Q: Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied? Title: Can't buy at 85 Review: My sincere apologies Disney Corporation, but I will not purchase nor will I give a positive review to this film without "The Love Is Gone" being included in the film. This film is a solid Four Stars, perhaps even Five Stars, in its entirety. Nevertheless, this will not do and should be, for Heaven's sake, "re-released" in its entirety.
A: dissatisfied


Q: Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied? Title: Worst ever!! Don't buy!! Review: We bought ours less than 2 months ago. I bought it to mainly use for small messes my toddlers make. It worked great at first. Now we would be happy if it would run for more than 3 minutes without the battery dying. We have to go over and over the specks of dirt. Sometimes it will pick it up in the 5th try. Sometimes we can even get one area rug vacumed before the battery runs out. Ours has found a new home in the trash. We found for large jobs our Bosch Cyclone is the best, and small jobs I now use a Sanyo Transformax Sc-180. I won't even bother with cordless anymore.
A: dissatisfied


Q: Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied? Title: A little disappointed Review: With my blood pressure level pretty high, my Dr. wanted me to keep a daily check on it. I purchased a Omron HEM 790IT monitor. It lookedlike a well built unit, however I had trouble with getting the cuffon my arm. It would twist around my arm as I was trying to wrap thevelcro end together. The readings were always higher than what my Dr.would get. We tested the unit in his office, and aginst his, we got readings that were 10 points higher. I returned the unit, and got asecond one. This one seems to be the same. The readings are alwayshigh.
A: dissatisfied


Q: Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied? Title: Wolfram needs to read the latest literature Review: Cellular automata is not new. The use of CA for modelling is not new. The theories that he disputes are not current. It is similar to arguing that his science is new because it refutes the fact that we are not the center of the universe. The only way any of this would get published in a reviewed journal is if he paid the editor. Which is exactly what he did to get this published.
