Austin Lai,Kelly Owens,Surya Patel,Matilda Nicholas
The Impact of Air Pollution on Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic dermatitis,Air pollution,Particulate matter,Eczema
Purpose of Review Atopic dermatitis (AD) remains a dermatological disease that imposes a significant burden on society. Air pollution has previously been linked to both the onset and severity of atopic dermatitis. As air pollution remains a critical environmental factor impacting human health, this review seeks to provide an overview of the relationship between different air pollutants and AD. Recent Findings AD can develop from multiple causes that can be broadly grouped into epidermal barrier dysfunction and immune dysregulation. Air pollution imposes significant health risks and includes a wide variety of pollutant types. AD has been linked to outdoor air pollutants such as particulate matter (PM), volatile organic compounds (VOC), gaseous compounds, and heavy metals. Exposure to indoor pollutants such as tobacco smoke and fungal molds has also been associated with an increased incidence of AD. While different pollutants impact distinct molecular pathways in the cell, they mostly converge on ROS product, DNA damage, and dysregulated T-cell activity and cytokine production. Summary The presented review suggests a strengthening tie between air pollution and AD. It points to opportunities for further studies to clarify, as well as potential therapeutic opportunities that leverage the mechanistic relationships between air pollution and AD.
The Impact of Air Pollution on Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) remains a dermatological disease that imposes a significant burden on society. Air pollution has previously been linked to both the onset and severity of atopic dermatitis. As air pollution remains a critical environmental factor impacting human health, this review seeks to provide an overview of the relationship between different air pollutants and AD.

AD can develop from multiple causes that can be broadly grouped into epidermal barrier dysfunction and immune dysregulation. Air pollution imposes significant health risks and includes a wide variety of pollutant types. AD has been linked to outdoor air pollutants such as particulate matter (PM), volatile organic compounds (VOC), gaseous compounds, and heavy metals. Exposure to indoor pollutants such as tobacco smoke and fungal molds has also been associated with an increased incidence of AD. While different pollutants impact distinct molecular pathways in the cell, they mostly converge on ROS product, DNA damage, and dysregulated T-cell activity and cytokine production.

The presented review suggests a strengthening tie between air pollution and AD. It points to opportunities for further studies to clarify, as well as potential therapeutic opportunities that leverage the mechanistic relationships between air pollution and AD.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease and the leading non-fatal health burden attributable to skin diseases, affecting approximately 31.6 million people in the USA [1, 2]. AD is characterized by pruritus and eczematous lesions that manifest in specific patterns across the body [3]. In addition to the primary symptoms, AD can contribute to a multitude of other health effects such as secondary infection [4], failure to thrive [5], sleep deprivation [6, 7], and impaired psychosocial well-being [8]. Numerous etiologies of atopic dermatitis have been proposed, including epidermal barrier dysfunction, dysregulation of the immune system, and alterations of the microbiome [9]. These mechanisms of AD pathogenesis have led to the description of two major subtypes of AD: extrinsic and intrinsic. The extrinsic form of the disease, historically described by the “outside-in hypothesis,” is driven by the loss of epidermal barrier integrity (Fig. 1). The intrinsic form, also known as the “inside-out hypothesis,” is driven by the dysregulated activity of certain immune cell types. While there has been a long-standing discussion on the initial cause of AD, researchers have begun to explore other elements that may modify the severity of AD. Over the last two decades, numerous studies have covered the relationship between environmental factors, allergies, and AD. This area of work has not only produced insights into the effect of air pollution on AD but also highlighted crucial questions that remain unanswered. An improved understanding of this relationship may advance public policy and therapeutic development for AD and overall health. This review will discuss our evolving understanding of the connection between air pollution exposure and atopic dermatitis. We begin with our current understanding of the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Next, we discuss the body of work on the association and relationship between different pollutants and AD. Finally, we discuss our current mechanistic insights into the role of pollutants and AD. With the framework of molecular mechanisms, we discuss the inside-out and outside-in hypotheses and how they guide future directions in this area of work.

AD has traditionally been considered to affect mainly children; however, it also affects adults. Smaller epidemiological studies suggest an AD prevalence of about 7% in adults [10], with some studies showing as high as 17% in the elderly [11] and evidence that this may be increasing over time [12]. The overall prevalence of AD in children in the USA is estimated to be around 16% [13–16]. Global studies mirror that of the USA, with approximately 5–20% of children suffering from AD worldwide [17]. Higher rates of sensitization to allergens, including aeroallergens, are seen in children over the age of 5 [18, 19], with the rate further elevated in the AD patient population [20]. While sensitization to allergens and frequency of AD are associated with high socioeconomic status, a lower socioeconomic status is associated with more severe disease [21]. There has been evidence suggesting that air pollution may be linked to increasing incidence seen in the elderly [22].

Multiple mechanisms have been implicated in the development of atopic dermatitis. These mechanisms are delineated into two conceptual categories: those that involve internal dysregulation, the inside-out hypothesis, and those that involve increased external insults, the outside-in hypothesis. The outside-in hypothesis postulates that AD is triggered by epidermal barrier dysfunction and skin inflammation due to environmental insults. Alternatively, the inside-out hypothesis focuses on how immune dysregulation and cascading pathways result in AD. The core of the inside-out hypothesis is that AD is initiated by immune dysregulation and inflammation. Tissue damage and microorganisms in the skin can activate innate immune receptors on keratinocytes and antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Activation of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), such as the toll-like receptors (TLRs), can lead to the release of various factors. These include alarmins such as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs); cytokines IL-1A, TSLP, and IL-33; proteases such as kallikreins and cathepsins; and ECM proteins, including periostin [23]. Alarmin-mediated activation of inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells and type-2 immune cells such as Th2 cells drive a local inflammatory response. Activated Th2 cells secrete IL-4 and IL-13 and promote inflammation while also triggering the production of IgE by B cells [24]. Finally, the Th2 cytokines can suppress the expression of terminal keratinocyte differentiation genes (e.g., FLG, loricrin, involucrin), thus promoting epidermal hyperplasia [25]. The immune system also plays a role in mediating chronic itch, one of the cardinal symptoms of AD. The sensation of pruritus is mediated by signal transmission along the peripheral C-nerve fibers, which originate from the pruriceptive sensory neuronal cell bodies in the dorsal root ganglia [26]. These nerve fibers can be activated by endogenous and exogenous pruritogens, which include histamine, cytokines, and proteases. AD skin is characterized by alloknesis, in which hyperinnervation of the skin with C-nerve fibers generates pruritus from even mild mechanical stimulation [27]. Studies utilizing mouse models have identified IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31 receptors on sensory neurons innervating the skin. Interaction of IL-4 with their pruritogenic sensory nerve endings appears to sensitize the neuron to other pruritogens, rather than directly triggering itch [28, 29]. The outside-in hypothesis proposes that AD is initiated by epidermal barrier dysfunction. Filaggrin is critical to the integrity of the stratum corneum, as it is processed from its profilaggrin form to hygroscopic amino acids and their respective derivatives that combine with ions and organic compounds to maintain water retention and hydration in the stratum corneum [30, 31]. Pathologic deficiency of filaggrin results in epidermal barrier dysfunction and disrupts keratinocyte differentiation. A subset of inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-13, IL17A, and others) have been shown to suppress filaggrin expression in the skin, resulting in filaggrin deficiency, thus compromising the integrity of the epidermal barrier [32]. This suggests a point of convergence between the inside-out and outside-in hypotheses, as immune function influences epidermal barrier integrity. In addition to filaggrin, imbalances between proteases and antiproteases that function locally in the stratum corneum can also result in the breakdown of the skin barrier. Within the stratum granulosum, genetic loss of tight junction proteins such as those in the claudin family may lead to impairment of the skin barrier and contribute to AD. Genetic association studies uncovering loci associated with atopic dermatitis have provided valuable insight into the risk factors for AD, as well as the relative contributions of the different pathogenic mechanisms [33–35]. Across numerous studies, loss-of-function mutations in FLG, encoding profilaggrin, are the strongest genetic risk factor for AD [33, 36, 37]. In addition, GWAS studies have found cytokines clusters, EMSY, the membrane protein, LRRC32, and more recently, candidate genes involved in innate host defense and T-cell function [34]. These add support to the role of autoimmune dysregulation in AD. AD can also be caused by alteration of the cutaneous microbiome [9]. AD patients have reduced microbiome diversity in the skin [9]. Additionally, the dermal microbiome of AD patients is characterized by the overgrowth of Staphylococcus aureus in the lesional skin, and to a smaller degree, in non-lesional skin [38]. Of note, microbiome diversity is restored after treatment [39]. Various types of secreted bacterial proteins can contribute to pathogenesis. Factors secreted by Staphylococcus include enterotoxin serotypes (SEA, SEB SED, SEE, SEG) that can bind to major histocompatibility complex class II on APCs and T cell receptors on T cells, increasing cytokine production. Superantigens from S. aureus can also increase IgE response and trigger mast cell degranulation [40].

Air pollutants are ubiquitous and can be categorized into outdoor and indoor pollutants. Outdoor pollutants can have both natural and man-made origins. Natural sources of pollution include wildfires, volcanoes, biological decay, and dust storms [41]. The urbanization of society has drastically emphasized the importance of man-made origins, which include motor vehicles, biomass burning, power plants, manufacturing facilities, water incinerators, and others. Humans encounter air pollutants primarily via inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact. Exposure of pollutants to the skin can result in immune reactivity that drives allergic responses and may contribute to the pathogenesis and/or severity of AD. Air pollutants can refer to a variety of materials, including particulate matter (PM), volatile organic compounds (VOC), traffic-related air pollution (TRAP), tobacco smoke, gaseous compounds, and heavy metals (Fig. 2). Different types of pollutants have been shown to have different levels of association with skin disorders such as atopic dermatitis. Among the air pollutants, particulate matter (PM) is the most detrimental to overall human health, particularly inflammatory lung and cardiovascular diseases [42]. PM is a mixture of particles with a heterogenous chemical composition [41] and can be found in both outdoor and indoor environments, depending on the ventilation of the building [41]. Fine particles (PM2.5) and coarse particles (PM10), referring to particles smaller than 2.5 and 10 µm in diameter, respectively, are most studied in the context of their effects on allergic reactions of the skin and atopic dermatitis. Recent studies have shown a significant positive association between AD and long-term average concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10. A study in South Korea observed an association between increasing levels of PM2.5, PM10, SO2, and CO with increasing monthly patient visits for AD [43••, 44•]. Exposure during infancy and childhood were more harmful [44•]. Volatile organic compounds within air pollution have been shown to result in immune reactivity, allergy, and increase the likelihood of AD. Formaldehyde is a common industrial pollutant that can affect skin health. One particular study found formaldehyde to induce more trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) in children with AD compared to those without the condition [45]. A shift of skin pH towards neutral pH was also observed. This was the first study that demonstrated the direct link between exposure to chemicals and exacerbation of AD symptoms. Prenatal exposure to tobacco smoke has also been recognized as a significant risk factor for AD. A study of 7030 children aged 6 to 13 years showed a positive correlation between maternal smoking during pregnancy and the development of AD [46]. Specific gaseous compounds have been studied for their roles in different skin conditions. Many of these gaseous compounds are byproducts of combustion, such as in road transport. Key gaseous compounds that have been studied in allergy and AD include sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3). In a study by Park and colleagues, increases in SO2 and CO concentrations were significantly associated with increases in the number of patient visits for AD [43••]. The study found that every 1 parts per billion (ppb) increase in SO2 resulted in a visit increase of 2.26% (95% CI 1.35–3.17; P < 0.001), while every 100 ppb increase in CO resulted in visit increases of 2.86% (95% CI 1.35–4.40; P < 0.001). Furthermore, the increase in the rate of AD correlates with the amount of increase in SO2 and CO levels. However, they found no significant association between O3 and patient visits for AD. NO2 is another toxic gas and common atmospheric pollutant produced by combustion. Common sources of NO2 include fossil fuels, smog, car exhaust, and cigarettes. Studies have reported conflicting observations regarding the role of NO2 in AD. A study in China found that exposure to NO2 had a strong influence on daily outpatient visits of eczema, and an investigation in the Munich metropolitan area observed a modest, positive association between NO2 exposure and doctor-diagnosed eczema, reporting an odds ratio of 1.18 (1.00–1.39) between an increase (per interquartile range) in pollutant and prevalence of eczema diagnosis [47]. Another study in South Korea found no significant association between NO2 and increase in patient visits for AD [43••]. Another single-blind study found that short-term exposure to NO2 through a provocation test resulted in increased trans-epidermal water loss (TWEL) in AD patients [48], suggesting aggravation of AD symptoms. Heavy metals can also be an irritant that drives symptoms of AD. A common test done to evaluate sensitivity to heavy metals is a patch test using nickel, cobalt, and chromium. Those with positive patch-test to these three metal species have increased odds of a history of atopic eczema [49, 50]. Studies utilizing genetically modified mice models suggest that deficiency in suprabasin (SBSN), a secreted protein in the stratum corneum that is often reduced in AD patients, can cause nickel allergy [51, 52]. Taken as a whole, a recent meta-analysis showed significant effects of outdoor air pollution on the development, severity, and symptoms of adult atopic dermatitis [53•]. In addition, indoor pollutants are associated with both development and aggravation of AD symptoms. Indoor pollutants can include tobacco smoke, as well as biological pollutants such as dust mites, animal dander, and mold spores. In addition, pollutants commonly recognized to have outdoor origins, such as VOCs, PM, and combustion pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and NO2 [41], are also present indoors and can influence AD in this setting. Beyond the effects of VOCs, PM, and combustion byproducts on AD mentioned above, tobacco smoke has been associated with AD development. Prenatal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke has been associated with reduced regulatory T-cell activity and increased AD development after birth [41, 54, 55]. A study from South Korea found that prenatal exposure, but not postnatal exposure to mold is associated with AD (Adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.83) [56]. These studies demonstrate the varying effects that indoor pollutants have on AD onset and development.

Studies elucidating the effects of different pollutants relied more on a mixture of clinical studies, animal models, and in vitro studies. Higher levels of PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 result in increased production of ROS, causing higher levels of oxidation in the stratum corneum. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), a significant component of PM, can diffuse through the stratum corneum and bind to aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AhRs) [57]. Activated AhRs translocate to the nucleus and promote transcription of target genes, including CYP1A1, which in turn increases ROS production, DNA damage, and inflammatory cytokines [58]. Increased ROS-mediated damage in the stratum corneum has been associated with AD [59]. An airborne chemical that has been more extensively studied for its mechanistic basis of influencing AD is formaldehyde. While the entirety of the mechanism remain elusive, it has been shown that formaldehyde induces cell death [60], increases Th2 activity and mRNA expression by these cells [61, 62], and increased pro-inflammatory cytokine/IL-4 expression/IL mRNA expression [63]. Heavy metals species have also been shown to influence local immune activity in the skin. Exposure of the skin to nickel, cobalt, chromium, and palladium led to mixed Th1 and Th2-type cytokine response in in vitro models [64, 65]. Additionally, as air pollution and atmospheric humidity influence each other, studies have investigated both the correlation between humidity and levels of different air pollutants, as well as the association of humidity with AD. Levels of PM2.5 and PM10 are negatively associated with humidity. Prolonged periods of humidity have been shown to accelerate trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) in the skin of AD patients, which amplifies barrier defects and increases cytokine signaling [66]. Indoor air pollutants have varying effects on the development of exacerbation of AD. Prenatal exposure to tobacco smoke has been shown to associate with increased AD development, with some insights into the mechanistic basis for its effects. A study from Germany analyzed the expression of different T-reg cell numbers and miRNA in maternal blood and cord blood during pregnancy. They found that maternal tobacco consumption during pregnancy was associated with a higher expression of miR-233 and fewer regulatory T-cells in the maternal and cord blood. Children with lower T-reg numbers are more likely to develop AD during the first 3 years of life. These associative relationships posit a potential model in which prenatal exposure to VOCs in tobacco smoke predisposes to AD by dysregulated T-reg activity, potentially due to altered miRNA levels [54]. Our understanding of the mechanisms underlying mold exposure and AD remains unclear. The study in South Korea reporting the positive association between prenatal exposure to Ascomycota and AD observed that infants with AD who were previously exposed to mold during pregnancy tended to have higher total serum IgE [56]. More work is required to elucidate the mechanism by which mold exposure promotes the development of AD symptoms.

As urbanization continues, it is important to further clarify the relationship between air pollution and atopic dermatitis. Designing studies that establish causal relationships between different air pollutants and AD remains a challenge in the field. The unusual and abrupt environmental changes that the COVID-19 pandemic caused globally in recent years provide a rare opportunity to investigate how these disruptions have impacted AD disease progression and severity across populations. This may provide further insight into the impact of airborne pollution, particularly TRAP in AD. Pollutants and other irritants on the skin activate Th2 cells and downstream upregulation of various cytokines. This cytokine overactivity drives inflammation and IgE production, which contributes to the phenotypes seen in AD. Given the convergence of different environmental factors on cytokine activity, targeting their receptors holds therapeutic potential. Indeed, one of the more promising treatment strategies is dupilumab, a human monoclonal antibody directed at the alpha subunit of IL-4 receptors, which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in early 2017. In the authors’ experience, this medication has been a major advance in managing atopic dermatitis, though unfortunately, it is not universally efficacious. More recently, tralokinumab, an IL-13 inhibitor, has recently received FDA approval and holds the potential to be another excellent option for the safe and effective management of AD. Another treatment strategy is to target multiple immune signaling pathways which signal through JAK-STAT molecules. JAK-STAT signaling pathways have been implicated in AD and many other inflammatory diseases, as they regulate multiple immune pathways in AD, including Th2, CCL1, Th22, Th1, and Th17 [67]. The large diversity of downstream effects is driven by a family of four different receptor-associated kinases (JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2) and five STAT molecules (STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT5A/B, and STAT6). For instance, JAK1, JAK3, and their interactions with STAT3, STAT5, and STAT6 are necessary for the pathogenic IL-4 signaling in AD [68–70], and STAT6 drives IgE class switching [71, 72]. The JAK-STAT signaling pathway is thus a desirable target for its numerous pathogenic roles in AD, leading to the development of multiple small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK-i). Oral (upadacitinib and abrocitinib) and topical (1.5% ruxolitinib) JAK inhibitors were recently approved by the FDA for atopic dermatitis. Both upadacitinib and abrocitinib are oral JAK1 antagonists. As JAK2 is involved in erythropoiesis, myelopoiesis, and platelet activation, selective inhibition of JAK1 over JAK2 and JAK3 may reduce hematologic adverse effects such as anemia and thrombocytopenia. A recent clinical trial found that upadacitinib has higher efficacy compared to dupilumab in moderate-to-severe adult AD patients, with no new safety signals [73]. Similarly, a recent trial found that abrocitinib was well-tolerated and efficacious in adults with moderate-to-severe AD [74]. Safety concerns about tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor approved for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), have led to a black box warning on all JAK-i for possible increased risk of cancer and thrombotic and cardiovascular events [75]. So far, similar studies in upadacitinib in dermatologic disease have not supported these concerns [76]. While more long-term studies are needed to carefully characterize the safety profiles of different JAK-i in the treatment of AD, data for this class of medications appears to be promising.

The last two decades have seen a significant accumulation of studies exploring the effects of pollution on dermatological diseases, including AD. Here, we presented the current understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of AD, the strength of influence of pollutants on the development and progression of AD, and how pollutants fit into or modify the mechanistic understanding of AD pathogenesis. Further studies are needed to more rigorously study the causative role of pollutants such as NO2, while additional efforts in the development of novel therapy should be guided by mechanistic pathways that have been highlighted by the intersection between air pollutants and AD.