Cuckoo vs Bloom Filter

Could you provide an example of a situation where one might choose to use a cuckoo filter over a bloom filter, based on these specific requirements?

Cuckoo filters and Bloom filters are both popular probabilistic data structures used for membership testing, but they have different trade-offs in terms of space usage, false positive rates, and insertion/deletion performance. Here's an example of a situation where one might choose to use a cuckoo filter over a Bloom filter based on specific requirements:

Suppose you are building a large-scale web application that needs to store a set of billions of URLs and check whether a given URL is already in the set or not. Your requirements are:

Space efficiency: You want to use as little memory as possible to store the set of URLs.

Low false positive rate: You want to minimize the chances of falsely reporting a URL as being in the set when it's not.

Fast insertion and deletion: You need to add and remove URLs from the set frequently and quickly.

In this case, you might choose to use a cuckoo filter over a Bloom filter because cuckoo filters offer better space efficiency and insertion/deletion performance while maintaining a similar false positive rate. Cuckoo filters can achieve up to 98% space utilization, while Bloom filters typically achieve around 50%. Cuckoo filters also allow fast insertions and deletions, whereas Bloom filters do not support deletions and have slower insertions due to potential collisions. Finally, cuckoo filters have a slightly higher false positive rate than Bloom filters, but still maintain a very low rate of about 1-2%.

Therefore, in this scenario, a cuckoo filter would be a better choice since it offers higher space efficiency and faster insertion/deletion performance while maintaining a low false positive rate.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence