text: existing] problem that is somewhere else. 
  
  Regardless of the real probability of data alterations before they are published, the major problem 
  
  happens after. We already mentioned in the first report the fact that, while correct interpretation of 
  
  public data from*the majority of average citizens*is absolutely critical, the current situation, even in 
  
  countries with (theoretical) high alphabetization and Internet access rates, is one in which most 
  
  people still lack the skills needed for such analysis. Therefore, there surely is space for both 
  
  intentional manipulation of PSI and for misunderstanding it. After the publication of the first report, 
  
  we've encountered several examples of this danger, which are reported in the rest of this paragraph. 
  
  Before describing those cases, and in spite of them, it is necessary to point out one thing. While the 
  
  impact on the general public (in terms of raising interest and enhancing participation) on the Open 
  
  Data activity of 2010 is been, in many cases and as of today, still minimal, it is also true that there 
  
  has been no big increase in demagogy, more or less manipulated scandals and conflictual discussion 
  
  caused by Open Data. There has certainly been something of this in the Cablegate but that's not 