TN mandamus relator decries bid for 30 days more to explain CV-19 disaster
David Tulis writes his certificate of service to be inserted with his filing for review the slow-walking of a petition for writ of mandamus with the supreme court of Tennessee Nov. 2, 2020. (Photo Carl Dure)

State of Tennessee on relation objects to favor being shown respondent Barnes by a grant of time beyond the 30-day service delivery time recognized in TRCP 6.01. Such an extension would be prejudicial and bring unmerited, substantive harm to the process and right of mandamus and to state of Tennessee in the equity and due process rights in her claims.

By David Tulis / NoogaRadio 92.7 FM

[The following is the objection to the pleadings of Becky Barnes, Hamilton County health administrator, for an additional month in which to plot strategy and generate a response after having admitted already as a matter of record she is in violation of the health statute in her pretended battle against Covid-19. Nine minutes before Tulis got the motion file-stamped with the court clerk, Judge Fleenor had her order file stamped giving approval to an effective month more of time in the state-based CV-19 disaster. — DJT]

“PEREMPTORY. Imperative; absolute; conclusive; positive; not admitting of question, delay, or reconsideration. Positive; final; decisive; not admitting of any alternative. Self-determined; arbitrary; not requiring any cause to be shown. Wolfe v. State, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 62, 178 S.W.Zd 274, 279.” Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th ed. Black’s lists mandamus in the scope of the concept of peremptory.
['David Tulis']
['Tennessee', 'Lockdownsa', 'Lockdown Challenge', 'Covid 19 Crisis', 'Coronavirus Covid19']