Yes. Well, in that case, maybe the optimal size is a size that hurt as few ducks as possible. If so, just one (1) really large duck (so large that it's impossible to fit more ducks) would be optimal. It would also be optimal from a purely optimizational view, since one large duck, so big that it fills up a whole car will raise the survival rate of the other ducks, which is something that is almost by definition in the general direction of optimal.

So my final answer is that exactly one (1) really large duck would fit in a 70's Chevrolet Camaro. I would always choose a really large duck over many small ones, since it is optimal in terms of survival rate among the ducks. Stacking ducks on top of each other is cruel and immoral, and often lead to a painful death, I agree with you. Choosing a duck so large that no other ducks can fit, would solve the problem. No stacking = higher survival rate among ducks. I don't think a calculation is even necessary here. I'm sure you can understand basic logic. Let me know if this is not the answer you're looking for or if I can help you in any other way. I'm here to help!
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence