abstract: Deep Speech Enhancement Challenge is the 5th edition of deep noise suppression (DNS) challenges organized at ICASSP 2023 Signal Processing Grand Challenges. DNS challenges were organized during 2019-2023 to stimulate research in deep speech enhancement (DSE) . Previous DNS challenges were organized at INTERSPEECH 2020, ICASSP 2021, INTERSPEECH 2021, and ICASSP 2022. From prior editions, we learnt that improving signal quality (SIG) is challenging particularly in presence of simultaneously active interfering talkers and noise. This challenge aims to develop models for joint denosing, dereverberation and suppression of interfering talkers. When primary talker wears a headphone, certain acoustic properties of their speech such as direct-to-reverberation (DRR), signal to noise ratio (SNR) etc. make it possible to suppress neighboring talkers even without enrollment data for primary talker. This motivated us to create two tracks for this challenge: (i) Track-1 Headset; (ii) Track-2 Speakerphone. Both tracks has fullband (48kHz) training data and testset, and each testclips has a corresponding enrollment data (10-30s duration) for primary talker. Each track invited submissions of personalized and non-personalized models all of which are evaluated through same subjective evaluation. Most models submitted to challenge were personalized models, same team is winner in both tracks where the best models has improvement of 0.145 and 0.141 in challenge's **Score** as compared to noisy blind testset.
address: Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, USA
  firstname.lastname@example.com
bibliography: main.bib
title: ICASSP 2023 Deep Speech Enhancement Challenge

# INTRODUCTION

Deep Speech Enhancement (DSE) models perform significantly better than their classical counterparts . We open-sourced training datasets and test sets, Personalized ITU-T P.835 subjective evaluation framework  as part of the previous DNS challenges. Our GitHub repository[^1] open-sourced Personalized and Non-personalized DNSMOS P.835  and word accuracy (WAcc) APIs to empower iterative model improvements for teams articipating in the challenge. This reduces the barrier to entry in field and provides standard tools for evaluation of DSE models. Like previous challenges, each track has two testsets: (i) development (dev) test set which was released at the beginning of the challenge; (ii) blind test set released a few days before the final challenge deadline. While dev testset enables intermediate model evaluations, blind set is used for final ranking of models based on challenge metric (Score). Registration and submission of enhanced clips was done through CMT site <https://cmt3.research.microsoft.com/DNSChallenge2023>, cloud storage and Azure Blobs as per participant's preference. Questions related to challenge can be sent to firstname.lastname@example.com.

In this challenge, participants could use any datasets including external corpora, challenge training datasets to do model training. We do not prohibit the use of headset corpora for training speakerphone models and vice versa. Participants were required to describe the datasets used for training their models in sufficient detail in their extended journal papers, and provide a brief coverage in 2-page ICASSP grand challenge paper. Challenge website <https://aka.ms/5th-dns-challenge> has details of scope and requirements; definitions of algorithmic latency, processing latency, causal model, Real-time factor (RTF) and associated challenge rules; and name of winning teams etc. We verified whether the top models are real-time or not and provide this information on our website. Verification was done with a $NRT$ testset which contains clips with overlapping segments. Previous challenge websites are linked at <https://aka.ms/dns-challenge>.

We introduced the following changes in this challenge: (i) there are two tracks: Headset, and Speakerphone both has desktop and mobile recordings in testsets; (ii) All testclips in both tracks has 10-30s enrollment speech (primary talker) with or without noise; (iii) Personalized P.835 framework is improved and now includes voice recognition, robust spam filtering and more accurate evaluation of enhanced testclips with noise and neighboring talkers; (iv) Personalized P.835 framework uses cleaned enrollment speech which was enhanced using a non-causal model. Cleaned enrollment speech helps human rater perform subjective evaluation more consistently.; (v) Personalized and non-personalized models for a track were sent to same subjective evaluation and ranked together, i.e. personalized and non-personalized models are treated alike and compared against each other. (vi) Track-1 and Track-2 has their separate subjective evaluations to ensure we have headset testclips evaluated together, and speakerphone testclips evaluated together.

Most of the models submitted to challenge were personalized models. Winning teams in both tracks have similar ranking in each track. We invited challenge participants to submit their Preference-2 models which were not sent for subjective evaluation. These enhanced clips are expected to be used in semi-supervised training of personalized DNSMOS P.835.

# Challenge Tracks

Enhancing speech quality (i.e., eliminating speech distortion) and suppressing noise, reverberation and neighboring talkers are two trade-offs DSE models must handle. DSE models submitted to challenge were supposed to do joint denoising and dereverberation in presence of neighboring (interfering) talkers. The goal is to enhance audio signal and preserve the primary talker while suppressing the neighboring talkers, noise, and reverberation. All datasets used in this challenge were full band (48 kHz). It aimed to study headset and speakerphone DSE in separate tracks thereby creating possibility of new insights. Acoustic properties of headset scenarios can be leveraged in developing models for suppressing neighboring talkers without enrollment speech. Non-personalized model not requiring enrollment speech are suitable for consumers/industry with strict privacy requirements.

This challenge has two tracks: Track-1 Headset; Track-2 Speakerphone. Dev and blind testset for both tracks were different. The testsets were collected using similar procedure except that the Track-1 testsets were collected using Headset devices while Track-2 testsets were collected using Speakerphone devices. Each test clip in both tracks has enrollment speech with 30s duration. The enrollment speech can be noise-free or noisy and with or without reverberation. This facilitates multi-condition enrollment of primary talkers which serves as a measure of robustness for personalized models which use enrollment speech as additional input for enhancing the testclips. Participants could choose to work on models with speaker enrollment or without it for one or both tracks. Each team was asked to submit 1-4 models depending on what models they trained. Each participating team could submit a maximum of one personalized and one non-personalized model for each track, e.g., a team can submit one personalized and one non-personalized model for Track 1 but not two personalized or two non-personalized model for Track 1. Similarly, another team could submit 4 models, personalized and non-personalized model for Track 1 and personalized and non-personalized model for Track 2. This rule facilitates almost equal representation of personalized and non-personalized models, and also similar participation in both tracks.

While submitting the blind set enhanced clips, participants were asked to submit their preference for models submitted in each Track, e.g. they had to assign Preference-1 to their best model and Preference-2 to their second best model in each track. From the subjective evaluation of dev testsets, we noticed that subjective results were taking several days of time to get back the results. Also, very large batches of enhanced testclips may also results in some inconsistency in evaluation results. We used Preference-1 clips from all teams in both tracks for final evaluation based on enhanced blind set. Preference-2 enhanced clips could be leveraged in semi-supervised training of Personalized DNSMOS (PDNSMOS) P.835 model or in another subjective evaluation for generating labels for training of PDNSMOS P.835. All models for a track were evaluated and ranked together i.e., both personalized and non-personalized models for Track 1 went through one subjective evaluation. Similarly, for Track 2, all models in one subjective evaluation. Participants were encouraged to conduct experiments with both personalized and non-personalized models to elucidate the benefits of personalization. Though, this was not a requirement for this challenge.

# Challenge Datasets

## Training Data

We used a machine learning model for extracting the near-field headset-like clean speech which is released as clean speech for headset track. We used entire clean speech from 4th DNS Challenge as clean speech for speakerphone track. Noise dataset and impulse responses are same as in 4th DNS Challenge . Participants can re-use near-field clean speech in Track 1 by convolving it with impulse responses for generating the training data for Track 2. The provided datasets include different languages with talker and device variety. We also provide speaker ID information for all clean speech clips to facilitate development of personalized models for both tracks. We also provide code for extracting speaker embeddings based on state-of-the-art ECAPA-TDNN embeddings trained on Voxceleb . Along with clean speech, we added clean speech with emotions such as crying, yelling, laughter, or singing to training data. Entire training set consists of clean speech clips in English and 10 non-English languages.

Clean speech in the Track-2 training set is a total of 760.53 hours: read speech (562.72 hours), singing voice (8.80 hours), emotional speech (3.6 hours), Chinese Mandarin (185.41 hours). Track-1 clean speech is obtained by doing near-end speech extraction on Track-2 dataset. Clean speech has four subsets: (i) Read speech recorded in clean conditions; (ii) Singing clean speech; (iii) Emotional clean speech; and (iv) non-English clean speech.

Noise data included in the training set is chosen from AudioSet  and is identical to noise set in 4th DNS Challenge . AudioSet is a collection of about 2 million human-labeled 10s sound clips extracted from YouTube videos. There are over a million clips in AudioSet with audio classes music and speech and less than 200 clips for classes such as toothbrush, creak, etc. Approximately 42% of the clips have a single class, but the rest may have 2 to 15 labels. Hence, we developed a sampling approach to balance the dataset in such a way that each class has at least 500 clips. We also used a speech activity detector to remove the clips with any kind of speech activity, to strictly separate speech and noise data. Audioset clips were made available at 44.1kHz, we upsampled those to fullband (48 kHz). The resulting noise dataset has 152 audio classes and 60,000 clips . In total, there are 181 hours of noise data in the training set.

## Development Testset

Both test sets consist of fullband audio clips recorded in real-world scenarios collected through crowd-sourcing where workers read provided text prompts and record their voice using desktop/laptop/mobile devices in the presence of noise and/or neighboring talkers. We include some new noise types in the test set covering relevant real-world scenarios, device variety and added paralinguistic test set as new category. Our dev test set consists of real-world test clips recorded by crowd-sourced workers.

The development test set for the non-personalized track consists of 600 real recordings. All clips contain noisy speech in the English language. Among these, 193 test clips have emotional speech in the presence of noise. There are six emotion types, namely happy, sad, angry, yelling, crying, and laughter. Crowd-sourced workers were asked to read provided text prompts and create emotional events in each test clip. The remaining clips contain the voice of a talker reading text in the presence of the following noise types: fan, air conditioner, typing, door shutting, clatter noise, car noise (i.e., standing near a car on a busy street or standing outside the car), kitchen noise (noise from kitchen utensils, dish scrubbing etc.), dish washer, running water, opening chips bags, munching or eating, creaking chair, heavy breathing, copy machine, baby crying, dog barking, inside-car noise (e.g., sitting on a passenger seat in a car which is being driven by someone else), mouse clicks, mouse scroll wheel, touch pad clicks, etc. Each test clip was recorded at 48 kHz with a duration of 10 to 20 seconds. Workers were asked to record in the near-field (close-talk) and far-field with distances of 1, 2, and 3 meters. All test clips in the non-personalized development test set were recorded using a laptop or desktop computer. Both development and blind test set have 2.5 minutes of enrollment speech for primary talkers to be used in personalized denoising. PDNS leverages speaker embedding (features) for preserving only the primary talker in a noisy environment while suppressing the neighboring talkers and noise. The development test set for the personalized track consists of 1443 real recordings. All clips contain noisy speech in the English language. Among these, 193 test clips have emotional speech in the presence of noise and are identical to the emotional test clips in the non-personalized track. There are 737 test clips where the primary talker reads the provided text in the presence of the same noise types as those in the non-personalized track. Each test clip was recorded at 48 kHz with a duration of 10–20 seconds. Workers were asked to record in the near-field (close-talk) and far-field with distances of 1, 2, and 3 meters. There are 166 test clips with the primary talker speaking in the presence of a neighboring talker and noise where both the noise and neighboring talker are simultaneously active in the primary talker's background. There are 347 test clips where the primary talker is speaking in the presence of a neighboring speaker with no background noise. Thus, we have simulated three scenarios for PDNS: (i) primary talker in the presence of noise; (ii) primary talker in the presence of neighboring talker; and (iii) primary talker in the presence of simultaneously active neighboring talker and noise. All test clips in the personalized development test set were recorded using a laptop or desktop computer.

## Blind Testset

We include some new noise types in the test set covering relevant real-world scenarios, device variety and added paralinguistic test set as new category. Blind testset consists of real testclips which were not previously used in any challenge and not otherwise available publically. Our test set consists of real-world test clips recorded by crowd-sourced workers. Some of the devices used for collecting blind set includes \[list of devices\]. Blind set clips were chosen to confirm blind set specifications which were also shared with crowd-sourced workers. We performed rigorous quality assurance (QA) to ensure blind set is representative of real-world scenarios in terms of speaker variety, device variety, variety in acoustic scenarios, different direct-to-reverb-ratio (DRR), different T60 which is achieved by changing the relative and absolute position of primary and interfering talkers, noise source and presence of reflecting surfaces etc.

Unlike previous challenges, Blind testset in this challenge contains paralinguistic test clips. These contains standard forms of paralanguage  including but not limited to The throat-clear, "hmm" or "mhm", "Huh?" or "what?, Gasps, Sighs, Moans and groans, Deceptive speech, Sincere speech, Speech with high-base, Speech with high-pitch, Speech with low-pitch, Confident speech, Tired speech (when talker is tired), Persuasive speech, Voice change mid-clip (i.e. mimicry in last 50% of the clip).

Blind testset will also include emotional speech including but not limited to happy, sad, angry, yelling, crying, and laughter. Blind testset include real test clips with high reverberation, high reverberation with noise, and noise in presence of interfering talkers. Testset noises include but not limited to Office scenarios (Typing, AC, Door shutting, Eating/munching, Copy machine, Squeaking chair, Notification sounds etc.), Home scenarios (Baby crying, Dogs, TV, Radiators, hair dryer, kitchen noise, running water etc.), Appliances (Washer Dryer, Dishwasher, Coffee maker, kitchen noise, Vacuum cleaner etc.), Fire alarm, Car, Inside parked car on busy road, In-car neighboring talkers, Traffic Road, Car noise (from machinery, control systems, turn signal etc.), Café, Coffee machine, Blender, Background babble, Airport Announcements etc.

# Evaluation Setup

## Baseline Models

Along with training datasets and testsets, we also provide a baseline model (or enhanced clips) for both tracks.

Baseline models were personalized and non-personalized variants of models presented in .

## Subjective Evaluation

### Cleaning Enrollment Clips

We cleaned (enhanced) enrollment clips with a non-causal model based on E3Net architecture . The subjective evaluation uses only 5s of enrollment speech. We manually choose a 5s segment either from the enhanced enrollment clip ensure all long pause (\>0.2s) are removed and resulting 5s audio is normalized to ensure easier recognition of primary talker by human raters. The non-causal DSE model is a fullband time domain domain based on end-to-end enhancement network (E3Net) which was originally proposed for the task of personalized speech enhancement using wideband signals .

Non-causal model is non-personalized and is trained to remove background noise and reverberation for fullband speech. This model uses a learnable encoder and decoder instead of STFT and iSTFT which can mitigate the problem of imperfect phase reconstruction that exists in most time-frequency based speech enhancement methods. This model is based on 20ms frames with a stride of 10ms. The core block in non-causal model is a bidirectional LSTM which offers improved performance for offline processing which is suitable for enhancing enrollment clips for subjective evaluations.

This model was trained on training clean speech and noise from he 4th DNS challenge . Impulse responses used for training this model consists of 150,000 simulated impulse responses at sampling rate 48kHz using the Image Source method . The reverberant speech and noise signals were mixed with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) drawn from a Gaussian distribution with N(-5,20) dB. All training samples were 10s segments. Training data consists of synthesized 1000 hours of fullband data. For increasing the robustness of the model with respect to audios with different bandwidths, namely narrowband and wideband audios, we also downsampled half of the 1000 hours training set to 16kHz and 8kHz respectively and upsampled them back to 48 kHz and combined these with the training set. Thus, the final training dataset has 3000 hours of data.

### Personalized P.835 Framework

This challenge relies on ITU-T P.835  subjective evaluation framework. A modified version (Personalized) ITU-T P.835 was used for measuring the performance of personalized DSE models. Personalized P.835 framework uses 5s of clean enrollment speech for primary talkers to help human raters recognize the primary talker's voice while assigning subjective scores. Human raters were instructed to focus on the quality of the voice of the primary talker when two or more talkers were present in a test clip. In addition, personalized P.835 subjective framework is improved to include voice recognition, better spam filtering and more accurate evaluation of enhanced testclips with noise and neighboring talkers.

In all test clips, we have only one primary talker in enrollment clip while noisy test clip may have noise, reverberation, one or more neighboring talkers in addition to a primary talker. The goal of DSE models is to preserve primary talker's speech while suppressing everything else.

Crowd-sourced workers doing subjective evaluation are instructed to rate interfering talkers as undesirable signal so the model which suppresses interfering talkers is rated higher. Personalized P.835 subjective framework provides three scores, namely speech quality (SIG), background noise quality (BAK), and overall audio quality (OVRL). We evaluated all challenge models through our Personalized P.835 framework to get the subjective ratings used for computing the challenge metric.

## Word Accuracy

We computed word accuracy (WAcc) from a state-of-the-art speech recognition system. We did WAcc computation ourselves during last week of the challenge to ensure all models are evaluated in exactly same way. WAcc is an objective metric for measuring the impact of speech enhancement on speech recognition transcription service. WAcc is defined as
$\text{WAcc} = 1 - \text{WER}$,

where WER is the word error rate of speech recognition system. We transcribed the entire blind set for both tracks to obtained the ground-truth. Dev testset was not transcribed. We computed WAcc results internally. Unlike subjective P.835 framework which uses only 7s of manually chosen segment from noisy or enhanced clips, WAcc engine uses entire testclips. Blind set test clips are of different duration from 10s to more than 6 minutes.

Blind testset was collected from crowd-sourced data collection using various recording apps where the worker was provided with a text prompts to read from. Since there are often reading errors, omissions of words etc., prompts do not reflect the correction transcription. We used a five step approach to obtain ground-truth transcription for blind testset. In first step, we just obtain the prompts for each testclips in blind set. In second step, we obtained the transcripts from the state-of-the-art speech recognition engine for each testclips in blind set. In third step, expert human listeners listened each testclips and generated the corresponding human transcripts. Expert listeners were advised to listen audio clips several times until they were confident about their transcription. In fourth step, we compute word error rate (WER) for each testclip in blind set. Then, the testclips with WER \> 0.5 were chosen for fifth round of listening. In fifth round of listening, human listeners listen the clips with WER \> 0.5 and validated/corrected the human transcriptions. We found that a very few clips were needed to be corrected at fifth stage this elucidates the robustness of our transcription approach.

We found that several clips in blind set results had WER \> 0.5, it is often due to insertion error where DSE models leaked the secondary talker's voice and those speech were transcribed by speech recognition engine. During five step approach for generating ground-truth transcription, we found out that there were several clips where neighboring talker was sounding very similar to primary talker (e.g., same accent, same gender, similar loudness and sitting close to each other), some of those clips took more than 10 times listening to correctly transcribe, some of those were not possible to transcribe and hence skipped. Thus, our WAcc was computed over entire duration of selected clips with ground-truth transcripts. It is important to note that speech recognition engine is not personalized and does not use any enrollment speech to focus on primary talker. In future, it would be interesting to develop a personalized speech recognition engine. WAcc ground-truth transcripts only contained words spoken by the primary talker, thus treating interfering talker as undesirable signal.

## Challenge Metric

Like past challenges, models in both tracks were ranked in terms of a final score obtained by weighted average of subjective P.835 scores and word accuracy (WAcc). Four metrics, three personalized P.835 subjective scores namely SIG, BAK, OVRL and WAcc from a speech recognition system were used to evaluate challenge models. Metrics on the blind test set were combined into a final score for ranking the models. Higher WAcc shows superior speech enhancement performance with respect to speech recognition. Higher P.835 scores shows better subjective speech quality. The final score is computed as
$\text{Final score}= 0.5[\text{WAcc} + 0.25(\text{OVRL} -1)]$.

We evaluated the submitted models based on Personalized ITU-T P.835 subjective evaluation scores, namely speech quality (SIG), background noise quality (BAK), and overall audio quality (OVRL), and WAcc from a state-of-the-art speech recognition system. WAcc is an objective metric for measuring the impact of speech enhancement on speech recognition transcription service.

# Results & Discussions

There were 11 submissions in Track-1 and 11 submissions in Track-2 out of which 10 teams participated in both tracks. Almost all models in both tracks were personalized models. We had two baseline models for Track-1 out of which one was non-personalized model. We had personalized model as baseline for Track-2. By dint of acoustic properties of primary speech in a headset scenarios, a non-personalized model may be able to suppress neighboring talkers and noise, hence we included a non-personalized model. Each team was asked to provide enhanced clips from their models. Teams were allowed to submit maximum of two models (at most one personalized and at most one non-personalized) per track. Since subjective evaluations may take very long-time if number of submitted models is large, we ask participants to provide their Preference of models. We chose the first Preference model from each team in their respective tracks for subjective evaluations. We also conducted a dev testset subjective evaluation based on enhanced dev set and provided the results to participants.

Fig.  show the subjective personalized P.835 scores, WAcc and challenge metric (Score) for all teams sorted in decreasing order of performance. dMOS for SIG, BAK, OVRL refers to the difference in SIG, BAK, OVRL between the enhanced clip and corresponding noisy clip. Similarly, dWAcc is the difference in WAcc between the enhanced clip and noisy clip. We conducted ANOVA test on top models in each track to determine statistical significance (see <https://aka.ms/5th-dns-challenge>) for ANOVA results.

# Conclusions

This challenge has a more diverse blind test set collected through crowdsourcing using multiple data vendors. We included paralinguistic testclips and leakage testclips in blind set. We enhanced and chose the enrollment speech segment for primary talkers, and noisy segment from testclips to ensure robust subjective evaluations. We verified if winning models are causal with helps of our $NRT$ testset. Results show degradation in signal quality (SIG) for most of the models. It may be due to two reasons: (i) testset is significantly challenging; (ii) Personalized model end up suppressing the primary talker. Noticeable SIG degradation's happen due to suppression of primary talker's speech and/or leakage of interfering talker and noise. Detailed analysis of results from current and previous DNS challenges will be covered in our extended OJSP journal paper. We encourage all the challenge participants and readers to send us their feedback and contribute to DNS Challenge repository.

[^1]:  <https://github.com/microsoft/DNS-Challenge>


author: Margaret M. Moerchen, Laura J. Churcher, Charles M. Telesco, Mark Wyatt, R. Scott Fisher & Christopher Packham
bibliography: ../moerchen_bibtex.bib
nocite: ; ; ;
title: Asymmetric Heating of the HR 4796A Dust Ring
  Due to Pericenter Glow

We have obtained new resolved images of the well-studied HR 4796A dust ring at 18 and 25 $\mu$m with the 8-meter Gemini telescopes. These images confirm the previously observed spatial extent seen in mid-IR, near-IR, and optical images of the source. We detect brightness and temperature asymmetries such that dust on the NE side is both brighter and warmer than dust in the SW. We show that models of so-called pericenter glow account for these asymmetries, thus both confirming and extending our previous analyses. In this scenario, the center of the dust ring is offset from the star due to gravitational perturbations of a body with an eccentric orbit that has induced a forced eccentricity on the dust particle orbits. Models with 2-$\mu$m silicate dust particles and a forced eccentricity of 0.06 simultaneously fit the observations at both wavelengths. We also show that parameters used to characterize the thermal-emission properties of the disk can also account for the disk asymmetry observed in shorter-wavelength scattered-light images.

# Introduction

HR 4796A is an A0V star with the highest fractional IR luminosity ($L_{IR}$/$L_{\star}$= 5 x $10^{-3}$) yet discovered among debris disks. Its recently revised distance estimate is 73 pc (updated from 67 pc \[Perryman et al. 1997\]), and it has an M-star T Tauri companion with a separation of 7.7" . Its age of 8$\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}2 Myr (based on the lithium abundance of HR 4796B) places the disk of HR 4796A in the very interesting early phase of chaotic disk evolution dominated by collisions (e.g., Kenyon & Bromley 2005).

Based on the dust temperature, first tentatively suggested 40 AU (now 44 AU) as the main location of dust responsible for the HR 4796A excess thermal emission. Indeed, the mid-IR discovery images of the source at CTIO and Keck revealed a highly inclined ringlike disk with a dust distribution peaking near 70 AU (now 76 AU) . Follow-up coronagraphic near-IR images with $HST$/NICMOS tightly constrained the width of the ring to $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}17 AU (now $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}18.5 AU), with the dust population severely depleted both interior and exterior to this region .

Further imaging observations of the thermal emission confirmed a strong peak in the dust density at 70 AU . also noted a 1.8-$\sigma$ brightness asymmetry at 18 $\mu$m in which the northeast side of the disk is brighter than the southwest side. In a companion paper, demonstrated that such an asymmetry could arise from the phenomenon of pericenter glow. A second body in the system on an eccentric orbit about the star may cause pericenter glow when, through secular perturbations, it effectively shifts the center of the dust ring away from the star and closer to the apastron of the perturbing companion's orbit. The side of the ring shifted closer to the star becomes relatively warmer and more luminous , giving rise to the "glow". At present, while several works have acknowledged the existence of a brightness asymmetry (e.g., Wahhaj et al. 2005, Debes et al. 2008), no alternative explanations for the brightness asymmetry have been proposed.

We have obtained mid-IR images of HR 4796A with the Michelle and T-ReCS cameras at the Gemini North and Gemini South telescopes, respectively. These permit us to confirm unambiguously the brightness asymmetry, which was previously characterized at only the 1.8-$\sigma$ level of significance. By imaging thermally emitting dust at two wavelengths, we also examine the spatial distribution of dust temperatures within the resolved disk, and we conclude that the dust population in the NE ansa of the disk is not only brighter, but also warmer, than the dust in the SW ansa. With these new data and with the consideration of shorter-wavelength images of scattered light, we re-examine the possibility that these observed asymmetric characteristics are caused by pericenter glow.

# Mid-IR images of HR 4796A

We observed HR 4796A with T-ReCS at Gemini South (using the Qb filter) in May 2004 and with Michelle at Gemini North (using the Qa filter) in April 2005. The central wavelengths for these two filters are 18.1 $\mu$m for Qa and 24.5 $\mu$m for Qb. A PSF and flux standard star were observed close in time to the target object for both sets of images. We reduced the images with an IDL reduction package developed at the University of Florida, and we performed photometric measurements with the Starlink GAIA program. The images in both bandpasses show that the disk of HR 4796A is clearly resolved, in the form of an elongated disk $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}3" in extent with two prominent peaks in brightness (Figure ).

Table  lists results of the sky-subtracted aperture photometry of HR 4796A at 18.1 $\mu$m and 24.5 $\mu$m. The uncertainties reflect only measurement errors. Photometric uncertainties are driven primarily by variable sky transmission throughout the night, and lacking multiple standard star measurements, we adopt typical photometric uncertainties of 15% for both filters.

|             |                    |             |                   |
|:-----------:|:------------------:|:-----------:|:-----------------:|
| $\lambda_c$ | Total Flux Density | Photosphere | Disk Flux Density |
|  $[\mu$m\]  |      \[mJy\]       |   \[mJy\]   |      \[mJy\]      |
|    18.1     |    1106 $\pm$ 7    |     48      |   1058 $\pm$ 7    |
|    24.5     |   3307 $\pm$ 47    |     33      |   3274 $\pm$ 47   |

Photometry of the HR 4796A Disk

The photospheric contribution in the bandpasses of the imaging observations are based on a 10.8-$\mu$m value derived by by extrapolating the $K$-band (2.2 $\mu$m) flux density using a $\nu^{1.88}$ power law as given by the model atmosphere with T = 9500 K and log $g$ = 4.0. Photospheric values at longer wavelengths were estimated with the assumption that HR 4796A and Vega have the same 10-to-18 $\mu$m flux ratio, since they are both A0V stars. The photospheric contribution to the total flux density of the source is 4% at 18.3 $\mu$m and 1% at 24.5 $\mu$m.

The PSF was scaled such that the integrated flux matched the photosphere level, and its center was shifted to the position assumed for the star in the target source images. The maximum intensities of the scaled PSF and of the disk (prior to the photosphere subtraction) at the stellar position are, respectively, 1.4 mJy/pixel and 5.0 mJy/pixel at 18.1 $\mu$m and 0.3 mJy/pixel and 9.8 mJy/pixel at 24.5 $\mu$m. For the 18.3-$\mu$m image, the adopted stellar position was the centroid peak of the 2-pixel-smoothed central lobe of emission (which we assume arises from the presence of the star) between the NE and SW ansae, where the peaks were also determined from a centroid measurement of the 2-pixel-smoothed image. The stellar centroid peak position in the 18.1-$\mu$m image differs from the actual midpoint between the NE and SW peaks of emission by $<$`<!-- -->`{=html}1 pixel, which is insignificant as this is approximately the level of certainty in the determination of the peak location. One pixel in the 18.1-$\mu$m image corresponds to 0.1", or $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}7 AU. For the 24.5-$\mu$m image, the stellar position is not obvious, and so the midpoint between the two centroid peaks of the NE and SW ansae was adopted as the stellar position. The distance from the NE peak to the SW peak in the 2-pixel-smoothed image is 17.3 pixels (1.74") at 18.1 $\mu$m and 18.2 pixels (1.62") at 24.5 $\mu$m.

The scaled PSF image in each bandpass was then subtracted from the corresponding image of HR 4796A. The total photosphere-subtracted flux density of the source was measured at each wavelength, and the results are given in Table .

# Disk asymmetry

The global dust color temperature is 102 $\pm$ 11 K, based on the 18.1-$\mu$m/24.5$\mu$m flux density ratio determined from aperture photometry of the entire photosphere-subtracted disk. This temperature is consistent with the initial color temperature estimated by based on $IRAS$ photometry (T$\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}110 K). The color temperature of the dust as a function of disk radius was also calculated using the approach described below.

The position angle (PA), east of north, is defined as the angle between the vertical image axis and the line connecting the two central peaks of emission of the two ansae: 28.1$^{\circ}$ in the 18.1-$\mu$m image and 29.9$^{\circ}$ in the 24.5-$\mu$m image. We estimate an uncertainty for the PA of 0.9 degrees, half the difference between the values measured in the stacked image at each wavelength. We adopt a PA value of 29$^{\circ}$, the average of the two values. For convenient display, the images of HR 4796A were rotated counter-clockwise by an angle of 61$^{\circ}$, to orient the disk plane parallel to the x-axis.

*Quantifying the asymmetric structure–* The asymmetric structure is quantified in both the observations and in the model distributions (§) by finding the brightness peak for each ansal "lobe" and its offset from the star. We calculated the following values for each image:

-   $D_{mean}$, the mean offset of the lobes' peak brightness from the center, in pixels

-   $\frac{\Delta D}{D_{mean}}$, the difference between the distance of the lobe brightness peaks ($D_{NE}-D_{SW}$), divided by the mean offset of the brightness peaks from the center, given as a percentage value

-   $F_{mean}$, the mean peak brightness of the lobes

-   $\frac{\Delta F}{F_{mean}}$, the difference in lobe peak brightness, ($F_{NE}-F_{SW}$), divided by the mean peak brightness of the lobe ($F_{mean}$), given as a percentage value

The level of the brightness asymmetry, $\Delta F/F_{mean}$, is of primary interest, and it is 15.3$~\pm$ 2.6% at 18.1 $\mu$m and 13.0$~\pm$ 3.8% at 24.5 $\mu$m. The uncertainty in $\Delta F/F_{mean}$ was calculated by taking a circular symmetrical fit to the observations (i.e., repeating the modeling but imposing zero forced eccentricity) and then using Monte Carlo methods to add noise to the model at the observed level (0.007 mJy/pixel at 18.3 $\mu$m, 0.135 mJy/pixel at 24.5 $\mu$m) to work out the asymmetry that would have been detected purely due to noise.

*Assessing the temperature asymmetry–* After removal of the photospheric contribution, the angular resolution of each image was degraded to achieve the same resolution in both images for accurate spatial comparison in the color temperature calculation. Using the $gauss$ routine in IRAF, each of the target images was convolved with a Gaussian profile having the same FWHM as the PSF from the other bandpass. The PSF FWHM was estimated by a Gaussian fit to the azimuthally averaged profile. The FWHM values were 5.19 pixels (0.52") in the 18.1-$\mu$m image and 8.08 pixels (0.72") in the 24.5-$\mu$m image. The PSF images themselves were convolved in the same manner, which confirmed that the resulting resolution (assessed with FWHM measurements) was identical for both images. The final resolution of the cross-convolved images is $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}0.9", which corresponds to $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}65 AU for the source distance of 73 pc.

The rotated images were cropped to a swath of vertical width $\Delta$y$\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}3". The pixel values in these images were summed along the y-axis, resulting in a one-dimensional brightness profile for the disk at each wavelength. From these brightness profiles, a color profile and a color temperature profile (Figure ) were constructed to illustrate variations in temperature along the extent of the disk. As a test of the robustness of the temperature estimates, the 24.5-$\mu$m brightness profile was shifted by $\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}1 pixel ($\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}6 AU) along the x-axis relative to the 18.1-$\mu$m brightness profile before the two brightness profiles were combined to determine the color profile. The two resulting color profiles that incorporated these offsets yielded color temperature profiles that did not differ from the results presented in Figure  within 60 AU of the star by more than 2 K.

The NE and SW profiles are overplotted on the same radius scale (along the x-axis) to better show differences in temperature at the same distances from the central star. We see no significant variation in color temperature within a radius of 15 AU from the star. While that result is expected for such a narrow annulus, this result is in fact attributable principally to the degradation of resolution that we carried out to make the temperature estimates. This effect is also seen in the separation of the two ansae peaks, which decreased for both images following the cross-convolution, from 1.74" to 1.1" at 18.1 $\mu$m, and from 1.62" to 1.58" at 24.5 $\mu$m (where the lesser effect for the 24.5 $\mu$m image is likely due to being convolved by a smaller kernel).

There is a clear temperature asymmetry, with the dust in the NE side of the disk having significantly higher color temperatures at greater than 30 AU from the star and in particular at the location of the emission peaks corresponding to the two ansae of the dust ring. The temperature difference peaks at $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}9 K near 60 AU. The uncertainties due to measurement error in the temperature estimates are less than 2 K. The color temperature uncertainties that incorporate photometric uncertainties are $\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}8 K, but in this analysis we are most interested in the relative temperatures of the two ansae and are therefore most concerned with uncertainties within the images and not absolute photometric uncertainties.

# Pericenter glow modeling

## Pericenter glow scenario and prior work

One motivation for observing debris disks is the potential to reveal as-yet unseen planetary companions through the disk morphology. A massive orbiting body can gravitationally perturb the orbits of smaller bodies like dust particles over long-period ("secular") timescales, and these perturbations may be observed in the global characteristics of the disk. For example, a planet on an eccentric orbit eventually imposes a forced eccentricity on the dust particles, which results in an offset of the disk's center of symmetry from the host star. While this offset may be observable directly, other manifestations of the offset may be more prominent. In particular, if the dust population is azimuthally homogenous in size distribution and composition, the side of the disk (the pericenter side) that is offset toward the star will experience enhanced heating, increasing both its temperature and brightness. The resulting asymmetry in brightness between the apocenter and pericenter sides of the disk is referred to as pericenter glow .

The asymmetric morphology of the HR 4796A disk observed in previous thermal emission images at 18 $\mu$m was well approximated by models that invoked pericenter glow , but the statistical significance of the asymmetry in those earlier images was relatively low. We note that the brightness asymmetry was also previously detected at 10.8 $\mu$m , but the much greater prominence of the starlight at those wavelengths makes such shorter wavelength observations less useful for our analysis. With new 18.1-$\mu$m images and the addition of images at 24.5 $\mu$m in this dataset, we have re-examined this hypothesis by using the same models to reconstruct the observed thermal emission and color temperature profiles.

## Thermal emission reconstruction

*Model inputs–* The physics of pericenter glow and the associated modeling of it are outlined in detail by , and here we review only the key parameters involved in that analysis. The model for the disk's density distribution of dust was generated with three distinct inputs: the physical structure of the disk, the combination of the optical properties and size distribution of the dust particle population, and the orientation of the disk along the line of sight. We recall that the mass of the perturbing body itself does not come into play and is not constrained by this approach. The physical structure of the disk is modelled by a radial density distribution of dust with defining parameters as follows: $a_{min}$ and $a_{max}$, the inner and outer semimajor axes of the dust ring (which are roughly equivalent to the inner and outer radii), $\gamma$, the power-law index of the semimajor axis distribution, $e_f$, the forced eccentricity, and $\sigma_{tot}$, the total surface area of the dust particles in the disk. The forced eccentricity is that imposed on all particles in the disk by the planet's secular perturbations ; as such, the planet's orbit is not affected by its own perturbations. The eccentricities of particle orbits are the vector sum of this forced eccentricity and their own proper eccentricity. To first order, the disk remains circular but is just offset. The total surface area of the dust is effectively a scaling factor that can be adjusted to approximate the overall brightness level of the dust emission. While the intrinsic disk offset and asymmetry (i.e., if viewed face-on) are determined by the forced eccentricity $e_f$, the measured offset and asymmetry are determined by the additional variables of disk inclination, $i$, and the angle of pericenter, ${\omega}_f$. For example, the forced eccentricity required to replicate a given measured asymmetry increases as the angle of pericenter deviates from being perpendicular to the line of sight.

The optical properties of dust were calculated using Mie theory, Rayleigh-Gans theory, and geometric optics for astronomical silicate spheres the diameter of which ($D_{typ}$=2 $\mu$m) was constrained by a simultaneous fit to the images at both wavelengths. The resulting dielectric constant was 6.7x$10^{-5}$, and the absorption coefficients were 0.54 and 0.30 at 18.1 and 24.5 $\mu$m, respectively. While a single particle size is used to represent a particle population that has a range of sizes and composition, it reasonably encapsulates key mid-IR emission characteristics of the disk. We adopted values for the stellar luminosity and effective temperature of 21 L$_{\odot}$ and 9500 K, respectively (e.g., Debes et al., 2008).

The output from the disk radial distribution model and the calculation of the dust optical properties were combined with the specified orientation to calculate the line-of-sight brightness and generate images of the model disk. The model images at each wavelength were rotated to the same position angle as the observed disk, and each image was convolved by a PSF kernel with the profile width of the observed PSF reference star in the same filter. In the generation of color temperature profiles for the model data, the images were also convolved by the profile width corresponding to the other filter to match the treatment of the observational data (§).

*Optimizing the model–* With the images of the model disk, we generated brightness profiles and color temperature profiles in the same way that we did with the observational data (§). We compared the observed and model profiles, and we adjusted the model parameters until the model disk yielded a good approximation to the observations. First, we varied the inner and outer disk radii and the total disk surface area until the brightness profile width and magnitude were well approximated. We then adjusted the forced eccentricity until the brightness asymmetry level was matched for a fixed value of the angle of pericenter. The fit was repeated for several values of the angle of pericenter to assess the corresponding forced eccentricity necessary to reproduce the same asymmetry (Table ). The forced eccentricity and the angle of pericenter define the magnitude of the radial offset asymmetry in the disk model, which in turn defines the brightness asymmetry and the dust color temperature asymmetry. The initial assessment of how changing these parameters affected the resulting brightness profiles was performed by chi-squared minimization on the brightness profiles and images. The brightness profiles of the observations and the model disk with varying values for the angle of pericenter are shown in Figure , and the color temperature profiles are shown in Figure . The quantitative measurements used to assess the asymmetry in the model and in the observed disk, as described above, are summarized in Table .

```latex
\begin{table*}
\caption{Asymmetry parameters for observations and models\label{tab:asymmetry}}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
\hline\hline
& & \multicolumn{2}{c}{18.1} & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{24.5} & \\
\cline{3-4}  \cline{6-7}
 & $e_f$ & $\frac{\Delta D}{D_{mean}}$ [\%] & $\frac{\Delta F}{F_{mean}}$ [\%]  & & $\frac{\Delta D}{D_{mean}}$ [\%] & $\frac{\Delta F}{F_{mean}}$ [\%]  & reduced $\chi^2$  \\
\hline
observed & -- & 0 & 15.28  & & 0 & 13.00 & --\\
model $\omega_f=0^\circ$ & 0.06 & -11.71 & 15.26 & & -6.11 & 13.10 & 2.17 \\
model $\omega_f=40^\circ$ & 0.10 & -10.81 & 15.31 & & -7.01 & 13.30 & 2.31 \\
model $\omega_f=55^\circ$ & 0.13 & -11.18 & 15.35 & & -7.15 & 13.05 & 2.21 \\
model $\omega_f=75^\circ$ & 0.30 & -14.50 & 10.55 & & -7.39 & 12.70 & 2.26 \\
\hline

\end{tabular}
\tablefoot{
All models were simultaneously fitted to 18.1- and 24.5-$\mu$m brightness profile linecuts of 0.5'' and share the following parameter values: $a_{min}$=70~AU, $a_{max}$=84~AU, $\gamma$=-1.5, $D_{typ}$=2~$\mu$m, and $i$=14.1$^{\circ}$.  Also recall that the value $\frac{\Delta D}{D_{mean}}$ for the observations is 0 because we defined the stellar position at 24.5~$\mu$m as the midpoint between the brightness peaks of the two ansae (with the measured difference between the midpoint and the stellar peak at 18.1~$\mu$m to be $<$1 pixel.)}
\end{table*}
```

*Results of the modelling–* We have determined that a forced eccentricity of 0.06 imposed on a ring of dust with $D_{typ}$= 2 $\mu$m spanning 74–84 AU can reproduce the thermal IR images, fitting the observed brightness asymmetry well at both 18.1 and 24.5 $\mu$m. The disk density power-law exponent was set to -1.5. The same result for the characteristic particle size was inferred previously in order to simultaneously fit 10-$\mu$m and 18-$\mu$m images of HR 4796A . We have estimated the uncertainty in the forced eccentricity to be 0.01, which is the change required to effect a 1-$\sigma$ change in the brightness asymmetry of the model at 18.3 $\mu$m (the more limiting case). The angle of pericenter was 0$\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}30$^\circ$ (perpendicular to the line of sight), and the disk inclination was 14.1$^{\circ}$ . We note that these results differ from those found by and ($e_f$=0.02, $\omega_f$=$75^\circ$) likely because of the different levels of observed asymmetry, which are nonetheless within 3$\sigma$ of one another (5.1 $\pm$ 3.2% in the previous work, 15.3 $\pm$ 2.6% in this work).

We have also used the model to quantify the limits set by these data on the presence of hot dust inside the ring. We compared the photometry of the photosphere-subtracted images with that of the model within an aperture radius equal to the size of the PSF FWHM (0.52" at 18.3 $\mu$m, 0.72" at 24.5 $\mu$m), and then we repeated the measurement with the same aperture on the models, where an unresolved flux component could be added at the position of the star. Excluding calibration uncertainties, the measured flux density within a 0.52"-radius aperture on the 18.3-$\mu$m photosphere-subtracted image was 289 $\pm$ 3 mJy. The same measurement on the model with no added unresolved flux component was 290 mJy. Therefore, the maximum unresolved contribution we can add to the model that is 3-$\sigma$ consistent with the observations is 8 mJy. Repeating the same procedure at 24.5 um with an aperture of radius 0.72", we measured a flux density of 1290 $\pm$ 12 mJy for the photosphere-subtracted images and 1289 mJy for the model. Therefore, the 3-$\sigma$ upper limit of 1326 mJy for this aperture allows the presence of an unresolved component at a level of 37 mJy. However, these measurements do not account for the assumed 15% calibration uncertainty. Since a change in calibration would also result in a corresponding change to the model (to fit the peaks at the correct level), it is instructive to consider what would have been derived with a revised calibration factor. In the extreme situation that the calibration factor was 45% higher, the flux measured in the previously described apertures at 18.1 and 24.5 $\mu$m respectively would have been 438 $\pm$ 4 mJy and 1881 $\pm$ 17 mJy, with corresponding model fluxes of 290\*1.45 = 421 mJy and 1289\*1.45 = 1869 mJy, and so a flux excess of 17 $\pm$ 4 and 12 $\pm$ 17 mJy. Therefore, a 3-$\sigma$ deviation in both calibration and statistical uncertainty puts the limits on the unresolved flux at $<$`<!-- -->`{=html}29 mJy and $<$`<!-- -->`{=html}63 mJy at 18.1 and 24.5 $\mu$m. estimated an exozodiacal contribution of 87 $\pm$ 22 mJy at 24.5 $\mu$m, which is consistent to within 3$\sigma$ with the upper limit we derive.

## Scattered light comparison

A brightness asymmetry has also been detected at wavelengths that are dominated by light scattered by the dust disk. Images obtained by at 1.1 $\mu$m were suggestive of a brightness imbalance favoring the NE that was later noted to be at the 10–15% level . The disk ansae were again compared in the analysis of data sets taken with $HST$ NICMOS at 1.71–2.22 $\mu$m, but the NE ansa was not consistently brighter in all bandpasses . Most recently, $HST$ STIS images at 0.57 $\mu$m show that the SW ansa is 0.74 $\pm$ 0.07 times as bright as the NE ansa, as measured in "lobes" within $\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}20$^\circ$ of the major axis and between 0.8" and 1.5" from the star. measured an offset asymmetry, $(D_{NE}-D_{SW})/D_{mean}~=-3.7\%$, such that the center of the disk is offset from the star by 1.4 $\pm$ 0.4 AU (19 $\pm$ 6 mas) in the plane perpendicular to the line of sight.

Thus, another test for our pericenter glow model is whether it can replicate the observations in scattered light. To examine this, we modified the model's particle properties to correctly calculate the scattered light fluxes, using a combination of Mie theory, the Rayleigh-Gans approximation, and geometric optics, which yielded a mean albedo of 0.05. We assumed that the same particle population (in this case, modeled as a first approximation by 2-$\mu$m silicate spheres) is responsible for both the thermal emission and the scattered light reflection. We adopted a Henyey-Greenstein phase function to model the non-isotropic scattering properties of the small grains , with the form $$\label{eq:phasefxn}
f(\alpha) = \frac{1 - g^2}{1 - g^2 -2gcos(\alpha)}$$ where $\alpha$ is the scattering angle to the line of sight and $g$ is the asymmetry parameter. The parameter $g$ indicates the relative level of front or back scattering, such that $g=1$ for 100% forward scattering, $g=-1$ for 100% backward scattering, and $g=0$ for isotropic scattering. We adopted the value $g=0.16$ as determined from the optical $STIS$ images , which is consistent within 2$\sigma$ of the values for $g$ determined by for the near-IR $NICMOS$ images.

To check that our model produced realistic flux levels, we compared them to those measured by at a wavelength of 0.57 $\mu$m. Due to the presence of coronagraphic spikes in the image, the flux density measurement had to be corrected for the missing area, yielding a total flux 9.4$\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}0.8 mJy. The total flux in our model scattered light image is 10.8 mJy. As a secondary check, we used the formula given by to predict the surface brightness of a disk in scattered light (in mJy arcsec$^{-2}$) $$\label{eq:diskflux}
S = \frac{F\tau\omega}{4\pi\phi^2}$$ where $F$ is the flux received from the star in mJy, $\tau$ is the optical depth of the scattering material, $\omega$ is the albedo (from Mie theory, where $Q_{sca}$=0.08), and the factor $\tau\omega$ can be approximated by $L_{disk}/L_{\star}$ if $\omega=1$. The expected flux density calculated with this relation agrees with the flux density values both from observations and from our model to within 20% at 0.57, 1.1, and 1.6 $\mu$m.

We also replicated the lobe asymmetry measurement by with our disk model. Within the same apertures (within $\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}20$^\circ$ of the major axis and between 0.8" and 1.5" from the star), we determine a SW/NE brightness ratio of 0.92 at 0.57 $\mu$m and 0.93 at 1.1 $\mu$m. Our model values are therefore consistent within 3$\sigma$ with the value of 0.74$~\pm~$`<!-- -->`{=html}0.07, and are also consistent with a simple 1/$r^2$ attenuation of starlight due to the disk ansae being at different distances from the star. Our model also replicates the radial offset asymmetry at a level of 3.3%, which is consistent with the value of 3.7 $\pm$ 1.1%.

acknowledge that dynamical perturbations such as those we propose may be responsible for part of the brightness asymmetry, also suggesting that a segregation of the particle population or an azimuthal density variation in a homogenous dust ring could produce the asymmetry. However, whether such a model could also reproduce the observed temperature asymmetry has yet to be tested. Additionally, we note that particles in the disk should be moving slightly faster at pericenter, relative to their velocity at apocenter, and the collisional timescale at pericenter should be relatively shorter in turn. Therefore, the population of small particles that scatter near-IR light may be enhanced due to the increased collision rate near pericenter, thus yielding a density variation in the dust ring and a greater brightness imbalance in scattered light. There is the potential to further develop the pericenter glow model with such an enhanced particle population, which may help to determine whether factors beyond dynamical perturbations must be invoked to explain the observed morphology. Such refinements to our model would bear greater consideration especially if the large near-IR brightness asymmetry is confirmed.

# Discussion and conclusions

Using new mid-IR images at 18 and 25 $\mu$m, we have confirmed the previously observed brightness asymmetry discovered by in the HR 4796A disk to a high level of statistical significance. We have determined that a model disk with forced eccentricity of 0.06 that is dynamically induced by a companion can replicate that brightness asymmetry. After incorporating the dust scattering properties, we can also reproduce, to within 3$\sigma$, the level of brightness asymmetry seen in near-IR scattered-light images . We believe that near-IR imaging in additional bandpasses will further constrain the level of the asymmetry observed in scattered light, and that such constraints will assist in confirming whether the pericenter glow model is sufficient to explain the disk asymmetry observed throughout the spectrum.

The model disk is comprised of particles 2 $\mu$m in diameter ($D_{typ}$), in agreement with previous analysis of the disk , and the particles are assumed to be spherical silicates. Dust particles smaller than $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}8 $\mu$m in diameter should be blown out roughly within an orbital timescale ($\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}400 yr). In reality the dust population is not this simple, but we have adopted this value to characterize the overall population. We must consider that the particles may have a more complex set of optical properties that allows them to be heated to the temperatures we infer and to remain in the system without being rapidly blown out. More complex dust properties (e.g., Li & Lunine 2003) could be incorporated into the pericenter glow model in future iterations.

Finally, we recall that a key result for a system like HR 4796A that exhibits pericenter glow is the implied presence of a perturbing companion. In fact, the principal perturbing body may be the nearby M-star companion HR 4796B. However, the orbital parameters of HR 4796B are unknown and may not be commensurate with its being the primary perturber. The sharp inner edge of the ring points to the possibility that the perturbing object responsible for the asymmetry is also truncating the inner edge, as has been suggested for Fomalhaut . In this case, the putative planet responsible would be expected to lie just interior to the ring. For example, a Jupiter-mass planet would be expected to orbit at $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}60 AU with an eccentricity of $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}0.06 (maximum projected separation 0.87"), but it could be closer to the dust ring if it were more massive. Given the ambiguity in potential perturbers and the fact that the level of forced eccentricity induced by the companion does not constrain its mass, the continued search for the putative companion is warranted, if not with the current generation of telescopes then with the next, such as the space-based $JWST$ or the ground-based TMT or E-ELT facilities. have demonstrated a successful direct planet detection that was pursued following similar evidence of a forced stellar offset, as in the case of Fomalhaut, which is nearer and brighter than HR 4796A.


abstract: We study the interaction between the Moon and the solar wind using a three-dimensional hybrid plasma solver. The proton fluxes and electromagnetical fields are presented for typical solar wind conditions with different magnetic field directions. We find two different wake structures for an interplanetary magnetic field that is perpendicular to the solar wind flow, and for one that is parallell to the flow. The wake for intermediate magnetic field directions will be a mix of these two extreme conditions. Several features are consistent with a fluid interaction, e.g., the presence of a rarefaction cone, and an increased magnetic field in the wake. There are however several kinetic features of the interaction. We find kinks in the magnetic field at the wake boundary. There are also density and magnetic field variations in the far wake, maybe from an ion beam instability related to the wake refill. The results are compared to observations by the WIND spacecraft during a wake crossing. The model magnetic field and ion velocities are in agreement with the measurements. The density and the electron temperature in the central wake are not as well captured by the model, probably from the lack of electron physics in the hybrid model.
author: M. Holmström[^1], S. Fatemi,$^*$ Y. Futaana,$^*$ and H. Nilsson$^*$
date: July 8, 2011
title: The interaction between the Moon and the solar wind

# Introduction

Bodies that lack a significant atmosphere and internal magnetic fields, such as the Moon and asteroids, can to a first approximation be considered passive absorbers of the solar wind. The solar wind ions and electrons directly impact the surface of these bodies due to the lack of atmosphere, and the interplanetary magnetic field passes through the obstacle relatively undisturbed because the bodies are assumed to be non-conductive. Since the solar wind is absorbed by the body, a wake is created behind the object. This wake is gradually filled by solar wind plasma downstream of the body, through thermal expansion and the resulting ambipolar electric field, along the magnetic field lines. For a review of the Moon–solar wind interaction, including recent findings, see Halekas *et al.* (2010), who also point out the fact that we can view the near lunar space as a plasma laboratory. Although the Moon lacks any significant atmosphere and ionosphere there are many interesting features to this seemingly simple solar wind interaction. To understand the global interaction between the solar wind and the moon we need computer models that can give us a three-dimensional picture that complements the in-situ plasma observations.

Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) modeling of the Moon–solar wind interaction has a long history, starting with the work of Spreiter *et al.* (1970), who analytically treated the special case of an interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) aligned with the solar wind flow direction by finding a transformation of the MHD equations into a hydrodynamic problem. However, there are many kinetic processes that cannot be described by fluid models, e.g., the non-Maxwellian particle populations in the wake region, so particle models should capture more of the physical processes. An approximation of the refill of the lunar wake is the general one-dimensional problem where plasma expands into a vacuum (Widner, 1970; Samir, 1983; Mora, 2003), and such models have specifically been applied to the refill of the lunar wake (Farrell, 1998; Birch and Chapman, 2001). A nice property of such models is that even if they are one-dimensional, they can to some degree approximate a two-dimensional model of the lunar wake, where time corresponds to distance downstream the wake, i.e., the one-dimensional model is applied perpendicular to the solar wind flow and convects with the flow. A disadvantage of one-dimensional models, e.g., along $x$, is that the magnetic field component along the $x$-axis is forced to be constant, from the requirement that $\nabla\cdot\mathbf{B}=0$. This is a severe restriction for modeling the lunar wake, where the field component across the wake can increase. Due to the computational complexity, particle in cell (PIC) models, that include electrons as particles, are for the foreseeable future limited to at most two spatial dimensions, so what has been investigated using such models is the interaction of an infinite cylinder with the solar wind (Harnett and Winglee, 2003; Kimura and Nakagawa, 2008).

Hybrid models, where ions are particles and electrons a fluid, are less computational demanding that full PIC models and are suitable for studying processes of size comparable to the ion inertial length and gyro radius. A two-dimensional hybrid model by Trávnı́ček *et al.* (2005) focused mostly on wave activity in the lunar wake. The Moon–solar wind interaction is however a fully three-dimensional problem, since the IMF component perpendicular to the solar wind flow introduces asymmetry into an otherwise cylindrical symmetric problem. A three dimensional hybrid model by Kallio (2005) had a fairly coarse grid on a small region, and did not handle the wake region in a self consistent way (the electric field was specified in that region). Recently another three dimensional hybrid model has been presented in Wiehle *et al.* (2011). They compare observations by one of the ARTEMIS spacecrafts to a model run with time dependent inflow conditions, and find a good agreement. The time dependence enables comparison with observations even during changing solar wind conditions, but makes it more difficult to see how the wake forms differently depending on the solar wind conditions.

Here we also apply a three dimensional hybrid model to the Moon–solar wind interaction, but for steady inflow conditions. This allow us to study how the wake depends on the direction of the IMF, and in what follows we describe the method and present a comprehensive global overview of the different plasma quantities in the wake.

# Model

In the hybrid approximation, ions are treated as particles, and electrons as a massless fluid. In what follows we use SI units. The trajectory of an ion, $\mathbf{r}(t)$ and $\mathbf{v}(t)$, with charge $q$ and mass $m$, is computed from the Lorentz force, $$\frac{\displaystyle d\mathbf{r}}{\displaystyle dt} = \mathbf{v}, \quad
  \frac{\displaystyle d\mathbf{v}}{\displaystyle dt} = \frac{\displaystyle q}{\displaystyle m} \left(
    \mathbf{E}+\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B} \right),$$ where $\mathbf{E}=\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},t)$ is the electric field, and $\mathbf{B}=\mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r},t)$ is the magnetic field. The electric field is given by $$\mathbf{E} = \frac{\displaystyle 1}{\displaystyle\rho_I} \left( -\mathbf{J}_I\times\mathbf{B}
  +\mu_0^{-1}\left(\nabla\times\mathbf{B}\right) \times \mathbf{B}
  - \nabla p_e, \right) \label{eq:E}$$ where $\rho_I$ is the ion charge density, $\mathbf{J}_I$ is the ion current, $p_e$ is the electron pressure, and $\mu_0=4\pi\cdot10^{-7}$ \[Hm$^{-1}$\] is the magnetic constant. We assume that the electrons are an ideal gas, then $p_e=n_ekT_e$, so the pressure is directly related to temperature ($k$ is Boltzmann's constant). There are several ways to handle the electron pressure (p. 8790, Winske and Quest, 1986). Here we assume that $p_e$ is adiabatic (small collision frequency), with an adiabatic index, $\gamma=5/3$. Then the relative change in electron pressure is related to the relative change in electron density by $p_e\propto|\rho_e|^\gamma$ (Winske and Quest, 1986), and we have that $$\frac{p_e}{p_{e0}} = \left( \frac{n_e}{n_{e0}} \right)^{\gamma},$$ where the zero subscript denote reference values (here the solar wind values at the inflow boundary). From charge neutrality and $p_e=n_ekT_e$ we can derive that $$p_e = A \rho_I^{\gamma}
    \mbox{ with } A=\frac{k}{e}\rho_I^{1-\gamma}T_e   \label{eq:pe}$$ a constant that is evaluated using reference values of $\rho_I$ and $T_e$ (solar wind values). Note that $\gamma=1$ corresponds to assuming that $T_e$ is constant, and $\gamma=0$ gives a constant $p_e$.

Finally, Faraday's law is used to advance the magnetic field in time, $$\frac{\displaystyle\partial\mathbf{B}}{\displaystyle\partial t} = -\nabla\times\mathbf{E}.$$

We use a cell-centered representation of the magnetic field on a uniform grid. All spatial derivatives are discretized using standard second order finite difference stencils. Time advancement is done by a predictor-corrector leapfrog method with subcycling of the field update, denoted cyclic leapfrog (CL) by Matthews (1994). An advantage of the discretization is that the divergence of the magnetic field is zero, down to round off errors. Also, the discretization conserves energy very well (Holmström, 2011). The ion macroparticles (each representing a large number of real particles) are deposited on the grid by a cloud-in-cell method (linear weighting), and interpolation of the fields to the particle positions are done by the corresponding linear interpolation. Initial particle positions are drawn from a uniform distribution, and initial particle velocities from a drifting Maxwellian distribution. Further details on the hybrid model can be found in Holmström (2010).

The implementation of the algorithm was done in the FLASH software framework, developed at the University of Chicago (Fryxell *et al.*, 2000), that implements a block-structured adaptive (or uniform) Cartesian grid and is parallelized using the Message-Passing Interface (MPI) library for communication. Further details on the FLASH hybrid solver can be found in Holmström (2011). The general solver will be included in future releases of FLASH.

A crucial point in modeling the interaction between the Moon and the solar wind is how to choose the inner boundary conditions, at the surface of the moon. Here we model the Moon as an absorber of the solar wind. Ideally we should then remove all ions that hit the surface of the Moon, but that would introduce a discontinuity in the charge density, from solar wind values outside the sphere, to zero inside the sphere. However, numerical differentiation of discontinuous functions on a grid will lead to oscillations and instabilities in the fields. Therefore we choose to keep also ions inside the Moon, but we gradually reduce their weight by a factor $f_{obs}$ after each time step while they are inside the Moon (the mass and charge of each particle are reduced). Thus, the Moon acts as a gradual sink for ions, and this approach also avoids the problem of $\rho_I=0$ in Eq. . However, we do not plot these reduced ions in what follows, only protons that have never hit the Moon are used when computing the various statistics. This can be seen as a form of smoothing, done in a self consistent way. Often smoothing of fields are used in hybrid solvers, but it is then done in an ad-hoc way, as an extra step. The downside of our approach is that we introduce a numerical parameter, but experience shows that the solution will not change by much when reducing $f_{obs}$, indicating that the solution is converging. The reduction parameter cannot be chosen too small however, since a steep gradient in ion density will cause oscillations in the magnetic field. We have verified numerically that this approach keeps the IMF constant inside the Moon, and thus that no spurious currents are present there. There are no inner boundary conditions on the electro-magnetic fields.

The coordinate system is centered at the Moon, with the $x$-axis is directed toward the Sun, so the solar wind flows opposite to the $x$-axis. The IMF is in the $xy$-plane, and we will from now on denote it as the IMF plane. This defines a plane of symmetry, since the only asymmetry in the problem stems from a non-zero component of the IMF perpendicular to the $x$-axis. The solar wind consists only of protons (and the massless electron fluid), and we have a rectangular simulation domain divided into cells. The $+x$-face of the domain is an inflow boundary where we have a layer of shadow cells outside the domain that are filled with macroparticles drawn from the solar wind proton velocity distribution, and where the solar wind magnetic field is set. The $-x$-face is an outflow boundary where particles exiting the domain are removed, and where the magnetic field is extrapolated from the interior. The four other faces have periodic boundary conditions for fields and particles. The simulation domain is divided into a Cartesian grid with cubic cells of size 160 km. The geometry of the simulation domain is shown in Fig. .

The extent of the simulation box is $[-32.40,4.08]\times[-8.32,8.32]\times[-8.32,8.32] \cdot 10^3$ km $\approx [-18,2.4]\times[-4.8,4.8]^2 R_L$, with the Moon as a sphere of radius $R_L=1730$ km at the origin. The total number of simulation macroparticles is about 300 million, with 121 particles per cell on average. Here we have used values of $\gamma=5/3$, $f_{obs}=0.965$, a time step of $0.08$ s, and a final time of 170 s, when the solution has reached a steady state. The plots in what follows show the solution at the final time. Five subcycles of the CL algorithm are used here when updating the magnetic field, and the execution time is about 13 hours on 384 CPU cores.

# Results

In what follows, we have used typical solar wind conditions at 1 AU (Table 4.1, Kivelson and Russel, 1995), unless otherwise noted. The solar wind velocity is 450 km/s, the number density is 7.1 cm$^{-3}$, and the ion temperature is $1.2\cdot10^5$ K. The electron temperature is $1.4\cdot10^5$ K, and the IMF is in the $xy$-plane with a magnitude of 7 nT. For these plasma parameters, the ion inertial length is 85 km, the Alfvén velocity is 58 km/s, the thermal proton gyro radius is 66 km (the gyro time is 9 s), and the ion plasma beta is 0.6.

## Overview

In Fig.  the number density (three first rows) and the ion velocities (three last rows) are shown, each for three different IMF directions (at 0, 45 and 90 degrees to the $x$-axis, in the $xy$-plane). The most obvious feature of the interaction between the Moon and the solar wind is that a wake is formed behind the Moon, visible as a region of low density. We also see how the refill of the wake depends on the IMF direction. The wake refills along the magnetic field lines, making the wake shorter when the component of the IMF that is perpendicular to the solar wind is larger (Fig. .1). When the IMF is anti-parallel to the solar wind flow there is hardly any refill of the wake over the length of the simulation domain, also the flow then is cylindrical symmetric around the Moon–Sun axis. That the wake refill occur along the magnetic field lines is also visible in the cuts of the far wake (Fig. .1d), with the refill region as a rectangle aligned with the IMF.

Another notable feature is the density rarefaction cone that emanate from the terminator region. This region of low density propagate mostly above the poles in the case of a perpendicular IMF (Fig. .1), indicating that it propagates perpendicular to the magnetic field lines. This will be discussed in more detail when we look at the associated reduction in magnetic field strength (Fig. ).

We now examine the ion velocities, computed from the ion current and the charge density as $\mathbf{J}_I/\rho_I$, as is usual for particle in cell models, since the ion current density and the ion charge density are quantities that are available on the computational grid. The small white region downstream of the Moon is a region without any particles that has not hit the Moon, thus no velocities can be computed there. The $x$-velocity is shown as the deviation from the solar wind velocity, when the IMF is perpendicular to the flow, in Fig. .4. We see a slight slow down of the solar wind in the rarefaction cone. There is also a slow down behind the $+z$ hemisphere (and a speed up behind the $-z$ hemisphere) seen in Fig. .4b. This is probably a geometric effect, where part of the velocity distribution function is emptied by collisions with the lunar surface. The $y$-velocity (Fig. .5) shows how the wake symmetrically refills from both sides of the wake. The ions move inward not only in the central part of the wake, but also in the rarefaction cone. For the case of an aligned IMF, the $z$-velocity (Fig. .6) also shows a flow in the rarefaction cone toward the wake center. There we also see a flow of ions at the wake boundary in the IMF plane, and there seem to be a small kinetic effect of alternating upward and downward going ions in the upper and lower part of the wake (Fig. .6b). This seems associated with the wave pattern in density inside the rarefaction cone (Fig. .1-3), possibly caused by oscillations at the wake boundary.

The magnetic field magnitude (three first rows) is shown for three different IMF directions in Fig. , where also each of the vector components (rows 4-9) are shown for two different IMF directions (perpendicular and aligned to the solar wind flow).

The most prominent feature is the enhanced magnetic field in the wake. For a perpendicular IMF (Fig. .1) this region spreads out in the IMF plane, in the same region where we in the density saw the wake refill. For the aligned IMF the magnetic field increase is larger, and confined to the narrow wake (Fig. .3). There are also structured fluctuations in the far wake region in the IMF plane. Then there is a cone of lower field strength in the case of an aligned IMF (Fig. .3), corresponding to the cone of reduced density (Fig. .3). For the perpendicular IMF the cone is partial, and only extends perpendicular to the IMF, toward $+z$ and $-z$ (Fig. .1). Between the central region of enhanced field and the cone of lower field, there are field fluctuations parallel to the cone, as is also seen in the density (Fig. .1b,2b,3b). Examining these density plots, the waves seem to originate at the wake boundary and could be caused by oscillations at this interface between high and low ion density.

The magnetic field $z$-component for the case of a perpendicular IMF (Fig. .8) exhibits a pinching of the field, consistent with earlier predictions (Fig. 3, Owen, 1996) and model observations (Kallio, 2005). The field is bent toward the IMF plane in the wake (Fig. .8c,8d). However, the $x$-component of the magnetic field is also perturbed (Fig. .4). Close to the IMF plane, the field is bent toward the moon on one side of the wake, and away from the moon on the other side of the wake (Fig. .4a). Note also that these bends in the magnetic field are not confined to central parts of the wake, but expand along with the rarefaction in magnetic field (Fig. .1d) and density (Fig. .1d). Thus, for a perpendicular IMF the magnetic field in the wake is not only bent toward the IMF plane, but also toward the moon, as shown in Fig. .

The Mach cone of decreased density and magnetic field makes an angle to the solar wind flow direction of about 10 degrees, as seen in Fig.  and Fig. . Since the outer edge of the cone is diffuse, it is impossible to give a more exact angle. The ion-acoustic wave velocity is $v_S\approx \sqrt{2\gamma k_B T_e/m_i}\approx 58$ km/s, and the Alfvén velocity is also $v_A\approx 58$ km/s for these solar wind conditions, corresponding to angles of 7 degrees. We see that the density depletion travel perpendicular to the magnetic field. This together with the fact that the propagation velocity is larger than both the ion-acoustic and the Alfvén velocity suggests that the fast magnetosonic wave, with a phase velocity of $\sqrt{v_A^2+v_S^2}$ leading to an angle of 10 degrees, is responsible for the creation of the Mach cone in the hybrid model. This is consistent with the observation of Wiehle *et al.* (2011) that all three MHD modes (fast, Alfvén and slow) will be manifested in the lunar wake.

In Fig.  the electric field magnitude (top row) is shown along with the three vector components (three lower rows) for the case of an IMF perpendicular to the solar wind flow direction. What is shown is the electric field with the solar wind convective electric field, $\mathbf{E}_{sw}=-\mathbf{u}_{sw}\times \mathbf{B}_{sw}$, (directed along the $z$-axis) subtracted. We do not show the electric field for the case of an IMF aligned with the $x$-axis, since it is indistinguishable from zero using the same color scale.

We can note that the regions of enhanced electric field magnitude coincide with those of enhanced magnetic field magnitude shown in Fig. .1. Also, there are similarities in the components of the electric and magnetic fields. $E_y$ is very similar to $B_z$ (Fig. .8), and correspondingly $E_x$ is similar to $B_y$ (Fig. .8).

## Comparison with WIND observations

We here compare the hybrid model results with observations by the WIND spacecraft on December 27, 1994, when it traversed the lunar wake approximately perpendicular to the solar wind flow, in the plane of the IMF, at a distance of $x=-6.5$ R$_L\approx-11300$ km. Ogilvie *et al.* (Fig. 1, 1996) plots several plasma parameters during the wake crossing. Apparently the solar wind conditions changed during the observation. This is most apparent in the plasma number density that decreased by more than a factor of two from the undisturbed solar wind on the inbound trajectory to the solar wind on the outbound trajectory. Therefore we make two runs of the hybrid model for the two sets of solar wind conditions, here denoted *before* and *after*. The solar wind conditions used for the before (after) case are as follows. A solar wind velocity of 470 (500) km/s, a number density of 5 (2) cm$^{-3}$, an ion temperature of $0.9$ $(0.5)\cdot10^5$ K, and an electron temperature of $1.5$ $(2)\cdot10^5$ K. The IMF was $(6.39,2.33,0)$ nT for the before case, and $(5.57,5.02,0)$ nT for the after case. The time step was 0.08 (0.05) s and $f_{obs}=0.98 (0.985)$. Since the plasma parameters are different in the two cases, these numerical parameters have different values to ensure the stability of the solutions.

In Fig.  we show the model magnetic field magnitudes, compared with the observation by WIND.

The observed magnetic field magnitude matches well to the model values, if we assume that there was a change in the upstream solar wind conditions around wake entry (there we switch from comparing the *before* model results to comparing the *after* model results with the observation). Before the wake crossing there is a drop in the observed magnetic field strength that is also seen in the model. This is the rarefaction wave that we saw in Fig.  earlier. The IMF in the *before* case has the largest component along the $x$-axis and therefore the magnetic field magnitude should best match Fig. .3a, with a pronounced rarefaction cone. Then there is an increase in the central wake which is reproduced in the *after* model. Followed by a gradual decrease at wake exit, but no rarefaction wave. For the *after* case the IMF is at about 45$^{\circ}$ away from the $x$-axis and thus correspond to Fig. .2a, with a much weaker rarefaction cone. In the observation there are some large variations further away from the wake that are not present in the model. This could be upstream solar wind disturbances.

In Fig.  the proton velocity observed by WIND is compared to the velocity in the two hybrid model runs.

Again we have fairly good agreement between the model and observations, assuming a shift in solar wind conditions around wake entry. There are more variations in the observed velocities, but the locations of the velocity changes, and the slopes match the model. In the central wake there is however no data from the model since the model density is too low. This can be seen when we compare the proton number density from the model with observations in Fig. .

We see that the general features of the observed density profile across the wake is found in the model, including a shift of the minimum density toward the outbound part of the trajectory, if we assume the shift in solar wind conditions around wake entry. However, the drop off in density is quicker in the hybrid model, and is much below the observations in the central part of the wake. The cause of this could be the incomplete treatment of electron dynamics in a hybrid model. Since the electrons are a massless charge neutralizing fluid, there are no forces from the electrons on the ions, except for the electron pressure gradient term in the definition of the electric field (Eq. ). In reality, the refill of the wake is governed by the electrons. Due to their higher thermal velocity they will speed ahead of the ions to refill the wake, setting up an ambipolar electric field due to the charge separation that will accelerate the ions into the wake (Halekas *et al.*, 2010).

Similarly, the lack of electron dynamics in the hybrid model will affect the electron temperature, $T_e$, in the wake. Observations show an increased electron temperature in the wake (Fig. 1, Ogilvie *et al.*, 1996). But from Eq. , and the ideal gas law, $T_e \sim \rho_I^{\gamma-1} = \rho_I^{2/3}$ for $\gamma = 5/3$, so $T_e$ in the hybrid model is then lower in the wake.

# Discussion

Since the only deviation from axial symmetry is the component of the IMF that is perpendicular to the solar wind flow, we can see that the two extreme cases are when the IMF is perpendicular to the flow, and when the IMF is aligned with the flow. For a constant IMF magnitude, the flow and field for cases when the IMF is at an angle to the flow will be a mixture of these extreme cases, as seen in Fig. .2 and Fig. .2.

There are many processes related to electron dynamics that are not captured by a hybrid model. The process of plasma expansion into a vacuum has a lot of details, and instabilities that can form (Birch and Chapman, 2001). Also, the region near the lunar surface probably has strong electric fields, and charge separation effects (Farrell *et al.*, 2008). However using the hybrid approximation it is possible to model the global three-dimensional interaction between the Moon and the solar wind, so full PIC models and hybrid models are complementary tools in the study of this interaction. Also, the Moon–solar wind interaction, although seemingly simple, is complex enough to be a good test of the applicability of different models; fluid, hybrid, and PIC models.

We have here considered the simplest possible model of the Moon in the solar wind — a spherical sink of solar wind protons. There are many physical processes that make the real interaction more complex than that. Two examples are magnetic anomalies that deflect the solar wind and will cause downstream disturbances (Lue *et al.*, 2011), and the reflection of solar wind protons by the dayside lunar surface (Holmström *et al.*, 2010).

# Summary and conclusions

We have presented a fully self consistent three-dimensional hybrid plasma model of the interaction between the Moon and the solar wind and shown the resulting global ion fluxes and fields for typical solar wind conditions and different IMF directions. Magnetic field enhancement in the wake, and a rarefaction wave in density and magnetic field are seen in the model. The two extreme cases are that of an IMF perpendicular to the solar wind flow, and that of an IMF that is parallel to the solar wind flow. We find that the wake for intermediate IMF directions can be seen as a superposition of these two states. Some kinetic effects were also observed in the model. There are density and field variation in the far wake, maybe caused by an ion beam instability from the refill of the wake. Visible are also kinks in the magnetic field at the inner boundary of the rarefaction cone for an IMF perpendicular to the solar wind flow direction.

Observations by the WIND spacecraft were fairly well reproduced by the hybrid model, showing that a hybrid model with the moon as a spherical sink of ions is able to represent many global features of the interaction. However, the model central wake density and electron temperature were different from observations, probably due to the lack of electron dynamics in the hybrid model.

## Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Swedish National Space Board, and conducted using the resources of the High Performance Computing Center North (HPC2N), Umeå University, Sweden. The software used in this work was in part developed by the DOE-supported ASC / Alliance Center for Astrophysical Thermonuclear Flashes at the University of Chicago. The work of S. Fatemi was supported by the National Graduate School of Space Technology, Luleå University of Technology.

## References

Birch, P.C., and Chapman, S.C., Detailed structure and dynamics in particle-in-cell simulations of the lunar wake, *Physics of Plasmas*, **8**, 4551–4559, 2001.

Farrell, W. M., Kaiser, M. L., Steinberg, J. T., and Bale, S. D., A simple simulation of a plasma void: Applications to Wind observations of the lunar wake, *J. Geophys. Res.*, **103**, 23653–23660, 1998.

Farrell, W. M., Stubbs, T. J., Halekas, J. S., Delory, G. T., Collier, M. R., Vondrak, R. R., and Lin, R. P., Loss of solar wind plasma neutrality and affect on surface potentials near the lunar terminator and shadowed polar regions, *Geophys. Res. Lett.*, **35**, L05105, 2008.

Fryxell, B., Olson, K., Ricker, P., Timmes, F. X., Zingale, M., Lamb, D. Q., MacNeice, P., Rosner, R., Truran, J. W., and Tufo, H., FLASH: An Adaptive Mesh Hydrodynamics Code for Modeling Astrophysical Thermonuclear Flashes, *The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series*, **131**, 273–334, 2000. `http://flash.uchicago.edu/`

Halekas, J.S., Saito, Y., Delory, G.T., Farrell, W.M., New views of the lunar plasma environment, *Planetary and Space Science*, in press, doi:10.1016/j.pss.2010.08.011

Harnett, E.M., and Winglee, R.M., 2.5-D fluid simulations of the solar wind interacting with multiple dipoles on the surface of the Moon, *J. Geophys. Res.*, **108**, 1088–, 2003.

Holmström, M., Hybrid modeling of plasmas, in *Proceedings of ENUMATH 2009*, Edited by Kreiss, G., *et al.*, 451 pp, Springer, 2010. arXiv:1010.3291

Holmström, M., Wieser, M., Barabash, S., and Futaana, Y., Dynamics of solar wind protons reflected by the Moon, *J. Geophys. Res.*, **115**, A06206, 2010.

Holmström, M., An Energy Conserving Parallel Hybrid Plasma Solver. Submitted to *Proceedings of ASTRONUM-2010*, 2011. arXiv:1010.3291

Kallio, E., Formation of the lunar wake in quasi-neutral hybrid model, *Geophys. Res. Lett.*, **32**, L06107, 2005.

Kimura, S., and Nakagawa, T., Electromagnetic full particle simulation of the electric field structure around the moon and the lunar wake, *Earth Planets Space*, **60**, 591–599, 2008.

Kivelson, M.G., and Russell, C.T, Eds., *Introduction to Space Physics*, Cambridge, 1995.

Lue, C., Futaana, Y., Barabash, S., Wieser, M., Holmström, M., Bhardwaj, A., Dhanya, M.B., and Wurz, P., Strong influence of lunar crustal fields on the solar wind flow, *Geophys. Res. Lett.*, **38**, L03202, 2011.

Matthews, A.P., Current Advance Method and Cyclic Leapfrog for 2D Multispecies Hybrid Plasma Simulations, *Journal of Computational Physics*, **112**, 102–116, 1994.

Mora, P., Plasma Expansion into a Vacuum, *Physical Review Letters*, **90**, 185002, 2003.

Ogilvie, K.W., Steinberg, J.T., Fitzenreiter, R.J., Owen, C.J., Lazarus, A.J., Farrell, W.M., Torbert, R.B., Observations of the lunar plasma wake from the WIND spacecraft on December 27, 1994, *Geophys. Res. Lett.*, **23**, 1255–1258, 1996.

Owen, C. J., Lepping, R. P., Ogilvie, K. W., Slavin, J. A., Farrell, W. M., Byrnes, J. B., The lunar wake at 6.8 R$_L$: WIND magnetic field observations, *Geophys. Res. Lett.*, **23**, 1263–1266, 1996.

Samir, U., Wright, K. H., Jr., and Stone, N. H., The expansion of a plasma into a vacuum: basic phenomena and processes and applications to space plasma physics, *Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics*, **21**, 1631–1646, 1983.

Spreiter, J.R., Marsh, M.C., and Summers, A.L., Hydromagnetic aspects of solar wind flow past the Moon, *Cosmic Electrodynamics*, **1**, 5–50, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht–Holland, 1970.

Trávnı́ček, P., Hellinger, P., Schriver, D., and Bale, S. D., Structure of the lunar wake: Two-dimensional global hybrid simulations, *Geophys. Res. Lett.*, **32**, L06102, 2005.

Widner, M., Alexeff, I., and Jones, W. D., *Physics of Fluids*, **14**, 795–796, 1971.

Wiehle, S., Plaschke, F., Motschmann, U., Glassmeier, K.-H., Auster, H. U., Angelopoulos, V., Mueller, J., Kriegel, H., Georgescu, E., Halekas, J., Sibeck, D. G., McFadden, J. P., First lunar wake passage of ARTEMIS: Discrimination of wake effects and solar wind fluctuations by 3D hybrid simulations, *Planetary and Space Science*, **59**, 661–671, 2011.

Winske, D., and Quest, K.B., Electromagnetic Ion Beam Instabilities: Comparison of one- and two-dimensional simulations, *J. Geophys. Res.*, **91**, 8789–8797, 1986.

[^1]: Swedish Institute of Space Physics, PO Box 812, SE-98128 Kiruna, Sweden. (firstname.lastname@example.com)