An Equivalence between Bayesian Priors and Penalties in Variational   Inference
In machine learning, it is common to optimize the parameters of a probabilistic model, modulated by an ad hoc regularization term that penalizes some values of the parameters. Regularization terms appear naturally in Variational Inference (VI), a tractable way to approximate Bayesian posteriors: the loss to optimize contains a Kullback--Leibler divergence term between the approximate posterior and a Bayesian prior. We fully characterize which regularizers can arise this way, and provide a systematic way to compute the corresponding prior. This viewpoint also provides a prediction for useful values of the regularization factor in neural networks. We apply this framework to regularizers such as L2, L1 or group-Lasso.