Q: Title: Track Listing Product review: 1. Why Do Fools Fall in Love 2. Share 3. Paper Castles 4. Who Can Explain? 5. Am I Fooling Myself Again 6. I'm Not a Juvenile Delinquent 7. Goody Goody 8. Little Bitty Pretty One 9. Love is A Clown 10. Baby, Baby. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
A: flattering


Q: Title: great over and over Product review: I just keep watching because it has that oddball pull of being simple yet complex. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
A: flattering


Q: Title: It just never makes an impact Product review: I am quite a fan of Merchant/Ivory films, and I love Kazuo Ishiguro's novels. The cast is also made of wonderful actors. So why is this movie just OK? They recreate 1930s Shanghai with a sort of "Cabaret" theme (you can't hide yourself in a nightclub while WWII is clearly beginning outside), which sounds promising, but the whole film feels flat and emotionless. The script has much too much exposition. The Countess part is severely underwritten, which is unfortunate as she is supposed to be the center of the movie. There is no chemistry between the two leads at all. The more interesting relationship is between Jackson and his mysterious Japanese friend. It is also very annoying that Jackson's blindness is overly used as a metaphor. This 2 star rating is in context--it is a 2 star Merchant/Ivory film, but of course with all the awful movies out there this at least a 3 star film among all films. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
A: unflattering


Q: Title: Shallow Look At Dull Words Product review: First off, the Editorial Review is somewhat misleading, as there are very few idioms ("say it with flowers" is not one of them) in this book. The book is mainly concerned with words originating from Middle or Old English -- that is, words whose origins are straightforward.I was hoping for a book that would discuss modern words with unclear (like "hooker", "skyscraper", or "reefer"), and include idioms common in today's speech. This book seems to limit its entries to words with easy-to-trace origins, and idioms (like "spick and span") that don't see much usage in the books I read.There must be a better reference out there. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
