text: <html>
          <head> <meta charset="UTF-8">
          <style>
          table, th, td {
              border: 1px solid black;
              font-size: 10px;
          }
          </style> </head>
          <body>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups" width="100%%">
              [html]<thead><tr><tdcolspan="3">This configuration has the following characteristics :</td></tr><tr><tdcolspan="3">–</td></tr><tr><td>Each node has the remote copy port group that is configured in the I / O groups 1 or 2. However, only one port per system in both remote copy port groups remains active and participates in IP partnership.</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Chly a single port per system from each configured remote copy port group participates simultaneously in IP partnership. Therefore, both of the links are used.</td><td>−</td></tr><tr><td>During node failure or port failure of a node that is actively participating in IP partnership, IP partnership continues from the allernative port because another port is in the system in the same remote copy port group but in a different I /</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>The pathing algorithm can start discovery of available ports in the affected remote copy port group in the second I / O group and pathing is reestablished, which restores the total bandwidth, so both of the links are available to support IP p</td><td>•</td></tr><tr><td>Eight - node system in IP partnership with a four - node system over dual inter - sile links, as shown in Figure 11 - 104 on page 565 ( configuration 7 ).</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr></tr></tbody>
          </table> </body> </html>