**ABSTRACT**

Quantum mechanics is now 100 years old and still going strong. Combining general relativity with quantum mechanics is the last hurdle to be overcome in the "quantum revolution".

plus .5pt minus .5pt

= 12pt

This year we celebrate 100 years of quantum theory, and in particular the anniversary of an announcement made by Max Planck at a meeting of the German Physical Society on 14 December 1900. Planck was interested in the nature of radiation emitted by hot objects, and in 1900 he devised a theory that described all of the experimental evidence, but that required a radical new concept: energy is not emitted or absorbed continuously, but in discrete amounts, called quanta. At the time, Planck was not aware of the profound consequences of his work, but gradually physicists realized that they needed quantum concepts to understand the structure of all matter and radiation.

Over the past century there have been many successful tests of quantum mechanics (see accompanying commentary by Anton Zeilinger in this issue ). Experiments have confirmed even some of the most counterintuitive predictions of quantum theory, including "particle-wave duality", the idea that a particle should be treated as a wave. But some physicists still wonder whether quantum theory is a truly fundamental ingredient of the laws of nature, or just a convenient description of some aspects of the microscopic world. It is still possible that quantum mechanics is an approximation to a more fundamental theory, just as Newtonian gravity is a special case of the more accurate description of gravity and the relationship between space and time provided by Einstein's general relativity theory.

The biggest challenge to accepting quantum mechanics as a fundamental theory of nature is that despite 70 years of attempts  it has still not been integrated with the classical theory of general relativity. Most of the time, the subtleties of quantum mechanics can be safely ignored by general relativity: gravity drives the expansion of the Universe and the formation of galaxies, whereas quantum theory reigns supreme at the atomic scale. But there are times when quantum mechanics cannot be excluded. For example, a theory unifying gravity and quantum mechanics is required to understand the "Big Bang" - the first few moments of the universe when gravitational interactions were very strong and the scales involved were all microscopic.

Another area of concern is the lack of experimental evidence on the interplay between quantum theory and general relativity. The structure of the two theories does allow for situations in which neither can be neglected, but it is extremely hard to create the required conditions in a laboratory. This is crucial if we are to test any of the theoretical ideas that propose to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity.

**The incomplete revolution.**

The "relativity revolution" and the "quantum revolution" are among the greatest successes of twentieth century physics, yet the theories they produced appear to be fundamentally incompatible. General relativity remains a purely classical theory: it describes the geometry of space and time as smooth and continuous whereas quantum mechanics divides everything into discrete chunks. The predictions of the two theories have been confirmed in a large number of experiments, but each of these experiments is relevant for only one or the other of the two theories because of the different scales involved. Physicists' discomfort with this situation is perhaps best described by Rovelli's characterization  of the 1900s as "the century of the incomplete revolution", suggesting there may be a greater revolution to come.

Part of the underlying theoretical incompatibility arises from the way the two theories treat the geometry of space and time. In quantum mechanics, space-time has the role of a fixed arena within which one describes the evolution of various "quantum observables", such as the position of particles. But in general relativity, space and time are dynamical quantities that can respond to and influence other physical processes, such as the movement of planets. So, in principle, the particles in a quantum mechanics experiment affect the evolution of space-time through the gravitational fields generated by their energies. In practice, the particles are usually so small that they have a negligible effect on space-time dynamics, and general relativity can be ignored. This has been the case in all successful test of quantum mechanics.

**Approaches to quantum gravity.**

The search for a more fundamental theory, in which the incompatibility between general relativity and quantum mechanics be resolved, can take two different paths. The most drastic option is to look for an alternative theory based on principles that are profoundly different from the principles of quantum mechanics. In such a theory quantum mechanics would only be meaningful as an approximation . The other option is to maintain the existing principles of quantum mechanics but develop a more fundamental theory that can answer questions of a different type , such as the ones emerging with a dynamical space-time. The situation in which quantum mechanics is abandoned at the level of the more fundamental theory is a much harder challenge, because one would need to rewrite the rulebook, and no serious candidate has yet emerged. The second option is more easily explored: at least one has quantum theory as a starting point.

There are currently two mature theories based on quantum mechanics that attempt to unify general relativity and quantum mechanics: "canonical quantum gravity"  and "superstring theory" . Although they share a common goal these two theories are quite different in the way they approach the technical and physical problems that emerge when building a quantum picture of gravity and space-time. In particular, they differ in the way they handle the mathematical infinities that naturally occur in quantum descriptions of gravitational fields. These infinities are not peculiar to quantum gravity: for example, they also appear in the quantum description of electromagnetic fields (the subject of quantum electrodynamics or QED) but in QED they can be removed by a technique known as perturbative renormalization. Thanks to this technique, QED has become one of the most accurate and best-tested theories of modern physics. But perturbative renormalization does not work for the quantization of Einstein's theory of gravity: the mathematical infinities are too persistent. In canonical quantum gravity "non-perturbative renormalization" is being tried. In "superstring theory" perturbative renormalization can be made to work if it is assumed that the particles we perceive (with the relatively low resolution we presently have) as point-like are actually more properly described using one-dimensional entities (strings) that exist in a space-time with ten dimensions. These ten dimensions include the four we ordinarily perceive (three of space and one of time) plus six other dimensions that would only show up in experiments at extremely small sales. None of these extra dimensions, or any of the string-like states, have yet been observed.

The two approaches also differ in the way they deal with the most fundamental challenge to the unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics: replacing the fixed space-time arena with a dynamical version. In "superstring theory" the idea of a fixed space-time arena is conserved, but the theory includes some dynamical variables that also describe space-time. The end result is a dynamical space-time (which, in a sense, is the "sum" of the classical fiducial starting point and some dynamical quantum space-time effects), but some physicists feel that the starting point provided by the fiducial space-time arena does not fully embrace the lessons taught by general relativity. In this respect "canonical quantum gravity" is more ambitious: space-time is fully dynamical from the start. Unfortunately it is not yet clear how this quantum dynamical space-time will describe the important limiting cases (corresponding to the majority of the viable experimental situations) where space-time does behave as a classical and fixed arena.

**A quantum theory of space-time.**

One of the most exciting possibilities emerging from "canonical quantum gravity", "superstring theory" and other (less developed) approaches to the unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics is the idea of a space-time that is itself quantized. This could involve a discretization of space-time and/or a quantum "uncertainty principle" similar to that found in ordinary quantum mechanics. In a space-time with a quantum uncertainty principle it would not be possible to measure accurately the distance between two space-time points, just as in ordinary quantum mechanics it is not possible to measure (simultaneously) the position and momentum of a particle within the classical space-time arena.

The quantum description of space-time would require a profound renewal of fundamental physics. For example, it might have unexpected effects on the propagation of particles. These effects would only emerge at the small scale of the Planck length (which is not easily explored experimentally). A useful analogy is the one of the surface of a wooden table. We usually perceive the surface as perfectly flat, but if we look at the table with a microscope (which allows us to acquire sensitivity to its short-distance structure) it becomes clear that it is not exactly flat. The flatness we ordinarily perceive is some sort of averaging over the short-distance irregularities of the table's surface. If we take a ball with diameter much larger than the short-distance scale of roughness of the table and roll it over the surface, we find no evidence of the roughness, but if we use a ball whose diameter is not much larger that the scale of roughness we will see disturbances in the path of the ball resulting from its interaction with the roughness.

Similarly, a rich short-distance structure in space-time may have important effects on the propagation of particles, in a way that depends on the wavelengths of the particles. (Because of the wave-particle duality of quantum mechanics, all particles can be characterized by a wavelength, which is inversely related to their momentum.) In the tabletop analogy the diameter of the balls plays the role of the particle wavelength. For the particles we observe experimentally there should be very little wavelength dependence, but for particle wavelengths comparable with the tiny Planck length the phenomenon of particle propagation would be severely affected (imagine rolling a ball with diameter smaller than the scale of surface roughness over the table).

**Hints of a new revolution?**

A key ingredient in Planck's revolutionary breakthrough was provided by Ludwig Boltzmann's earlier work, particularly his interpretation of the second law of thermodynamics as a statistical law rather than an absolute law of nature. At the time no one could have imagined that Boltzmann's work would eventually play a role in studies proving the inconsistency of classical mechanics. Is it possible that we already have some of the ingredients of a new revolution today? In recent years, several theoretical ideas have emerged that would require a change of perspective as radical as Boltzmann's. These include the theories that quantize space-time discussed above, which explain the classical properties of space-time that are perceived by long-wavelength particles as a sort of average over the richer microscopic structure of quantum space-time. This is not unlike Boltzmann's description of the second law of thermodynamics as a statistical outcome of the properties of the many microscopic constituents of a thermodynamic system.

On the experimental side the crucial input for Planck's breakthrough came from puzzling data on the radiation emitted by hot bodies in thermal equilibrium with their surroundings. The light from these bodies is a mixture of different frequencies (colours). The classical formula linking the radiation emitted at different frequencies with the temperature of the hot body works well for radiation at low frequencies, but disagrees with experimental data at high frequencies. Planck observed that this puzzle could be solved by assuming that energy could be emitted or absorbed only in discrete amounts, and the quantum of energy was born.

Among the experimental puzzles confronting fundamental physics today there are a few that could have the potential to lead to a profound renewal of fundamental physics. A relevant illustrative example is provided by the observation of cosmic rays above the so-called Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin (GZK) limit . Cosmic rays are particles emitted by distant active galaxies. These rays produce showers of elementary particles when they pass through the Earth's atmosphere. Before reaching us ultra-high-energy cosmic rays travel gigantic (cosmological) distances and astronomers would expect interactions with photons in the cosmic microwave background (the faint glow left over from the big bang) to cool them down, producing a cut off at higher energies. The discovery of cosmic rays with energies above this GZK cut-off  apparently originating from outside our Galaxy, cannot be explained by current theories.

To calculate the GZK limit theorists have to take into account Lorentz symmetry, a property of classical space-time . It has been suggested that the observation of cosmic rays above the GZK limit could be explained by assuming very small modifications to the predictions of Lorentz symmetry . A plausible origin for such a modification comes from an unexpected source - the quantization of space-time. Remarkably, the value of the GZK limit predicted by calculations within some of the scenarios for quantization of space-time turns out to be consistent with the astronomical data .

There are other plausible explanations for the cosmic-ray puzzle, but the explanation involving a quantum space-time is the only one that would simultaneously solve another similar puzzle . Astronomers have detected high-energy photons from distant astrophysical sources that, according to the classical picture of space-time, should not be able to reach us because they are expected to interact with the cosmic infrared background. This means that there should be a theoretical upper limit to the energies of the photons, similar to that for cosmic rays. Experimental evidence for such puzzles is just emerging, so it is too early to build a case for a quantum description of space-time. Nonetheless their existence is intriguing, and the mere possibility of such effects promotes the study of quantum space-times from the realm of science fiction to that of proper science.

**The equivalence principle.**

Experiments that can observe the interplay between general relativity and quantum mechanics are not easy to design. The tiny scale of the Planck length at which these effects are expected to emerge, and the extreme weakness of gravity compared with the other forces of nature, have led many to believe that the study of quantum gravity would be beyond the reach of doable experiments. Moreover, there appears to be a fundamental theoretical issue that affects the experimental study of gravitational forces at the quantum level. The standard approach to the operative definition of forces in quantum mechanics is in conflict with the Equivalence Principle, one of the cornerstones of general relativity.

In the study of all other forces, the operative definition of the fields involves experimental particles with two primary characteristics: their charge under the influence of the force field and their inertial mass. As shown in a celebrated paper by Bohr and Rosenfeld , the only way to extract accurate information on the force field is to use particles with large inertial mass and small charge. In the case of studies of gravitational fields this type of strategy would require particles with large inertial mass and small gravitational mass (which is the gravitational charge in the sense that it sets the strength of the gravitational forces felt by the particle), but the equivalence principle requires inertial and gravitational masses to be equal. Therefore the standard (Bohr-Rosenfeld) strategy appears to lead  to a fundamental limitation on the accuracy with which gravitational fields can be measured (and operatively defined).

**The experimental frontier.**

Despite these many challenges, in the last quarter of the twentieth century physicists have started to make some progress in the experimental study of quantum gravity. A first significant step was taken in the mid-1970s with experiments that, while not being capable of testing quantum properties of space-time itself, studied how the presence of strong gravitational fields affected the quantum mechanical behaviour of microscopic particles . These experiments established that the gravitational fields generated by the Earth affect interference experiments in a way that is completely analogous to the influence of electromagnetic fields.

The first experimental studies  with sensitivity to conjectured quantum properties of space-time were proposed in the 1980s, when it was realized that experiments testing one of the fundamental symmetries of particle physics, known as CPT, were finally reaching sensitivity levels that could plausibly detect minute modifications of these symmetries caused by the quantum properties of space-time. The sensitivity of CPT experiments (in particular studies of particles known as neutral kaons ) has continued to improve over the past few decades. So far they have provided no evidence of any quantum property of space-time.

For several years tests of CPT symmetry were the only examples of experiments being analysed from the point of view of quantum space-time, but over the past few years more proposals have been put forward. The most sensitive among these experiments are the mentioned searches for departures from Lorentz symmetry in cosmic-ray physics. Besides the GZK limit, another key implication of Lorentz symmetry - the prediction that the time needed by a massless particle to propagate over a given distance should not depend on the wavelength of the particle - is going to be tested with extremely high accuracy by astrophysics experiments now in preparation. Quantum space-time might alter the propagation of gamma-rays collected from distant gamma-ray bursts  - some of the most powerful explosions in the Universe. Within 5 or 10 years the next generation of gamma-ray telescopes, such as the GLAST space mission , will reach sensitivity levels sufficient for testing the type of minute wavelength-dependence which (as illustrated by the tabletop analogy described above) could be a property of quantum space-time.

In addition to tests of Lorentz and CPT symmetries, it might even be possible to explore directly the structure of space-time itself. Modern gravity-wave interferometers are built to detect tiny fluctuations in the distances between some test masses that might be caused by a passing gravity wave . Gravity waves are ripples in the fabric of space-time predicted by Einstein's classical theory of gravity, but they have never been detected. In a recent paper , I observed that gravity-wave interferometers could also be used in attempts to detect quantum fluctuations of space-time; in fact, any physical process that induces fluctuations in the distances between the test masses will affect the interference effect. Interferometers under construction, such as the LIGO detector in the United States and the VIRGO detector in Italy, could be sensitive  to fluctuations at scales that correspond to the Planck length, but this possibility depends very strongly  on the actual mechanism of these fluctuations, and much theoretical work is still needed in order to establish which fluctuation mechanisms give rise to consistent pictures of space-time.

**Prospects for the 21st century.**

After 100 years of quantum theory and more than 70 years of failed attempts to unify general relativity and quantum mechanics, we finally have some promising theoretical and experimental avenues for the investigation of the interplay between relativity and quantum theory. There is a strong theoretical desire to unite these two theories, but without a healthy experimental programme our best models would remain as mere speculation. For now, the experiments are limited in number and their sensitivities are still only at levels that would correspond to rather optimistic estimates of the effects (estimates that rely on the assumption that the strength of some of the effects induced by the unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics will only be mildly suppressed by the smallness of the Planck length). Nonetheless, it seems reasonable to expect that a growing number of experimental and theoretical ideas will emerge over the 21st century and will eventually allow us to bring clarity into the challenge to quantum mechanics presented by the need to come to terms with general relativity.

# Acknowledgements

The writeup of this article went through several rounds of editing. I felt I should use this opportunity to convey to scientists from other fields an exciting picture of frontier research within and beyond quantum mechanics, but some aspects of the subject are very technical and I feared that the final result might be disappointing in all respects: in spite of painful oversimplifications and painful compromizes on factual accuracy I could have missed the target of a piece readable by non-experts. In the end a draft that I could live with did mature, but only thanks to several rounds of feed-back and precious guidance from John Stachel and Sarah Tomlin. The generous contribution of John and Sarah is very greatfully acknowledged.

plus .5pt minus .5pt

= 12pt


abstract: Melanoma, a malignant form of skin cancer is very threatening to life. Diagnosis of melanoma at an earlier stage is highly needed as it has a very high cure rate. Benign and malignant forms of skin cancer can be detected by analyzing the lesions present on the surface of the skin using dermoscopic images. In this work, an automated skin lesion detection system has been developed which learns the representation of the image using Google's pretrained CNN model known as Inception-v3 . After obtaining the representation vector for our input dermoscopic images we have trained two layer feed forward neural network to classify the images as malignant or benign. The system also classifies the images based on the cause of the cancer either due to melanocytic or non-melanocytic cells using a different neural network. These classification tasks are part of the challenge organized by International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) 2017. Our system learns to classify the images based on the model built using the training images given in the challenge and the experimental results were evaluated using validation and test sets. Our system has achieved an overall accuracy of 65.8% for the validation set.
author:

{miruna,firstname.lastname@example.com, email@example.com,

email@example.com
bibliography: skin_lesion.bib
title:  **Deep Learning for Skin Lesion Classification**

# Introduction

Skin protects the body against infection and injury and helps to regulate body temperature. Cancer cells are formed on the skin when healthy cells change and grow uncontrollably, forming a mass called tumor. A tumor can be malignant or benign. Malignant tumor is very dangerous and can grow and spread to other parts of the body. A benign tumor may or may not be cancerous and it may grow but will not spread to other parts of the body. The benign or malignant tumors may arise from either melanocytes or non-melanocytic cells of skin.

Melanoma is a malignant tumor of melanocytes and it develops when unrepairable DNA damage has happened to skin cells which triggers mutations. These mutations cause the skin cells to multiply rapidly and form malignant tumors. These tumors originate in the pigment producing melanocytes in the basal layer of the epidermis. The majority of melanomas are black or brown, but they can also be skin-colored, pink, red, purple, blue or white. Melanoma is caused mainly by intense, occasional UV exposure (frequently leading to sunburn), especially in those who are genetically predisposed to the disease. Melanocytic Nevus are benign proliferation of melanocytes. They usually present as a brownish lesion with well defined borders with excess hair in it. The surface of the nevus may be roughed. Seborrheic keratoses are common, benign, pigmented epidermal tumors. Lesions appear as coin-like, sharply demarcated, exophytic lesions and are "stuck on the skin" with a verrucous, rough, dull or punched-out surface. Flat lesions often have a smooth surface and are scarcely elevated above the surface of the skin. If melanoma is detected early and treated, it can be cured, but if not, the cancer spreads to other part of the body and can be fatal.

A statistical analysis of color features on two different feature space such as lesion and object feature space has been proposed by Cheng Y et al. to classify various type of skin lesions. Chang W-Y and Huang A and Yang C-Y et al proposed a Computer Aided diagnosis system which used conventional and new color-related image features to classify the lesions as benign or malignant using support vector machines (SVMs). The review of the state of art of different systems and current practices, problems, and prospects of image acquisition, pre-processing, segmentation, feature extraction and selection, and classification of dermoscopic images were reported in . The classification system of skin lesion involves preprocessing the image for noise and hair removal, segmentation of lesions and extracting features from the lesions to further classify them. Instead of going for explicit feature engineering, techniques have been developed which learn an image representation using deep neural networks.

Our proposed automated system aims to detect the type and cause of the cancer directly using image representation obtained from Google's Inception-v3 model. Based on the representation vector we have performed two phase classification using 2 layer feed forward neural network with softmax activation function in our output layer. The two phase classification is achieved using two different neural networks with same representation vector. In phase-1 we have determined the type of cancer either as malignant and benign and the phase-2 involves determining the cause of cancer either due to melanocytic or non-melanocytic cells.

#  Proposed Methodology

## System Architecture

The system takes input as dermoscopic images of various sizes. The overall training process consists of three stages: Preprocessing, Representation Learning and Classification. The system architecture is depicted in the Figure

### Pre-Processing

The images are first preprocessed and resized to the size of 299x299x3 so that it can be fed to the inception module. Many preprocessing techniques were applied to improve the test accuracy. From the traning set 20% of images were chosen randomly and those images were mirrored, cropped, scaled and increased in brightness These preprocessed images were included in the training set.

### Representation Learning

The inception module consists of multiple convolutional and pooling layers. The convolution layers consists of filters of size 7x7, 3x3, 5x5, 1x1 and of varying strides 1 and 2. Similarly, the architecture consists of both max pooling and average pooling of size 3x3 and 7x7 respectively with stride 2. To effectively compute deep convolutions, it makes use of various inception modules in between which consists of smaller 1x1 and 3x3 convolutional and pooling layers. Each convolution filter convolves over its input computes the weighted sum.

Pooling layers are used to reduce the size of the image and also provides translation invariance. Pooling is achieved by using filters and pooling strategies such as max pooling, mean pooling and min pooling.

The representation vector of the input image is obtained at different hierarchy level using the different layers of convolutional neural networks. The 1000 dimensional representation vector obtained at the next-to-last layer of the Inception-v3 model is used as input to our 2-layer feed-forward neural network.

### Classification

The two layer feed forward neural network consists of 1000 units in the hidden layer and 2 units in the output layer. The input to our network is 1000 dimensional representation vector of the image obtained from the fine tuned Google's inception model. The output of hidden layer is fed to the softmax layer which outputs the probabilities of the image belonging to each of the class. Since for both the classification task, the images are the same, we use the same representation learned by the inception module and feed it to two different feed-forward neural networks. We use the Adam optimizer and cross-entropy loss for updating the weights by backpropagating the error backwards. The system was trained for 4000 iterations to obtain weights for the classification.

# Results and Discussion

## Data Set

The training dataset consists of 2000 dermoscopic images of skin lesions in JPEG format along with ground truth labels. The validation set has 150 images and the testing set consists of 600 images. The ground truth contains the image id, for phase-1 classification binary value of 0 corresponds to benign and 1 for malignant type of cancerand in phase-2 classification value of 1 corresponds to non-melanocytic cells and 0 for melanocytic cells.

## Result

The system was trained for different number of iterations for each of the classification problems. Our system achieved high accuracy of 82.5% and 81.4% at 4000th iterations in the training phase using the training images. The accuracy of the training phase has been depicted in the figure . The minimization of the loss function during the training phase is depicted in the figure .

During the validation phase, the model scored 72% for the phase-1 classification and 71% in the phase-2 and an average AUC score of 65.8%

#  Conclusion

We have developed an automated system for skin lesion classification which involves two different phases where the phase-1 classifies the skin lesions either as malignant or benign and phase-2 classifies the cause of the lesions either due to non-melanocytic or melanocytic cells. The system classifies automatically using the image representation obtained from the dermoscopic images using Google's inspection model. We have achieved a overall AUC score of 65.8% using the validation set provided in ISBI challenge.


author: K Younsi$^1$, V Russier$^1$, L Bessais$^1$, J-C Crivello$^1$
$^1$ ICMPE, UMR 7182 CNRS-Université Paris Est,
2-8 Rue Henri Dunant F-94320 Thiais, France.
email@example.com
title: Magnetic and structural properties of nanocrystalline PrCo$_3$.

# Introduction

The permanent magnetic materials with high performance require appropriate intrinsic hard magnetic properties *i.e* a high uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy field, a high Curie temperature and a high saturation magnetization. Among nanocrystalline magnets based on rare earth and transition metal compounds the $R$Co$_3$ compounds ($R$ as a rare earth) have been the subject of many studies during the last decades. These ones crystallize in rhombohedral PuNi$_3$-type (space group: $R\bar3m$). The unit cell contains two non-equivalent crystallographic sites for $R$ ions, $3a$ and $6c$, and three sites for Co: $3b$, $6c$ and $18h$. $R$Co$_3$ alloys present excellent magnets properties such as large magnetocrystalline anisotropy and important saturation magnetization. These properties are resulting from to combination of the $3d$ itinerant magnetism of the Co sublattice and $4f$ localized magnetism of the sublattice.

In this study, we report the elaboration of nanocrystalline PrCo$_3$ by high-energy milling, and their structural and magnetic properties in amorphous state and after recrystallization. Hard magnetic properties of the as milled PrCo$_3$ have been improved by a controlled nanocrystallization, which optimize the grain size in order to obtain a high coercivity.

In addition to the experiments, results from simulation and microscopic calculations are presented. We have proposed a simple model for the system after annealing based on a lattice of crystallites embedded in an amorphous matrix. The simplest realization of such a model is considered here, in order to bring out at the qualitative level the microstructure effect on the magnetization curve. This model is treated in the framework of micromagnetism, *i.e.* through a continuous medium type of approach, and the calculations are performed by using the code based on the finite elements method. We also present the results of *ab initio* band structure calculations and magnetic properties based on the spin polarized local approximation of the density functional theory (DFT) of $R$Co$_x$, where $R$=(Y,Pr) and $x$=2,3 and 5 intermetallic compounds. We will focus on a quantitative analyse of the localized $4f$ states and itinerant $3d$ magnetism.

# Experimental studies

A polycrystalline PrCo$_3$ was prepared by melting high-purity starting elements ($>99.9\%$) in an induction furnace under an atmosphere of high purity Ar. The ingot was remelted five times to ensure homogeneity. These ingots were used as pre-alloys to manufacture samples by high-energy milling. Technique and conditions of milling has been described in . After milling, the powder mixtures was wrapped in tantalum foil and sealed in silica tubes under a vacuum of 10$^{-6}$ Torr, then annealed for 30 min at temperature between 1023 K and 1323 K followed by quenching in water. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of as-cast, as-milled and annealed powders were carried out with Cu-K$\alpha$ radiation source on a Bruker diffractometer. The unit-cell parameters were measured with Si as the standard ($a$= 5.4308 Å) leading to a unit-cell parameter accuracy of $\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}1$\times$`<!-- -->`{=html}10$^{-3}$ Å. The data treatment was made by Rietveld refinement with FULLPROF computer code in the assumption of Thompson–Cox-Hastings line profile alloying multiple-phase refinement. This refinement gives the weight percentage of each of the coexisting phases, the line broadening leads to the autocoherent domain size owing to Scherrer formula. The magnetic ordering temperatures $T_C$ were obtained on a differential sample magnetometer MANICS in a field of 1 kOe on powder, in vacuum-sealed silica tube. Curie temperature was determinate by extra-polating the linear part of the M–T curve and extending the baseline: intersection point corresponds to the value of T$_C$. The $M-H$ curves (Magnetic hysteresis measurement) were plotted at T= 10 and 293 K with a Physical Properties Measurement System (PPMS) Quantum Design equipment and a maximum applied field of 90 kOe on sample in epoxy resin.

## Structure analysis

Before milling, the ingot is analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The Fig.  presents the analysis result of XRD pattern of PrCo$_3$ ingot using the Rietveld analysis. The PrCo$_3$ ingot is nearly single phase with the rhombohedral PuNi$_3$-type structure (space group: $R\bar3m$) and is an appropriate precursor for using as pre-alloys to manufacture samples by high-energy milling.

In order to check the crystalline structure of PrCo$_3$ powders, the XRD measurement of samples annealed at distinct temperature have been performed. The XRD patterns of both as-quenched and annealed PrCo$_3$ powder are shown in Fig.. It can be seen that as-quenched powder is essentially quasiamorphous. Such quasiamorphous matrix suggests the presence of various types of small crystallites. The diffraction peaks become more pronounced with increasing annealing temperature. The annealed samples at 773 and 1273 K for 30 min reveal the presence of PrCo$_3$ phases crystallized.

However, when the annealed is at temperature between 773 and 1023 K, we observe in the low angles a large line around 32$^\circ$. The large peak widths points to a small grain size. When the powders are annealed at temperature higher than 1023 K, the XRD patterns show the presence of PrCo$_3$ phases crystallized. We have observed a small amount (around 0.5 wt$\%$) of Pr$_2$O$_3$ in all samples annealed after milling. The mean diffraction crystallite size of the powder after annealing at 1023 and 1273 K for 30 min obtained by fitting the XRD diagram with Rietveld method, ranges between 31 and 45 nm respectively, this implies that synthesized materials are noncrystalline.

The Curie temperature is determined by the exchange-coupling interaction between the nearest-neighbor Co-Co atoms, which is the origin of ferromagnetism. This interaction depends markedly on the interatomic distance. The Curie temperature of PrCo$_3$ compound is 349 K,  this result is in agreement with the data given by Lemaire .

The low Curie temperature in PrCo$_3$ compounds is due to the short Co-Co interatomic distances at the sites $6c-18h$ and at $18h-18h$  , where the Co atoms couple antiparallel. In this structure, the $6c-18h$ and at $18h-18h$ interactions are strongly negative.

Isothermal magnetization curves $M-H$ obtained at 293 K is represented in Fig.  for PrCo$_3$. This figure shows that at 293 K the saturation is not reached, which gives evidence for a magnetocrystalline anisotropy among the highest known in those kinds of systems. The pattern obtained on sample oriented under an external magnetic field, applied perpendicularly to the plane of the sample, shows only $(00l)$ Bragg peaks, which amount to suggest that the anisotropy strengthens the peaks of diffraction of type $(00l)$ and at room temperature the easy magnetization direction is parallel to the c-axis. A similar result is obtained for YCo$_{3-x}$Fe$_x$ by obtained by oriented powder under extern field.

## Extrinsic magnetic properties

The best magnetic properties were reached after a treatment at 1023 K for 30 min. Fig.  show as an example the hysteresis loops measured at 10 and 293 K. This sample exhibits the highest coercivities we have obtained, for $T= 10$ K, $H_\mathrm{c}= 55$ kOe, $M_\mathrm{R}= 56$ emu/g and $M_\mathrm{R}/M_\mathrm{max}= 0.75$. For T= 293 K, $H_\mathrm{c}= 12$ kOe and $M_\mathrm{R}= 44$ emu/g and $M_\mathrm{R}/M_\mathrm{max}= 0.60$ inherent to nanocrystalline state. The highest coercivity of 55 kOe at 10 K confirms the large magnetocrystalline anisotropy.

# Computational studies

## Micromagnetism simulation

In order to get a picture of the link between the structure at the nanometer scale and the extrinsic magnetic properties we have performed a micromagnetic simulation on a model for the system. The picture we have in mind is that the crystallization takes place locally on dispersed seeds in the amorphous matrix representing the as-milled sample. Hence we consider an assembly of crystallites presenting a uniaxial anisotropy comparable to what is expected in hard magnetic R-TM compounds. The saturation magnetization, $J_s$ of the crystallites is that of the bulk PrCo$_3$, namely $J_s~=~0.723~T$. We consider the simplest realization of the model, by using identical crystallites, located on the nodes of a simple cubic lattice. The crystallites are either spherical or cubic; however, the later case is likely to be closer to the experimental sample. We have chosen somewhat arbitrarily a volumic fraction occupied by the crystallites of $\phi~=~0.73$ (in the case of cubic crystallites) and the crystallite size corresponds to what has been estimated experimentally, namely, a cubic edge $a~=~35~nm$. The amorphous character of the matrix is translated by a zero valued anisotropy constant, while its saturation magnetization ($J_s^{(mat)}$) is a free parameter of the model. The value we get for $J_s^{(mat)}$, namely c.a. $J_s/5$ seems reasonable in our picture of an amorphous matrix. The important point is that we clearly get the signature of a two uncoupled phases behavior for $M(H)$; the amplitude of the kink at zero field being determined by $\phi$ and $J_s^{(mat)}$.

## DFT calculations

### Methodology

Band structure spin polarized calculations were carried out by using the DFT scheme implemented in the projector-augmented wave (PAW) method, performed with the VASP package . In the present study, the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) is used for the exchange and correlation energy functionals with the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE)  functional. A plane wave basis set with a cutoff energy of 600 eV was used in all calculations converged within 0.1 eV in total energy. Brillouin zone sampling using a mesh of 0.5 k points for each primitive cell of $R$Co$_x$ compounds, described respectively in $Fd\bar{3}m$ space group for $x$=2, $R\bar{3}m$ for $x$=3 and $P6_3/mmm$ for $x$=5 compounds. Structural optimization were carried out under the condition that residual forces should be smaller than 0.1 eV.Å$^{-1}$.

### Electronic structures

Figure  shows the density of states (DOS) for the YCo$_x$ and PrCo$_x$ ($x$=2, 3 and 5) in the two directions of spin. For both series, the majority occupied states are dominated by the $3d$ states of Co, with a small electronic charge transfert of $R$ to Co, which is more important from $R$=Y to Co than from Pr to Co (calculated by Bader's theory). The increase of $x$ leads to a distinct shift of the Co-$3d$ states in spin majority and minority DOS as expected in the rigid-band Stoner theory. Whereas $R$Co$_2$ shows the paramagnetic state as the most stable in energy, the ferromagnetic behavior is confirmed for $x$=3 and $x$=5 compounds, with an increase of the angular magnetic moment from 1.45 to 7.34 and 3.59 to 4.70 $\mu_B$ f.u.$^{-1}$ for $R$=Y and Pr respectively. The magnetic anisotropy has been confirmed for $R$Co$_{3}$ compounds, since non-collinear spin calculation along the $z$ axis has been found $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}0.2 eV f.u.$^{-1}$ more stable than calculation along $x$ axis direction. Since the DOS at Fermi level is high enough for $x$=3 and 5, the itinerant magnetism properties of theses compounds can be explained by intra-atomic $3d-3d$ exchange. In contrast to YCo$_x$, PrCo$_x$ compounds present tiny and high density structures above the Fermi level, corresponding to localized empty $4f$ states of Pr. It is clear that the Co-$3d$ states are modified compared to YCo$_x$, due to the hybridization with the Pr-$4f$ states. As expected in $3d-5d$ hybridization compounds, the energy between the bonding and anti-bonding sub-bands becomes different for the two-direction of spins . The consequence is a larger occupation of minority $5d$ states as compared to majority $5d$ of the rare earth, that means a ferrimagnetic coupling between $3d$ and $5d$ states occurs and increases with the increasing of $x$ composition.

# Conclusion and outlook

The PrCo$_3$ intermetallic compound crystallizes in rhombohedral PuNi$_3$-type structure and presents a very high uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy. The coercivity of this compound, prepared by high energy milling followed by annealing (1023 K, 30 mn), takes a very high value, up to 55 kOe at 10 K. A micromagnetic simulation and atomic scale *ab-initio* calculations have been performed to understand on the one hand the way in which the electronic structure and especially the interplay between $3d$ and $4f$ electronic states, leads to the observed anisotropy and magnetic moment, and on the other hand the relation between the nanoscale structure and the extrinsic magnetic properties. DFT calculations will be improved with spin-orbit coupling considerations, and with Hubbard corrections in order to better describe cohesive properties of materials with strong electronic correlations.

# Acknowledgement

The numerical part of this work was performed using HPC resources from GENSI- CINES (Grant 2010-096180).