Challenge 

 A startups accelerator is Looking for Problems for their startups to solve . They started by trying to ensure different leaders in a certain field are aligned on the core problems facing this field , and asked me to facilitate this process . These leaders represent different stakeholders , never met before and sometimes have competing interests . A document is needed to ensure top challenges of this field are listed , agreed upon , to put it in design thinking terms : figuring out “ the what is ” . In 90 mins Session . Having alignment on these problems will help in the process of finding solutions , by the accelerator in progress . 

 Tool Selection & Application 

 Since the leaders never met before I tried to use a simple thing that does n’t require many steps , given the short time available . I also picked two systems thinking tools ( stakeholders mapping & crucial factors mapping ) at the same time , to be able to capture the depth of the wicked problems available . 

 ● Mind mapping(for main field stakeholders and their main challenges ) was chosen as a tool to facilitate discussion among the leaders in the session . 

 ● We started by drawing a circle , putting the name of the field players / stakeholders and their main concerns . 

 ● We then renamed the concerns and clustered those who are close or maybe the same . 

 ● Then started making relationships of each concern with other concerns in the circle drawn . 

 ● To formulate this circle a set of questions were asked to the leaders present , so as to help them reflect and discuss any findings . 

 ● We put their findings in the form of aspirations for the future to mitigate the concerns they jotted down . 

 ● We got 4 main wishes 

 Insight , Approach & Next Steps 

 My main intake is the time taken to this needed to be increased by 30 mins . I believe the mapping tools and insights gathering were convenient , because mapping helped the conversations be concrete , specific and quick to be out . Which is different from letting people only talk / discuss and go in circles with their speech with no output . I believe that using a polling tool / votes during the first circle was missing . It was left to the facilitator to perceive the voting which I believe will jeopardise the accuracy of the final report . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Challenge 

 A startups accelerator is Looking for Problems for their startups to solve . They started by trying to ensure different leaders in a certain field are aligned on the core problems facing this field , and asked me to facilitate this process . These leaders represent different stakeholders , never met before and sometimes have competing interests . A document is needed to ensure top challenges of this field are listed , agreed upon , to put it in design thinking terms : figuring out “ the what is ” . In 90 mins Session . Having alignment on these problems will help in the process of finding solutions , by the accelerator in progress . 

 Tool Selection & Application 

 Since the leaders never met before I tried to use a simple thing that does n’t require many steps , given the short time available . I also picked two systems thinking tools ( stakeholders mapping & crucial factors mapping ) at the same time , to be able to capture the depth of the wicked problems available . 

 ● Mind mapping(for main field stakeholders and their main challenges ) was chosen as a tool to facilitate discussion among the leaders in the session . 

 ● We started by drawing a circle , putting the name of the field players / stakeholders and their main concerns . 

 ● We then renamed the concerns and clustered those who are close or maybe the same . 

 ● Then started making relationships of each concern with other concerns in the circle drawn . 

 ● To formulate this circle a set of questions were asked to the leaders present , so as to help them reflect and discuss any findings . 

 ● We put their findings in the form of aspirations for the future to mitigate the concerns they jotted down . 

 ● We got 4 main wishes 

 Insight , Approach & Next Steps 

 My main intake is the time taken to this needed to be increased by 30 mins . I believe the mapping tools and insights gathering were convenient , because mapping helped the conversations be concrete , specific and quick to be out . Which is different from letting people only talk / discuss and go in circles with their speech with no output . I believe that using a polling tool / votes during the first circle was missing . It was left to the facilitator to perceive the voting which I believe will jeopardise the accuracy of the final report .
### Output: 