Q: Title: Furious Review: I have never critiqued a book on Amazon. However, I am so sorely dissappointed by Rushdies latest book, Fury, that I feel obligated to warn Rushdie fans to avoid this book at all costs. If you have respect for his previous works, like I have, than this book will definitely wreck your image of a genious writer with the gift of magical realism. However, if you are interested in hearing an intellectual writer snobbishly gloat for nearly 250 pages about his life then buy it. I have my reservations about American Society as well as he does - but geez to dwell on it for so many pages and then 'cut and paste' people magazine into the novel makes me wonder if he secretely loves to hate the country he loves. To top it all off, this is the most amatuer plot I have read - since I've reread my own writing when I used to think I could write. Don't waste your time. Is the review positive or negative?
A: Negative


Q: Title: changing habits Review: I recently purchased "Changing Habits" by Debbie Macomber from Amazon..I really enjoyed thebook. It was an easy/fast read..It was a large print home library edition which made it easyto read at night if your lighting is not the greatest. I would definetly recommend this bookand also the service from Amazon. I rec. it a few days before the delivery date. Is the review positive or negative?
A: Positive


Q: Title: A deep story for humans Review: I didnt think that this could be better than Enders Game but I was wrong! The characters in the book come alive and its so hard to not to feel their pain and sadness. Is the review positive or negative?
A: Positive


Q: Title: In total ignorance of science.... Review: This book attempts to challenge every discipline of science with nothing more than statements based on belief. The so called "scientific" theories presented are in direct conflict with the basic foundations and evidence of physics, astronomy, geology, and chemistry. The author uses scientific sounding statements in attempting to convince the reader that there is substance to his arguments. The so called "facts" presented in this book have long ago been shown to be based on totally faulty assumptions. Is the review positive or negative?
