Ques: Title: Very disappointing. Review: I would much rather see a documentary on the work that went into this film than the film itself. It falls far short of what I expect from a nature documentary by pandering to the "family-friendly" crowd with its anthropomorphic narration and a very blinking eye.If you watch it with the sound turned down, it is gorgeous though. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
Ans: Negative

Ques: Title: Gravity is Great! Review: I LOVE this grinder. I was looking for one like this for some time. Works great and always brings a smile to the user. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
Ans: Positive

Ques: Title: Disappointing Review: She sounds absolutely horrible. The songs don't flow, the mixing sucks, and her voice is painfully untrained. This one is going directly in the trash. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
Ans: Negative

Ques: Title: Get the original mix Review: The original 1982 "Secret Records" mix of Under the Blade was Twisted Sister's best record. This one, the 1985 "Atlantic Records Remaster," is the worst.I am not a snob--I really feel that the new mix detracts just that much from the songs and the overall quality of the album.1982 Original Mix: Drum-and Bass-oriented. A very heavy, punky, fast metal pop album1985 Mix: Guitar and Vocal-oriented, "glammy" mix. Now, I'm not saying there's anything wrong with a glammy mix as long as this is how an album was recorded. However, Under the Blade was a punk attitude album. With the guitar and vocals levels increased to biblical proprtions, and drums and bass whittled down in the mix, the guitar sounds crappy, the vocals weak, etc.Avoid this one and seek out the original, from 1982, either on Secret or Roadrunner records. Avoid the Atlantic / Spitfire re-release. Even the cover is different, "glammy" on this one. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
Ans: