Non - Business Use 

 Journey Mapping by Hamzah Halawani 

 Challenge and selection     Journey mapping is very helpful tool that helped me a lot in identifying the gap of one of my routine   activities which is conducting field safety inspection and generate recommendations to proponent . These   recommendations are generated based on observed findings either related to safety behavior or   conditions . The optimum goal of implementing the recommendations by proponent is to prevent having   unsafe act or unsafe condition in future which helps in enhancing the safety compliance during conducting   any job work related .    The challenge is that sometimes these recommendations are not being implemented by proponent which   divert from the original goal . I used the journey management tool to find out why these recommendations   are not implemented and to make sure that the goal from the recommendation ’s implementation is   achieved . 

 Application      After spending one year of practicing and doing field safety inspection and generating recommendations   to proponent , we decided to measure the effectiveness of these recommendations . Normally , after   completing a site visit and listing all observations , we generate recommendation for each observation and   we logged these recommendations in a system that assign the recommendation to a proponent member   in order to implement the recommendation . After completing the recommendation , the proponent   member should close the recommendation in the system so it goes back to me as initiator for verification   and mark as completed . So , we went back to the system and analyzed all provided recommendations in   order to measure the percentage of the completed recommendations of all submitted recommendations .   The result was around 50 % of implementation which means that the other 50 % are still open and not   being implemented .    We started interviewing the proponent member to find out the reason of not completing these   recommendations , which was that these recommendations take time and efforts to implement and not   being recognized by management . So , either they implement it or leave it open in the system does not   make any difference . Therefore , they start picking the major recommendations that should be stopped   from happening due to safety concerns and implement them , while the minor safety recommendations   are kept and left open in the system since there is to effective tracking nor management monitoring to   these recommendations . This led to having 50 % of open items in the system . After interviewing the   proponent members , we engaged the proponent management and highlighted to them these concerns   which took their attention . We recommended that to have a KPI to monitor the implementation of all   field safety inspections recommendations on monthly basis .      Insight & Approach      It was led to a higher recommendations implementation completion which reached 80 % . The original goal   was achieved and safety culture was improved . Also , proponent managements started recognizing the   time and efforts of their members that led to excellence . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: Non - Business Use 

 Journey Mapping by Hamzah Halawani 

 Challenge and selection     Journey mapping is very helpful tool that helped me a lot in identifying the gap of one of my routine   activities which is conducting field safety inspection and generate recommendations to proponent . These   recommendations are generated based on observed findings either related to safety behavior or   conditions . The optimum goal of implementing the recommendations by proponent is to prevent having   unsafe act or unsafe condition in future which helps in enhancing the safety compliance during conducting   any job work related .    The challenge is that sometimes these recommendations are not being implemented by proponent which   divert from the original goal . I used the journey management tool to find out why these recommendations   are not implemented and to make sure that the goal from the recommendation ’s implementation is   achieved . 

 Application      After spending one year of practicing and doing field safety inspection and generating recommendations   to proponent , we decided to measure the effectiveness of these recommendations . Normally , after   completing a site visit and listing all observations , we generate recommendation for each observation and   we logged these recommendations in a system that assign the recommendation to a proponent member   in order to implement the recommendation . After completing the recommendation , the proponent   member should close the recommendation in the system so it goes back to me as initiator for verification   and mark as completed . So , we went back to the system and analyzed all provided recommendations in   order to measure the percentage of the completed recommendations of all submitted recommendations .   The result was around 50 % of implementation which means that the other 50 % are still open and not   being implemented .    We started interviewing the proponent member to find out the reason of not completing these   recommendations , which was that these recommendations take time and efforts to implement and not   being recognized by management . So , either they implement it or leave it open in the system does not   make any difference . Therefore , they start picking the major recommendations that should be stopped   from happening due to safety concerns and implement them , while the minor safety recommendations   are kept and left open in the system since there is to effective tracking nor management monitoring to   these recommendations . This led to having 50 % of open items in the system . After interviewing the   proponent members , we engaged the proponent management and highlighted to them these concerns   which took their attention . We recommended that to have a KPI to monitor the implementation of all   field safety inspections recommendations on monthly basis .      Insight & Approach      It was led to a higher recommendations implementation completion which reached 80 % . The original goal   was achieved and safety culture was improved . Also , proponent managements started recognizing the   time and efforts of their members that led to excellence .
### Output: 