input:  Now, answer this question: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: I have read most of R.N.Patterson's books - and the enjoyment quotient has ranged from moderate to high. Had to give this one up after 200 pages: insipid, putrid, shallow, and BORING!! The characters are stark and wooden - the pace that of a martini-soaked snail. I felt absolutely no empathy with anyone in this grotesque political melodrama - it almost made "election 2000" seem exciting in retrospect! Yes, I have given up reading Richard North Patterson for lent - and maybe for life. Answer:
A:
output: No

input:  Now, answer this question: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: My bookstore offer 5 different translations, each one claiming to be 'radically new'. If you read Zola, you'll see how truly horrible these translations can be (full of British terms like 'he was keen to go'). The brits have ruined many French novels. Which version do you all recommend?? Answer:
A:
output: No

input:  Now, answer this question: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: Ugh. This book needs some serious editing. There may be an interesting story in there and the concept is good, but it's painful to get through it. A good editor could easily cut out half the pages. There's so many times where the book reads like someone's daily account of activities - got up, took a shower, got dressed, doorbell rang, etc. Stuff that adds nothing what so ever to the story. As a result, the characters are pretty flat. If you need something to help you pass a lot of time or you like crappy chik-lit, then read it. Otherwise - leave this one on the shelf. Answer:
A:
output: