Mind Mapping 

 Challenge : Describe your challenge , including all relevant information . 

 When I enrolled in my first case championate , I decided not to create my own team , but use a   system called “ Team roulette ” . I t was my first experience , and so it was for my new teammates .   Case was based on logistecs , and we needed to decide , how we will collect our information in   order to get insights about our potential strategy . 

 Selection : In your own words , briefly describe the tool you selected ( e.g. , what it is and   why you selected it for your challenge -- including any appropriate video lecture   references ) . 

 Firstly , we tried to collect our information on A4 pieces of paper – and we learned that it is not   suitable to collecting large pieces of data ( 20 + A4 lists is n’t very clear , when you trying to   analyzing them simultaneously , right ? ) . So we decided to use what called in this course as Mind   Mapping , but in a digital form . 

 Application : Describe how you applied the tool you selected to your challenge ( e.g. , what   you did and how the tool was applied effectively or ineffectively ) . 

 We decided to use a platform called “ Miro ” . It is an online desk , where you can place stickers ,   phrases , images , arrows , smiles and etc . in order to use and operate the data with comfort . So   we distributed our pieces of information across the deck and finally got the answers from the mind   map . Maybe our use of the technique was not very effective , but finally we got answers – and the   right answers ! 

 Insight : Describe the insight you gained from applying the tool you selected to your   challenge ( e.g. , how an insight affected your thinking about the challenge and about   design thinking more broadly ) . 

 We used ti think that the problem was only in logistics itself , but because of the results of our   analysis we started to look at our abstract logistics problem as a subset of a discrete , small   concrete problems . It was not shocked us , but we never even thought about it unless we   uncovered it with the use of mindmapping . 

 Approach : Describe what you might do differently next time -- applying the same tool you   selected or a different one -- and the reason(s ) why 

 I may use it slightly differently , necause from the course we know , that it is not preferable to use   such technic , working with a linear problems . So I would rather divede the problems into the linear   structural and non - linear unstructured types of problems , analyzing them with differentl   approaches . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Mind Mapping 

 Challenge : Describe your challenge , including all relevant information . 

 When I enrolled in my first case championate , I decided not to create my own team , but use a   system called “ Team roulette ” . I t was my first experience , and so it was for my new teammates .   Case was based on logistecs , and we needed to decide , how we will collect our information in   order to get insights about our potential strategy . 

 Selection : In your own words , briefly describe the tool you selected ( e.g. , what it is and   why you selected it for your challenge -- including any appropriate video lecture   references ) . 

 Firstly , we tried to collect our information on A4 pieces of paper – and we learned that it is not   suitable to collecting large pieces of data ( 20 + A4 lists is n’t very clear , when you trying to   analyzing them simultaneously , right ? ) . So we decided to use what called in this course as Mind   Mapping , but in a digital form . 

 Application : Describe how you applied the tool you selected to your challenge ( e.g. , what   you did and how the tool was applied effectively or ineffectively ) . 

 We decided to use a platform called “ Miro ” . It is an online desk , where you can place stickers ,   phrases , images , arrows , smiles and etc . in order to use and operate the data with comfort . So   we distributed our pieces of information across the deck and finally got the answers from the mind   map . Maybe our use of the technique was not very effective , but finally we got answers – and the   right answers ! 

 Insight : Describe the insight you gained from applying the tool you selected to your   challenge ( e.g. , how an insight affected your thinking about the challenge and about   design thinking more broadly ) . 

 We used ti think that the problem was only in logistics itself , but because of the results of our   analysis we started to look at our abstract logistics problem as a subset of a discrete , small   concrete problems . It was not shocked us , but we never even thought about it unless we   uncovered it with the use of mindmapping . 

 Approach : Describe what you might do differently next time -- applying the same tool you   selected or a different one -- and the reason(s ) why 

 I may use it slightly differently , necause from the course we know , that it is not preferable to use   such technic , working with a linear problems . So I would rather divede the problems into the linear   structural and non - linear unstructured types of problems , analyzing them with differentl   approaches .
### Output: 