Reflection – Learning Launch 

 I work at my design department and my challenge is to improve the design projects in industrial   design within the department in order to increase sales for clints and to spend designs budgets   on the right campaigns . The project scope includes the design department composed of 11   employees , as well as the larger design department and engineer ’s department , with whom we   work closely . The project is limited to internal resources . The project should not exceed 30   business days and the solution should include an even distribution of working hours amongst   the team members . We will focus on trying to uncover what our team members , as well as key   stakeholders within the larger design department and engineer ’s department , consider to be   ineffective or problematic with regard to the workflow . Our team has already gone through   several design thinking tools , so we are ready to try the learning launch tool . Broadly speaking ,   the learning launch is an experiment meant to quickly test an idea and prototype . For our first   learning launch , we focused on the structure of our design tasks . In particular , we wanted to see   if we could structure our tasks , projects , and processes to adapt the methods of Scrum project   management for our work in an effort to become more agile . This tested our assumption that   the structure and execution were the main causes of our workflow challenge . Our team went   through a three - day training with a design project management coach . Next , we went through   five workshops to structure our tasks and processes in a more agile way . These two sessions   occurred within in a three - week timeframe . We expected to produce a document with a clear   description of our new , more agile processes / workflow . For our second learning launch , we   focused on gaining clarity about our tasks and priorities . This tested our assumption that our   prioritization of tasks was the main cause of our workflow challenge . Our team completed an   anonymous survey . Additionally , five key stakeholders from the larger design department and   engineer ’s department also completed an anonymous survey . The surveys included questions   about our new , proposed process , understanding the process and the prioritization of tasks , and   feelings about the change , and were conducted within a one - week timeframe . To sum up , By   applying the learning launch tool , our team identified our assumptions and designed launches to   test these assumptions . Additionally , we thought through anticipated results , expecting to find   that a more agile approach would improve our workflow , and that both our team and the key   stakeholders would be fairly open to the new prioritization of tasks and process . Our actual   results were slightly different from what we anticipated : while our team was open to the   prioritization of tasks and process , the key stakeholders in the larger design department and   engineers ’ department expressed some concerns . Moving forward , our team will review this   insight and incorporate it into future launch designs . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Reflection – Learning Launch 

 I work at my design department and my challenge is to improve the design projects in industrial   design within the department in order to increase sales for clints and to spend designs budgets   on the right campaigns . The project scope includes the design department composed of 11   employees , as well as the larger design department and engineer ’s department , with whom we   work closely . The project is limited to internal resources . The project should not exceed 30   business days and the solution should include an even distribution of working hours amongst   the team members . We will focus on trying to uncover what our team members , as well as key   stakeholders within the larger design department and engineer ’s department , consider to be   ineffective or problematic with regard to the workflow . Our team has already gone through   several design thinking tools , so we are ready to try the learning launch tool . Broadly speaking ,   the learning launch is an experiment meant to quickly test an idea and prototype . For our first   learning launch , we focused on the structure of our design tasks . In particular , we wanted to see   if we could structure our tasks , projects , and processes to adapt the methods of Scrum project   management for our work in an effort to become more agile . This tested our assumption that   the structure and execution were the main causes of our workflow challenge . Our team went   through a three - day training with a design project management coach . Next , we went through   five workshops to structure our tasks and processes in a more agile way . These two sessions   occurred within in a three - week timeframe . We expected to produce a document with a clear   description of our new , more agile processes / workflow . For our second learning launch , we   focused on gaining clarity about our tasks and priorities . This tested our assumption that our   prioritization of tasks was the main cause of our workflow challenge . Our team completed an   anonymous survey . Additionally , five key stakeholders from the larger design department and   engineer ’s department also completed an anonymous survey . The surveys included questions   about our new , proposed process , understanding the process and the prioritization of tasks , and   feelings about the change , and were conducted within a one - week timeframe . To sum up , By   applying the learning launch tool , our team identified our assumptions and designed launches to   test these assumptions . Additionally , we thought through anticipated results , expecting to find   that a more agile approach would improve our workflow , and that both our team and the key   stakeholders would be fairly open to the new prioritization of tasks and process . Our actual   results were slightly different from what we anticipated : while our team was open to the   prioritization of tasks and process , the key stakeholders in the larger design department and   engineers ’ department expressed some concerns . Moving forward , our team will review this   insight and incorporate it into future launch designs .
### Output: 