Title: What a failure Product review: Easily the worst Weezer album. I'm a big fan of the blue album, and Pinkerton was wonderful. The Green album and Maladroit were lesser albums, but still had at least 3-4 good songs on them. But this album is just terrible. The lyrics are howlingly bad - simple, stupid and childish. The lyrics on the past albums weren't Shakespeare, but at least the music distracted you. This time, the songs are bland, and the melody is lacking. I would be embarassed to play any of these songs out loud, or for someone to see this album in my collection. Don't waste your money. And don't listen to the babbling fanatics - this album is terrible. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
unflattering

Title: A classic guitar instrumental sound Product review: This album, the second to last before their hiatus and later resurgence, sounds nothing like their earlier output or later work in the 70's and 80's. But a tight, toe-tapping sound is still present from Hank Marvin, Bruce Welch, John Rostill, and Brian Bennett. This album was entitled "Shadows 67" in Canada. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
flattering

Title: better with time Product review: I have everything on the "CLOUDS"since "Live at the music Hall" in 67' to "Live in Charlston" in 96'and I haven't heard this kind of a change in the type of material they do since they recorded " It's Time" in 74';But it goes to show that the Mighty Clouds are one of the most versatile groups in the industry today and this album is a testament to that fact and it seems the voice of willie joe ligon is ageless and the group just gets better with time. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
