{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028203062046736505, 'fraction_numerical': 0.022562449637389202, 'mean_word_length': 5.536842105263158, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of flecainide with quinidine for suppression of chronic stable ventricular ectopic depolarizations. A double-blind randomized study in ambulatory outpatients.

In a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial, we compared flecainide to quinidine for treatment of ventricular ectopic depolarizations in 19 patients. The mean percent suppression of total ventricular ectopic depolarizations was 95% for flecainide and 56% for quinidine (p less than 0.05). A greater than 80% reduction of total ventricular ectopic depolarizations was obtained in eight of nine patients given flecainide and in five of ten patients given quinidine (p = 0.09). After the randomized protocol, the patients who had received quinidine were given flecainide; 9 of the 10 patients had greater than 80% reduction of total ventricular ectopic depolarizations. Flecainide produced 100% suppression of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and 99.5% suppression of paired ventricular depolarizations. Flecainide prolonged the PR and QRS intervals; quinidine prolonged the PR and JTC intervals. Side effects were commoner with quinidine than flecainide (p = 0.06). Three other patients failed to complete the protocol because of serious adverse experiences.