Q: Title: The overlooked masterpiece Review: This book is extremely imporatnt for economists - yet it is definitely mainly overlooked in mainstream economics and/or misinterpreted in some references what I saw. Actually no wonder why - it evidently shows that modern economics was based on incorrectly understood physical principles from its inception in 19 century, and in fact remains almost in the same mode now. The recent rise of econophysics just showed that from another angle. The aggregation of Mirowski's excellent histgorical findings and modern econophysical concepts is still waiting its hour. The only drawback I found in this book is some redundany, when the same thoughts are repeated several times, quite unexpectedly. It seems it could be reduced in two times without any loss of its value. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
A: Positive


Q: Title: Garbage Review: This item is a total piece of garbage, cannot even cut a potato into french fries and it comes with TWO attachments for french fries, truely a waste of money. This is a negative review so Amazon probably won't post it like my other negative review. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
A: Negative


Q: Title: Where's my Mary Beth Hughes? Review: I bought this thinking it was the 1941 b-movie by the same name starring Mary Beth Hughes and Lloyd Nolan (it was labeled as such). I was disappointed, to say the least. This movie's just kind of boring and I didn't get my Mary Beth Hughes eye candy fix. I know this isn't helpful,but some sellers on Amazon Marketplace seem to be getting these two movies mixed up, so be sure to ask the seller which version of Dressed to Kill they're selling before you buy! Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
A: Negative


Q: Title: Good Start Review: Earlier reviewer was partially correct: the best writers here are Wagner and Shrewsbury, but I would include Heath as well. Also, I wouldn't put Shrewsbury above the other two. In fact, probably just below them, but it's close, and it really depends on your taste. Heath has more flair and isn't afraid to take chances with a unique phrase or plot device, Wagner has knack for picking just the right word and his writing flows very smoothly, while Shrews has a more straight-forward, conventional style that he employs with practiced competence. The rest of the volume is (mostly) unremarkable, but I'd say it's worth the money just for these three. Who knows, maybe one, or all, will hit it big and you'll have a nice token of their early work. If you enjoy tradition fantasy, this is for you. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
