Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: Sheldon needs to make up his mind what he wants to do with TELL ME YOUR DREAMS. He starts of with a barely acceptable thriller, then switches suddenly to a trial drama, a sorry take-off on Grisham's A TIME TO KILL. Realizing how poorly he failed, he changes to a psychological drama. In the words of Beavis and Butthead, "It sucks!" The only thing that keeps you reading is that it's bursting with potential, and, with a better author (Grisham?), could soar. An appropriate sequel should be entitled SORRY SID. But could it be any worse? Answer:
No
--
Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: This is a great book for middle school/junior high boys. Not just about hockey, but about surviving in this world. Exciting, fun and good to read. You will love it! Answer:
Yes
--
Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: Before I go into the negative, I'd like to mention that I would give the novel itself five stars, hands down. Like the rest of the series, it is well written, complex, and an absolutely phenomenal read.That being said, the Kindle download of this book was shot to hell. With obvious (and sometimes confusing) typos in just about every single freaking paragraph, it was obvious that there was no attempt to review or edit after the translation to digital. I am ashamed to have paid money for this garbage, and am definitely buying the rest of the books in paperback to save myself the frustration of trying to figure out what what the authors had actually written. I've come to accept a certain amount of errors in my Kindle downloads and can ignore them for the most part, but this was absolutely unacceptable. Answer:
No
--
Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: Kreeft's so-called socratic argument does not find it neccessary to include scientfic propositional content in his work on abortion, yet surely it is science that proves that anti-abortionists have no factual basis for their claims that the embryo or foetus is an autonomous organism. A shallow display of Aristotlean a priori reasoning, debatable essences not based on scientific fact, and an argument that doesn't work in real life. Hypatia, break Socrates out of there!! Answer:
