{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04234527687296417, 'fraction_numerical': 0.010857763300760043, 'mean_word_length': 5.585714285714285, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Antitrust and Global Capitalism, 1930–2004 (review)

stimulate the movement to establish wilderness” (11). This book ends with a vague sense of inconclusiveness. Admittedly, the worker’s engagement with nature was—and is—complex. But the narrative’s end seems more ragged than necessary, and battles over ash, game, timber, dams, wilderness, income-tax reform, ash-stocking, predator-control, and the Ku Klux Klan are not always clearly grounded in the author’s main argument, further clouding the worker’s trajectory regarding conservation. Nonetheless, to his credit, Lipin provides an invaluable foundation for discussing the troubled relationship between organized labor and the environment, and he clearly has much to say about how this relationship has changed over time. In this sense, he contributes something of great value to our understanding of labor history, environmental history, and the history of Oregon.