Typology of Hate Speech
By far this has the least severity, but this shown not be neglected yet. This type of hate speech is also the most common out of the three categories. Such comments are an “early warning” to the hate on its development stage towards a group, and the individual has not taken drastic actions in defaming nor discriminating against them. Such vocabulary include “dumb”, “stupid” or “pointless”. As ITEMS has pointed out, the precursor to the "early warning" hate speech is often categorising oneself and us, and discrimination against another group through the usage of "them"
Dehumanization often compares its victims to inhuman human objects or animals that are less than human. It can be interpreted as personification but in a severely negative context. Such as "Pigs", "Retards" or "'Monkeys". Another type of dehumanization may take in a form of demonization, where an individual is shone in a bad light intentionally as to portray its victim in a both evil and threatening setting. Such terms include: "Corrupt", "Sinful" or "Extremist". The intention behind dehumanization and demonization is somewhat mixed; however, it is often used to turn a particular group collectively against a minority group.
This is the most extreme case of hate speech border lining "hate-crime" -- and it may often result in an armed confrontation. Unlike dehumanization, this type of hate speech often calls out certain groups and promotes the usage of violence in the suppression of the suppressed. By portraying violence against the victim group as "normal", oftentimes lead to the "normalization" of violence committed in other minds. This is a huge factor in encouraging the support of hate crimes targeted towards gendered people on a global scale.
Aina ya Hotuba ya Chuki Kwa mbali hii ina ukali mdogo zaidi, lakini hii imeonyeshwa kuwa haijapuuzwa bado. Aina hii ya hotuba ya chuki pia ndiyo ya kawaida zaidi kati ya makundi hayo matatu. Maelezo kama hayo ni "maonyo ya mapema" kwa chuki katika hatua yake ya maendeleo kuelekea kikundi, na mtu binafsi hajachukua hatua kali katika kudhalilisha wala kutofautisha dhidi yao. Maneno hayo yanatia ndani "binafsi", "upumbavu" au "upumbavu". "Kama ITEMS ilivyoonyesha, ""maonyesho ya mapema ya chuki"" mara nyingi ni kujiweka katika makundi na kututenganisha na ubaguzi dhidi ya kikundi kingine kupitia matumizi ya ""watu"" - mara nyingi inalingana na watu wasio na ubinadamu au wanyama ambao ni chini ya binadamu." Inaweza kutafsiriwa kuwa ufananisho lakini katika muktadha mbaya sana. Kama vile "Nguruwe", "Wasiomavu" au "Monkeys". Aina nyingine ya dehumanization inaweza kuchukua katika aina ya demonization, ambapo mtu ni shone katika mwanga mbaya makusudi kama kuelezea mhasiriwa wake katika mazingira ya wote waovu na kutisha. Maneno hayo yanatia ndani: "Mfisadi", "Mkosa" au "Mkandamizaji". Kusudi la dehumanization na demonization ni tofauti; hata hivyo, mara nyingi hutumiwa kugeuza kikundi fulani kwa pamoja dhidi ya kikundi kidogo. Hii ni kesi kali zaidi ya hotuba ya chuki inayopitia mpaka wa "uhalifu wa chuki" - na mara nyingi inaweza kusababisha mapigano ya silaha. Tofauti na dehumanization, aina hii ya hotuba ya chuki mara nyingi huita vikundi fulani na kukuza matumizi ya vurugu katika kukandamiza wale waliokandamizwa. Kwa kuelezea vurugu dhidi ya kundi la waathirika kama "ya kawaida", mara nyingi husababisha "kufanya kawaida" vurugu zilizofanywa katika akili za wengine. Hii ni sababu kubwa katika kuhamasisha msaada wa uhalifu wa chuki unaolenga watu wa jinsia moja kwa kiwango cha kimataifa.