Neutrino tomography of Earth
Neutrino tomography of Earth
ReferencesGaisser, T. K. & Honda, M. Flux of atmospheric neutrinos. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 52, 153–199 (2002).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Gandhi, R., Quigg, C., Reno, M. H. & Sarcevic, I. Ultrahigh-energy neutrino interactions. Astropart. Phys. 5, 81–110 (1996).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                González-García, M. C., Halzen, F., Maltoni, M. & Tanaka, H. K. M. Radiography of Earth’s core and mantle with atmospheric neutrinos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 061802 (2008).Borriello, E. et al. Sensitivity on Earth core and mantle densities using atmospheric neutrinos. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 0906, 030 (2009).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Borriello, E. et al. Studies on neutrino Earth radiography. Earth Planets Space 62, 211–214 (2010).Takeuchi, N. Simulation of heterogeneity sections obtained by neutrino radiography. Earth Planets Space 62, 215–221 (2010).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Romero, I. & Sampayo, O. A. About the Earth density and the neutrino interaction. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1696 (2011).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Aartsen, M. G. et al. Searches for sterile neutrinos with the IceCube detector. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 071801 (2016).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Bolt, B. A. The precision of density estimation deep in the Earth. Q. J. R. Astron. Soc. 32, 367–388 (1991).ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Kennett, B. L. N. On the density distribution within the Earth. Geophys. J. Int. 132, 374–382 (1998).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Masters, G. & Gubbins, D. On the resolution of density within the Earth. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 140, 159–167 (2003).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                de Wit, R., Käufl, P., Valentine, A. & Trampert, J. Bayesian inversion of free oscillations for Earth’s radial (an)elastic structure. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 237, 1–17 (2014).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Williamson, E. & Adams, L. H. Density distribution in the Earth. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 13, 413–428 (1923).
                    Google Scholar 
                The USGS Earthquake Hazards Program (US Geological Survey, 2017); https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/
                        Bellini, G. et al. Observation of geo-neutrinos. Phys. Lett. B 687, 299–304 (2010).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Gando, A. et al. Partial radiogenic heat model for Earth revealed by geoneutrino measurements. Nat. Geosci. 4, 647–651 (2011).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Winter, W. Neutrino tomography: Learning about the Earth’s interior using the propagation of neutrinos. Earth Moon Planets 99, 285–307 (2006).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Placci, A. & Zavattini, E. On the Possibility of Using High-Energy Neutrinos to Study the Earth’s Interior CERN Report (CERN, 1973); https://cds.cern.ch/record/2258764
                        Volkova, L. V. & Zatsepin, G. T. On the problem of neutrino penetration though the Earth. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Fiz. 38, 1060–1063 (1974).
                    Google Scholar 
                Hoshina, K. & Tanaka, H. K. M. Neutrino radiography with IceCube neutrino observatory. Poster at the XXV International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, 3–9 June 2012, Kyoto (Japan) (2012).Dziewonski, A. M. & Anderson, D. L. Preliminary reference Earth model. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 25, 297–356 (1981).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Luzum, B. et al. The IAU 2009 system of astronomical constants: the report of the IAU working group on numerical standards for fundamental astronomy. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 110, 293–304 (2011).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                USAO, USNO, HMNAO and UKHO The Astronomical Almanac (US Navy, 2017); http://asa.usno.navy.mil/
                        Chen, W., Li, C. L., Ray, J., Shen, W. B. & Huang, C. L. Consistent estimates of the dynamic figure parameters of the Earth. J. Geod. 89, 179–188 (2015).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Adrián-Martínez, S. et al. Letter of intent for KM3NeT 2.0. J. Phys. G 43, 084001 (2016).Gaisser, T. K., Stanev, T. & Tilav, S. Cosmic ray energy spectrum from measurements of air showers. Front. Phys. 8, 748–758 (2013).Article 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Ostapchenko, S. Monte Carlo treatment of hadronic interactions in enhanced Pomeron scheme: I. QGSJET-II model. Phys. Rev. D 83, 014018 (2011).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Zatsepin, V. I. & Sokolskaya, N. V. Three component model of cosmic ray spectra from 100-GeV up to 100-PeV. Astron. Astrophys. 458, 1–5 (2006).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Riehn, F., Engel, R., Fedynitch, A., Gaisser, T. K. & Stanev, T. A new version of the event generator Sibyll. PoS ICRC2015, 558 (2016).
                    Google Scholar 
                Barr, G. D., Gaisser, T. K., Robbins, S. & Stanev, T. Uncertainties in atmospheric neutrino fluxes. Phys. Rev. D 74, 094009 (2006).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Fedynitch, A., Becker Tjus, J. & Desiati, P. Influence of hadronic interaction models and the cosmic ray spectrum on the high energy atmospheric muon and neutrino flux. Phys. Rev. D 86, 114024 (2012).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Aartsen, M. G. et al. Measurement of the multi-TeV neutrino cross section with IceCube using Earth absorption. Nature 551, 596–600 (2017).ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Cooper-Sarkar, A., Mertsch, P. & Sarkar, S. The high energy neutrino cross-section in the Standard Model and its uncertainty. J. High Ener. Phys. 08, 042 (2011).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Aaron, F. D. et al. Combined measurement and QCD analysis of the inclusive e
                           + − p scattering cross sections at HERA. J. High Energy Phys. 01, 109 (2010).Bustamante, M. & Connolly, A. Measurement of the energy-dependent neutrino-nucleon cross section above 10 TeV using IceCube showers. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11043 (2017).Argüelles Delgado, C. A., Salvado, J. & Weaver, C. N. A simple quantum integro-differential solver (SQuIDS). Comput. Phys. Commun. 196, 569–591 (2015).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                González-García, M. C., Halzen, F. & Maltoni, M. Physics reach of high-energy and high-statistics IceCube atmospheric neutrino data. Phys. Rev. D 71, 093010 (2005).Berezinsky, V. S., Gazizov, A. Z., Zatsepin, G. T. & Rozental, I. L. On penetration of high-energy neutrinos through Earth and a possibility of their detection by means of EAS. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 43, 406 (1986). [Yad. Fiz. 43, 637 (1986)].Halzen, F. & Saltzberg, D. Tau-neutrino appearance with a 1000 megaparsec baseline. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4305–4308 (1998).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Beacom, J. F., Crotty, P. & Kolb, E. W. Enhanced signal of astrophysical tau neutrinos propagating through Earth. Phys. Rev. D 66, 021302 (2002).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Dembinski, H. P. et al. Data-driven model of the cosmic-ray flux and mass composition from 10 GeV to 1011 GeV. PoS ICRC2017, 533 (2017).ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Riehn, F. et al. The hadronic interaction model SIBYLL 2.3c and Feynman scaling. PoS ICRC2017, 301 (2017).ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Ostapchenko, S. LHC results and hadronic interaction models. Preprint at https://arXiv.org/abs/1612.09461 (2016).Aab, A. et al. Testing hadronic interactions at ultrahigh energies with air showers measured by the Pierre Auger Observatory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 192001 (2016).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Dedenko, L. G., Lukyashin, A. V., Roganova, T. M. & Fedorova, G. F. Testing of the VENUS 4.12, DPMJET 2.55, QGSJET II-03 and SIBYLL 2.3 hadronic interaction models via help of the atmospheric vertical muon spectra. EPJ Web Conf. 158, 06006 (2017).Article 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Dedenko, L. G., Lukyashin, A. V., Roganova, T. M. & Fedorova, G. F. Testing of the EPOS LHC, QGSJET01, QGSJETII-03 and QGSJETII-04 hadronic interaction models via help of the atmospheric vertical muon spectra. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 934, 012017 (2017).Article 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Pierog, T. Review of model predictions for extensive air showers. JPS Conf. Proc. 19, 011018 (2018).
                    Google Scholar 
                Feroz, F. & Hobson, M. P. Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 384, 449–463 (2008).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P. & Bridges, M. MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, 1601–1614 (2009).Article 
    ADS 
    
                    Google Scholar 
                Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P., Cameron, E. & Pettitt, A. N. Importance nested sampling and the MultiNest algorithm. Preprint at https://arXiv.org/abs/1306.2144 (2013).Download references