*Question*
Title: Don't burn urself... Product review: I just purchased this item yesterday from Kohls for 78 dollars because I price matched the Walmart price...YAYThe only function I have used so far is the rotisserie. The instructions tell you to preheat first...I did that...Then, while trying to place the bird in the hot preheated oven I burned myself. It is quite a task to get the spic inside the oven. It's made like kinda like an arrow. You have to fit the pointed end in the hole which is impossible to do without burning something, your arm, clothing, potholders, etc.They should've made the spic easier to drop in like the one on the Foreman rotisserie. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
**Answer**
flattering

*Question*
Title: Lost in Translation Product review: The movie had a couple of funny Bill Murray moments. But what a dud! Kept waiting for it to get started and at the end, all I could say was "what was that all about". I know the critics highly praised it, but I have to be honest about what I saw, it didn't hook me emotionally and it rather irritated me in many scenes. The only scenes that were entertaining were when Bill Murray was doing the commercial. He was very good in that. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
**Answer**
unflattering

*Question*
Title: Good movie- awful dvd Product review: I always thought this one of the better Emmanuelle films and it still is but this has got to be the worst DVD's ever. It's not so much DVD artefacts that the actual master seems to be from a home video recording with the bleeding colours and tape dropouts a dead giveaway. There is no reason to get this on DVD unless that's the only way you have to see this. Film gets three and a half stars, DVD only one star. A pity Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
**Answer**
unflattering

*Question*
Title: Horrible textbook. Product review: This has to be the worst textbook I have ever used in my life. Terms are not in bold, there are no review questions, and the authors do not provide footnotes with there sources. The book is impossible to Outline or even take notes on since it follows no coherent structure. Sometimes it will talk about the consequences of things, before it discuss's there causes. It also has numerous historical mistakes. Our teacher points them out every class, but some even I cna see on my own.The book filled with typos. It says that nationalism challenged neo-platonism. I think it means nominalism. Please do not use this as a main textbook for the course. You students will not do well. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
**Answer**
