messages: “Il a en outre affirmé que la façon dont le conseil arbitral a mené la nouvelle audience et rendu sa deuxième décision ne pouvait mener une personne raisonnablement bien informée a conclure qu'il y avait une probabilité de parti pris, selon le critère postulé par la Cour suprême du Canada dans l'affaire Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy Board (1976), 68 DLR (3d), 716.”
messages: assistant
messages: Could you translate this please
messages: user
messages: “He further submitted that the Board's conduct of the rehearing and the manner in which it rendered the second decision were not such as would lead a reasonably well-informed person to conclude that there was any likelihood of bias, according to the test postulated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy Board (1976), 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716.”
messages: assistant