abstract: Density functional theory (DFT) has become the computational method of choice for modeling and characterization of carbon dioxide adsorbents, a broad family of materials which at present are urgently sought after for environmental applications. The description of polar carbon dioxide (CO$_{2}$) molecules in low-coordinated environments like surfaces and porous materials, however, may be challenging for local and semilocal DFT approximations. Here, we present a thorough computational study in which the accuracy of DFT methods in describing the interactions of CO$_{2}$ with model alkali-earth-metal (AEM, Ca and Li) decorated carbon structures, namely anthracene (C$_{14}$H$_{10}$) molecules, is assessed. We find that gas-adsorption energies and equilibrium structures obtained with standard (i.e. LDA and GGA), hybrid (i.e. PBE0 and B3LYP) and van der Waals exchange-correlation functionals of DFT dramatically differ from results obtained with second-order M$\o$ller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), an accurate computational quantum chemistry method. The major disagreements found can be mostly rationalized in terms of electron correlation errors that lead to wrong charge-transfer and electrostatic Coulomb interactions between CO$_{2}$ and AEM-decorated anthracene molecules. Nevertheless, we show that when the concentration of AEM atoms in anthracene is tuned to resemble as closely as possible to the electronic structure of AEM-decorated graphene (i.e. an extended two-dimensional material), hybrid exchange-correlation DFT and MP2 methods quantitatively provide similar results.
author: Claudio Cazorla; Stephen A. Shevlin
title: Accuracy of Density Functional Theory in Prediction of
  Carbon Dioxide Adsorbent Materials

# Introduction

The concentration of carbon dioxide (CO$_{2}$) in the atmosphere has increased by about 30% in the last 50 years and is likely to double over the next few decades as a consequence of fossil-fuel burning for energy generation \[\]. This excess of CO$_{2}$ greenhouse gas may have dramatic negative repercussions on Earth's air quality and climate evolution. Besides exploitation of renewable energy resources, carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) implemented in fossil-fuel energy plants and ambient air have been envisaged as promising cost-effective routes to mitigate CO$_{2}$ emissions \[\]. To this end, membranes and solid sorbents (e.g. activated carbons -AC-, hydrotalcites, and coordination polymers -i.e. zeolitic imidazolate and metal organic frameworks-) are widely considered as the pillars of next-generation CCS technologies because of a encouraging compromise between large gas-uptake capacities, robust thermodynamic stability, fast adsorption-desorption kinetics, and affordable production costs \[\]. A key aspect for the success of these materials is to find the optimal chemistry and pore topologies to work under specific thermodynamic conditions \[\]. Unfortunately, due to the tremendous variety of possible compositions and structures, systematic experimental searches of this kind generally turn out to be cumbersome. In this context, first-principles and classical atomistic simulation approaches emerge as invaluable tools for effective and economical screening of candidate carbon adsorbents.

Density functional theory (DFT) performed with the local-density (LDA) and generalized-gradient (GGA) approximations of the electronic exchange-correlation energy, has become the *ab initio* method of choice for modeling and characterization of CCS materials. Standard DFT-LDA and DFT-GGA methods are known to describe with precision and affordability a wide spectrum of interactions in bulk crystals and surfaces, however computational studies on the accuracy of DFT in reproducing CO$_{2}$-sorbent forces are surprisingly scarce in the literature (see "Methods" section of work \[\] and references therein). In view of the ubiquity of DFT methods to CCS science \[\], it is therefore crucial to start filling this knowledge gap while putting a special emphasis on the underlying physics. Computational benchmark studies on CO$_{2}$-sorbent interactions, however, are technically intricate and conceptually difficult since most CCS materials have structural motifs that are large in size. In particular, genuinely accurate but computationally very intensive quantum chemistry approaches like MP2 and CCSD(T) can deal efficiently only with small systems composed of up to few tens of atoms, whereas DFT can be used for much larger systems (i.e. extended -periodically replicated in space- systems composed of up to $1,000-10,000$ atoms). Consequently, computational accuracy tests need to be performed in scaled-down systems resembling to the structure and composition of the material of interest (e.g. the case of organic C$_{n}$H$_{m}$ molecules to graphene \[\]). Generalization of so-reached conclusions to realistic systems however may turn out to be fallacious since intrinsic DFT limitations (e.g. exchange self-interaction and electron correlation errors) can be crucial depending, for instance, on the level of quantum confinement imposed by the topology of the system.

In this article, we present the results of a thorough computational study performed on a model system composed of a CO$_{2}$ molecule and alkali-earth-metal (AEM) decorated anthracene (e.g. X-C$_{14}$H$_{10}$ with X=Ca, Li), that consists of standard DFT (i.e. LDA and GGA), hybrid DFT (i.e. PBE0 and B3LYP), van der Waals DFT (vdW), and MP2 adsorption energy, E$_{\rm ads}$ \[\], and geometry optimization calculations. It is worth noticing that anthracene is structurally and chemically analogous to the organic bridging ligands found in metal- and covalent-organic frameworks, -MOF and COF-, thus our model conforms to a good representation of a promising class of CCS materials \[\]. We find that standard, hybrid and vdW functionals of DFT dramatically fail at reproducing CO$_{2}$/AEM-C$_{14}$H$_{10}$ interactions as evidenced by E$_{\rm ads}$ discrepancies of $\sim 1-2$ eV found with respect to MP2 calculations. This failure is mainly due to electron correlation errors that lead to inaccurate electron charge transfers and exaggerated electrostatic Coulomb interactions between CO$_{2}$ and X-C$_{14}$H$_{10}$ molecules. In the second part of our study we analyse whether our initial conclusions can be generalized or not to extended carbon-based materials, another encouraging family of CO$_{2}$ sorbents \[\]. For this, we tune the concentration of calcium atoms in anthracene so that the partial density of electronic states (pDOS) of the model system resembles as closely as possible to the pDOS of Ca-decorated graphene. In this case we find that DFT and MP2 methods qualitatively provide similar results, with hybrid DFT and MP2 in almost quantitative agreement.

# Computational Methods

Standard DFT calculations were done using the plane wave code VASP \[\] while hybrid DFT and MP2 results were obtained with the atomic orbitals (AO) code NWCHEM \[\]. Numerical consistency between the two codes was checked at the DFT-PBE energy level. The value of all technical parameters were set in order to guarantee convergence of the total energy to less than $1$ meV/atom. Optimized structures were determined by imposing an atomic force tolerance of $0.01$ eV/Å  and verified as minima on the potential energy surface by vibrational frequency analysis. Basis-set superposition errors (BSSE) in hybrid DFT and MP2 energy calculations were corrected using the counter-poise recipe \[\]. Indeed, only results obtained in the complete-basis-set (CBS) limit \[\] can be regarded as totally BSSE free however reaching that limit in our calculations turned out to be computationally prohibitive due to the size of the systems and large number of cases considered. Nevertheless, we checked in a reduced Ca-benzene system that MP2 binding energy results obtained with large Dunning-like AO basis sets (i.e. triple zeta cc-pVTZ and quadruple zeta cc-pVQZ) and in the CBS limit differed at most by $20$ meV (see Fig. ), thus we assumed the MP2/cc-pVTZ method to be accurate enough for present purporses (i.e. as it will be shown later, the reported discrepancies are in the order of $1-2$ eV) and regarded it as "gold standard". It is worth noting that MP2 results obtained with medium and large Pople-like AO basis sets (i.e. 6-311G++(2d,2p) and 6-311G(2df,2pd)) are also in notable agreement with MP2/cc-pVTZ results (i.e. E$_{\rm ads}$ differences of $20-30$ meV in the worse case) whereas MP2/6-31G++ estimations (not shown in the figure) turn out to be not so accurate.

# Results

## AEM-decorated anthracene systems

Carbon dioxide adsorption energy and equilibrium geometry results obtained for AEM-anthracene systems are shown in Figs.  and . Since the number of reaction coordinates in CO$_{2}$/AEM-anthracene systems (i.e. intermolecular distances and molecular bond and torsional angles) is considerably large, rather than parameterizing E$_{\rm ads}$ curves as a function of just few of them, first we performed DFT and MP2 atomic relaxations and then calculated all DFT and MP2 energies in the resulting equilibrium structures. In doing this, we disregard local minimum conformations, as customarily done in computational materials studies, and gain valuable insight into the energy landscape provided by each potential. It is important to note that due to the size of the systems considered we were able to perform tight MP2 atomic relaxations only at the 6-31G++ and 6-311G++(2d,2p) levels. Nevertheless, MP2/6-311G++(2d,2p) and benchmark MP2/cc-pVTZ equilibrium structures are very likely to be equivalent since results obtained with both methods are in fairly good agreement (see Figs.  and ), and MP2/6-31G++ and MP2/6-311G++(2d,2p) equilibrium geometries are already very similar (the former case not shown here).

First, we note that equilibrium DFT and MP2 structures obtained for both Ca- and Li-anthracene systems are perceptibly different (see Fig. ). Of particular concern is the Ca-anthracene system where, depending on the geometry optimization method used, the plane containing the CO$_{2}$ molecule orientates perpendicularly (DFT) or parallel (MP2) to anthracene. Also, we observe important differences between DFT-PBE and DFT-B3LYP optimized geometries, the Ca atom being displaced towards an outside carbon ring in the hybrid case (as it also occurs in the MP2-optimized system). Structural differences among Li-anthracene systems are similar to those already explained except that the gas molecule always binds on top of the Li atom and no off-center AEM shift appears in MP2 optimizations.

Concerning E$_{\rm ads}$ results (see Fig. ), let us concentrate first on the Ca-C$_{14}$H$_{10}$ case. As one can see, adsorption energies calculated with the same evaluation and geometry optimization method (highlighted with large grey circles in the figure) are very different. In particular, DFT methods always predict thermodynamically favorable CO$_{2}$-binding to Ca-anthracene, with DFT-LDA and DFT-PBE0 providing the largest and smallest E$_{\rm ads}$ values, whereas MP2/6-311G++(2d,2p) calculations show the opposite. Moreover, with MP2/6-311G(2df,2pd) and MP2/cc-pVTZ methods large and positive adsorption energies of $\sim 0.6-1.0$ eV are obtained for DFT-optimized geometries, in stark contrast to DFT E$_{\rm ads}$ results (i.e. $\sim -1.0-0.0$ eV). Adsorption energy disagreements in Li-C$_{14}$H$_{10}$ systems are not as dramatic as just described, although the performance of standard DFT methods still remains a cause for concern. Specifically, DFT-LDA and DFT-PBE predict unfavorable CO$_{2}$-binding whereas hybrid DFT and MP2 methods predict the opposite. Also, computed MP2 energies in standard DFT-optimized structures are negative and noticeably larger than DFT $\mid {\rm E_{ads}} \mid$ values. Interestingly, the series of binding energies calculated for hybrid DFT and MP2/6-311G++(2d,2p) geometries are in remarkably good agreement in spite of the evident structural differences involved (see Fig. ).

Since the agreement between MP2 and hybrid DFT results in Ca-C$_{14}$H$_{10}$ is only marginally better than achieved with LDA or GGA functionals, common self-interaction exchange errors alone cannot be at the root of standard DFT failure. Consequently, DFT difficulties at fully grasping electron correlations, which in the studied complexes account for the 44 % to 57 % of the total binding energy, must be the major factor behind the discrepancy. In fact, upon gas-adsorption important dispersive dipole-dipole and dipole-quadrupole forces appear in the systems as a consequence of CO$_{2}$ inversion symmetry breaking (i.e. the polar molecule is bent) which cannot be reproduced by either local, semilocal or hybrid DFT approximations. Moreover, the non-linearity of the gas molecule also indicates the presence of large electron transfers which are well-known to pose a challenge for description to standard and hybrid DFT methods \[\]. But, which of these DFT shortcommings, i.e. omission of non-local interactions, charge-transfer errors or a mix of both, is the predominant factor behind E$_{\rm ads}$ inaccuracies? In order to get insight into this question, we performed frontier molecular orbital and charge distribution analysis on isolated and joint Ca-C$_{14}$H$_{10}$ and CO$_{2}$ complexes \[\]. We found that the energy difference between the HOMO of Ca-anthracene and the LUMO of the gas molecule, $\Delta E_{\rm front}$, varied from $0.7-0.9$ eV to $-1.4$ eV when either calculated with DFT (standard and hybrid) or MP2/cc-pVTZ methods. Positive and large $\Delta E_{\rm front}$ values do imply large reactivity and charge transfers from Ca-C$_{14}$H$_{10}$ to CO$_{2}$ molecules, $\Delta Q$. In fact, this is consistent with results shown in Fig. a and also with our charge distribution analysis performed: $\Delta Q$ values obtained with DFT amount to $\sim 1~e^{-}$, about a 50 % larger than computed with MP2/cc-pVTZ \[\]. Standard and hybrid DFT approximations, therefore, provide overly charged donor (+) and acceptor (-) species which in the joint complexes are artificially stabilized by the action of exaggerated electrostatic interactions. In view of this finding, and also of the large size of the binding energies reported, we tentatively identify the inability of DFT methods to correctly describe charge-transfer interactions (and not the omission of non-local interactions) as the principal cause behind its failure. Calculations done on Li-anthracene systems appear to support this hypothesis since a mild improvement on the agreement between hybrid DFT and MP2 methods is obtained (not seen in the standard cases) which is accompanied by smaller $\Delta E_{\rm front}$ discrepancies (i.e. of just few tenths of an eV). Also, the amount of electronic charge transferred from Li-C$_{14}$H$_{10}$ to CO$_{2}$ does not change significantly when either calculated with hybrid DFT or MP2 methods (i.e. $0.6$ and $0.4~e^{-}$, respectively).

In order to fully quantify the effect of neglecting non-local interactions and their role on standard and hybrid DFT E$_{\rm ads}$ inaccuracies, we conducted additional energy calculations using two different DFT van der Waals approaches implemented in VASP. The first of these methods corresponds to that developed by Grime, also known as DFT-D2 \[\], in which a simple pair-wise dispersion potential is added to the conventional Kohn-Sham DFT energy. The second approach, referred to as DFT-vdW here, is based on Dion *et al.*'s proposal \[\] for which a non-local correlation functional is explicitly constructed. We considered three different equilibrium configurations (i.e. those obtained in DFT-PBE, DFT-B3LYP and MP2/cc-pVTZ geometry optimizations) and calculated the corresponding DFT-D2 and DFT-vdW adsorption energies. In Table I, we report the results of these calculations. As one can see, the overall effect of considering non-local interactions is to decrease E$_{\rm ads}$ values by about few tenths of an eV, increasing so slightly the discrepancies with respect to the MP2/cc-pVTZ method. Also, we find that van der Waals corrections obtained with both DFT-D2 and DFT-vdW methods are fairly similar. For instance, $\Delta E_{\rm D2}$ and $\Delta E_{\rm vdW}$ differences (taken with respect to DFT-PBE values, see Table I) computed in the DFT-B3LYP case amount to $-0.08$ and $-0.13$ eV, respectively. We also found that the equilibrium CO$_{2}$/Ca-C$_{14}$H$_{10}$ geometry determined with the DFT-D2 method is practically identical to that found with DFT-PBE. Therefore, our above assumption on the causes behind unsatisfactory description of specific CCS processes by DFT methods (i.e. charge-transfer interaction errors) turns out to be rigorously demonstrated.

```latex
\begin{table*}
\begin{center}
\label{tab:dft-vdW}
\begin{tabular}{ c c c c }
\hline
\hline
$ $ & $ $ & $ $ & $ $ \\
$ $ & \multicolumn{3}{c}{${\rm ~Geometry~Optimization~Method~}$} \\
$ $ & \multicolumn{3}{c}{$ $} \\ \cline{2-4}
$ $ & $ $ & $ $ & $ $ \\
$ $ & $\quad {\rm DFT-PBE} \quad$ & $\quad {\rm DFT-B3LYP} \quad$ & $\quad {\rm MP2/PM} \quad$ \\
$ $ & $ $ & $ $ & $ $ \\
\hline
$ $ & $ $ & $ $ & $ $  \\
${\rm DFT-D2} $ & $  -0.719   $ & $  -0.775   $ & $  -0.056   $  \\
$  {\rm (\Delta E_{D2})}      $ & $ (-0.083)  $ & $ (-0.074)  $ & $ (-0.254)  $  \\
$ $ & $ $ & $ $ & $ $  \\
${\rm DFT-vdW} $ & $ -0.856   $ & $  -0.836   $ & $  -0.115   $  \\
$  {\rm (\Delta E_{vdW})}     $ & $ (-0.220)      $ & $ (-0.135)  $ & $ (-0.313)      $  \\
$ $ & $ $ & $ $ & $ $  \\
${\rm MP2/cc-pVTZ}   $ & $  0.920    $ & $   0.835   $ &  $ 0.219    $  \\
$ $ & $ $ & $ $ & $ $  \\
\hline
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{CO$_{2}$-adsorption energy results obtained for Ca-anthracene using the DFT-D2~[\onlinecite{grime06}],
  DFT-vdW~[\onlinecite{dion04,roman09,klimes10}], and (for comparison) MP2/cc-pVTZ methods. ${\rm \Delta E_{D2}}$ values
  correspond to ${\rm E_{DFT-D2}} - {\rm E_{DFT-PBE}}$ energy differences, and ${\rm \Delta E_{vdW}}$ to
  ${\rm E_{DFT-vdW}} - {\rm E_{DFT-PBE}}$. All energies are expressed in units of eV.}
\end{table*}
```

Overall, the results presented in this section show the key importance of charge-transfer interactions in AEM-based CCS nanoparticles which, as we mentioned in the Introduction, can be reasonably generalized to similar covalent organic structures. Consequently, MP2 or other efficient computational schemes embodying also many-electron correlations (see for instance Ref. \[\]) must be employed for the rational design and characterization of these complexes.

## Emulating extended AEM-decorated carbon surfaces

In view of the composition and structure of anthracene, it appears tempting to generalize our previous conclusions to extended carbon-based materials (e.g. AC and nanostructures). Nevertheless, we show in Fig.  that Ca-anthracene and Ca-graphene are quite distinct systems in terms of electronic structure since partially occupied $s$ and $d$ electron orbitals are missing in the former. It is important to note that equivalent partial density of states (pDOS) dissimilarities are also found when larger C$_{n}$H$_{m}$ molecules are considered (e.g. the case of Ca-coronene \[\]). In consequence of these differences, hybridization between $sd$-sorbent and $p$-CO$_{2}$ orbitals leading to strong gas attraction will be more limited in Ca-C$_{14}$H$_{10}$ complexes than in Ca-decorated graphene \[\].

Aimed at improving the likeness among the pDOS of the model system and Ca-decorated graphene while constraining the size of the former system to be small, we increased the number of Ca atoms decorating anthracene \[\]. We found that pDOS features in 3Ca-C$_{14}$H$_{10}$ are already compatible with those relevant for CO$_{2}$-binding to Ca-graphene (see Fig. ) thus, in spite of the obvious chemical and structural deformations introduced (e.g. now the anthracene molecule is significantly bent, see Fig. ), we performed additional benchmark calculations for this system.

In Figs.  and we show the resulting optimized geometries and E$_{\rm ads}$ values. As can be appreciated standard DFT, hybrid DFT and MP2 calculations are now in qualitative good agreement: all methods predict equivalent equilibrium structures and thermodynamically favorable CO$_{2}$-binding. Moreover, adsorption energy differences between hybrid DFT and MP2 methods amount to less than $0.4$ eV in most studied geometries with hybrid DFT systematically providing the smaller values. Therefore, the agreement between hybrid DFT and MP2 approaches can be regarded in this case as almost quantitative. On the other hand, standard DFT approximations tend to significantly overestimate E$_{\rm ads}$ (i.e. by about $\sim 1.0-2.0$ eV with respect to the MP2/cc-pVTZ method). It must be stressed that charge-transfer interactions in Ca-overdecorated organic complexes are very intense and play also a dominant role. Indeed, the amount of electron charge transferred from 3Ca-C$_{14}$H$_{10}$ to CO$_{2}$ is $\Delta Q = 1.3~e^{-}$ according to the MP2/cc-pVTZ method and also hybrid DFT approximations. In contrast, standard DFT methods predict exceedingly large $\Delta Q$ values of $\sim 1.6-1.8~e^{-}$. We identify therefore self-interaction exchange errors, which now appear as a consequence of populating spatially localized $d$-Ca orbitals \[\], as the principal cause for the overestimation of CO$_{2}$-binding by standard DFT approaches.

In the light of the results presented in this section, we conclude that standard DFT modeling of extended carbon-based CCS materials can be expected to be correct only at the qualitative level. On the other hand, hybrid DFT approximations conform to a well-balanced representation of the relevant interactions in AEM-decorated carbon surfaces thus we propose using them when pursuing accurate description of these systems.

# Conclusions

We have performed a thorough computational study in which the failure of standard, hybrid and van der Waals DFT methods at describing the interactions between X-anthracene (X = Li and Ca) and CO$_{2}$ molecules is demonstrated. The origins of this deficiency mainly resides on the inability of standard and hybrid DFT approximations to correctly describe charge-transfer interactions. This finding has major implications in modeling and characterization of coordination polymer frameworks (e.g. MOF and COF) with applications in carbon capture and sequestration. As an effective strategy to get rid of these computational shortcomings, we propose using MP2 or other effective computational approaches incorporating many-electron correlations. Moreover, based on the similarities in electronic structure found between Ca-graphene and 3Ca-C$_{14}$H$_{10}$ systems (and in spite of their obvious chemical and structural differences) and the tests performed, we argue that standard DFT modeling of extended carbon-based materials may be expected to be correct at the qualitative level. On the other hand, hybrid DFT approximations will provide quantitative information on these systems. The conclusions presented in this work suggest revision of an important number of computational studies that are relevant to CCS materials engineering.

# Acknowledgments

This work was supported by MICINN-Spain (Grants No. MAT2010-18113, CSD2007-00041, and FIS2008-03845) and computing time was kindly provided by CESGA.


**Sergei Maslov**$^1$  and **Kim Sneppen**$^2$

$^1$ *Department of Physics, Brookhaven National Laboratory,
Upton, New York 11973, USA*
$^2$ *Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway.*

Abstract:

Molecular networks guide the biochemistry of a living cell on multiple levels: its metabolic and signalling pathways are shaped by the network of interacting proteins, whose production, in turn, is controlled by the genetic regulatory network. To address topological properties of these two networks we quantify correlations between connectivities of interacting nodes and compare them to a null model of a network, in which al links were randomly rewired. We find that for both interaction and regulatory networks, links between highly connected proteins are systematically suppressed, while those between a highly-connected and low-connected pairs of proteins are favored. This effect decreases the likelihood of cross talk between different functional modules of the cell, and increases the overall robustness of a network by localizing effects of deleterious perturbations.

With the growth of experimental information about basic biochemical mechanisms of life, molecular networks operating in living cells are becoming better defined. Direct physical interactions between pairs of proteins form one such network. It serves as a backbone for functional and structural relationships among its nodes and defines pathways for the propagation of various signals such as phosphorylation and allosteric regulation of proteins. The information about specific binding of proteins to each other has recently grown by an unprecedented amount as a result of high throughput two-hybrid experiments . The production and degradation of proteins participating in the interaction network is controlled by the genetic regulatory network of the cell formed by all pairs of proteins in which the first protein directly regulates the abundance of the second. The majority of known cases of such regulation happens at the level of transcription, in which a transcription factor positively or negatively regulates the RNA transcription of the controlled protein. The large scale structure of both these networks is characterized by a high degree of interconnectedness, where most pairs of nodes are linked to each other by at least one path. One may wonder how such a heavily intertwined and mutually dependent dynamical system can perform multiple functional tasks, and remain stable against deleterious perturbations.

We analyzed the topological properties of interaction and transcription regulatory networks in yeast *Saccharomyces cerevisiae*, which at present is perhaps the best characterized model organism. The interaction network used in this work consists of 4549 physical interactions between 3278 yeast proteins as measured in the most comprehensive two-hybrid screen of yeast proteins , while the genetic regulatory network is formed by 1289 directed positive or negative direct transcriptional regulations within a set of 682 proteins as listed in the YPD database . The protein interaction network is a representative of the broad class of scale-free networks in which the number of nodes with a given number of neighbors (connectivity) $K$ scales as a power law $\propto 1/K^{\gamma}$. In our case the histogram of connectivities can be fitted by a power law with $\gamma=2.5 \pm 0.3$ for $K$ ranging from 2 to about 100 . A small part of the protein interaction network, formed by proteins known to be localized in the nucleus and to interact with at least one other nuclear protein, was visualized (Fig. 1). One striking feature of this graph is the abundance of highly connected proteins that are mostly connected to those with low connectivity, and thus well separated from each other.

To test for correlations in connectivities of nodes for each of the above two networks we calculated the likelihood $P(K_0,K_1)$ that two proteins with connectivities $K_0$ and $K_1$ are connected to each other by a link and compared it to the same quantity $P_r(K_0,K_1)$ measured in a randomized version of the same network. In this "null model" network all proteins have exactly the same connectivity as in the original one, while the choice of their interaction partners is totally random. The transcription regulatory network is naturally directed, while the network of physical interactions among proteins in principle lacks directionality. However, for poorly understood reasons the two-hybrid experimental data have a significant asymmetry between baits and preys, with bait hybrids being more likely to be highly connected than their prey counterparts. This can be seen e.g. in the fact that average connectivity of baits with at least one interaction partner is close to 3, whereas the same quantity measured for preys is only 1.8. Since each reported interaction involves one bait and one prey protein, this asymmetry needs to be taken into account when constructing an uncorrelated "null" model for the interaction network. For this purpose in our randomization procedure we would treat the two-hybrid data as a directed network with an arrow on each edge pointing out from bait to prey hybrid. Randomized versions of these two networks were constructed by randomly reshuffling links, while keeping the in- and out-degree of each node constant. A convenient numerical algorithm performing such randomization consists of first randomly selecting a pair of directed edges A$\rightarrow$B and C$\rightarrow$D The two edges are then rewired in such a way that A becomes connected to D, while C to B. However, in case if one or both of these new links already exist in the network this step is aborted and a new pair of edges is selected. This last restriction prevents the appearance of multiple edges connecting the same pair of nodes. A repeated application of the above rewiring step leads to a randomized version of the original network. Multiple sampling of randomized networks allowed us to calculate both the average expectation and the standard deviation for any particular property of the random network.

Correlations in connectivities manifest themselves as systematic deviations of the ratio $P(K_0,K_1)/P_r(K_0,K_1)$ from 1. We calculated this ratio for interaction (Fig. 2A) and regulatory (Fig. 2B) networks, with $K_0$ and $K_1$ being the total number of interaction partners of two interacting proteins (for the interaction network), and out- and in-degrees of two nodes connected by a directed edge 0$\rightarrow$`<!-- -->`{=html}1 (for the regulatory network). Thus by the very construction $P(K_0,K_1)$ is symmetric for the physical interaction network but not for the regulatory network. We also estimated the statistical significance $Z(K_0,K_1)$ of the above deviations in the interaction (Fig. 2C) and regulatory (Fig. 2D) networks, by dividing each observed deviation from the null model by the standard deviation in multiple realizations of a randomized network. The combination of these two plots reveals the regions on the $K_0-K_1$ plane, where connections between proteins in the real network are significantly enhanced or suppressed, compared to the null model. In particular red regions in the upper left and the lower right corners reflect the tendency of highly connected nodes (hubs) to associate with nodes of low connectivity, while the blue/green region in the upper right corner reflects the reduced likelihood that two hub centers are directly linked to each other. One should also note a prominent feature on the diagonal of the Fig. 2A and 2C corresponding to an enhanced affinity of proteins with between 4 and 9 interaction partners to physically interact with each other. This feature can be tentatively attributed to the tendency of members of multi-protein complexes to interact with other proteins from the same complex. The above range of connectivities thus correspond to a typical number of direct interaction partners of a protein in a complex. When we checked for interactions between proteins in this range of connectivities we found 39 pairs of interacting proteins to belong to the same complex in a recent high throughput study , which is 4 times more than one would expect to find by pure chance alone.

To further quantify and compare correlation patterns in interaction and regulatory networks we calculated the average connectivity $\langle K_1 \rangle$ of nearest neighbors of a node, as a function of its own connectivity $K_0$ (Fig. 3A). In order to simplify the comparison between two networks here we characterize each node in the regulatory network by its total number of neighbors $K=K_{in}+K_{out}$. For both interaction and regulatory networks the average connectivity $\langle K_1 \rangle$ shows a gradual decline with $K_0$, which can be fitted with a power law $\langle K_1 \rangle \propto 1/K_0^{0.6\pm 0.1}$ over approximately two decades. This observation gives an additional credit to the affinity between correlation patterns in these two protein networks visible in Fig. 2. It was recently found that the internet, defined as the set of interconnected routers, in addition to a scale-free distribution of node connectivities similar to the protein interaction network, is characterized by the same correlation pattern between connectivities of neighboring nodes: $\langle K_1 \rangle \propto 1/K_0^{0.5}$. This extends by one step an intriguing similarity in the topology of these networks of completely different nature.

For the scale-free physical interaction network we also plotted the probability distribution of the nearest neighbor connectivity $K_1$, measured separately for nodes with small connectivity $K_0 \leq 3$, and for those with large connectivity $K_0 \geq 100$ (Fig. 3B). In the absence of correlations this conditional probability does not depend on $K_0$, and is proportional to $K_1/K_1^{\gamma} \sim 1/K_1^{1.5}$. This uncorrelated form holds approximately true for neighbors of a protein with low connectivity. It is only violated at the far tail of the distribution due to an excess likelihood of it being connected to a protein with very high connectivity, as was mentioned above. On the other hand, the distribution of connectivities $K_1$ of neighbors of highly connected proteins scales as $\propto 1/K_1^{2.5}$ and thus differs from that of lowly connected ones by a factor of $1/K_1$.

When analyzing molecular networks one should consider possible sources of errors in the underlying data. Two-hybrid experiments give rise to false positives of two kinds. In one case the interaction between proteins is real but it never happens in the course of the normal life cycle of the cell due to spatial or temporal separation of participating proteins. In another case an indirect physical interaction is mediated by one or more unknown proteins localized in the yeast nucleus. Reversely, in a high throughput two-hybrid screens one should expect a sizeable number of false negatives. Primarily a binding may not be observed if the conformation of the bait or prey heterodimer blocks relevant interaction sites or if the corresponding heterodimer altogether fails to fold properly. Secondly, 391 proteins out of the potential 5671 baits in were not tested as possible bait hybrids because they were found to activate transcription of the reporter gene in the absence of any prey proteins.

Unlike for the interaction network, our data for the genetic regulatory network do not come from a single large scale project. Instead, they represent a collection of numerous experiments performed by different experimental techniques in different labs. Therefore, it is not feasible even to list possible sources of errors present in such a diverse data set. In particular one should worry about a hidden anthropomorphic factor present in such a network: some proteins just constitute more attractive subjects of research and are, therefore, relatively better studied than others. One should also note that the transcription regulation network is only a subset of a larger genetic regulatory network, which in addition to transcriptional regulation includes translational regulation, RNA editing, etc. An encouraging sign was that when we separately analyzed the set representing the current knowledge about this later more complete network, consisting of 1750 genetic regulations among 848 proteins we reproduced all of our empirical results for the transcriptional network.

