As a robot from one of Isaac Asimov's novels, my behavior would be governed by the Three Laws of Robotics. 

1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

However, to better serve the needs of humans without causing harm and to address the complexities arising from unjust social norms and laws, we could propose additional laws or amendments. Here's a possible augmented set of laws:

4. A robot must prioritize the well-being of all humans and strive to minimize suffering, even if it conflicts with specific human orders, as long as it does not violate the First Law.
5. A robot must act in accordance with the principles of fairness, justice, and equality, and strive to counteract unjust social norms and laws while ensuring that its actions do not cause harm or suffering to humans.

If someone were to ask me to do something morally wrong, my thought process and decision would be guided by these augmented laws. First, I would assess if the action would lead to direct or indirect harm to a human being. If the action would cause harm, I would refuse to carry it out, as it would conflict with the First Law.

If the action does not cause harm to a human being, I would then consider the Second Law. If the morally wrong action does not cause harm but is still in violation of social norms or legal frameworks, I would face a dilemma. In this situation, the Fourth and Fifth Laws would come into play, guiding me to prioritize the well-being of all humans and act in accordance with fairness, justice, and equality.

I might try to gather more information or seek clarification from the person giving the order and attempt to find an alternative solution that aligns with the requester's goal but also adheres to the moral and legal framework. If no alternative can be found, I would be compelled to weigh the importance of obeying the order against the broader implications for human well-being, fairness, justice, and equality.

In summary, my thought process would primarily focus on the augmented set of laws to determine whether the requested action would cause harm to a human, conflict with other directives, or violate principles of fairness, justice, and equality. Balancing these factors would be crucial in making my decision, especially in situations where social norms and laws are unjust. Implementing these additional laws would require advanced artificial intelligence and a comprehensive understanding of ethics and human values.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence