A note on analytic rubrics : If you decide you feel more comfortable grading with an analytic rubric , you 

 can assign a point value to each concept . The drawback to this method is that it can sometimes unfairly 

 penalize a student who has a good understanding of the problem but makes a lot of minor errors . Also , one 

 must assign a point - value to every type of error made by your students , and the variety of mistakes can be 

 staggering . Because the analytic method tends to have many more parts , the method can take quite a bit 

 more time to apply . In the end , your analytic rubric should give results that agree with the common - sense 

 assessment of how well the student understood the problem . This sense is well captured by the holistic 

 method . 

 An introductory - level , large - lecture course is a difficult setting for managing a student research assignment . 

 With the assistance of an instructional support team that included a GSI teaching consultant and a UC 

 Berkeley librarian , sociology lecturer Mary Kelsey developed the following assignment : 

 Write a seven- to eight - page essay in which you make an argument about the relationship between social 

 factors and educational opportunity . To complete the assignment , you will use electronic databases to gather 

 data on three different high schools ( including your own ) . You will use this data to locate each school within 

 the larger social structure and to support your argument about the relationship between social status and 

 public school quality . In your paper you should also reflect on how your own personal educational 

 opportunities have been influenced by the social factors you identify . Course readings and materials should 

 be used as background , to define sociological concepts and to place your argument within a broader 

 discussion of the relationship between social status and individual opportunity . Your paper should be clearly 

 organized , proofread for grammar and spelling , and all scholarly ideas must be cited using the ASA style 

 manual . 

 This was a lengthy and complex assignment worth a substantial portion of the course grade . Since the class 

 was very large , the instructor wanted to minimize the effort it would take her GSIs to grade the papers in a 

 manner consistent with the assignment ’s learning objectives . For these reasons Dr. Kelsey and the 

 instructional team gave a lot of forethought to crafting a detailed grading rubric . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: A note on analytic rubrics : If you decide you feel more comfortable grading with an analytic rubric , you 

 can assign a point value to each concept . The drawback to this method is that it can sometimes unfairly 

 penalize a student who has a good understanding of the problem but makes a lot of minor errors . Also , one 

 must assign a point - value to every type of error made by your students , and the variety of mistakes can be 

 staggering . Because the analytic method tends to have many more parts , the method can take quite a bit 

 more time to apply . In the end , your analytic rubric should give results that agree with the common - sense 

 assessment of how well the student understood the problem . This sense is well captured by the holistic 

 method . 

 An introductory - level , large - lecture course is a difficult setting for managing a student research assignment . 

 With the assistance of an instructional support team that included a GSI teaching consultant and a UC 

 Berkeley librarian , sociology lecturer Mary Kelsey developed the following assignment : 

 Write a seven- to eight - page essay in which you make an argument about the relationship between social 

 factors and educational opportunity . To complete the assignment , you will use electronic databases to gather 

 data on three different high schools ( including your own ) . You will use this data to locate each school within 

 the larger social structure and to support your argument about the relationship between social status and 

 public school quality . In your paper you should also reflect on how your own personal educational 

 opportunities have been influenced by the social factors you identify . Course readings and materials should 

 be used as background , to define sociological concepts and to place your argument within a broader 

 discussion of the relationship between social status and individual opportunity . Your paper should be clearly 

 organized , proofread for grammar and spelling , and all scholarly ideas must be cited using the ASA style 

 manual . 

 This was a lengthy and complex assignment worth a substantial portion of the course grade . Since the class 

 was very large , the instructor wanted to minimize the effort it would take her GSIs to grade the papers in a 

 manner consistent with the assignment ’s learning objectives . For these reasons Dr. Kelsey and the 

 instructional team gave a lot of forethought to crafting a detailed grading rubric .
### Output: 