Title: Quality of "The Dragons of North Chittendon" Review: I'll start of by saying this is a fantastic read, I think anyone should give it a chance. Now this buy was nice, not too pricey, and got to my house from Minnesota quite quickly. The quality is pretty good, the cover's not great, but all the pages are in pretty much perfect shape. Two thumbs up. Is the review positive or negative?
Positive
------
Title: Very good but slightly biased Review: Here is a good reference guide for the honest historic ship modeller! I only regret the fact its coverage of portuguese ships is very incomplete and casual. It even presents a totally unreliable model of a portuguese XVI century caravel in page 203! In the sources chapter it doesn't even mention the oldest technical documents on shipbuilding in Europe: the "Ars Nautica"(1570). However, for everyone mainly interested in ancient ships other than the portuguese it's a fairly complete reference not to be without. Is the review positive or negative?
Positive
------
Title: Perfect. Review: The plot description didn't entice me (a lonely old man imagines flying cities in the plains below), but the reviews convinced me to try it. Wow... I cried at the end of Calenture the way I sometimes cry at the opera - overwhelmed by the sheer beauty of it. Must-read literary, imaginative fantasy. Is the review positive or negative?
Positive
------
Title: Gobble-dee Guk Review: This book is almost impenetrable. Utterly incomprehensible. This book was written for advanced experts in the murky field of philosophy of religion -- I would guess that .00001% of the world's population can understand this stuff. What is the deal? Why would anyone write such a book that is utterly and totally impossible to understand?If you like sentences like this, you are gonna love this book:"It may be worth exploring a possible metaphoric relation between the semiotic realm and its possible capacity to mirror exotic ontology in the context of original creativity."Got that? Is the review positive or negative?
