{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016923076923076923, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0019230769230769232, 'mean_word_length': 5.880952380952381, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reentrant Ventricular Arrhythmias in the Late Myocardial Infarction Period: 14. Mechanisms of Resetting, Entrainment, Acceleration, or Termination of Reentrant Tachycardia by Programmed Electrical Stimulation

The mechanisms of resetting, entrainment, acceleralion, or termination of reentrant ventricular tachycardia by programmed electrical stimulation were studied in the canine post‐infarction model. In this model, reentrant circuits were localized in the epicardial layer overlying the infarction and were accessible to detailed mapping by multiplexer techniques. The reentrant circuit has a characteristic figure‐eight configuration in the form of two circulating wavefronts around arcs of functional conduction block that coalesce into a slow common reentrant wavefront. Termination of reentrant tachycardia occurred when a stimulated wavefront arrived earlier to a strategically located area in the proximal portion of the zone of slow conduction, before refractoriness expired distally, resulting in conduction block. The three factors that determined if the stimulated wavefrout could reach this zone in time for conduction block were: (1) the cycle length of stimulation; (2) the number of stimulated beats, and (3) the site of stimulation. The most optimal situation for stimulated termination of reentry was a critically coupled single stimulus applied to the ischemic zone close to the proximal side of the zone of slow conduction that captured locally and conducted prematurely to the strategic zone for conduction block. When a single stimulated wavefront failed to terminate reentry, one or more subsequent wavefronts succeeded. However, the stimulated train had to be terminated following the beat that interrupted reentry. Otherwise, a subsequent stimulated beat could reinitiate the same reentrant circuit or induce a different circuit. The new circuit could have a shorter revolution time, resulting in tachycardia acceleration, and occasionally degeneration into ventricular fibrillation. Overdrive termination of reentry required both a critical cycle length of stimulation and a critical number of beats in a stimulated train. Otherwise, the stimulated train could establish a new balance of refractoriness and conduction velocity in the reentrant pathway. This could perpetuate the reentrant process at the shorter cycle length of the stimulated train and spontaneous reentry would resume on termination of the train (entrainment). The study provides better understanding of the mechanisms of action of programmed electrical stimulation on reentrant ventricular tachycardia.