Work 

 Reflection 

 Challenge : Describe your challenge , including all relevant information . 

 I run my own practice , including different initiatives ( salons , consulting , 

 conferences , blogging , working on a book ) and as part of that work with different 

 people , seek different connections . I constantly struggle with prioritizing effort , and 

 synthesizing noise to signal . 

 Selection : In your own words , briefly describe the tool you selected ( e.g. , what it is and why you selected it for your challenge – including any appropriate video lecture references ) . 

 I chose to use a mind map , as I am trying to both articulate my vision for this 

 different circles , as well as seeing how they might coalesce , transition , or graduate 

 to a more central one ( given that the ultimate goal is recruiting consultancy work ) . 

 Application : Describe how you applied the tool you selected to your challenge ( e.g. , what you did and how the tool was applied effectively or ineffectively ) . 

 I sketched the different people I connect with ( may it be in academia , or industry ) , 

 then considered all of my activities , together with the goals of my business . Those 

 all joined into a 3 concentric shape framework , which had multiple gradual 

 dimensions ( the people , my activity , and the linking activity ) 

 Insight : Describe the insight you gained from applying the tool you selected to your challenge ( e.g. , how an insight affected your thinking about the challenge and about design thinking more broadly ) . 

 My main insight and tool was a very palpable engagement meter , on what I need 

 from each of those audiences and what showing up look for them 

 Approach : Describe what you might do differently next time – applying the same tool you selected or a different one – and the reason(s ) why . 

 I might try and avoid my own conﬁrmation bias . Even though I did change what I do 

 based on this exercise ( more consolidate than pivot to be truthful ) I wonder if these 

 was a way of fooling myself to have a ‘ true ’ outsider ’s perspective 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Work 

 Reflection 

 Challenge : Describe your challenge , including all relevant information . 

 I run my own practice , including different initiatives ( salons , consulting , 

 conferences , blogging , working on a book ) and as part of that work with different 

 people , seek different connections . I constantly struggle with prioritizing effort , and 

 synthesizing noise to signal . 

 Selection : In your own words , briefly describe the tool you selected ( e.g. , what it is and why you selected it for your challenge – including any appropriate video lecture references ) . 

 I chose to use a mind map , as I am trying to both articulate my vision for this 

 different circles , as well as seeing how they might coalesce , transition , or graduate 

 to a more central one ( given that the ultimate goal is recruiting consultancy work ) . 

 Application : Describe how you applied the tool you selected to your challenge ( e.g. , what you did and how the tool was applied effectively or ineffectively ) . 

 I sketched the different people I connect with ( may it be in academia , or industry ) , 

 then considered all of my activities , together with the goals of my business . Those 

 all joined into a 3 concentric shape framework , which had multiple gradual 

 dimensions ( the people , my activity , and the linking activity ) 

 Insight : Describe the insight you gained from applying the tool you selected to your challenge ( e.g. , how an insight affected your thinking about the challenge and about design thinking more broadly ) . 

 My main insight and tool was a very palpable engagement meter , on what I need 

 from each of those audiences and what showing up look for them 

 Approach : Describe what you might do differently next time – applying the same tool you selected or a different one – and the reason(s ) why . 

 I might try and avoid my own conﬁrmation bias . Even though I did change what I do 

 based on this exercise ( more consolidate than pivot to be truthful ) I wonder if these 

 was a way of fooling myself to have a ‘ true ’ outsider ’s perspective
### Output: 