{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0149812734082397, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004993757802746567, 'mean_word_length': 5.365079365079365, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The utility of anoscopy in the rapid diagnosis of symptomatic anorectal gonorrhea in men.

Thirty-nine homosexual men seeking treatment for symptomatic proctitis were examined for anorectal gonorrhea by study of gram-stained smears obtained via an anoscope and by a blindly obtained anorectal swab specimen. Anorectal specimens for culture were obtained from all men. The sensitivity of the anoscopically obtained smears was 79% as compared with 53% for the blindly obtained smears. It was concluded that gram-stained smears obtained through an anoscope can provide rapid diagnosis of most cases of symptomatic anorectal gonorrhea. All patients with symptomatic proctitis should have routine anoscopy and examination of gram-stained smears obtained via anoscopy as part of their diagnostic evaluation.