text: <html>
          <head> <meta charset="UTF-8">
          <style>
          table, th, td {
              border: 1px solid black;
              font-size: 10px;
          }
          </style> </head>
          <body>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups" width="100%%">
              [html]<thead><tr><td>Component</td><td>Remote copy primary site</td><td>Remote copy secondary site</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>FlashCopy Source</td><td>Supported</td><td>Supported latency : When the FlashCopy relationship is in the care the care the care the care at the remote copy secondary site operates in write - through model. The care at the operations with the care and the care attendance the latent remo</td></tr><tr><td>FlashCopyTarget</td><td>This is a supported combination of community restrictions ; restrictions ; results ; lossing a stage – farce comparisons copy relationship to be fully restrictionship to be fully restrictions / clied. Malers, and loss to surveillance th</td><td>This is a supported combination with the major restriction that the FlashCopy mapping cannot be copy ing, stopp ing, or suspended. Otherwise, the restrictions are the same as at the remote copy primary site.</td></tr></tbody>
          </table> </body> </html>