Here's my feedback:

- On lending I think this is totally fine.
- On RUNEpool I am going to reserve commenting for now as I need more time to think it over.
- On Savers, there's concerns this still does create net $RUNE sell pressure which is not matched by system income. It also seems to hurt DLPs. See screenshots below.

My feedback right now is for @jpthor to unbundle the Savers (and maybe Runepool) solutions from the lending solution. The unwind module as structured 100% works for lending, but there seem to be more complex issues affecting DLPs with the other two.

Solutions which fit with the unwind module with savers & runepool can be implemented later. There is no need to solve this all in one proposal, and given the size of the liabilities it makes sense to take time and do this the right way.