Title: very good product Product review: I have been using this product for some time, its been very good in handling and accuracy. Its a very good one.Pros: Easy to use, big screen, good display, nice bag, consistent measurementcons: so far nothing, will notify if any Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
flattering

Title: Great price great product Product review: For fifty bucks you cant beat these headphones,There is a little white noise, but when you playing Halo2 with these on with the volume up you cant hear anything but the game.The simulated surround is really good as with the base, I found myself being really scared at times playeing halo 2 because of all the surround sound I was not use to hearing.Also works well with the movies. The unit comes with all adaptions for any kind of hook up required.Im sure there are better models out there if you want to pay the money. For the price you cant beat these.Im going to be buying two more sets for my brothers so we dont wake up the kids when were haveing our halo partys. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
flattering

Title: OK, but very disappointing Product review: Given that the story of the 8 German spies is fascinating, it's hard to imagine anyone ruining the story, but that's what happened. Although the acting and writing are well done, the story drones on, without any mention at all of perhaps the most interesting twist of all in the tale: the US Supreme Court holding a virtually unprecedented special session to hear oral arguments in a habeas corpus petition on behalf of the spies whose attorney (an Army colonel, no less!)claimed they should be tried in a regular court room, not by a secret military commission. THe case is Ex Parte Quirin, and is a case anyone interested in military commissions or WW 2 should read. The Supreme Court denied their petition and they were executed. How could this be overlooked, especially when there's footage shown of their attorney on the steps of the US Supreme Court's courthouse? Anyway, as interesting as it is, it is a major disappointment. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
unflattering

Title: narrow and outdated coverage of the period Product review: This anthology appears to have been transported in a time machine from the 1950s. It is narrow both in its range of authors and subject matter and completely out of step with recent Victorian studies. Students gaining their knowledge of the Victorian period from this anthology would not only have a distorted view of the period, but would also find themselves inadequately prepared for graduate study. See the review of this anthology on the Victorian web. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
