 Denny Atkin of Computer Gaming World wrote that Jane 's Attack Squadron " had the potential to be <unk> of the year in 2000 " , but that it had been rendered largely irrelevant by delays and " <unk> design goals . " He believed that its graphics would have been " state of the art in 2000 " , but he found them middling in 2002 ; and he noted the presence of numerous glitches . He considered the game 's most serious flaw to be its low number of missions . Although Atkin found the air @-@ to @-@ air combat " generally fun " , citing " good pilot AI " and " decent " flight physics , he believed that the game 's bombing runs were its most outstanding element . He hoped that fans would use the mission and physics editors to improve the game , and he concluded , " It 's buggy , but when it works it 's worth flying . " Andy <unk> of PC Gamer US wrote that Jane 's Attack Squadron is " <unk> an entertaining and unique WWII prop <unk> " , but he believed that it was clearly inferior to games such as <unk> @-@ 2 Sturmovik . He found the game 's graphics to be outdated and its design to be " simplistic " , and he wrote that its " somewhat basic flight model " prevents advanced maneuvers . He praised the game 's sound effects and music , as well as its " intricate damage modeling " , as its best features . He finished by saying that , because the genre was " <unk> for fresh titles " , Jane 's Attack Squadron could be recommended despite its flaws . 
