Problem: 
Q: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: This book is an example of how History ought to be written. Too often, tales of tragedy and disasters are told in cold statistics or impersonal sweeping genaralizations. Brown tells the story of Hinckley and the fire of 1894 in such personal detail that it reads like a novel -- a good novel. His research supports the narrative, and brings this cataclysmic event alive, showing us what it must have felt like to survive and mourn the loss of one's hometown. I applaud Brown for his work and commend him to others, especially those who write history.My only complaint? I bought this at a bookstore, where it was pigeon-holed into the "Nature" section. No doubt it involves nature, but that is akin to hiding "Seabiscuit" in the "Horse" section of the store. Under a Flaming Sky should be on display in the history section, perhaps in an end cap. Answer:
Answer: Yes
Problem: 
Q: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: Absolutely, unequivocally, one of my favorite books of all time, if not THE favorite. The world the author weaves is believable, poignant, witty and magical. The book is so layered, and the characterization great. It really reads like a cross between Jane Austen, Tolstoy, Wilkie Collins and Harry Potter, if such a thing were possible. If you love one or two of these authors, you'll LOVE this! It's not at all dense and hard to read, as some reviewers have suggested. Sure, it's not Dan Brown, but neither is it War and Peace. A page-turner...classifiable as adventure or suspense. The ending was so gripping I was pretty much skimming things to find out what happened! Answer:
Answer: Yes
Problem: 
Q: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: I feel like a lot of people posting about this book are clearly extreme lit nerds. I read this book as a high school student and still thought it was breathtaking. For me, I didn't really understand that there was any underlying literary theory behind it - what I liked about it was that, like Moby-Dick, it seems like several times it starts meandering and turning in on itself and you begin to question its relevance and quality, and then in the last few pages it comes together and hits you in the face with exactly how much it means. There's so much there to understand and uncover.If I gave any advice to someone reading this book for the first time, it's to stick it out. It started to get pretty exasperating for me - so long, so many details - but ultimately it's the immersion in a foreign, detailed, and physically constrained environment that allows the book to pack such a wallop. The ending is worth waiting for. Answer:
Answer: