International arbitration can be an effective way to resolve cross-border intellectual property disputes, but there are challenges that need to be addressed to make the process more efficient and effective. Werra (2012) argues that parties and their counsel need to assess in advance the implications of using arbitration effectively for solving international intellectual property disputes in a way that meets their needs and protects their interests. Lewis (2021) demonstrates how international arbitration is particularly well poised to address some of the specific considerations and requirements of paramount concern to the international intellectual property lawyers and their clients. Hanotiau (2011) notes that international arbitration is facing challenges such as judicialization, time and cost efficiency, and various ethical issues. Jović (2019) analyzes the benefits and limitations of international arbitration in disputes that are subject to intellectual property rights, and pays particular attention to the WIPO Center for Arbitration and Mediation as a permanent arbitration institution whose primary activity is the resolution of disputes in the field of intellectual property rights. Overall, the papers suggest that international arbitration can be an effective way to resolve cross-border intellectual property disputes, but parties and their counsel need to carefully consider the implications of using arbitration and address the challenges that may arise.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence