The use of artificial intelligence (AI) can be deemed morally questionable in certain domains, for example due to ethical and legal concerns. While there might be understandable scepticism, the advance of AI models appears to be unstoppable. Many benefits have already been identified. Research shows, for example, that AI usage can lead to a productivity and efficiency boost and increased job satisfaction (Noy & Zhang, 2023). No wonder more and more organisations and citizens are jumping on the AI bandwagon, not only in education, journalism and academia but in politics.
In the run-up to the Dutch parliamentary elections of November 2023, two political parties used ChatGPT to modify their election programmes (Timmermans, 2023). In addition, the Dutch Government are investigating whether a virtual policy assistant, Codi, can help civil servants answer the thousands of parliamentary questions (NL AIC, 2023). Politicians have also sought ChatGPT’s assistance in crafting speeches and motions.
The Parliamentary Reporting Office (PRO) of the Dutch House of Representatives of the States General produces edited verbatim reports of the House’s plenary hearings and of other debates and hearings. Reporters write out five minutes of audio at a time based on an audio recording. Writing and editing are entirely manual procedures, thus requiring a significant amount of time. As is widely recognised, automatic speech recognition (ASR) can ease this process.
However, this article does not primarily address ASR. Instead, it focuses on generative AI tools centered around text, such as ChatGPT. It examines three specific domains in which AI can benefit parliamentary reporters: improving texts, providing feedback and analysing documents.
In addition to the edited verbatim reports, the PRO produces short, non-verbatim web reports of major debates and of the regular Question Hour, when MPs ask Ministers questions. The reports are published shortly thereafter, which adds time pressure to reporting. AI can assist the reporter in generating suggestions to clarify and shorten the text to meet the maximum word limit for paragraphs. It is also able to provide title recommendations. Also, AI can help to detect grammatical errors and other language inaccuracies. This process can be further facilitated when AI is integrated into Microsoft Word, which reportedly is Microsoft’s aim (Holmes & McLaughlin, 2023).
When editing, all reporters of the PRO use a wide set of rules. For example, we rely on a carefully curated glossary and a style guide with agreements on when and when not to correct a text. It can be challenging to fully internalise these conventions, especially for individuals who are new to the organisation. AI could scan an already edited text for passages or word usages that do not conform to our set of rules, for example by teaching an existing AI model those rules or developing a model of its own. In this way, the editor can quickly rectify any errors in order to meet the required uniform style of reporting.
There is also the possibility of uploading the complete set of editing rules to a tool such as ChatPDF, after which you can ask questions about the document. This would allow reporters easily to find out whether numbers, for example, are written as words or digits. Of course, editors can also upload their feedback databases and consult them. Thus, AI can fulfil the role of a substitute tutor or virtual trainee, which can be particularly useful on busy days when there are many debates or no colleagues available for assistance.
The Dutch House of Representatives meets hundreds of times yearly, either in plenary or in committee. Every reporter is thus confronted with an impressive range of debates and topics. Texts should be grammatically correct and their content easily understandable. This requires a strong understanding of all topics and their political intricacies. That is not always easy, particularly when the debate is about complex pension legislation, for example. In that case, AI can be used to scan legal texts and policy documents and answer questions about them to grasp the topic better. After all, understanding the topic makes writing and editing easier.
The three examples above demonstrate that AI can be used very easily to help parliamentary reporters in their work, and to help them become smarter. However, several pitfalls must be taken into account.
To begin with, one should realise that AI is not really “intelligent”. Large language models, the foundation of tools such as ChatGPT, are also known as “stochastic parrots”: they mimic human speech based on datasets without understanding what they are saying (Bender et al., 2021). Therefore, the reporter must be extra attentive to context and interpretation when editing. This kind of craftsmanship is impossible to outsource to AI (Voutilainen, 2023). Typical government jargon, nonverbal cues or emotions can be understood adequately only by reporters practised in these political texts.
As mentioned, AI tools can make recommendations for grammatical improvements. Grammar tools, such as Grammarly, are becoming more and more sophisticated. However, they are mainly English language-focused and are therefore of limited use to non-English language parliaments. Human intervention remains essential, yet parliamentary editors might explore the potential of grammar tools for experimentation.
Secondly, the reporter should take into account any “hallucinations” of AI tools. When trying to understand the context of legislation for debate, it is important not to rely solely on AI-generated conclusions. When hallucinating, AI tools do not differentiate between truth and falsehood. The story about a lawyer who cited fake cases in a court filing after getting “help” from ChatGPT is well known (Weiser & Schweber, 2023). It has also been discovered that political bias in AI models can occur because of the pre-existing political bias present in the input data (Gover, 2023).
Thirdly, using AI raises ethical and legal issues related to privacy violations and copyright infringement. Civil servants, including parliamentary editors, should handle data with care. For instance, when information is entered into ChatGPT, the text is not kept in a secure environment. Instead, it is utilised to train the model further. In theory, these texts could end up with third parties via prompt leaks. The EU AI Act is likely to require more transparency from large language models. However, for now, it is unclear how the AI Act, which is expected to come into force no earlier than 2025, will specifically impact parliamentary reporters. Until then, parliamentary organisations will have to develop policies and guidelines on AI use.
AI tools such as ChatGPT offer potential benefits for parliamentary reporters, enhancing text improvement, providing valuable feedback and aiding in document analysis. However, it is important to recognise their limitations. They do not have a deep understanding and can be biased. Additionally, ethical and legal concerns regarding data privacy and copyright need to be considered. Yet parliamentary organisations might find a way to ensure that AI’s benefits are captured while also preserving the insights and context that human reporters offer, particularly in the complex world of politics and legislation.
Gijs Freriks is an editor in the Parliamentary Reporting Office (PRO) of the House of Representatives of the States General, The Netherlands.
- Bender, E., T. Gebru, A. McMillan-Major & S. Shmitchell (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? – FAccT ’21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3442188.3445922
- Gover, L. (2023). Political Bias in Large Language Models. – The Commons: Puget Sound Journal of Politics, vol. 4, no. 1. URL: https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/thecommons/vol4/iss1/2/
- Holmes, A. & K. McLaughlin (2023). Ghost Writer: Microsoft Looks to Add OpenAI’s Chatbot Technology to Word, Email. – The Information. URL: https://www.theinformation.com/articles/ghost-writer-microsoft-looks-to-add-openais-chatbot-technology-to-word-email
- NL AIC (2023). “Codi, de Virtuele Beleidsassistent. – Nederlandse AI Coalitie. URL: https://nlaic.com/use-cases/codi-de-virtuele-beleidsassistent/
- Noy, S. & W. Zhang (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. – Science, vol. 381, no. 6654, pp. 187-192. URL: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh2586
- Timmermans, M. (2023). ChatGPT slaat ook aan bij BBB en Volt in aanloop naar verkiezingscampagne. – Trouw.nl. URL: https://www.trouw.nl/politiek/chatgpt-slaat-ook-aan-bij-bbb-en-volt-in-aanloop-naar-verkiezingscampagne~b9dc1b47/
- Voutilainen, E. (2023). Artificial intelligence suggests using itself for professional transcription. – Tiro 1/2023. URL: https://tiro.intersteno.org/2023/07/artificial-intelligence-suggests-using-itself-for-professional-transcription/
- Weiser, B. & N. Schweber (2023). The ChatGPT Lawyer Explains Himself. – The New York Times. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/08/nyregion/lawyer-chatgpt-sanctions.html
Matumizi ya akili bandia (AI) inaweza kuonekana kuwa ya kuhojiwa katika maeneo fulani, kwa mfano kwa sababu ya wasiwasi wa maadili na kisheria. Ingawa kunaweza kuwa na shaka inayoeleweka, maendeleo ya mifano ya AI yanaonekana kuwa hayawezi kukomeshwa. Faida nyingi tayari zimetambuliwa. Utafiti unaonyesha, kwa mfano, kwamba matumizi ya AI yanaweza kusababisha kuongeza uzalishaji na ufanisi na kuongeza kuridhika kwa kazi (Noy na Zhang, 2023). Haishangazi kwamba mashirika na raia wengi wanajiunga na AI, sio tu katika elimu, uandishi wa habari na wasomi, lakini pia katika siasa. Katika kipindi cha uchaguzi wa bunge la Uholanzi mnamo Novemba 2023, vyama viwili vya kisiasa vilitumia ChatGPT kurekebisha programu zao za uchaguzi (Timmermans, 2023). Serikali ya Uholanzi imepanga kuanzisha mfumo wa msaidizi wa sera ya mtandao wa Codi, ambayo itasaidia maafisa wa umma kujibu maelfu ya maswali ya wabunge. Wanasiasa pia wametafuta msaada wa ChatGPT katika kutengeneza hotuba na harakati. Ofisi ya Ripoti ya Bunge (PRO) ya Bunge la Wawakilishi la Uholanzi ya Jimbo la Jimbo la Uholanzi hutoa ripoti zilizohaririwa za usikilizaji wa Bunge na majadiliano mengine na usikilizaji. Waandishi wa habari huandika sauti ya dakika tano kwa wakati mmoja kwa kutegemea rekodi ya sauti. Kuandika na kuhariri ni taratibu za mikono kabisa, hivyo kuhitaji kiasi kikubwa cha muda. Kama inavyojulikana sana, utambuzi wa sauti wa moja kwa moja (ASR) unaweza kurahisisha mchakato huu. Hata hivyo, makala hii si hasa kushughulikia ASR. Badala yake, inazingatia zana za AI zinazozalishwa zinazozunguka maandishi, kama vile ChatGPT. "Kulingana na ripoti hiyo, ""AI inaweza kuwa na manufaa kwa waandishi wa habari wa bunge katika maeneo matatu: kuboresha maandishi, kutoa maoni na kuchambua nyaraka.""" Pamoja na ripoti za maandishi, PRO inazalisha ripoti fupi za wavuti zisizo za maandishi ya mjadala mkubwa na saa ya maswali ya kawaida, wakati wabunge wanauliza maswali kwa mawaziri. Ripoti huchapishwa muda mfupi baadaye, ambayo huongeza shinikizo la wakati kwa kuripoti. AI inaweza kusaidia mwandishi katika kuzalisha mapendekezo ya kufafanua na kufupisha maandishi ili kukidhi kikomo cha juu cha maneno kwa mafungu. Pia ina uwezo wa kutoa mapendekezo ya kichwa. Pia, AI yaweza kusaidia kugundua makosa ya sarufi na kasoro nyingine za lugha. Utaratibu huu unaweza kuwezesha zaidi wakati AI imeunganishwa katika Microsoft Word, ambayo inaripotiwa kuwa lengo la Microsoft (Holmes & McLaughlin, 2023). Wakati wa kuhariri, waandishi wote wa PRO hutumia seti pana ya sheria. Kwa mfano, tunategemea kamusi iliyochaguliwa kwa uangalifu na mwongozo wa mtindo na makubaliano juu ya wakati na wakati wa kutorekebisha maandishi. Inaweza kuwa changamoto ya kuingiza kikamilifu mikataba hii, hasa kwa watu ambao ni wapya kwa shirika. AI inaweza kuchunguza maandishi yaliyohaririwa tayari kwa vifungu au matumizi ya maneno ambayo hayapatani na seti yetu ya sheria, kwa mfano kwa kufundisha mfano wa AI uliopo sheria hizo au kuendeleza mfano wake mwenyewe. Kwa njia hii, mhariri anaweza kurekebisha haraka makosa yoyote ili kukidhi mtindo wa ripoti ya umoja unaohitajika. Pia kuna uwezekano wa kupakia seti kamili ya sheria za uhariri kwenye chombo kama vile ChatPDF, baada ya hapo unaweza kuuliza maswali kuhusu hati. Hii ingewawezesha waandishi wa habari kujua kwa urahisi kama namba, kwa mfano, zimeandikwa kama maneno au tarakimu. Bila shaka, wahariri wanaweza pia kupakia hifadhidata zao za maoni na kuziangalia. Kwa hivyo, AI inaweza kutimiza jukumu la mwalimu wa badala au mzoefu wa virtual, ambayo inaweza kuwa muhimu hasa katika siku za shughuli nyingi wakati kuna mjadala mwingi au hakuna wenzake wanaopatikana kwa msaada. Baraza la Wawakilishi la Uholanzi hukutana mamia ya mara kwa mwaka, ama katika mkutano wa jumla au katika kamati. Hivyo, kila mwandishi wa habari anakabiliwa na mjadala na mada mbalimbali. Maandishi yanapaswa kuwa sahihi kiakili na yaliyomo yanapaswa kueleweka kwa urahisi. Hii inahitaji uelewa mkubwa wa mada zote na utata wao wa kisiasa. Hiyo si rahisi daima, hasa wakati mjadala ni kuhusu sheria tata ya pensheni, kwa mfano. Katika kesi hiyo, AI inaweza kutumika kuchunguza maandishi ya kisheria na nyaraka za sera na kujibu maswali kuhusu mada hiyo ili kuelewa vizuri. Baada ya yote, kuelewa kichwa hufanya uandishi na uhariri uwe rahisi zaidi. Mifano mitatu iliyotajwa hapo juu inaonyesha kuwa AI inaweza kutumika kwa urahisi sana kusaidia waandishi wa habari wa bunge katika kazi yao, na kuwasaidia kuwa werevu zaidi. Hata hivyo, kuna vizuizi kadhaa vinavyohitaji kuzingatiwa. Kuanza na, mtu anapaswa kutambua kwamba AI si kweli <unk>intellectual<unk>. Mifano kubwa ya lugha, msingi wa zana kama vile ChatGPT, pia inajulikana kama <unk>stochastic parrots<unk>: wao kuiga hotuba ya binadamu kulingana na seti za data bila kuelewa nini wao ni kusema (Bender et al., 2021). Kwa hiyo, mwandishi lazima awe makini zaidi kwa muktadha na tafsiri wakati wa kuhariri. "Kama vile, ""hawezi kuwa na uwezo wa kuunda AI"" (Voutilainen, 2013)." Jargon ya kawaida ya serikali, ishara zisizo za maneno au hisia zinaweza kueleweka vizuri tu na waandishi wa habari waliozoezwa katika maandishi haya ya kisiasa. Kama ilivyoelezwa, zana za AI zinaweza kutoa mapendekezo ya maboresho ya sarufi. Vifaa vya sarufi, kama vile Grammarly, vinakuwa vya hali ya juu zaidi na zaidi. Hata hivyo, wao ni hasa Kiingereza lugha-focus na ni kwa hiyo ya matumizi mdogo kwa bunge lisilo la Kiingereza lugha. Uingiliaji wa binadamu unabaki kuwa muhimu, lakini wahariri wa bunge wanaweza kuchunguza uwezo wa zana za sarufi kwa majaribio. Pili, mwandishi wa habari anapaswa kuzingatia yoyote <unk> hallucinations <unk> ya zana AI. Wakati kujaribu kuelewa muktadha wa sheria kwa ajili ya mjadala, ni muhimu si kutegemea tu juu ya AI-kuzaliwa hitimisho. Wakati wa kuota, zana za AI hazitofautishi kati ya ukweli na uwongo. "Hadithi ya mwanasheria mmoja aliyetumia kesi bandia katika kesi ya mahakama baada ya kupata ""msaada"" kutoka kwa ChatGPT ni maarufu sana (Weiser & Schweber, 2023)." Pia imegunduliwa kuwa upendeleo wa kisiasa katika mifano ya AI unaweza kutokea kwa sababu ya upendeleo wa kisiasa uliopo katika data ya pembejeo (Gover, 2023). Kwa upande mwingine, AI inaongeza masuala ya kimaadili na kisheria yanayohusiana na ukiukaji wa faragha na haki za uchapaji. Wafanyakazi wa umma, ikiwa ni pamoja na wahariri wa bunge, wanapaswa kushughulikia data kwa uangalifu. Kwa mfano, wakati habari ni kuingizwa katika ChatGPT, maandishi si kuhifadhiwa katika mazingira salama. Badala yake, ni kutumika kwa mafunzo ya mfano zaidi. Kwa nadharia, maandishi haya yanaweza kuishia na watu wa tatu kupitia uvujaji wa haraka. Sheria ya EU ya AI inahitaji uwazi zaidi kutoka kwa mifano mikubwa ya lugha. Hata hivyo, kwa sasa haijulikani ni jinsi gani sheria ya AI, ambayo inatarajiwa kuanza kutumika mapema kama 2025, itaathiri waandishi wa habari wa bunge. "Hata hivyo, mashirika ya bunge yatalazimika kuendeleza sera na miongozo juu ya matumizi ya AI. """ Vifaa vya AI kama vile ChatGPT hutoa faida za uwezekano kwa waandishi wa habari wa bunge, kuimarisha uboreshaji wa maandishi, kutoa maoni muhimu na kusaidia katika uchambuzi wa hati. Hata hivyo, ni muhimu kutambua mipaka yao. Hawana uelewa wa kina na wanaweza kuwa na upendeleo. Kwa kuongezea, wasiwasi wa kimaadili na kisheria kuhusu faragha ya data na hakimiliki inahitaji kuzingatiwa. Hata hivyo, mashirika ya bunge yanaweza kupata njia ya kuhakikisha kwamba faida za AI zinapatikana wakati pia kuhifadhi ufahamu na muktadha ambao waandishi wa habari wa binadamu hutoa, haswa katika ulimwengu tata wa siasa na sheria. Gijs Frers is a member of the Parliamentary Reporting Office (PRO) of the House of Representatives of the States General (Kampuni ya Ripoti ya Bunge) ya Bunge la Marekani. - Bender, E., T. Gebru, A. McMillan-Major & S. Shmitchell (2021). Kuhusu Hatari za Vipepeo wa Stochastic: Je, Mifano ya Lugha Inaweza Kuwa Kubwa Sana? "Fundamentals of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FACT 21) ni mkutano wa kimataifa wa ACM uliofanyika mnamo 2021 na unajumuisha ""Uadilifu, Uwajibikaji, na Uwazi.""" "Ukurasa wa kwanza: ""Ukurasa wa pili"" (Ukurasa wa pili) ""Ukurasa wa tatu"" (Ukurasa wa tatu) ""Ukurasa wa tatu"" (Ukurasa wa tatu) ""Ukurasa wa tatu"" (Ukurasa wa tatu) ""Ukurasa wa tatu"" (Ukurasa wa tatu) ""Ukurasa wa tatu"" (Ukurasa wa tatu) ""Ukurasa wa tatu"" (Ukurasa wa nne) ""Ukurasa wa tatu"" (Ukurasa wa nne) ""Ukurasa wa tatu""" Upendeleo wa kisiasa katika mifano mikubwa ya lugha. <unk> The Commons: Puget Sound Journal of Politics, vol. 4, hapana 1. Uwe na mtazamo wa kweli "Ukurasa wa mwisho: https: www.pugetsu.edu.com ""Kutoka kwa ""Kutoka kwa"""" ni kwa ""Kutoka kwa"" ni kwa ""Kutoka kwa"" ni kwa ""Kutoka kwa"" ni kwa ""Kutoka kwa"" ni kwa ""Kutoka kwa"" ni kwa ""Kutoka kwa"" ni kwa ""Kutoka kwa"" ni kwa ""Kutoka kwa"" ni kwa ""Kutoka kwa"" ni kwa ""Kutoka kwa"" ni kwa ""Kutoka kwa." & K. McLaughlin (2023). Microsoft inaongeza teknolojia ya OpenAI ya Chatbot kwa Word  Habari. "Ukurasa wa mwisho wa ""Ukurasa wa mwisho"" ni ""Ukurasa wa mwisho"" wa ""Ukurasa wa mwisho"" wa ""Ukurasa wa mwisho"" wa ""Ukurasa wa mwisho"" wa ""Ukurasa wa mwisho"" wa ""Ukurasa wa mwisho"" wa ""Ukurasa wa mwisho"" wa ""Ukurasa wa mwisho"" wa ""Ukurasa wa mwisho"" wa ""Ukurasa wa mwisho"" wa ""Ukurasa wa mwisho"" wa ""Ukurasa wa mwisho"" wa ""Ukurasa wa mwisho"" wa ""Ukurasa wa mwisho"" wa ""Ukurasa wa mwisho.""" <unk>Codi, de Virtuele Beleidsassistent. <unk> Nederlandse AI Coalitie. "Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Ukurasa wa mwisho: "" Ushahidi wa majaribio juu ya athari za uzalishaji wa akili bandia ya kizazi.  Sayansi, vol. 381 - Hapana 6654 - Ukurasa wa Mwaka 1872-92. "Ukurasa wa mwisho: ""Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti." ChatGPT slaat ook aan bij BBB en Volt in aanloop naar verkiezingscampagne.  Trouw.nl. "Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe wa ""Ujumbe "" wa "" Ujumbe "" wa "" Ujumbe "" wa "" Ujumbe "" wa "" Ujumbe "" wa "" Ujumbe "" wa "" wa "" Ujumbe "" wa "" Ujumbe "" wa "" Ujumbe "" wa "" Ujumbe "" wa "" Ujumbe "" wa "" Ujumbe "" wa "" Ujumbe "" wa "" Ujumbe "" wa "" Ujumbe "" wa "" Ujumbe "" wa "" U Akili bandia inapendekeza kutumia yenyewe kwa ajili ya transcription ya kitaalamu.  Tiro 1 2023. "Ukurasa wa mwisho wa ""Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti wa Utafiti""" & N. Schweber (2023). Mwanasheria wa ChatGPT anaelezea mwenyewe. <unk> Gazeti la New York Times. "Ukurasa wa mwisho: https: www.nytimes.com.au ""nothing new"" au ""nothing new"" au ""nothing new"" au ""nothing new"" au ""nothing new"" au ""nothing new"" au ""nothing new"" au ""nothing new"" au ""nothing new"" au ""nothing new"""