{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03383458646616541, 'fraction_numerical': 0.018796992481203006, 'mean_word_length': 4.731182795698925, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of Greenhouse and Field Experiments for Cesium Uptake in Two Aquatic Plant Species

Results and Discussion Significantly higher accumulation (p <0.005) of Cs+ was found in the PPF experiment compared to CDF, CDG and PPG. All other types of experiments tested were not significant differences. Removal rates for all types of experiments and concentrations are shown in Table 1. Cs+ values accumulated by CDF, CDG and PPG are lower than those published by Rinadli et al. (2017), but PPF values are comparable with them [2].