Reflection – Visualization 

 Challenge & Selection 

 The principal apparatus I utilized was the device of Visualization , or Visual Thinking , to accomplish a   mutual comprehension of an issue space among a different gathering of partners before   endeavoring to distinguish and characterize conceivable answers for the issue . I utilize this approach   regularly with our clients , who are government organizations attempting to apply innovation   advancements to modernize their central goal or the conveyance of their administrations to their   client , which might be U.S. subjects , organizations , and non - residents . I have utilized the system of   utilizing a straw man perception of an issue space with an arrangement of inquiries or prompts for   exchange to enable a different gathering of partners to gain from each other during the time spent   characterizing the extension , limits , key components , and connections between components to   consider while recognizing torment focuses and open doors for changes or arrangements .   Application I begin the procedure by making a straw man realistic of the issue area . To build up the   straw man realistic , I will draw from any current material accessible to comprehend the earth . The   current material might be operational or procedural records , preparing materials , showcasing   materials , GAO or other reviewing reports . In the event that materials are not accessible , at that   point I direct casual meetings with one - three of the partners who fill in as my primary purposes of   contact on the activity . 

 Application 

 I begin the procedure by making a straw man realistic of the issue area . To build up the straw man   realistic , I will draw from any current material accessible to comprehend nature . The current   material might be operational or procedural archives , preparing materials , promoting materials ,   GAO or other examining reports . In the event that materials are not accessible , at that point I direct   casual meetings with one - three of the partners who fill in as my fundamental purposes of contact on   the activity . 

 On the off chance that proper to the circumstance , I will acquire the idea to " front - organize / back- arrange " from past research , and talked about in David Gray 's book , " The Connected Company " . The   front - arrange / back - arrange approach fortifies the thought that each administration – even an inner   administration – has clients with whom the specialist co - op interfaces and inside procedures that   empower the association to give the administration . The layout I regularly begin with additionally   has a segment on the left to distinguish Partners and Value Chain Providers and a section on the   privilege to recognize Oversight Organizations , for example , Congress , GAO , worker 's organizations ,   backing gatherings , and different elements that may add imperatives to how the association works .   The straw man realistic is straightforward , utilizing basic shapes and symbols accessible in Visio or on   the Internet . In the event that the front - arrange / back - organize see does n't work , at that point I will   make an alternate sort of visual , either in view of an abnormal state process stream with swim paths   for various partners , or another configuration . For the action , I will isolate the partners into   gatherings of 5 - 6 members each speaking to an alternate association or territory of intrigue . Each 

 gathering gets a notice estimate duplicate of the straw man realistic that they can compose on   straightforwardly , or utilize sticky notes to make remarks . I give them two - three inquiries to reply ,   for example , 1 ) What key components are absent from the realistic ? 2 ) What might you change   about the realistic to make it all the more precisely mirror your concern space ? 3 ) What key   experiences do you have about the connections between the elements in your concern space ? I give   them roughly 20 minutes to talk about the inquiries and increase the realistic . At that point I have   each gathering report out on their responses to those three inquiries while indicating the check ups   on their publication . As each gathering reports out , I record shared characteristics in the experiences   of each gathering , and after that extra bits of knowledge that originate from the gathering exchange   on an extra duplicate of the realistic . After the session , I digitize each gathering 's publication as a   curio , make a view that consolidates the mutual and new bits of knowledge from the gathering   exchange , and afterward make an updated realistic that joins their criticism and proposed changes   that they consented to as a gathering . 

 Insight & Approach 

 What I have gained from directing this activity with a few gatherings is that while the realistic –   particularly the amended realistic that joins their criticism – is imperative for fortifying their   comprehension of the issue they are attempting to comprehend , the more important part of the   movement is the common bits of knowledge and shared discovering that happens while they are   attempting to characterize their concern space . The realistic gives the various gathering of partners a   point of convergence for exchange that enables them to share their viewpoints and form bits of   knowledge into potential underlying drivers of their issues . While they could make the realistic from   a clear slate in a community oriented way , beginning with a straw man kicks off the discussion for   them . They can rapidly distinguish where they are in the realistic – or in the event that they are   missing – and would more be able to rapidly increase new experiences about connections between   key substances as opposed to setting aside opportunity to recognize them . They can likewise   recognize factors in the issue space – that is , it causes them to distinguish what they do n't have the   foggiest idea , in what territories they have to acquire data or information to give the qualities to the   factors . Since I found that the most profitable viewpoint is the common experiences and learning ,   next time I would utilize the perception action as a beginning stage for a progression of   configuration thinking exercises . At that point the reconsidered realistic that joins their consolidated   criticism can fill in as a kind of perspective instrument all through the rest of their work . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Reflection – Visualization 

 Challenge & Selection 

 The principal apparatus I utilized was the device of Visualization , or Visual Thinking , to accomplish a   mutual comprehension of an issue space among a different gathering of partners before   endeavoring to distinguish and characterize conceivable answers for the issue . I utilize this approach   regularly with our clients , who are government organizations attempting to apply innovation   advancements to modernize their central goal or the conveyance of their administrations to their   client , which might be U.S. subjects , organizations , and non - residents . I have utilized the system of   utilizing a straw man perception of an issue space with an arrangement of inquiries or prompts for   exchange to enable a different gathering of partners to gain from each other during the time spent   characterizing the extension , limits , key components , and connections between components to   consider while recognizing torment focuses and open doors for changes or arrangements .   Application I begin the procedure by making a straw man realistic of the issue area . To build up the   straw man realistic , I will draw from any current material accessible to comprehend the earth . The   current material might be operational or procedural records , preparing materials , showcasing   materials , GAO or other reviewing reports . In the event that materials are not accessible , at that   point I direct casual meetings with one - three of the partners who fill in as my primary purposes of   contact on the activity . 

 Application 

 I begin the procedure by making a straw man realistic of the issue area . To build up the straw man   realistic , I will draw from any current material accessible to comprehend nature . The current   material might be operational or procedural archives , preparing materials , promoting materials ,   GAO or other examining reports . In the event that materials are not accessible , at that point I direct   casual meetings with one - three of the partners who fill in as my fundamental purposes of contact on   the activity . 

 On the off chance that proper to the circumstance , I will acquire the idea to " front - organize / back- arrange " from past research , and talked about in David Gray 's book , " The Connected Company " . The   front - arrange / back - arrange approach fortifies the thought that each administration – even an inner   administration – has clients with whom the specialist co - op interfaces and inside procedures that   empower the association to give the administration . The layout I regularly begin with additionally   has a segment on the left to distinguish Partners and Value Chain Providers and a section on the   privilege to recognize Oversight Organizations , for example , Congress , GAO , worker 's organizations ,   backing gatherings , and different elements that may add imperatives to how the association works .   The straw man realistic is straightforward , utilizing basic shapes and symbols accessible in Visio or on   the Internet . In the event that the front - arrange / back - organize see does n't work , at that point I will   make an alternate sort of visual , either in view of an abnormal state process stream with swim paths   for various partners , or another configuration . For the action , I will isolate the partners into   gatherings of 5 - 6 members each speaking to an alternate association or territory of intrigue . Each 

 gathering gets a notice estimate duplicate of the straw man realistic that they can compose on   straightforwardly , or utilize sticky notes to make remarks . I give them two - three inquiries to reply ,   for example , 1 ) What key components are absent from the realistic ? 2 ) What might you change   about the realistic to make it all the more precisely mirror your concern space ? 3 ) What key   experiences do you have about the connections between the elements in your concern space ? I give   them roughly 20 minutes to talk about the inquiries and increase the realistic . At that point I have   each gathering report out on their responses to those three inquiries while indicating the check ups   on their publication . As each gathering reports out , I record shared characteristics in the experiences   of each gathering , and after that extra bits of knowledge that originate from the gathering exchange   on an extra duplicate of the realistic . After the session , I digitize each gathering 's publication as a   curio , make a view that consolidates the mutual and new bits of knowledge from the gathering   exchange , and afterward make an updated realistic that joins their criticism and proposed changes   that they consented to as a gathering . 

 Insight & Approach 

 What I have gained from directing this activity with a few gatherings is that while the realistic –   particularly the amended realistic that joins their criticism – is imperative for fortifying their   comprehension of the issue they are attempting to comprehend , the more important part of the   movement is the common bits of knowledge and shared discovering that happens while they are   attempting to characterize their concern space . The realistic gives the various gathering of partners a   point of convergence for exchange that enables them to share their viewpoints and form bits of   knowledge into potential underlying drivers of their issues . While they could make the realistic from   a clear slate in a community oriented way , beginning with a straw man kicks off the discussion for   them . They can rapidly distinguish where they are in the realistic – or in the event that they are   missing – and would more be able to rapidly increase new experiences about connections between   key substances as opposed to setting aside opportunity to recognize them . They can likewise   recognize factors in the issue space – that is , it causes them to distinguish what they do n't have the   foggiest idea , in what territories they have to acquire data or information to give the qualities to the   factors . Since I found that the most profitable viewpoint is the common experiences and learning ,   next time I would utilize the perception action as a beginning stage for a progression of   configuration thinking exercises . At that point the reconsidered realistic that joins their consolidated   criticism can fill in as a kind of perspective instrument all through the rest of their work .
### Output: 