14
Vol:.(1234567890)Scientific Reports |        (2022) 12:17268  | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22228-7
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
 52. Xiong, W . et al. Can climate-smart agriculture reverse the recent slowing of rice yield growth in China?. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 
196, 125–136 (2014).
 53. Hertel, T. W . Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications 5–30 (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
 54. Corong, E. L., Hertel, T. W ., McDougall, R., Tsigas, M. E. & Mensbrugghe, D. V . The standard GTAP model, version 7. J. Glob. 
Econ. Anal. 2(1), 1–119 (2017).
 55. Ciscar, J. C. et al. Physical and economic consequences of climate change in Europe. PNAS 108, 2678–2683 (2011).
 56. Hsiang, S. et al. Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. Science 356(6345), 1362–1369 (2017).
 57. Taheripour, F ., Hertel, T. W . & Liu, J. The role of irrigation in determining the global land use impacts of biofuels. Energy Sustain. 
Soc. 3(1), 4 (2013).
 58. Ali, T., Huang, J. K. & Y ang, J. Impact assessment of global and national biofuels developments on agriculture in Pakistan. Appl. 
Energy 104, 466–474 (2013).
 59. Y ang, J., Huang, J. K., Qiu, H. G., Rozelle, S. & Sombilla, M. A. Biofuels and the greater Mekong Subregion: Assessing the impact 
on prices, production and trade. Appl. Energy 86, S37–S46 (2009).
 60. Horridge, M. SplitCom, programs to disaggregate a GTAP sector (Centre of Policy Studies, Vitorial University). https:// www. copsm 
odels. com/ split com. htm (2005).
 61. Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, B. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 
(2012).
 62. Zhou, B. T., Wen, H. Q. Z., Xu, Y ., Song, L. C. & Zhang, X. B. Projected changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in China 
by the CMIP5 multimodel ensembles. J. Clim. 27, 6591–6611 (2014).
 63. Knutti, R., Rogelj, J., Sedláček, J. & Ficher, E. M. A scientific critique of the two-degree climate change target. Nat. Geosci. 9(1), 
1–6 (2015).
 64. Rogelj, J. et al. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5°C. Nat. Clim. Change 5(6), 519–527 
(2015).
 65. Friedlingstein, P . et al. Persistent growth of  CO2 emissions and implications for reaching climate targets. Nat. Geosci. 7(10), 709–715 
(2014).
 66. Azar, C., Johansson, D. J. A. & Mattsson, N. Meeting global temperature targets the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and 
storage. Environ. Res. Lett. 8(3), 1345–1346 (2013).
 67. Liu, B. et al. Testing the responses of four wheat crop models to heat stress at anthesis and grain filling. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 
1890–1903 (2016).
 68. Elad, Y . & Pertot, I. Climate change impacts on plant pathogens and plant diseases. J. Crop Improv. 28, 99–139 (2014).
 69. Challinora, A. J. et al. Improving the use of crop models for risk assessment and climate change adaptation. Agric. Syst. 159, 296–306 
(2018).
 70. Bassu, S. et al. How do various maize crop models vary in their responses to climate change factors?. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 
2301–2320 (2014).
 71. Wang, N. et al. Increased uncertainty in simulated maize phenology with more frequent supra-optimal temperature under climate 
warming. Eur. J. Agron. 71, 19–33 (2015).
 72. Rosenzweig, C. et al. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the twenty-first century in a global gridded crop model 
intercomparison. PNAS 111, 3268–3273 (2014).
Author contributions
K.L. designed the framework of the article and analyzed the yield results and the maize price under future sce -
narios. J.P . simulated the climate data from 5 climate models recommended by ISI-MIP under 4 RCP scenarios. 
W .X. simulated the maize yields in whole world under different scenarios. W .X. simulated the market price of 
maize at national and global levels. T.A. helped the revision of language.
Funding
Funding was provided by the National Key Research and Development program of China (Grant Nos.