Example Reflection - Mind Mapping      Challenge   Working as an academic development officer for the rectorate of a private design   university operating with a national multi - campus strategy and an international focus   as their USP , I am in charge of the project management of a redesign of the product :   the curricula of 6 interdisciplinary Bachelor programs .      The challenge is to make the programs more profitable while at the same time   keeping up the general quality of teaching and research of the university in order to   stay competitive and meet the national assessment criteria . The student numbers   are growing and more growth is expected . However , in the last two years , with new   investments the costs have exceeded the revenues . Thus , a new structure by   reducing the current resources has to be created by the next winter term , which is   starting in about 8 months . Besides economic and quality aspects ( accreditation ) to   be considered , the main challenge is to integrate all stakeholders : teaching staff as   well as students evaluations , who are the end - consumers and the most important   focus group . Moreover , the curricula are supposed to be more flexible adaptable to   the different campuses in order to meet their own regional needs .        Selection   The academic program leaders in the past have already undergone steady , but   minor optimizations of the curricula . Although being mostly designers and used to   creative work environment themselves , time pressure often prevented to come up   with new innovations .    As the scrum master , I developed a plan together with the product owners defining   sprints and the delivery team while using a kanban board . As tools , I decided to stick   to use various mind - mapping tools to re - think the curricula in a free and creative way   in order to avoid sticking on the already known and be able to come up with new   ideas . Together with the product owners we decided whom to involve in the process   and how to mix the various groups . Thus , employees were mixed in three different   groups : the first one was theme related including all theory or communication design   professors , the second one was vertically mixed including different positions and   responsibilities by the teaching staff and the third group included members of the   examination office and accreditation officers .    The students were undertaken a different process with interviews regarding their   needs and wishes . Data from previous student evaluation was taken into   consideration as well . 

 Application   At the beginning , applying mind - mapping , we exclusively focused on the   content - side of the curricula and ignore economic boundaries or limits of resources :   with sticky notes needed skills and the teaching goals behind each program were   collected and grouped in each of the groups . In a seperate round knowledge , attitude   and expectations of the students from a staff perspective were equally grouped . In a   next step , these were compared to student interviews and insights from the   evaluation data and adjusted accordingly . All this took place throughout the course of   2 month with a weekly 1 - day workshop with one of the groups .    The next step was to merge these needs together with the set economic boundaries   to create a minimum viable product . Starting with the outcomes of the delivery   teams , the team of the product owners started mind - mapping various structures   shaping the content . Two different curricula were created : both contain large   amounts of shared modules , who could are adjustable to short - term needs or   external co - operations , but start from different angles . Both curricula were   undertaken calculations in order to meet the set economic goals .      Insight   By applying the mind mapping method , the team was able to think out of the box and   identify new groupings and thus create a whole new structure . The approach was   holistic and we started to think the product through from the bottom , especially   leaving out the pressure to meet the expected economic goals at the beginning .   Including insights on the expectations of the students , by revising evaluation data of   alumni and current students , was very valuable .        Approach   Generally speaking , the mind mapping tool was the right one for the development of   a new curriculum structure and the highly motivated team was happy to have a clear   goal to work to towards . However , some workshop days had to be postponed due to   the daily obligations of the team members . Also , the long period , was quite arduous   to some of the team members . In the future , I would make a more dense workshop   week to finish faster with the overall project . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Example Reflection - Mind Mapping      Challenge   Working as an academic development officer for the rectorate of a private design   university operating with a national multi - campus strategy and an international focus   as their USP , I am in charge of the project management of a redesign of the product :   the curricula of 6 interdisciplinary Bachelor programs .      The challenge is to make the programs more profitable while at the same time   keeping up the general quality of teaching and research of the university in order to   stay competitive and meet the national assessment criteria . The student numbers   are growing and more growth is expected . However , in the last two years , with new   investments the costs have exceeded the revenues . Thus , a new structure by   reducing the current resources has to be created by the next winter term , which is   starting in about 8 months . Besides economic and quality aspects ( accreditation ) to   be considered , the main challenge is to integrate all stakeholders : teaching staff as   well as students evaluations , who are the end - consumers and the most important   focus group . Moreover , the curricula are supposed to be more flexible adaptable to   the different campuses in order to meet their own regional needs .        Selection   The academic program leaders in the past have already undergone steady , but   minor optimizations of the curricula . Although being mostly designers and used to   creative work environment themselves , time pressure often prevented to come up   with new innovations .    As the scrum master , I developed a plan together with the product owners defining   sprints and the delivery team while using a kanban board . As tools , I decided to stick   to use various mind - mapping tools to re - think the curricula in a free and creative way   in order to avoid sticking on the already known and be able to come up with new   ideas . Together with the product owners we decided whom to involve in the process   and how to mix the various groups . Thus , employees were mixed in three different   groups : the first one was theme related including all theory or communication design   professors , the second one was vertically mixed including different positions and   responsibilities by the teaching staff and the third group included members of the   examination office and accreditation officers .    The students were undertaken a different process with interviews regarding their   needs and wishes . Data from previous student evaluation was taken into   consideration as well . 

 Application   At the beginning , applying mind - mapping , we exclusively focused on the   content - side of the curricula and ignore economic boundaries or limits of resources :   with sticky notes needed skills and the teaching goals behind each program were   collected and grouped in each of the groups . In a seperate round knowledge , attitude   and expectations of the students from a staff perspective were equally grouped . In a   next step , these were compared to student interviews and insights from the   evaluation data and adjusted accordingly . All this took place throughout the course of   2 month with a weekly 1 - day workshop with one of the groups .    The next step was to merge these needs together with the set economic boundaries   to create a minimum viable product . Starting with the outcomes of the delivery   teams , the team of the product owners started mind - mapping various structures   shaping the content . Two different curricula were created : both contain large   amounts of shared modules , who could are adjustable to short - term needs or   external co - operations , but start from different angles . Both curricula were   undertaken calculations in order to meet the set economic goals .      Insight   By applying the mind mapping method , the team was able to think out of the box and   identify new groupings and thus create a whole new structure . The approach was   holistic and we started to think the product through from the bottom , especially   leaving out the pressure to meet the expected economic goals at the beginning .   Including insights on the expectations of the students , by revising evaluation data of   alumni and current students , was very valuable .        Approach   Generally speaking , the mind mapping tool was the right one for the development of   a new curriculum structure and the highly motivated team was happy to have a clear   goal to work to towards . However , some workshop days had to be postponed due to   the daily obligations of the team members . Also , the long period , was quite arduous   to some of the team members . In the future , I would make a more dense workshop   week to finish faster with the overall project .
### Output: 