Question: Title: Laughable Review: Rather than rant about whether Ms. Coulter is right or wrong about the Clinton Administration, I would rather comment about her style of writing.Ms. Coulter's writing is average. It doesn't take a great intellect to discern her meaning. It does require a bit of patience to get through all the furious flag waving and name calling. Her constant use of the term "the framers" (in lieu of the Founding Fathers) and various forms of the word "pervert" for Clinton got old very fast. She also couldn't decide if Clinton "molested" interns or had affairs with them (two very different actions). At times, her book seemed more like a tabloid than an investigation into the alleged crimes of the former President.In her defense, she tries to do a thorough job by sifting through all the scandals and supposed cover-ups. If she could have tempered her language and insults, the book could have been a lot more interesting. Is the review positive or negative?
Answer: Negative

Question: Title: The suspect is the same! Review: Once again Emily is decived. Her sister, Nancy, is back from the physco hospital, and there are funny tricks. The ending is SO predictable its not even scary. Not a very good book. Should have just left the story with the first one Is the review positive or negative?
Answer: Negative

Question: Title: EXQUISITE!!!!! Review: It's the absolute best book someone could buy. It has magic, dragons and a bunch o' cool stuff. I think it's the best book ever!!! Is the review positive or negative?
Answer: