Question: Title: Not Understanding Product review: This book was my second lesbian book I've ever read. And I was taught new things that I never knew were possible with a woman's body and then again some I really didn't want to know. There were some sentences in some of the stories that were sensual more than erotic. I prefer sensual over exotic right now. I guess I didn't know erotic meant exotic. I felt a little bit intimidated by most of the stories and was perplexed by many. I don't think it's a good book for a newly out lesbian like myself as it has mostly hardcore action happening. I wish I could sell it for it is too late to return but I don't wish to read it again. One story I did find quite intriging but not worth buying the whole thing, which was Water Marks by Dawn Dougherty. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Answer: unflattering

Question: Title: Good VHS Product review: This is a great VHS with Bugs and Elmer's early battles.1. Wabbit Twouble (Clampett, 1941)2. The Big Snooze (Clampett, 1946)3. Fresh Hare (Freleng, 1942)4. The Unruly Hare (Tashlin, 1945)5. Slick Hare (Freleng, 1947)6. Hare Remover (Tashlin, 1946)7. Stage Door Cartoon (Freleng, 1944) Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Answer: flattering

Question: Title: Help! This was not a good book! Product review: This (i am soory to say) was definently NOT the best book I have read. There is almost zero percent of a wait before the romance starts. There is so much of it that it is overwhelming. I had to force myself to finish it. Sorry Ms. Hendrickson. Better Luck next time! Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Answer: