Title: Don't bother buying it. Product review: The one thing that is consistent with all reviews on this product is you must call customer service. Instructions are useless. On the 4th call to customer service I was advised that it will only work with a limited (few) routers. Go to the D-links web site, click on support and find the 10 routers (mostly d-link) that it works with. It would have been nice if the literature suggested how limiting the possible success rate will be or the first tech would have brought the issue up. If you bothered to read these reviews, please save time and aggrevation by looking at another product. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
unflattering
------
Title: Not what I had hoped.... Product review: I really wanted to like this product. My dad had one very much like this that he used for more than 30 years, but it had holes on the sides of the spike, and not one hole at the bottom/end like this does. The problem is that as soon as I pushed the irrigator into the ground, it got plugged up with dirt and small pebbles so no water would come out. If the holes were on the sides, this would not be a problem. I know that there are irrigators out there with the holes in the side, and I would recommend that you look for one of those models. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
unflattering
------
Title: Larson Series on whole is poor Product review: When Houghton Mifflin lost Mary P. Dolciani (due to death in 1996) and therefore could no longer author their best selling math series since the 60's, HM turned to Ron Larson. I will make this brief and simple. As an ex- math teacher, his texts are horrible, a pale comparison to the sainted Dr. Dolciani. Poorly written, confusing, as one review stated "over 1020 pages for an Algebra 1 book" the Lawson series of textbooks is just a teaching and learning disaster. Stay away from any of his texts! Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
unflattering
------
Title: Time Bomb 2000: Don't Bother Product review: While the Yourdans clearly expended a great deal of effort in coming up with - and then naming - some of the many disasters potentially caused by the Y2K problem, it's something my morbid imagination can do on its own. I was looking for a technical explaination of the problem, how it happened, why it hasn't been fixed... I was NOT looking for a laundry list of disasters great and small. The appendix, however, wasn't bad; I think it starts around page 314. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
