text: really relevant because, as we've already explained, what Wikileaks did is intrinsically different 
  
  from Open Data. So far, negative or at least controversial reactions by manipulation and 
  
  misunderstanding of Open Data haven't happened to such a scale to justify not opening PSI. 
  
  This said, let's look at some recent example of misunderstanding and/or manipulation based on 
  
  (sometimes open) public digital data. 
  
  Nicolas Kayser-Bril mentioned a digital map of all the religious places in Russia, that shows 
  
  [also]*"mosques that are no longer in use, so as to convey the idea that Muslims were invading*
  
  *Russia."*
  
  In September 2010 the Italian National Institute of Geophysics and Vulcanology officially declared 
  
  in September 2010 that they were evaluating whether to stop publishing online Italy's seismic data, 
  
  as they had been doing for years. The reason was that, following the March 2009 earthquake in 
  
  Italy, the data were being used to*"come to conclusions without any basis at all"*, both by the press, 
  
  to sell more, and by local politicians trying to hide the lack of preventive measures, like enforcing 
  
  anti seismic construction codes. 
  
  Still in Italy, Daniele Belleri runs a Milan crime mapping blog called "Il giro della Nera", making a 