text: The largest regional differences between 2°C and 1.5°C global warming tend to be in the 
  regions where the local impact is largest relative to the baseline. For TXx this is generally the mid- 
  latitudes, whereas for TX90p it is generally the tropics. So, broadly, the impacts at 1.5°C global 
  warming could be estimated by scaling-back the impacts at 2°C. 
  
  These results show some similarities with those from the CMIP5 models [9,38], but also some 
  notable differences. The CMIP5 models were at lower spatial resolution than the models used 
  here. Although the general patterns of change in TXx are broadly similar in our study and 
  CMIP5, with greater warming in many continental interiors, is notable that our results show more 
  marked geographical variation than those from CMIP5 projections ([9], among others), with the 
  continental interior warming being more intense in our projections. In particular, our results with 
  HadGEM3 show more intense increases in maximum temperature in North America and Europe. 
  Our projections of changes in consecutive dry days (CDD) broadly consistent with those found 
  in a subset of the CMIP5 ensemble [9], although there are some differences. Our ensemble mean 
  suggests shorter dry spells in the central Amazon, whereas ISIMIP-indicated longer dry spells. 
  Also, as with the temperature indices, our results show greater geographical differentiation in the 
  intensity of changes. 