text: <html>
          <head> <meta charset="UTF-8">
          <style>
          table, th, td {
              border: 1px solid black;
              font-size: 10px;
          }
          </style> </head>
          <body>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups" width="100%%">
              [html]<thead><tr><td>56. Magnus 2005, pp. 35 – 38.2. Truth tables ; Angel 1.584, p. 154, HaB & CrDomell 2000, p. 49 [ Mtps :// books. gaogle. com / books? 651e = P. MUS0C - 2bp. days - P. 449 ].</td><td>57. Magnus 2005, pp. 35 – 45.3. Truth tables ; Angell 1964, p. 164.</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>58. Tarski 1994, p. 40.</td><td>59. Hintikez029, lead section,< underline > SNature and varieties of logic </ underline > Audi 1999b, Philosophy of logic.</td></tr><tr><td>60. Blackburn 2008, argument ; Stairs 2017, p. 343.</td><td>61. Copi, Cohen & Rodych 2013, p. 30 ( Intps :// books. poope. com / books?/ dc - 30bADwAAOBAJ6.92 - 92 - 92 - 930 ).</td></tr><tr><td>62. Hintikka & Sandu 2006, p. 20 ; Backmann 2019, pp. 235 – 255 ; IEP Staff.</td><td>63. Hintikka & Sandu 2006, p. 16 ; Backmann 2013, pp. 235 – 255, IEP Staff.</td></tr><tr><td>64. Groarke 2021.1. 1 Formal and Informal Logic ; Weddle 2011, pp. 383 – 8.36. Informal logic and the eductive - inductive distinction ; van Eermeren iii Grarssen 2009, p. 191.</td><td>65. Evance 2005.8. Deductive Reasoning, p. 159 [ https :// books google. com / books? itb < underline > https :// dnks </ underline > crtbkHsaC @ QeMCAsp < underline > PALIS9 </ underline ></td></tr><tr><td>66. McKeon.</td><td>67. Hintikka & Sandu 2006, pp. 13 – 4.</td></tr><tr><td>60. Hintikka & Sandu 2006, pp. 13 – 4 ; Blackburn 2016, rule of inference.</td><td>69. Blackburn 2016, rule of inference.</td></tr><tr><td>70. Dick & Muller 2017, p. 157.</td><td>71. Hintikia & Sandu Z006, p. 13 ; Backmann 2013 ; pp. 235 – 255 ; Douven 2021.</td></tr><tr><td>72. Hintikka & Sandu 2006, p. 14 ; DAgostino & Floridi 2009, pp. 271 – 315.</td><td>73. Hintike 8. Satisticiz006, p. 14 ; Saquillo 2014, pp. 75 – 80 ; Hintikka 1370, pp. 135 – 152.</td></tr><tr><td>74. Hintike & Sandu 2006, pp. 13 – 6 ; Backmann 2013, pp. 235 – 255, IEP Staff.</td><td>75. Rocci 2017, p. 26 ; Hintikka & Sandu 2006, pp. 13.16 ; Douven 2021.</td></tr><tr><td>76. IEP Staff ; Douven 2021 ; Hawthorne 2021.</td><td>77.1EP Staff ; Hawthorne 2021 ; Wilbanks 2010, pp. 107 – 124.</td></tr><tr><td>78. Douven 2021.</td><td>79. Groarke 2021.4. 1 AV Criteria ; Possin 2015, pp. 563 – 593.</td></tr><tr><td>B0. Scott & Marshall 2009, arashytic induction ; Houde & Camacho 2003, Induction.</td><td>81. Borchert 2006b, Induction.</td></tr><tr><td>R2. Douven 2012 ; Koolowslii 2017 ; Abductive researching and explanation ( https :// www. tag / other cis. comfocoled / 212.424 / 3783.115725677 - 35 / abductive - treacming - explanation - bartae - kod ( 969 )</td><td>83. Cummings 2010, Abduction, p. 1.</td></tr><tr><td>84. Hansen 2020 ; Chatfield 2017, p. 194.</td><td>85 Walton 1997, pp. 7.1. A new model of argument ; Hansen 2020.</td></tr><tr><td>86. Hansen 2020.</td><td>87. Hansen 2020 ; Walton 1987, pp. 63.3. Logic of propositions.</td></tr><tr><td>88. Sternberg ; Stone 2012, pp. 327 – 356.</td><td>89. Walton 15957, pp. 2 – 4.1. A new model of argument, Dowden ; Hansen 2020.</td></tr><tr><td>90. Engel 1.982, pp. 50 – 92.2. The medium of language : Mackle 1967 ; Stump.</td><td>91. Stump ; Engel 1.982, pp. 143 – 212.4. Fallacies of presumption.</td></tr><tr><td>92. Stump : Mackie 1967.</td><td>93. Hintikka & Sandu 2006, p. 20.</td></tr><tr><td>94. Hintikka & Sandu 2006, p. 20 ; Pedemonte 2018, pp. 1 – 17 ; Hintikka 2023.</td></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr></tbody>
          </table> </body> </html>