author: N. L. Barreiro; C. I. Ventura; T. Govezensky; M. Núñez; P. G. Bolcatto; R. A. Barrio
bibliography: sample.bib
title: Strategies for COVID-19 vaccination under a shortage scenario: a geo-stochastic modelling approach.

# Introduction

Since the early appearance of SARS-CoV-2 in November 2019 in Wuhan, the world faces a new disease, COVID-19. All governments, without exception, had to quickly devise strategies against this unexpected threat to public health. Meanwhile, the scientific community is advancing in the understanding of all aspects of this disease, which has become a pandemic at a fast rate and with a strength unknown in contemporary history (i.e. more than 127 million cases and 2.7 million deaths worldwide in 16 months, ). Some countries are going through the effects of a second or third wave of infections while others are still suffering the first. As the top priority is to diminish the number of susceptible people, in order to minimize the propagation of the virus, several laboratories started to develop vaccines last year. Many of them have reached promising advances and the first generation of vaccines has been already validated by health authorities in many countries.

At present, various emergency-approved vaccines have reached an efficacy above 90$\%$ in preventing COVID-19 infections, and more importantly, they protect against serious cases requiring hospitalization and reduce lethality.

As a consequence, different vaccination plans and strategies have emerged around the world. More than one year after the isolation of the virus some people have already been vaccinated (about 320 million people, i.e. $\sim$ 4.1 $\%$ of the world population, have received a single dose of vaccine at least, the proportion depending on the country ).

Nevertheless, at present vaccine shortage prevails, and international requests are made to the laboratories to increase their vaccine production. More recently, new variants of SARS-CoV-2 with different mutations were detected (e.g. in UK , Brazil, SouthAfrica ), which are more transmissible than the previously circulating strain of the virus.

This raises questions about the efficacy of the first set of approved vaccines against the new strains. In any case, this reinforces the need to minimize the propagation of the virus as fast as possible, since contagion favors the appearance of mutations and eventually also of vaccine-resistant strains.

Due to the novelty of the problem, many open questions remain. A critical point to be considered is the immunity period of time provided by the different developed vaccines. It is not clear yet if the immunity lasts a few months, or if it could reach a year. Therefore, even if the problems regarding production, commercialization, distribution logistics, legal aspects,etc. were solved, the schedule or strategies of vaccination are not closed issues.

The complexity of the problem deserves to be treated multidisciplinarily. In this sense compartmental models have been useful to describe and predict different disease scenarios . In particular for countries with large territories and heterogeneous population distribution, such as Mexico and Argentina, geographical spread of the disease must be considered. This family of classical compartmental models can be useful tools only if a degree of local stochasticity is added , accounting for the social behavior (mobility, familiar relationships, etc.) . In this work, we have extended previous approaches by including the possibility of a decrease in the number of susceptible people, as a consequence of a schedule of massive vaccination.

Concretely, we use a SEIRS (Susceptible, Exposed, Infected, Recovered, Susceptible) stochastic model of geographical spreading of the disease and added a compartment to account for vaccinated people, which during the vaccine immunity-period are removed from the susceptible group. We fit the model parameters describing the pandemic evolution in Argentina, Mexico and Spain, respectively, and we analyze the effect of various vaccination strategies with different number of stages and timing regarding their application.

These strategies are based on realistic proposals by the World Health Organization (WHO) and governments, and account for different social behaviors (as lock-down limitations on mobility e.g.), and also if the vaccines are applied either homogeneously or limited to the most densely-populated areas.

Finally, we also included the effect of quarantines on detected positive cases, an effective measure used to reduce infections in many countries, in order to improve the description of the pandemic evolution and thus assess the long-term vaccination effects more realistically.

Our analyses focus on three different countries (Argentina, Mexico, and Spain), however, the approach could be applied to any country or local jurisdiction that needs to devise a vaccination plan.

In the next section we present the model, then we exhibit and analyze our results, and finally we discuss them, remarking their relevance in order to optimize the effect of vaccination plans in the context of vaccine shortages.

# Model

The present model includes the virus spreading at two levels: (i) Local dynamics: consisting of a compartmental model whose constant parameters are related to the specific disease agent and the host's immune response, and (ii) Global dynamics of geographical disease spreading: involving mobility parameters related to social habits of the country and affected, at different times, by different non-pharmaceutical interventions by the different governments.

In order to implement the model, a geographical map of the region of interest is divided into square cells with coordinates $(i,j)$, covering the whole region. Roads between cities were used to allow short or long distance travelling within the grid. Population size ($N$) is assumed to be constant during the simulated period. If life expectancy is given by $L$ and for the mortality we assume an exponential functional form with constant rate $\mu=1/L$, then the birth rate should be equal to $\mu N$.

Population density heterogeneity is considered by using a matrix whose entries are the actual population densities ($\rho(i,j)$) inside each cell ( at position $(i,j)$)

The local dynamics within each cell is calculated using a model with four different compartments (see Fig. ). These include the susceptible individuals ($S(i,j)$) that might become exposed ($E(i,j)$) yet not infectious. They become infected ($I(i,j)$) after the incubation period $\epsilon$ and remain in that state for $\sigma$ days. Afterwards they become recovered ($R(i,j)$) individuals, remain immune for $\omega$ days and close the cycle by becoming susceptible again according to the survival parameter $S$. Vaccines are applied to susceptible people according to a vaccination rate $v_r$. Considering that vaccines arrive in batches, this value is adjusted in each study in order to guarantee the proper administration of all available vaccines in each lot. It is assumed that individuals in the vaccinated ($V(i,j)$) compartment have already received as many shots as recommended by pharmaceutics and have developed immunity, thus do not transmit the infection.

However this immunity lasts $\delta$ days and people become susceptible again after that period. Vaccines are considered 100$\%$ effective which is a strong assumption. All time parameters are constant and dimensionless, expressed in a time scale of one day. Based on these assumptions the model is expressed by the discrete mathematical map detailed in eqs. 1-5 .

$$\begin{aligned}
 \label{ec:modelo1}
S_{t+1}(i,j) &=& q~[S_{t}(i,j)- G_{t}(i,j)+S q^{\epsilon +\sigma + \omega} G_{t-1-\epsilon -\sigma - \omega}(i,j)+q^{\delta-1} vr_{t-\delta}~ S_{t-\delta}(i,j) - vr_{t}~ S_{t}(i,j)]+\mu N \\
E_{t+1}(i,j) &=& q~[E_{t}(i,j)+ G_{t}(i,j) - q^{\epsilon} G_{t-1-\epsilon }(i,j)]\\
I_{t+1}(i,j) &=& q~[I_{t}(i,j)+ q^{\epsilon} G_{t-1-\epsilon}(i,j)-q^{\epsilon +\sigma } G_{t-1-\epsilon -\sigma}(i,j)]\\
R_{t+1}(i,j) &=& q~[R_{t}(i,j)+q^{\epsilon +\sigma } G_{t-1-\epsilon -\sigma}(i,j)- q^{\epsilon +\sigma + \omega} G_{t-1-\epsilon -\sigma - \omega}(i,j)]\\
V_{t+1}(i,j) &=& q~[V_{t}(i,j) + vr_{t}~ S_{t}(i,j) - q^{\delta-1} vr_{t-\delta}~ S_{t-\delta}(i,j)]
\end{aligned}$$

The sum $N(i,j)=S(i,j)+E(i,j)+I(i,j)+R(i,j)+V(i,j)$, is normalized to 1 at t=1. The incidence function $G_t(i,j)=S_t(i,j)\rho(i,j)(1-e^{- \beta I_t(i,j)})$ is based on a Poisson probability distribution, assuming a homogeneous mixing within every cell , and taking into account the population density of the specific cell $(i,j)$. The transmission parameter $\beta$ is constant and does not depend on population density or mobility but it is a characteristic of the specific pathogen.

It is considered that people sometimes move locally in non-predictable ways. Therefore, randomness is added to cell dynamics. A local mobility parameter per cell ($0<\nu_L<1$) is compared with a random number from a flat distribution ($r$); if $\nu_L \leq r$ the epidemic proceeds, otherwise no new infected cases accumulate in that cell due to low mobility during that day.

## Global dynamics

Three mobility mechanisms cause geographical spreading of the virus: by displacements to neighbor cells, by long distance travelling, and by seemingly random trips causing the spread of the disease to remote areas.

Virus spreading to neighbors is often modeled as a diffusion process. An alternative approach is used here by assuming a stochastic process with average cell to cell mobility $0<\nu_n<1$ using a Metropolis Monte-Carlo algorithm. Cells considered as possible spreaders are defined with $I_t(i,j)>\eta$, $\eta$ being a parameter related to the infectiousness of the disease. For example, considering $(i,j+1)$ as neighbor cell then if $\nu_n$$\leq$$r$ becomes infected then $S_t(i,j+1)=1-\eta$ and $I_t(i,j+1)=\eta$.

Long distance travel takes place by air and land thus we define a long distance mobility parameter $0<\nu_a<1$. A Metropolis Monte-Carlo algorithm is run again to define if the disease is propagated from cell $(i,j)$ to cell $(m,n)$. The flows of people between large cities are greater than between small ones. Therefore, in this case $\nu_a\rho(i,j)\rho(m,n)$ is compared to $r$. As before, spreader cells are those where $I_t(i,j)>\eta$.

We assume noise in the transmission process because people make non routinary moves in a seemingly random way, allowing for the appearance of epidemic outbreaks in unexpected places. Considering this noise as analogous to the "kinetic energy" of the system, if $e^{-1/KT}>r$ and $\rho(i,j)>$T, (with T being a normalized population density threshold), then the disease is started in the cell (i,j) by making $I_t(m,n)=\eta$ and $S_t(m,n)=1-\eta$.

Numerical calculations were performed using maps of population density and road connections for the various countries. (see Supplementary Information: Fig. S1) The size of the grid was of the order of few Km$^2$. Since in this model parameters associated with the pathogen and host's immune response are independent of population density and of people's mobility, we used $\beta=0.91$, $\epsilon=1$, $\sigma=14$ and $\omega=140$, as in R. A. Barrio et al. , and N.Barreiro et al. , for all countries. For simplicity, mobility parameters are considered equal $v_a=v_l=v_n=v$. The parameter $v$ changes along time according to non-pharmaceutical interventions adopted by each specific government at specific dates.

# Parameter space exploration

The present shortage of vaccines worldwide highlights the need to propose coherent and lasting strategies to eradicate the pandemic. The model above allows to simulate and analyze different scenarios and administration schemes, in order to determine the parameters that are most relevant to stop the spread of the disease.

With this objective in mind we chose three countries as model systems, namely, Argentina, Spain and Mexico. These countries were chosen because they allow to compare specific aspects of the model. For instance, Argentina and Spain have a similar populations (45 and 47 million, respectively) but they are spatially distributed in a different way. While Argentina has a large territory with few overpopulated areas surrounded by territories with few people, Spain has a more homogeneous distribution of its population. This leads to quite different connections among cities (flow of travellers).

