text:
President Ford set a precedent by pardoning Nixon. If it were to be "too traumatic" for the American people to try Nixon in a real court of law, such "trauma" becomes a reason specific Pentagon PsyOps operations are launched. As powerful emotional blackmail, Pentagon missions are advanced precisely because exposure of said missions will be "too traumatic" for the American people. This is PsyOps, using your deeply held belief system against you. Such operations are chosen for their inherent disbelievability, their potential for traumatizing a thoroughly mind-controlled American people and, of course, to serve the military industrial complex.
Before you dismiss 9/11 as not being a false-flag attack consider this: suppose your government fully believed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and was intent on using them in an American city killing millions. Your government also beieved that only a sizable demonstration of power would wake up the American people to this threat. Would a false-flag attack then make more and more sense as a controlled "lesser evil" to the Machiavellian personalities in the White House?
CIA whistleblowers have come out to say that Mind Control has been used on the "terrorists" to convince them they planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks. Why must they be so brainwashed? Only a real court of law can get to the facts.
In the post-Orwellian age of totalitarian deception, we do not expect you to believe this or any other website. The exceptional patriot must do his or her own research and realize that the American people have been brainwashed into a mythic system where Popularity=Truth. Once government dominates all that is popular, it can fully manipulate this idea of "truth." The real truth in a mind-controlled society will become the most unpopular subject for the emotional mind. The rational mind, however, can defeat this brainwashing. Remember, the secret government has brainwashed Americans to deeply believe its agents are "parental" so that government is empowered as the Machiavellian manipulator, invisible to your rational mind.
Understand that your Mockingbird media is a totalitarian deception. To defy this deception, one must ascend the cliffs of Niagara falls. Truly, the raging currents of the banal fully repress the truth. Even as your media is set-up to present "political discussions," such is an illusion as the most significant discussions are never allowed through a sickening peer-pressure of top-down, political cyborgs. You will know these cyborgs when they come for your children: they have a total disregard for the Constitution. Remember, the real power system is elite vs. non-elite and all other "politics" is pure deception. The agenda is fully set by an extra-constitutional elite. As Valerie Plame, a long-time CIA asset, and countless others get major book deals sexing-up the CIA, they are all advancing deceptive "political argument." Even those who put down the CIA as a monumental failure are setting you up for deception. The CIA according to its own perverse value system is no failure! The real issue is that our own highly duplicitous federal government carried out the 9/11 atrocities, and we are meant to be fully manipulated away from this fact by highly contrived "political arguments" which serve only distraction and deception. Ask yourself, who set up Mockingbird, did he then achieve near-universal political power, for himself and for his son? George Bush's Mockingbird media will never tell you this truth! They are mere cyborgs.
Former Italian President and the man who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio, Francesco Cossiga has gone public on 9/11, telling Italy's most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the CIA and Isreal's Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies. There are now hundreds of intelligence operatives speaking out about "false flag" terror attacks through Operation Gladio. The American public is so thoroughly mind-controlled by mass media Mockingbird operations, that they are functionally political basket cases.
Apart from running or hiding from these political control devices, I delve deeply into them exposing them. You can do the same. The lack of confusion on 911 is a dead giveaway that this was a massive programming event. The FBI acted within 15 minutes of the attack to seize critical evidence that would prove a federal conspiracy, simultaneously advanced incredible "evidence" of a bin Laden connection and acted as the parent figure. Everyone in intelligence knows about parallel operations designed to mimic known terror groups or foreign operations, yet even the FBI did not present this very common form of deception as a possibility. Instead, the FBI immediately laid out "evidence" of a direct bin Ladin connection hours after the attack with military precision. Yet the careful and deliberate circumvention of real courts is a dead giveaway of pure political theatre. Powerful conformist psychology has been deliberately applied to us from birth to accept this top-down conspiracy. This conformist psychology comes from government and not real parents.
The Mind Control Matrix is an elaborate scheme of groupthink intimately involving you and me. Even as much of this psychology is sophisticated and complex, the basics are not difficult to understand. This 911 Mind Control Matrix is a sophisticated conspiracy to undermine and destroy the Constitution of the United States. It is the true Monster Plot where a coup is advanced through a totalitarian deception and theatre of the absurd. Most of this deception will be advanced by "marionettes" who are never made aware of the real plot and the real elitist conspirators. But the elite are united in their quest to demoralize and manipulate the American population as they intend to manipulate this population as militant blind conformists for world domination and eugenics.
The 911 attacks are based upon trauma effects on the human mind perfected by Mengele in Nazi death camps. Trauma and terror are critical for total brainwashing. Mengele determined that hysteria and trauma will break children from their parents and make them slaves for the elite. Therefore the deliberate, covert use of hysteria-building devices is developed as a very sophisticated "science." These trauma effects have now been fully normalized against the vast majority of Americans even though they clearly originate from ancient slave-making arts. Trauma is now routinely advanced as a cover for vast government crimes. The elite have set up false courts and false science which traffic millions of non-elite children toward the Pentagon. This "science" of learned ignorance and programmed bureaucrats over parents also programs children for political bigotry, population control and militancy. These devices for making slaves have been employed for thousands of years and are now completely obvious.
Until we begin to use the correct language to describe trauma-based programming of children, parents and the culture as a whole, this abuse of power will only get worse. Emotional contagion will be spread upon us to drive us like cattle and they will do so as "parent" figures and "sun gods" which cannot be questioned in real courts. The most fundamental structure of this monumental fraud is a tetrahedron power structure where anyone can study the three pillars of the Illuminati's plan for absolute World Domination: they will first employ Shock and Awe and then impose Sex, Drugs and Usury Mind Control devices. The sex, drugs and usury devices require ignorance programmed into children in these three areas. The CIA has a very long paper trail of establishing these Mind Control devices against U.S. citizens by destroying and manipulating the critical knowledge that would protect children. These devices of slavery have been implemented since 1947 and are now fully "normalized." You must study these devices for what they are: powerful subconscious slave-making devices which come direct from Nazi Germany.
The 911 attacks were a classic trauma-based mass Mind Control event. This event does not serve terrorism, it serves wrongful government. To understand this, you must ask yourself: how were Americans programmed on 911? Who did this programming serve? This programming for war is being extensively documented as a Mind Control conspiracy, since the media was fully complicit in building a steady and consistent drumbeat for war during the 911 events. What will be even more disturbing to you is the synchronicity of symbolism, imagery and powerfully imbedded archetypes which were triggered in you on 9/11. These powerful archetypes were programmed into to you since birth. To understand this, you must begin to understand real psychology and the enormous amount of Alpha-level programming which you have endured your entire life. You will begin to understand that our Congress' concerns about comic books in the 1950s was not so peculiar. This was the time in our history where our federal government was beginning to understand the power of Alpha-level Mind Control. They then secretly advanced this powerful witchcraft against us through massive repetition in all media. Televisions were deliberately set to the most hypnotic flicker rates, your media "parents" were fully programmed into you as such.
On 9/11, the media issued "facts" that they could not possibly have known. The FBI issued "facts" that were completely bogus on their face. They omitted the most obvious fact of all: the CIA has actively pursued such grandiose psychic attacks for decades! In fact, this overwhelmingly important fact was bowled over by trauma-based imagery. The CIA's Northwoods plans for totalitarian deception using your own mind against you were highly advanced for decades. Now they had a president willing to employ these horrific methods. This is no accident. The trauma-event served to clear the minds of millions of Americans in classic Mind Control trauma programming. Americans then became incapable of asking the most obvious and rational questions. The media then operated as a mass programmer of the nation's collective subconscious mind on a religious-patriotic level of mind where issues of authority are programmed. Millions of Americans were programmed to advance emotion-based war-logic and not reason-based justice or constitutional clarity. This trauma-based "fog of war" has been actively perfected by the CIA for decades. This is so obvious, that most Americans will simply turn away from this fact completely demoralized or in full denial as political conformists to absolute treason. These Americans are not patriots! It's time to wake up!
The next psychic attack "event" will be even more spectacular and will make Bush's Nazi usurpation of our Constitution absolute. All critical evidence connecting real terrorists to these crimes will be intentionally kept out of real courts, major government conspirators will never be subject to lie detectors. The American people deserve better from their government. It's time we build awareness of the real American threat and start using accurate language to describe it!
For the Machiavellian manipulator, the arbitrary reliance on mere chance is perceived as a weakness. The role of the "Sun King" authority is to charge over chance through statistically superior devices of deception and build false control systems and history itself. Through a probability calculus, we find that the events on 9/11 serve all the many contributors, alliances and goals of the Bush administration to a remarkably high degree of synchronicity while simultaneously demoralizing their political opponents. Bin Laden as a Biblical archetypal figure is fundamentally important to the NWO attack on all traditionalist religion. Therefore, the Mind Control synchronicity variables prove an extra-constitutional conspiracy. All Standard Machiavellian Mass Manipulation revolutions require: Demoralization, Crisis, Normalization. They now have the power to impose the first two, but who really has the power to normalize such a revolution? Only you can normalize this fraud by accepting it! View a massive Web of Crime involving the same people manipulating sex, drugs and usury.
We are now seeing the vast wealth of the United States being siphoned off through enormous corruption, inflated oil prices and the radical depreciation of the dollar. These conspirators are then re-establishing themselves and their fortunes in the Middle East. It's time to wake up!
Loose Change Final Cut: One of the best documentaries on the 9/11 Cover-up
The Lies and Crimes of 9/11, a Canadian Professor's Perspective
Alex Jones warns of 9/11 attacks in July, 2001
Truth Rising: 50,000 Deaths from 911?
The Great Conspiracy
The 911 Inside Job
911: The Great Illusion
Those who are destroying our Constitution
Understand that at no time in its history did the Secret Service ever step down in its protection of the president except on 9/11. Everyone in the Secret Service would have known the president would have been a potential target as planes crashed into buildings for over an hour. As actual attacks were being carried out, the president was not wisked away or in any reasonable way protected. There was no confusion or attempt to protect him in any normal fashion given the circumstances. He was role-playing for an important Mind Control media event. Playing the role of the American father, the prolonged role-playing of the Sun King "parent" is critical for programming authority. 25 Reasons Why "White Collar Terrorists" Are To Blame for 9-11, "America's New War," and the Impending World War III
1) The "terrorist" attacks were completely predictable and, in fact, predicted. By studying Mind Control for 20 years, I had a clear and accurate prediction of 911. But no one believed me! I was not the only one. Broadcaster and Secret Government expert Bill Cooper reported the conspiracy before 911 and was killed shortly thereafter. Here are some of Dr. Leonard Horowitz's insights. Forewarnings were issued by many patriotic and heroic individuals to government and military officials well in advance of Sept. 11, 2001. For instance, in August, Drs. Garth Nicolson, Ph.D., and his wife Nancy Nicolson, Ph.D., among the world's most esteemed Mycoplasma researchers and Gulf War Syndrome investigators, reported to Pentagon officials that they had confirmed intelligence that on Sept. 11, 2001 a terrorist strike against the Pentagon would be made. Read his letter to expose this horrible conspiracy by our government against our own troops. Their sources included individuals in key intelligence positions, the mob, and one high level African diplomat. Their "information was passed on to the Director of Policy of the Department of Defense, the Inspector General of the US Army Medical Corps and the National Security Council," Dr. Nicolson wrote. "Unfortunately, it was ignored." Likewise, Dr. Leonard Horowitz, the award-winning author of the prophetically titled book, Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic Warfare, released three months before the attacks on Washington and New York, correctly predicted such a first strike on New York. For three years, based on government documents and intelligence reports, he had been warning "Metropolis" residents, "It's time to move."
Why did they kill Bill Cooper, a Constitutional patriot? View the full video.
The most obvious fact that the 911 "Investigation" was a total hoax is that they first tried to give the job to Henry Kissinger, the ultimate "New World Order" insider criminal. He was the perfect choice to "protect" a massive New World Order crime. He was laughed out of the job. The Active Conspiracy to kill an official and legally sound investigation continues
2) On Friday, September 7, Florida Governor, Jeb Bush, brother to the President, issued an Executive Order in which members of the Florida National Guard were activated, "for the purpose of training to support law-enforcement personnel and emergency-management personnel in the event of civil disturbances or natural disaster." Or, to protect the President from a botched 911 operation? Perhaps the president and his brother received Dr. Nicolson's warnings or were the source of the warnings? The terrorists grouped in Sarasota Florida before the attacks. This is a known CIA center where extremist Mind Control all combining federal government secret activities including KKK, neo-Nazi operations at Stormfront, extremist Islamic centers and known Illuminati centers for advanced "tennis" vacationing where the President stayed the night before 911, "The Colony Tennis Resort." "Evidence" left in Sarasota by the terrorists are highly suspected as plants.
Marvin P. Bush, the president's younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Bush also served. According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center "up to the day the buildings fell down." The company lists as government clients "the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S Air force, and the Department of Justice," in projects that "often require state-of-the-art security solutions for classified or high-risk government sites."
Secondary bombings were anything but secondary. Many of the first rescue teams were demoralized and threatened to remain silent about numerous secondary explosions which occurred in a controlled fashion. These brave Americans are patriots and they will not remain silent!
The Company with full "access control" of the World Trade Center on 911 was never investigated.
3) Numerous reports have surfaced alleging that Bush administration, military, and intelligence officials' close associates had suddenly, and inexplicably, sold all their airline stock just days before the terrorist attacks. The F.B.I. is reportedly investigating these reports and such "inside traders." But the F.B.I. is deeply involved in many black ops missions and serve to keep the entire "war on terror" out of real courts.
4) Osama bin Laden and his band of "Terrorists" could not have pulled off the "sophisticated" operation of four simultaneous air hijackings, and precision directed attacks, without the support of one or more "intelligence organizations." This was the expert testimony provided by past CIA Afghanistan operations director and bin Laden's American intelligence aficionado, Milt Bearden, interviewed by Dan Rather on September 12, 2001. In fact, when pressed by Dan Rather to endorse the theory of bin Laden's culpability, Mr. Bearden stated, "if they didn't have an Osama bin Laden, they would invent one."
a. The Pakistani intelligence agency ISI, creator of the Taliban and close ally to both the CIA and "al-Qaeda," allegedly wired $100,000 to Mohamed Atta just prior to September 11th, reportedly through the ISI asset Omar Saeed Sheikh (later arrested for the killing of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, who was investigating ISI connections to "al-Qaeda.")
b. This was ignored by the congressional 9/11 investigation, although the senator and congressman who ran the probe (Bob Graham and Porter Goss) were meeting with the ISI chief, Mahmud Ahmed, on Capitol Hill on the morning of September 11th.
c. About 25 percent of the report of the Congressional Joint Inquiry was redacted, including long passages regarding how the attack (or the network allegedly behind it) was financed. Graham later said foreign allies were involved in financing the alleged terror network, but that this would only come out in 30 years.
5) On October 31, 2001, the French daily Le Figaro reported that Osama bin Laden had met with a high-level CIA official in July 2000. At that time, bin Laden was already being sought for trial for his involvement in two U.S. embassy bombings and the U.S.S. Cole attack. The meeting was held in bin Laden's private suite in a Dubai hospital. Though he was eligible for extermination, according to President Bill Clinton's intelligence findings, on July 14th he was let go and left Dubai on his private jet. Halliburton, the oil services company formerly headed by US Vice-President Dick Cheney, is moving its headquarters from Texas to Dubai. Dick Cheney sold his U.S. dollars and bought a home in Dubai, conveniently, war-crimes extraditions are not honored by the Dubai government.
View the YouTube video: Mike Rupert on the CIA's Drug and Oil Connections to 911
6) Every expert in the field of terrorism, up until Sept. 11, 2001, routinely explained the fact that certified terrorist organizations operate in an effort to garner worldwide attention and support for their political cause(s). In the case of pro-Palestinian terrorist organizations, their attacks had been traditionally against American military facilities and personnel. This was obviously neither the intent nor outcome of the attacks on the World Trade Center.
7) For weeks preceding September 11, 2001 international opinion regarding Israel and the United States had plummeted to an all-time low. Alternatively, pro-Palestinian attitudes had rapidly increased to an all-time high, particularly following the United Nations Conference on Racism wherein the U.S. and Israel had been chastised for their racist policies. Any intelligent pro-Palestinian terrorist group, such as Osama bin Laden's legions, or intelligence organization(s) supportive to the Palestinian cause, would not have jeopardized the significant gains achieved at that time.
911 solution
8) Osama bin Laden took his direction and money from the CIA for ten years. His ties with the CIA and Bush family go back decades. During this time, approximately $5 billion was funneled to his organization through black op budgets into CIA operation known as Maktab al-Khidamar-the MAK. It is clear, as a MAK mercenary army leader, bin Laden's fortune vastly increased during that time. It is said that, "Once in the CIA, always in the CIA." Could this be one of the intelligence organizations about which Milt Bearden was speaking?
What about the bin Laden video tape in which he takes credit for the 9/11 attack? Every indication is that the tape is a fake. The bin Laden in the November 9, 2001, "confession video" looks nothing like the bin Laden in the last confirmed video of December, 2001.
Recently, the Italian newspaper, Corriere Della Sera, reported that the former president of Italy, Francesco Cossiga, said that Italian intelligence had concluded that the bin Laden confession video was a fake.
William Arkin in the online Washington Post, February 1, 1999, described a voice-morphing technology developed at the government's Los Alamos laboratory. Arkin reported that digital morphing, including appearance, "has come of age, available for use in psychological operations."
Investigative reporter Kristina Borjesson reminds us that "six days after 9/11, CNN reported that bin Laden had sent a statement to Al Jazeera denying that he had been involved." She also reminds us that the FBI says it has no hard evidence that bin Laden was responsible for 9/11. The FBI wants Osama for the 1998 bombings of US embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, not for 9/11. Borjesson also reports that in the "confession video" bin Laden is revealed writing with his right hand, but is known to be left-handed.
If the bin Laden "confession video" is indeed a fake, as it appears to be, why run the risk of creating such a video if the CIA has on video tape the confessions of the alleged al Qaeda participants in the 9/11 plot? Other "confession" tapes were deliberately destroyed as torture was advanced as a red herring. Why destroy such evidence, especially when torture has been given a green light by the DOJ and US Congress?r><br>9) Also on Tuesday evening September 12, 2001 previous Secretary of Defense for the Clinton administration, William S. Cohen, explained to CBS News anchorman Dan Rather, that the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington were an aberration. He fully expected there to be a full-scale deployment of biological and chemical "weapons of mass destruction" very soon. This reinforced his earlier statements as Defense Secretary that a five-pound bag of anthrax bacteria in the hands of terrorists would likely cause the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans. We were particularly vulnerable to this "immanent" threat, he said. Many critical military observers considered these statements treasonous. Reason? At no time in American military history has a top level official broadcast internationally the country's greatest attack vulnerability. In effect, his statements were akin to giving anti-Americans their marching orders.
10) A sincere U.S. Government, truly concerned about the health and safety of American citizens, would be doing everything in its power to advance public health and educational policies for biological and chemical attack preparedness. Instead, such critical policy and advice has been left entirely to independent, often ill-trained, "experts," at best, and special interests and media producers at worst. The mainstream media has completely neglected the simple things people can do to guard loved-ones, such as natural medicines (e.g.,garlic) to ward off infections such as anthrax.
11) In July 2000, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) endorsed one single largely untested and highly risky antibiotic, Bayer Corporation's Cipro, for anthrax prophylaxis and treatment. Following September 11, 2001 demand for this drug skyrocketed 1,000 percent, according to Peter Jennings in an ABC News report broadcast September 27. Pharmacies charged $700 per person for a mere two-month supply of Cipro. It is well established that far less expensive antibiotics, including the penicillins and tetracyclines, are highly effective against Anthrax. The Bayer Corporation during and following World War II had been blacklisted by the U.S. Government for being the principle profiteer, in partnership with the Rockefeller Standard Oil Company, for funding the Third Reich, their terrorist organizations, and Germany's war machine. History Channel admits the Antrax attacks were an Inside Job.
12) During the first week of October, the media heralded a bizarre anthrax outbreak at the National Enquirer near Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. By October 11, three cases of reported "criminal" anthrax infections had occurred. This form of anthrax--a classic biological weapon strain--is not easily acquired. It is distributed mainly by the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) of Rockville, Maryland. The curator there is Dr. Joshua Lederberg, who is also the president of Rockefeller University. Preceding the Gulf War, the U.S. Congressional Record (May 25, 1994, commonly called the "Don Riegle Report") exposed the ATCC for shipping to Sadam Hussein's Ministry of Higher Education and the Ministry of Trade, nineteen shipments of various strains of Bacillus Anthraces from 1978 to 1988.
13) According to investigators at the FBI, the Enquirer anthrax attack was not likely done by typical "terrorists," but rather one or more "criminals" using highly specific U.S. anthrax. For what motive? Obviously, whoever did this had a motive, and had access to weapons grade anthrax. That virtually leaves typical blue-collar "criminals" out entirely since skill in handling and shipping live anthrax would be required for this crime. The fact that, of all places, America's bestselling tabloid was first attacked, then other mainstream media outlets, speaks volumes about the criminal motive. Since no one has claimed responsibility for this act, they obviously did not do it for personal publicity. Obviously, then, the attack was a white collar crime by one or more "white collar bioterrorist(s)." At least one Rockefeller-linked U.S. biological weapons official, Dr. Lederberg, and Rockefeller-partnered Corporation, Bayer (aspirin) that largely financed the Third Reich, and Hitler's rise to power, had obvious white-collar (financial) motives for these contemporary "terrorist" attacks. Key experts in this field were murdered or died of mysterious causes within months of these attacks. This deserves critical consideration and further investigation.
14) On October 1, 2001, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz sent the FBI, as well as half the members of the U.S. Congress, an urgent request to investigate this matter. (See: http://www.tetrahedron.org "Apocalypse Prevention Project") Included in this letter was the following statement concerning the links between contemporary terrorist organizations, the global neo-Nazi movement, and possible Bayer Corporation involvement: The Bayer Company [also linked to AID-virus contaminated blood products during 1980 investigations] evaded U.S. Government controls during and following the holocaust in which millions of mostly Jewish people were used as experimental subjects in medical atrocities overseen by I.G. Farben's president Hermann Schmitz, who also directed the German-multinational Bayer A.G.
Of urgent pertinence to the FBI's current investigation into terrorism's money trail, a recent investigation into terrorist group funding, issued by The Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee (OBIC) directed by Representative Charles Key, found "Neo-Nazi figures have actually been implicated in Middle Eastern special weapons procurement and terrorist activity." For example, the group reported, "since the 1960s, an old Swiss Nazi named Francois Genaud has reportedly masterminded several airplane hijackings for the PLO." The now defunct "Odessa" organization, the post-war successor to Hitler's S.S., according to OBIC, "had numerous documented meetings with representatives of various Arab organizations; and, during the early 1980s, a Neo-Nazi named Odfried Hepp attacked several U.S. military installations in Germany with bombs. Hepp was later found to have been financed by Al Fatah." Hepp, OBIC reported, did his Ph.D. on "Neo-Nazi/PLO bombings of U.S. housing, cars and military facilities in Germany." Given these facts alone, an FBI investigation into this matter is critical.
I am also contacting congressional leaders at this time urging an immediate U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) investigation into the FDA's "advisory committee" that sponsored the unprecedented sole endorsement of Bayer's Cipro for anthrax. Nowhere in the Physician's Desk Reference (2000) is it claimed that Cipro is especially indicated for anthrax. In fact, Bacillus anthracis is not even mentioned. What is mentioned is that, "although effective in clinical trials, ciprofloxacin is not a drug of first choice in the treatment of presumed or confirmed pneumonia secondary to Streptococcus pneumoniae." This organism, like anthrax, is an aerobic gram-positive microbe. (Likewise, Bacillus anthracis causes pneumonia in the form of commonly terminal hemorrhagic bronchopneumonia.) Furthermore the PDR states: "WARNINGS-THE SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF CIPROFLOXACIN IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS AND ADOLESCENTS (LESS THAN 18 YEARS OF AGE), PREGNANT WOMEN, AND LACTATING WOMEN HAVE NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED." Alternatively, numerous bioweapons experts have consistently recommended far less costly and time-tested antibiotics to fight anthrax, including the natural and synthetic penicillins, erythromycin, cephalosporins, and the tetracyclines.
As with Dr. Nicolson's forewarning to military leaders concerning the Sept 11 Pentagon attack, the above urgent request by Dr. Horowitz for FBI investigation into this matter, to date (Nov. 5, 2001) has gone ignored. This strongly suggests, if not evidences, a conspiracy within our own government-a conspiracy of silence at minimum.
a. The September 11th families who fought for and gained an independent investigation (the 9/11 Commission) posed 400-plus questions, which the 9/11 Commission adopted as its roadmap. The vast majority of these questions were completely ignored in the Commission hearings and the final report.
b. The membership and staff of the 9/11 Commission displayed awesome conflicts of interest. The families called for the resignation of Executive Director Philip Zelikow, a Bush administration member and close associate of "star witness" Condoleezza Rice, and were snubbed. Commission member Max Cleland resigned, condemning the entire exercise as a "scam" and "whitewash."
c.The 9/11 Commission Report is notable mainly for its obvious omissions, distortions and outright falsehoods - ignoring anything incompatible with the official story, banishing the issues to footnotes, and even dismissing the still-unresolved question of who financed 9/11 as being "of little practical significance."
15) Aaron Swirski, one of the architects of the World Trade Center, said they designed the towers to withstand airplane collisions. "I designed it for a 707 hit, he said." The collapse of the buildings came as a complete "shock" to him and his colleagues. Van Romero, a demolition expert, former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center, and current vice present for research at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology said that the manner in which the twin towers collapsed, resembled those of controlled implosions used in planned demolition. "My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse," Romero said. ABC News interviewed people who had escaped "ground zero" on September 11, 2001. One unidentified man said: "We were stuck on the stairs for a while. I came down from the 85th floor. When we were just about to leave the building, there was a blast." A woman's testimony followed: "I got stuck on the stairs. When we got to the lobby there was a blast," she said.
Why did World Trade Center 7 collapse? No airplane hit that building, and before September 11, no steel skyscraper had ever collapsed because of a fire. Yet three fell–very neatly and virtually into their own footprints. (Even if one allows the engineers their claims that WTC1 and WTC2 were designed to collapse in on themselves, what of the perfect collapse of WTC7?)
The firefighters who were in the two towers were not in the least concerned about a collapse, as demonstrated in the fire department's transcript of their radio traffic. In fact, they stated that the fires were dying out and could be extinguished with just a couple of lines of hose. Jet fuel burns like kerosene or charcoal fluid–quickly and completely–yet Ground Zero burned for 100 days.
Perhaps the biggest blunder by 911 conspirators was Building 7's controlled demolition and its cover-up, an obvious case of massive fraud to any rationally open-minded person. Building 7 was the staging area for secret government and contained enormous amounts of evidence.
View the BBC video: Announcing the fall of WTC 7 Building 23 minutes before it happened, pounding the drums of war into the hypno-patient.
View the YouTube video: Obvious Demolitions during the 911 Mind Control Event
Massive evidence of Israeli involvement in 911 still "classified"
Multiple controlled explosions used to bring down World Trade Center buildings for full Mind Control effect.
September 11, Revisited
"The tall, strong Twin Towers were broken into very small pieces and massive clouds of dust long before anything hit the ground," Top structural engineer Richard Gage observed. "We did not see them 'collapse' that morning, we saw them explode into dust and individual steel components. Watch the videos for yourself -- they are widely available on the Internet (including ours at www.AE911Truth.org) and they all show the same essential features. Flashes of light and sounds of explosions were witnessed by 118 first responders and recorded by the FDNY. Huge rubble clouds formed immediately and symmetrically outside the buildings as they fell. The destruction was of amazing speed, evenness, and thoroughness, that it could only have been very carefully engineered and planned in advance."
Tons of molten iron "flowing like lava" was found by demolition crews and by Leslie Robertson, the World Trade Center structural engineer. This observation can only be explained by the use of thermite, an incendiary used by the military to cut through steel. Chemical analysis on the steel and the dust performed by physicist Steven Jones, Ph.D., and 3 other scientists found the classic signature traces of thermite.
Richard Gage has been joined by more than 130 architects and engineers who have signed an online petition to the members of the House of Representatives and the Senate demanding a truly independent investigation with subpoena power.
Gage has made his presentation to several California architectural firms, colleges, and universities. At the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, Canada, he and author Barrie Zwicker spoke to over 500 people at two events. More than 90% of those in attendance agreed with his conclusions.
Well, here are what top experts who eyewitnessed the molten metal say:
The structural engineer responsible for the design of the WTC purportedly described fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 days after the attacks.
A retired professor of physics and atmospheric science said "in mid-October when they would pull out a steel beam, the lower part would be glowing dull red, which indicates a temperature on the order of 500 to 600 °C. And we know that people were turning over pieces of concrete in December that would flash into fire--which requires about 300 °C. So the surface of the pile cooled rather rapidly, but the bulk of the pile stayed hot all the way to December"
The head of a team of scientists studying the potential health effects of 9/11, reported, "Fires are still actively burning and the smoke is very intense. In some pockets now being uncovered, they are finding molten steel."
Hazardous materials experts also stated that, six weeks after 9/11, "There are pieces of steel being pulled out [from as far as six stories underground] that are still cherry red" and "the blaze is so 'far beyond a normal fire' that it is nearly impossible to draw conclusions about it based on other fires" (pay-per-view)
An expert stated about World Trade Center building 7, "A combination of an uncontrolled fire and the structural damage might have been able to bring the building down, some engineers said. But that would not explain steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been PARTLY EVAPORATED in extraordinarily high temperatures" (pay-per-view). Note that evaporation means conversion from a liquid to a gas; so the steel beams in building 7 were subjected to temperatures high enough to melt and evaporate them.
According to reporter Christopher Bollyn, Mark Loizeaux, president the world's top demolition company, and Peter Tully, head of a large construction firm, said the following: Tully told AFP that he had seen pools of "literally molten steel" in the rubble.
Loizeaux confirmed this: "Yes, hot spots of molten steel in the basements," he said, "at the bottom of the elevator shafts of the main towers, down seven levels."
The molten steel was found "three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed," he said. He confirmed that molten steel was also found at WTC 7, which mysteriously collapsed in the late afternoon.
Investigators monitoring air quality at the World Trade Center, after the September 11th attacks, found extremely high levels of volatile organic chemicals as well as unusual species that had never been seen before in structure fires. Data collected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency indicate striking spikes in levels of benzene, styrene, and several other products of combustion. These spikes occurred on specific dates in October and November 2001, and February 2002. Additionally, data collected by researchers at the University of California Davis showed similar spikes in the levels of sulfur and silicon compounds, and certain metals, in aerosols. To better explain these data, as well as the unusual detection of 1,3-diphenylpropane, the presence of energetic nanocomposites in the pile at Ground Zero is hypothesized.
16) On September 11, 2001 President Bush was is Sarasota, Florida, "In Sarasota, Fla. "reading to children in a classroom at 9:05 a.m. when his chief of staff, Andrew Card, whispered into his ear, according to the Associated Press (Sept. 12). The president briefly turned somber before he resumed reading. . . .[Next] President Bush listened to 18 Booker Elementary School second-graders read a story about a girl's pet goat . . . before he spoke briefly and somberly about the terrorist attacks." Many are curious as to why the "Commander-in-Chief" of the U.S. took about a half-hour before he responded to the national security urgency, or even addressed the tragedies. Isn't this just plain bad acting from a tough-guy president?
17) The New York Times reported on September 15, 2001 that Pentagon officials had been tracking the second two hijacked planes for almost an hour following the WTC attacks because they simply "didn't know what to do." Regarding the plane that crashed into Pennsylvania "Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy defense secretary, said . . . that the Pentagon had been tracking that plane and could have shot it down if necessary; it crashed about 35 minutes after the Pentagon crash." Many are wondering why, if they could have shot that plane down, did they not shoot the plane down that flew into the Pentagon?
18) Vice President Dick Cheney was interviewed on Sept. 12, 2001. When asked where he was when he learned of the attacks, many were surprised to learn that he was alerted by his secretary who was "watching television" in his Washington, D.C. office. In essence, though the FAA had known at least four planes were veering far off their course, while the Pentagon, too, had been tracking at least two of the hijacked planes, Mr. Cheney received his initial intelligence report by way of television through his clerical secretary.
19) "Drugs and terrorism go hand in hand," wrote investigative journalist and retired LAPD officer Michael C. Ruppert (http://www.copvcia.com) "Conveniently ignored in all of the press coverage since the tragic events of Sept. 11," Mr. Ruppert wrote, "is the fact that on May 17 Secretary of State Colin Powell announced a gift of $43 million to the Taliban as a purported reward for its eradication of Afghanistan's opium crop this February. That, in effect, made the U.S. the Taliban's largest financial benefactor according to syndicated columnist Robert Scheer writing in The Los Angeles Times on May 22."
20) "Now as US military action will replace the Taliban government and fresh crops will be planted in Afghanistan," Mr. Ruppert continued, "the slack in cash flow will assuredly be replaced by dramatically increased opium production in Colombia; the revenues from that effort being needed to maintain the revenue streams into Wall Street. Prior to the WTC attacks, credible sources, including the U.S. government, the IMF, Le Monde and the U.S. Senate placed the amount of drug cash flowing into Wall Street and U.S. banks at around $250-$300 billion a year."
21) Mr. Ruppert also revealed that an Executive Director at the CIA named A. "Buzzy" Krongard is suspected of Wall Street profiteering from foreknowledge of the Sept 11 attacks. Formerly with Bankers Trust catering to the world's wealthiest clients of the Deutsch Bank. (The Deutsche Bank is heavily implicated in Dr. Len Horowitz's book Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism, and Toxic Warfare released in June, 2001) In 1999, Mr. Krongard left Deutsch Bank for his present high-level job in the CIA. Enormous quantities of "Put" options were handled through the Deutsche Bank, which allowed the options buyers to earn profits in the event the value of airline stocks went down. The appearance of advance knowledge of Sept. 11 is so strong that to date $2.5 Million of the $20 Million in profits earned on those unusual trades, remains unclaimed, possibly by Mr. Krongard, or other affiliates of the CIA.
22) Many journalists have reported that the bombing of Afghanistan, allegedly intended to punish the Taliban for affiliations with Bin Laden, is simply a cover for that government's reneging of support for an oil pipeline through Afghanistan from the vast Caspian Sea oil fields. Sept. 11, provided a great excuse to pursue this petrochemical, economic, and "national security" objective.
23) On December 20, 1997, the national newspaper CONTACT: The Phoenix Project, published an interview on anthrax biowarfare threats and vaccinations in which Dr. Leonard Horowitz was asked "about the government's pressure to vaccinate [using the anthrax vaccine] and the bioweapons scare tactics, etc." He responded: "Look at the motive behind the persuasion, and what is it? They're preparing to blame it on the Muslims, Christian patriots, and militia groups. The militia groups are already dysfunctional because they're penetrated by agitators."
This is precisely what followed in the wake of the 9-11 attacks. Muslim groups were blamed for the 9-11 attacks. Christian patriots were blamed for the anthrax mailings. Militia groups were entirely silenced and even implicated. And false patriotism in which Americans welcome the destruction of basic constitutional liberties with CIA command over the entire U.S. military and Government has come to pass.
24) On October 31, 2001 the American people and U.S. Constitutional freedoms were attacked, not by the Taliban government or Muslim terrorists, but by CDC officials who advanced the "Model State Emergency Health Powers Act" that will force masses of people suspected of exposure to broadly-defined "infectious diseases" and biological weapons into concentration camp-like holding facilities for drugging, vaccination, and quarantine, without any viable legal recourse.
25) The entire 9-11 tragedy and subsequent threats to U.S. national and global securities fits far too perfectly with standard Machiavellian theory to be overlooked. This ongoing practice-the "problem/reaction/solution" agenda of precisely "managed chaos"-appears to be standard operating procedures for oligarchs historically bent on developing a "New World Order." Sadly now for the American people, as it has been for the Third World, this effort includes killing approximately half of the world's current population.
You are meant to believe that this conspiracy is so overwhelming that it simply must be accepted. The truth is, it has been an ongoing conspiracy against our Constitution and it is all based on one simple principle: mind-controlled bureaucrats over parents. This crime of "behavioral science" effectively sets up children to become "fully programmable." Parents are the most powerful force in America because they can build truth into the next generation, and it's time we honor parents and not secret government. This massive conspiracy employs mass media attitude manipulation which serves eugenics. Families are literally cooked alive by psychological warfare as they are simultaneously denying their children critical education to counter this horrific warfare. The elite are not denying their children this critical education! The full reversal of our Constitution places idiot bureaucrats over parents for obvious eugenics and Americans are conditioned to accept this fraud. These Americans are not patriots!
Throughout Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2001 no one asked the most basic questions: Who did this really serve? Why would a man in a cave who gained an enormous fortune from the CIA want to make our overly-insured financial center a target of a grandiose and virtually impossible psychic event without CIA help? A $100 million investment in the towers was parlayed into an $11 Billion insurance windfall. Building 7 also contained enormous amounts of evidence against these same Wall Street criminals being investigated by the federal government on other charges. Who really gains by these horrors? Are Americans so mind controlled that they cannot ask these fundamental questions?
View John McCain on a Mind Controlled roll
While there have been convened two purported "investigations" of 9-11, one by a
joint committee of Congress plus a second, "independent" investigation conducted, in the main, by the Commission chaired by Thomas Kean and comprised of persons with flagrant conflicts of interest, neither investigation has addressed in earnest and transparently — much less made known to the public — the facts of what really happened on 9-11 to cause the deaths of approximately 2,993 persons from some 83 countries (most of the deceased being citizens of the United States).
On August 15, 2006, a book by Kean and 9/11 Commission Vice Chairman Lee H. Hamilton, titled Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission, was released regarding the September 11 attacks and the September 11 Commission. In the book, Kean and Hamilton write that the 9/11 Commission was so frustrated with repeated misstatements by officials from The Pentagon and Federal Aviation Administration during their investigation that they considered a separate investigation into possible obstruction of justice by Pentagon and FAA officials.
We know that within minutes of the "worst terrorist attack" in US history, even before the collapse of WTC-2 at 9:59 am, US officials knew the names of several of the alleged hijackers. CBS reported that a flight attendant on AA Flight 11, Amy Sweeney, had the presence of mind to call her office and reveal the seat numbers of the hijackers who had seized the plane.[1] FBI Director Robert Mueller later said, "This was the first piece of hard evidence." In his memoirs CIA Director George Tenet emphasizes the importance of the passenger manifests, as does counter-terrorism czar Richard A. Clarke. All of which is very strange because the manifests later released by the airlines do not include the names of any of the alleged hijackers. Nor has this discrepancy ever been explained.
According to MSNBC, the plan to invade Afghanistan and "remove Al Qaeda from the face of he earth" was already sitting on G.W. Bush's desk on the morning of 9/11 awaiting his signature. The plan, in the form of a presidential directive, had been developed by the CIA and according to Richard Clarke called for "arming the Northern Alliance...to go on the offensive against the Taliban [and] pressing the CIA to...go after bin Laden and the Al Qaeda leadership."
A former Pakistani diplomat, Niaz Naik, tells virtually the same story. During a BBC interview, three days after 9/11, Niak claimed that senior American officials had informed him in mid-July 2001 that the US would attack the Taliban "before the snows start falling in Afghanistan, by the middle of October at the latest." Niak said he received this information in Berlin at a UN-sponsored international contact group on Afghanistan. He also predicted, correctly, that the US attack would be launched from bases in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. But how could US officials know in mid-July that American forces would invade Afghanistan in October unless they had foreknowledge of the attack?
Foreknowledge probably also explains why General Richard Myers, the acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs on 9/11, announced at the first post-9/11 meeting of Bush's National Security Council, held on video-conference the afternoon of the attack, that "there are forty-two major Taliban bombing targets." But how did Myers come to have such detailed information about military targets in Afghanistan, so soon after the 9/11 attack? This important detail belies oft-repeated claims that the US military was not prepared to attack Afghanistan, and points to extensive war planning before 9/11. Journalist Steve Coll arrived at a similar conclusion while researching his 2004 book, Ghost Wars, an excellent history of the period leading up to the 9/11 attack. Coll interviewed two Clinton administration officials who informed him that "the Pentagon had been studying possible targets in the same spring [i.e., 1998] that the CIA had been drawing up its secret plan to raid Tarnack Farm," located near Kandahar, Afghanistan, where bin Laden had taken up quarters at the invitation of Taliban leader Mullah Omar.
According to Clarke, at the same meeting on the afternoon of 9/11, CIA Director George Tenet informed the president that "Al Qaeda had committed these atrocities." But, again, how did Tenet know this so soon after the attack, especially given that "security failures" had occurred, unless he had foreknowledge?
No Hard Evidence
On September 20, 2001, the Bush administration officially declared that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 attack. Three days later, Secretary of State Colin Powell announced on Meet the Press that the government would soon release "a white paper" detailing the evidence against bin Laden. Later the same day, Bush faced questions from the press about Powell's remark and backed away from releasing any additional information. Bush explained that the government had a lot of evidence but that most of it was classified and could not be made public. Bush emphasized, however, that the evidence "leads to one person, as well as one global terrorist organization." National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice made a similar statement during an interview on FOX News. Said Rice: "We have very good evidence of links between Osama bin Laden, Al Qaeda operatives, and what happened on September 11." Rice refused to release any particulars, however, and, like Bush, claimed that the evidence was "classified."
As we know, the US government never got around to releasing the promised white paper. Why not? Was it because the evidence against bin Laden was too weak to hold up in court? Such was the view of journalist Seymour Hersh, who cited CIA and Justice Department sources to this effect in his regular column in the New Yorker magazine.
Foreign intelligence agencies were also busily investigating the case, but fared no better. For instance, Germany's Chief Federal Prosecutor, Kay Nehm, admitted that there was no hard evidence linking bin Laden with the crime. The lack of evidence prompted former German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt to speak out against President Bush's decision to invoke Article V of the NATO Treaty, mobilizing NATO's involvement in the war on terrorism. In Schmidt's own words: "Proof had to be delivered that the September 11 terror attack came from abroad. [Yet,] that proof still has not been provided."
Osama did not cooperate by acknowledging his role in the attack; on the contrary. In a statement on September 16, 2001 carried by Al-Jazeera, bin Laden categorically denied any involvement. Days later, he repeated this denial during an interview with the Pakistani newspaper Ummaut. On November 3, 2001 Al-Jazeera released a third statement, in which bin Laden not only denied involvement but also accused the Bush administration of waging a "crusader war" against the Muslim world. To the best of my knowledge, none of these denials were reported in the US media. Why not?
On October 1, 2001 British Prime Minister Tony Blair told the House of Commons that the case against bin Laden was proved beyond a shadow of doubt. Said Blair: "I have seen absolutely powerful and incontrovertible evidence of his [Osama Bin Laden"s] link to the events of the 11th of September." Several days later (on October 4), Blair's government went public with the evidence to which Blair had alluded: a "Bin Laden Dossier." But the evidence turned out to be short of "incontrovertible," and in fact was shockingly thin. The Independent described it as "little more than conjecture," and an editorial in the Guardian concluded that the dossier was "almost worthless from a legal point of view."[20] The (London) Times agreed, observing that "There is no evidence presented [in the dossier] that directly links bin Laden to September 11."
The Bin Laden Video and the personification of evil
Confronted with US demands to hand over bin Laden unconditionally, the Taliban was initially defiant, and refused. However, in early October 2001 two Pakistani Islamic parties persuaded the Taliban leadership to extradite bin Laden to Peshawar, Pakistan, where he would be held under house arrest and tried by an international tribunal. The deal even included the extradition of bin Laden to the US in the event of a conviction. However, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf vetoed the arrangement, no doubt, under heavy pressure from the Bush administration. But why would the US turn down an opportunity to bring the arch villain of 9/11 to justice for the crime of the century? Was it because, as I have already suggested, the US had insufficient evidence to convict and faced the embarrassing likelihood of an acquittal?
In fact, the only evidence the US government released linking bin Laden to 9/11 was a video-tape which supposedly turned up by chance in Afghanistan. According to the State Department, US military forces found the hour-long video in Jalalabad on December 9, 2001, shortly after the US invasion. It purportedly shows bin Laden and several of his al Qaeda comrades ghoulishly celebrating their successful attack upon America. The US government released the tape on December 13, 2001 along with an English translation and a Department of Defense (DoD) press release. The latter included the following statement by Rumsfeld: "There was no doubt of bin Laden's responsibility for the September 11 attacks before the tape was discovered." The US media made much of this confessional tape, as did political luminaries like New York City Mayor (and presidential hopeful) Rudy Giuliani, who told CNN that the tape confirmed that the US military campaign against bin Laden was "more than justified." Giuliani added: "Obviously, this man [i.e., bin Laden] is the personification of evil. He seems delighted at having killed more people than he anticipated, which leaves you wondering just how deep his evil heart and soul really is."
In the video bin Laden brags about al Qaeda's role in staging the attack. But is the footage bona fide? Anyone who has seen the film knows that the main character bears only the most superficial resemblance to bin Laden, judging from well-known photos. In addition, there are major discrepancies. For example, the video shows bin Laden writing with his right hand when according to the FBI he is a southpaw.
Two independent translators and a third expert on oriental studies also took issue with the English translation of the Arabic released by the DoD. During the program "Monitor," which aired on the German TV channel "Das Erste," the three experts stated that "at the most important places where it [i.e, the video] is held to prove the guilt of bin Laden, it [i.e., the translation] is not identical with the Arabic." The experts also disputed the US claim that the tape proved foreknowledge. Gernot Rotter, professor of Islamic and Arabic Studies at the University of Hamburg, stated that "The American translators who listened to the tapes and transcribed them apparently wrote a lot of things in that they wanted to hear but that cannot be heard on the tape no matter how many times you listen to it." While this does not necessarily exonerate bin Laden, it does raise questions. If, as Bush claimed, the US had solid evidence of bin Laden"s guilt, then why make false claims?
Evidently, the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agrees with the skeptics. The FBI's on-line web listing of "Most Wanted Terrorists" includes a page devoted to Osama bin Laden. According to this official post, which may be viewed by anyone with access to cyberspace, bin Laden is wanted by the FBI for the August 1998 attacks upon US Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya, which killed over 200 people. However, the page makes no reference to the events of September 11, 2001. Nor is there any mention of the video discussed above. In June 2006, when blogger Ed Haas learned about this, he was understandably puzzled and contacted FBI headquarters by phone seeking an explanation. Haas talked with Rex Tomb, the FBI's Chief of Investigative Publicity, who informed him that "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11." Haas was dumbfounded, and said: "But how is this possible?" Tomb replied that "bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection with 9/11." He then explained why not:
"The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice then decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11." [my emphasis]
This admission by the FBI is astonishing and raises fundamental questions about the war on terrorism, as well as the role of the US media. Was Osama bin Laden convicted for the cold-blooded murder of nearly 3,000 innocent Americans in the US court of public opinion by means of a media circus? Did the US government and the corporate media collude to deceive the American people? If so, then a colossal miscarriage of justice has occurred.
Consider also the strange statement made by President Bush at a press conference on March 13, 2002. When asked about the progress being made to catch bin Laden, Bush replied that "we haven"t heard much from him. [i.e., bin Laden] And I wouldn"t necessarily say he"s at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don"t know where he is. I, I"ll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him." [my emphasis] But why this almost lackadaisical attitude about the arch-villain whom Bush had promised to track down to the ends of the earth? What had become of the president's laser-like determination" Bush explained that bin Laden had ceased to be a terrorist threat due to the US occupation of Afghanistan. Yet, by at least one account, the US forces at Tora Bora displayed almost unbelievable incompetence during the pursuit of bin Laden, as a result of which the accused and most of his entourage escaped. Was this the plan, all along?
A no less strange remark made a few weeks later (April 6, 2002) by General Richard Myers, then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, suggests that bin Laden"s getaway had been approved at the highest level. Myers told CNN that "the goal has never been to get bin Laden." I personally found his statement incomprehensible, since at the time Osama was public enemy number one. Did the US allow bin Laden to escape because the Bush administration judged he was more valuable at-large" We can"t be certain, because by this time there were also numerous reports that bin Laden was dead.
Did President Bush know when he made the above statement that bin Laden was already deceased? This would explain Bush's casual demeanor. Yet, either way, from the standpoint of propaganda it hardly mattered whether bin Laden was dead or alive. His larger-than-life reputation could be sustained simply by neglecting to confirm his death, and the legend is what counted. His persona could also be "spun" in various ways and made to serve political expedience. Indeed, by this logic bin Laden was even more valuable dead because a living breathing bin Laden might at some point be apprehended, in which case the Bush administration faced the unwelcome prospect of a very public trial at which the terrorist would have an opportunity to tell his side of the story to a listening world. And this, of course, had to be avoided.
If we can believe the 9/11 Commission Report, the case against bin Laden was greatly bolstered by the capture and subsequent confession in 2003 of the alleged 9/11 mastermind, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM). The problem, of course, is that the official story about the plot against America is wholly based on secret CIA interrogations that have never been independently confirmed, and must therefore be viewed as suspect. But even if we accept the testimony of KSM in 2003, this does not explain the rush to war in 2001. Nor does it explain President Bush's decision to go to war against Saddam Hussein, a decision reportedly made in July 2002.
Previous cases of terrorism had already demonstrated the wisdom of proceeding with caution, since knee-jerk responses can (and do) misfire. For example, after the 1995 bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, US investigators at first suspected a Mideast connection. But this was proved false, and similar errors were made after the 1988 downing of Pan American Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland. Although initial evidence pointed to Syria or Iran, a thorough forensic investigation ruled these out and eventually implicated Libya. The 9/11 Commission Report itself describes the latter case as "a cautionary tale about rushing to judgement in attributing responsibility for a terrorist act." So, why the rush to war after the September 11 attack? If the Bush administration had conclusive evidence that al Qaeda was responsible, why not release it? Was the Bush White House tight-lipped because the actual evidence would have exposed the complicity of the US military and intelligence community? A stunning story that broke in the US press in 2005 points to such a conclusion.
Able Danger
As it happened, a legitimate US military counter-terrorist operation known as Able Danger was tracking Mohamed Atta and his cohorts as early as January-February 2000. The operation, based at Ft. Belvoir, Virginia, was small but extremely high-tech, as it employed advanced computers to sweep the internet, a methodology known as as data-mining. In May 2000, however, when Able Danger's success became known throughout the Defense Department, the officers who ran it were ordered to shut it down and destroy their data. One officer reportedly was threatened with prison if he refused. Later, the Pentagon attempted to block Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on Able Danger, and in 2005, when this failed, the Pentagon refused Able Danger staffers permission to testify before the committee.
One intelligence officer who later testified anyway, Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, was targeted for harassment. The question is why? Of course, the standard explanation is that the military bureaucracy made gross blunders and later sought to cover up their incompetence. But there is another possibility. Was Able Danger shut down because this honest operation threatened to unmask the covert planning for the September 11 "attack"?
What is clear is that the Pentagon's self-serving attempts to gag and discredit Lt. Col. Shaffer are not to be believed. In February 2006 Shaffer told the House Armed Services Committee that during the summer of 2000 he and other officers involved in Able Danger attempted on three separate occasions to warn the FBI about the terrorist threat posed by Mohamed Atta. But the meetings never happened. Each time they were canceled at the last minute by high-level Pentagon attorneys. Nor has the Pentagon ever provided a satisfactory explanation as to why.
Some time after the dissolution of Able Danger Shaffer was reassigned to Bagram Air Base, in Afghanistan, where in October 2003 he succeeded in bringing the existence of Able Danger to the attention of the 9/11 Commission. This apparently happened due to a chance encounter with Philip Zelikow, Executive Director of the commission, and several commission staffers who were then on tour, gathering firsthand information about the US war on terrorism. Lt. Col. Shaffer told the House committee that after he briefed the commission staff about Able Danger's success in identifying Mohamed Atta and other alleged 9/11 hijackers, Zelikow came up, handed him his card, and asked him to "please contact me upon your return to the states so we can continue this dialogue." However, three months later when Shaffer did just that he was surprised to discover that Zelikow was no longer interested in Able Danger. But why wouldn't he be?
Then, all hell broke loose when Shaffer dutifully informed his commanding officer about the contact. From that point on Lt. Col. Shaffer was subjected to the sort of military hazing that is usually reserved for green recruits. His security clearance was cancelled. He lost access to his office computer and all of his classified materials about Able Danger, which, he later learned, were destroyed. Subsequently, the Pentagon dismissed his testimony, claiming it was unsupported by hard evidence, an obvious example of Catch-22. Shaffer also learned that he was under investigation, although no formal charges were ever filed against him. He was told "off the record" that he had "pissed off" one or more high-ranking officers. Several of Shaffer's colleagues from Able Danger corroborated his story, but it didn't matter. His military career was over, destroyed. Shaffer's testimony before Congress is riveting and is essential reading for anyone interested in 9/11 truth.
In their 2006 book Without Precedent, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission, deny that Able Danger had ever identified Mohamed Atta before 9/11. But their assertion, much belated, is just not credible. Their own final report on 9/11 makes no mention of Able Danger. It is abundantly clear that even though Lt. Col. Shaffer notified the panel about this important counter-terrorism operation the commissioners made no attempt to investigate it, and since Kean and Hamilton failed to do so how can they now credibly claim to know? Obviously, their denial is based on information they received, much later, from the Pentagon.
Kean and Hamilton write that their staff "received all of the Department of Defense documents on Able Danger and had found no mention of Atta." But their claim is not persuasive, since we know that 2.5 terabytes of intelligence data about Able Danger had already been destroyed (in 2000), not to mention the information on Shaffer's hard drive (in 2004). The question for the co-chairs is simple: What assurance could they possibly have that the documents they received from the DoD about Able Danger tell the full story? Obviously, they do not. More to the point, why would Kean and Hamilton believe the Pentagon over the testimony of Lt. Col. Shaffer? By this time the co-chairs already had good reason to suspect that the Pentagon, not Shaffer, had deceived them in the hearings.
Eavesdropping on bin Laden
The fact that Able Danger was shut down in May 2000, long before Bush entered office, raises disturbing questions. Was covert planning for 9/11 already underway during the Clinton administration" It is curious that in 2002 CIA Director George Tenet told a closed session of a joint House-Senate panel investigating the 9/11 "security failure" that al Qaeda's planning of the September 11, 2001 attack started as early as 1998. But how could Tenet know this unless the CIA had been tracking bin Laden, all along? As a matter of fact, we know they were! According to several UPI reports, the National Security Administration (NSA) acknowledged in February 2001 that the use of advanced Echelon software enabled the US intelligence community to eavesdrop on thousands of bin Laden's cell phone calls over a period of years. US officials disclosed that even after bin Laden began to encrypt certain calls in 1995, his "codes were broken."
The date 1998 is doubly curious. That same year Tenet informed the Senate Intelligence Committee that the CIA's strategy to defeat al Qaeda included the recruiting of al Qaeda operatives. In his memoirs Tenet goes even further with an assertion that is remarkable for its candor. He writes: "the [9/11] commission failed to recognize the sustained comprehensive efforts conducted by the intelligence community prior to 9/11 to penetrate the al Qaeda organization." I had to re-read this passage several times just to believe my own eyes. Did the CIA recruit terrorists who were then used as patsies on 9/11?
Bush officials, of course, have steadfastly denied that the US successfully penetrated al Qaeda before 9/11. But their denials are less than persuasive in light of Lt. Col. Shaffer's testimony about Able Danger, and also because there is no doubt: we know that the monitoring of phone calls continued. After al Qaeda bombed two US embassies in East Africa in August 1998, FBI investigators got lucky and stumbled upon an al Qaeda communications hub in Yemen. According to writer Lawrence Wright, this proved to be "one of the most important pieces of evidence the FBI would ever discover, allowing investigators to map the links of the al Qaeda network all across the globe." The hub was a private telephone, anything but high tech. The switchboard operator turned out to be the brother-in-law of Khalid al-Midhar, one of the nineteen alleged hijackers. His job in Yemen was simply to relay messages to-and-from various al Qaeda operatives, including bin Laden.
From phone records US investigators confirmed a flurry of calls through the hub before the embassy bombings, and this pattern was repeated before the attack on the USS Cole in October 2000.[52] Indeed, it is unclear why US intelligence agencies failed to prevent the attack on the Cole because, by this time, they were listening. The al Qaeda hub was allowed to operate right up until September 11, 2001, and even after. Incredibly, US and Yemeni authorities did not finally move in and close it down until 2002.
Based on this evidence, gleaned from open sources in the US media, we must conclude that the US intelligence community was tracking al Qaeda's nearly every move before 9/11, and had been for years, probably including the entry of the alleged hijackers into the US, their "flight training" and subsequent movements. The phone intercepts certainly continued.
In June 2002 both the Miami Herald and the Dallas Star-Telegram reported that in the summer of 2001 the NSA even monitored phone conversations between alleged 9/11 lead hijacker Mohamed Atta and alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM).[54] The papers reported that the NSA "did not recognize the significance of what they had." Evidently, we are supposed to believe that the NSA did not pass along this important intelligence to the CIA. But this is absurd. After all, the NSA is a part of the US Department of Defense and exists for the purpose of providing intelligence to the CIA and the US military. The story in the Miami Herald even acknowledges this, citing an NSA official who stated under condition of anonymity that it was "simply not true" that the NSA failed to share the information with other intelligence agencies. Of course they shared it. Incidentally, a google search failed to locate the full text of either of these articles, which apparently have long since been scrubbed from the internet. To the best of my knowledge they survive in cyberspace only as thumbnails.
What are we to make of all of this? Did elements of the US intelligence community know about al Qaeda's multiple hijacking operation, all along? Did they, then, covertly piggy-back their own planning on top of it, thereby insuring the attack's "success" while also manipulating it for their own ignoble ends? If true, this would easily explain why the Pentagon shut down Able Danger in May 2000. It would explain the Pentagon's gag order imposed upon the Able Danger staffers, which blunted a Congressional inquiry. It would also explain the carefully orchestrated smear campaign aimed at Lt Col. Shaffer, who did his patriotic duty and was made to pay a terrible price. It would explain why the DoD fed phony or incomplete information about Able Danger to co-chairs Kean and Hamilton, and other members of the commission, to persuade them that the data-mining effort was "insignificant." It would also explain why, time and again, during the period before 9/11, the CIA withheld critical information from the FBI, information, which, had it become known, would have enabled the FBI to foil the 9/11 attack. The FBI was always just one or two critical pieces of information short of putting together the plot. Nor has the CIA disconnect ever been adequately explained.[56] The standard excuses, bureaucratic bungling and interagency rivalry, are simply not persuasive.
This interpretation would also explain why George Tenet lied during the 9/11 Commission hearings when he denied his meetings with President Bush in August 2001. Indeed, it might even explain why President-elect G.W. Bush retained Tenet, a Clinton appointee, as his CIA chief. The move was one of Bush's first decisions as president and was most unusual, especially given the neocons' scarcely concealed scorn for the Clinton administration. However, it makes perfect sense, assuming that when Bush took office elements of the CIA and US military were already deeply involved in the covert planning for the 9/11 attack. Continuity at the CIA would have been essential. As far as I know, writer Ian Henshall was the first to make this connection. And let us not forget: during the period before 9/11 the CIA Director visited the White House on a daily basis. Tenet personally briefed Bush on intelligence issues, an unusual chore for a CIA Director. But, again, this becomes understandable, assuming that a major covert operation was in the works, one that entailed extreme compartmentalization. Only a very few individuals at the top would have been fully briefed.
bin Laden in Dubai?
A no less shocking story that appeared in the prestigious French paper Le Figaro on October 11, 2001 points to the same conclusion. The story claimed that bin Laden was actually under the protection of US security agencies prior to the 9/11 attack. According to Le Figaro, bin Laden checked in to the American Hospital in Dubai on July 4, 2001, just two months before 9/11, where he received medical treatment over a ten-day period for a serious kidney ailment.
Dubai is one of the Arab Emirates located in the Persian Gulf. The story cannot be based on just rumor or hearsay because it includes many details: Bin Laden was reportedly accompanied by his personal physician, a nurse, four body guards, and at least one of his lieutenants. It also states that the local CIA station chief, evidently a well known figure in the tiny country, was seen entering bin Laden"s hospital suite during his stay, and immediately after the meeting caught a flight back to the US. If the story is accurate, bin Laden held court from his hospital room, welcoming various members of his extended family, as well as prominent Saudis and Emiratis. It is no secret that bin Laden suffered from kidney disease. Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif had informed the Clinton administration about bin Laden"s deteriorating health as early as 1998, during a state visit to Washington.
A follow-up report in the Guardian (UK) on November 1, 2001 confirmed the above story and added further details, noting that bin Laden's Saudi guests included Prince Turki al Faisal, who was then head of Saudi intelligence. The article in the Guardian names French intelligence as the source of the story in Le Figaro. It also claims the information was leaked because the French were "keen to reveal the ambiguous role of the CIA and to restrain Washington from extending the war to Iraq and elsewhere." Given that bin Laden was already wanted at the time for the US embassy bombings in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam, why did the US not arrange to have local authorities snatch the terrorist in Dubai, in order to bring him to justice? Of course, it goes without saying that bin Laden would never have visited the US hospital in the first place had he not been confident of his protected status. Do we dare to connect these dots? Surely the story in Le Figaro suggests that elements of the US intelligence establishment knew about the coming 9/11 attack and allowed bin Laden to remain free to play his assigned role. As shocking as this sounds, if the story is correct there is no other plausible explanation.
Such a conclusion is further supported by powerful evidence that first came to light on November 6, 2001, when the BBC program Newsnight produced FBI documents on British television proving that soon after G.W. Bush entered office the White House ordered the FBI to "back off" from ongoing investigations of Osama bin Laden and other members of his family, some of whom were living in the US at the time. To the best of my knowledge, none of these stories from European and UK press were ever reported in the US media. Again, why not?
Were elements of the US government and intelligence community complicit in the events of September 11, 2001? Did they allow the attack to happen, or even help to stage it, in order to generate the pretext for a much more aggressive US foreign policy which the American people would not otherwise support? Either way, the implications are shocking, indeed, so shocking that many of our fellow countrymen (and women) cannot bring themselves to think such thoughts. Yet, it is a matter of record that the neoconservatives openly advocated an imperial shift in US foreign policy before the November 2000 election. Moreover, Clinton was already moving in this direction.
These are grave questions for our nation and we must not fail to address them. If there is any truth in them we face a Constitutional crisis unlike anything in our history.
The government, and most of the major media allied with, or operating in fear of
offending, the Bush II Administration, would have the public believe that the facts of by whom
and in what manner the 9-11 attacks were carried out have been investigated, and the 2,993
homicide cases are "closed," but for the hoped-for capture of Osama bin Laden and others of the
"al Qaeda" network who may have aided in the attacks. Literally within just a few hours
following the attacks, government and corporate media sources put forth an "Official Story"
which, with minor patching-up to gloss over revelations that President George W. Bush and
other high government and military officials had many, surprisingly specific warnings of terror
attacks using airplanes as weapons, is essentially as follows. Four planes, American Airlines
3 Formally, the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, hereinafter
referred to as the "Commission."
"The Official Story" was laid out with military precision in the first hours after the attacks but contain ludicrous assertions of "evidence" that literally has fallen from the sky right into the FBI's hands. Yet we are led to believe that our federal government bungled everything prior to 911 on a massive scale. This "bungling" just-so-happens to require a strong, top-down authoritarian, highly secretive federal government. Coincidence? Or highly programmed Mind Control?
Flights 11 and 77, and United Airlines Flights 93 and 175, were hijacked by four teams of Arab
hijackers totaling 19 men. The hijackers were part of a decentralized network of Islamist
militants, whose leader (or one of whose top leaders) is Osama bin Laden, who although
generally acknowledged as a longtime CIA "asset" (at the time that the U.S. Government and the
CIA funneled funds to anti-Soviet militants fighting in Afghanistan) is now depicted as a devout
enemy of America. Bin Laden, and the hijackers, are said to have been motivated by their hatred
for America (in President Bush's words by hatred of "our freedoms" yet these same religious fanatics come to the U.S. and drink heavily and leave their religious books in a Sarasota strip club hours before killing themselves for the "cause") and resentment over U.S. troops remaining stationed in Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries, U.S. support for Israel
and its treatment of the Palestinian Arabs, and perceived American opposition to Islam.
Initially, the "Official Story" claimed that the attacks came "without warning," that "no one could have imagined [them]."
As such claims were resoundingly discredited, the story was revised to assert
that such warnings as were received were too indefinite to allow actions as might have prevented
the attacks from occurring. Yet an Isreali film crew was stationed on a rooftop to film the attack. While all other aircraft were grounded, the family of the alleged "mastermind" to the attacks is allowed to fly out of the country without questioning them. Upon this information, not one American who held on 9-11 a position in the Government, the military, the affected airlines, the airport security systems, or the civilian air traffic control systems has been discharged, or forced to resign his or her job, or court martialled due to failure to do their duty in respect of the attacks. The Official Story, of course, fails even
to consider as within the realm of possibility that high government or military personnel may
have affirmatively desired that the attacks succeed, and for that reason failed to take measures as
might have prevented the attacks or, once the same were in progress, mitigated the loss of life
(such as intercepting the diverted aircraft before the WTC and the Pentagon were struck). That
such persons might have actively participated in planning or sponsoring the attacks, or enabling
the attacks to succeed, is considered so incredible as to be unworthy of refutation by the
proponents of the "Official Story."
We now have a political reality of over 30% of the American people believing the federal government was behind the events of 911. Fully 50% of New York City residents believe this conspiracy to be correct. Top professional organizations involving engineering, political science, social science, constitutional law and psychology are reporting even higher percentages of distrust toward their federal government in regard to 911 events. These are literally among the best and the brightest patriots in the U.S. whose sole motivation is truth.
This is a very good description of what was done to the American people on and after September 11th, 2001. The images of the planes crashing into landmark buildings, and those buildings exploding into powder and shards, created a state of extreme confusion, "a kind of psychological shock or paralysis." The bombs that brought down the Twin Towers and WTC-7 literally exploded the world that was familiar to us, and our images of ourselves in that world. We experienced a moment of dissociation, which is why we can still recall where we were and what we were doing when we learned of the attack. As the psychological warfare experts who designed the operation knew very well, this left us radically open to suggestion--to mass hypnosis. Our old world had been annihilated, and we were ready to be hypnotized, and to have a new world created for us. We desperately needed a parent figure to tell us how to make sense of the madness.
The government, of course, became that transferred parent figure. The presidency, instituted by George "father of his country" Washington, is a paternal institution. Even an illegitimate son-of-a-Bush could briefly become our idealized national daddy. We believed what "they" told us about 9/11, with little or no effort to discern the actual facts, because we had been coerced and infantilized. When Susan Sontag spoke out against the absurd infantilization of the American people post-9/11, she was subjected to vicious attacks by intelligence-asset pseudo-journalists. Why? Not because what she said wasn't true--it obviously was. The reason Sontag had to be ripped to shreds by the CIA rag National Review and its epigones was that she was getting too close to understanding that 9/11 was a psychological warfare operation by US and allied intelligence agencies, not a "terrorist attack" by anti-American foreigners. Sontag understood that the American public had been subjected to induced regression. By calling attention to this fact, she was indirectly calling attention to the psy-op man behind the curtain.
The choice of September 11th as the date of the attacks was obviously made by a psychological warfare expert who wanted to make the American people suffer induced regression and put childlike faith in their government. The number 911 has overwhelming emotional associations in the mind of every American. From early childhood, we are taught that this is the magic number we can call in the event of an emergency. If anything terrible or deeply threatening happens to us, all we have to do is push those three buttons on the nearest telephone, and a benevolent parent figure--the government--will come rushing to help us. With the ongoing breakdown of the family and its authority, and the widespread consciousness of abuse between family members, the number 911 represents the government that has become our real daddy. The planners of 9/11 took advantage of this fact, enshrining their false-flag attack with a number that evokes our desperate, childlike need for the government to be the daddy who comes racing to help us in an emergency. Every time we hear "9/11" we are enveloped in subconscious emotional associations of a benevolent, fatherly government that can be counted on to save us from catastrophe. Unless we have learned how to defend ourselves against coercion, it is these emotional associations, not facts, that condition how we think.
Once our old world had been exploded, our minds regressed to a childlike emotional level, and our faith placed in the transferred parent figure of our government and its paternal figurehead, we were ready to be bombarded by hypnotic words and images. The hypnotic inculcation of thoughts, beliefs, and attitudes is a simple matter. The key is repetition: Repetition, repetition, repetition. In the Alice-in-Wonderland world of the so-called war on terror, "what I tell you three times is true." They tell us over and over that 9/11 was like Pearl Harbor; we accept the paradigm and prepare for a righteous world war. They tell us over and over that Bin Laden did it, and we internalize that belief, without reference to evidence. They tell us over and over that Bin Laden is America's enemy, and we accept the story, even though many of the world's most prestigious journalistic outlets have told us that Bin Laden spent the first two weeks of July, 2001 getting treated at the American Hospital in Dubai and meeting with CIA Station Chief Larry Mitchell. They tell us over and over that the guy in the grainy video confessing to 9/11 is Bin Laden, even though there is very little resemblance between this overweight impostor and the Osama Bin Laden of other photos and videos. They tell us over and over about the 19 suicide hijackers, and we believe them, even when we find out that many of these alleged hijackers are still alive, that these individuals were/are not Muslims at all but intelligence agents, and that the "flight schools" they trained at were actually CIA drug import airstrips.
They tell us over and over that (whore-chasing, boozing cokehead) Mohammad Atta put a bizarre parody of an "Islamic terrorist's last will and testament" into a suitcase and checked that suitcase on board his suicide flight--say what?!--and that the suitcase was mistakenly put onboard a different flight so it could be quickly discovered and offered as "evidence." They tell us that other "suicide hijackers" conveniently left a car full of evidence at the airport. They tell us that a hijacker's passport miraculously floated down from the inferno in the Towers to be discovered as more "evidence." They tell us that the fact that the "hijackers" spent the night of 9/10/2001 in a motel right across the street from the gates of the National Security Agency headquarters is just a weird coincidence. They tell us that a good Samaritan burglar happened to "steal" the briefcase containing the "evidence" of the "hijackers" concocting their plot in Hamburg, Germany, and felt compelled to deliver the briefcase to the German police. (What they don't tell us is that the German police are rolling on the ground laughing at the absurd pretext, and have publicly stated that the "burglar" was an intelligence agent.) They tell us over and over that the World Trade Center collapsed from diesel-fuel-induced fires, despite the fact that no high rise steel frame skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire, including much worse ones than those on 9/11. They tell us over and over that Hani Hanjour, who could not fly a Cessna training aircraft, somehow executed an amazing stunt maneuver in a hijacked 757 in order to hit the empty, newly-reinforced wing of the Pentagon and cause minimal damage--instead of just diving into the roof and killing thousands.
