*Question*
Title: Wasted reputation Review: I have used an Olympus C-3000Z (expensive) camera since year 2000. It is a wonderful camera that has taken over 50,000 pictures. So I get the significant other an FE-100 knowing it is a low-end camera. It is basically useless! The battery problem mentioned by several reviewers is much worse than they say. With fresh non-rechargable batteries, you may only get a half-dozen pictures before it won't even turn on. Rechargables only work right off the charger, and then not for long. I did the first software upgrade that was supposed to help this problem, but it made little difference. On the rare occasion that you can use the camera, in full daylight it makes quite good pictures. In low light, forget it whether you use flash or not. I don't understand why Olympus would waste a sterling reputation on this Chinese piece of trash. I have been thinking of buying a new good camera, but I probably won't risk getting more such junk from Olympus. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
**Answer**
Negative

*Question*
Title: Three Blind Mice **SPOILER** Review: I agree with Dustin B - shame not to see Edward Furlong in T3 - this movie had so much potential (in the realm of Hitchcock) but went wrong in so many ways - it insulted the audience several times (old-fashioned cops and a hacker with a knack for buggin whose place is broken into and he doesn't check for bugs or wonder why someone was even there?) The ending fight was pretty lame tho the twist wasn't too bad - the older actors weren't very good - too stereotypical and one dimensional. It had the strangest clash of a 1940's/2004 that didnt mix. And yes, Furlong did seem too tired too much of the time (there were actual scenes where it looked like he had a good night's sleep). If you want to see something not so technical but along the same lines - rent 8mm Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
**Answer**
Negative

*Question*
Title: WRONG SIZE in listing Review: I'm sure this is a great roasting pan, but I am very disappointed that the listing inaccurately describes the product size. I needed a large pan, and decided upon this one since the listing says the "Product Dimensions" are 13x17.2x6. However these are the measurements of the BOX, NOT THE PAN. The Pan is actually 11.5x15x3.75 (without handles), which is significantly less than expected (only about 50% pan capacity). Looking to return it in search of a pan who's actual size matches the description. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
**Answer**
Negative

*Question*
Title: DVD lacks Christmas Review: Strangely enough, the majority of the cartoons on this DVD have nothing to do with Christmas. I think the Popeye cartoon has a few seconds of a fist fight in the Swiss Alps. There is snow, and that is as close as it gets. The Hawaiian Birds has a few moments in New York winter, but no connection to the Holidays. Now, I am always happy to have another Popeye cartoon, but I was actually expecting it to be Christmas themed.The DVD quality is about what you come to expect from Cartoon Crazy's. The picture is fine, the sound can be a little weird but I like it, and the extras are mainly adds for their other titles.If you are looking for a collection of classic Christmas cartoons, they did a much better job with their second outing, "A Cute Cavalcade of Classic Christmas Cartoons." The best cartoons on this DVD, "Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer," "Christmas Comes But Once a Year ," and "The Shanty were Santa Claus Lives," are duplicated on "A Cute Cavalcade..." Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
**Answer**
