REFLECTION - LEARNING LAUNCH 

 Challenge 

 I am a member of my Bank ’s online unit and my / our challenge is to enhance the functionality ( activities   and projects ) within the unit so as to increase sales in the online platform and spend marketing budgets   on the right crusade . The project scope involves the online marketing unit comprised twelve employees ,   and the larger marketing unit and in collaboration with our information technology department . The   project is restricted to internal resources . The project should be executed within 27 working days and   the solution includes uniform distribution of working hours amongst the unit members . We will target   on trying to unravel what our team members , major stakeholders within the larger marketing unit and IT   department , observe to be unsuccessful in respect to the workflow . 

 Selection 

 Our team has completed numerous design thinking / tools , so we are set to try the learning launch tool .   The learning launch is an experiment meant to swiftly test a concept and model . 

 Application 

 Our first learning launch targeted on the building / execution of our online marketing jobs . Specifically ,   we wanted to see if we could build our jobs , projects and procedures to a suitable methods of   framework project management for our tasks ( e.g. , seminars , meetings , reviews etc . ) for us to move   quickly . This tested our hypothesis that the structure and execution were the cause or issues of our   workflow challenge . Our team attended three - day training with a project instructor . We equally   underwent six seminars to structure our jobs and procedures in a more effective manner . These sessions   happened in two weeks ’ timeline . We expected to come up with a document of unambiguous   description of our fresh , more detailed procedure / workflow . 

 Our second learning launch , we focused on attaining transparency about our tasks and preferences . This   tested our hypothesis that our preference of tasks was the cause of our workflow challenge . Our unit   concluded impersonal survey . Six major stakeholders from the larger marketing unit and information   technology department also concluded impersonal survey . The surveys comprised questions about new ,   presented procedure , comprehending the procedure and the preference of jobs , and feelings about the   change , and were conducted in seven days as the timeline . 

 Insight 

 By applying the learning launch tool , our team discovered our hypothesis and designed launches to test   these hypotheses . Furthermore , we pondered over the expected results , waiting to see a more supple   approach would enhance our workflow , and both our unit and stakeholders would be reasonably   exposed to the new preference of jobs and procedure . Our main results were a bit different from what   we expected : while our team / unit was opened to the preference of jobs and procedure , the major   stakeholders in the larger marketing unit and information technology extracted some concerns . 

 Subsequently , our team will review this insight and integrate it into future launch designs . The   integration is germane at this moment , as launches come before a full deployment in the design thinking   timeframe . 

 Approach 

 Having seen that our team has concluded numerous design thinking activities / tools and are this stage in   the timeframe , the learning launch is the correct tool . As earlier stated , out team is required to review   the insight gathered from our first two launches and integrate this insight into future launch designs .   Future launch designs should reflect insight gained , progress made , and come closer to a captivating   solution ready for full deployment . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: REFLECTION - LEARNING LAUNCH 

 Challenge 

 I am a member of my Bank ’s online unit and my / our challenge is to enhance the functionality ( activities   and projects ) within the unit so as to increase sales in the online platform and spend marketing budgets   on the right crusade . The project scope involves the online marketing unit comprised twelve employees ,   and the larger marketing unit and in collaboration with our information technology department . The   project is restricted to internal resources . The project should be executed within 27 working days and   the solution includes uniform distribution of working hours amongst the unit members . We will target   on trying to unravel what our team members , major stakeholders within the larger marketing unit and IT   department , observe to be unsuccessful in respect to the workflow . 

 Selection 

 Our team has completed numerous design thinking / tools , so we are set to try the learning launch tool .   The learning launch is an experiment meant to swiftly test a concept and model . 

 Application 

 Our first learning launch targeted on the building / execution of our online marketing jobs . Specifically ,   we wanted to see if we could build our jobs , projects and procedures to a suitable methods of   framework project management for our tasks ( e.g. , seminars , meetings , reviews etc . ) for us to move   quickly . This tested our hypothesis that the structure and execution were the cause or issues of our   workflow challenge . Our team attended three - day training with a project instructor . We equally   underwent six seminars to structure our jobs and procedures in a more effective manner . These sessions   happened in two weeks ’ timeline . We expected to come up with a document of unambiguous   description of our fresh , more detailed procedure / workflow . 

 Our second learning launch , we focused on attaining transparency about our tasks and preferences . This   tested our hypothesis that our preference of tasks was the cause of our workflow challenge . Our unit   concluded impersonal survey . Six major stakeholders from the larger marketing unit and information   technology department also concluded impersonal survey . The surveys comprised questions about new ,   presented procedure , comprehending the procedure and the preference of jobs , and feelings about the   change , and were conducted in seven days as the timeline . 

 Insight 

 By applying the learning launch tool , our team discovered our hypothesis and designed launches to test   these hypotheses . Furthermore , we pondered over the expected results , waiting to see a more supple   approach would enhance our workflow , and both our unit and stakeholders would be reasonably   exposed to the new preference of jobs and procedure . Our main results were a bit different from what   we expected : while our team / unit was opened to the preference of jobs and procedure , the major   stakeholders in the larger marketing unit and information technology extracted some concerns . 

 Subsequently , our team will review this insight and integrate it into future launch designs . The   integration is germane at this moment , as launches come before a full deployment in the design thinking   timeframe . 

 Approach 

 Having seen that our team has concluded numerous design thinking activities / tools and are this stage in   the timeframe , the learning launch is the correct tool . As earlier stated , out team is required to review   the insight gathered from our first two launches and integrate this insight into future launch designs .   Future launch designs should reflect insight gained , progress made , and come closer to a captivating   solution ready for full deployment .
### Output: 