Title: SHOULD HAVE STOPPED WITH SERIES ONE Product review: SEASON ONE OF BATTLESTAR GALACTICA WAS ONE OF THE BETTER SCI FI SHOWS CONSIDERING IT DIDNT HAVE MUTCH OF A BUDGET. IT WASNT STUPID LIKE STAR TREK WITCH HAD ALIENS WITH DIFFERNT SHAPED FORE HEADS IN EVERY EPISODE.SEASON ONE FOCUSED ON THE STRUGGLE AND ODDESY AFTER THE ALLMOST TOTAL DESTUCTION OF MANKIND FROM AN ENEMY RACE, TRYING TO FIND THE PLANET OF THE 13NTH TRIBE , THE LONG LOST BROTHERS WHO VENTURED OUT INTO SPACE 1000 YEARS AGO . THE PLANETS NAME IS EARTH. GALACTICA 1980 [SEASON TWO ] SEEMED TO LOSE THE PREMIS OF THE ORIGONAL SHOW AND TURNED INTO A COMEDY. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
unflattering

Title: Unbearable Product review: Great cover. Unfortunately, the music is just godoffal. Like the movie "Hearts of Fire," the release of these live recordings seems to suggest that Dylan has finally found his legend too much to bear. "You think I'm great?" he seems to be asking. "Well then, how do you explain this crap?" On "Gotta Serve Somebody" and "Slow Train," perhaps the best tracks only because they haven't been done to death on live albums, Dylan doesn't even seem to know the lyrics, and what might have been a good rendition of "Knockin' on Heaven's Door" is completely sabotaged by that foolish addition to the chorus ("Knock, knock, knockin' on heaven's door/like so many times before"). This may very well be the worst Dylan record ever. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
unflattering

Title: Dam Good Product review: This SACD sounds great !!! Its like hearing these songs for the first time, the sound quality is outstanding.The shipping was fast and the packing was good. I would recommend this product to others. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
flattering

Title: Truth in comedy Product review: Having a bit of trouble wading through the issue of how much better this method is than any other form of improv on the planet. Gets very old, and makes me want to put the book down, which is finally what I did. Can't imagine why it is necessary to continually inform the reader of the value of the stylistic differences, and the superiority of this method. Didn't Shakespeare have something to say about this need? Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
