Verizon Tells Customer To Get A Lawyer & A Subpoena To Get An Itemized Bill
Verizon Tells Customer To Get A Lawyer & A Subpoena To Get An Itemized Bill


				


				


				from the judge-tells-verizon-to-get-stuffed dept
				


				I’ve noticed in the last couple years that major telcos have really ramped up their customer service.  I’ve had very positive exchanges with folks at Sprint and AT&T — two companies, which used to have reputations for horrible customer service.  Sprint, in particular, appears to have made it abundantly clear to customer service agents that they should bend over backwards to help customers.  Apparently, Verizon has gone in a different direction.  A woman, who called Verizon to try to find out about the $4.19 she was being charged for six local calls, was told by Verizon reps that the only way it would provide her an itemized bill was to get a lawyer and have the lawyer get a subpoena to force Verizon to disclose the information.
Instead, the woman went to court (by herself) and a judge told Verizon to hand over the itemized bill info.


It is a basic matter of fair business practice that a consumer should be able to contact a utility about a charge on a bill and learn what the charge is for and learn that the charge was correctly applied. The only verification that Verizon’s witness could offer that a charge like [the customer’s] $4.19 measured use charge was accurate and billed correctly was her faith in the accuracy of Verizon’s computer system. The only way that Verizon would offer any information about a past charge in response to a consumer inquiry was to require that customer to hire a lawyer and subpoena their own usage information. By no reasonable standard could this be considered reasonable customer service.


The judge has also suggested Verizon should be fined $1,000 for its failure here, and that suggestion will be reviewed by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

				


	Filed Under: itemized bill, subpoena
	

	Companies: verizon


			