Ques:Title: Unreadable Product review: While I am sure Civil War history buffs who really enjoy detail may find this book interesting, I found it to be almost unreadable. It seemed to me that this was a PhD thesis that the authors felt had to be lengthy to get accepted. And after an enormous amount of redundant material, I felt like they didn't prove their views. If you want something readable, look to Battle Cry of Freedom by McPherson. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:unflattering
-----
Ques:Title: The most unsympathetic account of transsexuality ever Product review: This book is advertised as based on original research and grounded firmly in the scientific method. So it was surprising that it turned out to be primarily a platform for offensive opinions about transsexuality. Though the book claims to be sympathetic to transsexuals, instead of portraying them as otherwise normal people with an incongruent gender identity, it portrays them as primarily low socioeconomic, sex-focused losers, prostitutes, and fetishists. There appears to be no scientific basis for this opinion, and certainly no new relevant peer-reviewed research. As experts on the subject have long ago discounted these offensive views, why dredge them up again now? This is one of the most unsympathetic portrayals of transsexuality ever written.Ben Barres, M.D., Ph.D.Professor of NeurobiologyStanford University School of Medicine Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:unflattering
-----
Ques:Title: book retired for copying whole sections Product review: This book copied whole sections of flying by D'Exupery and was therefore retirted from print. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:unflattering
-----
Ques:Title: A great, fun read... Product review: I have a question...why do the previous reviews from "A reader" and "Robert Beveridge" criticize the book for a) not being similar to Umberto Eco and b) not having the sophistication of prose to be considered a good book? All I can say to these two is "Hey, if you two are such an expert on what makes a great book, why is Katherine Neville the one with a published novel that has sold millions of copies?"...And why does everyone think that liking an Umberto Eco book makes them a sophisticated reader? I bet half these people havent even read, or at least made it past page 30 of an Eco book...Anyway, about THE EIGHT. A great, exciting read, full of characters that you end up really caring about. The two plots that are intertwined, one in the past and one in the present, are both interesting enough that I never minded when the timeline shifted. Not the greatest book ever written, but definitely worth the read if you like adventure Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans: