(Q).
Title: 368 Pages Product review: But only about 240 if you remove all of the quotes from Conrad, Dana, Mehlville, etc.Truly a letdown. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
(A).
unflattering


(Q).
Title: Info reasonable (if dating quickly), but twisted by anger Product review: While much of the info is correct (if changing quickly, thanks to the rise of shared-custody arrangements), the tone perpetuates the stereotype of raging ex-husband who demonizes the wife, and aims to "win". There's no winning with an attitude like this. And I see this attitude leaving woman after woman feeling like she has to simply shut down any attempt at communication and relationship-building with her ex.Bottom line: There are mature points between "but I trusted her completely and gave her everything" and "kill". I would read it for the raw info, but leave the emotion behind, and leave the emergency out. Divorce doesn't need any more sense of emergency.I would also recommend Mr. Seidenberg read Joan Williams' critique of child support and reconsider his notion of what child support is. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
(A).
unflattering


(Q).
Title: This movie made absolutely no sence... Product review: ...and I find it very hard to categorize! It's a some kind of surreal drama, sometimes odd as a fable, one hour longer than it has to be (serious!), and easiest described as a movie not quite going anywhere -it's like you are waiting for the story to begin, and after a long gasp it is over -and you have no idea what you have spend one hour and fifty minutes on.Not that it is horrible, but it's not good. Three talented actors, including two senior-legends hardly do much acting at all -and their roles requires nothing but one look on their faces, and no emotions are shown at all during one hour and fifty minutes..! It's the strangest movie I've seen so far this year -and I'd recommend you to do something else instead.Warning : It's not in the category of "Grumpy old men 1 or 2" in case you wondered -this is very, very different and far from being comparable! Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
(A).
