Problem:

Is this product review positive? Title: A must for any writer! Review: I first saw this dictionary at my library. I thought it would be very useful when I write. I write all of the time. Sometimes I get stuck at a certain word or phrase. I know what I want to say but I know there's a better or different way to say it. I would flip through the book and find exactly what I needed. And since having the dictionary--I went out to buy one for myself--my writing has improve. I'm not using little words as often in my writings. I think every writer--or anyone for that matter--should get this dictionary. It'll help improve your vocabulary. I know that I'll be using this book for while! ^_^ Answer:
****
A: Yes


Problem:

Is this product review positive? Title: Ring of Fire Review: Badly done. I only watched it to the end because I met the 'champ' back in the 1960s in NYC. Answer:
****
A: No


Problem:

Is this product review positive? Title: Lemmon In One Of His Most Profound Roles Review: Even though Save The Tiger May not of been a commercial sucsessit still shows how great filmaking was once made. Basicallythe story is about a day & a half in the Life of Harry Stonerowner of a garment manufactuing company who's going through amidlife crisis is in debt considers arson to his warehouse as a way of his troubles and manages to commit adultry. Jack Lemmon'samazing performce which earned him a well deserved oscar playswith sheer brillance and belivablity that he is pratcally in every scene of this film. One great scene was when Harry litterlybreaks emotinally thinking back to his army days seeing his friends wounded & killed when giving a speech at a fashion show.No Matter how dated or strange this film may be today it's stilla great film it's defintely not a film for visual & specialeffcts nuts but a film with certain amount of intelligenceand should be held as a clasic film. Answer:
****
A: Yes


Problem:

Is this product review positive? Title: Great Picture but.... Review: The picture quality was great but I didn't like Devane's version, I enjoyed the original better Answer:
****
A: