{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016903914590747332, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.120253164556962, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Additional diagnostic methods for recording of adenoid hypertrophy in children with allergic rhinitis].

The role of enlarged adenoids and tonsils in upper airway obstruction has become well-established earlier, thus, adenoidectomy with or without tonsillectomy is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in the paediatric population. Direct assessment of adenoidal size is difficult and no definitive method is so far available to complement clinical assessment. The most important diagnostic techniques are recording of obstructive symptoms, transoral posterior rhinoscopic examination, radiological evaluation, such as lateral radiography of the adenoid and nasopharyngeal magnetic resonance imaging, transnasal fiberoscopic examination, acoustic rhinometry and others. In this study we compare acoustic rhinometry, fiberoscopy and Cohen and Konac radiological method. Spearman's correlation test was used to evaluate the degree of correlation between these three methods. We concluded that acoustic rhinometry and radiology are good and objective methods for measuring adenoid sizes in allergic children.