Selection 

 As per assignment I decided to explore and choose learning tool to achieve desired output for the task at hand . 

 The main reason to opt for this particular tool is that , we have explored various methods in the past also and have 

 numerous rounds of meeting to improve quality of output and achieve desired result but failed to move the needle 

 towards desired outcome . we felt as a group to try and implement learning tool as many team members judged it 

 to be suitable for progress . 

 Application 

 After closely analysing existing situation and deliberating it over a couple of months we have realised that the 

 quality of research paper was not up to the mark wrt to design . First , we decided to analyse the existing creatives 

 for research papers . The research service is already mature , but it has n't grown anymore . Various hypotheses and 

 discussions were done to find out reason . Including In - depth interviews , focused group studied were conducted 

 with several people to verify the hypothesis . There were many interviewees , including research users , publishers , 

 illustrators , students , teachers and many others . Through the interview results , we found problems with existing 

 research service . People just wanted to write and many of them had very lilted interest or inclination for projecting 

 and design of the research article . For them , research design was a difficult task . So , we focused on the editor 

 so that we could focus only on writing and giving content for research article . The prototype was made , and the 

 team members tested and completed . After the design service was completed , CBT was conducted in - house , and 

 the modification was repeated again . And finally , the design service with external resource was released to the 

 selected few people . We provided beta services to 100 researchers we selected ourselves and upgraded the 

 service . A month later , the official design service with help of external in - house designer was released to everyone 

 and the response was great 

 Insight 

 When planning the deign service , it was imperative to check the data and discuss it among team 

 Members researcher to drive conclusion    Based on the meeting , a new function was created . However , after using 

 the learning launch tools , I was able exact find the root cause of the problem & user 's needs . Thus , enabling and 

 upgrading process and identifying suitable and efficient resource to complete designated task and develop 

 prototypes 

 Approach 

 We will establish similar identified and efficient specialist resource of each of the task , and thus driving efficiencies 

 es in all departments and upgrade various services in the future . However , have now released its important to take 

 into consideration other people ’s perspective and viewpoint in order to get to actual root cause of the problem . 

 . We will utilize various design tools to crete services that are close to users . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Selection 

 As per assignment I decided to explore and choose learning tool to achieve desired output for the task at hand . 

 The main reason to opt for this particular tool is that , we have explored various methods in the past also and have 

 numerous rounds of meeting to improve quality of output and achieve desired result but failed to move the needle 

 towards desired outcome . we felt as a group to try and implement learning tool as many team members judged it 

 to be suitable for progress . 

 Application 

 After closely analysing existing situation and deliberating it over a couple of months we have realised that the 

 quality of research paper was not up to the mark wrt to design . First , we decided to analyse the existing creatives 

 for research papers . The research service is already mature , but it has n't grown anymore . Various hypotheses and 

 discussions were done to find out reason . Including In - depth interviews , focused group studied were conducted 

 with several people to verify the hypothesis . There were many interviewees , including research users , publishers , 

 illustrators , students , teachers and many others . Through the interview results , we found problems with existing 

 research service . People just wanted to write and many of them had very lilted interest or inclination for projecting 

 and design of the research article . For them , research design was a difficult task . So , we focused on the editor 

 so that we could focus only on writing and giving content for research article . The prototype was made , and the 

 team members tested and completed . After the design service was completed , CBT was conducted in - house , and 

 the modification was repeated again . And finally , the design service with external resource was released to the 

 selected few people . We provided beta services to 100 researchers we selected ourselves and upgraded the 

 service . A month later , the official design service with help of external in - house designer was released to everyone 

 and the response was great 

 Insight 

 When planning the deign service , it was imperative to check the data and discuss it among team 

 Members researcher to drive conclusion    Based on the meeting , a new function was created . However , after using 

 the learning launch tools , I was able exact find the root cause of the problem & user 's needs . Thus , enabling and 

 upgrading process and identifying suitable and efficient resource to complete designated task and develop 

 prototypes 

 Approach 

 We will establish similar identified and efficient specialist resource of each of the task , and thus driving efficiencies 

 es in all departments and upgrade various services in the future . However , have now released its important to take 

 into consideration other people ’s perspective and viewpoint in order to get to actual root cause of the problem . 

 . We will utilize various design tools to crete services that are close to users .
### Output: 