Q: Title: a must read Product review: I did enjoy this book. The only problem was that i'm use to reading books were the charators are more important then the setting. Hunter prefers to write more on what is happening aroung the charators rather then the charators themselves. Overall this was a great book and i enjoyed reading it and recomment it to anyone who loves to read romance novels. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
A: flattering


Q: Title: I'm addicted to this CD!!! Product review: I'm a really big fan of Suede, so I was very excited when this album came out, Suede fans you will not be disappointed!!! This album rocks! I love all the songs on here, especially, "A Love As Strong As Death", "Brave New Century", and their single," Lovers", overall, this album is really great though, and I recommend it to any Suede fan! Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
A: flattering


Q: Title: Great for 6 months use Product review: I loved this kettle but must have overused it because it justquit on me after 6 months. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
A: unflattering


Q: Title: Ludicrous Hypothesis At Odds With Known Facts Product review: I gave this book two stars because it does somewhat accurately portray Lincoln in his final days. Sadly, it lacks any semblance of credibility after that. I have read every known account of the facts and circumstances surrounding the Lincoln assasination and have presented many talks on this subject. In my opinion, Balsiger's book ranks with Louis Weichmann's as one of the worst and most unreliable volumes on the subject.Factual information is either ignored, misinterpreted, or given short shrift. The "conspiracy" to the degree one existed was between John Wilkes Booth, Lewis Paine, George Atzerodt, and David Herold (and to a lesser degree, Michael O'Laughlin, John Surratt, and Samuel Arnold). ... Balsiger's book does little more than make sensational claims that the author cannot support without discrediting, reinventing, or ignoring historical fact. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