Argentina and Mexico are populated quite heterogeneously but they have very different total populations: 127 and 45 million respectively.

These features are ideal to compare the effect of the model parameters, such as mobility or the increase in the number of vaccines, in different contexts.

In order to analyze their influence in the pandemic evolution, we considered different vaccination strategies by varying a) The total number of vaccines administered in different stages according to their availability ; b) the timing between stages; c) the vaccine immunity time, $\delta$, which is yet uncertain; d) the social behavior (reflected on people´s mobility) once vaccination begins, and e) the distribution of vaccines, by assuming that the vaccines are applied homogeneously across the country, or vaccinating only in the most densely populated areas. We assume that the efficiency of the vaccines is 100%. If the vaccines were less effective, in this model it would be equivalent to considering that the number of administered vaccines was lower.

At present, in most of the world the number of vaccines is lower than needed. Therefore, it is not possible to ensure their availability, according to the plans made by each government, and many delays are expected. Furthermore, there are multiple variables (political, economical and social) that affect social behavior making it difficult to predict future mobility in each country. Because of this, we emphasize that we do not intend to make specific predictions (although a concrete application of the model would allow it) but to compare different vaccination scenarios presently under consideration by the corresponding decision makers.

## Immunity period and distribution strategies

Due to constraints on the availability of vaccines in the great majority of countries, different vaccine distribution schemes have been proposed (see a review by O.J.Wouters et al, ).

To avoid a repetition of the uneven access to vaccines in the H1N1 influenza pandemic of 2009, in April 2020 the World Health Organization announced the creation of the Covid-19 Vaccine Global Access Facility (COVAX), joined already by two-thirds of the world´s countries. To protect the majority of the world´s population against the virus spread and its global impact, COVAX was launched with the initial aim of having 2 billion global vaccine doses available by end of 2021, and a distribution in stages. To ensure equitable access to the world´s largest and most diverse portfolio of safe and effective vaccines, each participant country can request vaccines to cover between 10 and 50$\%$ of its population, though will not receive above 20$\%$ before all other interested countries received that percentage.

Studies support such a global equitable scheme (see e.g in Chinazzi et al. ), predicting a 50$\%$ reduction in the number of global deaths could be obtained if the Covid vaccines were distributed proportionally to each country´s population, instead of reserving two-thirds of the vaccines for higher-income countries.

Furthermore, considering the expected initial very limited vaccine supply, two initial stages were suggested by the WHO to reach that 20$\%$ coverage of each country´s population: a first stage covering 3$\%$, followed by 17$\%$. Here, we decided to simulate three vaccination stages: those first two WHO-suggested ones, adding a third stage covering 40$\%$ of the population, in order to reach a total of 60$\%$ of the population vaccinated (closer to the expected values for COVID herd immunity).

Since the vaccine immunity period $\delta$ is yet unknown, three values of the parameter were assessed, varying the time between stages accordingly. Fig. shows the results for the case of Argentina. In Strategy 1: the first stage starts at day 300 after the appearance of the first COVID case, second stage at day 330 and third stage at day 390. In Strategy 2: the first stage starts at day 300, second stage at day 390 and third stage at day 480. Two different geographic distributions of the vaccines are shown: homogeneous, and limited to the most densely populated cities. In all scenarios mobility remains constant from day 300 onward.

Figure evidences that $\delta$ affects the timing of a new COVID outbreak and also the value of the minimum in the number of daily cases (incidence).

Incidence decline depends on the timing between stages, in particular, shorter times between stages are more efficient in lowering the total number of cases (see Table S3 in the Supplementary Information). If vaccines are not available for longer periods, so that the time between vaccination stages is longer, the incidence decline is slower and small rebounds may be observed. Although the new outbreak, up to day 720 seems higher for Strategy 2 (see supplementary information Table S3).

Our results show that in case of vaccine shortage, applying doses to the most densely populated areas is more effective, since the total number of cases decreases faster. Furthermore, the minimum number of daily cases reached is lower than when vaccinating homogeneously in the country. The effect is clearly observed for Strategy 1 (further information in Additional Results section of the Supplementary Information).

## Vaccination coverage

To further investigate the effect of the total number of vaccines administered, calculations with Strategy 1 (described above) were performed. An homogeneous distribution of vaccines was simulated while the number of vaccines applied was changed at the third stage from 10$\%$ to 50$\%$ to obtain a total final coverage of 30$\%$ to 70$\%$. Two values of $\delta$ were used. The results are summarized in Fig. .

For the case of $\delta=180$ days, even with 70$\%$ of the population vaccinated, a second wave is observed. However, if only 30$\%$ of the population is vaccinated, the incidence lowers, but a steady low incidence period is not observed. In all cases, a second wave starts as the number of immune people decreases, even when 70$\%$ of the population is inoculated. When 30$\%$, 40$\%$ or 50$\%$ of the population is vaccinated, the number of daily cases on day 720 reaches the same levels observed at the maximum of the first wave.

If $\delta=360$ days, the lowest incidence level reached depends on the percentage of the population vaccinated. However, in most cases a slow but steady incidence increase is observed, leading to the appearance of a second wave. However, in all cases a slow but continuous increase in incidence is observed, giving rise to the appearance of a new wave. Only when vaccinating 70$\%$ of the population the number of daily cases remains very low (approximately 10 cases per day) all thru to the end of the simulation.

## Impact of social behavior

Social behavior is reflected in the mobility parameters used in the model to fit the reported data for a country. Fig. shows the evolution of the pandemic according to different aspects of vaccination and social behavior in Argentina and Spain. All simulations assume that the vaccines are distributed in 5 stages, as detailed in the upper panel of Table . Three curves are compared in each graph: 1)homogeneous vaccine distribution, 2) vaccines applied only in cities with population density above a threshold (see maps with cities included in Fig. S1 in the Supplementary information), and 3) a baseline without vaccination.

```latex
\resizebox{0.7\linewidth}{!}{
\begin{tabular}{cccc}
 \# of stage & Period   & Argentina vaccines (millions) & Spain vaccines (millons)  \\
\midrule
 1st & January & 0.3 & 0.31   \\
 2nd & February & 5  & 5.2\\
 3rd & March - April & 5 & 5.2 \\
 4th & May - July & 9  & 9.37\\
 5th & August onward & 8.7 & 9.06 \\
 \bottomrule
\end{tabular}}
```

`\resizebox{0.4\linewidth}{!}{
\begin{tabular}{ccc}
 \# of stage & Period & Mexico vaccines (millons) \\
\midrule
 1st & February & 0.125   \\
 2nd & March & 17.1  \\
 3rd & April & 13.7  \\
 4th & May & 16.5    \\
 5th & June onward & rest of the population \\
 \bottomrule
\end{tabular}}`{=latex}

Figure (A) shows the pandemic evolution in Argentina for the case of low mobility. It simulates a strict lock-down starting in January 2021. It can be observed , as expected, that the amount of daily cases is reduced after a few months. In this case there is no difference between vaccine distribution methods as both of them reduce the amount of daily cases to a minimum. However, due to economic and social stress, it should not be expected that this low mobility could be sustained for a long time. Thus other two situations were modeled, namely with medium and high mobility.

Figure (B) shows the evolution of daily cases when social distancing measures are somewhat relaxed. In this case there is a noticeable difference between providing vaccines or not. Moreover, while a homogeneous distribution of vaccines seems to drastically diminish the amount of daily cases, the strategy that reduces the infections to zero is based on prioritizing highly populated areas .

Figure (C) shows the model simulations with high mobility, representing the case for no social distancing measures at all. In this situation there is a time lag between the application of the vaccines and their effect, observed on the amount of daily cases, as they keep increasing for a while.

The vaccination of people in highly populated areas is clearly a better strategy to reduce the amount of daily cases This is because most of the infectious hot spots appear in densely populated areas. From there people carry the disease to smaller cities and towns. Moreover, when the main infection sources are turned off, the disease tends to disappear in the whole country.

From these considerations it can be concluded that good results could be achieved for Argentina by applying a strategy combining social distancing and vaccination, even if only 62% of the population were immunized, This percentage corresponds to 28 million people, which is the maximum number of vaccines that might be purchased in Argentina during the whole 2021 year, according to the approved national budget (see Fig. S3 in Supplementary Information).

A similar analysis was performed for the case of Spain modeling analogous vaccination strategies under different representative mobilities (see upper panel in Table ). Although in this case the strategy is modified in order to vaccinate the same percentage of people at each stage, as it is the case for Argentina (covering 62% of the total population).

Figures (D), (E) and (F) show the daily cases in Spain for low, medium and high mobility respectively. There are three curves in each graph, representing the different vaccination schemes : no vaccination, homogeneous vaccination, and vaccination prioritizing the densely populated cities. All three figures confirm that delivering vaccines in the most densely populated areas is the most efficient method to reduce the number of daily cases.

However, the strategy of distributing doses to only 62% of the population is not as effective in Spain as it is in Argentina for reducing the daily cases. Mobility has a more important role in the virus spread in Spain, as the graphs show. This could be understood in terms of geographic extension and intercity connections: While Argentina has a larger territory and many small isolated cities, Spain is more densely populated and very much connected, in average. Therefore, further outbreaks spread faster throughout the Spanish territory making it harder to stop the pandemic. This points to the conclusion that herd immunity is not only related to the amount of vaccines given but also to other characteristics of the country, for instance, geographic extension, connections, social behavior, etc.

Notice that in Figures (D), (E) and (F) a second vaccination scheme was included for year 2022 (a span of 720 days after the first infected case was reported). Since the immunity of the vaccine is assumed to be of 180 days, a rebound of cases is expected in early 2022 due to the loss of vaccine-immunity. Because of this, a periodical immunization scheme should be considered essential in order to reduce the impact of the pandemic. More examples stressing this point will be shown in the next section.

## Periodical vaccination scheme

As the pandemic seems to be significantly reduced after an adequate relation between responsible social behavior and vaccination, a new question emerges. How long will it last? In order to answer this question we propose different scenarios in Argentina and Mexico that are shown in Fig. . The vaccination strategy for Argentina is the same as in table . For Mexico we took into account the strategy announced by the government in November 2020. In this case vaccines will be given to the whole population in progressive steps (like e.g. discussed by WHO , or L.Matrajt et al. ).

First, Mexico will vaccinate health workers, then, people aged more than 60 years. Next, people between 50 and 59, after them people between 40 and 49 , and finally, the rest of the population. Taking into account the proportion of the population considered in each age group, we estimated the vaccination strategy shown in the lower panel of Table .

Figures (A) and (C) show 2 curves: a baseline without vaccines, and homogeneous distribution of vaccines for a scenario where vaccines are given only during 2021. Since in our simulations we assumed that the vaccines provide an immunity period of 180 days, it is expected that the virus will start to spread again and yield a new peak in 2022, reaching the levels of the no-vaccination curve. This behavior is expected to be similar for any vaccine distribution method.

Figures (B) and (D) show 3 curves: a baseline without vaccines and two types of distributions, homogeneous or vaccination only in more densely populated areas. In this scenario vaccines are distributed as in Table during 2021 and 2022 giving place to a significant reduction in the second peak for both countries. It should be noticed that the appearance of this second peak is strongly related to the vaccine immunity period, $\delta$. A longer period would imply a smaller peak, as far as the same strategy is repeated the next year. But if no vaccines are given the second year, the increment in the daily cases will occur anyway at some point in the future.

As a conclusion and independently of the actual value of $\delta$, it is clear that vaccines should be administered to the population periodically to avoid the long term virus spreading. Again, the application of vaccines in highly populated areas gives better results than an homogeneous distribution of doses.

## SEIQRS-V model

Previous studies have shown that most countries are capable of detecting only a fraction of the infected cases. The reason being that most people are asymptomatic or present mild symptoms and do not always seek for medical attention .

Many articles have emphasized the need to improve infected tracking and contact tracing, as a way to reduce the incidence of the pandemic by isolating those detected as positive . Taking this into account, track and trace policies, along with social distancing and vaccination, should be considered the main pillars to eradicate the pandemic.

With this in mind, we added a new compartment to our model in order to consider infected people who were isolated. The model with the quarantined (Q) compartment is described in detail in Barreiro *et al.* .

In this work we assume that only a fraction $p$ of people who is actually ill is tested and that they get isolated after $\alpha$ days of being infected. In this way, this $p$ fraction of people stop infecting others reducing the pandemic evolution rate (For more information see Supplementary Information: SEIQRS-V Model section).

It is important to keep in mind that, in this model, government official data for infected cases coincide with the quarantined persons, *i.e.* we assume that all the people who tested positive, are in fact isolated and counted as ill by authorities.

In the present work we applied this model to Argentina, Spain and Mexico. As in the SEIRS-V model discussed above, we used the same values for $\beta$, $\epsilon$, $\sigma$ and $\omega$ for all the countries. $p$, $\alpha$ and $S$ where estimated from official data and previous studies. The mobility parameter was fitted in function of time according to changes in governments policies and social behavior (see Supplementary Information: table S2).

Vaccination strategies used in this case can be found in Tables and . In all the cases shown, the same vaccination strategy is repeated in 2021 and 2022. The immunity period of the vaccine, $\delta$, was conservatively fixed at 180 days.

```latex
\resizebox{0.5\linewidth}{!}{
\begin{tabular}{ccc}
 \# of stage & Period & Amount of vaccines (millons)\\
\midrule
 1st & February & 2.3   \\
 2nd & March & 4.5  \\
 3rd & April & 6.6  \\
 4th & May & 6.6  \\
 5th & June & 6.6  \\
 6th & July & 6.6  \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}}
```

## SEIQRS-V model comparison

In this section we compare the results of different vaccination strategies for the three countries considered.

Figure shows the SEIQRS-V model predictions. Day 1 in the figures coincides with the date of the first reported COVID-19 case in each country. In the Johns Hopkins University database these dates are March 3rd, February 1st and February 27th for Argentina, Spain and Mexico, respectively.

For the case of Argentina, mobility was fitted up to day 315 keeping a high value from this moment onward. We also assumed $p=0.1$ and $\alpha=5$. The vaccination plan is the same as in Table but delayed for 30 days.

Figure (A) show the number daily cases. One should notice that even with isolation and vaccination, the model predicts that daily cases will never go below 1000 for high mobility. This implies that it is important to implement a better test and trace mechanism or to vaccinate a higher percentage of the population.

It should also be remarked that, in this case, we are considering a relatively small value for vaccine immunity (180 days) and this generates the appearance of a second wave around March 2022. As was shown above for the SEIRS-V model, a longer vaccine immunity period delays the appearance of new pandemic waves.

Figure (B) shows the vaccination strategy as a function of time, and the amount of immune vaccinated people. For a $\delta$ value of 180 days the amount of immune people starts descending in November 2021, thus causing a growth of daily cases. When a new batch of vaccines is administered in 2022, the amount of immune people increases reducing the impact of the new wave during this year. Under the established immunity conditions, shifting the second vaccination periods to November 2021 could prevent the emergence of this new wave.

Figures (C) and (D) shows the SEIQRS-V model applied to Spain. In this case we used $p=0.2$, $\alpha = 5$ and a high mobility from the day 343 onward. The vaccination strategy is shown in Table and applied in 2021 and 2022. Figure (C) shows the model prediction together with the reported daily cases. If 70% of the population is vaccinated during the first half of 2021 a strong reduction of daily cases is expected for the summer. Nevertheless, assuming a short immunity period for the vaccine (180 days), the daily cases start growing again generating a new peak around February 2022. This effect could also be understood by looking at Fig. (D). This plot shows vaccinated and immunized people as a function of time. Since vaccines are administered within a short time frame, most people lose immunity by the end of the year. This creates a time window with a low number of immune people that allows new outbreaks and the appearance of a new epidemic wave.

Finally, Figures (E) and (F) show the SEIQRS-V model applied to Mexico. In this case we used $p=0.08$, $\alpha = 7$ and a high mobility parameter value from day 325 onward. The vaccination strategy is shown in Table and applied in 2021 and 2022.

This strategy establishes that vaccines are administered at an approximately constant rate throughout the year. Therefore a baseline of immunized people is created, which causes the reduction of the susceptible group by almost 50 million people. This kind of administration method also reduces the incidence of new pandemic waves making a difference with respect to the cases of Argentina and Spain.

# Final Remarks

Different vaccination strategies for the Covid-19 were analyzed using a novel epidemiological model with stochastic dynamics of infections in a geographical region. This approach has proven to exhibit a reliable long term predictive power .

The parameters defining the disease, as transmission rate, latency and infectiousness periods, can be adjusted with real data taken during a short time after the first outbreak. Furthermore, the parameters regulating the spread of the pandemic in a country have a clear and direct relationship with the measures taken by the authorities and followed by citizens.

This strategy has allowed us to predict the dynamical behavior of the pandemic in three very different countries, like Argentina, Mexico and Spain. There, we include the suggested vaccination strategies and analyze the results under different scenarios which take into account the difficulties caused by the current global vaccine shortage.

The mobility parameters of our model allow to simulate different social behaviors (e.g. lock-down interventions, travel restrictions, social distancing), and analyze the effect of different vaccine distribution strategies. One could also analyze the predictions using a strategy based on a homogeneous vaccination of the population, or when prioritizing the most densely populated areas.

In a context of doses shortage, our model predicts that the most effective strategy in reducing infections is the vaccination of the most-densely populated areas.

Since the epidemic reappears periodically, we found that vaccination campaigns should be repeated. In order to optimize the effect of these, one should take into account the immunity period of the vaccines to prevent premature future outbreaks. Keeping the number of contagions low is of great importance, as a large number of infections favors the appearance of mutations and, eventually, of new vaccine-resistant strains.

Regarding the so called herd immunity, understood as the successful suppression of the epidemic reached when enough people are immune to the virus, previous works estimate its threshold for SARS-CoV-2 in the range from 10$\%$ to 70$\%$ or more. The lower values might not hold true because of the assumptions made about people interactions in social networks . However, for the case of COVID-19, we learnt from our model that it depends on the number of already infected people and the interplay of disease and vaccine related-factors. Among the virus factors we considered the influence of the immunity time after recovery and the probability of reinfections. While for the vaccine-related factors, we explored the effects of the time period of immunity conferred by the vaccine, the percentage of population vaccinated, and the pace of vaccine delivery.

The probability of infection is affected by logistical, social and demographic factors and it is key to the adopted vaccination strategy. As was mentioned before, there are huge differences between a scheme based on a demographic homogeneous vaccine delivery and one that prioritizes the most densely-populated areas. We found that the vaccination impact is larger in countries with less connected cities, combined with a low mobility.

From modelling concrete vaccination strategies in countries with very different demographic features, it can be clearly concluded that in the case of a limited number of vaccines, herd immunity is not achieved using vaccination strategies alone. A combination of mobility control, detection and isolation of infected people (and probably social distancing measures) is needed to drastically reduce infections. Such measures have negative socio-economic impacts at the local (and global) level. However, these could be minimized by optimizing the allocation of vaccines.

Some guidelines can be learnt from our model as it was shown and discussed in this work. However, the worldwide vaccination allocation should be approached carefully. There are 130 nations with 2.5 billion people that have not received a single vaccine yet , where the COVID-19 virus with uncontrolled transmission, has a perfect playground to evolve into dangerous variants, even immune to the developed vaccines.

An outbreak there, has the potential to become an outbreak anywhere. In this respect, our model could be extended from one particular country to a continent or even to the whole world in order to compare different vaccine global distribution strategies.

Despite the real threat, the current global vaccine allocation is driven by national interest and consequently it is highly asymmetric. High-income countries, representing $16\%$ of the world's population, purchased more than half of all COVID-19 vaccine doses available to date, aside the COVAX agreement. This will extend the time frame of the pandemic and the economical burden worldwide . Unless a worldwide vaccine allocation strategy based on health and epidemiological needs is implemented, humanity will not be able to achieve global herd immunity soon enough and will suffer the consequences of COVID-19 for much longer.

# Acknowledgements

RAB, MN and NLB acknowledge support from The National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) and Alianza UCMX of the University of California (UC), through the project included in the Special Call for Binational Collaborative Projects addressing COVID-19. RAB was financially supported by Conacyt through project 283279. MN was partially supported by CONICET. We appreciate useful discussions with Prof. Yang Quan Chen and collaborators.

# Author contributions statement

N.L.B., C.I.V., T.G. and R.A.B. conceived the idea. N.L.B. proposed and wrote the model in python, created the maps and did the fitting for each country. N.L.B, C.I.V., T.G. and M.N. conducted the simulations. All authors discussed the results, wrote and reviewed the manuscript.

# Additional information

**Competing of interests**
The authors declare no competing interests.


author: Yaël Nazé [^1]; Gregor Rauw$^{\star\star}$; Asif ud-Doula
title: Hot and cool: two emission-line stars with constrasting behaviours in the same XMM*-Newton* field[^2]

High-energy emissions are good indicators of peculiar behaviours in stars. We have therefore obtained an XMM*-Newton* observation of HD 155806 and 1RXS J171502.4$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}333344, and derived their spectral properties for the first time. The X-ray spectrum of HD 155806 appears soft, even slightly softer than usual for O-type stars (as shown by a comparison with the O9 star HD 155889 in the same XMM*-Newton* field). It is well-fitted with a two-component thermal model with low temperatures (0.2 and 0.6 keV), and it shows no overluminosity ($\log[L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm BOL}]$=$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}6.75). The high-resolution spectrum, though noisy, reveals a few broad, symmetric X-ray lines ($FWHM\sim2500$  km s$^{-1}$). The X-ray emission is compatible with the wind-shock model and therefore appears unaffected by the putative dense equatorial regions at the origin of the Oe classification. 1RXS J171502.4$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}333344 is a nearby flaring source of moderate X-ray luminosity ($\log[L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm BOL}]$=$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}3), with a soft thermal spectrum composed of narrow lines and presenting a larger abundance of elements (e.g. Ne) with a high first ionization potential (FIP) compared to lower-FIP elements. All the evidence indicates a coronal origin for the X-ray emission, in agreement with the dMe classification of this source.

# Introduction

Over the past decades, stars of almost all spectral types have been identified as X-ray emitters . However, the physical processes at the origin of this high-energy emission differ throughout the HR diagram. Coronae play a large role in the X-ray emission of F to M stars, as well as in young T Tauri objects. For these sources, flares, narrow X-ray lines, tight relation between rotation and X-ray luminosity, as well as changing abundance patterns, were detected, indicating that magnetic processes are heating up the X-ray plasma. In contrast, the X-ray emission from early-type stars appears highly dependent on the stellar winds. The high energies thus uniquely probe the mass-loss processes, and additional emission is easily spotted when two winds collide in binaries. Peculiar stellar phenomena (e.g. accretion/decretion discs, jets, magnetically-confined winds) are also shown to affect the X-ray emission. The X-ray domain is therefore a unique tool for analysing the physical processes at work in the envelopes of stars.

This paper provides the first X-ray investigation of two peculiar emission-line stars at two opposite extremes of the HR diagram: the hot Oe star HD 155806 and the cool dMe object 1RXS J171502.4$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}3333440. Section 2 presents our dataset, Sects. 3 and 4 give the observed X-ray properties of the Oe star HD 155806 and of the lower-mass object 1RXS J171502.4$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}333344, respectively, while Section 5 summarizes the results. An appendix yields the properties of the neighbouring HD 155889.

# Observations and data reduction

The field surrouding HD 155806 and 1RXS J171502.4$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}333344 was observed by XMM*-Newton* on 2008 Aug. 26 (Rev. 1596, PI Nazé), for a total exposure time of 35 ks. We processed the data with the Science Analysis System (SAS) software, version 8.0; further analysis was performed using the FTOOLS tasks and the XSPEC software v 11.2.0.

As the brightest star in the field (HD 155806) is rather optically bright, this observation used the three European photon-imaging cameras (EPICs) in the standard, full-frame mode with a thick filter to reject optical light. The EPIC data were first processed with the pipeline chains (tasks emproc, epproc) and then filtered following the recommendations of the SAS team to keep only the best-recorded events (pattern between 0 and 12 + \#XMMEA_EM filter for the EPIC MOS detectors, pattern between 0 and 4 + flag$=$`<!-- -->`{=html}0 for the EPIC pn detector). The light curve at high energies (pulse invariant channel number$>$`<!-- -->`{=html}10000, or E$\gtrsim$`<!-- -->`{=html}10 keV, and with pattern$=$`<!-- -->`{=html}0) shows no flare that could have affected our dataset. A detection algorithm (task $edetect\_chain$) was applied to the XMM*-Newton* dataset, with a minimum likelihood of 20. The brightest X-ray source in the field is 1RXS J171502.4$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}333344. Comparing the derived list of X-ray sources with the list of hot stars in the field-of-view (FOV) yields only two objects in common: HD 155806 and HD 155889. Both are O-type stars, the only two of the FOV, and none of the 5 B-type stars (HD numbers 155703, 155754, 155888, 155942, 319583) present in the FOV are detected in our exposure. This is not too surprising since B stars, especially the late-type objects, such as those present in the FOV, are known to be fainter X-ray emitters than O stars . The count rates of these 3 sources in the 0.4–10 keV energy band and for different EPIC cameras are provided in Table , together with the hardness ratios $HR_1,HR_2$ defined as (M$-$S)/(M+S) and (H$-$M)/(H+M), respectively, where S, M and H are the EPIC-MOS2 count rates in the 0.4–1. keV, 1.–2. keV, and 2.–10. keV bands, respectively.

```latex
\begin{table*}
      \caption{Hardness ratios and count rates of the studied sources. }
         \label{tab:ctrate}
     \centering
         \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
            \hline\hline
Source & MOS1 & MOS2 & pn & $HR_1$& $HR_2$\\
& cts\,s$^{-1}$ & cts\,s$^{-1}$ & cts\,s$^{-1}$ & &  \\
            \hline
HD\,155806& 0.070$\pm$0.002 & 0.069$\pm$0.002 & 0.311$\pm$0.003   & --0.63$\pm$0.02 & --0.94$\pm$0.03 \\
HD\,155889&   & 0.032$\pm$0.002 &  & --0.28$\pm$0.05 & --0.44$\pm$0.09 \\
1RXS      & 0.464$\pm$0.004   & 0.484$\pm$0.004   & 1.743$\pm$0.008   & --0.16$\pm$0.01 & --0.56$\pm$0.01 \\
            \hline
         \end{tabular}
   \end{table*}
```

To analyse the high-energy properties of HD 155806, a circular source region of 40 radius and a nearby background region of the same shape were used to extract EPIC spectra and lightcurves. Similar regions were used for the bright source 1RXS J171502.4$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}333344. For the spectral analyses, the spectra were binned to reach at least 10 counts per bin, and both bad energy bins and noisy bins at E$<$`<!-- -->`{=html}0.3 keV or $>$`<!-- -->`{=html}10. keV were discarded.

Our observation also consists of data from the reflection grating spectrograph (RGS) for HD 155806 and 1RXS J171502.4$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}333344 (which is 220 west of HD 155806). First, the pipeline chain (task rgsproc) was run with the coordinates of the objects and processed in a standard way (tasks $rgsspectrum$, $rgsrmfgen$, $rgsfluxer$). No flare in the lightcurve was detected, as was already the case for the EPIC cameras. The RGS spectra were binned to reach at least 5 cts per bin. The data from the second order does not contain enough counts to be useful, so we discarded them from the analysis. A check was made to ensure that one source was not contaminating the other. For the background estimation of one source, the other source was excluded from the background region to avoid background contamination. According to the XMM*-Newton* user manual, the RGS point-spread-function has an $FWHM$ of 0.25 in the cross-dispersion direction, but the sources are separated by 0.8 in this direction, which makes the cross-contamination rather negligible.

# HD 155806, the hottest known Oe star

## The Oe category

The class of Oe stars was officially defined by as O-stars displaying emission in the Balmer lines without emission in He ii $\lambda$`<!-- -->`{=html}4686 or in the neighbouring N iii triplet (two signatures of a strong stellar wind). The shape of the Balmer lines in these stars is reminiscent of that in Be objects, and the Oe stars are thus often seen as the continuity of the Be phenomenon to higher temperatures. It is true that most of these stars display high projected rotational velocities $v \sin(i)$ but, contrary to Be stars, direct evidence of that disc is still lacking , although indirect evidence, such as variability similar to that of Be stars, has been observed in the emission lines of several Oe stars . It should also be noted that the Oe stars are quite rare: only eight members of this class are known so far and all appear to be of late O-type (O9-B0, ), with the sole exceptions of HD 155806 (O7.5) and maybe HD 39680 (O8.5). This is taken as evidence that high temperatures are incompatible with the Be characteristics, a conclusion that agrees with the predictions of , who notably point out the influence of strong mass loss and its accompanying loss of angular momentum in the most massive stars.

The X-ray emission of the Oe stars has never been investigated, and their properties in this domain are thus totally unknown, despite the fact that X-rays could help for showing the link (or absence of link) with the more common Be stars. Depending on the exact nature of the Oe phenomenon, different behaviours could be expected. First, if the dense equatorial regions have little impact on the overall wind outflow, the X-ray emission should appear very similar to that of "normal" O-type stars, i.e. the usual wind-shock model of spherically-symmetric winds would apply. Second, if the dense equatorial regions are optically thick, but the only effect at high-energies concerns absorption, some asymmetries in the line profiles could be observed, depending on the viewing angle. Finally, if the equatorial feature is really dominating the circumstellar environment, hard X-ray emission would be expected. In this context, one may wonder whether hot '$\gamma$ Cas analogs[^3]' exist or if magnetic confinement plays a role in the putative dense equatorial regions. Indeed, for single O stars (i.e. objects without colliding wind emission or emission from accretion by a compact companion), the signature of a magnetic confinement can be distinguished from intrinsic wind shocks. The best known example of such cases is $\theta^1$ Ori C, whose high-energy characteristics (narrow lines, very hot plasma) are well-fitted by magnetohydrodynamical models .

For the first X-ray investigation of Oe stars, we focus on the hottest Oe star, HD 155806, which had been detected by *ROSAT* during its all-sky survey . First reported as a Be object in 1925 , it was later recognised as a true Oe star of type O7.5IIIe or V\[n\]e[^4]. HD 155806 indeed displays Balmer lines in emission (with a multiple-peak structure in H$\alpha$, see e.g. Fig. 8 in ), but also Fe ii emission lines and double-peaked emissions in C ii $\lambda$`<!-- -->`{=html}4268Å, Mg ii $\lambda$`<!-- -->`{=html}4481Å, He i $\lambda\lambda$`<!-- -->`{=html}4713,6678Å. Its terminal wind velocity and projected rotational velocity were estimated by to 2460 km s$^{-1}$ and 91 km s$^{-1}$, respectively. Variations in the Balmer lines are common in Oe/Be objects, and HD 155806 is no exception (see Fig. A.1 in ). However, it is important to stress that, for this star, the H$\alpha$ emission never disappears as the variations only affect the upper part of the line (note that an archival UVES dataset of April 2008, close to the time of the XMM*-Newton* observation, clearly shows the usual, strong H$\alpha$ emission). In addition, no velocity variation was found for this star , so binarity is not thought to play a role in its behaviour. Recently, a weak magnetic field has been detected in one spectropolarimetric dataset of HD 155806: $<Bz>=-115\pm37$ G . Subsequent investigation may have revealed some polarity changes from one day to the next, though these were only marginal detections that await confirmation . Further observations will be needed to confirm the presence of such a magnetic field in this object.

## The observed X-ray emission of HD 155806

```latex
\begin{table*}
      \caption{Best-fit models and X-ray fluxes at Earth for the two O-type stars. }
         \label{tab:fit}
     \centering
         \begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc}
            \hline\hline
Source & $N_H$ & k$T_1$ & norm$_1$ & k$T_2$ & norm$_2$ & k$T_3$ & norm$_3$ &  $\chi^2_{\nu}$ (dof) & $f_{\rm X}^{\rm abs}$ & $f_{\rm X}^{\rm unabs}$\\
& $10^{22}$\,cm$^{-2}$& keV   & $10^{-4}$cm$^{-5}$ & keV   & $10^{-4}$cm$^{-5}$ & keV   & $10^{-4}$cm$^{-5}$  & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$10^{-13}$~erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$}  \\
            \hline
\vspace*{-0.3cm}&\\
HD\,155806\ (EPIC) & 0.$_{0.}^{0.003}$ & 0.19$_{0.18}^{0.19}$ & 4.51$_{4.34}^{4.63}$ & 0.48$_{0.45}^{0.50}$ & 1.80$_{1.65}^{1.95}$ &  & & 1.54 (410) & 4.78 & 9.16\\
\vspace*{-0.3cm}&\\
HD\,155806\ (EP+RGS) & 0.04$_{0.02}^{0.06}$ & 0.20$_{0.18}^{0.21}$ & 23.5$_{10.1}^{47.0}$ & 0.73$_{0.62}^{0.79}$ & 0.61$_{0.50}^{1.02}$ &  & & 1.36 (869) & 4.61 & 8.69\\
\vspace*{-0.3cm}&\\
\multicolumn{9}{l}{+ abundances compared to solar : N=0.59$_{0.29}^{0.99}$, O=0.21$_{0.15}^{0.36}$, Ne=0.42$_{0.36}^{0.51}$}\\
\vspace*{-0.1cm}&\\
HD\,155889 (EP, 2T) & 0.42$_{0.23}^{0.56}$ & 0.09$_{0.06}^{0.11}$ & 474$_{184}^{1729}$ & 0.61$_{0.50}^{0.71}$ & 2.14$_{1.33}^{3.37}$ &  & & 1.30 (38) & 1.84& 3.14\\
\vspace*{-0.3cm}&\\
HD\,155889 (EP, 3T) & 0.01$_{0.}^{0.27}$ & 0.12$_{0.07}^{0.15}$ & 3.49$_{1.39}^{10.6}$ & 0.63$_{0.46}^{0.72}$ & 0.60$_{0.46}^{4.17}$ & 3.02$_{1.93}^{9.12}$ & 0.65$_{0.29}^{0.91}$& 1.20 (36) & 2.21 & 3.49\\
\vspace*{-0.3cm}&\\
            \hline
         \end{tabular}
   \end{table*}
```

In the XMM*-Newton* data, the X-ray spectrum of HD 155806 immediately appears soft, with basically no counts detected above 2 keV (Fig.). It is thermal in nature, as proven by the appearance of the RGS spectrum (see below), and the EPIC data were thus fitted by a sum of absorbed optically-thin thermal components. Two temperatures were needed to obtain a good fit, and the models thus take the form $wabs(ISM)\times wabs\times(apec+apec)$, with $N_H^{\rm ISM}$ fixed to 1.23$\times10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$ . Table lists the derived spectral parameters in that case: the indices and exponents noted for each parameter correspond to the lower and upper limits of the 90% confidence interval (derived from the $error$ command under xspec), respectively; the normalisation factors are defined as $10^{-14}\int n_e n_{\rm H} dV/4\pi D^2$, where $D$, $n_e$, and $n_{\rm H}$ are respectively the distance to the source, the electron, and proton density of the emitting plasma; the abundances were kept solar, and the fluxes are given in the 0.5–10 keV band. Using the bolometric corrections of for an O7.5III star, a distance to Sco OB4 of 1.1 kpc , and a V magnitude of 5.61, the bolometric luminosity was evaluated to $7.4\times10^{38}$erg s$^{-1}$ and the $L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm BOL}$ ratio is therefore $-6.75$. This value is quite normal for an O-type star , and there is thus no X-ray overluminosity for HD 155806.

Because of the relative faintness of HD 155806, the high-resolution X-ray spectrum is quite noisy and only a few limited conclusions can be drawn from it. Some X-ray lines are clearly detected (Fig. ): Lyman-$\alpha$ lines of hydrogen-like neon and oxygen (Ne x $\lambda$`<!-- -->`{=html}12.13Å, O viii $\lambda$`<!-- -->`{=html}18.97Å), as well as $fir$ triplets of He-like ions of the same elements (Ne ix $\lambda$`<!-- -->`{=html}13.5Å, O vii $\lambda$`<!-- -->`{=html}21.8Å). For these triplets, the $f$ line clearly has a much lower amplitude than the $r$ and $i$ lines, as expected for such a hot star emitting a wealth of UV photons . The noise prevents us from deriving strong constraints from them, but only yields $f/i<0.1$, corresponding to an X-ray source situated below $\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}10 R$_*$ from the stellar photosphere , for the brightest triplet, that of O vii. A simultaneous fit of the EPIC and RGS data provides hints of reduced abundances in N, O, and Ne (Table ), but these values should be independently confirmed because of the large uncertainties introduced by the noise in the RGS data.

The strongest lines, O viii Ly$\alpha$ and the triplets of O vii, were the sole ones to provide enough counts to be fitted using Gaussians with a fixed central energy (SPEX v2.0: 0.6533 keV for O viii Ly$\alpha$ and 0.56101, 0.56874, 0.57395 keV for the O vii triplet). The resulting line widths were estimated to $FWHM=2500_{1700}^{3800}$ km s$^{-1}$ for O viii Ly$\alpha$ and $FWHM=3200_{2100}^{4200}$ km s$^{-1}$ for the O vii triplet, i.e. values comparable to the terminal velocity (2460 km s$^{-1}$, ). A slightly poorer fit was found for O viii Ly$\alpha$ in the case of a width of 1400 km s$^{-1}$, with a lower limit of the confidence interval of about 1000 km s$^{-1}$. Small widths, $<$`<!-- -->`{=html}400 km s$^{-1}$ like those of $\gamma$ Cas , $\theta^1$ Ori C , or $\theta$ Car , are clearly excluded.

As these properties are typical of "normal" O-type stars, we further attempted to fit the O viii Ly$\alpha$ line with an exospheric line profile model following the formalism of . In this model, the X-ray emission originates in material distributed throughout a homogeneous spherical wind, above a radius $r \geq R_0 > R_*$, and the hot plasma follows the same velocity law as the cool wind. Doppler broadening due to macroscopic motion therefore provides the main source of line broadening. The line emissivity is assumed to scale as $\epsilon \propto \rho^2$, which is equivalent to the assumption of a constant filling factor of the X-ray plasma throughout the wind. The free parameters of this model are thus $R_0$ and $\tau_{\lambda,*} = \frac{\kappa_{\lambda}\,\dot{M}}{4\,\pi\,v_{\infty}\,R_*}$, the characteristic optical depth at wavelength $\lambda$. For the terminal wind velocity, we adopted $v_{\infty} = 2460$ km s$^{-1}$ as derived by . In our fits, we accounted for a (pseudo)-continuum beneath the oxygen line with a level of $6 \times 10^{-5}$ cts s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ Å$^{-1}$. The best fit to the line profile with default binning (resulting from the task rgsfluxer: 3400 bins between 4 and 38.2Å) is obtained for $R_0 \simeq 2.05$ $R_*$ and $\tau_{\lambda,*} = 0$ corresponding to a flat-topped profile. The 90% confidence intervals on these parameters are approximately $[1.5,3.0]$ and $[0.0,1.0]$ for $R_0$ and $\tau_{\lambda}$, respectively. The fits to a higher signal-to-noise fluxed spectrum composed of 1000 bins nicely confirm this picture, though the best-fit value of $R_0$ is now $\simeq 1.85$ $R_*$ (Fig. ). These values of the opacity and onset radius are not exceptional amongst hot stars. found $R_0=1.25-1.67$ R$_*$ and $\tau=0-1$ for a sample of closeby, X-ray bright O-type stars. Though their X-ray spectra had a much better signal-to-noise than in our study, we may note that the parameters of $\zeta$ Ori resemble most those of HD 155806.

A final comment can be made on the (a)symmetry of the X-ray lines. This property is important in the debated question of the origin of the X-ray emission from massive stars, with notably dense winds producing blueward-skewed lines and porous winds more symmetric lines . For HD 155806, the sole line that is both isolated and strong enough to perform such an analysis is the O viii Ly$\alpha$ line. First, the Gaussian fitting within Xspec shows no significant trend in the residual that would indicate an asymmetry . It is also obvious from the above fitting that the best exospheric model is symmetric ($\tau$=0). Finally, the first three moments were calculated for the RGS spectrum derived from the task rgsfluxer on the interval $[-v_{\infty}..v_{\infty}]$ . The first moment indicates no line shift: $\mu_1=-0.03$ to $-0.09$ with a 1-$\sigma$ error of 0.045 and the x-axis defined as $\left( \frac{\lambda}{\lambda_0}-1 \right) \frac{c}{v_{\infty}}$. The second- and third-order moments, calculated with respect to the rest wavelengths of the Ly$\alpha$ components (i.e. 18.977 and 18.971Å) and for the different binnings (default 3400 binning, custom 1000 binning), yield $\mu_2=0.21\pm0.05$ (a result in agreement with the FWHM calculated above) and $\mu_3=-0.02$ to $-0.06\pm0.05$, i.e. not significantly different from zero. Equivalently, the derived skewness is $\mu_3/\mu_2^{3/2}=-0.2$ to $-0.6\pm0.5$. Within the limitations of our data, the lines of HD 155806 should thus be considered symmetric. However, we note that (1) because of the noise in our data, only large asymmetries would have been detected, if present; and (2) even for bright sources with much better RGS spectra, conflicting results are sometimes found .

Over recent years, it has been shown that the assumption of a homogeneous wind might not be entirely appropriate for treating the absorption of the X-ray emission by the stellar wind of O-type stars and that clumping or porosity likely affect the wind opacity. This is probably why our best-fit optical depth is consistent with 0.0. However, given the limited quality of our data, we preferred to fit the profile with a simple homogeneous wind model.

The XMM*-Newton* lightcurve was investigated with $\chi^2$ and $pov$ tests . No significant variations were detected. For investigating long-term variations, we can only compare our XMM*-Newton* observation with the sole previous *ROSAT* detection. Within the RASS faint source catalogue , HD 155806 is recorded as 1RXS J171518.9$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}333250. This source presented a PSPC count rate of (4.40$\pm$`<!-- -->`{=html}1.45)$\times$`<!-- -->`{=html}10$^{-2}$ cts s$^{-1}$. The best-fit model from Table predicts a *ROSAT*-PSPC count rate of 4.7$\times$`<!-- -->`{=html}10$^{-2}$ cts s$^{-1}$, which agrees with the previous detection. To the best of our knowledge, HD 155806 therefore appears non-variable at X-ray energies.

A soft X-ray spectrum, broad X-ray lines, the absence of X-ray overluminosity, and lack of variations: all the evidence agrees with the 'classical' wind-shock model as the origin of the high-energy emission. HD 155806 resembles 'normal' O-stars, such as HD 155889 (see Appendix), and is certainly not a hot $\gamma$ Cas analog, though one Oe star apparently belongs to this class HD 119682 (O9.7e, ): it is still unclear why some Oe/Be do present similarities with $\gamma$ Cas, while others do not. A dedicated multiwavelength survey of a large sample of such objects would help to better constrain the physical parameters responsible for the various Oe/Be phenomena.

In addition, our observations do not indicate a strong contribution from magnetic phenomena, such as magnetically-confined winds (exemplified by $\theta^1$ Ori C). On the basis of the single magnetic detection of , the estimated magnetic confinement parameter for this star is about 0.4, i.e. quite close to 1, the limit where magnetic phenomena dominate. However, changes in polarity were reported by , and the single observed value, rather uncertain, thus might not reflect the actual strength of the overall stellar magnetic field of HD 155806. To explain the X-ray characteristics and pinpoint the magnetic field properties, a new, sensitive spectropolarimetry campaign covering the likely rotation period of the star, i.e. spanning several days, should be undertaken.

In conclusion, in the case of HD 155806, the putative dense equatorial region apparently plays a minor role in the X-ray emission.

# 1RXS J171502.4$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}333344

The brightest source in the field is neither HD 155806 nor HD 155889 but a nearby source detected previously by *ROSAT*: 1RXS J171502.4$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}333344 (Table ). As it has never been studied in detail, it is valuable to present here the results of a high-quality observation of this source. Its coordinates (Eq. 2000.0) are refined to 17h15m2.3s $-$`<!-- -->`{=html}33$^{\circ}$`<!-- -->`{=html}33. The formal error on the coordinates is 0.03, but we note that the position of HD 155806 in the X-ray data is offset by 1.3 with respect to the GSC2.3 coordinates of the latter star. The closest counterpart is the star catalogued as USNO-B1.0 0564–0551957 or 2MASS 17150219–3333398, with magnitudes $R\sim$`<!-- -->`{=html}10.3, $I$=8.6, $J$=7.92, $H$=7.28, $K$=7.07. The *ROSAT* source was indeed considered associated with this 2MASS objet , but we note that it is situated at 3.7-3.8 from the XMM source, which is a large positional error for an X-ray source close to the centre of the FOV. However, the 2MASS star is situated at a distance of only 31pc, so it displays a relatively high tangential velocity of 25 km s$^{-1}$ , which could (at least partially) account for the separation between the 2MASS coordinates of this object and the position of the XMM source.

```latex
\begin{table*}
      \caption{Same as Table \ref{tab:fit} for 1RXS\,J171502.4$-$333344. }
         \label{tab:fit1RXS}
     \centering
         \begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc}
            \hline\hline
Source & $N_H$ & k$T_1$ & norm$_1$ & k$T_2$ & norm$_2$ & k$T_3$ & norm$_3$ &  $\chi^2_{\nu}$ (dof) & $f_{\rm X}^{\rm abs}$ & $f_{\rm X}^{\rm unabs}$\\
& $10^{22}$\,cm$^{-2}$& keV   & $10^{-4}$cm$^{-5}$ & keV   & $10^{-4}$cm$^{-5}$ & keV   & $10^{-4}$cm$^{-5}$  & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$10^{-13}$~erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$}  \\
            \hline
1RXS (EP, quiet, Z=0.24$_{0.22}^{0.25}$) & 0.$_{0.}^{0.002}$ & 0.30$_{0.28}^{0.31}$ & 11.5$_{10.5}^{12.8}$ & 0.78$_{0.76}^{0.81}$ & 11.9$_{11.0}^{13.3}$ & 1.48$_{1.41}^{1.56}$ & 9.53$_{8.70}^{10.2}$& 1.21 (768) & 21.9  & 21.9\\
\vspace*{-0.3cm}&\\
1RXS (EP, flare, Z=0.40$_{0.32}^{0.45}$) & 0.$_{0.}^{0.003}$ & 0.33$_{0.32}^{0.37}$ & 16.5$_{14.8}^{19.4}$ & 0.98$_{0.94}^{1.02}$ & 21.9$_{18.9}^{28.3}$ & 3.00$_{2.83}^{3.23}$ & 53.0$_{49.9}^{55.6}$& 0.94 (850) & 98.7  & 98.7 \\
\vspace*{-0.3cm}&\\
1RXS (EP+RGS, Z=0.24$_{0.20}^{0.26}$)& 0.$_{0.}^{0.003}$ & 0.33$_{0.32}^{0.33}$ & 15.0$_{14.2}^{18.5}$ & 0.95$_{0.92}^{0.96}$ & 16.2$_{14.7}^{20.6}$ & 2.54$_{2.39}^{3.09}$ & 12.4$_{9.80}^{13.5}$& 1.17 (1816) &  32.7 & 32.7\\
\vspace*{-0.3cm}&\\
1RXS (EP, quiet) & 0.$_{0.}^{0.004}$ & 0.25$_{0.24}^{0.26}$ & 8.47$_{7.01}^{10.2}$ & 0.63$_{0.61}^{0.64}$ & 13.0$_{11.3}^{15.1}$ & 1.51$_{1.44}^{1.58}$ & 10.56$_{9.66}^{11.4}$& 1.09 (765) & 22.0  & 22.0\\
\vspace*{-0.3cm}&\\
\multicolumn{9}{l}{+ abundances compared to solar : CNOS=0.23$_{0.19}^{0.26}$, MgAlSi=0.24$_{0.19}^{0.29}$, CaFeNi=0.19$_{0.17}^{0.21}$, NeAr=0.82$_{0.72}^{0.91}$}\\
\vspace*{-0.3cm}&\\
1RXS (EP, flare) & 0.$_{0.}^{0.007}$ & 0.31$_{0.29}^{0.33}$ & 20.8$_{17.1}^{29.2}$ & 0.99$_{0.94}^{1.04}$ & 16.4$_{13.0}^{21.7}$ & 2.87$_{2.61}^{3.05}$ & 57.3$_{54.2}^{60.4}$& 0.92 (847) & 98.7  & 98.7 \\
\vspace*{-0.3cm}&\\
\multicolumn{9}{l}{+ abundances compared to solar : CNOS=0.28$_{0.20}^{0.37}$, MgAlSi=0.29$_{0.14}^{0.44}$, CaFeNi=0.44$_{0.36}^{0.50}$, NeAr=0.74$_{0.49}^{1.01}$}\\
\vspace*{-0.3cm}&\\
1RXS (EP+RGS)& 0.$_{0.}^{0.001}$ & 0.26$_{0.25}^{0.27}$ & 7.30$_{6.28}^{8.24}$ & 0.64$_{0.63}^{0.65}$ & 13.4$_{12.1}^{15.1}$ & 1.93$_{1.88}^{1.99}$ & 18.4$_{17.7}^{19.1}$& 1.08 (1813) &  32.5 & 32.5\\
\vspace*{-0.3cm}&\\
\multicolumn{9}{l}{+ abundances compared to solar : CNOS=0.29$_{0.26}^{0.31}$, MgAlSi=0.25$_{0.20}^{0.29}$, CaFeNi=0.22$_{0.20}^{0.24}$, NeAr=1.05$_{0.97}^{1.14}$}\\
\vspace*{-0.3cm}&\\
            \hline
         \end{tabular}
   \end{table*}
```

The lightcurve of 1RXS J171502.4$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}333344 sharply contrasts with those of the O-type stars, and instead resembles the lightcurve of AT Mic . It displays a large flare towards the end of the 35ks observation and a modulation of much smaller amplitude during the whole exposure (plus a very small flaring event near the beginning of the exposure, see Fig. ). Though the source is then bright, the EPIC-pn data are not affected by pile-up, and the contamination of the EPIC-MOS data is very limited, as was checked by a run of the task $epatplot$. Unfortunately, the decay phase has not been observed by XMM*-Newton* but it is interesting to note that the rise of the flare presents a much steeper slope than the beginning of the decaying phase. In addition, the hardness ratios are variable, with a small, but definite, hardening during the flare. Finally, as for Ross 154 , the hard X-ray lightcurve peaks before that in the soft X-ray band. This is reminiscent of the Neupert effect, which is explained by the radio, optical, and hard X-ray emissions tracing the rate of energy deposition, while the soft X-rays scales with the cumulative thermal energy in the beginning of the flare. This effect has been observed in the Sun and a few other coronal sources , 1RXS J171502.4$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}333344 thus being a new, rare example of such cases. The optical monitor being closed during the exposure, no optical/UV lightcurve is available.

Since the source is close to the optical axis, its RGS spectrum could be extracted, and it clearly reveals the presence of lines, without a strong continuum (Fig. ): the X-ray emission thus appears thermal in nature. The fitting procedure was similar to that of the O-type stars, but a faint high-energy tail required an additional, third thermal component to get a good fit to the data. The EPIC spectra before (i.e. the first 30ks of the observation) and during the flare were at first analysed separately (Table ). As was indicated by the lightcurve, the spectra are indeed brighter (a factor of 5 increase in flux) and harder (the two hardest components now dominate, the soft component remaining relatively unchanged) during the flare.

One remarkable feature of the fits is the low overall metallicity needed to reproduce the spectrum at all times, with a larger abundance needed during the flare (Table ). We thus decided to investigate this property further by fitting abundances of groups of elements, i.e. elements with similar first ionization potential (FIP). As in , we grouped together CNOS, MgAlSi, CaFeNi, and NeAr. The first three groups present similar abundances, but they are definitely lower than the abundances of the fourth group, NeAr, the two elements which have the highest FIPs. Also, the abundances do not vary significantly between the quiescence and the flaring state (Fig. ), except maybe for a slight increase in the CaFeNi group during the flare (though its value is still marginally consistent with the abundance of CNOS and MgAlSi). A simultaneous fitting of the whole EPIC and RGS (order 1) datasets was also undertaken, yielding average properties (Table and Fig. ).

As the change in the overall spectral shape is only detectable in the EPIC data at the highest energies ($>$`<!-- -->`{=html}2 keV), the RGS data remain largely unaffected by the flare, and the whole exposure was thus analysed, to get the best signal-to-noise ratio (Fig. ). The $fir$ triplets appear quite different from those of the O-type stars, with a quite strong $f$ line: there is thus no bright source of UV photons in the vicinity of the X-ray emitting regions, nor are they of high density . Unfortunately, the noise prevents us from performing a quantitative analysis of these triplets. However, as for HD 155806, the strongest line, O viii Ly$\alpha$, was fitted by a Gaussian with a fixed central energy (0.6533 keV). The resulting line width was estimated to $FWHM=180_{60}^{370}$ km s$^{-1}$.

Given the Galactic coordinates of our field ($l_{II} = 352.59^{\circ}$, $b_{II} = +2.87^{\circ}$) and the fact that the X-ray spectrum of source 1RXS J171502.4–333344 shows no evidence of a substantial absorption, we can exclude the possibility that this source could be associated with a background object. On the other hand, the 2MASS colours of the nearest counterpart candidate of this source are actually consistent with the near-IR source being an early M-type star (it was in fact classified as type M0, ), whose red spectrum shows signs of mild chromospheric activity ($EW[{\rm H}_{\alpha}]=3$Å, ).

Several points indeed hint at this X-ray source being a coronally-active dMe object. First, the flare, since magnetically active M dwarves frequently present flares in their X-ray emission . The hardening during the flare (associated with a higher emission measure of the hottest components) and the shifted maximum of the hard X-ray lightcurve are also indicative of a coronal source . Second, the luminosity. Adopting the above estimate of the distance, we evaluate a quiescence luminosity of $2.5 \times 10^{29}$ erg s$^{-1}$. This value increases to $1.1 \times 10^{30}$ erg s$^{-1}$ during the flare. The quiescence luminosity is very similar to the typical $L_{\rm X}$ of other dMe stars , and is lower than for PMS T Tauri stars or RS CVn interacting binaries. Moreover, the $\log(L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm BOL})$ ratio amounts to $-3.3$ in quiescence and $-2.6$ during the flare, which is the typical ratio observed at the saturation limit for coronally-active sources .

Finally, the observed peculiar abundance pattern is also found in other dMe stars . The overall subsolar abundance is typical of nearby M stars, though a detailed comparison with the particular photospheric abundances of 1RXS J171502.4–333344 must wait for new, high-resolution spectroscopy in the optical range. The increase in the coronal metallicity during the flare has also been observed in some cases, e.g. Ross 145, and it might well reflect the arrival of fresh chromospheric or photospheric material . The abundance distribution appears flat from Si to N (i.e. the abundances ratios are similar to the solar mixture), but shows a pronounced enhancement for the high-FIP element Ne, with few changes during the flare. Again, this agrees well with observations of other dMe sources .

# Conclusions

Our XMM*-Newton* observations of HD 155806 and 1RXS J171502.4$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}333344 constitute the first X-ray investigations of these objects.

For HD 155806, the hottest Oe star, the X-ray emission was found to be quite soft, even slightly softer than for the neighbouring 'normal' O-type star HD 155889: the best-fit thermal components have temperatures of 0.2 and 0.6 keV, and only one tenth of the intrinsic flux is emitted in the 1.-2.5 keV energy band. Moreover, the high-resolution spectrum, though noisy, reveals broad, symmetric X-ray lines ($FWHM>1000$ km s$^{-1}$), and variations were found neither on short (35ks) nor on long (10yrs) timescales.

The characteristics of the X-ray emission of HD 155806 are fully compatible with predictions of the wind-shock model. No signature of magnetic phenomena, such as magnetically-confined winds, was detected. If magnetic fields play a role in Oe stars, it must be a small one, with a reduced impact on the stellar wind and associated X-ray emission. HD 155806 does not seem to be a hot $\gamma$ Cas analog either. Quite surprisingly, its X-ray emission thus appears independent of the dense equatorial regions thought to be linked to the Oe phenomenon.

The characteristics of the source 1RXS J171502.4$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}333344, discovered by *ROSAT*, are now better constrained: its position was refined, a flare was detected, and its spectra (in quiescence and during the flare) were analysed in detail. High-resolution spectra reveal the presence of narrow X-ray lines and of a strong $f$ line in the triplet of the He-like ion O vii, whereas lower-resolution data unveil the hardening of this source during the flare. This coronal source, associated to a dMe star, also displays an inverse FIP effect. The observed characteristics of 1RXS J171502.4$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}333344 are quite similar to those reported for other dMe stars.

# The neighbouring star HD 155889 as an example of a "normal" O-star

HD 155889 (O9IV) is a poorly studied, hot star situated some 13 southeast of HD 155806. did not find any velocity variation and concluded that the star is likely to be single. However, an optical companion exists at 0.19, and was demonstrated to be a true, physical companion in an elliptical, $>$`<!-- -->`{=html}500 yrs orbit . The nature of this companion is unknown, but it is about 1 mag fainter than HD 155889 in the I-band. The observed colours of HD 155889 (B=6.51, V=6.57) reveal an extinction similar to that of HD 155806: the same interstellar absorbing column was thus used for this star.

The extraction was more difficult for this star than for HD 155806 since the X-ray counterpart appears at the edge of the FOV. Only half of it can be seen with EPIC-MOS1, therefore EPIC spectra and lightcurves were only extracted in EPIC-MOS2 (pn data were unusable). The regions used were a circular source region with a radius reduced to 30 for MOS2 (because of crowding in the area) and a nearby background region of 30 radius.

Overall, the EPIC-MOS2 spectrum of HD 155889 appears quite typical of O-type stars (Fig. ). It is mostly soft, but appears slightly harder than that of HD 155806. The unabsorbed flux in the 1.-2.5 keV band is a third of the unabsorbed flux in the 0.5-1. keV band, whereas it was one tenth for HD 155806. A faint high-energy tail required 3 temperature components for the best fit (see Table ). With the same assumptions as before, the bolometric luminosity was evaluated to $2.5\times10^{38}$erg s$^{-1}$ and the $L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm BOL}$ ratio is therefore $-6.68$, again quite typical of O-type stars . There is thus no X-ray overluminosity for HD 155889 and the companion is obviously not the dominant X-ray emitter in the system. In addition, the lightcurves show no significant variations during our observation: the X-ray emission is therefore in reasonable agreement with the expectations of the wind-shock model.

[^1]: Research Associate FNRS

[^2]: Based on observations collected with XMM-Newton, an ESA Science Mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by ESA Member States and the USA (NASA).

[^3]: In X-rays, the Be star $\gamma$ Cas displays variability, a high overluminosity ($\log[L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm BOL}]$=$-$`<!-- -->`{=html}5.4), a dominant plasma extremely hot (12 keV), a strong continuum component, and rather narrow X-ray lines - though not as narrow as for some B stars . The disc here, presumably, plays a non-negligible role, as a source of absorption and, possibly, of soft X-ray emission. Similar characteristics were found in a few other emission-line stars , which prompted the definition of a new subclass of X-ray active Be stars, the so-called '$\gamma$ Cas analogs'.

[^4]:  favour the original giant classification of , but they recognise that the star's luminosity is 'on the low side'. This is probably why rather used the dwarf classification. In this paper, we follow Negueruela's choice, keeping in mind the above caveat.


abstract: A novel operational method for estimating the efficiency of quantum state tomography protocols is suggested. It is based on a-priori estimation of the quality of an arbitrary protocol by means of universal asymptotic fidelity distribution and condition number, which takes minimal value for better protocol. We prove the adequacy of the method both with numerical modeling and through the experimental realization of several practically important protocols of quantum state tomography.
author: $Yu.~I.~Bogdanov^{1}, G. Brida^{2}, M. Genovese^{2}, S.~P.~Kulik^{3}, E.~V.~Moreva^{4}, A.~P.~Shurupov^{2, 5}$
date: 2024-10-02
title: Statistical Estimation of Quantum Tomography Protocols Quality

**Introduction.** Quantum states and processes being a fundamental tool for basic research, also become a resource for developing quantum technologies : this demands for their characterization. At present quantum state/process tomography serves as a standard instrument for characterizing quality of preparation and transformation of quantum states. Basically it includes a given set of unitary transformations over the state to be reconstructed, then the transformed state is measured and finally some computational procedure applied to the measuring outcomes completes the state reconstruction. The result is a state vector or a density matrix. In order to compare different schemes the achieved result can eventually be checked by calculating some distance measure, like fidelity, that shows the quality of preparation/reconstruction of the quantum state.
It is worth to mention that in real experiments the accuracy of the reconstruction depends on two types of uncertainties: statistical and instrumental ones. If the total number of measurement outcomes (sample size or statistics) is large enough, the instrumental uncertainties dominate over fundamental statistical fluctuations caused by probabilistic nature of quantum phenomena . Practically the required statistics, allowing to exclude statistical fluctuations, depends on the tomographic protocol itself and the total accumulating time needed for taking data. From this point of view it is of the utmost interest to point out simple and universal algorithms for the estimation of the chosen protocol on design stage before doing experiments as well as the sample size for desirable quality of the state reconstruction.
In this letter we propose a universal method for estimating the quality of any tomographic protocol based on discrete degrees of freedom and test it with well-known reconstruction protocols of polarization states of qubit pairs. Since it represents a paradigmatic example, here we restrict ourselves to polarization degrees of freedom only. Manipulations with polarization qubits, qutrits and ququarts have been discussed widely in context of quantum state reconstruction and its optimization .

**Theory and numerical simulation** An arbitrary $s$-dimensional quantum state is completely described by a state vector in a $s$-dimensional Hilbert space when it is a pure state, or by a density matrix $\rho$ for a mixed one. To measure the quantum state one needs to perform a set of projective measurements. According to Bohr's complementarity principle, it is impossible to measure all projections simultaneously, operating with a single representative of the quantum state only. So, first of all, one needs to generate a set of copies of the state . Then for each measurement $j$ outcome rates $\lambda_{j}$ can be evaluated from amplitudes of a quantum process $$\lambda_{j}=|M_{j}|^2.
\label{eq:prob}$$ The amplitudes $M_{j}$ cannot be measured directly, but they are linearly related to the state vector . For an arbitrary protocol based on $m$ measurements the process amplitudes can be represented as: $$M_{j}=X_{j}c, \,\,\,\,\ j=1,2,..m \label{eq:ampl}$$ $c$ being the state vector and $X_{j}$ a row of the so called instrumental matrix $X$, which describes the entire set of mutually-complementary measurements. The normalization condition for the protocol bounds the total expected number of events $n$ and the acquisition time $t_j$: $\sum _{j=1}^{m}tr(X_{j}^{+}X_{j}\rho)t_{j}=n$. We define the row of the measurement matrix $B$ for a tomographic protocol as the direct product $B_{j}=t_{j}X_{j}\bigotimes X_{j}^\star$, its size being $m\times s^2$ and we assume $m \geq s^2$. By using the matrix $B$, the protocol can be compactly written in the matrix form: $$T = B\rho \label{eq:matrix}$$ Here $\rho$ is the density matrix, given in the form of a column (second column lies below the first, etc.). The vector $T$ of length $m$ records the total number of registered outcomes. The algorithm for solving equation () is based on the so called singular value decomposition (svd) . Svd serves as a base for solving inverse problem by means of pseudo-inverse (PI) or Moore-Penrose inverse . In summary, matrix $B$ can be decomposed as: $$B=USV^{+},\label{eq:svd}$$ where $U$ ($m\times m$) and $V$ ($s^2\times s^2$) are unitary matrices and $S$ ($m\times s^2$) is a diagonal, non-negative matrix, whose diagonal elements are "singular values". Then () transforms to a simple diagonal form: $$Sf=Q\label{eq:svd1}$$ with a new variable $f$ unitary related to $\rho$ as $f=V^{+}\rho$ and a new column $Q$ unitary related to the vector $T$ as $Q=U^{+}T$. We use this algorithm as a starting approximation for maximal likelihood state reconstruction. By defining $q$ as the number of non-zero singular values of $B$ we formulate two important conditions of any tomography protocol, namely its completeness and adequacy . The protocol is supposed to be informationally complete if the number of tomographically complementary projection measurements is equal to the number of parameters to be estimated; mathematically completeness means $q=s^{2}$. Adequacy means that the statistical data directly correspond to the physical density matrix (which has to be normalized, Hermitian and positive). However, generally for mixed state it can be tested only if the protocol consists of redundant measurements, i.e. $m>q$.

PI provides with zero approximation for estimated parameters of quantum states. Optimization of these parameters can be done following the approach developed in in the frame of maximal likelihood method. It is worth to stress that the reconstructed state vector extracted from the likelihood equation associates with finite statistics of the registered outcomes of an experiment and therefore takes random values. The difference between the reconstructed state vector and its exact value is caused by statistical fluctuations . The complete information matrix introduced in allows analyzing arbitrary functions on fluctuating parameters of quantum states. One very relevant function in the context of quantum state/process estimation is fidelity $F = \left[ \textrm{Tr}\sqrt {\sqrt {\rho ^{( 0 )}} \rho
\sqrt {\rho ^{(0)}} } \right]^2$ where $\rho_{0}$ and $\rho$ being the exact and the reconstructed density matrices correspondingly, tending to identity for complete protocols with an unlimited increase of a sample size.
Basically the problem of the state reconstruction splits into two scenarios. The first one relates to the case when the reconstructed state is known in advance (like in quantum cryptography). Then statistical comparison between exact theoretical state and reconstructed one allows one either to reveal the source of instrumental uncertainties or to be sure that such uncertainties are small enough in comparison with statistical fluctuations. The second case occurs when the reconstructed state is unknown. Then using the approach developed below one should calculate the statistical distribution of fidelity between unknown exact state and reconstructed (by means of maximal likelihood method) one. Fidelity will be either inside the uncertainty boundary for small statistics or outside for large statistics (when instrumental uncertainties prevail). In this case it is convenient to analyze the so called fidelity loss $dF = 1-F$. When the reconstruction accuracy is determined by a finite number of representatives of the quantum state, fidelity loss is a random variable whose asymptotic distribution can be represented as : $$1-F=\sum _{j=1}^{j_{\max } }d_{j} \xi_{j}^{2}
\label{eq:losses}$$ where $\xi _{j} \sim N\left(0,1\right)$ are independent and normally distributed random variables with zero mean values and unit dispersion, $d_{j}\sim\frac{1}{n} >0$, $j_{max}=2s-2$ for pure states, $j_{max}=s^2-1$ for mixed states. The coefficients $d_{j}$ can be extracted from the complete information matrix . Distribution () is a natural generalization of the $\chi ^{2}$ - distribution for which all $d_{j}=1$. As it follows from () the average value of fidelity loss is: $$\left\langle 1-F\right\rangle =\sum _{j=1}^{j_{\max } }d_{j}
\label{eq:average_losses}$$ PI implies introduction of so called condition number $K$, which is defined as the ratio between the minimal nonzero singular eigenvalue of $B$ and maximal one $$K=\frac{b_{\max } }{b_{\min } }.
\label{eq:cond}$$ $K$ determines the stability of the linear system () and therefore can be used as a practical quantifier for estimating efficiency of the protocol: the lower $K$ the better the protocol. If at least one of $s^{2}$ singular eigenvalues $b_{j}$ is close to zero then the protocol becomes incomplete and $K\longrightarrow \infty$. The optimal value of $K$ would be unity that means uniform distribution of singular values .
The present approach allows to analyze arbitrary protocols of statistical reconstruction of quantum states. As an example we have selected three popular protocols. The first, suggested in and dubbed J16 , is suited for reconstructing 4-dimensional polarization states, as photon pairs degenerate in frequency generated in the process of spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC). In this protocol the projective measurements upon some components of Stokes vector are performed for each qubit in pair individually, so the 16 two-qubit measurements are $HH$, $HV$, $VV$, $VH$, $RH$, $RV$, $DV$, $DH$, $DR$, $DD$, $RD$, $HD$, $VD$, $VL$, $HL$, $RL$ where $H$, $V$, $R$, $L$, $D$ denotes horizontal, vertical, right and left circular and $45^o$ diagonal polarizations respectively. Here, for example, the measurement setting $HR$ means measuring horizontal polarization on the first qubit and right circular polarization on the second qubit in pair. In our formalism the protocol can be represented by an instrumental matrix with 16 rows $X_{j}$.
In the case of independent measurement of two qubits the projective measurements can be chosen arbitrarily. In measured qubits were projected on the states possessing tetrahedral symmetry (R4). There are several works showing that due to the high symmetry such protocol provides a better quality of reconstruction . Let us stress that since $m=s^{2}=16$ the adequacy of both R16 and J16 can not be tested.
We also consider a protocol where the whole single-beam two-qubit state is subjected to linear transformations using two retardation plates (B144). The total number of projective measurements is redundant and equals to 144, so the corresponding instrumental matrix has 144 rows and protocol admits adequacy testing, being $m>16$.
For these protocols we calculate condition numbers $K$ which take the following values: $K_{R16}=3$, $K_{J16}\approx 10$, $K_{B144}\approx 60$. Thus, we expect that the symmetrical protocol R16 provides with better state reconstruction quality . We have checked this statement with numerical simulations of each protocol applied to different two-qubit states depending on the sample size.
As an example, let us consider the numerical reconstruction of the Bell state $\left| \Phi^{-}  \right\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} } \left({\left| H_{1} H_{2}  \right\rangle} -{\left| V_{1} V_{2}  \right\rangle} \right)$. Fig. shows average fidelities, calculated according to () as functions of sample size for each protocol. It turns out that the difference between curves disappears at sufficiently large sample size ($10^{5}$) , but for the same quality of state reconstruction the correct choice of protocol allows using a smaller set of statistical data, i.e. finally reduces total acquisition time. Fig. shows that protocols are ranged in accuracy as following: R16, J16, and B144 in complete agreement with the range given by condition number K. Fig. presents accuracy distributions calculated according to () for the sample size $3\times 10^{3}$. For better visualization we transformed the abscissa scale into particular common logarithmic one as $z=-lg(1-F)$. Corresponding integers indicate the number of nines in fidelity recording. The density distribution for the R16 protocol is narrower than the one for J16 and B144 and localizes in the region of lower losses or higher fidelities. The distribution for B144 is broader and lower in comparison with R16 and J16. Obviously, the narrower distribution of fidelity indicates a better reconstruction quality in the sense that the reconstruction procedure returns a better-defined state. Thus, Fig. confirms our expectation based on estimation of condition number $K$: R16 achieves the best results.

**Experiment.** We prepared a family of two-photon polarization states which can be easily converted into both entangled (in polarization) and factorized states $$\left| \Psi  \right\rangle= \left(c_1{\left| H_{1} H_{2}  \right\rangle} +c_2e^{i\varphi }{\left| V_{1} V_{2}  \right\rangle} \right)
\label{eq:family}$$ with real amplitudes $c_1$ and $c_2$. The set-up is schematically depicted in Fig. .

A cw argon laser beam at $\lambda=351nm$ pumps, after having selected by a Glan-Thompson prism (GP) its horizontal polarization, two type-I BBO crystals (1 mm) positioned with the planes that contain optical axes orthogonal to each other. The halfwave plate placed in front of crystals ($\lambda_p/2$) rotates the polarization of the pump by the angle $\phi$ which controls real amplitudes $c_1$ and $c_2$ in (). The crystals are cut for collinear frequency non-degenerate phase-matching around central wavelength 702nm. The relative phase shift $\varphi$ in () is controlled by tilting quartz plates QP. If $\phi=0$ we prepare the state $\left| \Psi \right\rangle=\left| V_{1}V_{2} \right\rangle$, if $\phi=22.5$ and $\varphi=3\pi/2$ then the state transforms to $\left| \Psi
\right\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} } \left({\left| H_{1} H_{2}
\right\rangle} -{\left| V_{1} V_{2} \right\rangle} \right)\equiv \left| \Phi^{-}
\right\rangle$.

To maintain stable phase-matching conditions, BBO crystals and QP are placed in a closed box heated at fixed temperature. The lens $L$ couples SPDC light into the monochromator M (with 1 nm resolution), set to transmit "idler" photons at 710nm. The conjugate "signal" wavelength 694 nm is selected automatically by means of coincidence scheme. Zero-order wave plates ($\lambda/2,\lambda/4$) are used in both J16 and R16 for arranging the projective measurement set. In B144 these plates were removed and additional achromatic quartz plates WP$_{1,2}$ (0.9183 mm, 0.9167 mm) established the necessary measurement set at given wavelengths .
For protocols described above the statistical reconstruction of prepared states () has been performed at given sample sizes. As an example, Fig.() shows calculated widths of fidelity distributions at 1%- and 99%- quantiles for the three protocols (see Fig.) as well as the experimentally reconstructed values for the specific state $\left| \Phi^{-}  \right\rangle$.

The approach described above provides the ideal accuracy level for quantum state reconstruction. It means that fluctuations of the estimated quantum states certainly cannot lead to uncertainties smaller than this limit. Presence of instrumental uncertainties makes this level to be exceeded. Indeed, Fig. shows that, beginning from some sample size, the experimental value of fidelity falls out the theoretical uncertainty boundary shown as dotted lines (corresponding to 1% significance level which characterizes a given protocol). This happens since instrumental uncertainties prevail over the statistical ones and indicates that either state preparation stage or measurement procedure were not performed accurately enough. Incidentally, the absence of uncertainty bars for data in Fig.4 derives from running once the corresponding protocol. Repeated measurements would provoke appearance of a statistical uncertainty, however respective theoretical uncertainty levels should be re-scaled.
Definitely comparison between reconstructed states and fundamental statistical fluctuations can serve to achieve precise adjustment of the set-up, detection of the unapproved incursion into communication channel, etc.

**Conclusion.** We have proposed and tested, both by numerical calculation and experimental realization, a new estimation scenario of tomographic protocols. Our results demonstrate the potentialities of this method for a widespread application to experiments on fundamental quantum optics and quantum technologies. Indeed, it can provide in advance, based on condition number $K$, indications on the uncertainty that can be reached for a certain set-up by a tomographic scheme, providing experimentalist with a tool for choosing the best protocol based on available experimental resources (retardant plates, polarization filters, etc.) and limited available time for data acquisition. Also we would like to stress that the developed method is quite general and that it can be applied to any sort of quantum states and measurement sets .

**Acknowledgments**. This work was supported in part by Russian Foundation of Basic Research (projects 08-02-00741a, 10-02-00204a, 08-07-00481a), Leading Russian Scientific Schools (project 65179.2010.2), MIUR (PRIN 2007FYETBY) and NATO (CBP.NR.NRCL.983251).