Learning Launch 

 Challenge 

 I am working in a Learning and development firm , from quite sometime and my major work is to   design programs for Behavioural trainings . My target is to create as many training contents for our   Business clients in order to increase revenue and to spend business budgets on the right campaigns   of our programs . We need to develop more vILT ( Virtual instructor led training ) programs as   compared to ILT ( Instructor led training ) courses due to more promising features and results of vILT   programs . 

 The project scope included the business development department , social media as well as content   development team , with whom we work closely . The project was restricted to internal resources in   terms of , budget and employee time . The project had a strict deadline of 40 business days and the   solution should include a successful delivery of atleast one vILT course . We focussed on trying to   uncover what our team members , as well as key stakeholders considered to be ineffective or   challenging with respect to selling of content for our business . 

 Selection 

 We explored various design thinking activities / tools , so we were prepared to try the learning launch   tool . Precisely , the learning launch is an experiment meant to quickly assess an idea and   sample / prototype . 

 Application 

 In our initial learning launch , we focused on the structure / execution of our training content and   social media tasks to market our programs . Particularly , we wanted to see if we could structure our   tasks , projects , and processes to adapt to the need of our clients in an effort to become more agile .   This tested our assumption that the structure and execution were the main causes of our business   challenge . Our team went through a four - day training with a leading vILT course provider platform . 

 Then , we went through a series of meetings and discussions with various providers of elearning   portals to structure our tasks and delivery in a more streamlined manner . These meetings or   discussions occurred within a five - week timeframe . We expected to produce a document of our   process map with a clear description of our new , more streamlined processes of content   development . 

 In our phase two- learning launch , we focused on achieving precision about our process and   priorities . This tested our hypothesis of prioritization of tasks and designing content to make it more   attractive and insightful virtually , and this was the main cause of our business challenge to shift from   an ILT provider to vILT provider . Our team launched a dummy vILT course via one of the service   provider ’s portal using their LMS ( Learning management system ) , with five key stakeholders from   our company and five stakeholders from the portal provider ’s side as participants , to test the   effectiveness of our behavioural training program . 

 The training program was followed by a participant feedback form which included questions about   our new , proposed process of delivering training , understanding the concepts covered in the 

 program , and feelings about the program , and feedback was collected within few hours after the   training ended . 

 Insight 

 By utilizing the learning launch tool , we discovered the assumptions and designed launches to assess   these assumptions . We were quite clear that a more agile approach would improve our business in   Learning and development vertical , and that both our team and the key stakeholders would agree to   the new prioritization or development of tasks and process . 

 The real outputs were slightly different from what we anticipated but we were open to the   development of tasks and processes and also the key stakeholders in our organisation and elearning   portal provider expressed some concerns . Our team will analyse this insight and feedback and   integrate it into future launch designs . 

 Approach 

 Understanding that our team has gone through certain design thinking activities / tools and at this   stage in the timeline , the learning launch is the most apt tool . We need to review the insight gained   from our initial launches and integrate this insight into future launch designs . Future launch designs   has to reflect insight gained , improvement made , and a fascinating solution ready for full   implementation . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Learning Launch 

 Challenge 

 I am working in a Learning and development firm , from quite sometime and my major work is to   design programs for Behavioural trainings . My target is to create as many training contents for our   Business clients in order to increase revenue and to spend business budgets on the right campaigns   of our programs . We need to develop more vILT ( Virtual instructor led training ) programs as   compared to ILT ( Instructor led training ) courses due to more promising features and results of vILT   programs . 

 The project scope included the business development department , social media as well as content   development team , with whom we work closely . The project was restricted to internal resources in   terms of , budget and employee time . The project had a strict deadline of 40 business days and the   solution should include a successful delivery of atleast one vILT course . We focussed on trying to   uncover what our team members , as well as key stakeholders considered to be ineffective or   challenging with respect to selling of content for our business . 

 Selection 

 We explored various design thinking activities / tools , so we were prepared to try the learning launch   tool . Precisely , the learning launch is an experiment meant to quickly assess an idea and   sample / prototype . 

 Application 

 In our initial learning launch , we focused on the structure / execution of our training content and   social media tasks to market our programs . Particularly , we wanted to see if we could structure our   tasks , projects , and processes to adapt to the need of our clients in an effort to become more agile .   This tested our assumption that the structure and execution were the main causes of our business   challenge . Our team went through a four - day training with a leading vILT course provider platform . 

 Then , we went through a series of meetings and discussions with various providers of elearning   portals to structure our tasks and delivery in a more streamlined manner . These meetings or   discussions occurred within a five - week timeframe . We expected to produce a document of our   process map with a clear description of our new , more streamlined processes of content   development . 

 In our phase two- learning launch , we focused on achieving precision about our process and   priorities . This tested our hypothesis of prioritization of tasks and designing content to make it more   attractive and insightful virtually , and this was the main cause of our business challenge to shift from   an ILT provider to vILT provider . Our team launched a dummy vILT course via one of the service   provider ’s portal using their LMS ( Learning management system ) , with five key stakeholders from   our company and five stakeholders from the portal provider ’s side as participants , to test the   effectiveness of our behavioural training program . 

 The training program was followed by a participant feedback form which included questions about   our new , proposed process of delivering training , understanding the concepts covered in the 

 program , and feelings about the program , and feedback was collected within few hours after the   training ended . 

 Insight 

 By utilizing the learning launch tool , we discovered the assumptions and designed launches to assess   these assumptions . We were quite clear that a more agile approach would improve our business in   Learning and development vertical , and that both our team and the key stakeholders would agree to   the new prioritization or development of tasks and process . 

 The real outputs were slightly different from what we anticipated but we were open to the   development of tasks and processes and also the key stakeholders in our organisation and elearning   portal provider expressed some concerns . Our team will analyse this insight and feedback and   integrate it into future launch designs . 

 Approach 

 Understanding that our team has gone through certain design thinking activities / tools and at this   stage in the timeline , the learning launch is the most apt tool . We need to review the insight gained   from our initial launches and integrate this insight into future launch designs . Future launch designs   has to reflect insight gained , improvement made , and a fascinating solution ready for full   implementation .
### Output: 