Title: Book 5 is a 4 out of 5 Review: I think Harry Potter, Order of the Phoenix was very informative, but not as exciting as Book 3 or 4. It started kind of slowly, and some of the side storylines were not that interested. However, we learned a lot about Harry's past, and he grew up a lot. I also think Hermione and Neville grew up a lot. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
Positive

Title: comment on OF HUMAN BONDAGE Review: Bette Davis is good as Mildred, the waitress with whom Philip had an abusive relationship. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
Positive

Title: Oh, good Lord. Review: I get very tired of reviews that say things like, "The value of this book is that it makes you think and ask questions -- look at how it's made the other reviewers react."Stupid, stupid, stupid. That wasn't Crossan's purpose in this book, and a volume of fanciful pseudohistory isn't valuable just because it torques people off.There's a certain sort of sophomoric reader/reviewer who thinks it's just plain good sport to annoy "fundamentalists" and call it "provoking controversy," as though controversy _itself_ were somehow valuable no matter how well-founded it is or what it's about. Grow up, kids. Bad history doesn't turn into good writing just because it stimulates powerful responses from people who know better. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
