Question: Title: the worst Bond ever! Review: this had to have been the absolutely dumbest 007 film i have seen! The cast was pleasing but the original movie, THUNDERBALL, was tens of hundreds of times better! the intro was tickling but not innovative enough. The cool suaveness Sean Connery had in the earlier films was not apparent. All in all, this was a weak attempt to update one of the best 007 films in history, which of course was "Thunderball" Is the review positive or negative?
Answer: Negative

Question: Title: Ex-Mormon is Right Review: This is a typical piece of literature authored by someone who became disheartened by the doctrines of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Having served a mission for this Church (not `church'), I recognize that her supposed `psychological research' into the psyche of Mormon missionaries is based on her own frustrations and shortcomings. The bottom line is if anyone is to know exactly what the Mormon missionaries preach then they should seek them out and listen. Reading a book about the supposed secret teachings and meanings of a `cult church' is ridiculous; go to the source of the information (missionaries) then ask the Supreme Source of Truth (God) if the doctrines these young men and women teach are true. An anti-Mormon book will not inform or clarify; such a book will only confuse, disorient and make a sensible, good Christian into a judgmental heathen. Is the review positive or negative?
Answer: Negative

Question: Title: A joke, signally unfair Review: This biography of one of America's greatest writers is a colossal joke. Atlas takes pot shots at Bellow througout the book and actually attempts to psychoanalyze him several times! Instead of focusing on the brilliant works Bellow has produced, Atlas whacks Bellow over the head time and again for being a womanizer.Fortunately, a couple of knowledgeable and appreciative authors have come forward and set the record straight concerning Bellow's unmatched contribution to American letters. Most recently, Charles Simic wrote a fabulous appreciation of Bellow in the New York Review of Books (May 31, 2001, "The Thinking Man's Comedy"). A recent Harper's magazine piece (February or March 2001 issue, I believe) also takes Atlas to task for producing such a pile of dung.I refer Bellow fans and other interested readers to the above-mentioned articles. Is the review positive or negative?
Answer: