# Is the relation c=νλ valid only for Electromagnetic waves?

What is the validity of the relation $c = \nu\lambda$? More specifically, is this equation valid only for Electromagnetic waves?

I read this statement in a book, which says:

de Broglie waves are not electromagnetic in nature, because they do not arise out of accelerated charged particle.

This seems correct, but arises a doubt in my mind.
Suppose I find out the wavelength of a matter wave (or de Broglie wave) using de Broglie's wave equation: $$\lambda = \frac{h}{p}$$

Now, can I use $c = \nu\lambda$ to find out the frequency of the wave?

• No, now you cannot use $c= \nu\lambda$ Feb 6, 2016 at 15:29
• It would be $v=\nu\lambda$ where v is speed of matter wave. Feb 6, 2016 at 15:31

No.

The general relation is given by

$$v = \lambda\nu$$

Where $v$ is the velocity of the considered wave and $\lambda$ and $\nu$ its wavelength and frequency. Of course in the case of an electromagnetic wave which is traveling at the speed of light you gain

$$c = \lambda\nu$$

If you're treating instead some massive particle, then thou have $$p = \frac{Ev}{c^2}$$

and using $E = \frac{h}{\nu}$ you obtain $$p = \frac{h}{\lambda}$$

For a non-relativistic particle

$$\lambda = \frac{h}{p} = \frac{h}{\sqrt{2mK}}$$, where $K$ is the non-relativistic kinetic energy $K = \frac{p^2}{2m}$.
{"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 1, "mathjax_display_tex": 1, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0, "katex": 0, "math-container": 0, "wp-katex-eq": 0, "align": 0, "equation": 0, "x-ck12": 0, "texerror": 0}