Ques:Title: This remote isn't worth a wooden nickle!!! Product review: I ordered this remote in the hopes that I can remove all other remotes from service since I have a pile of them for many devices. No such luck! The TV was a simple setup. PIP didn't want to configure and the buttons all scrambled as to which one did what, but I could work with that. Cable...that's another story. Almost NONE of the controls worked with it even though I reprogramed the buttons to try to get more functions. Learning remote is not the case for what you would need. It learns terribly! It wouldn't control my surround sound any at all! DVD worked at first for most functions, but then started loosing functions and I kept having to reprogram them into it over and over. I'll not go into the VCR as it was another nightmare. So, basicly what I'm saying is the only way I would give this remote 5 stars is if I was rating it for a patience practicing device. WORTHLESS. Mine is now in the trash. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:unflattering
-----
Ques:Title: I want my 2 hours and 17 minutes back!! Product review: That's right. I have just wasted 2 hours and 17 minutes enduring possibly the most boring, disjointed and incoherent "thing" that has ever passed itself off as a movie. Let me break the silence, Academy voters, this picture was completely pointless and an awful waste of resources...right down to the oxygen the editor was breathing as s/he struggled to figure out how to create a logical story sequence while wondering whether they could ever list this project on a resume and still be taken seriously. The biggest shame, however, was the amount of effort expended by the production designer, set decorators, artists and costume designers who beautifully recreated the 1940's settings. I would insist that the producers and director send them all an apology for abusing and shamelessly wasting their time. Then they'll need to do the same for me..... Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:unflattering
-----
Ques:Title: Hellboy was a masterpiece compared to this Product review: Dimwitted supernatural thriller that is a major bore for the most partwith a dimwitted performance by Keanu Reeves, who is miscast in themain role and a screenplay that is as stupid as it can be. A lot hasbeen said about Rachel Weisz being the only good thing that this moviehas to offer and I will agree with that assessment because she doesmake you care about what is going on with the movie while you aretrying to figure out a way to care about the dumb story that is beingtold. Weisz's performance is much too rich and powerful for a movielike this and she gives you a reason to stick around while in essencethere is no reason to even stay till the end. Hellboy was a masterpiececompared to this and that was marginal decent for what it was at thevery best.For Weisz's rich and powerful performance, I give the movie one star.If she were not in the movie, my rating would be in the negative numbers Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:unflattering
-----
Ques:Title: not for me Product review: I didn't like the set up or the problems or exercises. It's not very well written and frankly for an old reproduction of a book, Amazon is selling it too expensive. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans: