<story><title>Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract 3 papers</title><url>https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>panarky</author><text>The student-run newspaper broke the story and relentlessly pursued it.&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Stanford president’s research under investigation for scientific misconduct, University admits ‘mistakes’&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;2022&amp;#x2F;11&amp;#x2F;29&amp;#x2F;stanford-presidents-research-under-investigation-for-scientific-misconduct-university-admits-mistakes&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noreferrer&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;2022&amp;#x2F;11&amp;#x2F;29&amp;#x2F;stanford-presidents-res...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Stanford president dodges research misconduct questions&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;2023&amp;#x2F;04&amp;#x2F;25&amp;#x2F;stanford-president-dodges-research-misconduct-questions&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noreferrer&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;2023&amp;#x2F;04&amp;#x2F;25&amp;#x2F;stanford-president-dodg...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Internal review found ‘falsified data’ in Stanford President’s Alzheimer’s research, colleagues allege&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;2023&amp;#x2F;02&amp;#x2F;17&amp;#x2F;internal-review-found-falsified-data-in-stanford-presidents-alzheimers-research-colleagues-allege&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noreferrer&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;2023&amp;#x2F;02&amp;#x2F;17&amp;#x2F;internal-review-found-f...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;The reporter, Theo Baker, is a freshman.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;author&amp;#x2F;tabaker&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noreferrer&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;author&amp;#x2F;tabaker&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>ProjectArcturis</author><text>Good for Theo for writing this up, but it was Elizabeth Bik who got the ball rolling in discovering and investigating the fraud.</text></comment>
<story><title>Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract 3 papers</title><url>https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>panarky</author><text>The student-run newspaper broke the story and relentlessly pursued it.&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Stanford president’s research under investigation for scientific misconduct, University admits ‘mistakes’&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;2022&amp;#x2F;11&amp;#x2F;29&amp;#x2F;stanford-presidents-research-under-investigation-for-scientific-misconduct-university-admits-mistakes&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noreferrer&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;2022&amp;#x2F;11&amp;#x2F;29&amp;#x2F;stanford-presidents-res...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Stanford president dodges research misconduct questions&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;2023&amp;#x2F;04&amp;#x2F;25&amp;#x2F;stanford-president-dodges-research-misconduct-questions&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noreferrer&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;2023&amp;#x2F;04&amp;#x2F;25&amp;#x2F;stanford-president-dodg...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Internal review found ‘falsified data’ in Stanford President’s Alzheimer’s research, colleagues allege&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;2023&amp;#x2F;02&amp;#x2F;17&amp;#x2F;internal-review-found-falsified-data-in-stanford-presidents-alzheimers-research-colleagues-allege&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noreferrer&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;2023&amp;#x2F;02&amp;#x2F;17&amp;#x2F;internal-review-found-f...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;The reporter, Theo Baker, is a freshman.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;author&amp;#x2F;tabaker&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noreferrer&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;stanforddaily.com&amp;#x2F;author&amp;#x2F;tabaker&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>malux85</author><text>Good, this kind of thing in academia is far too common. Cherry picking results all the way to outright falsifying data. It’s a problem at Auckland university here in NZ too, my friends who are studying there say that their results are ignored if they are inconvenient. It’s disgusting, and they should make an example of them (they are I guess)</text></comment>