text: Table 6 Comparison with State-of-the-Art Models. We compare V-JEPA with state-of-the-art baselines in frozen evaluation 
  with an attentive probe on downstream image tasks (IN1K, Place205, iNat21) and video tasks (K400, SSv2, AVA). All models 
  are evaluated at resolution 224, except I-JEPA512 and V-JEPA384 which are evaluated respectively at resolution 512 and 
  384. On K400 and SSv2 we follow the standard practice of reporting accuracy from several spatial and temporal views 
  from the video. Compared to other video baselines, V-JEPA exhibits a consistent improvement across all downstream tasks. 
  Compared to image-models that excel under the frozen evaluation, V-JEPA shows a significant performance improvement on 
  tasks requiring motion understanding (+21 points on SSv2), and reduces the gap between video and image models on tasks 
  requiring static appearance-based features. 