Title: This answering system ROCKS! Review: I had purchased this system many years ago, and then, after several years of heavy usage and trusty service, it putzed out on us. I searched high and low for something comparable and couldn't find anything. I decided to look on Amazon.com - and really lucked out!This is why I love this answering system:1) Audio Caller ID: the system verbally announces the number of incoming calls!2)Separate mailboxes: we are a busy family, and so we each have our own mailboxes.3) It's inexpensive (but NOT cheap!)4) It's SUPER easy to useNow that I think about it....I should have bought two.... Is the review positive or negative?
Positive
------
Title: CAI Review: I am very pleased with this cold air intake it is a simple installation. It gives the car a really nice growl when accelerating and better throttle response. If you have the money for it buy it. Is the review positive or negative?
Positive
------
Title: The Lament Of The Neo-Realists Review: Richard Haass attempts to distinguish himself from the neocons. Aside from form, however, the substance really isn't any different. Both begin with the assumption that American Imperium is a requirement for peace and prosperity and any real deviation means *global* catastrophe. Any suggestion that American Imperium itself is the problem is simply beyond the pale, and is dismissed by all sides of american foreign policy elite (neocons and neorealists) as "unserious" or worse. Neocons and neorealists are 2 sides of the same coin. The "argument" between them is kabuki theater. A pointless handwringing melodrama, signifying little and meaning even less. At their core, both are motivated by a proconsul's view of the world where the only future of humanity worth living is one where america's elite, and the children of america's elite, are the one's calling the shots.It's not a view shared by the rest of the world. Is the review positive or negative?
Negative
------
Title: Classic Sam Peckinpah! Review: It's been 30 years since I've seen this film on cable. I decided to re-visit this obscure film and see if I missed anything in the initial viewing. As it turned out, I didn't miss anything. It's pretty much the same, routine Sam Peckinpah film, filled with lots of blood, guts, bullets and slow-motion action. It's also a long, tedious film that is not one of his best, but will satisfy those who enjoy ultra-violence in their movies. Is the review positive or negative?
