 Philadelphia Inquirer - asked " [ s ] ince when do Americans have to declare their constitutional rights out loud in order to claim them ? " and that the decision had " set off ... shock waves among rights activists " . It commented that " [ t ] he fact that DNA exonerations often upend criminal confessions that turn out to have been coerced after lengthy interrogations demonstrates the risks of such police procedures . That 's a key reason Miranda rights were established in the first place " . The ruling made automatic videotaping of major @-@ crime interviews " critical " . It concluded that " [ i ] t may seem to some that the high court ruling will enable police to nab more bad guys and make the charges stick . But by setting up a ' gotcha ' set of rules about a key constitutional protection , the high court has eroded individual liberty for all Americans . " 
