Example Reflection – Visualization Challenge & Selection The first tool I used was the tool of   Visualization , or Visual Thinking , to achieve a shared understanding of a problem space among   a diverse group of stakeholders before attempting to identify and define possible solutions to the   problem . I use this approach often with our customers , who are government agencies working   to apply technology innovations to modernize their mission or the delivery of their services to   their customer , which may be U.S. citizens , businesses , and non - citizens . I have used the   technique of using a straw man visualization of a problem domain with a set of questions or   prompts for discussion to allow a diverse group of stakeholders to learn from each other in the   process of defining the scope , boundaries , key elements , and relationships between elements   to consider when identifying pain points and opportunities for improvements or solutions .   Application I start the process by creating a straw man graphic of the problem domain . To   develop the straw man graphic , I will draw from any existing material available to understand the   environment . The existing material may be operational or procedural documents , training   materials , marketing materials , GAO or other auditing reports . If materials are not available , then   I conduct informal interviews with one - three of the stakeholders who serve as my main points of   contact on the initiative . If appropriate to the situation , I will borrow the concept to   “ front - stage / back - stage ” from previous research , and discussed in David Gray ’s book , “ The   Connected Company ” . The front - stage / back - stage approach helps to reinforce the notion that   every service – even an internal service – has customers with whom the service provider   interacts and internal processes that enable the organization to provide the service . The   template I often start with also has a column on the left to identify Partners and Value Chain   Providers and a column on the right to identify Oversight Organizations , such as Congress ,   GAO , labor unions , advocacy groups , and other entities that may add constraints to how the   organization operates . The straw man graphic is simple , using simple shapes and icons   available in Visio or on the Internet . If the front - stage / back - stage view does n’t work , then I will   create a different type of visual , either based on a high - level process flow with swim lanes for   different stakeholders , or another format . For the activity , I will divide the stakeholders into   groups of 5 - 6 participants each representing a different organization or area of interest . Each   group receives a poster - size copy of the straw man graphic that they can write on directly , or   use sticky notes to make comments . I give them two - three questions to answer , such as : 1 )   What key elements are missing from the graphic ? 2 ) What would you change about the graphic   to make it more accurately reflect your problem space ? 3 ) What key insights do you have about   the relationships between the entities in your problem space ? I give them approximately 20   minutes to discuss the questions and mark up the graphic . Then I have each group report out   on their answers to those three questions while pointing to the mark - ups on their poster . As   each group reports out , I record commonalities in the insights of each group , and then additional   insights that come from the group discussion on an additional copy of the graphic . After the   session , I digitize each group ’s poster as an artifact , create a view that combines the shared   and new insights from the group discussion , and then create a revised graphic that incorporates   their feedback and proposed changes that they agreed to as a group . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Example Reflection – Visualization Challenge & Selection The first tool I used was the tool of   Visualization , or Visual Thinking , to achieve a shared understanding of a problem space among   a diverse group of stakeholders before attempting to identify and define possible solutions to the   problem . I use this approach often with our customers , who are government agencies working   to apply technology innovations to modernize their mission or the delivery of their services to   their customer , which may be U.S. citizens , businesses , and non - citizens . I have used the   technique of using a straw man visualization of a problem domain with a set of questions or   prompts for discussion to allow a diverse group of stakeholders to learn from each other in the   process of defining the scope , boundaries , key elements , and relationships between elements   to consider when identifying pain points and opportunities for improvements or solutions .   Application I start the process by creating a straw man graphic of the problem domain . To   develop the straw man graphic , I will draw from any existing material available to understand the   environment . The existing material may be operational or procedural documents , training   materials , marketing materials , GAO or other auditing reports . If materials are not available , then   I conduct informal interviews with one - three of the stakeholders who serve as my main points of   contact on the initiative . If appropriate to the situation , I will borrow the concept to   “ front - stage / back - stage ” from previous research , and discussed in David Gray ’s book , “ The   Connected Company ” . The front - stage / back - stage approach helps to reinforce the notion that   every service – even an internal service – has customers with whom the service provider   interacts and internal processes that enable the organization to provide the service . The   template I often start with also has a column on the left to identify Partners and Value Chain   Providers and a column on the right to identify Oversight Organizations , such as Congress ,   GAO , labor unions , advocacy groups , and other entities that may add constraints to how the   organization operates . The straw man graphic is simple , using simple shapes and icons   available in Visio or on the Internet . If the front - stage / back - stage view does n’t work , then I will   create a different type of visual , either based on a high - level process flow with swim lanes for   different stakeholders , or another format . For the activity , I will divide the stakeholders into   groups of 5 - 6 participants each representing a different organization or area of interest . Each   group receives a poster - size copy of the straw man graphic that they can write on directly , or   use sticky notes to make comments . I give them two - three questions to answer , such as : 1 )   What key elements are missing from the graphic ? 2 ) What would you change about the graphic   to make it more accurately reflect your problem space ? 3 ) What key insights do you have about   the relationships between the entities in your problem space ? I give them approximately 20   minutes to discuss the questions and mark up the graphic . Then I have each group report out   on their answers to those three questions while pointing to the mark - ups on their poster . As   each group reports out , I record commonalities in the insights of each group , and then additional   insights that come from the group discussion on an additional copy of the graphic . After the   session , I digitize each group ’s poster as an artifact , create a view that combines the shared   and new insights from the group discussion , and then create a revised graphic that incorporates   their feedback and proposed changes that they agreed to as a group .
### Output: 