« New Paper on the "Virtual Tax" Question | Main | Ludium II Announcement »

Mar 21, 2007



Lisa> It occurs to me that various military organizations could similarly leverage the rabid faction-orientation of games like World of Warcraft and get people riled up about fighting enemies, etc. What ever happened to all of those military MMO projects anyway?

I know it's not the focus of the article, but when I was in the Army in the early 90's, people would joke about how not allowing people with certain criminal records deprived the army of some of its best candidates.

An officer once explained to us that aggressive killers were the LAST thing the Army wanted. They wanted people to take orders.

Sometimes that means marching instead of fighting. Sometimes that means holding your ground and NOT pursuing a fleeing enemy. Sometimes that means treating a prisoner humanely. Sometimes,that means being cautious in your targeting and avoid trigger-happy friendly fire or "collateral damage" systems. Oftentimes, that means acting as a force of occupation and treating the locals with compassion- in an effort to win their hearts and minds.

Faction-based gameplay works against most of those goals. The rather basic combat resolution system we have doesn't help either. Heck, even the lack of friendly fire incidents can condition a soldier to be too careless. You just end up conditioning a more closed-minded and trigger-happy soldier dehumanizes the enemy and locals to the point they don't offer humane treatment.

(On the plus side, raid "metagame" (planning, execution, and after-action review) can be positive.)


So now the quests will be to a run to mars and collect some martian water to deliver to the output on Junipter while dodging asteroids? Then we can launch a counter attack on the alien orcs.


I got email from NASA (!) shortly after blogging this very story saying that the whole thing has been postponed.


>>saying that the whole thing has been postponed.

Lemme guess ... lack of funding ....

Have fun



The application of MMOs is a recurring theme, especially their involvement with military stuff. On the one hand we have America’s Army on the other the story that was knocking around a while ago about the Israeli arms ‘issues’ with roleplayers.

Anyway, why do NASA need a new MMO, isn't EvE all you need to know about the future of space?


If only you'd waited a day before posting this, Lisa: James T. Kirk's birthday is on the 22nd March.



wow, Richard, that is some excellent trivia to pull out, thank you.

btw, the CFP has now been mysteriously postponed, if you look at the site again. Hopefully that just means people have more time to get their ideas together, not that some bigwig is stomping on NASA's fun.


Have we ever known NASA to NOT delay a launch?


>>> Have we ever known NASA to NOT delay a launch? >>>>

Yes. The one time I visited the USA and Cape Canaveral, the shuttle launch with the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite was on time and a perfect launch. Very impressive. Especially when the wall of sound from the engines ripples the oceans surface on its way to the place where I was watching.

The comments to this entry are closed.