text: <html>
          <head> <meta charset="UTF-8">
          <style>
          table, th, td {
              border: 1px solid black;
              font-size: 10px;
          }
          </style> </head>
          <body>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups" width="100%%">
              [html]<thead><tr><tdcolspan="2">Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.</td><td></td><td>quality. Neuroimage 169.407 – 418 ( 2018 ).</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">Data availability</td><td></td><td>Yushkevich, P. A. et al. Automated volumetry and regional</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">The dataset consists of 26 MRI scares ( T1w, T2w and diffusion scars ) alongside state - dependent measures and serum assessments of ovar -</td><td></td><td>thickness analysis of hippocampal subfelds and medial temporal cortical structures in mild cognitive impairment. Hum. Brain Mapp. 36.258 – 287 ( 2015 ).</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">lan sex hormones for each session. The raw data is publicly available at https :// openneuro. org / datasets / ds005299. Source data are provided</td><td>68. Alty, M. & Turk - Browne, N. B. Attention stabilizes representations in the human hippocampus. Cereb. Cortex 26.78.3 – 796 ( 2016 ).</td><td>with this paper.</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">69. Wang, H. et al. Multi - atlas segmentation with joint label fusion. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35.61 %- 623 ( 2O13 ).</td><td>Code availability</td><td>70. Yushkevich, P. A. et al. User guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures. significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 81.116 – 1128 ( 2006 ).</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">No custom code was used.</td><td>References</td><td>71. Palombo, D. J. et al. KIBRA polymorphism is associated with</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">49. Karch, J. D. et al. Identifying predictors of within - person variance in MRI - based brain volume estimates. Neurolmage 200.575 – 589 ( 209 ).</td><td>individual differences in hippocampal subregions : evidence from anatomical segmentation using high - resolution MRI. J. Neurosci. 33.13086 – 13093 ( 2013 ).</td><td>50. Cohen, S.</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">72.</td><td></td><td>Crum, W. R., Camara, O. & Hill, D. L. Generalized overlap measures for evaluation and validation in medical image analysis.</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">51.</td><td>Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F. III, Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R. & Kupfer, D. J. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index a new instrument</td><td>IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25.1451 – 1461 ( 2006 ). 73. Cieslak, M. et al. QSIPrep. an integrative platfo</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 28.193 – 213 ( 1989 ).</td><td></td><td>preprocessing and reconstructing diffusion MRI data. Nat. Methods 18.775 – 778 ( 2021 ).</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">52.</td><td>Speilberger, C. D. & Vagg, P. R. Psychometric properties of the STAI : a reply to Ramanaiah, Franzen, and Schill. J. Pers. Assess. 48.95 – 97 ( 984 ).</td><td>74.</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">Yeh, F, C, Badre, D. & Verstynen, T. Connectometry : a statistical approach harnessing the analytical potential of the local connectome. Neuroimage T25.162 – 171 ( 2016 ).</td><td>53</td><td>Pollock, V., Cho, D. W., Reker, D. & Volavka, J. Profile of mood states : the factors and their physiological correlates... I. Nerv. N57.612 – 614 ( 1979 ).</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">75.</td><td>Yeh, F. C. & Tseng, W. Y. I. NTU - 90 : a high angular resolution brain atlas constructed by q - space diffeomorphic reconstruction. Neuroimage 58.91 – 99 ( 201 ).</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">Avants, B. B. et al. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage 54,</td><td>76.</td><td>Wood, S. N. Generalized Additive Models : An Introduction With R, Second Edition ( Chapman and Hall / CRC, 2017 ).</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">2033 – 2044 ( 2011 ).</td><td>77.</td><td>Sullivan, K. J., Shadish, W. R. & Steiner, F. M. An introduction to modeling longitudinal data with generalized additive models : applications to single - case designs. Psychol. Methods 20,</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">55.</td><td>Tustison, N. J. et al. Large - scale evaluation of ANTs and FreeSurfer cortical thickness measurements. Neuroimage 99.166 – 179 ( 2014 ).</td><td>modeling longitudinal data with generalized additive models : applications to single - case designs. Psychol. Methods 20.26 – 42 ( 2015 ).</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">56</td><td>Das, S. R., Avants, B., Grossman, M. & Gee, J. C. Registration based cortical thickness measurement. Neuroimage 45.867 – 879 ( 2009 ).</td><td>78.</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">Yeh, F. C., Verstynen, T. D., Wang, Y., Fernandez - Miranda, J. C. & Tseng, W. Y. I. Deterministic diffusion fiber tracking improved by quantitative anisotropy. PLoS ONE 8, e80713 ( 2013 ).</td><td>57.</td><td>Friston, K. J., Rotshtein, F., Geng, J. J. J., Sterzer, P. & Henson, R. N. A critique of functional localisers. Neuroimage 30.1077 - 1087 ( 2006 ).</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">79.</td><td>Jovicich, J. et al. Brain morphometry reproducibility in multi - center 3T MRI studies : a comparison of cross - sectional and langitudinal segmentations. Neuroimage 83.472 – 484 ( 2013 ).</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">Schaefer, A, et al. Local - global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Cereb. Cortex 28.3095 – 3114 ( 2018 ).</td><td>80</td><td>Hedges, E. P. et al. Reliability of structural MRI measurements. the effects of scan session, head tilt, inter - scan interval, acquisition sequence, FreeSurfer version and processing stream. Neuroimage</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">59</td><td>Yeo, B. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106.1125 – 1165 ( 201 ).</td><td>246.118751 ( 2022 ).</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2">60</td><td>Dale, A. M., Fischl, B. & Sereno, M. I. Cortical surface - based analysis : I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9.179 – 194 ( 1999 ).</td><td>The authors would like to thank M. Mendoza for his phlebotomy and MRI assistance at the UCSB Brain Imaging Center ; C. Stark and R. Tain for MRI assistance at the UCI Facility for Imaging and Brain</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="2"</tr><tr><tdcolspan="2"</tr></tbody>
          </table> </body> </html>