Example Reflection – Learning Launch 

 Challenge    I am a member of my organization ’s online marketing department and my / our challenge is to improve the workflow ( activities and projects )   within the department in order to increase sales in the online channel and to spend marketing budgets on the right campaigns . The project   scope includes the online marketing department composed of ten employees , as well as the larger marketing department and IT   department , with whom we work closely . The project is limited to internal resources ( i.e. , budget and employee time ) . The project should   not exceed 30 business days and the solution should include an even distribution of working hours amongst the team members . We will   focus on trying to uncover what our team members , as well as key stakeholders within the larger marketing department and IT department ,   consider to be ineffective or problematic with regard to the workflow .      Selection    Our team has already gone through several design thinking activities / tools , so we are ready to try the learning launch tool . Broadly speaking ,   the learning launch is an experiment meant to quickly test an idea and prototype .      Application    For our first learning launch , we focused on the structure / execution of our online marketing tasks . In particular , we wanted to see if we   could structure our tasks , projects , and processes to adapt the methods of Scrum project management for our work ( e.g. , time boxed ,   daily , specific meetings , reviews , etc . ) in an effort to become more agile . This tested our assumption that the structure and execution were   the main causes of our workflow challenge . Our team went through a two - day training with a Scrum project management coach . Next , we   went through five workshops to structure our tasks and processes in a more agile way . These two sessions occurred within in a three- week timeframe . We expected to produce a document with a clear description of our new , more agile processes / workflow .    For our second learning launch , we focused on gaining clarity about our tasks and priorities . This tested our assumption that our   prioritization of tasks was the main cause of our workflow challenge . Our team completed an anonymous survey . Additionally , five key   stakeholders from the larger marketing department and IT department also completed an anonymous survey . The surveys included   questions about our new , proposed process , understanding the process and the prioritization of tasks , and feelings about the change , and   were conducted within a one - week timeframe .      Insight    By applying the learning launch tool , our team identified our assumptions and designed launches to test these assumptions . Additionally ,   we thought through anticipated results , expecting to find that a more agile approach would improve our workflow , and that both our team   and the key stakeholders would be fairly open to the new prioritization of tasks and process . Our actual results were slightly different from   what we anticipated : while our team was open to the prioritization of tasks and process , the key stakeholders in the larger marketing   department and IT department expressed some concerns . Moving forward , our team will review this insight and incorporate it into future   launch designs . The ongoing incorporation of insight is particularly important at this stage , as launches come before a full rollout in the   design thinking timeline .      Approach    Given that our team has already gone through several design thinking activities / tools and are at this stage in the timeline , the learning   launch is the appropriate tool . As previously mentioned , our team needs to review the insight gained from our first two launches and   incorporate this insight into future launch designs . Future launch designs should reflect insight gained , progress made , and come closer   to a compelling solution ready for full rollout . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Example Reflection – Learning Launch 

 Challenge    I am a member of my organization ’s online marketing department and my / our challenge is to improve the workflow ( activities and projects )   within the department in order to increase sales in the online channel and to spend marketing budgets on the right campaigns . The project   scope includes the online marketing department composed of ten employees , as well as the larger marketing department and IT   department , with whom we work closely . The project is limited to internal resources ( i.e. , budget and employee time ) . The project should   not exceed 30 business days and the solution should include an even distribution of working hours amongst the team members . We will   focus on trying to uncover what our team members , as well as key stakeholders within the larger marketing department and IT department ,   consider to be ineffective or problematic with regard to the workflow .      Selection    Our team has already gone through several design thinking activities / tools , so we are ready to try the learning launch tool . Broadly speaking ,   the learning launch is an experiment meant to quickly test an idea and prototype .      Application    For our first learning launch , we focused on the structure / execution of our online marketing tasks . In particular , we wanted to see if we   could structure our tasks , projects , and processes to adapt the methods of Scrum project management for our work ( e.g. , time boxed ,   daily , specific meetings , reviews , etc . ) in an effort to become more agile . This tested our assumption that the structure and execution were   the main causes of our workflow challenge . Our team went through a two - day training with a Scrum project management coach . Next , we   went through five workshops to structure our tasks and processes in a more agile way . These two sessions occurred within in a three- week timeframe . We expected to produce a document with a clear description of our new , more agile processes / workflow .    For our second learning launch , we focused on gaining clarity about our tasks and priorities . This tested our assumption that our   prioritization of tasks was the main cause of our workflow challenge . Our team completed an anonymous survey . Additionally , five key   stakeholders from the larger marketing department and IT department also completed an anonymous survey . The surveys included   questions about our new , proposed process , understanding the process and the prioritization of tasks , and feelings about the change , and   were conducted within a one - week timeframe .      Insight    By applying the learning launch tool , our team identified our assumptions and designed launches to test these assumptions . Additionally ,   we thought through anticipated results , expecting to find that a more agile approach would improve our workflow , and that both our team   and the key stakeholders would be fairly open to the new prioritization of tasks and process . Our actual results were slightly different from   what we anticipated : while our team was open to the prioritization of tasks and process , the key stakeholders in the larger marketing   department and IT department expressed some concerns . Moving forward , our team will review this insight and incorporate it into future   launch designs . The ongoing incorporation of insight is particularly important at this stage , as launches come before a full rollout in the   design thinking timeline .      Approach    Given that our team has already gone through several design thinking activities / tools and are at this stage in the timeline , the learning   launch is the appropriate tool . As previously mentioned , our team needs to review the insight gained from our first two launches and   incorporate this insight into future launch designs . Future launch designs should reflect insight gained , progress made , and come closer   to a compelling solution ready for full rollout .
### Output: 