Title: Awesome starter lens Review: This was one of the first lenses I bought for my camera beyond the kit lens, and I must say it has served me very well. At the wide end (70mm) it is just wide enough to capture the majority of the shots I need, and at the long end (200mm) it provides the extra reach I need to get closer to my subjects, without getting in the way. This lens is also reasonably quick (f/4) and works surprisingly well in low light conditions. Unfortunately I now need something a little longer and faster, and even with a 1.4x teleconverter, it's just not enough.Pros:Quick and decent performance (even in low light conditions)Good range with wide angle and telephoto abilitiesLight and Compact that makes it easy to carry around all dayCons:Not as long as I'd likeNot as fast as the f/2.8 lens (Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras)No Image Stabilization Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
Positive
------
Title: V ery interesting Review: Found the book quite entertaining and interesting. The only thing I found confusing was that at times it was mentioned "Book 1, 2, etc. and I found quite confusing, because I did not know on which book I was reading or what it was all about. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
Positive
------
Title: Great Citizen Watch Review: It made her eyes pop, and put a big smile on her face. Beautiful craftmanship, and technology. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
Positive
------
Title: I'll never use TaxCut again! Review: What terrible customer service! Here's a brief description of what happened to me.TaxCut said the State of Maryland would deduct my taxes owed from my SAVINGS account - then, around the middle of MAY - I get a letter from the state saying they only deduct from CHECKING accounts - along with a fine and penalty. So, I look and that fact is on their web site! Silly me - I trusted TaxCut. When I present this in a claim to the company they reply that it's not a processing error or an arithmetic error, so my claim is denied. How odd. Even a simple man like me can see that, in fact that's not even the issue! It's a FACTUAL error, an INFORMATIONAL error. DID ANYONE THERE BOTHER TO READ MY CLAIM? Any company that treats its customers that way will certainly not get any more of my business. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
