Ques: Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied? Title: do not buy Review: You will be sorry if you purchase from these guys. They have an abysmal customer support record and a laughable sense of proper documentation. "Is my printer compatible?" "I don't know, you would have to call pre-sales"So I just keep checking with pre-sales until I find a printer that works? You're kidding, right?
Ans: dissatisfied

Ques: Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied? Title: Fun racing game Review: It's good fun racing, and a change from some of they hyper real racing environments. A really nice video game, in the truest sense of the word.Treat yourself.This is not a game that promises to change the way you spend your life, nor is it 'the greatest visuals, graphics, etc.' but straight forward entertainment, though I have to point out that the graphics are much nicer than many other games'. This will not hurt your eyes, I promise. Have fun.
Ans: satisfied

Ques: Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied? Title: Is there a directors cut? Review: I like this movie very much and enjoyed the acting and the watching of the beautiful photography. Still it kept me very unsatisfied .After two hours, the plot is set for the high tense scenes, the Greek theatre is renewed, calibans puppets are shown and so on. But then there is just the tempest and a feasf. in my opinion, the director planned to have the harpye-scenes or the Juno scenes there, but for some reasons, he dropped them, or they have been cut out. I tried to find out about the story of the moviemaking via Internet, but couldn't find anything.Someone out there knows more?
Ans: satisfied

Ques: Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied? Title: Genetics is more than intuition Review: The wonderful reviews of this book I found here are perhaps evidence that we should take all such offerings at Amazon with a boulder of salt. At the risk of being labelled a braying pc-er, let me ask you to THINK BEFORE YOU LEAP into bed with Rushton's perception of human variation. His logic is, in brief...1. Human groups differ in some traits (e.g. crime & sex), 2. Human groups differ in some genes (e.g. those affecting skin color), therefore , 1 is because of 2. This logic is neither "obvious" nor "brave" nor "anti-pc"...it's just flawed at the core. Rushton's been rejected by most evolutionary ecologists not because he is a seeker of hard truths that shatter pc illusions, but because he uses blizzards of often irrelevant numbers and paper thin or incorrect logic to make arguments that automatically resonate with many folks regardless of their knowledge of the science involved(see other reviews here). How brave.
Ans: