Ques: Title: Good Learning for the Uneducated of Family Abuse Review: Back in high school, I read this book and I still remember the impact it had on me then. This book is great education for learning about the abuse through the victom's eyes and how they see it. For those who have had regular childhood, this book almost seems horrifying for the mental, physical and emotional abuse that went on for a child that wanted to be just like any other child but didn't know how. It is only normal that she couldn't get out of her situation, because she didn't understand what was normal except for what she experienced with others or saw - until her adult years in life and to be able to compair to what it should have been. That goes for any child. I recommend anyone to read this book. Thanks for reading my review. Is the review positive or negative?
Ans: Positive

Ques: Title: low quality Review: The clamp is made from flimsy plastic, and the clamp is riveted to the light so you can't change the position of how it clamps to the boat. Is the review positive or negative?
Ans: Negative

Ques: Title: Buy jazz CDs instead Review: If you are interested in learning about jazz,buy (1) a decent jazz history, such as Ted Gioia's A History of Jazz, and (2) eight or ten representative recordings: Louis Armstrong's Hot Fives and Sevens, Duke Ellington, Coleman Hawkins, Lester Young, Charlie Parker, John Coltrane, Thelonious Monk, Miles Davis are all good places to start. Or buy the Smithsonian Collection of Classic Jazz (is that still available?). Burns' bloated product, while containing plenty of nuggets, is too unreliable and biased to be worth your money. Rent it if you must, glean it for what it's worth, but please, there are better ways to spend that kind of dough. Is the review positive or negative?
Ans: Negative

Ques: Title: Thin Thin Thin Review: I had high hopes for this book. I thought it would be very interesting but the author dropped the ball completely. I was surprised to find out later how well informed she was about this issue but shared nothing of this with her readers. My overall opinion is that she was making stuff up as she went along. When she referred twice to a "plea bargain" in an emancipation case, I had to wonder if she had even the barest knowledge of family court. The fact that she rendered the entire law suit, the major conflict in the plot, pointless when she established early on that no organ transplant would or could ever take place from an unwilling donor made the whole book pointless as well. Then she feeds us a bunch of tripe about two angry, would-be lovers who snipe at each other the whole way through this boring book, I felt like I was reading a bodice ripper from my grandmother's book shelf. The characters were under-developed, the plot underfed, the ending embarrassing. Skip this book! Is the review positive or negative?
Ans: