{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02081977878985036, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007807417046193884, 'mean_word_length': 5.866071428571429, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Giant granules of neutrophils in Chediak‐Higashi syndrome are derived from azurophil granules but not from specific and gelatinase granules

The abnormal giant granules of Chediak‐Higashi syndrome (CHS) neutrophils in humans are thought to be derived from both azurophil and specific granules, whereas the presence of gelatinase granules and their contribution to giant granule formation has not been investigated previously. We have examined the ultrastructure and mobilization of neutrophil granules from a patient with CHS by immunogold electron microscopy and exocytosis experiments of isolated leukocytes. The giant granules contained the azurophil granule components myeloperoxidase and CD63. We found no evidence of involvement of specific or gelatinase granules in the formation of giant granules because lactoferrin and gelatinase were contained in normal‐appearing peroxidase‐negative granules. On stimulation of leukocytes with N‐formyl‐methionyl‐leucyl‐phenylalanine and the calcium ionophore, ionomycin, there was a diminished exocytosis of myeloperoxidase in CHS compared with a healthy control, indicating a lack of mobilization of the giant granules. On the other hand, there was a normal or augmented release of lactoferrin and gelatinase in CHS neutrophils, with gelatinase granules being the most easily mobilized, as known from normal neutrophils. In conclusion, giant granules from CHS neutrophils originate from azurophil granules but not from the specific and gelatinase granules. J. Leukoc. Biol. 64: 72–77; 1998.