abstract: Aliovalent rare earth substitution into the alkaline earth site of CaFe$_2$As$_2$ single-crystals is used to fine-tune structural, magnetic and electronic properties of this iron-based superconducting system. Neutron and single crystal x-ray scattering experiments indicate that an isostructural collapse of the tetragonal unit cell can be controllably induced at ambient pressures by choice of substituent ion size. This instability is driven by the interlayer As-As anion separation, resulting in an unprecedented thermal expansion coefficient of $180\times 10^{-6}$ K$^{-1}$. Electrical transport and magnetic susceptibility measurements reveal abrupt changes in the physical properties through the collapse as a function of temperature, including a reconstruction of the electronic structure. Superconductivity with onset transition temperatures as high as 47 K is stabilized by the suppression of antiferromagnetic order via chemical pressure, electron doping or a combination of both. Extensive investigations are performed to understand the observations of partial volume-fraction diamagnetic screening, ruling out extrinsic sources such as strain mechanisms, surface states or foreign phases as the cause of this superconducting phase that appears to be stable in both collapsed and uncollapsed structures.
author: S. R. Saha; N. P. Butch; T. Drye; J. Magill; S. Ziemak; K. Kirshenbaum; P. Y. Zavalij; J. W. Lynn; J. Paglione
date: 2024-10-02
title: Structural collapse and superconductivity in rare earth-doped CaFe$_2$As$_2$

# Introduction

The interplay between structural, magnetic and superconducting properties in the iron-based superconducting compounds has been a central theme in attempts to elucidate the nature of Cooper pairing in this new family of high-temperature superconductors. Much focus has been paid to the intermetallic series of iron-based compounds with the ThCr$_2$Si$_2$-type (122) crystal structure. With well over 700 compounds known to take on this configuration, the 122 structure forms the basis for a rich variety of physical phenomena that stem from the fact that this lattice structure not only supports a wide assortment of elemental combinations, but also harbors different mixtures of ionic, covalent and metallic bonding.

The interesting chemistry of the AB$_2$X$_2$ configuration was highlighted in 1985 by R. Hoffman, who pointed out that a segregation of this large family of materials occurs due to the presence or absence of interlayer X-X bonding, which results in, respectively, either a "collapsed" or "uncollapsed" tetragonal structure. Despite a $\sim 20\%$ change in unit cell volume in traversing through Ba, Sr, and Ca-based series of AFe$_2$As$_2$ structures, this family of 122 materials remains in the uncollapsed structure geometry at ambient pressures through the entire range. However, it can be driven to collapse by a modest external pressure applied to the smallest-volume member of the series, CaFe$_2$As$_2$, resulting in a dramatically abrupt $\sim 10\%$ $c$-axis reduction of its tetragonal unit cell upon cooling.

Interestingly, a superconducting phase with maximum $T_c$ of $\sim 10$ K was first reported to straddle the critical pressure where the collapse occurs in CaFe$_2$As$_2$ (Refs. ) but only under non-hydrostatic experimental conditions, suggesting that the change in electronic structure that occurs through the collapse is not supportive of pairing. This was further confirmed by the absence of superconductivity in the collapsed phase induced by isovalent phosphorus substitution, and its importance heightened by first principles calculations predicting a quenched Fe moment in the collapsed structure.

The nearness of the structural collapse instability to the ambient pressure phase of CaFe$_2$As$_2$ suggests that chemical pressure is a viable alternative to applied pressure, as indeed was shown by isovalent substitution directly into the FeAs sublattice. We have stabilized the 122 collapsed phase at ambient pressures by employing rare earth substitution into Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ to selectively induce a structural collapse via choice of rare earth. The close match between ionic radii of the lighter rare earths such as La, Ce, Pr and Nd (130, 128.3, 126.6 and 124.9 pm, respectively ) with that of Ca (126 pm) in the 8-coordinate geometry allows us to selectively tune the structural parameters with both larger and smaller relative radii, invoking a uniform chemical pressure on the unit cell at a tunable rate of chemical substitution. In parallel, electron doping via aliovalent substitution of trivalent R$^{3+}$ ions for divalent Ca$^{2+}$ also tunes the electronic structure, acting to suppress antiferromagnetic (AFM) order and induce a superconducting phase with transition temperatures reaching as high as 47 K.

In this article, we provide a comprehensive study of the structural, magnetic and electronic properties of the rare earth-doped CaFe$_2$As$_2$ system throughout the antiferromagnetic, superconducting and structural collapsed phases. We show that the substitution of light rare earths provides an ideal method of fine-tuning the structure through collapse, while simultaneously electron-doping the system. In Sections II and III, we review the synthesis and characterization of our single-crystal samples, providing chemical analysis and structural refinements as a function of substitution and temperature. Neutron scattering and x-ray scattering experiments are used to outline the systematic chemical pressure effects of rare earth substitution and the evolution of all structural parameters through the collapse transition. Section IV presents the temperature dependence of electrical transport and magnetic susceptibility data, comparing the evolution of physical properties for different chemical pressures and dopings. Section V reviews our systematic studies of the superconducting phase induced by the suppression of the antiferromagnetic phase, including annealing, etching, and oxidation effects. In Section VI we build a composite phase diagram that segregates the effects of electron doping and chemical pressure, and finally summarize our conclusions based on this work in Section VII.

# Growth and Chemical Analysis

Single-crystal samples of Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ were grown using the FeAs self-flux method ,yielding crystals as large as $\sim 10 \times 10 \times 0.1$ mm$^3$. Chemical analysis was obtained via both energy-dispersive (EDS) and wavelength-dispersive (WDS) x-ray spectroscopy, showing 1:2:2 stoichiometry between (Ca,R), Fe, and As concentrations. For WDS analysis, rare earth concentrations were determined by recording the concentration at 8 separate scanned points across each sample surface and averaging the result for each sample, with standard deviation never found to be more than a few percent (or within the accuracy of the technique). In the rest of the paper, actual $x$ concentrations are quoted based on WDS results.

Fig.  presents the measured concentration $x$ in Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ single-crystal samples determined by WDS spectroscopy as a function of nominal starting concentration. Error bars are determined conservatively, taking the range in $x$ values determined in scanned WDS values across each sample. At low values of $x$ there is close to a one-to-one correspondence between actual and nominal concentrations, indicating good control of target and resultant substitution concentration. With increasing $x$, it is apparent that saturation occurs whereby actual substitutional concentrations do not exceed a solubility limit that depends on the rare earth species. This value can be readily inferred from the value at which $x$(WDS) saturates in Fig. , and appears to follow the tendency of lower saturation point for decreasing ionic radii of the heavier rare earths. The limited solubility is likely due to ionic size mismatch between Ca$^{2+}$ and corresponding rare earth $R$, as also encountered in the synthesis of Sr$_{1-x}$La$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$..

# Structural Characterization

Crystal structure determination was performed using single-crystal x-ray diffraction data measured on a Bruker Smart Apex2 diffractometer equipped with CCD detector, graphite monochromator, and mono-cap collimator using MoK$\alpha$ radiation from fine focus sealed tube. Due to strong absorption and highly anisotropic crystal shape, the full sphere of reflections was collected with a redundancy of at least 8 and corrected for absorption effects using integration method (SADABS software ) based on crystal shape (face indices) yielding very good agreement between equivalent reflections R$_{int}$ (see Table ). The structure refinement was performed using SHELXL software and included atomic coordinates, anisotropic atomic displacement parameters and Ca:R occupation factors, assuming fully occupied sites and using 9 parameters in total.

Fig.  presents the evolution of lattice constants with rare earth concentration determined from single-crystal x-ray refinements performed at a fixed temperature of 250 K. Data points determined by neutron scattering experiments are also included. The scatter in both data sets arises due to uncertainties in measured WDS concentration $x$ ($\sim \pm 1\%$), measurement temperature ($250 \pm 5$ K) and systematic variations in measurement platforms (*i.e.*, x-ray vs. neutron scattering), but is dominated by the uncertainty in temperature due to the extremely large thermal expansion (see below).

At 250 K with increasing $x$, the $a$-axis lattice parameter for all $R$ increases at close to the same rate, while the variation of the $c$-axis shows a strong dependence on type of rare earth substituent. As shown in Fig. b), the $c$-axis remains constant with $x$ for La substitutions, but decreases for Ce, Pr and Nd at a rate that increases for smaller/heavier rare earth species. Overall, it is clear that the progression of the $c$-axis lattice parameter with rare earth substitution presents a unique opportunity to controllably apply chemical pressure by choice of rare earth substituent. Below, we investigate the effects of controlled $c$-axis reduction via this technique on the crystal structure and its instability to collapse.

Neutron diffraction experiments were performed on single-crystal samples using the BT-7 and BT-9 triple axis spectrometers at the NIST Center for Neutron Research. The incident energy was 14.7 meV using pyrolytic graphite (002) monochromators and analyzers.  Data were collected using $\theta :2\theta$ scans to determine the temperature dependence of the $a$ and $c$ lattice parameters, in steps of 2 K. Typically data were taken upon warming and cooling through the range 2 K to 300 K in order to properly capture the large hysteresis of the structural collapse transition.

A few select neutron diffraction scans are shown in Fig.  for a Nd$_{0.08}$Ca$_{0.92}$Fe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ crystal with mass 3 mg, measured upon warming. At base temperature there is a resolution limited peak on the high angle side, which has a modest shift to the left on warming as expected from thermal expansion. On warming, there is a dramatic structural transition that occurs between 80 K and 84 K. In particular, at 82 K there is a distribution of $c$-axis lattice parameters, while at 84 K the peak has jumped to smaller angle, indicating that the $c$-axis has suddenly increased. Above 84 K the system undergoes continuous thermal expansion as discussed below.

This abrupt shift in the (004) Bragg reflection arises from a dramatic shift in the $c$-axis lattice constant as a function of temperature, resulting from only 8% substitution of Nd into CaFe$_2$As$_2$. As shown in Fig. , the substitution of a similar amount of Pr into CaFe$_2$As$_2$ is also enough to drive the collapsed tetragonal (CT) transition, with the $a$-axis and $c$-axis lattice parameters undergoing a discontinuous jump that is hysteretic in temperature. In contrast, the substitution of up to 28% La does not drive the system toward any observable transition, consistent with the expectation that the larger ionic radius of La is not amenable to inducing positive chemical pressure. The temperature dependence of the $c$-axis unit cell dimension upon cooling for a series of R-doped crystals, shown in Fig. a), presents a summary of this dramatic variation in structural properties. As shown, small amounts of Nd and Pr substitutions act in a quantitatively similar manner, achieving an almost identical collapse transition, while crystals with larger rare earth size substitution (*i.e.*, 19% La and 17% Ce) fail to collapse through the entire temperature range studied. Note that we have verified that the CT transition is intrinsic to these crystals, and not caused by strain fields induced by growth conditions as observed in undoped CaFe$_2$As$_2$. (see Fig.  in the next section for more details).

The absolute change in $c$-axis upon collapse is nearly identical to that observed in CaFe$_2$As$_2$ under pressure , despite subtle but important differences in charge doping effects. This speaks to the dominant bonding interactions driving the collapse, also apparent in the extremely large $c$-axis thermal expansion observed in this series: even in the absence of a collapse transition, a 22% Ce-doped crystal undergoes a 5.3% expansion of the $c$-axis between 0 and 300 K, giving a linear thermal expansion coefficient of 180$\times$`<!-- -->`{=html}10$^{-6}$/K. This value is one of the largest for any metal (*e.g.*, as compared to the largest known thermal expansion values of 97, 83 and 71$\times$`<!-- -->`{=html}10$^{-6}$/K for elemental Cs, K and Na, respectively, at 25$^o$C), and even rivals the largest known values for any solid as observed in molecular crystals.

The strong $c$-axis contraction and instability to collapse is driven by an increasing overlap of interlayer As orbitals, controlled via the chemical pressure instilled by rare earth substitution. In fact, the As-As interlayer separation itself appears to be the key parameter controlling the collapse: as shown in Fig. b), both CaFe$_2$As$_2$ under 0.6 GPa pressure as well as Pr- and Nd-doped CaFe$_2$As$_2$ crystals collapse once the interlayer As-As distance reaches a critical value of $\sim 3.0$ Å, while La- and Ce-doped crystals which remain uncollapsed to the lowest temperatures do not cross this value.

```latex
\begin{table*}[tbh]

\caption{\label{tabl1}Crystallographic data for
Ca$_{0.91}$Nd$_{0.09}$Fe$_2$As$_2$ determined by single-crystal x-ray
diffraction at 250~K (tetragonal structure (T), above collapse transition), 105~K (T structure, just above collapse transition), and 80~K (collapsed tetragonal (CT) structure, just below collapse transition). Uncertainty in temperature values is $\pm 5$~K.}

\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{llll}
%\begin{tabular*}{\textwidth}{@{}l*{15}{@{\extracolsep{0pt plus12pt}}l}}
Temperature&80~K&105~K&250~K\\
\hline
Structure&CT&T&T\\
Space group&I4/mmm&I4/mmm&I4/mmm\\
$a$($\mathrm{\AA}$)&3.9822(16)&3.9202(15)&3.9025(7)\\
$b$($\mathrm{\AA}$)&=$a$&=$a$&=$a$\\
$c$($\mathrm{\AA}$)&10.684(4)&11.273(5)&11.591(2)\\
$V$($\mathrm{\AA}^3)$&169.43(6)&173.24(5)&176.53(5)\\
$Z$&1&1&1\\
Density(g/cm$^3$)&6.096 &5.964&5.865\\
Refl.collected&927&1128&1639\\
Independent refl.&96&99&100\\
R$_{int}$\footnotemark[1] (\%)&3.38&3.69&3.93\\
wR$_2$\footnotemark[2], all refl.&2.25&5.74&6.61\\
R$_1$\footnotemark[3], I$\geq 2\sigma$I&5.11&2.58&3.15\\
Atomic parameters:&&&\\
Nd occupation factor&0.086(7)&0.091(7)&0.097(8)\\
Ca/Nd&2$a$(0,0,0)&2$a$(0,0,0)&2$a$(0,0,0)\\
Fe&4d(0,1/2,1/4)&4d(0,1/2,1/4)&4d(0,1/2,1/4)\\
As&4e(1/2,1/2,$z$)&4e(1/2,1/2,$z$)&4e(1/2,1/2,$z$)\\
&$z$=0.13328(11)&$z$=0.13391(12)&$z$=0.13339(14)\\
Atomic displacement&&\\
parameters U$_{eq}$ ($\mathrm{\AA}^2$):&&&\\
Ca1/Nd1&0.0089(8)&0.0110(9)&0.0173(10)\\
Fe1&0.0079(3)&0.0097(4)&0.0158(5)\\
As1&0.0074(3)&0.0094(3)&0.0158(4)\\
Bond lengths ($\mathrm{\AA}$):&&\\
Ca/Nd-As&3.1554(12)$\times$8&3.1563(12)$\times$8&3.1631(9)$\times$8\\
Fe-As&2.3494(10)$\times$4&2.33568(7)$\times$4&2.3736(10)$\times$4\\
Fe-Fe&2.8158(11) &2.7720(11) &2.7595(5) \\
Bond angles (deg):&&&\\
As-Fe-As&115.88(6)$\times$2&112.54(6)$\times$2&110.58(7)$\times$2\\
 &106.37(3)$\times$4&107.96(3)$\times$4&108.92(3)$\times$4\\
Fe-As-Fe&73.63(3)$\times$4&72.04(3)$\times$4&71.08(3)$\times$4\\
%\mr
\hline
\end{tabular}
\footnotesize\rm
\footnotetext[1]{~R$_{int}$= $\Sigma \vline F_o^2$-$F_c^2$(mean)/$\Sigma$[$F_o^2$]}
\footnotetext[2]{~wR$_2$ = {$\Sigma $[w($F_o^2$ -$F_c^2$)$^2$] / $\Sigma $[w($F_o^2$)$^2$]}$^{1/2}$}
\footnotetext[3]{~R$_1$ = $\Sigma \parallel F_o \vline $ - $\vline F_c\parallel$ / $\Sigma \vline F_o \vline$}
\end{ruledtabular}
\end{table*}
```

The highest-doped Ce compound is just on the verge of collapse at ambient pressure. Applying a tiny amount of external pressure to a 22% Ce crystal, whose As-As separation approaches $3.0$ Å at zero temperature, confirms this scenario.The $c$-axis lattice parameter of a 22% Ce sample was studied via neutron diffraction as a function of applied hydrostatic pressure achieved using an Al-alloy He-gas pressure cell as described previously. As shown in Fig. , a collapse is induced at only 0.05 GPa applied pressure at 50 K constant temperature. This is an order of magnitude lower pressure than that required to induce the collapse in undoped CaFe$_2$As$_2$, which is easily understood by the fact that 22% Ce substitution brings the crystal structure very close to the critical $3~\AA$ interlayer As-As distance at low temperatures, thereby only requiring a very small additional pressure to induce the collapse.

Furthermore, it appears the critical distance has more to do with the $p$-orbital bonding character than the exact chemical make-up: phosphorus-based materials SrRh$_2$P$_2$ and EuRh$_2$P$_2$ both undergo a collapse of the $c$-axis dimension by $\sim 1.5$ Å as a function of pressure (5 GPa) and temperature (800 K), respectively, when they cross a similar critical interlayer P-P distance of $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}3 Å. The fact that 3 Å is the average value between covalent and Van der Waals radii of both elemental As and P (Ref. ) suggests that this striking universal behavior can be observed in any system with similar $p$-orbital overlap approaching this critical value.

Full structural refinement data for 9% Nd at temperatures above and below the collapse transition are tabulated in Table  and presented graphically in Fig.  along with several other characteristic samples for various temperatures and rare earth concentrations. For each characteristic doping, the same crystal was measured at several fixed temperatures, providing a more systematic set of data that suffer from less scatter than the $x$-dependent quantities shown in Fig. . Data are presented for each rare earth doping and compared to available data for undoped CaFe$_2$As$_2$ under 0.6 GPa applied pressure. The intralayer Fe-As bond length, which remains relatively rigid in all FeAs-based compounds, is shown to decrease with decreasing temperature in 28% La, 16% Ce, 14.5% Pr, and 9% Nd from 250 K down to 100 K, as shown in Fig. (e). Samples that undergo a structural collapse show a large contraction of the Fe-As bond length in line with the concomitant expansion of the $a$-axis plane. Interestingly, as shown in Fig. (f) the As-Fe-As tetrahedral bond angle shows an even stronger evolution with temperature in all samples. While this angle also shows an abrupt increase through the collapse transition in Pr- and Nd-doped samples as expected by the strong $c$-axis contraction, even the non-collapsing samples show a $\sim 2\%$ increase from 250 K to zero temperature indicative of the strong thermal expansion discussed above.

# Transport and Susceptibility

In addition to structural tuning, rare earth substitution introduces an important extra degree of freedom that applied pressure does not: charge doping via aliovalent substitution allows for fine-tuning of both pressure and doping effects on the physical properties. Here we use electrical resistivity $\rho$ measured with the standard four-probe ac method, and magnetic susceptibility $\chi$ measured in a SQUID magnetometer, to track the evolution of both structural and electronic properties as a function of rare earth substitution.

Fig. (a) presents the progression of electrical resistivity $\rho$ of single crystals of Ca$_{1-x}$La$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ for various La concentrations, normalized to 300 K values. In CaFe$_2$As$_2$, the sharp jump at $T_N=165$ K is due to a structural phase transition from tetragonal to orthorhombic upon cooling, and is known to coincide with the onset of antiferromagnetic (AFM) order. The substitution of La into Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ suppresses the feature associated with $T_N$ to lower temperatures, eventually suppressing it completely with higher La concentrations. As shown in Fig. (b), Pr substitution also acts to suppress $T_N$ to lower temperatures in a similar manner.

This trend is also observed in magnetic susceptibility data, shown in Figs. (c) and (d). Closest to the critical La concentration for suppression of the AFM phase, such as at $x=0.14$, $\chi(T)$ shows an extremely flat temperature dependence that mimics the undoped compound above $T_N$. A moderate increase in $\chi(T)$ is apparent at low temperatures, and is attributed to the FeAs sublattice of the crystals given the non-magnetic nature of La substituents. In contrast, $\chi(T)$ enhances strongly with Pr substitution due to the increasing concentration of Pr localized 4$f$ electrons and their contribution of a Curie-like susceptibility, as shown in Fig. (d). Pr substitution gradually suppresses the step-like feature at $T_N$ as with La, but an abrupt appearance of another first-order transition occurs near 7.5%, coinciding with the structural CT transition.

A comparison of crystals grown under different conditions was performed to verify that strain mechanisms are not the primary cause of the CT transition. This phenomenon was recently reported to occur under different thermal treatments in pure CaFe$_2$As$_2$, resulting in replication of conditions similar to applied pressure that stabilize the structural collapse. Fig.  presents a comparison of susceptibility data for two crystals with the same Pr concentration but grown under different conditions: one using the FeAs (self) flux technique described above and another using Sn flux, known to provide the least amount of strain during growth and cooling. As shown in the $\chi(T)$ curves, the structural collapse is evident in both cases, and moreover is almost identical, thus indicating that the collapse is caused by intrinsic chemical pressure due to rare earth substitution and not due to an extrinsic strain field as found for undoped CaFe$_2$As$_2$.

A large hysteresis of $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}30 K between temperature cooling and warming measurements is present in all structural, transport and magnetic measurements, indicating the first-order nature of this transition. The magnetic character of this hysteresis does not appear to depend on the rare earth species (c.f. only present in Pr- and Nd-doped crystals), as indicated by the abrupt, sharp transitions present in $\chi(T)$ as highlighted in Fig. . However, the change in absolute resistivity appears to show a progression from a very large increase(decrease) on warming(cooling) in undoped CaFe$_2$As$_2$ (under applied pressures) to an almost negligible change in magnitude at large rare earth concentration. As shown in Fig. , a change in $\rho(T)$ of the order of 10% of the normalized resistivity is observed in undoped CaFe$_2$As$_2$ under pressure, as compared to a much smaller change in a crystal with 9% Nd and an almost negligible change in magnitude as shown for 14.5% Pr. This appears to be related to the effect of electron doping caused by trivalent rare earth substitution, as the magnitude of the change decreases with increasing rare earth substitution.

Through the structural collapse, a dramatic change in electronic structure is predicted to occur involving the elimination of a cylindrical hole pocket centered at the $\Gamma$ point in the Brillouin zone. This is confirmed by measurements of the Hall coefficient $R_H$ in 14.5% Pr shown in Fig. , which provide evidence for a dramatic and abrupt change in electronic structure through the collapse transition, even exhibiting hysteretic behavior identical to that observed in structural (x-ray and neutron scattering) and magnetic (susceptibility) data. The reduction of $R_H$ towards zero below the CT transition suggests a transformation toward an almost exact compensation of electron and hole bands. In contrast, there is very little relative change in longitudinal resistivity through the structural transition as noted above. For example, note the contrast in behavior for 14.5% Pr, which shows a dramatic order of magnitude drop in $R_H(T)$ through the CT transition as shown in Fig. , while there is an almost negligible relative change in $\rho(T)$ as shown in Fig. (c). This suggests that the change in band structure through the collapse does not dramatically affect the bands that dominate intra-layer $ab$-plane transport, which is consistent with an iron plane that expands but nevertheless remains intact through the collapse with a lower electronic density of states. Moreover, because electron doping decreases the amplitude of the jump in $\rho(T)$ at the CT transition, which is most pronounced in undoped CaFe$_2$As$_2$ under pressure and almost absent in the 14% Pr crystal (c.f. Fig. ), one can conclude that the enlarging electron bands are more two-dimensional than the shrinking hole band(s), leading to this effect. More work is required to fully explore the change in the electronic structure through the CT transition, but ambient-pressure access to both phases as a function of a continuously tunable parameter such as temperature promises to provide much insight into the nature of the bonding that dominates the electronic and magnetic properties of these materials.

# Superconducting Phase

As evident in Fig. , the resistivity of Pr- and La-doped samples exhibits high-temperature superconductivity, with the highest observed onset temperature reaching 47 K as shown in Fig. . This is much higher than any value reported previously in electron-doped intermetallic FeAs-based systems, including both the commonly employed transition metal doping and the only other previously known case of electron doping via rare earth substitution in Sr$_{1-x}$La$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$. It also surpasses the highest values found in hole-doped (*e.g.*, K$^{1+}$ for Ba$^{2+}$, Ref. ) 122 compounds which have a maximum $T_c$ of $\sim 38$ K, and is more comparable to that found in the fluorine-based materials (Ca,R)FeAsF, where similar rare earth electron-doping with Pr and Nd results in $T_c$ values approaching the highest reported for any non-cuprate material.

The appearance of superconductivity in the Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ series is consistent with the generally accepted hypothesis that the minimization of chemical disorder in the active FeAs layers, by substitution in the alkaline earth site, allows for the highest possible $T_c$ values in the iron-based materials. What is most surprising, however, is that this superconducting phase exists in *both* collapsed and uncollapsed structures. As shown in Fig. , superconductivity is present both in 14% Pr and 8% Nd crystals which both undergo a collapse transition, and in 27% La and 22% Ce crystals which do not collapse. Given the evidence for a substantial change in the electronic structure through the structural collapse as shown by Hall data in Fig. , it is remarkable that high-temperature superconductivity appears to occur in this system regardless of the nature of the interlayer bonding: an insensitivity of pairing in the iron layer to the configuration of As $p$-orbitals would provide strong constraints on a microscopic model of superconductivity originating in the iron sublattice. Furthermore, because theoretical calculations predict a non-magnetic ground state in the CT phase, it is tantalizing to conclude that superconductivity is originating in a phase void of spin fluctuations, providing an additional pivotal constraint on the nature of the pairing mechanism. However, the same calculation also predicts a second nearly degenerate magnetic ground state for the CT phase, so the perturbation introduced by charge doping must be properly included before such conclusions are made.

Experimentally, the coexistence of a small fraction of non-collapsed tetragonal phase cannot be ruled out below the $\sim 1\%$ level from our elastic neutron scattering data, although it is highly unlikely due to the dramatic difference in lattice constants between the two structural phases. Nevertheless, the accessibility of the CT phase at ambient pressures in Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ will allow for magnetism to be probed in a manner similar to that done for undoped CaFe$_2$As$_2$ under pressure. Below, we investigate and rule out several possible extrinsic causes of superconductivity that would point to other explanations.

Superconducting transitions are observed in all rare earth substitutions as evidenced by resistive transitions and the onset of Meissner screening in magnetic susceptibility. As shown in Fig. , three characteristic samples with La, Ce, and Pr content exhibit an onset of Meissner screening in magnetic susceptibility measured in low fields, observable more clearly on the semi-log scale of the inset figure. Full volume fraction screening is not observed in these crystals, which exhibit partial screening estimated to reach as high as $\sim 10\%$ of full volume fraction, as shown for the case of 14% Pr. While much smaller than that expected for a bulk superconducting material, this peculiar superconducting phase seems to be impervious to annealing, strong surface etching and surface oxidation, suggesting that the superconducting fraction of these samples is not obviously an extrinsic phase.

First, the persistent appearance of resistive transitions and diamagnetic screening signals indicating $T_c$ values between 30 K and 47 K only occur in samples sufficiently doped such that the AFM phase is suppressed, as shown in Fig. . For instance, superconductivity with much lower $T_c$ values often appears in very low-doped samples such as Ca$_{0.92}$La$_{0.08}$Fe$_2$As$_2$, which shows a resistive transition near $\sim 10$ K (Fig. a). This "10 K phase" persistently appears at low rare earth concentrations in the Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ series, and often shows traces in resistivity data of pure CaFe$_2$As$_2$ such as shown in Fig. . The origin of this phase is not known, but is likely related to the strain-induced transition observed under non-hydrostatic pressure conditions in undoped CaFe$_2$As$_2$. The high-$T_c$ state induced by rare earth substitution appears to be a phase distinct from the 10 K phase, and occasionally exhibits distinct partial resistive transitions as displayed in Fig. (a) for 18% La. The higher-$T_c$ phase in Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ is likely stabilized by the extra carries introduced by aliovalent substitution, as isovalent substitution fails to induce superconductivity.

However, higher $T_c$ transitions are never observed in resistivity for $x$ values below the concentrations necessary to suppress the AFM phase, ruling out any randomly occurring impurity or contaminant phase and suggesting that this pairing mechanism is strongly tied to the suppression of magnetism. It should also be noted that the presence of impurity or contaminant phases has not appeared in any scattering or chemical analysis experiments of these samples. In particular, single-crystal x-ray scattering data refinements of over twenty different crystals have not indicated the presence of any crystalline phases other than the 122 structure, and have consistently yielded residual fitting factors never greater than $\sim3\%$. More detailed (*i.e.*, synchrotron) scattering experiments are required to further reduce the possible level of impurity phase that may be present, but the consistent absence of this phase in AFM samples statistically makes a strong case against this possibility.

Second, the magnitude of the $T_c$ values observed is far above the transition temperatures that appear in undoped CaFe$_2$As$_2$ under non-hydrostatic pressure conditions (*i.e.*, "10 K" phase) or in undoped SrFe$_2$As$_2$ under strain (*i.e.*, "20 K" phase), thus reducing the possibility of superconductivity due to strain conditions in parts of the sample. While we cannot rule out that strain is not playing any role whatsoever, the fact that the dramatic change in lattice constants through the collapsed structural transition does not influence the effectiveness of this potential strain mechanism is extremely challenging for such a scenario.

Nevertheless, to further reduce strain mechanisms as a concern we have performed annealing studies of superconducting samples, both with and without structural collapse conditions present. Starting with as-grown La- and Pr-substituted samples that exhibit Meissner screening, we first performed susceptibility measurements of each sample to characterize their as-grown properties and then subjected each sample to an annealing treatment. This consisted of sealing each sample in a separate quartz tube together with a Ta foil oxygen getter under partial Ar gas pressure, heating to 700$^{\circ}$C and holding at that temperature for 24 hrs before cooling to room temperature. Immediately after the annealing sequence, the susceptibility of each sample was measured following the same procedure as before. Figs. (a)-(b) present the results of the before- and after-anneal measurements. Although there are finite changes in measured screening fractions, the main result is that both samples still exhibit Meissner screening after their annealing treatments. Furthermore, while the La-substituted sample shows a reduction in diamagnetic signal, the Pr-substituted sample in fact shows a small enhancement, reflective of the absence of any systematic trends to enhancing or reducing Meissner screening under this heat treatment schedule. This is in stark contrast to what happens in stoichoimetric SrFe$_2$As$_2$, where annealing completely removes any signature of superconductivity.

Finally, to rule out the possibility that surface impurity phases are responsible for partial Meissner screening, we have checked the effect of both etching and oxidation on the superconductivity in Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$. With $T_c$ values approaching those of the oxygen-based iron-pnictide superconductors, it is important to check for the possibility that oxygenated surface phases somehow achieve optimal oxygen doping for superconductivity and are providing the partial screening observed here. As shown in Figs. (c)-(d), we have measured both resistivity and magnetic susceptibility of a 14.5% Pr sample both before and after etching the sample in concentrated HNO$_3$ for 30 s, which removes $\sim25\%$ of its mass. It is clear that superconductivity survives this harsh treatment, which results in no change in qualitative screening behavior, as well as very little change in resistivity signatures of both the collapse transition near 70 K and the superconducting transition that onsets at 40 K.

To further verify that oxidation is not the cause of enhanced screening, the susceptibility of a 16% Ce-doped sample with $T_c$=35 K was measured first as-grown and then after subsequent exposures to air under heated conditions on a temperature-controlled hot plate. As shown in Fig. , there is again no systematic trend observed after repeated oxidations, with onset of Meissner screening not changing significantly even after visible oxidation from 300$^{\circ}$C exposure. (The small volume fraction variations, which are non-monotonic with exposure temperature, are likely due to uncertainty in mass changes due to handling, as well as damage to the sample from oxidation).

Together, these tests strongly reduce the likelihood of the observed high-$T_c$ superconducting phase in Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ originating from extrinsic sources such as strain mechanisms, surface states or foreign phases such as oxides or other contaminants. However, assuming this superconducting phase is of the conventional type, the consistent observation of such small superconducting volume fractions points to a phase that does not occupy the bulk of the samples. This is extremely surprising, given that the majority of FeAs-based superconducting compounds exhibit bulk superconductivity upon suppression of the AFM phase. We can speculate on its origin as having a localized nature tied to the low percentage of rare earth substitution, but further characterization is required to elucidate the origin of this phase and its potential to be stabilized in bulk form.

# Phase Diagrams

Because pressure and doping are both effective in suppressing the AFM transition, the temperature-doping phase diagrams of the Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ series appear qualitatively similar but in fact evolve with different concentration rates that depend on rare earth ionic size. Fig.  presents the composite phase diagrams of Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ for each rare earth species, with antiferromagnetic transitions defined by the minimum in $\rho(T)$ and the midpoint of the drop in $\chi(T)$, superconducting transitions determined by the onset of a drop in $\rho(T)$, and CT transitions defined by abrupt features in $\chi(T)$ upon warming and cooling as discussed in Section IV.

The suppression of the AFM phase with $x$ is similar for each species, but progresses at noticeably different rates. Extrapolating a phenomelogical fit of $T_N$ as a function of $x$ to $T=0$ shows this explicitly: the resultant critical concentration $x_{c}$ where $T_N$ vanishes is shown to vary with rare earth. In the inset of Fig. , we show that $x_{c}$ actually scales linearly with the ionic radii values of the rare earth species for 8-coordinate geometry. Given the known sensitivity of the lattice parameters to choice of rare earth substituent as shown by the structural characterization in Section III, this trend verifies that, in addition to electron doping, chemical pressure also plays a role in shaping the phase diagram of the Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ system.

To disentangle the doping and pressure effects, we utilize the observations noted in Section III about the progression of lattice constants – in particular the strong and weak dependences of $c$- and $a$-axis lattice constants, respectively, on rare earth species (c.f. see Fig. ) – to characterize chemical pressure by the measured change in $c$-axis unit cell dimension. For instance, substitution of La into CaFe$_2$As$_2$ does not change the $c$-axis unit cell length for concentrations up to almost 30% La, while Nd substitution changes the $c$-axis very rapidly with $x$. However, for all rare earth species the $a$-axis length increases on average at the same rate with substitution concentration regardless of ionic size. This is possibly due to an expansion of the Fe sublattice caused by charge doping with an effective adjustment of the Fe oxidation state, but such a conclusion requires verification from a core level spectroscopy experiment.

Therefore, we take the change in $c$-axis length as a measure of the true chemical pressure. The value of the $c$-axis lattice parameter at $x_{c}$ for each $R$ is then used to project the individual phase diagrams onto the $x$–$c$-axis plane, as shown in Fig. . Note the smooth progression of the $x_c$ points across this plane (*i.e.*, dash-dotted line), which also includes the same extrapolated critical point for undoped CaFe$_2$As$_2$ under pressure. This indicates that a parameterized relation exists between the suppression of AFM order via chemical pressure and electron doping.

Also, the positions where the As-As interlayer distance equals 3 Å are shown as a solid grey line, indicating the positions where the collapse transition onsets. This construction forms the basis for the universal phase diagram for Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ shown in Fig. , which extends the pressure-temperature phase diagram of CaFe$_2$As$_2$ (Refs. ) along a third charge-doping axis. In this manner, it is seen that the individual rare earth species phase diagrams nicely straddle the doping-pressure plane in a manner that allows access to distinct parts of the phase diagram by choice of rare earth substituent.

# Discussion and Summary

Combining our transport, magnetic susceptibility and neutron scattering data enables us to trace the progression of the AFM, CT and superconducting transitions as a function of the segregated parameters of electron doping and chemical pressure. In this way, it can be seen that the AFM phase is effectively suppressed by both doping and chemical pressure, similar to other established systems such as Ba$_{1-x}$K$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ and pressurized BaFe$_2$As$_2$. Furthermore, the AFM transition line exhibits continuity through the doping-pressure plane, demonstrating the symmetry between both methods of tuning. This is in line with ideas about band structure tuning, whereby nesting features of the Fermi surface that may stabilize the AFM phase in the parent compound are disrupted by either tuning parameter. However, the suppression of AFM order with electron doping at the alkaline earth site is in stark contrast to recent first-principles calculations that predict an enhancement of magnetism, demonstrating the failure of a rigid band picture even at low charge doping. This is reflective of a continued challenge to understand the true nature of the magnetic order and its suppression by doping and pressure.

As in undoped CaFe$_2$As$_2$ under pressure, where the CT phase abruptly severs the continuous suppression of the AFM transition under applied pressure, the suppression of the AFM phase in Ca$_{1-x}$Pr$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ and Ca$_{1-x}$Nd$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ is also shown to be interrupted by the CT transition but at slightly lower temperatures and effective pressures. This is understood as due to the occurrence of the CT transition exactly at the 3 Å interlayer As-As separation, which follows both a pressure- and doping-dependent path through the phase diagram as marked by the solid grey line in Fig. . What is more unusual is the insensitivity of the observed high-$T_c$ superconducting phase to this boundary, raising important questions regarding which elements of chemical, electronic and magnetic structure are important to Cooper pairing should this superconducting phase prove to be intrinsic to both the uncollapsed and collapsed structures that straddle this division.

Interestingly, high-temperature superconductivity in the Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ series appears to exist only exclusively from the AFM phase. This is strikingly similar to the segregation of SC and AFM phases found in 1111 materials doped with fluorine, such as in LaFeAsO$_{1-x}$F$_x$ (Ref. ) and CeFeAsO$_{1-x}$F$_x$ (Ref. ), and should be contrasted with the well-known coexistence shown to occur in BaFe$_{2-x}$Co$_x$As$_2$. Further confirmation of the intrinsic nature of superconductivity in Ca$_{1-x}$R$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ will shed light on this interesting dichotomy, possibly providing an explanation for this distinction between phase diagrams in oxypnictide-based and intermetallic-based superconductors.

In conclusion, we have shown that rare earth substitution into the iron-based superconductor parent compound CaFe$_2$As$_2$ provides for a rich playground of phases that will prove useful for studying various aspects of the physics of iron-based superconductivity. Depending on the choice of rare earth substituent, varying degrees of chemical pressure and electron doping can be utilized to tune both the electronic and structural phases of this system, resulting in a remarkable control over a large phase space of temperature, doping and pressure.

We have shown that chemical pressure can drive CaFe$_2$As$_2$ through a structural collapse of the tetragonal unit cell that retains the crystal symmetry, but dramatically changes the bonding structure, dimensionality and electronic properties. The collapse is driven solely by the interlayer As-As $p$-orbital separation, which prefers to form a covalent bond when the separation is driven to less than 3 Å by chemical substitution or applied pressure, or a combination of both. This results in an unprecedented thermal expansion of the unit cell due to this instability, and a controllable tunability of the crystal and electronic structure as a function of temperature.

Interestingly, an unprecedentedly high superconducting transition temperature was observed in all rare earth substitutions upon complete suppression of the antiferromagnetically ordered phase, with several extrinsic origins of this partial-volume-fraction phase systematically ruled out. The presence of this superconductivity regardless of the structural collapse instability raises important questions regarding the sensitivity of Cooper pairing in the iron-based materials to electronic structure, bonding and dimensionality, and access to this dramatic structural collapse at ambient pressure conditions will provide ample opportunity to study these effects in further detail.

# Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge B. Eichhorn, M.A. Green, R.L. Greene, I.I. Mazin, J. Schmalian and I. Takeuchi. This work was supported by AFOSR-MURI Grant FA9550-09-1-0603 and NSF-CAREER Grant DMR-0952716.


abstract: We numerically model the coronal mass ejection (CME) event of October 28, 2003 that erupted from active region 10486 and propagated to Earth in less than 20 hours causing severe geomagnetic storms. The magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model is formulated by first arriving at a steady state corona and solar wind employing synoptic magnetograms. We initiate two CMEs from the same active region, one approximately a day earlier that preconditions the solar wind for the much faster CME on the 28th. This second CME travels through the corona at a rate of over 2500 km s$^{-1}$ driving a strong forward shock. We clearly identify this shock in an image produced by the Large Angle Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) C3, and reproduce the shock and its appearance in synthetic white light images from the simulation. We find excellent agreement with both the general morphology and the quantitative brightness of the model CME with LASCO observations. These results demonstrate that the CME shape is largely determined by its interaction with the ambient solar wind and may not be sensitive to the initiation process. We then show how the CME would appear as observed by wide-angle coronagraphs onboard the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) spacecraft. We find complex time evolution of the white-light images as a result of the way in which the density structures pass through the Thomson sphere. The simulation is performed with the Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF).
author: Ward B. Manchester IV, Angelos Vourlidas, Gábor Tóth, Noé Lugaz, Ilia I. Roussev, Igor V. Sokolov, Tamas I. Gombosi Darren L. De Zeeuw Merav Opher
title: Three-Dimensional MHD Simulation of the 2003 October 28 Coronal Mass Ejection: Comparison with LASCO Coronagraph Observations

# Introduction

The October-November period of 2003 saw some of the most energetic solar flares and coronal mass ejections of any solar cycle. These eruptive events came to be known as the Halloween Events and included 11 X-class flares, 6 radiation storms and 4 geomagnetic storms. These eruptions originated from three active regions (ARs), 10484, 10486 and 10488 of which 10486 was the largest, most complex and most active producing 12 major coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Three of these CMEs that occurred on October 28, 29 and November 4 were particularly energetic with speeds in excess of 2000 km s$^{-1}$ and were associated with X17, X10 and X28 flares respectively. The October 28 CME was very geoeffective and damaged satellites, diverted airplane routes, caused power failures in Sweden, disrupted long-distance radio communications, and caused northern lights (aurora borealis) as far south as Florida. The November 4 CME was the most energetic of the Halloween Events, but occurred while AR 10486 was on the western limb so that the CME was less geoeffective as the CME was not directed toward Earth.

Because of their extreme nature, the Halloween Events have been the subject of a great deal of study, both observational as well as theoretical and modeling efforts. The October 28 CME in particular was well observed from Sun to Earth beginning with the vector magnetic field of AR 10486 , and surface flow measurements . For this event, flare loops were observed by TRACE , and the global coronal field has been reconstructed from data taken from the Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) aboard the Solar and Heliospheric Observations (SOHO) spacecraft . Dense plasma associated with the October 28 CME has been observed to propagate past the Earth by the Solar Mass Ejection Imager (SMEI) and was also detected by interplanetary scintillation (IPS) . Finally, the event was observed *in situ* by Wind and the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) , which reveal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) quantities in the solar wind as well as ion abundances.

Efforts to simulate the Halloween Events include those of who modeled the propagation of the CME plasma from 2.5 ${\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ to 10 AU with a three-dimensional (3D) kinematic model. modeled the 2003 October 28-30 period with a one-and-a-half-dimensional (1.5D) reduced MHD model that describes the self-similar expansion of a magnetic flux rope. In this case, the authors also coupled the heliospheric results with a 3D magnetosphere code and compared it with simulations driven by the observed solar wind data. modeled the CME eruption in the solar corona with density and pressure perturbations. and both modeled CME-driven shock propagation and predicted the shock arrival times with reasonable success. This work to model a specific event marks a clear distinction from non-event-specific CME simulations , and non-event-specific Sun-to-thermosphere space weather simulations modeled by the Center for Space Environment Modeling (CSEM) and the Center for Integrated Space Weather Modeling (CISM) .

More recently, modeled the October 28 CME as part of a Sun-to-Earth space weather event that included an in-depth description of the resulting geomagnetic storm. This work by is ground breaking in two regards. First, like those by , it is the first 3D numerical full MHD simulation to reproduce observed CMEs as they are magnetically driven from active regions in the low corona. The earliest attempt to model an observed CME (including the magnetic field) propagating from the Sun to the Earth, is that of . This particular simulation is two-dimensional and did not capture the structure of the solar wind or the active region, but did roughly capture the magnetic cloud at 1 AU. More recent modeling efforts have been 3D and capture the structure of the solar wind, but treat CME propagation outside of the magnetosonic point $(r \approx 20 {\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}})$ . The second noteworthy aspect of the simulation by is that it is the first event study to employ a framework to couple several individual codes to model the physical domain extending from the corona to the Earth's upper atmosphere. The framework used was the Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF) developed by members of CSEM at the University of Michigan by . A framework for similar purposes is being developed by CISM at Boston University.

In this paper, we examine the simulation described by , and concern ourselves with the physical properties of the CME as it propagates from the low corona to Earth. In particular, the detailed structure of the coronal and solar wind allow us to quantitatively compare the model with Large Angle Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) C2 and C3 observations of the October 28 event. In this case, we validate the accuracy of the simulation in reproducing the speed mass, appearance (in scattered light), and shock properties of the observed CME. We also make wide-angle, large elongation Thomson-Scattered white light images of the model to show how the CME would appear in the wide angle coronagraphs of the Sun Earth Connection Corona and Heliospheric Imager (SECCHI) instrument on board the STEREO spacecraft. These synthetic images show that the CME appears much different far from the Sun due to scattering affects at large elongation.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows: The SWMF, its components, and numerical techniques are briefly discussed in section 2. Section 3 provides a description of the CME simulation, the results of which are compared to LASCO observations in section 4. In section 5, we show how the CME would appear propagating past the Earth in the SECCHI heliospheric imagers HI1 and HI2. We conclude with a summary and an outlook for future development in section 6.

# Numerical Methods: SWMF and BATS-R-US

The SWMF couples models treating physical domains of the space environment extending from the solar corona to the Earth's upper atmosphere. The model coupling is flexible yet efficient, making faster than real-time space weather simulations feasible on massively parallel computers. Each model has its own dependent variables, a mathematical model, and a numerical scheme with an appropriate grid structure and temporal discretization. The physics domains may overlap with each other or they can interact through a boundary surface. The SWMF is able to incorporate models from the community and couple them with modest changes in the software of an individual model. The SWMF is a fully functional and documented framework that provides high-performance computational capability to simulate the physics from the low solar corona to the upper atmosphere of the Earth. Currently, the SWMF is composed of nine physics modules, and is driven by external data such as magnetograms, flare and CME observations, satellites upstream of the Earth (like ACE, Geotail and Wind), etc. The SWMF can model any physically meaningful subset of the physics domains, and is freely available via registration at
`http://csem.engin.umich.edu/SWMF`.

There were seven SWMF components used in the Halloween storm simulations: Solar Corona (SC), Eruptive Event Generator (EE), Inner Heliosphere (IH), Global Magnetosphere (GM), Inner Magnetosphere (IM), Ionosphere Electrodynamics (IE), and Upper Atmosphere (UA). For our purposes, the only relevant components are the SC, EE and IH that model the corona, solar wind, and CME propagation from the active region to 1 AU. Components SC, EE, and IH are based on the BATS-R-US code that solves the governing equations of MHD in a conservative finite volume form. Non-ideal MHD terms are included through appropriate source terms. The code uses a limited reconstruction that ensures second-order accuracy away from discontinuities, while simultaneously providing the stability that ensures non-oscillatory solutions. In addition, the code employs several approximate Riemann solvers. The resulting scheme solves for the hydrodynamic and electromagnetic effects in a tightly coupled manner that works equally well across several orders of magnitude in plasma $\beta$ (the ratio of plasma pressure to magnetic pressure). The BATS-R-US also uses a relatively simple yet effective block-based adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) scheme to resolve structures spanning many length scales. The BATS-R-US scales almost linearly to more than 1000 processors for a fixed problem size, and fully implicit time stepping scheme is incorporated, that can be combined with explicit time stepping.

The Solar Corona domain is a Cartesian box that extends from the surface of the Sun to $-24\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}< x, y, z < 24\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$, where ${\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ is the radius of the Sun. The physics of this domain is described by the equations of MHD with additional source terms required to take into account the heating and acceleration of the solar wind . Recently, developed a solar wind model based on the empirical relationship between solar wind speed and magnetic flux tube expansion , which has been incorporated into the SWMF. Here, we use the coronal model presented in . At the inner boundary of the SC component, the density, pressure, velocity and magnetic field are defined at a height just above the transition region. The magnetic field is obtained from a synoptic solar magnetogram. The boundary conditions for the temperature and mass density at the Sun are varied as a function of magnetic field strength to achieve a realistic distribution of fast and slow wind speeds near the Sun and at 1AU. The velocity components at the inner boundary maintain line-tying of the magnetic field to the rotating solar surface. Differential rotation is currently neglected. The flow at the outer boundary is usually superfast (faster than the fast magnetosonic speed of the plasma), so no information is propagating inward.

The EE domain is in the Solar Corona, restricted to the active region responsible for the CME. The EE in this case takes the form of a nonlinear perturbation of the SC solution, which is made by superimposing a modified version of the flux rope to active region 10486. The flux rope is in an initial state of force imbalance that drives the eruption. This eruption generator follows from the work of who incorporated the flux rope in the BATS-R-US code.

The IH domain extends from its inner boundary at $r=20\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ to a cube extending to $-240\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}< x,y,z < 240\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$, which encompasses Earth's orbit. The physics of this domain is described by the equations of ideal MHD, solved in an inertial frame, on a Cartesian grid. The inner boundary conditions of the IH component are obtained from the SC component. The flow at the outer boundary of the IH component is always assumed to be superfast.

# Halloween Storm Simulation

## Initial State

Here, we summarize the basic description of the CME simulation that was first presented in . For more details, we refer the reader to this earlier paper. The simulation begins with the construction of a steady state corona and solar wind. The magnetic field at the inner boundary (base of the corona) of the SC component is specified from an MDI synoptic magnetogram centered around the time of the October 28 eruption. The initial volumetric field is specified with a potential-field-source-surface extrapolation fit to this map. The computational grid is highly refined around AR 10486 where the smallest cells are about $3\times10^{-3}\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$. The grid is refined to $0.1\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ within a $1\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ diameter cylinder extending along the Sun-Earth line. The SC component is then run to steady state allowing the solar wind to relax. Figure , Panel (a) shows the steady state solution. Here the radial field strength is shown in color at the inner boundary, and field lines are drawn extending out into the corona. Orange lines are open while closed lines are shown in blue. The SC is run in the Heliographic Rotating (HGR) coordinate system with the sidereal Carrington rotation period of 25.38 days. An offset angle around the $Z$ axis places the Earth in the $-X,Z$ half plane at the time of the large eruption on October 28 CME.

The IH component is coupled to the SC component at $20\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$, and rapidly achieves steady state as the superfast wind blows through the domain. During the steady state run, the IH component uses a rotating coordinate system, which is then switched to Heliographic Inertial (HGI) with an offset angle that puts the Earth in the $-X,Z$ half plane (the orbital motion of the Earth is neglected). The grid resolution is $1/4\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ near the inner boundary and also along the Sun-Earth line within a cylinder of $1\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ radius, while the largest cells are $4\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$.

## Generating Eruptive Events

The October 28 event was preceded by several smaller CMEs, which significantly modified the ambient solar wind. To take into account the preconditioning effect of previous CMEs on the solar wind, we start our simulation on October 26, when a smaller CME was launched at approximately 07:00 UT from AR 10486. For this first CME, we use 07:24 UT as the initiation time, which is within the uncertainties of the observations. The much more energetic CME that is the focus of this study occurred at approximately 10:54 UT. This eruption occurred near disk center producing a full halo CME.

Here, we initiate the CMEs by inserting magnetic flux ropes (the size of the active region) based on the modified model. In Figure  (Panel (b)), the flux rope for the October 28 eruption is seen arching above AR 10486. The location and orientation of the flux ropes were chosen to arch over the dipolar part of the active region. The active region can be easily identified in the high resolution synoptic map obtained from the observed photospheric magnetic field. The density in the loop was obtained from the size and estimated mass of the CMEs. The rope's magnetic field does not match that observed at the photosphere. The reason for the discrepancy is that the field of the rope is highly twisted and is orthogonal to the polarity inversion line. In contrast, the measured magnetic field was observed to be in a highly sheared configuration running parallel to the inversion line . In spite of this limitation, the magnetic field strength of the flux ropes can be adjusted to produce eruptions that match LASCO observations of the CME speeds at 20 solar radii (1500 and 2500 km s$^{-1}$ for the October 26 and October 28 events, respectively). For the first CME, the magnetic flux rope has a free enegy $2.3\times 10^{32}$ ergs, while the second faster CME requires nearly ten times as much energy at $2.0\times 10^{33}$ ergs.

After 20 minutes from the start of the time dependent simulation, the leading shock of the first CME reaches a radial distance of 5.5$\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ at a speed slightly exceeding 2100 km s$^{-1}$. The first CME reaches the SC/IH boundary at 20$\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ after about 1.7 hours, and the speed of the leading shock is the observed 1500 km s$^{-1}$. The first CME is propagating in a direction about 30 degrees off from the Sun-Earth line, but the flanks of the shock reach the Earth 45 hours after the eruption at 4:30 UT Oct 28. The simulated solar wind velocity at the Earth increases from about 350 km s$^{-1}$ to 550 km s$^{-1}$, which is a good approximation to the solar wind conditions preceding the arrival of the October 28 CME as observed by the ACE satellite .

The second CME is initiated at 10:54 October 28 with a flux rope that is 50% larger in radius than the previous one. Due to the larger size and stronger magnetic field, the second CME reaches a speed of 2500 km s$^{-1}$ (on the Sun-Earth line) measured at 20$\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$. After 15 minutes, the second CME reaches 9$\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ with a shock speed near 3200 km s$^{-1}$. The shock reaches the SC/IH boundary at 20$\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ in less than an hour with a speed around 2800 km s$^{-1}$. The density structure of the October 28 CME is shown in Figure . Panels (a) and (c) show a color representation of the electron density on the meridional plane $(x-z)$ at 15 and 45 minutes after CME initiation, respectively. White lines show the direction of the magnetic field confined to the plane. In these pictures, the magnetic flux rope is clearly seen to be expelled from the corona. Panels (b) and (d) show the density ratio (relative to the pre-event corona) on $y-z$ located at $x = -5 {\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ and $x = -8 {\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ at 15 and 45 minutes after initiation, respectively. The white and black circles correspond to the solar limb and LASCO C3 coronagraph, respectively. These images show the nearly self-similar evolution of the plasma expelled in the CME. The plasma is distributed in a shell with the greatest density in the southern hemisphere.

The three-dimensional density of the CME is shown in Figure  with iso-surfaces of the density enhancement (i.e. density divided by the pre-event level) at $t= 15$ minutes after initiation. Blue, green and red iso-surfaces corresponding to values of 0.9, 2, and 5 are shown from four perspectives: (a) side, (b) polar, (c) back and (d) front facing Earth. The green surface effectively shows the extent of the shock front, the red surface shows the core material, while the blue iso-surface shows the density depleted cavity. The cavity forms as a rarefaction behind the flux rope, while the densest plasma is located in the southern hemisphere, both in and below the flux rope. The polar and back views (Panels (b) and (d) respectively) best show the density enhancement at the southern end of the CME. Comparison of Figure  with Figure 6 in also suggests that the simulated 3D density structure qualitatively agrees with the density enhancements reconstructed from SMEI observations.

# Comparisons with LASCO Observations

CMEs are most frequently observed in visible light that is Thomson scattered by coronal electrons within the CME. In addition to this electron scattered photospheric light (referred to as the K-corona), there is also light scattered by interplanetary dust that is referred to as the F-corona. There are significant differences between the two components of scattered light. First, the F-corona is unpolarized within 5-6$\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$, while the K-corona is polarized with components both radial and tangential to the solar limb . Second, the brightness of the K-corona falls off much more rapidly with distance from the Sun such that it dominates close to the Sun, is roughly equal to the F-corona at $r \approx 4\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$, and is much dimmer than the F-corona far from the Sun. Finally, the F-corona is nearly constant in time and is believed to be largely unaffected by CMEs.

The corona is optically thin in white light, so that the intensity of scattered light along a given line of sight (LOS) is the integrated contribution of all electrons along the line. The contribution to a given LOS is highly dependent on the location of the electron relative to the Sun and the observer . Close to the Sun, the scattering is heavily weighted in the plane of the sky. Coronagraphs located in space observe coronal light without contending with atmospheric scattering, which makes it possible to view the corona far from the Sun. In the case of LASCO, the C2 and C3 coronagraphs have fields of view extending to 6 and 32$\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ respectively. More recently, SMEI and STEREO coronagraphs have observed Thomson scattered light at very large angles from the Sun that extend beyond Earth's orbit.

In this section, we make comparisons between synthetic coronagraph images constructed from our model CME, and LASCO observations. The synthetic images are created by numerically integrating the Thomson scattered light along a LOS for each pixel with the appropriate scattering function . Images of numerical CME models have been made in this fashion before . More recently, synthetic images have been made for models of specific CME events, and qualitatively compared to LASCO images . Here, we go further, and for the first time make truly quantitative comparisons with the data. To make the comparison, we process the synthetic data and the LASCO data in the same way and display the resulting images in identical formats. We account for F-corona far from the Sun where it is the dominant source of scattered light. Since our MHD model only allows us to directly treat electron density, we estimate the contribution of dust scattering with the same power-law empirical relationship used to make the LASCO images. In this case, the background F-corona brightness is taken to have the form $B_F = c r^{(0.22\cos(2\theta) - 2.47)}$ . Here, we estimate the magnitude of $c$ by setting $B_F = B_K$ at $r = 4\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ where $B_K$ is the background polar brightness of the K-corona taken from .

The results of the comparison are shown in Figure . Here, images of the October 28 CME as observed with LASCO C2 (Panel (a)) and C3 (Panels (c) and (e)) are shown for times $t =$ 11:30, 11:42 and 12:18 respectively. Panels (b), (d), and (f) of Figure  show the synthetic images at times $t =$ 13, 21, and 50 minutes after initiation when the model CME is closest in size to that of the corresponding LASCO image. In reality, the CME travels slower than in our model with the observed sequence of images occurring at approximately 36, 48, and 84 minutes after initiation. In both data and model, the color images show the total brightness divided by that of the pre-event background. White circles show the solar limb, and filled black circles show the occulting disks. In all cases, we find extremely good quantitative agreement in both the magnitude and spatial distribution of the observed brightness. In these images, the greatest brightness is below the southern limb of the Sun, that extends in an arc over the eastern limb, while the the dimmest part of the CME is found in the north western quadrant. This brightness distribution corresponds with the position of AR 10486, which was located at 20 degrees below the equator on October 28. By 12:18 UT, the observed brightness patterns is more highly structured than the model, showing evidence of a bright core in the south. The model (Panel (f)) lacks these fine details, and retains a single bright arc in the south.

## CME Mass

To further quantify the comparison between the our numerical model and the LASCO coronagraph observations, we calculate the CME mass in both cases in an identical fashion. This mass is derived by integrating the excess brightness of the K-corona with the assumption that the plasma is in the plane of the sky, which sets a lower limit on CME mass. The F-corona is subtracted out from the observations and does not affect the mass. We restrict this integral to the brightest portion of the CME that extends from 235 to 330 degrees as measured from the $-y$ axis in Figure . In the case of the C2 field of view (top row of Figure ), this integration sector extends from 2.0 to 6.0 $\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$, and for the C3 field of view (middle and bottom rows of Figure ) the sector extends from 4.0 to 16.4$\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$. With these criteria, the CME masses derived from observations at $t =$ 11:30, 11:42 and 12:18 UT are $1.50 \times 10^{16}$ g, $1.55 \times 10^{16}$ g, and $1.70 \times 10^{16}$ g, respectively. The corresponding masses of the model CME (Panels (b), (d), and (f)) are, respectively, $2.23 \times 10^{16}$ g, $2.16 \times 10^{16}$ g, and $4.90 \times 10^{16}$ g.

The observed masses are approximately 30% less than that of the model at times $t =$ 11:30 UT and 11:42 UT, which is consistent with the larger filling factor of the model event. The slight decrease in model CME mass found from Panel (d) is the result of a greater part of the CME being obscured by the occulting disk. By 12:18 the CME mass is observed to increase by 13 %, while the model mass (as shown in Panel (f)) more than doubles. We expect the mass of fast CMEs to increase as plasma is swept up as they travel from the Sun as shown in numerical simulations . However, the mass increase seen in LASCO observations is attributed to mass entering the coronagraph field of view from below the occulter . In general, there is not yet proof of a plasma pileup in the low corona by CMEs. In the case of our simulation, we believe that the CME mass increases faster than what is observed because of the excess speed of the CME. For the observed event, the (excess) mass continues to increase by almost an order of magnitude, to $13.6 \times 10^{16}$ g as measured with SMEI on October 29, 12:00 UT as the CME passed the Earth .

## Shock Identification

Faint arcs are frequently observed at the outer edges of fast CMEs viewed in coronagraph images, yet it has been difficult to conclusively identify these arcs as shocks. The earliest example of shock identification is that of who observed a bright loop at the front of a fast CME. In that case, the presence of a shock was inferred from its high speed (1070 km s$^{-1}$), the absence of any deflections preceding the shock, and the fact that the expanding shock front did not cease its lateral motion to form stationary legs. More recently, observed a similar feature with LASCO that they identified as a shock wave. In this work, a numerical simulation was employed to model the shock's appearance and confirm its presence in the coronagraph image. More recent MHD simulations have also found manifestations of CME driven shocks in synthetic coronagraph images . Perhaps the most compelling observational evidence for shocks appearing as visible components of CMEs in LASCO images is presented in and . Here, shocks were observed simultaneously in the low corona $(r < 3\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}})$ by LASCO, the Ultraviolet Coronagraph Spectrometer (UVCS) and as type II radio burst. UVCS gave clear spectroscopic evidence for the presence of shock fronts, while radio bursts indicated the presence of shock-accelerated electrons.

In our simulation, we can conclusively identify a shock front and determine its appearance in synthetic coronagraph images. By detailed comparison with the observations, we can then clearly demonstrate the existence of a shock front in the corona. For this purpose, we reexamine the coronagraph data presented in the bottom row of Figure . We again show the brightness, but with the color contours adjusted in Figure to more clearly show the faint features at the outer-most edge of the observed and modeled CME in Panels (a) and (b) respectively. In both panels, we see very similar faint rims at the outer edge of the CME where the color makes a transition from blue-green and yellow indicating an increase in brightness at a level between 1 and 2%. This rim has a width of 2$\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ and extends out to $16\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ from the Sun. In the data, this faint rim is near the noise level and we draw a curved black line to mark its outer boundary.

For a more detailed comparison, we extract the brightness and electron density along radial lines (shown in Figure , Panels (a) and (b)) that pass through the southern outer edge of the CME. Panel (c) shows both the observed and modeled brightness with solid and dashed lines respectively. We find very good agreement between the model and the observations. Both cases exhibit a similar steep drop in brightness that levels off forming the faint rim, where the noise in the observations is close to the signal level. For the purpose of the comparison, we have aligned these features in the radial direction by shifting model results a small amount $(+0.62\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}})$. In Panel (d), we plot (solid line) the electron density deduced from observations under the assumption of an axisymmetric distribution around the Sun. The model electron density is extracted along a line extending from the center of the Sun, and passing through the southern most extent of the disturbance near $x,y,z = -8.6, 0.83, -15.9\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$. The projection of this line on the $y-z$ plane corresponds to line shown in Panel (b). We plot this data in Panel (d) with a dashed line and translate the model density in the radial direction to align with the observed quantities. We find remarkable agreement between the two electron densities, where both increase from approximately 2000 to 10000 cm$^{-3}$ at the outer edge of the faint rim between 14 and $17\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$. In the simulation, we can conclusively identify this density jump as a strong fast-mode shock driven by plasma moving at 2010 km s$^{-1}$. The density increase at the shock is very near the theoretical limit of $(\gamma +1)/(\gamma -1) = 5$ for $\gamma = 1.5$ used in the simulation. The shock is smeared out over a distance of $2\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ by grid resolution at $1/4\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$. By a detailed comparison between the simulation and the observations, we clearly demonstrate the existence of a shock front in the LASCO C3 image at $t =$ 12:18.

The overall 3D shape of the shock front is seen in Figure , from which we can discern why the shocked plasma is so faint. The outer edge of the shock front is $5\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ from the plane of the sky and is sharply curved at its greatest distance from the $x$ axis. The lines-of-sight at the outer edge of the CME graze the shock surface, and even though there is nearly a factor of four increase in density at shock, the enhancement occurs over such a short distance that it results in a very small increase in brightness. The brightness increases as the lines of sight pass through progressively longer distances of compressed plasma behind the shock. For the numerical model, the decrease in brightness occurs faster than what is observed, in part because the shock front is smeared out by the limited numerical resolution.

# CME Appearance at Large Elongation: STEREO-SECCHI Predictions

In this section, we make wide-angle, large elongation Thomson-scattered white light images of the model to show how the CME would appear in the coronagraphs of the Sun Earth Connection Corona and Heliospheric Imager (SECCHI) instruments onboard the STEREO spacecraft . The fields of view of the four SECCHI coronagraphs: COR1, COR2, HI1, and HI2 give complete coverage extending from the low corona to beyond the Earth's orbit as shown in Figure . COR1, COR2 coronagraphs are centered on the Sun with fields of view that extend from 1.4 to 4$\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ and 2 to 15 ${\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ respectively. HI1 and HI2 are pointed toward the Sun-to-Earth line with fields of view that extend from 12 to 84$\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ and 66 to $381\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$, respectively. Figure shows synthetic COR1 and COR2 images of our model of the October 28 CME as it appears from the location of the Earth. HI1 and HI2 images show the CME from a location 22 degrees ahead of the Earth where STEREO A will be one year into it's mission.

Thomson scattering has a strong angular dependence such that scattering into a LOS is highly dependent the on location of the electron relative to the Sun and the observer . The region of space for which there is maximum scattering into LOS is in the shape of a sphere that contains the Sun and the observer as see in Figure . Close to the Sun, the scattering is heavily weighted to the plane of the sky. At large elongation (more then $60\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ from the Sun), the spherical shape of the maximum scattering surface becomes significant to the appearance of coronagraph images .

Our model provides an opportunity to examine the effects of the angular dependence of Thomson scattering on the appearance of CMEs at large elongation as seen in the HI2 coronagraphs. Figure shows the time evolution of the model CME as it would appear from SECCHI-HI2A one year into the mission (22 degrees ahead of the Earth). The total brightness is shown in a time sequence at intervals $t =$, 9.1, 13.1, 18.3, and 22.3 hours in panels (a), (b), (c) and (d), respectively. The CME is seen to propagate into the field of view on the right hand side of Panel (a), appears to stall in Panel (b), and then reappears on the left hand sides of Panels (c) and (d) without ever being bright in the middle of the field of view. (A movie is available for the online version of this paper.) Figure shows the corresponding series of images that would be made be SECCHI-HI2B. In this case, the spacecraft is 22 degrees behind the Earth with the HI2B instrument pointing toward the Sun-Earth line in the opposite direction as HI2A. From this perspective, the CME enters the HI2B field of view from the left hand side seen in Figure , Panel (a). Here, the CME appears as an arc that first brightens as seen in Panel (b) and then gradually fades away as seen in Panels (c) and (d).

The complex behavior shown in the model HI2 images is not seen in standard coronagraph images, and was not found in the simulated HI2 images of a less structured CME examined by . The reason the CME fades in and out is because of multiple crossings of the Thomson sphere by dense arcs that propagate through the field of view of HI2A as illustrated in Figure . Here, for the same time sequence as shown in Figure , we show the mass density in color on the equatorial ($x-y$) plane. We mark the intersection of the Thomson sphere with the equatorial plane with a white circle. The position of STEREO A is marked along with black lines roughly showing the field of view of the HI2 coronagraph. Dense plasma is preferentially brightened in close proximity to the Thomson sphere. At $t = 9.1$ hours, a dense arc of plasma crosses the Thomson sphere from the right hand side. This arc begins to move away from the Thomson sphere followed by a cavity at times $t = 13.1$ and 18.3 hours, which explains the dimming on the right hand side of the field of view. By time $t = 22.3$ hours, dense plasma on the Thomson sphere is found directly in front of the space craft on the left hand side, and far across the Thomson sphere on the right hand side. This two-sided distribution of plasma and its proximity to the Thomson sphere coincides with the bright arcs seen in the left and right hand sides of the field of view seen in Panel (d) of Figure .

# Summary and Conclusions

We have preformed a detailed analysis of a 3D MHD time-dependent simulation of flux-rope-driven CMEs originating from AR 10408 on October 26 and 28, 2003 . The simulation was carried out with the SWMF in which propagation of the CMEs were followed from the low corona to beyond 1 AU. We have created synthetic coronagraph images of the October 28 event and made strict quantitative comparisons of these images with those made my LASCO C2 and C3. The simulation closely reproduces the appearance of the October 28 CME, both in the morphology and magnitude of Thomson scattered light through the fields of view of both LASCO C2 and C3. Furthermore, the CME masses calculated from the synthetic coronagraph images and the LASCO observations also are in close agreement.

We have identified a shock front at the southern edge of the CME. A detailed analysis shows that the appearance of the CME-driven-shock in a synthetic coronagrpah image closely matches the same structure found the LASCO C3 image at 12:18 UT on October 28. Both the rigor of this quantitative comparison and the fidelity in reproducing coronagraph images of CMEs is unprecedented. This is all the more remarkable in that there was no parameter fitting to produce the CME images, as only the CME speed at $20\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$ was used as a guide in specifying the flux rope.

The simulation allows the opportunity to view the October 28 CME as it would appear at large elongation in the HI2 coronagraph . Here, we found complex time evolution of the CME in the HI2 field of view as dense structures were temporarily highlighted as they came in close proximity to the Thomson sphere. These results vividly illustrate the effects of CME propagation viewed at large elongation pointed out by .

An aspect of the simulation that can be improved upon is the speed of the CME, which is a factor of two too fast inside of $5\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$, and does not recover the measured velocity until $20\,{\mathrm R}_{\mathrm{S}}$. We conclude that most of the errors in CME speed originate from the *ad hoc* initiation with a flux rope in a state of force imbalance. However, the expansion of the flux rope, in the realistic 3D coronal model, is remarkable in its ability to reproduce the appearance of the CME in Thomson scattered white light. This result suggests that much of the density structure of the CME is determined by the plasma distribution in the corona surrounding the active region.

Future models of CME initiation will be improved by the use vector magnetogram data rather than just fitting flux ropes to the observed line-of-sight component of the field. For this event, vector magnetograms clearly show that the magnetic field of AR 10486 is very highly sheared with the field running nearly parallel to the neutral line from which the CMEs erupt . The evolution of magnetic shear is made manifest by observations of photospheric proper motions, which show strong shear flows along the magnetic neutral line prior to CMEs . These observations strongly suggest that the magnetic shear is ultimately driving these CMEs. A physical explanation and simulation of such shear flows was first provided respectively by and , which shows that the flows are driven by the Lorentz force that occurs as the magnetic field emerges in a stratified atmosphere. Furthermore, these Lorentz-force-driven flows may persist until the magnetic field becomes so highly sheared that there is a loss of equilibrium producing eruptions that can drive CMEs . The need to resolve the photospheric pressure scale height has limited these simulations to Cartesian domains. Currently, we are adressing the challenge to include this self-consistent shearing mechanism in a global model of CME initiation that is guided by vector magnetic field observations.

This work has been supported in part by NASA AISRP grant NNG04GP89G, NASA STEREO grant NAS5-3131, NSF ITR project ATM-0325332, and by DoD MURI grant F49620-01-1-0359. W. Manchester and M. Opher are thankful for support provided by LWS grant NNX06AC36G. G. Tot́h has been partially supported by the Hungarian Science Foundation (OTKA, grant No. T047042). We acknowledge the use of data from SOHO C2 and C3 coronagraphs. We gratefully acknowledge the supercomputing resources provided by NASA's Columbia system under award SMD1-Dec04-0099. (OTKA, grant No. T047042).