Question: Title: LOW BUDGET Product review: I have to hand it to the people who made this video. They tried, and since I have never made a video myself, I can't be too critical. It goes to show that you can't judge a "movie" by it's cover. The house that is pictured on the cover is what attracted me. This is not the house that is in the video. The makers of the video appear to have borrowed a plantation museum to use as the location for most of the video. The dialogue is long and drawn out and there isn't much of a plot. I don't know if it was because I watched it on my laptop or if the video has a glitch, but the audio doesn't line up with the video.Again, it was an attempt, but that's about it. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Answer: unflattering

Question: Title: The definitive book on D-Day? Product review: This book may very well become the definitive book on D-Day, at least from the British viewpoint. It is very detailed, reminiscent of Churchill's The Second World War or Morison's 15 volume History of United States Naval Operations in World War II. Groups are named, often down to the squad level and personal stories from named individuals (British, American and German) are smoothly woven into the story.This book starts with an excellent chapter, Dunkirk to D-Day 1940-1944, that in very few words brings you up to date including even a defense of the ill-fated raid on Dieppe, in that it taught the basic lessons on how to operate on D-day, indeed amphibious warfare throughout the war.All in all, this is an excellent book on D-day-a little too heavy and detailed, perhaps, for the average, casual reader but for historians, researchers, and avid WWII "junkies" such as those who read Kilroy Was Here, it can't be beaten! Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Answer: flattering

Question: Title: Beyond awful! Product review: Being a huge fan of the first Underworld movie, I went into Underworld: Awakening with an open mind and low expectations. I was at least excited to see the ever lovely Kate Beckinsale make a return to the series, but that was as far as my excitement developed. As said in the other reviews, the plot and effects were awful, and for the most part, the acting was subpar. As somewhat of an effects artist myself, I was sad to see a departure from the great traditional effects (designed by the awesome Patrick Tatopoulos) only approach used in the first movie, to the use of really crappy CG work (also designed by Patrick Tatopoulos). Please, either give up on making this series, or let the original group of writers write and direct the sequel (if there is one), and please let Mr. Tatopoulos use traditional effects again instead of mediocre CG. DO NOT WASTE YOUR MONEY ON THIS MOVIE. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
Answer: