Challenge and Selection      Recently , I had the opportunity to apply the Visualization tool , or Visual Thinking . I mentored a   session with the aim of helping to prioritize a set of initiatives to be used throughout the project .   It was the first session with this profile that I was responsible for developing . It was a great   personal learning experience , where I identified points to evolve , also generated great results   for the project 's stakeholders .      Application      The process was carried out completely online with a smaller group of people , as a pilot   initiative . Mural online tool was used to apply the methodology , the board interface was design   before the session begins . The first step during the session was to align expectations and explain   a little about how the workshop would be applied , also a discussion wheel with some   explanations about the project initiatives .       I applied the MSCW 's Methodology to prioritize the importance and value of the project   initiatives , with 3 remote votes sessions which allowed to separate the four classifications of the   method . Following the capacity , the second stage consisted of the complexity evaluation of each   initiative , for this step , prioritization was applied using Fibonacci sequence , since the member   had a technical background .      When concluding the first two steps , that is , the value for the business and the technical   complexity were prioritized , the initiatives were " plotted " in a graph with axes of complexity and   value , and initiatives with low complexity and high value were selected " Champions " and   adopted a higher development priority , being followed by other initiatives until arriving next to   the high complexity and low value initiatives , which would be reevaluated if necessary .      Approach     Some learnings of the application were , even do the voting session is a concentration moment ,   the silence i d bad for the workshop , is time to share ideas and opinions . Also , during the session   there were about 20 initiatives to be prioritized , is also necessary to reduce this number , to 15   maybe 10 . The team said it was confusing to prioritize so many things at once . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Challenge and Selection      Recently , I had the opportunity to apply the Visualization tool , or Visual Thinking . I mentored a   session with the aim of helping to prioritize a set of initiatives to be used throughout the project .   It was the first session with this profile that I was responsible for developing . It was a great   personal learning experience , where I identified points to evolve , also generated great results   for the project 's stakeholders .      Application      The process was carried out completely online with a smaller group of people , as a pilot   initiative . Mural online tool was used to apply the methodology , the board interface was design   before the session begins . The first step during the session was to align expectations and explain   a little about how the workshop would be applied , also a discussion wheel with some   explanations about the project initiatives .       I applied the MSCW 's Methodology to prioritize the importance and value of the project   initiatives , with 3 remote votes sessions which allowed to separate the four classifications of the   method . Following the capacity , the second stage consisted of the complexity evaluation of each   initiative , for this step , prioritization was applied using Fibonacci sequence , since the member   had a technical background .      When concluding the first two steps , that is , the value for the business and the technical   complexity were prioritized , the initiatives were " plotted " in a graph with axes of complexity and   value , and initiatives with low complexity and high value were selected " Champions " and   adopted a higher development priority , being followed by other initiatives until arriving next to   the high complexity and low value initiatives , which would be reevaluated if necessary .      Approach     Some learnings of the application were , even do the voting session is a concentration moment ,   the silence i d bad for the workshop , is time to share ideas and opinions . Also , during the session   there were about 20 initiatives to be prioritized , is also necessary to reduce this number , to 15   maybe 10 . The team said it was confusing to prioritize so many things at once .
### Output: 