26rsta.royalsocietypublishing.orgP h i l .T r a n s .R .S o c .A376:20160452 ........................................................
2. Murphy JM et al.2009 UK climate projections science report: climate change projections. Exeter, UK:
Met Ofﬁce Hadley Centre. See http://ukclimateprojections.metofﬁce.gov.uk.
3. United Nations. 2010 Report of the Conference Parties on its ﬁfteenth session, held in
Copenhagen, 7 to 19 December 2009. Addendum. Part Two: Action taken by the Conference
of the Parties at its ﬁfteenth session. See http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/
11a01.pdf.
4. United Nations. 2016 Report of the Conference Parties on its twenty-ﬁrst session, held in Paris,
30 November to 13 December 2015. Addendum Part two: Action taken by the Conference of
the Parties at its twenty-ﬁrst session. Seehttp://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/
10a01.pdf.
5. Hewitson B et al. 2014 Regional context. In Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and
vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth assessment
report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(eds VR Barros et al.), pp. 1133–1197.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Dankers R et al.2013 First look at changes in ﬂood hazard in the inter-sectoral impact model
intercomparison project ensemble. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA111, 3257–3261. ( doi:10.1073/
pnas.1302078110)
7. IPCC. 2014 Summary for policymakers. In Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and
vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(eds CB Field et al.), pp.
1–32. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Schewe J et al.2014 Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proc. Natl
Acad. Sci. USA111, 3245–3250. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1222460110)
9. Schleussner C-F et al. 2015 Differential climate impacts for policy-relevant limits to global
warming: the case of 1.5°C and 2°C. Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss.6, 2447–2505. (doi:10.5194/
esdd-6-2447-2015)
10. James R, Washington R, Schleussner C-F, Rogeli J, Conway D. 2017 Characterizing half-a-
degree difference: a review of methods for identifying regional climate responses to global
warming targets. WIREs Clim Change8, e457. (doi:10.1002/wcc.457)
11. Haarsma RJ et al.2016 High resolution model intercomparison project (HighResMIP v1.0) for
CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev.9, 4185–4208. (doi:10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016)
12. Hewitt HT, Copsey D, Culverwell ID, Harris CM, Hill RSR, Keen AB, McLaren AJ, Hunke
EC. 2011 Design and implementation of the infrastructure of HadGEM3: the next-generation
Met Ofﬁce climate modelling system. Geosci. Model Dev. 4, 223–253. ( doi:10.5194/gmd-4-
223-2011).
13. Martin GM et al. 2011 The HadGEM2 family of met ofﬁce uniﬁed model climate
conﬁgurations. Geosci. Model Dev.4, 723–757. (doi:10.5194/gmd-4-723-2011)
14. Walters DN et al. 2011 The Met Ofﬁce Uniﬁed Model Global Atmosphere 3.0/3.1 and
JULES global land 3.0/3.1 conﬁgurations. Geosci. Model Dev.4, 919–941. ( doi:10.5194/gmd-
4-919-2011)
15. Williams KD et al.2015 The Met Ofﬁce Global Coupled Model 2.0 (GC2) conﬁguration. Geosci.
Model Dev.8, 1509–1524. (doi:10.5194/gmd-8-1509-2015)
16. Senior CA et al. 2016 Idealized climate change simulations with a high-resolution physical
model: HadGEM3-GC2. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst.8, 813–830. (doi:10.1002/2015MS000614)
17. Wood N et al. 2014 An inherently mass-conserving semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian
discretization of the deep-atmosphere global non-hydrostatic equations. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.
140, 1505–1520. (doi:10.1002/qj.2235)
18. MacLachlan C et al. 2014 Global seasonal forecast system version 5 (GloSea5): a high-
resolution seasonal forecast system.Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.141, 1072–1084. (doi:10.1002/qj.2396)
19. Knight J et al. 2014 Predictions of climate several years ahead using an improved decadal