<story><title>Lawmakers Want to Block Pornography at the Expense of Free Speech and Privacy</title><url>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/02/state-lawmakers-want-block-pornography-expense-your-free-speech-privacy-and-hard</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>saagarjha</author><text>&amp;gt; Those filters could only be removed if consumers pay a $20 fee.&lt;p&gt;Wait, what? Why should a fee to opt out exist?</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>rgbrenner</author><text>Read their faq... this question and the one after it:
&lt;a href=&quot;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;humantraffickingpreventionact.com&amp;#x2F;#q2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;humantraffickingpreventionact.com&amp;#x2F;#q2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;They encourage retailers and manufacturers to charge more than the $20 and pocket the difference. They are marketing the bill as pro-business.</text></comment>
<story><title>Lawmakers Want to Block Pornography at the Expense of Free Speech and Privacy</title><url>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/02/state-lawmakers-want-block-pornography-expense-your-free-speech-privacy-and-hard</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>saagarjha</author><text>&amp;gt; Those filters could only be removed if consumers pay a $20 fee.&lt;p&gt;Wait, what? Why should a fee to opt out exist?</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>jordan801</author><text>Because they don&amp;#x27;t care about the moral and psychological aspects of the content filtered. They care about making money and they know that people will buy the opt out.</text></comment>