[ID] 57 [Status] Closed [Commenter] Loïc Martínez Normand [Location] Step 4 [Resolution] Resolution: Section rewritten. Rationale: Provides more guidance on how to evaluate content using WCAG 2.0 and its accompanying document. [Rationale] 
"some of the content of this step seems to me to be out of scope. WCAG-EM is about testing conformance to WCAG 2.0, that is, to determine whether a web site conforms to the technical requirements of WCAG 2.0, which are the 61 success criteria and the 5 conformance requirements. WCAG-EM should not deal with other types of accessibility evaluations, such as user testing or the concept of "accessibility-in-use" as defined in current research. So the first substep, as 4.a (check for use cases), seems to me out of scope." "What I expected as content of step 4 is guidance about: how to evaluate each success criterion for each element of a web page of the sample, including guidance about the best approach: inspection, testing by experts, testing by users... how to combine the results obtained for each element in order to get a result for the page, how to evaluate the 5 conformance requirements once the result of each SC is known for the page, how to combine the results obtained for each page to get the global result for the site (that then will be reported in step 5)."