Title: Rolodex Business Card Book Review: I am using the business card book although not entirely happy with the quality. The plastic pages are designed to hold two business cards, back-to-back, in each pocket. The cards do not stay in the pockets, they slide out each time the book is opened to the page. I expected much better quality from Rolodex. I will more than likely replace it-reading the customer review before buying.So many times I see a product I think I want and after reading the customer reviews, I no longer want the product. Thank you Amazon for this wonderful service; I am now a much wiser consumer. Is the review positive or negative?
Negative

Title: Into Thin Air Review: I thoroughly enjoyed this book. It was very interesting to learn all the difficulties faced by those who climb these extreme mountains. I never realized how many other dangers were involved other than falling yet those who face the challenge are obsessivley pushed to put their lives on the line for that moment of glory at the top of the world. Sadly May 1996 took it's toll on so many, both the seasoned climbers and the less experienced. It definately makes one respect the power of nature. Is the review positive or negative?
Positive

Title: surprisingly good and useful Review: I am not at all a fan of Bradley's Avalon books, finding them exploitative at best, and I am not usually a follower of the scholarship of John and Caitlin Matthews, finding their slant normally too esoteric and new-agey to be a source of useful information about Arthurian matters. However, I picked up this book recently after consciously avoiding it for years, and was very pleasantly surprised: if you gloss over the "goddess archetype" premise, and simply read the different sections, you will find some interesting, useful, well-researched, well-presented information regarding some potential roots of each character they address. The Matthewses shouldn't be the only scholars you follow - the works of Geoffrey Ashe, Norris Lacy, Roger Sherman Loomis, Jean Markale, Ronan Coghlan, and many others are useful and valid for those interested in the topic - but you could do a lot worse than to add "Ladies of the Lake" to your armory of Arthurian knowledge. Is the review positive or negative?
Positive

Title: Move Away from this Page Review: The book is full of hypothesis. Till now nobody would have implemented all the checklists/templates/procedures mentioned in this book, in their real environment and I can bet on this.Checklists are needed if the task of review/testing is very critical and the organizational processes shall demand that. An attempt to define a checklist/template to make it global is real childishness.The definition of Verification and Validation itself is written wrong in this book. I dont know if these terms had such definitions during the past years.Summary: We are in 2003 now. If somebody wants to go back to 1970 then this book will be very useful for them. A wise decision for normal readers would be to move away from this page. Thanks. Is the review positive or negative?
