{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020864381520119227, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00894187779433681, 'mean_word_length': 5.857142857142857, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The applicability and the inter‐rater reliability of the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale in an elderly clinical population

Psychopathological rating scales are developed and tested on a relatively young population. Their applicability and psychometric performance in the elderly (aged above 60–65 years) are mostly unknown. It is unknown how factors related to ageing or mild cognitive dysfunction influence the applicability and the reliability of these scales. We tested the applicability and the inter‐rater reliability of the Dutch version of the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS) on an elderly (age > 60 years) inpatient population.