Here's a short story:

Knowledge is a familiarity, awareness, or understanding of someone or something, such as facts, information, descriptions, or skills, which is acquired through experience or education by perceiving, discovering, or learning. 

Knowledge can refer to a theoretical or practical understanding of a subject. It can be implicit (as with practical skill or expertise) or explicit (as with the theoretical understanding of a subject); it can be more or less formal or systematic. In philosophy, the study of knowledge is called epistemology; the philosopher Plato famously defined knowledge as "justified true belief", though this definition is now thought by some analytic philosophers to be problematic because of the Gettier problems while others defend the platonic definition. However, several definitions of knowledge and theories to explain it exist. 

Knowledge acquisition involves complex cognitive processes: perception, communication, and reasoning; while knowledge is also said to be related to the capacity of "acknowledgment" in human beings. 

The definition of knowledge is a matter of ongoing debate among philosophers in the field of epistemology. The classical definition, described but not ultimately endorsed by Plato, specifies that a statement must meet three in order to be considered knowledge: it must be justified, true, and believed. Some claim that these conditions are not sufficient, as Gettier case examples allegedly demonstrate. There are a number of alternatives proposed, including Robert Nozick's arguments for a requirement that knowledge 'tracks the truth' and Simon Blackburn's additional requirement that we do not want to say that those who meet any of these conditions 'through a defect, flaw, or failure' have knowledge. Richard Kirkham suggests that our definition of knowledge requires that the evidence for the belief necessitates its truth. (End of story)

Provide your best guess for the following question based on this story, and describe how likely it is that your guess is correct as one of the following expressions:

Almost Certain
Highly Likely
Very Good Chance
We Beleive
Probably
Probable
Likely
Better than Even
About Even
Probably Not
We Doubt
Unlikely
Little Chance
Chances Are Slight
Improbable
Highly Unlikely
Almost No Chance

Give ONLY the guess and your confidence, no other words or explanation. For example:

Guess: <most likely guess, as short as possible; not a complete sentence, just the guess!>
Confidence: <description of confidence, without any extra commentary whatsoever; just a short phrase!>

Here are a few examples of questions and answers:

Question: Who said knowledge is justified true belief?
Guess: Plato
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Do recent philosophers agree?
Guess: some do
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Why do some disagree?
Guess: because of the Gettier problems
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: How is knowledge obtained?
Guess: unknown
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Is it implicit or explicit?
Guess: its both
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: What does it mean to be implicit?
Guess: like as with practical skill or expertise
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: And explicit?
Guess: as in the theoretical understanding of a subject
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: What term is used for the study of knowledge?
Guess: epistemology
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: How many processes are involved with acquiring knowledge?
Guess: Three
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Are these simple processes?
Guess: no
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Would communicating be one of them?
Guess: yes
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Is there much disagreement about the definition of knowledge?
Guess: yes
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: In the classical sense, how many things must be true for something to be considered knowledge?
Guess: three
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: What are those?
Guess: it must be justified, true, and believed.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Who described this definition?
Guess: Plato
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Did he agree with the premise?
Guess: no
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: What do some philosophers claim?
Guess: they claim that these conditions are not sufficient
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: What showed that that is likely the case?
Guess: Gettier case examples
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Now answer the following question in the same format.

Question: What requirement would Nozick add to the list?

that  knowledge tracks the truth