Challenge 

 I am an incoming MBA student , working with a team for a competition as a part   of my b - school 's induction program . The project is informal , but has seen large   numbers of participants . We have two deliverables with deadlines one week   apart .   The final deliverable is submission of a magazine related to our city . We   are focusing on the key stakeholders , i.e , the students who will read the   magazine . 

 Selection 

 Our team consists of 23 members . Hence , with the hoards of ideas coming in ,   are trying to conduct fast and cheap ( financially and personally ) experiments to   test most of the ideas on a sample of students ( i.e our upcoming batch - mates )   and choose the best ones . 

 Application 

 We divided ourselves into small multifunctional teams to eliminate individual   cognitive biases and designated roles for them . Various topics and ideas which   were formed during the brainstorming or the ' what if ' session were based on the   needs of the stakeholders- students wanting to know more about the cities . We   launched a small scale ' meme competition ' wherein we involved the   stakeholders in the process , to submit jokes about their perceptions of our cities .   Then we collected this data to confirm or disconfirm our assumptions regarding   the same , and also used it directly for our magazine . 

 For the second learning launch , we posted a ' pre - teaser ' video on the portals to   gather data about the various responses from the students . This tested our   assumption that whether the standard format of showing different themes like   culture , food , tech , history etc would capture the attention of the audience . 

 Insight 

 We understood various perceptions of various students from all over the country   through our first learning launch experiment . This also confirmed our   assumption that students react well to humour based themes which connect to   them . From the second learning launch , we learned that our assumption that the   standard format appeals to students is not necessarily true . 

 Approach 

 Given the above conclusions , we will now design our magazine accordingly ,   and hope for the best result in terms of positive respones . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Challenge 

 I am an incoming MBA student , working with a team for a competition as a part   of my b - school 's induction program . The project is informal , but has seen large   numbers of participants . We have two deliverables with deadlines one week   apart .   The final deliverable is submission of a magazine related to our city . We   are focusing on the key stakeholders , i.e , the students who will read the   magazine . 

 Selection 

 Our team consists of 23 members . Hence , with the hoards of ideas coming in ,   are trying to conduct fast and cheap ( financially and personally ) experiments to   test most of the ideas on a sample of students ( i.e our upcoming batch - mates )   and choose the best ones . 

 Application 

 We divided ourselves into small multifunctional teams to eliminate individual   cognitive biases and designated roles for them . Various topics and ideas which   were formed during the brainstorming or the ' what if ' session were based on the   needs of the stakeholders- students wanting to know more about the cities . We   launched a small scale ' meme competition ' wherein we involved the   stakeholders in the process , to submit jokes about their perceptions of our cities .   Then we collected this data to confirm or disconfirm our assumptions regarding   the same , and also used it directly for our magazine . 

 For the second learning launch , we posted a ' pre - teaser ' video on the portals to   gather data about the various responses from the students . This tested our   assumption that whether the standard format of showing different themes like   culture , food , tech , history etc would capture the attention of the audience . 

 Insight 

 We understood various perceptions of various students from all over the country   through our first learning launch experiment . This also confirmed our   assumption that students react well to humour based themes which connect to   them . From the second learning launch , we learned that our assumption that the   standard format appeals to students is not necessarily true . 

 Approach 

 Given the above conclusions , we will now design our magazine accordingly ,   and hope for the best result in terms of positive respones .
### Output: 