{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031504065040650404, 'fraction_numerical': 0.024390243902439025, 'mean_word_length': 5.7465753424657535, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Productivity and Citations of Educational Research: Using Educational Psychology as the Data Base

The purpose of this paper is to report rankings and analyses of educational researchers' productivity and citations in both scholarly and textbook literature. Although productivity and citation analyses are common in the natural and social sciences (see bibliographies in works such as Garfield, 1981; Menard, 1971; Wade, 1976), relatively few have been conducted in educational research. Walberg, Rasher, and Mantel (1977) analyzed only the citation rankings of several highly-distinguished educational researchers. Smith and Caulley's (1981) and Walberg, Vukosavich, and Tsai's (1981) studies were limited to citations of individual papers and journal citations of one another. Thus, there is much to be learned about the rankings of individual research productivity and citations, the association of these indexes, and their impact on the professional field of educational practice.