input with options: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: I was looking forward to increasing my connection capacity with this 7 port hub (currently have a 4 port), but was disappointed in the design of this unit. The 2-piece design (hub and base) seems like a good idea but doesn't really work well. They include a stick-on foam strip to help keep the hub attached to the base, but this is clearly an after-thought to correct the problem users had with the hub slipping out of the base. I ended up setting the base aside and just using the main hub component. Oh, and it also failed to work! The main cable connecting the hub to the computer had a poor connection at the hub that caused any attached device to work intermittently - not a pleasant experience. Returned unit for credit after attempting to use it for one day. Answer:
output: No

input with options: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: This 1986 book has spawned many children, as some reviewers have noted. I read Visser's book because it was, as far as I know, the first of its kind. The book is structured around a chapter for each ingredient in a common dinner, a technique that was highly original in its day. The content is very detailed, sometimes too much so for my taste. For instance, the early chapter on corn contains much information that has been restated over the years to the point where it has become common knowledge. As a result, her treatment of corn's history feels like overkill. But it was a fairly "new" subject for general readers in its day. If you are interested in the history of humankind's interactions with foods that are common to America's dining table today, then Much Depends On Dinner is an excellent place to start. Answer:
output: Yes

input with options: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: If you are looking for the Audrey Hepburn Story, then this is most definately not the place. While the film is whimsical and pretty to look at, a documentary film or biography on the late actress would be far more capable of telling the story. The title role was horribly miscast, and while Ms. Hewitt tries very hard, she lacks the age, grace and wisdom to conquer such a role. I was very dissapointed in the picture, especially at the fact that they dedicated three hours to such a small portion of Audrey Hepburn's life and only ten seconds to her work with UNICEF (the best ten seconds of the film). While Hewitt fans are sure to enjoy her in a role that was very obviously tailored for her, I urge people in search of the "real" Audrey Hepburn to look elsewhere. Answer:
output: No

input with options: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: I began watching Black Cadillac not knowing what to expect. For some reason I was thinking it was a supernatural/paranormal thriller type movie... And was very surprised when it turned out not to be.Overall, the story is good and the movie well acted. As almost everyone else has mentioned, the only actor I recognized was Randy Quaid. That doesn't mean it's not a good movie though. You have to give new actors on low budget movies a chance, you know? I agree with the person who stated that Josh Hammond stole the show. I also thought he was great.My only issue with the movie was that I thought it took too long to reveal why the Black Cadillac was chasing them. I started to get bored by the time the real action started to take place... My attention was recovered, though, and I stayed well tuned in for the rest of the movie. While I think more could have been done with this movie, it was still good. I recommend for anyone who enjoys thriller/suspense movies. Answer:
output: