 The Court of Claims looked at whether the tribe had hunting and fishing rights and drew the same conclusion as the Wisconsin Supreme Court — that the terms of the treaty had to be resolved in the favor of the tribe , citing The Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States , 95 <unk> 232 ( <unk> , 1941 ) . In that decision , the Court of Claims had observed that the reason the tribe had agreed to the site of the reservation was that it was well suited for hunting , with plenty of game . The hunting rights by treaty were therefore confirmed . 
