Q: Title: 2nd One Wasn't Good Review: Update:After a couple of years, my coffeemaker started leaking badly. At this price I threw it out and bought a new one because I loved it. The new one improved the size of the cup you can use, however, it leaked badly from day one. I had to stop using it. I can no longer recommend it.This simple coffeemaker makes a decent cup of coffee in no time flat! It takes up hardly any room on my counter and the coffee is hot. The only reason I rated it four stars and not five is that there is a an unpleasant residue in the bottom of my cup because you can't use a paper filter. So I don't drink the last sip and I am good to go! Also, you can't fit a large mug in it - the picture is deceiving. Is the review positive or negative?
A: Negative


Q: Title: A voice of reason on potty training Review: Dr. Lekovic has written an interesting, well thought-out manual on the topic of potty training. She is a voice of reason in an often unreasonable or mirky area with regard to parenting advice. Her book provides medical data to support the importance of earlier potty training and also provides cultural data to support a variety of methods for potty training. She approaches potty training in a logical manner that ensures success for parent and child. This book is not only helpful, but is a must-read for all parents. Is the review positive or negative?
A: Positive


Q: Title: This is a cartoon Review: I have no idea if this is any good as a cartoon, but as a casual movie kinda guy I thought it would be the latest Batman movie. The cover certainly looks legit and the name sounds about right. This is awfully close to the scam line in my opinion, especially since Amazon has a no returns policy on digital content. This movie is probably making a killing on here, and I'm sad to have contributed $5. Lesson learned: Read the reviews and don't just look at the cover. Is the review positive or negative?
A: Negative


Q: Title: How much did Frank McCourt get paid to endorse this trash? Review: It was bound to happen: readers stopped caring about the minutae of Maynard's thoroughly ordinary life. So she rolled out the big guns and scrapped together recollections of an ages-old and very brief pedophilic relationship with J.D. Salinger. That anyone even bought this book is a testimony not to Maynard's style or skill, but to the amazingly gifted reculsive Salinger's ability to still draw a crowd. I wish Picador had published his unreleased novel Hapworth 16, 1924 instead. Is the review positive or negative?
