[Commentor] LC-400 Zev Blut [Comment] 5.1.3 Work around deficient implementations “It is recognized that content providers may need to violate specific best practices in order to support their intentions on devices that exhibit deficiencies in implementation. If a device is not known to have specific limitations then content providers must comply with best practices” My question is the use of “must comply” is a bit strong, because there can be cases where developers and the W3C differ in opinion on whether a certain device has limitations. In areas where interpretations differ this may prevent the developer from getting the “mobileOK” mark. Who and or how are agreements going to be made about when a device is known to have specific limitations? [Working Group decision] We say that this is relevant when the device does not respect the author's intentions. [Commentor reply] 
no reply from commenter
n o r e p l y f r o m c o m m e n t e r
y e s