text:
Timeline of the far future
While the future can never be predicted with absolute certainty,[1] present understanding in various scientific fields allows for the prediction of some far-future events, if only in the broadest outline. These fields include astrophysics, which has revealed how planets and stars form, interact, and die; particle physics, which has revealed how matter behaves at the smallest scales; evolutionary biology, which predicts how life will evolve over time; and plate tectonics, which shows how continents shift over millennia.
All projections of the future of Earth, the Solar System, and the universe must account for the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy, or a loss of the energy available to do work, must rise over time. Stars will eventually exhaust their supply of hydrogen fuel and burn out. Close encounters between astronomical objects gravitationally fling planets from their star systems, and star systems from galaxies.[3]
Physicists expect that matter itself will eventually come under the influence of radioactive decay, as even the most stable materials break apart into subatomic particles.[4] Current data suggest that the universe has a flat geometry (or very close to flat), and thus will not collapse in on itself after a finite time,[5] and the infinite future allows for the occurrence of a number of massively improbable events, such as the formation of Boltzmann brains.[6]
The timelines displayed here cover events from the beginning of the 11th millennium[note 1] to the furthest reaches of future time. A number of alternative future events are listed to account for questions still unresolved, such as whether humans will become extinct, whether protons decay, and whether the Earth survives when the Sun expands to become a red giant.
|Astronomy and astrophysics
|Geology and planetary science
|Particle physics
|Technology and culture
Future of the Earth, the Solar System and the universe
|Years from now
|If a failure of the Wilkes Subglacial Basin "ice plug" in the next few centuries were to endanger the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, it will take up to this long to melt completely. Sea levels would rise 3 to 4 metres.[7] One of the potential long-term effects of global warming, this is separate from the shorter-term threat of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet.
|10,000[note 2]
|The red supergiant star Antares will likely have exploded in a supernova. The explosion is expected to be easily visible in daylight.[8]
|According to the Sahara pump theory, the precession of Earth's poles will move the North African Monsoon far enough north to convert the Sahara back into a tropical climate, as it was 5,000–10,000 years ago.[9][10]
|The northern Martian polar ice cap could recede as Mars reaches a warming peak of the northern hemisphere during the c. 50,000-year perihelion precession aspect of its Milankovitch cycle.[11][12]
|The small red dwarf Ross 248 will pass within 3.024 light-years of Earth, becoming the closest star to the Sun.[13] It will recede after about 8,000 years, making first Alpha Centauri again and then Gliese 445 the nearest stars[13] (see timeline).
|According to Berger and Loutre, the current interglacial period ends,[14] sending the Earth back into a glacial period of the current ice age, regardless of the effects of anthropogenic global warming.
Niagara Falls will have eroded away the remaining 32 km to Lake Erie, and cease to exist.[15]
The many glacial lakes of the Canadian Shield will have been erased by post-glacial rebound and erosion.[16]
|The length of the day used for astronomical timekeeping reaches about 86,401 SI seconds, due to lunar tides decelerating the Earth's rotation. Under the present-day timekeeping system, either a leap second would need to be added to the clock every single day, or else by then, in order to compensate, the length of the day would have had to have been officially lengthened by one SI second.[17]
|The proper motion of stars across the celestial sphere, which is the result of their movement through the Milky Way, renders many of the constellations unrecognisable.[18]
|100,000[note 2]
|The hypergiant star VY Canis Majoris will likely have exploded in a hypernova.[19]
|100,000[note 2]
|Earth will likely have undergone a supervolcanic eruption large enough to erupt 400 km3 (96 cubic miles) of magma. For comparison, Lake Erie is 484 km3 (116 cu mi).[20]
|Native North American earthworms, such as Megascolecidae, will have naturally spread north through the United States Upper Midwest to the Canada–US border, recovering from the Laurentide Ice Sheet glaciation (38°N to 49°N), assuming a migration rate of 10 metres per year.[21] (However, non-native invasive earthworms of North America have already been introduced by humans on a much shorter timescale, causing a shock to the regional ecosystem.)
|As one of the long-term effects of global warming, 10% of anthropogenic carbon dioxide will still remain in a stabilized atmosphere.[22]
|Lōʻihi, the youngest volcano in the Hawaiian–Emperor seamount chain, will rise above the surface of the ocean and become a new volcanic island.[23]
|c. 300,000[note 2]
|At some point in the next "several" hundred thousand years, the Wolf–Rayet star WR 104 is expected to explode in a supernova. It has been suggested that it may produce a gamma-ray burst that could pose a threat to life on Earth should its poles be aligned 12° or lower towards Earth. The star's axis of rotation has yet to be determined with certainty.[24]
|500,000[note 2]
|Earth will likely have been hit by an asteroid of roughly 1 km in diameter, assuming it cannot be averted.[25]
|The rugged terrain of Badlands National Park in South Dakota will have eroded away completely.[26]
|1 million
|Meteor Crater, a large impact crater in Arizona considered the "freshest" of its kind, will have eroded away.[27]
|1 million[note 2]
|Earth will likely have undergone a supervolcanic eruption large enough to erupt 3,200 km3 (770 cubic miles) of magma, an event comparable to the Toba supereruption 75,000 years ago.[20]
|1 million[note 2]
|Highest estimated time until the red supergiant star Betelgeuse explodes in a supernova. The explosion is expected to be easily visible in daylight.[28][29] It may explode in as little as 100,000 years, if particular evolutionary models turn out to be correct.
|1 million[note 2]
|Desdemona and Cressida, moons of Uranus, will likely have collided.[30]
|1.4 million
|The star Gliese 710 will pass as close as 9,000 AU (0.14 light-years to the Sun) before moving away. This will gravitationally perturb members of the Oort cloud, a halo of icy bodies orbiting at the edge of the Solar System, thereafter raising the likelihood of a cometary impact in the inner Solar System.[31]
|2 million
|Estimated time for the recovery of coral reef ecosystems from human-caused ocean acidification; a similar time was taken for the recovery of marine ecosystems after the acidification event that occurred about 65 million years ago.[32]
|2 million+
|The Grand Canyon will erode further, deepening slightly, but principally widening into a broad valley surrounding the Colorado River.[33]
|2.7 million
|Average orbital half-life of current centaurs, that are unstable because of gravitational interaction of the several outer planets.[34] See predictions for notable centaurs.
|10 million
|The widening East African Rift valley is flooded by the Red Sea, causing a new ocean basin to divide the continent of Africa[35] and the African Plate into the newly formed Nubian Plate and the Somali Plate.
|10 million
|Estimated time for full recovery of biodiversity after a potential Holocene extinction, if it were on the scale of the five previous major extinction events.[36]
Even without a mass extinction, by this time most current species will have disappeared through the background extinction rate, with many clades gradually evolving into new forms.[37]
|10 to 1,000 million[note 2]
|Cupid and Belinda, moons of Uranus, will likely have collided.[30]
|25 million
|According to Christopher R. Scotese, the movement of the San Andreas Fault will cause the Gulf of California to flood into the Central Valley. This will form a new inland sea on the West Coast of North America.[38]
|50 million
|Maximum estimated time before the moon Phobos collides with Mars.[39]
|50 million
|According to Christopher R. Scotese, the movement of the San Andreas Fault will cause the current locations of Los Angeles and San Francisco to merge.[38] The Californian coast will begin to be subducted into the Aleutian Trench.[40]
Africa's collision with Eurasia closes the Mediterranean Basin and creates a mountain range similar to the Himalayas.[41]
The Appalachian Mountains peaks will largely erode away,[42] weathering at 5.7 Bubnoff units, although topography will actually rise as regional valleys deepen at twice this rate.[43]
|50–60 million
|The Canadian Rockies will erode away to a plain, assuming a rate of 60 Bubnoff units.[44] The Southern Rockies in the United States are eroding at a somewhat slower rate.[45]
|50–400 million
|Estimated time for Earth to naturally replenish its fossil fuel reserves.[46]
|80 million
|The Big Island will have become the last of the current Hawaiian Islands to sink beneath the surface of the ocean, while a more recently formed chain of "new Hawaiian Islands" will then have emerged in their place.[47]
|100 million[note 2]
|Earth will likely have been hit by an asteroid comparable in size to the one that triggered the K–Pg extinction 66 million years ago, assuming it cannot be averted.[48]
|100 million
|According to the Pangaea Proxima Model created by Christopher R. Scotese, a new subduction zone will open in the Atlantic Ocean and the Americas will begin to converge back toward Africa.[38]
|100 million
|Upper estimate for lifespan of the rings of Saturn in their current state.[49]
|110 million
|The Sun's luminosity has increased by 1%.[50]
|180 million
|Due to the gradual slowing down of Earth's rotation, a day on Earth will be one hour longer than it is today.[51]
|230 million
|Prediction of the orbits of the planets is impossible over greater time spans than this, due to the limitations of Lyapunov time.[52]
|240 million
|From its present position, the Solar System completes one full orbit of the Galactic center.[53]
|250 million
|According to Christopher R. Scotese, due to the northward movement of the West Coast of North America, the coast of California will collide with Alaska.[38]
|250–350 million
|All the continents on Earth may fuse into a supercontinent. Three potential arrangements of this configuration have been dubbed Amasia, Novopangaea, and Pangaea Ultima.[38][54] This will likely result in a glacial period, lowering sea levels and increasing oxygen levels, further lowering global temperatures.[55][56]
|~250 million
|Rapid biological evolution may occur due to the formation of a supercontinent, causing lower temperatures and higher oxygen levels.[57]
|300–600 million
|Estimated time for Venus's mantle temperature to reach its maximum. Then, over a period of about 100 million years, major subduction occurs and the crust is recycled.[58]
|350 million
|According to the extroversion model, first developed by Paul F. Hoffman, the Pacific Ocean will close completely.[59][60][54]
|400–500 million
|The supercontinent (Pangaea Ultima, Novopangaea, or Amasia) will likely have rifted apart.[54] This will likely result in higher global temperatures, similar to the Cretaceous period.[57]
|500 million[note 2]
|Estimated time until a gamma-ray burst, or massive, hyperenergetic supernova, occurs within 6,500 light-years of Earth; close enough for its rays to affect Earth's ozone layer and potentially trigger a mass extinction, assuming the hypothesis is correct that a previous such explosion triggered the Ordovician–Silurian extinction event. However, the supernova would have to be precisely oriented relative to Earth to have any negative effect.[61]
|600 million
|Tidal acceleration moves the Moon far enough from Earth that total solar eclipses are no longer possible.[62]
|600 million
|The Sun's increasing luminosity begins to disrupt the carbonate–silicate cycle; higher luminosity increases weathering of surface rocks, which traps carbon dioxide in the ground as carbonate. As water evaporates from the Earth's surface, rocks harden, causing plate tectonics to slow and eventually stop. Without volcanoes to recycle carbon into the Earth's atmosphere, carbon dioxide levels begin to fall.[63] By this time, carbon dioxide levels will fall to the point at which C3 photosynthesis is no longer possible. All plants that utilize C3 photosynthesis (≈99 percent of present-day species) will die.[64]
|700–800 million[note 2]
|The death of most plant life will result in less oxygen in the atmosphere, allowing for more DNA-damaging ultraviolet radiation to reach the surface. The rising temperatures will increase chemical reactions in the atmosphere, further lowering oxygen levels. Flying animals would be better off because of their ability to travel large distances looking for cooler temperatures.[65] Many animals may be driven to the poles or possibly underground. These creatures would become active during the polar night and hibernate during the polar day due to the intense heat and radiation. Much of the land would become a barren desert, and plants and animals would primarily be found in the oceans.[66]
|800 million
|Carbon dioxide levels fall to the point at which C4 photosynthesis is no longer possible.[64] Without plant life to recycle oxygen in the atmosphere, free oxygen and the ozone layer will disappear from the atmosphere allowing for intense levels of deadly UV light to reach the surface. In the book The Life and Death of Planet Earth, authors Peter D. Ward and Donald Brownlee stated that some animal life may be able to survive in the oceans. Eventually, however, all multicellular life will die out.[67] The only life left on the Earth after this will be single-celled organisms.
|1 billion[note 3]
|27% of the ocean's mass will have been subducted into the mantle. If this were to continue uninterrupted, it would reach an equilibrium where 65% of the surface water would remain at the surface.[68]
|1.1 billion
|The Sun's luminosity has risen by 10%, causing Earth's surface temperatures to reach an average of c. 320 K (47 °C; 116 °F). The atmosphere will become a "moist greenhouse", resulting in a runaway evaporation of the oceans.[63][69] This would cause plate tectonics to stop completely, if not already stopped before this time.[70] Pockets of water may still be present at the poles, allowing abodes for simple life.[71][72]
|1.2 billion
|High estimate until all plant life dies out, assuming some form of photosynthesis is possible despite extremely low carbon dioxide levels. If this is possible, rising temperatures will make a complex biosphere unsustainable from this point on.[73][74][75]
|1.3 billion
|Eukaryotic life dies out on Earth due to carbon dioxide starvation. Only prokaryotes remain.[67]
|1.5–1.6 billion
|The Sun's rising luminosity causes its circumstellar habitable zone to move outwards; as carbon dioxide rises in Mars's atmosphere, its surface temperature rises to levels akin to Earth during the ice age.[67][76]
|1.6 billion
|Lower estimate until all prokaryotic life will go extinct.[67]
|2 billion
|High estimate until the Earth's oceans evaporate if the atmospheric pressure were to decrease via the nitrogen cycle.[77]
|2.3 billion
|The Earth's outer core freezes, if the inner core continues to grow at its current rate of 1 mm (0.039 in) per year.[78][79] Without its liquid outer core, the Earth's magnetic field shuts down,[80] and charged particles emanating from the Sun gradually deplete the atmosphere.[81]
|2.55 billion
|The Sun will have reached a maximum surface temperature of 5,820 K. From then on, it will become gradually cooler while its luminosity will continue to increase.[69]
|2.8 billion
|Earth's surface temperature reaches c. 420 K (147 °C; 296 °F), even at the poles. At this point, all life, now reduced to unicellular colonies in isolated, scattered microenvironments such as high-altitude lakes or caves, will go extinct.[63][82]
|c. 3 billion[note 2]
|There is a roughly 1-in-100,000 chance that the Earth might be ejected into interstellar space by a stellar encounter before this point, and a 1-in-3-million chance that it will then be captured by another star. Were this to happen, life, assuming it survived the interstellar journey, could potentially continue for far longer.[83]
|3 billion
|Median point at which the Moon's rising distance from the Earth lessens its stabilising effect on the Earth's axial tilt. As a consequence, Earth's true polar wander becomes chaotic and extreme, leading to dramatic shifts in the planet's climate due to the changing axial tilt.[84]
|3.3 billion
|1% chance that Jupiter's gravity may make Mercury's orbit so eccentric as to collide with Venus, sending the inner Solar System into chaos. Possible scenarios include Mercury colliding with the Sun, being ejected from the Solar System, or colliding with Earth.[85]
|3.5–4.5 billion
|All water currently present in oceans (if not lost earlier) evaporates. The greenhouse effect caused by the massive, water-rich atmosphere, combined with the Sun's luminosity reaching roughly 35–40% above its present value, will result in Earth's surface temperature rising to 1,400 K (1,130 °C; 2,060 °F), which is hot enough to melt some surface rock.[70][77][86][87] This period in Earth's future is often compared to Venus today, but the temperature is actually around two times the temperature on Venus today, and at this temperature the surface will be partially molten,[88] while Venus probably has a mostly solid surface at present. Venus will also probably drastically heat up at this time as well, most likely being much hotter than Earth will be as it is closer to the Sun.
|3.6 billion
|Neptune's moon Triton falls through the planet's Roche limit, potentially disintegrating into a planetary ring system similar to Saturn's.[89]
|4 billion
|Median point by which the Andromeda Galaxy will have collided with the Milky Way, which will thereafter merge to form a galaxy dubbed "Milkomeda".[90] The planets of the Solar System are expected to be relatively unaffected by this collision.[91][92][93]
|4.5 billion
|Mars reaches the same solar flux the Earth did when it first formed, 4.5 billion years ago from today.[76]
|5.4 billion
|With the hydrogen supply exhausted at its core, the Sun leaves the main sequence and begins to evolve into a red giant.[94]
|6.5 billion
|Mars reaches the same solar radiation flux as Earth today, after which it will suffer a similar fate to the Earth as described above.[76]
|7.5 billion
|Earth and Mars may become tidally locked with the expanding subgiant Sun.[76]
|7.59 billion
|The Earth and Moon are very likely destroyed by falling into the Sun, just before the Sun reaches the tip of its red giant phase and its maximum radius of 256 times the present-day value.[94][note 4] Before the final collision, the Moon possibly spirals below Earth's Roche limit, breaking into a ring of debris, most of which falls to the Earth's surface.[95]
During this era, Saturn's moon Titan may reach surface temperatures necessary to support life.[96]
|7.9 billion
|The Sun reaches the tip of the red-giant branch of the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram, achieving its maximum radius of 256 times the present-day value.[97] In the process, Mercury, Venus, and very likely Earth are destroyed.[94]
|8 billion
|The Sun becomes a carbon-oxygen white dwarf with about 54.05% its present mass.[94][98][99][100] At this point, if somehow the Earth survives, temperatures on the surface of the planet, as well as other remaining planets in the Solar System, will begin dropping rapidly, due to the white dwarf Sun emitting much less energy than it does today.
|22 billion
|The end of the Universe in the Big Rip scenario, assuming a model of dark energy with w = −1.5.[101] If the density of dark energy is less than -1, then the Universe's expansion would continue to accelerate and the Observable Universe would continue to get smaller. Around 200 million years before the rip, galaxy clusters like the Local Group or the Sculptor Group would be destroyed. Sixty million years before the rip, all galaxies will begin to lose stars around their edges and will completely disintegrate in another 40 million years. Three months before the end, all star systems will become gravitationally unbound, and planets will fly off into the rapidly expanding universe. Thirty minutes before the end, planets, stars, asteroids and even extreme objects like neutron stars and black holes will evaporate into atoms. 10−19 seconds before the end, atoms would break apart. Ultimately, once rip reaches the Planck scale, cosmic strings would be disintegrated as well as the fabric of spacetime itself. The universe would enter into a "rip singularity" when all distances become infinitely large. Whereas a "crunch singularity" all matter is infinitely concentrated, in a "rip singularity" all matter is infinitely spread out.[102] However, observations of galaxy cluster speeds by the Chandra X-ray Observatory suggest that the true value of w is c. −0.991, meaning the Big Rip will not occur.[103]
|50 billion
|If the Earth and Moon are not engulfed by the Sun, by this time they will become tidelocked, with each showing only one face to the other.[104][105] Thereafter, the tidal action of the white dwarf Sun will extract angular momentum from the system, causing the lunar orbit to decay and the Earth's spin to accelerate.[106]
|65 billion
|The Moon may end up colliding with the Earth due to the decay of its orbit, assuming the Earth and Moon are not engulfed by the red giant Sun.[107]
|100-150 billion
|The Universe's expansion causes all galaxies beyond the former Milky Way's Local Group to disappear beyond the cosmic light horizon, removing them from the observable universe.[108]
|150 billion
|The universe will have expanded in size by a factor of 10,000 to approximately 1015 (1 quadrillion) light-years in diameter.[109]
Proximate galaxy group M81, currently one of the closest to the Local Group at 11.4 million light-years away and receding at ≈300 km/s, would then be over 100 billion light-years away and receding at more than 6 times the speed of light.[110]
Galaxy GN-z11, currently at 32 billion light-years away the most distant galaxy known, would then be more than 200 trillion light-years away and receding at over 10,000 times the speed of light, assuming convergence of the Hubble parameter from currently ≈70 km/s/Mpc to a future value of 55.4 km/s/Mpc.
|150 billion
|The cosmic microwave background cools from its current temperature of c. 2.7 K to 0.3 K, rendering it essentially undetectable with current technology.[111]
|450 billion
|Median point by which the c. 47 galaxies[112] of the Local Group will coalesce into a single large galaxy.[4]
|785 billion
|If the projected expansion rate of the universe continues with doubling in size occurring approximately every 12 billion years,[109][note 5] the universe will have doubled in size more than 64 times (a factor of more than 1019 ) to more than 1030 (1 nonillion) light-years in diameter. Formerly proximate galaxy group M81 would at that point be more than 1026 (100 septillion) light-years away and receding more than 400 million light-years per second.
The most distant-known galaxy GN-z11 would be more than 1029 light-years away and receding at approximately 1 trillion light-years (more than 10 times the diameter of the currently observable universe) per second, assuming a future Hubble parameter value of 55.4 km/s/Mpc.[note 6]
|800 billion
|Expected time when the net light emission from the combined "Milkomeda" galaxy begins to decline as the red dwarf stars pass through their blue dwarf stage of peak luminosity.[113]
|1012 (1 trillion)
|Low estimate for the time until star formation ends in galaxies as galaxies are depleted of the gas clouds they need to form stars.[4]
The Universe's expansion, assuming a constant dark energy density, multiplies the wavelength of the cosmic microwave background by 1029, exceeding the scale of the cosmic light horizon and rendering its evidence of the Big Bang undetectable. However, it may still be possible to determine the expansion of the universe through the study of hypervelocity stars.[108]
|1011 – 1012 (100 billion – 1 trillion)
|Estimated time until the Universe ends via the Big Crunch, assuming a "closed" model. Depending on how long the expansion phase is, the events in the contraction phase will happen in the reverse order.[114] Galaxy superclusters would first merge, followed by galaxy clusters and then later galaxies. Eventually, stars have become so close together that they will begin to collide with each other. As the Universe continues to contract, the cosmic microwave background temperature will rise above the surface temperature of certain stars, which means that these stars will no longer be able to expel their internal heat, slowly cooking themselves until they explode. It will begin with low-mass red dwarf stars once the CMB reaches 2,400 K (2,130 °C; 3,860 °F) around 500,000 years before the end, followed by K-type, G-type, F-type, A-type, B-type and finally O-type stars around 100,000 years before the Big Crunch. Minutes before the Big Crunch, the temperature will be so great that atomic nuclei will disband and the particles will be sucked up by already coalescing black holes. Finally, all the black holes in the Universe will merge into one singular black hole containing all the matter in the universe, which would then devour the Universe, including itself.[114] After this, it is possible that a new Big Bang would follow and create a new universe. The observed actions of dark energy and the shape of the Universe do not support this scenario. It is thought that the Universe is flat and because of dark energy, the expansion of the universe will accelerate; However, the properties of dark energy are still not known, and thus it is possible that dark energy could reverse sometime in the future.
It is also possible that the Universe is a "closed model", but that the curvature is so small that we can't detect it over the distance of the current observable universe.[115]
|1.25×1012 (1.25 trillion)
|The universe will have doubled in size more than 100 times (a factor of more than 1030) to more than 1041 light-years in diameter. All gravitationally unbound galaxies currently separated by more than 1 megaparsec (Mpc) will at this point be separated by more than 1030 Mpc (≈1036 light-years) and receding from each other more than 100 million times the diameter of the currently observable universe every second.
Distant galaxy GN-z11 or its remnants would at that point also be more than 1041 light-years away and receding more than 1 trillion times the diameter of the currently observable universe every second[note 7] (assuming a continued expansion rate of doubling every 12.2 billion years and future Hubble parameter value of 55.4 km/s/Mpc[109]) . Beyond this point, the universe will expand by a factor of 1024 every trillion years, and it will be increasingly difficult to describe the recession of any gravitationally unbound objects in terms of a familiar physical analogy.
|4×1012 (4 trillion)
|Estimated time until the red dwarf star Proxima Centauri, the closest star to the Sun at a distance of 4.25 light-years, leaves the main sequence and becomes a white dwarf.[116]
|4.2×1012 (4.2 trillion)
|The universe will have expanded by significantly more than a factor of 10100. All gravitationally unbound galaxies currently separated by more than 1 Mpc will at this point be separated by more than ≈10103 Mpc (≈10110 light-years) and receding from each other at more than ≈1083 Gpc/s (≈1092 light-years per second), assuming a continued expansion rate of doubling every 12.2 billion years and future Hubble parameter value of 55.4 km/s/Mpc.[109]
The proper distances between galaxies will be increasing to such an extent[note 8] that the rate at which they are receding from each other is accelerating by more than ≈1065 Gpc/s/s (≈1074 light-years per second per second) due to the expansion of the universe.
|1.2×1013 (12 trillion)
|Estimated time until the red dwarf VB 10, as of 2016 the least massive main sequence star with an estimated mass of 0.075 M☉, runs out of hydrogen in its core and becomes a white dwarf.[117][118]
|3×1013 (30 trillion)
|Estimated time for stars (including the Sun) to undergo a close encounter with another star in local stellar neighborhoods. Whenever two stars (or stellar remnants) pass close to each other, their planets' orbits can be disrupted, potentially ejecting them from the system entirely. On average, the closer a planet's orbit to its parent star the longer it takes to be ejected in this manner, because it is gravitationally more tightly bound to the star.[119]
|1014 (100 trillion)
|High estimate for the time until normal star formation ends in galaxies.[4] This marks the transition from the Stelliferous Era to the Degenerate Era; with no free hydrogen to form new stars, all remaining stars slowly exhaust their fuel and die.[3]
|1.1–1.2×1014 (110–120 trillion)
|Time by which all stars in the universe will have exhausted their fuel (the longest-lived stars, low-mass red dwarfs, have lifespans of roughly 10–20 trillion years).[4] After this point, the stellar-mass objects remaining are stellar remnants (white dwarfs, neutron stars, black holes) and brown dwarfs.
Collisions between brown dwarfs will create new red dwarfs on a marginal level: on average, about 100 stars will be shining in what was once the Milky Way. Collisions between stellar remnants will create occasional supernovae.[4]
|1015 (1 quadrillion)
|Estimated time until stellar close encounters detach all planets in star systems (including the Solar System) from their orbits.[4]
By this point, the Sun will have cooled to five degrees above absolute zero.[120]
|1019 to 1020
(10–100 quintillion)
|Estimated time until 90%–99% of brown dwarfs and stellar remnants (including the Sun) are ejected from galaxies. When two objects pass close enough to each other, they exchange orbital energy, with lower-mass objects tending to gain energy. Through repeated encounters, the lower-mass objects can gain enough energy in this manner to be ejected from their galaxy. This process eventually causes the Milky Way to eject the majority of its brown dwarfs and stellar remnants.[4][121]
|1020 (100 quintillion)
|Estimated time until the Earth collides with the black dwarf Sun due to the decay of its orbit via emission of gravitational radiation,[122] if the Earth is not ejected from its orbit by a stellar encounter or engulfed by the Sun during its red giant phase.[122]
|Estimated time until those stars not ejected from galaxies (1%–10%) fall into their galaxies' central supermassive black holes. By this point, with binary stars having fallen into each other, and planets into their stars, via emission of gravitational radiation, only solitary objects (stellar remnants, brown dwarfs, ejected planetary-mass objects, black holes) will remain in the universe.[4]
|Estimated time for all nucleons in the observable universe to decay, if the hypothesized proton half-life takes its smallest possible value (8.2×1033 years).[123][124][note 9]
|Estimated time for all nucleons in the observable universe to decay, if the hypothesized proton half-life takes the largest possible value, 1041 years,[4] assuming that the Big Bang was inflationary and that the same process that made baryons predominate over anti-baryons in the early Universe makes protons decay.[124][note 9] By this time, if protons do decay, the Black Hole Era, in which black holes are the only remaining celestial objects, begins.[3][4]
|Assuming that protons do not decay, estimated time for rigid objects, from free-floating rocks in space to planets, to rearrange their atoms and molecules via quantum tunneling. On this timescale, any discrete body of matter "behaves like a liquid" and becomes a smooth sphere due to diffusion and gravity.[122]
|Estimated time until a stellar mass black hole with a mass of 3 solar masses decays into subatomic particles by Hawking radiation.[125]
|Estimated time until the supermassive black hole of TON 618, as of 2018 the most massive known with the mass of 66 billion solar masses, dissipates by the emission of Hawking radiation,[125] assuming zero angular momentum (non-rotating black hole).
|Estimated time until a supermassive black hole with a mass of 20 trillion solar masses decays by the Hawking process.[125] This marks the end of the Black Hole Era. Beyond this time, if protons do decay, the Universe enters the Dark Era, in which all physical objects have decayed to subatomic particles, gradually winding down to their final energy state in the heat death of the universe.[3][4]
Also by this time, if the projected expansion rate of the universe continues with doubling in size occurring approximately every 12 billion years,[109] the universe will have expanded in size by a factor of more than [note 10][note 11] If protons do decay, most of the universe would then be almost pure vacuum with each of the currently estimated 1097 subatomic particles being entirely alone within its cosmological event horizon.[note 12] From a probabilistic standpoint, our currently observable universe would be unlikely to then contain even a single subatomic particle.[note 13][note 14]
|2018 estimate of Standard Model lifetime before collapse of a false vacuum; 95% confidence interval is 1058 to 10241 years due in part to uncertainty about the top quark mass.[126]
|Estimated high time for all nucleons in the observable universe to decay, if they do not via the above process, through any one of many different mechanisms allowed in modern particle physics (higher-order baryon non-conservation processes, virtual black holes, sphalerons, etc.) on time scales of 1046 to 10200 years.[3]
|Assuming protons do not decay, the estimated time until all baryonic matter has either fused together to form iron-56 or decayed from a higher mass element into iron-56 (see iron star).[122]
|[note 15][note 16]
|Low estimate for the time until all objects exceeding the Planck mass collapse via quantum tunnelling into black holes, assuming no proton decay or virtual black holes.[122]
On this vast timescale, even ultra-stable iron stars are destroyed by quantum tunnelling events. First iron stars of sufficient mass (somewhere between 0.2 M☉ and the Chandrasekhar limit. Because when iron stars have 0.2 M☉ or less (neutron stars around 0.2 M☉ are stable), these iron stars are energetically favorable enough to prevent collapse via tunnelling[127]) will collapse via tunnelling into neutron stars. Subsequently, neutron stars and any remaining iron stars less than 0.2 M☉ collapse via tunnelling into black holes. The subsequent evaporation of each resulting black hole into sub-atomic particles (a process lasting roughly 10100 years), and subsequent shift to the Dark Era is on these timescales instantaneous.
|[note 2][note 16]
|Estimated time for a Boltzmann brain to appear in the vacuum via a spontaneous entropy decrease.[6]
|[note 16]
|High estimate for the time until all matter collapses into neutron stars or black holes, assuming no proton decay or virtual black holes,[122] which then (on these timescales) instantaneously evaporate into sub-atomic particles.
This is the highest estimate possible time for Black Hole Era (and subsequent Dark Era) to finally commence. Beyond this point, it is almost certain that Universe will not contain any more baryonic matter and the Universe after this time will be near-pure vacuum (possibly accompanied with the presence of a false vacuum), characteristic of Dark Era Universe until it reaches final energy state, assuming it does not happen before this time.
|[note 16]
|High estimate for the time for the universe to reach its final energy state, even in the presence of a false vacuum.[6]
|[note 2][note 16]
|Around this vast timeframe, quantum tunnelling in any isolated patch of the vacuum could generate, via inflation, new Big Bangs giving birth to new universes.[128]
Because the total number of ways in which all the subatomic particles in the observable universe can be combined is ,[129][130] a number which, when multiplied by , disappears into the rounding error, this is also the time required for a quantum-tunnelled and quantum fluctuation-generated Big Bang to produce a new universe identical to our own, assuming that every new universe contained at least the same number of subatomic particles and obeyed laws of physics within the range predicted by string theory.[131]
Future of humanity
|Years from now
|Most probable estimated lifespan of technological civilization, according to Frank Drake's original formulation of the Drake equation.[132]
|If globalization trends lead to panmixia, human genetic variation will no longer be regionalized, as the effective population size will equal the actual population size.[133]
|Humanity has a 95% probability of being extinct by this date, according to Brandon Carter's formulation of the controversial Doomsday argument, which argues that half of the humans who will ever have lived have probably already been born.[134]
|According to the glottochronology linguistic model of Morris Swadesh, future languages should retain just 1 out of 100 "core vocabulary" words on their Swadesh list compared to that of their current progenitors.[135]
|Time required to terraform Mars with an oxygen-rich breathable atmosphere, using only plants with solar efficiency comparable to the biosphere currently found on Earth.[136]
|1 million
|Estimated shortest time by which humanity could colonize our Milky Way galaxy and become capable of harnessing all the energy of the galaxy, assuming a velocity of 10% the speed of light.[137]
|2 million
|Vertebrate species separated for this long will generally undergo allopatric speciation.[138] Evolutionary biologist James W. Valentine predicted that if humanity has been dispersed among genetically isolated space colonies over this time, the galaxy will host an evolutionary radiation of multiple human species with a "diversity of form and adaptation that would astound us".[139] This would be a natural process of isolated populations, unrelated to potential deliberate genetic enhancement technologies.
|7.8 million
|Humanity has a 95% probability of being extinct by this date, according to J. Richard Gott's formulation of the controversial Doomsday argument.[140]
|100 million
|Maximal estimated lifespan of technological civilization, according to Frank Drake's original formulation of the Drake equation.[141]
|1 billion
|Estimated time for an astroengineering project to alter the Earth's orbit, compensating for the Sun's rising brightness and outward migration of the habitable zone, accomplished by repeated asteroid gravity assists.[142][143]
Spacecraft and space exploration
To date five spacecraft (Voyager 1, Voyager 2, Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11 and New Horizons) are on trajectories which will take them out of the Solar System and into interstellar space. Barring an extremely unlikely collision with some object, the craft should persist indefinitely.[144]
|Years from now
|Pioneer 10 passes within 3.8 light-years of Barnard's Star.[145]
|The Arecibo message, a collection of radio data transmitted on 16 November 1974, reaches the distance of its destination, the globular cluster Messier 13.[146] This is the only interstellar radio message sent to such a distant region of the galaxy. There will be a 24-light-year shift in the cluster's position in the galaxy during the time it takes the message to reach it, but as the cluster is 168 light-years in diameter, the message will still reach its destination.[147] Any reply will take at least another 25,000 years from the time of its transmission (assuming faster-than-light communication is impossible).
|Pioneer 10 passes within 3 light-years of Ross 248.[148][149]
|Voyager 1 passes within 1.6 light-years of AC+79 3888, a star in the constellation Camelopardalis also known as Gliese 445.[150]
|The KEO space time capsule, if it is launched, will reenter Earth's atmosphere.[151]
|Voyager 2 passes within 4.3 light-years of Sirius, the brightest star in the night sky.[150]
|800,000–8 million
|Low estimate of Pioneer 10 plaque lifespan, before the etching is destroyed by poorly-understood interstellar erosion processes.[152]
|2 million
|Pioneer 10 passes near the bright star Aldebaran.[153]
|4 million
|Pioneer 11 passes near one of the stars in the constellation Aquila.[153]
|8 million
|The LAGEOS satellites' orbits will decay, and they will re-enter Earth's atmosphere, carrying with them a message to any far future descendants of humanity, and a map of the continents as they are expected to appear then.[154]
|1 billion
|Estimated lifespan of the two Voyager Golden Records, before the information stored on them is rendered unrecoverable.[155]
Technological projects
|Years from now
|Planned lifespan of the Long Now Foundation's several ongoing projects, including a 10,000-year clock known as the Clock of the Long Now, the Rosetta Project, and the Long Bet Project.[156]
Estimated lifespan of the HD-Rosetta analog disc, an ion beam-etched writing medium on nickel plate, a technology developed at Los Alamos National Laboratory and later commercialized. (The Rosetta Project uses this technology, named after the Rosetta Stone).
|Projected lifespan of Norway's Svalbard Global Seed Vault.[157]
|1 million
|Estimated lifespan of Memory of Mankind (MOM) self storage-style repository in Hallstatt salt mine in Austria, which stores information on inscribed tablets of stoneware.[158]
|1 million
|Planned lifespan of the Human Document Project being developed at the University of Twente in the Netherlands.[159]
|1 billion
|Estimated lifespan of "Nanoshuttle memory device" using an iron nanoparticle moved as a molecular switch through a carbon nanotube, a technology developed at the University of California at Berkeley.[160]
|more than 13 billion
|Estimated lifespan of "Superman memory crystal" data storage using femtosecond laser-etched nanostructures in glass, a technology developed at the University of Southampton.[161][162]
Human constructs
|Years from now
|Estimated atmospheric lifetime of tetrafluoromethane, the most durable greenhouse gas.[163]
|1 million
|Current glass objects in the environment will be decomposed.[164]
Various public monuments composed of hard granite will have eroded one metre, in a moderate climate, assuming a rate of 1 Bubnoff unit (1 mm in 1,000 years, or ≈1 inch in 25,000 years).[165]
Without maintenance, the Great Pyramid of Giza will erode into unrecognizability.[166]
On the Moon, Neil Armstrong's "one small step" footprint at Tranquility Base will erode by this time, along with those left by all twelve Apollo moonwalkers, due to the accumulated effects of space weathering.[167][168] (Normal erosion processes active on Earth are not present due to the Moon's almost complete lack of atmosphere.)
|7.2 million
|Without maintenance, Mount Rushmore will erode into unrecognizability.[169]
|100 million
|Future archaeologists should be able to identify an "Urban Stratum" of fossilized great coastal cities, mostly through the remains of underground infrastructure such as building foundations and utility tunnels.[170]
Astronomical events
Extremely rare astronomical events beginning in the 11th millennium AD (year 10,001) will be:
|Date / Years from now
|20 August, AD 10,663
|A simultaneous total solar eclipse and transit of Mercury.[171]
|25 August, AD 11,268
|A simultaneous total solar eclipse and transit of Mercury.[171]
|28 February, AD 11,575
|A simultaneous annular solar eclipse and transit of Mercury.[171]
|17 September, AD 13,425
|A near-simultaneous transit of Venus and Mercury.[171]
|The Earth's axial precession will have made Vega the northern pole star.[172][173][174][175]
|13,000 years
|By this point, halfway through the precessional cycle, Earth's axial tilt will be reversed, causing summer and winter to occur on opposite sides of Earth's orbit. This means that the seasons in the Northern Hemisphere, which experiences more pronounced seasonal variation due to a higher percentage of land, will be even more extreme, as it will be facing towards the Sun at Earth's perihelion and away from the Sun at aphelion.[173]
|5 April, AD 15,232
|A simultaneous total solar eclipse and transit of Venus.[171]
|20 April, AD 15,790
|A simultaneous annular solar eclipse and transit of Mercury.[171]
|14,000–17,000 years
|The Earth's axial precession will make Canopus the South Star, but it will only be within 10° of the south celestial pole.[176]
|Thuban will be the northern pole star.[177]
|Polaris will again be the northern pole star.[178]
|27,000 years
|The eccentricity of Earth's orbit will reach a minimum, 0.00236 (it is now 0.01671).[179][180]
|October, AD 38,172
|A transit of Uranus from Neptune, the rarest of all planetary transits.[181]
|26 July, AD 69,163
|A simultaneous transit of Venus and Mercury.[171]
|Comet Hyakutake returns to the inner Solar System, after traveling in its orbit out to its aphelion 3,410 A.U. from the Sun and back.[182]
|27 and 28 March, AD 224,508
|Respectively, Venus and then Mercury will transit the Sun.[171]
|A simultaneous transit of Venus and the Earth as seen from Mars[171]
|6 million
|Comet C/1999 F1 (Catalina), one of the longest-period comets known, returns to the inner Solar System, after traveling in its orbit out to its aphelion 66,600 A.U. (1.05 light-years) from the Sun and back.[183]
Calendar projections
This assumes that these calendars continue in use, without further adjustments.
|Years from now
|The Gregorian calendar will have drifted by about 10 days in relation to the seasons.[184]
|10 June, AD 12,892
|In the Hebrew calendar, due to a gradual drift in relation to the solar year, Passover will fall on the northern summer solstice (it has historically fallen around the spring equinox).[185]
|The lunar Islamic calendar and the solar Gregorian calendar will share the same year number. After this, the shorter Islamic calendar will slowly overtake the Gregorian.[186]
|The Tabular Islamic calendar will be roughly 10 days out of sync with the Moon's phases.[187]
|1 March, AD 48,901[note 18]
|The Julian calendar (365.25 days) and Gregorian calendar (365.2425 days) will be one year apart.[188]
The Julian day number (a measure used by astronomers) at Greenwich mean midnight (start of day) is 19 581 842.5 for both dates.
Nuclear power
|Years from now
|The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, for nuclear weapons waste, is planned to be protected until this time, with a "Permanent Marker" system designed to warn off visitors through both multiple languages (the six UN languages and Navajo) and through pictograms.[189] The Human Interference Task Force has provided the theoretical basis for United States plans for future nuclear semiotics.
|The Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, the 2,600-square-kilometre (1,000 sq mi) area of Ukraine and Belarus left deserted by the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, will return to normal levels of radiation.[190]
|Estimated supply lifespan of fission-based breeder reactor reserves, using known sources, assuming 2009 world energy consumption.[191]
|Estimated supply lifespan of fission-based light-water reactor reserves if it is possible to extract all the uranium from seawater, assuming 2009 world energy consumption.[191]
|Half-life of technetium-99, the most important long-lived fission product in uranium-derived nuclear waste.
|The estimated minimum time at which the spent plutonium stored at New Mexico's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant will cease to be radiologically lethal to humans.[192]
|15.7 million
|Half-life of iodine-129, the most durable long-lived fission product in uranium-derived nuclear waste.
|60 million
|Estimated supply lifespan of fusion power reserves if it is possible to extract all the lithium from seawater, assuming 1995 world energy consumption.[193]
|5 billion
|Estimated supply lifespan of fission-based breeder reactor reserves if it is possible to extract all the uranium from seawater, assuming 1983 world energy consumption.[194]
|150 billion
|Estimated supply lifespan of fusion power reserves if it is possible to extract all the deuterium from seawater, assuming 1995 world energy consumption.[193]
Graphical timelines
For graphical, logarithmic timelines of these events see:
- Graphical timeline of the universe (to 8 billion years from now)
- Graphical timeline of the Stelliferous Era (to 1020 years from now)
- Graphical timeline from Big Bang to Heat Death (to 101000 years from now)
See also
- Chronology of the universe
- Detailed logarithmic timeline
- Earth's location in the Universe
- Future of Earth
- Future of an expanding universe
- Heat death of the universe
- Human timeline
- Life timeline
- Nature timeline
- Orders of magnitude (time)
- Space and survival
- 10th millennium
- Timeline of cosmological epochs
- Timeline of natural history
- Timeline of the near future
- Ultimate fate of the universe
- The precise cutoff point is 0:00 on 1 January AD 10,001.
- This represents the time by which the event will most probably have happened. It may occur randomly at any time from the present.
- Units are short scale
- This has been a tricky question for quite a while; see the 2001 paper by Rybicki, K. R. and Denis, C. However, according to the latest calculations, this happens with a very high degree of certainty.
- The projected rate of doubling actually derives directly from the value of the Hubble parameter since the recession velocity increases linearly with distance. We can estimate the time in years until an object currently at a distance of 1 Mpc and receding 55.4 km/s/Mpc would be distance Mpc away as log() / log(1 + (55.4 km/s * 86400 s/day * 365.25-day/y)/((3.262*106 ly/Mpc)*(9.461*1012 km/ly))). The value of is essentially the expansion factor, and =2 yields 1.224 * 1010 years.
- Recession velocity computed as (5.9 * 1029 ly) / (3.262 * 106 ly/Mpc) * (55.4 km/s/Mpc) / (9.461 * 1012 km/ly) = 1.06 * 1012 ly/s.
- Recession velocity computed as (2.2 * 1041 ly) / (3.262 * 106 ly/Mpc) * (55.4 km/s/Mpc) / (9.461 * 1012 km/ly)/(9.3 * 1010 ly/observable universe diameter) = 4.2 * 1012 observable universe diameter/s.
- By analogy, if each of the estimated 1080 atoms in the known universe were individually inflated to the size of the currently observable universe (≈1011 light-years) and placed end-to-end, the resulting distance would be "only" ≈1091 light-years. Galaxies would be receding from each other by more than 10 times this distance every second.
- Around 264 half-lives. Tyson et al. employ the computation with a different value for half-life.
- If the universe doubles in size every 12.2 billion years, then by this time the size will have doubled 1.7 × 10106 / 1.22 × 1010 = 1.39 × 1096 times. = . So, the cumulative expansion is actually significantly underestimated here. Moreover, this underestimate still holds even if the published estimated expansion rate is off by more than a factor of 4 and the universe doubles in size only once every 50 billion years.
- The timescale here is already so vast that this same numeric value similarly underestimates the projected expansion of the universe since the dissipation of the most massive black hole known, TON 618, in the preceding entry at 6.036×1099 years. In fact, from this point forward the universe will expand by a factor of between any successive times at years 10106+x and 10106+x+1.
- Some published estimates suggest distance to the cosmological event horizon in a dark energy dominated universe will converge to approximately 15.5 Gly. See excerpt from text by M. Whittle for illustration.
- This follows from a straightforward mathematical estimate of the average particle density of the universe, with = 1097 and ≈ . The exponentially expanded size of the universe completely dominates any other terms in the calculation. Analogous to the note below regarding use of nanoseconds or star lifespans, even if is in error by many orders of magnitude, the digits do not change in the result. The average density could be safely expressed as less than 1 subatomic particle per cubic light-years. While there would of course be no frame of reference to identify "our" observable universe, the odds of any specific comparable volume of ≈1032 cubic light-years containing a particle could similarly be expressed as less than 1 in .
- The (generously) estimated probability of is so close to zero that, if expressed in decimal form, the paper required to print the leading zeros between the decimal point and the 1 would occupy a volume approximately 400,000 times that of the currently known universe (assuming a 12 pt font and paper 0.1 mm thick). Comparable analogies can be made about many of the large numbers cited in this article.
- is 1 followed by 1026 (100 septillion) zeroes
- Although listed in years for convenience, the numbers beyond this point are so vast that their digits would remain unchanged regardless of which conventional units they were listed in, be they nanoseconds or star lifespans.
- is 1 followed by 1050 (100 quindecillion) zeroes
- Manually calculated from the fact that the calendars were 10 days apart in 1582 and grew further apart by 3 days every 400 years. 1 March AD 48900 (Julian) and 1 March AD 48901 (Gregorian) are both Tuesday.
- Rescher, Nicholas (1998). Predicting the future: An introduction to the theory of forecasting. State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0791435533.
- Adams, Fred; Laughlin, Greg (1999). The Five Ages of the Universe. New York: The Free Press. ISBN 978-0684854229.
- Adams, Fred C.; Laughlin, Gregory (1997). "A dying universe: the long-term fate and evolution of astrophysical objects". Reviews of Modern Physics. 69 (2): 337–372. arXiv:astro-ph/9701131. Bibcode:1997RvMP...69..337A. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.69.337.
- Komatsu, E.; Smith, K. M.; Dunkley, J.; et al. (2011). "Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 192 (2): 18. arXiv:1001.4731. Bibcode:2011ApJS..192...19W. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18.
- Linde, Andrei. (2007). "Sinks in the Landscape, Boltzmann Brains and the Cosmological Constant Problem". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2007 (1): 022. arXiv:hep-th/0611043. Bibcode:2007JCAP...01..022L. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.266.8334. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/01/022.
- Mengel, M.; A. Levermann (4 May 2014). "Ice plug prevents irreversible discharge from East Antarctica". Nature Climate Change. 4 (6): 451–455. Bibcode:2014NatCC...4..451M. doi:10.1038/nclimate2226.
- Hockey, T.; Trimble, V. (2010). "Public reaction to a V = −12.5 supernova". The Observatory. 130 (3): 167. Bibcode:2010Obs...130..167H.
- Mowat, Laura (14 July 2017). "Africa's desert to become lush green tropics as monsoons MOVE to Sahara, scientists say". Express.co.uk. Retrieved 23 March 2018.
- "Orbit: Earth's Extraordinary Journey". ExptU. 23 December 2015. Archived from the original on 14 July 2018. Retrieved 23 March 2018.
- Schorghofer, Norbert (23 September 2008). "Temperature response of Mars to Milankovitch cycles" (PDF). Geophysical Research Letters. 35 (18): L18201. Bibcode:2008GeoRL..3518201S. doi:10.1029/2008GL034954. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 September 2009.
- Beech, Martin (2009). Terraforming: The Creating of Habitable Worlds. Springer. pp. 138–142. Bibcode:2009tchw.book.....B.
- Matthews, R. A. J. (Spring 1994). "The Close Approach of Stars in the Solar Neighborhood". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 35 (1): 1. Bibcode:1994QJRAS..35....1M.
- Berger, A & Loutre, MF (2002). "Climate: an exceptionally long interglacial ahead?". Science. 297 (5585): 1287–1288. doi:10.1126/science.1076120. PMID 12193773.
- "Niagara Falls Geology Facts & Figures". Niagara Parks. Archived from the original on 19 July 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2011.
- Bastedo, Jamie (1994). Shield Country: The Life and Times of the Oldest Piece of the Planet. Arctic Institute of North America of the University of Calgary. p. 202.
- Finkleman, David; Allen, Steve; Seago, John; Seaman, Rob; Seidelmann, P. Kenneth (June 2011). "The Future of Time: UTC and the Leap Second". American Scientist, July–August , V N4 P312. 2011 (99). arXiv:1106.3141.
- Tapping, Ken (2005). "The Unfixed Stars". National Research Council Canada. Archived from the original on 8 July 2011. Retrieved 29 December 2010.
- Monnier, J. D.; Tuthill, P.; Lopez, GB; et al. (1999). "The Last Gasps of VY Canis Majoris: Aperture Synthesis and Adaptive Optics Imagery". The Astrophysical Journal. 512 (1): 351–361. arXiv:astro-ph/9810024. Bibcode:1999ApJ...512..351M. doi:10.1086/306761.
- "Super-eruptions: Global effects and future threats". The Geological Society. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
- Schaetzl, Randall J.; Anderson, Sharon (2005). Soils: Genesis and Geomorphology. Cambridge University Press. p. 105.
- David Archer (2009). The Long Thaw: How Humans Are Changing the Next 100,000 Years of Earth's Climate. Princeton University Press. p. 123. ISBN 978-0-691-13654-7.
- "Frequently Asked Questions". Hawai'i Volcanoes National Park. 2011. Retrieved 22 October 2011.
- Tuthill, Peter; Monnier, John; Lawrance, Nicholas; Danchi, William; Owocki, Stan; Gayley, Kenneth (2008). "The Prototype Colliding-Wind Pinwheel WR 104". The Astrophysical Journal. 675 (1): 698–710. arXiv:0712.2111. Bibcode:2008ApJ...675..698T. doi:10.1086/527286.
- Bostrom, Nick (March 2002). "Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards". Journal of Evolution and Technology. 9 (1). Retrieved 10 September 2012.
- "Badlands National Park – Nature & Science – Geologic Formations".
- Landstreet, John D. (2003). Physical Processes in the Solar System: An introduction to the physics of asteroids, comets, moons and planets. Keenan & Darlington. p. 121.
- "Sharpest Views of Betelgeuse Reveal How Supergiant Stars Lose Mass". Press Releases. European Southern Observatory. 29 July 2009. Retrieved 6 September 2010.
- Sessions, Larry (29 July 2009). "Betelgeuse will explode someday". EarthSky Communications, Inc. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
- "Uranus's colliding moons". astronomy.com. 2017. Retrieved 23 September 2017.
- Filip Berski and Piotr A. Dybczyński (25 October 2016). "Gliese 710 will pass the Sun even closer". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 595 (L10): L10. Bibcode:2016A&A...595L..10B. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629835.
- Goldstein, Natalie (2009). Global Warming. Infobase Publishing. p. 53.
The last time acidification on this scale occurred (about 65 mya) it took more than 2 million years for corals and other marine organisms to recover; some scientists today believe, optimistically, that it could take tens of thousands of years for the ocean to regain the chemistry it had in preindustrial times.
- "Grand Canyon – Geology – A dynamic place". Views of the National Parks. National Park Service.
- Horner, J.; Evans, N.W.; Bailey, M. E. (2004). "Simulations of the Population of Centaurs I: The Bulk Statistics". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 354 (3): 798–810. arXiv:astro-ph/0407400. Bibcode:2004MNRAS.354..798H. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08240.x.
- Haddok, Eitan (29 September 2008). "Birth of an Ocean: The Evolution of Ethiopia's Afar Depression". Scientific American. Retrieved 27 December 2010.
- Kirchner, James W.; Weil, Anne (9 March 2000). "Delayed biological recovery from extinctions throughout the fossil record". Nature. 404 (6774): 177–180. Bibcode:2000Natur.404..177K. doi:10.1038/35004564. PMID 10724168.
- Wilson, Edward O. (1999). The Diversity of Life. W.W. Norton & Company. p. 216.
- Scotese, Christopher R. "Pangea Ultima will form 250 million years in the Future". Paleomap Project. Retrieved 13 March 2006.
- Bills, Bruce G.; Gregory A. Neumann; David E. Smith; Maria T. Zuber (2005). "Improved estimate of tidal dissipation within Mars from MOLA observations of the shadow of Phobos" (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research. 110 (E07004): E07004. Bibcode:2005JGRE..110.7004B. doi:10.1029/2004je002376. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 May 2017. Retrieved 16 September 2015.
- Garrison, Tom (2009). Essentials of Oceanography (5 ed.). Brooks/Cole. p. 62.
- "Continents in Collision: Pangea Ultima". NASA. 2000. Retrieved 29 December 2010.
- "Geology". Encyclopedia of Appalachia. University of Tennessee Press. 2011. Archived from the original on 21 May 2014. Retrieved 21 May 2014.
- Hancock, Gregory; Kirwan, Matthew (January 2007). "Summit erosion rates deduced from 10Be: Implications for relief production in the central Appalachians" (PDF). Geology. 35 (1): 89. Bibcode:2007Geo....35...89H. doi:10.1130/g23147a.1.
- Yorath, C. J. (1995). Of rocks, mountains and Jasper: a visitor's guide to the geology of Jasper National Park. Dundurn Press. p. 30.
- Dethier, David P.; Ouimet, W.; Bierman, P. R.; Rood, D. H.; et al. (2014). "Basins and bedrock: Spatial variation in 10Be erosion rates and increasing relief in the southern Rocky Mountains, USA" (PDF). Geology. 42 (2): 167–170. Bibcode:2014Geo....42..167D. doi:10.1130/G34922.1.
- Patzek, Tad W. (2008). "Can the Earth Deliver the Biomass-for-Fuel we Demand?". In Pimentel, David (ed.). Biofuels, Solar and Wind as Renewable Energy Systems: Benefits and Risks. Springer.
- Perlman, David (14 October 2006). "Kiss that Hawaiian timeshare goodbye / Islands will sink in 80 million years". San Francisco Chronicle.
- Nelson, Stephen A. "Meteorites, Impacts, and Mass Extinction". Tulane University. Retrieved 13 January 2011.
- Lang, Kenneth R. (2003). The Cambridge Guide to the Solar System. Cambridge University Press. pp. 328–329.
- Schröder, K.-P.; Connon Smith, Robert (2008). "Distant future of the Sun and Earth revisited". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 386 (1): 155–63. arXiv:0801.4031. Bibcode:2008MNRAS.386..155S. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13022.x.
- Jillian Scudder. "How Long Until The Moon Slows The Earth to a 25 Hour Day?". Forbes. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
- Hayes, Wayne B. (2007). "Is the Outer Solar System Chaotic?". Nature Physics. 3 (10): 689–691. arXiv:astro-ph/0702179. Bibcode:2007NatPh...3..689H. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.337.7948. doi:10.1038/nphys728.
- Leong, Stacy (2002). "Period of the Sun's Orbit Around the Galaxy (Cosmic Year)". The Physics Factbook. Retrieved 2 April 2007.
- Williams, Caroline; Nield, Ted (20 October 2007). "Pangaea, the comeback". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 13 April 2008. Retrieved 2 January 2014.
- Calkin and Young in 1996 on pages 9–75
- Thompson and Perry in 1997 on pages127–28
- Thompson and Perry in 1997 on pages 127–28
- Strom, Robert G.; Schaber, Gerald G.; Dawson, Douglas D. (25 May 1994). "The global resurfacing of Venus". Journal of Geophysical Research. 99 (E5): 10899–10926. Bibcode:1994JGR....9910899S. doi:10.1029/94JE00388.
- Nield in 2007 on pages 20–21
- Hoffman in 1992 on pages 323–27
- Minard, Anne (2009). "Gamma-Ray Burst Caused Mass Extinction?". National Geographic News. Retrieved 27 August 2012.
- "Questions Frequently Asked by the Public About Eclipses". NASA. Archived from the original on 12 March 2010. Retrieved 7 March 2010.
- O'Malley-James, Jack T.; Greaves, Jane S.; Raven, John A.; Cockell, Charles S. (2012). "Swansong Biospheres: Refuges for life and novel microbial biospheres on terrestrial planets near the end of their habitable lifetimes". International Journal of Astrobiology. 12 (2): 99–112. arXiv:1210.5721. Bibcode:2013IJAsB..12...99O. doi:10.1017/S147355041200047X.
- Heath, Martin J.; Doyle, Laurance R. (2009). "Circumstellar Habitable Zones to Ecodynamic Domains: A Preliminary Review and Suggested Future Directions". arXiv:0912.2482 [astro-ph.EP].
- Ward & Brownlee in 2003 on pages 117-28
- Ward & Brownlee in 2003 on pages 117–28
- Franck, S.; Bounama, C.; Von Bloh, W. (November 2005). "Causes and timing of future biosphere extinction" (PDF). Biogeosciences Discussions. 2 (6): 1665–1679. Bibcode:2005BGD.....2.1665F. doi:10.5194/bgd-2-1665-2005.
- Bounama, Christine; Franck, S.; Von Bloh, W. (2001). "The fate of Earth's ocean". Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 5 (4): 569–575. Bibcode:2001HESS....5..569B. doi:10.5194/hess-5-569-2001.
- Schröder, K.-P.; Connon Smith, Robert (1 May 2008). "Distant future of the Sun and Earth revisited". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 386 (1): 155–163. arXiv:0801.4031. Bibcode:2008MNRAS.386..155S. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13022.x.
- Brownlee 2010, p. 95.
- Brownlee, Donald E. (2010). "Planetary habitability on astronomical time scales". In Schrijver, Carolus J.; Siscoe, George L. (eds.). Heliophysics: Evolving Solar Activity and the Climates of Space and Earth. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521112949.
- Li King-Fai; Pahlevan, Kaveh; Kirschvink, Joseph L.; Yung, Luk L. (2009). "Atmospheric pressure as a natural climate regulator for a terrestrial planet with a biosphere". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (24): 9576–9579. Bibcode:2009PNAS..106.9576L. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809436106. PMC 2701016. PMID 19487662.
- Caldeira, Ken; Kasting, James F (1992). "The life span of the biosphere revisited". Nature. 360 (6406): 721–23. Bibcode:1992Natur.360..721C. doi:10.1038/360721a0. PMID 11536510.
- Franck, S. (2000). "Reduction of biosphere life span as a consequence of geodynamics". Tellus B. 52 (1): 94–107. Bibcode:2000TellB..52...94F. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0889.2000.00898.x.
- Timothy M, von Bloh; Werner (2001). "Biotic feedback extends the life span of the biosphere". Geophysical Research LettersLenton. 28 (9): 1715–18. Bibcode:2001GeoRL..28.1715L. doi:10.1029/2000GL012198.
- Kargel, Jeffrey Stuart (2004). Mars: A Warmer, Wetter Planet. Springer. p. 509. ISBN 978-1852335687. Retrieved 29 October 2007.
- Li, King-Fai; Pahlevan, Kaveh; Kirschvink, Joseph L.; Yung, Yuk L. (16 June 2009). "Atmospheric pressure as a natural climate regulator for a terrestrial planet with a biosphere". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (24): 9576–9579. Bibcode:2009PNAS..106.9576L. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809436106. PMC 2701016. PMID 19487662.
- Waszek, Lauren; Irving, Jessica; Deuss, Arwen (20 February 2011). "Reconciling the Hemispherical Structure of Earth's Inner Core With its Super-Rotation". Nature Geoscience. 4 (4): 264–267. Bibcode:2011NatGe...4..264W. doi:10.1038/ngeo1083.
- McDonough, W. F. (2004). Compositional Model for the Earth's Core. Treatise on Geochemistry. 2. pp. 547–568. Bibcode:2003TrGeo...2..547M. doi:10.1016/B0-08-043751-6/02015-6. ISBN 978-0080437514.
- Luhmann, J. G.; Johnson, R. E.; Zhang, M. H. G. (1992). "Evolutionary impact of sputtering of the Martian atmosphere by O+ pickup ions". Geophysical Research Letters. 19 (21): 2151–2154. Bibcode:1992GeoRL..19.2151L. doi:10.1029/92GL02485.
- Quirin Shlermeler (3 March 2005). "Solar wind hammers the ozone layer". News@nature. doi:10.1038/news050228-12.
- Adams, Fred C. (2008). "Long-term astrophysicial processes". In Bostrom, Nick; Cirkovic, Milan M. (eds.). Global Catastrophic Risks. Oxford University Press. pp. 33–47.
- Adams 2008, pp. 33–44.
- Neron de Surgey, O.; Laskar, J. (1996). "On the Long Term Evolution of the Spin of the Earth". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 318: 975. Bibcode:1997A&A...318..975N.
- "Study: Earth May Collide With Another Planet". Fox News. 11 June 2009. Archived from the original on 4 November 2012. Retrieved 8 September 2011.
- Guinan, E. F.; Ribas, I. (2002). Montesinos, Benjamin; Gimenez, Alvaro; Guinan, Edward F. (eds.). "Our Changing Sun: The Role of Solar Nuclear Evolution and Magnetic Activity on Earth's Atmosphere and Climate". ASP Conference Proceedings. 269: 85–106. Bibcode:2002ASPC..269...85G.
- Kasting, J. F. (June 1988). "Runaway and moist greenhouse atmospheres and the evolution of earth and Venus". Icarus. 74 (3): 472–494. Bibcode:1988Icar...74..472K. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(88)90116-9. PMID 11538226.
- Hecht, Jeff (2 April 1994). "Science: Fiery Future for Planet Earth". New Scientist (1919). p. 14. Retrieved 29 October 2007.
- Chyba, C. F.; Jankowski, D. G.; Nicholson, P. D. (1989). "Tidal Evolution in the Neptune-Triton System". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 219 (1–2): 23. Bibcode:1989A&A...219L..23C.
- Cox, J. T.; Loeb, Abraham (2007). "The Collision Between The Milky Way And Andromeda". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 386 (1): 461–474. arXiv:0705.1170. Bibcode:2008MNRAS.386..461C. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13048.x.
- NASA (31 May 2012). "NASA's Hubble Shows Milky Way is Destined for Head-On Collision". NASA. Retrieved 13 October 2012.
- Dowd, Maureen (29 May 2012). "Andromeda Is Coming!". The New York Times. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
[NASA's David Morrison] explained that the Andromeda-Milky Way collision would just be two great big fuzzy balls of stars and mostly empty space passing through each other harmlessly over the course of millions of years.
- Braine, J.; Lisenfeld, U.; Duc, P. A.; et al. (2004). "Colliding molecular clouds in head-on galaxy collisions". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 418 (2): 419–428. arXiv:astro-ph/0402148. Bibcode:2004A&A...418..419B. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20035732.
- Schroder, K. P.; Connon Smith, Robert (2008). "Distant Future of the Sun and Earth Revisited". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 386 (1): 155–163. arXiv:0801.4031. Bibcode:2008MNRAS.386..155S. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13022.x.
- Powell, David (22 January 2007). "Earth's Moon Destined to Disintegrate". Space.com. Tech Media Network. Retrieved 1 June 2010.
- Lorenz, Ralph D.; Lunine, Jonathan I.; McKay, Christopher P. (1997). "Titan under a red giant sun: A new kind of "habitable" moon" (PDF). Geophysical Research Letters. 24 (22): 2905–2908. Bibcode:1997GeoRL..24.2905L. doi:10.1029/97GL52843. PMID 11542268. Retrieved 21 March 2008.
- Rybicki, K. R.; Denis, C. (2001). "On the Final Destiny of the Earth and the Solar System". Icarus. 151 (1): 130–137. Bibcode:2001Icar..151..130R. doi:10.1006/icar.2001.6591.
- Balick, Bruce. "Planetary Nebulae and the Future of the Solar System". University of Washington. Archived from the original on 19 December 2008. Retrieved 23 June 2006.
- Kalirai, Jasonjot S.; et al. (March 2008). "The Initial-Final Mass Relation: Direct Constraints at the Low-Mass End". The Astrophysical Journal. 676 (1): 594–609. arXiv:0706.3894. Bibcode:2008ApJ...676..594K. doi:10.1086/527028.
- Based upon the weighted least-squares best fit on p. 16 of Kalirai et al. with the initial mass equal to a solar mass.
- "Universe May End in a Big Rip". CERN Courier. 1 May 2003. Retrieved 22 July 2011.
- Caldwell, Robert R.; Kamionkowski, Marc; Weinberg, Nevin N. (2003). "Phantom Energy and Cosmic Doomsday". Physical Review Letters. 91 (7): 071301. arXiv:astro-ph/0302506. Bibcode:2003PhRvL..91g1301C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.071301. PMID 12935004.
- Vikhlinin, A.; Kravtsov, A.V.; Burenin, R.A.; et al. (2009). "Chandra Cluster Cosmology Project III: Cosmological Parameter Constraints". The Astrophysical Journal. 692 (2): 1060–1074. arXiv:0812.2720. Bibcode:2009ApJ...692.1060V. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/692/2/1060.
- Murray, C.D. & Dermott, S.F. (1999). Solar System Dynamics. Cambridge University Press. p. 184. ISBN 978-0-521-57295-8.
- Dickinson, Terence (1993). From the Big Bang to Planet X. Camden East, Ontario: Camden House. pp. 79–81. ISBN 978-0-921820-71-0.
- Canup, Robin M.; Righter, Kevin (2000). Origin of the Earth and Moon. The University of Arizona space science series. 30. University of Arizona Press. pp. 176–177. ISBN 978-0-8165-2073-2.
- Bruce Dorminey (31 January 2017). "Earth and Moon May Be on Long-Term Collision Course". Forbes. Retrieved 11 February 2017.
- Loeb, Abraham (2011). "Cosmology with Hypervelocity Stars". Harvard University. 2011 (4): 023. arXiv:1102.0007. Bibcode:2011JCAP...04..023L. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/04/023.
- Siegel, Ethan. "Ask Ethan: How Big Will The Universe Get?". Forbes. Retrieved 2 March 2019.
- "Frequently Asked Questions in Cosmology – Can objects move away from us faster than the speed of light?". www.astro.ucla.edu. Retrieved 17 March 2019.
- Chown, Marcus (1996). Afterglow of Creation. University Science Books. p. 210.
- "The Local Group of Galaxies". University of Arizona. Students for the Exploration and Development of Space. Retrieved 2 October 2009.
- Adams, F. C.; Graves, G. J. M.; Laughlin, G. (December 2004). García-Segura, G.; Tenorio-Tagle, G.; Franco, J.; Yorke, H. W. (eds.). "Gravitational Collapse: From Massive Stars to Planets. / First Astrophysics meeting of the Observatorio Astronomico Nacional. / A meeting to celebrate Peter Bodenheimer for his outstanding contributions to Astrophysics: Red Dwarfs and the End of the Main Sequence". Revista Mexicana de Astronomía y Astrofísica (Serie de Conferencias). 22: 46–49. Bibcode:2004RMxAC..22...46A. See Fig. 3.
- Davies, Paul (1997). The Last Three Minutes: Conjectures About The Ultimate Fate of the Universe. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-03851-0.
- Fraser Cain (17 October 2013). "How Will The Universe End?". Retrieved 13 June 2016.
- Fred C. Adams; Gregory Laughlin; Genevieve J. M. Graves (2004). "RED Dwarfs and the End of The Main Sequence" (PDF). Revista Mexicana de Astronomía y Astrofísica, Serie de Conferencias. 22: 46–49.
- "Why the Smallest Stars Stay Small". Sky & Telescope (22). November 1997.
- Adams, F. C.; P. Bodenheimer; G. Laughlin (2005). "M dwarfs: planet formation and long term evolution". Astronomische Nachrichten. 326 (10): 913–919. Bibcode:2005AN....326..913A. doi:10.1002/asna.200510440.
- Tayler, Roger John (1993). Galaxies, Structure and Evolution (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 92. ISBN 978-0521367103.
- Barrow, John D.; Tipler, Frank J. (19 May 1988). The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. foreword by John A. Wheeler. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0192821478. LC 87-28148.
- Adams, Fred; Laughlin, Greg (1999). The Five Ages of the Universe. New York: The Free Press. pp. 85–87. ISBN 978-0684854229.
- Dyson, Freeman J. (1979). "Time Without End: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe". Reviews of Modern Physics. 51 (3): 447–460. Bibcode:1979RvMP...51..447D. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.51.447. Retrieved 5 July 2008.
Nishino, Super-K Collaboration, et al. (2009). "Search for Proton Decay via
in a Large Water Cherenkov Detector". Physical Review Letters. 102 (14): 141801. arXiv:0903.0676. Bibcode:2009PhRvL.102n1801N. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.141801. PMID 19392425.
- Tyson, Neil de Grasse; Tsun-Chu Liu, Charles; Irion, Robert (2000). One Universe: At Home in the Cosmos. Joseph Henry Press. ISBN 978-0309064880.
- Page, Don N. (1976). "Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole: Massless Particles from an Uncharged, Nonrotating Hole". Physical Review D. 13 (2): 198–206. Bibcode:1976PhRvD..13..198P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.198. See in particular equation (27).
- Andreassen, Anders; Frost, William; Schwartz, Matthew D. (12 March 2018). "Scale-invariant instantons and the complete lifetime of the standard model". Physical Review D. 97 (5): 056006. arXiv:1707.08124. Bibcode:2018PhRvD..97e6006A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.056006.
- K. Sumiyoshi, S. Yamada, H. Suzuki, W. Hillebrandt (21 July 1997). "The fate of a neutron star just below the minimum mass: does it explode?". arXiv:astro-ph/9707230.
Given this assumption... the minimum possible mass of a neutron star is 0.189CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
- Carroll, Sean M.; Chen, Jennifer (27 October 2004). "Spontaneous Inflation and the Origin of the Arrow of Time". arXiv:hep-th/0410270.
- Tegmark, M (May 2003). "Parallel universes. Not just a staple of science fiction, other universes are a direct implication of cosmological observations". Sci. Am. 288 (5): 40–51. arXiv:astro-ph/0302131. Bibcode:2003SciAm.288e..40T. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0503-40. PMID 12701329.
- Max Tegmark (2003). "Parallel Universes". In "Science and Ultimate Reality: From Quantum to Cosmos", Honoring John Wheeler's 90th Birthday. J. D. Barrow, P.C.W. Davies, & C.L. Harper Eds. 288 (5): 40–51. arXiv:astro-ph/0302131. Bibcode:2003SciAm.288e..40T. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0503-40. PMID 12701329.
- M. Douglas, "The statistics of string / M theory vacua", JHEP 0305, 46 (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0303194; S. Ashok and M. Douglas, "Counting flux vacua", JHEP 0401, 060 (2004).
- Smith, Cameron; Davies, Evan T. (2012). Emigrating Beyond Earth: Human Adaptation and Space Colonization. Springer. p. 258.
- Klein, Jan; Takahata, Naoyuki (2002). Where Do We Come From?: The Molecular Evidence for Human Descent. Springer. p. 395.
- Carter, Brandon; McCrea, W. H. (1983). "The anthropic principle and its implications for biological evolution". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. A310 (1512): 347–363. Bibcode:1983RSPTA.310..347C. doi:10.1098/rsta.1983.0096.
- Greenberg, Joseph (1987). Language in the Americas. Stanford University Press. pp. 341–342.
- McKay, Christopher P.; Toon, Owen B.; Kasting, James F. (8 August 1991). "Making Mars habitable". Nature. 352 (6335): 489–496. Bibcode:1991Natur.352..489M. doi:10.1038/352489a0. PMID 11538095.
- Kaku, Michio (2010). "The Physics of Interstellar Travel: To one day, reach the stars". mkaku.org. Retrieved 29 August 2010.
- Avise, John; D. Walker; G. C. Johns (22 September 1998). "Speciation durations and Pleistocene effects on vertebrate phylogeography". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 265 (1407): 1707–1712. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0492. PMC 1689361. PMID 9787467.
- Valentine, James W. (1985). "The Origins of Evolutionary Novelty And Galactic Colonization". In Finney, Ben R.; Jones, Eric M. (eds.). Interstellar Migration and the Human Experience. University of California Press. p. 274.
- J. Richard Gott, III (1993). "Implications of the Copernican principle for our future prospects". Nature. 363 (6427): 315–319. Bibcode:1993Natur.363..315G. doi:10.1038/363315a0.
- Bignami, Giovanni F.; Sommariva, Andrea (2013). A Scenario for Interstellar Exploration and Its Financing. Springer. p. 23. Bibcode:2013sief.book.....B.
- Korycansky, D. G.; Laughlin, Gregory; Adams, Fred C. (2001). "Astronomical engineering: a strategy for modifying planetary orbits". Astrophysics and Space Science. 275 (4): 349–366. arXiv:astro-ph/0102126. Bibcode:2001Ap&SS.275..349K. doi:10.1023/A:1002790227314. hdl:2027.42/41972. Astrophys.Space Sci.275:349-366,2001.
- Korycansky, D. G. (2004). "Astroengineering, or how to save the Earth in only one billion years" (PDF). Revista Mexicana de Astronomía y Astrofísica. 22: 117–120. Bibcode:2004RMxAC..22..117K.
- "Hurtling Through the Void". Time. 20 June 1983. Retrieved 5 September 2011.
- Glancey, Jonathan (1 October 2015). Concorde: The Rise and Fall of the Supersonic Airliner. Atlantic Books, Limited. ISBN 978-1-78239-108-1.
- "Cornell News: "It's the 25th Anniversary of Earth's First (and only) Attempt to Phone E.T."". Cornell University. 12 November 1999. Archived from the original on 2 August 2008. Retrieved 29 March 2008.
- Dave Deamer. "In regard to the email from". Science 2.0. Retrieved 14 November 2014.
- "Pioneer 10 Spacecraft Nears 25TH Anniversary, End of Mission". nasa.gov. Retrieved 22 December 2013.
- "Space Flight 2003 – United States Space Activities". nasa.gov. Retrieved 22 December 2013.
- "Voyager: The Interstellar Mission". NASA. Retrieved 5 September 2011.
- "KEO FAQ". keo.org. Retrieved 14 October 2011.
- Lasher, Lawrence. "Pioneer Mission Status". NASA. Archived from the original on 8 April 2000.
[Pioneer's speed is] about 12 km/s... [the plate etching] should survive recognizable at least to a distance ≈10 parsecs, and most probably to 100 parsecs.
- "The Pioneer Missions". NASA. Retrieved 5 September 2011.
- "LAGEOS 1, 2". NASA. Retrieved 21 July 2012.
- Jad Abumrad and Robert Krulwich (12 February 2010). Carl Sagan And Ann Druyan's Ultimate Mix Tape (Radio). National Public Radio.
- "The Long Now Foundation". The Long Now Foundation. 2011. Retrieved 21 September 2011.
- "A Visit to the Doomsday Vault". CBS News. 20 March 2008.
- "Memory of Mankind". Retrieved 4 March 2019.
- "Human Document Project 2014".
- Begtrup, G. E.; Gannett, W.; Yuzvinsky, T. D.; Crespi, V. H.; et al. (13 May 2009). "Nanoscale Reversible Mass Transport for Archival Memory" (PDF). Nano Letters. 9 (5): 1835–1838. Bibcode:2009NanoL...9.1835B. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.534.8855. doi:10.1021/nl803800c. PMID 19400579. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 June 2010.
- Zhang, J.; Gecevičius, M.; Beresna, M.; Kazansky, P. G. (2014). "Seemingly unlimited lifetime data storage in nanostructured glass". Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (3): 033901. Bibcode:2014PhRvL.112c3901Z. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.033901. PMID 24484138.
- Zhang, J.; Gecevičius, M.; Beresna, M.; Kazansky, P. G. (June 2013). "5D Data Storage by Ultrafast Laser Nanostructuring in Glass" (PDF). CLEO: Science and Innovations: CTh5D–9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 September 2014.
- "Tetrafluoromethane". Toxicology Data Network (TOXNET). United States National Library of Medicine. Retrieved 4 September 2014.
- "Time it takes for garbage to decompose in the environment" (PDF). New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 June 2014. Retrieved 23 May 2014.
- Lyle, Paul (2010). Between Rocks And Hard Places: Discovering Ireland's Northern Landscapes. Geological Survey of Northern Ireland.
- Weisman, Alan (10 July 2007). The World Without Us. New York: Thomas Dunne Books/St. Martin's Press. pp. 171–172. ISBN 978-0-312-34729-1. OCLC 122261590.
- "Apollo 11 – First Footprint on the Moon". Student Features. NASA.
- Meadows, A. J. (2007). The Future of the Universe. Springer. pp. 81–83.
- Weisman, Alan (10 July 2007). The World Without Us. New York: Thomas Dunne Books/St. Martin's Press. p. 182. ISBN 978-0-312-34729-1. OCLC 122261590.
- Zalasiewicz, Jan (25 September 2008). The Earth After Us: What legacy will humans leave in the rocks?. Oxford University Press., Review in Stanford Archaeolog
- Meeus, J. & Vitagliano, A. (2004). "Simultaneous Transits" (PDF). Journal of the British Astronomical Association. 114 (3). Retrieved 2 August 2016.
- "Why is Polaris the North Star?". NASA. Archived from the original on 25 July 2011. Retrieved 10 April 2011.
- Plait, Phil (2002). Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from Astrology to the Moon Landing "Hoax". John Wiley and Sons. pp. 55–56.
- Falkner, David E. (2011). The Mythology of the Night Sky. Patrick Moore's Practical Astronomy Series. Springer. p. 116. Bibcode:2011mns..book.....F. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0137-7. ISBN 978-1-4614-0136-0.
- "Calculation by the Stellarium application version 0.10.2". Retrieved 28 July 2009.
- Kieron Taylor (1 March 1994). "Precession". Sheffield Astronomical Society. Retrieved 6 August 2013.
- Falkner, David E. (2011). The Mythology of the Night Sky. Patrick Moore's Practical Astronomy Series. Springer. p. 102. Bibcode:2011mns..book.....F. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0137-7. ISBN 978-1-4614-0136-0.
- Komzsik, Louis (2010). Wheels in the Sky: Keep on Turning. Trafford Publishing. p. 140.
- Laskar, J.; et al. (1993). "Orbital, Precessional, and Insolation Quantities for the Earth From ?20 Myr to +10 Myr". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 270: 522–533. Bibcode:1993A&A...270..522L.
- Laskar; et al. "Astronomical Solutions for Earth Paleoclimates". Institut de mécanique céleste et de calcul des éphémérides. Retrieved 20 July 2012.
- Aldo Vitagliano (2011). "The Solex page". University degli Studi di Napoli Federico II. Archived from the original on 20 December 2008. Retrieved 20 July 2012.
- James, N.D (1998). "Comet C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake): The Great Comet of 1996". Journal of the British Astronomical Association. 108: 157. Bibcode:1998JBAA..108..157J.
- Horizons output. "Barycentric Osculating Orbital Elements for Comet C/1999 F1 (Catalina)". Retrieved 7 March 2011.
- Borkowski, K.M. (1991). "The Tropical Calendar and Solar Year". J. Royal Astronomical Soc. Of Canada. 85 (3): 121–130. Bibcode:1991JRASC..85..121B.
- Bromberg, Irv. "The Rectified Hebrew Calendar".
- Strous, Louis (2010). "Astronomy Answers: Modern Calendars". University of Utrecht. Retrieved 14 September 2011.
- Richards, Edward Graham (1998). Mapping time: the calendar and its history. Oxford University Press. p. 93.
- "Julian Date Converter". US Naval Observatory. Retrieved 20 July 2012.
- "Permanent Markers Implementation Plan" (PDF). United States Department of Energy. 30 August 2004. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 September 2006.
- Time: Disasters that Shook the World. New York City: Time Home Entertainment. 2012. ISBN 978-1-60320-247-3.
- Fetter, Steve (March 2009). "How long will the world's uranium supplies last?".
- Biello, David (28 January 2009). "Spent Nuclear Fuel: A Trash Heap Deadly for 250,000 Years or a Renewable Energy Source?". Scientific American.
- Ongena, J; G. Van Oost (2004). "Energy for future centuries – Will fusion be an inexhaustible, safe and clean energy source?" (PDF). Fusion Science and Technology. 2004. 45 (2T): 3–14. doi:10.13182/FST04-A464.
- Cohen, Bernard L. (January 1983). "Breeder Reactors: A Renewable Energy Source" (PDF). American Journal of Physics. 51 (1): 75. Bibcode:2005BGD.....2.1665F. doi:10.1119/1.13440.
- Adams, Fred C. (2008). "Long term astrophysical processes". In Bostrom, Nick; Ćirković, Milan M. (eds.). Global catastrophic risks. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-857050-9.
- Brownlee, Donald E. (2010). "Planetary habitability on astronomical time scales". In Schrijver, Carolus J.; Siscoe, George L. (eds.). Heliophysics: Evolving Solar Activity and the Climates of Space and Earth. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-11294-9.


text:
This weekend I went on a trip with my family to visit an Aunt. Mckenna came along, and here is some random doll stuff. I didn't bring my camera into the hotel so they are all car pics, but some of them are good. It was at least ten hours in the car, and Mckenna helped with some of that.
This is my favorite picture from the batch. When we went to lunch we had to wait 40 minutes, so we walked over to goodwill next to the place we were eating. I found an american girl book in the book section and read it on the way home.
It's a Mckenna song! Now here is a little hairstyle how to. You will everything on my lap. Use your doll's hair to cut yarn a bit longer than her hair. Tie the yarn to a hairband. Put on the doll's head. Separate some hair from the rest. And the the other hair into a ponytail. Twist each section into hair. Pull it all into a bun. And place a headband over the hairband if you want. Now you have a pretty hairstyle!
In a couple of months we are taking a longer vacation. I want to bring a doll, but my Mom wants me to leave it at home because I took my time dressing Mckenna. So if you want reviews, photo shoots, crafts, news, posts instead of nothing for two weeks like this post! Maybe if lots of people want posts Mom will let me bring a doll.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Looks like you have entered an invalid amount. We will need this to compare your money transfer.
Join our FREE consultancy to find the cheapest rates for your business.
Xendpay was founded by ethical innovators who want to better the world through corporate success. The aim has always been to reduce the cost of international money transfer whilst still maintaining the best possible customer service.
Today we are proud to have created a real alternative for you to get behind - one with a mission to change the international money transfer industry for the better.
Xendpay is now potentially the first genuinely no fees international money transfer service to bank accounts, offering you the best exchange rates usually only available to multinational corporations, without compromising on transfer times or reliability. This represents a significant challenge to the traditionally high charge practice within the global remittance industry and is a unique offer to individuals seeking to send money overseas.
Xendpay isn't just a highly competitive financial service; it is also a global cause. International money transfer is the largest overall source of external financing to developing countries - $436 billion in 2014 according to World Bank estimates. That's three times the total global aid budget! But every year 9% of money transferred is swallowed up by fees and bad exchange rates and never reaches it's intended destination. Earlier this year Kofi Annan described remittance fees to Africa as "unethically expensive" and the G8 has called for action. Xendpay is our answer.
By using and sharing Xendpay you can join us to take real action for a better global economy and ensure that more money reaches its intended destination. Collectively this really will make a difference.
In order for Xendpay to be successful and change the money transfer industry, we can't go it alone. You can help in two ways:
Firstly, having removed the traditional profit mechanisms of our industry, we are reliant on people, like you, who appreciate and want to support what we are trying to do, making a small voluntary payment in lieu of other charges. When you use our service you will see that we recommend a customisable voluntary charge based on the cost to us of delivering the service, and all we ask is that you pay what you think the service is worth. We need you to collaborate with us in this way so that we can sustain the service for everyone.
Secondly, our rivals spend millions on marketing and advertising, but we want to pass these savings onto you so that everybody can always expect to pay less with Xendpay. Instead we ask you to help us spread the word after using the service, recommending us in person and through social media, so that over time more and more people can benefit from our offer and in turn we can maximise the benefit for the developing world.
"If you're looking for an honest channel to send your money overseas, Xendpay is your answer. They made sure i was fully satisfied with their service from beginning till end."
"Greatly appreciate the hard efforts put in to get my currency exchanged before my holiday. "
|Type Of Provider
|Money Transfer
|The Headquarter
|Comnutries Send From
Netherlands, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United-Kingdom
|Countries Send to
Qatar, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United-Kingdom, United-states-of-america
|Transfer Fee
|Minimum Transfer Amount
|Maximum Transfer Amount
|Receving Method
|Money Transfer
xendpay @xendpay - 23 Oct @paramvaibhav Thank you for your email. I can confirm we have re
Dinerito Power @dineritopower - 23 Oct RT @dineritopower: Esta p omoción fue un bombazo en la 1ª cuaren
HostingPill @hostingpill - 23 Oct 23 Best #PayPal Alternati es of 2020 https://t.co/lkwHpeIhw7 �
समीर कुलकर्णी @paramvaibhav - 23 Oct @xendpay Hi, I have done the transaction. Sorry to bother you, b
Vorto Trading partners with SendThatCash for foreign exchange comparisonTue, 02 May 2017 - 12:32 AM


text:
EMDR Therapy for Trauma
So, what the heck is EMDR Therapy you might ask. It is hard to explain, but here I go.
EMDR is a psychotherapeutic approach that helps to reprocess traumatic memories and move them to long term memory. Research indicates that counseling is most effective when it incorporates both the left and right sides of the brain, and EMDR therapy does just that. It engages both sides of the brain, so we can address trauma and attachment wounds and the painful symptoms that they create. In addition, EMDR Therapy is a very effective method for enhancing skills and resources, such as confidence, relaxation, focus, and motivation and for strengthening internal resources.
When emotionally disturbing events have occurred in our lives, the brain is often unable to process the experience as it normally would. Instead, the negative thoughts and feelings of the traumatic event can get "trapped" in the nervous system, with all of the accompanying sights, sounds, thoughts and feelings. EMDR utilizes bilateral stimulation – either through eye movements or other forms of gentle, rhythmic stimulation – which activates both sides of the brain, allowing for a release of painful emotional experiences from the nervous system.
Because traditional talk therapy typically accesses only the left side of the brain and trauma and attachment wounds are stored in the right side of the brain, it is not necessarily the most effective therapy for trauma processing. We all have an idea about what happens in talk therapy. We tell the counselor our problem, explore that situation together, and come up with solutions to help solve the problem. That's the left brain at work. If we are lucky we will even have an "ah ha" moment. EMDR therapy shortens not only the discovery process, but, and this is important, the healing process.
So, then what? Well then, the client's full brain is able to recognize what solutions will be the most beneficial for them. Instead of having a therapist, with all of our education and experience, offering ideas, the client's own brain is given the opportunity to bypass its typical defenses and make itself accessible. EMDR therapists call this Adaptive Information Processing, and it is exactly what it sounds like.
You see, we human beings are pretty clever at developing maladaptive coping strategies to help us survive the effects of trauma, and to avoid the pain. Common ones would be; overworking, alcohol or drug abuse, relationship addiction, compulsive behaviors. We may have even tried talk therapy or prescription drugs, but only experienced partial or no relief, leaving us even more discouraged. Then we blame ourselves and create new maladaptive responses such as negative thinking (e.g., pessimism, catastrophizing) and self-defeating beliefs (e.g., I'm not good enough, I'm powerless). These strategies, rather than being helpful, can turn out to be significant sources of anxiety, depression, addiction, lack of motivation, anger and relationship problems. And it is for these symptoms we seek therapy.
The end result of EMDR Therapy is that instead of living with the symptoms, we will be able to feel calm, relaxed, present-centered, happier with a more positive outlook on life, capable of experiencing fulfilling and satisfying relationships, greater self-esteem and confidence, and finally, empowered to create positive change in our lives. Don't just imagine. Call me now for further information.
"EMDR is proving to be the silicon chip of psychotherapy; it allows people to process incredible amounts of material in a shockingly short time." – Michael Elkin,Ph.D. Director, Center for Collaborative Solutions


text:
Nicole Bottet
Nicole Bottet was born in Pontoise/France in 1942. She studied at the Ecole de Beaux Arts in Paris. Since 1973 she participated in a lot of exhibitions and had many solo exhibitions in France, Germany, Netherlands, Austria, Japan and Switzerland. A lot of museums show the work of Nicole Bottet. She lifes and works in France.
Very important for her work is the use of color. Gold and silver in particular, have a special meaning in her pictures. The nature morte is a prominent motif in her pictures.


text:
Ever After High Prom
Tags: Dress Up Games / Girl Games / Makeover Games
Publisher: 3wj.com
Video Walkthrough
For some of us, the beginning of summer also means the beginning of prom season. Graduating from school can be an emotional and stressful time, as you have plenty of exams to take and on top of it, graduating also means going to prom. In this brand new 3WJ game called Ever After High Prom, Brair Beauty is getting ready for her prom. Help her have a fabulous hairstyle and a glam outfit in order to shine at the ball. Get a stunning makeover for her and have fun playing!
Mouse control
Embed this game
Share this game


text:
'Hooley in the Valley 2014' set to sparkle
Leading country stars Derek Ryan and Jim Devine are set to headline the sixth year of the annual Hooley in the Valley Festival which takes place in Augher village from Thursday 7th until Sunday 10th August 2014.
The event which is being supported by Harp lager will see renowned artists Derek and Jim take to the stage for what is set to be a fun filled weekend with great country and western performances as well as highlights from many musical genres that everyone can enjoy.
Rising star Derek Ryan is making tremendous strides in the world of country music and has risen steadily in recent times from his early performances with his brother Adrian as the 'Ryan Brothers' right through to a pop career with an international band, he has now become one of today's biggest Irish Country artists. Local Tyrone man Jim Devine is also planning a big show for his festival performance. After capturing the hearts of many in the 'The Voice of Ireland,' he has made a big impact on the music scene and is now playing across the island of Ireland with a brilliant band at his back.
Martin Venning, Diageo Northern Ireland, said: "Diageo is committed to supporting a dynamic and growing tourism industry and through our partnership with the Hooley in the Valley we can help to showcase hospitality sector and support the industry to help it reach its full potential.
"We are really looking forward to welcoming a great line up of first class artists for Irish country music fans and what better way to celebrate the diversity and range of local talent coming to the town than with Diageo's iconic brand Harp, which will play such an important role in providing visitors with a unique and authentic experience. Country fans are passionate about music and we believe the festival will provide an opportunity for our customers to celebrate the great talent that we have coming to the heart of Co. Tyrone."
Commenting on the festival, Head of PR, Brendan Trainor said, "The Augher Summer Festival, incorporating Hooley in the Valley, has grown into one of the most significant festivals of its kind across the island of Ireland. This year's event is set to surpass all others with a suite of activity including a great line up of local dancers participating in the first ever 'Stricly Augher.'
"We are delighted to bring leading country stars Jim and Derek to the stage in and we know that they are really looking forward to playing at the Hooley. Through the continued support of Harp lager and the commitment of such great acts, the festival continues to be a great boost for, and investment in, Augher and its surrounding communities. The festival marquee will be buzzing with some of the best live country music and we are looking forward to welcoming an eclectic mix of fans that will converge in Co. Tyrone throughout the festival weekend."
Drink Responsibly
Visit www.drinkaware.co.uk for the facts