Reflection.- 	 Mind 	 mapping 

 1 .   Challenge : 

 I am a professor at University and I was assigned a special project with a nearby 

 small community . People were suffering   with the arrival of minor drug dealers that   were affecting the youth in the community in different ways . They were trying to   distribute   their products outside the school   and to recruit people to widen their   distribution network . Some of the public spaces were taken by this recently arrived   individuals to carry out their trade , and families   were scared of going out because they   did n’t want any trouble ; so little by little the public spaces were taken by the “ bad ” and   all the “ good citizens ” were forced to stay at home . The public spaces started to look   abandoned and dirty 

 The assignment was to recover one of those public spaces , so families felt safe 

 spend their free time there . This would force bad people go away . 

 2 .   Selection : 

 The tool we selected to start this project was : Mind Maping .   We believed we 

 needed a tool that was hepful to represent everyone ’s opinions around the main   problem . This way we were able to visualize which were the pain points of the   community about the problems , how was the community before the arrival of these   people , what was the most visited public space , and what where they willing to do   about it . This tool was helpful because it gave all the participants an opportunity to give   an opinion , and all opinions were considered . 

 3 .   Application : 

 For the mind mapping we invited 30 different memembers of the community . The 

 community leaders , teachers , families ( father , mother and children ) leaders form   important community groups : artist , dancers , etc . Also the students participated in the   activity . We divided the group in 3 teams and made sure that each team had all kinds   of members . Each team was lead by a trained student and was given the same   instructions on what to include in the mind map : Pain points , how was the community   before , and what they were willing to do to solve this problem . The 3 models expresed   similar ideas . After each mind map was done , the whole group combined the mind   maps to build one . 

 4 .   Insight : 

 The applied tool gave us the opportunity to pick up everyone ’s opinion . It was not 

 a vote , it was a consensus . In an organized and visual way we were able to “ draw a   picture ” of the situation and how the community felt about it .   We all understood   exactly what was the situation and how to proceed . We undestood each other and   mainly , we printed all the details about reality , we did n’t invent anything . Having all the   details ,   together we decided on the action plan and we all felt commited to it because   it was everyone ideas 

 5 .   Approach : 

 I really liked the tool but I must say that analyzing the information took longer 

 than expected . Next time , I would prepare deeply on this phase of the tool , or maybe   with more practice we can do it in a more agile way . We are very pleased with the   results , I ca n’t wait to try all the different tools that design thinking has to offer . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Reflection.- 	 Mind 	 mapping 

 1 .   Challenge : 

 I am a professor at University and I was assigned a special project with a nearby 

 small community . People were suffering   with the arrival of minor drug dealers that   were affecting the youth in the community in different ways . They were trying to   distribute   their products outside the school   and to recruit people to widen their   distribution network . Some of the public spaces were taken by this recently arrived   individuals to carry out their trade , and families   were scared of going out because they   did n’t want any trouble ; so little by little the public spaces were taken by the “ bad ” and   all the “ good citizens ” were forced to stay at home . The public spaces started to look   abandoned and dirty 

 The assignment was to recover one of those public spaces , so families felt safe 

 spend their free time there . This would force bad people go away . 

 2 .   Selection : 

 The tool we selected to start this project was : Mind Maping .   We believed we 

 needed a tool that was hepful to represent everyone ’s opinions around the main   problem . This way we were able to visualize which were the pain points of the   community about the problems , how was the community before the arrival of these   people , what was the most visited public space , and what where they willing to do   about it . This tool was helpful because it gave all the participants an opportunity to give   an opinion , and all opinions were considered . 

 3 .   Application : 

 For the mind mapping we invited 30 different memembers of the community . The 

 community leaders , teachers , families ( father , mother and children ) leaders form   important community groups : artist , dancers , etc . Also the students participated in the   activity . We divided the group in 3 teams and made sure that each team had all kinds   of members . Each team was lead by a trained student and was given the same   instructions on what to include in the mind map : Pain points , how was the community   before , and what they were willing to do to solve this problem . The 3 models expresed   similar ideas . After each mind map was done , the whole group combined the mind   maps to build one . 

 4 .   Insight : 

 The applied tool gave us the opportunity to pick up everyone ’s opinion . It was not 

 a vote , it was a consensus . In an organized and visual way we were able to “ draw a   picture ” of the situation and how the community felt about it .   We all understood   exactly what was the situation and how to proceed . We undestood each other and   mainly , we printed all the details about reality , we did n’t invent anything . Having all the   details ,   together we decided on the action plan and we all felt commited to it because   it was everyone ideas 

 5 .   Approach : 

 I really liked the tool but I must say that analyzing the information took longer 

 than expected . Next time , I would prepare deeply on this phase of the tool , or maybe   with more practice we can do it in a more agile way . We are very pleased with the   results , I ca n’t wait to try all the different tools that design thinking has to offer .
### Output: 