text: As part of a broader critique of IIT, Michael Cerullo suggested that the theory's proposed explanation is in 
  fact for what he dubs (following Scott Aaronson) the "Pretty Hard Problem" of methodically inferring 
  which physical systems are conscious—but would not solve Chalmers' hard problem.[136] "Even if IIT is 
  correct," he argues, "it does not explain why integrated information generates (or is) consciousness."[136] 
  Chalmers agrees that IIT, if correct, would solve the "Pretty Hard Problem" rather than the hard 
  problem.[139] 