message: Improving code coverage of `missing_descendant_trie_keys`
diff: @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ mod tests {
  value: StoredValue,
  }
  - fn create_test_pairs() -> [TestPair; 2] {
  + fn create_test_pairs() -> [TestPair; 3] {
  [
  TestPair {
  key: Key::Account(AccountHash::new([1_u8; 32])),
  @@ -266,6 +266,15 @@ mod tests {
  key: Key::Account(AccountHash::new([2_u8; 32])),
  value: StoredValue::CLValue(CLValue::from_t(2_i32).unwrap()),
  },
  + TestPair {
  + key: Key::Account(AccountHash::new(
  + [2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8,
  + 1_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8,
  + // ^^^^ Is 1_u8 not 2_u8! (makes an extension node to pointer not leaf)
  + 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8,
  + 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, 2_u8, ])),
  + value: StoredValue::CLValue(CLValue::from_t(2_i32).unwrap()),
  + },
  ]
  }
  