# Find Visible Segments by Sweeping Lines

After two months of classes and two weeks of exams, the first quarter of my Master’s is finally complete. I can say that 1/8th of my degree is complete. With a new quarter comes new courses. It’s been just a week but there is one specific topic that I found quite intriguing: geometric algorithms, specifically sweep line algorithms.

Before getting deeper into the subject, what are geometric algorithms? Well, they are used to solve geometric problems! Now you may be thinking “why is he stating the obvious?”. Since geometric problems usually deal with an enormous amount of diverse data, the computational complexity is very important. A difference between the running time of a bad algorithm compared to an efficient one can be in the order of days, or even months and years.

To illustrate this, I’m going to use a variant of the sweep line algorithm. Traditionally, the algorithm is sued to find intersections aong line segments in a plane but there are many variations. Let’s picture the problem where you have a point p and many line segments surrouding it. None of them interesect each other, being completely disjoint. A simple algorithm would be to go for each line segment and test it against all the others to see if it was the closest to p at any point. However, the complexity of this is insane.

With that being said, there’s a much better, yet simple, strategy that would solve our problem in logarithmic time. Please remember that we’re assuming there’s no intersections and all line segments are completely disjoint. The idea is to have a ray from p that does a 360ΒΊ roudtrip and checks for the closest line segment. However, how can we do this?

We’re going to need two data structures: one for the events, which are the endpoints of the line segments (for starting and ending); and another one for the status, which will represent the current ray intersections at the current instant in time.

For the events, we will be using a priority queue E. The operations we need, enqueue and dequeue, can both be executed in constant time. For the status, we will be using a balanced binary search tree (BST) S where the operations search, insert and delete can run in logarithmic time.

Let’s look at the algorithm now:

1. Initialize E with all the endpoints from all line segments. The endpoints are represented in polar coordinates (angle, distance) and sorted by distance. This takes O(n log n).
2. Initialize S with the intersections for the first ray, when the angle of rotation is 0ΒΊ. The BST will be sorted by distance. Takes O(n).
3. For each event in E, remove the element from S if it’s an end endpoint or add the element to S if it’s a start endpoint. On both cases, check the leftmost leaf in the tree, which will represent the current visible line segment, since it is sorted by distance. Takes O(n log n).

In total, the algorithm takes O(n log n) time. Try to picture it. Does it make sense? It makes sense to me and I hope it’s correct.

What do you think about this kind of problems? There’s many other variations of this, such as find intersections and find the smallest circles in a set of points.
{"found_math": false, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 0, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0, "katex": 0, "math-container": 0, "wp-katex-eq": 0, "align": 0, "equation": 0, "x-ck12": 0, "texerror": 0}