{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029045643153526972, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015411973918197985, 'mean_word_length': 4.881533101045296, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Prevalence of Martin-Gruber anastomosis on motor nerve conduction studies].

Prevalence of median to ulnar anastomosis in the forearm(Martin-Gruber anastomosis; MGA) to the first dorsal interosseous(FDI), abductor digiti quinti (ADQ) and adductor pollicis(AP) was investigated. Subjects contained 106 patients with normal nerve conduction or patients with various neuropathies. Recording electrodes were placed on the motor point of FDI, ADQ and AP. Supramaximal stimulations were given to the median and ulnar nerves at the wrist or above the elbow. The diagnosis of MGA was made by the following criteria; amplitude of compound muscle action potential(CMAP) increased after elbow stimulation as compared with the wrist stimulation in median nerve conduction studies. The corresponding decrease in CMAP amplitude was found after above elbow stimulation as compared with the wrist stimulation in ulnar nerve conduction studies. No MGA was found in 80(75%) out of 106 patients. MGA to FDI was found in all 26 patients who had MGA. MGA to ADQ and AP was found in 11% and 10% of the patients, respectively. Only 8 out of 26 patients had MGA to all 3 muscles. In the presence of MGA median motor nerve conduction studies demonstrate larger CMAP, with a small initial positivity, after elbow stimulation than after wrist stimulation. And moreover, ulnar motor nerve conduction studies reveal a conduction block-like finding in the forearm. In this study MGA was found in 25% of the patient to FDI, in 11% to ADQ and in 10% to AP. Although a very small MGA might be overlooked in our method, such a small MGA doesn't mislead us into erroneous interpretation of motor nerve conduction studies.