Title: Too bad the screen format is full instead of wide Review: My only gripe with this set is that the screen format is full instead of wide. Who in their right mind converts video to hd in full screen? Apart from that the video quality is good and the colors look pretty good for the source being so old. Is this product review negative?
No
--
Title: Great first attempt by someone new to the movie scene Review: While I was one of the two oldest people in the theater (my friend being the other), I actually really enjoyed this movie BECAUSE it is a scary movie that I would be okay taking my twelve-year-old brother to see. If this was meant to cater to twenty-somethings, I might have been disappointed, but it's supposed to be for teenagers so I pretty much knew what to expect upon entering (not quite sure why others seem surprised). The camera work was fantastic, acting was pretty good (especially the kid that played Owen) if perhaps a little over-done at times, and the story line had a few twists. I will take my little brother to see this and be comfortable, and he will love it (as did the other teens in the theater). Not bad for a first-timer. Is this product review negative?
No
--
Title: AnnLaguna Review: Very interesting detail of the few humans who believed in the commandment to love thy neighbor and exercised this commandment as children of God. Is this product review negative?
No
--
Title: Sloppy editing Review: Most "investment advice" books suffer from poor editing, both of the 'grammar & syntax' variety, and, more distressingly for this genre, flat-out incorrect information. Klines's book is no exception- the grammar & syntax are fine, but her book is replete with factual errors and misstatements. For example, on page 207, she defines a synthetic long futures as "sell a call option, buy a put option." Wrong. That is a synthetic short position. Similar errors pervade the book.One useful feature is chapter 3, which presents futures contract specifications. However, even here, some of the information is occasionally confusing or misleading.This book is published by McGraw-Hill, a highly reputable house. My surmise is that McGraw-Hill has no financial experts on its editorial staff; otherwise, it wouldn't tolerate the publication of such a sloppily-edited piece. Disappointing! Is this product review negative?
