Measuring Fairness under Unawareness of Sensitive Attributes: A   Quantification-Based Approach
Algorithms and models are increasingly deployed to inform decisions about people, inevitably impacting their lives. As a consequence, those in charge of developing these models must carefully evaluate their impact on different groups of people and favour group fairness, i.e., ensure that groups determined by sensitive demographic attributes, such as race or sex, are not treated unjustly. In order to reach this goal, the availability (awareness) of these demographic attributes to those evaluating the impact of these models is fundamental. Unfortunately, collecting and storing these attributes is often in conflict with industry practices and legislation on data minimisation and privacy. For this reason, it may be hard to measure the group fairness of trained models, even from within the companies developing them. In this work we tackle the problem of measuring group fairness under unawareness of sensitive attributes, by using techniques from quantification, a supervised learning task concerned with directly providing group-level prevalence estimates (rather than individual-level class labels). We show that quantification approaches are particularly suited to tackle the fairness-under-unawareness problem, as they are robust to inevitable distribution shifts while at the same time decoupling the (desirable) objective of measuring group fairness from the (undesirable) side effect of allowing the inference of sensitive attributes of individuals. More in detail, we adapt several quantification methods to measure demographic parity, and test them under five different experimental protocols corresponding to important challenges that complicate the estimation of classifier fairness under unawareness.