Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Proxies revealed on Anwar and Quek!


Read ABITW here and here.










That is not difficult. Many had done so.




The defense could probably appeal this rejection.


How will Anwar answer to the public?




The amount of RM224.5 million is no chicken feed to anybody.








Anonymous said...

anwar guna proksi untuk dapat untung atas angin. bila sykt lingkup proksi yang kena tanggung dan terpaksa di isytihar muflis

agaknya anwar memang dah bangkrap kot. cara paling senang nak dapat duit jadi balaci pihak luar. masyukkk

Anonymous said...

ada juga hikmah pada anwar bila kes ini timbul.

boleh la cover isu WSJ / Israel yang lagi sensitif tu. Ramai lebai Pas tengah pening nak defend dan marah kat anwar.

kalau setakat kes loan bank dan proksi ni, anwar boleh spin celah gigi saja masa ceramah kat kampung atau pendengar yang tak faham sistem pinjaman besar bank.

ada dia kesah hormat kes dalam sebutan mahkamah atau tidak.

Grand Marquis said...

In RPK article about the same issue, there is a very interesting quote.

RPK said:

This tells us that there is more need for UMNO to exist, because if PR wins and DAP managed to siphoned into power like what happen to Penang, it will be worse. This time the quote will read like "behind every Chinese business tycoon is a Chinese politician. The Chinese need the Politician to spin their rip off. The Politician also need the Chinese to tell their success story. The Chinese now no longer need the Malays to abuse this power. The Chinese already have economic power and simply have to invest their money in any Chinese politician."

The situation in Penang is a good example of what is happening. The DAP Chinese politician now team up with the Chinese tycoon to rip the state in the name of CAT.

Nazri said...


Tidak ada apa apa yang suprise dalam court document yang disiarkan oleh RPK.Ia hanya menyatakan yang defandent claim ia diberitahu oleh Faiz dan Hanzah yang mereka ini proxcy Anwar.Susaha mahkamah hendak terima.Tidak ada document bertulis.Ini antaras your word against my words.

Tulisan RPK juga tidak tepat.Idris Hydrolik merupakan syarikat Public co.UMNO bukan pemegang sahamnya.Malah saya boleh comfirm disini UMNO tidak memileki satu saham pun dalam Idris.Idris menjual saham syarikat kewangannya KBB kapada Arus Murni dengan harga $450 juta.Dan yang itu di terima sapenohnya oleh Idris.
Idris juga tidak membayar apa apa kommision kapada Anwar atau proxcy nya.
Saman itu berhubongan dengan pinjaman yang diambil oleh defendent untok membeli saham Arus Murni.Kenapa harus Anwar atau Quek meminjam untok membeli saham Arus Murni?

Dalam tulisan RPK ia menyatakan yang Nalla berkerja dengan Vincent Tan dalam Spot ToTo.Nalla berkerja dengan T.K Lim yang menguasai Magnum.

Sebab sabenar Vincent Tan tidak dibenarkan membeli saham MUI bank kerana mengikut peraturan Bank Negara malaysia pemegang saham syarikat Gambling tidak dibenarkan menguasai Institusi kewangan.Vinvent terpaksa membuat pilehan sama ada menguasai Spot Toto atau MUI bank.

Saya yakin tidak ada apa2 yang diperolehi dengan pendedehan ini.

A Voice said...


Do stick to the subject. Sori Azman Hashim is not.


Every words or statement made to or in court is accepted as good unless there is a counter answer or disputed convincingly in court.

I think you are being presumptous to assume Low cannot prove and it is a matter of heresay.

If Anwar side do not dispute, it will be an accepted and refered fact.

Should realised what it means by rejected on technical ground.

In fact there is such practise for court to reject new addition because of time factor.

If the proceeding was only kick start now, since 2005, why not give the leeway and let this clause be argued.

In the name of justice??

My Say