text: <html>
          <head> <meta charset="UTF-8">
          <style>
          table, th, td {
              border: 1px solid black;
              font-size: 10px;
          }
          </style> </head>
          <body>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups" width="100%%">
              [html]<thead><tr><td>95. Boris & Alexander 2017, p. 74 ; Cook 2009, p. 124</td><td>98. Foltyfoki 2020, p. 39 ( hitps :// bockes. psoglec. combooks : 66 = 5C : 4NE : AAAQRAJ & psychotry_Eerlemann & Mangold 2009, p. 154 ( https :// boles. posple. combocholes / https :// cs / csl / csl / csl / csl / cslosks / csplexTri / capp = 799.94 )</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>57. GenSler 2006, p. xlii ; Font & Jansana 2017, p. 8.</td><td>98. Haack : 2578, pp. 1 – 101, Phikosophy of logics ; Hintilkka & Sandui 2006, pp. 21 – 32 ; Jacquette 2006, pp. 1 – 22, Introduction : Philosophy of logic today.</td></tr><tr><td>99. Moore & Cashing 1982, p. 53, Enderton 2002, pp. 12 – 13 ( https :// books. google. com / books "/ d =. 9 / nC ) EtukCdapp : PA12 ), Sentential Logic.</td><td>100. Lepore & Cumming 2012, p. 5.</td></tr><tr><td>101, Weshleverale 2018, pp. 145 – 6 ; Rathjen & Sing 2022.102.5ider 2010, pp. 34 – 42 : Shapints & Kounder2022. Bimbo 2015, pp. 8 – 8</td><td>101. Resiall & Standefer 2023, pp. 92.5 : Enderton 2001, pp. 332 – 145 ( https :// books. goodec. com / bodyc / hcf / ncO. EtUKCBpp = 7A121 ), Chapter 2.5 : van Dalen1.294_Chapter 1.5.</td></tr><tr><td>104. Jacquette 2006, pp. 1 – 12, Intraduction : Phliosophy of logic today : Smith 2022 ; Groarke.</td><td>105. Haack 1996.1. 7Alternative ' in ' Alternative Logic '.</td></tr><tr><td>1206. Haack 2578, pp. 1 – 10, Philosophy of logics ; Haack 1595.1. ' Alternative ' in ' Alternative Logic '' Wolf 1570, pp. 327 – 340.</td><td>107. Smith 2022 ; Groarke ; Bobzien 2020.</td></tr><tr><td>108. Groarke.</td><td>109. Smith 2022 ; Magnus 2005.2. 2 Connectives.</td></tr><tr><td>110. Smith 2022 ; Bolzien 2020 ; Hintilkka & Spade, Aristofe ( https :// www. britamica. com / traici / history ≤ 9 / logic / Artizotie ).</td><td>111. Westerstahl 1989, pp. 577 – 585.</td></tr><tr><td>112. Smith 2022 ; Groarke.</td><td>113. Smith 2022 ; Hurley 2015 ; 4. Calesprical Syllogisms : Copi, Cohen & Prodych 2015 ; 6. Categorical Syllogiesms ( https :// bocks. google. com / books5 / 6 :: 38bAR284AR384.48ae ;- 294.187 ).</td></tr><tr><td>114. Groarke ; Hurley 2015 ; 4. Cadesporical Syllogisms ; Copi, Cohen & Prodych ZIL9.6. Categorical Syllogiesms ( https :// bocks. google. com / books556 = 380A / QRA. Mage = 94.037 ).</td><td>115. Hurley 2015.4. Categorical Syllogisms.</td></tr><tr><td>116. Spriggs 2012, pp. 20 – 2.</td><td>117 Hintilke 20159, SNature and varieties of logic, 544ternative logics, Hintikka & Sanda 2006, pp. 27 – 8 ; Balck 2015, p. 327.</td></tr><tr><td>118. Shapiro & Kouri Kissel 2022.</td><td>119. Burgess 2009.1. Classical logic.</td></tr><tr><td>120. Jacquette 2006, go. 1 – 12, Introduction : Philosophy of logic today ; Borchert 2006 ;. Logic, Non - Classical ; Goble 2001, Introduction.</td><td>121. Brody 2006, pp. 535 – 536.</td></tr><tr><td>122. Klement 1995b.</td><td>123. Shapiro & Kouri Kissel 2022 : Honderich 2005, philosophical logic ; Michaelson & Reimer 2013.</td></tr><tr><td>124. Nolt 2021 ; Magnus 2005.4 Quantified logic.</td><td>125. Burnin & Yu 2009, p. 179 ( https :// books. google. com / books? NS = 97.2FEAAAQ6A3 & pp = PA. 79 ; Garson 2023. Introduction ( https :// plata. stanford. edu / entries / logie. modal ).</td></tr><tr><td>126. Garson 2023 ; Sadeglt – Zadeh 2015, p. 983.</td><td>127. Fitch 2014, p. 17.</td></tr><tr><td>129. Garson 2023 ; Carnielli & Pizzi 2008, p. 3 ; Benthem.</td><td>129. Garson 2023.</td></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr><tr></tr></tbody>
          </table> </body> </html>