Question: Title: the only slide player to nail the Sacred Steel feel Product review: This is an amazing album. I am a steel guitarist playing in the Sacred Steel tradition, and Derek's playing completely floors me in his touch, his tone, his control, his feel. Without a doubt the best slide player I have ever heard. I simply had not known that the slide guitar was capable of so much sensitivity and complexity. What is most impressive is Derek's artistic judgement ... and play with feeling. My only criticism is that the album displays so many facits of his playing that it doesn't seem to have a unifying theme, but that it minor indeed. What an amazing musician. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Answer: flattering

Question: Title: Impressive Product review: Picked up this little system based on the reviews and the price. I was kind of skeptical, I looked at the comparable bose system, but didn't want to shell out the extra 100 bones. This little 2.1 is an excellent value for what it is. The 3" woofs have more throat (mid range) than I figured they would, which is a good thing. It did take some fussing with the an EQ to make the system shine. If you want more, go to a receiver and floor speakers (my initial intentions, but I'm saving it for later). Overall good sound so far (first few hours), we'll see how it holds up. I'd recommend it for anybody looking for a good 2.1, just make sure you have a decent sound card. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Answer: flattering

Question: Title: Please Explain? Product review: This is a great movie, probably the all-time best of its genre. The 1 star is not for the content of the movie but for its adaptation to dvd. Now, several reviewers have argued that the film was originally shot in a 1.33 ratio instead of 1.85, which, if true, would make it superfluous to release a widescreen version. However, other reviewers have pointed out that a 1.85 ratio widescreen version existed at one time on vhs. Not being terribly familiar with film, I would ask those who say that it was originally shot in 1.33 how it was made into a 1.85 version...where would the footage that occupied the additional space have come from? Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Answer: