{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03232323232323232, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00202020202020202, 'mean_word_length': 5.117283950617284, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Joanna Bottenberg, Shared Creation. Words and Music in the Hofmannsthal-Strauss Operas.

However, it may be that, despite its length and difficulty, the study must be comprehended äs a whole, and it will likely take some time for scholars to master it coilectively and make all of its insights and initiatives fruitful. But this should prove worthwhile in the long term because of Geppert's respect for the texts, which despite the ponderousness of the theoretical superstructure are not sacrificed to it: "Im Zweifel sagt die Literatur mehr als das Programm, so daß eher dieses von jener her zu interpretieren wäre als umgekehrt" (p. 18). In this era of a contentious, even heiligerem relationship of criticism to literature, of the delighted discovery of gendering, patriarchy, bourgeois compiicity, appropriation of the other, of entlarven, hinterfragen, etc., Geppert, if I perceive him correctly, loves and admires the books the most hopeful attitude for fathoming the Great Tradition.