Q: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: I got it at F.Y.E. on Monday at Genesee Valley.I haven't seen this since since I bought the DVD's of it.I haven't watched it,yet. Answer:

A: Yes


Q: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: So you pick up this book and read on the back cover the exciting quote about Hemingway's ghost and you're ready to drop some cash, right? Guess what--there's zero information about the Hemingway haunting in this book! In addition, old Ataulfo of Madrid has less words wasted on him than an asthmatic's version of Handel's Halleluja Chorus. Instead, what's offered here is a rehash of old stories (and old theories about what ghosts could be) with insipid, comic book illustrations. Why this is called a "field guide" with its connotation of an exhaustive reference to every kind of manifestation of a particular phenomenon--be it birds, plants, or mushrooms--is yet another part of the mystery of why this book exists. If you're a serious researcher of this subject, then pass this book up and seek Hem's fetch elsewhere. Answer:

A: No


Q: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: As a huge fan of comic books, I was so excited about this film. But as the movie unfolded before my eyes, all I felt was cheated by what could have been. Do not waste your time or money on this one. Go see a film like Unbreakable to see what a real movie of the genre can be like. Answer:

A: No


Q: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: I read this book because I liked Donald Duk, which was required for one of my literature classes. This book here recycled everything from Donald Duk. But instead of focusing on the valid discourse surrounding the ethnic appropriation of history, he bashes other writers such as Maxine Hong Kingston (using tired arguments - right or not, we already get it!) and tells people explicitly what what he thinks is crap or not in writing, but based only on a paranoid fear of being a stereotypical, effeminate Chinese. I did not enjoy reading it, but no one who does can be left with any doubts as to where Frank Chin stands. Which would be no problem if he either had said something new or had said expanded upon his previous valid ideas. This book is simply a rant, and undermines his previous work. Please read Donald Duk instead. Answer:

A: