Challenge : 

 The    Risk    Team    designed    a    process    that    assists    managers    of    every    line    of    business    to    think    about    and    input    information    about    risks    and    related    controls    into    a    standardized    system .    This    system    allows    the    managers    to    input    all    of    the    required    qualitative    and    quantitative    information    into    the    system    in    one    process .    This    interface    also    allows    the    auditors    and    senior    management    to    view    the    risks    of    the    various    business    units    and    the    company    in    a    more    effective    and    uniform    manner .    What    is    not    included    in    this    is    a    process    to    group    the    risks    and    controls    to    allow    a    better    understanding    of    the    larger    picture    and    how    that    could    affect    the    company    overall .    Some    of    these    macro - risks    could    be    a    collection    of    the    same    risk    that    was    identified    multiple    times    or    some    themes    that    are    not    easily    connected . 

 Selection : 

 I    decided    that    Mind    Mapping    would    be    a    great    tool    to    help    direct    the    team    toward    a    solution .    The    reason    that    I    thought    to    use    this    tool    now    is    there    are    multiple    experts    that    look    at    the    collective    data    and    draw    different    conclusions .    In    general ,    these    conclusions    are    more    driven    by    the    biases    that    the    user    brings    to    the    table    and    less    on    the    given    data .    To    quote    Marianne    Moore    from   the    training    materials    “ Mind    mapping    is    looking    for    patterns    and    insights    in    a    large    quantity    of    data    you    collected    during    your    exploration    of    what    is    the    current    reality .    The    goal    is    to    establish    criteria    for    the    what - if    idea    generation    phase . ” 

 The    mind    mapping    process    can    be    summarized    in    the    following    steps .    First ,    gather    all    of    the    facts    and    information    that    you    have    into    a    defined    location .    This    could    take    some    refinement    to    get    the    information    into    a    displayable    format .    Second ,    have    your    stakeholder    review    this    physical    representation    of    the    facts    and    have    each    of    the    stakeholders    find    the    parts    that    they    think    are    important .    Third ,    gather    the    stakeholders    into    small    groups    and    allow    the    stakeholders    a    few    minutes    to    define    some    categories    of    the    data .    Fourth ,    have    one    of    the    stakeholders    share    one    of    the    categories    and    see    if   there    are    other    facts    that    have    been    found    that    can    be    included    in    the    category    from    other    stakeholders .    Continue    until    all    of    the    important    facts    are    in    a    category .    Finally ,    find    an    insight    for    each    of    the    defined    categories . 

 Application : 

 The    steps    that    we    followed    were : 

 1 . Assemble    the    risks    and    controls    into    a    visual    display    within    a    defined    location .    This    will    include    multiple    representations    of    the    data    including    individual    risks    and    controls    as    well    as    reports    and    metrics    from    the    collective    data . 

 2 . Allow    some    Risk    Team    members    and    other    experts    review    the    data    and    look    for    the    “ good    stuff ” .    This    would    happen    at    their    own    pace    over    an    afternoon . 

 3 . Have    each    Risk    Team    Member    categorize    the    important    risk    information ,    into    categories . 

 4 . Let    the    Risk    Team    Members    form    small    groups    ( 4 - 5    people )    and    have    one    share    a    category ,    with    other    Risk    Team    members    adding    facts    to    this    category . 

 5 . For   each    of    the    categories ,    find    the    true    insight    for    the    category . 

 6 . Allow    the    insights    to    inform    the    organization    of    the    macro    risks    that    exist    for    the    company . 

 Insight    &    Approach : 

 After    the    completion    of    this    exercise ,    there    were    two    competing    directions    that    jumped    out    of    the    set - up    of    this    exercise .    The    first    was    the    process    of    figuring    out    how    to    set - up    the    gallery    of    information ,    we    tried    to    resist    organizing    the    information    into    a    story    as    we    did    not    want    to    lead    the    Risk    Team    into    some    predefined    categorization .    In    the    end ,    we    organized    the    information    by    department    with    some    of    the    summary    information    near    the    end    of    the    display .    What    happened    was    that    there    was    so    much    information    that    the    stakeholders    felt    overwhelmed    with    the    volume    of    data    that    they    needed    to    look    at .    Watching    the    people    flow    through    the    room    the    departments    that    had    their    information    near    the    beginning    of    the    display    ended    up    with    more    information    being    collected    by    the    stakeholders .    I    think    that    as    they    got    to    the    end    of    the    display ,    some    of    the    information    that    was    not    really    seen    by    the    stakeholders    as    they    suffered    from    information    overload . 

 After    the    completion    of    this    exercise ,    it   was    clear    that    we    needed    an    additional    step    to    take    some    time    and    apply    some    additional    summarization    of    the    data    as    the    volume    of    presented    data    was    an    unintended    barrier .    As    previously    noted ,    there    is    a    risk    of    introducing    bias ,    but    it   was    clear    that    having    too    much    unprocessed    information    leads    to    another    bias    which    was    ignoring    the    data    at    the    end    of    the    display .    In    addition ,    because    of    the    large    volume    of    information ,    we    could    have    helped    to    solve    this    problem    by    having    the    stakeholders    enter    at    different    points    so    that    the    information    could    be    semi - randomized . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Challenge : 

 The    Risk    Team    designed    a    process    that    assists    managers    of    every    line    of    business    to    think    about    and    input    information    about    risks    and    related    controls    into    a    standardized    system .    This    system    allows    the    managers    to    input    all    of    the    required    qualitative    and    quantitative    information    into    the    system    in    one    process .    This    interface    also    allows    the    auditors    and    senior    management    to    view    the    risks    of    the    various    business    units    and    the    company    in    a    more    effective    and    uniform    manner .    What    is    not    included    in    this    is    a    process    to    group    the    risks    and    controls    to    allow    a    better    understanding    of    the    larger    picture    and    how    that    could    affect    the    company    overall .    Some    of    these    macro - risks    could    be    a    collection    of    the    same    risk    that    was    identified    multiple    times    or    some    themes    that    are    not    easily    connected . 

 Selection : 

 I    decided    that    Mind    Mapping    would    be    a    great    tool    to    help    direct    the    team    toward    a    solution .    The    reason    that    I    thought    to    use    this    tool    now    is    there    are    multiple    experts    that    look    at    the    collective    data    and    draw    different    conclusions .    In    general ,    these    conclusions    are    more    driven    by    the    biases    that    the    user    brings    to    the    table    and    less    on    the    given    data .    To    quote    Marianne    Moore    from   the    training    materials    “ Mind    mapping    is    looking    for    patterns    and    insights    in    a    large    quantity    of    data    you    collected    during    your    exploration    of    what    is    the    current    reality .    The    goal    is    to    establish    criteria    for    the    what - if    idea    generation    phase . ” 

 The    mind    mapping    process    can    be    summarized    in    the    following    steps .    First ,    gather    all    of    the    facts    and    information    that    you    have    into    a    defined    location .    This    could    take    some    refinement    to    get    the    information    into    a    displayable    format .    Second ,    have    your    stakeholder    review    this    physical    representation    of    the    facts    and    have    each    of    the    stakeholders    find    the    parts    that    they    think    are    important .    Third ,    gather    the    stakeholders    into    small    groups    and    allow    the    stakeholders    a    few    minutes    to    define    some    categories    of    the    data .    Fourth ,    have    one    of    the    stakeholders    share    one    of    the    categories    and    see    if   there    are    other    facts    that    have    been    found    that    can    be    included    in    the    category    from    other    stakeholders .    Continue    until    all    of    the    important    facts    are    in    a    category .    Finally ,    find    an    insight    for    each    of    the    defined    categories . 

 Application : 

 The    steps    that    we    followed    were : 

 1 . Assemble    the    risks    and    controls    into    a    visual    display    within    a    defined    location .    This    will    include    multiple    representations    of    the    data    including    individual    risks    and    controls    as    well    as    reports    and    metrics    from    the    collective    data . 

 2 . Allow    some    Risk    Team    members    and    other    experts    review    the    data    and    look    for    the    “ good    stuff ” .    This    would    happen    at    their    own    pace    over    an    afternoon . 

 3 . Have    each    Risk    Team    Member    categorize    the    important    risk    information ,    into    categories . 

 4 . Let    the    Risk    Team    Members    form    small    groups    ( 4 - 5    people )    and    have    one    share    a    category ,    with    other    Risk    Team    members    adding    facts    to    this    category . 

 5 . For   each    of    the    categories ,    find    the    true    insight    for    the    category . 

 6 . Allow    the    insights    to    inform    the    organization    of    the    macro    risks    that    exist    for    the    company . 

 Insight    &    Approach : 

 After    the    completion    of    this    exercise ,    there    were    two    competing    directions    that    jumped    out    of    the    set - up    of    this    exercise .    The    first    was    the    process    of    figuring    out    how    to    set - up    the    gallery    of    information ,    we    tried    to    resist    organizing    the    information    into    a    story    as    we    did    not    want    to    lead    the    Risk    Team    into    some    predefined    categorization .    In    the    end ,    we    organized    the    information    by    department    with    some    of    the    summary    information    near    the    end    of    the    display .    What    happened    was    that    there    was    so    much    information    that    the    stakeholders    felt    overwhelmed    with    the    volume    of    data    that    they    needed    to    look    at .    Watching    the    people    flow    through    the    room    the    departments    that    had    their    information    near    the    beginning    of    the    display    ended    up    with    more    information    being    collected    by    the    stakeholders .    I    think    that    as    they    got    to    the    end    of    the    display ,    some    of    the    information    that    was    not    really    seen    by    the    stakeholders    as    they    suffered    from    information    overload . 

 After    the    completion    of    this    exercise ,    it   was    clear    that    we    needed    an    additional    step    to    take    some    time    and    apply    some    additional    summarization    of    the    data    as    the    volume    of    presented    data    was    an    unintended    barrier .    As    previously    noted ,    there    is    a    risk    of    introducing    bias ,    but    it   was    clear    that    having    too    much    unprocessed    information    leads    to    another    bias    which    was    ignoring    the    data    at    the    end    of    the    display .    In    addition ,    because    of    the    large    volume    of    information ,    we    could    have    helped    to    solve    this    problem    by    having    the    stakeholders    enter    at    different    points    so    that    the    information    could    be    semi - randomized .
### Output: 