[Commentor] LC-422 on behalf of I18N WG [Working Group decision] We have not found sufficient support for this encoding scheme in mobile devices. [Commentor reply] no reply from commenter [Comment] 
Comment from the i18n review of: link Comment 7 At link Editorial/substantive: E Owner: FS Location in reviewed document: Sec.2.3 [link] Comment: In some character encodings like UTF-8, scripts with a similar number of characters (e.g. latin versus indic scripts) vary in space requirements. To avoid high bandwidth / cost related to scripts, you might propose for such cases the use of the compression scheme for unicode [link] .