I solved the Sallyport! This literally confirms my hypothesis! #FreeKarenRead HELL YEA IT WAS EDITED! 

I bought an Axis 3045v camera based on budget records that cited it in a 2019 invoice from the Town of Canton budget records. 

I tested the motion activation parameters and sensitivity, the compression and GOP settings, as well as conducted lighting and aperture tests. The quality and compression I tested did not align with what was seen in the Sallyport footage, based on the camera model. In fact, I couldn’t replicate the poor quality, even with this outdated camera model. This inconsistency led me to hypothesize that the footage was edited.

How they did it? 

They used a screen-recorded video from the Exacqvision media player and layered the edited footage on top using an NLE program—likely After Effects. The frame handling, in simple terms, reveals inconsistencies with adding and removing frames (GOP) in export which is a one of many downside in exporting native low framerates within the program. 
 
What we saw in court was a video that appeared to be played in ExacqVision… 

Exacqvision uses proprietary encryption for video files stored within its system to ensure data integrity and security. The files are typically stored in a proprietary format (.evx) that includes encrypted metadata and video streams. The encryption ensures the files cannot be tampered with or played back using non-ExacqVision software without proper decoding.

Furthermore, Exacqvision has a very specific storage structure in archiving. There’s literally no way they could have lost the footage as there are backups.

I attempted rewrite the AVI file to play in ExacqVision, but I couldn’t get it to play past 5 seconds without causing the player to crash. Due to the AES-256. That was this missing piece. 

But what we saw was not played in Exacqvision it just looked like it was 🎬✌️😂🤣 they can’t produce the file cause they don’t have it. SOLVED 

Dropping videos on YouTube this weekend to break it down. My life is complete!
#FreeKarenRead