Even more important than the repetition of such ludicrous propositions, has been the bombardment of the public with words and phrases designed to disable rational thought: terror, terrorism, the war on terror, hate our freedoms, hate our values, patriot, patriotic, Patriot Act, evildoers, extremists, security, anthrax, homeland, biological weapons, Islamo-fascist, dirty bombs, weapons of mass destruction. These emotionally-charged terms, drummed incessantly into our brains, reinforce the unconscious emotional predispositions that govern our thoughts. They literally force us to think certain thoughts, and render us literally incapable of even entertaining others. Just as the car salesman's coercive question "How do you take your coffee" literally forces 90% of non-coffee-drinkers to obediently accept a cup of coffee, the psych-war experts' attack of disorientation, regression, and parental transference literally forces 90% of the American public to think patently ludicrous thoughts, adopt those thoughts as a model of reality, and cling to those self-evidently absurd thoughts in the teeth of overwhelming factual evidence.
by J. Michael Springmann
After airplanes flew into the World Trade Towers and the Pentagon, The Los Angeles Times reported that 15 of the 19 alleged hijackers got their U.S. visas from the American Consulate General at Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, a consulate where I had served as chief of the Visa Section. What The Los Angeles Times did not report was what I had told their Washington, D.C. bureau after reading the story: (1) that the Jeddah Consulate was not a State Department post but an intelligence services operation; (2) that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) routinely demanded (and got) visas for sleazy characters with no ties to either their home country or Saudi Arabia; (3) that these vile people were terrorists recruited by U.S. intelligence officers along with Osama bin Laden, then a CIA asset. With the help of non-State Department officials, i.e., Consul General, Jay Philip Freres (retired and living in Clearwater, Fla.), the head of the Political/Economic Section, Eric L. Qualkenbush (retired and living in Findlay, Ohio), the Political Officer, Henry Ensher (currently assigned to D.C. and living in McLean, Va.), a Commercial Officer, Paul Arvid Tveit (retired and also living in McLean, Va.), the Chief of the Consular Section, Justice (given name) Stevens (whereabouts unknown), and a "part-time" Consular officer, Andy Weber (last seen on the PBS program "Bio-Terror"), they were sent to America for training in blowing things up and shooting things down. Afterwards, they were sent on to Afghanistan to murder Soviet soldiers. It seems pretty clear that they and people that they had trained are now pursuing their own goals (and most likely U.S. foreign policy interests) in helping destabilize Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Their next target may be Iran.
9-11 Anomalies 911Research.com
Anomalies of the September 11th Attack, Its Run-Up, and Response
Accepting the official story of the 9/11/01 attack requires one to accept a long series of anomalies -- extremely improbable events, amazing coincidences, and contradictions. This page lists many such anomalies. The Top Anomalies page focuses on the more salient ones. The anomalies described on this page are organized into the following topics:
Run-up to the attack
Hijacking scenario
(Lack of) military response
World Trade Center destruction
Pentagon attack
Death toll
Coincidences in service of incompetence
Government response
Means, motive, and precedent
Run-Up to the Attack
Numerous incidents preceding the attack indicate many people had advance knowledge of the attack.
Put Options
Stock trades bet on the fall in share values for the two airlines whose planes were used in the attack. Put options purchases on United Airlines and American Airlines stock rose to four and 25 times normal levels in the days preceding the attack.
Avoidance of the Airlines, the WTC, and the Pentagon
Government officials and executives avoided the targets of the attack.
Pentagon officials canceled travel plans on September 10th.
San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown received a warning not to fly on September 10th.
Scotland Yard prohibited Salman Rushdie from flying on September 11th.
Two employees of Odigo, the instant messaging service, received e-mail warnings of the attack two hours before the first assault on the WTC.
Business executives, some of whom worked in the WTC, were in Nebraska to attend a meeting at Offutt Air Force Base hosted by billionaire Warren Buffett on the morning of September 11th. The same base would be visited later that day by George W. Bush.
Hijacking Scenario
The attack scenario was irrational on the part of the alleged hijackers, and its execution is incomprehensible in light of their behavior. There is little or no credible evidence that Arab hijackers were involved in the September 11th attack, except in the takeover of Flight 93.
Attack Plan
By flying from remote airports and going far out of their way, the attack planners exposed their plan to almost certain ruin, had the air defense system operated normally. The originating airport for Flights 11 and 175 was Boston Logan instead of any of several airports near New York City. This created about 40 minutes of exposure to interception for each flight.
Flight 77 flew to the Midwest before turning around to return to Washington D.C.. It was airborne an hour and 23 minutes before allegedly attacking the Pentagon. That would provide ample opportunity for interception even if the air defense system were mostly disabled.
Flight 93 flew to the Midwest before turning around to fly toward Washington D.C. Had it reached the capital, it would have been airborne for more than an hour and a half. The odds of escaping interception with that plan would be infinitesimal under standard operating procedures.
Behavior of Villains
The behavior of the alleged hijackers preceding the attack is inconsistent with skill and discipline needed to have a hope of pulling off such an attack. Mohammed Atta allegedly barely caught Flight 11, a key flight in the event that he was supposedly planning for years. The alleged hijackers partied at topless bars and drank alcohol, despite being portrayed as fundamentalist Muslims, for whom such behavior would be surprising, to say the least. Such behavior is typical of CIA however.
Evidence Void
There is no hard evidence that any of the alleged hijackers were on any of the doomed flights, and substantial evidence that some weren't involved. No video of any of the 19 hijackers at any of the three originating airports of the four flights has been made public, except for a video allegedly showing hijackers of Flight 77.
At least six of the alleged hijackers have turned up alive since the attack. None of the four flight crews radioed Air Traffic Control about hijackings in progress. None of the four flight crews punched in the four-digit hijacking code.
No public evidence indicates that the remains of any of the hijackers was identified at any of the crash sites. None of the contents of any of the black boxes have been made public. The only 4-1/2 minutes of the phone call from Flight 11 Attendant Betty Ong made public describes a stabbing but does not provide any details indicating that Arab hijackers were on board. Astoundingly, a passport from one alleged hijacker escapes the wreckage and enormous flames of the towers and falls to the street into the hands of the FBI and is not even damaged.
Phenomenal Success
The success with which hijackers allegedly took over four jets with knives and then piloted the jets to small targets is simply miraculous. None of the four flight crews were able to stop the alleged hijackers, in spite of several of the pilots being Vietnam veterans. None of the alleged hijackers were good pilots, yet the three buildings were hit with phenomenal precision. Top pilots initially reported "miraculous" maneuvers and unheard-of navigation skills were required which was later silenced by the media.
(Lack of) Military Response
Despite normal intercept times of between 10 and 20 minutes for errant domestic flights, the airliners commandeered on 9/11/01 roamed the skies for over an hour without interference.
Failures to Report
According to NORAD's timeline the FAA reported errant airliners after inexplicable delays. The FAA took 18 minutes to report Flight 11's loss of communication and deviation from its flight plan. The FAA took 39 minutes to report Flight 77's deviation from its flight plan.
Failures to Scramble
Interceptors were only scrambled from distant bases after long delays.
Despite the fact that Flights 11 and 175 were headed for New York City, no interceptors were scrambled from nearby La Guardia, or from Langley, Virginia.
Despite NORAD's having received formal notification of the first hijacking at 8:38, no interceptors were scrambled from Andrews to protect the nearby Pentagon until after it was hit at 9:37.
Failures to Intercept
Once in the air, interceptors flew at only small fractions of their top speeds, assuring they would fail to intercept the airliners.
The two F-15s scrambled from Otis AFB to chase Flight 11 flew at an average of 447 mph, about 23.8% of their top speed of 1875 mph.
The two F-16s scrambled from Langley to protect the capital flew at an average of 410.5 mph, about 27.4% of their top speed of 1500 mph.
Failures to Redeploy
Nearby fighters on routine patrol duty were not redeployed to intercept the airliners, nor were fighters that belatedly reached Manhattan sent to defend the capital. Two F-15s flying off the coast of Long Island were not redeployed to Manhattan until after the second tower was hit. The two F-15s scrambled from Otis AFB to protect Manhattan could have reached the capital in 9.6 minutes once they arrived over New York City. That was still 34 minutes before the Pentagon was hit.
World Trade Center Destruction
On 9/11/01 three skyscrapers were totally destroyed, with structural collapse primarily due to fires given as the explanation. Fires and bombings have never before or since caused steel-frame buildings to collapse.
Building 7
Building 7 imploded late on 9/11/01. It was not hit by an aircraft.
Building 7 experienced total collapse, allegedly because of fires, when no steel-frame building before or since has ever collapsed, totally or even partially, due to fires. Building 7 was an over-engineered 47-story steel-frame skyscraper, standing over 350 feet from the nearest of the Twin Towers. Public evidence documents only small fires in it on September 11th.
Building 7 collapsed in a nearly perfectly vertical fall, producing only minor damage in the Verizon and Post Office buildings only 60 feet on either side of it.
Building 7 collapsed into a remarkably small rubble pile of mostly pulverized remains, when no steel building falling for any reason has ever pulverized itself.
Building 7 contained a 15-million-dollar emergency command center, but instead of using it for its ostensible purpose, then-Mayor Giuliani evacuated his team to a makeshift command center as soon as the September 11th attack started. 10 11
The emergency command center was destroyed along with the rest of the building, even though it was constructed as a bomb-hardened shelter.
The remains of Building 7 were rapidly removed and the steel recycled, evidently without any on-site and only extremely limited off-site examination. The rapid disposal operation proceeded despite the fact that no one was believed buried in the rubble, and the tidy rubble pile was not blocking adjacent roads.
Twin Towers
The Twin Towers exploded into dust and shattered steel, a behavior inconsistent with the known behavior of steel structures outside of explosive demolition.
The South Tower was struck 17 minutes after the North Tower, and in a less damaging manner, and it had less severe fires, yet it collapsed 29 minutes before the North Tower.
The South Tower's core structure was largely undamaged by the off-centered jet impact, unlike the North Tower, yet it collapsed sooner.
The South Tower had much less severe fires than the North Tower, and yet collapsed sooner.
Smoke from the fires in the South Tower became progressively darker up to the time it collapsed. Firefighters reached the crash zone of the South Tower and calmly described controllable fires. Both towers started to disintegrate at regions above and below the crash zones in the first seconds of their falls. Both towers fell straight down, through themselves, following the path of maximum resistance, a behavior never before observed in spontaneous collapses of any type of vertical structure.
The collapses of both towers exhibited features never otherwise seen except in controlled demolitions: sudden onset accompanied by thunderous bangs, visible explosions ringing their perimeters, energetic ejections of dust at regular intervals, and copious production of dust.
Both towers exploded outward and were shredded and pulverized -- a pattern of destruction much more destructive than normal controlled demolitions, yet this result was supposedly produced without the added energy of explosives.
Pentagon Attack
The Pentagon attack defies expectations that this prime terrorist target would have been defended, and that a terrorist would have hit the front side in a simple maneuver, rather than the back side in an extreme precision aerobatic maneuver.
Wide-Open Target
The Pentagon -- the heart of the military establishment of the world's greatest super-power -- was hit after ample warning without being protected by any defensive action. The 9:37 strike was well over an hour after the first signs of a hijacking and 34 minutes after the South Tower strike confirmed that an attack was underway.
The Pentagon is within 11 miles of Andrews Air Force Base, which apparently had two combat-ready fighter wings on 9/11/01.
The attack plane was monitored on radar as it approached the capital.
Unlikely Super-pilot
Alleged Flight 77 pilot Hani Hanjour was not up to the task.
The spiral dive approach to the Pentagon was such an extreme maneuver that experienced air traffic controllers thought it was military jet. The tree-top final approach skimmed objects in the yard and crashed the plane into the first floor of the building. Experienced pilots have wondered if any human pilot could have executed the maneuver.
Hani Hanjour was considered incompetent by his flight school instructors, and was denied rental of a single-engine plane.
Evidence Vacuum
Authorities systematically confiscated or destroyed the evidence.
Video recordings from adjacent businesses were seized by the FBI shortly after the attack and have never been seen since. Only two video segments have been released by the Pentagon from all the security cameras that monitor its periphery. Neither clearly shows the attack aircraft.
Investigators were not allowed access to the crash site until well into October.
More Than Just a Crash
Was the crash engineered?
A photographed scrap of aircraft debris that has markings similar to an American Airlines 757 corresponds to the forward portion of the starboard (right) side of the plane, yet the scrap was far to the left of the plane's path. Eyewitnesses reported the smell of cordite.
Several eyewitnesses reported that the jetliner exploded before reaching the facade of the Pentagon. Portions of the facade where the wing ends and tail of a 757 would have collided show no gouging. Were these parts shredded by explosives before they reached the facade?
Death Toll
The death toll of the attack, though horrific, was much lower than it would have been if not for numerous aspects of target selection and timing.
All four flights were unusually empty. Flights 11, 175, 77, and 93 were only at 51%, 31%, 20%, and 16% occupancy, respectively.
World Trade Center
The towers were attacked before most people had arrived, and were hit high enough to allow most people to escape. When Flight 11 hit the North Tower at 8:46 AM, the World Trade Center buildings were at less than half the occupancy of a typical mid-day. The first tower to be attacked was hit just 15 stories below the top, and trapped people mostly between the 95th and 110th floors.
The second tower to be attacked was hit only 30 stories below the top, and the plane missed the core, allowing people to evacuate from above the impact zone. The 17 minutes that elapsed since the first hit allowed many people to escape the second tower while the elevators were still working.
125 people were killed in a building with 20,000 people.
The portion of the Pentagon that was attacked, the West Block, was in the process of being renovated, and so was at low occupancy. No high-level Pentagon officials were killed in the attack.
Coincidences in Service of Incompetence
Many decisions and events in the days and months preceding the attack helped to make the incompetence theory more plausible.
War Games
Several war game exercises were being conducted on 9/11/01.
Operation Northern Vigilance redeployed northeast sector air defense resources to northern Canada and Alaska.
Operations Vigilant Warrior and Vigilant Guardian, which simulated hijackings and involved live radar "injects," may have confused military and civilian personnel monitoring aircraft.
The National Reconnaissance Office, which monitors satellites and airborne objects, was evacuated while the attack unfolded because it was conducting a plane-into-tower crash drill.
The Tripod II biowarfare exercise, scheduled for 9/12/01, resulted in the deployment of FEMA to Manhattan before the attack.
Rules Changes
Procedural changes would limit the ability of pilots and military commanders to respond to hijackings. Military orders stripped commanders in the field of autonomy in responding to hijackings. The FAA banned firearm possession by commercial pilots two months before the attack.
Out to Lunch
Top officials were not available until after the attack was over. President George W. Bush remained at the publicized location of Booker Elementary School until about a half-hour after the news of the attack went on TV worldwide, first reading My Pet Goat to second-graders, and then holding a press conference. Acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff allegedly remained in a meeting with Senator Max Cleland until nearly the time the Pentagon was hit. Brigadier General Montague Winfield had Navy Captain Charles J. Leidig, Jr. -- a rookie -- assume his watch as Deputy Director for Operations for the National Military Command Center (NMCC) at 8:30 am on 9/11/01, and relieved him after the attack was over.
Government Response
Despite the worst failure in history of the military to protect American civilians, and the worst alleged engineering failures in history, there were no consequences for the responsible authorities, and no honest investigations.
Air Defense Failures
No one was held to account for the numerous unprecedented failures in air defense.
General Richard Myers, Acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on September 11th, was confirmed as Chairman on September 13th in spite of being unable to provide any meaningful answers to questions regarding the air defense failures.
General Richard Eberhart, commander of NORAD on September 11th, was promoted to head the newly created NORTHCOM.
NORAD's press release contradicted early statements by high-ranking officials that no interceptors had been scrambled on 9/11/01.
NORAD's vague timeline raises far more questions than it answers, yet officials have never been required to give a full account.
The 9/11 Commission advanced a new timeline which contradicts NORAD's earlier timeline and the testimony of military officials to the commission itself.
Building Collapse Inquiry
The total collapses of WTC 1, 2, and 7 were the three largest engineering failures in history (based on the official story). How were they investigated?
FEMA was given the sole authority to investigate the collapses even though it is not an investigative agency.
The investigative team assembled by FEMA consisted of unpaid volunteers.
The investigators were not allowed access to Ground Zero.
The investigators were not provided with the blueprints of the buildings.
FEMA's report states the causes of the collapse "remain unknown at this time". (By the time the report was released the steel had been entirely disposed of.) The fact that Building 7 (supposedly) failed in a way that contradicts 100 years of engineering experience makes it the largest and least understood structural failure in history.
The 9/11 Commission Report failed to even mention the existence of Building 7.
The 9/11 Commission Report denied the existence of the Twin Towers' core structures.
NIST's report on the collapse of the Twin Towers purports to provide a "probable collapse sequence" for each Tower but truncates its timelines before the collapses even begin.
Means, Motive, and Precedent
The preceding list is far from complete. It does not include consideration of facts pertaining to the means, motive, and precedent for the crime. The official account's blaming one organization, while ignoring others with much more to gain and possessing tools and access better suited to the commission of the crime is arguably a vast anomaly. This subject is addressed by 911Review.com.
Sept. 11, 2001 Timeline
8:53am New York Plane crashes into World Trade Center, according to television reports
8:56 New York Smoke poured out of a gaping hole in the upper floors of the World Trade
Center on Tuesday and there were broadcast reports a plane had struck it.
9:01 New York An aircraft crashed into the upper floors of one of the World Trade Center
towers Tuesday morning, and black smoke poured out of two gaping holes.
9:04 New York Explosion rocks second World Trade Center tower
9:05 New York An aircraft crashed into the upper floors of one of the World Trade Center
towers Tuesday morning. Shortly afterward a second explosion rocked the other tower.
9:09 New York Plane crashes into second World Trade Center tower
9:11 New York An aircraft crashed into the upper floors of one of the WTC towers Tuesday
morning. Shortly afterward a second plane hit the other tower.
9:12 Washington FBI investigating reports of plane hijacking before World Trade Center crashes
9:15 Washington The FBI is investigating reports that two plane crashes at the WTC are the
result of foul play, The AP has learned.
9:18 New York Planes crashed into the upper floors of both WTC towers minutes apart Tuesday
in a horrific scene of explosions and fire that left gaping holes in the 110 story buildings.
9:31 Sarasota, FL Bush calls World Trade Center crashes apparent terrorist attack
9:34 Washington President Bush said Tuesday that two plane crashes into the WTC were
"an apparent terrorist attack on our country."
9:40 Washington First plane to hit World Trade Center was hijacked after takeoff from Boston,
U.S. official says
9:42 Washington One of two planes that crashed into the WTC was hijacked after takeoff from Boston,
a U.S. official said, citing a transmission from the plane.
9:43:07 Washington An aircraft has crashed into the Pentagon, witnesses say
9:43:59 Washington West Wing of White House evacuated amid terrorist threats
9:44 Washington An aircraft crashed near the Pentagon and the West Wing of the White House
was evacuated amid threats of terrorism.
9:47 Washington White House threatened with terrorist attack, source says
9:49 Washington The Federal Aviation Administration has shut down all aircraft takeoffs nationwide
9:50 The White House was evacuated after the Secret Service received credible threat of
a terrorist act against the presidential mansion and residence.
9:53 Washington Aircraft crashed near Pentagon. White House evacuated after bomb threats.
FAA shuts down all air traffic.
10:00 New York Explosion hits another building near World Trade Center
10:07 New York One World Trade Center tower collapses
10:11 New York Two planes crashed into WTC. Bush says "apparent terrorist attack."
Witness saw people falling and jumping from towers.
10:19 Washington State Department evacuated due to a possible explosion.
10:23 Washington Car bomb explodes outside State Department, senior law enforcement officials say
[Note: Officials' version later proved unfounded]
10:29 New York Second World Trade Center tower collapses
10:30 New York In a horrific sequence of events, terrorists crashed planes into the WTC, and explosions
rocked the Pentagon and the State Department, spreading fear through the country.
10:37 Pittsburgh Large plane crashes in western Pennsylvania, officials at
Somerset County airport confirm
10:39 New York Fourth explosion at World Trade Center
10:46 Pittsburgh A large plane, believed to be a 767, crashed north of Somerset County Airport,
near Pittsburgh.
11:15 New York Mayor Giuliani says: "I have a sense it's a horrendous number of lives lost."
11:16 New York Terrorists crashed planes into the WTC. Explosions also rocked the Pentagon.
Mayor Giuliani: "I have a sense it's a horrendous number of lives lost."
11:17 New York Authorities had been trying to evacuate WTC. Expert: "I would name at the top of the
list Osama Bin Laden." Aircraft crashed into Pentagon.
11:19 New York In Pennsylvania, a large plane believed to be a 747 crashed.
Nation's air traffic halted. New York "like a war zone."
11:23 Fort Worth, TX American Airlines says it "lost" two aircraft carrying 156 people
11:33 Pittsburgh United Airlines confirms flight from Newark, NJ, to San Francisco
crashed near Pittsburgh
11:41 Pittsburgh, San Francisco witness account of Pennsylvania crash.
11:52 Washington Federal Reserve reports it is prepared to provide additional money to nation's banking
system as needed following terrorist attacks
12:03 Chicago United Airlines confirms second plane crashing, location not given
12:23 New York High-ranking city police official says the number of people killed or injured
could be in the thousands
12:53 Barksdale AFB Bush says military on high-alert status
16:31 Washington President Bush is returning to the White House, spokesman says
16:54 Washington United States suspects Osama bin Laden in terrorist attacks, two U.S. officials say
20:33 Washington Bush says "thousands of lives were suddenly ended" in terrorist attacks
22:27 New York Mayor says some people alive in Trade Center
Wednesday, Sept. 12
7:19 Washington Powell says U.S. will go after terrorists responsible for assault
9:54 Washington Pentagon says no more survivors expected; 80 bodies retrieved so far
10:00 Washington Offficials say no more survivors expected to be found in Pentagon wreckage
10:52 Washington Bush says terrorist attacks were "acts of war"
10:57 Washington Bush calls attacks, "acts of war." Says he will ask Congress for money for recovery.
12:07 Washington Pentagon evacuating building due to threat of spreading fire
12:16 Washington Pentagon recalls evacuation order
12:18 Washington World's richest countries vow that terrorist attack in United States "will not be compounded
by disruption of global economy."
12:33 Raleigh,NC Midway Airlines suspends all flight operations; 1,700 employees lose jobs immediately
12:49 New York Osama Bin Laden information. More details of the Pentagon damage.
14:23 Washington FAA allows flights diverted Tuesday to resume; others grounded
14:59 Washington White House spokesman says Air Force One and White House were intended targets
in Tuesday attacks
15:16 Brussels, Belgium NATO says terror attacks in U.S. can be considered an attack on the whole alliance
15:52 Washington Attorney General John Ashcroft says government has several leads in terrorist attacks
16:47 New York New York Stock Exchange does not expect to open before Friday, official says
17:02 Washington Government not ready to resume normal air traffic operations
17:31 New York The remaining portion of south World Trade Center tower collapses
Active Child Trafficking in America
The Monarch Worm: CIA Programming now used against American Children
The Programmed Killers that Shape the Nation
One Million U.S. Children will Suffer from Active Sexual Repression Programming
MKULTRA, Monarch Mind Control
Active Population Control Agendas in America
Republican Sexual Repression Cults
Gang Stalking Methods used against Fathers
Republican Dirty Tricks regarding Comprehensive Sex Education
Illegal Sexual Inquisitions now routinely destroy non-Republican families
How Political Bigotry is Programmed into Children
Eugenics and the Republican Elite, Where have the Elite gone?
Social Engineering Agenda: How it works
Corporate Mind Control and Child Trafficking Profits
Republican Sex Cult, Bedford, Pennsylvania
CIA, Big Pharma Drugs designed to Pacify Reason and Critical Thinking
Government Databases on your Family, the Quaker "threat"
CIA implants in Americans
Rape-kitting of Children for effective Mind Control
AIDS as Biological Weapon
Harvard Children targeted for Sex Investigations
The Creation of New "Sub-Humans"
The Real Unabomber, Not so Uni
Controlled Breeding for Politics
How the Child Trafficking Industry Began
Symbols of the New World Order in America
Child Trafficking in America by Top Federal Officials
FBI: Mind Control goes Public
Cathy O'Brien explains Mind Control
Cathy O'Brien Mind Control Victim
Bryce Taylor: Mind Control Victim
The Secret Military of Assassins and Secret Courts
Henry Kissinger on the New World Order
Vote For RobertsCourt.com
at Conspiracy Top Sites
Free TopSite