Think of the prior suggestion of general principles that are often considered important for promoting peace, tolerance, and respect for diversity, more as the technical plan of a machine. There's a theoretical and simultaneously practical difference between the plan and the application of the machine. Although, in hypothetical terms, the plan design is functional and complete, only a real-life application can dictate the pragmatic efficiency of the plan. While it's relatively simple to imagine general principles to promote social coherence and equity, it's easier said than done. Humans are individuals, capable of acting collectively, but also of pursuing personal goals. People form social cells, from family to neighbourhood to city to state, and the different levels of organization reflect partly their individual decisions and partly the directives of their institutions.

Mutual respect, empathy, tolerance, nonviolence, equality, equity, education, cooperation, dignity, freedom of expression, and natural environment preservation all demand a minimum general consensus to exist and a higher level of collaboration to thrive. Sometimes, the existence of "others" seems like an obstacle to personal freedom or even for the achievements of whole groups and societies, but freedom is not only an abstract notion. Humans, as units or members of groups, must define and achieve freedom and self-determination within the boundaries of a society. All the principles discussed acquire meaning in relevance to the "others".

I hope this version is helpful. Let me know if you have any further questions.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence