{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014938488576449912, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0017574692442882249, 'mean_word_length': 4.9296875, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Document: Openings for Peace and Justice in a World of Danger and Struggle

There is a craving for a positive vision of human destiny manifest in many parts of the world, And yet, the sense of the present, the shape of the ordeal arising out of current conditions, varies greatly from place to place. Some are obsessed by the dark shadows cast by the nuclear arms race, others are locked in a daily encounter with death through famine, disease, and physicaI abuse. Still others believe that the evidence is mounting that human activity is destroying the biosphere or crowding the planet beyond all thresholds of adjustment. It is obvious that the current arrangements of power and influence can rarely provide satisfactory solutions. Especially governments, with notable exceptions, seem immobilized when it comes to the big world order issues. The most prominent states continue to seek security through strength and wealth, and do little to alter their geopolitical style, beyond on occasion acknowledging in words that the situation is dangerous. The United Nations has also lost most of its inspirational power. There is a widespread acceptance of the organization as a useful arena for communication, and even its helpfulness in certain limited undertakings, generally at the margins of strategic conflict. At the same time, it has become evident that those who control the purse strings of the United Nations do not want the organization to grow very strong. The two superpowers have made it plain that they prefer their freedom of action to any further endowment of global institutions with capabilities for action. The United States Government rejection of the Law of the Seas Treaty after ten years of negotiation and compromise is suggestive of the leverage that special economic interests can bring to bear on even the most moderate and mutually beneficial world order arrangements. The beacon of socialism has also lost much of its allure. A series of revolutionary successes, going back to the victory of the Bolsheviks in October 1917, has not produced models for others to follow, especially with regard to social and political reconstruction. Even where socialist rulers have eased the rigors of the poor and cut down on waste and gross inequity, socialism-in-