Title: Make sure you own a Scepter gas can Review: My main issue with this part is that it is to be used ONLY with Moeller Scepter cans. Nowhere in the description does it ever mention that these are only to be used for Scepter tanks. I tried to use these as a replacement on my current cans and more fuel leaked from where the spout screws to the can than out of the spout. I cant comment on the poor construction or the fact that they dont last for very long, as I gace them less than ten minutes of my time before I packed them back up and came to the computer to print out a return label. Amazon should clearly state that these are to be used with the same manufacturer gas can to avoid any further confusion.I agree with so many others that the new eco freindly spouts are pure garbage. I have yet to find one that last and that does not spill gasoline. None are easy to pour into lawnmower/snowblower/weedwacker fuel tanks. The restrictions have turned refueling your equiptment into a two person job. Is the review positive or negative?
Negative
------
Title: Very cool! Review: I brought this for my son's room. His room is in a rain forest decor. Awesome addition to any room. It adds ambiance and style along with great sounds! Is the review positive or negative?
Positive
------
Title: DO NOT BUY PETMATE PRODUCTS..THEY DO NOT STAND BEHIND THEM Review: This PetMate product lasted less than two months! I have had similar products, so I know I did not abuse or misuse the product. I contacted PetMate twice...they did not respond to either inquiry. They do not stand behind their products! I would have rated it 0 stars if I could have. Is the review positive or negative?
Negative
------
Title: ID Should Be Based On Science Review: While I do not reject creationist theology, I think ID must be based on science. Dembski's book is poor reading because it mixes the two. This is the same mistake the Darwinists make when they confuse their ID opponents with creationists. While the ID position shares much common ground with creationism, that position is strongest when it relies on it's scientific strengths, as with Michael Behe's "Darwin's Black Box: The Bio-Chemical Challenge To Evolution". If the argument for Intelligent Design is ever proven, then the question of whom the designer is can be addressed, until then the emotion-laden issue of God's existence should be put aside. Science and religion may one day come together but that day is not here yet. Is the review positive or negative?
