{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05015197568389058, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014184397163120567, 'mean_word_length': 5.7406143344709895, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Substituent effect on the photophysical properties, electrochemical properties and electroluminescence performance of orange-emitting iridium complexes.

A series of bis(2-phenylbenzothiozolato-N,C(2'))iridium(acetylacetonate) [(bt)(2)Ir(acac)] derivatives, 1-4, were synthesized. Different substituents (CF(3), F, CH(3), OCH(3)) were introduced in the benzothiazole ring to study the substituent effect on the photophysical, electrochemical properties and electroluminescent performance of the complexes, and finally to select high-performance phosphors for use in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). All complexes 1-4 and (bt)(2)Ir(acac) are orange-emitting with tiny spectral difference, despite the variation of the substituent. However, the phosphorescent quantum yield increases with the electron-withdrawing ability of the substituent. This is in contrast to the previous observation that the substituent in the phenyl ring bonded to the metal center of (bt)(2)Ir(acac) not only affected the luminescent quantum efficiency but also greatly tuned the emission color of the complexes. Quantum chemical calculations revealed that the substituents in this position do not make a significant contribution to both the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), which probably accounts for the fact that they do no strongly influence the bandgap and emission color of the complexes. Orange OLEDs were fabricated using 1-4 as doped emitters. The electron-withdrawing CF(3) and F groups favor improving the electroluminescence efficiency in comparison with that of the parent (bt)(2)Ir(acac), while electron-donating CH(3) and OCH(3) are not favorable for light emission. The complex 1 based OLED exhibited a maximum luminance efficiency of 54.1 cd A(-1) (a power efficiency of 24 lm W(-1) and an external quantum efficiency of 20%), which are among the best results ever reported for vacuum deposited orange OLEDs so far.