text: (h) without reasonable excuse P contravenes a requirement in or imposed under regulation 
  11(2); 
  
  (i) without reasonable excuse P contravenes a requirement in paragraph 5 or 16(a), so far is 
  it relates to paragraph 5, of Schedule 11 (requirement to possess managed self-isolation 
  package); 
  
  (j) P contravenes any other requirement in Schedule 11 (except paragraph 15); or 
  (k) without reasonable excuse P contravenes a requirement in paragraph 4 of Schedule 9 
  
  (employers’ obligations relating to workforce tests). 
  
  (2) But P does not commit an offence where P contravenes a requirement in— 
  
  (a) paragraph (1), (2), (3) or (4) of regulation 4, if P reasonably believed at the time of the 
  contravention that the notification of a negative result was valid and from a qualifying 
  test; 
  
  (b) regulation 9 in the circumstances described in paragraph (9)(d), (10)(f), (13)(j) or (16) of 
  that regulation, if P reasonably believed at the time of the contravention that the test was 
  an appropriate test (within the meaning given in paragraph 2 of Schedule 10); or 
  
  (c) Schedule 11 if accommodation or transport booked is no longer available for reasons 
  
  beyond the P’s control. 
  
  (3) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), reasonable excuses include, in particular, where— 
  
  (a) P was medically unfit to provide a sample for a qualifying test and possessed a document, 
  in English or accompanied by a certified English translation, signed by a medical 
  practitioner entitled to practise in the country or territory in which that practitioner was 
  based, to that effect; 
  
  (b) it was not reasonably practicable for P to obtain a qualifying test due to a disability; 
  (c) P required medical treatment with such urgency that obtaining a qualifying test was not 
  
  reasonably practicable; 
  
  (d) P contracted coronavirus and required emergency medical treatment; 
  (e) P was accompanying, in order to provide support, whether medical or otherwise, a person 
  described in sub-paragraph (c) or (d) where it was not reasonably practicable for P to 
  obtain a qualifying test; 
  
  (f) P began the journey to England in a country or territory in which a qualifying test was not 
  available to the public, with or without payment, or in which it was not reasonably 
  practicable for P to obtain a qualifying test due to a lack of reasonable access to a 
  qualifying test or testing facility and it was not reasonably practicable for P to obtain a 
  qualifying test in P’s last point of departure if this was different to where P began the 
  journey; 
  
  (g) the time it has taken P to travel from the country or territory where P began the journey to 
  the country or territory of their last point of departure prior to arriving in England meant 
  that it was not reasonably practicable for P to meet the requirement in paragraph 1(c) of 
  Schedule 7, and it was not reasonably practicable for P to obtain a qualifying test in P’s 
  last point of departure. 
  
  (4) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(c)— 
  
  (a) reasonable excuses for contravening regulation 6(3), (4) or (5) include, in particular, 
  
  where— 
  (i) it was not reasonably practicable for P to book a test due to a disability, 
  (ii) P reasonably considered before arriving in England that it would not be reasonably 
  practicable for P (or, as the case may be, the child for whom P has responsibility) to 
  provide a sample for a test in accordance with regulation 6 due to a disability, 
  (iii) P required medical treatment with such urgency that booking a test was not 
  
  reasonably practicable, 