Title: Underplays underlayment Review: I will not duplicate points made in other reviews.Just note that the roofing (cedar shakes, and asphalt shingles) is shown without using underlayment/felt. False economy, or to clarify photos? Shingle mnfrs demand it, and it serves several useful purposes. Why would the author repeatedly stress pressure-treated lumber on the moist bottom of sheds, and yet short-change the moist TOP?! Is the review positive or negative?
Positive

Title: No Results/poor shipment Review: I did not see any results. Waste of money. It was packaged poorly where product was exposed and not only was it seen by the post office, but it was also seen by the person at (which address was used to sent product).It should have been packaged more discreatly and privatley. This was a private matter product and therefore noone was to know that I purchased a "slimming product". Is the review positive or negative?
Negative

Title: Buy the J.W. Black & Albert Molinaro book instead Review: Klaus Blasquiz's book is a noble effort, but weak on details, weak on pictures and unbelievably weak on editing and proofreading. One gets the impression that English is not his first language - and the fact that nobody fixed this in editing is unforgiveable in a "professional" reference book. I recently got the Black and Molinaro book, it's WAAAY better with lots of luscious photos. Is the review positive or negative?
