Challenge :     I work as a nurse informaticist for a large healthcare organization that has multiple hospitals   spanning several states .   One of my responsibilities is co - facilitating a weekly women ’s health   workgroup meeting with hospital clinical informatics stakeholders .   Because the workgroup   consists of hospital constituencies spread out across a large geographic radius , these meetings   are held virtually .   A key workgroup objective is to complete the value prioritization , design ,   communication , and implementation of hospital stakeholder submitted enhancement requests to   the electronic medical record ( EMR ) .   Approval of any enhancement request design or solution   must achieve consensus across the multiple hospital organizations impacted .   The enhancement requests submitted should state the pain point or problem to be solved and   an alternative solution than the current workflow that would mitigate the pain point .   The weekly   workgroup meetings are intended to be the forum to distill the pain point prompting the   enhancement request for better insight into the design criteria that the group agrees would solve   the problem .     Selection :     Mind mapping is a tool that allows for immersion into current state workflows or data to identify   the meaning or patterns underlying a specific stakeholder problem and to define design criteria   that might solve it .   I chose mind mapping as a tool because of the rich insights it can reveal   from current state and the translational yielding of design criteria to satisfy the intent of a   submitted enhancement request .   It also provides a way for a diverse set of stakeholders to   participate in the design process .     Application :     The women ’s health workgroup was struggling with a particularly challenging enhancement   request to streamline nursing workflow with labor and delivery documentation .   The hospital   stakeholders knew that the nurses were not satisfied with the current labor and delivery   documentation because it was too cumbersome , it was taking them too long to complete , and   that they were forgetting to chart key elements needed to meet regulatory requirements .   What   they did not understand was what changes were required to improve the nursing documentation   workflow and create efficiencies .   To facilitate this transition , a mind mapping process was used .     The first step we took was to pull a query of all the documentation fields contained in the labor   and delivery documentation .   The second step was to have each hospital constituency group   review the data separately to identify where improvements to the nurse ’s documentation might   be made and where efficiencies might be derived . We then met together over several sessions   as a larger workgroup to review the insights that each hospital stakeholder group unearthed with   me functioning as facilitator . 

 Each documentation field was color - coded based on the insight derived from the stakeholder   assessment and subsequently discussed amongst the larger group .   Through the mind - mapping   process , we were able to gain an understanding of what was contributing to nurse   dissatisfaction and why it was leading to inefficiencies and missed charting in the labor and   delivery documentation workflow .   Notable patterns included multiple instances of duplicative   documentation and charting data elements ordered out of sequence with how nurses manage a   labor and delivery workflow .   From these insights , the stakeholders reached a consensus on a   redesign of the labor and delivery documentation which included removal of the extra   documentation and reorganization of the charting fields to make it easier to find and document   the data elements required .      Insight :     Taking current state data and providing it to the stakeholder groups helped unearth the patterns   underpinning the problem and shed light on what design criteria would be necessary to   formulate a solution .   A helpful byproduct of our mind - mapping exercise was insight into   additional EMR optimization opportunities unrelated to the initial request .   These items were   color - coded from our analysis and have been submitted , prioritized , and worked iteratively by   the workgroup .     Approach :     A notable barrier to use of mind mapping is how to make a typical in person exercise work   virtually .   The use of collaborative tools like google sheets and teleconferencing as well as   setting the ground rules for the mind mapping exercise helped spur engagement and   participation from the stakeholders in a virtual environment .   However , a big challenge was   ensuring all stakeholders had the chance to voice feedback .   If I use mind mapping again to   work through an enhancement request , I will explore what other types of digital tools ( google   forms , as an example ) might be more advantageous to use to achieve the same outcomes of   pattern and insight generation . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Challenge :     I work as a nurse informaticist for a large healthcare organization that has multiple hospitals   spanning several states .   One of my responsibilities is co - facilitating a weekly women ’s health   workgroup meeting with hospital clinical informatics stakeholders .   Because the workgroup   consists of hospital constituencies spread out across a large geographic radius , these meetings   are held virtually .   A key workgroup objective is to complete the value prioritization , design ,   communication , and implementation of hospital stakeholder submitted enhancement requests to   the electronic medical record ( EMR ) .   Approval of any enhancement request design or solution   must achieve consensus across the multiple hospital organizations impacted .   The enhancement requests submitted should state the pain point or problem to be solved and   an alternative solution than the current workflow that would mitigate the pain point .   The weekly   workgroup meetings are intended to be the forum to distill the pain point prompting the   enhancement request for better insight into the design criteria that the group agrees would solve   the problem .     Selection :     Mind mapping is a tool that allows for immersion into current state workflows or data to identify   the meaning or patterns underlying a specific stakeholder problem and to define design criteria   that might solve it .   I chose mind mapping as a tool because of the rich insights it can reveal   from current state and the translational yielding of design criteria to satisfy the intent of a   submitted enhancement request .   It also provides a way for a diverse set of stakeholders to   participate in the design process .     Application :     The women ’s health workgroup was struggling with a particularly challenging enhancement   request to streamline nursing workflow with labor and delivery documentation .   The hospital   stakeholders knew that the nurses were not satisfied with the current labor and delivery   documentation because it was too cumbersome , it was taking them too long to complete , and   that they were forgetting to chart key elements needed to meet regulatory requirements .   What   they did not understand was what changes were required to improve the nursing documentation   workflow and create efficiencies .   To facilitate this transition , a mind mapping process was used .     The first step we took was to pull a query of all the documentation fields contained in the labor   and delivery documentation .   The second step was to have each hospital constituency group   review the data separately to identify where improvements to the nurse ’s documentation might   be made and where efficiencies might be derived . We then met together over several sessions   as a larger workgroup to review the insights that each hospital stakeholder group unearthed with   me functioning as facilitator . 

 Each documentation field was color - coded based on the insight derived from the stakeholder   assessment and subsequently discussed amongst the larger group .   Through the mind - mapping   process , we were able to gain an understanding of what was contributing to nurse   dissatisfaction and why it was leading to inefficiencies and missed charting in the labor and   delivery documentation workflow .   Notable patterns included multiple instances of duplicative   documentation and charting data elements ordered out of sequence with how nurses manage a   labor and delivery workflow .   From these insights , the stakeholders reached a consensus on a   redesign of the labor and delivery documentation which included removal of the extra   documentation and reorganization of the charting fields to make it easier to find and document   the data elements required .      Insight :     Taking current state data and providing it to the stakeholder groups helped unearth the patterns   underpinning the problem and shed light on what design criteria would be necessary to   formulate a solution .   A helpful byproduct of our mind - mapping exercise was insight into   additional EMR optimization opportunities unrelated to the initial request .   These items were   color - coded from our analysis and have been submitted , prioritized , and worked iteratively by   the workgroup .     Approach :     A notable barrier to use of mind mapping is how to make a typical in person exercise work   virtually .   The use of collaborative tools like google sheets and teleconferencing as well as   setting the ground rules for the mind mapping exercise helped spur engagement and   participation from the stakeholders in a virtual environment .   However , a big challenge was   ensuring all stakeholders had the chance to voice feedback .   If I use mind mapping again to   work through an enhancement request , I will explore what other types of digital tools ( google   forms , as an example ) might be more advantageous to use to achieve the same outcomes of   pattern and insight generation .
### Output: 