Reflection- Learning Launch 

 Challenge 

 I ’m technical consultant Coordinator for a security information consultancy company , the objective   of my project was to create a training program for new employees ( students ) . The main problems   that I faced were : 

 1 . Technology we managed is not public or studied by persons in the University   2 . Technical concepts are really complex , sometimes people forget what they learned .   3 . My goal was to reduce the learning path from 1 year to 6 months 

 Selection 

 I asked to all Consultants of Latin America ( around 10 people ) about the main issues they faced   during their learning paths . Through design thinking sessions I realized that : 

 1 . They forget technical concepts when they not associate to something real   2 . They forget technical concepts when they not practice them   3 . They just go to specific technical details just in case they faced problems 

 Application 

 After the insights I received from Latin America Consultants I built and applied the following learning   path : 

 1 . E - learning . This tool exists all the time and it ’s a good introduction for consultants . What I   change was the order and I group into 5 modules .   2 . Face to face presentation . One sr Consultant has to make a face to face session in which he   will make a short presentation of the topics that students studied from the e - learnings . At   this point Sr Consultants has to solve student ’s questions .   3 . Teaching material . All modules closed with a dynamic in which sr Consultants shows an   example of the real life that is an analogy of the material they studied .   4 . Check - point . It is like a tricky exam in which students with some issues presented that   students have to solve .   5 . Assessments . Once student has finished check - points they should be able to present the   topic to other team members . 

 Insight 

 By applying the learning launch tool , I identified that the points described in application were really   useful for students , however some of the checkpoints have to be improved , considering that some   topics were not covered , or maybe were understood not correctly by students . Some of the   assessments were useful to let students know their lack of knowledge and also the things they   adopted correctly . 

 Approach 

 After the program was applied I realized that first students took 8 months to complete the entire   program , then when I correct some presentations , checkpoints new students were able to end the   course in 6 months . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Reflection- Learning Launch 

 Challenge 

 I ’m technical consultant Coordinator for a security information consultancy company , the objective   of my project was to create a training program for new employees ( students ) . The main problems   that I faced were : 

 1 . Technology we managed is not public or studied by persons in the University   2 . Technical concepts are really complex , sometimes people forget what they learned .   3 . My goal was to reduce the learning path from 1 year to 6 months 

 Selection 

 I asked to all Consultants of Latin America ( around 10 people ) about the main issues they faced   during their learning paths . Through design thinking sessions I realized that : 

 1 . They forget technical concepts when they not associate to something real   2 . They forget technical concepts when they not practice them   3 . They just go to specific technical details just in case they faced problems 

 Application 

 After the insights I received from Latin America Consultants I built and applied the following learning   path : 

 1 . E - learning . This tool exists all the time and it ’s a good introduction for consultants . What I   change was the order and I group into 5 modules .   2 . Face to face presentation . One sr Consultant has to make a face to face session in which he   will make a short presentation of the topics that students studied from the e - learnings . At   this point Sr Consultants has to solve student ’s questions .   3 . Teaching material . All modules closed with a dynamic in which sr Consultants shows an   example of the real life that is an analogy of the material they studied .   4 . Check - point . It is like a tricky exam in which students with some issues presented that   students have to solve .   5 . Assessments . Once student has finished check - points they should be able to present the   topic to other team members . 

 Insight 

 By applying the learning launch tool , I identified that the points described in application were really   useful for students , however some of the checkpoints have to be improved , considering that some   topics were not covered , or maybe were understood not correctly by students . Some of the   assessments were useful to let students know their lack of knowledge and also the things they   adopted correctly . 

 Approach 

 After the program was applied I realized that first students took 8 months to complete the entire   program , then when I correct some presentations , checkpoints new students were able to end the   course in 6 months .
### Output: 