Ques: Title: Good for some things Product review: I used the book for about a month to prepare for the GRE's. It was my main source of information. I found the review and tips helpful, especially for the quantitative. However, the writing samples are below par. The author believes that it is not that important to score well on this section, but in my opinion if you are writing a study guide then you should assume that your customers have high standards. Otherwise, why buy a book with the goal of a crappy essay? The book also gains you access to the online practice tests which are really helpful. The math questions seem a bit on the easy side though, compared to the actual test. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Ans: flattering

Ques: Title: Best Haunted House CGI I've Seen So Far Product review: I like haunted house movies and this film is no exception. Yes, it is a "reimaging" of the original film and the plot differs a bit from that film. So what? That is what reimaging is all about.I'm also interested in paranormal phenomena and how they are depicted in films. The original film was scary because of the sound effects. There are also sound effects in this version AND now we get to see the spirits of the children and the evil Hugh Crane. CGI makes this possible as we see ghostly children outlined in curtains, weird morphed reflections, and a Hill House that literally comes alive and undergoes threatening distortions.I've watched this film several times since it arrived and have not been bored by it. Liam Nielsen portrays the deceptive scientist well and Catherine Zeta Jones is perfect in the part originally played by Claire Bloom.If you like spook house films, you will not be disappointed by this effort. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Ans: flattering

Ques: Title: dear leod Product review: Hey glad you noticed my post. Actually you have made a subtle mistake. If the Borg had taken the earth in the past THERE WOULD BE NO ENTERPRISE. Get it? No Picard, No Kirk. Nothing. That is what I meant by my post. Its quite possible I didnt explain it properly in my post and I apologize. However to assume I didnt have the volume up is just rude.From a warm place,Wayne Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Ans: unflattering

Ques: Title: Don't bother. Pointless stories and unlikable characters Product review: If you get a chance to read this, don't. I listened to the audio version of the book and had to force myself to finish it because it was a selection of my book club. I kept hoping there might be some thread cleverly connecting the stories, but except for the character of Noboru Watanabe, who showed up in different guises in a few stories, that thread never materialized. Many of the stories seemed like so much navel-gazing, letting us in on the private thoughts of unremarkable people. While I, too, might have thoughts such as "Do bugs get cold?" I hardly consider them the stuff of literature. It's not that the quality of the writing itself was bad. Rather, the stories were boring and pointless. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Ans: