Autonomous Weapons Letter
Autonomous Weapons Open Letter: AI & Robotics Researchers - Future of Life Institute
All Open LettersAutonomous weapons select and engage targets without human intervention. Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has reached a point where the deployment of such systems is — practically if not legally — feasible within years, not decades, and the stakes are high: autonomous weapons have been described as the third revolution in warfare, after gunpowder and nuclear arms.Published9 February, 2016This open letter was announced July 28 at the opening of the IJCAI 2015 conference on July 28.
Journalists who wish to see the press release may contact Toby Walsh.
Hosting, signature verification and list management are supported by FLI; for administrative questions about this letter, please contact Max Tegmark.
Click here to see this page in other languages: German Japanese   Russian
Autonomous weapons select and engage targets without human intervention. They might include, for example, armed quadcopters that can search for and eliminate people meeting certain pre-defined criteria, but do not include cruise missiles or remotely piloted drones for which humans make all targeting decisions. Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has reached a point where the deployment of such systems is — practically if not legally — feasible within years, not decades, and the stakes are high: autonomous weapons have been described as the third revolution in warfare, after gunpowder and nuclear arms.
Many arguments have been made for and against autonomous weapons, for example that replacing human soldiers by machines is good by reducing casualties for the owner but bad by thereby lowering the threshold for going to battle. The key question for humanity today is whether to start a global AI arms race or to prevent it from starting. If any major military power pushes ahead with AI weapon development, a global arms race is virtually inevitable, and the endpoint of this technological trajectory is obvious: autonomous weapons will become the Kalashnikovs of tomorrow. Unlike nuclear weapons, they require no costly or hard-to-obtain raw materials, so they will become ubiquitous and cheap for all significant military powers to mass-produce. It will only be a matter of time until they appear on the black market and in the hands of terrorists, dictators wishing to better control their populace, warlords wishing to perpetrate ethnic cleansing, etc. Autonomous weapons are ideal for tasks such as assassinations, destabilizing nations, subduing populations and selectively killing a particular ethnic group. We therefore believe that a military AI arms race would not be beneficial for humanity. There are many ways in which AI can make battlefields safer for humans, especially civilians, without creating new tools for killing people.
Just as most chemists and biologists have no interest in building chemical or biological weapons, most AI researchers have no interest in building AI weapons — and do not want others to tarnish their field by doing so, potentially creating a major public backlash against AI that curtails its future societal benefits. Indeed, chemists and biologists have broadly supported international agreements that have successfully prohibited chemical and biological weapons, just as most physicists supported the treaties banning space-based nuclear weapons and blinding laser weapons.
In summary, we believe that AI has great potential to benefit humanity in many ways, and that the goal of the field should be to do so. Starting a military AI arms race is a bad idea, and should be prevented by a ban on offensive autonomous weapons beyond meaningful human control.
Add your signature

Signatories
		Click here to view the full list of signatories.

To date, the open letter has been signed by  AI/Robotics researchers and  others. The list of signatories includes:





AI/Robotics Researchers:
You need javascript enabled to view the open letter signers.



Other Endorsers:
You need javascript enabled to view the open letter signers.







Read More

		            CloseHow does verification work?Verified signatures are those which we have taken one or more extra steps to confirm as legitimate:• Direct contact - We have been in direct contact with this person to verify that they have signed the letter.• Declaration URL - This person has made a public declaration of signing the open letter which can be viewed online.All published signatures, ‘verified’ or otherwise, are subject to several forms of verification: email verification, spam and duplicate filters, and a review by a member of our data vetting team.
        OPEN LETTERSRelated postsIf you enjoyed this, you also might like:Sign up for the Future of Life Institute newsletterJoin 40,000+ others receiving periodic updates on our work and cause areas.Steering transformative technology towards benefiting life and away from extreme large-scale risks.Our Mission© 2024 Future of Life Institute. All rights reserved.