{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05090497737556561, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01809954751131222, 'mean_word_length': 5.232394366197183, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An upside down view of cholesterol's condensing effect: does surface occupancy play a role?

The condensing action of cholesterol has been compared with that of a structural isomer having its hydroxyl group located at the C-25 position (i.e., 25-OH'), that is, an isomer favoring an "upside down" orientation in lipid membranes. Surface pressure-area isotherms of mixed monolayers made from 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC)/cholesterol and DMPC/25-OH' have established that 25-OH' has a weaker condensing effect than cholesterol. Nearest-neighbor recognition measurements in liposomes made from 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC) have also shown that 25-OH' has a weaker condensing effect in the physiologically relevant fluid bilayer state. These findings provide support for surface occupancy playing a role in the condensing action of cholesterol.