<story><title>Three typefaces for mathematics (2007) [pdf]</title><url>http://ultrasparky.org/school/pdf/DanielRhatigan_Dissertation.pdf</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>reikonomusha</author><text>In my opinion, the Monotype caster with a competent operator, the Modern Series 7 typeface, and the 4-line system produced mathematical typesetting not yet surpassed. There is no contemporary system for typesetting mathematics that can produce such beautiful compositions as the Monotype did.&lt;p&gt;TeX is phenomenal. And Computer Modern was a Herculean effort by Knuth, but in my opinion, it’s wholly lacking in many departments. It’s spindly, clinical, and vapid. But I don’t blame Knuth; we just need a serious typographer to learn METAFONT and make a beautiful typeface for mathematics that is not gimmicky.</text></comment>
<story><title>Three typefaces for mathematics (2007) [pdf]</title><url>http://ultrasparky.org/school/pdf/DanielRhatigan_Dissertation.pdf</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>drfuchs</author><text>The 4th paragraph on the 29th page names the students involved with the Euler effort in alphabetical order, giving the incorrect impression that I made a significant contribution.  All credit goes to the others listed.</text></comment>