Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1062 21 of 22
79. Williams, H.T.; McMurray, J.R.; Kurz, T.; Lambert, F.H. Network analysis reveals open forums and echo
chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2015, 32, 126–138. [CrossRef]
80. Guo, L.; Rohde, J.A.; Wu, H.D. Who is responsible for Twitter’s echo chamber problem? Evidence from 2016
US election networks. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2020, 23, 234–251. [CrossRef]
81. Gephi. Websites of Gephi. Available online: https: //gephi.org (accessed on 16 January 2020).
82. Calabrese, C.; Anderton, B.N.; Barnett, G.A. Online Representations of “Genome Editing” Uncover
Opportunities for Encouraging Engagement: A Semantic Network Analysis. Sci. Commun. 2019, 41,
222–242. [CrossRef]
83. Fruchterman, T.M.; Reingold, E.M. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Softw. Pract. Exp. 1991, 21,
1129–1164. [CrossRef]
84. Myers, J.L.; Well, A.D.; Lorch, R.F., Jr.Research Design and Statistical Analysis; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2013.
85. Krackhardt, D. Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Soc.
Netw. 1988, 10, 359–381. [CrossRef]
86. Borgatti, S.P .; Everett, M.G.; Freeman, L.C.Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis; Analytic
Technologies: Harvard, MA, USA, 2002; Volume 6.
87. Zaval, L.; Keenan, E.A.; Johnson, E.J.; Weber, E.U. How warm days increase belief in global warming.Nat.
Clim. Chang. 2014, 4, 143. [CrossRef]
88. Marx, S.M.; Weber, E.U.; Orlove, B.S.; Leiserowitz, A.; Krantz, D.H.; Roncoli, C.; Phillips, J. Communication
and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Glob. Environ.
Chang. 2007, 17, 47–58. [CrossRef]
89. Bostrom, A.; Morgan, M.G.; Fischhoﬀ, B.; Read, D. What do people know about global climate change? 1.
Mental models. Risk Anal. 1994, 14, 959–970. [CrossRef]
90. Moser, S.C. Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley
Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang. 2010, 1, 31–53. [CrossRef]
91. Huang, J.; Thornton, K.M.; Efthimiadis, E.N. Conversational tagging in twitter. In Proceedings of the 21st
ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Toronto, ON, Canada, 13–16 June 2010; pp. 173–178.
92. Callon, M. Acting in an Uncertain World; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009.
93. O’Neill, S.; Williams, H.T.; Kurz, T.; Wiersma, B.; Boykoﬀ, M. Dominant frames in legacy and social media
coverage of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 380. [CrossRef]
94. Brian Kennedy, M.H. U.S. Concern about Climate Change Is Rising, but Mainly among Democrats. 2019.
Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/08/28/u-s-concern-about-climate-change-is-
rising-but-mainly-among-democrats / (accessed on 10 October 2019).
95. Carroll, L. George Takei Says White House Removed Pages about Climate Change, Civil Rights from Website.
2017. Available online: https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2017/jan/23/george-takei/george-
takei-says-white-house-removed-pages-about- /l (accessed on 10 October 2019).
96. Haug, G.H.; Günther, D.; Peterson, L.C.; Sigman, D.M.; Hughen, K.A.; Aeschlimann, B. Climate and the
collapse of Maya civilization. Science 2003, 299, 1731–1735. [CrossRef]
97. Kennett, D.J.; Breitenbach, S.F.; Aquino, V .V .; Asmerom, Y.; Awe, J.; Baldini, J.U.; Bartlein, P .; Culleton, B.J.;
Ebert, C.; Jazwa, C.; et al. Development and disintegration of Maya political systems in response to climate
change. Science 2012, 338, 788–791. [CrossRef]
98. Fredland, J.S. Unlabel Their Frankenstein Foods: Evaluating a US Challenge to the European Commission’s
Labeling Requirements for Food Products Containing Genetically-Modiﬁed Organisms.Vanderbilt J. Transnatl.
Law 2000, 33, 183.
99. Scott, I.M. Green symbolism in the genetic modiﬁcation debate. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2000, 13, 293–311.
[CrossRef]