Certainly! Here's a new definition that exacerbates the three arguments:

"Art is the exclusive production of visually appealing paintings and sculptures created by a privileged few, designed solely for the enjoyment of an elite group of individuals who share the same narrow definition of beauty and emotional response."

This definition worsens the previous arguments as follows:

- **The definition is even narrower:** It explicitly states that art is limited to visually appealing paintings and sculptures, completely disregarding other art forms such as music, literature, dance, and performance art.
- **The definition is more subjective:** It emphasizes that art is designed solely for the enjoyment of an elite group, implying that only their opinion on beauty and emotional response matters. This exacerbates the subjectivity by restricting it to a particular, exclusive audience.
- **The definition is highly elitist:** It highlights the production of art by a privileged few, reinforcing the notion that art is only accessible and appreciated by a select group of individuals, further marginalizing other artists and art forms.

This definition accentuates the flaws of the previous arguments by intensifying the exclusivity, subjectivity, and elitism associated with art.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence