*Question*
Title: several improvements, but... Review: The new board is bigger than the old Milton Bradley version, and that's great. I like that land troops can cross a few of the narrow straits without a galley. The new battle system is simpler, but each die has two pictures of infantry, and only one of each other unit. So infantry has the best chance to hit, yet are the cheapest to buy. I've heard catapults were too powerful in the original rules for the old version, but they are too restricted here. Calvary still have more movement, but with the reduced effectiveness in battle, I don't see much point. Also, land troops on a galley do not participate in naval battle under the new rules. So a full ship is no more powerful than an empty ship. Your troops can be easily sunk so watch out. I guess some rules can be tweaked by house rules, but it would be pretty hard to convert the little pictures on the dice to make more sense. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
**Answer**
Positive

*Question*
Title: this is a *book*? Review: i really don't like writing truly negative reviews for children's books, since i generally feel that there is always something a child can get from a book.. but i just can't help myself. perhaps because i found this book through some 'best titles for infants' list, so i expected something much better.the illustrations are so, so horribly cheap. i get the point of simple, bold colors, but these illustrations are just plain cheap. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
**Answer**
Negative

*Question*
Title: After i am done, this book shall burn! Review: I never rely on the instructor to teach me math, I only rely on the the book. This book is the worst book i ever read in my life when it comes to math. The authors explanation of concepts is terrible, including the terms which he uses to explain them. After a concept, he jumps straight into hard examples without showing you easy ones. Take for example section 1.6 "on the distribution of balls in urns". He explains this concept all in theory and uses the word vectors which confused me beucause i was thinking physics. He should have used the term "cell" or something less confusing. Besides, afer he explains the concept in a theoratical manner he jumps straight into a theoratical examples whithout giving you a regular application example. I cant believe my instructor is making my class use this terrible book. After i am done with it this book i am going to burn it. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
**Answer**
Negative

*Question*
Title: Should have left well enough alone Review: You have to love classic Superman. We had been building up what an awesome superhero Superman is to our kids, but this was a movie night flop. In their words "He didn't even fight!" This movie was a melodramatic disaster and a disgrace to Superman movies. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
**Answer**
