Challenge : Describe your challenge , including all relevant information . 

 Mind mapping is a tool that was taught to me to visualise and organise information while   showing a relationship across the entire concept . 

 I work as an Innovation Lead for a technology accelerator unit of a university . My work   involves working across stakeholders ’ group ( government , corporate , startup , aspiring   entrepreneur etc ) to identify promising ideas , products , technology , and opportunity . As part of   the process , we are often working at the unknown unknowns space where technologies and   solutions are so new that we are not able to predict anything , less so on its ’ impact and   outcome accurately . 

 For example , we are working with a district developer to incorporate innovative solutions ,   technology and design plans for their upcoming innovation district development plans which   will be constructed from 2021 onwards . 

 Selection : In your own words , briefly describe the tool you selected ( e.g. , what it is and   why you selected it for your challenge -- including any appropriate video lecture   references ) . 

 Given the complexity of the task , a combination of the different design thinking tools should be   used . However , I would like to zone into the “ what if ” phase where we may adopt “ Mind   mapping ” . 

 The reason for this selection being we have massive discussion and exchange of information   with the developer over the past months . Therefore , it is time for us to move forward to gather   feedback from the wider stakeholders as per the lecture suggested , to set up a yard sale or   gallery for the stakeholders to visit and feedback . 

 Application : Describe how you applied the tool you selected to your challenge ( e.g. ,   what you did and how the tool was applied effectively or ineffectively ) . 

 Insight : Describe the insight you gained from applying the tool you selected to your   challenge ( e.g. , how an insight affected your thinking about the challenge and about   design thinking more broadly ) . 

 With all the information gathered from the developer client , we will connect related ideas ,   concepts , and to establish the criteria for stakeholders . Specifically , with the visualisation   created , the gallery will be a watered - down version of the vision we understand from our   exchange . 

 Unfortunately , due to COVID and the festive year - end season . This exercise will be a thought   experiment . 

 We shall gather a group of 30 - 50 stakeholders , each given a stack of post - it note and pen .   Participants will be asked to review the vision gallery and note down information such as what   are good ideas , what ideas need improvement . 

 The participants will be asked to gather back in a group of 5 or 6 to review and share what   they pick up . Specifically to group the common theme ( including good ideas and ideas that   requires refinement ) together while keeping a tap on the outliers . 

 Each group will then be asked to share their findings and insights gathered from their   discussion . 

 Our team will take note of the respective sharing and insights , and ask questions to challenge   the participants in giving meaningful insight statement . The statement will be used to relate   back to the post - it notes grouped earlier to strengthen their connections and representation . 

 Lastly , we will seek for design criteria statement from the participants that translate the   insights gathered for subsequent prototyping or learning launch . 

 Approach : Describe what you might do differently next time -- applying the same tool   you selected or a different one -- and the reason(s ) why . 

 By going through the thought experiment , it helps me review my process of engagement with   the client . 

 I ’ve gained more insight that challenges my earlier assumption of what I had for the innovation   district . For example , from the developer briefing notes , they wanted specific spaces for   autonomous vehicles , drones , shared labs etc . However , as technology progress over the   years for the district to be developed , what they needed would be innovative , open and   flexible spaces that can be transformed or accommodate the future deployment . This shifted   the design focus of the district and how we may approach the client . 

 In an ideal situation , I would like to go through the entire design thinking process with the   client to gather and generate the right information and outcome . 

 Our current collaboration is based on good faith , however , much of the information is withheld   from the developer side due to confidentiality consideration . 

 It makes the planning and proposal difficult from our side due to the lack of accurate   information and full picture . 

 After going through this design thinking course , it reminds me of the importance of   understanding the current situation , before exploring for ideas . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Challenge : Describe your challenge , including all relevant information . 

 Mind mapping is a tool that was taught to me to visualise and organise information while   showing a relationship across the entire concept . 

 I work as an Innovation Lead for a technology accelerator unit of a university . My work   involves working across stakeholders ’ group ( government , corporate , startup , aspiring   entrepreneur etc ) to identify promising ideas , products , technology , and opportunity . As part of   the process , we are often working at the unknown unknowns space where technologies and   solutions are so new that we are not able to predict anything , less so on its ’ impact and   outcome accurately . 

 For example , we are working with a district developer to incorporate innovative solutions ,   technology and design plans for their upcoming innovation district development plans which   will be constructed from 2021 onwards . 

 Selection : In your own words , briefly describe the tool you selected ( e.g. , what it is and   why you selected it for your challenge -- including any appropriate video lecture   references ) . 

 Given the complexity of the task , a combination of the different design thinking tools should be   used . However , I would like to zone into the “ what if ” phase where we may adopt “ Mind   mapping ” . 

 The reason for this selection being we have massive discussion and exchange of information   with the developer over the past months . Therefore , it is time for us to move forward to gather   feedback from the wider stakeholders as per the lecture suggested , to set up a yard sale or   gallery for the stakeholders to visit and feedback . 

 Application : Describe how you applied the tool you selected to your challenge ( e.g. ,   what you did and how the tool was applied effectively or ineffectively ) . 

 Insight : Describe the insight you gained from applying the tool you selected to your   challenge ( e.g. , how an insight affected your thinking about the challenge and about   design thinking more broadly ) . 

 With all the information gathered from the developer client , we will connect related ideas ,   concepts , and to establish the criteria for stakeholders . Specifically , with the visualisation   created , the gallery will be a watered - down version of the vision we understand from our   exchange . 

 Unfortunately , due to COVID and the festive year - end season . This exercise will be a thought   experiment . 

 We shall gather a group of 30 - 50 stakeholders , each given a stack of post - it note and pen .   Participants will be asked to review the vision gallery and note down information such as what   are good ideas , what ideas need improvement . 

 The participants will be asked to gather back in a group of 5 or 6 to review and share what   they pick up . Specifically to group the common theme ( including good ideas and ideas that   requires refinement ) together while keeping a tap on the outliers . 

 Each group will then be asked to share their findings and insights gathered from their   discussion . 

 Our team will take note of the respective sharing and insights , and ask questions to challenge   the participants in giving meaningful insight statement . The statement will be used to relate   back to the post - it notes grouped earlier to strengthen their connections and representation . 

 Lastly , we will seek for design criteria statement from the participants that translate the   insights gathered for subsequent prototyping or learning launch . 

 Approach : Describe what you might do differently next time -- applying the same tool   you selected or a different one -- and the reason(s ) why . 

 By going through the thought experiment , it helps me review my process of engagement with   the client . 

 I ’ve gained more insight that challenges my earlier assumption of what I had for the innovation   district . For example , from the developer briefing notes , they wanted specific spaces for   autonomous vehicles , drones , shared labs etc . However , as technology progress over the   years for the district to be developed , what they needed would be innovative , open and   flexible spaces that can be transformed or accommodate the future deployment . This shifted   the design focus of the district and how we may approach the client . 

 In an ideal situation , I would like to go through the entire design thinking process with the   client to gather and generate the right information and outcome . 

 Our current collaboration is based on good faith , however , much of the information is withheld   from the developer side due to confidentiality consideration . 

 It makes the planning and proposal difficult from our side due to the lack of accurate   information and full picture . 

 After going through this design thinking course , it reminds me of the importance of   understanding the current situation , before exploring for ideas .
### Output: 