


But it’s WRONG, according to Michael Lisanti at the Kimmel Cancer Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. He has a completely different model, which puts a whole new light on how cancer cells feed and grow.












The theory looks pretty solid.



This new theory would explain why chemo often makes things worse.











































20 thoughts on “STUNNING NEW THEORY

  1. Very interesting indeed. However, what if the patient was living a healthy lifestyle but the only thing different was hormonal therapies e.g. ivf & extra hormonal therapies due to multiple adhesions of the womb? If the breast cancer is hormonal related, then wouldn’t it suggest that this was a major contributing factor to the development of cancer? And if so, then why would the patient need to change her diet if she was already eating healthy and normal foods?

  2. My question is this. Dose the one minute miriacl and others like it (Sodium Chlorite) encourage cancer growth instead of slow it?

    • I think that Sodium Chlorite is said to kill anaerobic micro organisms which flourish in the out of balance environment which is happening in the body with dis-ease. So as there is die off of these undesirable organisms the pathway is being cleared to assist the body to fight back. Not sure how this relates to the hydrogen peroxide envirmonment – look forward to what the doc has to say.

  3. Warburg Theory of Cancer and Ferromagnetic Theory of Cancer. Warburg’s theory that cancer starts from irreversible injury to cellular respiration eventually fell out of favor amid research pointing to genomic mutations as the cause of uncontrolled cell growth. Ferromagnetic Theory-2006 of Cancer (Iron Conception) [clinical and molecular biological aspects]: 1) Any human cell is a society of dia-, para-, superpara-, ferri- and ferromagnetic nanoparticles. 2) Any onco-pathology and ALS work by intracellular superpara-, ferri- and ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Intracellular molecules FeO;Fe2O3;Fe3O4 ‘create’ intracellular superpara-, ferri- and ferromagnetic nanoparticles. These nanoparticles are able chaotically distort DNA / shift chromosomes by local magnetic fields. 3) Non-complicated anti-iron methods of the Old Testament can beat Cancer and ALS (intracellular superpara-ferri-ferromagnetic infections). Cancer patients-2012 must receive anti-cancer anti-iron intratumoral injections [sulfur (2%) + olive oil (98%)] by ceramic needles. These intratumoral injections will initiate harmless infiltrations (deposits of cells that die; harmless necroses). Accurate anti-iron slow blood loss (even 75%) [hemoglobin control] and anti-iron goat’s milk diet will neutralize any micro-metastases ; ; ; Vadim Shapoval

  4. Sarcomas, Warburg Cancer Theory and Ferromagnetic Cancer Theory. There are numerous types of sarcomas that can affect different parts of the body; however, they have similar characteristics and symptoms, and medical treatments are similar. Sarcoma is an uncommon and often malignant tumor. Benign tumors rarely recur, but sarcomas can reappear after treatment. The percentage of people diagnosed with sarcoma who survived 5 years later is only 50%. This includes all patients suffering from all types of sarcomas. There is an acute need to develop entirely new treatment strategies for the treatment of sarcomas. For most types of sarcomas, the major cause of death is metastatic disease. There are certain types of sarcomas in which metastases rarely occur but uncontrolled local growth represents the major therapeutic problem. Surgery is the most common treatment for sarcoma. If the tumor cannot be removed surgically, it may be permanently controlled with radiation therapy. Chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy: 1) may be given before or after surgery to reduce the risk of recurrence; 2) may also be used to reduce the size of the sarcoma or relieve pain and other symptoms. If the sarcoma is found to have a specific chromosomal abnormality, the targeted therapy may be used in some patients. Oncologists use interferon for patients with osteosarcomas and imatinib for patients with gastrointestinal sarcomas. Ferromagnetic Cancer Theory (Theory from The Old Testament; Iron Conception) offers to treat all types of sarcomas by intratumoral injections of solution [sulfur (2%) + olive oil (98%); 36.6C – 39.0C]. These intratumoral injections by ceramic needles: 1) can create harmless infiltrations (harmless necroses; deposits of cells that die; benign capsules); 2) can suppress secondary bacterial infection (oncopatients have a significant risk for infection due to their treatment). The intratumoral anti-iron treatment can chemically eliminate any sarcomatous tumors and large metastases. Anti-iron slow blood loss (even 75%) [hemoglobin control], anti-iron goat’s milk diet and anti-iron drinking water containing hydrogen sulfide can neutralize any micrometastases and isolated tumor cells. Otto Warburg suggested that cancer cells produce the bulk of their energy by breaking down glucose in the absence of oxygen. Otto Warburg ideas can’t beat cancers and sarcomas; the Old Testament’s clinical information will beat any cancers and sarcomas. Cancer Research Secrets & Vadim Shapoval

  5. Fascinating! Now I ponder how this may tie in with Dr. Tulio Simoncini’s theories and so far successful use of sodium bicarbonate …applied directly on the cancer tumors which, (of course!), treats the immediately surrounding tissues? He does this surgically and/or with various catheter type devises.
    Please refer to his book: CANCER IS A FUNGUS
    …Robert Conn

    • Robert, Please be aware that Simoncini is a self-promoting liar.
      His recoveries and testimonials are people who would probably have recovered anyway.
      Many do – please consult my book.
      Lots of people spent $30,000 or more (for $5 sodium bicarbonate??!?!!) and got
      absolutely no result (he doesn’t promote those).
      A number of people have been killed by this madman’s therapy.
      His license was revoked and I approve – but it hasn’t stopped him.
      He works out of the back of cars now.

      • Thanks so much for the advise! I just ordered your book last night – can’t wait to receive & read it – especially regards energy devises such as Rife machines and SCENAR instruments.

  6. Based on this article, do you recommend sodium chlorite for cancer? I have just started using it for my rheumatoid arthritis.

  7. It is curious mitochondria are mentioned as lost due to decay (means what?) – there is a cheap nutrient called pyrroloqinoline quinone (BioPQQ) which produces mitochondrial biogenesis – maybe only in healthy cells.
    The physicist-pharmacist-natropath qualified scientist Dr Joanna Budwig understood Warburg’s work very well and built upon it very successfully many decades ago, complete with clinical records that have yet to be surpassed.
    It grates on my sense of what science is really about when “only” scientific results are to be referred to when tens of thousands of successful clinical records exist (and many more have been deliberately destroyed to “make the case” for “science”) which validate the case for alternative treatments for all disease, not “just” cancer.
    I do believe it is time to reign in the conventional medical world by only allowing doctors to practice with limited and qualified licences. Since the huge majority of “doctors” have essentially zero knowledge of nutrition – a lack that can kill you – then such doctors must only be allowed to practice with this limitation clearly spelled out to all their patients prior to any diagnosis and treatment. Draconian penalties applied for non-compliance.
    To all your good health

  8. Very interesting!! This throws up many questions….Does this theory suggest that the actual cancer cells are NOT anaerobic? But the surrounding fibroblasts tissue, (due to hydrogen peroxide), becomes anaerobic and thrives on glucose metabolism? If so, what do the [actual] cancer cells (bad guys) thrive on?

    Also, it has been observed by many that hydrogen peroxide has a strong cancer killing effect, or was this possibly just killing off the fibroblasts part of the tumour?

    • Good questions Richie.
      I don’t know that it overthrows Warburg’s idea, so much as adds to/complicates it.
      It certainly pays not to have too simplistic a theory.
      Think, for example: we need oxygen for life, yet oxygen is toxic and ages us rapidly.
      We have so much to learn!

  9. Agree here to be confusing. Are we suggesting that taking 35% hydrogen peroxide is GOOD or BAD to help keep the body healthy?

    Really wanting to understand if the ongoing Oxygen Therapy is actually going in the RIGHT or WRONG direction. Perhaps it is only for short-term use to keep the cancer cells at-bay?

    • I don’t hold with it as prophylactic and the
      “1 Minute Cancer Cure” is a hoax, in my view, written
      by internet marketers, not medically-trained people.

  10. I am a middle school student who started this project based on Warburg’s theory. Back then when I started there was only one credible website that help me fund my whole research and plan a science fair project. Amazing theory about cancer many things that I though and analyze which where not in the website are now all over the place in scientific articles, amazing I think this article was amazing and I would have it in mind when I continue with my science fair project this year.

  11. If hydrogen peroxide is needed to be reduced what about the breathing in of food grade 0.03 percent hydrogen peroxide to help stop winter flu or Covid for that matter a not so safe practice

    • Yes Fiona,
      “nebulized” hydrogen peroxide has established itself recently.
      It’s a good option for viruses. Clear the sinuses! Ha ha!

Leave a Reply to Josephine Power Cancel reply
