(Q).
Title: Couldn't get past the first 3 pages Product review: I'm sorry I bought this book. I wish I could return it to the supermarket where I got it from but I can't find the receipt. This was not grabbing my attention at all. I will be selling this one. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
(A).
unflattering


(Q).
Title: the king of the erudites Product review: Warning: This play is nothing like R&G Are Dead or Arcadia. The Invention of Love is boring, erudite, and trifling. The constant referencing of Classical poetry is painful to wade through. The concept behind the play is interesting but the execution is directionless and unengaging. There isn't a single line of dialogue that doesn't include italized Latin squashed into an otherwise strong sentence. Surely there is merit to using Latin but Stoppard overdoes it and as a result, the play is worthlessly pedantic. I wouldn't recommend it to my mortal enemy. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
(A).
unflattering


(Q).
Title: Uriah Heep's worst album, ever. Product review: How the mighty have fallen. This one is simply awful. It originally came out in 1990, and has been described as a Bon Jovi soundalike. I wouldn't even be that generous with this album. If it deserves comparison to anything, it is to what the Christian band Petra was doing around the same time - same lame attempts at social commentary in the lyrics, same limp, going-through-the-motions "hard" rock, same hoarse grade-B vocals that suggest Bruce Springsteen trying to sound like Steve Perry, same unimaginative compositions that merely recycle what was being played on the hair metal stations at the time. The album cover and title are both blatant copies of Manfred Mann's 1976 album _Roaring Silence_. A waste of money, unless you think Petra's _This Means War_ was the pinnacle of rock. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
(A).
