#AWOF assertions without facts

This ridiculous article asserts three things that are all wrong as far as I can tell.

TikTok should be banned. There was a 90 day extension clause built in and that's what Trump executed. That's not unconstitutional or illegal. It doesn't go against congress at all.  

The birthright citizenship argument is equally bias on no real foundation. This article asserts that people can be here for decades illegally and that it's okay. This is FALSE. Being naturalized means to be in the process of citizenship. If a family stays in the United States and doesn't do anything to become a citizen, they are not naturalized. They are illegal aliens by definition. Therefore they should be deported based on our laws. 

They argued that border enforcement as Trump is applying it is incorrect. Unfortunately, this is the weakest argument of all. If we have evidence of an invasion, and we clearly do, it's 100% in his constitutional and legal right to close the border with executive actions. The only leg to stand on here is that the invasion looks different than what people think an "invasion" would look like. 

As they try to bring up presidents of the past who have acted in this way, they ignore the most obvious examples. Biden and Obama. Both of them ignored the constitution and laws routinely. Think Obamacare. It's an unconstitutional tax. Think preemptive pardons. This has never been done because it's been determined to be one of the dumbest ideas politically proposed. It'll likely be overturned by the supreme court as soon as it gets there.
#AWOF