who wrote the book clear and present danger
Tom Clancy
661036
Clear and Present Danger Clear and Present Danger is a political thriller novel, written by Tom Clancy and published on August 17, 1989. A sequel to "The Cardinal of the Kremlin" (1988), main character Jack Ryan becomes acting Deputy Director of Intelligence in the Central Intelligence Agency, and discovers that he is being kept in the dark by his colleagues who are conducting a covert war against a drug cartel based in Colombia. It debuted at number one on the New York Times bestseller list. A film adaptation, featuring Harrison Ford reprising his role as Ryan, was released on August
Clear and Present Danger
661036
Clear and Present Danger Clear and Present Danger is a political thriller novel, written by Tom Clancy and published on August 17, 1989. A sequel to "The Cardinal of the Kremlin" (1988), main character Jack Ryan becomes acting Deputy Director of Intelligence in the Central Intelligence Agency, and discovers that he is being kept in the dark by his colleagues who are conducting a covert war against a drug cartel based in Colombia. It debuted at number one on the New York Times bestseller list. A film adaptation, featuring Harrison Ford reprising his role as Ryan, was released on August
Clear and Present Danger
3509587
The Dark Half The Dark Half is a horror novel by American writer Stephen King, published in 1989. "Publishers Weekly" listed "The Dark Half" as the second best-selling book of 1989 behind Tom Clancy's "Clear and Present Danger". The novel was adapted into a feature film of the same name in 1993. Stephen King wrote several books under a pseudonym, Richard Bachman, during the 1970s and 1980s. Most of the Bachman novels were darker and more cynical in nature, featuring a far more visceral sense of horror than the psychological, gothic style common to many of King's most famous works.
The Dark Half
4752982
weekend and holding the top spot for two weeks. It eventually went on to gross an estimated $122,187,717 in the U.S., and $93,700,000 in foreign revenue for a worldwide total of $215,887,717. The film was nominated for two Academy Awards for Best Sound (Donald O. Mitchell, Michael Herbick, Frank A. Montaño, and Art Rochester) and Best Sound Editing (John Leveque and Bruce Stambler). Clear and Present Danger (film) Clear and Present Danger is a 1994 American spy thriller film directed by Phillip Noyce and based on Tom Clancy's novel of the same name. It was preceded by the 1990 film
Clear and Present Danger (film)
4752971
Clear and Present Danger (film) Clear and Present Danger is a 1994 American spy thriller film directed by Phillip Noyce and based on Tom Clancy's novel of the same name. It was preceded by the 1990 film "The Hunt for Red October" and the 1992 film "Patriot Games", all three featuring Clancy's character Jack Ryan. It is the last film version of Clancy's novels to feature Harrison Ford as Ryan and James Earl Jones as Vice Admiral James Greer, as well as the final installment directed by Noyce. As in the novel, Ryan is appointed CIA Acting Deputy Director, and
Clear and Present Danger (film)
661049
because we wanted to divest it of some of its baggage and let it walk on its own two legs.” In a 2018 interview with "Entertainment Weekly", "Tom Clancy’s Jack Ryan" creators Carlton Cuse and Graham Roland revealed that they originally opted to adapt "Clear and Present Danger" for television. Roland then explained: “About a month into it, we realized the reason the Clancy books worked so well was because they were relevant for the time that they were written. So we had to take the spirit of what he did and create our own original story.” Clear and Present
Clear and Present Danger
5809722
played Félix Cortez, a former colonel of Cuban military intelligence in the Tom Clancy thriller, "Clear and Present Danger", co-starring Harrison Ford, Willem Dafoe and Anne Archer. The film debuted at number one in the box office, earning a reported $20.5 million in the United States. "Clear and Present Danger" was a great success and was nominated for two Academy Awards. Later in 1994, Almeida starred in the romantic comedy "Only You", in which he plays a suave Italian businessman named Giovanni. According to "The New York Times", the film director and producer Norman Jewison said: "I interviewed many actors
Joaquim de Almeida
7522818
of "Clear and Present Danger" in 1994, a year was spent developing Tom Clancy's "The Cardinal of the Kremlin" before the material was deemed too difficult to adapt, resulting in producer Mace Neufeld purchasing the rights to Clancy's "The Sum of All Fears". In October 1999, Harrison Ford announced that the next Jack Ryan novel being scripted into a film would indeed be "The Sum of All Fears" and that "hopefully we'll get that to a place where we can make a movie." During this time, writer Akiva Goldsman wrote multiple drafts of the script. However, on June 8, 2000,
The Sum of All Fears (film)
556804
"Schenck v. United States", the Supreme Court held that an antiwar activist did not have a First Amendment right to advocate draft resistance. In his majority opinion, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. introduced the clear and present danger test, which would become an important concept in First Amendment law; but the "Schenck" decision did not formally adopt the test. Holmes later wrote that he intended the clear and present danger test to refine, not replace, the bad tendency test. Although sometimes mentioned in subsequent rulings, the clear and present danger test was never endorsed by the Supreme Court as a
Clear and present danger
4752980
"San Francisco Chronicle", commented how it "delights in an almost boyish way in the trappings of power: rocket launchers and high-tech missiles, flags, ceremony and political double-speak." James Berardinelli, who wrote for "ReelViews", remarked, ""Clear and Present Danger" is all plot and no characters. The people running around on screen have about as much depth as the sheen of sweat on Harrison Ford's forehead. Jack Ryan is the most disappointing of all. He's disgustingly virtuous: a flawless fighter for good and justice, a Superman without the cape. I spent half the movie wondering if this guy was ever going to
Clear and Present Danger (film)
3583919
"Clear and Present Danger" (1994), which stars Harrison Ford. Jones also appeared in at least two episodes of "Murder, She Wrote", which starred Angela Lansbury as Jessica Fletcher - a crime writer who also solves murders. On July 25, 1994, Jones was a guest on "100 Huntley Street". Jones' first marriage to Mae Inez Entwisle ended in divorce in 1970. They had two daughters. He was married to actress Lory Patrick from 1973 until his death in 2015. Lory had a son, Michael Patrick, who was Jones' stepson. Jones became a devout born-again Christian in 1973 or 1974. His book
Dean Jones (actor)
18281749
Fair Trade chocolate in order to combat child slavery in the Ivory Coast. In 2006, James wrote a publication for Global Exchange titled "U.S. Intervention in Venezuela: A Clear and Present Danger", where she said the United States "undermines" Venezuela's democracy and social progress while also calling on United States citizens to counter this alleged "undermining". The Marxist magazine "Political Affairs" called James a "Venezuela expert" and that "U.S. Intervention in Venezuela: A Clear and Present Danger" "tells a shocking tale of US intervention in Venezuela’s democratic process, examines a series of myths about Venezuela, and offers an explanation of
Deborah James
556806
Gitlow for publishing the "Left Wing Manifesto". "Gitlow" was decided based on the bad tendency test, but the majority decision acknowledged the validity of the clear and present danger test, yet concluded that its use was limited to Schenck-like situations where the speech was not specifically outlawed by the legislature. Brandeis and Holmes again promoted the clear and present danger test, this time in a concurring opinion in 1927's "Whitney v. California" decision. The majority did not adopt or use the clear and present danger test, but the concurring opinion encouraged the Court to support greater protections for speech, and
Clear and present danger
556810
Judge Hand: Following "Schenck v. United States", "clear and present danger" became both a public metaphor for First Amendment speech and a standard test in cases before the Court where a United States law limits a citizen's First Amendment rights; the law is deemed to be constitutional if it can be shown that the language it prohibits poses a "clear and present danger". However, the "clear and present danger" criterion of the "Schenck" decision was replaced in 1969 by "Brandenburg v. Ohio", and the test refined to determining whether the speech would provoke an "imminent lawless action". The vast majority
Clear and present danger
661048
the central character, Clancy lambasted the new screenplay as “really awful” and criticized its technical inaccuracies. “First things first,” Clancy continued, “"Clear and Present Danger" was the No. 1 best-selling novel of the 1980s. One might conclude that the novel’s basic story line had some quality to it. Why, then, has nearly every aspect of the book been tossed away?” Regarding the different ending, in which Ryan testified before Congress about the covert operations instead of privately confronting the President, Ford said: ”We have softened somewhat the political bias [Clancy] brings to the subject, not because we’re bleeding-heart liberals, but
Clear and Present Danger
556807
it suggested that "imminent danger"a more restrictive wording than "present danger"should be required before speech can be outlawed. After "Whitney", the bad tendency test continued to be used by the Court in cases such 1931's "Stromberg v. California", which held that a 1919 California statute banning red flags was unconstitutional. The clear and present danger test was invoked by the majority in the 1940 "Thornhill v. Alabama" decision in which a state antipicketing law was invalidated. Although the Court referred to the clear and present danger test in a few decisions following "Thornhill", the bad tendency test was not explicitly
Clear and present danger
1451143
the conviction, a plurality of the Court adopted Judge Learned Hand's formulation of the clear and probable danger test, an adaptation of the clear and present danger test: In each case [courts] must ask whether the gravity of the "evil", discounted by its improbability, justifies such invasion of free speech as necessary to avoid the danger. In his dissent, Black wrote: These petitioners were not charged with an attempt to overthrow the Government. They were not charged with overt acts of any kind designed to overthrow the Government. They were not even charged with saying anything or writing anything designed
Dennis v. United States
556812
United States" decisions (both of which cite "Schenck" without using the words "clear and present danger"). However, a subsequent essay by Zechariah Chafee titled "Freedom of Speech in War Time" argued despite context that Holmes had intended to substitute clear and present danger for the bad-tendency standard a more protective standard of free speech. Bad tendency was a far more ambiguous standard where speech could be punished even in the absence of identifiable danger, and as such was strongly opposed by the fledgling American Civil Liberties Union and other libertarians of the time. Having read Chafee's article, Holmes decided to
Clear and present danger
19925516
ratings share in the 18-49 demographics. "Clear and Wesen Danger" received positive reviews. Les Chappell from The A.V. Club gave the episode a "B" rating and wrote, "After a series of episodes that have escalated the danger and stepped back from procedural activity, "Grimm" is back to a more familiar groove this week with 'Clear And Wesen Danger.' Once again, there's a monster of the week who needs to be tracked down and it seems like the overarching plot is being conducted off to the side, except this time "Grimm"s trying to build more of a synergy between its two
Clear and Wesen Danger
556808
overruled, and the clear and present danger test was not applied in several subsequent free speech cases involving incitement to violence. In May 1950, one month before the appeals court heard oral arguments in the "Dennis v. United States" case, the Supreme Court ruled on free speech issues in "American Communications Association v. Douds". In that case, the Court considered the clear and present danger test, but rejected it as too mechanical and instead introduced a balancing test. The federal appeals court heard oral arguments in the CPUSA case on June 21–23, 1950. Judge Learned Hand considered the clear and
Clear and present danger
19925519
is, the 'raging war' that's coming, and his baby momma moving in — by thinking about whether he's a Grimm, a Hexenbeist, or what Adalind calls a 'Grimmerbeist/Hexengrimm.'" MaryAnn Sleasman from "TV.com", wrote, "That was better, right? This episode felt like a return to "Grimm"s strengths and while far from perfect, 'Clear and Wesen Danger' was certainly channeling the good stuff in its efforts to return Nick and the gang to some kind of stability. The discomfort that permeated 'The Grimm Identity' was still present, as it should be. Nick's life hasn't been so dramatically altered since his Grimm legacy
Clear and Wesen Danger
12991810
In the cockpit, the pilot loses control and the plane plummets towards the ground. The final shot shows Mohinder losing his grip on Peter's hand, a direct reference to the cliffhanger of the pilot episode, "Genesis". Josh Modell of "The A.V. Club" rated this episode a B-. Robert Canning of IGN gave the episode 7.8 out of 10. A Clear and Present Danger "A Clear and Present Danger" is the 14th episode of the third season of the NBC science fiction drama series "Heroes" and 48th episode overall. It aired on February 2, 2009. The episode is the beginning of
A Clear and Present Danger
12991800
A Clear and Present Danger "A Clear and Present Danger" is the 14th episode of the third season of the NBC science fiction drama series "Heroes" and 48th episode overall. It aired on February 2, 2009. The episode is the beginning of Volume 4: "Fugitives". It marks the first time a season of "Heroes" has contained more than one volume. Originally, season two was planned to consist of three volumes, but was reduced to one volume due to the 2007–2008 Writers Guild of America strike. Tracy Strauss is captured by armed men, while a TV interview with the new chairman
A Clear and Present Danger
3701773
first of which, "Schenck v. United States", he stated the famous "clear and present danger" standard: speech could be punished if it posed a clear and present danger of causing some harm that Congress had power to forbid. The defendants in "Schenck" had mailed leaflets to men awaiting induction, urging them to resist the draft. The defendants did not deny that they intended this result. Since they could have been prosecuted for a crime if they accomplished the intended result, and there was a clear and present danger that they would, they could also be convicted of an attempt to
Abrams v. United States
15246394
finding contempt only in the most serious situations. With regard to the latter extreme, the Court of Appeal held that the concept of a real risk should not be equated with the concept of a clear and present danger as the two concepts have different meanings. The concept of a clear and present danger is a more stringent standard compared to the concept of a real risk. The latter encompasses the former but not "vice versa". The Court proceeded to reject the clear and present danger test for the following reasons. To begin with, the test is linked to the
Shadrake v Attorney-General
556802
Clear and present danger Clear and present danger was a doctrine adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States to determine under what circumstances limits can be placed on First Amendment freedoms of speech, press, or assembly. The test was replaced in 1969 with "Brandenburg v. Ohio"s "imminent lawless action" test. Before the 20th century, most free speech issues involved prior restraint. Starting in the early 1900s, the Supreme Court began to consider cases in which persons were punished 'after' speaking or publishing. The primary legal test used in the United States to determine if speech could be criminalized
Clear and present danger
556814
press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action". "Brandenburg" is now the standard applied by the Court to free speech issues related to advocacy of violence. Clear and present danger Clear and present danger was a doctrine adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States to determine under what circumstances limits can be placed on First Amendment freedoms of speech, press, or assembly. The test was replaced in 1969 with "Brandenburg v. Ohio"s "imminent
Clear and present danger
2528947
said the Manifesto contained "the language of direct incitement" and was not "the expression of philosophical abstraction." In his dissent, Holmes, the author of "Schenck"'s clear and present danger test, wrote that he believed it was still the appropriate test to employ in judging the limits of freedom of expression. Joined by Brandeis, he argued that Gitlow presented no present danger because only a small minority of people shared the views presented in the manifesto and because it directed an uprising at some "indefinite time in the future." He responded to Sanford's kindling metaphor that "eloquence may set fire to
Gitlow v. New York
2383457
"no choice" but to agree that threats against the government by a group of Communists were illegal under the repressive Smith Act of 1940. In order to do so, he interpreted the "clear and present danger" in a new way. "In each case," he wrote, "[courts] must ask whether the gravity of the 'evil', discounted by its improbability, justifies such invasion of free speech as is necessary to avoid the danger." This formula allowed more scope for curbing free speech in cases where, as the government believed with Communism, the danger was grave, whether it was immediate or not. Critics
Learned Hand
2793842
of All Fears", Clancy then used his next novel "Clear and Present Danger" (1989) as a way to introduce future President Fowler. Speaking of the consistency, Clancy said: "The whole series really is a logical and connected network of plot lines which would continue to diverge and converge throughout the body of the work." The novel was notable for detailing the process in making a bomb; however, certain technical details were altered, and Clancy made clear in the novel's afterword that a lot of information in his book can be found in the public domain. The book received positive reviews.
The Sum of All Fears
20893908
described in the book, had "proven Bertram Gross to be an amazingly astute prophet . [...] The evidence for this [in the book] is stunning". According to a book review in the journal "Social Justice" by Gregory Shank of the Institute for the Study of Labor and Economic Crisis, ""Friendly Fascism" [...] is written to alert readers to a clear and present danger in the current trajectory of American politics". More recently in 2016, the book prompted the following response from Michael Moore right after Donald Trump was elected President: "The next wave of fascists will not come with cattle
Friendly Fascism (book)
894952
of Iraq and wrote several books about it. In an interview with "The Brooklyn Rail" he said, We certainly should not be initiating a war, as it's not a clear and present danger to the United States, or in fact, to anyone around it. If it were, then the states around Iraq would be calling for a war on it. The Arab states around Iraq are opposed to the war, and if anyone's in danger from Iraq, they are. At the same time, the U.S. is violating the U.N. charter by initiating a war on Iraq. Bush made a big
Howard Zinn
20578026
he made contact with the guerillas who allowed him to return to the village. Cremonesi knew of Clemente Vismara and wrote of him in high esteem. The rebels defeated government soldiers - on 7 February 1953 - which prompted the surviving government forces to flee to the village that Cremonesi was stationed in. But the soldiers soon became convinced upon their entrance that the villagers favored the rebels and were perhaps allies to the rebels. This presented a clear danger to the villagers which prompted Cremonesi to intervene to assure them that there were no rebels nor rebel allies present
Alfredo Cremonesi
2383604
element at the heart of a democratic society. Implicitly, Brandeis here moves far beyond the "clear and present danger" test, and insists on what some have called a "time to answer" test: no danger flowing from speech can be considered "clear and present" if there is full opportunity for discussion. While upholding full and free speech, Brandeis tells legislatures, while they have a right to curb truly dangerous expression, they must define clearly the nature of that danger. Mere fear of unpopular ideas will not do: Justice William O. Douglas believed that had Brandeis lived longer, he would have abandoned
Whitney v. California
8702406
were sufficient grounds for criminal sanctions on nonparticipants in proceedings. In its conclusion, the Court wrote: "the [clear and present danger] test requires a court to make its own inquiry into the imminence and magnitude of the danger said to flow from the particular utterance and then to balance the character of the evil as well as its likelihood against the need for free and unfettered expression." Landmark Communications, Inc. v. Virginia Landmark Communications v. Virginia, 435 U.S. 829 (1978), was a United States Supreme Court case that was argued on January 11, 1978 and decided on May 1, 1978.
Landmark Communications, Inc. v. Virginia
3701766
John Hessin Clarke in an opinion for the majority held that the defendants' intent to hinder war production could be inferred from their words, and that Congress had determined such expressions posed an imminent danger. Their conviction was accordingly warranted under the "clear-and-present-danger" standard, derived from the common law and announced in "Schenck v. United States" and companion cases earlier in 1919. Opinions for a unanimous Court in those cases were written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. In the "Abrams" case, however, Holmes dissented, rejecting the argument that the defendants' leaflets posed the "clear and present danger" that was true
Abrams v. United States
428234
avoid the danger." Clearly, Vinson suggested, clear and present danger did not intimate "that before the Government may act, it must wait until the "putsch" is about to be executed, the plans have been laid and the signal is awaited." In a concurring opinion, Justice Felix Frankfurter proposed a "balancing test", which soon supplanted the "clear and present danger" test: The demands of free speech in a democratic society as well as the interest in national security are better served by candid and informed weighing of the competing interests, within the confines of the judicial process. In "Yates v. United
First Amendment to the United States Constitution
2383601
question before the court was whether the 1919 Criminal Syndicalism Act of California violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses. The Court unanimously upheld Whitney's conviction. Justice Sanford wrote for the seven-justice majority opinion and invoked the Holmes test of "clear and present danger" but also went further. The Court held that the state, in exercise of its police power, has the power to punish those who abuse their rights to freedom of speech "by utterances inimical to the public welfare, tending to incite crime, disturb the public peace, or endanger the foundations of organized government and
Whitney v. California
16749949
2010, director Jack Bender was the frontrunner to direct the film, based on a script tentatively titled "Moscow" by Adam Cozad. The following month, writer Anthony Peckham was brought on to perform rewrites, and later Steve Zaillian, who wrote the screenplay for "Clear and Present Danger" (1994), was engaged to perform rewrites as well. However, Zaillian withdrew after a few weeks and the film was put on hold by Paramount for Pine to reprise his role as James T. Kirk in "Star Trek Into Darkness". During this time, David Koepp was brought on to rewrite the script, with shooting scheduled
Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit
12842471
2008 was 'offensive', aimed at abducting IDF soldiers and posing an imminent threat, was also reported with doubt by various other players and commentators, such as UNISPAL that wrote " IDF special forces had entered the area to blow up a tunnel dug by Hamas for allegedly kidnapping IDF soldiers." Another example is the Israeli daily Ha'aretz that wrote "(The tunnel was) dug ostensibly to facilitate the abduction of Israeli soldiers, (but the tunnel) was not a clear and present danger". Ex-U.U. President Jimmy Carter wrote "Israel launched an attack in Gaza to destroy a defensive tunnel being dug by
Gaza War (2008–09)
19925521
coexist." Christine Horton of "Den of Geek" wrote, "This is a good thing. If the writers take their time and develop a major storyline that runs all season – and allow Nick and the others to focus solely on it – it would not only be a real change to previous seasons with their 'Wesen of the week' plots, but it would add a story arc that, hopefully will provide more detail about the shadowy second world that we still don’t understand." Clear and Wesen Danger "Clear and Wesen Danger" is the 2nd episode of season 5 of the supernatural
Clear and Wesen Danger
1451057
the Administration, because the prosecution was abandoned. White then asked Holmes to write the opinion for a unanimous Court in the next case, one in which they could agree, "Schenck v. United States". Holmes wrote that opinion, and wrote again for a unanimous court upholding convictions in two more cases that spring, "Frohwerk v. United States" and "Debs v. United States", establishing what remains the standard for deciding the constitutionality of criminal convictions based on expressive behavior. Holmes disliked legislative-style formulas, and did not repeat the language of "clear and present danger" in any subsequent opinion, however. The Schenck opinion
Schenck v. United States
19614246
David Cameron's holiday in Lanzarote, a petition started by Mendoza to prevent Cameron from re-entering the country "gathered momentum after Mendoza wrote a satirical article" for "The Canary", Romil Patel wrote in the "International Business Times". The petition said, in part: David Cameron presents a clear and present danger to the short, medium and long-term interests of the country. As such, the UK should institute a temporary ban on his return to Britain at the conclusion of his holiday in Lanzarote. "The Canary" coverage of Jeremy Hunt and the junior doctors' strike has gained support from left-wing political parties, such
Kerry-Anne Mendoza
13544707
overthrow the U.S. government in violation of the unused Sedition Act of 1861 as well as the newly passed Smith Act. When critics argued that the government should adhere to the doctrine enunciated by Justice Holmes that free speech could only be prosecuted if it presented "a clear and present danger," Attorney General Biddle replied that Congress had considered both that standard and the international situation when writing the Smith Act's proscriptions. At trial the judge took Biddle's view and refused to instruct the jury in the "clear and present danger" standard as the defendants' attorneys requested. The trial began
Smith Act
1451194
concludes his First Amendment analysis in Dennis by asserting that: The authors of the "clear and present danger test" never applied it to a case like this, nor would I. If applied as it is proposed here, it means that the Communist plotting is protected during its period of incubation; its preliminary stages of organization and preparation are immune from the law; the Government can move only after imminent action is manifest, when it would, of course, be too late. In the end, the Court applied its own version of the "clear and present danger test" in Dennis, essentially disregarding
Robert H. Jackson
661045
military power, and addresses the dangers of a government bureaucracy where no one can be held accountable for actions implied to be illegal by a democratic society. The book was released around the time of the Iran-Contra affair, which strikingly bears many parallels with the novel. Additionally, it pushes the narrative that the War on Drugs, which was also a major issue during the time of the book's publication, is corrupting law enforcement, and that the status quo is enforced in this struggle. The book debuted at number one on the New York Times bestseller list, and has stayed on
Clear and Present Danger
661046
the chart for several years as well as its paperback edition. It became the best-selling novel of the 1980s, selling 1,625,544 hardcover copies. The book received wide critical acclaim. "The Washington Post" praised it as a “rousing adventure” and “a crackling good yarn”. "The New York Times" remarked in its review: “The issues raised are real ones, and a jump ahead of the headlines.” Publishers Weekly hailed it as Clancy's best work since "The Hunt for Red October". The book was adapted as a feature film, which was released on August 3, 1994. Harrison Ford reprised his role from the
Clear and Present Danger
7249622
military or naval forces of the United States, or the flag ..." In "Schenck v. United States" (1919) the Supreme Court upheld the laws, setting the "clear and present danger" standard. Congress repealed both laws in 1921, and "Brandenburg v. Ohio" (1969) revised the clear-and-present-danger test to the significantly less-restrictive "imminent lawless action" test. In "Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier" (1988), the Supreme Court upheld the right of a school principal to review (and suppress) controversial articles in a school newspaper funded by the school and published in its name. In "United States v. Manning" (2013), Chelsea Manning was found guilty of
Freedom of the press in the United States
661044
to Cuba, where he is branded as a traitor by his former colleagues. Upon confronted by Clark with evidence of his treason, Cutter commits suicide. Ryan confronts the defiant President for not informing him about the covert operations in Colombia; after he briefs the committee, the President deliberately loses the election to Fowler, in order to hide the operations and protect the honor of those involved. Meanwhile, Clark takes Chavez under his wing and recruits him into the CIA. "Clear and Present Danger" is considered to be a work of dystopian fiction. It talks about the abuse of political and
Clear and Present Danger
556813
retroactively reinterpret what he had meant by "clear and present danger" and accepted Chafee's characterization of the new test in his dissent in "Abrams v. United States" just six months after "Schenck". "Schenck", "Frohwerk", and "Debs" all resulted in unanimous decisions, while "Abrams" did not. For two decades after the "Dennis" decision, free speech issues related to advocacy of violence were decided using balancing tests such as the one initially articulated in "Dennis". In 1969, the court established stronger protections for speech in the landmark case "Brandenburg v. Ohio", which held that "the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free
Clear and present danger
1451064
again explaining the clear-and-present-danger standard for criminal attempts in these terms, reiterating the argument that political speech was protected because of the value of democratic deliberation. The Supreme Court continued to affirm convictions for seditious speech in a series of prosecutions of leftists, however, culminating in "Dennis v. United States", 341 U.S. 494 (1951) in which a bitterly divided Court upheld the sedition convictions for the leaders of the Communist Party. Judge Learned Hand in the court below and Chief Justice Vinson for the plurality in the Supreme Court cited "Schenck", and the language of "clear and present danger" accordingly
Schenck v. United States
428229
that although he had not spoken any words that posed a "clear and present danger", taken in context, the speech had a "natural tendency and a probable effect to obstruct the recruiting services". In "Abrams v. United States", four Russian refugees appealed their conviction for throwing leaflets from a building in New York; the leaflets argued against President Woodrow Wilson's intervention in Russia against the October Revolution. The majority upheld their conviction, but Holmes and Justice Louis Brandeis dissented, holding that the government had demonstrated no "clear and present danger" in the four's political advocacy. The Supreme Court denied a
First Amendment to the United States Constitution
3701777
weeks between the two sets of opinions. Holmes always maintained that he had adhered to the standard for punishing criminal attempts used in the earlier convictions, a standard based on long years as a common-law judge and scholar. Critics of his earlier "clear-and-present-danger" opinion have insisted that the "Abrams" dissent stands on a different footing, and is more protective. The objection may be based in part on a misunderstanding. In his "Abrams" dissent, Holmes first disposed of the argument that the facts in the case supported a conviction under the clear-and-present-danger standard, insisting that a criminal prosecution required proof of
Abrams v. United States
4752981
show anything to mark him as vaguely human." In "", author Matthew Alford formulated a critique of the film, pointing out that supporting characters like Cutter and Ritter are pointedly squeamish about the use of force. He queried, "Where is this abundance of sensitivity from the US national security apparatus towards the people of Latin America in the real world?". He concluded, "The answers are all too obvious, except to a Hollywood hooked on schmaltz, willfully ignorant of reality and in thrall to power." "Clear and Present Danger" opened strongly at the U.S. box office, grossing $20,348,017 in its first
Clear and Present Danger (film)
10178902
Workers of the World. In "Schenck v. United States", the Supreme Court upheld the Espionage Act and banned speaking against the draft during World War I. This case led to the "clear and present danger" test. In 1969, "Brandenburg v. Ohio" established the "imminent lawless action" test. State sedition acts, if in place, are likely unconstitutional under the Brandenburg doctrine of "imminent lawless action" or the older doctrine of "clear and present danger." The Alien Registration Act or Smith Act () of 1940 is a United States federal statute that made it a criminal offense for anyone to It also
Censorship in the United States
2778179
even of seeking to curry favor with his young admirers. In "Abrams", the majority opinion did rely on the clear-and-present-danger formulation of "Schenck", claiming that the leaflets showed the necessary intent, and ignoring the point that they were unlikely to have any effect. In later opinions, the Supreme Court departed from this line of reasoning where the validity of a statute was in question, adopting the principle that a legislature could properly declare that some forms of speech posed a clear and present danger, regardless of the circumstances in which they were uttered. Holmes continued to dissent. In 1920, in
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
4752973
Cutter, his National Security Advisor, that the cartels represent a "clear and present danger" to the U.S., tacitly instructing him to use illegal force against the men responsible for his friend's murder. Jack Ryan, appointed acting Deputy Director of Intelligence after Vice Admiral Jim Greer is stricken with cancer, asks Congress for increased funding for ongoing CIA operations in Colombia, believing the funds to be for advisory purposes only. Keeping Ryan in the dark, Cutter turns to the CIA's Deputy Director of Operations Bob Ritter to take down the cartel. Ritter assembles a black operations team with the help of
Clear and Present Danger (film)
4752979
order as they appear in the film. Some parts of the soundtrack are based on the music from James Horner's soundtrack for Gorky Park (film), but played with different instruments. The film received positive reviews from critics. Rotten Tomatoes gives it a rating of 80% based on reviews from 40 critics. At Metacritic, which assigns a weighted average out of 100 to critics' reviews, "Clear and Present Danger" received a score of 74 based on 14 reviews. Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "A" on an A+ to F scale. Mick LaSalle, writing for the
Clear and Present Danger (film)
556805
test to be used by lower courts when evaluating the constitutionality of legislation that regulated speech. The Court continued to use the bad tendency test during the early 20th century in cases such as 1919's "Abrams v. United States", which upheld the conviction of antiwar activists who passed out leaflets encouraging workers to impede the war effort. In "Abrams", Holmes and Justice Brandeis dissented and encouraged the use of the clear and present test, which provided more protection for speech. In 1925's "Gitlow v. New York", the Court extended the First Amendment to the states, and upheld the conviction of
Clear and present danger
19925509
Clear and Wesen Danger "Clear and Wesen Danger" is the 2nd episode of season 5 of the supernatural drama television series "Grimm" and the 90th episode overall, which premiered on November 6, 2015, on the cable network NBC. The episode was written by Thomas Ian Griffith and was directed by Norberto Barba. In the episode, Nick, Hank and Wu investigate a person who seemingly embezzled money for the company. The episode received positive reviews from critics, who praised its fast pace. Opening quote: "Cherish those who seek the truth but beware of those who find it." Beau Childs (Gary Kraus),
Clear and Wesen Danger
1323399
of judicial tests for free speech standards, such as the tests for "clear and present danger", "bad tendency", "gravity of the evil," "reasonableness," or "balancing." Black would write that the First Amendment is "wholly 'beyond the reach' of federal power to abridge ... I do not believe that any federal agencies, including Congress and the Court, have power or authority to subordinate speech and press to what they think are 'more important interests.'" He believed that the First Amendment erected a metaphorical wall of separation between church and state. During his career Black wrote several important opinions relating to church-state
Hugo Black
5121406
remarks and the decision to drop DOB from the sponsor list led lesbian feminist Rita Mae Brown to angrily resign her administrative job at NOW in February 1970 (Jay 137-138, Brownmiller 82). On March 15, 1970, straight radical feminist Susan Brownmiller quoted Friedan's remarks about the "lavender menace" and dismissed her worries as "A lavender "herring", perhaps, but no clear and present danger" in a "New York Times Magazine" article. While the term "Lavender Menace" originated as a negative term for lesbianism, it was later reclaimed as a positive term by lesbian feminists. Brownmiller later said that when she wrote
Lavender Menace
13728635
case dealt with the prosecution of a woman for aiding the Communist Labor Party, an organization that was promoting the violent overthrow of the government. In their opinion and test to uphold the conviction, they expanded the definition of "clear and present danger" to include the condition that the "evil apprehended is so imminent that it may befall before there is opportunity for full discussion." According to legal historian Anthony Lewis, scholars have lauded Brandeis's opinion "as perhaps the greatest defense of freedom of speech ever written by a member of the high court." In their concurring opinion, they wrote:
Louis Brandeis
9749320
for which John Beal wrote original scores between 1977 and 2007 cover a wide range of styles: "Titanic, We Were Soldiers, The Last Samurai, Finding Neverland, Star Wars, Aladdin, The Matrix, Mean Girls, Planet of the Apes, Batman Beyond, Alaska, Being John Malkovich, Black Beauty, Black Hawk Down, Black Rain, The Bodyguard, Braveheart, Casualties of War, Chaplin, Clear and Present Danger, Conspiracy Theory, Cruising, Dead Again, Donnie Brasco, Fallen, Ferris Bueller's Day Off, First Blood, Flight of the Intruder, Ghost, Hamlet, Heathers, The Hunt for Red October, JFK, The Mask, The Mask of Zorro, Medicine Man, Miracle on 34th Street
John Beal (composer)
2866273
of his last opinions in the area, Burton voted to limit the application Smith Act in "Yates v. United States", 354 U.S. 298 (1957). The majority had overturned the conviction of seven individuals using the "clear and present danger" First Amendment doctrine by concluding they had advocated violent overthrow of the government as an abstract doctrine, not as advocacy to action. Burton wrote an opinion concurring in the outcome, but cast his vote on arrow procedural grounds. Generally, Burton favored a strict separation of church and state. But his pragmatic approach to law sometimes caused him to dissent from majorities
Harold Hitz Burton
11895666
1991. During his stint on the Court, Sarmiento held staunch civil libertarian views. In "People v. Nazario", 165 SCRA 186, the Court through Sarmiento acknowledged the void for vagueness rule as able to invalidate criminal statutes. In "Pita v. Court of Appeals", G.R. No. 80806, 5 October 1989, 163 SCRA 386, he wrote for the Court that any restraint on the publication of purportedly obscene materials must satisfy the clear and present danger test. In "Salaw v. NLRC", G.R. No. 90786, 27 September 1991, 202 SCRA 7, Sarmiento's opinion for the Court held that the dismissal of an employee in
Abraham Sarmiento
20498826
up to 1,600 children five days a week. Hemminger worked to bring new retailers to Chapel Hill, hoping to make the town a "regional foodie destination", such as by approving construction of a Wegmans supermarket. She supports a cap on campaign donations, which was $353 for individuals in Chapel Hill during her first election. Hemminger wrote to UNC chancellor Carol Folt to ask for the "Silent Sam" statue on campus to be put into storage in August 2017 because it presented a "clear and present danger" to students should it be felled. She endorsed Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee, in
Pam Hemminger
9108628
and prevent radiation sickness. "Purification: An Illustrated Answer To Drugs" (New Era Publications, 1984. ) is an earlier, illustrated explanation of the Purification Rundown. Another illustrated book, "Narconon New Life Detoxification Program: the effective purification program by L. Ron Hubbard." (Bridge Publications, 1991. ) is listed as based on "Clear Body, Clear Mind". Clear Body, Clear Mind Clear Body, Clear Mind is a book published in 1990 by the Church of Scientology's publishing house Bridge Publications. It is credited to L. Ron Hubbard who died four years earlier, and is largely a compilation of material he wrote in the 1960s.
Clear Body, Clear Mind
4752977
and a squadmate have been captured and the rest have been killed. Ryan visits Escobedo's mansion and shares his intelligence on Cortez. Enraged, Escobedo confronts Cortez, but is killed by Cortez's associate. Ryan, Clark and Chávez rescue the prisoners, kill Cortez, and escape. Ryan confronts the President and tells him he intends to inform the Congressional Oversight Committee about the conspiracy despite the damage it could do to his career. As he walks out of the Oval Office, Cutter asks to speak with him, but Ryan ignores him. Ryan then begins his testimony to Congress. John Milius wrote the first
Clear and Present Danger (film)
13857521
get a break from the kids. Knowing that Harry is an expert on children, they assume that he will appreciate the gesture and leave just after he arrives. Unbeknownst to them, Harry only wrote a book about raising children because his publisher told him to, and actually he isn't fond of children at all. He reluctantly takes the position as the babysitter of his nieces and is escorted by Alice Mayton, the Lawrence's attractive neighbor. It soon becomes clear that Harry won't get any rest, as the careless girls often annoy him by getting themselves into danger or going through
Helen's Babies (film)
543420
Democratic senator Joe Lieberman wrote the legislation that created the 9/11 Commission, while he and Democratic senator Fritz Hollings co-sponsored the Aviation and Transportation Security Act that federalized airport security. In March 2002, McCain–Feingold, officially known as the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, passed in both Houses of Congress and was signed into law by President Bush. Seven years in the making, it was McCain's greatest legislative achievement. Meanwhile, in discussions over proposed U.S. action against Iraq, McCain was a strong supporter of the Bush administration's position. He stated that Iraq was "a clear and present danger to the
John McCain
428236
the court handed down its decision in "Brandenburg v. Ohio" (1969), expressly overruling "Whitney v. California". "Brandenburg" discarded the "clear and present danger" test introduced in "Schenck" and further eroded "Dennis". Now the Supreme Court referred to the right to speak openly of violent action and revolution in broad terms: In "Cohen v. California" (1971), the Court voted 5–4 to reverse the conviction of a man wearing a jacket reading "Fuck the Draft" in the corridors of a Los Angeles County courthouse. Justice John Marshall Harlan II wrote in the majority opinion that Cohen's jacket fell in the category of
First Amendment to the United States Constitution
16886667
fear among the American public and attempts at suppression of criticism by the government, the First Amendment was given wider examination in the U.S. Supreme Court. Lewis writes that Associate Justices Louis Brandeis and Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., began to interpret broader support for freedom of speech imparted by the First Amendment. Holmes wrote in the case of "Schenck v. United States" that freedom of speech must be defended except for situations in which "substantive evils" are caused through a "clear and present danger" arising from such speech. The author reflects on his view of speech in the face of
Freedom for the Thought That We Hate
7986491
Shepherd's Rod, Volume 1, he wrote, It is the intention of this book to reveal the truth of the 144,000 mentioned in Revelation 7 but the chief object of this publication is to bring about a reformation among God's people. The truth herein contained is divided into seven sections, giving proof from seven different angles, to prevent any doubt or confusion. This subject is made clear by the use of the Bible and the writings given by the Spirit of Prophecy.The truth revealed here is of great importance to the church just now because of the foretold danger which God's
Victor Houteff
3085460
Danger Danger, Michael Jackson's "Dangerous", the 4 Non Blondes' "Bigger, Better, Faster, More!", the Red Hot Chili Peppers' "One Hot Minute", Jack Off Jill's "Clear Hearts Grey Flowers", the Screaming Trees' "Uncle Anesthesia", Marcy Playground, "Shapeshifter" and Aerosmith's "Love in an Elevator". Also during this time, Ryden created book covers including Stephen King's novels "Desperation" and "The Regulators". He made a living as a commercial artist until his work was taken up by Robert Williams, a former member of the Zap Comix collective, who in 1994 put it on the cover of "Juxtapoz", a magazine devoted to "lowbrow art". Ryden’s
Mark Ryden
20204475
The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump is a 2017 book, edited by Dr. Bandy X. Lee, a forensic psychiatrist, containing essays from 27 psychologists, psychiatrists, and mental health professionals on the "clear and present danger" that US President Donald Trump's mental health poses to the "nation and individual well being". They argued that the president's mental health was affecting the mental health of the people of the United States and that he places the country at grave risk of involving it in a war and of undermining democracy itself because of his pathological narcissism
The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump
20809751
Dangerous Case of Donald Trump", containing essays from 27 psychologists, psychiatrists, and mental health professionals on the "clear and present danger" that Trump's mental health poses to the "nation and individual well being". They argued that the president's issues affected the mental health of the United States population, and that he placed the country at grave risk of war because of his pathological traits. They defined Trump's behavior in terms of psychiatric diseases, such as narcissistic personality disorder. Carlos Lozada, writing for "The Washington Post", considered these conclusions "compelling", but also noted that the book contributors were writing from their
Health of Donald Trump
16563175
book. On February 7, 2003, Paramount announced a box set entitled "The Jack Ryan Special Edition DVD Collection", which includes new editions of "The Hunt for Red October", "Patriot Games" and "Clear and Present Danger" as well as the special edition of "The Sum of All Fears". Both the set and the individual editions of each film were released on May 6, 2003. While the four films were originally intended to be released in a Blu-ray collection entitled "The Jack Ryan Collection", the films were later broken up into separate releases for the high definition format on July 29, 2008.
