Challenge     I recently attended a 1 - day design thinking bootcamp where a diverse group of individuals   learned the theories and practices behind design thinking . We were tasked with addressing a   big question to practice design thinking : How might we design the best workplace in the world ?   Since it was just a day - long workshop , we had to move through each phase of design thinking   quickly . We started by defining “ workplace ” and “ best ” and completing empathy interviews with   stakeholders to understand their pain points and how we might address them . Lastly , we   developed a prototype and conducted a learning launch to test our assumptions .     Selection     After examining “ what is ” and “ what if ” , we were ready to develop a prototype that we could test   through a learning launch . We determined the questions we needed to confirm and disconfirm   through interviews with other attendees of the workshop .   The learning launch method allowed   us to quickly and effectively test our key assumptions to understand if our idea could move to   Launch 2.0 or if we needed to pivot entirely .     Application     Our team defined “ workplace ” as the physical space a person enters each day for work and   “ best ” as a place that inspires ownership and personal connection . As a result , we decided to   architect a new office design on paper for our prototype . This design involved a “ Choose Your   Own Adventure ” aspect whereby there were areas of the office floorplan for all types of working   and learning styles - a brainstorming room , phone booth , private offices , open desks ,   conference rooms , comfortable couches and swings , and communal space for lunch and happy   hour .     For the first learning launch , our team wrote out our key assumptions and developed a set of   questions that we wanted to ask our audience . We focused on understanding where people   would want to spend the majority of their time in the office design so we could confirm or   disconfirm if open and comfortable workspace is even desired . We shared a large design of our   office with someone who usually works from home . Due to the nature of our short workshop , we   only had about seven minutes to ask questions and learn from our interviewee . Ultimately , the   assumptions we were trying to test were the correct ones but we could have developed better   questions to get at the quality of data we were seeking .      While we did n’t have time to complete a second learning launch , for this phase I would have   kept the same prototype design but developed a better set of questions to ask a wider audience   ( since we only had time to interview one person ) .      Insight 

 Because of the assumption we developed about “ the best workplace ” , our physical prototype   design was absolutely necessary to give our audience a visual of our idea . While our initial   empathy interviews illustrated that employees sought more ownership and personal connection   in their work , we had to test that customers would actually utilize various workspaces in order to   accomplish ownership and personal connection . Since we only interviewed one person who   works from home , she felt a connection to the closed office spaces rather than the open and   communal spaces . This was the opposite of our assumption but was also a very small sample   size for us to determine next steps .      Approach     Ultimately , it was very clear that we needed more and better data in order to properly test our   assumptions . In the future , our team needs to agree on the number of people we will interview   and have more time to conduct the interviews in order to successfully test the assumption and   determine next steps for Launch 2.0 and our idea in general . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Challenge     I recently attended a 1 - day design thinking bootcamp where a diverse group of individuals   learned the theories and practices behind design thinking . We were tasked with addressing a   big question to practice design thinking : How might we design the best workplace in the world ?   Since it was just a day - long workshop , we had to move through each phase of design thinking   quickly . We started by defining “ workplace ” and “ best ” and completing empathy interviews with   stakeholders to understand their pain points and how we might address them . Lastly , we   developed a prototype and conducted a learning launch to test our assumptions .     Selection     After examining “ what is ” and “ what if ” , we were ready to develop a prototype that we could test   through a learning launch . We determined the questions we needed to confirm and disconfirm   through interviews with other attendees of the workshop .   The learning launch method allowed   us to quickly and effectively test our key assumptions to understand if our idea could move to   Launch 2.0 or if we needed to pivot entirely .     Application     Our team defined “ workplace ” as the physical space a person enters each day for work and   “ best ” as a place that inspires ownership and personal connection . As a result , we decided to   architect a new office design on paper for our prototype . This design involved a “ Choose Your   Own Adventure ” aspect whereby there were areas of the office floorplan for all types of working   and learning styles - a brainstorming room , phone booth , private offices , open desks ,   conference rooms , comfortable couches and swings , and communal space for lunch and happy   hour .     For the first learning launch , our team wrote out our key assumptions and developed a set of   questions that we wanted to ask our audience . We focused on understanding where people   would want to spend the majority of their time in the office design so we could confirm or   disconfirm if open and comfortable workspace is even desired . We shared a large design of our   office with someone who usually works from home . Due to the nature of our short workshop , we   only had about seven minutes to ask questions and learn from our interviewee . Ultimately , the   assumptions we were trying to test were the correct ones but we could have developed better   questions to get at the quality of data we were seeking .      While we did n’t have time to complete a second learning launch , for this phase I would have   kept the same prototype design but developed a better set of questions to ask a wider audience   ( since we only had time to interview one person ) .      Insight 

 Because of the assumption we developed about “ the best workplace ” , our physical prototype   design was absolutely necessary to give our audience a visual of our idea . While our initial   empathy interviews illustrated that employees sought more ownership and personal connection   in their work , we had to test that customers would actually utilize various workspaces in order to   accomplish ownership and personal connection . Since we only interviewed one person who   works from home , she felt a connection to the closed office spaces rather than the open and   communal spaces . This was the opposite of our assumption but was also a very small sample   size for us to determine next steps .      Approach     Ultimately , it was very clear that we needed more and better data in order to properly test our   assumptions . In the future , our team needs to agree on the number of people we will interview   and have more time to conduct the interviews in order to successfully test the assumption and   determine next steps for Launch 2.0 and our idea in general .
### Output: 