(Q).
Title: Great content, sloppy editing Review: I was really disappointed with this book. The content itself is great - Dabney is insightful and memorable.However, the editing in this book is truly awful. There are only 36 pages of text, and I found 41 editing problems. Some were minor - a typo here and there. Others were pretty egregious - editing marks that were left in the manuscript when Vision Forum published it. For instance, on page 25, you read "Parental love is the main bond ((or)) (should be "of???)) human society..." - it is clear the editor in this case just didn't finish his job.I am a big fan of Vision Forum's material, having ordered quite a bit from them and intend to continue to do so. But the quality of this book was just not up to snuff. Is the review positive or negative?
(A).
Negative


(Q).
Title: Great Visual Tool! Review: I use this when I am cooking with my daugther to help gain a concept of fractions and whole numbers. She is only 5 and I do not expect her to fully grasp the concept, but using this in conjunction with measuring cups and following a recipe I read out to her makes for a solid learning experience. It just adds to the fun of the activity, so it's a nice twist. I think something like this will be huge as she gets older and can visually appreciate the fractions and how they relate. Is the review positive or negative?
(A).
Positive


(Q).
Title: Awful :( Review: This is a very bad imitation of Lord of the Rings. I bought it thinking that it was going to be a good and enjoyable book, but instead I've been reading counting the pages anxiously until I finished it. Will definitely do not recommend to anyone, and will certainly not read the 2nd book. You should go and read Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter which are books that you cannot stop reading... This one is not worth your time. Is the review positive or negative?
(A).
