*Question*
Title: Lifeless Product review: This could have been great but somewhere along the way Neil Diamond must have lost it. He's got a great voice and has at least occasionally interpreted other writers' material quite well before. There are only two tracks that I consider as being up to Diamond standard: "As Time Goes By" and "Windmills of Your Mind". The other 18 tracks all sound dull and uninspired, as if ND wasn't really in to the songs when recording them.And what really upset me is that the original 2 CD release could have easily fit on one disc as the total combined playing time is just a little over 60 minutes. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
**Answer**
unflattering

*Question*
Title: A Poor Man's Harry Potter Product review: I tried to get through this first book but just couldn't manage it. I was bored to tears. I presume Rowling was familiar with the basic idea of a young man going to wizard school and finding out who he really was, but Rowling did it brilliantly while Le Guin was just plain awful. I presume it was so popular when written because there just wasn't a lot of fantasy for fans of the genre. I'm amazed that it's still in print. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
**Answer**
unflattering

*Question*
Title: Just Not My Thing... Product review: I bought this at the request of a friend, knowing I wasn't fond of Mr. Stern. What I didn't expect was the friend asking me to please watch it with him. So, I did. It's typical self indulgent, I'll be a bad boy if I want to, nyah nyah Howard Stern stuff. If that's your thing, then you'll probably like it. Since it's NOT my thing....well, you get the picture. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
**Answer**
unflattering

*Question*
Title: Surprisingly poor Product review: At a glance, this film would appear to have a nice Hitchcockian plot, filled with suspense and doubt. However, even the intial setup winds up being clunky and nonsensical, while the rest of the film see-saws between laughably ridiculous and painfully dull. Though Leelee Sobieski, Stellan Skaarsgard, and Diane Lane all have given wonderful performances in other films, each of them falls flat in this one, which is to be expected, given how little they had to work with by way of plot and direction. Seek out their other works, and avoid "The Glass House" like the plague. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
**Answer**
