Title: Historical Errors Review: There are several errors in this book and some important information is left out. Ignorance of author is evidenced by showing a picture of Prophet Mohammed (pbuh). There is no record of his likeness since it is forbidden to do so for followers of Islam. Besides, today over a billion muslims would find it offensive for any one to draw a picture and claim it be the likeness of Prophet Mohammed (pbuh). Is the review positive or negative?
Negative

Title: Fabulous idea, poor execution Review: This clipboard was a great idea, and it worked excellent (for a while). Unfortunately, the materials are just not up to the task. The plastic liner on the inside of the clipboard breaks after just a few days of folding and unfolding. That was not too big of a deal, as I just trimmed it with a scalpel. However, and hinge is also pretty flimsy. So after a few weeks, it broke as well. Now all that I have is two chunks of metal that used to be a clipboard.They do have a good warrantee, however. They did replace my broken clipboard in short order. The plastic liner on the new one again only lasted a couple of days, but the hinge is so far holding up well. Is the review positive or negative?
Negative

Title: A Fantastic Introduction Review: I just picked up this book because I read that the author is an historical consultant for the HBO upcoming series The Pacific. Miller's book is the only general account of the Pacific that reinforces the stark realism of the narrative describing the unusually-savage fighting, by using first-hand accounts of the same eyewitnesses used in the HBO series.Perhaps I have a different edition than the reviewer who claims that D-Days in the Pacific has many factual errors because I could find none that he cited.For those looking for an introduction to the war in the Pacific, D-Days in the Pacific is an excellent choice.The book well illustrated with has photographs as well as maps that help the reader understand the brutal and vast nature of this conflict. D-Days deserves a wide readership. Historians, students, and the general populace too will find it compelling. Is the review positive or negative?
