[ID] 58 [Status] Closed [Commenter] Loïc Martínez Normand [Location] Step 4 [Current text] Note 1 [Suggested Change] Proposal for that second sentence: "An evaluator does not need to repeatedly identify successes and failures in meeting the conformance target for these repetitive elements on every web page. The success and failures for such repetitive elements can be identified once and then be reused in all the pages those elements appear." [Resolution] Resolution: Edited. Rationale: The note has been edited and worked into the main text. [Rationale] 
"The first note is confusing. If there are repetitive elements on every web page it makes sense to evaluate them only once, and then record and reuse the evaluation results. It is clear that an evaluator should not valuate several times the same repetitive elements but it is also important to note that the result assigned after the first evaluation has to be used when evaluating each page where the repetitive elements appear! My understanding of the second sentence of this note is that it implies that the repetitive elements are only evaluated once and their result is only used once... I'm probably misreading it, but I think that the text would benefit from some rewrite. In addition I don't see the point of referring back to step 1.b in this note. What would be the difference on dealing with repetitive elements depending of the type of expected report?"