Title: Not as good as the 7.2 Exilim Product review: I purchased this camera after my son broke my Casio Exilim 7.2. Unfortunately, most of the stores don't carry the 7.2 models anymore. I bought the latest model EX-Z1000 instead assuming that it'll be just as good, if not, better.I was disappointed to find out that when I took pictures, it had these vertical lines on the LCD screens. Looks defective, but I'm not sure if that is normal with this model. I just returned it anyways. Another thing was that the fact that it's higher in resolution, it fills up my memory card so much quicker. But I don't notice it being any more clearer than my older one. The more I use this, the more my I miss my old camera. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
unflattering

Title: Murakami &#65533; After The Quake Product review: Murakami's stories, like his novels, take place on an earthly plane just slightly askew from the one the rest of us inhabit. His view of the world is consistently unique and fresh. I think that's what makes his work so compelling to read. After The Quake is no different.The six stories contained in this slim volume are thematically bound by 1995's Kobe earthquake. While there is a mention or two to the event in each story, these stories primarily deal with larger, more emotional issues. From beach bonfires to superhero frogs, Murakami never fails to dazzle. This collection is excellent. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
flattering

Title: Hardly Kong quality Product review: Usually I have had great experienced with Kong products in the past. Reading that this frisbee was very durable (although not a chew toy), I bought this with confidence that my 50lb dog would not be able to destroy this easily. To get to the point, within 5 minutes of my dog playing with this frisbee, it was shredded into a million pieces. You are better off buying a 99cents frisbee from PetSmart. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
unflattering

Title: how to lose a guy in 10 easy steps Product review: I just browsed the book and I have to tell you it's amazing that anyone would think this owuld work, it has a real 1940s point of view, you might as well stay at home and learn to cook a decent meal before you go out and try to use this book as a guide to meeting men online. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
