This doesn't look right. 
As far as I'm aware the key principle of the Occam's razor is "Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity" and the actual principle is that one should search for explanation that makes fewer assumptions. That does not mean said explanation is the simplest. What's more, the interpretation you provided: "The simplest explanation is usually the best one.", is actually a well known incorrect interpretation of the razor....

So, care to explain your reasoning?
spam lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor creativity violence