(Q).
Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: The Best Holmes Film Ever! Review: This 1939 version of "HOUND" is, in my opinion, the best film version of a Sherlock Holmes mystery ever done.This is the first of 14 motion pictures teaming the outstanding duo of Basil Rathbone as Holmes and Nigel Bruce as his bumbling cohort, Dr. John H. Watson (although we see a not-so-bumbling Watson in this film).Whoever cast these two fine actors in these roles was a genius! For me, it's hard to accept ANY other individuals (except Basil & Nigel) in the roles of Holmes & Watson. (Although Peter Cushing's Holmes in 1959's "Hound" remake was very good also.)This version of "Hound", which was first seen by movie-house patrons on March 31, 1939, exudes the perfect eerie and foggy atmosphere that is ideal for a Sherlock picture. It's a highly re-watchable version of Doyle's classic.The supporting cast of characters is good here as well. Answer:
(A).
Positive


(Q).
Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: James Patterson Review: I love all of James Pattersons books. Have read many of the Woman's Murder Club series. Haven't started it yet, but am sure I'll like it. Answer:
(A).
Negative


(Q).
Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: Terrible acting of main character Review: I was so disappointed that the actress (?) Vittoria Belvedere playing the role of St. Rita couldn't act at all. She looks so blank, so boring and still and could not even express any emotion. I blame on director for that he should have replaced the no-acting actress with another one from the beginning. The story of St. Rita's life is excellent one, but Vittoria totally ruin the movie. I and my wife are so angry for spending 25 bucks for a lousy movie video. We threw it in the trash can after that and promise not to recommend it to any body. Answer:
(A).
