Title: Senseless waste of trees Product review: This is a pared-down reprint of _A Guide to Library Service in Mathematics_, which is still available. That book was a guide to math librarianship plus an annotated bibliography of materials. The annotations are merely "This is a book about...", helpful before the Internet, but now completely worthless. If you want to find a good book, you would now browse the reviews on Amazon. The only part of the 1993 book that is still worth reading is the advice for librarians, which is just what was cut from this new edition. So, I can't see any justification for the existence of this book. Besides that, the paper, printing, and binding are poor. I suppose the reason why they decided to publish this is to compete with Dekker, which has just come out with _Using the Mathematics Literature_. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
unflattering

Title: can opener Product review: came highly recommnended--we both like it very much---would definitely recommend to other customers--great can opener--we always purchased lower priced can openers. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
flattering

Title: Poor Quality! Product review: Bit doesn't hold well. The design and the construction of the chuck doesnt work. Probably why these are selling cheaper than their weight in scrap metal. Very frustrating. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
