Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: Finally a book that goes beyond "Wicca 101" Review: I recommend this book to any practicing witch who wishes to study the theory behind our faith and its magickal applications. While the authors tendency to jump to historical conclusions on the basis of trivial details or theories that are dubious at best and discredited at worst is worrisome, the remainder of the book is a delight. This book deepened my faith in my belief system and helped me to understand it better. Answer:
Positive

Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: Poorly made Review: After a few uses the wire stretches and then breaks. It is not repairable. Too bad, since they make other good products. Answer:
Negative

Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: Not enough of the good stuff Review: This is reported to be Michael Hedges best release. When he is playing solo guitar it is excellent. But on too many of the tracks, and most of the long ones, Hedges adds other instruments and the result is very spacey, mellow sounds that are indeed too much like elevator music. Very boring. This is a shame because Hedges obviously has more to offer. The After The Gold Rush cover is so slow and dull it begins to annoy after about 2 minutes. On other tracks, the popping percussive hits on the guitar can be sometimes a bit jarring, but after hearing them several times you get used to it. If you get this cd, plan to program your player to play only 3 or 4 tracks which are very good. Nothing bad here, but too much is boring. Answer:
Negative

Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: Dow 60000 by 2010!!!!! WOW!!!! ;-) Review: Said Morningstar about the author's fund in 2004 ("The Best- and Worst-Performing Funds of 2004"):"Grand Prix GPFFXThis fund's wacky trajectory has enabled more than a few fund analysts to unleash car-themed jokes. Only "crash test dummies" would want this "out of control" "lemon," we opined over the space of three Analyst Reports. This year's 36% loss to date is just a taste of losses that have hit this fund's shareholders. It's one of the most volatile funds in our database, yet investors haven't been rewarded for sticking with it. It has lost an annualized 22% over the past five years. And it charges 2.49% in expenses to boot."And the author wants me to buy his book??I'll stick with boring, conventional wisdom (Bogle, Graham, Malkiel) and index funds, thanks. Answer:
