text: Overall hamstring volume of the WSM (1,545 cm3) was 
  109% greater than a large pooled population of untrained con- 
  trols (739 ± 142 cm3; n ¼ 50), 44% greater than subelite sprint- 
  ers (1,075 ± 178 cm3), 53% greater than long-term resistance- 
  trained individuals (1,011 ± 142 cm3), and 17% greater than elite 
  sprinters (1,315 ± 130 cm3; Fig. 5A). The WSM’s hamstring vol- 
  ume was also marginally larger ( þ 3%) than the most muscu- 
  lar individual we have previously assessed (subelite sprinter, 
  1,495 cm3). The ST (563 cm3) and BFlh (454 cm3) volumes of 
  the WSM were 132–182% larger than that of the pooled popula- 
  tion of untrained controls (ST: 200 ± 48 cm3; BFlh: 196 ± 47 
  cm3; Fig. 5, C and D) and greater than the mean of any 
  trained/athletic group we have previously assessed (Fig. 5, C 
  and D). SM (392 cm3) volume of the WSM was 66% greater 
  than untrained controls (SM 236 ± 46 cm3) and greater than 
  the mean for trained/athletic groups we have previously 