 A British parliamentary motion put forward by Labour MP Kate <unk> in February 2013 to <unk> <unk> the Viscount attacks and <unk> the victims on the anniversary of the second <unk> prompted <unk> in the <unk> press , with the Herald branding it a racist " <unk> motion " intended to <unk> the <unk> administration and its supporters . <unk> <unk> , a former <unk> commander , described the move as a <unk> motivated by race that went against the spirit of the amnesty enacted at Lancaster House . Christopher <unk> , a diplomat and political analyst , took a similar line , calling <unk> 's proposed commemoration " a <unk> ... [ that ] means they only regard the death of white people alone during the struggle . There is no mention of what happened to our sons and daughters in and outside the country . " <unk> 's official response to <unk> 's motion included the assertion that in all conflicts " civilians get caught up in cross @-@ fires due to faulty intelligence reports and other communication errors " , and juxtaposed the civilians killed in the Viscount <unk> with those killed at <unk> . 
