Table of ContentsOther Litigation Related to Our Products and ServicesWe are also subject to various lawsuits that seek monetary and other injunctive relief. These lawsuits include proposedclass actions and other consumer claims that allege, among other things, purported defects and misrepresentations related to ourproducts and services. For example, on September 14, 2022, a proposed class action was filed against Tesla, Inc. and relatedentities in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging various claims about the Company’s driverassistance technology systems under state and federal law. This case was later consolidated with several other proposed classactions, and a Consolidated Amended Complaint was filed on October 28, 2022, which seeks damages and other relief onbehalf of all persons who purchased or leased from Tesla between January 1, 2016, to the present. On October 5, 2022, aproposed class action complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York asserting similar stateand federal law claims against the same defendants. On September 30, 2023, the Court dismissed this action with leave toamend the complaint. On November 20, 2023, the plaintiff moved to amend the complaint, which Tesla opposed. On August 8,2024, the Court denied the plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint and entered judgment for Tesla. OnSeptember 5, 2024, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On March 22,2023, the plaintiffs in the Northern District of California consolidated action filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to orderTesla to (1) cease using the term “Full Self-Driving Capability” (FSD Capability), (2) cease the sale and activation of FSDCapability and deactivate FSD Capability on Tesla vehicles, and (3) provide certain notices to consumers about proposed court-findings about the accuracy of the use of the terms Autopilot and FSD Capability. Tesla opposed the motion. On September 30,2023, the Court denied the request for a preliminary injunction, compelled four of five plaintiffs to arbitration, and dismissedthe claims of the fifth plaintiff with leave to amend the complaint. On October 31, 2023, the remaining plaintiff in the NorthernDistrict of California action filed an amended complaint, which Tesla moved to dismiss, and on May 15, 2024, the Courtgranted in part and denied in part Tesla’s motion. On October 2, 2023, a similar proposed class action was filed in San DiegoCounty Superior Court in California. Tesla subsequently removed the San Diego County case to federal court and on January 8,2024, the federal court granted Tesla’s motion to transfer the case to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District ofCalifornia. Tesla moved to compel arbitration, which the plaintiff did not oppose, and on June 27, 2024, the Court stayed thecase pending arbitration.On February 27, 2023, a proposed class action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Californiaagainst Tesla, Inc., Elon Musk and certain current and former Company executives. The complaint alleges that the defendantsmade material misrepresentations and omissions about the Company’s Autopilot and FSD Capability technologies and seeksmoney damages and other relief on behalf of persons who purchased Tesla stock between February 19, 2019, and February 17,2023. An amended complaint was filed on September 5, 2023, naming only Tesla, Inc. and Elon Musk as defendants. OnNovember 6, 2023, Tesla moved to dismiss the amended complaint. On September 30, 2024, the Court granted Tesla’s motionto dismiss without prejudice.On March 14, 2023, a proposed class action was filed against Tesla, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the NorthernDistrict of California. Several similar complaints were also filed in the same court and these cases have now all beenconsolidated. These complaints allege that Tesla violates federal