Discrimination remains a curse in America in this, the twenty-first century. Today, the
discrimination that has come into vogue is not the discrimination of the twentieth and earlier centuries – the discrimination
that segregated Blacks from whites, that was evidenced in the lynching’s of Blacks and the inequality that was seen in the low
pay for women, and only manual labor jobs for Hispanics and Asians. Back then, we openly discriminated against gays, lesbians
Here in the second decade of the twenty-first century we are experiencing a different form of
discrimination – it’s called reverse discrimination and/or reverse racism. But, make no mistake – whatever it is called, it
is DISCRIMINATION and it is also wrong!
“Reverse racism or reverse discrimination is the concept that affirmative action and similar
color-conscious programs for redressing racial inequality are a form of anti-white racism. The concept is often associated
with conservative social movements and the belief that social and economic gains by black people in the United States and
elsewhere cause disadvantages for white people.” (Ref. 1)
At work, white people are being told to check their privilege at the door. But a court ruling in
early April of 2022 indicated there was still hope for fair treatment in the corporate world.
On April 1, 2022, a California court struck down a state law mandating that corporate boards seats
be reserved for people of minority groups. The court said quotas violated the state’s constitutional guarantee that
everyone is treated equally under the law.
Equal protection isn’t just for minority races. It’s everyone’s right.
Justice Thurgood Marshall, the first African American on the U.S. Supreme Court, wrote in 1976 that
discriminating against white employees in favor of nonwhite employees was just as wrong and contrary to the Constitution as
the reverse. That is still the law today!
In 2020, California passed a law requiring public companies headquartered in the state to have at
least one board member who is a racial minority or LGBTQ+ by the end of 2021, and increase that to two or more “diverse” board
members by the end of 2022.
The law was challenged by Judicial Watch which also challenged another California law enacted in 2018
mandating that all public companies reserve nearly half their seats for women. Both lawsuits attracted national attention
because several other states are considering similar quotas.
In August 2021, the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved a rule that Nasdaq-listed
companies must have at least one female board member and another who identifies as an “underrepresented minority” or LGBTQ+
or explain in writing why they have failed to meet that goal. Judicial Watch and other advocacy groups are challenging the
Nasdaq rule in federal court.
The diversity Gestapo have shown themselves to be quite willing to trample constitutional
rights and ignore the impact on nonminority people - especially white men - as if a worthy goal justifies any means.
It should be remembered that corporate boards need diversity of skills and experience. The average
board chooses one new member a year, at most. Quotas will force them to prioritize race, gender and sexual preference
ahead of merit.
The California ruling is important beyond corporate board selection. Deliberately
discriminating against white people to meet race, gender and sexual preference targets violates federal civil rights law and
the Constitution. It’s odious and divisive.
Quotas are a mistake. The boardroom door was swinging open without them.
An impressive 72% of all new corporate directors at S&P 500 companies in 2021 were from underrepresented groups. Now
already, 11% of directors are Black, and 30% are women.
America can achieve inclusion without discriminatory quotas like the one slapped down in
Kelanji Brown Jackson was recently confirmed by the Senate to be a United States Supreme Court judge.
Her nomination and confirmation will forever be clouded by the announcement of the president in nominating her that he would
chose that person because she was a woman and was black, rather than the most qualified person. President Biden and - to some
extent - the senators that voted to confirm have demonstrated what many progressive politicians have become. They are players
of Identity Politics, trying to serve the interests of one group or the other at the expense of other groups. Ability
and real qualifications have little to no relevance for them.
Here in 2022, the social justice crowd thinks skin color is more important than merit in finding
people to place in positions that will have significant consequences for others. This mindlessness belittles the selected
group by assuming its members cannot otherwise advance. It cheats the unselected groups that may include people who attained
exceptional capabilities through exceptional effort. There are far better ways to confront racial prejudice than smashing the
principle of fair play. In short, President Biden should have been looking for the person most able to serve with wisdom in
the hugely important position of Supreme Court justice, whatever race or sex that person may have been. If that most qualified
person was a Black woman, then hurrah.
Here in these United States of America in 2022, in many ways, discrimination is increasing
rather than decreasing. BUT the discrimination we are witnessing today is discrimination not against Blacks or
homosexuals or women. Instead, it is discrimination against white heterosexual men.
“The expansion of pervasive discrimination has been a shocking violation of more than seven decades
of effort. That effort [was originally} to end segregation and move forward an integrated America with opportunity for all.
[But] In federal and state government agencies, and a growing number of corporations and associations, being white [is
increasingly becoming] a liability. Being a white male is a guarantee of discriminatory treatment. We are in the process of
repudiating Martin Luther King Jr.'s call for focusing on the content of our character rather than the color of our skin.
None of this has been supported by the American people. It has been imposed by a militant minority of radicals who believe
in discrimination based on [race, gender and sexual orientation].” (Ref. 4]
Here is one example of this disturbing trend.
“David Duvall worked at Novant Health Inc. in Michigan as a marketing specialist. During his time
at the company, he performed well and received strong performance reviews.
”Five days before his five-year anniversary, Duvall was fired. The five-year mark was significant,
because Duvall would become eligible for a better benefits package as well as a higher severance amount. The company also
had a 30-day termination notification policy, which it disregarded in Duvall’s firing.
”Duvall was told his firing had nothing to do with his performance, and that he had done ‘everything
asked of him, and more.’ After his firing, Duvall’s position was filled by two female employees — one white, one African
“Duvall then sued for race and sex discrimination.
“The company tried to fight the lawsuit, claiming Duvall’s performance wasn’t up to par. It said he
had communication and delegation problems, and that Duvall’s stellar performance reviews had been incorrect.
“But the court didn’t buy this. The company had documented Duvall’s excellent performance for years,
so there was very little chance of an error being made on that. The court rejected the company’s reason for firing Duvall.
That, combined with the fact he was replaced by two women, gave merit to his discrimination claim.
“The jury awarded Duvall $10 million.
“This case acts as an important reminder on a number of fronts. One, it shows that, while rare,
discrimination against white and/or male employees can occur in the workplace - and it’s just as illegal as discrimination
against minorities.” (Ref. 5)
Let’s face it - white Americans being discriminated against. “Reverse racism,” as highlighted by
researchers at Tufts University, reveals that America is not living in a “post-racial” society.
Despite the outcry from many members of the public and their political allies regarding our society’s
horrid obsession with race, many still regard race as a critical way to classify others. BUT many white
Americans now feel that the tide has shifted in the American consciousness. Anti-black was formerly the mainstream,
and now the mainstream is anti-white. Retributive racism can only cause an endless cycle of back-and-forth hatred
and further degrade our society.
Racism, America’s original sin, continues to plague America from making true progress as a united
nation, free of racial division and bias. Just as one group appears to be making significant progress, another finds itself
Rather than viewing racism as judging others by the color of their skin, racism has been modified to
be about power dynamics; the powerful class is the only class that can be racist and less powerful classes cannot. In
practice, that means white people cannot say things about colored people that colored people can say about white people,
no matter how vile and racist the statement may be. Most Americans would hopefully agree that one should be judged by the
content of their character as opposed to the color of their skin.
Yet, despite our nation’s praise for the late Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., it seldom happens that
we practice what we preach.
A joint survey from National Public Radio and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation/Harvard T.H. Chan School
of Public Health found that “more than half of whites - 55% - surveyed say that, generally speaking, they believe there is
discrimination against white people in America today.”
These feelings can only breed a sense of resentment, anger, and distrust that leads to further
division and distrust between Americans of all races and all classes. The United States must rid itself of racism if it is
to remain a dominant and prosperous nation; otherwise, our focus will remain on race and not what matters.
It is as if the sins of our forefathers and slavery have come full circle. Many white Americans are
beginning to feel that being white is a negative thing. This subjective feeling has taken an objective stance in the hiring
field, where many companies are overtly advertising positions, and choosing employees for positions, based on their race. It
is easy to see the irony in this: that hiring - or not - someone based on the color of their skin is the very definition of
We can only hope that our nation leaves the issue of race in the past to focus on what really matters:
The issue of reverse racism in today’s America was raised by Whoopi Goldberg when she talked about
the Holocaust on the ABC’s The View program. While she did not actually say that “all white people look alike to
me,” she implied it during her comments.
Goldberg was temporarily suspended from The View after receiving backlash for comments she
made about the Holocaust while on air on January 31, 2022. Goldberg claimed that the Holocaust, which involved the murder of
six million Jews and other victims, was not "about race."
The tenor of her remarks was that the Holocaust could not be an act of racism because it was done by
white people to white people. By implication, the Holocaust was of far less significance that events such as the George Floyd
killing since only white people died. This put the woke management of ABC in a dilemma. They could cancel Goldberg and run the
risk of angering her considerable following among progressive women - particularly women of color - or bring down the wrath of
the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL). In a predictably chin-dribbling liberal response, ABC split the difference. Goldberg
got a slap-on-the wrist two-week suspension from the show, and the ADL got an apology from Goldberg. In her subsequent
attempts to clarify her remarks in an apology tour, Goldberg only dug herself in deeper as a reverse racist. She didn’t go
so far as to claim that “some of my best friends are white,” but she came close.
Today, there is a mindset among many in America that white people are inherently bad, and that
attitude is not confined to people of color. This may be justly called reverse racism.
There are two kinds of reverse racism. The first is straightforward; it consists of blacks who hate
whites. That is understandable, and it is the result of people who think that their own problems are a result of someone else
discriminating against them because of their skin color. There is some truth in that, but it does not explain the horrendous
increase in black-on-black murder or the meteoric rise in crime in predominately black urban areas in our country.
The second, and more perverse form of reverse racism, is Critical Race Theory, which
encourages whites to hate themselves for being the root cause of all the problems for black Americans. This causes
people like Joe Biden to promise to consider only a person of one race and one gender to be nominated to the Supreme
Court. Pandering to one very small minority group will not bridge the racial animosity in America; it will only
exacerbate the division.
The worst of both types of reverse racism blame whites, including Jews - and in some cases Asians -
for all the problems of African Americans in this country while exonerating their own community of any culpability.
The reality is that most Americans are willing to tolerate their neighbors of other races. Toleration
does not equate with love, but it does mean that people are willing to work and live alongside one another. The obsession with
race is the proverbial self-licking ice cream cone; it feeds on itself until it becomes an end unto
Martin Luther King, Jr., once described racism as being as dumb as hating someone for the color of
their eyes. It wasn’t about skin color or eye color, but for the content of your character that you might be judged. Now,
public schools in the USA, including from elementary grades through college, are teaching that all white people are born
racist, ego-centric, arrogant, privileged, spoon-fed and you get the message.
If you are white, you should be ashamed of yourself. You are the cause of riots in America. You are
the reason the whole country had to deal with a white supremacist president for 4 years. You are the nationalist, the Nazi,
the extremist, the domestic terrorist. White people. You. Or so they’d have us believe.
The radical Left is preaching, teaching and embedding this in the curriculum, that White people are
to blame for everything that’s wrong with America right now, just the way Hitler blamed the Jews for the pitfalls of the
German economy in the 1930’s. The parallel is deafening. History does repeat itself.
Take a close look at the Antifa/BLM/Democrat platform and you’ll see everything but the swastika.
Hate Whitey, right? Hate Jews, right? White has become the only race (color) in America that you can legally
Reverse-racism justifies and makes it LEGAL to discriminate against whites, all whites, while
demanding that they forfeit everything they’ve ever earned in their life, all in the name of reparations for past crimes.
The goal of the anti-White racists is to remove our rights as Americans.
Racism is reported to be alive and well in Hollywood, but the racism of today is the “reverse” of the
racism of the past. While the racism of the past targeted minorities, the racism in today’s Hollywood is aimed at middle-aged
whites, according to a group of actors, writers and producers.
“A new wave of what has been termed by some as anti-white prejudice is causing writers, directors
and producers to fear they will never work again. One described the current atmosphere as ‘more toxic than Chernobyl’, with
leading actors afraid to speak out amid concern they will be labelled racist,”. Meanwhile, some high-powered black directors
are allowed to blatantly discriminate against whites.
The climate in Hollywood is now toxic to any “white, middle-aged man in show business.” One studio
executive said that, “We’re only hiring people of color, women or LGBT to write, star, produce, operate the cameras, work in
craft services. If you are white, you can’t speak out because you will instantly be branded ‘racist’ or condemned for
‘white privilege,'”. Also, “The pendulum has swung so far, everyone is paralyzed with fear by the idea anything you say
could be misinterpreted and your career ended instantly. There are a lot of hushed conversations going on, but publicly
everyone is desperate to be seen to be promoting diversity and too terrified to speak out. It’s imploding: a total
This is the same phenomenon sweeping corporate board rooms, media companies, colleges, universities
and every other subset of American life thanks to the exponentially growing intersectional/Black Lives Matter cult and
In Hollywood, it’s reportedly all about being down with “Bipoc,” an acronym for Black, Indigenous and
People of Color. “Directors normally have a say about who is in their project. Not any more. It’s all about ‘Bipoc hiring’.
And it’s coming directly from the heads of the studios who know their jobs are on the line. White middle-aged men are
collateral damage. They are the Menemy,” an Oscar-nominated insider said. ‘Menemy’ is short for a white male enemy.
One veteran actor in his 50s described how he’d been told during an audition that he was “perfect for
the part” but was rejected anyway because of patently discriminatory “Bipoc” hiring. People won’t admit it, they can’t admit
it, but reverse racism is definitely going on,” a studio insider said.
This studio insider went on to say, “You could argue that it’s a good thing, that this swinging of
the pendulum so far the other way is only fair after years of white privilege. But at what cost? Surely it is best for
everyone if people are hired on the basis of talent and ability? I can tell you, we are hiring people based purely on their
ethnicity, gender and social-media profiles.”
Being white is literally seen as being “evil” these days in
- Reverse racism, Wikipedia, Accessed 11 April 2022.
- Quotas are unconstitutional, inherently inequitable, Betsy McCaughey, Boston Herald; Pge 14,
9 April 2022.
- Biden playing identity politics with Supreme Court pick, Jay Ambrose, Boston Herald: Page 15,
29 January 2022.
- Discrimination against white men is pervasive, Dave Smith, The Courier, 10 April 2022.
- White male employee wins $10M in race discrimination lawsuit, Rachel Mucha, hrmorning.com,
4 November 2021.
- Are White Americans Facing Discrimination?, Armstrong Williams, The Daily Signal,
14 May 2021.
- Whoopi Goldberg on The View, search.yahoo.com, Accessed 11 April 2022.
- Whoopi’s Whoopsie Brings Reverse Racism and CRT Back in the Spotlight, Gary Anderson,
The American Spectator, 8 February 2022.
- WHITE PEOPLE: The only race you can legally discriminate against in the USA, S.D. Wells,
American Conservative Movement, 16 April 2021.
- Insiders warn wave of anti-white ‘reverse racism’ is toxic in Hollywood: ‘Everyone’s paralyzed with fear’,
Vivek Saxena, Business & Politics, 12 July 12 2020.
Ubaguzi bado ni laana katika Amerika katika karne hii ya ishirini na moja. Leo ubaguzi ambao umekuja kuwa wa kawaida si ubaguzi wa karne ya ishirini na karne za mapema - ubaguzi ambao uliwatenganisha weusi na wazungu, ambao ulionyeshwa katika mauaji ya weusi na ukosefu wa usawa ambao ulionekana katika mshahara wa chini kwa wanawake, na kazi za mikono tu kwa Wahispania na Waasia. Wakati huo, tulikuwa tukipinga waziwazi mashoga, wasagaji.Hapa katika muongo wa pili wa karne ya ishirini na moja tunakabiliwa na aina tofauti ya ubaguzi - unaitwa ubaguzi wa kinyume na au ubaguzi wa rangi wa kinyume. Lakini, usifanye kosa <unk> chochote kinachojulikana, ni ubaguzi na pia ni kosa! <unk>Ubaguzi wa rangi wa nyuma au ubaguzi wa rangi ya nyuma ni dhana kwamba hatua ya uthibitisho na programu kama hizo za ufahamu wa rangi kwa kurekebisha ukosefu wa usawa wa rangi ni aina ya ubaguzi wa rangi dhidi ya wazungu. Mara nyingi dhana hiyo inahusishwa na harakati za kijamii za kihafidhina na imani kwamba faida za kijamii na kiuchumi za watu weusi nchini Marekani na kwingineko husababisha hasara kwa watu weupe. 1) Katika kazi, watu weupe wanaambiwa kuangalia haki zao mlangoni. Lakini uamuzi wa mahakama mapema Aprili 2022 ulionyesha bado kuna matumaini ya matibabu ya haki katika ulimwengu wa ushirika. Aprili 1, 2022, mahakama ya California ilikataza sheria ya jimbo iliyotarajia kwamba viti vya bodi za ushirika vipewe watu wa makundi madogo. Mahakama hiyo ilisema viwango hivyo vilikiuka dhamana ya kikatiba ya jimbo hilo kwamba kila mtu hutendewa kwa usawa chini ya sheria. Ulinzi sawa si kwa ajili ya jamii ndogo tu. Kila mtu ana haki yake. "Mwanasheria Thurgood Marshall, aliyekuwa mwanasheria wa kwanza wa Afrika katika Mahakama Kuu ya Marekani, aliandika mwaka 1976 kwamba ""kuwatenga wafanyakazi weupe kwa faida ya wafanyakazi wasio weupe ni kosa na kinyume cha Katiba kama vile ilivyo kinyume.""" Hiyo bado ni sheria leo! California ilipitisha sheria ya kisheria ambayo inahitaji kampuni za umma zilizo na makao makuu katika jimbo kuwa na angalau mwanachama mmoja wa bodi ambaye ni wachache wa rangi au LGBTQ + ifikapo mwishoni mwa 2021, na kuongeza hiyo kwa wanachama wawili au zaidi wa bodi ya 'tofauti' ifikapo mwishoni mwa 2022. Sheria hiyo ilishutumiwa na Judicial Watch, ambayo pia ilishutumiwa na sheria nyingine ya California iliyopitishwa mnamo 2018 ikitoa amri kwamba kampuni zote za umma zihifadhi karibu nusu ya viti vyao kwa wanawake. Kesi zote mbili zilivutia uangalifu wa kitaifa kwa sababu majimbo mengine kadhaa yanafikiria viwango kama hivyo. "Kama ilivyoelezwa hapo juu, Tume ya Usalama na Kubadilishana (SEC) ilipitisha sheria ambayo inahitaji kampuni zilizoorodheshwa kwenye Nasdaq kuwa na angalau mwanachama mmoja wa bodi ya wanawake na mwingine ambaye anajitambulisha kama ""watu wachache waliowakilishwa"" au LGBTQ+ au kuelezea kwa maandishi kwa nini wameshindwa kufikia lengo hilo." Judicial Watch na vikundi vingine vya utetezi vinapinga sheria ya Nasdaq katika mahakama ya shirikisho. Gestapo ya tofauti imeonyesha kuwa tayari kabisa kukanyaga haki za kikatiba na kupuuza athari kwa watu wasio wachache - haswa wanaume weupe - kana kwamba lengo lenye thamani linastahili njia yoyote. Ni lazima kukumbukwa kwamba bodi za kampuni zinahitaji utofauti wa ujuzi na uzoefu. Kwa wastani, baraza huchagua mshiriki mmoja mpya kwa mwaka, kwa kiwango cha juu. Vipimo vitawalazimisha kuangazia jamii, jinsia na upendeleo wa kingono mbele ya sifa. Uamuzi wa California ni muhimu zaidi ya uteuzi wa bodi ya ushirika. """Kutenganisha kwa makusudi watu weupe ili kukidhi malengo ya jamii, jinsia na upendeleo wa kijinsia ni ukiukaji wa sheria ya haki za kiraia ya shirikisho na Katiba." Ni chukizo na kinachotenganisha. Vipimo ni kosa. Mlango wa chumba cha mkutano ulikuwa ukifunguka bila wao. Zaidi ya asilimia 72 ya wakurugenzi wa kampuni mpya katika makampuni ya S&P 500 katika 2021 walikuwa kutoka kwa makundi yasiyo na uwakilishi. Kwa sasa, asilimia 11 ya wakurugenzi ni weusi na asilimia 30 ni wanawake. "Watu wa Marekani wanaweza kufikia ujumuishaji bila mipaka ya ubaguzi kama ile iliyopigwa katika kesi ya Kelechi Brown Jackson, ambaye hivi karibuni alithibitishwa na Baraza la Seneti kuwa hakimu wa Mahakama Kuu ya Marekani.""" """Uteuzi wake na uthibitisho wake utashikwa na tangazo la rais kwamba atachagua mtu huyo kwa sababu alikuwa mwanamke na mweusi, badala ya mtu anayestahili zaidi." Rais Biden na - kwa kiwango fulani - maseneta waliopiga kura ya kuthibitisha wameonyesha kile wanasiasa wengi wa maendeleo wamekuwa. Wao ni wachezaji wa siasa za utambulisho, wakijaribu kutumikia maslahi ya kikundi kimoja au kingine kwa gharama ya vikundi vingine. Uwezo na sifa halisi hazina umuhimu wowote kwao. Katika 2022, umati wa haki ya kijamii unafikiri rangi ya ngozi ni muhimu zaidi kuliko sifa katika kupata watu kuweka katika nafasi ambazo zitakuwa na matokeo muhimu kwa wengine. Ukosefu huo wa akili hupunguza thamani ya kikundi kilichochaguliwa kwa kudhani kwamba washiriki wake hawawezi kusonga mbele kwa njia nyingine. Inadanganya makundi yasiyochaguliwa ambayo yanaweza kujumuisha watu ambao walipata uwezo wa kipekee kupitia juhudi za kipekee. Kuna njia bora zaidi za kukabiliana na ubaguzi wa rangi kuliko kuvunja kanuni ya kucheza kwa haki. "Mwishowe, Rais Biden alipaswa kuwa anatafuta mtu anayeweza kutumikia kwa hekima katika nafasi muhimu sana ya mahakama ya juu, bila kujali jamii au jinsia ya mtu huyo.""" Ikiwa mtu huyo mwenye sifa za juu zaidi alikuwa mwanamke mweusi, basi hurra. Katika nchi hii ya Marekani, kwa njia nyingi ubaguzi unaongezeka badala ya kupungua. Lakini ubaguzi tunaoshuhudia leo si ubaguzi dhidi ya weusi au mashoga au wanawake. Badala yake, ni ubaguzi dhidi ya wanaume weupe wa jinsia tofauti. <unk>Upanuko wa ubaguzi ulioenea umekuwa ukiukaji wenye kushtua wa juhudi za zaidi ya miongo saba. Jitihada hiyo [ilikuwa awali} kumaliza ubaguzi na kusonga mbele Amerika iliyounganishwa na fursa kwa wote. [Lakini] katika mashirika ya serikali ya shirikisho na ya jimbo, na idadi inayoongezeka ya mashirika na vyama, kuwa mweupe [inaongezeka kuwa] dhima. Kuwa mwanamume mweupe ni dhamana ya kutendewa kwa njia ya ubaguzi. "Hii ni kwa sababu Martin Luther King Jr. aliwahi kusema ""Kujishughulisha na tabia zetu badala ya rangi ya ngozi yetu.""" Hakuna lolote la haya ambalo limeungwa mkono na watu wa Marekani. Imewekwa na wachache wa wapiganaji wa wakali ambao wanaamini katika ubaguzi kulingana na [rasasi, jinsia na mwelekeo wa kijinsia]. <unk> (Ref. 4] Hapa ni mfano mmoja wa mwelekeo huu wenye kusumbua. David Duvall alifanya kazi katika Novant Afya Inc. katika Michigan kama mtaalamu wa masoko. Wakati wake katika kampuni, alifanya vizuri na kupokea maoni ya nguvu ya utendaji. <unk>Siku tano kabla ya maadhimisho ya miaka mitano ya maisha yake, Duvall alifutwa kazi. Mkataba wa miaka mitano ulikuwa muhimu, kwa sababu Duvall angekuwa na haki ya kupata mfuko bora wa faida na vile vile kiasi cha juu cha kuachana. Kampuni hiyo pia ilikuwa na sera ya taarifa ya kukomesha siku 30, ambayo ilipuuza katika kufutwa kazi kwa Duvall. Duvall aliiambia kuwa kufutwa kazi kwake hakukuwa na uhusiano wowote na utendaji wake, na kwamba alikuwa amefanya kila kitu kilichomwuliza, na zaidi. Baada ya kufutwa kazi, nafasi ya Duvall ilijazwa na wafanyikazi wawili wa kike - mmoja mweupe, mmoja Mwarabu - Duvall kisha alishtakiwa kwa ubaguzi wa rangi na jinsia. <unk>Kampuni ilijaribu kupigana na kesi hiyo, ikidai kwamba utendaji wa Duvall haukuwa sawa. Ilisema alikuwa na matatizo ya mawasiliano na uwakilishi, na kwamba Duvall's nyota utendaji mapitio alikuwa na makosa. Lakini mahakama haikukubali hili. Kampuni hiyo ilikuwa imeandika utendaji bora wa Duvall kwa miaka mingi, kwa hiyo kulikuwa na nafasi ndogo sana ya kosa kufanywa juu ya hilo. Mahakama ilikataa sababu ya kampuni hiyo ya kumfukuza Duvall. Hilo, pamoja na ukweli kwamba alibadilishwa na wanawake wawili, lilithibitisha madai yake ya ubaguzi. <unk>Juri lilimpa Duvall dola milioni 10. <unk>Kesi hii hutumika kama kikumbusho muhimu katika pande kadhaa. Moja, inaonyesha kwamba, wakati nadra, ubaguzi dhidi ya wazungu na / au wafanyakazi wa kiume inaweza kutokea katika mahali pa kazi - na ni kama kinyume cha sheria kama ubaguzi dhidi ya wachache. <unk> (Ref. 5) Hebu tukabiliane na hilo - Wamarekani weupe wanakabiliwa na ubaguzi. "Ubaguzi wa rangi wa nyuma", kama ilivyoonyeshwa na watafiti katika Chuo Kikuu cha Tufts, inaonyesha kwamba Marekani haiishi katika jamii ya "baada ya ubaguzi wa rangi". "Licha ya kelele kutoka kwa wanachama wengi wa umma na washirika wao wa kisiasa kuhusu ""mzozo"" wa jamii yetu na jamii, wengi bado wanaona jamii kama njia muhimu ya kuainisha wengine." Lakini Wamarekani wengi weupe sasa wanahisi kwamba hali imebadilika katika fahamu ya Wamarekani. Upinzani dhidi ya weusi hapo awali ulikuwa wa kawaida, na sasa upinzani dhidi ya weupe ni wa kawaida. Ubaguzi wa rangi wa kulipiza kisasi unaweza tu kusababisha mzunguko usio na mwisho wa chuki ya nyuma na mbele na kuharibu zaidi jamii yetu. Ubaguzi wa rangi, dhambi ya asili ya Marekani, unaendelea kuathiri Amerika kutoka kwa kufanya maendeleo ya kweli kama taifa lililoungana, bila mgawanyiko wa rangi na upendeleo. "Kama vile kikundi kimoja kinaonekana kufanya maendeleo makubwa, kikundi kingine kinajikuta kuwa badala ya kuona ubaguzi wa rangi kama kuhukumu wengine kwa rangi ya ngozi yao, ubaguzi wa rangi umebadilishwa kuwa kuhusu nguvu za nguvu; darasa lenye nguvu ni darasa pekee ambalo linaweza kuwa ubaguzi wa rangi na darasa lenye nguvu kidogo haliwezi.""" "Hii inamaanisha kuwa wazungu hawawezi kusema juu ya watu wenye rangi kile watu wenye rangi wanaweza kusema juu ya wazungu, bila kujali jinsi taarifa hiyo inaweza kuwa ya ""mzuri"" na ""ubaguzi.""" """Wamarekani wengi wangekubali kwamba mtu anapaswa kuhukumiwa kwa yaliyomo katika tabia yake, badala ya rangi ya ngozi yake." Hata hivyo, licha ya sifa ya taifa letu kwa marehemu Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. alisema, 'Ni mara chache sana tunatenda kile tunachohubiri.' Utafiti uliofanywa na National Public Radio na Robert Wood Johnson Foundation na Harvard University Chan School of Public Health iligundua kwamba zaidi ya nusu ya wazungu - 55% - waliochunguzwa wanasema kwamba, kwa ujumla, wanaamini kuna ubaguzi dhidi ya wazungu nchini Marekani leo.Hisi hizi zinaweza kuzalisha tu hisia ya chuki, hasira, na kutokuamini ambayo inaongoza kwa mgawanyiko zaidi na kutokuamini kati ya Wamarekani wa jamii zote na madarasa yote. """Mataifa yanapaswa kujiondoa katika ubaguzi wa rangi ikiwa yatabaki kuwa taifa lenye kutawala na kustawi, vinginevyo, lengo letu litabaki kuwa juu ya jamii na sio kile kinachohusika." Ni kana kwamba dhambi za mababu zetu na utumwa zimejaza mzunguko. Wamarekani wengi weupe wanaanza kuhisi kwamba kuwa mweupe ni jambo baya. Hisia hii ya kibinafsi imechukua msimamo wa lengo katika uwanja wa kuajiri, ambapo makampuni mengi yanatangaza wazi nafasi, na kuchagua wafanyikazi kwa nafasi, kulingana na jamii yao. "Hii ni kwa sababu ya ""kuajiri au kutoajiri mtu kulingana na rangi ya ngozi yake ni ufafanuzi wa ""Tunaweza tu kutumaini kwamba taifa letu linaacha suala la jamii katika siku za nyuma ili kuzingatia kile kinachohusika kweli"" - Whoopi Goldberg, mwandishi wa habari wa ABC." Wakati yeye si kweli kusema kwamba <unk>watu wote weupe kuangalia sawa kwangu,<unk> yeye implicated ni wakati wa maoni yake. Goldberg alisimamishwa kwa muda kutoka The View baada ya kupokea majibu ya maoni aliyofanya juu ya Holocaust wakati wa hewa mnamo Januari 31, 2022. Goldberg alidai kwamba yale Maangamizi Makubwa, ambayo yalitia ndani kuuawa kwa Wayahudi milioni sita na waathiriwa wengine, hayakuwa "kwa sababu ya jamii". "Mtazamo wake ni kwamba ""Holocaust haiwezi kuwa tendo la ubaguzi wa rangi kwa sababu lilifanywa na watu weupe kwa watu weupe.""" "Halafu, ""Holocaust"" ilikuwa na umuhimu mdogo kuliko matukio kama vile mauaji ya George Floyd, kwani ni wazungu tu waliokufa." Jambo hilo liliwafanya wasimamizi wa ABC wawe na tatizo. "Wanaweza kufuta Goldberg na kuendesha hatari ya kukasirisha wafuasi wake wengi kati ya wanawake wa maendeleo - hasa wanawake wa rangi - au kuleta ghadhabu ya Ligi ya Kinyume cha Utukanaji wa Kiyahudi (ADL).""" Katika majibu ya uhuru ya kutabirika ya kidevu, ABC iligawanya tofauti hiyo. Goldberg alikataliwa kwa wiki mbili kutoka kwenye kipindi hicho, na ADL ilipata ombi la msamaha kutoka kwa Goldberg. Katika majaribio yake ya baadaye ya kufafanua maoni yake katika ziara ya kuomba msamaha, Goldberg alijificha tu ndani ya kina kama ubaguzi wa rangi wa kinyume. Yeye <unk> hakuenda mbali kama kudai kwamba <unk> baadhi ya marafiki wangu bora ni nyeupe, <unk> lakini yeye alikuja karibu. """Leo kuna mawazo miongoni mwa wengi nchini Marekani kwamba watu weupe ni wabaya kiasili, na mtazamo huo haupatikani tu kwa watu wa rangi." Hilo laweza kuitwa kwa haki ubaguzi wa rangi wa kinyume. Kuna aina mbili za ubaguzi wa rangi. Ya kwanza ni ya moja kwa moja; ina watu weusi wanaowachukia wazungu. Hii ni kwa sababu watu wengi wanafikiri matatizo yao ni kwa sababu ya ubaguzi wa rangi ya ngozi. "Hiyo ni kweli, lakini haifanyi kueleza ongezeko kubwa la mauaji ya weusi dhidi ya weusi au kuongezeka kwa uhalifu katika maeneo ya mijini ya weusi nchini mwetu.""" "Mfano wa pili wa ubaguzi wa rangi ni ""Critical Race Theory"" ambayo inawahimiza wazungu kujichukia kwa kuwa chanzo cha matatizo yote ya weusi." "Hii imesababisha watu kama Joe Biden kuahidi ""kufikiria tu mtu wa jamii moja na jinsia moja kupewa uteuzi katika Mahakama Kuu.""" "Kufurahia kikundi kimoja kidogo sana cha watu wa makabila hakutasaidia kuondoa uhasama wa rangi nchini Marekani, lakini tu kuimarisha mgawanyiko huo. """ "Kutokana na aina zote mbili za ubaguzi wa rangi, ""watu weupe, ikiwa ni pamoja na Wayahudi - na katika baadhi ya kesi, Wasia - wanalaumu kwa matatizo yote ya Waafrika-Wamarekani katika nchi hii, huku wakiondoa jamii yao kwa hatia yoyote.""" Ukweli ni kwamba Wamarekani wengi wako tayari kuvumilia majirani wao wa jamii nyingine. Uvumilivu haufanani na upendo, lakini unamaanisha kwamba watu wako tayari kufanya kazi na kuishi pamoja. "Uchungu wa rangi ni kama ""koni ya aiskrimu inayolala yenyewe"" ambayo hujipaka chakula hadi inapoisha, Martin Luther King Jr. aliwahi kuelezea ubaguzi wa rangi kama ""upumbavu kama kuchukia mtu kwa rangi ya macho yake.""" Haikuwa kuhusu rangi ya ngozi au rangi ya macho, lakini kwa maudhui ya tabia yako kwamba unaweza kuhukumiwa. Shule za umma nchini Marekani, kuanzia shule za msingi hadi chuo kikuu, zinafundisha kwamba watu wote weupe huzaliwa wakiwa na ubaguzi wa rangi, wenye kiburi, wenye kiburi, wenye mapendeleo, na wanaokula kwa kijiko. Kama wewe ni mweupe, unapaswa kuwa na aibu juu yako mwenyewe. Wewe ni kisababishi cha ghasia nchini Marekani. """Wewe ni sababu nchi nzima ililazimika kushughulika na rais mweupe wa ukandamizaji kwa miaka minne." "Mimi ni mwanachama wa chama cha ""Nationalist,"" ""Nazi,"" ""Extremist,"" ""Domestic terrorist.""" Watu weupe. Wewe. Au ndivyo walivyotaka tuamini. "Kama vile Hitler alivyosema, ""Wazungu wanawajibika kwa kila kitu kibaya na Marekani sasa hivi, kama vile Hitler aliwajibika Wayahudi kwa mapungufu ya uchumi wa Ujerumani katika miaka ya 1930.""" Ulinganisho huo ni wenye kusumbua. Historia hujifanya mara kwa mara. Angalia kwa karibu jukwaa la Antifa/BLM/Democrat na utaona kila kitu isipokuwa swastika. Hate Whitey, right? Unawachukia Wayahudi, sivyo? """Wazungu wamekuwa jamii pekee (rangi) nchini Marekani ambayo unaweza kisheria kugeuza ubaguzi wa rangi na kufanya iwe halali kuwafanya wazungu, wazungu wote, wakati wa kudai kwamba wao kupoteza kila kitu walichopata katika maisha yao, wote kwa jina la fidia kwa uhalifu wa zamani." Lengo la wapinzani wa ubaguzi wa rangi ni kuondoa haki zetu kama Wamarekani. Ubaguzi wa rangi unaripotiwa kuwa hai na vizuri huko Hollywood, lakini ubaguzi wa rangi wa leo ni <unk> kinyume <unk> cha ubaguzi wa rangi wa zamani. Wakati ubaguzi wa rangi wa zamani ulilenga wachache, ubaguzi