Final Assignment Overview 

 The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity to apply one of the design thinking tools presented in the course to a challenge of your choice . This assignment requires selecting one of the tools , writing a reflection , and completing three peer reviews . 

 Instructions The assignment itself contains detailed instructions and we provide an Assignment Rubric to guide the development of your reflection . 

 Your completed reflection should be written in English and be between five and ten paragraphs in length . When complete , you will upload your reflection ( PDF file only ) for peer review , which will determine your grade for this assignment . After uploading your reflection , you will be prompted to review three of your peers ' submissions . 

 To pass this assignment , your peers must score your reflection an average of two or above , based on the rubric criteria . To successfully complete the course , you must complete your peer reviews and pass this assignment . 

 Challenge I am a member of a four persons team that created a new on - line tool named Round One Business . Is a corporate technology marketplace . It connects buyers ( small to big companies that need technology ) with sellers ( small to big companies thar sell technologies , such as products or services ) in the same virtual place providing them our online platform . We also provide assessments to small companies to publish their projects . Projects are basically their need to search for products or services or the best technological partner for their business . In sum , we democratize access to digital transformation . 

 Selection To investigate our problem , to ask “ what is ” , and get better information about the problem that we wanted to resolve , we used the design thinking tool secondary research . In this case we searched for relevant data by interviewing thirty ( 30 ) CEOs from different companies , big or small . They were our source of information , and with all their answers or market data they kindly provided us , we developed specific design criteria to solve the next design thinking question “ what if ” , and for our next step . 

 Application After this , we first made a quick assumption testing by surfacing and testing the key assumptions behind our idea and immediately after we started co.creating a prototype . During the creation of our software development we design and create our landing page , and we showed it to the same group of businessmen we interviewed before . Once we had the prototype we made our learning launch , we invited fifty ( 50 ; same and other ) big and small businessmen to use this prototype and we interviewed them after using the tool . 

 Insights 

 We then grouped several comments and feedback from the “ testers ” , analysed and prioritize them , and made the different modifications that we thought we needed considering this analysis . Finally , we were ready for our big test . We uploaded our landing page , open our platform , we made it public in the web for everyone to register and start using our marketplace . This tested our assumption that the landing page was not so clear in information . People who saw the landing page before knew about what we were selling in our marketplace , the clients we were expecting and had all the information about how it worked . New businessmen wanting to search for seller companies to solve their corporate problems got to the landing page and did not understand the hole idea ; and so they left quickly . But the ones who did register and used the platform were satisfied with the marketplace tool , the software to connect with other companies . So we made another session of co.creation to change our landing page , another learning launch , and actually new companies started to register after this new changes we made . 

 Approach Secondary research was a great tool to understand the problem . Our assumptions were correct but this tool gave as much more data to understand the big real problem and to work with clients and users . Furthermore , learning launch was another appropriate tool to use for this case . Our team needed to review the insight gained from our first launch and incorporate this insight into the uploaded and functioning tool . Design thinking made our purpose more of learning and improving , iterating with people , and co creating , rather than to solve a problem to earn money . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Final Assignment Overview 

 The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity to apply one of the design thinking tools presented in the course to a challenge of your choice . This assignment requires selecting one of the tools , writing a reflection , and completing three peer reviews . 

 Instructions The assignment itself contains detailed instructions and we provide an Assignment Rubric to guide the development of your reflection . 

 Your completed reflection should be written in English and be between five and ten paragraphs in length . When complete , you will upload your reflection ( PDF file only ) for peer review , which will determine your grade for this assignment . After uploading your reflection , you will be prompted to review three of your peers ' submissions . 

 To pass this assignment , your peers must score your reflection an average of two or above , based on the rubric criteria . To successfully complete the course , you must complete your peer reviews and pass this assignment . 

 Challenge I am a member of a four persons team that created a new on - line tool named Round One Business . Is a corporate technology marketplace . It connects buyers ( small to big companies that need technology ) with sellers ( small to big companies thar sell technologies , such as products or services ) in the same virtual place providing them our online platform . We also provide assessments to small companies to publish their projects . Projects are basically their need to search for products or services or the best technological partner for their business . In sum , we democratize access to digital transformation . 

 Selection To investigate our problem , to ask “ what is ” , and get better information about the problem that we wanted to resolve , we used the design thinking tool secondary research . In this case we searched for relevant data by interviewing thirty ( 30 ) CEOs from different companies , big or small . They were our source of information , and with all their answers or market data they kindly provided us , we developed specific design criteria to solve the next design thinking question “ what if ” , and for our next step . 

 Application After this , we first made a quick assumption testing by surfacing and testing the key assumptions behind our idea and immediately after we started co.creating a prototype . During the creation of our software development we design and create our landing page , and we showed it to the same group of businessmen we interviewed before . Once we had the prototype we made our learning launch , we invited fifty ( 50 ; same and other ) big and small businessmen to use this prototype and we interviewed them after using the tool . 

 Insights 

 We then grouped several comments and feedback from the “ testers ” , analysed and prioritize them , and made the different modifications that we thought we needed considering this analysis . Finally , we were ready for our big test . We uploaded our landing page , open our platform , we made it public in the web for everyone to register and start using our marketplace . This tested our assumption that the landing page was not so clear in information . People who saw the landing page before knew about what we were selling in our marketplace , the clients we were expecting and had all the information about how it worked . New businessmen wanting to search for seller companies to solve their corporate problems got to the landing page and did not understand the hole idea ; and so they left quickly . But the ones who did register and used the platform were satisfied with the marketplace tool , the software to connect with other companies . So we made another session of co.creation to change our landing page , another learning launch , and actually new companies started to register after this new changes we made . 

 Approach Secondary research was a great tool to understand the problem . Our assumptions were correct but this tool gave as much more data to understand the big real problem and to work with clients and users . Furthermore , learning launch was another appropriate tool to use for this case . Our team needed to review the insight gained from our first launch and incorporate this insight into the uploaded and functioning tool . Design thinking made our purpose more of learning and improving , iterating with people , and co creating , rather than to solve a problem to earn money .
### Output: 