text: **See also**
  
  <html>
          <head> <meta charset="UTF-8">
          <style>
          table, th, td {
              border: 1px solid black;
              font-size: 10px;
          }
          </style> </head>
          <body>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups" width="100%%">
              [html]<thead><tr><td>• Animal consciousness</td><td>• Binding problem •</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>• Blindsight • Chinese room</td><td>• Cogito_ergo_sum • Cognition</td></tr><tr><td>• Free will • Ideasthesia • Introspection</td></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr></tbody>
          </table> </body> </html>
  
  **Notes**
  
  1. "But, without any delusive representations of images or phantasms, I am most certain that I 
  am, and that I know and delight in this. In respect to these truths I am not at all afraid of the 
  arguments of the Academians, who say, What if you are deceived? For if I am deceived, I 
  am. For he who is not, cannot be deceived..." 
  
  2. There has been debate over how best to characterize James' position. The*Stanford*
  *Encyclopedia of Philosophy*states: "James’s commitment to panpsychism remains 
  somewhat controversial, since he also advanced a cogent set of objections against a 
  version of the view, which he labelled the 'mind dust' theory, in chapter six of The Principles 
  of Psychology ([1890] 1981). These objections are the inspiration for the so-called 
  'combination problem', around which much of the twenty first century literature on 
  panpsychism focuses." 