{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027408637873754152, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.2155688622754495, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of double-stranded and single-stranded cfDNA library construction methods for targeted genome and methylation sequencing

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) profiling by deep sequencing (i.e., by next generation sequencing (NGS)) has wide applications in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy response monitoring. One key step of cfDNA deep sequencing workflow is NGS library construction, whose efficiency significantly affects the utilization efficiency of cfDNA molecules, and eventually determines effective sequencing depth and sequencing accuracy. In this study, we compared two different types of cfDNA library construction methods, namely double-stranded library (dsLib, the conventional method which captures dsDNA molecules) and single-stranded library (ssLib) preparation, which captures ssDNA molecules, for the applications of mutation detection and methylation profiling, respectively. Our results suggest that the dsLib method was suitable for mutation detection while the ssLib method proved more efficient for methylation analysis. Our findings could help researchers choose the more appropriate library construction method for corresponding downstream applications of cfDNA sequencing.