wa rangi katika Hollywood ya leo unalenga wazungu wa umri wa kati, kulingana na kikundi cha waigizaji, waandishi na wazalishaji. "Wimbi jipya la kile ambacho baadhi ya watu wamekiita ubaguzi dhidi ya wazungu linawafanya waandishi, wakurugenzi na wazalishaji kuogopa kwamba hawatakuwa na kazi tena.""" Mmoja alielezea hali ya sasa kama "ya sumu zaidi kuliko Chernobyl", na waigizaji wakuu wanaogopa kusema kati ya wasiwasi watakuwa na lebo ya ubaguzi wa rangi, " Wakati huohuo, baadhi ya wakurugenzi weusi wenye nguvu huruhusiwa kuwatendea ubaguzi waziwazi wazungu. "Mwanamume mmoja wa studio alisema, ""Tunawaajiri watu wa rangi, wanawake au LGBT tu kuandika, nyota, kuzalisha, kuendesha kamera, kufanya kazi katika huduma za ufundi.""" Kama wewe ni mweupe, huwezi kusema kwa sababu wewe mara moja kuwa branded 'rasist' au kuhukumiwa kwa 'upendeleo mweupe,' Pia, <unk>Pendulum imebadilika hadi sasa, kila mtu amepooza kwa hofu na wazo kwamba chochote unachosema kinaweza kutafsiriwa vibaya na kazi yako ilimalizika mara moja. Kuna mazungumzo mengi ya kimya yanayoendelea, lakini hadharani kila mtu anajitahidi sana kuonekana kuwa anaendeleza utofauti na anaogopa sana kusema. "Hii ni hali sawa ya kuenea kwa vyumba vya bodi za ushirika, kampuni za vyombo vya habari, vyuo vikuu, vyuo vikuu na kila sehemu nyingine ya maisha ya Marekani, shukrani kwa kuongezeka kwa wingi kwa ibada ya ""Black Lives Matter"" na ""Bipoc,"" kifupi cha ""Black, Indigenous and People of Color.""" <unk>Mkurugenzi kwa kawaida ana maoni kuhusu nani yuko katika mradi wao. Si tena yoyote. Ni wote kuhusu <unk>Bipoc kuajiri<unk>. Na inakuja moja kwa moja kutoka kwa wakuu wa studio ambao wanajua kazi zao ziko hatarini. Wanaume weupe wenye umri wa makamo ni hasara ya ziada. Wao ni Menemy, <unk> Oscar-mteule insider alisema. "Madui" ni kifupi cha adui mweupe wa kiume. Mwigizaji mmoja wa zamani katika miaka yake ya 50 alielezea jinsi alivyokuwa ameambiwa wakati wa mtihani kwamba alikuwa "mzuri kwa sehemu" lakini alikataliwa hata hivyo kwa sababu ya uajiri wa wazi wa ubaguzi wa "Bipoc". Watu hawataki kukiri, hawawezi kukiri, lakini ubaguzi wa rangi wa kinyume unaendelea kabisa, "mwanzoni mwa studio alisema. Hii studio insider aliendelea kusema, "Unaweza kujadili kwamba ni jambo zuri, kwamba hii swinging ya pendulum hadi sasa njia nyingine ni haki tu baada ya miaka ya upendeleo nyeupe. Lakini ni kwa gharama gani? Bila shaka ni bora kwa kila mtu ikiwa watu wanaajiriwa kwa msingi wa vipaji na uwezo? "Kama tunavyojua, tunawaajiri watu kulingana na kabila lao, jinsia na wasifu wao kwenye mitandao ya kijamii. ""Kuwa mweupe ni kweli kuonekana kama kuwa ""mbaya"" siku hizi katika - Ubaguzi wa rangi wa nyuma, Wikipedia, kupatikana Aprili 11, 2022." "Kuwa na mipaka ya kazi ni jambo la kawaida, lakini ni jambo la kawaida, ""Betsy McCaughey, Boston Herald, Aprili 9, 2022." """Biden akicheza siasa za utambulisho na uamuzi wa Mahakama Kuu,"" Jay Ambrose, Boston Herald: Ukurasa wa 15, Januari 29, 2022." """Ubaguzi dhidi ya wanaume weupe ni wa kawaida,"" Dave Smith, The Courier, Aprili 10, 2022." Mfanyakazi mweupe wa kiume anashinda $ 10M katika kesi ya ubaguzi wa rangi, Rachel Mucha, hrmorning.com, Novemba 4, 2021 "Wamarekani Wazungu wanakabiliwa na ubaguzi? - Armstrong Williams, ""The Daily Signal"" 14 Mei 2021" Whoopi Goldberg, The View, search.yahoo.com, Aprili 11, 2022 "Whippie huleta ubaguzi wa rangi wa kinyume na CRT nyuma katika mwangaza, Gary Anderson, ""The American Spectator"" Februari 8, 2022" - WANJANGA: Jamii pekee ambayo unaweza kutofautisha kisheria nchini Marekani, S.D. "Wells, American Conservative Movement, 16 Aprili 2021" "Wanachokutana na ""watu wa rangi nyeupe"" wanafahamika kama ""watu wa rangi nyeupe"" na ""watu wa rangi nyeupe"" na ""watu wa rangi nyeupe"" na ""watu wa rangi nyeupe"" na ""watu wa rangi nyeupe"" na ""watu wa rangi nyeupe"" na ""watu wa rangi nyeupe"" na ""watu wa rangi nyeupe"" na ""watu wa rangi nyeupe"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"" na ""wete"""