{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017197452229299363, 'fraction_numerical': 0.019745222929936305, 'mean_word_length': 5.309236947791165, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Immunologic aberrations, HIV seropositivity and seroconversion rates in patients with hemophilia B.

Because there have been reports that factor IX concentrate is less immunosuppressive and therefore factor IX users have less immunologic aberrations, we have studied a group of 22 patients with hemophilia B and six patients with factor VIII deficiency and high titer inhibitors with respect to lymphocyte numbers and function, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serology, and factor usage. This group was compared to 111 patients with hemophilia A and a group of 28 healthy male volunteer controls. When the study began in 1983, the majority of patients with hemophilia B and with higher titer factor VIII inhibitors were seronegative, 77% and 83% respectively, as compared to only 30% of patients with hemophilia A. At that time the factor IX users also had milder immune aberrations than the hemophilia A group. However, with time and increasing clotting factor concentrate usage, seroconversion and more striking abnormalities in immune function have occurred in the hemophilia B group. In a subgroup of 16 patients with hemophilia B studied twice, the incidence of seropositivity increased from 31% in 1983 to 69% in 1985. We thus conclude that factor IX concentrate in itself is not less immunosuppressive than factor VIII concentrate. Seroconversion in factor IX concentrate users appears to be lagging behind seroconversion in factor VIII concentrate users, perhaps secondary to the lower cumulative dosage of concentrate that patients with hemophilia B utilize.