input with options: Title: Momentum building Review: I've been reading this series since the first book, AREA 51, and this one has upped the ante. Each book had its own climax but also left something for the series to continue, but this was the best of the bunch. It had a climax, simply the world being saved which doesn't seem to have been enough for some of the reviewers, but the cliffhanger for the series makes me anticipate the next quite a bit. Is this product review negative?
output: No

input with options: Title: Evidentally NOT for me! Review: Evidentally this cream was not for me. I had gotten off my estrogen replacement pill and opted for the more natural cream. Evidentally, I do not need estrogen replacement. Shortly after using, I had the worst head-ache and anxiety. This was the worst I have felt in a long time. I di not reuse cream for a week just in case it was something other than the cream. I tried it again about a week later and got same results. I'm sure this cream is great if you need it, but it was not for me. Another negative was it did leak alot in package it was delivered in-big mess. To be fair, the cream did go on smooth. Is this product review negative?
output: Yes

input with options: Title: Fun movie! Review: I don't remember this at all from childhood, even though it is a couple of decades old, but it is such a cute movie and I'm glad I found it. My 4-yr old daughter loves it, as does my 7-year old nephew. I love all of the Scholastic movies, but I think the kids liked this one more than others because it's not animated. Is this product review negative?
output: No

input with options: Title: The Man Who Mistook This Documentary for a Story Review: I am a big fan of Oliver Sacks and despite my low rating for this book, I will continue to be a big fan. I was simply misled. I thought it was going to be the characteristic, titillating Sacks tale, as were "Awakenings" or "The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat." Instead, it was a disjointed journal of Sacks travels in Micronesia. It certainly had its interesting, intellectual points but fell far short of the usual Sacks page-turner. Is this product review negative?
output: