Mind mapping on unmet healthcare needs . 

 Challenge : 

 I am leading the research and development team of my organization . The organization is looking   forward for an innovative solutions that caters unmet needs of patients . The product development   cycle is a very long process and involves substantial investment . Hence , it is of prime importance   that we understand the real pain points of the patients and then develop a product or service to   cater those unmet needs . The scope of the project included 10 members from sales , who work   closely with patients and understand and provide the most important feedback ,   10 team members   for R&D that work on prototype development and 5 member from strategy team to evaluate the   commercial aspects of the product . Ideation process has to be completed with 30 calendar days . 

 Selection : 

 Based on the previous experience , we were sure about the enormous amount of idea and data will   be generated during the process . Hence , we selected the mind mapping technique to rearrange he   data and look for patterns and insights in huge amount of data which was collected during the mind   mapping stage . Later , we applied the design criteria i.e. , putting conditions around our possible   design solutions to fulfill the unmet needs of the patients . In exploration of what is the current   reality . The goal is to establish criteria for the what - if idea generation phase . Which comes next . This   phase is pivotal in the design thinking process . Finally we completed the design thinking process by   selecting the possible solutions to our design challenge . 

 Application : 

 We conducted the mind mapping exercise , in following round with a clear objective for each round . 

 1 ) Round 1 : During initiation of round 1 all 25 team members were asked to list down about 

 the various pain point that a patient experience while undergoing a therapy . It was also   recommended that the pain points , specific to a particular type of disease or therapy should   be specified . 

 2 ) Round 2 : All data points were classified based on the type of disease and therapy . When we 

 looked at the data there were few data points which were very specific to a specific type of   therapy , many were common to more than 1 therapy and there were few which were   common to all listed therapy . This rearrangement of data provides lots of insight to the   collected data points . Top 5 therapies were selected for the next round . 

 3 ) Round 3 :   In round 3 , 5 teams were made and one therapy from top 5 selected , were 

 assigned to each team . Each team was asked to list down the top 5 pain point for respective   therapy and provide the probable solution that can cater the unmet needs . The solutions   were again rearranged to look into how these solutions are able to address the wide variety   pain points . 

 4 ) Design Thinking / Design Criteria . Data from all 5 teams were collected to understand the 

 top solutions that can cater the most painful points and number of pain points . 

 Insights : 

 The most exciting part of this journey was to see the insights coming from the observation made by   the team members . During design thinking process , the data from all 5 teams were to understand   the top solutions that can cater the most painful points and number of pain points . This provided a   great insight to the data points . The top solutions were very much different from what we were   anticipating in the beginning . The outliers were also discussed . 

 Approach : 

 The great insight drawn from the data was most exciting part of this journey . We could actually   picked up cost effective , simple solutions covering majority of the unmet needs covering variety of   therapy . This strategic outcome of single solution for multiple therapy also made a good business   case for approval from management . We will be running this learning launch and are planning to   implement this technique for various other programs . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Mind mapping on unmet healthcare needs . 

 Challenge : 

 I am leading the research and development team of my organization . The organization is looking   forward for an innovative solutions that caters unmet needs of patients . The product development   cycle is a very long process and involves substantial investment . Hence , it is of prime importance   that we understand the real pain points of the patients and then develop a product or service to   cater those unmet needs . The scope of the project included 10 members from sales , who work   closely with patients and understand and provide the most important feedback ,   10 team members   for R&D that work on prototype development and 5 member from strategy team to evaluate the   commercial aspects of the product . Ideation process has to be completed with 30 calendar days . 

 Selection : 

 Based on the previous experience , we were sure about the enormous amount of idea and data will   be generated during the process . Hence , we selected the mind mapping technique to rearrange he   data and look for patterns and insights in huge amount of data which was collected during the mind   mapping stage . Later , we applied the design criteria i.e. , putting conditions around our possible   design solutions to fulfill the unmet needs of the patients . In exploration of what is the current   reality . The goal is to establish criteria for the what - if idea generation phase . Which comes next . This   phase is pivotal in the design thinking process . Finally we completed the design thinking process by   selecting the possible solutions to our design challenge . 

 Application : 

 We conducted the mind mapping exercise , in following round with a clear objective for each round . 

 1 ) Round 1 : During initiation of round 1 all 25 team members were asked to list down about 

 the various pain point that a patient experience while undergoing a therapy . It was also   recommended that the pain points , specific to a particular type of disease or therapy should   be specified . 

 2 ) Round 2 : All data points were classified based on the type of disease and therapy . When we 

 looked at the data there were few data points which were very specific to a specific type of   therapy , many were common to more than 1 therapy and there were few which were   common to all listed therapy . This rearrangement of data provides lots of insight to the   collected data points . Top 5 therapies were selected for the next round . 

 3 ) Round 3 :   In round 3 , 5 teams were made and one therapy from top 5 selected , were 

 assigned to each team . Each team was asked to list down the top 5 pain point for respective   therapy and provide the probable solution that can cater the unmet needs . The solutions   were again rearranged to look into how these solutions are able to address the wide variety   pain points . 

 4 ) Design Thinking / Design Criteria . Data from all 5 teams were collected to understand the 

 top solutions that can cater the most painful points and number of pain points . 

 Insights : 

 The most exciting part of this journey was to see the insights coming from the observation made by   the team members . During design thinking process , the data from all 5 teams were to understand   the top solutions that can cater the most painful points and number of pain points . This provided a   great insight to the data points . The top solutions were very much different from what we were   anticipating in the beginning . The outliers were also discussed . 

 Approach : 

 The great insight drawn from the data was most exciting part of this journey . We could actually   picked up cost effective , simple solutions covering majority of the unmet needs covering variety of   therapy . This strategic outcome of single solution for multiple therapy also made a good business   case for approval from management . We will be running this learning launch and are planning to   implement this technique for various other programs .
### Output: 