[Responder] Larry Masinter [What to publish?] I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft. [Comments] 
I think neither "majority" nor "most votes" should be used: if there is not "consensus" and there are votes (rather than straw polls), then one-vote-per-independent organization should be retained (one company has 17 members in "good standing"), and the "good standing" role of "invited experts" who are not actually experts or who do not actually participate should be reevaluated. A vote should not determined by those who are listed as working group members out of courtesy or for the rationale that their IPR disclaimer is needed. As far as IPR is concerned, both drafts contain new, unreviewed material that might trigger a patent review; commit-then-discuss should be evaluated against the patent policy to see if some adjustment is needed.