Title: For Us, the Living Review: I can see why this book was not picked up by a publisher in 1939. It is quite possibly the worst Heinlein book I have ever read and I own the hardbounds off ALL of his work except this one. There is too much pontification and very little applied to plot and character. Sometimes it doesn't even sound like the Heinlein we all know and love. My life would have been complete without ever knowing this book existed. If you are a Heinlein fan, it would be good to read this in order to feel the nexus of the rest of his work. But, as a stand alone book, it sucks pretty badly. Is this product review negative?

Answer: Yes


Title: A bad moral book Review: This book is very bad and I wouldn't recommend it to anybody! It has all kinds of gross things like bad thoughts, bad motives, sex, and more. The girls are basically sleeping their way into getting a movie. I started reading it because I got it for my birthday, but stopped halfway through because it was so horrible. I threw it in the trash, because that's what it is. Is this product review negative?

Answer: Yes


Title: Pathetic Collection Review: I am a big fan of Warren William. This guy was adept at being the pre-code seducer of women, business magnet, and urbane sophisticate. So here is the question------why would they put out a Warren William Collection with three of his least successful? These are lousy movies. Stinko. Rotten. The stories are poor and the writing is woefully inadequate. The plots were flatter than a pancake.If the folks at the Warner Archives had any intention of resurrecting Warren William in a respectful way all they needed to do was a set with three strong entries that are representative of his work. Where are EMPLOYEES ENTRANCE, THE MATCH KING, UPPERWORLD and SKYSCRAPER SOULS? I have the utmost respect for Warren William and I don't understand why a collection with his name on it would feature 3 clunkers that he was obligated to perform in under his contract.My advice is to avoid this collection and wait until there are new offerings which fairly represent Warren William. Is this product review negative?

Answer: Yes


Title: One handed operation = awesomeness Review: Oxo wins again with this handy gadget! (Excuse the pun) It is easy to use and can be operated one-handed using a side-to-side motion. It has tight-sealing lids for both the top and bottom, so you can leave flour in it all of the time. It holds two cups, which is perfect for most applications, yet it remains small enough for easy storage. I had been using a strainer, which can be pretty messy, so this was a big step up from that.One thing to note regarding the tag for arthritis on this... I have psoriatic arthritis, which effects my hand & wrist joints. After typical use with this sifter, my wrist joint is pretty sore. I do not think this is a better option than traditional sifters, in that regard, but I thought I would mention it. Perhaps the tag is there because the handle is more ergonomic... Is this product review negative?

Answer: