text: **References and notes**
  
  1 OSH Barometer data visualisation tool: https://visualisation.osha.europa.eu/osh-barometer 
  
  2 Methodological remark: Many workers in the service sectors have similar physically demanding work like workers 
  in manufacturing, construction and agriculture. The statistical assignment of enterprises of a certain type to the 
  service sectors and the sectors industry/construction/agriculture is a too rough approach to describe and analyse 
  working conditions, particularly if more detailed data on working conditions are available. For that reason, when 
  talking about health outcomes, in this report often more informative categories are used, for example, managerial 
  jobs (LFS, Eurostat terminology), or high-, medium- and low-skilled clerical work (EWCS), or high-skilled manual 
  and low-skilled manual work (Eurostat), independent on the sector where this work is performed. 
  
  3 EU-OSHA – European Agency for Safety and Health at Work: Third European Survey of Enterprises on New 
  and Emerging Risks (ESENER 3), ESENER Data visualisation, section ‘Comparisons 2014-2019’; for ‘Prolonged 
  sitting’ value from ‘Data visualisation 2019’ not from ‘Comparisons’. 
  4 Some of the very first OSH regulations on psychosocial risks at workplaces were issued by Denmark in the early 
  1980s, dealing with monotony at work, stress, risk of violence at work and risks of working alone. 
  5 Psychosocial risks are regarded as reason, and mental health/disease as consequence or outcome of these 
  risks. 