Challenge 

 Our challenge as a member of my organization 's online marketing department is to optimise the   department 's workflow ( activities and projects ) in order to grow online sales and spend marketing   dollars on the appropriate campaigns . The project scope comprises the 5 - person online marketing   department , as well as the broader marketing and IT departments , with whom we collaborate closely .   Internal resources are restricted for this project ( i.e. , budget and employee time ) . The project should not   take more than 30 days to complete , and the solution should involve an equitable distribution of   working hours among team members . We 'll try to figure out what our team members , as well as key   stakeholders in the wider marketing department and IT department , think is inefficient or troublesome   with the workflow . Selection Our team has already completed a number of design thinking activities and   tools , so we 're excited to check out the learning launch tool . In general , a learning launch is an   experiment designed to swiftly evaluate a concept or prototype . 

 Application 

 We concentrated on the structure and execution of our digital marketing responsibilities for our first   learning launch . In order to become more agile , we tried to explore if we could structure our tasks ,   projects , and procedures to adapt Scrum project management approaches for our work ( e.g. , time   boxed , daily , specialised meetings , reviews , etc . ) . This reinforced our hypothesis that the main reasons   of our workflow problem were the structure and execution . Our team received two days of Scrum   project management training from a Scrum project management coach . Following that , we went   through five seminars to better structure our activities and processes . Within a three - week period , these   two sessions took place . We proceeded to create a document that detailed our new , more agile   processes and workflow . We focused on getting clarity about our tasks and priorities for our second   learning launch . This validated our hypothesis that our task prioritisation was the root of our workflow   problem . An anonymous survey was performed by our team . An anonymous survey was also completed   by five important stakeholders from the broader marketing department and IT department . The surveys   were completed within a one - week timeframe and included questions concerning our new , proposed   method , understanding the process and task prioritising , and opinions about the change . 

 Insight 

 Using the learning launch tool , our team was able to identify our assumptions and create launches to   test them . We also considered the expected outcomes , anticipating that a more agile approach would   improve our workflow and that both our team and key stakeholders would be receptive to the new task   and process priorities . Our actual outcomes differed significantly from our expectations : while our team   was open to task and process prioritising , important stakeholders in the bigger marketing department   and IT department expressed some reservations . Our team will examine this information in the future   and incorporate it into future launch ideas . Because launches come before a full rollout in the design   thinking timeline , continuous integration of insight is especially critical at this point . 

 Approach 

 The learning launch is an acceptable tool because our team has already completed multiple design   thinking activities / tools and is at this point in the timetable . As previously stated , our team must analyse   the information acquired from our first two launches and apply it into future launch plans . Future launch   designs should take into account the knowledge learned , the progress made , and the progress made   toward a compelling solution that is ready for full rollout . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Challenge 

 Our challenge as a member of my organization 's online marketing department is to optimise the   department 's workflow ( activities and projects ) in order to grow online sales and spend marketing   dollars on the appropriate campaigns . The project scope comprises the 5 - person online marketing   department , as well as the broader marketing and IT departments , with whom we collaborate closely .   Internal resources are restricted for this project ( i.e. , budget and employee time ) . The project should not   take more than 30 days to complete , and the solution should involve an equitable distribution of   working hours among team members . We 'll try to figure out what our team members , as well as key   stakeholders in the wider marketing department and IT department , think is inefficient or troublesome   with the workflow . Selection Our team has already completed a number of design thinking activities and   tools , so we 're excited to check out the learning launch tool . In general , a learning launch is an   experiment designed to swiftly evaluate a concept or prototype . 

 Application 

 We concentrated on the structure and execution of our digital marketing responsibilities for our first   learning launch . In order to become more agile , we tried to explore if we could structure our tasks ,   projects , and procedures to adapt Scrum project management approaches for our work ( e.g. , time   boxed , daily , specialised meetings , reviews , etc . ) . This reinforced our hypothesis that the main reasons   of our workflow problem were the structure and execution . Our team received two days of Scrum   project management training from a Scrum project management coach . Following that , we went   through five seminars to better structure our activities and processes . Within a three - week period , these   two sessions took place . We proceeded to create a document that detailed our new , more agile   processes and workflow . We focused on getting clarity about our tasks and priorities for our second   learning launch . This validated our hypothesis that our task prioritisation was the root of our workflow   problem . An anonymous survey was performed by our team . An anonymous survey was also completed   by five important stakeholders from the broader marketing department and IT department . The surveys   were completed within a one - week timeframe and included questions concerning our new , proposed   method , understanding the process and task prioritising , and opinions about the change . 

 Insight 

 Using the learning launch tool , our team was able to identify our assumptions and create launches to   test them . We also considered the expected outcomes , anticipating that a more agile approach would   improve our workflow and that both our team and key stakeholders would be receptive to the new task   and process priorities . Our actual outcomes differed significantly from our expectations : while our team   was open to task and process prioritising , important stakeholders in the bigger marketing department   and IT department expressed some reservations . Our team will examine this information in the future   and incorporate it into future launch ideas . Because launches come before a full rollout in the design   thinking timeline , continuous integration of insight is especially critical at this point . 

 Approach 

 The learning launch is an acceptable tool because our team has already completed multiple design   thinking activities / tools and is at this point in the timetable . As previously stated , our team must analyse   the information acquired from our first two launches and apply it into future launch plans . Future launch   designs should take into account the knowledge learned , the progress made , and the progress made   toward a compelling solution that is ready for full rollout .
### Output: 