Title: The Bear Essentials Product review: Nicklaus is STILL the greatest golfer of all-time. How amazing that he's also one of the top two or three, perhaps the top designer period in golf course design.Neat insights in here into the Bear's thinking. I'll never look at a golf hole quite the same way. Great pictures, great behind the scenes stories. Loved it. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
flattering
------
Title: The Title Is The Funniest Part Of The Book Product review: I just could not get into this book. Maybe I'll try again in the future.Not what I epected from Carlin. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
unflattering
------
Title: A strong sophmore album Product review: This is a very solid second album from the Rapper Noyd. If you like QueenBridge reality rap, you'll be happy with the purchase of this album. There are about 6 seriously banging tracks on the album: Watch Out, Bang Bang, Bang Bang Pt.2, Air It Out, Higher, and the Kid is Nice. I'd place any of these tracks against any gangster songs out this fall/winter.I didn't give this album 5 stars because the skits are worthless and the other tracks are good to weak. I think this album is worth the purchase. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
flattering
------
Title: ALL THE NEWS THAT SUITS US TO PRINT - DONT BUY Product review: I would like to relate my experience making comments to the NYT "comments" area. I have posted several times there - and was quietly censored each time. My posts were critical of the drug companies and medical establishment, but were not offensive, attacking, etc. THe NYT gets advertising dollars from drug/medical interests. Recently, the NYT admitted the comments were "moderated," when it became public knowledge what they were doing.So my objection to the NYT is they don't believe in freedom of speech, a serious transgression indeed for a journalist enterprise. They have turned from serious journalists to government-industrial hacks. As such they are part of the problem and have little legitimacy and trust-worthiness as guardians of the truth, and yes, the peoples' interests. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
