To my knowledge, there isn't an official "innocent" verdict in most legal systems. The idea behind this is that once someone has been accused of a crime, the burden shifts to the government/prosecutor to demonstrate guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If the government fails to meet this burden, then the individual should be acquitted (i.e., "not guilty"). This doesn't necessarily mean the person was completely blameless or had no connection to the offense; it could simply indicate that the evidence presented during the trial wasn't strong enough to warrant a guilty verdict. Ultimately, the focus is on ensuring that people aren't wrongly convicted due to insufficient evidence or other factors.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence