Ques:Title: Not good memory foam Product review: I saw the reviews on this and decided to give it a try. I had a 2" memory foam on our bed that I bought about 2 years ago. In comparison the old 2" one is considerbly heavier than the new 3". This is very cheap memory foam (the price and quality).This one is more like foam rubber. It is hard and not very confortable. We took it off this morning and put the old one back on.Tempur-pedic's density is 5.3lbs.I came up with about 3.05 lbs/cubic ft. for this pad. (Density = Weight / Volume = 13lb / 4.25 cu. ft. ).Go to Sams and buy a good one. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:unflattering
-----
Ques:Title: PG15- Product review: The biggest advantages of this mag are it's cheap and it's really 'popular'. Which means you don't need much science education to understand almost all their articles. It's an ok reading for children in their tender age, say 15 and below. Why PG? as other reivewers had pointed out, the loads of ads populated at the back of the mag are not scientific and often sxual oriented. If you do not yet wish to expose the next day delivered Viagra to your ten-year-old son, rip a few pages off before giving it to your kids. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:unflattering
-----
Ques:Title: Great Idea ~ Poor Quality Product review: One of the nicest nozzle ever owned until it broke. The nozzle spins around and prevents the hose from kinking - wonderful! However, it is made of plastic and the connection below the trigger broke. It's still kinda useable but if you don't watch out, you will get wet. For the cost, should last much longer. Would recommend but be very gentle with it. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:unflattering
-----
Ques:Title: Poorly designed Product review: For all of the bragging on the company's website about blade design, this product doesn't deliver.The major flaw comes in the form of how the razor deals with cut hair. The hair is trapped by the plastic housing surrounding the blades, clogging the blade, and rendering it useless within a single swipe. I was hoping it would be able to outperform the gillette fusion, but it comes nowhere near the performance (granted the fusion costs more). The gillette has a completely open design which allows hair to pass between the blades and easily wash away. I have only tried the sport version of this product, but I doubt I'll waste my money trying the others. I've used generic three blade razors with better performance. The fusion costs more, but it works. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans: