66. Harris, Sam. "Making Sense #96" (https://samharris.org/subscriber-extras/96-nature-conscio
usness/). SamHarris.org. Sam Harris. Retrieved 27 August 2020. "(25.45) TM:I think it will
not be a mystery. Life is not a mystery anymore, but a hundred and fifty years ago many
people thought that this is an irreducible mystery. (25:57) Harris:So you're not a fan
anymore, if you ever were, of the framing by David Chalmers of the Hard Problem of
Consciousness? Metzinger: No, that's so boring. I mean, that's last century. I mean, you
know, we all respect Dave [Chalmers], and we know he is very smart and has got a very fast
mind, no debate about that. But conceivability arguments are just very, very weak. If you
have an ill-defined folk psychological umbrella term like "consciousness", then you can pull
off all kinds of scenarios and zombie thought experiments. It doesn't really… It helped to
clarify some issues in the mid 90's, but the consciousness community has listened to this
and just moved on. I mean nobody of the serious researchers in the field thinks about this
anymore, but it has taken on like a folkloristic life of its own. A lot of people talk about the
Hard Problem who wouldn't be able to state what it consists in now."
67. Garrett, Brian Jonathan (May 2006). "What the History of Vitalism Teaches Us About
Consciousness and the 'Hard Problem'". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 72
(3): 576–588. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00584.x (https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1933-1
592.2006.tb00584.x).
68. Hacker, Peter (2010). "Hacker's challenge" (http://philpapers.org/rec/HACHC). The
Philosophers' Magazine. 51 (51): 23–32. doi:10.5840/tpm2010517 (https://doi.org/10.5840%
2Ftpm2010517).
69. Schaal, David W. (2005). "Naming Our Concerns About Neuroscience: A Review of Bennett
and Hacker's Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pm
c/articles/PMC1389787). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 84 (3): 683–692.
doi:10.1901/jeab.2005.83-05 (https://doi.org/10.1901%2Fjeab.2005.83-05). PMC 1389787
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1389787). PMID 16596986 (https://pubmed.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16596986).
70. Dennett, Daniel C. (1979). "On the Absence of Phenomenology". In Gustafson, Donald F.;
Tapscott, Bangs L. (eds.). Body, Mind, and Method. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 93–
113.
71. Dennett, Daniel C. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Penguin Books.
72. Dennett, Daniel C. (2003). "Explaining the 'magic' of consciousness". Journal of Cultural and
Evolutionary Psychology. 1 (1): 7–19. doi:10.1556/jcep.1.2003.1.2 (https://doi.org/10.1556%
2Fjcep.1.2003.1.2). S2CID 144560246 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:14456024
6).
73. Dennett, Daniel C. (1991). Consciousness explained (https://archive.org/details/consciousne
ssexp00denn). Boston: Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 978-0316180658.
74. Anthis, Jacy (2022). "Consciousness Semanticism: A Precise Eliminativist Theory of
Consciousness" (https://philarchive.org/rec/ANTCSA). Biologically Inspired Cognitive
Architectures 2021. Studies in Computational Intelligence. Vol. 1032. pp. 20–41.
doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96993-6_3 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-030-96993-6_3).
ISBN 978-3-030-96992-9. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
75. Irvine, Elizabeth (2013). Consciousness as a scientific concept: a philosophy of science
perspective. Studies in brain and mind. Vol. 5. Dordrecht; New York: Springer-Verlag. p. 167
(https://books.google.com/books?id=jO4HNB7OoUgC&pg=PA167). ISBN 9789400751729.
76. Chalmers, David (2018). "The Meta-Problem of Consciousness" (http://consc.net/papers/me
taproblem.pdf) (PDF). Journal of Consciousness Studies. 25 (9–10): 6–61. Retrieved
6 February 2019.
77. Graziano, Michael (2013). Consciousness and the social brain. Oxford; New York: Oxford
University Press. ISBN 978-0190263195.
78. Michael Graziano (10 July 2015). "Build-a-brain" (https://aeon.co/essays/can-we-make-cons