Q: Title: Same old jokes, Such a disappointment Review: I found this movie to be extremely disappointing. The jokes were almost 90% copies of the first movie (which was Excellent): the shh scene, Mustafa being very badly hurt, the introductory nudity coverup scene, Austin getting his butt caught in closing doors, etc etc. The "Just the Two of Us" scene was funny for a few seconds but also was so out of place and an effort to get a cheap laugh. The formula can only work so many times before it gets repetetive and dull. There were a handful of funny scenes but this was clearly an attempt to make a movie around the funny jokes and lines from the first film. Don't waste your time or money. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
A: Negative


Q: Title: Christmas Present Review: I ordered this item for a Christmas gift to learn the recipient had already recieved the same gift from Amazon. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
A: Positive


Q: Title: I want my 90 minutes back Review: Having seen The Path to 9/11 with Harvey Keitel last year, I was hoping this would be a great dramatization along those lines. What I found was a complete and total waste of my time. I don't know the ins and outs of how ideas and scripts turn into movies but the fact that this actually was made, with actors, cameras and all is a pathetic testament of taste. The acting was atrocious, the plot was a joke and... I don't even know. Trust me - you'll have more fun holding a lit match between your fingers until your skin blisters. At least you'll feel something. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
A: Negative


Q: Title: Ripples (A story of Garth Brooks) Review: Although I found the characters in the story of Madeline and Ryan to be very interesting, I was disappointed in the story because I did not find it believable. I am very interested in this subject and have read many many books about past live regressions. In each previous experience, it seemed like the memories were like jig saw puzzles where the party was trying to put the fragments of their past lives together and make sense out of their recalls. Never have I encountered in any of my other readings, including Edgar Cayce (who was the lst and best, in my opinion) did the subject recall entire lives from start to finish with every little innuendo in between. Ms. Smedley is asking us to believe that she recalled entire dialogue with her past love (Garth Brooks) from 300 years ago over a span of many years, as well as that of other members of the family, including their thoughts and feelings at the time. I find that a stretch of imagine, to say mildly. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
