Using the provided source, generate a concise summary:

SECTION Page 1 Court Case Title Appeal From Date Filed Case Number Fee Status Case Type Case Subtype US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAURIZIO ANTONINETTI v. CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO CASE INFORMATION PAID APPEALS CIVIL PRIVATE Nature of Suit 3440 OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS Key Nature of Suit APPEALS (030) District LOWER COURT INFORMATION 0974-3 Lower Court Docket Number 3 Trial Judge(s) NAPOLEON A. JONES, JUNIOR, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Court Reporter(s) JOAN KING Date Filed Page 2 Date Order/Judgment Date NOA Filed Date COA Received OTHER CASES Current Case(s) Relationship CONSOLIDATED POST-BR CROSS-APPEAL CROSS-APPEAL RELATED RELATED RELATED Name Type Attorney Attorney Phone Firm Name Firm Address Name Type Attorney Firm Name Firm Address Attorney Lead Docket Member Docket Start Date -- -----NAMES MAURIZIO ANTONINETTI PLAINTIFF - APPELLEE AMY BETH VANDEVELD VANDEVELD LAW OFFICES SUITE 22 1850 FIFTH AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 End Date -- ------ CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. DEFENDANT - APPELLANT GREGORY FRANCIS HURLEY, ESQUIRE, SENIOR LITIGATION GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 3161 MICHELSON DRIVE IRVINE, CA 92612 VIRGINIA E. ROBINSON Page 3 Attorney Phone Firm Name Firm Address Firm Phone Attorney Attorney Phone Firm Name Firm Address Firm Phone ENTRY # 20 19 18 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP SUITE 1200 1750 TYSONS BLVD. MCLEAN, VA 22102 JOHN FRANCIS SCALIA, ESQUIRE GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP STE. 1200 1750 TYSONS BLVD. MCLEAN, VA 22102 DOCKET PROCEEDINGS DATE DESCRIPTION NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT ON APRIL CALENDAR. PLEASE RETURN ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE FORM TO PASADENA OFFICE. ATTENTION THE NOTICE OF DOCKET ACTIVITY MAY NOT LIST YOUR CASE NUMBER. PLEASE OPEN ATTACHED DOCUMENTS TO VIEW DETAILS ABOUT YOUR CASE. (LN) CASE REJECTED FROM CIRCUIT MEDIATION PROGRAM. (SB) RECEIVED 10 PAPER COPIES OF CROSS-APPEAL REPLY BRIEF 16 FILED BY CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. IN ONE COPY TO CASE FILES, THE REMAINDER TO RECORDS. (SD) 17 16 15 14 13 12 Page 4 FILED CLERK ORDER CROSS-APPEAL REPLY BRIEF BRIEF 16 FILED BY CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS OF THE FILING OF THIS ORDER, FILER IS ORDERED TO FILE 10 COPIES OF THE BRIEF IN PAPER FORMAT, WITH A GREY COVER, ACCOMPANIED BY CERTIFICATION, ATTACHED TO THE END OF EACH COPY OF THE BRIEF, THAT THE BRIEF IS IDENTICAL TO THE VERSION SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY. (PK) SUBMITTED (ECF) CROSS-APPEAL REPLY BRIEF BRIEF FOR REVIEW. SUBMITTED BY APPELLANT CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. IN APPELLEE CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. IN DATE OF SERVICE -- COURT SPREAD FILING TO CASE NOS. AND BY MA (VER) RECEIVED 10 PAPER COPIES OF THIRD BRIEF ON CROSSAPPEAL 12 FILED BY MAURIZIO ANTONINETTI IN ONE COPY TO CASE FILES, THE REMAINDER TO RECORDS. (SD) FILED APPELLANT MAURIZIO ANTONINETTI EXCERPTS OF RECORD VOLUME 10. SERVED ON (PK) FILED CLERK ORDER THIRD BRIEF ON CROSS-APPEAL 12 FILED BY MAURIZIO ANTONINETTI IN WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS OF THE FILING OF THIS ORDER, FILER IS ORDERED TO FILE 10 COPIES OF THE BRIEF IN PAPER FORMAT, WITH A YELLOW COVER, ACCOMPANIED BY CERTIFICATION, ATTACHED TO THE END OF EACH COPY OF THE BRIEF, THAT THE BRIEF IS IDENTICAL TO THE VERSION SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY. (LA) SUBMITTED (ECF) THIRD BRIEF ON CROSS-APPEAL BRIEF FOR REVIEW. SUBMITTED BY APPELLANT MAU- 10 9 11 8 7 6 Page 5 RIZIO ANTONINETTI IN DATE OF SERVICE (ABV) RECEIVED 10 PAPER COPIES OF SECOND BRIEF ON CROSS-APPEAL 8 FILED BY CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. IN ONE COPY TO CASE FILES, THE REMAINDER TO RECORDS. (SD) FILED CLERK ORDER SECOND BRIEF ON CROSSAPPEAL BRIEF 8 FILED BY CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS OF THE FILING OF THIS ORDER, FILER IS ORDERED TO FILE 10 COPIES OF THE BRIEF IN PAPER FORMAT, WITH A RED COVER, ACCOMPANIED BY CERTIFICATION, ATTACHED TO THE END OF EACH COPY OF THE BRIEF, THAT THE BRIEF IS IDENTICAL TO THE VERSION SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY. (PK) FILED APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. IN & SUPPLEMENTAL EXCERPTS OF RECORD ON APPEAL IN 1 VOLUME. (LA) SUBMITTED (ECF) SECOND BRIEF ON CROSS-APPEAL BRIEF FOR REVIEW. SUBMITTED BY APPELLEE CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. IN DATE OF SERVICE -- COURT SPREAD FILING TO BY MA (GFH) RECEIVED 10 PAPER COPIES OF OPENING BRIEF 5 FILED BY MAURIZIO ANTONINETTI IN ONE COPY TO CASE FILES, THE REMAINDER TO RECORDS. (SD) FILED APPELLANT MAURIZIO ANTONINETTI IN EXCERPTS OF RECORD IN 9 VOLUMES, WITH -- 5 4 3 2 Page 6 ADDITIONAL, SEPARATELY-BOUND FULL INDEX. SERVED ON (LA) FILED CLERK ORDER FIRST BRIEF ON CROSS-APPEAL 5 FILED BY MAURIZIO ANTONINETTI IN & WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS OF THE FILING OF THIS ORDER, FILER IS ORDERED TO FILE 10 COPIES OF THE BRIEF IN PAPER FORMAT, WITH A BLUE COVER, ACCOMPANIED BY CERTIFICATION, ATTACHED TO THE END OF EACH COPY OF THE BRIEF, THAT THE BRIEF IS IDENTICAL TO THE VERSION SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY. (LA) SUBMITTED (ECF) FIRST BRIEF ON CROSS-APPEAL BRIEF FOR REVIEW. SUBMITTED BY APPELLEE MAURIZIO ANTONINETTI IN DATE OF SERVICE (ABV) FILED CLERK ORDER (DEPUTY CLERK LBS ) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF AND WITH AND IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED APPEALS SHALL BE ASSIGNED TO THE SAME MERITS PANEL. THESE APPEALS SHALL BE BRIEFED SEPARATELY. BRIEFING HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN AND THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ESTABLISHED ON MARCH 20, 2009 IN AND IS UNCHANGED. (SC) FILED (ECF) APPELLANT MAURIZIO ANTONINETTI IN MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES DATE OF SERVICE (ABV) FILED APPELLANT CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. IN CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT. SERVED ON (RT) 1 Page 7 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND CADS NO. SETTING CROSS-APPEAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE AS FOLLOWS FIRST CROSS APPEAL BRIEF DUE FOR MAURIZIO ANTONINETTI. SECOND BRIEF ON CROSS APPEAL DUE FOR CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.. THIRD BRIEF ON CROSS APPEAL DUE FOR MAURIZIO ANTONINETTI. OPTIONAL CROSS APPEAL REPLY BRIEF FOR CHIPOLTE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. IS DUE 14 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE THIRD BRIEF ON CROSS APPEAL. (RT)

Summary: 


A paraplegic individual who uses a wheelchair sued Chipotle for violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) and California state law in two of its California restaurants. The defendant implemented a new Customers with Disabilities which the district court found to be in compliance with the ADA, but the Ninth Circuit found otherwise, that viewing the ingredients behind the counter was part of the Chipotle Experience. Ultimately, the defendant lowered the heights of the walls in front of the food-preparation areas in all of its California locations so that customers in wheelchairs could see the ingredients, and the plaintiff was awarded in attorneys' fees and costs and $5,000 in statutory damages.

