Ques: Title: Warren Zevon's Third Great Album In A Row Product review: BAD LUCK STREAK IN DANCING SCHOOL is Warren Zevon's third great album in a row. Zevon had gone clean and sober for the first time when this CD was recorded, and it didn't dull his sense of humor one bit. On the title track, he examined his bad habits in a sarcastic manner which anyone with ANY addiction (drugs, alcohol, tobacco, food, caffeine) can understand, while "Jungle Work" humorously describes mercenary violence in a way that inspired me to do what I need to in order to remind myself that "carb" stands for the names of four politicians who support such actions (Cheney, Ashcroft, Rumsfeld, Bush). The other songs are all great, too, and you should pick up this CD. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Ans: flattering

Ques: Title: China Seas Product review: Harlow, Gable, and Beery teamed up again. Wally Beery played a mean s o b which was one of his strong points. Leave it to Jean Harlow and Clark Gable to foil his nasty plans. A very entertaining film. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Ans: flattering

Ques: Title: nothing of value Product review: It will make me unpopular to say this, as if I am not already wildly unpopular, but this was a terrible and totally overrated movie. In light of Marlon Brando's semi-recent death I thought it high time to see some of his best known works. Cited as a classic in many cases, at least for being raunchier than anything else at the time of its release, this film was flat, left me dazed, it was useless. I hated it. It was strange, mumbling, sleazy. The acting-particularly from Maria Schneider-if you could call it acting, anyway-was mediocre at best. Where's the story? This just strikes me as a film made at the time to push the envelope of what was considered "art" and "decent". To me, it was just a monumental waste of time, like roughly half of Bernardo Bertolucci's work. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Ans: unflattering

Ques: Title: Bad Printer Product review: Very poor product design and quality. Have had it for a few years and has been anything but dependable. Pretty much need to change ink every time your print. Also does not allow scanning or faxing when there is no ink, which is a poor poor design feature. Would never recommend this to anyone. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Ans: