Q: Title: Great read Review: Four elements make Dreamcatcher a terrific read: the long, slow start loaded with foreshadowing; the involving, detailed friendship of the four/five protagonists; the yucko fungus and all that alien stuff (and I thought I wanted to read an alien novel); and Jonesy locked in his own mind--which has some very innovative moments. Not new territory for King, yet it felt as though he was taking chances, both with the bones of the story and the language he uses. There is one military character who drove me nuts, and I agree with the reviewer who reminded us that King isn't Tom Clancy. But I'll bet this character was fun to write. My advice to other readers: Read this book on its own merits and try not to compare it too much with King's other novels. As irrisistible as that might be, considering where Dreamcatcher takes place . . . and what it's about . . . Is the review positive or negative?
A: Positive


Q: Title: How Long Has Montel Had MS? Review: What we really need is a book about ordinary people with MS leading extraordinary lives! Throughout this book, I never was under the impression that it was Montel writing. While I appreciate his efforts in bringing MS to the forefront as a celebrity, how long has he had this disease, how much light was he really able to shed on the debilitating effects of the disease (not too much)... certainly, though, donating the proceeds of the book to MS is noble. Is the review positive or negative?
A: Negative


Q: Title: OK Western, poor quality tape Review: I purchased Front Row Entertainment's VHS version of "Vengeance Valley" and was bitterly disappointed. The video quality is poor and the sound track is no better. The story, from what I could make of it, is humdrum. If you're a Lancaster fan, however, the movie is worth having in your collection. And if you're a fan of wasting 20 bucks on a poor quality video, this is a tape for you! Is the review positive or negative?
A: Negative


Q: Title: Waste of time and money.... Review: I can't claim to have seen every terrible film in cinematic history, but in my fairly extensive watchography, 2012 is certainly in the top 5 worst ever. Is the review positive or negative?
