author: Kajal K. Ghosh [^1]; Douglas A. Swartz ; Allyn F. Tennant ; Kinwah Wu [^2]
date:
title: ROSAT/Chandra observations of a bright transient in M81

# Introduction

M81 (NGC 3031) is a nearby Sab spiral galaxy just beyond the Local Group. It has a well defined central bulge; its two spiral arms are clearly marked by strings of bright young stars.

M81 was observed by *Einstein* in 1979 and by *ROSAT* over the period 1991–1998. The *Einstein* observations identified 10 point sources (including the nucleus) in the field (Fabbiano 1988). There are 46 HRI and 69 PSPC sources found in the deep images obtained by *ROSAT* (Immler & Wang 2001). The *Chandra* observation was carried out in 2000. A total of 97 sources were detected in the ACIS S3 image (Tennant et al. 2001), which has an area of $8'.3 \times 8'.3$ centered at the nuclear region. More sources are in the other S-chip images further away from the nucleus (Swartz et al. in preparation).

While a portion of the sources in the M81 field are foreground stars and background AGNs, the majority are believed to belong to the galaxy or its dwarf satellites (Tennant et al. 2001; Immler & Wang 2001). These X-ray sources form an inhomogeneous group, consisting of objects from canonical sources such as supernova remnants and X-ray binaries to exotic systems such as the very-soft sources discussed in Swartz et al. (2001). Many sources are variable, and some are transients showing dramatic brightening for a brief duration ($\mbox{\raisebox{-0.6ex}{$\stackrel{\textstyle<}{\sim}$}}$`<!-- -->`{=html}1 yr) (see Immler & Wang 2001; La Parola et al. 2001).

X-ray transients are also commonly found in our Galaxy. Among the brightest are candidate black-hole X-ray binaries, whose peak luminosities may reach $10^{39}-10^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$ during the outbursts, and certain neutron-star X-ray binaries (including the Type I bursters), which may be as bright as or even brighter than $2\times 10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$, the Eddington limit of a 1.5-M$_\odot$ compact accretor. These luminous X-ray binaries can be detected easily everywhere within the Galaxy when they are in active states. (For a review of the properties of galactic X-ray binaries, see articles in Lewin, van Paradijs & van den Heuvel 1995). Transient X-ray binaries are found in globular clusters as well as in the Galactic bulge and disk. No candidate black hole X-ray binaries have been identified in Galactic globular clusters. The bright globular cluster sources in our Galaxy tend to be Type I X-ray bursters (Verbunt & van den Heuvel 1995). The most luminous globular cluster X-ray source in the Galaxy has a luminosity $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}5$\times 10^{37}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (Bloser et al. 2000).

Here, we report the analysis of the photometric and spectroscopic data of the peculiar transient source in the NW region of M81 observed by *ROSAT* and *Chandra*. The nature of the source and its implications are discussed.

# Observations and Data Analysis

The M81 field was observed many times by *ROSAT* in the 1990s (Immler & Wang 2001) including 9 PSPC observations spanning 1991 March to 1994 April and 11 HRI observations (from 1992 Oct to 1998 April). We examined these data using a combination of FTOOLS and LEXTRCT, a locally supported software package. *ROSAT* PSPC images obtained in 1992 and in 1993 are shown in the left and right panels of Figure , respectively. The transient as well as SN 1993J are both seen in the 1993 data. In the 1992 data, there is only a very slight excess at the transient's position that is significant at the 2.4 $\sigma$ level. To derive an accurate position, we adjusted the coordinates in each *ROSAT* image to align the nucleus to be at the radio position $9^{\rm h}55^{\rm m}33.17^{\rm s}$, +69 03 55.1 (Ma et al. 1998). This adjustment was typically $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}5 arcsec. No rotation was applied. With this offset, the locations of SN 1993J and the bright *Einstein* sources X-2, X-3 and X-6 are all consistent with their *Chandra* positions. The transient is listed as source P33 in Immler & Wang (2001) at ($9^{\rm h}55^{\rm m}22.7^{\rm s}$, +69 06 31). In our adjusted coordinates, its position is ($9^{\rm h}55^{\rm m}21.96^{\rm s}$, +69 06 38.0) with an uncertainty of 3.5 arcsec.

The M81 field was observed for 50 ks by *Chandra* on 2000 May 7 with the nucleus centered on the ACIS S3 chip. The *Chandra* image, data-analysis, and general properties of the sources found in the S3 image were presented in Tennant et al. (2001). The transient is less than 1 arcsec from a *Chandra* source at a position of ($9^{\rm h}55^{\rm m}21.95^{\rm s}$, +69 06 37.8). The source is off-axis in the *Chandra* data, appearing roughly elliptical in shape, with Gaussian widths $\sigma=$ 2 and 1 arcsec in the two dimensions on the sky.

The *Chandra* position is less than 1 arcsec from the object listed as ID 50777 by Perelmuter & Racine (1995) who report its brightness and colours are $V=16.87$, $B-V=0.97$, and $V-R=0.56$.

The region around object ID 50777 was observed with *Hubble* WFPC2 on 1998 April 17. The three images taken with the F450W filter, which roughly correspond to the V band, were combined using a median filter to remove cosmic ray tracks. The final image was visually inspected and in particular object ID 50777 was compared to object ID 50658; another bright star-like object with V=15.91 (Perelmuter & Racine, 1995). Object ID 50658 shows diffraction spikes and is saturated in the core with indication of some charge leakage during read out. Object ID 50777 does not show diffraction spikes, nor does it appear to be saturated in the core. The background around both objects is partially resolved into stars and no attempt was made to remove these very faint stellar images.

The Tiny Tim software package (Krist & Hook 1999) was used to compute model Point Spread Functions (PSFs) for the two locations. The radial profiles of the two sources as well as the profiles derived from the Tiny Tim model PSFs are shown in Figure . To normalize the data we subtracted the average level in the outer three annuli(from roughly 3.7 to 4.0 arcsec). To normalize the Tiny Tim models we multiplied by the total number of counts detected in the data. As can be seen the PSF of ID 50658 is saturated in the core with an excess at 0.25 arcsec where the charge is finally read out. At larger radii, the model PSF approximates the data fairly accurately. The model PSF poorly approximates the data for object ID 50777. The radial profile of ID 50777 is very smooth and does not show the central core nor the excess at 1-2 arcsec (mainly due to the diffraction spikes). Thus, ID 50777 appears extended in the *Hubble* data. Not shown in the figure is the PSF for object ID 50696 (Perelmuter & Racine 1995) which is also in the same *Hubble* field and was confirmed by Perelmuter, Brodie & Huchra (1995) as a globular cluster in M81. The radial profile of ID 50696 shows an extension very similar to that of object ID 50777.

We conclude that object ID 50777 is extended in the *Hubble* data and is very likely a bright globular cluster in M81. The half light radius in the *Hubble* data is 2.4 pixels. At the distance of M81 this corresponds to 4.4 pc. If we remove the estimated *Hubble* PSF then the half light radius would be about 3 pc which is a fairly typical size for globulars in our galaxy (*e.g.*, Ashman & Zepf 1998).

# Brightness Variation and Spectroscopic Properties

The 10-year X-ray light curve of the transient source is shown in Figure 3. The source was below the *ROSAT* HRI equivalent count rate of $\sim 3 \times 10^{-4}$ cts s$^{-1}$ up to 1993 May in both the PSPC and HRI images. Its count rate, however, reached about $1.5\times 10^{-2}$ cts s$^{-1}$ during the flare (brightening) around 1993 September$-$November. It then faded within a 5-month period and was marginally detected ($< 2.5 \sigma$) in the subsequent *ROSAT* observations at the brightness level of $\sim (2-3) \times 10^{-4}$ cts s$^{-1}$.

The equivalent *ROSAT* HRI count rate of the *Chandra* source is $(2.6\pm0.2) \times 10^{-4}$ cts s$^{-1}$, consistent with the 'quiescent' brightness of the source P33 seen in the *ROSAT* observations.

We extracted the *ROSAT* PSPC spectra of the source during the brightening in 1993 and grouped them into spectral bins containing a minimum of 20 counts. The spectra are fitted using XSPEC (Arnaud, 1996) to simple functions. The best fitting parameter values as well as the 90 percent confidence single parameter uncertainties are shown in Table 1. In all cases, the absorption column density is consistent with the line-of-sight Galactic value ($n_{\rm H} = 4 \times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$, Stark et al. 1992). The power-law and bremsstrahlung models provide equally acceptable fits. For the black-body model, the best fitting absorption column density is consistent with zero, and therefore, we fixed its value to the Galactic value. Based on the value of $\chi^2$ we cannot rule out a black-body model although it does not fit as well. When we add the two *ROSAT* data sets, the black-body model is still the worst model, but it cannot be ruled out at the 3-$\sigma$ level.

Assuming that the source is within M81 and the distance to the galaxy is 3.6 Mpc (Freeman et al. 1994), the black-body model implies an unabsorbed luminosity $\sim 6.7\times 10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in the 0.2-2.4 keV band, and a negligible intrinsic absorption of the source in comparison with the line-of-sight Galactic absorption. If the flare spectrum is a power law then the luminosity in the *ROSAT* band is $\sim$$8.5 \times 10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$. Clearly if the power law extends to higher energies, then the X-ray luminosity could be significantly above $10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$.

The *Chandra* data show that the source had a power-law spectrum in 'quiescence'. The best fit parameters are listed in Table 1. The inferred unabsorbed luminosity is $1.7 \times 10^{37}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in the 0.5-8 keV band and, in the *ROSAT* bandpass, it is roughly 60 times fainter than that of the flare luminosity in late 1993. There is a suggestion that the *Chandra* spectrum is steeper than the *ROSAT* spectra; however we note that $\Gamma \sim 1.6$ is consistent with both data sets.

```latex
\begin{table*}
      \caption[]{Spectral fit to the {\em ROSAT} and {\em Chandra} observations}
         \label{Table 1}
     $$
         \begin{array}{p{0.13\linewidth}p{0.13\linewidth}lcccc}
            \hline
            \noalign{\smallskip}
    observation & date & model & n_{\rm H}~(10^{20}~{\rm cm}^{-2})
          &  \Gamma & T (keV) & \chi^2/dof  \\
            \noalign{\smallskip}
            \hline
            \noalign{\smallskip}
   ROSAT & 1993~Sep~29
     &  phabs*po    & 4.4^{+2.7}_{-1.8} & 1.30^{+0.37}_{-0.36} &  & 19.6/22 \\
     & & phabs*bb   & 4.0~(fixed) & & 0.33^{+0.05}_{-0.33}    & 31.6/23 \\
     & & phabs*brem & 4.3^{+2.1}_{-1.2}& & 15.5^{+\infty}_{-10.1} & 19.6/22 \\
   ROSAT &  1993~Nov~1
     &  phabs*po    & 6.3^{+12.8}_{-3.2} & 1.55^{+0.95}_{-0.45} &  & 19.8/18 \\
     & & phabs*bb   & 4.0~(fixed) &  & 0.32^{+0.05}_{-0.32} & 22.5/19 \\
     & & phabs*brem & 5.6^{+7.1}_{-2.4}& & 4.7^{+\infty}_{-2.3} & 19.4/18 \\
   ROSAT & coadd~Sep/Nov
     &  phabs*po    & 4.8^{+2.6}_{-1.6} & 1.37^{+0.29}_{-0.27} &  & 46.0/43 \\
     & & phabs*bb   & 4.0~(fixed) & & 0.32^{+0.03}_{-0.02}  & 61.5/44 \\
     & & phabs*brem & 4.6^{+1.9}_{-1.0}& & 9.5^{+\infty}_{-3.9} & 45.6/43 \\
   Chandra  & 2000~May~7
     &  phabs*po  & 12.4^{+17.7}_{-12.4} & 1.88^{+0.60}_{-0.55} &  & 2.3/4 \\
     & & phabs*bb  & 4.0~(fixed) & & 0.47^{+0.10}_{-0.47}   & 10.6/5 \\
     & & phabs*brem & 7.6^{+3.9}_{-7.6}& & 4.5^{+\infty}_{-0.9} & 2.4/4 \\
            \noalign{\smallskip}
            \hline
         \end{array}
     $$
%\begin{list}{}{}
%\item[$^{\mathrm{a}}$] This is footnote a
%\end{list}
   \end{table*}
```

# Nature of the Source

The fact that the flaring spectra obtained by *ROSAT* PSPC in late 1993 are equally well fit by a number of simple models implies that the exact nature of the source is still open to investigation. The low absorbing column does tend to rule out a high mass companion, since such systems typically have strong stellar winds and hence large intrinsic columns. Here we briefly discuss several possibilities. We begin by assuming a single source is responsible for all the observed X-ray emission and describe possible scenarios for objects outside (§ ) or within (§ ) M81. We then consider (§ ) the possibility that two or more X-ray sources are present along the same line of sight.

## Systems outside M81

If we assume the X-rays come from a star within our Galaxy and that object ID 50777 in Perelmuter & Racine (1995) is its counterpart, the colours suggest an early K spectral type. If the star is on the main sequence, the optical brightness implies a distance of 1.5 kpc. We first consider the possibility that the X-rays are due to coronal emission. For stellar coronae, the ratio of the X-ray flux to the optical flux is expected to be in the range $10^{-3}$ to $10^{-5}$ for F- to M-type stars (Topka, et al. 1982) whereas we find $F_{\rm x}/F_{\rm opt} \approx 0.14$. The hardness of the *Chandra* spectrum is also inconsistent with typical coronal emission. Therefore, coronal emission from a late-type main-sequence star is unlikely.

If a distance of 1.5 kpc is assumed, then the flare luminosity of the source would be $\sim 10^{32}$ erg s$^{-1}$. Typical X-ray luminosities (above 0.5 keV) of magnetic cataclysmic variables (mCVs) — which are close binaries consisting of a magnetic white dwarf and a late K or M main-sequence star — are about $10^{31}-10^{32}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (see Cropper 1990 and references therein). MCVs are also known to show transitions between high and low states (Cropper 1990, Warner 1995). Thus we are unable to rule out a foreground mCV based on the X-ray observations alone. However, the optical source should not appear extended as it does in the *Hubble* image. The issue could be resolved if an optical image taken during the X-ray high state were available as mCVs show brightening in both the X-ray and optical bands during high states.

The extended emission could be accounted for if the object were a background AGN. AGNs are not known to show such large amplitude X-ray variabiltiy on timescales of a few months as seen. In principle tidal disruption of a star by the black hole at the center of a galaxy could produce a large amplitude ($10^3$ to $10^4$) flare but the expected timescale is of order a year or more (Ulmer 1999). Furthermore, if the object is behind M81, then the absorbing column would come from not only our own galaxy, but also the column through the entire disk of M81 as well as any intrinsic column. The low column measured from the X-ray data makes this possibility unlikely. An optical measurement of spectral redshift would provide conclusive evidence.

If the optical source is unrelated to the X-ray source, then the true optical counterpart would be a fainter and presumably more distant object. The most common X-ray source is an interacting binary. X-ray binaries in their active states have luminosities in the range $10^{36}-10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (*e.g.* White, Nagase & Parmar 1995). But, the *ROSAT* count rate during the flare in 1993 implies a luminosity of only $\sim 5 \times 10^{35}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in the 0.2$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}2.4 keV band even at a distance as great as 100 kpc, which would place it in the outer part of the Galactic halo. If the source is an X-ray binary within the Galaxy, unrelated to the observed optical source, it would be one of the fainter systems.

## Systems within M81

If we assume that the optical object is in M81 and is related to the X-ray source, then it is far too bright to be an isolated X-ray binary in M81. It is also too bright to be an isolated supernova remnant which could potentially account for the optical extension, but not the X-ray variability.

The optical object may be a previously unidentified (and yet to be confirmed) globular cluster in M81 harbouring the X-ray source. Galaxies similar to M81 could contain of order 200 globular clusters (Perelmuter & Racine 1995). To date, only 25 globular clusters in M81 have been confirmed (Perelmuter, Brodie & Huchra 1995), and only 4 of these are within the viewing field of ACIS S3. The colours reported by Perelmuter & Racine (1995) for ID 50777 are within their expectations for M81 globular cluster candidates. As shown in section 2, object ID 50777 has a half light radius of about 0.2 arcsec which would be impossible to detect from the ground, although the outer halo could be. The V magnitude of 16.9 would imply an absolute magnitude of $M_{\rm V} \approx -10.9$ which would make it brighter than any Milky Way cluster and similar to the absolute magnitude of the brightest globular cluster in the Andromeda galaxy M31 (see the review by Ashman & Zepf 1998). Thus the brightness and small size of ID 50777 would account for it being missed in previous searches for globular clusters.

X-ray transients are known to occur in Milky Way globulars. Typical globular cluster sources in our galaxy have luminosities ranging up to $\sim 5\times 10^{37}$ erg s$^{-1}$ and none are black hole candidates. The luminosity of the *Chandra* source is consistent with that of bright X-ray sources found in Galactic globular clusters (Verbunt & van den Heuvel 1995, Sidoli, et al. 2001). Both the spectra of the *ROSAT* observations in late 1993 and the *Chandra* observation are well fit by a power-law with a photon index about 1.6. This value is consistent with the power-law component seen in the spectra of X-ray binaries. The *ROSAT* count rates together with the distance to M81 imply the flare luminosity of the source above the Eddington luminosity of X-ray binaries containing an accreting neutron star. Di Stefano et al. (2001) report *Chandra* observations of M31 that show that the majority of the most luminous X-ray sources in M31 are in globular clusters and that the highest sustained luminosity observed exceeds $2 \times 10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$. We also note that some peculiar Galactic neutron-star binaries (*e.g.* Cir X-1, which is believed to have a very eccentric orbit) have super-Eddington luminosities (up to three times the Eddington limit of a 1.5-M$_\odot$ accretor) over a quite substantial portion of their orbital cycles (*e.g.*, Shirey et al. 1996). Thus the possibility of an extremely bright neutron-star X-ray binary cannot be easily eliminated.

The high luminosity makes the source a candidate black-hole binary. From the *Chandra* observation we obtain a 'quiescence' luminosity of $1.7 \times 10^{37}$ erg s$^{-1}$. The ratio of the flare luminosity to the quiescence luminosity is therefore $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}60. This is significantly lower than those of the Galactic black-hole binaries GS 2000+251, Nova Mus 91, A0620-00, and V404 Cyg whose observed ratios ($10^{6}$ to $10^7$, Garcia et al. 2001) are in agreement with Advection-Dominated-Accretion-Flow (ADAF) model predictions (Narayan, Garcia & McClintock 1997).

## Multiple X-ray sources in a M81 globular cluster

Although the X-ray temporal behaviour suggests an X-ray transient, the peak luminosity is difficult to explain with a neutron star. On the other hand the brightness of Chandra measurement is inconsistent with the currently popular ADAF model. This leads to the possibility that the strong source seen by *ROSAT* in 1993 and the fainter source observed by *Chandra* in 2000 are two different objects. If we assume that each detected X-ray source occupies an area of the detector out to the 90% radius of the *Chandra* PSF then the 97 X-ray sources reported in Tennant et al. (2001) would occupy $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}2% of all the pixels on the ACIS S3 detector. Thus the probability of a randomly-located source appearing within a detected ACIS source region is 2%. Of course, assuming X-ray sources are more likely to be found in dense stellar environments, such as the cores of globular clusters, then this probability should be considered a lower limit.

Thus, object ID 50777 may be a massive (*i.e.,* luminous and compact) globular cluster in M81 containing the *ROSAT* flare source P33 and the fainter *Chandra* source. The *Chandra* source is presumably one or more persistent X-ray binaries while the brightness of the *ROSAT* source in 1993 suggests a black-hole binary in the core.

If systems displaying similar X-ray characteristics can be identified elsewhere, however, the multiple-source hypothesis becomes less viable and a single-source explanation is to be favored. We note that the *Einstein* source X-2 lies very close to a bright (V=17.29) point-like object listed as ID 50548 in Perelmuter & Racine (1995). During the *Chandra* observation, X-2 had faded dramatically relative to its *Einstein*-measured brightness. To our knowledge, however, X-2 has never exceeded an X-ray luminosity of $\sim 2 \times 10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$. Optical followups of ID 50548 would also be of interest. The recently discovered transient source (Steinle, Dennerl & Englhauser 2000) in the direction of galaxy Cen A may also display characteristics similar to those reported here. If the source is in Cen A, then it would have had a peak X-ray luminosity of $3 \times 10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$ and it also appears to be associated with a weak *Chandra* source.

Roughly 10% of globular clusters are expected to contain accreting neutron stars detectable above the *Chandra* threshold and galaxies like M81 typically contain of order 200 globular clusters (Perelmuter & Racine 1995). However, there are only 25 confirmed globular clusters in M81 (Perelmuter, Brodie, & Huchra, 1995) and only 10 within the *Chandra*-observed field. None of these are coincident with X-ray sources detected by *Chandra*.

# Summary

The transient X-ray source brightened to $\sim$$7 \times 10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$, during *ROSAT* observations spanning 1993 Sep 29 to 1993 Nov 7 and was only 12–75 times fainter during the rest of the 10-year observing period including observations taken 5 months before and after the bright phase. Spectra obtained during both the high and low brightness states can be equally well fit by either power law models with $\Gamma \sim 1.6$ and by thermal bremsstrahlung models with temperatures exceeding 4 keV. In all cases the data are consistent with only a Galactic interstellar absorption column. Blackbody models provide a substantially poorer fit. The bright optical counterpart to the transient source is extended with a half-light radius of $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}0.2 arcsec and with luminosity and colours consistent with a massive globular cluster in M81.

The only viable foreground object candidate for this source is a mCV. A Galactic mCV would have a flaring luminosity (at a distance $\sim
1.5$ kpc) and spectral shape similar to that observed. The optical extension and low state X-ray luminosity of order $\sim 2 \times 10^{30}$ erg s$^{-1}$ argue strongly against this hypothesis. A background AGN is unlikely based on the short X-ray "on-time" of the source and on the low column density derived from the spectral fits.

An X-ray binary at the distance of M81 is suggested by the shape of the observed power law spectra yet the luminosities observed make this scenario difficult to reconcile with canonical Galactic objects in this class: The high luminosity during the flare exceeds that of an accreting neutron star while the small ratio of flare luminosity to quiescent luminosity argues against a black-hole system. This can be resolved if the X-rays come from two objects, a black hole that produced the flare and a neutron star to account for the *Chandra* flux. Though a rare superposition may occur, the probability is greater if the sources are located within a single massive globular cluster in M81. If this is the case, then this is the first black hole candidate in a globular cluster. In any case, the peak X-ray luminosity exceeds that of any globular cluster X-ray source in the Galaxy and rivals that of the brightest M31 globular cluster X-ray source.

Further optical observations are encouraged in order to confirm the nature of the optical counterpart and to monitor changes in optical brightness if the source turns out to be a foreground object. An optical redshift measurement would strictly limit the AGN hypothesis. The companion star of a foreground mCV should show distinct emission lines unlike the absorption line spectrum typical of globular clusters.

[^1]: NRC Senior Research Associate

[^2]: ARC Australian Research Fellow


address: Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Föhringer Ring 6, 80805 Germany
author: S. KLUTH
title: MEASUREMENT OF THE STRONG COUPLING $\alpha_S$ FROM THE 3-JET RATE IN $\mathrm{e^+e^-}$ ANNIHILATION USING JADE DATA

# Introduction

We report on the first measurement of $\ensuremath{\alpha_\mathrm{S}}(\ensuremath{m_{\mathrm{Z^0}}})$ from the 3-jet rate with the Durham algorithm with matched NNLO+NLLA QCD calculations . The first measurement of $\alpha_\mathrm{S}$ from $R_3$ with NNLO QCD calculations was shown in .

# JADE Detector and Data

The JADE detector was a universal and hermetic detector covering a solid angle of almost $4\pi$. The interaction point was surrounded by a large tracking detector (jet chamber) of 1.6 m diameter and 2.4 m length inside a solenoid magnet coil with a magnetic field of 0.48 T. Outside of the magnetic coil was the electromagnetic calorimeter consisting of 2520 lead glass blocks in the barrel section and 96 lead glass blocks in each endcap with a total acceptance of 90% of $4\pi$. The measurement of hadronic final states relies mainly on these two detector systems. More details can be found e.g. in .

The data used in the analysis are from the JADE experiment which operated at the PETRA $\mathrm{e^+e^-}$ collider at DESY in Hamburg, Germany, from 1979 to 1986. The main data samples were collected at centre-of-mass (cms) energies of 14, 22, 35, 38 and 44 GeV. The integrated luminosities range from about 1/pb at 14 and 22 GeV to about 100/pb at 35 GeV and correspond to sample sizes of O($10^3$) events at 14, 22, 38 and 44 GeV and O($10^5$) events at 35 GeV.

# QCD Predictions

The Durham jet clustering algorithm  defines $y_{ij}=2\min(E_i,E_j)^2(1-\cos\theta_{ij})/s$ as distance in phase space between a pair of particles or jets $i$ and $j$ with energies $E_i,E_j$ and angle $\theta_{ij}$ between them. The pair with the smallest $y_{ij}$ is combined by adding their 4-vectors, the particles or jets $i,j$ are removed and the combined 4-vector is added. This procedure is repeated until all $y_{ij}>\ensuremath{y_{\mathrm{cut}}}$. The 3-jet rate for a given value of $y_{\mathrm{cut}}$ at a cms energy $Q=\sqrt{s}$ is defined as $R_3(\ensuremath{y_{\mathrm{cut}}},Q)=N_{3-jet}(\ensuremath{y_{\mathrm{cut}}},Q)/N(Q)$, where $N_{3-jet}$ is the number of 3-jet events and $N$ is the total number of events in the sample. The 3-jet rate is a measurement of $\sigma_{3-jet}(\ensuremath{y_{\mathrm{cut}}},Q)/\sigma_{had}(Q)$ where $\sigma_{3-jet}(\ensuremath{y_{\mathrm{cut}}},Q)$ is the exclusive 3-jet cross section and $\sigma_{had}(Q)$ is the total hadronic cross section.

The NNLO QCD prediction  can be written as: $$R_{3,NNLO}(\ensuremath{y_{\mathrm{cut}}},Q)= A(\ensuremath{y_{\mathrm{cut}}})\ensuremath{\hat{\alpha}_\mathrm{S}}(Q) + B(\ensuremath{y_{\mathrm{cut}}})\ensuremath{\hat{\alpha}_\mathrm{S}}^2(Q) + C(\ensuremath{y_{\mathrm{cut}}})\ensuremath{\hat{\alpha}_\mathrm{S}}^3(Q)$$ with $\ensuremath{\hat{\alpha}_\mathrm{S}}(Q)=\ensuremath{\alpha_\mathrm{S}}(Q)/(2\pi)$. The coefficient functions $A(\ensuremath{y_{\mathrm{cut}}})$, $B(\ensuremath{y_{\mathrm{cut}}})$ and $C(\ensuremath{y_{\mathrm{cut}}})$ are obtained by numerical integration of the QCD matrix elements in LO, NLO or NNLO. The resummed NLLA calculations use an improved resummation scheme  and are matched to the NNLO prediction . Figure  (left) shows these QCD predictions as black band with renormalisation scale uncertainty defined by multiplying the renormalisation scale $\mu$ by a factor of $1/2$ or 2. The other bands show NLO and NLO+NLLA predictions for comparison. The theoretical uncertainties of the NNLO+NLLA prediction are significantly smaller compared to the less advanced predictions.

# Data Analysis

The data for the 3-jet rate $R_3$ are corrected for the effects of detector resolution and acceptance and for photon initial state radiation to the so-called hadron-level using samples of simulated events. The expected contributions from $\ensuremath{\mathrm{e^+e^-}}\rightarrow\ensuremath{\mathrm{b\bar{b}}}$ events are subtracted. The Monte Carlo generators PYTHIA 5.7, HERWIG 6.2 or ARIADNE 4.11 with parameter settings from OPAL are used to produce the simulated events together with a full simulation of the JADE detector. The corrected data for $R_3$ are well described by the simulations.

The QCD predictions have to be corrected for effects of the transition from the partons (quarks and gluons) of the theory to the particles of the hadronic final state. These so-called hadronisation corrections are taken from the samples of simulated events by comparing $R_3$ values after the parton shower has stopped (parton-level) and the hadron-level consisting of all particles with a lifetime larger than 300 ps. OPAL has compared for the observable [^1] $y_{23}$ the parton-level predictions of the theory and the simulation and found agreement within the differences between the three simulations . Thus it is justified to use the simulations to derive the hadronisation corrections, since the hadronisation systematic uncertainty evaluated by comparing the three simulations covers any discrepancies.

The theory is compared with the data using a $\chi^2$-fit with $\alpha_\mathrm{S}$ as a free parameter. The statistical correlations between the data points for $R_3(\ensuremath{y_{\mathrm{cut}}})$ are taken into account. Only data points within a restricted range of $y_{\mathrm{cut}}$ are used in the fits to ensure that the experimental and hadronisation corrections are under control and that the QCD predictions are reliable.

Several sources of systematic uncertainty are investigated. Experimental uncertainties are evaluated by repeating the analysis with different event selection cuts, reconstruction calibration versions, corrections for experimental effects, and with different fit ranges. The experimental uncertainties are dominated by the different detector calibrations and the detector corrections based on PYTHIA or HERWIG. Hadronisation uncertainties are estimated by changing the Monte Carlo generator for hadronisation corrections from PYTHIA to HERWIG or ARIADNE. The differences between PYHTIA and HERWIG determine this uncertainty. Theoretical systematic uncertainties are found by repeating the fits with the renormalisation scale factor $\ensuremath{x_{\mu}}=\mu/Q$ changed from $\ensuremath{x_{\mu}}=1$ to 0.5 or 2.

# Results

The fit of the NNLO+NLLA QCD prediction to the 3-jet rate data at $\sqrt{s}=35$ GeV is shown in figure  (right). The fitted prediction agrees well with the data corrected to the hadron-level within the fit range. The extrapolation to the other data points also gives a good description of the data. For this fit based on statistical errors we find $\ensuremath{\chi^2/\mathrm{d.o.f.}}=1.2$. The fits at the other cms energies are similar with $1.2<\ensuremath{\chi^2/\mathrm{d.o.f.}}<3.8$ except at $\sqrt{s}=14$ GeV where we have $\ensuremath{\chi^2/\mathrm{d.o.f.}}=6.3$. At the lowest cms energy the hadronisation corrections are significantly larger compared to the other cms energies. The individual fit results for $\alpha_\mathrm{S}$ are shown in figure  (left) as a function of the cms energy where they were obtained.

The individual results for $\alpha_\mathrm{S}$ are evolved to $\ensuremath{\alpha_\mathrm{S}}(\ensuremath{m_{\mathrm{Z^0}}})$ using the 3-loop evolution equations. Then they are combined into a single value taking account of correlated experiental, hadronisation and theory uncertainties as described in . The result from $\sqrt{s}=14$ GeV is excluded from the combined value since it has a much larger value of $\chi^2/\mathrm{d.o.f.}$ and larger hadronisation corrections compared to the other results. The combined value is $$\ensuremath{\ensuremath{\alpha_\mathrm{S}}(\ensuremath{m_{\mathrm{Z^0}}})}= 0.1199\pm0.0010\ensuremath{\mathrm{(stat.)}}\pm0.0021\ensuremath{\mathrm{(exp.)}}\pm0.0054\ensuremath{\mathrm{(had.)}}\pm0.0007\ensuremath{\mathrm{(theo.)}}\;\;.$$ The errors are dominated by the hadronisation correction uncertainties.

As a cross check the analysis is repeated with NNLO QCD predictions using the same fit ranges with $\ensuremath{x_{\mu}}=1$. We find larger values of $\chi^2/\mathrm{d.o.f.}$, a less satisfactory description of the $R_3$ data and larger uncertainties from variations of the fit ranges compared to the NNLO+NLLA fits. The NNLO predictions do not reproduce the slope of the $R_3(\ensuremath{y_{\mathrm{cut}}})$ data as well as the NNLO+NLLA predictions. A similar observation can be made in the analysis of .

In figure  (right) the result of this analysis is compared with other measurements of $\ensuremath{\alpha_\mathrm{S}}(\ensuremath{m_{\mathrm{Z^0}}})$ using the 3-jet or 4-jet rate based on the Durham algorithm. The JADE measurement with $y_{23}$ is highly correlated with our measurement using $R_3$ and the good agreement of the results is a strong consistency check. The agreement with the other results and with the world average value is also satisfactory within the uncertainties.

# Conclusion

We have shown the first measurement of $\ensuremath{\alpha_\mathrm{S}}(\ensuremath{m_{\mathrm{Z^0}}})$ using the 3-jet rate with the Durham algorithm and matched NNLO+NLLA QCD calculations and data from the JADE experiment. The agreement between data and the NNLO+NLLA QCD prediction is improved compared to less advanced predictions. The errors are dominated by the hadronisation correction uncertainties as expected at the low cms energies of the JADE experiment. However, the data of the JADE experiment at comparatively small cms energies can now be analysed with rather good precision thanks to the progress in perturbative QCD calculations and Monte Carlo simulations made since the data were recorded. Our analysis provides an independent and strong cross check on those recent QCD calculations made for the LHC which have related Feynman diagrams or share calculation techniques.

# References

[^1]: The distribution of $y_{ij}$ values for which events change from 2 jets to 3 jets.


author: Matti Lindroos$^{1,2}$; Ville Arpiainen$^{1}$; A. Bansil$^{2}$
title: **Reply to Comment on Circular Dichroism in the Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectrum of the High-Temperature Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_8$ Superconductor, http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.1648**

Our purpose in Ref. 1 was to carry out a realistic first-principles angle-resolved photointensity (ARPES) computation to assess the importance of geometric effects in inducing dichroism in the curpates, and not so much to focus on the results of Ref. 2. Using the known low- and high-temperature (LT and HT) bulk crystal structures of Bi2212, we showed that the orthorohombic distortion in the Bi-O plane in going from the HT to the LT structure yields an increase in the dichroic signal of 1.5 to 3.5%, depending on photon energy, which is comparable to the dichroic effect of 3% reported in Ref. 2. Moreover, our computed dichroic signal of 6% at 49.7 eV photon energy for the HT structure is comparable to the 5% effect reported on single crystals \[3\]. Thus, we clearly established the sensitivity of dichroism to structural details and the viability of the geometric mechanism in explaining existing measurements, and demonstrated that the detection of time reversal symmetry breaking via ARPES will be complicated by the masking effects of lattice distortions.

The structure of thin films of Ref. 2, especially how this structure varies with temperature/doping, is unknown. That the films were heavily twinned is revealed by the authors for the first time in their present Comment, but how the population of the two twins varies with doping or temperature is not known. Since the films display weak superstructure, one may speculate that these films are structurally closer to Pb-doped rather than non-Pb-doped crystals. Unfortunately, however, experiments on Pb-doped crystals \[3\] found a zero dichroic signal at low- as well as high-T, suggesting that the observed dichroism in Ref. 2 is peculiar to films. To date, the thin-film measurement of Ref. 2 is the only ARPES experiment in the literature reporting a non-zero dichroic effect at low-T.

We emphasize that a 1% dichroic effect can be induced by an in-plane movement of O-atoms in the BiO layer by only 0.03 Å, which is well below the accuracy with which lateral positions of surface atoms can be determined currently via surface sensitive probes. Given the sensitivity of dichroism to structrural details it will be prudent to keep the following further points in mind in interpreting dichroic effects and their temperature/doping dependencies: (1) ARPES is a surface-sensitive probe, and the surface structure of thin-films or single crystals will in general be different from bulk. We employed an ideal Bi-O terminated semi-infinite crystal in our computations because the detailed surface structure is unknown (x-ray scattering is not sensitive to surface structure); (2) Surface structure will likely be more sensitive than bulk to temperature; (3) Ref. 2 reports sample to sample variation in dichroism, which they ascribe to changes in domain structure. If so, such domain variations may become exaggerated in the surface region. Our simulations show that 1% dichroic effect can result from only a 4% change in the population of one twin; (4) Additional complications involve effects of disorder and layer-to-layer variations in structure in the surface region.

We would expect the computed momentum and energy dependencies of the dichroic signal to be even more sensitive to structural details than the size of the dichroic signal. Therefore, the detailed comparisons of the sort alluded to in the Comment between our computations on an ideal Bi-O terminated bulk structure and experiments on thin films, where the computations and measurements refer to different structures, are not of much relevance.

Finally, we note that structural issues with the study of Ref. 2 have been raised earlier in the comments contained in Refs. 4 and 5. We refer to those comments and responses for details of these and other issues raised previously in the literature on the study of Ref. 2.

We conclude that arguments of Norman et al. in their present Comment do not provide a significant basis for their claim that the geometric mechanism for explaining the observations reported in Ref. 2 is not viable. More generally, our study \[1\] highlights the importance of assessing structural issues before invoking exotic mechanisms for explaining unusual spectroscopic observations, especially in complex materials.

Work supported by the Division of Materials Science and Engineering (U.S.D.O.E.) under 07ER46352.


abstract: A deep learning approach has been proposed recently to derive speaker identifies (d-vector) by a deep neural network (DNN). This approach has been applied to text-dependent speaker recognition tasks and shows reasonable performance gains when combined with the conventional i-vector approach. Although promising, the existing d-vector implementation still can not compete with the i-vector baseline. This paper presents two improvements for the deep learning approach: a phone-dependent DNN structure to normalize phone variation, and a new scoring approach based on dynamic time warping (DTW). Experiments on a text-dependent speaker recognition task demonstrated that the proposed methods can provide considerable performance improvement over the existing d-vector implementation.
author:
bibliography: segvector.bib
title: Improved Deep Speaker Feature Learning for Text-Dependent Speaker Recognition

: d-vector, time dynamic warping, speaker recognition

# Introduction

Most modern speaker recognition systems are based on human-crafted acoustic features, for example the Mel frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC). A problem of the MFCC (and other primary features) is that it involves plethora information besides the speaker identity, such as phone content, channels, noises, etc. These heterogeneous and noisy information convolve together, making it difficult to be used for either speech recognition or speaker recognition. All modern speaker recognition systems rely on a statical model to 'purify' the desired speaker information. For example, in the famous Gaussian mixture model-universal background model (GMM-UBM) framework , the acoustic space is divided into subspaces in the form of Gaussian components, and each subspace roughly represents a phone. By formulating the speaker recognition task as subtasks on the phone subspaces, the GMM-UBM model can largely eliminate the impact of phone content and other acoustic factors. This idea is shared by many advanced techniques derived from GMM-UBM, including the joint factor analysis (JFA)  and the i-vector model .

In spite of the great success, the GMM-UBM approach and the related methods are still limited by the lack of discriminative capability of the acoustic features. Some researchers proposed solutions based on discriminative models. For example, the SVM approach for GMM-UBMs  and the PLDA approach for i-vectors . All these discriminative methods achieved remarkable success. Another direction is to look for more task-oriented features, i.e., features that are more discriminative for speaker recognition . Although it seems to be straightforward, this 'feature engineering' turns out to be highly difficult. A major reason, in our mind, is that most of the proposed delicate features are human-crafted and therefore tend to be fragile in practical usage.

Recent research on deep learning offers a new idea of 'feature learning'. It has been shown that with a deep neural network (DNN), task-oriented features can be learned layer by layer from very raw input. For example in automatic speech recognition (ASR), phone-discriminative features can be learned from spectra or filter bank energies (Fbanks). This learned features are very powerful and have defeated the MFCC that has dominated in ASR for several decades . This capability of DNNs in learning task-oriented features can be utilized to learn speaker-discriminative features as well. A recent study shows that this is possible at least on text-dependent tasks . The authors reported that reasonable performance can be achieved with the DNN-learned feature, and additional performance gains can be obtained by combining the DNN-based approach and the i-vector approach.

Although the DNN-based feature learning shows great potential, the existing implementation still can not compete with the i-vector baseline. There are at least two drawbacks with the current implementation: First, the DNN model does not use any information about the phone content, which leads to difficulty when inferring speaker-discriminative features; second, the evaluation (speaker scoring) is based on speaker vectors (so called 'd-vectors'), which are derived by averaging the frame-wise DNN features. This simple average ignores the temporal constraint that is highly important for text-dependent tasks. Note that for tasks with a fixed test phrase, the two drawbacks are closely linked to each other.

This paper follows the work in  and provides two enhancements for the DNN-based feature learning: First, phone posteriors are involved in the DNN input so that speaker-discriminative features can be learned easier by alleviating the impact of phone variation; second, two scoring methods that consider the temporal constraint are proposed: segmentation pooling and dynamic time warping (DTW) .

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section  describes some related work, and Section  presents the DNN-based feature learning. The new methods are proposed in Section  and the experiments are presented in Section . Finally, Section  concludes this paper and discusses some future work.

# Related work

This paper follows the work in  and provides several extensions. Particularly, the speaker identity in  is represented by a d-vector derived by average pooling, which is quite neat and efficient, but loses much information of the test signal, such as the distributional property and the temporal constraint. One of the main contribution of this paper is to investigate how to utilize the temporal constraint in the DNN-based approach.

The DNN model has been studied in speaker recognition in several ways. For example, in , DNNs trained for ASR were used to replace the UBM model to derive the acoustic statistics for i-vector models. In , a DNN was used to replace PLDA to improve discriminative capability of i-vectors. All these methods rely on the generative framework, i.e., the i-vector model. The DNN-based feature learning presented in this paper is purely discriminative, without any generative model involved.

# DNN-based feature learning

It is well-known that DNNs can learn task-oriented features from raw input layer by layer. This property has been employed in ASR where phone-discriminative features are learned from very low-level features such as Fbanks or even spectra . It has been shown that with a well-trained DNN, variations irrelevant to the learning task can be gradually eliminated when the feature propagates through the DNN structure layer by layer. This feature learning is so powerful that in ASR, the primary Fbank feature has defeated the MFCC feature that was carefully designed by people and dominated in ASR for several decades.

This property can be also employed to learn speaker-discriminative features. Actually researchers have put much effort in searching for features that are more discriminative for speakers , but the effort is mostly vain and the MFCC is still the most popular choice. The success of DNNs in ASR suggests a new direction, that speaker-discriminative features can be learned from data instead of being crafted by hand. The learning can be easily done and the process is rather similar as in ASR, with the only difference that in speaker recognition, the learning goal is to discriminate different speakers.

Fig.  presents the DNN structure used in this work for speaker-discriminative feature learning. Following the convention of ASR, the input layer involves a window of 20-dimensional Fbanks. The window size is set to $21$, which was found to be optimal in our work. The DNN structure involves $4$ hidden layers, and each consists of $200$ units. The units of the output layer correspond to the speakers in the training data, and the number is $80$ in our experiment. The 1-hot encoding scheme is used to label the target, and the training criterion is set to cross entropy. The learning rate is set to $0.008$ at the beginning, and is halved whenever no improvement on a cross-validation (CV) set is found. The training process stops when the learning rate is too small and the improvement on the CV set is too marginal. Once the DNN has been trained successfully, the speaker-discriminative features can be read from the last hidden layer.

In the test phase, the features are extracted for all frames of the given utterance. To derive utterance-based representations, an average pooling approach was used in , where the frame-level features are averaged and the resultant vector is used to represent the speaker. This vector is called 'd-vector' in , and we adopt this name in this work. The same methods used for i-vectors can be used for d-vectors to conduct the test, for example by computing the cosine distance or the PLDA score.

## Comparison between i-vectors and d-vectors

The two kinds of speaker vectors, the d-vector and the i-vector, are fundamentally different. I-vectors are based on a linear Gaussian model, for which the learning is unsupervised and the learning criterion is maximum likelihood on acoustic features; in contrast, d-vectors are based on neural networks, for which the learning is supervised, and the learning criterion is maximum discrimination for speakers. This difference leads to several advantages with d-vectors: First, it is a 'discriminative' vector, which represents speakers by removing speaker-irrelevant variance, and so sensitive to speakers and invariant to other disturbance; second, it is a 'local' speaker description that uses only local context, so can be inferred from very short utterances; third, it relies on 'universal' data to learn the DNN model, which makes it possible to learn from large amounts of data that are task-independent.

# Improved deep feature learning

There are several limitations in the implementation of the feature learning paradigm presented in the previous section. First, it does not involve any prior knowledge in model training, for example phone identities. Second, the simple average pooling does not consider the temporal information which is particularly important for text-dependent recognition tasks. Several approaches are proposed in this section to address these problems.

## Phone-dependent training

A potential problem of the DNN-based feature learning described in the previous section is that it is a 'blind learning', i.e., the features are learned from raw data without any prior knowledge. This means that the learning purely relies on the complex deep structure of the DNN model and a large amount of data to discover speaker-discriminative patterns. If the training data is abundant, this is often not a problem; however in tasks with a limited amount of data, for instance the text-dependent task in our hand, this blind learning tends to be difficult because there are too many speaker-irrelevant variations involved in the raw data, particularly phone contents.

A possible solution is to supply the DNN model extra information about which phone is spoken at each frame. This can be simply achieved by adding a phone indicator in the DNN input. However, it is often not easy to get the phone alignment in practice. An alternative way is to supply a vector of phone posterior probabilities for each frame, which is a 'soft' phone alignment and can be easily obtained from a phone-discriminative model. In this work, we choose to use a DNN model that was trained for ASR to produce the phone posteriors. Fig.  illustrates how the phone posteriors are involved in the DNN structure. The training process does not change for the new structure.

## Segment pooling and dynamic time warping

Text-dependent speaker recognition is essentially a sequential pattern matching problem, but the current d-vector approach derives speaker identities as single vectors by average pooling, and then formulates speaker recognition as vector matching. This is certainly not ideal as the temporal constraint is totally ignored when deriving the speaker vector. A possible solution is to segment an enrollment/test utterance into several pieces, and derive the speaker vector for each piece. The speaker identity of the utterance is then represented by the sequence of the piece-wise speaker vectors, and speaker matching is conducted by matching the corresponding vector sequences. This paper adopts a simple sequence matching approach: the two sequences are assumed to be identical in length, and the matching is conducted piece by piece independently. Finally the matching score takes the average of scores on all the pieces.

Note that for the i-vector approach, this segmentation method is not feasible, since i-vectors are inferred from feature distributions and so the piece-wised solution simply degrades the quality of the i-vector of each piece. For d-vectors, this approach is totally fine as they are inferred from local context and the segmentation does not impact quality of the piece-wise d-vectors very much.

A more theoretical treatment is based on dynamic time warping (DTW) . The DTW algorithm is a principle way to measure similarities between two variable-length temporal sequences. In the most simple sense, DTW searches for an optimal path that matches two sequences with the lowest cost, by employing the dynamic programming (DP) method to reduce the search complexity. In our task, the DNN-extracted features of an utterance are treated as a temporal sequence. In test, the sequence derived from the enrollment utterance and the sequence derived from the test utterance are matched by DTW, where the cosine distance is used to measure the similarity between two frame-level DNN features. Principally, segment pooling can be regarded as a special case of DTW, where the two sequences are in the same length, and the matching between the two sequences is piece-wise.

# Experiments

## Database

The experiments are performed on a database that involves a limited set of short phrases. The entire database contains recordings of $10$ short phrases from $100$ speakers (gender balanced), and each phrase contains $2\sim5$ Chinese characters. For each speaker, every phrase is recorded $15$ times, amounting to $150$ utterances per speaker.

The training set involves $80$ randomly selected speakers, which results in $12000$ utterances in total. To prevent over-fitting, a cross-validation (CV) set containing $1000$ utterances is selected from the training data, and the remaining $11000$ utterances are used for model training, including the DNN model in the d-vector approach, and the UBM, the T matrix, the LDA and PLDA model in the i-vector approach.

The evaluation set consists of the remaining $20$ speakers. The evaluation is performed for each particular phrase. For each phrase, there are $44850$ trails, including $2100$ target trails and $42750$ non-target trials. For the sake of neat presentation, we report the results with $5$ short phrases and use 'Pn' to denote the n-th phrase. The conclusions obtained here generalize well to other phrases.

## Baseline

Two baseline systems are built, one is based on i-vectors and the other is based on d-vectors. The acoustic features of the i-vector system are $39$-dimensional MFCCs, which consist of $13$ static components (including C0) and the first- and second-order derivatives. The number of Gaussian components of the UBM is $128$, and the dimension of the i-vector is $200$. The d-vector baseline uses the DNN structure shown in Fig. . The average pooling is used to derive d-vectors. The acoustic features are $40$-dimensional Fbanks, with the left and right $10$ frames concatenated together. The frame-level features are extracted from the last hidden layer, and the dimension is $200$.

Table  presents the results in terms of equal error rate (EER). It can be seen that the i-vector system generally outperforms the d-vector system in a significant way. Particularly, the discriminative methods (LDA and PLDA) clearly improves the i-vector system, however for the d-vector system, no improvement was found by these methods. This is not surprising, since the d-vectors have been discriminative by themselves. For this reason, LDA and PLDA are not considered any more for d-vectors in the following experiments.

|          |        |  EER%  |       |       |
|:---------|:------:|:------:|:-----:|:-----:|
|          | Phrase | cosine |  LDA  | PLDA  |
| i-vector |   P1   |  2.86  | 1.81  | 1.71  |
|          |   P2   |  1.52  | 2.29  | 1.57  |
|          |   P3   |  3.43  | 3.05  | 3.05  |
|          |   P4   |  3.19  | 2.86  | 2.71  |
|          |   P5   |  3.57  | 3.00  | 2.67  |
| d-vector |   P1   | 10.29  | 9.81  | 12.67 |
|          |   P2   | 10.52  | 10.57 | 12.29 |
|          |   P3   | 10.10  | 9.33  | 10.48 |
|          |   P4   | 10.38  | 9.95  | 11.10 |
|          |   P5   |  9.14  | 9.29  | 11.10 |

Performance of baseline systems

## phone-dependent learning

In this experiment, the phone posteriors are included in the DNN input, as shown in Fig. . The phone posteriors are produced by a DNN model that was trained for ASR with a Chinese database consisting of $6000$ hours of speech data. The phone set consists of $66$ toneless initial and finals in Chinese, plus the silence phone. The results are shown in the second row of Table , denoted by 'DNN+PT'. It can be seen that the phone-dependent training leads to marginal but consistent performance improvement for the d-vector system.

|              | EER%  |       |       |       |      |
|:-------------|:-----:|:-----:|:-----:|:-----:|:----:|
|              |  P1   |  P2   |  P3   |  P4   |  P5  |
| DNN baseline | 10.29 | 10.52 | 10.10 | 10.38 | 9.14 |
| DNN+PT       | 10.24 | 10.05 | 9.81  | 9.48  | 8.71 |
| DNN+PT+SEG   | 9.95  | 8.90  | 8.95  | 9.76  | 8.67 |
| DNN+PT+DTW   | 9.14  | 8.38  | 8.52  | 8.86  | 8.14 |

Performance with improved DNN feature learning

## Segment pooling and DTW

As presented in Section , the segment pooling approach segments an input utterance into $n$ pieces, and derives a d-vector for each piece. The scoring is conducted on the piece-wise d-vectors independently, and the average of scores on these pieces is taken as the utterance-level score. The results are shown in Fig. , where seg-$n$ means that each utterance is segmented into $n$ pieces. It can be seen that segment pooling offers clear performance improvement.

For a more clear comparison, the EER results with $3$ segments are shown in Table , denoted by 'DNN+PT+SEG'. It is clear to see that by the segmentation, significant performance is obtained.

The DTW results are shown in the fourth row of Table , denoted by 'DNN+PT+DTW'. It can be observed that DTW generally outperforms segment pooling.

|             | EER% |      |      |      |      |
|:------------|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|
|             |  P1  |  P2  |  P3  |  P4  |  P5  |
| PLDA        | 1.71 | 1.57 | 3.05 | 2.71 | 2.67 |
| DNN+PT+DTW  | 9.14 | 8.38 | 8.52 | 8.86 | 8.14 |
| Combination | 1.52 | 1.38 | 2.33 | 2.33 | 2.38 |

Performance of system combination

## System combination

Following , we combine the best i-vector system (PLDA) and the best d-vector system (DNN+PT+DTW). The combination is simply done by interpolating the scores obtained from the two systems: $\alpha s_{iv} + (1-\alpha) s_{dv}$, where $s_{iv}$ and $s_{dv}$ are scores from the i-vector and d-vector systems respectively, and $\alpha$ is the interpolation factor. The EER results with the optimal $\alpha$ are shown in Table . It can be seen that the combination leads to the best performance we can obtain so far.

# Conclusions

This paper presented several enhancements for the DNN-based feature learning approach in speaker recognition. We presented a phone-dependent DNN model to supply phonetic information when learning speaker features, and proposed two scoring methods based on a segment pooling and DTW respectively to leverage temporal constraints. These extensions significantly improved performance of the d-vector system. Future work involves investigating more complicated statistical models for d-vectors, and use large amounts of data to learn more powerful speaker-discriminative features.


abstract: Complexity measures are essential to understand complex systems and there are numerous definitions to analyze one-dimensional data. However, extensions of these approaches to two or higher-dimensional data, such as images, are much less common. Here, we reduce this gap by applying the ideas of the permutation entropy combined with a relative entropic index. We build up a numerical procedure that can be easily implemented to evaluate the complexity of two or higher-dimensional patterns. We work out this method in different scenarios where numerical experiments and empirical data were taken into account. Specifically, we have applied the method to $i)$ fractal landscapes generated numerically where we compare our measures with the Hurst exponent; $ii)$ liquid crystal textures where nematic-isotropic-nematic phase transitions were properly identified; $iii)$ 12 characteristic textures of liquid crystals where the different values show that the method can distinguish different phases; $iv)$ and Ising surfaces where our method identified the critical temperature and also proved to be stable.
author: Haroldo V. Ribeiro; Luciano Zunino; Ervin K. Lenzi; Perseu A. Santoro; Renio S. Mendes
date: 2024-10-02
title: Complexity-Entropy Causality Plane as a Complexity Measure for Two-dimensional Patterns

# Introduction

Investigations related to the so called complex systems are widely spread among different scientific communities, ranging from physics and biology to economy and psychology. A considerable part of these works deals with empirical data aiming to extract patterns, regularities or laws that rule the dynamics of the system. In this direction, the concept of complexity measures often emerges. Complexity measures can compare empirical data such as time series and classify them in somewhere between regular, chaotic or random , while other complexity measures can differentiate between degrees of correlations . Examples of these measures include algorithmic complexity , entropies , relative entropies , fractal dimensions , and Lyapunov exponents . These seminal works are still motivating new definitions, and today there are numerous definitions of complexity, which have been successful applied to different areas such as medicine , ecology , astrophysics , and music .

It is surprising that this large number of complexity measures is mainly focused on one-dimensional data, while much less attention has been paid to two and higher-dimensional structures such as images. Naturally, there are few exceptions such as the work of Grassberger  and more recent Refs. , though some of the authors of these papers agree that a higher-dimensional approach still represents an open and subtle problem. Furthermore, as it was stated by Bandt and Pompe , most of the complexity measures depend on specific algorithms or recipes for processing the data which may also depend on tuning parameters. As a direct consequence, there are huge difficulties for reproducing previous results without the knowledge of details of the methods.

Bandt and Pompe not only raised this problem, but they also proposed an alternative method that tries to overcome the previous problems, introducing what they call *permutation entropy* — a *natural* complexity measure for time series. There are many recent applications of this new technique that confirm its usefulness  . In particular, Rosso et al.  have successful applied the Bandt and Pompe ideas together with a relative entropic measure  to differentiate chaotic time series from stochastic ones. They have constructed a diagram, which was first proposed by López-Ruiz et al. , (called as complexity-entropy causality plane) by plotting the relative entropic measure versus the permutation entropy. Intriguingly, chaotic and stochastic series are located in different regions of this representation space.

Here, we show that the complexity-entropy causality plane can be extended for higher-dimensional patterns. We apply this new approach in different scenarios related to two-dimensional structures and the results indicate that the method is very promising for distinguishing between two-dimensional patterns. The following sections are organized as follows. Section II is devoted to review briefly the properties of the permutation information-theory-derived quantifiers and the complexity-entropy causality plane, and also to define an appropriate way to generalize these definitions to higher-dimensional data. In Section III, we work out several applications based on numerical and empirical data. Section IV presents a summary of our results.

# Methods

The ingenious idea of Bandt and Pompe  was to define a measure that may be easily applied to any type of time series. The method lies on associating symbolic sequences to the segments of the time series based on the existence of local order, and next, by using probability distribution associated to these symbols, to estimate the complexity quantifier. For purpose of definition, let us consider a time series $\{x_t\}_{t=1,\dots,n}$ composed by $n$ elements and also $d$-dimensional vectors ($d>1$) defined by $$(s)\mapsto (x_{s-(d-1)},x_{s-(d-2)},\dots,x_{s-1},x_{s})\;,$$ where $s=d,d+1,\dots,n$. Next, for all the $(n-d+1)$ vectors, we evaluate the permutations of $(0,1,\dots,d-1)$ defined by $x_{s-r_{d-1}}\leq x_{s-r_{d-2}}\leq \dots \leq x_{s-r_{1}} \leq x_{s-r_{0}}$. The $d\, !$ possible permutations of $\pi$ will be the accessible states of the system, and for each state we estimate the ordinal pattern probability given by $$p(\pi) = \frac{\#\{s|s\leq n-d+1;~ (s) ~\text{has type}~ \pi \}}{n-d+1}\;,$$ where the symbol $\#$ stands for the number of occurrences of the permutation $\pi$. Now, we can apply the ordinal patterns probability distribution, $P=\{p(\pi)\}$, to estimate a complexity measure based on some entropic formulation.

Before advancing, we note that the previous method may be extended to higher-dimensional data structures such as images. In order to do this, we consider that the system is now represented by a two-dimensional array $\{y_{i}^{j}\}_{i=1,\dots,n_x}^{j=1,\dots,n_y}$ of size $n_x \times n_y$. In analogy to the vector $(s)$, we define $d_x\times d_y$ matrices ($d_x,d_y>1$) given by $$\begin{footnotesize}
(s_x,s_y) \mapsto
\left(
\begin{array}{ccccc}
y_{s_x-(d_x-1)}^{s_y-(d_y-1)} & y_{s_x-(d_x-2)}^{s_y-(d_y-1)} & \dots & y_{s_x-1}^{s_y-(d_y-1)} & y_{s_x}^{s_y-(d_y-1)}\\
y_{s_x-(d_x-1)}^{s_y-(d_y-2)} & y_{s_x-(d_x-2)}^{s_y-(d_y-2)} & \dots & y_{s_x-1}^{s_y-(d_y-2)} & y_{s_x}^{s_y-(d_y-2)}\\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \vdots\\
y_{s_x-(d_x-1)}^{s_y-1} & y_{s_x-(d_x-2)}^{s_y-1} & \dots & y_{s_x-1}^{s_y-1} & y_{s_x}^{s_y-1}\\
y_{s_x-(d_x-1)}^{s_y} & y_{s_x-(d_x-2)}^{s_y} & \dots & y_{s_x-1}^{s_y} & y_{s_x}^{s_y}\\
\end{array} \right)\,,
\end{footnotesize}$$ where $s_x=d_x,d_x+1,\dots,n_x$ and $s_y=d_y,d_y+1,\dots,n_y$. Next, for all these $(n_x-d_x+1)(n_y-d_y+1)$ matrices, we evaluate the permutations $\pi=[(r_0,u_0),(r_1,u_0),\dots,(r_{d_x-1},u_0), \dots,(r_0,u_{d_y-1}),$ $(r_1,u_{d_y-1}),\dots,(r_{d_x-1},u_{d_y-1})]$ of $(0,1,\dots,d_x\,d_y-1)$ defined by $y_{s_x-r_{d_x-1}}^{s_y-u_{d_y-1}}\leq y_{s_x-r_{d-2}}^{s_y-u_{d_y-1}}\leq \dots \leq y_{s_x-r_{1}}^{s_y-u_{d_y-1}} \leq y_{s_x-r_{0}}^{s_y-u_{d_y-1}} \leq \dots \leq
y_{s_x-r_{d_x-1}}^{s_y-u_0}\leq y_{s_x-r_{d-2}}^{s_y-u_0}\leq \dots \leq y_{s_x-r_{1}}^{s_y-u_0} \leq y_{s_x-r_{0}}^{s_y-u_0}$. The system can now access $(d_x\,d_y)!$ states for which we calculate the probability distribution $P=\{p(\pi)\}$ through the relative frequencies given by $$p(\pi) = \frac{\#\{(s_x,s_y)|s_x\leq n_x-d_x+1~\text{and}~s_y\leq n_y-d_y+1;~ (s_x,s_y) ~\text{has type}~ \pi \}}
{(n_x-d_x+1)(n_y-d_y+1)}\;.$$ For easier understanding, we illustrate this procedure for a small array in Fig. .

Naturally, the order procedure that defines the permutation $\pi$ is no longer unique as in the one-dimensional case. For instance, instead of ordering the elements of $(s_x,s_y)$ row-by-row, we could also order column-by-column. However, these other definitions will only change the "name" of the states in such a way that the set $P=\{p(\pi)\}$ will remain unchanged. Thus, there is no lost of generalization in assuming a given order recipe for defining $\pi$.

We note that this procedure is straightforward generalized to accomplish higher-dimensional structures (e.g., the volumetric brain images obtained via functional magnetic resonance imaging), and that it recovers the one-dimensional case by setting $n_y=1$ and $d_y=1$. Here, for simplicity, we focus our analysis on two-dimensional structures.

The parameters $d_x$ and $d_y$ (known as embedding dimensions) play an important role in the estimation of the permutation probability distribution $P$, since they determine the number of accessible states. In the one-dimensional case, it is usual to choose $d\,!\ll n$ in order to obtain reliable statistics in the one-dimensional case (for practical purposes, Bandt and Pompe recommend $d=3,\dots,7$ ). For the two-dimensional case a similar relationship must hold, i.e., $(d_x d_y)!\ll n_x n_y$.

To go further, we need to rewrite the entropic measures used in Refs. . The first one is called normalized permutation entropy  and it is obtained by applying the Shannon's entropy to the probabilities $P=\{p(\pi)\}$, i.e., $$\label{eq:entropy}
H[P]=\frac{S[P]}{S_{\text{max}}} \;,$$ where $S[P]=-\sum p(\pi) \log p(\pi)$ and $S_{\text{max}}=\log [(d_x d_y)!]$. The value of $S_{\text{max}}$ is obtained by considering all the $(d_x d_y)!$ accessible states to be equiprobable, i.e., $P=P_e=1/(d_x d_y)!$. By definition, $0 \leq H[P] \leq 1$, where the upper bound occurs for a completely random array. We expect $H[P]<1$ for arrays that exhibit some kind of correlated dynamics.

