Link: Bestiality orgies

We’re worse than the Romans, perhaps.

The dark truth about bestiality parties

In a major newspaper. This is where “if it feels good, do it” leads.

“consenting adults” is a lesser form, trying to appeal to a kind of legalism

We don’t let ‘consenting’ adults do plenty of things. Certain things you aren’t in the right mind to consent to.

Hardly anyone is mature enough at 18 these days to know what is actually good for them.

Appealing to minors, like the sex section of teenage magazines, is outright grooming.

“One woman describes how her first time was in front of her husband and eight other members of their BDSM group.”

I remember a commentor on Vox Day’s site suggesting that these pain/pleasure circuitry malfunctions, as well as being indicative of other mental illness (it’s always the BDSMers, isn’t it?) would fit many of the ancient criteria for demonic possession, demons being best known for their sexual sadism.

Personally, I don’t trust people who have to pervert any of the necessary pleasures for life.

This isn’t like handcuffs BDSM, the nice PR version, like lipstick lesbianism.
It never is. Escalation is common with addicts.

I was re-reading this link and well, it fits.

The immature fixation on sexuality as a polyfiller for the spiritual emptiness is too true.

All these Hollywood types high on their own fake PR have no idea what they’re dealing with when they host the PC term for orgies: sex “parties”.

50s parties involved a table of treats and dancing to a radio.

This will come back to haunt them, I guarantee it.

Gen Y error correction

Millennials are so SJW because they think they stand to gain £££££££.

When the promises of the Left prove false, such as home ownership, stable work and retirement….

A sea change wouldn’t describe it, tsunami might.

We’re completely self-indulgent but it’s a secondary effect of generational depression.
Gen X were angry, we’re depressed, Z are apathetic.

A+ comment

“I’m a millennial, metaphorically I feel the moral corruption of my generation, whispering to me that I should just fuck bitchez and leave well enough alone, that I’ll never succed as a tradionalist, that I’ve fucked enough bitchez and can’t possibly marry, it’s hypocritical of me to support traditional marriage or heteronormativity. If I believed in demons, I would say the sexual immorality we were all but taught in school by the boomers is one.

I know that other millennials would be with us if they didn’t have easy access to genz pussy on tinder, and others would be with us if they didn’t see ideas as separate from their personal lives / see the path of redemption as hypocrisy.”

The degeneracy isn’t just killing people individually, it’s killing their futures collectively.
Enabled by people who detest them as Straight, White Males.
Now, what do you offer a Straight White Male to destroy himself, since you can’t do it yourself?
The Sexual Revolution. It ruined men.
Until that problem is addressed and acknowledged and well-known, the exploitation of man’s greatest weakness, then all the crying about universal suffrage is a red herring. There isn’t a single “right-wing” man I’ve seen online that isn’t as “Sex Positive” as the most virulent SJW. That’s why we’ve lost. Bacchus isn’t Jesus, it’s Satanic.

Postmodernism, any modernism, can only be defeated by a return to tradition, but the men are too weak.
They’re all too weak now.

From thinking with their dicks, worse than any case of PMS.
PMS never killed a race.

Reverse the Sexual Revolution

If you pointed at a random American man or woman on the street and shouted Whore! you’d probably be right.
Note the contradiction of ‘healthy’ ‘infected’. They know the cancer risk and doubtless others.
This is being pushed as healthy?

Meanwhile, there are probably psychiatric effects from HPV…

and this includes men, who retain STDs in their urethra (the area isn’t sterile), as well the inevitability of male birth control.


The eternal r-type

for the Title alone

“Somebody needs to pay! Somebody needs to be held accountable!”


“At what number of children does a woman loose her ‘reproductive rights’ to bring even more children into this world that she is unable to care for? Why are you and I ‘forced’ to support children that we had no part in creating? I had no part in the pleasure of any of the orgasms required to create these children …… so why am I required to support them and their mother?
I am informed that here in Florida, the grandmother of the children will go to DCF and allege that her daughter is unfit to care for and raise her grandchildren. Once the mother is declared “unfit”, then the grandmother will gain legal custody of the children and then become their “foster parent”. This changes the whole nature of the situation from a welfare issue to a foster care issue. Grandma can then collect approximately 2.5X more as a foster care provider than her daughter can receive as a welfare recipient.
At this point, the daughter moves back in with her mother and her children and they all live happily after ….. at our expense. How about after the delivery of two welfare babies we also provide the mother with a tubal ligation; at our expense of course. To be completely fare about the whole thing, we also give the father a free vasectomy.
Food for thought homies. Too cold on my part?”

This sex-positive Sexual Revolution propaganda is all about dem dollars.

It’s a wealth transfer to the immature dependents (high time pref) from the actual adults (low time pref). The productive are being vampirised for the leeches, that’s why they can’t afford to breed themselves!

You have a ‘right’ to breed as many children as you like, under our construct of consensual=moral, but you do not have a right to force others to pay for it. At most, your own relations ought to pay for them, not strangers. I find it funny the men complaining about free birth control are the ones (sluts) who benefit from it, they never want to shut down free STD clinics or the abortion clinics, do they?

Replacement-level only is too generous, one child only. You need to breed those genes OUT.
The old rule was all those claiming any welfare go on birth control OR forsake all right to support for any child they produce while claiming.

“This angers me because I remember trying not to cry when I went in for my tubal ligation. We wanted more kids but knew in our hearts we couldn’t afford more. We stopped at three, wanted five originally. It was hard but I figured if I was ever in a position to truly support another lil guy then I could afford a reversal or in vitro. Made sense to me then, makes sense to me now. I don’t regret it because I know my kids would have less if I had been emotional and selfish.

And then to think of the poor couples who can’t have any at all! Really makes me sick. And more and more people have no responsibility for thier actions in any way anymore. I have to wonder, if there were no such thing as welfare, would she have had all those kids?”

It hurts other, better women most of all, the ones who keep their legs shut.

In a way, it’s deeply sexist against K-women. We have a shorter breeding period where we’re forced to pay for welfare trash babies instead of saving for our own.

“Let’s be fair…
Norplant as long as you are on welfare.
Once you start on welfare no more children are added to the payouts.
You lose the right to vote as long as you are on welfare.
to collect welfare you need to turn in the father with a DNA test to prove it.
So if you are down on your luck you get help, and if you turn your life around you get to have as many children as you want, vote, and collect child support from dad(s)”

Why should anyone’s sex life (lifestyle choice) be subsidized by the taxpayer?

The assumption nobody ever attacks.

There is no such thing as a human right to orgasms.

You have no right to a sex life, especially at the expense of others. This goes from free contraception to rape. Within marriage, you have a right to sex. That is literally the ‘conjugal right‘. You don’t have conjugal rights over anyone you’re not married to. That’s the real issue, they refuse to marry.

They want all the perks of marriage: sex, children, financial providence but no obligations or responsibilities.

In a patriarchy, it’s always the father’s responsibility as the provider, this is more a paternal failure but the women are almost as bad. Simply extract all the mother’s costs from the father, or he can work it off in prison. That’s the only way to do this, the traditional way.

Without promiscuity culture, this would never have happened.

Social shame would have prevented it but who wants to name the Beast of lust? All both parents want is ‘fun’.

They had sex knowing the biological consequence. You are taught this before puberty. You can have ‘fun’ in a thousand other ways or take up a masturbation habit if orgasms are so core to your self-esteem. Too much sex and the wrong sex (out of marriage, with strangers) is bad for your body and mind. It’s also common sense. There is NO such thing as ‘casual sex’. It has one, clear outcome.

“If you can’t feed em, don’t breed em.”
“The bitch and her bastards belong in the gas chamber.”
“How’s about the Dads pay and you keep your legs together. I don’t owe you anything.”

If anything, they owe society.

In these cases, it’s always unfair to blame only the mother when it takes two to horizontal tango.
Always ask: where’s the father?

comment on a previously linked article, relevant
Long before you start saving money for your own kids, you pay for someone else’s. Get some single mother’s kid set up with toys, clothes and food and THEN you can start putting aside some money for your OWN kid, but not before. First some brown kid somewhere gets a Tonka truck, new jeans, KFC, ice cream sandwiches with your money. See what’s left, stick it in the piggy bank for your kid. Fuck it.”

The welfare system is unjust.

Our future is stolen.

The hypocrisy of the signalling Right

I lost a bet to write this because it’s the reddest of redpills. Shove it up your rectum, there’s plenty of room.

You’re probably not gonna like me for this. Stop reading if you’re easily trigg-ed (cough Forney cough).

But I call out these things wherever I see them. No penis passes. No ingrouping/No Enemies on the Right special appeals, because that is my point. You are not right wing, if we’re still going by what is likely an outdated paradigm based on behaviours, in light of identity politics, which are largely innate.

Literally most of the supposed Right Wing has a serious issue with hypocrisy. You wanna lead? #1 Be the example. Otherwise, GTFO. It’s literally the bare minimum for inclusion. If you want a stable society of smug marrieds, you need to get married or at least desire marriage if you meet your One. Don’t advise other people to do what you would not or cannot do yourself. You don’t get to ride the carousel and then complain why do carousels exist? You. You’re the consumer keeping this damaged system (SMP) in business.

Common sense, seriously.

Give up your own degeneracy THEN I’ll trust you’re opposed to it.

well leaves nope no go leaving

Otherwise, you’re an empty signalling piece of shit.
No better than the SJWs. Narcissism of small differences, it burns like your probable STDs.

The rest of us can totally see it. 20/20.
I’m finally pointing it out.

People who cannot control themselves seek to control others. This is the rule with SJWs and the people who repurpose the fashy memes seriously.  Note they don’t have the originality or sense of humour to come up with good ones themselves?
For example, these people with negative Social Intelligence come on here asking if I’m actually a man but anytime they wanna criticise me, I magically become a woman. Okay, that’s misogyny (and magical thinking) and all your claims to meritocracy fall flat when you do this. This is why feminists laugh at you, which is fine, but by extension and association (you steal our memes and terms) at people like me. The MSM loves you because you drag down us.

Minor point: I hate how being funny is now seen as a masculine thing when it’s really a gay thing. Going by pop culture. Which is actually a feminine thing, if we’re selecting a gender. I’m actually very femme in my critique. There’s nothing wrong with me. There is something wrong with expecting women to act like men (feminist programming, pornography) socially and sexually.

You think I’m bitchy? That isn’t an insult to an actual woman. I’m meant to be femme, fam.
I’m funny and I’m feminine. I don’t care if you approve or I’d camwhore on YT and sit next to Milo on panels for Old Media shekels.

Don’t like it?

well fuck off gary oldman

This isn’t a safe space for crybabies, I don’t give a damn which side you claim to be on. Know a tree by its fruit, motherfuckers and wifeswipers. If you think actual cuckoldry is funny, and Beta Bux, you aren’t really party to our level of integrity or the ideas discussed therein. We don’t actually hate other men. We critique politi-cucks because they sell out everyone and our futures, female and yes, your competition, other men. Real men. Men with a future. Manly men who don’t need to keyboard warrior themselves by slagging off the opposite sex before they cry to sleep at night, Tinder still open in their free hand.

It’s like the old people who ‘don’t get’ GIFs (cough Roosh cough). Well, you aren’t the target audience, how is that my problem? You’re acting like I should change the way I operate for your comfort.

Back to the people who judge everyone to distract from the total genetic and social failures of themselves. This doesn’t work.

They’ll bitch about Sandra Fluke slutting it up, but when they slut it up, that’s fine for society! It doesn’t increase everyone’s insurance payments, either, does it? They get real cagey about it. Why the shame? Why hide your face and name, AlphaBro5000?

I'm so vague I may as well be inhuman unless my ego catches up to me

If women were really attracted to your beliefs, why hide them IRL? It’s such a teenage fuck fantasy but coming from old men (30+, no excuse) discussing ‘swimming in pussy’ seriously it makes you wonder if the Western values can be saved. CM got to them and they don’t even know what they’re pushing. They care about being cool and would sell their souls to do it. It’s pathetic. People like that detract from our moral authority if we allow them to feed off our ideas, leech our readers and take donations (whores of Patreon) like a Church of Depravity. You know they aren’t paying taxes.

You can easily see them whining like entitled babies because they can’t find a Mummy to marry. Why? Society doesn’t owe you a whole other person, you have to earn it. Step 1: stop crying.

Their abandonment expectation pings strongly male borderline.
If you think everyone else (female) is crazy, get your own head checked, maybe.

They can’t get women because wife material aren’t lesbians. We see how bitchy and effete they are. Gay men are the original misogynists, as I’ve observed feminists point out in a rare, redpill moment.

They can’t attract women to the ideology because they try to kick us out. It’s intentional.

To quote Aurini, of all people;

Well who do they hate? They hate the original fans. All these movements, the masses show up and hate the founders. They wanna moderate the tone, make it more inclusive

The projection is strong and true. See the Alt Light. I called this months ago when they tried outgrouping the AR founders by calling us… cucks.

i don't even whatever

Oh noes, what-ever will be do?!!! Of all the insults? Are you kitten-mee?

why confused what wtf

I was aghast at the time. I mean, not bothered, they can’t stop us or our memes and they certainly can’t control us like that rant seemed to imply. We’re smarter. We have the IQ in this equation. We don’t scream into video cameras.

what ho whatwhat hello yep yes yeah we know english

On their own sites it’s worse. They censor like SJWs.

They think Ban Hammer makes them correct.

It’s the SJW paradigm. They have SJW tactics, like safe spaces, censoring and doxxing. They’ve tried to fake doxx me, which was relatively funny as a study in projection.

These people don’t wanna overturn the r-selected Sodom, they benefit from it. Watch what happens when you offer to restrict their porn to 18+. Wailing like a toddler. Is that a pro-family conservative value, people?

Here’s a tidbit of wisdom for ya.

What’s good for the goose, is good for the gander. Know what this means?

If it’s good for men, it’s good for women too. This is how logic works. Either the behaviour is prosocial or antisocial.

Nothing to do with feminist equality. Feminists breathe, breathing isn’t feminist.
Quit it with the non-sequiturs.

The Muh Dicks can go to the Middle East where their culture belongs, where they’ll feel really comfy in a Taharrush or Eve Teasing setup. Because a woman in a miniskirt is the problem and showing skin is evil (ask yourselves what species of ‘Christian’ is this and did it survive the Industrial Revolution). Meanwhile, men walk around with their bitch tits out and women magically resist the temptation to rape them.

Back to the rampant sexuality, which is meant to be healthy because Darwin? These people didn’t read Darwin, clearly. He’s very stern and disapproving of bestial sexualities. It’s inhuman. He discusses breeding, not ONSs. Hence, non-human animals are not degenerate, they lack the agency and choice and birth control.
Where exactly, did Darwin say this thing about men being able to fuck whatever and wherever? Where did the biology touch you, Jerry? No place for naturalistic fallacy, the average IQ of Alt Righters is higher than your Asian anime waifu. They’ll admit objectively that culture is over-sexualised, freely, but if you dare suggest, if you dare question Internet-Alpha-Man, that he might be oversexed and it might be unhealthy if you look at the psychiatry and suicide rates…. you must be a feminist because, apparently, they follow the Biblical virtue of prudence now?

Detour: They say ‘Double Standard’ like it’s an argument? They use it like a thought-terminating cliche, like a K/O instant win of the argument. This is the poison you get corrupting us from the manosphere. That’s not an argument. It’s basic logical hypocrisy. You say human rights, that applies to all humans. You say meritocracy, that is blind to anything identity and purely based on merit. Double Standard is a fallacy when there are two sets of rules to one society. It cannot work practically. It’s a logical inconsistency. Do you understand how stupid you sound?

It’s maths, you manwhores.
Has the HPV penetrated that much of your microbiome?
We all know about the hypofrontality. It’s brain damage, reeeee.

Women are people, worthy of respect. Women are half the equation for a prosperous society.

If you disagree with that, you’re not traditional.

The West was built off the backs and blood and sweat of good women and good men. Neither is the enemy. The feminists want that Gender War to have something to do. That isn’t looking in a mirror. Anyone who wants to turn you against your natural inclination to the opposite sex is an enemy to the nuclear family, they are anti-natal.

Ask these people if they want Hook-Up Culture, State Sponsored Abortions and Free (Taxpayer) Birth Control (chemical abortifacents). If they say Yes to any of these, they are Left wing. Instead, they are deceivers, trying to subvert the right wing with the promise of Free Goodies and dopamine addiction. Same way they did with the poor black community, look at your future.

You’re just an inverted feminist, with the sexes switched out. Call yourselves MRA, you wanna rentseek and feed from the trough with the other piggies. Call yourselves MGTOW, you never actually Go, do you? You never leave women alone, especially online? You seek us out. It’s creepy. We can see you’re not doing any of the things you claim to be. We are smarter than you. You may delude yourself, other people aren’t wearing Blinders.

Men can err. Women can err. Neither sex is good or evil. Common sense.

They claim they want Patriarchy but a Patriarchy would’ve strung them up by now for corrupting their daughters and binge-drinking. Don’t get me started on the creepy pedophilia of sex tourism. They’re lying, they’re empty signalling hoping to win points from both sides.

The priors are all wrong, all the way down. Turtle logic. All the way down. The circular reasoning of It’s all female’s fault (fun fact: most women aren’t feminists) because I said so. …And? Anyone with your notch count, worse who’s proud of it, is no moral authority. This isn’t a game, this is the future of society at stake.

But women are natural conservatives, once we’ve bred and have something to protect, men are natural liberals if you look at any worker’s union, whether or not they breed. Look at the class pyramid Marx pointed out, the majority is working class and the majority of working class men vote Left, men are natural socialists because it backs up their natural provision duties. Quit projecting and look at the facts. If you look at voter trends as I have on here, men are the liberal problem. Quit applying American SJW on campus demo BS to the rest of the world. It’s a bubble. It isn’t real, look at the stats or be content in your laziness/ignorance.

It’s a class issue and SJWs will do anything to deny that, because they’re upper-middle privileged.
You don’t see working class men making bank by bitching on Youtube, do you? Too busy working to keep people like you in antibiotic shots, which thanks to people like you, are now failing.

The wages of sin used to be paid by the sinners. This was just.
These people will protect these things, this corrupt degeneracy, this ‘culture’.

After all this time, they still don’t get the Matrix references.
And these people claim to have founded us? Bich plz.

They don’t want to revolution or reform anything. They care for pleasure and being narcissists, pulling one over on conservatives by signalling as one while playing feminist to screw them too gives them extra shots of pozz dopamine.

They are parasite singles, as the Japanese correctly fingered. This is simple;

If someone claims to complain about degeneracy, they’d better not be contributing to it.

That’s the sound of a thousand body pillows being stuffed into mattresses in the distance.

Nod and back away from the crazies

The same people who never hold the male feminists and SJWs and founder of FEMEN accountable. Because Penis Pass. This is, to turn a phrase, hella dodgy.

There isn’t a separate Deadly Sins list for women and men. You’re either going to Hell in this White Christian society you claim to want, or you’re not. Simple enough reasoning, you’d think.

For pointing any of this out I get called a feminist. Really? Ad hominem doesn’t work, silly. I’m still correct and the points stand on their own merit whatever you dislike about my personality or my tone (tone policing wahey). Really, I was mean? Welcome to reality, remove the dummy from your gaping rainbow cakehole. You kiss your mama with that misogynist maw? If all women are whores, that includes your Mother. I tend to agree. Idiots cannot see their unintended consequences or unfortunate (logical) implications, but it’s funny to those of us with an IQ with digits of three.
Good luck keeping a Patriarchy when no woman will sleep with you, dipshits. You need our support and our complicity to breed. We aren’t robots that keep the babies of rape, either.

Consent requires a basic level of intelligence to know when and what to reject. [Also why if women can’t vote, fucking them would be pedophilia, legally. Either we have agency and can make such weighty decisions like reproduction or not. Pick ONE.]

Even ‘crazy’ feminists need the security of birth control before sleeping with the crazy of you, man who wants ‘no-strings’ sex like that has ever existed in the history of humanity. Sluts are damaged forever, but ignore player burnout. Why does no decent woman want me? [1]

Listen to yourselves.

I listen to myself.

Darwin doesn’t apply to sterile sex and even IF she got pregnant, you’d be the first lot to 180 your ‘principles’ (really signals) and demand an abortion OR an exemption from child support.

To quote pieces from elsewhere.

The world doesn’t owe you sex. That’s entitlement. No IFs or BUTs. That’s entitlement. Put down the porn. They’re the male Sandra Flukes expecting the rest of us to give them orgasms…. because they exist, therefore they deserve it.

Did porn tell you that?

porn cheat archer

If you think hypersexuality is a positive force for society, you’re a feminist.

The Sexual Revolution was feminist. The defining cornerstone. If you wouldn’t unwind that, you don’t want a Patriarchy. Either it existed historically, in which case the feminists are right, or it never existed like Male-Only Suffrage and you’re wrong. Again.
They have no power over men without sex, as the failed strike not to sleep with Trump supporters has proven. Turns out, most of his supporters were straight and female (women win elections in democracy by sheer force of numbers) so this is awkward. Your definitive woman-hating ideologies fail basic predictions. Congrats, you’re in the same category as global warming. Hug it out, happy non-breeder. 

They would agree with that sentiment, I think. I have no illusions where these supposedly right-wing males stand. The lays never lie. Your politics is proven by your personal life.

Women being biologically distinct from men doesn’t make us inferior. What I just described is sexual dimorphism. It’s a silly question, morality doesn’t apply in science. Feminists try to force the issue, doesn’t work. Either it’s true or it isn’t and if you choose to make spurious claims, yeah, people will think you’re full of it, because you’re hiding behind the apron strings of Science like a surrogate rhetorical Mommy. Oh, you have one study? Call Al Gore. At least he commits. Read a real book. The maximal difference is within chance level, about 5% tops. Unlike race, which you deny while using the term ‘racist’ for opponents. The modern human is androgynous too, so this is probably far less in our reality. Apply logic, remove Womb Envy (as real as Penis Envy).

Like, I’ve been here for years. Literally years. I know how this goes.

You can’t outsignal an original member.

These male entryists, these absolute antisocial degenerate losers wheedle their way into a successful cultural bandwagon (e.g. the Manosphere) and start booting out the original members that made it good (they don’t but it looks that way cos we leave). If this sounds familiar, it’s the SJW tactic that ruined Geek Culture.

Mainstream is fine. These people are cancer.

So they come up to people like me and try to outgroup me. Like Oh, it’s a shame the Alt Right has women, we don’t hate women but let’s all move to a homoerotic island for Male Supremacy.

“Let’s you and him fight” – this is the abuse tactic called triangulation.
Characteristic of gaslighters and rabbits, but I repeat myself.
Divide and conquer, like this is new? Like they invented this??

How stupid do they think we are?

Real men want a good wife and good children. They oppose anything that stands in the way of that ambition, the only real ambition if you remove contemporary culture selling you on the SATC ‘dream’ of materialism and sex blogging. They don’t get much joy out of bitching on a sausage-fest forum and crying into their hentai porn screen with the futility of someone who doesn’t deserve their fertility.

They burned down the manosphere and other associated groups and now they’re trying to do it with us.

It won’t work because we’re basing our material on reality and have smarter people naturally but if we don’t pay attention soon, removing the sin equivalent of kebab won’t be as easy. Our MSM rep will suffer. ‘Member that Vox Day (OK on other topics) claims to know what white people need to do better than we know ourselves. Why are we allowing the mystery meat to lecture us? Someone please explain the reasoning here. Isn’t this the problem in the first place, taking tips from the outgroup that hate us?

Misogyny, which does exist on the internet (as well as misandry, can’t have one without t’uther), rots any ideology that seeks to create a healthy society because men and women need each other and that’s nothing to be ashamed of. It isn’t bitchy/faggy/weak to want to breed and raise your spawn. Anyone who tries to shame you for the biological imperative to settle down and have a family is brainwashed. Essentially, if they say the nuclear family is good, they’re also claiming you’re not good enough to reproduce. Mellow on that thought.

The manosphere is the male equivalent of Carrie Bradshaw. If you find a good woman, you don’t need books on Text Games and Juicing Recipes. If you have kids, you don’t have time to give traffic views to their clickbait. You have unplugged from their system. The PUA scam relies on you being Forever Alone. Like its proponents.

If people want to let their genetics die with them, I think they should be encouraged.

These entryists burned down the manosphere with bitchy sweeping statements about all women. Sure, sure, NAWALT. But it’s true. It’s like when the feminists go on about men being rapists. It’s true that sweeping statements have no basis in reality. You’re being sexist. You are not judging the person based on their actions, but their sex, and making exemptions (a fallacy) based on a special sex. Just because you spend all your time in clubs surrounded by the worst quality people (birds of a feather) doesn’t make women in the same city like that. There’s an egregious problem with Americans projecting and trying to World Police the sexuality of the world (non-America).

You are Sodom. Sort yourself out.
You are the hub of degeneracy. No pity party for you. No limp-dick standing around Won’t Someone Do Something? You’re the Alpha Males, that means it’s your fault. Responsibility is an alien concept to r-types, even the somewhat self-aware ones for sexual manipulation (rape) purposes.

Magical White Man isn’t going to ride in and save you. You are not the victim, you are the criminal. You caused this mess. You are not Princess Peach in need of rescue from the meanies. Don’t try to Snowflake while throwing up bravado. It doesn’t work. It fools nobody. Hypoagency is a feminist lie. Men have as much self control as women. You are possibly more responsible if you believe in ‘Men should lead’ theories. Since leaders bear the brunt, logically.

Society doesn’t improve because men won’t improve.

That doesn’t mean notch counts, this isn’t Pacman.

The West won’t save itself because the men are expecting women to rescue them.

It’s simple.

Don’t be degenerate. If you ‘can’t’ do this, why do you expect your kind to do it too?

Unless you don’t expect change, which makes you a vacuous, signalling liar.

Impotent or deceptive, it can only be one.
Either way, we don’t want you. The problem is not with us.

After this, most obvious of signs, flashy neon, they still won’t get it.

Sure, these people masterminded the whole meme thing, right, Alt Right?

[1]  Really I should trash-compact my points less. I know.

And being nice gets you nothing. That’s called the First World standard. It’s the minimum. You aren’t special for being polite to women because women are people, the same way women aren’t entitled to a drink because they smiled at a guy.

A puppy is nice.

Nobody wants to fuck a puppy.

Have the standards for husband slipped so low?

The self-aware r-types try to win women from both sides by signalling K. Run away. They’re crazy. Leave them to the cokeheads and sluts. Let the genetic suicides get on with it and burn out their pleasure circuits. Yes, that’s what (player) burnout is.

The persuasive case against Eurasians

The psychiatric issues cannot be denied.

OT but I’ll put it here

He wasn’t even handsome.
Seriously, all the ‘straight men’ calling him attractive need a good, long look in the mirror but that involves coming out of the closet on the other side.

He looked like a puffy sex doll, with the middle distance porn star stare. Definite creeper vibe, probable anime fetish. It’s mostly in the lips. We call that a trout pout but it’s a pretty good indicator of whorishness since it’s usually a result of Botox. He looked like a strange ambiguous anime character on a balloon or bobblehead. At least very femme for a man. He looked about 13. This case disproves a lot of supposedly redpill truisms e.g. rich guys always win, women will sleep with anything if it’s cocky enough, hypergamy is a female thing instead of a projection of male ambition, women are superficial but also don’t care about looks, you need a car and the alpha mindset (WTF NLP BS is that, alpha males IRL have children and ONE mate) and finally, mixed race is the future. I guess that’s why they have high rejection rates both on dating websites and organ donation. Evil, bigoted biology, amirite?

I still see ‘redpill men’ going on about the injustice of it.

If you’re basing your lifestyle on a rapper, you’re doing Life wrong.
If your ‘bang’ (shudder) is on birth control, you shouldn’t feel proud. They aren’t ‘selecting’ you for anything. Darwin doesn’t apply to sterile sex and even IF she got pregnant, you’d be the first lot to 180 your ‘principles’ (really signals) and demand an abortion OR an exemption from child support (so Alpha, to abandon your children, so strong, not to mention cuckolding some other guy you call Beta, such brotherly love). You aren’t proving your masculinity, your Alpha-ness or anything other than your ability to be a throbbing dildo or otherwise vaginal plug while she’s between ‘boyfriends’. Where’s the victory here.



The rest of the world won’t fetishize your child the way you fetishized their mother with some Oriental BDSM BS. Don’t expect everyone to agree with your vision or, as the feminists themselves call it, fuck your beauty standards.

If you think about it, he’s trying to emulate his parents’ relationship with his Daddy’s money, like a male Paris Hilton. I don’t know what to comment about that, let’s leave it.

If you actually read his manifesto, it doesn’t go on about women per se.

It goes on about white, blonde women.

How dare they not let him buy them? Like, we’re people? He knows what they need, like he’s their surrogate Sugar Daddy father figure. [Protip for women: if any man hints at trying to roleplay your father or a Daddy-like figure, run, he’s an r-type. Ks want an equal force in the home, they don’t actually control contrary to r-type belief, because they don’t need to, they know their woman is good.] He cares about women so much he thought we are disposable objects, not future wives and mothers capable of making our own decisions, including knowing when to reject someone who’s clearly missing a couple of screws. Consent requires a basic level of intelligence to know when and what to reject. [Also why if women can’t vote, fucking them would be pedophilia, legally. Either we have agency and can make such weighty decisions like reproduction or not. Pick ONE.]

That’s right, your mystery meat White Saviour was anti-white. Why do you want this supposed beta uprising if you’re doing so well IRL and also not beta or lower yourself? Is this not some delta revenge fantasy?


A puppy is nice.

Nobody wants to fuck a puppy.

Have the standards for husband slipped so low?


Anal sex linked to anal cancer, says Captain Obvious


Not the point. You shouldn’t have STDs in your arse.
That’s the point.

If only we had a book of some kind, teaching people these basic facts of life.

What to do, sure, but more importantly and practically, what not to do…

Yeah, that’ll do.

Honestly, the worst lie atheists peddle is that the rules of reality are arbitrary.
Things are called bad for a reason – because they ARE bad for you. Personally.
Morality is based on the individual and their dumb-arse choices.

Couldn’t resist.

It’s gay sex. Doesn’t matter if you’re doing it with a woman, if you’re not doing it with the woman parts of the woman. Gay sex habits, gay sexual statistics. Because we know that bell curve ends well.


  1. Not correcting for sexual ‘lifestyle’. Not an argument.
  2. As if microbes cannot migrate. Through the same system. With zero boundaries. The area of the tract is vastly larger than the opening. Accounting for physical size.

See note.

“Similarly, the greater number of sexual partners, the greater the risk of cancer.”

I keep seeing the manosphere complain about prostate cancer but deny… this bit.
How did it get there? Magic?

You can only shut out reality for so long. Before it comes knocking on your backdoor.

You notice how so few of these sex-positive people are willing to talk about medical facts, from HBD to STD immunity?

Prostate cancer is under-funded, therefore women are wrong.

Prostate cancer is bad, therefore breast cancer is funny.

Prostate because man. Manly man macho man. Listen to Mr Man. Anal fun.

Note: This pathogenic cancer aetiology is a great score for Gay Germ theory. I wonder if the ‘men’ indulging in the medically, morally wrong type of sex to imitate porn stars (great sexual role models) will show greater effeminacy (and other atypical gender psychological outcomes). So the pussies complaining about cancer in men as sexist are happily spreading germs they know probably cause cancer in women. No sympathy necessary.

“two-thirds of new cases are diagnosed in women.”

Did I mention the best part?
Men can catch and keep STDs in their urethra from not wearing a condom, it makes you less of a man regardless of where you stick it. It doesn’t just protect the woman/receptive party.  Even the testes are not immune, as Ebola shows.

I mean, anal sex with a woman can still result in pregnancy so I don’t know what argument they’ve got at this point.

Almost like it’s evil (as eating bad pork used to be fatal, prior to antibiotics and electric ovens). All the stuff about the sin of men lying as with other men refers to this practice, it isn’t exclusive to gays but it’s the only internal type they can do, they don’t have as much choice. When God got mad at sodomites, they might’ve been doing it to women, also raising questions about spilling seed with the expected pre-marital stuff to boot. I mention that because the guys who get high and mighty about doing it with women, are actually worse according to the Bible than the homosexuals they look down on.

Wherever anal sex is discussed, it should be dismissed, based on literally ALL the evidence.

Never taught to kids as the ‘same’ and OK to emulate based on porn.

The first challenger to sex positivity: Super-gonorrhea

Doctors have expressed “huge concern” that super-gonorrhoea has spread widely across England and to gay men.


Public Health England acknowledges measures to contain the outbreak have been of “limited success”.

Doctors fear the sexually transmitted infection, which can cause infertility, could soon become untreatable.

Terrible news for whores.

shrug lol toldyaso fuck you bateman

The rest of us are sitting pretty.
This whole thing is priceless.

Only 34 cases have been officially confirmed in laboratory testing, but this is likely to be the tip of the iceberg of an infection that can be symptomless.

The outbreak started in straight couples, but is now being seen in gay men too.

By straight they mean swingers.

“We’ve been worried it would spread to men who have sex with men,” Peter Greenhouse, a consultant in sexual health based in Bristol, told BBC News.

“The problem is [they] tend to spread infections a lot faster simply as they change partners more quickly.”

They are also more likely to have gonorrhoea in their throats. There further resistance is more likely to develop as antibiotics get to the throat in lower doses and the area is also teeming with other bacteria that can share the resistance to drugs.

Cock-tail effect?

The bacterium that causes gonorrhoea is extremely adept at shrugging off our best antibiotics.

So two drugs – azithromycin and ceftriaxone – are used in combination.

But now resistance to azithromycin is spreading, doctors fear it is only a matter of time before ceftriaxone fails too.

Oh noes.

England’s most senior doctor has already warned gonorrhoea is on the cusp of becoming untreatable.



“If strains of gonorrhoea emerge that are resistant to both azithromycin and ceftriaxone, treatment options would be limited as there is currently no new antibiotic available to treat the infection.”

Yeah, same with lots of diseases, few of which are transmitted by consensual choices.
You chose to take on the risk. Welcome to adulthood.

She is encouraging people to practise safe sex to minimise the risk of sexually transmitted infections.

I have sympathy for those who will have caught it from being cheated on, but the rest brought it on themselves. Notice how entitled they feel to treatments and R&D meds from taxpayer funding? Why should others fund your lifestyle? Why should I pay for your sex life? I wanna stay the hell out of your bedroom, like that slutty American tart instructed.


Society? The promiscuous make up about 15% of the population.
The slutty people become infertile?
Isn’t this Nature’s sterilization process for bad parents?
How is this my problem?

But Mr Greenhouse warned that sexual health services were facing their “biggest restriction ever” due to funding cuts.

You wanted more people in the country, meaning you get a smaller slice of the pie (tax takings).

The emergence of a dangerous superbug was creating a “perfect storm scenario”, he said.

How. What. Why. Where. BS.

Meanwhile, the Department of Health has announced a new tool to help GPs cut the number of antibiotics they prescribe.

Omg. Punishing the rest of us, seriously?
That will kill people, they’re already under-prescribed for real diseases and over-prescribed for STDs, from political pressure. Where do you think the resistance (evolution) is coming from, this quickly and this suddenly? The bacteria swap genetic material when people bang uglies.
Promiscuity culture is killing people, wonderful….

Encourage the stupid it will make less of them

All our medical advancements are flying out the window because some people refuse to control themselves and prefer to behave like animals, on our dime.

It will allow practices to see how their antibiotic prescribing habits compare with other practices.

Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said: “I want to see antibiotics being prescribed only when necessary and hope this will be a new weapon to help GPs cut the numbers of antibiotics needlessly being given out.”

Let me guess, the sluts are necessary, little kids with strep throat will be told to deal.
Do they remember reading about what life was like before antibiotics? Infant mortality? Death in childbirth? Industrial workers picking things up from the factory floor?

The Bible warned about the connection between immorality and plagues.
We were warned.

What slippery slope? Orgies go mainstream

According to the Bible, collapse should be right around the corner.

This has been happening in really warped Boomer couples for decades, but they’re pushing it into the mainstream now to attract young desperate people. As a local, we don’t talk about it. We know it happens, but it’s gross and most of the people are ugly, why bother? Swingers (people who refuse to divorce but flout their vows) and bisexuals (or try-sexuals) are responsible for all those STD epidemics you keep hearing about.

I wonder if there’s any link between “sex positivism” and the increasing rates of sexually-transmitted infections (see article elsewhere on this site)? Morality isn’t just some code invented by spoilsports – it has practical applications, and the lack of it has consequences, which we’re evidently seeing now.

It’s all a bit reminiscent of the last days of the Roman Empire, but I hope I’m wrong.

I don’t, those bastards deserved it.