Q: Title: Not enough content, price too high Product review: After reading the reviews for this subscription, I was doubtful about wanting to pay for it, but gave it a shot since it came with a free 14 day trial. I canceled the free trial after 2 days, because I found it so useless. At least half of the sections present on the nytimes website are missing, the most glaring omission was the technology section, which I particularly enjoy.I also feel that the price is far too high, especially considering the missing content. If all of the content were included, it might be close to worth it, but even then $20 is a lot, especially considering that article on the website are free. I find it much more useful to copy and paste some articles that interest me into a text document and transfer it to the kindle. It's a little more work, but worth saving $20 a month. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
A: unflattering


Q: Title: Who can resist George? Product review: Did you break a bone? Then it's George to the rescue. We are huge George fans going back three generations! Since my son wants to be a doctor, this was a no-brainer. This George is sweet, cuddly and the perfect bedtime companion. Hooray for George! Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
A: flattering


Q: Title: WASTE OF PLASTIC Product review: this product is a waste of the materials used to produce it. STAY AWAY.bristles fall out, handle unglues- Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
A: unflattering


Q: Title: REALLY sweet Product review: I found this product to be waaaaay to sweet. I've had two bottles of it for weeks and I'm still not fisnished with it. I find I must mix it with another aloe product to cut the sweetness. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
