1 . Challenge 

 Facing many times during the brainstorming process a gap between the proposals and the actual   problem solving proposals , there was a need for a tool to brainstorm all the aspects of a particular   idea retaining all this info for future reference . A particular issue that we were looking to resolve was   the format of the restructure for an upcoming reform within the company . It was considered that the   mind gapping tool is a great match to solve this problem as combines the extended brainstorm along   with broaden audience . 

 2 . Selection 

 Mind mapping tool was selected as the most appropriate tool for brainstorming efficiently . This tool   incorporates the gathering of all good stuff from a set of people about a particular topic . The   selection of people is random , combining people from various backgrounds . Upon gathering the   good stuff , people are clustered by the selected good stuff . Then the teams should identify the   insights related to each cluster looking for among the clusters . Lastly should be translated all the   insights to design criteria . 

 It was considered that the mind gapping tool is a great match to solve this problem as combines the   extended brainstorm along with broaden audience . 

 3 . Application 

 The tool was applied by gathering up many stakeholders from different department and disciplines   both with and without organizational skills requesting some time to run a survey . Then was provided   the organizational chart requesting from them to point which do the believe are the most well- structured departments writing down every insight in yellow post . Then was provided a list of   historical data from company ’s organizational chart and other companies to take idea for further   discussion . Next step was to put all the posts in a whiteboard trying to cluster the related one without   discarding any of the posts . Upon cluster completion , we tried to move forward in creating   relationships between the clusters exporting combining knowledge . The last step was to conclude in   decision criteria that we took into consideration of applying the organizational reform . 

 The process had different findings that assisted the team for more deliberate thinking as we had   mentioned many aspects of the business that were not straight forward to everybody . A good part of   the application was that were highlighted parts of the organizational chart that worked perfectly and   there will be strong enforce in case changing but also the combination of different disciplines and   knowledge backgrounds made in sometimes a weird atmosphere . In the end , the outcome was   positive , were heard many justifications and discussions that were fruitful for the final decisions . 

 4 . Insight 

 The extracted insights gave us the opportunity to figure out which are the preferences of the   employees taking into consideration serious factors for their working scheme . From one point of view   we heard many different voices that lead us to better brainstorm , mentioning many non - possible 

 solutions that was quite good to be placed in the board and be opened discussed . From the other   point of view , the people with more extended organizational skillset were mixed with non- organization skillful being able to innovate providing realistic insights . 

 5 . Approach 

 I would try to make clear all the rules of the process in the first place , as there were moments people   who were insisted without giving the room to the rest for expressing their opinion . The role of   coordinator is quite important and should act as middleware between the participants . It was also   heard from some participants that there were best practices from other companies , that would be   useful to have a brief summary for final decision making . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: 1 . Challenge 

 Facing many times during the brainstorming process a gap between the proposals and the actual   problem solving proposals , there was a need for a tool to brainstorm all the aspects of a particular   idea retaining all this info for future reference . A particular issue that we were looking to resolve was   the format of the restructure for an upcoming reform within the company . It was considered that the   mind gapping tool is a great match to solve this problem as combines the extended brainstorm along   with broaden audience . 

 2 . Selection 

 Mind mapping tool was selected as the most appropriate tool for brainstorming efficiently . This tool   incorporates the gathering of all good stuff from a set of people about a particular topic . The   selection of people is random , combining people from various backgrounds . Upon gathering the   good stuff , people are clustered by the selected good stuff . Then the teams should identify the   insights related to each cluster looking for among the clusters . Lastly should be translated all the   insights to design criteria . 

 It was considered that the mind gapping tool is a great match to solve this problem as combines the   extended brainstorm along with broaden audience . 

 3 . Application 

 The tool was applied by gathering up many stakeholders from different department and disciplines   both with and without organizational skills requesting some time to run a survey . Then was provided   the organizational chart requesting from them to point which do the believe are the most well- structured departments writing down every insight in yellow post . Then was provided a list of   historical data from company ’s organizational chart and other companies to take idea for further   discussion . Next step was to put all the posts in a whiteboard trying to cluster the related one without   discarding any of the posts . Upon cluster completion , we tried to move forward in creating   relationships between the clusters exporting combining knowledge . The last step was to conclude in   decision criteria that we took into consideration of applying the organizational reform . 

 The process had different findings that assisted the team for more deliberate thinking as we had   mentioned many aspects of the business that were not straight forward to everybody . A good part of   the application was that were highlighted parts of the organizational chart that worked perfectly and   there will be strong enforce in case changing but also the combination of different disciplines and   knowledge backgrounds made in sometimes a weird atmosphere . In the end , the outcome was   positive , were heard many justifications and discussions that were fruitful for the final decisions . 

 4 . Insight 

 The extracted insights gave us the opportunity to figure out which are the preferences of the   employees taking into consideration serious factors for their working scheme . From one point of view   we heard many different voices that lead us to better brainstorm , mentioning many non - possible 

 solutions that was quite good to be placed in the board and be opened discussed . From the other   point of view , the people with more extended organizational skillset were mixed with non- organization skillful being able to innovate providing realistic insights . 

 5 . Approach 

 I would try to make clear all the rules of the process in the first place , as there were moments people   who were insisted without giving the room to the rest for expressing their opinion . The role of   coordinator is quite important and should act as middleware between the participants . It was also   heard from some participants that there were best practices from other companies , that would be   useful to have a brief summary for final decision making .
### Output: 