{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026627218934911243, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.572815533980583, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Evolution of clinical understanding: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria as a paradigm

In recounting the history of the development of knowledge about PNH, the roles of the clinician, the basic scientist, and the clinician-investigator are apparent. Without the observations of the clinicians, the problem could not be posed. Without the contributions from basic science (the biochemistry of complement, the biology of glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchors, etc), the information necessary to the solution of the problem would not be available. Without the synthesis of the clinician-investigator, the two elements would not be fused to result in knowledge about the disease.