Problem: 
Q: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: I really hate to say it, but I just can't get past the bad production quality. It was obviously filmed in the 80's, and like someone already mentioned what is on the cover is NOT AT ALL indicative of the video itself. It uses cheesy graphics, bad in-camera effects, and sometimes cuts edits while they guy is still talking. It's so dated that in places it is downright comical, even accounting for the fact that it was shot 20ish years ago.As for the instructors themselves, they seem to know their stuff and are pretty good at explaining things. However they have absolutely no energy so the whole thing just drags.This may be an okay video for some people since it does explain things very simplistically, but if your looking for something with energy and entertainment value I think I would find another video... Answer:
Answer: No
Problem: 
Q: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: Very disappointing. First problem: casting. DiCaprio does an adequate job as the precocious criminal, but simply doesn't possess the cunning or bluster to be a credible high-stakes con man. Tom Hanks gives (for once) a highly inconsistent performance, one minute confused and discombobulated and the next minute cool and calculating. Christopher Walken tries hard as DiCaprio's hard-luck father, but is too chilly to evoke the sympathy Spielberg apparently wants us to have for him. Second problem: direction. The story could have been told better. Starting at the end takes away much of the suspense. A little suspense might have kept the audience interested; as it is, the movie does not seem to know when to end, but you already know what happens, and that adds up to boredom. Answer:
Answer: No
Problem: 
Q: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: I bought this for s video output from my computer to a 40" tv. Picture was way blurry. Vga cable worked much better in my case. Answer:
Answer: