Learning Platform Naming with a Mind Mapping Methodology     Challenge   Naming for an internal system that will reach an entire employee population inside of a global   Fortune 100 organization . Our challenge was to generate a unique name for a ubiquitous   learning platform to more effectively build equity into an overarching narrative established by   senior leaders of our client .     Selection   Many design thinking methods were employed , with mind - mapping being one of the more   successful tools to quickly generate naming ideas as pertaining to key messages . Mind mapping   was selected due to the rapid allowance of divergent and convergent thinking . Additionally , this   tool provides an evolutionary view of our thoughts and ideas .     Application   Before mind mapping would begin , key messages were distilled from stakeholder and audience   interviews across a broad range of subject matter experts . These key messages formed the base   direction and guiding light of our mind mapping exercise and allowed free thinking to gravitate   around a singular concept . The divergent , rapid - fire brainstorming in the first session provided   the team with plentifully concepts to wade through and distill . Surprisingly , our conversations   had the team starting to redefine certain aspects of established key messages , which were   captured for a future mapping session . At the conclusion of this initial mapping , ideas were   collected , concentrated , and codified further to allow new central figures to emerge .      During our convergent sessions , energy began to form around two naming concepts that   further reframed the once - established narrative handed down to the team . We had   successfully brought new benefits and messages to light , which in turn would strengthen the   value proposition of the platform and equity in the eventual name . A third mind mapping   meeting would then pull together solidified ideas for consideration .     Insight   Insights gained form leveraging this tool were many . Most surprisingly to the team was that we   were able to redefine the established narrative passed to us by senior leaders . With our   thought mapped out in the topographical visualization , these leaders were able to “ check our   thinking ” and build consensus on emerging patterns first unthought of in the narrative .      Selfishly , this method was selected to bring together our team in a way not often leveraged .   The result of our approach provided members of our team , who were mostly not rooted in this   way of divergent / convergent thinking , a new appreciation for a process of rapid idea   generation and selection . The ability to observe the legacy of thinking , developing , removing ,   rethinking , and moving forward with “ winners ” is now an oft - mentioned tool in our box .     Approach 

 Future approaches will benefit from us augmenting our time spent on certain phases of   mapping . Feedback gained from our internal lessons - learned meeting was that divergent time   spent vastly outweighed codifying and sometimes felt aimless . A more structured “ timebox ” for   each phase will be attempted in further mind mapping exercises to perhaps concentrate our   collective thinking . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Learning Platform Naming with a Mind Mapping Methodology     Challenge   Naming for an internal system that will reach an entire employee population inside of a global   Fortune 100 organization . Our challenge was to generate a unique name for a ubiquitous   learning platform to more effectively build equity into an overarching narrative established by   senior leaders of our client .     Selection   Many design thinking methods were employed , with mind - mapping being one of the more   successful tools to quickly generate naming ideas as pertaining to key messages . Mind mapping   was selected due to the rapid allowance of divergent and convergent thinking . Additionally , this   tool provides an evolutionary view of our thoughts and ideas .     Application   Before mind mapping would begin , key messages were distilled from stakeholder and audience   interviews across a broad range of subject matter experts . These key messages formed the base   direction and guiding light of our mind mapping exercise and allowed free thinking to gravitate   around a singular concept . The divergent , rapid - fire brainstorming in the first session provided   the team with plentifully concepts to wade through and distill . Surprisingly , our conversations   had the team starting to redefine certain aspects of established key messages , which were   captured for a future mapping session . At the conclusion of this initial mapping , ideas were   collected , concentrated , and codified further to allow new central figures to emerge .      During our convergent sessions , energy began to form around two naming concepts that   further reframed the once - established narrative handed down to the team . We had   successfully brought new benefits and messages to light , which in turn would strengthen the   value proposition of the platform and equity in the eventual name . A third mind mapping   meeting would then pull together solidified ideas for consideration .     Insight   Insights gained form leveraging this tool were many . Most surprisingly to the team was that we   were able to redefine the established narrative passed to us by senior leaders . With our   thought mapped out in the topographical visualization , these leaders were able to “ check our   thinking ” and build consensus on emerging patterns first unthought of in the narrative .      Selfishly , this method was selected to bring together our team in a way not often leveraged .   The result of our approach provided members of our team , who were mostly not rooted in this   way of divergent / convergent thinking , a new appreciation for a process of rapid idea   generation and selection . The ability to observe the legacy of thinking , developing , removing ,   rethinking , and moving forward with “ winners ” is now an oft - mentioned tool in our box .     Approach 

 Future approaches will benefit from us augmenting our time spent on certain phases of   mapping . Feedback gained from our internal lessons - learned meeting was that divergent time   spent vastly outweighed codifying and sometimes felt aimless . A more structured “ timebox ” for   each phase will be attempted in further mind mapping exercises to perhaps concentrate our   collective thinking .
### Output: 