text: **3.6.3. Unequal access**
  
  Even ignoring crime mapping, in some worst case scenarios, data openness may be not only 
  
  hindered by social divisions, but also create or enhance them. If citizens can't find and recognize 
  
  real, relevant*meaning*and practical value in data, as well as way to use them to make change 
  
  happen, there won't be any widespread, long lasting benefit from openness. How can we guarantee, 
  
  instead, that such meaning and value will be evident and usable? What are the ingredients for 
  
  success here? 
  
  Enhancing access to PSI it's harder than it may seem because it isn't just a matter of physical 
  
  infrastructure. It is necessary that those who access Open Data are in a position to actually 
  
  understand them and use them in their own interest. 
  
  This is far from granted also because, sometimes, the citizens who would benefit the most from 
  
  certain data are just those, already poor, marginalized and/or without the right education, who have 
  
  the least chances to actually discover and be able to use them. This is what G. Friedman was 
  
  <html>
          <head> <meta charset="UTF-8">
          <style>
          table, th, td {
              border: 1px solid black;
              font-size: 10px;
          }
          </style> </head>
          <body>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups" width="100%%">
              [html]<thead><tr><td>Table</td><td>Table</td><td>Control</td><td>Control</td>
          </table> </body> </html>