Absolutely! I can list possible interpretations of "Ruth's Chris Steak House" for you.

---

##### Possible Interpretations Of The Phrase
Here is a list of some possibilities:
- Ruth owns/built/designed/created/presents a house that is intended to contain/serve/sell/prepare a Chris type of steak, or a steak that was cooked/prepared/owned/sold/named by or for Chris, or a steak that was made of, decorated with, in the theme of, or made for a Chris, or all Chrises.
- Ruth owns/built/designed/created/presents a steakhouse that is of the Chris type, or was named after, created by, or dedicated to a Chris, or is in a location called Chris, or it serves, sells, specializes in, made of, decorated with, in the theme of, or made for a Chris or all Chrises.
- A steakhouse that serves, sells, specializes in, made of, decorated with, in the theme of, or made for Chris or Chrises, and the Chris or Chrises are a food, drink, product, or object prepared/served/presented/created by Ruth.
- A house made of, decorated with, in the theme of, or made for  Chris steaks, and either the house or the steaks or both are owned/built/designed/created/presented by Ruth. Chris steaks could be a category or variety of steak, or could be steaks cooked/prepared/owned/sold/named by Chris or Chrises.
- A house that is of Chris architecture/style/location/theme/purpose and made of, decorated with, in the theme of, or made for steaks, and the house is owned/built/designed/created/presented by Ruth.
- A steakhouse that was owned/built/designed/created/presented by Chris, and Chris belongs in some way to Ruth.  Chris could be owned by, married to, claimed by, related to, adopted by, associated with, or recognized by a connection with Ruth.
- A house made of, decorated with, in the theme of, or made for steaks, and the house was owned/built/designed/created/presented by Chris, and Chris belongs in some way to Ruth. Chris could be owned by, married to, claimed by, related to, adopted by, associated with, or recognized by a connection with Ruth.

These are just some possible interpretations of *the phrase* "Ruth's Chris Steak House".  

---

##### Actual Interpretation Of The Name Of The Restaurant
However, please bear in mind the accepted factual interpretation for *the name of the **Ruth's Chris Steak House** restaurant* is: 
- a steakhouse restaurant and brand founded and operated by Chris as Chris Steak House, that was purchased, operated, improved, and later renamed by Ruth. 

---

##### Explanation Of The Name And Official Interpretation
The steakhouse was founded and originally named ***Chris Steak House*** by **Chris Matulich** in 1927.  Though it was sold and rebought by Chris six times, Chris eventually sold the restaurant last to **Ruth Fertel** in 1965, still as ***Chris Steak House***.  This original name remained until 1976, when a fire forced Ruth to move the location of the restaurant to a nearby larger party space she had fortuitously signed a ten year lease on earlier that year. The name was changed to ***Ruth's Chris Steak House*** because the sales contract with Chris prevented the trademark ***Chris Steak House*** name from being used at any address except the original (now destroyed) location. Although, with the growth of the restaurant to many locations much later, a name change would have been inevitable eventually because of this.  Ruth has publicly stated she has always hated the name, but it was chosen in a hurry to legally reopen the steakhouse as quickly as possible after the fire (within a week!), while maintaining continuity with the increasingly popular original name and restaurant.  The name was never changed again since, for this same latter reason--even after being franchised, sold to private equity, becoming a public company, and reverting to private ownership once again.  (Source: [Wikipedia - Ruth's Chris Steak House](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth%27s_Chris_Steak_House))

---

Do you have any more questions about Ruth's Chris Steak House?  Or is there anything else I can help you with?
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence