Mind Map : How to ﬁll an exhibition with life ? 

 Starting position 

 I work in a university . In the last few years she has decided to go public with her topics and   research results and not only to communicate them to the scientiﬁc community . The background   is the idea that there are urgent problems in the world that can only be solved if everyone works   together . To do so , however , one must move from knowledge to understanding and action . So   how do you communicate complex interrelationships and scientiﬁc ﬁndings in such a way that   they are well understood ?    The university has or is developing various formats of communication and teaching for this   purpose , which explicitly address not only students , but also society as a whole . One format is an   exhibition . The exhibition is ready , but because of Corona all museums have to remain closed .   This means that the ﬁnished exhibition , which no one has seen before , will not be presented and   will be empty for at least the next three months . So what to do with this closed exhibition , ready   to start ? But there is another aspect to the problem : some at the university think that the university should   rather concentrate on its core tasks like teaching students and research than on such activities   like public exhibitions . 

 Challenge 

 One of the challenges is already to ﬁnd the right questions and to recognize the actual problem .   The obvious question is : How do we make the most of the time when the exhibition is closed ?    But there are other questions that arise , namely : what would be a good use , and for whom ?   Which stakeholders actually have what needs ? And how do we best meet them ? 

 I have chosen Mind Mapping as my approach . 

 First , questions concerning the diﬀerent needs and interested of the diﬀerent stakeholders were   collected with the team in a brainstorming session . They were then hung on the wall .    There were already guests from three stakeholder groups : the university scientists , the students   and what we imagined to be typical museum - goers .     Then we began to cluster the questions . On a trelloboard , everyone could think about how they   would sort the questions into a pattern , which was then hung on the wall . 

 The next step was to consider who the stakeholders actually are . This was collected as a group .   From this , 7 persona were made , which were then provided with a picture . Then it was assigned   which questions concern which stakeholders . At the same time a periodization was made , The team split up , tasks were distributed . In groups of two , two representatives of each persona   were asked about the issues that aﬀected them . A few days later the results were compiled and   evaluated . Goals and criteria of success were speciﬁed . Together they then brainstormed on small formats that would be tried out in the coming months   as Prototype . 

 Insight 

 I found it interesting that the group aspect became much more important than the actual ideas .   No completely spectacular results came out of this , nothing that I probably would n't have found in   any other way . However , through the involvement of many people and the team , something else   was achieved , which subsequently turned out to be much more important : Everybody was eagerly   involved in the project , supported it unconditionally and there was no criticism or envious looks ,   because everybody felt somehow responsible . Even those who were later not involved in the   implementation . 

 Approach 

 Next time I would also try the use of Design Thinking Prototypes and on a smaller scale . The very   ﬁrst time I tried to choose such a large project involving so many people , it quickly became much   more complex than expected and also led to some resentment . 

 Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator ( free version ) 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Mind Map : How to ﬁll an exhibition with life ? 

 Starting position 

 I work in a university . In the last few years she has decided to go public with her topics and   research results and not only to communicate them to the scientiﬁc community . The background   is the idea that there are urgent problems in the world that can only be solved if everyone works   together . To do so , however , one must move from knowledge to understanding and action . So   how do you communicate complex interrelationships and scientiﬁc ﬁndings in such a way that   they are well understood ?    The university has or is developing various formats of communication and teaching for this   purpose , which explicitly address not only students , but also society as a whole . One format is an   exhibition . The exhibition is ready , but because of Corona all museums have to remain closed .   This means that the ﬁnished exhibition , which no one has seen before , will not be presented and   will be empty for at least the next three months . So what to do with this closed exhibition , ready   to start ? But there is another aspect to the problem : some at the university think that the university should   rather concentrate on its core tasks like teaching students and research than on such activities   like public exhibitions . 

 Challenge 

 One of the challenges is already to ﬁnd the right questions and to recognize the actual problem .   The obvious question is : How do we make the most of the time when the exhibition is closed ?    But there are other questions that arise , namely : what would be a good use , and for whom ?   Which stakeholders actually have what needs ? And how do we best meet them ? 

 I have chosen Mind Mapping as my approach . 

 First , questions concerning the diﬀerent needs and interested of the diﬀerent stakeholders were   collected with the team in a brainstorming session . They were then hung on the wall .    There were already guests from three stakeholder groups : the university scientists , the students   and what we imagined to be typical museum - goers .     Then we began to cluster the questions . On a trelloboard , everyone could think about how they   would sort the questions into a pattern , which was then hung on the wall . 

 The next step was to consider who the stakeholders actually are . This was collected as a group .   From this , 7 persona were made , which were then provided with a picture . Then it was assigned   which questions concern which stakeholders . At the same time a periodization was made , The team split up , tasks were distributed . In groups of two , two representatives of each persona   were asked about the issues that aﬀected them . A few days later the results were compiled and   evaluated . Goals and criteria of success were speciﬁed . Together they then brainstormed on small formats that would be tried out in the coming months   as Prototype . 

 Insight 

 I found it interesting that the group aspect became much more important than the actual ideas .   No completely spectacular results came out of this , nothing that I probably would n't have found in   any other way . However , through the involvement of many people and the team , something else   was achieved , which subsequently turned out to be much more important : Everybody was eagerly   involved in the project , supported it unconditionally and there was no criticism or envious looks ,   because everybody felt somehow responsible . Even those who were later not involved in the   implementation . 

 Approach 

 Next time I would also try the use of Design Thinking Prototypes and on a smaller scale . The very   ﬁrst time I tried to choose such a large project involving so many people , it quickly became much   more complex than expected and also led to some resentment . 

 Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator ( free version )
### Output: 