{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02557200538358008, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.953271028037383, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Pluralization and Recognition: On the Self-Misunderstanding of Postmodern Social Theorists

Even the decision to take the category of the &dquo;postmodern&dquo; seriously within social philosophy today requires a certain justification: the object area of all theories with this title is unclear, their conceptual framework for an analysis of processes of social change is surely too narrow, and, besides, their individual bearing too self-satisfied, indeed unsympathetic. Every fresh concern with the fashionable concept makes all the more dramatically clear those inadequacies which were inherent in it right from the beginning: whether &dquo;postmodernity&dquo; should characterize only a changed constellation in the cultural realm or a new