THE LAWYER STUDENT COMPLICATIONS 

 I am Oscar Santos , a Lawyer Student in the Kenyon College and I have to use the online marketing department and 

 my / our challenge is to improve the workflow , within the group of my class in order to 

 increase sales in the online channel and to spend marketing budgets on the right 

 campaigns . The project scope includes the online marketing department composed of ten 

 employees , as well as the larger marketing department and IT department , with whom we 

 work closely . The project is limited to internal resources ( i.e. , budget and employee time ) . 

 The project should not excees business days and the solution should include an even 

 distribution of working hours amongst the team members . We will focus on trying to 

 uncover what our team members , as well as key stakeholders within the larger marketing 

 department and IT department , consider to be ineffective or problematic with regard to 

 the workflow . 

 When we Selection Our team has already gone through several design thinking 

 activities / tools , so we are ready to try the learning launch tool . Broadly speaking , the 

 learning launch is an experiment meant to quickly test an idea and prototype . Application 

 For our first learning launch , we focused on the structure / execution of our online 

 marketing tasks . In particular , we wanted to see if we could structure our tasks , projects , 

 and processes to adapt the methods of Scrum project management for our work ( e.g. , time 

 boxed , daily , specific meetings , reviews , etc . ) in an effort to become more agile . This 

 tested our assumption that the structure and execution were the main causes of our 

 workflow challenge . Our team went through a two - day training with a Scrum project 

 management coach . Next , we went through five workshops to structure our tasks and 

 processes in a more agile way . These two sessions occurred within in a three - week 

 timeframe . We expected to produce a document with a clear description of our new , more 

 agile processes / workflow . For our second learning launch , we focused on gaining clarity 

 about our tasks and priorities . 

 This tested our assumption that our prioritization of tasks was the main cause of 

 our workflow challenge and the principal carateristics of the law in Guatemala . Our team 

 completed an anonymous survey . Additionally , five key stakeholders from the larger 

 marketing department and IT department also completed an anonymous survey . The 

 surveys included questions about our new , proposed process , understanding the process 

 and the prioritization of tasks , and feelings about the change , and were conducted within 

 a one - week timeframe . Insight By applying the learning launch tool , our team identified 

 our assumptions and designed launches to test these assumptions . Additionally , we 

 thought through anticipated results , expecting to find that a more agile approach would 

 improve our workflow , and that both our team and the key stakeholders would be fairly 

 open to the new prioritization of tasks and process . Our actual results were slightly 

 different from what we anticipated : while our team was open to the prioritization of tasks 

 and process , the key stakeholders in the larger marketing department and IT department 

 expressed some concerns . Moving forward , our team will review this insight and 

 incorporate it into future launch designs . 

 The ongoing incorporation of insight and law , is particularly important at this 

 stage , as launches come before a full rollout in the design thinking timeline . Approach 

 Given that our team has already gone through several design thinking activities / tools and 

 are at this stage in the timeline , the learning launch is the appropriate tool . As previously 

 mentioned , our team needs to review the insight gained from our first two launches and 

 incorporate this insight into future launch designs . Future launch designs should reflect 

 insight gained , progress made , and come closer to a compelling solution ready for full 

 rollout . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: Oscar Santos
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: THE LAWYER STUDENT COMPLICATIONS 

 I am Oscar Santos , a Lawyer Student in the Kenyon College and I have to use the online marketing department and 

 my / our challenge is to improve the workflow , within the group of my class in order to 

 increase sales in the online channel and to spend marketing budgets on the right 

 campaigns . The project scope includes the online marketing department composed of ten 

 employees , as well as the larger marketing department and IT department , with whom we 

 work closely . The project is limited to internal resources ( i.e. , budget and employee time ) . 

 The project should not excees business days and the solution should include an even 

 distribution of working hours amongst the team members . We will focus on trying to 

 uncover what our team members , as well as key stakeholders within the larger marketing 

 department and IT department , consider to be ineffective or problematic with regard to 

 the workflow . 

 When we Selection Our team has already gone through several design thinking 

 activities / tools , so we are ready to try the learning launch tool . Broadly speaking , the 

 learning launch is an experiment meant to quickly test an idea and prototype . Application 

 For our first learning launch , we focused on the structure / execution of our online 

 marketing tasks . In particular , we wanted to see if we could structure our tasks , projects , 

 and processes to adapt the methods of Scrum project management for our work ( e.g. , time 

 boxed , daily , specific meetings , reviews , etc . ) in an effort to become more agile . This 

 tested our assumption that the structure and execution were the main causes of our 

 workflow challenge . Our team went through a two - day training with a Scrum project 

 management coach . Next , we went through five workshops to structure our tasks and 

 processes in a more agile way . These two sessions occurred within in a three - week 

 timeframe . We expected to produce a document with a clear description of our new , more 

 agile processes / workflow . For our second learning launch , we focused on gaining clarity 

 about our tasks and priorities . 

 This tested our assumption that our prioritization of tasks was the main cause of 

 our workflow challenge and the principal carateristics of the law in Guatemala . Our team 

 completed an anonymous survey . Additionally , five key stakeholders from the larger 

 marketing department and IT department also completed an anonymous survey . The 

 surveys included questions about our new , proposed process , understanding the process 

 and the prioritization of tasks , and feelings about the change , and were conducted within 

 a one - week timeframe . Insight By applying the learning launch tool , our team identified 

 our assumptions and designed launches to test these assumptions . Additionally , we 

 thought through anticipated results , expecting to find that a more agile approach would 

 improve our workflow , and that both our team and the key stakeholders would be fairly 

 open to the new prioritization of tasks and process . Our actual results were slightly 

 different from what we anticipated : while our team was open to the prioritization of tasks 

 and process , the key stakeholders in the larger marketing department and IT department 

 expressed some concerns . Moving forward , our team will review this insight and 

 incorporate it into future launch designs . 

 The ongoing incorporation of insight and law , is particularly important at this 

 stage , as launches come before a full rollout in the design thinking timeline . Approach 

 Given that our team has already gone through several design thinking activities / tools and 

 are at this stage in the timeline , the learning launch is the appropriate tool . As previously 

 mentioned , our team needs to review the insight gained from our first two launches and 

 incorporate this insight into future launch designs . Future launch designs should reflect 

 insight gained , progress made , and come closer to a compelling solution ready for full 

 rollout .
### Output: 