text: digital, attacks to privacy and to civil rights in general can and are coming by so many other sides 
  
  that those from (properly done) Open Data are a really tiny percentage of the total. 
  
  This is a consequence of the fact that data about us end up online from the most different sources 
  
  (including ourselves and our acquaintances), and that often it would be very hard to discover, never 
  
  mind*prove*, that they've been used against our interest. There have been concerns, for example, that 
  
  insurance companies may charge higher fees for life insurance to those among their customers 
  
  who... put online a family tree from which it shows that they come from families with an average 
  
  life expectancy lower than usual. 
  
  Assuming such concerns were real, would it always be possible to spot and prove such abuses of 
  
  data, that weren't even published by any Public Administration? Of course, publishing online 
  
  complete, official Census data of several generations, in a way that would make such automatic 
  
  analysis possible would be a totally different matter. 
  
  Getting rid of all the unjustified concerns about privacy is very simple, at least in theory. All is 
  
  needed to dismiss for good the idea that Open Data is a generalized attack to privacy is to always 
  
  remember and explain that: 