Ques: Title: Hummingbird Feeder Review: This feeder had a crack internal to the glass when we received it. The spout dripped liqiud for several minutes when we first installed it. The second time we put the spout with the rubber cork in, the cork went all the way into the glass ball (the cork should have been slightly larger). It does, however, look good hanging from the holder on the tree. Is the review positive or negative?
Ans: Negative

Ques: Title: worth the time Review: I recently read the first edition of this book. There are some things I understand now which I didn't understand when I read descriptions of the same material in other statistics textbooks. I didn't put forth the effort to try to understand everything the book had to say, but even my cursory reading added to my meagre but growing store of knowledge. Is the review positive or negative?
Ans: Positive

Ques: Title: Glowstick....w/o much glow Review: I should have taken the advice of a previous review. After opening up the package, about 20% of the sticks were already activated thus were useless. Almost all of the purple glowsticks were defective. This company needs to change the packaging they are using for shipping. Is the review positive or negative?
Ans: Negative

Ques: Title: Elementary in his presentation Review: I was very much anticipating the receipt of this work, because I was looking for critical evidence of the influence of Paganism in Christianity. Although there are references he uses, many of his thoughts, it seems, are just his beliefs stated with minimal or no support. Now I don't disagree with most of what he had to say but in many areas he must assume that support or an extended explanation is not needed. In many ways it reminds me of the writings of a non-professional parishioner discussing his non-orthodox beliefs written down for others to read rather than a scientific textual critique of the subjects. I wanted more extensive justification of how or why such and such might have ended up the way it was. He needed to make a case for much of what he talked about, but he did not. This would not be a work that a critical thinker could use to raise doubt in the mind of orthodoxy. Is the review positive or negative?
Ans: