Design Thinking application . 

 Challenge and Selection . 

 Within the growth plans in the company where I work , the principal idea for this year is   that employees who want to present an idea that can help someone or even   themselves , develop it through the methodology of Design Thinking . Although there is   no limitation of ideas and there maybe to many , the main objective is to contribute to   the paradigm shift of the company and together make it grow . 

 For this we met with my coworkers and we thought about what process we could   improve in our daily tasks and after a lot of discussion we said : “ Let ’s use the Mind   Mapping Tool ” to solve our “ great problem ” , development a validation Tool for internal   use . One tool that let us certificate the correct performance of our products and this   validation must be done in a few minutes . 

 Application : 

 To start , we generated some questions about our daily tasks and most of all these   questions were answered immediately and almost did not allow generating a new idea   to solve or at least start in the development of the idea . So we decided to forget about   our role and we selected the most experienced person to act as a kind of client . The   rest of the team began by unlocking the problem that our client presented to us : THERE   ARE NO TOOLS TO VALIDATE . 

 Basically on a board and with the help of some post - it , we start writing verbs about   tools , validation , because they do not exist , time . Then we group these verbs and from   here the generation of questions that we would ask the most experienced person   began . 

 After conducting the interview , we realized that if there are validation tools , but they   take too much time and within each test that must be done there is a different tool , so   we concluded that it would be good to have a tool that be done all validation in a single   process . 

 Insight & Approach 

 All the time we are " designing " things , from the route that we are going to take in the   morning to our work , the lunch that we are going to take , the follow - up strategy to carry   out my tasks , but rarely we sit down to analyze if things tools that we use on a day - to- day basis are like this because they are objectively designed or if they have an object   of study that determines at the time that it was the best implementation to work well . 

 It is to create the type of thought that promotes the design of thought , where we can   realize that it is enough for me or if on the contrary things can be improved or on the   contrary generate new tools or alternatives from the use case . Consider that this is the   biggest gain that this leather leaves me , the analysis if any situation , tool , maritime   situation of my work or daily life , can improve through the renewal of the environment . 

 On the other hand , consider that in an upcoming analysis situation , you would try to   analyze the problem as an external agent . Although in this exercise we knew the tools   and their operation and what we want us to improve , I think it would be better if the   " problems " were approached from the outside in order to analyze everything from a   more exponential point of view and not be carried out for the knowledge you have . ( try   to get out of the known situation ) . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Design Thinking application . 

 Challenge and Selection . 

 Within the growth plans in the company where I work , the principal idea for this year is   that employees who want to present an idea that can help someone or even   themselves , develop it through the methodology of Design Thinking . Although there is   no limitation of ideas and there maybe to many , the main objective is to contribute to   the paradigm shift of the company and together make it grow . 

 For this we met with my coworkers and we thought about what process we could   improve in our daily tasks and after a lot of discussion we said : “ Let ’s use the Mind   Mapping Tool ” to solve our “ great problem ” , development a validation Tool for internal   use . One tool that let us certificate the correct performance of our products and this   validation must be done in a few minutes . 

 Application : 

 To start , we generated some questions about our daily tasks and most of all these   questions were answered immediately and almost did not allow generating a new idea   to solve or at least start in the development of the idea . So we decided to forget about   our role and we selected the most experienced person to act as a kind of client . The   rest of the team began by unlocking the problem that our client presented to us : THERE   ARE NO TOOLS TO VALIDATE . 

 Basically on a board and with the help of some post - it , we start writing verbs about   tools , validation , because they do not exist , time . Then we group these verbs and from   here the generation of questions that we would ask the most experienced person   began . 

 After conducting the interview , we realized that if there are validation tools , but they   take too much time and within each test that must be done there is a different tool , so   we concluded that it would be good to have a tool that be done all validation in a single   process . 

 Insight & Approach 

 All the time we are " designing " things , from the route that we are going to take in the   morning to our work , the lunch that we are going to take , the follow - up strategy to carry   out my tasks , but rarely we sit down to analyze if things tools that we use on a day - to- day basis are like this because they are objectively designed or if they have an object   of study that determines at the time that it was the best implementation to work well . 

 It is to create the type of thought that promotes the design of thought , where we can   realize that it is enough for me or if on the contrary things can be improved or on the   contrary generate new tools or alternatives from the use case . Consider that this is the   biggest gain that this leather leaves me , the analysis if any situation , tool , maritime   situation of my work or daily life , can improve through the renewal of the environment . 

 On the other hand , consider that in an upcoming analysis situation , you would try to   analyze the problem as an external agent . Although in this exercise we knew the tools   and their operation and what we want us to improve , I think it would be better if the   " problems " were approached from the outside in order to analyze everything from a   more exponential point of view and not be carried out for the knowledge you have . ( try   to get out of the known situation ) .
### Output: 