 English professor Dana Heller argued that Solanas was " very much aware of feminist organizations and activism " , but that she " had no interest in participating in what she often described as ' a civil disobedience luncheon club . ' " Heller also stated that Solanas could " reject mainstream liberal feminism for its blind adherence to cultural codes of feminine politeness and decorum which the SCUM Manifesto identifies as the source of women 's debased social status . " 
