Q: Title: Well I liked it anyway Review: It took me one night to read this- even if the plot did seem to 'drag' King has a way of making you (well some people) need to know the outcome. His clever use of language as a tool of suspense was a major drawcard. Even though I am Australian and have know idea (and don't really care) about baseball, it didnt matter to me- I still found it an effective little novel. I dont think anyone else other than King could get way with the dodgy 'monster' or 'God of the Lost' or whatever it was. It was a scary being until the end when it revealed itself. Still, I kept on reading because King has this knack of making you want to find out what happens. I can see where some people might find it lame- its not everyones idea of a good scare, but I really did enjoy it for the simple fact that King has that effect on me- even in some of his really lacklustre novels (Regulators, Thinner)he still has a way of leading you to the end of the story. Is this product review negative?

A: No


Q: Title: Worst vampire movie ever. Review: There are certain genre conventions with vampires and werewolves. Like the fact that they are hard to kill. At one point in this movie a vampire passes out from blood loss due to a stab wound from an ordinary knife. Please. While this is the most egregious disappointment, it is certainly not the only one. The movie plays more like a Hong Kong gunfest than a vamp or werewolf movie. Werewolves were only identifiable when they (rarely) chose to wolf-out. Vampires weren't really identifiable at all, except perhaps for the one occasion when a vamp bit someone. And why are werewolves running on walls and ceilings?! The only good things about this movie are the leather outfits. Is this product review negative?

A: Yes


Q: Title: See!! Look what I can do to you!!! ....... I can bore you!!! Review: Despite the fact that Ben Affleck is the most overated actor in the last 10 years, I gave this movie a chance. My time would have been better spent giving myself shock treatments. At least then I would have gotten something out of the experience.Samuel L. Jackson did a good job portraying a desperate man who has been [done] over by Affleck. But Affleck's performance is absolutely horrible. They spend the entire film out to get each other only to feel guilty when they mess up the others' lives.Do yourself a favor, and try the shock treatments instead. Is this product review negative?

A: Yes


Q: Title: Not your parents' intro physics book Review: While some of the examples in the text need to be fleshed out a bit, and the problems at the end the of the chapters are somewhat too oriented toward programming problems, on the whole I am finding this to be an extraordinary text. I am teaching it to freshman physics majors, and even those who've had significant high school physics (includng AP) have never really seen a physics course like this, and it seems to be keeping them excited. Unlike the standard freshman college texts, which simply reiterate the high school curriculum at a slightly higher level (and makes them do blocks on planes and pulleys ad nauseum), Matter and Interaction introduces classical mechanics alongside modern, alongside relativity. I have also found it a useful jumping-off point to discuss oscillators and circuits. Though the authors will need to do a bit of fine-tuning in future editions, I highly recommend this as an excellent freshman physics curriculum. Is this product review negative?

A: