(Question)
Title: Old Guy No Like Product review: What the heck makes this "post rock?" It sounds like second rate guitar rock to me, repetive in a boring--rather than blissed out--way, with dynamic extremes that sound gimmicky rather than cathartic, opaque production and uninspired playing (I hesitate to mention song-writing because these guys are a jam band). A hopeful prediction from the 47 year old guy contingent: you 20 somethings who are slobbering over this will eventually come to your senses and go after some REAL noise: Bardo Pond, Flying Saucer Attack, Spacemen 3, Amp, Jessamine, Loop, older Flaming Lips, MBV, Lovesliescrushing, or maybe even the Stooges or MC5. If you insist on the post rock thing, Sigur Ros or GSYBE. Again, this is just mediocre, at times mildly inspired, guitar rock. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
(Answer)
unflattering


(Question)
Title: Slime has gone downhill Product review: I used to swear by pre-Slimed tubes - I used them in my bikes for at least 5 years - but I've stopped using them because they've become unreliable.The idea behind pre-Slimed tubes is great. The tubes come with just the right amount of an anti-flat goo already loaded in them so that the tire can fix itself if you get a small/medium puncture flat. This self-sealing action lessens the risk of a sudden flat that throws you off your bike since the tire deflates slowly. You'll probably be able to make it home before being forced to change the flat.I used these tubes for years and everything was great. Unfortunately, this year I've gotten a series of tubes that all failed at the valve stem within a few days of installation. The tubes were installed properly, one even by a professional. I wonder if the company that makes these changed their manufacturing process (cheaper! faster!). Anyway, I can't use something that I can't rely on.Therefore, one star. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
(Answer)
unflattering


(Question)
Title: How to waste 8 hours, 1 server, and 2 workstations Product review: I found this to be the worst product I have tried to use for a long time. I downloaded the eval of the product and first succeeded in destroying my NT server. I contacted their tech support and they told me it was because I had been using Microsoft's Proxy Server.In order to give them a fair chance, I built a brand new Windows 95-B machine. I tried to install their software and was told immediately to upgrade my Winsock.dll. I did. Then I installed their product and lost connectivity to my internal network.Again I contacted tech support via email. To make an 8 hour story short, their tech support gave me TCP/IP settings that simply don't work or follow any book I have ever read. Then I learned after several hours that installing WinProxy will "toast" the TCP/IP stack on Windows95. I finally did get it running at a speed of about 1200 Baud across a cable modem.I do find their tech support responsive, just not very knowledgeable. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
(Answer)
