Protect Educate and Empower 

 Women 

 Protect educate and empower women is a non - profit organization , working towards preventing 

 sexual exploitation of vulnerable women and children , and empowering them to lead an 

 independent life . 

 The organization offers following services 

    prevent human trafficking ( rural and urban ) by empowering them with 

 vocational skills to get employed 

    shelter , protection and prosecution support for the rescued 

    policy advocacy 

 For example , for urban prevention : It has community centers in 5 of urban migrant slums in Mumbai 

 in neighbourhoods such as Ghatkopar , Turbhe , Airoli , etc . to help prevent women from being 

 trafficked by reducing vulnerability factors such as lack of opportunities , livelihoods , gender 

 discrimination through vocational skill training and job placement support . The training 

 programs include short 4 month courses like beauty and hospitality offered at minimal rates . 

 Approach : Let ideas bubble up from the community 

 The project unfolded as a unique learning journey engagement with this team . Hearing out the 

 team through their unique stories and experiences , they built a detailed understanding of the 

 organization and strategically divided the project into four subsets : Urban Prevention 

    Rural Prevention 

    Advocacy 

    Prosecution 

 They divided the team into groups of 5 - 7 , ensuring a dynamic mix of members from different 

 departments within the organization ; and a dedicated a facilitator for each team . Every team owned 

 one problem area and worked towards the final solution over a period of 5 months . 

 What happened on ground : 

 They kick started with well - planned research activities spread across Mumbai , Nagpur , Pune 

 and Sangli ( they majorly operate from these major centers ) . They prepared detailed research 

 guides for every team and divided the work across the team because the number of stakeholders 

 involved was huge and we had to cover all the geographies in a short span of time . The research 

 included speaking to varied stakeholders like the on - ground mobilizers , trainers , rescued girls , 

 girls employed through their programs , their parents , lawyers , public prosecutors , the rescue team , 

 the counsellors , the shelter home teams , etc . 

 Building upon the research insights , brainstorming sessions were structured leading to large 

 buckets of ideas . These ideas were then prioritized based on the overall impact on the system at 

 large and taken ahead to prototype . The teams went back to the users with these prototypes , tested 

 them and captured their feedbacks . 

 Prototypes were in the form of posters , campaigns , videos , meetings which could be built and tested 

 quickly . Ranging from process hacks like communication collaterals , space revamp , information 

 channels , and information repository / website to softer emotional forms like community meetings 

 for fathers , welcome gifts for the newly joined government officials and capturing stories from 

 successful employed girls . 

 There were clear directions towards implementation of ideas that worked well . The 

 conclusion of the workshop was : 

    some of the next steps for these prototypes to be improved and scaled across centers 

    strategic planning guidelines for the upcoming year . 

 What did they achieve : 

 They built a culture of easy switch / to and fro between “ what the user wants / feels “ to “ going back to 

 the process / service ” and working forward from there . They walked the journey with the internal 

 team in identifying and prototyping both the a ) quick fixes and b ) larger strategic directional 

 changes . Presently , their team is working on scaling these solutions to the real scenarios . 

 They made the team experience and believe that change making is not a big deal if the user is 

 understood well ! 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Protect Educate and Empower 

 Women 

 Protect educate and empower women is a non - profit organization , working towards preventing 

 sexual exploitation of vulnerable women and children , and empowering them to lead an 

 independent life . 

 The organization offers following services 

    prevent human trafficking ( rural and urban ) by empowering them with 

 vocational skills to get employed 

    shelter , protection and prosecution support for the rescued 

    policy advocacy 

 For example , for urban prevention : It has community centers in 5 of urban migrant slums in Mumbai 

 in neighbourhoods such as Ghatkopar , Turbhe , Airoli , etc . to help prevent women from being 

 trafficked by reducing vulnerability factors such as lack of opportunities , livelihoods , gender 

 discrimination through vocational skill training and job placement support . The training 

 programs include short 4 month courses like beauty and hospitality offered at minimal rates . 

 Approach : Let ideas bubble up from the community 

 The project unfolded as a unique learning journey engagement with this team . Hearing out the 

 team through their unique stories and experiences , they built a detailed understanding of the 

 organization and strategically divided the project into four subsets : Urban Prevention 

    Rural Prevention 

    Advocacy 

    Prosecution 

 They divided the team into groups of 5 - 7 , ensuring a dynamic mix of members from different 

 departments within the organization ; and a dedicated a facilitator for each team . Every team owned 

 one problem area and worked towards the final solution over a period of 5 months . 

 What happened on ground : 

 They kick started with well - planned research activities spread across Mumbai , Nagpur , Pune 

 and Sangli ( they majorly operate from these major centers ) . They prepared detailed research 

 guides for every team and divided the work across the team because the number of stakeholders 

 involved was huge and we had to cover all the geographies in a short span of time . The research 

 included speaking to varied stakeholders like the on - ground mobilizers , trainers , rescued girls , 

 girls employed through their programs , their parents , lawyers , public prosecutors , the rescue team , 

 the counsellors , the shelter home teams , etc . 

 Building upon the research insights , brainstorming sessions were structured leading to large 

 buckets of ideas . These ideas were then prioritized based on the overall impact on the system at 

 large and taken ahead to prototype . The teams went back to the users with these prototypes , tested 

 them and captured their feedbacks . 

 Prototypes were in the form of posters , campaigns , videos , meetings which could be built and tested 

 quickly . Ranging from process hacks like communication collaterals , space revamp , information 

 channels , and information repository / website to softer emotional forms like community meetings 

 for fathers , welcome gifts for the newly joined government officials and capturing stories from 

 successful employed girls . 

 There were clear directions towards implementation of ideas that worked well . The 

 conclusion of the workshop was : 

    some of the next steps for these prototypes to be improved and scaled across centers 

    strategic planning guidelines for the upcoming year . 

 What did they achieve : 

 They built a culture of easy switch / to and fro between “ what the user wants / feels “ to “ going back to 

 the process / service ” and working forward from there . They walked the journey with the internal 

 team in identifying and prototyping both the a ) quick fixes and b ) larger strategic directional 

 changes . Presently , their team is working on scaling these solutions to the real scenarios . 

 They made the team experience and believe that change making is not a big deal if the user is 

 understood well !
### Output: 