input:  Now, answer this question: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: I find it a sad thing when people feel they have to put down others to make themselves feel better. The things some have said in their review of this book are personal attacks on the author and that is wrong. If you didn't like the book, just say you didn't. Many, including me, enjoyed the book. So if you really want to help other readers, just say what you didn't like about the book and let them decide if the book is for them or not. All the childish name-calling is just pathetic. Answer:
A:
output: Yes

input:  Now, answer this question: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: While this book had many fascinating points, especially the psychological effects of deception, there was way too much discussion of unrelated details, such as the "bare-ass naked cook" rollerskating. Gerard could have made the book half this length, including only details of the missions and a brief history, not 150 pages outlining eachn soldier's personal backround and if the ate steak rare or well-done. Overall interseting, but absolutely not a page turner. Only about 50% of the book is truly worth reading, the rest is irrelevant and boring. Answer:
A:
output: No

input:  Now, answer this question: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: I got through the first twenty pages and I was not liking it. I was FORCING myself to continue! Never force yourself to contine with a book. The summary and all sounds good, but I couldn't kepp track of character names. I thought I was reading about someone's point-of-view and then all of a sudden I was hearing about Cassie's point-of-view. I just got lost and couldn't follow along. I believe I would have like the story line about the whole seraching for Red part.I encourage you to read this and write a review. I would love to hear your review! Answer:
A:
output: