Title: what a terrible product!! Review: Fill it up with lotion and then try to use it. The little balls don't turn. If the little balls don't turn, the lotion doesn't come out. If the lotion doesn't come out, it doesn't moisturize your back. If it doesn't moisturize your back, time, lotion, money and high-hopes for a non-itchy back have all been wasted and dashed to the ground. It also comes with some little cover so you can save the excess lotion in there to use later. What a joke. I went to "use" it again the next morning (thought I'd give it a try in hopes that maybe the day before was a fluke) and the lotion was all dried out. What a waste. Oh well, it was a good idea in theory - not so much in real life. Mine went to the trash bin. Is the review positive or negative?
Negative

Title: Why did he re-write it and call it Climbing Mount Improbable? Review: I read this and some of his more recent books. His more recent books are excellent: very well written, entertaining, and cogent.Watchmaker is my least favorite Dawkins book [so far]. In a few places, it is sloppy and unconvincing, although the thesis is right on the mark and almost speaks for itself to anyone with an appropriate technical background.I haven't read Climbing Mount Improbable but I would guess that it is much better. Why else would he have re-written the same book ten years later? Is the review positive or negative?
Positive

Title: Great band just not their best work Review: I had heard that this cd was The Replacements at their punk best.Excited I purchased the cd immediately. I already own the Replacement's don't tell a soul, all shook down, pleased to meet me and Tim. This was the worst cd of theirs. Production value was miserable. The songs themselves sound rushed. None of the lyrics are memorable. If 4 drunk guys grabbed some instruments and started playing at a bar it would sound like this cd.Don't buy it. Is the review positive or negative?
