There is no definitive answer to this question, as different software packages may have different levels of exposure, complexity, and maintenance. However, based on the web search results, some possible factors that could make a software package more likely to be affected by new vulnerabilities are:

- The software package is widely used and popular, which makes it a more attractive target for attackers and researchers. For example, **Apache Log4j2**¹ was recently affected by several critical vulnerabilities that affected many applications that use it for logging.
- The software package is outdated or unmaintained, which means that it may not receive security patches or updates regularly. For example, **Software in the Public Interest, Inc** and **Fedora project** saw a small increase in vulnerabilities this year compared to last year².
- The software package has a large number of components or dependencies, which increases the attack surface and the complexity of securing it. For example, **IBM** was the vendor with the most confirmed vulnerabilities this year³, which could be partly due to its diverse portfolio of software products and services.

Based on these factors, some examples of software packages that could be more likely to be affected by new vulnerabilities in the near future are:

- **WordPress**: A popular content management system that powers over 40% of the web. It has many plugins and themes that can introduce vulnerabilities if they are not updated or verified.
- **Oracle Database**: A widely used relational database management system that stores and manages data for many applications. It has many features and options that can increase the complexity and risk of misconfiguration or exploitation.
- **Adobe Acrobat Reader**: A common software for viewing and editing PDF files. It has a history of being affected by various types of vulnerabilities, such as buffer overflows, memory corruption, or arbitrary code execution.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence