(Q).
Title: Very Sturdy Review: You could probably body slam this thing, throw it off the balcony, recover it, body slam it again, and it would probably still be very useful. The quantity it can hold is exactly the size I needed. If I had a necessity to keep whites and colored clothes separate, I'd probably buy a second one, but no need when it all fits in one. It can hold quite a bit of weight! Is the review positive or negative?
(A).
Positive


(Q).
Title: Hopelessly out of date! Review: This book spends way too much time dealing with "Duplicating machines", silly little forms, etc.. The chapter titles are there, but there is nothing of substance IN the chapters. Get the tape out! The cover cracks when you open the book, and the book virtually falls apart at Chapter 8. Don't fret though, Chapter 3 "Working with Volunteers" has the only useful paragraphs in the book anyway. Of the total 78 pages, pages 61 through 74 fell out completely but I felt this made an overall improvement to the book. I don't understand why this "non-book" was written. Is the review positive or negative?
(A).
Negative


(Q).
Title: Not very inspiring Review: I was given this book by my ladies in my book club group who are mostly Catholic, in the hopes they could sway my atheism. I gave it a good try, however the book has left me even more convinced that there is no God.The author misquotes Carl Sagan, not to mention that much of his science is incorrect an misrepresented.Science does not want to disprove the existence of god it simply wants to explain the nature of our world and universe. Science will hopefully continue to work to unravel the mysteries of nature and if religion would just allow scientists to do their work we can move closer to a better understanding of ourselves.It seems to me that when I see these books their tendency is to attack science as an enemy to religion, when religion is really the enemy to science. Science, it seems to me, has no interest in the existence of God. Is the review positive or negative?
(A).
