Quality of Government
In 2010 the European comissioned a report on the quality of government by region in
Europe. The report was prepared by the research team at the
Quality of Government Institute of University of Gothenburg in . Sweden
The primary task of this project was to create data for quality of government (QoG). Although a recent proliferation of QoG data have emerged since the mid 1990s, no quantification of the quality of government has been created or used in this process so far at the regional level. Based on the combination of national level international expert assessments from the World Bank and the largest QoG survey to date to focus on regional variation, they constructed the most complete quantitative estimates of QoG variation for 172 EU regions within 18 countries.
This study is important because numerous academic studies and statements by international organizations, have emphasized that only with a high quality of government can a country reap the benefits of economic growth and social development and foster economic development.
QoG was disaggregated into the following categories or pillars:
2) ‘rule of law’,
3) ‘bureaucratic effectiveness’
4) ‘government voice and accountability’/ or ‘strength of democratic and electoral
The general view is the following
One can see that, as expected, northern Europe is the most developed in QoG and not surprisingly
and East Europe are lagging behind.
If the EU countries had to be clustered in three groups the result would be this.
By pillars the results are the following:
Katika mwaka 2010, Tume ya Ulaya ilitoa ripoti kuhusu ubora wa serikali kwa mkoa katika Ulaya. Utafiti huo ulifanywa na timu ya watafiti wa Taasisi ya Ubora wa Serikali ya Chuo Kikuu cha Gothenburg. Sweden kazi ya msingi ya mradi huu ilikuwa kuunda data kwa ajili ya ubora wa serikali (QoG). Ingawa idadi kubwa ya data za QG zimeonekana tangu katikati ya miaka ya 1990, hakuna kipimo cha ubora wa serikali kilichoundwa au kutumika katika mchakato huu hadi sasa katika ngazi ya kikanda. Kwa kuzingatia mchanganyiko wa tathmini za kitaifa za wataalam wa kimataifa kutoka Benki ya Dunia na uchunguzi mkubwa wa QG hadi sasa kuzingatia tofauti za kikanda, waliunda makadirio kamili zaidi ya kiasi cha tofauti za QG kwa mikoa 172 ya EU ndani ya nchi 18. "Utafiti huu ni muhimu kwa sababu masomo mengi ya kitaaluma na taarifa za mashirika ya kimataifa, zimesisitiza kwamba tu na ubora wa juu wa serikali, nchi inaweza kuvuna faida za ukuaji wa kiuchumi na maendeleo ya kijamii na kukuza maendeleo ya kiuchumi. """ "Kama ilivyoelezwa hapo juu, ""Utawala wa sheria"" ni ""utawala wa sheria"" na ""utawala wa sheria"" ni ""utawala wa sheria"" na ""utawala wa sheria"" ni ""utawala wa sheria"" na ""utawala wa sheria"" ni ""utawala wa sheria"" na ""utawala wa sheria"" ni ""utawala wa sheria"" na ""utawala wa sheria"" ni ""utawala wa sheria.""" Ikiwa nchi za EU zingeweza kugawanywa katika makundi matatu, matokeo yangekuwa haya. Kwa nguzo matokeo ni yafuatayo: