Here is a further explanation of the differences between Suzuki and Rinpoche on the use of language and terminology in their books:

* Suzuki uses Zen terminology and concepts in his book, "Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind." This can make it difficult for readers who are not familiar with Zen to understand his teachings. For example, he uses the term "zazen" to refer to Zen meditation, and the term "no-self" to refer to the core Zen concept of anatta, or the absence of a permanent self.
* Rinpoche uses Tibetan Buddhist terminology in his book, "In Love with the World." However, he also provides translations and explanations for these terms, which makes his teachings more accessible to a wider audience. For example, he uses the term "tonglen" to refer to a Tibetan Buddhist practice of exchanging oneself with others, and the term "rigpa" to refer to the ultimate nature of reality.

The difference in the use of language and terminology reflects the different backgrounds and audiences of the two authors. Suzuki was a Japanese Zen master who wrote for an English-speaking audience. He wanted to share the teachings of Zen with people who might not be familiar with the tradition. Therefore, he used Zen terminology in his book, even though he knew that this could make it difficult for some readers to understand.

Rinpoche was a Tibetan Buddhist lama who wrote for a Western audience. He wanted to make his teachings accessible to people who might not be familiar with Tibetan Buddhism. Therefore, he provided translations and explanations for Tibetan Buddhist terms in his book.

Ultimately, the choice of language and terminology is a matter of personal preference. Some people prefer to read books that use familiar language, while others prefer to read books that challenge them to learn new things. There is no right or wrong answer, and the best choice will depend on the individual reader.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence