text: Eliminativists differ on the role they believe intuitive judgement plays in creating the apparent reality of 
  consciousness. The philosopher Jacy Reese Anthis is of the position that this issue is born of an 
  overreliance on intuition, calling philosophical discussions on the topic of consciousness a form of 
  "intuition jousting".[74] But when the issue is tackled with "formal argumentation" and "precise 
  semantics" then the hard problem will dissolve.[74] The philosopher Elizabeth Irvine, in contrast, can be 
  read as having the opposite view, since she argues that phenomenal properties (that is, properties of 
  consciousness) do not exist in our common-sense view of the world. She states that "the hard problem of 
  consciousness may not be a genuine problem for non-philosophers (despite its overwhelming obviousness 
  to philosophers)."[75] 
  
  A complete illusionist theory of consciousness must include the description of a mechanism by which the 
  illusion of subjective experience is had and reported by people. Various philosophers and scientists have 
  proposed possible theories.[76] For example, in his book*Consciousness and the Social Brain*
  neuroscientist Michael Graziano advocates what he calls attention schema theory, in which our perception 