Ques: Title: Not based on accurate historical information Product review: This was the first and only book of Stephen Lawhead I've read. It's also my last. As a pantheist and druid, I find Taliesin's conversion to christianity offensive. The early christian church has already stolen and corrupted most of the pagan gods and holidays, now the author is trying to take Taliesin. Read this book only if you want a diffused, rambling story with no hint of real historical facts Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Ans: unflattering

Ques: Title: Not the story everyone is used to. Product review: A very clever and interesting tale of the big bad wolf who tries to borrow a cup of flour from his neighbors, but his cold gets the better of him and he enjoys some tastey meals in the process. Recommended to the younger crowd. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Ans: flattering

Ques: Title: never disappointing! Product review: This lady has a wonderful gift in her ability to write wonderful books. How she manages to think up all of her stories amazes me. This book keeps you on your toes till the end. Barrie is a reporter who has made a few mistakes in her previous reporting experiences and is struggling to improve her reputation in her occupation. The president's wife, who lost her baby recently, asks to meet with her on an off the record meeting, much to her amazement. From the meeting, Barrie sees a story on SIDs as the baby belonging to the president and his wife died of it. As she looks into the story, it starts looking like murder instead, and then the story really heats up and doesn't let up until the last page. Just when you think you have it solved another twist shows up and takes you in another direction. Great book! Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Ans: flattering

Ques: Title: Catering to the india illiterate audience Product review: I think the author does a good job of capturing the attitude of "secular" indians. It seems to me that the author almost feels that the Bombay bomb blasts were actually justified. It an appalling state of affairs that many Indians actually follow this line of thought. For that perspective alone this book is worth reading. No matter how much it offends you.On a more technical note, the way the author makes conclusions from the data points he presents is clearly intended to convince someone who is not aware of the context. For example, the author makes a claim about how Bal Thakeray mentioned Ram Mandir and Lucknow in one sentence and how that means Bal Thackeray thinks Ram Mandir is in Ayodhya. What that basically means is that either the author has pretty weak reasoning skills or that his hate and disgust for people prevent him from making an objective inference. Both of those reasons are strong enough to give this book a 1 star. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Ans: