(Question)
Title: Low quality ink, won't feed paper and shakes too much Product review: I hate this printer. Strike one: Horrible paper handling. Bought it for printing 12x12" scrapbook pages along with ordinary correspondence. But not all scrapbook papers are precisely the same size. So if the paper is 11-15/16" instead of 12" it is stupidly rejected. It often chews up cardstock by twisting it sideways and doesn't like photo paper either; annoying in a "photo" printer.Strike two: Lousy ink formulation. My old HP 970cxi prints beautifully on vellum that I like to use for overlays and titles. I expected the same with this one. But after struggling to coax the paper thru, the ink just beads up and smears.Strike three: Shakes worse than an old dot-matrix even though it is relatively slow. They must have built it using an old carriage design. I finally moved the printer to a bottom shelf because I worried about my other equipment. You can imagine it doesn't get much use anymore.What a waste of money! Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
(Answer)
unflattering


(Question)
Title: not even close Product review: This is really a lot of dribble. I read it cover to cover in about an hour and learned literally nothing of use though I am now well informed about some useless phenomenon like fish raining from the sky. The forms included in the back of the book are marginally adequate. You're much better off with another book. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
(Answer)
unflattering


(Question)
Title: Not so good. Product review: Just a plastic box really. We since found much better cases that are smaller, cooler, and work better for the purpose of stornig games while on the go. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
(Answer)
