(Q).
Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: Not the Husky of yesteryear Review: I repurchased this in December '08 to replace one that had "lost its softness." It is a tad larger than the one from a few years ago, but its plush is thinner and its eyes (oh get this) are cross-eyed now! He used to have such a beautiful face too, how sad TY is another company that seems to be hitting bottom. The picture doesn't quite capture his new face. At least the kids can learn to be sensitive to those a bit different than those that are "normal". So I gave it a few stars for educational. Answer:
(A).
Negative


(Q).
Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: Poorly made! Review: My old mount lasted for years, this one lasted for 2 days, before it fell off the window and broke. Answer:
(A).
Negative


(Q).
Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: Broke on the first use Review: This thing is poorly constructed. Within 20 minutes of using it, it basically self-destructed. I've used many weed wackers. It first impressed me as being underpowered and with a small cutting radius, but I got the hang of using it. Then the cord broke off (as they often do). I took off the spool, re-extended the cord, and replaced the spool. When I turned it on and the cord hit the cutter (which trims the cord to length), instead of cutting the cord, it merely grabbed it, which then bent the cutter out of the way, and then the cord proceeded to smash up the protective plastic shield. Perhaps this is a fluke, but it seems poorly constructed to me. Answer:
(A).
