daniel was guilty of no crime on this record. with it and no more, so far as his own conduct is concerned,h e was guilty of two.
in another aspect of the case, this effect is thrown into even clearer light. the indictment here was filed after a prior one for conspiracy alone had been dismissed. this in turn came after petitioners had been convicted and had been successful in securing reversal on appeal for errors in the charge. pinkerton v. united states, 5 cir., 145 f.2d 252. following this reversal they were reindicted and tried in the present case. the government now says, as to the plea of double jeopardy on this account ( which the trial court overruled on demurrer), that the two indictments were for different conspiracies since the first one charged a different period of time as covered by the conspiracy; charged 16 as compared with 19 overt acts in the second; and an additional object was added in the latter, that is, intent to violate another section of the revenue act. in other words, there were two different conspiracies by virtue of these minute differences in the detail of the allegations. hence, there was no double jeopardy by the second indictment.
but later, in support of the conviction here, relative to the bearing of the various statutes of limitations upon proof of the acts, charged also as substantive offenses, the government points out that the earlier indictment was framed on the assumption that a three-year statute of limitations applied to the conspiracy as first charged; and the convictions were reversed for failure of the trial court to instruct the jury on that basis. then the district attorney discovered the decision in braverman v. united states, 317 u.s. 49, 54 , 55 s., 63 s.ct. 99, 102, and decided to revamp the [328 u.s. 640, 653] indictment to include details making the six-year period applicable. he did so, and added the substantive counts because, so it is said, in the view that a six-year period applied he felt there were enough substantive offenses within that time which he could successfully prove to justify including them.
it would seem, from this history, that to sustain this conviction as against the plea of former jeopardy by virtue of the earlier indictment and what followed, the government stands, and must stand, upon the idea that two separate and distinct conspiracies were charged, one by the first and one by the later indictment. see united states v. oppenheimer, 242 u.s. 85, 87 , 88 s., 37 s.ct. 68, 69, 3 l.r.a. 516. but to sustain daniel's conviction for the substantive offenses, via the conspiracy route, there was only a single continuing conspiracy extending over the longer period, in the course of which walter committed crimes, which were also overt acts, some of them running back of the period charged in the former indictment, others being the same but later acts which it had charged as overt acts against both.
for these now daniel is held responsible, not merely as a conspirator, as the prior indictment charged, but as both a conspirator and a substantive offender.
what this lacks by way of being put twice in jeopardy for the same offense, i am unable to understand. for not only has daniel been convicted for conspiracy for the same overt acts, and illegal ends, as the first indictment charged. he has had those acts converted into substantive offenses. i do not think the prosecutor's technical, and it would seem insubstantial, variations in the details of the indictment should be permitted to achieve so much. 5 [328 u.s. 640, 654] this, of course, should not relieve walter of the conviction for the substantive offenses. but his sentence for conspiracy should be annulled. so also should daniel's sentence on all counts.
mr. justicef rankfurter, reserving judgment on the question of double jeopardy, agrees in substance with the views expressed in this dissent.
the same rule obtains in the case of concurrent sentences. hirabayashi v. united states, 320 u.s. 81, 85 , 63 s.ct. 1375, 1378, and cases cited.
[ footnote 2 ] see may's law of crimes (4th ed. 1938) 126; 17 corn.l.q. (1931) 136; people v. tavormina, 257 n.y. 84, 89, 90, 177 n.e. 317, 318, 75 a.l.r. 1405.
[ footnote 3 ] the cases are collected in 37 a.l.r. 778, 75 a.l.r. 1411.
'we note the prevalent use of conspiracy indictments for converting a joint misdemeanor into a felony; and we express our conviction that both for this purpose and for the purpose-or at least with the effect-of bringing in much improper evidence, the conspiracy statute is being much abused.
'although in a particular case there may be no preconcert of plan, excepting that necessarily inherent in mere joint action, it is difficult to exclude that situation from the established definitions of conspiracy; yet the theory which permits us to call the aborted plan a greater offense than the completed crime supposes a serious and substantially continued group scheme for cooperative law breaking. we observe so many conspiracy prosecutions which do not have this substantial base that we fear the creation of a general impression, very harmful to law enforcement, that this method of prosecution is used arbitrarily and harshly. further the rules of evidence in conspiracy cases make them most difficult to try without prejudice to an innocent defendant.' annual report of the attorney general for 1925, pp. 5-6.
but we do not find that practice reflected in this present case.
[ footnote 5 ] this question does not arise as to walter. he was the direct actor in some of the substantive offenses on which his conviction rests. so the general sentence and fine are supportable under any one of those. see note 1, supra.
[ footnote 6 ] the trial court charged: '... after you gentlemen have considered all the evidence in this case, if you are satisfied from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that at the time these particular substantive offenses were committed, that is, the offenses charged in the first ten counts of this indictment if you are satisfied from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the two defendants were in an unlawful conspiracy, as i have heretofore defined unlawful conspiracy to you, then you would have a right, if you found that to be true to your satisfaction beyond a reasonable doubt, to convict each of these defendants on all these substantive counts, provided the acts referred to in the substantive counts were acts in furtherance therance of the unlawful conspiracy or object of the unlawful conspiracy, which you have found from the evidence existed'. daniel was not indicted as an aider or abettor (see criminal code, 332, 18 u.s.c. 550, 18 u.s.c.a. 550), nor was his case submitted to the jury on that theory.
[ footnote 1 ] these of course commrehend the vast variety of offenses prescribed by federal law, conspiracies for accomplishing which may be charged under the catchall conspiracy statute, note 3.
[ footnote 2 ] 'whoever directly commits any act constituting an offense defined in any law of the united states, or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces, or procures its commission, is a principal.' 18 u.s.c. 550, 18 u.s.c.a. 550.
[ footnote 3 ] 'if two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the united states, or to defraud the united states in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such parties do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be fined not more than $10,000, or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.' 18 u.s.c. 88, 18 u.s.c.a. 88.
[ footnote 4 ] in the substantially identical situation presented in the sall case as to the indictment and the proof, the government argued that the conviction on the substantive counts should stand because the proof that the accused had entered the conspiracy amounted to proof that he had 'aided and abetted' the commission of the substantive crimes within the meaning of 18 u.s.c. 550, 18 u.s.c.a. 550. the court rejected the idea, apparently now accepted here, that 'aiding and abetting' and 'conspiring' are, and are intended by congress to be the same thing, differing only in the form of the descriptive words. but if that is the only difference, then conviction for both 'offenses' on account of the same act is clearly double punishment.
[ footnote 5 ] the situation is essentially the same as when crimes are defined with such minute distinction as to make them different only in the most technical sense. see district of columbia v. buckley, 75 u.s.app.d.c. 301, 128 f.2d 17, concurring opinion at page 21; cf. ex parte nielsen, 131 u.s. 176 , 9 s.ct. 672; ex parte snow, 120 u.s. 274 , 7 s.ct. 556.


text:
"The Angel of the Revolution" tells the tale of a group of self-styled 'terrorists' who conquer the world through airship warfare. Led by a crippled, brilliant Russian Jew and his daughter, the 'angel' Natasha, 'The Brotherhood of Freedom' establishes a 'pax aeronautica' over the earth after a young inventor masters the technology of flight in 1903. The hero falls in love with Natasha and joins in her war against established society in general and the Russian Czar in particular.
"The Syren of the Skies" continues the tale of 'The Brotherhood of Freedom,' a worldwide brotherhood of anarchists fighting the world armed with fantastical airships. They must be quick in accomplishing their goals, as a dangerous comet is heading for the Earth.
George Griffith (1857?1906) was a prolific British science fiction writer and noted explorer who wrote during the late Victorian and Edwardian age. Griffith was extremely popular in the United Kingdom, in part due to his utopian socialist views. Being a journalist, rather than scientist, what his stories lack in scientific rigor and literary grace they make up for in sheer exuberance of execution.

lowercased:
"the angel of the revolution" tells the tale of a group of self-styled 'terrorists' who conquer the world through airship warfare. led by a crippled, brilliant russian jew and his daughter, the 'angel' natasha, 'the brotherhood of freedom' establishes a 'pax aeronautica' over the earth after a young inventor masters the technology of flight in 1903. the hero falls in love with natasha and joins in her war against established society in general and the russian czar in particular.
"the syren of the skies" continues the tale of 'the brotherhood of freedom,' a worldwide brotherhood of anarchists fighting the world armed with fantastical airships. they must be quick in accomplishing their goals, as a dangerous comet is heading for the earth.
george griffith (1857?1906) was a prolific british science fiction writer and noted explorer who wrote during the late victorian and edwardian age. griffith was extremely popular in the united kingdom, in part due to his utopian socialist views. being a journalist, rather than scientist, what his stories lack in scientific rigor and literary grace they make up for in sheer exuberance of execution.


text:
Ceili was fun again last night even though our musicians were dead from Valhalla so we lacked live music for the first time. We did just fine with the canned stuff, with a little technical issues with the sound being very muddy from the stereo last night. This was odd. But it mostly worked out.
Basically though in the past couple of weeks I've come to one big happy conclusion that was only slightly clouded last night: Everyone is happier. The one exception is Patrick, and I feel bad for him, but he dropped by last night and I was just thrilled to see him. He's not having so much fun at the Plough, but he's hanging in there. He's been there far longer than me, so that's saying a lot. I don't know how things are all going to work out in the long run, but for now, we've got about 40 people regularly attending in Alameda. It's a great crowd. And meanwhile, John and Gretchen are getting to remake Mondays at the Plough in their vision, so they're happier too. I think there's room for both of us in this world. I just wish it all could've been handled better. But there we were last night, flying through the demo for Google on Thursday, and practicing Anne's wedding dance, waltzing and redowa'ing and I taught the beginners the whole 4 hand reel in 1 hour and though they were a little overwhelmed, I figure that's okay. They'll be back again and they did fine in the open dancing. They've got the basic figures, and Terry always said that was more important to getting dancing than to fuss over footwork, and I firmly believe that. Your footwork can be beautiful and you can still be in totally the wrong place. If you're making it through the figures, your footwork probably isn't hurting anyone else (save for the round the house which is the one thing I spent quality time on). Anyway, it was a lovely night, full of dancing, friends, new faces, and goodness. I like how things have turned out.
Last night went ok. I was a little ticked that people didn't seem to be listening too well to announcement and teachers compared to earlier nights. Someone ignored the big clearly written sign that said "don't open this window" and that caused me to have a minor rage, but those items can be improved upon. As a general whole, this is quite a good event.

lowercased:
ceili was fun again last night even though our musicians were dead from valhalla so we lacked live music for the first time. we did just fine with the canned stuff, with a little technical issues with the sound being very muddy from the stereo last night. this was odd. but it mostly worked out.
basically though in the past couple of weeks i've come to one big happy conclusion that was only slightly clouded last night: everyone is happier. the one exception is patrick, and i feel bad for him, but he dropped by last night and i was just thrilled to see him. he's not having so much fun at the plough, but he's hanging in there. he's been there far longer than me, so that's saying a lot. i don't know how things are all going to work out in the long run, but for now, we've got about 40 people regularly attending in alameda. it's a great crowd. and meanwhile, john and gretchen are getting to remake mondays at the plough in their vision, so they're happier too. i think there's room for both of us in this world. i just wish it all could've been handled better. but there we were last night, flying through the demo for google on thursday, and practicing anne's wedding dance, waltzing and redowa'ing and i taught the beginners the whole 4 hand reel in 1 hour and though they were a little overwhelmed, i figure that's okay. they'll be back again and they did fine in the open dancing. they've got the basic figures, and terry always said that was more important to getting dancing than to fuss over footwork, and i firmly believe that. your footwork can be beautiful and you can still be in totally the wrong place. if you're making it through the figures, your footwork probably isn't hurting anyone else (save for the round the house which is the one thing i spent quality time on). anyway, it was a lovely night, full of dancing, friends, new faces, and goodness. i like how things have turned out.
last night went ok. i was a little ticked that people didn't seem to be listening too well to announcement and teachers compared to earlier nights. someone ignored the big clearly written sign that said "don't open this window" and that caused me to have a minor rage, but those items can be improved upon. as a general whole, this is quite a good event.


text: Welcome to Valley Kids — from infancy through fifth grade. Our teachers and volunteers provide loving, secure childcare and age-appropriate Biblical teaching. We also encourage and equip parents as the primary nurturers of their child’s faith. Director Erin Tubo is happy to answer your questions. Click here for more information.

lowercased: welcome to valley kids — from infancy through fifth grade. our teachers and volunteers provide loving, secure childcare and age-appropriate biblical teaching. we also encourage and equip parents as the primary nurturers of their child’s faith. director erin tubo is happy to answer your questions. click here for more information.


text:
Adjustable arms make the holder compatible with all size cell phones, with or without Cases. Such as Google Pixel xl(Warm tips: As for google pixel, the bracket will slightly press on the volume down button, google pixel xl won’t exist this problem), iPhone 7/ 7s/ 6s/ 6 plus/ 6s plus/ 6 / 5/ 5s ,Samsung S7/ S7 edge/ Note 5/ 4, LG G5/ G4, HTC One A9/ HTC 10 and more.
Angled bottom and two adjusting arms allow your phone stay on the mount sturdy while driving. Silicone on the pad, arms and bottom prevent your phone from scratching.
With a width enough separation allows you to charge your phone while while you’re using GPS, calling, listening to music or operate any of it’s features while driving.
Super Secure: Angled bottom and two adjusting arms prevent your phone from moving up and down. Adjustment screw to lock the mount into CD slot firmly. This car mount specially is designed to hold phones securely into the CD slot for drivers who rarely use CD player, if you want to use the phone holder as well as play CD, air vent car mount or suction cup car mount is a good alternative, you can have a try.
One Hand Operation: With quick release button the phone can be easily inserted and quick released. With just a touch of a button, the arms expand out to their full width. Simply set your phone in the holder and squeeze the arms until it holds your phone in place.
Universal Compatibility: Adjustable silicone padded holder with great expansion capabilities fits devices from 2 inch to 3.7 inch wide, such as GPS,Google Pixel XL (Warm tips: As for google pixel, the bracket will slightly press on the volume down button,google pixel xl won’t exist this problem), iPhone, Samsung, LG, HTC and more. 5.5inch cell phone is too weight and too large to keep firmly.
360°Rotation: With 360°rotation swivel ball allows you to get the perfect viewing angle without interfere the air flow direction.
What You Get: CHOETECH CD Slot Mount (bracket, CD slot blade and adjuster), 18 months warranty and friendly, easy-to-reach customer service. If the speaker hole is on the bottom of the phone, for high quality communication, please use bluetooth earphone rather than communicate directly through speaker.
Great vent mount. Perfection! Fantastic all around. Choetech has been putting out really great quality products lately and this is no exception. I was worried the part that gripped the vent wouldn’t be very secure, but it seems fine. It is made of a firm, but smooth soft rubber so there is no concern of it scratching or damaging your vents.
Tried four other CD Mounts for Cell Phones and this is by far the best!!! I’ve gone through four other CD holder Cell Phone Mounts and they’ve all been crap. They don’t fit perfectly in the CD slot so there is jiggle or they fall out. They don’t have good clearance and cover my stereo. The clamping mechanisms to hold the phone are cheap and break over time. Or they don’t hold my phone right so I’m constantly clamping my phone in and out every time I get in and out of my car.

lowercased:
adjustable arms make the holder compatible with all size cell phones, with or without cases. such as google pixel xl(warm tips: as for google pixel, the bracket will slightly press on the volume down button, google pixel xl won’t exist this problem), iphone 7/ 7s/ 6s/ 6 plus/ 6s plus/ 6 / 5/ 5s ,samsung s7/ s7 edge/ note 5/ 4, lg g5/ g4, htc one a9/ htc 10 and more.
angled bottom and two adjusting arms allow your phone stay on the mount sturdy while driving. silicone on the pad, arms and bottom prevent your phone from scratching.
with a width enough separation allows you to charge your phone while while you’re using gps, calling, listening to music or operate any of it’s features while driving.
super secure: angled bottom and two adjusting arms prevent your phone from moving up and down. adjustment screw to lock the mount into cd slot firmly. this car mount specially is designed to hold phones securely into the cd slot for drivers who rarely use cd player, if you want to use the phone holder as well as play cd, air vent car mount or suction cup car mount is a good alternative, you can have a try.
one hand operation: with quick release button the phone can be easily inserted and quick released. with just a touch of a button, the arms expand out to their full width. simply set your phone in the holder and squeeze the arms until it holds your phone in place.
universal compatibility: adjustable silicone padded holder with great expansion capabilities fits devices from 2 inch to 3.7 inch wide, such as gps,google pixel xl (warm tips: as for google pixel, the bracket will slightly press on the volume down button,google pixel xl won’t exist this problem), iphone, samsung, lg, htc and more. 5.5inch cell phone is too weight and too large to keep firmly.
360°rotation: with 360°rotation swivel ball allows you to get the perfect viewing angle without interfere the air flow direction.
what you get: choetech cd slot mount (bracket, cd slot blade and adjuster), 18 months warranty and friendly, easy-to-reach customer service. if the speaker hole is on the bottom of the phone, for high quality communication, please use bluetooth earphone rather than communicate directly through speaker.
great vent mount. perfection! fantastic all around. choetech has been putting out really great quality products lately and this is no exception. i was worried the part that gripped the vent wouldn’t be very secure, but it seems fine. it is made of a firm, but smooth soft rubber so there is no concern of it scratching or damaging your vents.
tried four other cd mounts for cell phones and this is by far the best!!! i’ve gone through four other cd holder cell phone mounts and they’ve all been crap. they don’t fit perfectly in the cd slot so there is jiggle or they fall out. they don’t have good clearance and cover my stereo. the clamping mechanisms to hold the phone are cheap and break over time. or they don’t hold my phone right so i’m constantly clamping my phone in and out every time i get in and out of my car.


text:
Cheesecake and brownies together?! Sold. Cheesecake is one of my favorite desserts. There is so many different ways of making it. And putting it on top of a brownie is as amazing as it sounds. Even if you’re not a seasoned baker, you can make these! You can make the brownies from scratch but to save time I would suggest using the boxed brownie mix! It’s almost Halloween so adding the cherries gives this a bloody look. You can pass this off as a perfect Halloween dessert!
(2) 8 oz packages of Cream Cheese.
Line a 9×13 baking dish with foil and spray lightly with cooking spray.
In a medium bowl make brownie mix according to box directions.
In a separate bowl beat together cream cheese and sugar and well combined and smooth.
Add egg and vanilla into cream cheese mixture and blend until smooth again.
Spread brownie mix into the bottom of the 9×13 baking dish. Spread cheesecake mixture on top. And then Lastly, add spread cherry pie filling over the top of the cheesecake.
Bake 45-55 minutes. Cool completely before serving.
Click the “Follow” button in the lower right hand corner of this page to receive updates on our posts!
Follow us on Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest and Like us on Facebook.
We just started our Pinterest! Follow us and pin our recipes!

lowercased:
cheesecake and brownies together?! sold. cheesecake is one of my favorite desserts. there is so many different ways of making it. and putting it on top of a brownie is as amazing as it sounds. even if you’re not a seasoned baker, you can make these! you can make the brownies from scratch but to save time i would suggest using the boxed brownie mix! it’s almost halloween so adding the cherries gives this a bloody look. you can pass this off as a perfect halloween dessert!
(2) 8 oz packages of cream cheese.
line a 9×13 baking dish with foil and spray lightly with cooking spray.
in a medium bowl make brownie mix according to box directions.
in a separate bowl beat together cream cheese and sugar and well combined and smooth.
add egg and vanilla into cream cheese mixture and blend until smooth again.
spread brownie mix into the bottom of the 9×13 baking dish. spread cheesecake mixture on top. and then lastly, add spread cherry pie filling over the top of the cheesecake.
bake 45-55 minutes. cool completely before serving.
click the “follow” button in the lower right hand corner of this page to receive updates on our posts!
follow us on twitter, instagram, pinterest and like us on facebook.
we just started our pinterest! follow us and pin our recipes!


text:
In the exhibition, Havana served as the hub for the theme of «Navigating Personal and Civic Space.» Other artists in this section included the Peruvian Lucia Cuba, left, speaking about her work, seen in the foreground, which addresses issues of gender and political power.
New Territories: Laboratories for Design, Craft and Art in Latin America runs through April 6 at the Museum of Arts and Design in Manhattan. Below, Ernesto Oroza’s 2006 video Architecture — Axonometrics and a perspective.

lowercased:
in the exhibition, havana served as the hub for the theme of «navigating personal and civic space.» other artists in this section included the peruvian lucia cuba, left, speaking about her work, seen in the foreground, which addresses issues of gender and political power.
new territories: laboratories for design, craft and art in latin america runs through april 6 at the museum of arts and design in manhattan. below, ernesto oroza’s 2006 video architecture — axonometrics and a perspective.


text: Chad "Buddy" came to me from an abused home, and was being treated for heartworm. The minute I laid eyes on him I fell completely in love with him and knew he was ment to be with me. He quickly became the most loved, cared for, spoiled dog ever. In my eyes (and his of course) he was the most amazing dog in the world. He filled my life with so much happiness. Then one day, with no warning, he became sick and was diagnosed with cancer. I was devistated. I lost him 8 days later. I miss him so much. We gave each other the best 5 years of our lives. I just want to thank airedale rescue for giving me the most preciouse gift anyone could ever receive. Thank you.

lowercased: chad "buddy" came to me from an abused home, and was being treated for heartworm. the minute i laid eyes on him i fell completely in love with him and knew he was ment to be with me. he quickly became the most loved, cared for, spoiled dog ever. in my eyes (and his of course) he was the most amazing dog in the world. he filled my life with so much happiness. then one day, with no warning, he became sick and was diagnosed with cancer. i was devistated. i lost him 8 days later. i miss him so much. we gave each other the best 5 years of our lives. i just want to thank airedale rescue for giving me the most preciouse gift anyone could ever receive. thank you.