Project 	
   from : 	
   Sonia Salinas 	
  	
   ( Spain ) . 	
  	
    1 . 	
   Challenge : 	
   Describe 	
   your 	
   challenge , 	
   including 	
   all 	
   relevant 	
   information 	
    The 	
   challenge 	
   presented 	
   is 	
   how 	
   ( dis)comfort 	
   is 	
   perceived 	
   for 	
   the 	
   workers 	
   of 	
   an 	
    existing 	
   tertiary 	
   building 	
   ( whose 	
   spaces 	
   are 	
   destined 	
   to 	
   offices 	
   and 	
   labs ) , 	
   and 	
   know 	
    if 	
   it 	
   is 	
   possible 	
   that 	
   their 	
   participation 	
   individually 	
   and 	
   as 	
   a 	
   collective 	
   influences 	
   in 	
    a 	
    better 	
    building 	
    intervention , 	
    more 	
    accurate , 	
    precise , 	
    and 	
    if 	
    possible 	
    with 	
    time 	
    and 	
   money 	
   saving . 	
   	
    2 . 	
   Selection : 	
   in 	
   your 	
   own 	
   words , 	
   briefly 	
   describe 	
   the 	
   tool 	
   you 	
   selected , 	
   what 	
   it 	
   is 	
    and 	
   why 	
   you 	
   selected 	
   it 	
   for 	
   your 	
   challenge , 	
   including 	
   any 	
   appropriate 	
   video 	
   lecture 	
    references 	
    The 	
    selected 	
    tool 	
    is 	
    Visualization . 	
   This 	
    tool 	
    facilitates 	
    the 	
    aim 	
    of 	
    a 	
    common 	
    and 	
    comprehensive 	
   understanding 	
   of 	
   a 	
   problem . 	
   Moreover , 	
   the 	
   culture 	
   level 	
   and 	
   the 	
    ability 	
    of 	
    communicate 	
    themselves 	
    could 	
    be 	
    very 	
    different 	
    depending 	
    on 	
    the 	
    stakeholder 	
   considered , 	
   their 	
   expertise 	
   and 	
   they 	
   background . 	
   So , 	
   evidence 	
   based 	
    on 	
   images , 	
   symbols , 	
   photos , 	
   or 	
   similar , 	
   helps 	
   to 	
   summarize , 	
   focus 	
   on 	
   the 	
   concept 	
   or 	
    idea 	
   to 	
   work 	
   with , 	
   and 	
   to 	
   express , 	
   even 	
   to 	
   report , 	
   personal 	
   situations 	
   detected 	
   by 	
    them 	
    ( for 	
    instance , 	
    by 	
    users , 	
    at 	
    home ) . 	
    This 	
    tool 	
    also 	
    fosters 	
    the 	
    stakeholders 	
    participation . 	
    At 	
    the 	
    same 	
    time , 	
    it 	
    favors 	
    the 	
    common 	
    understanding 	
    when 	
    someone 	
   expresses 	
   an 	
   idea 	
   or 	
   concept , 	
   helping 	
   to 	
   assure 	
   the 	
   comprehension 	
   of 	
   this 	
    term . 	
  	
    The 	
   later 	
   reflections 	
   based 	
   on 	
   those 	
   photos , 	
   individually 	
   and 	
   collectively 	
   improve 	
    the 	
    project , 	
    approaching 	
    the 	
    reality 	
    to 	
    researchers 	
    and 	
    practitioners 	
    in 	
    an 	
    imaginative 	
    and 	
    creative 	
    way . 	
    It 	
    allows 	
    to 	
    use 	
    the 	
    whole 	
    brain 	
    for 	
    better 	
    and 	
    unexpected 	
   connections 	
   that 	
   find 	
   different 	
   solutions 	
   ( as 	
   Nicole Brandt 	
   said 	
   in 	
   her 	
    video-­‐intervention 	
   describing 	
   the 	
   tool ) . 	
   	
    3 . 	
   Application : 	
   Describe 	
   how 	
   you 	
   applied 	
   the 	
   tool 	
   you 	
   selected 	
   to 	
   your 	
   challenge 	
    ( whay 	
   you 	
   did 	
   and 	
   how 	
   the 	
   tool 	
   was 	
   applied 	
   effectively 	
   or 	
   ineffectively ) 	
    In 	
   the 	
   Project , 	
   visualization 	
   was 	
   applied 	
   through 	
   photographs , 	
   taken 	
   by 	
   the 	
   own 	
    participants , 	
    to 	
    express 	
    graphically 	
    their 	
    concerns , 	
    lacks 	
    or 	
    problems 	
    related 	
    to 	
    their 	
    perception 	
    of 	
    workplace 	
    comfort . 	
    These 	
    photos 	
    would 	
    later 	
    be 	
    used 	
    as 	
    vehicles 	
    to 	
    trigger 	
    their 	
    storytelling 	
    about 	
    their 	
    perception , 	
    and 	
    also 	
    Foster 	
    debates 	
   among 	
   participants , 	
   to 	
   consense 	
   ideas 	
   or 	
   concepts 	
   to 	
   work 	
   with , 	
   and 	
   later , 	
    propose 	
   solutions . 	
  	
    The 	
   participants 	
   were 	
   15 , 	
   divided 	
   in 	
   3 	
   groups 	
   of 	
   5 	
   each , 	
   according 	
   to 	
   their 	
   building 	
    and 	
   energy 	
   knowledge . 	
   All 	
   of 	
   them 	
   evaluated 	
   and 	
   debate 	
   on 	
   the 	
   whole 	
   of 	
   photos 	
    taken 	
    ( more 	
    than 	
    50 ) , 	
    and 	
    in 	
    groups , 	
    their 	
    chose 	
    their 	
    representative 	
    ones , 	
    explained 	
    to 	
    the 	
    rest 	
    of 	
    the 	
    group 	
    why , 	
    and 	
    searched 	
    solutions 	
    together , 	
    categorizing 	
   them 	
   with 	
   the 	
   facilitator 	
   ( me ) 	
   help . 	
    We 	
    applied 	
    this 	
    tool , 	
    a 	
    kind 	
    of 	
    visualization 	
    trough 	
    participant 	
    own-­‐photos , 	
    because 	
    it 	
    had 	
    the 	
    power 	
    of 	
    give 	
    objectivity 	
    to 	
    situations 	
    that , 	
    narrated 	
    by 	
    someone , 	
   could 	
   be 	
   understood 	
   as 	
   exaggerated 	
   or 	
   just 	
   distorsion-­‐perceived . 	
   But 	
   if 	
    someone 	
   takes 	
   a 	
   photo 	
   of 	
   a 	
   particular 	
   situation , 	
   the 	
   result 	
   is 	
   more 	
   credible . 	
   And 	
    also , 	
   to 	
   use 	
   those 	
   images 	
   as 	
   triggers 	
   of 	
   debate , 	
   critical 	
   awareness , 	
   and 	
   search 	
   of 	
    solutions . 

 4 . 	
   Insight : 	
   describe 	
   the 	
   insight 	
   you 	
   gained 	
   from 	
   applying 	
   the 	
   tool 	
   you 	
   selected 	
   to 	
    your 	
    challenge 	
    ( how 	
    an 	
    insight 	
    affected 	
    your 	
    thinking 	
    about 	
    the 	
    challenge 	
    and 	
    about 	
   design 	
   thinking 	
   more 	
   broadly ) 	
    Qualitative 	
   approaches 	
   offer 	
   to 	
   researchers 	
   lots 	
   of 	
   insights 	
   that 	
   quantitative 	
   can´t 	
    do . 	
    So 	
    it 	
    was 	
    a 	
    great 	
    interest 	
    to 	
    choose 	
    this 	
    kind 	
    of 	
    approaches . 	
    Specifically , 	
    visualization 	
    offered 	
    the 	
    possibility 	
    to 	
    work 	
    with 	
    people 	
    with 	
    different 	
    studies 	
    level , 	
    building 	
    comfort 	
    and 	
    energy 	
    comprehension , 	
    age , 	
    and 	
    interests . 	
    It 	
    was 	
    a 	
    challenge 	
    for 	
    them 	
    ( also 	
    for 	
    researchers ) 	
    wait 	
    for 	
    photo-­‐results 	
    representing 	
    something 	
    so 	
    abstract 	
    such 	
    as 	
    “ comfort ” . 	
    But 	
    either 	
    taking 	
    their 	
    own 	
    photos , 	
    or 	
    debating 	
   on 	
   them , 	
   it 	
   was 	
   very 	
   helpful , 	
   efficient , 	
   and 	
   grateful . 	
  	
    There 	
   also 	
   appeared 	
   lots 	
   of 	
   insights , 	
   for 	
   instance 	
   comfort 	
   experts 	
   that 	
   worked 	
   in 	
    this 	
   building , 	
   and 	
   who 	
   were 	
   part 	
   of 	
   those 	
   participants , 	
   “ forgive ” 	
   in 	
   some 	
   way 	
   all 	
    the 	
    comfort 	
    lacks 	
    that 	
    they 	
    also 	
    suffered 	
    as 	
    users , 	
    due 	
    to 	
    their 	
    comprehensive 	
    understanding 	
    of 	
    certain 	
    building 	
    circumstances . 	
    It 	
    was 	
    very 	
    surpresing 	
    for 	
    me , 	
    because 	
   I 	
   hoped 	
   a 	
   more 	
   critical 	
   point 	
   of 	
   view . 	
  	
    Another 	
    insight 	
    was , 	
    that 	
    those 	
    comfort 	
    and 	
    energy 	
    experts , 	
    due 	
    to 	
    their 	
    discomfort 	
   at 	
   workplace , 	
   needed 	
   to 	
   use 	
   ( and 	
   took 	
   their 	
   photos ) 	
   about 	
   non-­‐efficient 	
    solutions 	
    to 	
    heat 	
    their 	
    internal 	
    spaces , 	
    for 	
    instance . 	
    When 	
    their 	
    explained 	
    their 	
    shoots , 	
    the 	
    argued 	
    that 	
    they 	
    knew 	
    that 	
    behavior 	
    was 	
    not 	
    proper 	
    to 	
    pursue 	
    a 	
    sustainable 	
    waste 	
    of 	
    energy , 	
    with 	
    inefficient 	
    solutions , 	
    but 	
    they 	
    could 	
    not 	
    work 	
    with 	
   such 	
   cold 	
   indoors . 	
  	
   	
    5 . 	
   Approach : 	
   Describe 	
   what 	
   you 	
   might 	
   do 	
   differently 	
   next 	
   time-­‐ 	
   applying 	
   the 	
   same 	
    tool 	
   you 	
   selected 	
   or 	
   a 	
   different 	
   one-­‐and 	
   the 	
   reason(s ) 	
   why . 	
    I 	
    think 	
    this 	
    tool 	
    has 	
    more 	
    advantages 	
    than 	
    disadvantages . 	
    But 	
    in 	
    a 	
    workplace 	
    environment , 	
   their 	
   application 	
   has 	
   to 	
   be 	
   followed 	
   and 	
   approved 	
   by 	
   the 	
   institution 	
    managers 	
   or 	
   directors , 	
   and 	
   also 	
   by 	
   department 	
   chiefs , 	
   to 	
   avoid 	
   mis-­‐understandings 	
    on 	
    what 	
    are 	
    shooted , 	
    and 	
    why . 	
    If 	
    not , 	
    it 	
    could 	
    be 	
    looked 	
    with 	
    distrust 	
    and 	
    suspicion . 	
  	
    Planification 	
   is 	
   also 	
   very 	
   important , 	
   in 	
   the 	
   whole 	
   process , 	
   to 	
   collect 	
   data 	
   ( photos 	
    are 	
    a 	
    kind 	
    of 	
    qualitative 	
    data , 	
    as 	
    well 	
    as 	
    storytelling ) , 	
    the 	
    way 	
    to 	
    communicate 	
    facilitators 	
   ( researchers ) 	
   and 	
   participants , 	
   the 	
   means 	
   of 	
   transfering 	
   data 	
   ( internet , 	
    whatsapp 	
   or 	
   similar , 	
   etc ) , 	
   the 	
   space 	
   to 	
   work 	
   in , 	
   the 	
   number 	
   of 	
   sessions 	
  	
   and 	
   tasks 	
    to 	
   do 	
   during 	
   each 	
   one , 	
   and 	
   the 	
   resources 	
   to 	
   facilitate 	
   debate 	
   ( press , 	
   pcs , 	
   screens , 	
    pens 	
   and 	
   paper , 	
   something 	
   sweet 	
   to 	
   help 	
   people 	
   think 	
   in 	
   a 	
   good 	
   mood … ) . 	
  	
    Next 	
    time 	
    I 	
    will 	
    try 	
    to 	
    work 	
    more 	
    efficientlywith 	
    photographs , 	
    avoiding 	
    silly 	
    conversations 	
   or 	
   silent 	
   gaps , 	
   to 	
   make 	
   debates 	
   shorter , 	
   but 	
   more 	
   interesting . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: Sonia Salinas
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Project 	
   from : 	
   Sonia Salinas 	
  	
   ( Spain ) . 	
  	
    1 . 	
   Challenge : 	
   Describe 	
   your 	
   challenge , 	
   including 	
   all 	
   relevant 	
   information 	
    The 	
   challenge 	
   presented 	
   is 	
   how 	
   ( dis)comfort 	
   is 	
   perceived 	
   for 	
   the 	
   workers 	
   of 	
   an 	
    existing 	
   tertiary 	
   building 	
   ( whose 	
   spaces 	
   are 	
   destined 	
   to 	
   offices 	
   and 	
   labs ) , 	
   and 	
   know 	
    if 	
   it 	
   is 	
   possible 	
   that 	
   their 	
   participation 	
   individually 	
   and 	
   as 	
   a 	
   collective 	
   influences 	
   in 	
    a 	
    better 	
    building 	
    intervention , 	
    more 	
    accurate , 	
    precise , 	
    and 	
    if 	
    possible 	
    with 	
    time 	
    and 	
   money 	
   saving . 	
   	
    2 . 	
   Selection : 	
   in 	
   your 	
   own 	
   words , 	
   briefly 	
   describe 	
   the 	
   tool 	
   you 	
   selected , 	
   what 	
   it 	
   is 	
    and 	
   why 	
   you 	
   selected 	
   it 	
   for 	
   your 	
   challenge , 	
   including 	
   any 	
   appropriate 	
   video 	
   lecture 	
    references 	
    The 	
    selected 	
    tool 	
    is 	
    Visualization . 	
   This 	
    tool 	
    facilitates 	
    the 	
    aim 	
    of 	
    a 	
    common 	
    and 	
    comprehensive 	
   understanding 	
   of 	
   a 	
   problem . 	
   Moreover , 	
   the 	
   culture 	
   level 	
   and 	
   the 	
    ability 	
    of 	
    communicate 	
    themselves 	
    could 	
    be 	
    very 	
    different 	
    depending 	
    on 	
    the 	
    stakeholder 	
   considered , 	
   their 	
   expertise 	
   and 	
   they 	
   background . 	
   So , 	
   evidence 	
   based 	
    on 	
   images , 	
   symbols , 	
   photos , 	
   or 	
   similar , 	
   helps 	
   to 	
   summarize , 	
   focus 	
   on 	
   the 	
   concept 	
   or 	
    idea 	
   to 	
   work 	
   with , 	
   and 	
   to 	
   express , 	
   even 	
   to 	
   report , 	
   personal 	
   situations 	
   detected 	
   by 	
    them 	
    ( for 	
    instance , 	
    by 	
    users , 	
    at 	
    home ) . 	
    This 	
    tool 	
    also 	
    fosters 	
    the 	
    stakeholders 	
    participation . 	
    At 	
    the 	
    same 	
    time , 	
    it 	
    favors 	
    the 	
    common 	
    understanding 	
    when 	
    someone 	
   expresses 	
   an 	
   idea 	
   or 	
   concept , 	
   helping 	
   to 	
   assure 	
   the 	
   comprehension 	
   of 	
   this 	
    term . 	
  	
    The 	
   later 	
   reflections 	
   based 	
   on 	
   those 	
   photos , 	
   individually 	
   and 	
   collectively 	
   improve 	
    the 	
    project , 	
    approaching 	
    the 	
    reality 	
    to 	
    researchers 	
    and 	
    practitioners 	
    in 	
    an 	
    imaginative 	
    and 	
    creative 	
    way . 	
    It 	
    allows 	
    to 	
    use 	
    the 	
    whole 	
    brain 	
    for 	
    better 	
    and 	
    unexpected 	
   connections 	
   that 	
   find 	
   different 	
   solutions 	
   ( as 	
   Nicole Brandt 	
   said 	
   in 	
   her 	
    video-­‐intervention 	
   describing 	
   the 	
   tool ) . 	
   	
    3 . 	
   Application : 	
   Describe 	
   how 	
   you 	
   applied 	
   the 	
   tool 	
   you 	
   selected 	
   to 	
   your 	
   challenge 	
    ( whay 	
   you 	
   did 	
   and 	
   how 	
   the 	
   tool 	
   was 	
   applied 	
   effectively 	
   or 	
   ineffectively ) 	
    In 	
   the 	
   Project , 	
   visualization 	
   was 	
   applied 	
   through 	
   photographs , 	
   taken 	
   by 	
   the 	
   own 	
    participants , 	
    to 	
    express 	
    graphically 	
    their 	
    concerns , 	
    lacks 	
    or 	
    problems 	
    related 	
    to 	
    their 	
    perception 	
    of 	
    workplace 	
    comfort . 	
    These 	
    photos 	
    would 	
    later 	
    be 	
    used 	
    as 	
    vehicles 	
    to 	
    trigger 	
    their 	
    storytelling 	
    about 	
    their 	
    perception , 	
    and 	
    also 	
    Foster 	
    debates 	
   among 	
   participants , 	
   to 	
   consense 	
   ideas 	
   or 	
   concepts 	
   to 	
   work 	
   with , 	
   and 	
   later , 	
    propose 	
   solutions . 	
  	
    The 	
   participants 	
   were 	
   15 , 	
   divided 	
   in 	
   3 	
   groups 	
   of 	
   5 	
   each , 	
   according 	
   to 	
   their 	
   building 	
    and 	
   energy 	
   knowledge . 	
   All 	
   of 	
   them 	
   evaluated 	
   and 	
   debate 	
   on 	
   the 	
   whole 	
   of 	
   photos 	
    taken 	
    ( more 	
    than 	
    50 ) , 	
    and 	
    in 	
    groups , 	
    their 	
    chose 	
    their 	
    representative 	
    ones , 	
    explained 	
    to 	
    the 	
    rest 	
    of 	
    the 	
    group 	
    why , 	
    and 	
    searched 	
    solutions 	
    together , 	
    categorizing 	
   them 	
   with 	
   the 	
   facilitator 	
   ( me ) 	
   help . 	
    We 	
    applied 	
    this 	
    tool , 	
    a 	
    kind 	
    of 	
    visualization 	
    trough 	
    participant 	
    own-­‐photos , 	
    because 	
    it 	
    had 	
    the 	
    power 	
    of 	
    give 	
    objectivity 	
    to 	
    situations 	
    that , 	
    narrated 	
    by 	
    someone , 	
   could 	
   be 	
   understood 	
   as 	
   exaggerated 	
   or 	
   just 	
   distorsion-­‐perceived . 	
   But 	
   if 	
    someone 	
   takes 	
   a 	
   photo 	
   of 	
   a 	
   particular 	
   situation , 	
   the 	
   result 	
   is 	
   more 	
   credible . 	
   And 	
    also , 	
   to 	
   use 	
   those 	
   images 	
   as 	
   triggers 	
   of 	
   debate , 	
   critical 	
   awareness , 	
   and 	
   search 	
   of 	
    solutions . 

 4 . 	
   Insight : 	
   describe 	
   the 	
   insight 	
   you 	
   gained 	
   from 	
   applying 	
   the 	
   tool 	
   you 	
   selected 	
   to 	
    your 	
    challenge 	
    ( how 	
    an 	
    insight 	
    affected 	
    your 	
    thinking 	
    about 	
    the 	
    challenge 	
    and 	
    about 	
   design 	
   thinking 	
   more 	
   broadly ) 	
    Qualitative 	
   approaches 	
   offer 	
   to 	
   researchers 	
   lots 	
   of 	
   insights 	
   that 	
   quantitative 	
   can´t 	
    do . 	
    So 	
    it 	
    was 	
    a 	
    great 	
    interest 	
    to 	
    choose 	
    this 	
    kind 	
    of 	
    approaches . 	
    Specifically , 	
    visualization 	
    offered 	
    the 	
    possibility 	
    to 	
    work 	
    with 	
    people 	
    with 	
    different 	
    studies 	
    level , 	
    building 	
    comfort 	
    and 	
    energy 	
    comprehension , 	
    age , 	
    and 	
    interests . 	
    It 	
    was 	
    a 	
    challenge 	
    for 	
    them 	
    ( also 	
    for 	
    researchers ) 	
    wait 	
    for 	
    photo-­‐results 	
    representing 	
    something 	
    so 	
    abstract 	
    such 	
    as 	
    “ comfort ” . 	
    But 	
    either 	
    taking 	
    their 	
    own 	
    photos , 	
    or 	
    debating 	
   on 	
   them , 	
   it 	
   was 	
   very 	
   helpful , 	
   efficient , 	
   and 	
   grateful . 	
  	
    There 	
   also 	
   appeared 	
   lots 	
   of 	
   insights , 	
   for 	
   instance 	
   comfort 	
   experts 	
   that 	
   worked 	
   in 	
    this 	
   building , 	
   and 	
   who 	
   were 	
   part 	
   of 	
   those 	
   participants , 	
   “ forgive ” 	
   in 	
   some 	
   way 	
   all 	
    the 	
    comfort 	
    lacks 	
    that 	
    they 	
    also 	
    suffered 	
    as 	
    users , 	
    due 	
    to 	
    their 	
    comprehensive 	
    understanding 	
    of 	
    certain 	
    building 	
    circumstances . 	
    It 	
    was 	
    very 	
    surpresing 	
    for 	
    me , 	
    because 	
   I 	
   hoped 	
   a 	
   more 	
   critical 	
   point 	
   of 	
   view . 	
  	
    Another 	
    insight 	
    was , 	
    that 	
    those 	
    comfort 	
    and 	
    energy 	
    experts , 	
    due 	
    to 	
    their 	
    discomfort 	
   at 	
   workplace , 	
   needed 	
   to 	
   use 	
   ( and 	
   took 	
   their 	
   photos ) 	
   about 	
   non-­‐efficient 	
    solutions 	
    to 	
    heat 	
    their 	
    internal 	
    spaces , 	
    for 	
    instance . 	
    When 	
    their 	
    explained 	
    their 	
    shoots , 	
    the 	
    argued 	
    that 	
    they 	
    knew 	
    that 	
    behavior 	
    was 	
    not 	
    proper 	
    to 	
    pursue 	
    a 	
    sustainable 	
    waste 	
    of 	
    energy , 	
    with 	
    inefficient 	
    solutions , 	
    but 	
    they 	
    could 	
    not 	
    work 	
    with 	
   such 	
   cold 	
   indoors . 	
  	
   	
    5 . 	
   Approach : 	
   Describe 	
   what 	
   you 	
   might 	
   do 	
   differently 	
   next 	
   time-­‐ 	
   applying 	
   the 	
   same 	
    tool 	
   you 	
   selected 	
   or 	
   a 	
   different 	
   one-­‐and 	
   the 	
   reason(s ) 	
   why . 	
    I 	
    think 	
    this 	
    tool 	
    has 	
    more 	
    advantages 	
    than 	
    disadvantages . 	
    But 	
    in 	
    a 	
    workplace 	
    environment , 	
   their 	
   application 	
   has 	
   to 	
   be 	
   followed 	
   and 	
   approved 	
   by 	
   the 	
   institution 	
    managers 	
   or 	
   directors , 	
   and 	
   also 	
   by 	
   department 	
   chiefs , 	
   to 	
   avoid 	
   mis-­‐understandings 	
    on 	
    what 	
    are 	
    shooted , 	
    and 	
    why . 	
    If 	
    not , 	
    it 	
    could 	
    be 	
    looked 	
    with 	
    distrust 	
    and 	
    suspicion . 	
  	
    Planification 	
   is 	
   also 	
   very 	
   important , 	
   in 	
   the 	
   whole 	
   process , 	
   to 	
   collect 	
   data 	
   ( photos 	
    are 	
    a 	
    kind 	
    of 	
    qualitative 	
    data , 	
    as 	
    well 	
    as 	
    storytelling ) , 	
    the 	
    way 	
    to 	
    communicate 	
    facilitators 	
   ( researchers ) 	
   and 	
   participants , 	
   the 	
   means 	
   of 	
   transfering 	
   data 	
   ( internet , 	
    whatsapp 	
   or 	
   similar , 	
   etc ) , 	
   the 	
   space 	
   to 	
   work 	
   in , 	
   the 	
   number 	
   of 	
   sessions 	
  	
   and 	
   tasks 	
    to 	
   do 	
   during 	
   each 	
   one , 	
   and 	
   the 	
   resources 	
   to 	
   facilitate 	
   debate 	
   ( press , 	
   pcs , 	
   screens , 	
    pens 	
   and 	
   paper , 	
   something 	
   sweet 	
   to 	
   help 	
   people 	
   think 	
   in 	
   a 	
   good 	
   mood … ) . 	
  	
    Next 	
    time 	
    I 	
    will 	
    try 	
    to 	
    work 	
    more 	
    efficientlywith 	
    photographs , 	
    avoiding 	
    silly 	
    conversations 	
   or 	
   silent 	
   gaps , 	
   to 	
   make 	
   debates 	
   shorter , 	
   but 	
   more 	
   interesting .
### Output: 