*Question*
Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied? Title: Soulless Village Backdrop for Murder Review: Fun murder mystery; like many others, not altogether believable in the real world, but entirely cohesive in its own. The heroine, Merry Mitchell, has a true past we learn about and learn to care about. The characters are not, for the most part, caricatures or stereotypical but drawn from life, believable. Definitely a possibility as the first novel of a series; whether Granger can continue the writing of believable characters we care about ~ especially Mitchell and Alan Markby, the police representative ~ remains to be seen. I hope so.
**Answer**
satisfied

*Question*
Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied? Title: Social-ist history Review: Lutes makes history human. He shows it doesn't just happen to people - people do it themselves. 1920s Germany comes alive, and Lutes shows politics wasn't something separate, left to politicians: it was life & death to everyday people. Lutes' Communists & fascists are real, and we feel their motivations. The love affair brought a lump to my throat. City of Stones is proof that education and emotion don't have to be separate.Finally, as a student of socialist history, I can vouch for Lutes' accuracy. The fascist street gangs with their wealthy backers, the communist cooperatives, rising anti-semitism set against revolutionary fervour - it's all there, drawn in beautiful, spare lines.
**Answer**
satisfied

*Question*
Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied? Title: not as advertised Review: A flimsy product with a case ill-designed to accommodate the various elements. Some blades difficult to mount on handle and impossible to secure properly.I do not recommend.
**Answer**
dissatisfied

*Question*
Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied? Title: MONISTIC Idealism? Hello! Review: The problem I find with Goswami is his choice of terms, particularly "monistic idealism." According to my education, "monistic" means you believe in one kind of substance, namely matter or soul substance. If Goswami admits the reality of matter, as he does in the first chapter and even implies in the subtitle of the book, then how can he call himself a "MONISTIC idealist?" The term denotes that he must believe that mind or "consciousness" is all that exists, but he hangs himself by allowing the reality of matter. So, he's really a DUALIST after all.Don't waste your time on this book. For a better example of pure idealistic monism, check out George Berkeley (you can find him in a book titled _The Empiricists_), or go back to the Hindu and other Indian sages upon whom Goswami draws.
**Answer**
