Question: Title: Chaplin is on trial once again and this time convicted. Review: For anyone who has read David Robinson's definitivebiography on Chaplin there is nothing new inKenneth Lynn's "Charlie Chaplin and his Times,"unless you wish, as the author seems to, that Chaplinwas convicted for all the crimes he was actuallyacquitted of. The author attempts to support hispreposterous thesis that every move Chaplin evermade was either a conscious or subconscious responseto his mother's mental illness. There is nothingabout creative or technical process here, only a 1920'sprudishness and '50's red-baiting mentality. Many ofthe author's interpretations of sexual symbolism inChaplin's early films are truly not for the squeamish. Is the review positive or negative?
Answer: Negative

Question: Title: Didn't get past the first 15 minutes Review: I really wanted to watch this movie, given the outstanding reviews. I just could not take the relentless profanity. I realize it's depicting a seamy environment, and I get that, but when 90% of every sentence in the bar scene is a string of filthy words, it just becomes a distraction. No movie needs that much profanity to make its point. Despite Affleck's other directing chops, I regard the overuse of profanity as a weakness. I would try to watch this again if it came on on TV, where they bleep out all the distracting words, because the characters are strong and the plot is compelling. Is the review positive or negative?
Answer: Negative

Question: Title: Broken Review: Clock had obviously been previously returned. Packaging was damaged & had parts missing. Clock itself was damaged (clock mechanism was no longer attached to back of clock, hands swung freely) and had probably been dropped. Return and refund was prompt and easy, no questions asked, but I didn't bother to reorder. Very disappointed, as the clock actually looked nice. Is the review positive or negative?
Answer: