Both purely subjective and purely objective feedback can be helpful, but they have different strengths and weaknesses.

***Purely subjective feedback*** is based on the critic's opinion or taste. It can be helpful for providing a different perspective or for identifying things that the critic enjoyed or didn't enjoy. However, it can also be biased or unhelpful if the critic is not familiar with the subject or if they have a personal agenda.

***Purely objective feedback*** is based on facts or evidence. It can be helpful for identifying things that are objectively good or bad, such as grammar errors or technical flaws. However, it can also be dry or unhelpful if it doesn't provide any context or analysis.

The best approach to constructive criticism is to use a combination of subjective and objective feedback. This allows the critic to provide both their personal opinion and their objective analysis. This can be helpful for the criticised subject because it gives them a more complete understanding of what the critic is saying and how they can improve.

For example, a critic might say that they enjoyed a play, but that they thought the ending was too abrupt. This is a combination of subjective and objective feedback. The critic is stating their opinion that they enjoyed the play, but they are also providing an objective analysis of why they thought the ending was too abrupt. This feedback can be helpful for the playwright because it gives them specific information about what they can do to improve their work.

Ultimately, the best way to provide constructive criticism is to be honest, fair, and helpful. The critic should focus on the criticized subject's work and offer suggestions for improvement. The critic should also be respectful of the criticized subject's time and effort.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence