Reflection – Learning Launch 

 Challenge : 

 This story takes place in a small country ( Uruguay ) where the awareness and collaboration of its inhabitants   has been essential ( until now ) to face the COVID context with encouraging indicators .     As Alumni Manager of an important University in this country , I believe that one of our most valuable   resources is our students and graduates community , therefore one of our greatest challenges is to keep   that community cohesive and aligned with different purposes .   A year ago , and prior to the appearance of COVID , we had planned different actions aimed at strengthening   our students and graduate ’s community . One of them included a collaborative purpose and was related to   involving part of this community generating projects and offering solutions to different problems . We offer   a series of challenges , a workshop cycle where we take advantage of the soft and hard skills , experience ,   and power of our community to develop projects that offer solutions to different problems .     Selection :      Although the COVID context did not enter our plans at that time , its arrival did not substantially modify the   process , I would say rather that it accelerated it , prompting us to quickly adapt to the new scenario . At that   time ( September / 2012 ) it was necessary to establish a series of stages to test the impact and degree of   commitment to the project by our community . We wanted to have the necessary feedback to plan or not   the different challenges . The learning launch tool therefore allowed us this degree of iteration .     Application :     The first stage of the learning launch tool was to generate a first challenge with a current problem . The   chosen problem was the challenges of immigration as a global phenomenon and solutions that could be   generated at local level for a better insertion of immigrants . For this , a joint work was carried out with   several universities from different parts of the world , discussing views about the repercussions of the same   problem in those different places . Although activity was not successful as we expected , the participants   evaluation , as well as the results , were truly positive .   Our failures had been in the communication process , the awareness and the necessary approach had not   been generated , so the problem did not generate interest as we expected .   By the time we had planned the execution of the second challenge , the COVID context has already installed   in our country . Once we got adapt to the new normal , we were able to resume and adjust the project to   the new scenario .   For our second learning launch experience , we recognize our previous failures , designing a different   communication strategy . Our objective had been slightly broadened . Instead of focusing on a specific topic ,   we wanted to generate a challenge where students and graduates from all disciplines ( IT , Communication ,   Design , Business and Architecture ) could exchange ideas , knowledge , skills and professional careers   processes to generate open collaborative projects resulting from the new context ( COVID ) .   The impact was better than in our first experience by far , exceeding the call , as well as the results and   evaluation of the participants , which were good in themselves .   For this , the alliance that we had been working with United Nations was very important . For us , it was   important to align future projects with the Sustainable Development Goals ( SDG ) , while for them we   represented an important sector where we could put into action the UN75 initiative for global dialogue .       Insight :     As I said before , we needed to fix the mistakes made in the first call , for which we necessarily had to   generate a different approach to the problem . We knew that some University graduates had been leading 

 collaborative projects to solve different problems , many of which were related to the COVID context , for   that reason we had to identify these projects . Once identified them , we began a strategy of content   development ( interviews , notes , stories ) and communication through networks , e - mailings and the web ,   encouraging our community to join and collaborate of those initiatives . Repercussion was very good since   many graduates and students began to be interested in those projects , asking how they could participate .     Approach :     This story had a concrete and satisfactory result where the learning launch tool has resulted in an iterative   process , enabling the necessary feedback to fix mistakes , and enhancing successes .   However , I consider that future strategy for next editions can not be developed based on a single tool . I   believe in our case that generation of awareness linked to the storytelling tool generates a high degree of   empathy , which it leads to a greater degree of commitment regarding participation in the activity . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Reflection – Learning Launch 

 Challenge : 

 This story takes place in a small country ( Uruguay ) where the awareness and collaboration of its inhabitants   has been essential ( until now ) to face the COVID context with encouraging indicators .     As Alumni Manager of an important University in this country , I believe that one of our most valuable   resources is our students and graduates community , therefore one of our greatest challenges is to keep   that community cohesive and aligned with different purposes .   A year ago , and prior to the appearance of COVID , we had planned different actions aimed at strengthening   our students and graduate ’s community . One of them included a collaborative purpose and was related to   involving part of this community generating projects and offering solutions to different problems . We offer   a series of challenges , a workshop cycle where we take advantage of the soft and hard skills , experience ,   and power of our community to develop projects that offer solutions to different problems .     Selection :      Although the COVID context did not enter our plans at that time , its arrival did not substantially modify the   process , I would say rather that it accelerated it , prompting us to quickly adapt to the new scenario . At that   time ( September / 2012 ) it was necessary to establish a series of stages to test the impact and degree of   commitment to the project by our community . We wanted to have the necessary feedback to plan or not   the different challenges . The learning launch tool therefore allowed us this degree of iteration .     Application :     The first stage of the learning launch tool was to generate a first challenge with a current problem . The   chosen problem was the challenges of immigration as a global phenomenon and solutions that could be   generated at local level for a better insertion of immigrants . For this , a joint work was carried out with   several universities from different parts of the world , discussing views about the repercussions of the same   problem in those different places . Although activity was not successful as we expected , the participants   evaluation , as well as the results , were truly positive .   Our failures had been in the communication process , the awareness and the necessary approach had not   been generated , so the problem did not generate interest as we expected .   By the time we had planned the execution of the second challenge , the COVID context has already installed   in our country . Once we got adapt to the new normal , we were able to resume and adjust the project to   the new scenario .   For our second learning launch experience , we recognize our previous failures , designing a different   communication strategy . Our objective had been slightly broadened . Instead of focusing on a specific topic ,   we wanted to generate a challenge where students and graduates from all disciplines ( IT , Communication ,   Design , Business and Architecture ) could exchange ideas , knowledge , skills and professional careers   processes to generate open collaborative projects resulting from the new context ( COVID ) .   The impact was better than in our first experience by far , exceeding the call , as well as the results and   evaluation of the participants , which were good in themselves .   For this , the alliance that we had been working with United Nations was very important . For us , it was   important to align future projects with the Sustainable Development Goals ( SDG ) , while for them we   represented an important sector where we could put into action the UN75 initiative for global dialogue .       Insight :     As I said before , we needed to fix the mistakes made in the first call , for which we necessarily had to   generate a different approach to the problem . We knew that some University graduates had been leading 

 collaborative projects to solve different problems , many of which were related to the COVID context , for   that reason we had to identify these projects . Once identified them , we began a strategy of content   development ( interviews , notes , stories ) and communication through networks , e - mailings and the web ,   encouraging our community to join and collaborate of those initiatives . Repercussion was very good since   many graduates and students began to be interested in those projects , asking how they could participate .     Approach :     This story had a concrete and satisfactory result where the learning launch tool has resulted in an iterative   process , enabling the necessary feedback to fix mistakes , and enhancing successes .   However , I consider that future strategy for next editions can not be developed based on a single tool . I   believe in our case that generation of awareness linked to the storytelling tool generates a high degree of   empathy , which it leads to a greater degree of commitment regarding participation in the activity .
### Output: 