17068
document
Double blind comparison of Iomeprol 350 and Iopamidol 340 in intravenous digital subtraction angiography for peripheral vascular disease . A randomized double blind study was undertaken to compare the diagnostic efficacy and side effects of a new non-ionic contrast medium Iomeprol with a commonly used one -- Iopamidol . Visual and densitometric comparison was made of intravenous digital subtraction angiograms performed for peripheral vascular disease . The results show the two media to be similar both in imaging quality and in the incidence of associated side effects . Ninety-eight per cent of the intravenous digital subtraction angiograms were assessed as adequate for clinical management by the vascular surgeon .
17069
Intervention_Pharmacological
Iomeprol 350 and Iopamidol 340
17070
Intervention_Physical
intravenous digital subtraction angiography
17071
Intervention_Pharmacological
non-ionic contrast medium Iomeprol
17072
Intervention_Pharmacological
commonly used one -- Iopamidol
17073
Intervention_Control
.
17074
Intervention_Surgical
intravenous digital subtraction angiograms
17075
Outcome_Other
diagnostic efficacy
17076
Outcome_Adverse-effects
side effects
17077
Outcome_Other
imaging quality
17078
Outcome_Adverse-effects
incidence of associated side effects
17079
Participant_Condition
intravenous digital subtraction angiography
17080
Participant_Condition
peripheral vascular disease