My job as a technical architect is to analyze , admit and register the city 's construction plans   that request approval from the local government . In this particular case the plan that was   presented to me did not have the standards that were accepted in the original draft .    My challenge was explain to the architect beyond the technicality , why the plan was not going   to be admitted , for the malpractice and the obvious problem in the plan presented .     While we were talking , I decided to use the storytelling tool , because in my opinion it is a very   adaptable tool to its environment , especially because it is born from experience and   authenticity . In this government context , using it in its most basic forms and without   overidentifying , can be very relevant .     After talking for 45 minutes with the architect , on one hand he insisted that it was the same   as what was accepted in the original draft , but that this plan was simply difficult to understand   because it was poorly drawn and presented . We talked about the urban regulations that apply ,   how they have changed and why he did n't update his plans in all these years knowing about   this . Then he insisted that the problem was that I did n’t understand the plans because I was   misreading it and so long , he tried to explain to me from the way he saw it . Never the less the   plans were n’t the same as the original draft . I was getting tired of the explanation without   substance and we had been talking for quite a bit .     I was tired and had already spent enough time , even passing by the solutions that he had to   make to correct the plans and be admitted . With the intention of concluding the meeting in   good manners , I applied the storytelling technique by saying : " A constructive plan is not   something that is open to interpretation , it is not literature . Somebody asked me not quite long   ago if I Had heard what ` they ´ say about being in loved and how is like being pregnant ; If you   are , you are , if not , you are not .   No one can be half pregnant . ” And then I added “ Well , with   building plans it 's the same thing , you can not build with half plans that are open to   interpretation . ”   He laughed and then understood that the plan will not be admitted as   presented and it was simple as that .     The insight I gained from using this argument as a storytelling tool is that it goes beyond one   sided point of view , it 's something that one can understand from any context and makes you   understand that most things are as simple as a ` yes or no ’ , analysis is an important study that   usually brings you to quite simple truths as results .     In this context of my work I would probably should had used a different example , but always   keeping in mind the mutual respect in the professional field . 


EMAIL: 
ID_NUM: 
NAME_STUDENT: 
PHONE_NUM: 
STREET_ADDRESS: 
URL_PERSONAL: 
USERNAME: 

### Task: You are a PII (Personal Identity Information) Detection. Given a essays written by students, you have to identify ONLY the following:
NAME_STUDENT - The full or partial name of a student that is not necessarily the author of the essay. This excludes instructors, authors, and other person names.
EMAIL - A student’s email address.
USERNAME - A student's username on any platform.
ID_NUM - A number or sequence of characters that could be used to identify a student, such as a student ID or a social security number.
PHONE_NUM - A phone number associated with a student.
URL_PERSONAL - A URL that might be used to identify a student.
STREET_ADDRESS - A full or partial street address that is associated with the student, such as their home address.
### Input: My job as a technical architect is to analyze , admit and register the city 's construction plans   that request approval from the local government . In this particular case the plan that was   presented to me did not have the standards that were accepted in the original draft .    My challenge was explain to the architect beyond the technicality , why the plan was not going   to be admitted , for the malpractice and the obvious problem in the plan presented .     While we were talking , I decided to use the storytelling tool , because in my opinion it is a very   adaptable tool to its environment , especially because it is born from experience and   authenticity . In this government context , using it in its most basic forms and without   overidentifying , can be very relevant .     After talking for 45 minutes with the architect , on one hand he insisted that it was the same   as what was accepted in the original draft , but that this plan was simply difficult to understand   because it was poorly drawn and presented . We talked about the urban regulations that apply ,   how they have changed and why he did n't update his plans in all these years knowing about   this . Then he insisted that the problem was that I did n’t understand the plans because I was   misreading it and so long , he tried to explain to me from the way he saw it . Never the less the   plans were n’t the same as the original draft . I was getting tired of the explanation without   substance and we had been talking for quite a bit .     I was tired and had already spent enough time , even passing by the solutions that he had to   make to correct the plans and be admitted . With the intention of concluding the meeting in   good manners , I applied the storytelling technique by saying : " A constructive plan is not   something that is open to interpretation , it is not literature . Somebody asked me not quite long   ago if I Had heard what ` they ´ say about being in loved and how is like being pregnant ; If you   are , you are , if not , you are not .   No one can be half pregnant . ” And then I added “ Well , with   building plans it 's the same thing , you can not build with half plans that are open to   interpretation . ”   He laughed and then understood that the plan will not be admitted as   presented and it was simple as that .     The insight I gained from using this argument as a storytelling tool is that it goes beyond one   sided point of view , it 's something that one can understand from any context and makes you   understand that most things are as simple as a ` yes or no ’ , analysis is an important study that   usually brings you to quite simple truths as results .     In this context of my work I would probably should had used a different example , but always   keeping in mind the mutual respect in the professional field .
### Output: 