Example Reflection – Visualization     Challenge & Selection   As mechanical design engineers , we create drawings for the parts that we have designed . These   drawings then go through a release process where the tech reviewers check the drawing for quality in   terms of drawing correctness and if Corp standards have been followed . Most of the drawings are sent   back due to not following of the drawing standards properly , thereby affecting First time right ( FTR ) and   cycle time increase . I have used this Visualization tool for improving the quality of our drawings . As the   tool describes , this is a process of writing down different error areas with charts , presentation , etc and   discussing the presentation with other stakeholders . Through this process , we identified the different   areas for improvement on our drawings . We created a step by step process to achieve this goal .     Application   We started writing a procedure / check - list by discussing with our team about different areas ( notes ,   BOM , dimensions , etc . ) of a drawing we need to review to avoid errors on our drawings . We first looked   at the major contributor of the errors and created the procedure / check - list on ways to minimize / reduce   them . We then looked at the next higher contributor of errors and so on and similarly created   procedures / check - list to reduce the errors . We also looked at an alternative approach in improving the   quality of drawing by automating certain drawing creation steps . Different sets of procedures / checklist   were created for different types of drawings - sheet metal , machined part , gas line tubing , assemblies ,   etc . We also worked with different groups in the organization to identify their BKM ’s and incorporate   those in the check - list .   We also looked to see if some of the steps in drawing creation is redundant ( which increases the   chances of errors ) and discussed ways to automate those details .     Insight & Approach   Once we had the procedure / check - list ready , we called a meeting with complete team and explained   them about the approach to be followed to improve the drawing quality . The team first looked at the   different areas for errors and the highest contributors and insight of the areas for improvement .   Finally , in a bigger forum , we discussed about the effect of incorporating this procedure / check - list and   have moved forward with this approach .   By implementing this procedure / check - list , we are making sure that we are reviewing all aspects of a   drawing and improving FTR thereby saving time where resources would have otherwise had to spend   time correcting a drawing on issues logged by tech reviewer . That time could well be used on other   productive work !   Our next step is to automate this process by incorporating this checklist into the drawing quality tool . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Example Reflection – Visualization     Challenge & Selection   As mechanical design engineers , we create drawings for the parts that we have designed . These   drawings then go through a release process where the tech reviewers check the drawing for quality in   terms of drawing correctness and if Corp standards have been followed . Most of the drawings are sent   back due to not following of the drawing standards properly , thereby affecting First time right ( FTR ) and   cycle time increase . I have used this Visualization tool for improving the quality of our drawings . As the   tool describes , this is a process of writing down different error areas with charts , presentation , etc and   discussing the presentation with other stakeholders . Through this process , we identified the different   areas for improvement on our drawings . We created a step by step process to achieve this goal .     Application   We started writing a procedure / check - list by discussing with our team about different areas ( notes ,   BOM , dimensions , etc . ) of a drawing we need to review to avoid errors on our drawings . We first looked   at the major contributor of the errors and created the procedure / check - list on ways to minimize / reduce   them . We then looked at the next higher contributor of errors and so on and similarly created   procedures / check - list to reduce the errors . We also looked at an alternative approach in improving the   quality of drawing by automating certain drawing creation steps . Different sets of procedures / checklist   were created for different types of drawings - sheet metal , machined part , gas line tubing , assemblies ,   etc . We also worked with different groups in the organization to identify their BKM ’s and incorporate   those in the check - list .   We also looked to see if some of the steps in drawing creation is redundant ( which increases the   chances of errors ) and discussed ways to automate those details .     Insight & Approach   Once we had the procedure / check - list ready , we called a meeting with complete team and explained   them about the approach to be followed to improve the drawing quality . The team first looked at the   different areas for errors and the highest contributors and insight of the areas for improvement .   Finally , in a bigger forum , we discussed about the effect of incorporating this procedure / check - list and   have moved forward with this approach .   By implementing this procedure / check - list , we are making sure that we are reviewing all aspects of a   drawing and improving FTR thereby saving time where resources would have otherwise had to spend   time correcting a drawing on issues logged by tech reviewer . That time could well be used on other   productive work !   Our next step is to automate this process by incorporating this checklist into the drawing quality tool .
### Output: 