{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015363128491620111, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.877049180327869, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Democracy for Russia, A Russia for Democracy

Of the problems posed in the text under discussion, the most important for us as specialists in the field of philosophy is, in my view, the very idea of sovereign democracy. After all, we are responsible precisely for the state of ideas in society, for their rational validity and moral quality. The idea of sovereign democracy has aroused great theoretical and public interest not only because it was voiced by a man whose words and actions draw everyone’s attention simply on account of his high administrative position and political influence. Much more important is that this idea directly and audaciously pointed to the historical challenge faced by Russia today.