« Mars has a lot of water. Who knew? | Main | Comey's defense is that he was Incompetent AND Negligent »

29 September 2020



blue peacock

"..Russian intelligence analysis alleging that US Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton had approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal against US Presidential candidate Donald Trump by tying him to Putin and the Russians’ hacking of the DNC."


So what analysis did the US IC have not just in the Obama administration but also in the Trump administration? Why didn't they get the intel on Hillary's plan?

All Trump appointees were in place by early 2017 - AG, DAG, FBI & CIA Director, DNI. Is the story now that the Russian IC knew about Hillary's plan but the Trump IC did not?


A well earned victory lap. It looks like Trump finally got some people who were willing to go there.

In saying that, in the past, or at least immediately after he assumed office, he was reluctant to go after Hillary. And I think she has too much dirt on other people, too much leverage to be put down.

I like this direction and I hope to see something happen.

BTW, Trump is killing the debate. Killing it.

Larry C Johnson

Blue Peacock
The fact that this was hidden is further evidence that the Deep State was hiding this info and trying to suppress it. The Russian meme is bullshit. What I mean by that is the narrative that Trump was colluding with the Russians. He wasn't. It was a fabricated narrative and the evidence was being withheld. If Trump interfered in trying to release that info they were going to use it as evidence of "obstruction of justice."

James Lung

Good News, Mr. Johnson. Politico reports that Ratcliffe duped by Russian Disinformation. Source: SSCI. Warner and his succubus Richard Burr investigated the matter. Nothing to see. Russian disinformation. Nothing to see here.

Larry C Johnson

Appreciate your humor. Politico is a disgrace. Ignore reality and whistle past the graveyard. We'll see if the Little Old Lady from South Carolina finds his testicles tomorrow and presses the issue with Jimmy Comey. But facts are facts. There is zero evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC.


I recall Comey reporting he took a disturbing "letter" he had received to Loretta Lynch, when he was agonizing over either (1) disclosing the Carlos Danger Weiner emails or (2) the fake "exoneration" over the original Clinton email debacle.

Can't remember which event. . I believe Comey explained to Lunch, see what i am up against?

Lynch apparently only gave Comey a very jaundiced eye, and made no comment. So Comey went ahead and did what he did on his own -either (1) re-open the Weiner emails; or (2) go forward with the pre-judged "exoneration". (Memory fritz here)

Does this ring a bell? Was this Clinton instigated Trump Russia hoax claim in the "letter" to Comey? Did this have anything to do with Bill Clinton's "random" tarmac meeting with Lynch in this same time frame?

The tarmac Lynch meeting would have coincided with the "exoneration" move by Comey.

PS, thanks for keeping us on top of this still very evolving and breaking story - 3.5 years later. Way too many loose ends that have not yet come together, but odd events when put into relationship with other later disclosures help clear the fog.


To be clear, this is not Russian disinformation and has not been assessed as such by the Intelligence Community. I’ll be briefing Congress on the sensitive sources and methods by which it was obtained in the coming days,” he (Radcliffe) wrote.........

From the net.



It gets better, Facebook labels the DNI's letter as false information, and it only took them an hour to do so. Of course they turned it over to CNN's former reporter Alan Duke, Editor-in-Chief & co-founder of "Lead Stories".



Congratulations on your early discernment of the centrality of the Clinton Group in this conspiracy. What was the date of your first piece on this? I would like to re-publish it.


Larry, Colonel,

It's seems that every time that investigation/prosecution of those involved in the Seth Rich murder is brought up, D.C. looks and runs the other way as fast as possible. What do you think is going on? Was Rich one more of the Clinton Group's body count?

Diana Croissant


Yes, you DO deserve a victory lap. It's too bad that your right to a victory lap is now confirmed so much later than it should have been. We could have had saved lots and lots of time and newsprint if others had listened earlier. D.C. really is full of swamp gas that the truth is often clouded over and ignored for a long time.

So much time wasted and so much in the way of tax payors' money spent over the years only to have this finally confirmed years later. My greatest wish would be that we never have to hear a word from HRC ever again.

Thanks for taking "no quarter" on the perpetrators of this attempt to subvert our government.

j. casey

"[A]betted by the CIA and the FBI" and legions of MSM types tripping over each other to get their daggers bloody. If indictments go out (a big "if") the people coordinating the MSM should be served, too.

Account Deleted

Fred wrote:


The burden of proof is on your side. A letter is not proof. Anyone can write one.

Show the evidence. Time to put up or shut up.



"The burden of proof is on your side. A letter is not proof. Anyone can write one."
Christopher Steele wrote one, you'll recall who was paying him. What was the result, oh, Clinesmith "writing" an email, or doctoring it, to get probable cause, it resulted in the Flynn case, with evidence like this:
and this:

It also resulted in Clinesmith taking the fall for the corrupt cast of characters surrounding Barack and Biden's corrupt coup effort.

Account Deleted

Interesting old news but immaterial to this discussion. I want to see the evidence for Larry's current tale.

Steve Richter

democrats run rings around republicans. The house in 2017 never called Hillary or Obama to testify about their involvement in all of this.

Now, when we finally get around to discovering what they did then, we are distracted from seeing how they are using ballot harvesting now to guarantee their election in Nov, 2020.



Oh, that evidence of criminal conduct by the FBI and DOJ is immaterial? I wonder what you'll need to be persuaded.

Steve Richter,

Democrat Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the house in 2017, and her fellow Democrats did not call Hilary or Obama to testify? That's a remarkable observation.


The old Catch 22 -- we have proof, but they will have to kill us if we reveal our sources. Looks like the game Gina Haskell is now playing - closing down rdeclassifications because they might ..."reveal their sources and methods of surveillance".

If you can't use the intelligence because of built-in prohibitions on ascertaining its reliability, should you even be harvesting it? Unless its only purpose is to run a deep state secret cabal with zero public accountability.


Is it possible CIA Director Haspel can't declassify damning documents that Sean Davis of The Federalist alluded to yesterday due to their importance to the Durham probe? Or is it more likely she's trying to cover up bureau misdeeds?


The president remains badly served. Gina Haspel, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's handpicked successor to lead the CIA, is blocking declassification of documents pertinent to the Russia hoax because, like the guest on Tucker Carlson made clear, it would expose her own role in the hoax:

"Unfortunately those releases and declassifications according to multiple sources I've talked to are being blocked by CIA director Gina Haspel who herself was the main link between Washington and London," Davis said.

"As the London station chief from John Brennan's CIA during the 2016 election. Recall, it was London where Christopher Steele was doing all this work. And I'm told that it was Gina Haspel personally who is blocking a continued declassification of these documents that will show the American people the truth of what actually happened."




Trump has given them all the rope they need to hang themselves, which is precisely what they are doing.


The president will let the fishing line run in the hope these people run themselves out until they can't carry on, like we saw with the Mueller probe. He needs to reel it in, so to speak, when they do make mistakes. Here's his CIA director and NSA director with nowhere else to go, declaring Ratcliffe's information Russian disinfo while blocking its release. Will Trump finally fire them? Trump should actually bring Graham into his administration since his Senate seat is looking less secure these days. He would certainly make a better director of the CIA than Haspel.


POTUS can order the immediate declassification of the documents and there is nothing Haspel can do about it


Thank you Larry.

And, thank you Tulsi, who knew. . . .and said so.





"Classical dynamics says if you know the state of the system at a particular time, this can tell us the entire history of the system"

Germain Tobar University of Queensland Australia "The Grand father Paradox"

In the released documents there is a reference from Brennan as cited by John Solomon in his article that "CITE alleged approved by Hillary Clinton a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service"

Who was that "foreign policy advisor" ?

...Or are we to run around the countryside yelling "Find that man" like some Fugitive movie?

It's always haunted me how your voice was collateral damage early on.
stay frosty brother.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

February 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Blog powered by Typepad