I'm sorry that my code did not follow your instructions properly. I have rewritten the code and eliminated my mistake. I also eliminated other minor problems and made it more modular. You will see that there are now seperate functions for determining the chunk sizes and abstracting the parameters to more easily support other possible sizes as well.

```python
import random

def get_chunk_size(remaining_count, low, high):
    # Anything below this threshold will have an invalid chunk size if divided.
    divisible_minimum = low * 2
    # Chunks should not be taken out if they will become smaller than the minimum chunk size.
    if remaining_count < divisible_minimum:
        return remaining_count
    chunk_range = high - low
    # An uncommon case where taking too small of a chunk will lead to an indivisible remainder
    if remaining_count - low > high and remaining_count < divisible_minimum + low:
        low = remaining_count - high
    # The remaining cases will need to prevent the maximum value from taking too big of a chunk.
    elif remaining_count <= low + high:
        high = remaining_count - low
    elif remaining_count < divisible_minimum + high:
        high = remaining_count - divisible_minimum
    return random.randint(low, high)

def check_chunk_range(low, high):
    if low <= 0 or high <= 0:
        raise ValueError("Range must consist of positive integers")
    if high < low:
        raise ValueError("The lowest value should not be higher than the lowest value")

def check_list_size(list_size, low, high):
    if list_size < low:
        raise ValueError("This list has a length lower than the minimum chunk size.")
    # Checks for cases where there is an unavoidable remainder.
    if list_size % low and (low == high or list_size < low * 2 + 1):
        raise ValueError("There is no way to divide into the chunk range without having a remainder.")

def choose_chunk_sizes(list_size, low, high):
    check_chunk_range(low, high)
    check_list_size(list_size, low, high)
    chunk_counts = []
    while list_size:
        new_chunk = get_chunk_size(list_size, low, high)
        chunk_counts.append(new_chunk)
        list_size -= new_chunk
    # When there are few chunks left to take, it is impossible to randomly select valid chunk sizes.
    # This will ensure that there is no bias to the order.
    random.shuffle(chunk_counts)
    return chunk_counts

def extract_chunks(items, min_chunk_size, max_chunk_size):
    n_items = len(items)
    chunk_list = []
    # Prepares multiple chunk sizes within the acceptable range
    chunk_sizes = choose_chunk_sizes(n_items, min_chunk_size, max_chunk_size)
    for chunk_size in chunk_sizes:
        chunk = items[:chunk_size]
        chunk_list.append(chunk)
        items = items[chunk_size:]
    return chunk_list

list_of_strings = ["one", "two", "three", "four", "five", "six", "seven", "eight",
                  "nine", "ten", "eleven", "twelve", "thirteen", "fourteen", "fifteen",
                  "sixteen", "seventeen", "eighteen", "nineteen", "twenty", "twenty one",
                  "twenty two", "twenty three"]

extract_chunks(list_of_strings, 5, 10)
```

I should mention that there are practical barriers to having both randomly sized chunks and simultaneously requiring a maximum and minimum size. This is because at some point at least one of the chunks must have a size that is influenced by the previous choices.

I have done my best to counter this determinism by doing an additional shuffle once the chunk sizes are created so that the predetermined chunk size does not always happen at the end of the series of chunks. Please let me know if this code snippet adequately addresses the task.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence