Reflection – Learning Launch 

 Challenge 

 I ’m part of my organization ’s technical department in Oil Company and my / our challenge is to developed   the workflow ( activity / project ) between the department in order to accelerate production of new oil   well with electrical submersible pump while permanent electrical power not available yet . The project   scope includes project department , electrical department as well as operation support department , with   whom we work closely . The project is limited to internal resource ( budget and time ) . The project should   not exceed 60 business days and the solution must include clear breakdown activity with timing among   involve departments . We will focus on trying to uncover what was the blocking factor from each   department , consider to be ineffective or problematic with regards to the workflow 

 Selection 

 Based on the existing challenge our team has already gone through several design thinking activity / tools   and study the existing problematic from each department , so we are ready to implemented learning   launch tool . Frankly speaking , the learning launch is an experiment meant to quick test an idea and   prototype 

 Application 

 For our first learning launch , we focus on the original workflow and activity time frame . In particular , we   want to analyze if we could simplified , eliminate and substitute project , scope of work and process to   adapt the method of scrum technical project for our work ( e.g. technical review , time boxed , location   acceptance , daily , specific meeting , etc . ) in an effort to become slim and time frame achievable . This   tested our assumption that the technical substitution and way of execution were the main cause of our   project workflow challenge . Our team attending several technical meeting with project , electrical and   operation support expert . Next we went to well site to plan the layout in order to arrange in such a way   new method could be implemented . These to session occurred within a three - week timeframe . We   continue the process to produce a document with a clear technical step , required material and clear time   frame of our new , more efficient project execution method . 

 For our second learning launch , we focus on gaining clarity about our task step and priority check list . This   tested our assumption that our prioritization of task was the main cause of our workflow challenge . Our   team completed all supported technical document , technical review , complete identification and   specified of require material , agreed on well site layout and streamline timeframe for each activity .   Including procuring required material and man power planning . 

 Insight 

 By implementing the learning launch control , our team able to identify our blocking factor to achieve the   goal in detail . Is important to have understanding of the problem that going to solve . Succeed to   understanding problem and expected goal , impacting on easier to solve the issue , listing all possible   solution , define priority of the task , and set clear process step with timeframe . Finally the task execution   could be proceed effectively and efficient , in result on goal achieve as per expectation and timeframe 

 Approach 

 In fact that our team has already gone through several design thinking activity / tool and are at this stage   in the timeline , the learning launch is the suitable tool . It been mentioned that out team required to   review the insight gained from our first two launches and incorporate this insight to the future launch   design . Future launch design will be preferable solution ready to implemented 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Reflection – Learning Launch 

 Challenge 

 I ’m part of my organization ’s technical department in Oil Company and my / our challenge is to developed   the workflow ( activity / project ) between the department in order to accelerate production of new oil   well with electrical submersible pump while permanent electrical power not available yet . The project   scope includes project department , electrical department as well as operation support department , with   whom we work closely . The project is limited to internal resource ( budget and time ) . The project should   not exceed 60 business days and the solution must include clear breakdown activity with timing among   involve departments . We will focus on trying to uncover what was the blocking factor from each   department , consider to be ineffective or problematic with regards to the workflow 

 Selection 

 Based on the existing challenge our team has already gone through several design thinking activity / tools   and study the existing problematic from each department , so we are ready to implemented learning   launch tool . Frankly speaking , the learning launch is an experiment meant to quick test an idea and   prototype 

 Application 

 For our first learning launch , we focus on the original workflow and activity time frame . In particular , we   want to analyze if we could simplified , eliminate and substitute project , scope of work and process to   adapt the method of scrum technical project for our work ( e.g. technical review , time boxed , location   acceptance , daily , specific meeting , etc . ) in an effort to become slim and time frame achievable . This   tested our assumption that the technical substitution and way of execution were the main cause of our   project workflow challenge . Our team attending several technical meeting with project , electrical and   operation support expert . Next we went to well site to plan the layout in order to arrange in such a way   new method could be implemented . These to session occurred within a three - week timeframe . We   continue the process to produce a document with a clear technical step , required material and clear time   frame of our new , more efficient project execution method . 

 For our second learning launch , we focus on gaining clarity about our task step and priority check list . This   tested our assumption that our prioritization of task was the main cause of our workflow challenge . Our   team completed all supported technical document , technical review , complete identification and   specified of require material , agreed on well site layout and streamline timeframe for each activity .   Including procuring required material and man power planning . 

 Insight 

 By implementing the learning launch control , our team able to identify our blocking factor to achieve the   goal in detail . Is important to have understanding of the problem that going to solve . Succeed to   understanding problem and expected goal , impacting on easier to solve the issue , listing all possible   solution , define priority of the task , and set clear process step with timeframe . Finally the task execution   could be proceed effectively and efficient , in result on goal achieve as per expectation and timeframe 

 Approach 

 In fact that our team has already gone through several design thinking activity / tool and are at this stage   in the timeline , the learning launch is the suitable tool . It been mentioned that out team required to   review the insight gained from our first two launches and incorporate this insight to the future launch   design . Future launch design will be preferable solution ready to implemented
### Output: 