Problem:

Is this product review positive? Title: A Sweet Game!! Review: When my U.S. History class started its World War II unit, I got a A+. Why? Medal of Honor: Allied Assault. Not only is it the best and most fun first-person shooter I'v ever played, it is very historically accurate. I recommend this game to anyone even remotely interested in WWII, or anyone who loves a good, fun game to sit back, relax, and play. The single player very fun but probably the best part is fighting on a team or for yourself online against other human players. This is a must-have game! Answer:
****
A: Yes


Problem:

Is this product review positive? Title: Boring Review: The book started out with a promise to be an interesting book but about 1/3 of the way into the book I began to get bored.I stuck it out & managed to finish the book but I wouldn't recommend it to my friends or even to my enemies. It had such promise & then fizzled big time. Answer:
****
A: No


Problem:

Is this product review positive? Title: It would be better if the film wasn't set in 1962! Review: This 1978 comedy Animal House is funny, disgusting, low budget and like most of the teen movies the rules no longer applied because the young people here are WACKY!!!There are also a lot of naughty words, some alcohol and drug use and many nudity scenes.When I heard that the film was set in the 60's I thought that it would be a crazy hippie rebel movie with soundtracks of the Rolling Stones, Beatles, Cream, Hendrix and more but I got it WRONG! There isn't a lot of soundtracks here and the main song of the movie is Louie Louie!!If the film was set in 1962 then the students and the fad had the 50's in mind.I guess this movie wasn't what I was looking for.P.S: I heard about another movie of the seventies set in the 60's called American Graffiti but is also set in 1962.Adios. Answer:
****
A: Yes


Problem:

Is this product review positive? Title: a good beginners book Review: Matthews offers a concise introduction into the realm of Celtic traditions. This book is especially useful, not only to those who are new to the "old religions", but also to those who are looking for a more solitary approach. My only problem with the text is the generally phallocentric viewpoint of the material, and those who endeavor to read this title should take that into consideration. Answer:
****
A: