Title: The Master is Back! Product review: While I was sadly disappointed with his "Under Fire", especially because of the miserable, maybe not even existent, editing...well, that is past. Old friend WEB is back in harness and in fine fettle, indeed.There are a couple of warts, but aren't they in any book? Jeanette Priestley of the Chicago Trib, is a brunette in "Under Fire", and a sexy blonde in the new book. So what! Even my wife is sometimes known to use the industrial version.This book is truly a return to the old masterhood in military story telling. Buy the book, it is worth to be in your personal library.PS: Is that a Cuban cigar he is smoking in the picture of the book jacket? UUUUUUUH! Dat's a nono!Tsk, tsk, tsk! Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
unflattering
------
Title: oh my, so - so bad... Product review: I never write reviews...after seeing this movie last night - I just had to say something. Whoever is putting good reviews on here (the reason I watched) is obviously working for the movie in some way...there is no way someone with an IQ of average intelligence would say this is in anyway a good movie. Such bad acting, ridiculous hole-ridden plot, so predictable. I laughed many, many times at the acting - and just insultingly amateur dialog.Don't pay a dime for this film. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
unflattering
------
Title: Fantastic Indie Music Product review: This CD is hands down one of my favorites that I own. Well done, feel good indie rock. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
flattering
------
Title: Hardly his best work... Product review: Galapagos is an O.K. book, but perhaps the worst of Vonnegut's books I've read. For beginners, I found it a bit difficult to get into the book due to its non-linear storyline. Sometimes this method works, like in Slaughterhouse 5, but sometimes it doesn't, which I feel applies to Hocus Pocus as well as this book. While the idea behind this book is interesting (showing the humoristic elements of evolution, and, I suppose, analogously showing the absurdity of other forms of progression such as tradition), the novel just seemed to be too long for such a single idea. While I liked the humorous elements typical of every Vonnegut novel, their comedic impact was increasingly outweighed by the monotony of the novel's exposition. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
