text: As the late Karen Spärck Jones pointed out: the use of LMs 
  ties us to certain (usually unstated) epistemological and method- 
  ological commitments [124]. Either i) we commit ourselves to a 
  noisy-channel interpretation of the task (which rarely makes sense 
  outside of ASR), ii) we abandon any goals of theoretical insight into 
  tasks and treat LMs as “just some convenient technology” [p.7], or 
  iii) we implicitly assume a certain statistical relationship — known 
  to be invalid — between inputs, outputs and meanings.20 Although 
  
  <html>
          <head> <meta charset="UTF-8">
          <style>
          table, th, td {
              border: 1px solid black;
              font-size: 10px;
          }
          </style> </head>
          <body>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups" width="100%%">
              [html]<thead><tr><td>Table</td><td>FF insilute</td><td>Parameter</td><td>Cellstrate</td><td>Table</td><td>Age, year</td><td>Table</td><td>Table</td><td>*</td><td>Species</td><td>Age ( years )</td><td>Table</td><td>Table</td>
          </table> </body> </html>