Learning Launch 

 Challenge     I am a member of my school ’s marketing club and our challenge is to improve the workflow   ( activities and projects ) within the department in order to increase sales in the online channel   and to spend marketing budgets on the right campaigns . The project scope includes the   online marketing department composed of ten employees , as well as the larger marketing   department and IT department , with whom we work closely . The project is limited to internal   resources ( i.e. , budget and employee time ) . The project should not exceed 30 business days   and the solution should include an even distribution of working hours amongst the team   members . We will focus on trying to uncover what our team members , as well as key   stakeholders within the larger marketing department and IT department , consider to be   ineffective or problematic with regard to the workflow .      Selection      Our team has already gone through several design thinking activities / tools , so we are ready to   try the learning launch tool . Broadly speaking , the learning launch is an experiment meant to   quickly test an idea and prototype .      Application      For our first learning launch , we focused on the structure / execution of our online marketing   tasks . In particular , we wanted to see if we could structure our tasks , projects , and processes   to adapt the methods of Scrum project management for our work ( e.g. , time boxed , daily ,   specific meetings , reviews , etc . ) in an effort to become more agile . This tested our assumption   that the structure and execution were the main causes of our workflow challenge . Our team   went through a two - day training with a Scrum project management coach . Next , we went   through five workshops to structure our tasks and processes in a more agile way . These two   sessions occurred within in a three - week timeframe . We expected to produce a document   with a clear description of our new , more agile processes / workflow . For our second learning   launch , we focused on gaining clarity about our tasks and priorities . This tested our   assumption that our prioritization of tasks was the main cause of our workflow challenge . Our   team completed an anonymous survey . Additionally , five key stakeholders from the larger   marketing department and IT department also completed an anonymous survey . The surveys   included questions about our new , proposed process , understanding the process and the   prioritization of tasks , and feelings about the change , and were conducted within a one - week   timeframe . 

 Insight      By applying the learning launch tool , our team identified our assumptions and designed   launches to test these assumptions . Additionally , we thought through anticipated results ,   expecting to find that a more agile approach would improve our workflow , and that both our   team and the key stakeholders would be fairly open to the new prioritization of tasks and   process . Our actual results were slightly different from what we anticipated : while our team   was open to the prioritization of tasks and process , the key stakeholders in the larger   marketing department and IT department expressed some concerns . Moving forward , our   team will review this insight and incorporate it into future launch designs . The ongoing   incorporation of insight is particularly important at this stage , as launches come before a full   rollout in the design thinking timeline .      Approach      Given that our team has already gone through several design thinking activities / tools and are   at this stage in the timeline , the learning launch is the appropriate tool . As previously   mentioned , our team needs to review the insight gained from our first two launches and   incorporate this insight into future launch designs . Future launch designs should reflect   insight gained , progress made , and come closer to a compelling solution ready for full rollout . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Learning Launch 

 Challenge     I am a member of my school ’s marketing club and our challenge is to improve the workflow   ( activities and projects ) within the department in order to increase sales in the online channel   and to spend marketing budgets on the right campaigns . The project scope includes the   online marketing department composed of ten employees , as well as the larger marketing   department and IT department , with whom we work closely . The project is limited to internal   resources ( i.e. , budget and employee time ) . The project should not exceed 30 business days   and the solution should include an even distribution of working hours amongst the team   members . We will focus on trying to uncover what our team members , as well as key   stakeholders within the larger marketing department and IT department , consider to be   ineffective or problematic with regard to the workflow .      Selection      Our team has already gone through several design thinking activities / tools , so we are ready to   try the learning launch tool . Broadly speaking , the learning launch is an experiment meant to   quickly test an idea and prototype .      Application      For our first learning launch , we focused on the structure / execution of our online marketing   tasks . In particular , we wanted to see if we could structure our tasks , projects , and processes   to adapt the methods of Scrum project management for our work ( e.g. , time boxed , daily ,   specific meetings , reviews , etc . ) in an effort to become more agile . This tested our assumption   that the structure and execution were the main causes of our workflow challenge . Our team   went through a two - day training with a Scrum project management coach . Next , we went   through five workshops to structure our tasks and processes in a more agile way . These two   sessions occurred within in a three - week timeframe . We expected to produce a document   with a clear description of our new , more agile processes / workflow . For our second learning   launch , we focused on gaining clarity about our tasks and priorities . This tested our   assumption that our prioritization of tasks was the main cause of our workflow challenge . Our   team completed an anonymous survey . Additionally , five key stakeholders from the larger   marketing department and IT department also completed an anonymous survey . The surveys   included questions about our new , proposed process , understanding the process and the   prioritization of tasks , and feelings about the change , and were conducted within a one - week   timeframe . 

 Insight      By applying the learning launch tool , our team identified our assumptions and designed   launches to test these assumptions . Additionally , we thought through anticipated results ,   expecting to find that a more agile approach would improve our workflow , and that both our   team and the key stakeholders would be fairly open to the new prioritization of tasks and   process . Our actual results were slightly different from what we anticipated : while our team   was open to the prioritization of tasks and process , the key stakeholders in the larger   marketing department and IT department expressed some concerns . Moving forward , our   team will review this insight and incorporate it into future launch designs . The ongoing   incorporation of insight is particularly important at this stage , as launches come before a full   rollout in the design thinking timeline .      Approach      Given that our team has already gone through several design thinking activities / tools and are   at this stage in the timeline , the learning launch is the appropriate tool . As previously   mentioned , our team needs to review the insight gained from our first two launches and   incorporate this insight into future launch designs . Future launch designs should reflect   insight gained , progress made , and come closer to a compelling solution ready for full rollout .
### Output: 