Jack Ryan (film series)
425683
1991 video game based on the novel, which is a global management simulation developed for Amiga. In a 1994 survey of wargames, "Computer Gaming World" gave the title one-plus stars out of five, stating that it "utilized intensive bar graphs as a replacement for action and entertainment". After the release of "Clear and Present Danger" (1994), a film based on the book was planned before it was deemed too difficult to adapt, resulting in producer Mace Neufeld purchasing the rights to "The Sum of All Fears". Harrison Ford was set to reprise his role as Jack Ryan, co-starring with William
The Cardinal of the Kremlin
661047
previous movie "Patriot Games" (1992) as Ryan, while Willem Dafoe played Clark. The film received positive reviews, with Rotten Tomatoes giving it a rating of 80% based on 40 reviews. It was a major financial success, earning over $200 million at the box office. As in the previous film "Patriot Games", Clancy was less than pleased with the movie due to script changes. He favored John Milius’s initial script, which was written before "Patriot Games" started production and closer to the book. However, when Donald Stewart was hired by Paramount Pictures to rewrite the script due to Ryan not being
Clear and Present Danger
6479631
so cut off from outer reality as to experience it as dangerous. It is a natural human response to turn away from sources of danger and toward sources of safety. The schizoid individual, therefore, is primarily concerned with avoiding danger and ensuring safety. Withdrawnness means detachment from the outer world, the other side of introversion. Only a small portion of schizoid individuals present with a clear and obvious timidity, reluctance, or avoidance of the external world and interpersonal relationships. Many fundamentally schizoid people present with an engaging, interactive personality style. Such a person can appear to be available, interested, engaged
Harry Guntrip
13031275
Lake", an account of the five families, including his grandmother, who resided in a house in Berlin, was published in 2015. The Economist wrote 'If "Hanns and Rudolf" was a sonata, "The House by the Lake" is a symphony, telling the story of modern Germany with one recurring theme: history as seen from the Alexander family’s lake house outside Berlin. "The House by the Lake" skips between its varied occupants and [historical] events to present an admirably clear and concise history of modern Germany. It’s an impressive feat of archival and investigative research. Fascinating revelations abound…. [A] powerful book.' "The
Thomas Harding (writer)
2528946
the "clear and present danger" test developed a few years earlier in "Schenck v. United States", 249 U.S. 47 (1919). He embraced "the bad tendency test" found in "Shaffer v. United States", 255 F. 886 (1919), which held that a "State may punish utterances endangering the foundations of government and threatening its overthrow by unlawful means" because such speech clearly "present[s] a sufficient danger to the public peace and to the security of the State." According to Sanford, a "single revolutionary spark may kindle a fire that, smoldering for a time, may burst into a sweeping and destructive conflagration." He
Gitlow v. New York
556809
present danger test, but his opinion adopted a balancing approach similar to that suggested in "American Communications Association v. Douds". The defendants appealed the Second Circuit's decision to the Supreme Court in "Dennis v. United States". The 6–2 decision was issued on June 4, 1951, and upheld Hand's decision. Chief Justice Fred Vinson's opinion stated that the First Amendment does not require that the government must wait "until the putsch is about to be executed, the plans have been laid and the signal is awaited" before it interrupts seditious plots. In his opinion, Vinson endorsed the balancing approach used by
Clear and present danger
9375386
the GOP political advocacy group Americans for Prosperity (AFP) issued a critical report on the WildEarth Guardians, entitled "Monkeywrenching the Courts: How One Green Group Games the System for Headlines and Profit". The AFP report concluded that WildEarth Guardians "will continue to present a clear and present danger not just to the court system, and to the Western economy and way of life, but to the taxpayers who unwittingly bankroll its monkey-wrenching of the West." An economic-impact study by a team from Utah State University and Southern Utah University, commissioned by the AFP in 2012, found that a total of
WildEarth Guardians
17303388
indeed has been taken of scholarly work published since the early 1970s." Marcia L. Colish described the book as "a superficial and shaky sketch of what universities actually taught. He emphasizes the organization, not the content of education." Colish finds Pedersen prone to "repeat and compound factual errors more recently given the decent burial they deserve." She suggests other, more reliable, authorities. On the other hand, Ian P. Wei gave the book an enthusiastic review, calling it a "clear and lively work of synthesis." He wrote that the "main thrust of the book is to present medieval universities as institutions
Olaf Pedersen
1868830
clear, Abraham is both the father who brings his son as an offering, and Kierkegaard who offers Regine." . Julie Watkin explained more about Kierkegaard's relation to Regine Olsen in her book, "Historical Dictionary of Kierkegaard's Philosophy". She says, Kierkegaard wrote "Either/Or", "Fear and Trembling", and "Repetition" as a way to get over Regine. John Stewart's review of the book removes Hegel from the whole structure of the book, He wrote, in 2007, "...nothing stands in the way of a commentator who wants to find a substantive philosophical discussion in these allusions to Hegel, and certainly there is no reason
Fear and Trembling
20439814
"clear and capable book about a difficult subject." Gross wrote that the book deserved to be widely read. Lener wrote that parts of the book were "diary-like", and gave Hamer's "descriptions of methods used" and "life histories of gay men who participated in the study" as examples. He also wrote that some of Hamer's statements, such as that nobody has studied the number of gay men in the United States since Kinsey's research, were incorrect, but nevertheless considered the book generally "very accurate" and credited Hamer with drawing on "recent, important publications." He concluded that, "General readers as well as
The Science of Desire
16303988
of students poses a "drastic danger" which "powerless, naive, and unthinking students unquestionably endorse." The political scientist Ronnee Schreiber of San Diego State University wrote that the conservative Independent Women's Forum continues to use the book to portray feminists as scheming falsifiers of statistical data. Who Stole Feminism? Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women is a 1994 book about American feminism by Christina Hoff Sommers, a writer who was at that time a philosophy professor at Clark University. Sommers argues that there is a split between equity feminism and what she terms "gender feminism". Sommers contends that equity
Who Stole Feminism?
17752264
problem. Soon, Kamran becomes the city’s most feared don with even the cops and politicians fearing him, earning him the name Ghalib Danger. "Ghalib Danger" was launched on 6 December 2013 at the Times of India Literary Carnival in at Mehboob Studio, Bandra, Mumbai. The book was launched by actor Anupam Kher in an event attended by actors Shriya Saran, Divya Dutta, Manoj Bajpayee & Anup Soni. Hussain Zaidi, author of "Dongri to Dubai" and "Black Friday" and the co-founder of Blue Salt was also present at the event. Ghalib Danger Ghalib Danger is a 2013 novel by Neeraj Pandey
Ghalib Danger
3619408
would "prefer just such an American defeat to a 'Vietnamization' of the war." A larger quote from "Why We Were in Vietnam" which was included in the review is as follows: In the early 1980s, Podhoretz was extremely sceptical that fundamental reform was possible in the USSR, and sharply criticized those who argued that U.S. policy toward the Soviet Union should be one of détente. In his 1980 book "The Present Danger", Podhoretz predicted that the United States was in danger of losing the Cold War and falling behind the Soviet Union as a global power. Later he would express
Norman Podhoretz
477993
any color who had more confidence in the voice of God, as spoken direct to her soul." Her faith in the divine also provided immediate assistance. She used spirituals as coded messages, warning fellow travelers of danger or to signal a clear path. Tubman also carried a revolver, and was not afraid to use it. The gun afforded some protection from the ever-present slave catchers and their dogs; however, she also purportedly threatened to shoot any escaped slave who tried to turn back on the journey since that would threaten the safety of the remaining group. Tubman told the tale
Harriet Tubman
9702871
work in the Congo. Gordon edited two hymn books and wrote the hymn tunes for at least fifteen hymns, including "My Jesus, I Love Thee," a hymn that has been included in nearly every evangelical hymnal published from 1876 to the present time. In his book "The Ministry of the Holy Spirit", Gordon wrote, "It seems clear from the Scriptures that it is still the duty and privilege of believers to receive the Holy Spirit by a conscious, definite act of appropriating faith, just as they received Jesus Christ" (see Baptism with the Holy Spirit). His most remembered work is
Adoniram Judson Gordon
5197551
book's author "is very good at finding quotations from the Qur'an or from obscure Muslim clerics to 'prove' the danger of Islam... Spencer states that '[w]hen modern Muslims like Jaffar Umar Thalib [sic] and Usama Bin Ladin declare Jihad, Muslims take them seriously... In present-day studies of Islam, one can easily cite as a source for research 'a writer on a Muslim bulletin board.' In June 2004, Khalid Hasan wrote in an article in Pakistan's " Daily Times" that the book was part of the “great Islamic conspiracy.” Hasan says that the book's opinion that Muslims in the United States
Onward Muslim Soldiers
428228
who had criticized U.S. involvement in foreign wars. In "Debs v. United States", the Court elaborated on the "clear and present danger" test established in "Schenck". On June 16, 1918, Eugene V. Debs, a political activist, delivered a speech in Canton, Ohio, in which he spoke of "most loyal comrades were paying the penalty to the working class – these being Wagenknecht, Baker and Ruthenberg, who had been convicted of aiding and abetting another in failing to register for the draft." Following his speech, Debs was charged and convicted under the Espionage Act. In upholding his conviction, the Court reasoned
First Amendment to the United States Constitution
1451135
who had been petitioning for socialist reforms claimed that the act violated their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and that they served no clear and present danger to the nation. The eleven petitioners were: The 1949 trial was presided over by Judge Harold Medina, a former Columbia University professor who had been a judge for only 18 months when the trial began. The trial was held in the Foley Square federal courthouse in New York City, and opened on November 1, 1948; preliminary proceedings and jury selection lasted until January 17, 1949; the defendants first appeared in court
Dennis v. United States
425749
Pamela Madden, a former prostitute who had been forced into working as a courier for a drug ring. She was later recaptured by her owners in Baltimore and later tortured, raped, and killed; Kelly was gravely wounded. While recovering from his injuries at Johns Hopkins Hospital, he met his future second wife, nurse Sandra "Sandy" O'Toole. They eventually had two daughters, Patricia Doris and Margaret Pamela. Kelly, who had by now changed his identity to Clark, first met Domingo "Ding" Chavez in the CIA during a black operation in Colombia ("Clear and Present Danger"). They would later work frequently together
John Clark (Tom Clancy character)
15275668
45 people, the parents of Kevin Carter also, helped Marinovich and Silva to write the book "straight". Judith Matloff, also listed under "impimpi", wrote in an article: "But the reporters and photographers stationed in South Africa at the time were also compassionate human beings who exposed themselves to danger because they wanted to record history". Other witnesses or impimpi for the book from that era include: James Nachtwey, Peter Magubane, Brian Mkhize, Gilles Peress, Vivian Silva, and more. The book was first published in January 2000 by William Heinemann, London, UK and then by Basic Books, New York. It was
The Bang-Bang Club (book)
11317671
aftermath of what became known as "The Great Escape". Other escape attempts (such as the Wooden Horse) are mentioned as well as the postwar hunt for the Gestapo agents who murdered fifty of the escapees on Hitler's direct order. The book was published in 1950. Brickhill, a journalist before and after the war, had previously written the story four different ways, initially as a BBC talk, then as newspaper and "Reader's Digest" articles, and in the 1946 book "Escape to Danger" which he co-wrote with Conrad Norton. By the time of the 1950 book, Brickhill had eliminated some of the
The Great Escape (book)
661037
3, 1994. The President of the United States, who is running for reelection, finds a fierce opponent in Ohio Governor J. Robert Fowler, who has rallied the American public behind his administration's failures in the War on Drugs. This provides National Security Advisor James Cutter with an opportunity to help him initiate covert operations within Colombia with intent to disrupt the illegal drug trade there. Aided by CIA Deputy Director (Operations) Robert Ritter and CIA director Arthur Moore, the plan involves inserting light infantry troops with Hispanic descent into the country to stake out airstrips used by the cartel (SHOWBOAT),
Clear and Present Danger
14002989
Yitzhak Shapira Yitzhak Shapira is an Israeli rabbi who lived in the West Bank Israeli settlement Yitzhar, and is head of the Od Yosef Chai Yeshiva. In 2009, he published a book (The King's Torah) in which he writes that it is permissible for Jews to kill non-Jews (including children) who threaten the lives of Jews. The book states "There is a reason to kill babies [on the enemy side] even if they have not transgressed the seven Noahide Laws because of the future danger they may present, since it is assumed that they will grow up to be evil
Yitzhak Shapira