Students should demonstrate that they can distinguish the relevant points that form a logically coherent argument. They should also be able to construct criticisms which effectively undermine, through the use of appropriate counter-examples, some premise of that argument. then , FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you will type a 1000-1500 word response in which you address EACH of the following points IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What is the author’s main argument? 2) How does he support his main argument (evidence, ancillary arguments, etc.)? 3) Do you agree or disagree with him? 4) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of at least two of the readings we have studied in this course (in chapters 1-9) to your analysis. Make sure to give a substantive explanation of how the philosophers’ insights are relevant to the topic you are discussing.
DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.
Wanafunzi wanapaswa kuonyesha kwamba wanaweza kutofautisha pointi muhimu ambazo huunda hoja yenye upatano wa kimantiki. Pia wanapaswa kuwa na uwezo wa kujenga ukosoaji ambao kwa ufanisi kudhoofisha, kwa kutumia mfano sahihi wa kupinga, baadhi ya msingi wa hoja hiyo. "Kwa mfano, kwa ""Mwanzo"" wa makala, unaweza kuandika jibu la maneno 1000-1500, na kisha utajibu kila moja ya mambo yafuatayo kwa maneno yako mwenyewe: 1) Ni nini hoja kuu ya mwandishi?" 2) Jinsi gani yeye inasaidia hoja yake kuu (uthibitisho, hoja za ziada, nk)? 3) Je, unakubaliana au hukubaliani naye? 4) Kwa nini au kwa nini si? Tumia angalau sehemu mbili za kitabu hiki (sura ya 1 hadi 9) katika uchunguzi wako. Hakikisha kutoa ufafanuzi wa msingi wa jinsi ufahamu wa wanafalsafa unavyohusiana na mada unayozungumzia. TUSIUTUMIE VYAKUZI NDIO ZIMEPITA NDIO LA DALRYMPLE NA KITABU CHAKO.