(Q).
Title: Fun story and history Product review: Was delighted that this book included the author's reason for writing these stories. Told the recipient that when he as done reading, I would like to read it also. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
(A).
flattering


(Q).
Title: Laced Product review: Very disappointing. Ms. Clark's style of writing is immature and would make a great read for middle schoolers!Definitely not in the same league as authors Alice Sebold or Sue Monck Kidd.Don't waste your time or money - unless you read at a grade school level. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
(A).
unflattering


(Q).
Title: Why was this book written? Product review: I bought two copies of this book so that my grandson and I could read and discuss it. My two purposes were 1) teach him about Alexander the Great and 2) show him how scholarly history books, as opposed to history text books, are written.This book has served as a good example of a bad example.To be charitable, I see that the copyright belongs to the Estate of Norman Cantor and was published after his death. I will assume that his illness led to the low quality of this book. Otherwise, I must assume he was a piss-poor professor.For the sakes of New York University, Tel Aviv University, and the Rhodes and Fulbright organizations, besides Mr. Cantor's reputation, the Estate should never have published this book in its present form.I am very disinclined to read any other works of Mr. Cantor's. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
(A).
