Challenge : I am heading the Department of Computer Science and Engineering in our institution . In   spite of the excellent infrastructure , dedicated instructors and supportive management , around 30 %   of undergraduate students fail every year . This is a problem common to most of the Institutions   around . Though methods such as remedial classes counselling and peer support were tried , they   could only bring in a limited improvement .   A learning launch including various stakeholders is being   planned to launch an online support channel for such slow learners . A sample outline for two first   two modules of two courses shall be uploaded and   the learning launch would include various stake   holders – The Head of the department , Academic and Administrative coordinators , teachers and few   students from various groups to gather various insights . The student sample from various sections   includes categories of the low , very low and extremely low performing students . 

 Selection : Based on few preliminary interviews , group discussions that were held with students and   the student feedback , we were able to identify the need for a continuous online engagement tool .   These were conducted by teachers , organized by coordinators . The enthusiasm of teachers and   students made us believe that we shall be able to gauge the success or need for improvement in the   idea , only if we conduct a learning launch involving all the stake holders . 

 Application : In the first learning launch , students are divided into groups of five and interact with   instructors of different courses , particularly with a higher failure rate in an open seminar hall . Twelve   such groups are identified .   The students are already given access to the sample material in the   channel , to be accessed from their mobile a couple of days earlier . These sample videos are also   played on the larger screen and snapshots of roadmap of proposed methodology with time lines is   displayed on the AV system , as well as in the form of drawings displayed throughout the hall .   Teachers are asked to prepare a questionnaire that has critical questions related to their   assumptions . For example- Students will be able to spare more hours to learning from the channel   on Saturdays ( though most of them actually they might be preoccupied with some other learning   activity in realty ) . 

 Students are informed to interact with teachers and come up with five suggestions per team , in   addition to answering the five set questionnaire prepared by the teacher . The second learning   launch would focus on actually improving on refining the content to suite the users learning styles ,   while the third learning launch may focus on making the complex units much simpler . Each launch is   planned in a month ’s duration while the final launch will be a finishing product launch made towards   the semester end . 

 Insight and approach : The learning launch tool is extremely useful for teachers to identify the   underlying assumptions behind student ’s failure . Two assumptions - that students need a central   repository for simplifying their learning and the need for a phased learning or investment of time   beyond classroom are open to debate / challenge . In the process , several additional insights that   might improve or even disprove the system are uncovered during the initial learning launch . 

 The validation / invalidation of the hypothesis will be obvious as various stake holder groups are   involved . The interactions may also lead to alternate preferable methodologies that might be   adopted in which case future launches might include them in place of current one . However , if the   current methodology is acceptable to a defined threshold ( > = 80 % ) of student groups , we shall   proceed to next learning launch with all the insights incorporated . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Challenge : I am heading the Department of Computer Science and Engineering in our institution . In   spite of the excellent infrastructure , dedicated instructors and supportive management , around 30 %   of undergraduate students fail every year . This is a problem common to most of the Institutions   around . Though methods such as remedial classes counselling and peer support were tried , they   could only bring in a limited improvement .   A learning launch including various stakeholders is being   planned to launch an online support channel for such slow learners . A sample outline for two first   two modules of two courses shall be uploaded and   the learning launch would include various stake   holders – The Head of the department , Academic and Administrative coordinators , teachers and few   students from various groups to gather various insights . The student sample from various sections   includes categories of the low , very low and extremely low performing students . 

 Selection : Based on few preliminary interviews , group discussions that were held with students and   the student feedback , we were able to identify the need for a continuous online engagement tool .   These were conducted by teachers , organized by coordinators . The enthusiasm of teachers and   students made us believe that we shall be able to gauge the success or need for improvement in the   idea , only if we conduct a learning launch involving all the stake holders . 

 Application : In the first learning launch , students are divided into groups of five and interact with   instructors of different courses , particularly with a higher failure rate in an open seminar hall . Twelve   such groups are identified .   The students are already given access to the sample material in the   channel , to be accessed from their mobile a couple of days earlier . These sample videos are also   played on the larger screen and snapshots of roadmap of proposed methodology with time lines is   displayed on the AV system , as well as in the form of drawings displayed throughout the hall .   Teachers are asked to prepare a questionnaire that has critical questions related to their   assumptions . For example- Students will be able to spare more hours to learning from the channel   on Saturdays ( though most of them actually they might be preoccupied with some other learning   activity in realty ) . 

 Students are informed to interact with teachers and come up with five suggestions per team , in   addition to answering the five set questionnaire prepared by the teacher . The second learning   launch would focus on actually improving on refining the content to suite the users learning styles ,   while the third learning launch may focus on making the complex units much simpler . Each launch is   planned in a month ’s duration while the final launch will be a finishing product launch made towards   the semester end . 

 Insight and approach : The learning launch tool is extremely useful for teachers to identify the   underlying assumptions behind student ’s failure . Two assumptions - that students need a central   repository for simplifying their learning and the need for a phased learning or investment of time   beyond classroom are open to debate / challenge . In the process , several additional insights that   might improve or even disprove the system are uncovered during the initial learning launch . 

 The validation / invalidation of the hypothesis will be obvious as various stake holder groups are   involved . The interactions may also lead to alternate preferable methodologies that might be   adopted in which case future launches might include them in place of current one . However , if the   current methodology is acceptable to a defined threshold ( > = 80 % ) of student groups , we shall   proceed to next learning launch with all the insights incorporated .
### Output: 