Title: The best of the Best of the Best series Product review: I thought that this third installment was the best of the series because of its story. The action is pretty consistent with the first two movies only now its all Phillip Rhee which is great! Gina Gershon also does a nice job as the female lead. Overall, its a good martial arts movie. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
flattering

Title: 2 1/2 ****** Product review: I've tried 3 times to give this movie a chance to get it's point across. It doesn't. As in most films Russell Crowe is in, he gives his all, but the story is pretty convoluted and doesn't give you much to care about. It gets pretty stupid towards the end. We kind of understood the owl showing up but never could understand the green lizard. The saving grace is the scene between Alec and Myra in the church and of course, somehow, Russell winds up dancing with his leading lady, something that happened in several of his earlier films. In the beginning of the film Russell and Bridget are very Bogart & Bacall and the banter flows pretty well, even if we have heard it before. If you have the need to see Mr. Crowe there are better films to choose from.(...) Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
unflattering

Title: Hmm. Product review: What to say about this book?Yes, it is biased to the nth degree- it has no pretensions to the contrary, though, so we can't fault it for that. (...)It can run thin on certain topics- like early Zionism, for example. Much better books on the topic from a similar viewpoint exist, such as Chomsky's 'The Fateful Triangle'- a scholarly, tasteful, and engaging, if also unashamedly biased, exploration of the subject. Just note how readily David regurgitates him; obvious 'borrowing' is an obvious sign of quality.However, this is a good ultra-quick, ultra-dirty guide both to the flaws of the status quo and to 'anti-Zionist' thinking. It's perfect for debates and light essays- both for easy collection of facts to back up one's argument and understanding 'the other side'. Think of it as Cliff Notes for Chomsky and Said, if you will- it would be a grave insult to author, viewpoint it represents, and reader to think of it as anything more serious. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
unflattering

Title: Did not last long Product review: I purchased item in May 2008, it died in October 2008. It just stopped brewing and made "monster in the pipes" noises. You can't take it apart to try and troubleshoot it. Until it broke, it did well.Update: Hamilton Beach will replace it, got bumped to three stars. But it costs $5 in shipping to get it, down to two stars. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
