Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1062 22 of 22
104. Walter, S.; De Silva-Schmidt, F.; Brüggemann, M. From “knowledge brokers” to opinion makers: How
physical presence aﬀected scientists’ Twitter use during the COP21 climate change conference.Int. J. Commun.
2017, 11, 570–591.
105. Peterson, T.C.; Connolley, W.M.; Fleck, J. The myth of the 1970s global cooling scientiﬁc consensus. Bull. Am.
Meteorol. Soc. 2008, 89, 1325–1338. [CrossRef]
106. Mazur, A. Global environmental change in the news: 1987–1990 vs. 1992–1996. Int. Sociol. 1998, 13, 457–472.
[CrossRef]
107. Statista. Reach of Selected Social Networks in the United States as of February 2017, by Age Group. Available
online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/305245/us-social-network-penetration-age-group / (accessed on 16
January 2020).
108. O’Connor, B.; Balasubramanyan, R.; Routledge, B.R.; Smith, N.A. From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment
to public opinion time series. In Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and
Social Media, Washington, DC, USA, 23–26 May 2010.
109. Zannettou, S.; Caulﬁeld, T.; De Cristofaro, E.; Sirivianos, M.; Stringhini, G.; Blackburn, J. Disinformation
warfare: Understanding state-sponsored trolls on Twitter and their inﬂuence on the web. In Proceedings
of the Companion of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–17 May 2019;
pp. 218–226.
110. Shao, C.; Ciampaglia, G.L.; Varol, O.; Yang, K.C.; Flammini, A.; Menczer, F. The spread of low-credibility
content by social bots. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4787. [CrossRef]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).