The other measure  is defined by $$\label{eq:rosso}
C[P]=Q[P,P_e]\,H[P]\,,$$ where $Q[P,P_e]$ is a relative entropic metric between the empirical ordinal probability $P=\{p(\pi)\}$ and the equiprobable state $P_e=1/(d_x d_y)!$. The quantity $Q[P,P_e]$ is known as disequilibrium and it is defined in terms of the Jensen-Shannon divergence  (or also in terms of a symmetrized Kullback-Leibler divergence ) and can be written as $$Q[P,P_e] = \frac{S[(P+P_e)/2] - S[P]/2 - S[P_e]/2}{Q_{\text{max}}}\,,$$ where $$Q_{\text{max}} = -\frac{1}{2}\left\{ \frac{(d_x d_y)!+1}{(d_x d_y)!} \log[(d_x d_y)!+1] -
2 \log[2 (d_x d_y)!] + \log[(d_x d_y)!] \right\}\,$$ is the maximum possible value of $Q[P,P_e]$, obtained when one of the components of $P$ is equal to one and all the other vanish.

The disequilibrium $C$ quantifies the degree of correlational structures providing important additional information that may not be carried only by the permutation entropy. In addition, for a given $H[P]$ value there exists a range of possible values for $C[P]$ . This is the main reason why Rosso et al.  proposed to employ a diagram of $C[P]$ versus $H[P]$ as a diagnostic tool, building up the complexity-entropy causality plane.

# Applications

In the following, we will calculate the diagram of $C[P]$ versus $H[P]$ to measure the complexity and to distinguish among different two-dimensional patterns.

## Fractal Surfaces

We generate fractal surfaces through the random midpoint displacement algorithm . This algorithm starts with a square. For each vertex, we assign a random value representing the surface height. Next, we add a new point located at the center of the initial square. We set the height of this point equal to the average height of the previous four vertex plus a Gaussian random number with zero mean and standard-deviation $\delta_1$. We also add four points located at the middle segments which connects each initial vertex. For these four points, the heights are equal to the average value between the two closest vertex and the middle point plus a Gaussian random number with zero mean and standard-deviation $\delta_1$. Now, we imagine that these 9 points represent four new squares and, for each one, we apply the previous procedure using $\delta_2$. By repeating this process $k$ times and using $\delta_k=\delta_0 \,2^{-\frac{k h}{2}}$, we should obtain a square surface of side $2^{k}+1$ with fractal properties. Here, $h$ is the Hurst exponent and $D=3-h$ is the surface fractal dimension. Figure shows several surfaces generated through this procedure for different values of $h$.

We apply our method for these surfaces aiming to verify how the permutation quantifiers $H$ and $C$ change with the Hurst exponent $h$, as it is shown in Fig. . In these 3d plots, we show the localization in the causality plane obtained for different values of $h$ evaluated from $1025\times1025$ surfaces ($k=10$). In Fig. a, we use $d_x=2$ and $d_y=3$ (circles), and $d_x=3$ and $d_y=2$ (squares) as embedding dimensions. Note that the values of $H$ and $C$ are practically invariant under the rotation $d_x\to d_y$ and $d_y\to d_x$. This invariance is related to the fact that in these fractal surfaces there is not preferential direction. In Fig. b, we employ $d_x=3$ and $d_y=3$. We note basically the same dependence but a different range for $H$ and $C$, since this change increases the number of accessible states. These results show that our method properly differentiates fractal surfaces concerning the Hurst exponent. Moreover, we investigate the robustness of the permutation quantifiers under several realizations of the random midpoint displacement algorithm and the results show that both indexes are very stable. For example, the standard-deviation in the values of $H$ and $C$ are usually smaller than $10^{-4}$ when considering $k=10$.

## Liquid Crystal Textures

Another interesting application is related to different patterns that a thin film of a liquid crystal exhibits. These textures are obtained by observing a thin sample of liquid crystal placed between two crossed polarizers in a microscope. The textures give useful information about the macroscopic structure of the liquid crystal. For instance, different phases have different typical textures, and by tracking their evolution one can properly identify the phase transition.

We first study a lyotropic liquid crystal under isotropic-nematic-isotropic phase transition. Figure  shows three snapshots of the texture at different temperatures. In this case, we clearly note the differences in the textures. The leftmost and rightmost textures are at the isotropic phase while the middle one is at the nematic phase. We observe that the pattern is very complex for the nematic phase, while for the isotropic one it is basically random.

We calculate $H$ and $C$ as a function of the temperature for different values of the embedding dimensions, as it is shown in Fig. . In these plots, the different shaded regions represent the different liquid crystal phases. We note that the phase transitions are successful identified independently of $d_x$ and $d_y$. However, Fig c and d show a slight different dependence of $H$ and $C$ versus the temperature when considering $d_x=2$ and $d_y=3$ or $d_x=3$ and $d_y=2$. Because the liquid crystal sample is placed in elongated capillary tube, there is a surface effect that act on the liquid crystal molecules. This effect is usually amplified at the phase transition and it is also the reason for differences between the embedding dimensions.

In this particular phase transition, the difference between the textures are large enough that it can be identified just by visual inspection. However, this is not the usual case and many phase transitions are very difficult to identify. In this context, an interesting question is whether our method can help to distinguish different phases. To address this question, we evaluate $H$ and $C$ for twelve characteristic textures of different liquid crystals. We download these textures from the webpage of the Liquid Crystal Institute at Kent State University  and Fig.  shows the value of $H$ and $C$ for each texture in the causality plane. The results allow to conclude that the method ranks the textures in a kind of complexity order where each characteristic texture occupies a different place in this representation space. Moreover, the different values of $H$ and $C$ indicate that the permutation quantifiers can also identify smooth phase transitions.

Naturally, the location of each texture in the causality plane should be related to physical properties of the liquid crystals. A better understanding of the relation between the permutation quantifiers and these physical attributes may deserves a more careful investigation since some properties of liquid crystals such as the order parameter can be quite hard to empirically measure. In this context, the existence of a clear relation between, for example, the order parameter and $H$ or $C$ will be experimentally handy. Here, we just have the pictures of the textures in such a way that is very hard to point out these relationships. However, a visual inspection of Fig.  suggests that some of the more ordered phases, such as the blue phase (this phase display a cubic structure of defects), are located in the central part of the causality plane (region of higher complexity), while other textures which present a large number of non-ordered defects, such as the Smectic B and C, are positioned closer to the aleatory limit ($C\to0$ and $H\to1$). Thus, it seems that the permutation quantifiers are capturing in somehow the competition between the orientational order of the phase and, also, the number of defects present in the textures.

## Ising Surfaces

As a last application, we study the permutation measures $H$ and $C$ applied to Ising surfaces . These surfaces are obtained by accumulating the lattice spin values $\sigma_i\in\{-1,1\}$ of the Ising model defined by the Hamiltonian $$\mathcal H = -\sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} \sigma_i \sigma_j\,,$$ where the sum is over all the pairs of first neighbor sites in the lattice. We numerically solve this spin-$1/2$ Ising model on a $L\times L$ lattice using the Monte Carlo method with periodic boundary conditions. By using the spin values, we define the surface height for each lattice site $i$ as $$\mathcal S_i = \sum_{t} \sigma_i(t)\,,$$ where $t$ represents the number of Monte Carlo steps. In Fig. , we show three surfaces obtained though this procedure for different values of the reduced temperature $T/T_c$, where $T_c=2/\ln(1+\sqrt{2})$ is the critical temperature of the model. We note the complex pattern exhibited by the surface for $T/T_c = 1$, and the almost random patterns for $T/T_c>1$ and $T/T_c<1$.

We first investigate the dependence of $H$ and $C$ on the reduced temperature $T/T_{C}$ after a large number of Monte Carlo steps ($10^5$) and for $L=500$. Figures a and b show $H$ and $C$ for $d_x=2$ and $d_y=3$, and for the rotation $d_x\to d_y$ and $d_y\to d_x$. We note that, at the critical temperature, both indexes display a sharp peak and that they are invariant under the rotation. Moreover, Fig. c presents a 3d visualization of the phase transition for $d_x=d_y=3$. This higher-dimensional representation can be useful when investigating more complex phase transitions, since a greater number of degrees of freedom allows the critical point to be more visible.

We further study the temporal evolution of $H$ and $C$ for different reduced temperatures, as it is shown in Fig. . The initial values of the spins were chosen equal to $1$ and, as we can see, the values for $H$ and $C$ are different just after one Monte Carlo step. For $T\neq T_c$, the value of $H$ increases over time and around $t\sim10^2$ it reaches a plateau. For $T=T_c$, the value of $H$ increases up to a maximum value around $t\sim10^2$ and then starts to approach a lower plateau value. A striking behavior is observed for $C$, where for all temperatures the complexity displays a maximum value before it begins to approach a plateau value. It is worth noting that both quantifiers are very stable after $\sim10^4$ Monte Carlo steps.

# Summary

We have proposed a generalization of the complexity-entropy causality plane to higher-dimensional patterns. We applied this approach to fractal surfaces, liquid crystal textures and Ising surfaces. It was shown that the indexes $H$ and $C$ performed very well for distinguishing between the different roughness of the fractal surfaces. The indexes properly identified the phase transitions of a lyotropic liquid crystal and sorted different characteristic textures in a kind of complexity order. Finally, concerning the Ising surfaces, the indexes not only had identified the critical temperature, but also proved to be stable after $\sim 10^4$ Monte Carlo steps. The method also has a very fast and simple numerical evaluation. Taking into account all these findings, we are very optimist that our method can reduce the gap between one-dimensional complexity measures and the higher-dimensional ones.

# Acknowledgments

HVR, RSM and EKL are grateful to CNPq and CAPES (Brazilian agencies) for the financial support. HVR also thanks CAPES for financial support under the process No. 5678-11-0. LZ was supported by Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina.


author: I. Martí-Vidal; J.M. Marcaide ; A. Alberdi; J.C. Guirado; M.A. Pérez-Torres; E. Ros; I.I. Shapiro; R.J. Beswick; T.W.B. Muxlow; A. Pedlar; M.K. Argo; S. Immler; N. Panagia; C.J. Stockdale; R.A. Sramek; S. Van Dyk; K.W. Weiler
date: Accepted in A&A on 24/03/2009
title: 23 GHz VLBI Observations of SN 2008ax

We report on phase-referenced 23 GHz Very-Long-Baseline-Interferometry (VLBI) observations of the type IIb supernova SN 2008ax, made with the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) on 2 April 2008 (33 days after explosion). These observations resulted in a marginal detection of the supernova. The total flux density recovered from our VLBI image is 0.8$\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}0.3 mJy (one standard deviation). As it appears, the structure may be interpreted as either a core-jet or a double source. However, the supernova structure could be somewhat confused with a possible close by noise peak. In such a case, the recovered flux density would decrease to 0.48$\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}0.12 mJy, compatible with the flux densities measured with the VLA at epochs close in time to our VLBI observations. The lowest average expansion velocities derived from our observations are $(1.90 \pm 0.30) \times 10^5$ km s$^{-1}$ (case of a double source) and $(5.2 \pm 1.3) \times 10^4$ km s$^{-1}$ (taking the weaker source component as a spurious, close by, noise peak, which is the more likely interpretation). These velocities are 7.3 and 2 times higher, respectively, than the maximum ejecta velocity inferred from optical-line observations.

# Introduction

Supernova was discovered in galaxy on 3 March 2008 (Mostardi et al. ) at the position $\alpha = 12^h 30^m 40.799^s$ and $\delta = 41^{\circ} 38' 14.825''$. The host galaxy is $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}8 Mpc distant (de Vaucouleurs ; we assume an uncertainty of 1 Mpc for the distance), and is dynamically interacting with (forming the pair ). Likely as a consequence of this interaction, has a relatively high star formation rate (Viallefond et al. ), which should results in a correspondingly high supernova rate.

We assume the discovery date of the supernova was the same as the explosion date, since 6 hours before its discovery, the location of the supernova was imaged with a limiting magnitude of 18.3 and no emission was detected (Nakano ). Radio emission from SN 2008ax was monitored with the VLA beginning on 3 March 2008, shortly after its discovery (see Stockdale et al. , ), with positive detections made at 4.9, 8.4, and 22.5 GHz, beginning on 7 March 2008. These detections were all in the millijansky range. The early part of the radio light curve of this supernova is qualitatively similar to that of SN 1993J. Since supernova SN 2008ax was also cataloged as type IIb (Chornock ), as was SN 1993J, there was evidence to believe that the radio emission of SN 2008ax would continue its evolution in a similar way to 's. In such a case, the flux density of SN 2008ax should have risen well above the VLBI detectability limit near the end of March 2008.

On 11 March 2008, we proposed a **target-of-opportunity** set of global VLBI observations of SN 2008ax at 23 GHz, in order to detect the supernova radio structure and, possibly, its expansion. Only antennas of the VLBA were allocated and only on 2 April 2008. Unfortunately, the flux density **started to drop faster than expected** by that time, resulting in only a marginal detection of the supernova. In the next section we describe the details of our VLBI observations, and in Section we present our results and conclusions.

# Observations and Data Reduction

We observed supernova 2008ax on 2 April 2008, with the VLBA (10 identical 25 m diameter antennas spread over the USA from the Virgin Islands to Hawaii). The recording rate was set to 256 Mbps, with 2-bit sampling and single polarization mode (LCP), covering a total bandwidth of 64 MHz (8 baseband channels, of 8 MHz width each). Our observations were cross-correlated at the Array Operations Center of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) in Socorro (New Mexico, USA), using an averaging time of 2 seconds.

The observations of SN 2008ax were made in phase-reference mode. Each scan of the supernova was of $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}2 minutes duration, and short observations ($\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}40 seconds) of strong, close by sources were interleaved between these scans of the supernova. Since the 23 GHz flux densities of these close by radio sources were unknown at the time of the observations, we chose the two closest, which were also the strongest at 15 GHz. Each pass of the recording tapes (22 minutes long) was then assigned to one of these two calibrators in an alternating scheme. The 12-hour long set of observations could, thus, be divided into two sets of roughly equal size. In the first one, we observed the supernova using the source as the phase calibrator (located 2.23 degrees from the supernova) and in the second one we used the source as the phase calibrator (located 2.57 degrees from the supernova).

After the cross correlation, the data were imported into the NRAO Astronomical Image Processing System (aips) for calibration. We performed the amplitude calibration using gain curves and system temperatures measured at all antennas. We then used in the scans of the supernova the time-interpolated antenna gains obtained from hybrid mapping of the calibrators. The phase calibration (with account taken of the structures of the calibrators) was performed with standard phase-reference calibration techniques. The data were then exported for further reduction in difmap (Shepherd et al. ).

# Results and Conclusions

The flux density of the calibrator source J1224+4335, obtained from hybrid mapping, is 198$\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}1 mJy and the flux density of the other calibrator source, J1225+3914, obtained with the same procedure, is 122$\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}1 mJy. Uncertainties are 3 times the root-mean-square, rms, of the hybrid-map residuals (see Readhead & Wilkinson ). There is no clear detection of SN 2008ax in any of the phase-referenced images obtained using both calibrators. There is not even a clear flux density peak in the images obtained from the totality of supernova visibilities (i.e., dynamic range above $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}6), regardless of the sky coverage of the image or the weighting scheme applied in Fourier space. However, when the phase-reference calibrator J1224+4335 (i.e., the strongest and closest calibrator) is used, there is a possible detection of the supernova. The detection arises from applying a visibility weighting in Fourier space with the weight of a pixel proportional to the square of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the visibilities inside that pixel (i.e., we increase the array sensitivity in the Fourier inversion). We additionally taper the visibilities using a Gaussian, centered at the origin of the uv-plane, with a Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of 500 M$\lambda$. The image obtained with such a visibility weighting has a peak flux density located at $0.08$ mas to the West and $9.2$ mas to the South of the position used at the correlator, which was taken from X-band VLA observations made on 8 March 2009. Therefore, the peak flux density detected is located at $\alpha = 12^h 30^m 40.79899^s$ and $\delta = 41^{\circ} 38' 14.81580''$, with an uncertainty of 0.05 mas, which is the size of the interferometric beam divided by 2 times the dynamic range of the image (Thomson et al. ). Since this position is based on a phase-reference to J1224+4335 at 23 GHz, we notice that opacity effects in the jet of this source (see Figure ) could introduce a systematic shift of several mas in the supernova position (the correlation position of J1224+4335 was taken from the VLBA Calibrator Survey at 8.4 GHz; see Beasley et al. ). Decreasing the FWHM of the Gaussian taper, or weighting each pixel with a higher power of the visibility SNR, results in a slightly better detection of the supernova but, due to the large decrease in resolution, at the price of a detailed detection of radio structure.

After performing a CLEAN deconvolution in the region of the flux density peak, we obtain the image shown in Figure . The rms of the residuals is 0.087 mJy beam$^{-1}$ and the peak flux density is 0.395 mJy beam$^{-1}$, so the dynamic range of the image is 4.7. The total flux density obtained after a deconvolution using the CLEAN algorithm is 0.8 mJy. Remarkably, the flux density recovered from our VLBI image is a factor $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}1.7 larger than the flux densities registered with the VLA by Stockdale et al. () at epochs close in time to the epoch of our observations ($0.48\pm0.12$ mJy on April 1, and $0.45\pm0.10$ mJy on April 3). This large discrepancy indicates that the source structure shown in Figure may be a chance superposition of a marginal detection (North) and a prominent noise peak (South), as we explain below. The integrated flux density of each of the noise peaks of the residual image in a 40$\times$`<!-- -->`{=html}40 mas square around the source is less than 0.4 mJy (i.e., less than 50% of the integrated flux density of the source). We show this wide-field image in Figure .

If the structure shown in Figure is real, does it correspond to a core-jet or is it part of a shell? Or, as we suggest above, can this structure be a combination of a marginal detection (North) with a stronger noise peak (South) than elsewhere in the map? Difficult to say.

### Case 1. Partial Shell-like Structure

For the radio structure part of a shell, we can compare its 50% contour level with that of a shell model convolved with the same beam. For a shell model with a fractional shell width of 0.3, which is the shell width found for SN 1993J by Marcaide et al. (), the outer radius of SN 2008ax would be 1.15$\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}0.15 mas (hereafter, all the uncertainties given are equal to the square root of the corresponding diagonal element of the covariance matrix, with the errors having been first uniformly scaled so that the reduced $\chi^2$ is equal to 1). This size translates into an average expansion velocity of $(4.8 \pm 0.8) \times 10^5$ km s$^{-1}$, which is superluminal. Indeed, we still obtain superluminal expansion velocities if we change the fractional shell width to different, unrealistic, values such as 0.1 (a narrower shell width translates into a smaller fitted shell size). Hence, it is unlikely that the radio structure is part of an expanding shell.

### Case 2. Double Source

If we instead fit the visibilities to two point sources, one to model the brightness peak (at the North) and the other one to model the source extension towards the South, we find components of 0.40$\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}0.11 and 0.24$\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}0.11 mJy, separated by 0.93$\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}0.10 mas. This result translates into an average relative velocity between components of $(3.90 \pm 0.62) \times 10^5$ km s$^{-1}$, which is superluminal. If the two components were moving in opposite directions with respect to the explosion center, the average expansion velocity of the radiostructure would be $(1.90 \pm 0.31) \times 10^5$ km s$^{-1}$, a factor $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}7.3 higher than the maximum ejecta velocity estimated from the optical-line emission of this supernova ($\sim 2.6 \times 10^4$ km s$^{-1}$, Blondin ). This velocity is also much higher than the typical expansion velocities of the radiostructures of other supernovae ($\sim 1-2 \times 10^4$ km s$^{-1}$). Hence, the two-point source model is also unlikely.

### Case 3. Detection with a Close by Noise Peak

Perhaps, then, we could consider that the structure shown in the map is due to a chance (near) superposition of a marginally detected radio source and a noise peak. In this case, the radio emission would not be resolved and its detection would be even more marginal. Fitting a shell model (with a fractional width of 0.3) to the northern flux density peak results in a source outer diameter of $0.25\pm0.05$ mas and a flux density of $0.48\pm0.12$ mJy. We notice that this flux density is consistent with the flux densities registered by Stockdale et al. at the same radio frequency and at epochs enclosing that of our VLBI observations. The resulting average expansion velocity is $(5.2 \pm 1.3) \times 10^4$ km s$^{-1}$, a factor of 2 larger than the velocity inferred from optical-line emission. This velocity is also $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}3 times larger than the expansion velocities of the other radio supernovae that were observed with VLBI ($<2.0\times10^4$ km s$^{-1}$), and would imply (if we assume a non-decelerated expansion at least until the epoch of our observations) a fractional width of the shocked circumstellar region of $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}0.5. To obtain this estimate, we assume that the optical-line emission comes from a region close to the inner edge of the shocked ejecta (see Chevalier & Fransson ). This fractional width is much larger than that found for SN 1993J and those predicted from different models of type II supernovae (Chevalier ). Considering a decelerated supernova expansion would result in even larger fractional-shell width estimates.

## General Remarks

In short, every model used in our analysis results in a supernova size much larger than expected from the optical-line velocities of this supernova and the expansion velocities found for all supernovae that could be imaged with VLBI. The lowest average expansion velocity compatible with our VLBI data is a factor of 2 larger than the velocity inferred from optical-line emission. However, despite the apparent significance of our measurements (4 $\sigma$ for the flux density and 5 $\sigma$ for the size), we have obtained only a marginal detection of SN 2008ax with our VLBI observations.