Q: Title: Want to win $1,000 a day? Product review: There is no doubt you can win at blackjack using this strategy. It is just outstanding.The author uses a much simplified card count system to identify favorable betting situations. This is by far the easiest and most effective count I have ever seen. But the strategy goes much further than simply introducing another card counting system.The author, Roger Ford, reveals a dynamic betting strategy that will put you way over the top at blackjack. Combined with his simplified card count, it produces the most consistent winnings I have ever seen at blackjack.I have been using the Advantage Blackjack strategy and racking up win after win. My win rate is just phenomenal and my losses have been very low. If you want to win consistently, even against the monster Atlantic City eight decks, you must use this strategy. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
A: flattering


Q: Title: Two quality singles do not make an album Product review: To say that there are only two songs worth hearing on Depeche Mode's second album, A Broken Frame, would be a bit of an exaggeration, but without a doubt the band suffered from the sophomore jinx here. It's not that the songs are consistently unlistenable; in fact they're pleasant enough, but nothing on the album stands out like its first single, "See You." Even the album's one other highlight, "The Meaning of Love," sounds like a Speak & Spell outtake. Keeping in mind that Martin Gore would churn out many singles as good or better than any on Speak & Spell in the years following A Broken Frame, it seems that rather than missing Vince Clark, Depeche Mode and Gore were just at a creative low point here. Only hardcore Depeche Mode fans need this, casual fans and neophytes should go for The Singles 81>85 instead. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
A: unflattering


Q: Title: when will Hollywood learn..... Product review: No plot, no credible facts. King Scorpion and Imhotep didn't even live in the same time frame. When will Hollywood learn?!This is a pathetic sequel to the first film, The Mummy (which was much more fun). It is also a film which make several references to older films in some scenes oh! so cliché (the jet airship?!?). The scriptwriters obviously did not care about making any sense when writing this junk. Alex's mother would worry but not the father?!?!?! Oh pleeease. The kid seems to have been, at first, a copy of Ramses Peabody (see the Amelia Peabody series written by Elizabeth Peters); however this dissolves after his meeting with the mummy.A film as full of oh! so phony special effects as possible. Some scenes even look like video games. It is so incredibly gory too.The two stars I give for making me laugh from beginning to end, and for its unbelievable stupidity throughout the story. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
A: unflattering


Q: Title: Not a true sequel, but a failed TV spin off series pilot. Product review: Don't be fooled by the title. Omen IV: The Awakening is not a true sequel to the cult classic theatrical trilogy at all. This made for television misfire is actually the failed pilot of a proposed Omen spin-off television series for the Fox Network that would have followed the growth of an all new Anti-Christ, the clone of the deceased Damien Thorn. A pathetic attempt to bottle another icy bolt of gothic terror that is just an embarrassing failure for all involved. Skip it. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
