Certainly! Prompt engineering can be particularly useful for crafting effective requests that elicit the desired response from the reader or listener. Here are some examples of how someone might prompt engineer a request:

1. Clarity and specificity: To make the request clear and specific, one might include details such as the deadline, the desired outcome, and any specific requirements. For example, instead of saying "Can you send me the report?", one might say "Could you please send me the report by 5pm today, in PDF format?"
2. Context and conditioning: To provide context and influence the reader's response, one might mention any relevant background information or explain the rationale behind the request. For example, "As we discussed in our meeting yesterday, I need the report by 5pm to finalize the presentation for the client meeting tomorrow."
3. Length and structure: To guide the reader's response and prevent them from becoming overwhelmed or confused, one might keep the request concise and well-structured. For example, breaking down a complex request into smaller, more manageable parts, such as "Please send me the report by 5pm today and include a summary of the key findings in the email."
4. Bias and fairness considerations: To avoid biases or unfairness in the request, one might use neutral language and avoid assumptions about the reader's capabilities or preferences. For example, instead of saying "You should know how to do this by now", one might say "Could you please provide a brief overview of the process for completing this task?"
5. Iterative refinement: To optimize the request for the best response, one might experiment with different variations of the request and refine them based on feedback and results. For example, one might try different levels of formality, different wording, or different degrees of urgency to see which version elicits the most effective response.

By applying prompt engineering techniques to requests, one can increase the likelihood of eliciting the desired response from the reader or listener, while also maintaining clarity, fairness, and effectiveness in communication.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence