text: We consider the instances of the physiotherapist running 
  together with the participant, which were perceived as important 
  for participants’ performance, to be an example of “participatory 
  sense-making” (22). As participants appreciated being guided or 
  the 
  even pushed by the physiotherapists, 
  physiotherapists were trusted in directing this interaction. As 
  such, we argue that 
  to 
  participants’ movements, 
  speech and gestures—tailoring the 
  interaction to their needs—was important for this ability to be 
  perceived as purposeful. This is supported by the few negative 
  incidents 
  participant-physiotherapist 
  interaction seemed to not be jointly coordinated and appeared to 
  fail. The reported mutual inﬂuences of sensorimotor capabilities 
  and interpersonal coordination, with the physiotherapists but 
  also the group, are in accordance with sensorimotor capacities 
  and intersubjective interactions being important 
  sense- 
  making in the world (35). The beneﬁts of these individualized 
  participant-physiotherapist 
  interactions are also described in 
  speciﬁc core-stability exercises in indoor groups (16, 43) and are 
  in line with the 
  facilitation of 
  through hands-on interaction previously proposed 
  movement 
  (44, 45). Our study informs new knowledge of physiotherapist- 
  participant 
  to achieve the recommended high- 
  intensity training and calls for physiotherapy clinical reasoning 
  through bodily and verbal communication skills adapted to the 
  participants’ responses in an ongoing and situated way. 
  
  described where  the 