 [ There is ] some little inconsistency in the defense , and the main part of it is this : There will be conversations here where Mr. Glasser wasn 't present , where people have seen Mr. Kretske and they have talked about , that they gave money to take care of Glasser , that is not binding on Mr. Glasser , and there is a <unk> there , and Mr. Glasser feels that if I would represent Mr. Kretske the jury would get an idea that they are together . . . . 
