input:  Now, answer this question: Is this product review positive? Title: Fun for Young Kids (and Uncynical Parents) Review: With people obsessing about Viet Nam and Watergate in 1974, it's a wonder a movie as optimistic as The Island at the Top of the World was even produced. Leave it to Disney. Stubbornly old-fashioned--and therefore family friendly--it follows a group of adventurers who stumble upon a lost Viking society in Antarctica. The mostly European cast--save for a flat but still likeable David Hartman and woefully underused character actor Mako--gives it a jauntily Victorian feel that seems almost innocent today (though grad students will zero in on the post-colonial subtext). While older kids are probably too cynical to enjoy the movie (Gasp! It has a happy ending and positive message), younger kids will probably like the art direction and special effects, crude by today's standards but quite possibly the inspiration for such films as Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. Even hard-hearted Gen-Xers might get a little nostalgic over this one. Answer:
A:
output: Yes

input:  Now, answer this question: Is this product review positive? Title: Kabhi Kushi Kabhie Gham Review: This was like two movies in one. This first half was fantastic! The second half was a bit cheesy, but was still fun to watch. In my opinion, Hrithik Roshan will never replace the great Shah Rukh Khan! Answer:
A:
output: Yes

input:  Now, answer this question: Is this product review positive? Title: Way too fake... Review: Although vaguely attached to the original in its content, this film is hardly worth being included in the series. This time, the shark (which has grown to Godzilla proportions) decides to wreak havoc on innocent bathers in a more hyped up beach resort (obviously the producers were tired of the quaintness of Amity Island.) Mother's revenge on those for stealing her baby? Alright, so the shark's top "lip" twitches, but the characteristic grey-white color of the Great White shark has been lost?! I wonder if anyone noticed, but the shark is kind of lazy too. It hardly moves, besides a feeble "wagging" of the tail once in awhile. What happened to Joe Alves jr.'s original design (which was perfect)? Obviously twenty-five feet just wasn't big enough! Please, just stick to the original! Answer:
A:
output: