{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030206677265500796, 'fraction_numerical': 0.018547959724430314, 'mean_word_length': 4.993650793650794, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Laboratory Foamed-Cement-Curing Evolution Using CT Scanning: Insights From Elevated-Pressure Generation


 Computed-tomography (CT) scanning has become a mainstay among scientists (Wildenschild and Sheppard 2013) because it enables nondestructive observation of material processes and formation in real time. Foamed cement is a high-strength, low-density material containing nitrogen gas, and is used to stabilize wellbore casings both onshore and offshore. In-situ foamed cement is subject to pressure changes because the slurry is pumped downhole and cures at depth. To correlate the influence of pressure to the gas-void size and the curing evolution of a foamed cement, two laboratory foamed cements were generated and CT scanned as they cured. One cement was generated following the American Petroleum Institute (API) industry standard API RP 10B-4 (2015) at atmospheric conditions using a blender, and the other cement was created using a foamed-cement generator (FCG) (resembling that of de Rozières and Ferrière 1991) to produce a sample at an elevated pressure. FCG-generated cement qualities (in the range of 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40%) were scanned at their cured state for comparison. From the CT-image time series and the single FCG scans, the volumetric void properties were characterized and compared. The time-series blender voids were an order of magnitude larger than the FCG voids, and void growth was stagnant after a curing period of 100 minutes, whereas the FCG voids gradually increased in volume after 100 minutes. The Hsü-Nadai plots (Brandon 1995) reveal that the FCG and blender voids are weakly prolate, and all FCG voids, regardless of generation quality, relax to a greater final-magnitude strain than the blender voids. These findings confirm that both the void size and the curing process are influenced by the pressure at which a foamed cement is generated.