Ques:Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: Waste of time. Review: I like parodies, but this one is just terrible. Let real actors adlib their lines not these rejects. Don't waste your time. Answer:

Ans:Negative
-----
Ques:Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: If you're going to use one of Christ's parables... Review: If you are going to use one of Christ's parables, Mr. Kiyosaki, at least get it right. You used the Parable of the Talents in a recent broadcast on PBS featuring this book and its teaching. However, the man you referred to as the father was actually a master in Matthew 25:14-30. The people he gave the money to were his servants, not his sons. In the book of Luke it is the Parable of the Minas. I do not see in either account that any of the servants spent all of their money. That was the younger son in the Parable of the Prodigal Son. Good teachers check their sources. Answer:

Ans:Negative
-----
Ques:Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: Gullah Opinion Review: After having read the book, we had an opportunity to tour Daufuskie Island (Yamacraw Island in the book). After the tour we stopped at the General Store and noticed that The Water Is Wide was not offered for sale. We asked about this. We were told the Gullahs thought the book put them down and they did not want the book available on the island. ..... Interesting. Answer:

Ans:Positive
-----
Ques:Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: Read much of the report online- should have remained private Review: I have read much of this report online - it is dominated by lurid, detailed descriptions of a sexual affair that should have remained private - a private mistake by the President of the United States that would have remained private but for the persistent efforts of his political enemies. There is no evidence of anything criminal except that which was directly related to keeping this private sexual affair secret. In addition, the testimony which may have not been truthful was ruled by the judge in the Paula Jones case to not be significant to that case and the entire case was dismissed as having no legal merit. To impeach the President for attempting to hide this private matter would be an extreme injustice. Answer:

Ans: