CHALLENGE 

 Am an analyst , working as an intern for company that deals in the production and sales of raw material   for the production of plastics and my challenge was to enhance growth in the production sector to meet   up with the weekly and month demand of product(raw material ) as the company could no longer meet   up with the customers demand for is product , the project scope consist of two shift(day and night )   with   20 worker in the production sector along with   supervisors two from the two shift and the general   supervisor also the HR department and some other important members of the organization a small   team   put together to enhance different Ideas embracing the act of a learning mind , the project is   schedule to produce result before the monthly demand of product , which means challenges are melt to   be resolve between the first three weeks of the month . 

 SELECTION 

 Although the small team stated other design thinking approaches as every ones opinion was consider ,   but with some few assumption as team we agree to apply the learning lunching , a fast cheap   experiment , to test hypothesis and our motive was to learn , and also to get the truth that saves time   and money . 

 APPLICATION 

 First we begin by asking questions created as a list of dis - confirming fact among small team and also pay   attention   to observe how each shift carry out various duties during work hours    in other to generate   data , within small group we begin by asking the question on " what is " the current status of machine   from identified users of the machine also what is their relationship like as co - workers what is the   environmental condition like to them , if they are satisfied with the duration of time schedule for each of   the working shift and if they were aware of the current situation of the organization although such   information are not at the disposer of production workers   but it just a way of getting them into the   conversation by telling them , as   answers are   allow from either end of the small team going on with the    conversation we ask the question on " what if " the organization is working on expanding the production   sector will it help the current situation also what if the organization is making a budget to buy new   machineries which of the machineries are to be included , double or excluded   on the budget    considering their different usage and necessity and also what if the company want to dissolve old shift   and allow each workers to create shift to match with their repertoire , and of which we had positive   feedback from the data we gather reflecting as confirming facts which were more likely to be truth so   we had no need to " pivot " or " trash can " , with the ideal gotten from one week of observation and small   team learning we decided to conduct a fast cheap experiment , based on the Confirming facts we   created an hypothesis with the idea to improve production scale to meet the demand of a particular set   of our costumer(dissatisfied ones ) weekly demand of raw material , on the what wows and what works   zone our idea to dissolve old shift and allow each worker to create shift that best suit their persona , co- create a medium that allow each worker to be a boss in their field in the production process by assign   each worker to a particular machine of their specialization to report directly to the supervisors , the idea    satisfy the need of our customer weekly demand for raw material better than the current alternatives ,    and after the first weeks of the experiment the other ideas generated through learning lunch where   further implemented as the scale of production improve awesomely in less than three weeks of the   application of the learning lunch approach . 

 INSIGHT 

 The knowledge I gained through this learning lunch exercise is the certainty of the saying that ‘ idea are   like sand ’ and best way to position yourself for these ideas is to have a learning mind and also by   applying learning lunch our assumptions were turn into Confirming fact and also became the idea that   resolve the challenge better than the formal alternatives . 

 APPROACH 

 Despite that the small team had other design thinking approach to consider the learning lunch approach   prove to be useful for this particular project and the company adapting to learning mind is also willing to   consider other design thinking tool /approach like story telling for the company advancement after the   positive change experience by the company due to the application of the selected approach , the   learning lunch approach . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: CHALLENGE 

 Am an analyst , working as an intern for company that deals in the production and sales of raw material   for the production of plastics and my challenge was to enhance growth in the production sector to meet   up with the weekly and month demand of product(raw material ) as the company could no longer meet   up with the customers demand for is product , the project scope consist of two shift(day and night )   with   20 worker in the production sector along with   supervisors two from the two shift and the general   supervisor also the HR department and some other important members of the organization a small   team   put together to enhance different Ideas embracing the act of a learning mind , the project is   schedule to produce result before the monthly demand of product , which means challenges are melt to   be resolve between the first three weeks of the month . 

 SELECTION 

 Although the small team stated other design thinking approaches as every ones opinion was consider ,   but with some few assumption as team we agree to apply the learning lunching , a fast cheap   experiment , to test hypothesis and our motive was to learn , and also to get the truth that saves time   and money . 

 APPLICATION 

 First we begin by asking questions created as a list of dis - confirming fact among small team and also pay   attention   to observe how each shift carry out various duties during work hours    in other to generate   data , within small group we begin by asking the question on " what is " the current status of machine   from identified users of the machine also what is their relationship like as co - workers what is the   environmental condition like to them , if they are satisfied with the duration of time schedule for each of   the working shift and if they were aware of the current situation of the organization although such   information are not at the disposer of production workers   but it just a way of getting them into the   conversation by telling them , as   answers are   allow from either end of the small team going on with the    conversation we ask the question on " what if " the organization is working on expanding the production   sector will it help the current situation also what if the organization is making a budget to buy new   machineries which of the machineries are to be included , double or excluded   on the budget    considering their different usage and necessity and also what if the company want to dissolve old shift   and allow each workers to create shift to match with their repertoire , and of which we had positive   feedback from the data we gather reflecting as confirming facts which were more likely to be truth so   we had no need to " pivot " or " trash can " , with the ideal gotten from one week of observation and small   team learning we decided to conduct a fast cheap experiment , based on the Confirming facts we   created an hypothesis with the idea to improve production scale to meet the demand of a particular set   of our costumer(dissatisfied ones ) weekly demand of raw material , on the what wows and what works   zone our idea to dissolve old shift and allow each worker to create shift that best suit their persona , co- create a medium that allow each worker to be a boss in their field in the production process by assign   each worker to a particular machine of their specialization to report directly to the supervisors , the idea    satisfy the need of our customer weekly demand for raw material better than the current alternatives ,    and after the first weeks of the experiment the other ideas generated through learning lunch where   further implemented as the scale of production improve awesomely in less than three weeks of the   application of the learning lunch approach . 

 INSIGHT 

 The knowledge I gained through this learning lunch exercise is the certainty of the saying that ‘ idea are   like sand ’ and best way to position yourself for these ideas is to have a learning mind and also by   applying learning lunch our assumptions were turn into Confirming fact and also became the idea that   resolve the challenge better than the formal alternatives . 

 APPROACH 

 Despite that the small team had other design thinking approach to consider the learning lunch approach   prove to be useful for this particular project and the company adapting to learning mind is also willing to   consider other design thinking tool /approach like story telling for the company advancement after the   positive change experience by the company due to the application of the selected approach , the   learning lunch approach .
### Output: 