Problem: 
Q: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: This tractor is not worth the money that you pay for it, whether at the Disney Store or right here. Do not buy this toy! The tractor is supposed to entertain by tipping over and tooting and such. The sound is barely audible. The toy didn't even work for an entire week before it just stopped rolling all together. Then the smoke stack broke off. Then one tire, then the other broke off! My son was so gentle with it because all he wanted to do was roll it and tip it. Disney should be ashamed that they sold such a bad product to children. Answer:
Answer: No
Problem: 
Q: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: How does a band possibly follow up British Steel? With Point Of Entry. Great album from start to finish. Well crafted songs, true there is more of a rock sound here but it's still got the solid Priest beast metal power in every song. Great album worth every penny. Answer:
Answer: Yes
Problem: 
Q: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: ... are all the tools used by this author. There is nothing here that regular readers of news coverage during the election turmoil have not seen. However, Tapper uses the politician's trick of taking a few facts and then using wild deductions to make fantastic allegations. (This is a good lesson in why scientists use "inductive" rather than "deductive" reasoning. The latter can be used to prove almost anything.)Rather than waste time with this book (which I'm happy to have picked up used, not new), I suggest the curious reread the coverage of the post-election recounts. There the irony (and paranoia) of both sides' legal arguments become clear. Most of the more "liberal" recount methods--those opposed by Bush and his team--applied to the infamous ballots would have given Bush the election. Most of the most restrictive or "conservative" recount methods--those opposed by Gore--would have given Gore the election. Answer:
Answer: