Ques:Title: Floundering in a snowdrift Product review: I picked this up based on the New York Times putting this on a list of the greatest books ever. While it starts off being somewhat of a period piece / love story, it degenerates badly into a nightmare of ridiculousness and entire pages of gibberish. Parts or it are beautifully descriptive, but it's not enough. I found it impossible to suspend disbelief and was rather resentful that I felt like I had to finish it after plowing through several hundred pages. It's a matter of taste I suppose. Be warned. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:unflattering
-----
Ques:Title: A Review of "Employee Training and Development Product review: I found this book to be very informative and the wide variety of topics covered involving training and development give a little something for everyone. The information in the book it present in digestible about and definitions are given for all information that may be unclear. For the beginner the is book is good but I would recommend it for use in a classroom setting where the lectures or some other form of discussion can supplement the material covered. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:flattering
-----
Ques:Title: worthless Product review: Bought this sprayer for an insecticide that I also purchased. . It would only spray for about 1 sec after it was pressurized even though it was still under pressure. And, I was unable to get it depressurized and when I finally unscrewed the spray arm, I got a nice shot of insecticide in my face. I was unable to get the insecticide sprayed on the only day I had to do it. I've use may of these sprayers in the past without any problems. I would highly recommend looking elsewhere if you need a sprayer. Only gave it a 1 star because it wouldn't let me give it a zero. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:unflattering
-----
Ques:Title: Interesting assertions but not effectively supported. Product review: Miller's theories on the fate of the Roanoke Colony are quite controversial and border on conspiracy theory. In order to give credance to these controversial theories, she had to include a great deal of historical referrences. This created a dichotomy of style straddling narrative and historical treatise. This caused difficulties with both styles. The narrative, while compelling, is often interrupted by the historical references. However, the theories put forward in the narrative depend on ascribing the political motivations of the people involved. That would be a nearly impossible task no matter how much documentation that was presented. Miller augments the documents she sites with layers of supposition and conjecture. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans: