text: 2. Murphy JM*et al.*2009*UK climate projections science report: climate change projections*. Exeter, UK: 
  **26**
  Met Ofﬁce Hadley Centre. See http://ukclimateprojections.metofﬁce.gov.uk. 
  
  3. United Nations. 2010 Report of the Conference Parties on its ﬁfteenth session, held in 
  Copenhagen, 7 to 19 December 2009. Addendum. Part Two: Action taken by the Conference 
  of the Parties at its ﬁfteenth session. See http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/ 
  11a01.pdf. 
  
  4. United Nations. 2016 Report of the Conference Parties on its twenty-ﬁrst session, held in Paris, 
  30 November to 13 December 2015. Addendum Part two: Action taken by the Conference of 
  the Parties at its twenty-ﬁrst session. See http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/ 
  10a01.pdf. 
  
  5. Hewitson B*et al.*2014 Regional context. In*Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and*
  *vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth assessment*
  *report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change*(eds VR Barros*et al.*), pp. 1133–1197. 
  Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 
  
  6. Dankers R*et al.*2013 First look at changes in ﬂood hazard in the inter-sectoral impact model 
  intercomparison project ensemble.*Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA***111**, 3257–3261. (doi:10.1073/ 
  pnas.1302078110) 
  
  7. IPCC. 2014 Summary for policymakers. In*Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and*
  *vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth*
  *Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change*(eds CB Field*et al.*), pp. 
  1–32. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 
  8. Schewe J*et al.*2014 Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change.*Proc. Natl*
  *Acad. Sci. USA***111**, 3245–3250. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1222460110) 
  
  9. Schleussner C-F*et al.*2015 Differential climate impacts for policy-relevant limits to global 
  warming: the case of 1.5°C and 2°C.*Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss.***6**, 2447–2505. (doi:10.5194/ 
  esdd-6-2447-2015) 
  
  10. James R, Washington R, Schleussner C-F, Rogeli J, Conway D. 2017 Characterizing half-a- 
  degree difference: a review of methods for identifying regional climate responses to global 
  warming targets.*WIREs Clim Change***8**, e457. (doi:10.1002/wcc.457) 
  11. Haarsma RJ*et al.*2016 High resolution model intercomparison project (HighResMIP v1.0) for 
  CMIP6.*Geosci. Model Dev.***9**, 4185–4208. (doi:10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016) 
  
  12. Hewitt HT, Copsey D, Culverwell ID, Harris CM, Hill RSR, Keen AB, McLaren AJ, Hunke 
  EC. 2011 Design and implementation of the infrastructure of HadGEM3: the next-generation 
  Met Ofﬁce climate modelling system.*Geosci. Model Dev.***4**, 223–253. (doi:10.5194/gmd-4- 
  223-2011). 
  13. Martin GM*et al.*2011 The HadGEM2 family of met ofﬁce uniﬁed model climate 
  
  30. Wiltshire A, Gornall J, Booth B, Dennis E, Falloon P, Kay G, McNeall D, McSweeney C, 
  Betts R. 2013 The importance of population, climate change and CO2 plant physiological 
  forcing in determining future global water stress.*Glob. Environ. Change***23**, 1083–1097. 
  (doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.005) 
  
  31. Papadimitriou LV, Koutroulis AG, Grillakis MG, Tsanis IK. 2016 High-end climate change 
  impact on European runoff and low ﬂows – exploring the effects of forcing biases.*Hydrol.*
  *Earth Syst. Sci.***20**, 1785–1808. (doi:10.5194/hess-20-1785) 
  32. Milly PCD, Dunne KA. 2016 Potential evapotranspiration and continental drying.*Nat. Clim.*
  *Change***6**, 946–949. (doi:10.1038/nclimate3046) 
  
  33. Swann ALS, Hoffman FM, Koven CD, Randerson JT. 2016 Plant responses to increasing 
  CO2 reduce estimates of climate impacts on drought severity.*Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA***113**, 
  10 019–10 024. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1604581113) 
  34. Betts RA*et al.*2007 Projected increase in future river runoff through plant responses to carbon 
  dioxide rise.*Nature***448**, 1037–1042. (doi:10.1038/nature06045) 
  
  35. Papadimitriou LV, Koutroulis AG, Grillakis MG, Tsanis IK. 2017 The effect of GCM biases 
  on global runoff simulations of a land surface model.*Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.***21**, 4379–4401. 
  (doi:10.5194/hess-21-4379-2017) 
  
  36. Shefﬁeld J, Goteti G, Wood EF. 2006 Development of a 50-year high-resolution global 
  dataset of meteorological forcings for land surface modeling.*J. Climate***19**, 3088–3111. 
  (doi:10.1175/JCLI3790.1) 
  
  37. Grillakis MG, Koutroulis AG, Tsanis IK. 2013 Multisegment statistical bias correction of daily 
  GCM precipitation output.*J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.***118**, 3150–3162. (doi:10.1002/jgrd.50323) 
  38. Wartenburger R, Hirschi M, Donat MG, Greve P, Pitman AJ, Seneviratne SI. 2017 Changes in 
  regional climate extremes as a function of global mean temperature: an interactive plotting 
  framework.*Geosci. Model Dev.***10**, 3609–3634. (doi:10.5194/gmd-10-3609-2017) 
  39. Mitchell D, James R, Forster PM, Betts RA, Shiogama H, Allen M. 2016 Realizing the impacts 
  of a 1.5°C warmer world.*Nat. Clim. Change***6**, 735–737. (doi:10.1038/nclimate3055) 
  40. Cox P*et al.*2008 Increase risk of Amazonian drought due to decreasing aerosol pollution. 
  *Nature***453**, 212–216. (doi:10.1038/nature06960) 
  
  41. Betts RA, Cox PM, Collins M, Harris PP, Huntingford C, Jones CD. 2004 The role of 
  ecosystem-atmosphere interactions in simulated Amazonian precipitation decrease and forest 
  dieback under global climate warming.*Theor. Appl. Climatol.***78**, 157–175. (doi:10.1007/ 
  s00704-004-0050-y) 
  
  42. Skinner CB, Poulsen CJ, Chadwick R, Diffenbaugh NS, Fiorella RP. 2017 The role of CO2 
  plant physiological forcing in shaping future daily-scale precipitation.*J. Climate***30**, 2319–2340. 
  (doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0603.1) 