Reflection – Learning launch     Challenge     Recently in my working life I had the opportunity to be part of a construction company   in which decision - making became a slow process , with many unproductive discussions ,   low generation of new ideas and a lot of scattered information that did not generate   solutions to the problem related to low sales and consequently a significant decrease   in income generation . The challenge is being an external person to that company ,   advising the CEO in the generation of ideas and conducting rapid tests that can   contribute to increasing customers and sales .     Selection     The tool selected for this challenge is the learning launch , based on the video in   chapter 4 where Toni Roth explains in an illustrative way how is the process to generate   ideas and validate them through quick and cheap tests that allow accepting or   rejecting the hypotheses formulated , taking into account the conformation of varied   groups of people to broaden the vision and produce more insights to refine the   analysis .     Application     The way I would apply the learning launch tool would be to gather information on the   current state of sales in the company , reviewing the marketing information obtained   and interviewing the leaders of the different areas to obtain their vision of the   situation . Based on this input , you would formulate a hypothesis about what the   customer needs right now . That hypothesis is : people a year and a half after the   pandemic are looking for more comfortable spaces to live where they can better   combine work and family life , which should offer housing with a better distribution of   spaces , therefore that the marketing message should be oriented to comfort , rather   than location or other aspects that were more important before the pandemic .     Insight     The perception obtained with the application of the learning launch tool is that   through a better compilation of information , at a deeper level , both with the leaders of   the company and with potential buyers , it allows to generate more hypotheses . in   accordance with the reality of the client and that in turn the design of experiments and   the validation of ideas is based on the reality of input information and not on the   simple perception that it has the risk of directing efforts in the wrong way .     Approach     What I would do differently the next time I come across a similar situation would be   not to fall into the dynamic of participating in endless and unproductive debates just   because it is the traditional way of discussing issues in companies , but rather because 

 of on the contrary , to inspire design thinking in the work team , demonstrating with   quick and measurable actions , the results that can be obtained . In other words , leading   from the conviction , of the advantages that the change of mentality has , to contribute   to a decision - making based on data , but that contributes to increase collective   creativity and achieve better results . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Reflection – Learning launch     Challenge     Recently in my working life I had the opportunity to be part of a construction company   in which decision - making became a slow process , with many unproductive discussions ,   low generation of new ideas and a lot of scattered information that did not generate   solutions to the problem related to low sales and consequently a significant decrease   in income generation . The challenge is being an external person to that company ,   advising the CEO in the generation of ideas and conducting rapid tests that can   contribute to increasing customers and sales .     Selection     The tool selected for this challenge is the learning launch , based on the video in   chapter 4 where Toni Roth explains in an illustrative way how is the process to generate   ideas and validate them through quick and cheap tests that allow accepting or   rejecting the hypotheses formulated , taking into account the conformation of varied   groups of people to broaden the vision and produce more insights to refine the   analysis .     Application     The way I would apply the learning launch tool would be to gather information on the   current state of sales in the company , reviewing the marketing information obtained   and interviewing the leaders of the different areas to obtain their vision of the   situation . Based on this input , you would formulate a hypothesis about what the   customer needs right now . That hypothesis is : people a year and a half after the   pandemic are looking for more comfortable spaces to live where they can better   combine work and family life , which should offer housing with a better distribution of   spaces , therefore that the marketing message should be oriented to comfort , rather   than location or other aspects that were more important before the pandemic .     Insight     The perception obtained with the application of the learning launch tool is that   through a better compilation of information , at a deeper level , both with the leaders of   the company and with potential buyers , it allows to generate more hypotheses . in   accordance with the reality of the client and that in turn the design of experiments and   the validation of ideas is based on the reality of input information and not on the   simple perception that it has the risk of directing efforts in the wrong way .     Approach     What I would do differently the next time I come across a similar situation would be   not to fall into the dynamic of participating in endless and unproductive debates just   because it is the traditional way of discussing issues in companies , but rather because 

 of on the contrary , to inspire design thinking in the work team , demonstrating with   quick and measurable actions , the results that can be obtained . In other words , leading   from the conviction , of the advantages that the change of mentality has , to contribute   to a decision - making based on data , but that contributes to increase collective   creativity and achieve better results .
### Output: 