text: In April 2013, the plaintiffs applied for an order to be allowed to 
  proceed with the second system access fee class action. In August 
  2013, the court denied this application and the second action remains 
  conditionally stayed. In December 2013 the plaintiff applied for an 
  order permitting them to amend the Statement of Claim to reintroduce 
  the claims they were not permitted to proceed with in the 2007 
  the 
  certification decision. We 
  Saskatchewan Court. We have not 
  this 
  contingency. 
  
  are 
  awaiting the decision of 
  recorded a liability for 
  
  As of December 31, 2013, private Rogers family holding companies 
  controlled by the trust owned approximately 90.9% of our outstanding 
  Class A Voting shares and approximately 9.8% of our Class B Non- 
  Voting shares, or in total approximately 28% of the total shares 
  outstanding. Only Class A Voting shares carry the right to vote in most 
  circumstances. As a result, the trust is able to elect all members of our 
  the vote on most matters submitted to a 
  Board and to control 
  shareholder vote. 
  
  **System Access Fee – British Columbia**
  In December 2011, a class action was launched in British Columbia 
  against providers of wireless communications in Canada about the 
  system access fee wireless carriers charge to some of their customers. 
  The class action relates to allegations of misrepresentations contrary to 
  the*Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act*(British Columbia), 
  among other things. The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages and 
  restitution. A certification hearing is scheduled for April 2014. We have 
  not recorded a liability for this contingency. 