[ID] 63 [Status] Closed [Commenter] Samuel Martin [Location] Scope of Applicability [Current text] in "Example of Web site enclosure", it is said that the scope of evaluation includes "aggregated and embedded content (...) including when such parts originate from third-party sources". Later on, in "Particular Evaluation Contexts", it is said that "third-party content is not under the control of the website or web service providers (...) non-conforming content needs to be clearly identified in the web pages in which it appears". [Rationale] The same term "third-party" is used for two different concepts that require two different approaches, this may confuse the readers. [Resolution] Resolution: No change. Rationale: Section "Principle of website enclosure" states that all third-party content in scope must be included in the evaluation while section "evaluating third-party content" explains how to go about with this type of content; the sections do not contradict. [Suggested Change] 
Distinguish between these two uses of "third-party content". One refers to content integrated from external sources, but which is part of the scope, so as to consider complete processes. The other refers to user-generated contents, which can be either repaired or excluded from the scope through a statement of partial conformance.