Learning Launch   Challenge    I am a member of my organization ’s Regulatory affairs department and my / our challenge is to   improve the product submission ( activities and projects ) to US marker and in order to increase   approvals without any major deficiencies . The project scope includes interacting with all cross   function teams , FDA communication related to products changes . The generic products   verified as per guidance for Sterile pharmaceutical or biological medicinal products , GMP   regulations , Regulatory requirement of pharmaceutical products , Health care regulatory   affairs , Clinical safety data management , Clinical investigation of medical devices .     Selection    Our team has to make a regulatory strategy for individual products , so we are ready to try the   learning launch tool . Broadly speaking , the learning launch is an experiment meant to quickly   test an idea and prototype .     Application    For our first learning launch , we focused on the structure / execution of our online marketing   tasks . In particular , we wanted to see if we could structure our tasks , projects , and processes to   adapt the methods of Scrum project management for our work ( e.g. , time boxed , daily , specific   meetings , reviews , etc . ) in an effort to become more agile . This tested our assumption that the   structure and execution were the main causes of our workflow challenge . Our team went   through a two - day training with a Scrum project management coach . Next , we went through   five workshops to structure our tasks and processes in a more agile way . These two sessions   occurred within in a three - week timeframe . We expected to produce a document with a clear   description of our new , more agile processes / workflow .      For our second learning launch , we focused on gaining clarity about our tasks and priorities .   This tested our assumption that our prioritization of tasks was the main cause of our workflow   challenge . Our team completed an anonymous survey . Additionally , five key stakeholders from   the larger marketing department and IT department also completed an anonymous survey . The   surveys included questions about our new , proposed process , understanding the process and   the prioritization of tasks , and feelings about the change , and were conducted within a one- week timeframe .      Insight    By applying the learning launch tool , our team identified our assumptions and designed   launches to test these assumptions . Additionally , we thought through anticipated results ,   expecting to find that a more agile approach would improve our workflow , and that both our   team and the key stakeholders would be fairly open to the new prioritization of tasks and   process . Our actual results were slightly different from what we anticipated : while our team   was open to the prioritization of tasks and process , the key stakeholders in the larger marketing   department and IT department expressed some concerns . Moving forward , our team will   review this insight and incorporate it into future launch designs . The ongoing incorporation of   insight is particularly important at this stage , as launches come before a full rollout in the design   thinking timeline .      Approach      Our regulatory affairs team covers a broad range of specific skills and occupations . Under the   best of circumstances , it is composed of a group of people who act as a liaison between the   potentially conflicting worlds of government , industry , and consumers to help make sure that 

 marketed products are safe and effective when used as advertised . People who work in   regulatory affairs negotiate the interaction between the regulators ( the government ) , the   regulated ( industry ) , and the market ( consumers ) to get good products to the market and to   keep them there while preventing bad products from being sold .     On the consumer side , people in regulatory affairs help keep the other two groups honest , and   they provide the stimulus for Congress to enact the laws that regulate how government and   industry treat products . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Learning Launch   Challenge    I am a member of my organization ’s Regulatory affairs department and my / our challenge is to   improve the product submission ( activities and projects ) to US marker and in order to increase   approvals without any major deficiencies . The project scope includes interacting with all cross   function teams , FDA communication related to products changes . The generic products   verified as per guidance for Sterile pharmaceutical or biological medicinal products , GMP   regulations , Regulatory requirement of pharmaceutical products , Health care regulatory   affairs , Clinical safety data management , Clinical investigation of medical devices .     Selection    Our team has to make a regulatory strategy for individual products , so we are ready to try the   learning launch tool . Broadly speaking , the learning launch is an experiment meant to quickly   test an idea and prototype .     Application    For our first learning launch , we focused on the structure / execution of our online marketing   tasks . In particular , we wanted to see if we could structure our tasks , projects , and processes to   adapt the methods of Scrum project management for our work ( e.g. , time boxed , daily , specific   meetings , reviews , etc . ) in an effort to become more agile . This tested our assumption that the   structure and execution were the main causes of our workflow challenge . Our team went   through a two - day training with a Scrum project management coach . Next , we went through   five workshops to structure our tasks and processes in a more agile way . These two sessions   occurred within in a three - week timeframe . We expected to produce a document with a clear   description of our new , more agile processes / workflow .      For our second learning launch , we focused on gaining clarity about our tasks and priorities .   This tested our assumption that our prioritization of tasks was the main cause of our workflow   challenge . Our team completed an anonymous survey . Additionally , five key stakeholders from   the larger marketing department and IT department also completed an anonymous survey . The   surveys included questions about our new , proposed process , understanding the process and   the prioritization of tasks , and feelings about the change , and were conducted within a one- week timeframe .      Insight    By applying the learning launch tool , our team identified our assumptions and designed   launches to test these assumptions . Additionally , we thought through anticipated results ,   expecting to find that a more agile approach would improve our workflow , and that both our   team and the key stakeholders would be fairly open to the new prioritization of tasks and   process . Our actual results were slightly different from what we anticipated : while our team   was open to the prioritization of tasks and process , the key stakeholders in the larger marketing   department and IT department expressed some concerns . Moving forward , our team will   review this insight and incorporate it into future launch designs . The ongoing incorporation of   insight is particularly important at this stage , as launches come before a full rollout in the design   thinking timeline .      Approach      Our regulatory affairs team covers a broad range of specific skills and occupations . Under the   best of circumstances , it is composed of a group of people who act as a liaison between the   potentially conflicting worlds of government , industry , and consumers to help make sure that 

 marketed products are safe and effective when used as advertised . People who work in   regulatory affairs negotiate the interaction between the regulators ( the government ) , the   regulated ( industry ) , and the market ( consumers ) to get good products to the market and to   keep them there while preventing bad products from being sold .     On the consumer side , people in regulatory affairs help keep the other two groups honest , and   they provide the stimulus for Congress to enact the laws that regulate how government and   industry treat products .
### Output: 