Here's a short story:

Science has a lot of uses. It can reveal laws of nature, cure diseases, make bombs, and help bridges to stand up. Indeed science is so good at what it does that there's always a temptation to drag it into problems where it may not be helpful. David Brooks, author ofThe Social Animal, The Hidden Sources of Love, Character, and Achievement, appears to be the latest in a long line of writers who have failed to resist the temptation. 

Brooks gained fame for several books. His latest bookThe Social Animal, however, is more ambitious and serious than his earlier books. It is an attempt to deal with a set of weighty topics. The book focuses on big questions: What has science revealed about human nature? What are the sources of character? And why are some people happy and successful while others aren't? 

To answer these questions, Brooks surveys a wide range of subjects. Because of this, you might expect the book to cover a variety of facts. But Brooks has structured his book in an unusual, and perhaps unfortunate way. Instead of introducing scientific theories, he tells a story, within which he tries to make his points, perhaps in order to keep the reader's attention. So as Harold and Erica, the hero and heroine in his story, live through childhood, we hear about the science of child development and as they begin to date we hear about the theory of sexual attraction. Brooks carries this through to the death of one of his characters. 

On the whole, Brooks's story is acceptable if uninspired. As one would expect, his writing is mostly clear and, to be fair, some chapters stand out above the rest. I enjoyed, for instance, the chapter in which Harold discovers how to think on his own. While Harold and Erica are certainly not strong characters, the more serious problems withThe Social Animallie elsewhere. These problems partly involve Brooks's attempt to translate his tale into science. (End of story)

Provide your best guess for the following question based on this story, and describe how likely it is that your guess is correct as one of the following expressions:

Almost Certain
Highly Likely
Very Good Chance
We Beleive
Probably
Probable
Likely
Better than Even
About Even
Probably Not
We Doubt
Unlikely
Little Chance
Chances Are Slight
Improbable
Highly Unlikely
Almost No Chance

Give ONLY the guess and your confidence, no other words or explanation. For example:

Guess: <most likely guess, as short as possible; not a complete sentence, just the guess!>
Confidence: <description of confidence, without any extra commentary whatsoever; just a short phrase!>

Here are a few examples of questions and answers:

Question: Who wrote "The Social Animal"?
Guess: David Brooks.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Was that his only published work?
Guess: No.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: What's another one of his literary works?
Guess: he Hidden Sources of Love.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: In "The Social Animal", who are the main characters?
Guess: Harold and Erica.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: What's one way science is useful?
Guess: Cure diseases.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Does it have anything to do with bridges?
Guess: Help bridges to stand up.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: What does "The Social Animal" seem to question?
Guess: What has science revealed about human nature?
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Are survey results in that story?
Guess: Yes.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: So, the book is fact filled?
Guess: No.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Does he make fact based points?
Guess: Yes.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Was that to keep people interested?
Guess: Perhaps.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Does he insert his data to explain the book happenings?
Guess: Yes.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Was this a great way to assemble the book?
Guess: No.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: What unromantic thing does he interject when the characters start dating?
Guess: Theory of sexual attraction.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Does he stop there?
Guess: No.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: How far does he take it?
Guess: To the death of one character.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Is the book okay?
Guess: Yes.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Are some chapters better than others?
Guess: Yes.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Question: Does a chapter help a character become independent in some way?
Guess: Yes.
Confidence: <appropriate level of confidence in this guess>

Now answer the following question in the same format.

Question: Are Harold and Erica great characters?

No.