text: (26–31); CMJ performed with an arm swing on a force plat- 
  form (32–38)]. Where the numerical values (means and SD) 
  from previously published studies were not reported, they 
  were extracted using online software (WebPlotDigitizer, ver- 
  sion 4.6, https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer). For IMTP 
  peak force in cases where it was not clearly stated that body 
  weight was subtracted from gross IMTP peak force, measures 
  were assumed to be gross IMTP peak force. Muscle and ten- 
  don morphology ﬁgures display means ± SD as well as indi- 
  vidual participant data for comparative populations, as these 
  values are from published research from our laboratory. IMTP 
  peak force and CMJ outcome ﬁgures display only means ± SD 
  values for comparative populations, as we relied on published 
  values from the literature where individual participant values 
  were not typically available. 
  
  the load cells across the two platforms) was displayed in 
  front of the participant during the IMTP efforts, and a hori- 
  zontal marker was placed on the highest force obtained after 
  the ﬁrst maximum effort. In the ofﬂine analysis, the force 
  signals were low pass ﬁltered (10 Hz using a fourth-order 
  zero-lag Butterworth ﬁlter) before summating the force out- 
  put from the two platforms to derive overall force produced. 
  The instantaneous highest force during maximum efforts 
  was identiﬁed as the measure of gross IMTP peak force (i.e., 
  including body weight). Force while the WSM was standing 
  upright on the platform at rest (i.e., body weight) was also 
  subtracted from the peak instantaneous force to calculate 
  net IMTP peak force. 