Methods to resolve such issues are numerous for each of these points. I could give you a few examples, but it won't come close to covering every angle.

1. There is a need to weight privacy concerns over the price of tools and methods to mitigate them. One way to solve this is to become more open, maybe as part of global policy, so privacy isn't needed as much. Other way is to improve user identification methods, offer users special hardware to partake in collaboration, that will be set to maintain required level of privacy. There's always a path to train users and cloud service providers on techniques to maintain privacy, ways to incentivize them to adhere to these techniques.

2. If we only talk about automation in AI form, then we need to understand that this is a sudden frontier for humanity. The progress in this field is so drastic, that assumptions on how it would evolve or explode in next few month are very uncertain, predictions for a few years would almost certainly be wrong. So, having that in mind, current AI models can be easily trained on biased data (actually the notion that data can be unbiased isn't something that can be taken seriously), that means public should have free access to data, that was used for training and to model weights and methods to train them at any time, because I believe that ethical model can be trained even on biased data if the order it was fed to model is right, so that way we will avoid senseless crusades (or book burnings) on certain types of data that are labeled "unethical", same goes for AI models trained on such datasets. Beside that humans have been generating enormous amounts of unethical data and feed it to each other for eons, despite that ethics didn't die, just evolved over the years. So, if someone would train unethical model, it outputs will be shunned and addressed same way unethical outputs of a person are addressed today. The main issue here is to spread ability to train AI models to every human, so we won't end up with ethical genocide of ethics variation in humanity by a single culture with most powerful AI in the end.

3. If you look [here](https://wir2022.wid.world/) and [here](https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/economy-99), you'll see that currently we have immensely unfair distribution of wealth among Earth population. The question on how to distribute wealth fairly is long past due to be answered. There are about 20 million people, who died from hunger in 2022, then about 450 millions are seriously undernourished, people who are mildly undernourished are in billions. And that is the food, one of the most basic need of a person. Other, less basic needs like education, housing, medicine, culture and so on are distributed even more unfairly. There's no point on solving the small issue on system that doesn't work at all for half of the world population and work bad for most of the other half. So, answering your question, the ethical solution to loss of the jobs is to spread wealth evenly among world population, chances that you will be that rich person, who suffers from such redistribution are about 1 in 10 million, maybe even less.

4. This is where we need to think about the reason why people want to partake in a workplace, that can be automated by an AI, or by other means. And again we understand that majority of people have to partake in such jobs, because wealth is unevenly distributed among people. They have to do such jobs to maintain their ability to live by getting their paychecks, not because they like such jobs or because by doing them they help humanity to move forward. As for creativity - if there's no pressure on keeping yourself alive, then all what's left is to be creative and explore possibilities or pursue goals, ideals and human connection.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence