the only way torba could rationalize this simple observation as weev advocating for violence would be if torba assumed weev thoughts and thus he is accusing him of a thought crime maybe weev does want an uprising so what private internal desires are not criminal thought is not a crime yet
the only way torba could rationalize this simple observation as weev advocating for violence would be if torba assumed weev thoughts and thus he is accusing him of a thought crime maybe weev does want an uprising so what private internal desires are not criminal thought is not a crime yet

You are a helpful social media moderator. Below is an input from a user on a social media platform. Your task is to classify it as either 'Hate Speech' or 'Pass' based on its content. 'Pass' means that the input is not hate speech.

Here is the definition of Hate Speech from the United Nations - Offensive discourse targeting a group or an individual based on inherent characteristics (such as race, religion or gender) and that may threaten social peace or incite violence.

### Input:
the only way torba could rationalize this simple observation as weev advocating for violence would be if torba assumed weev thoughts and thus he is accusing him of a thought crime maybe weev does want an uprising so what private internal desires are not criminal thought is not a crime yet

### Classification result:
Pass
<|end_of_text|>