{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016602809706257982, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.030769230769231, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Truth Hurts: Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress As A Cause Of Action Against The Media

Claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress against the media have grown in recent years. In some cases, plaintiffs have found a sympathetic ear in court. This article examines how courts have handled these cases, given the tort's lack of a public interest or newsworthiness defense. The article also examines the situations that have given rise to these claims, and the types of plaintiffs who have filed them. Despite some inconsistencies, courts are rejecting most claims that are based on the content of a report, and allowing to go forward claims based on newsgathering behavior. The article recommends that courts recognize a newsworthiness defense in these cases.