Ques:Title: Arrived damaged Review: This item arrived with a chip in the enamel. Also, it arrived in a generic bubble sleeve with no identifying product information, brand name, etc. This made me wonder if I had been sent a returned item minus the original product packaging. I am returning it and will not reorder. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?

Ans:Negative
-----
Ques:Title: Couldn't/didn't reach its prime :-( Review: I had looked forward to seeing this movie since I heard the cast and the premise. It failed to deliver however and I was actually very disappointed in it. I found it a little long winded in parts and slow going in general. There was so much room for more humour and yet it never got off the ground. Honestly, the only thing I was impressed with was Uma Thurmans younger boyfriend/Meryl Streeps son, Bryan Greenberg. He's hot.Overall, I am sorry to say that Meryl Streeps talent was severely wasted here and I'm hoping her Devil Wears Prada movie is much much better. She and this movie were both off the boil. Don't rush to see this. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?

Ans:Negative
-----
Ques:Title: Benassi Bros Rock Again! Review: I have to say, this is a GREAT song! I just had to get it! I only wish I could get some kind of music video DVD of it. This CD has 6 different versions, all of which are great! I am enjoying it very much!It is a very hard find too. I searched all over, and found some Vinyl copies, but otherwise only found one other place that had the CD format for sale, in another country. I hope more get printed! Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?

Ans:Positive
-----
Ques:Title: If you like others to think for you, this is your book! Review: Irons does a decent job of relating the history of the U.S. Supreme Court in an "easy to understand" manner. What this means is that he tries to paint a folksy picture of the people and issues surrounding the major court decisions of the past two centuries--he basically summarizes the major decisions, briefly explains why they're important, and then tells you his opinion and why it is correct. The book gives the reader nothing that your standard constitutional law reader does not--in fact, it gives less historical substance, compared with Kutler's book--but the appeal of this book is that it reads more like a novel and less like a history. Apparently some people like others to do their thinking for them. I do not, so I only found this book to be of minimal use. I wish that someone would have warned me about the book before I wasted my time on it, so hopefully I can prevent similar disappointment to someone else. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?

Ans: