Challenge : 

 I am a final year undergraduate student spearheading the Innovation Cell in our University . As a   part of it , we focus on pro bono innovation consultancy in the quest for Grassroot and Frugal   innovations across the state . Our challenge is to streamline our innovation space towards potent   and prolific projects by adapting existing useful technologies to find and develop new needed   technologies . We will try to focus on improving our workflow by circumscribing our scope while   reducing uncertainties in the process . 

 Selection : 

 We are selecting the Learning launch tool in this approach as it is best suited for our purpose to   quickly experiment with ideas , validate assumptions and assess deterministic failures .   Quantitative parameters and optimum target markets can not be studied or forecasted with much   certitude at the start of the Innovation process . 

 Application : 

 In our first onus , we focused on the edifice of identifying problems . We tried to achieve a holy   grail of specificity in defining our problem statements . It tested our assumption of workflow , that   we were spending superfluous time and effort on a vast problem .   We used an ultimate Root   Cause Analysis Tool – “ Five Why s ” which is an iterative interrogative technique used to explore   the cause - and - effect relationships . Each answer forms the basis of the next question . We   expected to come up with well - defined meticulous problem statements that clearly indicates   User type , emotional quotient , quantifiable impact and shortcomings . 

 In our second onus , we focused on our processes of Ideas brainstorming and Ideas appraisal .   This tested our assumption of workflow that we were creating redundant projects and following   imprudent viability scrutiny . We used the M - I - T model of experimental learning which explains   the ever - iterative innovation process and Market , Implementation , Technology ( M - I - T ) as its   three pillars . Deviating from linear - funnel models and false dichotomies helped us validate   assumption and reduce variables . 

 Insight : 

 The learning launch tool supplemented our process of abstraction , enhanced the initial feasibility   assessments and helped in prioritization of tasks . It also helped us with the epiphany of   intellectual honesty by the ability to face the Physical realm and Human realm instead of   suspending the reality . We gained insight through direct transactional experiences . It helped us   solicit genuine feedback for our projects instead of speculation and resolve uncertainty with   minimum commitment of resources . 

 Approach : 

 The learning launch is a pertinent tool as it not only augmented our workflow but also curtailed   losses . There were often setbacks such as irrelevant ideas and incorrect market research ,   however this approach helped us with sequential failure with lessening severity . Visual aids and   graphics can also be incorporated in this process for developing key insights and sharing   perspectives . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Challenge : 

 I am a final year undergraduate student spearheading the Innovation Cell in our University . As a   part of it , we focus on pro bono innovation consultancy in the quest for Grassroot and Frugal   innovations across the state . Our challenge is to streamline our innovation space towards potent   and prolific projects by adapting existing useful technologies to find and develop new needed   technologies . We will try to focus on improving our workflow by circumscribing our scope while   reducing uncertainties in the process . 

 Selection : 

 We are selecting the Learning launch tool in this approach as it is best suited for our purpose to   quickly experiment with ideas , validate assumptions and assess deterministic failures .   Quantitative parameters and optimum target markets can not be studied or forecasted with much   certitude at the start of the Innovation process . 

 Application : 

 In our first onus , we focused on the edifice of identifying problems . We tried to achieve a holy   grail of specificity in defining our problem statements . It tested our assumption of workflow , that   we were spending superfluous time and effort on a vast problem .   We used an ultimate Root   Cause Analysis Tool – “ Five Why s ” which is an iterative interrogative technique used to explore   the cause - and - effect relationships . Each answer forms the basis of the next question . We   expected to come up with well - defined meticulous problem statements that clearly indicates   User type , emotional quotient , quantifiable impact and shortcomings . 

 In our second onus , we focused on our processes of Ideas brainstorming and Ideas appraisal .   This tested our assumption of workflow that we were creating redundant projects and following   imprudent viability scrutiny . We used the M - I - T model of experimental learning which explains   the ever - iterative innovation process and Market , Implementation , Technology ( M - I - T ) as its   three pillars . Deviating from linear - funnel models and false dichotomies helped us validate   assumption and reduce variables . 

 Insight : 

 The learning launch tool supplemented our process of abstraction , enhanced the initial feasibility   assessments and helped in prioritization of tasks . It also helped us with the epiphany of   intellectual honesty by the ability to face the Physical realm and Human realm instead of   suspending the reality . We gained insight through direct transactional experiences . It helped us   solicit genuine feedback for our projects instead of speculation and resolve uncertainty with   minimum commitment of resources . 

 Approach : 

 The learning launch is a pertinent tool as it not only augmented our workflow but also curtailed   losses . There were often setbacks such as irrelevant ideas and incorrect market research ,   however this approach helped us with sequential failure with lessening severity . Visual aids and   graphics can also be incorporated in this process for developing key insights and sharing   perspectives .
### Output: 