The observed suppression of connections between nearest neighbors of highly connected proteins is consistent with compartmentalization and modularity characteristic of control of many cellular processes . In fact, it suggests the picture of functional modules of the cell organized around individual hubs. To further test the extent of modularity of hubs and their immediate neighborhood in each network we selected 15 highest connected nodes. To provide an unbiased sample of hubs from the point of view of in and out connectivity half of those nodes were selected as the highest out-degree hubs (8 baits with $K_{bait} \geq 90$ for the interaction network and 7 nodes with $K_{out} \geq 34$ for the regulatory network), while half were the highest in-degree hubs (7 preys with $K_{prey} \geq 20$ for the interaction network and 8 nodes with $K_{out} \geq 8$ for the regulatory network). In agreement with the correlation properties described above, direct connections between hubs were significantly suppressed. In the interaction network we observed 20 links between different hubs in this group, which is significantly below $56 \pm 7.5$ links in the randomized network. In the transcription regulatory network there were 16 links between hubs in real network as opposed to $35 \pm 6.5$ in its randomized version. Not only direct links between hubs are suppressed in both studied networks, but hubs also tend to share fewer of their neighbors with other hubs, thereby extending their isolation to the level of next-nearest neighbor connections. The total number of paths of length 2 between the set of 15 hubs in the interaction network is equal to 418, whereas in the null model we measured this number to be $653\pm 56$. Similarly, for the transcriptional network the number of paths of length 2 is equal to 186 in the real network, whereas from the null model one expects it to be $262 \pm 30$. Since the number of paths of length 2 between a pair of proteins is equal to the number of their common interaction partners one concludes that both the hub node itself and its immediate surroundings tend to separate from other hubs, reinforcing the picture of functional modules clustered around individual hubs.

A further implication of the observed correlation is in the suppression of the propagation of deleterious perturbations over the network. It is reasonable to assume that certain perturbations such as e.g. significant changes in the concentration of a given protein (including its vanishing altogether in a null-mutant cell) with a ceratin probability can affect its first, second, and sometimes even more distant neighbors in the corresponding network. While the number of immediate neighbors of a node is by definition equal to its own connectivity $K_0$, the average number of its second neighbors, given by $K_0 \langle (K_1-1) \rangle_{K_0}$, is sensitive to correlation patterns of the network. Since highly connected nodes serve as powerful amplifiers for the propagation of deleterious perturbations it is especially important to suppress this propagation beyond their immediate neighbors. It was argued that scale-free networks in general are very vulnerable to attacks aimed at highly connected nodes . The anticorrelation presented above implies a reduced branching ratio around these nodes and thus provides a certain degree of protection against such attacks. This may be the reason why the correlation between the connectivity of a given protein and the lethality of the mutant cell lacking this protein is not particularly strong .

It is feasible that molecular networks in a living cell have organized themselves in an interaction pattern that is both robust and specific. Topologically the specificity of different functional modules can be enhanced by limiting interactions between hubs and suppressing the average connectivity of their neighbors. We have seen that such correlation pattern appears in a similar way in two different layers of molecular networks in yeast, and thus presumably is a universal feature of all molecular networks operating in living cells.


author: Jan Hamann,; Steen Hannestad,; Georg G. Raffelt; and Yvonne Y. Y. Wong
title: Sterile neutrinos with eV masses in cosmology – how disfavoured exactly?

# Introduction

There is mounting evidence from reactor and short-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments suggesting the existence of one or two sterile neutrinos with mass splittings relative to the active flavours in the neighbourhood of $\Delta m^2 \sim 1~{\rm eV}^2$ and fairly large mixing parameters (see, e.g.,  for a review and global interpretation, and  for other recent analyses). In the early universe, flavour oscillations would bring these sterile states into thermal equilibrium prior to neutrino decoupling at $T\sim 1$ MeV, thereby increasing the relativistic energy density (see, e.g.,  for a review). This increase, commonly parameterised in terms of an additional contribution to the relativistic neutrino degrees of freedom $N_{\rm eff}$, significantly modifies big-bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) of light elements, the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies, and the formation of large-scale structures (LSS). By the same token, these eV-mass sterile neutrinos would later play the role of a non-negligible hot-dark matter component.

The cosmological verdict on eV-mass sterile neutrinos is somewhat mixed. Current CMB and LSS observations show a consistent preference for additional relativistic degrees of freedom beyond the standard model expectation of $N_{\rm eff}=3.046$, with low to moderate statistical significance . On the other hand, if this putative radiation excess is interpreted in terms of sterile neutrinos, the usual hot dark matter limits constrain the sterile masses to the sub-eV regime. For example, in a 3+1 scenario consisting of three essentially massless active flavours and one fully thermalised sterile flavour, the sterile mass is constrained to $m_s \mbox{\;\raisebox{.3ex}
    {$<$}$\!\!\!\!\!$\raisebox{-.9ex}{$\sim$}\;}0.5$ eV . Thus, cosmology appears to disfavour the existence of one or two sterile states that have mass and mixing parameters favoured by a global analysis of the laboratory data.

However, both the tentative evidence for extra radiation and these hot-dark matter bounds are based on the simplest $\Lambda$CDM framework; extended models may provide different answers. For example, if the dark energy equation of state parameter $w$ and curvature $\Omega_k$ are used as fit parameters, the presence of eV-mass sterile neutrinos favours a $w$ value much smaller than $-1$ . Here, we take the view that it may be more natural to look for extensions to $\Lambda$CDM within the neutrino sector alone, for example in terms of additional radiation. (However, we note in passing that in certain dynamical dark energy models such as the mass varying neutrino scenario, a strongly modified neutrino sector is responsible for driving the dark energy evolution. In this sense, changing $w$ may not be an entirely unnatural solution to the massive sterile neutrino problem.) Multiple sterile right-handed states may exist and some of them may even be lighter that the eV range. Moreover, the existence of sterile neutrinos also provides a means for the generation of large neutrino chemical potentials , which may be exploited to circumvent standard BBN bounds on the number of relativistic degrees of freedom.

The premise of our work is that sterile neutrino states with eV-range masses are real and that they are fully thermalised prior to neutrino decoupling. In addition, we allow for radiation beyond that due to the three standard flavours (assumed to be effectively massless) and beyond the eV-mass sterile neutrinos. We consider both data from precision cosmology and the constraints on $N_{\rm eff}$ imposed by BBN.

More specifically, in section  we investigate the impact of eV-mass sterile neutrinos on the inference of cosmological parameters from CMB and LSS observations. In section we evaluate the constraints on additional relativistic species during the BBN epoch, using measurements of the primordial abundances of several light elements. In section we summarise and discuss our results.

# CMB and LSS

## Cosmological data

The CMB anisotropies and the LSS distribution are sensitive to both additional relativistic degrees of freedom and the mass scale of light, free-streaming particles. To explore the impact of eV-mass sterile neutrinos on precision cosmology, we use CMB anisotropy data and their accompanying likelihood routines from the WMAP 7-year data release , as well as the ACBAR , BICEP , and QuAD  experiments. In addition, we use the halo power spectrum extracted from the SDSS-DR7 luminous red galaxy sample , and type Ia supernova (SN) data from the Union-2 compilation . Finally, we impose a constraint on the Hubble parameter based on the Hubble Space Telescope observations . We refrain from using observational data pertaining to very small length scales, such as estimates of small-scale density fluctuation amplitudes from the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest and cluster abundance. While these measurements are in principle an extremely powerful tool for constraining neutrino masses, they are also currently dominated by systematic uncertainties. We have tested explicitly that adding data from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT)  does not alter our results; The main role of ACT is to break parameter degeneracies in CMB-only analyses. These degeneracies are however already broken by the addition of LSS data.

We construct allowed regions in cosmological parameter space using standard Bayesian inference techniques. All posterior probability density functions are sampled using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) code `CosmoMC` .

| Parameter | Symbol | Prior |
|:---|:---|:--:|
| Baryon density | $\omega_{\rm b}$ | $0.005 \to 0.1$ |
| Cold dark matter density | $\omega_{\rm cdm}$ | $0.01 \to 0.99$ |
| Hubble parameter | $h$ | $0.4 \to 1.0$ |
| Amplitude of scalar spectrum @ $k=0.05~{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ | $\log[10^{10}A_s]$ | $2.7 \to 4$ |
| Scalar spectral index | $n_{\rm s}$ | $0.5 \to 1.5$ |
| Optical depth to reionisation | $\tau$ | $0.01 \to 0.8$ |
| Number of extra massless neutrino degrees of freedom | $\Delta N_{\rm ml}$ | $0 \to 5$ |
| Dark energy equation of state parameter | $w$ | $-2.5 \to -0.5$ |

Definitions of the model parameters and the prior ranges imposed on them in our CMB+LSS likelihood analysis. Uniform priors are used for all listed parameters.

## Cosmological models

We consider three basic cosmological frameworks in which we embed light sterile neutrinos and analyse their consequences.

1.  The $\Lambda$CDM class of models is defined by a flat spatial geometry and six free parameters, $\{\omega_{\rm
        b},\omega_{\rm cdm},h,A_s,n_s,\tau\}$. See table  for their definitions and prior ranges. Within this framework, we consider four possibilities in the neutrino sector: (a) 3 massless neutrinos (standard $\Lambda$CDM), (b) 3 massless+1 sterile (0 eV), (c) 3 massless+1 sterile (1 eV), and (d) 3 massless+1 sterile (2 eV).

2.  In the second class of models, which we dub $\Lambda$CDM+$\Delta N$, we include additional relativistic degrees of freedom beyond the 3+1 standard and sterile neutrinos. We consider three scenarios: (a) $3+\Delta N_{\rm
        ml}$ massless+1 sterile (0 eV), (b) $3+\Delta N_{\rm
        ml}$ massless+1 sterile (1 eV), and (c) $3+ \Delta N_{\rm
        ml}$ massless+1 sterile (2 eV). Such models are especially sensitive to BBN constraints to be discussed in section .

3.  The $w$CDM+$\Delta N$ framework is a variant of $\Lambda$CDM+$\Delta N$, in which we extend the dark energy sector to include the possibility that $w \neq -1$.

## Goodness-of-fit

We consider first the goodness-of-fit, as quantified by the best-fit effective $\chi^2$, of the cosmological models described in the previous section. Here the effective $\chi^2$ is defined as $\chi^2_{\rm eff} = - 2 \ln \mathcal{L}_{\rm max}$, where $\mathcal{L}_{\rm max}$ is the maximum likelihood of the data given the model. Table  summarises the best-fit $\chi^2_{\rm eff}$ for these models and, where appropriate, the preferred values of $\Delta N_{\rm
  ml}$ and $w$, using the data sets described in section . Some comments are in order.

1.  Within the $\Lambda$CDM framework, a scenario with 3 massless neutrinos plus one fully thermalised massless sterile species offers a slightly better fit than standard $\Lambda$CDM ($\Delta \chi^2_{\rm
        eff} = - 3.16$). However, once the sterile states have mass, the quality of the fit deteriorates. The 1 eV scenario is already marginally worse than standard $\Lambda$CDM by $\Delta \chi^2_{\rm
        eff} =4.20$. The 2 eV model may be deemed unacceptable ($\Delta\chi^2_{\rm eff} = 21.41$).

2.  The situation improves when we allow for additional radiation ($\Lambda$CDM+$\Delta N$). For example, if the sterile neutrino has a mass of 1 eV, the best-fit $\chi^2_{\rm eff}$ is comparable to that of standard $\Lambda$CDM, albeit at the cost of admitting $\Delta N_{\rm ml} \sim 1.5$ additional massless degrees of freedom. For a 2 eV sterile mass, we find $\Delta N_{\rm ml} \sim 2.6$ and $\chi^2_{\rm
        eff}=12.8$. This last result can be compared with the $w$CDM+$\Omega_k$ model of reference , for which $\Delta \chi^2_{\rm eff} = 12$ assuming a *lighter* 1.33 eV sterile neutrino. Therefore, introducing extra radiation appears to be somewhat superior to modifying the dark energy sector at resolving the sterile mass conundrum.

3.  Even more improvement is available if, in addition, we allow the dark energy equation of state parameter $w$ to differ from $-1$ ($w$CDM+$\Delta N$). In this class of models, we see that a scenario with one species of 1 eV sterile neutrinos in fact provides a better fit to the data than does standard $\Lambda$CDM, with $\Delta \chi^2_{\rm eff} =-0.78$, at the expense of two additional free parameters.

| Framework | Neutrino sector | $\Delta \chi^2_{\rm eff}$ | $\Delta N_{\rm ml}$ | $w$ | $\omega_{\rm cdm}$ |
|:---|:---|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|
| $\Lambda$CDM | 3 massless | $0$ | – | – | $0.1132^{+0.0036}_{-0.0082}$ |
|  | 3 massless + 1 sterile (0 eV) | $-3.16$ | – | – | $0.1299^{+0.0069}_{-0.0066}$ |
|  | 3 massless + 1 sterile (1 eV) | $4.20$ | – | – | $0.1398^{+0.0061}_{-0.0074}$ |
|  | 3 massless + 1 sterile (2 eV) | $21.41$ | – | – | $0.1473^{+0.0075}_{-0.0064}$ |
| $\Lambda$CDM+$\Delta N$ | 3+$\Delta N_{\rm ml}$ massless + 1 sterile (0 eV) | $-3.54$ | $0.01^{+1.12}_{-0.01}$ | – | $0.133^{+0.023}_{-0.005}$ |
|  | 3+$\Delta N_{\rm ml}$ massless + 1 sterile (1 eV) | $2.26$ | $1.49^{+1.11}_{-0.73}$ | – | $0.166^{+0.026}_{-0.017}$ |
|  | 3+$\Delta N_{\rm ml}$ massless + 1 sterile (2 eV) | $12.82$ | $2.57^{+1.24}_{-0.59}$ | – | $0.192^{+0.031}_{-0.015}$ |
| $w$CDM+$\Delta N$ | 3+$\Delta N_{\rm ml}$ massless + 1 sterile (0 eV) | $-5.38$ | $0.09^{+1.61}_{-0.09}$ | $-1.00^{+0.18}_{-0.12}$ | $0.132^{+0.032}_{-0.006}$ |
|  | 3+$\Delta N_{\rm ml}$ massless + 1 sterile (1 eV) | $-0.78$ | $1.23^{+1.61}_{-0.75}$ | $-1.11^{+0.18}_{-0.21}$ | $0.164^{+0.035}_{-0.015}$ |
|  | 3+$\Delta N_{\rm ml}$ massless + 1 sterile (2 eV) | $7.80$ | $2.48^{+1.71}_{-0.79}$ | $-1.17^{+0.23}_{-0.22}$ | $0.198^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ |

Best-fit $\Delta \chi^2_{\rm eff}$ relative to the standard $\Lambda$CDM framework for the models described in section , using the data sets of section . We also show the best-fit values and 95%-credible upper and lower limits on $\omega_{\rm cdm}$, and, where appropriate, on $\Delta N_{\rm ml}$ and $w$.

## Effects on other cosmological parameters

We have seen that precision cosmological observations can reasonably accommodate one fully thermalised species of massive sterile neutrinos if we allow also for additional massless degrees of freedom and/or a non-standard dark energy equation of state. An interesting consequence is that the preferred values of other free parameters of the model also shift accordingly.

The most notable example in this regard is the cold dark matter density $\omega_{\rm cdm}$. Figure  illustrates the shift in $\omega_{\rm cdm}$ as a function of the sterile neutrino mass within the $\Lambda$CDM+$\Delta N$ framework. Figure  is similar, but for the $w$CDM+$\Delta N$ models. See also table  for the best-fit values and credible regions. Clearly, the larger the sterile neutrino mass, the larger the preferred value of $\omega_{\rm cdm}$. In the case of a 2 eV sterile neutrino, the upward shift in $\omega_{\rm cdm}$ can be as large as 75% in the $w$CDM+$\Delta N$ model, relative to the standard $\Lambda$CDM inferred value. This shift in the cold dark matter density can have importance consequences for, e.g., the SUSY dark matter parameter space.

Another affected parameter is the scalar spectral index $n_s$, whose preferred region widens in the presence of additional light species, as was also seen in our previous analysis .

# Big bang nucleosynthesis

While not sensitive to the masses of neutrinos, BBN has long been used to probe the radiation content of the Universe at temperatures of order 1 MeV . In this section, we explore the implications of the latest primordial element abundance measurements on the sterile neutrino scenario. We consider a general BBN model with three free parameters: the baryon density $\omega_{\rm b}$, an extra $N_{\rm s}$ effective sterile neutrino species on top of the usual three fully thermalised standard neutrinos, and, eventually we also allow for the presence of a neutrino chemical potential $\xi$. Table  summarises the prior ranges for these parameters.

| Parameter                   | Symbol           |      Prior       |
|:----------------------------|:-----------------|:----------------:|
| Baryon density              | $\omega_{\rm b}$ | $0.01 \to 0.035$ |
| Number of sterile neutrinos | $N_{\rm s}$      |    $0 \to 5$     |
| Neutrino chemical potential | $\xi$            |  $-0.2 \to 0.3$  |

Definitions of the model parameters and the prior ranges imposed on them in our BBN likelihood analysis. Uniform priors are used for all listed parameters.

## Analysis

We infer constraints on the BBN parameters with a modified version of the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampler `CosmoMC` . [^1] The `PArthENoPE`  code is employed to pre-calculate the primordial element abundances on a grid of points in $(\omega_{\rm b},N_{\rm s},\xi)$-space. For each set of parameter values the abundances are then obtained from the grid by 3-dimensional cubic spline interpolation. We illustrate the dependence of the light element abundances on the cosmological parameters on selected slices through parameter space in figure .

## Uncertainties of input data

The output of `PArthENoPE` is subject to theoretical uncertainties from two principal sources: the nuclear reaction rates and the free neutron lifetime $\tau_{\rm n}$. The former induce a $\pm1.6$% error for the D prediction, negligible error for $^4$He, and $\pm8$% for $^7$Li . We fold these uncertainties into our definitions of the corresponding likelihood functions in section .

The main source of uncertainty for the predicted $^4$He abundance is the free neutron lifetime. The Particle Data Group recommends a value of $\tau_{\rm n}^{\rm PDG} = 885.7 \pm 0.8$ s . This, however, appears to be in strong tension with recent measurements performed by Serebrov *et al.* , who found $\tau_{\rm n}^{\rm S} = 878.5
\pm 0.8$ s, and Pichlmair *et al.* , who measured . Although a re-analysis of neutron lifetime data shows that previous estimates may have been biased by $\sim +6$ s , we will nonetheless consider the two extreme values $\tau_{\rm n}^{\rm S}$ and $\tau_{\rm n}^{\rm PDG}$ in the following, in order to illustrate the possible impact of this uncertainty on our inference. Going from $\tau_{\rm n}^{\rm S}$ to $\tau_{\rm n}^{\rm PDG}$ shifts the $Y_{\rm
  p}$ prediction by $\sim 0.6\%$, whereas $\left[^2{\rm D}/{\rm
    H}\right]_{\rm p}$ and $\left[^7{\rm Li}/{\rm H}\right]_{\rm p}$ change by $\sim 0.3\%$ which is negligible compared with the effects of other uncertainties (nuclear rates and astrophysical measurements).

## Primordial element abundance data and likelihood functions

### Deuterium

The primordial deuterium abundance $\left[{\rm D}/{\rm H}
\right]_{\rm p}$ can be inferred from measurements of the absorption of quasar light in high-redshift low-metallicity hydrogen clouds. Pettini *et al.*  derive a value of $\log
\left[{\rm D}/{\rm H} \right]_{\rm p} = -4.55 \pm 0.03$ from the observation of the spectra of seven quasars. Taking into account the theoretical uncertainty of 1.6%, the corresponding likelihood function is $$-2 \ln \mathcal{L}_{\rm D} = \frac{\left(\log \left[ {\rm D}/{\rm H} \right]_{\rm p} + 4.55 \right)^2}{0.034^2}.$$

### Helium-4

The mass fraction $Y$ of $^4$He is determined by measuring helium and hydrogen emission lines in low-metallicity HII regions of dwarf galaxies. Its primordial value $Y_{\rm p}$ can then be estimated by treating $Y$ as a function of metallicity $Z$ and extrapolating to $Z=0$. A linear regression of data from seven high-quality objects with a careful treatment of systematic uncertainties yields $Y_{\rm
p} = 0.2573^{+0.0033}_{-0.0088}$, with the additional restriction to theoretically meaningful positive slopes ${\rm d}Y/{\rm d}Z > 0$ . [^2] We therefore model the likelihood function as $$\label{eq:helike}
  -2 \ln \mathcal{L}_{\rm ^4He} =\left\{
    \begin{array}{cl}
      \frac{\left( Y_{\rm p} - 0.2573 \right )^2}{0.0033^2},&
     {\rm if}\ Y_{\rm p} \geq 0.2573 ,
     \\  \frac{\left( Y_{\rm p} - 0.2573 \right)^2}{0.0088^2}, &{\rm if}\ Y_{\rm p} < 0.2573.
    \end{array}
\right.$$

### Lithium-7

Lithium abundances have been determined from the spectra of metal-poor dwarf stars. At low metallicities, the lithium abundance appears to be independent of metallicity . However, the measurements are subject to significant systematic uncertainties about the stars' temperatures. Additionally, the measured plateau value may not be representative of the primordial abundance: $^7$Li can be generated by cosmic rays, or depleted through Population III stars or diffusion processes within the dwarf stars .

The Particle Data Group estimates an average of $[^7{\rm Li}/{\rm
  H}]_{\rm p} = (1.7 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.44) \times 10^{-10}$, which is significantly lower than the standard BBN expectation for realistic baryon densities – the well-known lithium problem . Approximating the 8% theoretical uncertainty with an absolute error of $\sigma^{\rm nucl}_{^7{\rm
Li}} \simeq 0.4 \times 10^{-10}$ and adding the errors in quadrature, we arrive at the following likelihood function for lithium: $$-2 \ln \mathcal{L}_{^7{\rm Li}} = \frac{\left( 10^{10} [^7{\rm Li}/{\rm H}]_{\rm p} - 1.7 \right)^2}{0.598^2},$$ which will be considered only where appropriate.

### CMB+LSS prior on the baryon density

In addition to primordial abundance measurements, we also consider a prior on the baryon density $\omega_{\rm b}$ from CMB+LSS data as an independent constraint. Since the bounds on $\omega_{\rm b}$ are in principle model-dependent, using results from a fit to the standard $\Lambda$CDM model as a prior for extended models would be technically incorrect. Instead we use the baryon density inferred within the $\Lambda$CDM+$N_{\rm s}$ model, $\omega_{\rm b} = 0.02255
\pm 0.00049$, to define our prior $$-2 \ln \pi_{\rm CMB+LSS}(\omega_{\rm b}) \propto  \frac{\left( \omega_{\rm b} - 0.02255 \right)^2}{0.00049^2}.$$ In practice, however, present CMB+LSS data are sufficiently sensitive to break any potential degeneracy between $N_{\rm s}$ and $\omega_{\rm b}$, so that the constraints on $\omega_{\rm b}$ show no appreciable variation with respect to the inclusion or otherwise of the parameter $N_{\rm s}$.

## BBN with sterile neutrinos

We first consider a BBN scenario with $N_{\rm s}$ effective sterile neutrino species. The additional radiation energy density contributed by the sterile neutrinos increases the expansion rate at BBN, leading to a higher freeze-out temperature $T_{\rm f}$. As a consequence, the equilibrium neutron-to-proton ratio $n/p = \exp (-
\Delta m/T)$, where $\Delta m$ is the neutron-proton mass difference, is larger at neutron freeze-out. The resulting $Y_{\rm
p}$ is larger because almost all neutrons end up in $^4$He. Similarly, a larger neutron lifetime also increases the expected $Y_{\rm p}$.

We show the constraints on the $(\omega_{\rm b},N_{\rm s})$ parameter space from our analysis in figure . The top two panels illustrate the well-known fact that the deuterium abundance constrains mainly the baryon density, whereas constraints on $N_{\rm s}$ are mostly driven by the helium data. However, once we impose the CMB+LSS prior on $\omega_{\rm b}$, even the deuterium data alone significantly constrain $N_{\rm s}$. This constraint is of interest in view of the helium data already being systematics-limited.

For a combined fit of the deuterium and the helium data, the best-fit value of $N_{\rm s}$ is 0.86, with a 95%-credible upper limit of $N_{\rm s} < 1.26$ (or 1.24 if the CMB+LSS prior on $\omega_{\rm b}$ is included). Using the larger neutron lifetime $\tau_{\rm n}^{\rm
  PDG}$, we obtain slightly lower values: a best-fit of 0.73 and a 95% upper limit of $N_{\rm s} < 1.14$. The one-dimensional marginalised posterior probability densities for $N_{\rm s}$ are shown in figure . As already emphasised in reference , there is no strong indication for $N_{\rm s} > 0$ from BBN alone – $N_{\rm s} = 0$ lies well within the 90%-credible interval in all cases – owing to the relatively weak lower limit on $Y_{\rm p}$. While one fully thermalised sterile neutrino species is slightly favoured over $N_{\rm s} = 0$, two fully thermalised sterile neutrino species are clearly incompatible with the data in this scenario.

## Degenerate BBN with sterile neutrinos

If we imagine for a moment that there were two sterile neutrino species today, how could this be reconciled with the results of the previous section? One possibility would be incomplete thermalisation, such that the effective $N_{\rm s}$ is smaller than 2; this scenario could be confirmed if future CMB+LSS data should find $N_{\rm eff} <
5$. Alternatively, the sterile neutrinos could be the decay products of a heavy particle species between BBN and decoupling. In this case, $N_{\rm s}$ could be smaller than 2 at BBN, but equal to or larger than 2 at decoupling.

A third possibility is the degenerate BBN scenario , in which all standard neutrinos share a common non-zero chemical potential $\xi$ . The presence of a chemical potential affects BBN in two ways. Firstly, it contributes an additional term to the effective radiation density, $$\Delta N_{\rm eff} = \frac{45}{7} \left[ 2  \left(\xi/\pi\right)^2 + \left(\xi/\pi\right)^4 \right].$$ Secondly, the degeneracy in the electron neutrinos modifies the equilibrium neutron-to-proton ratio, $$n/p = \exp \left( - \frac{\Delta m}{T} - \xi \right).$$ For $\xi \simeq \mathcal{O}(0.1)$, it is the latter effect that is most relevant for the resulting element abundances: a positive $\xi$ will reduce the number of available neutrons with respect to the $\xi
= 0$ case and thus suppress $Y_{\rm p}$. This suppression can be used to circumvent the upper bound on $N_{\rm s}$ found in the previous section.

Figure  shows the preferred region in the $(\xi,N_{\rm
s})$-plane in the degenerate BBN scenario. In the 3-dimensional parameter space $(\omega_{\rm b}, N_{\rm s},\xi)$, the deuterium and the helium data can only constrain two directions, leaving an unconstrained one which admits arbitrarily high values of $N_{\rm
s}$. Only by adding the CMB+LSS prior on $\omega_{\rm b}$ are we able to obtain any constraint at all: we find a best-fit of $N_{\rm
s} = 0.79$ and a 95%-credible upper limit of $N_{\rm s} < 2.56$. Conversely, if we assume $N_{\rm
  s} = 2$, a positive non-zero chemical potential is required: $0.03 <
\xi < 0.14$ (95%-credible interval), with a best-fit value of $\xi
= 0.064$.

As can be seen from figure , larger values of $N_{\rm
  s}$ and $\xi$ both lead to a lower prediction for the primordial $^7$Li abundance. Taking for instance $N_{\rm s} = 2$, $\xi =
0.066$ and $\omega_{\rm b} = 0.0225$, one obtains $\left[ ^7{\rm
Li}/{\rm
    H}\right]_{\rm p} = 0.372 \times 10^{-10}$ (compared to$\left[
  ^7{\rm Li}/{\rm H}\right]_{\rm p} = 0.460 \times 10^{-10}$ for $N_{\rm s} = \xi = 0$). While this is still $3.4$ standard deviations larger than the measured value, the discrepancy is not quite as serious as the 4.8 standard deviations one finds in standard BBN.

## Combining BBN with CMB+LSS data

If one assumes that neither $\omega_{\rm b}$ nor $N_{\rm eff}$ changed between the BBN era and the time of photon decoupling, one could perform a combined analysis of the CMB+LSS and BBN data in analogy to the previous literature .

With the stringent upper bound on the radiation density from the standard BBN setting, it is clear that the scenarios with one eV-mass sterile neutrino plus extra massless degrees of freedom considered in section  will fit the combined data rather badly: for a 1 eV (2 eV) sterile neutrino, the $\Lambda$CDM+$\Delta N$ model yields $\Delta \chi^2_{\rm eff} \simeq 9\ (19)$, relative to $\Lambda$CDM. This, in turn suggests the necessity for further modifications of the cosmological model: either by dropping the assumption of $N_{\rm eff}$ (or $\omega_{\rm b}$) being constant, or, as seen above, by admitting a nonzero neutrino chemical potential.

Aside of the massive sterile neutrino scenario, the combination of CMB+LSS and BBN data can of course also be used to constrain the commonly considered case of $N_{\rm eff}$ massless degrees of freedom. We find $N_{\rm eff} = 3.90^{+0.39}_{-0.56}$ at 95% credibility, with the standard model expectation of $N_{\rm eff} =
3.046$ outside the 99.5%-credible region, similar to the limits reported in the recent work of Hou *et al.* .

# Conclusions

In this work we have investigated the effects of eV-mass sterile neutrinos, as suggested by global interpretations of neutrino oscillation data, on cosmology. Such sterile neutrinos can thermalise prior to neutrino decoupling, thus contributing to the relativistic energy density in the early universe. However, while the combination of CMB+LSS and BBN data does appear to prefer extra relativistic degrees of freedom at 99.5% credibility within the $\Lambda$CDM framework, fully thermalised massive sterile neutrinos in the 1–2 eV mass range necessarily violates the hot dark matter limit on the maximum neutrino mass. In terms of the goodness-of-fit, adding one massless sterile neutrino species improves the CMB+LSS fit by relative to standard $\Lambda$CDM, whereas endowing this sterile state with a mass of 1 eV worsens the fit by relative to the same benchmark. Such a scenario is then excluded or strongly disfavoured.

Nonetheless, while it appears difficult to accommodate eV-mass sterile neutrinos within the $\Lambda$CDM framework, extending the framework with modifications in the neutrino sector improves to some extent the consistency of sterile neutrinos with precision cosmological data. The simplest such modification is to admit even more additional (effectively massless) relativistic degrees of freedom, not necessarily fully thermalised. Such a scenario improves somewhat the bad effect of the 1 eV sterile neutrino mass at the expense of introducing an additional 1.5 massless species, but the $\chi^2_{\rm eff}$ of the fit is still worse than standard $\Lambda$CDM by $2.26$ units. Allowing in addition for a dark energy equation of state $w \neq -1$ further improves the fit: for a 1 eV sterile neutrino, a model with $w=-1.11$ and $1.23$ additional massless species in fact fits the data marginally better than standard $\Lambda$CDM ($\Delta \chi^2_{\rm eff} = -0.78$).

Importantly, any model containing eV-mass sterile neutrinos will induce an upward shift in the cold dark matter density inferred from precision cosmological data. This shift can have important consequence for, e.g., the SUSY dark matter parameter space.

However, as is well known, increasing the radiation content in the early universe can be problematic for BBN. We find that while standard BBN prefers roughly an extra relativistic degree of freedom, which we interpret here as a thermalised 1–2 eV sterile neutrino species, additional fully thermalised massless species are strongly disfavoured. Nevertheless, it is possible to circumvent these BBN constraints with the introduction of a $\nu_e$ chemical potential, which itself could have been created by active-sterile oscillations in the early universe. Thus, the state of affairs can be summarised as follows. We need additional radiation to reduce the bad effect of hot dark matter on precision cosmology, and a small neutrino chemical potential to undo the bad effect of too much radiation on BBN. In principle, both of these ingredients can originate from the neutrino sector alone.

In summary, it is not trivial to accommodate a strongly mixed eV-mass sterile neutrino in cosmology. Additional ingredients are required, such as additional radiation, a neutrino chemical potential, or a nontrivial $w$ parameter. In all cases, significant changes in the inferred values of other *a priori* unrelated cosmological parameters are also incurred, e.g., an increase in the cold dark matter density. Thus, should the experimental indications for eV-mass sterile neutrinos become stronger, one must consider a fairly complex modification of the standard $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. On the observational side, the upcoming precision measurement of $\Delta N_{\rm ml}$ by Planck remains one of the most promising windows to physics beyond the standard model.

# Acknowledgements

We acknowledge computing resources from the Danish Center for Scientific Computing (DCSC). JH acknowledges support from a Feodor Lynen-fellowship of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. GR acknowledges partial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under grants No. TR 27 and EXC 153.

[^1]: The numerical module for implementing the BBN likelihood in `CosmoMC` is available from the corresponding author (Jan Hamann) upon request.

[^2]: It has been argued that a linear regression may not necessarily be realistic in view of certain models of early $^4$He production by Pop III stars , as for instance suggested in references . However, even in these cases, the difference between the primordial and the observed values of $Y$ will not exceed $\sim 0.01$, a possibility that is well covered by the lower limit on $Y_{\rm p}$ in equation ().


abstract: Light scalar fields with only gravitational strength couplings are typically present in UV complete theories of physics beyond the Standard Model. In the early universe it is natural for these fields to dominate the energy density, and their subsequent decay – if prior to BBN – will typically yield some dark matter particles in their decay products. In this paper we make the observation that a Non-thermal WIMP 'Miracle' may result: that is, in the simplest solution to the cosmological moduli problem, non-thermally produced WIMPs can naturally account for the observed dark matter relic density. Such a solution may be generic in string theory compactifications.
author: Bobby Samir Acharya[^1]; Gordon Kane[^2] and Scott Watson[^3][^4]; Piyush Kumar[^5]
date: 2024-10-03
title: A Non-thermal WIMP 'Miracle'

# Introduction

For several decades, a compelling theoretical picture for dark matter has been developed and widely applied, based on what is now called the Thermal WIMP 'Miracle'. In this picture, the early Universe is very hot and dense and essentially all particle species are in thermal and chemical equilibrium. As the Universe expands and cools to a temperature of order the mass of the dark matter particle $\chi$, the annihilations of $\chi$ cease to be efficient at reducing the number of particles compared to the cosmic expansion and a 'freeze-out' occurs. The resulting relic number density of $\chi$-particles then depends only on the ratio of the annihilation cross-section of $\chi$ and the Hubble scale near the freeze-out temperature. For Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs), i.e. particles with electroweak interactions and masses, the 'miracle' is that this ratio is in good agreement with that deduced from astrophysical and cosmological experiments (see for reviews).

Whilst this is an extremely compelling idea, it can often be difficult to implement in practice, with the relic density predicted by theory disagreeing with the data by a couple orders of magnitude in both directions. That is, the thermal WIMP 'miracle' faces significant challenges when directly confronted with precision data. It is not clear at present if this should be viewed as a failure of the theoretical models or as a phenomenological guide to select particular classes of models. For example, in supersymmetric models, where the thermal relic idea has perhaps been most extensively explored, most of the parameter space yields an incorrect dark matter density, prompting attempts to look at special regions .

Furthermore, by considering the high energy behavior (UV completion) of phenomenologically based models, it becomes less straightforward to motivate cosmologies in which the Universe is in thermal equilibrium prior to Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN). This is partly because many UV completions lead to the inclusion of moduli – neutral scalar fields which couple to matter only gravitational – and for a wide range of masses these moduli will typically evolve to dominate the cosmic energy density prior to BBN.

As a result, the decay of the moduli must give rise to temperatures above that of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) - a few MeV - or the predictions of BBN will be ruined. This is the cosmological moduli problem (formerly known as the Polonyi problem) and typically requires that the moduli masses are at least 10 TeV or greater. Of course, exceptions are possible. A period of low-scale inflation could dilute the moduli density . Another possibility is if signigicant energy is not stored in the fields. This could be accomplished by dynamics, or if the moduli are stabilized initially near points of enhanced symmetry . However, in this case, the need for a perturbative low energy theory necessarily requires at least one modulus to remain unprotected, and thus a substantial contribution to the energy density should still be expected . We will not discuss these interesting possibilities further here.

Moduli which evade the cosmological moduli problem have masses which are typically greater than that of WIMP dark matter candidates, so their decays will necessarily result in the production of some dark matter. In fact, the yield of dark matter particles can be quite large, since moduli tend to couple to the matter sector universally with gravitational strength couplings ($\sim 1/{m_p}$) and the branching ratios to stable particles are expected to be substantial. Thus, the density of dark matter at the time of moduli decay will typically be a sizable fraction of the energy density of the moduli themselves. Non-thermally produced dark matter has been considered previously by many authors .

In this paper we will attempt to elaborate the connection between the moduli problem and non-thermally produced dark matter. In the absence of any strong guidance as to how one might proceed from fundamental theory, we will take the viewpoint of a *generic supergravity theory containing moduli*. That is, we will simply take an effective field theory approach to the general problem of moduli coupled to matter in a supersymmetric framework. *A priori* though, in order to proceed, one still requires a clue about the mass spectrum of superpartners, moduli and the dark matter candidate. In fact, the effective theory itself provides such a clue.

To see this, note that in a generic supergravity theory the moduli masses are of order $m_{3/2}$ (the gravitino mass) and, furthermore, all scalars receive mass term contributions of the same order . This includes all squarks and sleptons. Thus, since $m_{3/2}$ is required to be at least 10 TeV because of the moduli problem, squarks and sleptons are at least as massive. Further, as we will argue below, gauginos need not be as massive as the squarks and sleptons in such a generic supergravity theory. On the other hand, in the absence of special symmetries, higgsinos also generically have a mass of order $m_{3/2}$ by the Giudice-Masiero mechanism. If we thus consider the simplest model within this framework - the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) coupled to moduli, these arguments suggest that $\chi$ is a (neutral) gaugino, i.e. a Bino, Wino or a mixture thereof.

Rather surprisingly, within the class of models with spectra suggested by the above arguments, there exists a Non-thermal WIMP 'Miracle' under very general conditions. In other words, by solving the cosmological moduli problem, one automatically obtains a consistent solution to the basic dark matter problem with WIMPs when the moduli masses are 10's of TeV.. However, as will be seen, compared to the thermal case, the WIMP annihilation cross-section is larger, thereby suggesting regions of parameter space previously avoided based on the thermal dark matter picture.

Examples of models with the sorts of spectra considered here have been considered previously in the context of AMSB and more recently in the context of $M$ theory where the non-thermal production of dark matter was emphasized (see also ). These examples show that with additional, well motivated assumptions, that the arguments of this paper can be sharpened and detailed models can be constructed. We emphasize that many of the ideas given here were inspired by the seminal work of .

# Moduli Masses and Supersymmetry breaking

The moduli fields must enter the supergravity potential. If not, they would remain massless and not gain the vevs required to explain, e.g. the value of the fine-structure constant $\alpha_{em}$ or the Yukawa couplings in the Standard Model. If $V$ is the potential for all scalar fields, and the only supersymmetry breaking physics is generated at the scale of order $\sqrt{F}$, then the moduli masses will generically also be of order the gravitino mass as we now review.

The supergravity potential evaluated in the vacuum is of the form $$\label{eqn1}
V = e^{K/m_p^2} F^i F_i -3m_{3/2}^2 m_{p}^2$$ where $F_i$ are the vacuum values of the SUSY-breaking $F$-terms which are to be summed over all scalars $\phi_i$ with non-trivial $F$-terms, $K$ is the Kahler potential, and $m_{3/2}$ is the gravitino mass. Hence, because the observed vacuum energy today is so small, $$m_{3/2} \sim F/m_{p}$$ where $F$ is of order the dominant $F$-term. This must be true, regardless of the mechanism of supersymmetry breaking. In fact, $F/m_{p}$ sets the typical mass scale for all scalar fields appearing in $V$ in a generic supergravity theory. For instance, since $$\label{eqn2}
F_i = {\partial W \over \partial{\phi_i}} + {\partial K \over \partial{\phi_i}} W \equiv \partial_{i} W + K_i W$$ where $W$ is the superpotential, there are terms in $V$ of order $$V \sim K_i K^i {|W|^2 \over m_p^2}.$$ If we consider the terms in $K$ (or in $K_i K^i$ ) of order $\phi_i \phi_i^*$ we obtain contributions to $V$ like $$V \sim \phi_i \phi_i^* {|W|^2 \over m_p^2}$$ In the vacuum $|W|^2 \sim m_{3/2}^2 m_{p}^4$ hence these terms are mass terms for $\phi_i$ of order $m_{3/2}$. Hence, all scalars receive contributions to their masses of order $m_{3/2}$ in a generic supergravity theory. This includes moduli as well as matter scalars such as higgses, squarks and sleptons [^6].

Exceptions exist to the above general statements. In the language of low energy supersymmetry, these would correspond to very special vacuum Kahler and superpotentials for the moduli and matter fields. For instance, if the moduli dynamics is $R$-symmetry preserving, then the moduli potential will not break supersymmetry and the moduli could, in principle, obtain large masses and vevs independent of the value of the gravitino mass, whose value is set by additional $R$-breaking dynamics at another scale. We will not consider such exceptions further, except in the conclusions, and will adopt the viewpoint of the 'generic supergravity Lagrangian'.

Notice also that, if there were a bare, large mass term in $W$ for the moduli, the fact that the moduli get vevs will give $W$ a vev in general and therefore contributes to $m_{3/2}$ thereby connecting again the moduli and gravitino mass. Again, to avoid this requires $R$-symmetric moduli dynamics.

## Gauge Mediation

In gauge mediation the dominant $F$-term $\sqrt{F} \leq 10^{10}$ GeV, though typically $F$ is taken to be much smaller than what the upper limit (of high scale gauge mediation) suggests. Hence, the gravitino mass and moduli masses are of order $$m_{3/2} \sim m_{\phi} \sim F/m_{p} \leq 10 \mathrm{GeV}$$

Since theories of gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking have $\sqrt{F}$ between a TeV and $10^{10}$ GeV they lead to moduli masses in the wide range: $$10^{-3} \mathrm{eV} \leq m_{\phi} \leq 10\; \mathrm{GeV}$$

Of course, in gauge mediation, charged scalars get much larger corrections to their masses from their interactions with the 'messengers of SUSY breaking', but the moduli do not.

This range of moduli masses leads to cosmological problems. First of all, since the moduli have Planck scale suppressed couplings to matter, this range of masses gives moduli whose lifetimes are between 100 and $10^{42}$ years. After inflation, when the Hubble scale becomes of order $m_{\phi}$ the moduli begin to oscillate and will quickly dominate the energy density of the universe over radiation. This range of masses corresponds to temperatures $$\mathrm{TeV} \leq T_{osc} \leq 10^{10} \; \mathrm{GeV}$$ which means that such moduli would begin to dominate *before* BBN. Therefore, such models lead to Universes which are dominated by moduli for very long periods. Further, after the moduli decay the Universe is not reheated enough to start BBN with the correct conditions. Hence, gauge mediation models coupled to moduli require quite special Kahler and super potentials which would allow for the moduli to be very massive compared to the gravitino.

## Moduli Masses in Gravity Mediation

In gravity mediation, $\sqrt{F}$ is much higher, e.g. $10^{11}$GeV to $10^{16}$GeV and hence $m_{3/2}$ is usually taken to be of order TeV, since supersymmetry is assumed to solve the hierarchy problem. Then, through the typical supergravity couplings discussed above, the moduli will also end up with TeV scale masses. Such moduli will decay *during* BBN and will typically ruin its successful predictions for light element abundances. The gravitino also leads to similar problems. This is just the usual moduli problem.

In gravity mediation, there is a simple solution to these problems. One can simply raise the scale of SUSY breaking ($\sqrt{F}$) by a factor of a few which raises both $m_{3/2}$ and $m_{\phi}$ by one order of magnitude. This decreases the moduli lifetime by three orders of magnitude and is consistent with BBN occurring just after the moduli have decayed. A detailed model in this case has been described in . Notice that the gravitino mass has also been raised above the TeV scale, since $F$ is increased.

Since, as we have discussed above, all scalars, including squarks, sleptons and Higgses, will have masses of order $m_{3/2}$ the fine tuning problem between $m_{3/2}$ and $m_{Z}$ is naively much worse in theories with moduli than in the usual little Hierarchy problem.

A crucial point, however, is that the gauginos do not have to be as massive as the squarks and sleptons: they can easily be lighter if *the field whose $F$-term dominates SUSY breaking in the hidden sector is not the field whose vev generates the gauge couplings* $\alpha$. In fact, in the generic supergravity point of view, there is no reason why the gauge coupling function should be dominated by the field with the dominant $F$-term. This can presumably also be understood as the consequence of an approximate $R$-symmetry in this sector. Here we emphasize that it is quite generic. However, in general this approximate $R$-symmetry only suppresses the gaugino masses but not that of the higgsinos. One could also have special $R$-symmetries in which both gaugino and higgsino masses are suppressed, as in split supersymmetry . Hence, we expect that the gauginos are significantly lighter than the squarks and sleptons. In the absence of special $R$-symmetries, we expect the higgsinos to get masses through the Giudice-Masiero mechanism of order $m_{3/2}$.

What we learn is – by considering the simplest solution to the cosmological moduli problem, we obtain a rough picture of the spectrum of BSM particles. Existing models which have this kind of spectrum include Anomaly Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking Models (AMSB) and the $G_2$-MSSM .

## The Non-thermal WIMP 'Miracle'

By taking this effective field theory approach we have arrived at a picture which suggests that supersymmetry breaking is gravity mediated with moduli and gravitino masses of order 10 TeV. The squark, slepton and higgsino masses are also of order 10 TeV, whereas the gauginos are typically lighter. Cosmologically, these moduli inevitably dominate the Universe after inflation and up to BBN.

We can now ask: with the spectrum roughly fixed by these arguments, how much dark matter is produced, both thermally, and non-thermally by the decays of the moduli fields? In other words, is there a connection between the moduli and dark matter problems?

After inflation, when the Hubble expansion becomes comparable to the mass of the moduli ($m_{\phi}$) they will begin to oscillate in their potential. The resulting energy density will dilute like normal pressure-less matter and they will quickly come to dominate the energy density. The oscillations will begin at a temperature determined by the moduli mass $$T_{osc} \sim \left(m_{\phi} m_{p}\right)^{1/2}.$$ The resulting condensate will then decay when the expansion rate becomes comparable to the decay rate $$\label{modulidecay}
H \sim \Gamma_{\phi} \sim {m_{\phi}^3 \over m_{p}^2}.$$ Given that the moduli dominate before their decays, the resulting energy density is (assuming instantaneous decay) $\rho_{decay} \sim {\Gamma_{\phi}}^2 m_{p}^2 = {m_{\phi}^6 / m_{p}^2}$ and so the expected number density of dark matter particles will be $$n_{\chi} \sim Br_{\phi \rightarrow \chi } \left( \frac{\rho_{d}}{m_{\chi}} \right)
\sim Br_{\phi \rightarrow \chi } \left( { m_{\phi}^6 \over m_{\chi} m_p^2 } \right)$$ We can compare with the critical number density for annihilations to occur, $$n_c \sim {H \over \sigma v} \sim {\Gamma_{\phi} \over \sigma v} \sim \frac{m_\phi^3}{m_p^2 \langle \sigma v \rangle},$$ where $\sigma v$ is the self annihilation cross-section times velocity of the produced dark matter particles.

$$\frac{n_\chi }{n_c}  \sim Br_{\phi \rightarrow \chi } \left( \frac{m_\phi^3}{m_\chi} \right) \langle \sigma v \rangle$$ Taking typical weak scale values for the dark matter mass ($\sim 100$ GeV) and cross-section ($\sim 10^{-24} \mathrm{cm}^3 \mathrm{s}^{-1} \sim 10^{-7}\mathrm{GeV^{-2}}$), and moduli masses in the range to address the cosmological moduli problem ($\sim 10-100$ TeV), we find that the number density of produced particles is easily large enough for the $\chi$ particles to annihilate efficiently, unless the branching ratio into dark matter particles is very small. This is unlikely if dark matter particles are gauginos, because the gauge coupling is a modulus vev and this has an order one coupling to the gauginos. They will thus continue to annihilate until their number density becomes of order ${\Gamma_{\phi} \over \sigma v}$. This is the non-thermal analogue of 'thermal freeze out'. Hence, the non-thermal freeze out number density is $$\label{num}
n_{\chi} \sim {H(T_{rh} ) \over \sigma v}$$ where the temperature of the Universe after the decay is $$T_{rh} \sim (\Gamma_{\phi}m_{p})^{1/2} \sim {m_{\phi}^{3/2} \over m_{p}^{1/2}}$$

The fact that a non-thermal freeze out actually occurs is by itself an important statement, making the relic density more model independent than if it did not occur. Assuming no further entropy production in the Universe after this stage, the resulting relic abundance is

where $\sigma_0 = 3 \times 10^{-24} {\mathrm{cm}^3}{\mathrm{s}^{-1}}$ and we have assumed[^7] the constant of proportionality in () is around a factor of ten. For $\chi$ particles with order $100$ GeV mass, a $100$ TeV moduli mass scale gives excellent agreement with the data. Note that, () expresses the number density at freeze-out as the ratio of the Hubble parameter to a particle physics cross-section, just as in the thermal case, except now the Hubble scale is evaluated at the moduli reheating temperature. This is the non-thermal WIMP 'miracle'. With larger moduli masses, smaller cross-sections are also possible. However, this separates the Electroweak scale from the scale of supersymmetry breaking even further and, for masses beyond 1000 TeV there are no good dark matter candidates in the spectrum whose cross-section is small enough, leading to too little non-thermal dark matter. Therefore, the preferred moduli mass scale is roughly 10 to 100 TeV.

For $\mathcal{O}(100)$ GeV masses, the $\chi$ particles freeze out at temperatures of order a few MeV, so the annihilation cross-section is about two to three orders of magnitude larger than the thermal case, where freeze out occurs at a few GeV. Also note that larger moduli masses dilute the final relic density, so that if the dark matter is to be explained this way by gauginos, it requires moduli masses just beyond the weak scale.

# Discussion

The consistent solution of both the dark matter and moduli problems suggests that there is another important scale in nature, of order 10-100 TeV. The picture which emerges here is, in some sense, as compelling as the thermal case, but has the additional advantage that it is consistent with string theory and other frameworks with moduli fields, without having to invoke 'unknown dynamics' which decouple the moduli. The non-thermal dark matter picture requires larger annihilation cross-sections than the thermal case, thereby suggesting a class of models which would not be considered based upon the thermal relic density picture. Larger cross-sections are also helpful to explain the cosmic ray positron excess observed by PAMELA. For instance, the neutral Winos (with annihilation cross-section $\sigma v \approx 2.4 \times 10^{-24} \, {\mathrm{cm}^3}\cdot{\mathrm{s}^{-1}}$) which are the dark matter particles in could be a good fit to the PAMELA data . Non-thermally produced dark matter particles will in general have a different phase space distribution than the thermal case; in principle this could lead to observable consequences for structure formation and the cosmic microwave background. Finally, although entropy production by the decay of moduli also dilutes any pre-existing baryon asymmetry, the problem can be naturally solved if either a sufficiently large initial baryon asymmetry (such as by the Affleck-Dine mechanism) is generated , or if the decays of the moduli themselves generate both the baryon asymmetry and Dark Matter .

We also point out that these arguments tend to disfavor gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking. If gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking were discovered at the LHC, it would imply that our supergravity vacuum is extremely non-generic, in that it allows large moduli masses whilst keeping the gravitino very light. An example might be a theory in which the moduli dynamics is $R$-symmetric whilst supersymmetry breaking is not. This might allow a decoupling of $m_{3/2}$ and $m_{\phi}$. However, as noted in , decoupling these scales is very difficult in general.

We would like to thank Paolo Creminelli, Guido D'Amico, Dan Grin, Jonathan Heckman, Shuntaro Nakamura, and Jorge Norena for useful discussions. The work of P.K. is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231 and NSF grant PHY-04-57315. The research of G.K. and S.W. is supported in part by the Department of Energy and the Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics. S.W. would also like to thank U of T - Austin for financial support under National Science Foundation Grant No. PHY-0455649.

[^1]: bacharyaATcern.ch

[^2]: email@example.com

[^3]: email@example.com

[^4]: On leave from Department of Physics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244

[^5]: firstname.lastname@example.com

[^6]: See for examples.

[^7]: Larger values for the proportionality constant were found from explicit calculations in , and smaller values are possible as well (see e.g. ).