Theodore R. Hall,Kathleen Brown
Correction to: Diversity in radiology: the right thing to do, the smart thing to do
Correction to: Diversity in radiology: the right thing to do, the smart thing to do

Correction to: Pediatric Radiology (2022) 52:1711–1718 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05416-5 A corrected version of Table 1 is provided. The following corrections have been made: “Diagnostic Radiology Residents” Men – 3,459 (73.5) “Diagnostic Radiology Residents” Women – 1,244 (26.5) “Diagnostic Radiology Residents” Total Non-duplicated – 4,703 “U.S. Medical Graduates” Total Non-duplicated – 20,390 “Diagnostic Radiology Applicants” Total Non-duplicated – 2,405 Of note, a comparison of this 2020 data with the 2010 data published by Chapman et al. [5] shows that compared to the 2010 demographic data (below) there was no significant change in the number or percentage of men and women in DR and IR residency training programs: Men – 3,271 (72.2) Women – 1,260 (27.8) Total Non-duplicated – 4,531 On page 1714 within the paragraph beginning with “By the 2020 U.S. Census. Women…”, the correct percentage for the women who were diagnostic radiology residents is 26.5% (instead of 35.9%). The point being made about underrepresentation remains valid.