(Q).
Title: Table of Contents is Best Part of Book Review: From the table of contents, you'd think this is the best book about futures you could get. "Traders Notes"? Too bad, no real insights from real traders. Can you read this book and understand the importance of calculating different hedges; why a speculator should care what hedges are common for different contracts (so one can interpret the news); how to interpret contango for different contracts? This is a large book (well over 600 pages) that looks like it was written simply by collecting introductory articles from a number of sources. Is the review positive or negative?
(A).
Negative


(Q).
Title: Lost my interest Review: I am a professional classical musician, and was looking forward to reading this beautiful book about the power of music. To my disappointment, this book turned out to be a total bore, with a stagnant plot and dimensionless characters. The "psychological" babble only skims the surface of human experience. I'm already three-quarters into the book, and still can't find anything worth turning of the next page. I'm only still reading it because I hate to quit a book I've started. The only redeeming feature of this book is its simple prose, which makes it a quick read. Is the review positive or negative?
(A).
Negative


(Q).
Title: B-O-R-I-N-G; trust me; pretentious, surreal garbage drama Review: The book starts out quick, right? Yeah, and it runs along kind of quickly except some of it starts sounding like switching back and forth from a documentary on the Tobacco Industry to a pretentious, incredulous thriller. The way Nicholas Easter controls the jurors is like a "scenes we'd like to see" scenario from Mad magazine. The book is also very predictable from the beginning, and the only thing that holds you through to the end is the anticipation of Fitch's reaction, which is not worth unveiling. Not worth the time or the money!!! Is the review positive or negative?
(A).
