Challenge and Selection : 

 The technique I used was a method to visualize or visualize a problem . A broader community of   people could consider a problem space before seeking to find and describe potential solutions to the   problem . I also use this approach for our clients , government departments trying to update their   tasks , and offer their services to Our residents , enterprises , and non - citizens and implement   technical advancements . In the process of identifying the distance , bounds , primary elements , and   connections among elements to consider in the identification of pain points and opportunities for   improvements or solutions , I used the technique of using a straw - man diagram of a problem field   with a collection of questions or prompts for discussion . 

 Application : 

 I begin the process by making a problem domain man 's graphic . I would draw on some existing   content to grasp the atmosphere to create the illustration of the individual . Operating or procedural   records , instructional manuals , publicity materials , or other audit reports may be part of established   materials . I perform informal interviews with 1 - 3 of the stakeholders , who serve as my crucial   touchpoint on the project if the materials are not given . 

 If the condition is relevant , I will take the definition from previous studies to the ' front / back point . '   The front / back step strategy strengthens the idea that each service – including an internal business –   is linked to consumers and the internal processes that require the industry to deliver the services .   The structure that I always begin with includes a partner and chain supplier column on the left and a   column on the right to define monitoring organizations , such as Congress , trade unions , activist   groups , and other associations that may hinder how the organization performs . The stubble graph of   Visio or the Internet is convenient to use with basic types and icons . Suppose the   foreground / background view does not work . In that case , I generate another picture , either based   on high - level process flow for the multiple stakeholders with swimming lanes or in a different style . 

 The members will be split into 4 participants , each representing another organization or sector of   concern . Each party gets a copy of the straw man illustrations in poster form , in which they can   personally write , or sticky notes . I am placing 3 questions , such as 1 ) What main elements do the   graph lack ? 2 . What are you trying to change the graph to represent your problem area more   accurately ? 3 ) What are your primary perspectives on the ties between the organizations in your   issue area ? I send them about 30 minutes to address issues and to mark the picture . Then , in   response to all three questions , I will have a paper from each party pointing out the poster 's   markings . When a group reports , I document commonalities in each group 's observations ,   accompanied by other perspectives from the group discussions in an alternate copy of the graph .   After the debate , I digitalize each party 's posters as an item , create a view that incorporates shared   and fresh perspectives from the community debate , and then create an updated graph that includes   their suggestions and suggestions for improvements that they accepted as a party . 

 Insight and Approach : 

 What I 've learned from the work with multiple groups is that while it is essential to improve the   understanding of the problem they are trying to solve , shared perspectives and mutual learning is   the most crucial part of the work , particularly the revisions in the graph that integrate their input .   The realistic gives a different gathering of partners a point of convergence for a conversation that   permits them to share their viewpoints and form experiences into potential main drivers of their   issues . While they could make the realistic from a clear record in a communitarian way , beginning   with a misrepresentation kicks off the discussion . They can rapidly distinguish where they are in the   practical – or if they are missing – and can more rapidly increase new experiences about connections   between essential substances instead of setting aside some effort to recognize them . They can   acknowledge factors likewise in the problematic space . It makes a difference to distinguish what   they do not have the foggiest idea ; in what territories they have to get data or information to give   the qualities to the factors . 

 Since I found that mutual perspectives and learning were the most essential element , the next time ,   I used visualization as a point of departure for a series of insightful design practices . With its   collective input , the updated image may then be a reference guide for the rest of the work . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Challenge and Selection : 

 The technique I used was a method to visualize or visualize a problem . A broader community of   people could consider a problem space before seeking to find and describe potential solutions to the   problem . I also use this approach for our clients , government departments trying to update their   tasks , and offer their services to Our residents , enterprises , and non - citizens and implement   technical advancements . In the process of identifying the distance , bounds , primary elements , and   connections among elements to consider in the identification of pain points and opportunities for   improvements or solutions , I used the technique of using a straw - man diagram of a problem field   with a collection of questions or prompts for discussion . 

 Application : 

 I begin the process by making a problem domain man 's graphic . I would draw on some existing   content to grasp the atmosphere to create the illustration of the individual . Operating or procedural   records , instructional manuals , publicity materials , or other audit reports may be part of established   materials . I perform informal interviews with 1 - 3 of the stakeholders , who serve as my crucial   touchpoint on the project if the materials are not given . 

 If the condition is relevant , I will take the definition from previous studies to the ' front / back point . '   The front / back step strategy strengthens the idea that each service – including an internal business –   is linked to consumers and the internal processes that require the industry to deliver the services .   The structure that I always begin with includes a partner and chain supplier column on the left and a   column on the right to define monitoring organizations , such as Congress , trade unions , activist   groups , and other associations that may hinder how the organization performs . The stubble graph of   Visio or the Internet is convenient to use with basic types and icons . Suppose the   foreground / background view does not work . In that case , I generate another picture , either based   on high - level process flow for the multiple stakeholders with swimming lanes or in a different style . 

 The members will be split into 4 participants , each representing another organization or sector of   concern . Each party gets a copy of the straw man illustrations in poster form , in which they can   personally write , or sticky notes . I am placing 3 questions , such as 1 ) What main elements do the   graph lack ? 2 . What are you trying to change the graph to represent your problem area more   accurately ? 3 ) What are your primary perspectives on the ties between the organizations in your   issue area ? I send them about 30 minutes to address issues and to mark the picture . Then , in   response to all three questions , I will have a paper from each party pointing out the poster 's   markings . When a group reports , I document commonalities in each group 's observations ,   accompanied by other perspectives from the group discussions in an alternate copy of the graph .   After the debate , I digitalize each party 's posters as an item , create a view that incorporates shared   and fresh perspectives from the community debate , and then create an updated graph that includes   their suggestions and suggestions for improvements that they accepted as a party . 

 Insight and Approach : 

 What I 've learned from the work with multiple groups is that while it is essential to improve the   understanding of the problem they are trying to solve , shared perspectives and mutual learning is   the most crucial part of the work , particularly the revisions in the graph that integrate their input .   The realistic gives a different gathering of partners a point of convergence for a conversation that   permits them to share their viewpoints and form experiences into potential main drivers of their   issues . While they could make the realistic from a clear record in a communitarian way , beginning   with a misrepresentation kicks off the discussion . They can rapidly distinguish where they are in the   practical – or if they are missing – and can more rapidly increase new experiences about connections   between essential substances instead of setting aside some effort to recognize them . They can   acknowledge factors likewise in the problematic space . It makes a difference to distinguish what   they do not have the foggiest idea ; in what territories they have to get data or information to give   the qualities to the factors . 

 Since I found that mutual perspectives and learning were the most essential element , the next time ,   I used visualization as a point of departure for a series of insightful design practices . With its   collective input , the updated image may then be a reference guide for the rest of the work .
### Output: 