(Question)
Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: trees died for the sake of THIS?! Review: Back when Janet Evanovich seemed to write mainly romances, i.e. pre Stephanie Plum, they weren't good enough to be Harlequins. They're still not. I, like many other readers of her Plum series, wish she would stop producing such absolute garbage books as this one (I'm so glad I didn't actually pay money for - a friend gave me hers) and really focus on bringing back the quality of writing that attracted readers to the Plum series. Since she has been doing the "Full" series, her Plum novels have plummeted. Answer:
(Answer)
Negative


(Question)
Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: 300 Review Review: Expected the book to be more interesting. The narrative part is very poor, the drawings have also let me down. Answer:
(Answer)
Negative


(Question)
Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: Little substance -- or genuine humor Review: Michaels can be quite amusing....or she can merely attempt to be amusing. This book is more the latter. It's rather a matter of overkill; she tries too hard. Sometimes it's funny, but it's more often boring, predictable, or silly (in a bad way). Armand's okay; Allegra is sometimes intriguing and sometimes an annoyance. There's nothing new here -- the same old characters and plots, with the exception of Oxie and his pranks, and they are not that amusing.There's not much to like; I had to force myself to finish. Maybe 2 stars is too generous. I'm not sure I'll be able to get through another Michaels books, but I'm tossing this one immediately. Answer:
(Answer)
