text:
Official Report (Hansard)
Session: 2013/2014
Date: 14 November 2013
PDF version of this report (280.58 kb)
Committee for Social Development
Inquiry into allegations arising from a BBC NI 'Spotlight' programme aired on 3 July 2013 of impropriety or irregularity relating to NIHE-managed contracts and consideration of any resulting actions: Briefing by J H Turkington
The Chairperson: I formally welcome everyone to the Committee. This is the first session of the Committee's inquiry. I remind everyone to switch off electronic devices, please, and I ask members to declare any interest relevant to the inquiry.
Mr Allister: I declare that, in my former professional life, I represented Turkington's in some matters, primarily in relation to planning issues. I do not see any relevance to this issue, but I want to declare that. I also declare that, in 2004, when I was the DUP candidate in the European election, Turkington's supplied the party with vans for use in the election. Also, I believe that, when I was an MEP, I invited Turkington's to a business breakfast.
The Chairperson: Have any other members anything to declare? No. Jim, we will take note of that and be aware of it. Thank you for declaring that interest.
I would like to deal with a couple of items, the first of which is the question of procedural fairness. It is important that I outline that. Members are aware that, in an inquiry of this nature, we have to be cognisant of how we, collectively as a Committee, conduct the inquiry. We have already taken a range of advice on procedural and legal matters pertinent to the remit of the Committee and to the terms of reference of the inquiry. We have done that to ensure that the integrity of the Committee is not undermined and that the risk of challenge to any findings that the Committee might make is minimised. It is also important to give due regard to how we treat witnesses and the evidence submitted to us. Procedural fairness is, therefore, key to how we conduct the inquiry. I will endeavour, as Chair, to ensure that the inquiry is conducted in an absolutely professional fashion. I have no doubt that all members are like-minded. The Committee Clerk has drafted a brief note on the issue, which was considered by Legal Services. I refer members to the briefing on procedural fairness, which is a ready reckoner to ensure procedural fairness in the process. Are members happy to endorse and adopt the paper before them? It encapsulates all of the advice that has been tabled and debated here.
Mr Campbell: A thought struck me after Jim's declaration of interest. It is up to individuals, but is each of us required to go through any business breakfasts that we may have held to establish whether those who attended included any representative or chief executive of the companies that applied or were considered for a contract under consideration in this inquiry?
The Chairperson: At all stages, we will take advice on this. My understanding is that members will declare any interest that they believe to be relevant and pertinent. I think that we have already considered, when getting legal advice on the matter, that, as public representatives, we engage with a wide range of people, companies and constituents on a variety of levels. The key thing here is whether we think that any of that could prejudice or leave anyone compromised in any shape, fashion or form or create that perception? Largely, members will have to make up their own mind. If they are in doubt, we can take advice.
The Committee Clerk has just reminded me that, if members are declaring interests, as has happened today, we can seek, as a further safeguard, the view of the Committee on Standards and Privileges, if they want to. Are members happy with that approach? Are members happy to endorse the briefing on procedural fairness in the inquiry?
Mr Wilson: I am not too sure how extensive that is, but, as Minister, I attended breakfasts and dinners at which people, some of whom will probably give evidence before the Committee, will have been present, but I could not even tell you the dates.
The Chairperson: As I said, members will be aware if they have been in a position that they think they need to declare.
If members are happy, we will move on. Members have adopted the briefing paper. On the back of that, it is important to say that the Committee considered the legal status of any such inquiry and our rights and ability to hold it. We are satisfied, from all the legal advice, that we have the statutory authority to do so. We have reliance on section 44, for example. The Committee has also decided that, although it has the authority to require people giving evidence to [Inaudible.] or make a declaration, it has, in the first instance, relied on the integrity of everybody presenting evidence. Of course, the Committee can at any stage revert to requiring people to give evidence under oath or by way of a declaration. I state that for the record.
I invite Ian Young and Jim McKeag to the table. You are very welcome, gentlemen. Ian, you are here in your capacity as a former divisional manager of Turkington Holdings Limited.
Mr Ian Young (Former divisional manager, J H Turkington): That is quite right.
The Chairperson: Jim, you are the current managing director of Turkington Holdings Limited.
Mr Jim McKeag (Managing director, J H Turkington): That is right.
The Chairperson: You will be aware that the 'Spotlight' programme of 3 July 2013 made a number of allegations against the Minister, one of which was that he misled the Committee on the review of double-glazing specifications. Central to our consideration of this issue is a meeting that was held on 16 April 2012 to discuss double-glazing specifications and the Minister's subsequent referral to that meeting in a letter to me as Chair of the Committee. The Committee is not inquiring into the specifications or anything of that nature; it is not about what the specifications were or whether they were good specifications or wrong specifications. That is not the purpose of the inquiry in any way. The Committee has asked you here today because, as we understand it, you both attended the meeting of 16 April 2012. Therefore, we hope that you can provide some insight that will help the Committee to determine whether the Minister misled the Committee. You have provided a joint submission to the Committee, which has been very useful, so thank you for that. I ask one or both of you to brief the Committee on that submission, after which I will open the floor to members' questions. The floor is yours, gentlemen.
Mr McKeag: Thanks very much for inviting us to the Committee this afternoon. I am the managing director of Turkington Holdings, which includes various companies in the business. I have been with the business for 28 years, and I am a fellow of the Chartered Institute of Building.
Mr Young: I worked at Turkington's for 17 years as divisional manager. I am currently the general manager of Polyframe. I was the chairman of the Northern Ireland Glass and Glazing Federation for 2005-06.
Mr McKeag: Turkington Holdings comprises a number of trading companies. It was set up in 1951 by Trevor Turkington's father and is based in Craigavon. The company employs 120 direct and indirect staff and has an annual turnover of £20 million. The group operates across Northern Ireland and across various sectors of the industry, acting as main contractor and developer through our construction division and providing specialist subcontracting and supply expertise through our window, curtain walling and pre-cast divisions. Over the past 30 years, depending on where the company was working, we have held a wide range of meetings with public representatives from all political parties. Meetings with public representatives were infrequent, but they were mainly with those involved in the Department for Regional Development (DRD) and the Department of the Environment (DOE). Over the years, I have personally met Ministers Attwood, Poots, Ritchie and Wilson.
Between 2001 and August 2011, Turkington's had not undertaken any work for the Northern Ireland Housing Executive directly or through a main contractor. Turkington's did not apply for the Egan contract in 2006-07, which was a combined contract for windows, kitchens and bathrooms. The company did not feel that it was appropriate at that time. In May/June 2011, Turkington's was contacted by Mascott Construction to see whether the company would be interested in undertaking a supply and installation window subcontract for some of its sites. Mascott had previously bought windows on a supply-only basis, but, on that occasion, it felt that the supply and installation route would be more beneficial. Turkington's was successful in being awarded a site and started the contract in August 2011. Further sites were awarded later in the year and on into 2012 — all for Mascott Construction. It was during the execution of those contracts that Turkington's started to identify a range of issues that, we believed, were worth bringing to the attention of the main contractor and the Northern Ireland Housing Executive.
The first issue was a health and safety matter relating to the Housing Executive's requirement for windows to be factory-glazed and then fitted on site. That led to a substantial increase in weight, which caused issues with manual handling at the factory and during installation on site. It was likely to lead to potential claims in the future. It was also a breach of the health and safety manual handling specification.
The second issue was the method of installation. The Housing Executive process required, first, that all the reveals had to be cut back; windows were installed; and then the reveals were replastered. That practice was increasing the time to complete houses because of the wet trades involved. It was, therefore, more costly for the Housing Executive, and it increased the disruption to tenants, including the time spent in tenants' properties. Redecoration grants were also being afforded to tenants because of the disruption to the houses.
Turkington's had initial discussions with Mascott about these issues, as it was the main contractor and should have taken them to the Housing Executive. It was agreed, because of the specialist nature of the issues, that we would raise them directly with the Housing Executive. Consequently, a meeting was arranged with David Adamson, who deals with procurement and specification at the Housing Executive, in late 2011. During the meeting, we discussed our concerns, and he said that he would come back to us. We were keen to resolve the pre-glazing issue quickly in order to minimise the potential impact on employees and protect against any breach of health and safety. Turkington's heard nothing from Mr Adamson, despite numerous follow-up e-mails. As it appeared that we were not receiving a timely response from the Housing Executive, Turkington's decided to try to raise the issue with the Minister responsible, Nelson McCausland. An approach was made to the Minister's special adviser, Stephen Brimstone, in the first instance, and a meeting was secured with him in January 2012. Mr Brimstone advised that we contact the Minister to request a meeting to discuss the issues. Therefore, on 2 February, Mr Young wrote a letter to the Minister requesting a meeting on behalf of Turkington's, with the intention of discussing these concerns to highlight the potential savings to the public purse if the window insulation process were reviewed. The letter is attached as appendix A.
Turkington's received a response from the Department for Social Development in March 2012, advising that a meeting had been arranged for 16 April. Mr Young and I attended the meeting on behalf of Turkington's with the Minister. Also in attendance were representatives of the Housing Executive and the Department for Social Development. The meeting focused on two issues, the first of which was the simple health and safety issue of pre-glazing glass. It was agreed at that meeting that, because Turkington's was supplying and installing, we could install the glass on site. The second issue focused on our perception that there appeared to be substantial costs being unnecessarily incurred by the public purse. Turkington's is a member of the Glass and Glazing Federation, and we comply with the standards set by the federation. These standards include installation guidelines. We explained that, if the windows were installed to the federation guidelines, this would not necessitate the reveals being removed, thereby avoiding the need for wet trades in tenants' homes. This would give an industry-recognised standard of installation at reduced cost and save disruption to tenants' property. We presented a spreadsheet, which is attached at appendix B, demonstrating that the decreased installation costs plus avoidance of having to pay the redecoration grant could save the Housing Executive between £20 million and £30 million as it completed its building programme. The Minister seemed impressed by the scale of the savings.
Some time after the meeting, the Housing Executive made an amendment to the specification for window installation that reflected our suggestion. It was our view that this change in the criteria would not only provide greater value for money for the Housing Executive but would encourage Turkington's and other contractors who met the Glass and Glazing Federation standards to tender for the new contract. A subsequent tender was issued. We tendered for it but were unsuccessful. Our proposed changes were incorporated into the existing Egan contract and the new tender contract.
Turkington's sought the meeting with the Minister after failing to secure a response from the Housing Executive. There was no material gain to the company arising from this meeting. In seeking the meeting, we were prompted by our first-hand experience as a subcontractor of the health and safety issues and our analysis that the contract would be delivered to the same standard but using a different process that would avoid considerable waste to public funds.
The Chairperson: Thank you.
Ian, may I ask you a question for formal clarification? I understand that the letter came from you, but we need to establish whether the request for the meeting was made on behalf of Turkington's.
Mr Young: Absolutely, yes.
The Chairperson: It was not on behalf on anybody else.
Mr Young: No.
The Chairperson: Your attendance at the meeting on 16 April was as a representative of Turkington's. Is that correct?
Mr Young: Yes.
The Chairperson: You were not there representing anybody else.
Mr Young: No.
Mr Allister: The Chairman has just drawn your attention to this. The letter asking for the meeting was quite explicit that it was for Turkington's.
Mr Young: Absolutely.
Mr Allister: You are quite clear that the meeting was with Turkington's. Any relevance of the Glass and Glazing Federation was simply in the context that you live by its guidance.
Mr Young: Its standards, yes.
Mr Allister: Just as you live by British standards on other things. So there was no basis on which anyone could rationally think that it was a meeting with the Glass and Glazing Federation.
Mr Young: No.
Mr McKeag: The words "Glass and Glazing Federation" come up several times. We told the meeting that we were members of it, and, secondly, that Ian is a past chairman of the Northern Ireland branch and, thirdly, that the specification changes that we were calling for were in line with the federation's specifications.
Mr Allister: Yes, but at no point did you hold yourself out as representing, being there on behalf of or speaking on behalf of it.
Mr McKeag: Absolutely not.
Mr Allister: The meeting came about by virtue of a letter of 2 February, which followed a meeting with the Minister's special adviser. How did you know to contact the special adviser?
Mr McKeag: The only other contact the company had with Nelson McCausland was way back in 2009, when he was sports Minister. That was to do with something at Nutts Corner. Trevor Turkington went through Mr Brimstone to arrange that meeting with Mr McCausland, so he had his contact details from 2009. That is why we contacted him.
Mr Allister: Why was the letter cc'd to the Finance Minister?
Mr McKeag: As documented in the press and in anything I have seen or read, there were substantial savings of £20 million to £30 million to be made. It was a decision on our part to copy the letter to the Finance Minister because of the significant sums involved.
Mr Allister: Was it cc'd to him as Finance Minister or as MP for East Antrim?
Mr McKeag: As Finance Minister.
Mr Allister: The cc simply says, "Sammy Wilson MP". Where was it sent?
Mr McKeag: I cannot remember where it was sent.
Mr Allister: Did Turkington's have particular contact with Mr Wilson?
Mr McKeag: As I said in my briefing, we have had various contacts with various Ministers. I had met Mr Wilson before when he was, I think, planning Minister, but we have also met Ministers from other parties, as you know.
Mr Allister: Who was taking minutes of the meeting?
Mr McKeag: I do not know whether she was the Minister's PA or whatever — I do not know the lady — but there was a lady there taking minutes. I do not know her name.
Mr Allister: Did you take any minutes?
Mr Young: No.
Mr McKeag: We have never seen any minutes.
Mr Allister: They were never circulated to you.
Mr Young: No.
Mr Allister: It turns out that the minutes were headed "Meeting with representatives of the Glass and Glazing Federation." If you had seen that, what would you have said?
Mr McKeag: We would have written back saying that there had been a misunderstanding. It could not have been a misunderstanding: we knew who we were, and we would not misrepresent ourselves in any shape or form.
Mr Young: Even at the start of the meeting, I had to give a brief explanation of who Turkington's was.
Mr McKeag: A history of the company and background.
Mr Allister: You have identified the two issues that, you say, were raised: the health and safety issue and the method of installation. Was the issue of the hinge type not also raised?
Mr McKeag: No, not at our meeting.
Mr Allister: Not at your meeting.
Mr McKeag: No.
Mr Allister: On three occasions, the minutes, which you say that you have not seen, refer to the hotel-type hinges costing five times as much as the industry standard installation.
Mr McKeag: The Housing Executive was at the meeting. I do not know whether the Minister was quizzing the Housing Executive about hinges. We did not bring the hinge issue —
Mr Allister: That was in your presence. It was a single meeting attended by all the participants at all times.
Mr McKeag: Ian and I never spoke about hinges.
Mr Allister: Did you hear hinges being discussed?
Mr Young: I cannot remember. We started off by talking about the glazing and the method of installation. In the minutes, the Housing Executive then went on to —
Mr McKeag: I think that the conversation might have opened up, but —
Mr Allister: Do you remember hinges being discussed?
Mr McKeag: No, I do not. That is not to say that they were not.
Mr Allister: Do you know the issue with hotel-type reversible hinges and casement-type hinges?
Mr McKeag: Ian knows about specification.
Mr Young: It was just a different specification.
Mr Allister: You know about that issue. Did Turkington have any interest in that?
Mr Young: No.
Mr Allister: Was Turkington in a position to manufacture the casement hinges but not the reversible hinges?
Mr Young: It could do both.
Mr Allister: You could do both at that time.
Mr Young: At that time, we made only casement windows
Mr Allister: At that time.
Mr Young: We had access to reversible windows.
Mr McKeag: We could buy them.
Mr Allister: You could buy them, but you could not manufacture them
Mr Young: At that time, we were actually making reversible windows.
Mr Allister: Yes, but not the hinges.
Mr Young: We would not make hinges.
Mr Allister: You were making reversible hinges.
Mr Young: Yes.
Mr Allister: Polyframe, which you are now involved with, is into reversible hinges. Is that right?
Mr Young: Polyframe makes every type of window, including casement windows, reversible windows and vertical sliding windows.
Mr Allister: You are saying quite clearly to us that you never heard hinges discussed at that meeting.
Mr McKeag: No, I could not say that. I have no recollection; I cannot say that they were not discussed. If they were discussed, we certainly did not bring it up, but I do not remember it being discussed. I think that it is fair to say that that is not to say that they were not discussed.
Mr Allister: Thank you.
Mr Campbell: Your presentation mentioned savings and your attempts to get to the Housing Executive. You said that numerous e-mails were sent, but the Housing Executive did not come back to you. You said that the decreased installation cost plus the avoidance of having to pay a redecoration grant meant that the Housing Executive could save between £20 million and £30 million. Subsequent to that, Turkington's was not successful. Is that right?
Mr McKeag: That is right.
Mr Campbell: Obviously, you know what you would have bidding for in going for that contract, but do you have any idea, on an industry-wide basis, how much might have been saved at that time, without knowing what the successful contract was for?
Mr McKeag: That specification change was industry-wide; it was not just for Turkington's. When we started the dialogue, there was talk of 50,000 homes. That figure changed: it went down to 40,000 and then 30,000. I do not know what the correct figure is, but based on 50,000 homes, the savings would have been £20 million to £30 million throughout the country, not just for Turkington's.
Mr Young: At the time of the meeting, I thought that there were 50,000 homes still to be done. That is how I worked out the cost of £32 million or whatever. At the meeting, it turned out that there were only 40,000 homes left to be done. That is why the figure was reduced pro rata for the number of homes.
Mr McKeag: It is a big multiplier.
Mr Campbell: What I am trying to get at is that, whatever the number of homes was at the end, you had had a meeting as Turkington's. Whatever anyone else thought the meeting was, you are clear that you were there as Turkington's.
Mr McKeag: Absolutely.
Mr Campbell: That is fine. We will have to ask the Minister what his impression was.
You raised the issue of potential savings of between £20 million and £30 million based on the figure of 50,000 homes. A lesser figure, pro rata, would mean a lesser saving. Is it your understanding that the savings that you had itemised at the meeting with the Minister would have been reflected in subsequent contracts?
Mr McKeag: Yes.
The Chairperson: Sorry, gentlemen, this is going into the issue of savings or specifications, which this Committee is not inquiring into. The gentlemen were advised of what the subject of this session would be, as were the other witnesses. We are not discussing or dealing with specifications and whether they were right or wrong, appropriate or over-expensive. That is not the purpose of this inquiry, so there is no point in asking the two gentlemen to explain whether there would have been savings made, whether greater, less or other. That is not their remit, and it is not in the remit of the inquiry.
Mr Campbell: I understand that, but savings were accrued as a result, even if it is outside the remit of the inquiry.
The meeting was almost two years ago, in February 2012. Do you recall roughly how long the meeting lasted?
Mr McKeag: I would say about 45 minutes to an hour.
Mr Young: Yes, about 45 minutes.
Mr Campbell: You said that you had had meetings with other Ministers from various parties. One of the previous questions was about minute taking. Did you take minutes? I do not know whether anybody else took minutes, but you did not take minutes at any of those meetings.
Mr McKeag: I would have had bullet points in case I forgot any points that I wanted to make. Once the meeting was over, I would destroy them; I would not keep them.
Mr Campbell: OK.
Mr Copeland: Somewhere in the back of my mind is Fusion21. Were you at the same meeting as the Glass and Glazing Federation and Fusion21, or were those separate entities?
Mr McKeag: We were not at any meeting with Fusion21.
Mr Copeland: You were not at any meeting and had no knowledge of Fusion21 contacting the Minister.
Mr McKeag: No. To be honest with you, I do not know what that means.
Mr Copeland: I think that it is another trade group of some description.
I am trying to get it right in my own mind. You saw the Minister and you said, "We can save you money". Obviously, any Minister is interested in saving money; he would fail in his duty were he not. If there were 50,000 units, based on your estimate, the sum was many millions of pounds. As the meeting progressed, did the potential savings decline, because there was some uncertainty about the number of units involved? Was the Minister quite clear in his mind about what the actual potential savings were as opposed to a figure extrapolated against 50,000 units, or did that come later?
Mr Young: We covered the glazing and the health and safety issues pretty quickly; we then talked about the second issue. He wrote down the figures as we went along. He totted up the value himself.
Mr McKeag: We went over it a few times. It was such a huge sum of money that it was difficult to believe at the start. It caught his attention very quickly. We put the numbers to him two or three times just to make it sink in that this could be the saving.
Mr Copeland: At that time, did you have a direct contractual relationship with the Housing Executive or the installer?
Mr McKeag: Just with Mascott Construction, the main contractor.
Mr Copeland: And it was present at the meeting as well.
Mr McKeag: No, but I told Mascot. I was very careful. We had a good contractual relationship with Mascott that I did not want to damage, because we were getting business from it. I told Mascott afterwards that we had been at the meeting and the reason why we had been at it. It was Mascott that suggested that we contact the Housing Executive directly because of the specialist nature of what we were talking about.
Mr Copeland: Even though you had no direct contractual relationship with the Housing Executive.
Mr McKeag: That is normal.
Mr Copeland: I understand that.
Mr McKeag: If things get technical, I, as a contractor, would tell my subcontractors to deal directly.
Mr Copeland: So you went and you saw the Minister. Did you identify the breakdown and the way in which any potential savings could be achieved? I understand that the Housing Executive had a particularly good record in specifying — some would say "overspecifying" — the quality of goods that it supplied because it has an issue with long-term maintenance. Its existing window system — the one that it was using at the time — proved to be quite successful. There had been very little call back and very little difficulty in installing the windows, except in some high-rise areas. That had been arrived at by a process. It was established and accepted that that is the Housing Executive's standard. You were essentially saying that, by altering the standard and making tweaks, substantial savings could be made. Northern Ireland has a distinctively different method of installing windows —
The Chairperson: Sorry, Michael. I want to be fair to everybody. In fairness, Gregory respected the guidance when asking the last question. This is not about savings or specifications; this is about the meeting — who attended the meeting, the purpose of the meeting, who asked for the meeting and why the meeting was described as one thing as opposed to another. That is the salient and only relevant point to this inquiry.
Mr Copeland: I understand. I was trying to develop the tack that the meeting took.
Mr McKeag: To answer your question, the specification was good for its day, but all specifications move on. There was a reason for that specification: the windows were secured into the reveal. With modern technology, you do not do that. As I say, the specification had moved on. The Housing Executive is under a lot of pressure, as you know —
Mr Copeland: This is my point: how did you quantify to the Minister what the potential savings were?
The Chairperson: Michael, can you get to a point relevant to the purpose of the meeting?
Mr McKeag: All the work around the reveal was omitted; that is where the saving was. The housing grant — the grant to the tenant — was the biggest saving of all.
Mr Copeland: The Minister was in no doubt at that time that the biggest potential savings were in the redecoration grant.
Mr McKeag: Yes.
Mr Copeland: Did you produce any evidence to him?
Mr McKeag: Appendix B —
The Chairperson: Sorry, Michael. Sorry, Jim. I know that you are trying to respond faithfully to members' questions, and I understand that that puts you in a difficult position. I suggest that this is a relatively easy issue to get to the nub of. Michael started his question by asking whether Fusion21 was at the meeting. That is relevant because, in the documentation that we have, a letter had been drafted that included Fusion21 and the Glass and Glazing Federation at the meeting.
Mr McKeag: The Glass and Glazing Federation might have been at the meeting with Fusion21, but we certainly were not.
The Chairperson: The initial letter that had been drafted referred to a meeting between Turkington's and the Minister. That letter was subsequently changed and includes Fusion21 and the Glass and Glazing Federation. You are obviously surprised at that; you have no control over that. You have no explanation of how that letter was changed to reflect —
Mr McKeag: We have not seen the letter.
Mr Young: We do not know who Fusion21 is.
The Chairperson: That is fair enough. You did not write the letter. I appreciate that.
Mr Clarke: Taking you back to the meeting, Jim asked you about the minute taker. Can we be clear about who took the minutes?
Mr McKeag: I do not know the name of the person.
Mr Clarke: So can we assume that it is fair to say that it was neither the Minister nor the special adviser?
Mr Young: I cannot honestly say who took the minutes.
Mr McKeag: There was a girl there who I thought was taking the minutes.
Mr Clarke: Can I draw your attention to the letter in which you requested the meeting? You are clear in your knowledge about Turkington's, but I draw your attention to the last paragraph of the letter, which says:
"We are also active members of the Glass and Glazing Federation."
Given that the minute taker would have had knowledge of the meeting and who was coming to it, do you agree that there could be confusion, given the fact that you made representation in your correspondence that you were also active members of the Glass and Glazing Federation?
Mr McKeag: We are, but we were not representing it. That was clear.
Mr Clarke: No. The point that I make is that you went to the length of emphasising in your correspondence requesting the meeting that you were active members of the federation. Do you accept that someone could construe from that that your representation could also have included the Glass and Glazing Federation?
Mr McKeag: I do not see how they could.
Mr Clarke: What was the purpose of putting the Glass and Glazing Federation in the letter if you were merely making your representations on behalf of Turkington's?
Mr McKeag: If we were to write that letter today, it would be a completely different letter. We wrote the letter requesting a meeting. We wanted to put that in it because we worked to the standards of the Glass and Glazing Federation, which is a recognised body. I suppose that you could say that it was the kudos of the company.
Mr Clarke: That is a fair enough point. You have made a fair point that you would write it differently today and might not include that, which could draw us all to the conclusion that there could have been confusion by your admission of that in the letter in the first place.
Mr McKeag: As I said, the Glass and Glazing Federation phrase came up three times during the meeting. Whether people construed that in whatever way, I have no idea.
Mr Clarke: I take you back to your response. You said that you may construct the letter differently. This is where I am trying to tie this down. You have said that it came up during discussions, but, primarily, it came up on your request for a meeting, first and foremost, and, on your admission, you have just said that, if you were framing the letter, you would frame it differently today. Would you frame it differently today because you made reference to it and there has been confusion afterwards?
Mr McKeag: We would rephrase it because I am sitting here today, to be honest with you. [Laughter.] If I am going to write a letter and you do not know me from Adam, I will tell you who I am. I am trying to let you know that we are not a fly-by-night organisation; we are a member of a recognised organisation that fits windows to a recognised national standard. That is why it is in there. If I were to write a letter today, I still think that we would say that we were members of the Glass and Glazing Federation because that gives you a certain kudos, I would have thought.
The Chairperson: Being a member of the federation does not make you a bad person. [Laughter.]
Mr McKeag: Thank you; that is a more eloquent way of saying it.
The Chairperson: It is important to establish that. People would normally, I presume, refer to their bona fides.
Mr Allister: Could anything have been said at the meeting with the special adviser in January to suggest that you were a spokesman for the Glass and Glazing Federation?
Mr McKeag: I was not at the meeting.
Mr Allister: You were not at it.
Mr Young: Trevor and I were at it. We were there on behalf of Turkington's.
Mr Allister: It was equally clear at that meeting that you were just Turkington's?
Mr Young: Yes.
Mr Brady: This is a simple enough question: at the meeting on 16 April did you suggest or imply at any point that you represented the Glass and Glazing Federation?
Mr Young: No.
Mr Brady: So, if minutes were being taken and you did not mention it, it should not have been included in the minutes, presumably. Before or after the meeting, did you at any time contact the Glass and Glazing Federation?
Mr Young: No.
Mr Brady: Did you feel the need to do so?
Mr McKeag: No. We knew their standards.
Mr Brady: Essentially, what you are saying and have said all along is that you were there as Turkington Holdings and not to represent anyone else.
Mr McKeag: No.
Mr Brady: So it would be difficult to see how anything else could be inferred.
Mr Dickson: Who is the current chair of the Glass and Glazing Federation, and which employer or company are they involved with? At the time, who would it have been, had it not been you?
Mr McKeag: Are you asking who the chairman was at the time of the meeting?
Mr Dickson: Yes.
Mr Young: At the time of the meeting, it was Michael Ravey from Glas Seal.
Mr Dickson: They were not involved in any of these contracts.
Mr McKeag: No.
Mr Dickson: The minutes of the meeting describe you as
"Jim McKeag, Representative of the Glass and Glazing Federation"
"Ian Young, Representative of the Glass and Glazing Federation".
Yet the first line of the minute reads:
"Ian advised his company Turkington Holdings that they have extensive double glazing experience and are installing windows for the NIHE"
Further on in the minute, it mentions
"the representatives of the Glass & Glazing Federation".
Are you concerned about the confusion in the minutes?
Mr Young: We did not get a copy of the minutes. Had we got a copy, we would have gone back and said that we were there on Turkington's business.
Mr McKeag: We could not misrepresent ourselves. We had no authority to be there on behalf of the Glass and Glazing Federation. Had we wanted to, we would have contacted the Glass and Glazing Federation.
Mr Dickson: My colleague, Mr Clarke, was trying, perhaps, to suggest that there was no reference to Turkington Holdings at the meeting. However, you were referred to, because you and Ian said that your company was Turkington Holdings.
Mr McKeag: At the start of the meeting, I did a bit of a presentation on who we were and where we came from, because people there would not have known us or the history of the business.
Mr Dickson: Have you any idea then why, when the Minister wrote to the Chair of the Committee, he said:
"I met with representatives of the Glass and Glazing Federation"?
Mr McKeag: No.
Mr Dickson: I appreciate the Chair's guidance with regard to hinges and the nature of the contract, but what motivated you to wish to speak to the Housing Executive about this?
Mr McKeag: The first part of the two items. We were contravening health and safety legislation.
Mr Dickson: That I understand, but why does that require a meeting with a Minister or even a government special adviser? Surely, with an organisation the size of the Housing Executive, you have a good working relationship with their health and safety people.
Mr McKeag: We have not worked with them. As I said in my briefing, we had not worked with them for a considerable time. The jobs were live, so these things were happening live.
Mr Dickson: Why did you not, for example, contact the Health and Safety Executive?
Mr McKeag: We took the initiative and did not do what the Housing Executive asked. Health and Safety Executive rules would be more important than Housing Executive rules, as far as lifting or manual handling is concerned.
Mr Dickson: Yes, but you or perhaps the trades union that you recognise could have gone directly to the Health and Safety Executive and made a formal complaint. Then the work would have stopped immediately, would it not?
Mr McKeag: I think it is more important to try to work with people than to go down that route.
Mr Dickson: How long did it take to get the meeting with the Minister? What time elapsed between recognising that you had a health and safety issue and getting the meeting with the Minister?
Mr Young: As Jim said, we were laying the ground, so we took the initiative. When you pair the cast and the frame together, it is a very heavy item.
Mr Dickson: I understand that, so —
Mr Young: We said that we would not send an e-mail to Mascott to say that we would bring these to sites separately. That still needed to be ratified by somebody to say —
Mr McKeag: We took the initiative to stop it and do it properly.
Mr Dickson: So you did stop.
Mr McKeag: Yes, and, at the same time, we tried to get the thing changed.
Mr Dickson: How long was it from the time that you stopped until you met the Minister?
Mr Young: I think that we stopped at about the end of January sometime. The meeting with the Minister was in April.
Mr Dickson: OK. So it took from January to April to draw the Minister's attention to a serious health and safety breach and, in the meantime, Housing Executive tenants were not getting an appropriate service.
Mr McKeag: They were getting —
Mr Dickson: The planned delivery of windows and frames was not happening.
Mr Young: They were still getting them —
Mr McKeag: There was no stop in the programme.
Mr Dickson: However, they were getting them separately, were they?
Mr McKeag: No.
Mr Young: The specification would have said that they had to be factory-glazed.
Mr Dickson: Yes, so you continued with that.
Mr Young: No, we did not, but you can still take them to site and install them there.
Mr McKeag: We brought the window and glass separately at the same time.
Mr Young: Yes, but it did not stop the —
Mr Dickson: Do you put them together on site and put them in the house?
Mr Young: It is quite a big difference.
Mr Dickson: Well, Mascott did, not you.
Mr Young: No, we did.
Mr McKeag: We fitted the windows.
Mr Dickson: You fitted the windows, OK. I am interested to know the time frame between your raising the issue with the Health and Safety Executive and meeting the Minister. However, I am more interested to know what motivated you in relation to the second point, which was to say that there was a more cost-effective way of doing this. What was the motivation behind that?
Mr McKeag: Well, apart from the huge savings for everyone involved, it made the job faster and cheaper for the Housing Executive. No wet trades were involved and no dirty work in taking off reveals; no plasterers were brought in to people's houses. It made the installation quicker.
Mr Dickson: And was there no difference to the value in the contract to you?
Mr McKeag: Any saving would have gone to the Housing Executive.
Mr Young: The value would be less.
Mr McKeag: The value is less, but the Housing Executive got that value. We were not getting the same price by creating a saving; we were getting paid for what we did.
Mr Dickson: How long had the methodology that you proposed to the Minister been standard practice outside the Housing Executive contract?
Mr Young: In the Glass and Glazing Federation or UK-wide, I do not know exactly, but it has been there for a long time.
Mr Dickson: Had there been a long gap since your previous contract to supply windows in this manner to the Housing Executive?
Mr Young: We had not worked for the Housing Executive as a main contractor or subcontractor for 11 years.
Mr McKeag: I think we said that in a briefing.
Mr Young: The last one was a newbuild contract, so taking out windows did not apply.
Mr Dickson: It did not apply, OK.
Mr F McCann: I have just two points to make. Thanks, gentlemen, for your presentation. After the meeting, did you report to anyone at Turkington Holdings about what had occurred at the meeting? If you did, who did you speak to and what did you speak about?
Mr McKeag: Did we report back?
Mr F McCann: Yes.
Mr McKeag: I spoke to Mascott after the meeting.
Mr F McCann: What about?
Mr McKeag: Just to say that they had immediately taken on board the health and safety issue and had gone away to contemplate the savings. No direct decision was made at the meeting to do with the savings. We just reported that it was ongoing.
Mr F McCann: You did not speak to anyone else in Turkington Holdings about what had occurred at the meeting.
Mr McKeag: I would have reported to my boss, Trevor Turkington.
Mr F McCann: What was the discussion about?
Mr McKeag: Just that we reported at the meeting, that we got the health and safety issue resolved and that they were going to report on the savings. That is all that we could report.
Mr F McCann: The letter that you signed, Ian, states that the scheme
"promises great potential, if executed properly. But we urge caution that if this scheme is not handled properly, a great opportunity could be lost".
What does that mean?
Mr McKeag: I assume that it meant that, unless they incorporated the specification changes, they would not get the benefit of the savings.
Mr F McCann: I do not want to go into the savings, but the vast majority of the savings were in the way of redecoration grants.
Mr McKeag: Yes, that is right.
Mr F McCann: Therefore there was no big change in what was being offered; it was just that the savings —
Mr McKeag: The installation of the windows would have been faster and cheaper, and the savings would have gone to the Housing Executive.
Mr Young: The redecoration grant was probably given out because of the mess that a plasterer makes.
Mr McKeag: The tenant would have had to redecorate — wallpaper and paint.
Mr F McCann: I have been in a lot of houses before and after, and there was still a mess. However, I do not want to go into that.
Mr McKeag: Yes, but it would be greatly reduced.
Mr Copeland: I want to clear something in my mind. You were a subcontractor with Mascott. Did Mascott fit the windows, or did you supply and fit them?
Mr Young: We supplied and fitted them.
Mr McKeag: Mascott previously bought windows and fitted them itself. That is all right if you are doing a house, but doing 400 houses is a specialist job, and it came to us to supply and fix.
Mr Copeland: Right. I presume that you had other strings to your bow and I accept that, with most double glazing, a frame is sent out and the glazing is then fitted. Your production line was set up to manufacture windows and glazing units separately and bring them together on site subsequently, as opposed to sending out window frames with the sealed units in them. Is that correct?
Mr Young: We always buy glass in; we never manufacture glass. Turkington's only makes windows.
Mr McKeag: The manufacturing process did not change; we manufacture the windows as normal, and they are put together. You either glaze it and take it out or you set the glazing with it and take it out and it is glazed on site.
Mr Copeland: Across all the contracts that you have, how many required frames and glazing units to be put together in one piece before they were sent out?
Mr McKeag: Do you mean factory-glazed?
Mr Copeland: Factory-glazed.
Mr Young: At the start, they had to be factory-glazed, but we changed it.
Mr Copeland: In general.
Mr Young: We always install glass on site.
Mr McKeag: We never factory-glaze.
Mr Young: We put the window in, bolt it to the frame and then glaze it.
Mr Copeland: I do not mean this disrespectfully, but, in some respects, you were saying, "This is the way that we do it. This is the best way to do it. You should change your specification, even though it might have been arrived at at the end of a process".
Mr McKeag: No. Essentially, it was a breach of health and safety legislation on manual handling.
Mr Copeland: Right. And none of the other people who supplied windows or frames here or in the UK or the Housing Executive raised that. Essentially, what we are saying is that the Housing Executive specification —
The Chairperson: Michael, we are getting into stuff that is not the remit of this afternoon's session. We will move on.
Mr Wilson: I want to put this all in context. You sought a meeting simply because you had been unsuccessful in getting any satisfactory response from the Housing Executive despite how many requests?
Mr McKeag: There were follow-up e-mails.
Mr Young: There was a meeting and then follow-up e-mails.
Mr McKeag: How many e-mails?
Mr Young: At least two.
Mr Wilson: The main point of the meeting and one of the reasons why you copied me into that letter was that you wanted to identify savings to the Minister.
Mr McKeag: There were two issues: the health and safety issue and the savings.
Mr Wilson: Regardless of how the meeting was described, its outcome was that substantial savings were made to the public purse.
Mr McKeag: Yes. Both in the existing contract and in a new contract that has just been let.
Mr Wilson: Your company did not benefit from it. So, however the meeting was described, it was not and could not be construed in any way as hiding some advantage for Turkington's.
Mr McKeag: You have heard what we had to say today. I do not think that anyone around this table could construe that it was beneficial to Turkington's. I do not see how you could do that.
The Chairperson: I want to summarise this.
Mr Campbell: Chairman, could I ask just one —
Mr Dickson: I want to make a brief point. Mr Wilson made the point that the letter invited the Minister and him to a meeting about substantial savings.
Mr Wilson: I was not invited to any meeting.
Mr Dickson: Sorry, I know that you were not invited to a meeting. The letter refers —
The Chairperson: Sorry, folks, one wee second, please. Make all comments through the Chair and ask the Chair to let you speak. Another member was about to speak when you intervened.
Mr Campbell: I have one question about the Glass and Glazing Federation. You said that you met the Minister when he was at DCAL a number of years previously. Is that right? Minister McCausland?
Mr McKeag: No, I did not: Trevor Turkington met him in 2009.
Mr Campbell: The company did, and that was how you had the contact details for his special adviser.
Mr McKeag: That is right.
Mr Campbell: There was then a meeting or conversation to set up the meeting that we have the minute of. Was that a telephone conversation or a meeting?
Mr McKeag: My PA would have contacted Mr Brimstone to arrange a meeting for Trevor and Ian with the Minister. I was not at the meeting.
Mr Campbell: At that meeting, would you have referred to the fact that Turkington's was a member of the Glass and Glazing Federation?
Mr Young: We probably did. We probably said that we were members of the Glass and Glazing Federation and that we installed to its standards.
Mr McKeag: We think that that is something to be proud of.
Mr Campbell: Yes. I can see why. However, it was your recollection that that was mentioned at the meeting.
Mr Young: It probably was. We were there on business for Turkington's.
Mr Campbell: I understand that. You have been explicit about that. However, the Glass and Glazing Federation membership was mentioned in the set-up meeting, if you like, for the meeting with the Minister and then came up several times during the meeting. That is what you said earlier.
Mr McKeag: Yes, that is right.
Mr Campbell: OK.
Mr Dickson: Apologies, Chair. If the letter that you are referring to is the letter from your company dated 2 February, which is cc'd to Sammy, I do not see anything in it that says that substantial savings could be made or any reference to the costs or value of the contract. It is simply a general [Inaudible.] to congratulate the Executive on its foresight in tackling fuel poverty. It offers your services and suggests that specialist glazing manufacturers and installers could assist the Department in undertaking a major programme of work.
Mr Clarke: Find the fourth paragraph.
Mr Dickson: In particular, it promises "great potential if executed properly" but urges:
"caution...if the scheme is not handled properly".
None of that tells me that that there are millions of pounds to be saved.
Mr McKeag: In the meeting we mentioned that substantial savings could be made. I assume that Mr Brimstone notified the Minister of that.
Mr Dickson: Do you not think that the letter might have made reference to the meeting with Mr Brimstone?
Mr McKeag: As I said, if we were to write the letter again, maybe we would write it differently. However, we wrote it the way that we wrote it when we wrote it. We could all say that it could have been written better.
Mr Dickson: I am not suggesting that the letter could have been written better. I am suggesting that it seems odd that there is no reference to something like "further to our meeting with Mr Brimstone, when we set out potential savings".
Mr Clarke: Perhaps to help Mr Dickson, paragraph 4 of the letter states:
"This particular scheme promises great potential if executed properly but we urge caution that if the scheme is not handled properly a great opportunity could be lost."
Rather than having meetings with Ministers, do we want to spell out every last detail when requests are made? That is explicit enough. It says:
" a great opportunity could be lost".
It has been explained today that there were £20 million pounds worth of reasons why this opportunity could have been lost if they had not had the meeting.
Mr Dickson: It does not say what the lost opportunity was.
Mr Allister: I think that we should give these two gentlemen the opportunity to comment on this. They have said that they met the Housing Executive in late 2011 and then their e-mails were ignored. In its written submission — we will hear its oral evidence later — the Housing Executive told us that there was a meeting between Turkington's and its policy and standards team on 13 March 2012, just a month before the meeting with the Minister. You have not mentioned that meeting. Was there such a meeting?
Mr Young: I cannot recall.
Mr Allister: You have been explicit that there were no meetings after November and that e-mails were ignored, yet the Housing Executive will tell us that it met you on 13 March, and you cannot remember.
Mr McKeag: If it was on 13 March, it would have been after we requested a meeting with the Minister.
Mr Allister: Yes, but before you met him.
Mr McKeag: If that meeting happened, you can understand why.
Mr Allister: I am asking you whether that meeting happened.
Mr Young: I honestly cannot recall. I will have to get back to you on that.
Mr McKeag: How many times did you meet Mr Adamson?
Mr Young: Once.
Mr McKeag: He is the specifications man.
Mr Young: Yes.
Mr McKeag: You met him in late 2011.
Mr Young: Yes.
Mr McKeag: We met the specifications person once in late 2011.
Mr Allister: The Housing Executive will tell us that you met its policy and standards team. I do not know who that is, obviously.
Mr McKeag: I certainly did not meet them. Did you?
Mr Young: We met only one person.
Mr Allister: Finally —
Mr McKeag: You have site teams, site supervisors and site contracts managers. Perhaps they had some dialogue that we are not aware of, but there was certainly no meeting at our level.
Mr Allister: Nothing was reported to you about such a meeting.
Mr Young: In March 2011?
Mr Allister: 2012.
Mr McKeag: In other words, after we had requested a meeting and before we met Mr Adamson again.
Mr Young: There might have been a meeting in the offices of Turkington.
Mr Allister: I did not specify where the meeting was.
Mr Young: With his team. That was to do with a contract and getting a sample passed for a contract. I think that Mr Adamson was there.
Mr Allister: The Housing Executive is going to tell us:
— the executive —
"were aware that they"
— Turkington's —
"had some ideas about how double glazing could be fitted more economically, a meeting having previously taken place between representatives of Turkington Holdings and our Policy and Standards Team (13th March 2012)."
You seem to have a blank about that meeting.
Mr Young: We met Mr Adamson on his own prior to that. That may have been a meeting to do with the contract and getting a window passed for a certain contract.
Mr Allister: Was there a meeting or was there not in March?
Mr Young: I could not tell you when it was. There was a meeting, yes. There were —
Mr Allister: So you are now saying that there was a meeting.
Mr Young: There were four people from the Housing Executive at it.
Mr Allister: You now remember the number at it. This is a meeting that you could not remember a few minutes ago.
Mr McKeag: It was a meeting that had nothing to do with what we are here to talk about; it was a meeting to do with getting a sample house prepared for approval. Is that correct?
Mr Young: That is right, yes.
Mr Allister: According to the Housing Executive, it was aware of your ideas about fitting things more economically because of the meeting on 13 March.
Mr McKeag: It was told about it on 11 November.
Mr Allister: Sorry, did the meeting of 13 March deal with how you could do the job more economically?
Mr Young: It was to do with getting a window passed for a contract.
Mr Allister: Would that be how you would do the job more economically?
Mr Young: It may have come up, but I do not honestly remember. It was more to do with getting a contract pass for a site.
Mr Allister: No doubt we will hear from the Housing Executive about that meeting, but I thought that you should have the opportunity to comment.
Finally, are you putting it on the record emphatically that Turkington Holdings had nothing to gain from a hinge change?
Mr Young: Absolutely no.
Mr Allister: Absolutely no.
Mr Young: No.
Mr Allister: Thank you.
Mr Wilson: Just so that we can be clear about the meeting in March, when you requested the meeting with the Minister — you asked for the meeting with the Minister in January, you were finally told in February that the meeting could be granted but not until April 3 — you had had no response from the Housing Executive. Hence — in fact, I think that you have made it clear in your earlier evidence — had a meeting been granted by the Housing Executive or had there been a response from the Housing Executive at an earlier date, you would not have needed to go near the Minister.
Mr Young: Correct.
Mr McKeag: Yes. I will just emphasise again that we were live on site, and that makes a big difference to people responding.
The Chairperson: Obviously, we will pursue that with other people who will present evidence to the Committee, not least this afternoon, because it flows on that, if there was any discussion — you acknowledge that there was a meeting — would the upshot of that not have led to the Minister or other senior officials? However, that is something that we will take up with others, and we may have to return to you if you say, in fairness, that you were not clear on all the detail of that meeting. So, we may have to return to that.
I want to encapsulate some of this. First, I am trying to summarise the evidence so far. It was very clear that the meeting that was held on 16 April was requested by Turkington's and by Turkington's alone, representing only Turkington's.
Mr McKeag: Yes.
The Chairperson: That is fair enough. The meeting did not refer to representing anybody else, whatever organisations you might be members of. It did not refer to anybody else, nor did it suggest that it represented anybody else. You have no explanation of how the meeting was subsequently characterised as being a meeting with the Glass and Glazing Federation and Fusion21.
Mr McKeag: We never saw a minute of that meeting.
The Chairperson: You did not receive any minutes of that. OK. You are saying that there was no discussion by you at that meeting on the 16th about getting the contracts or lobbying for work or anything of that nature.
Mr McKeag: No, none whatsoever.
The Chairperson: OK. That is fair enough.
No other members have indicated that they wish to speak. I want to give you gentlemen an opportunity. Is there anything else that you want to put on the record this afternoon, or are you happy enough that you have covered the issues? I just want to give you a fair opportunity.
Mr McKeag: I think that we have covered everything. However, I reiterate that we had concerns, we tried to get them resolved at a lower level, and they were not resolved. We were live on site, which makes a big difference to people's response times. We took it further, and that is why we are here today. In all of this, particularly in the press, what has been lost is the substantial savings that have been derived because Turkington's took that initiative. Indeed, you could say that we have been lambasted in the press over it. It is unfair.
The Chairperson: OK. Fair enough. So, you are happy enough, at least for now, that you have put your case on the table. I thank you, Jim and Ian, for your presence this afternoon.
Mr McKeag: Thank you.


text:
A leaking water heater may or may in no way seem to be a big deal. Nevertheless, it doesn't matter whether it is a large leak or a little leak, either may result in a whole lot of destruction to ones residence in the form of water harm. Frequently house owners forget to realize that a tiny leak is usually the warning sign of something more substantial which is starting to happen, or may happen in the foreseeable future. In the worse scenario, that little leak may turn into a significant flood if the water heater is close to totally giving out. In any case, we are right here for helping with any kind of Vancouver Hot Water Heater Repair which might be needed.
Apart from water damage to ones house via a leaking storage tank, there are actually health associated issues with almost any water leak inside a household. The dampness may bring about mold or mildew development. Individuals who have problems with allergies or asthma, it is not a fantastic scenario. The EPA states that certain mold spores are hazardous and can cause significant health issues.
Fix any leaks in your home's roof, walls, or plumbing so mold does not have moisture to grow. http://www.cdc.gov/mold/dampness_facts.htm
In hopes that a present water leak will repair on its own and merely disappear is something which just doesn't occur unfortunately. Plumbing leaks merely get worse over time. We have composed a step-by-step list of actions to take during these situations.
Action Steps for Leaking Water Heaters
1. First make sure that it really is the water heater that the leaking water is originating from.
If there is water close to where the hot water heater is located, the leak may not always be coming from it. Have a look at all water pipes or other objects close to where the heater is located. Are there some other appliances close that might generate condensation? If ones heater is found in a basement, this can be the case. It may potentially be a furnace drain line too, or coming from a water softener.
Initially, wipe up the water and determine if it comes back any time before long by watching the location regularly. Look over the water heater totally to verify if any water is originating from one of the fittings, T&P valve, or drain valve. When it's completely dry, continue to check out different items and places close by.
When absolutely nothing else is wet in the general region, put paper towels on the floor in the area that had been previously wet. Take a look at it each hour or so to verify the paper towels are still dry. It can be a lot easier to notice the paper towels being wet then the ground. After a day if nothing at all is wet once more, there should be absolutely nothing to concern yourself with, nevertheless still keep a watch on it for a couple days. In situations where water is coming back, and there is absolutely no other supply close by that it may be from, we will go on to the step two at this point to establish the source of the leak.
2. Shut the water heater's power off
Preferably, it is common knowledge that water and electric power do not go good together, so shut off the power for safety explanations.
For gas water heaters, there ought to be an on/off dial which needs to be established to the off position. Leave the gas line on right now still.
For electric heaters, head to the property's breaker box and switch off the breaker of the water heater.
3. Shut the water supply off
If one is sure that the leak is originating from the hot water heater, and in cases where it is reasonably big, turning the water off will remove the chance of water continuing to go into the storage tank and leak in ones home. Again, with a big leak coming from the heater, and if the shut off valve simply cannot be gotten to or if its not working correctly, go find and switch off the main shut off valve for the whole house. If one continues to be unclear the leak is coming from the water heater, one can keep the water supply on at this point.
Please be aware that water coming from the storage tank shall be hot and may burn ones skin. Most heaters will likely be established to a temperature of at the very least 120° F, that may lead to first degree burns on contact.
4. Identify the leak's position
We do not need to have our Vancouver water heater clients to self diagnose their leaks prior to getting in touch with us, particularly should there be a major water leak scenario occurring, but the more one can the faster we can help. Next is a summary of potential reasons why the leak is happening.
Leaking Water Connections
Verify to make sure the cold water inlet as well as the hot water outlet connections are tight. They are usually found at the top of the storage tank. Use a pipe wrench to confirm the connections. This is certainly an uncomplicated fix in case it is from where the leak is coming.
Leaking T&P Valve
Located on the side of the storage tank is the temperature and pressure relief valve. It will in addition have a drain pipe going down to the ground from it. The valve controls the volume of pressure which builds up inside the storage tank. It will let water out when it must control the pressure. This valve could be the cause of the leak and might need replacing whenever it doesn't stay shut firmly. Look to verify if any water is leaking via the valve. If water is coming from the valve when its in the shut position, a new valve shall be necessary. This really is an important valve of the hot water heater, and one that needs to work correctly. However, replacing it is easy and not expensive.
Danny Lipford suggests that:
Pressure relief valves sometime develop a drip when opened for the first time in years. Try opening and closing it a few times to see if it will seat itself. http://www.todayshomeowner.com/repair-leaking-water-heater-pressure-relief/
First, examine to discover if there may very well be debris in the valve. Set a container below the discharge tube and open the valve by lifting the handle on the valve. The water that is drained may flush the valve and clear away any dirt that could be in the path.
Other factors regarding a T&P valve leak might be high water pressure in the local water system, or via a backflow preventer located near the water meter.
Leaking Drain Valve
Check the drain valve at the bottom of the heater. These are commonly composed of plastic, and as a result, can break after a while. Ensure that it is closed tight. If the drain valve requires being replaced, it is an easy fix.
A drain valve leak may well be due to dirt within the valve. Try this first. Place a container beneath the valve and move the valve to open it. Draining some water should remove the debris. In the event following flushing, it continues to leak, it will need to be replaced.
In case the leak is originating from here and the valve keeps leaking due to the fact it needs replaced, try connecting a garden hose to it and have the hose go outdoors. With some luck, that could eliminate the water leaking inside your home.
Leak on the bottom of the tank
Whenever the tank leaks at the bottom, it indicates a considerable internal dilemma. Because of precisely how the water storage tank is constructed, being covered inside insulation and possessing an external skin, if it is leaking, it will probably not be seen from the outside. An internal water leak typically will be visible in the bottom of the storage tank. The more aged the storage tank is, the more likely it is beginning to rust and deteriorate. A rusting tank will need to get exchanged.
5. Will I require a repair or replacement water heater?
Coming from our experience, we will conduct a repair to take care of the leak, considerably more often then having to replace ones heater. The faster we could check out the situation, the faster we are able to accomplish a repair previous to the damage becoming any worse. We do highly suggest that any repairs or replacements be completed by a pro and not oneself, to guarantee they are accomplished the right way and up to code. Frequently, manufacturer warranties could be voided when a non-licensed person works upon it.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Harold & Lori's wedding was a beautiful blur. I say this because on MONDAY night, I received a blitz of texts from a friend I had worked with almost 6 years ago, asking if I had availability for that coming Saturday. Somehow, we had no plans, I had no events, and I'd just gotten a new camera to try out- so I enthusiastically accepted their wedding and here is a little highlight of it.
The love that I received from this family was indescribable. I was so happy to be a part of such an incredible day. thank you, Sanchez family, for allowing me the honor of capturing such a wonderful time in your lives.


text:
I was looking at the spec's of a specific mining machine, and looking at the track section it has ground pressure ratings:
Hmm, 1 decimal place for the psi rating, but 8 or 9 dp for kPa, looks like someone was asleep during high school science.
Charts like psi to pa this don't help the matter, but really given that the 15.5 psi can come from any value is the range 15.45 psi to 15.5499999 you get a value interval of +-0.344737864kPa. Thus using the old rule output dp equals no more than input dp, thus 1dp or give the error is 0.3 kPa, you should almost use 0dp.
Upon showing this to a co-worker, I also noticed that the track length is noted to the half inch 181.5" (it also could be read as tenth of an inch) but the metric value is 461.01 cm, yes to the hundredth of an centimeter, called a tenth of a millimeter, that's some very fine precession. Even at the tenth of a inch, that's a +-1mm error.
Picky I know, but I've been slow on the blogging front, so any post is a good post.


text:
"Don't worry, everybody, everything will get better after the 2014 World Cup." This tweet has been immortalized in reaction GIFs, YouTube comments and memes across Brazilian webspace as hilariously, tragically wrong. Since Brazil's loss to Germany at the World Cup, the country's political system has experienced a dramatic upheaval, culminating in the election of Jair Bolsonaro to president in October 2018. Bolsonaro, an ultraconservative ex-military officer, is often referred to in US media as the "Brazilian Trump." While there are definite parallels between the two, in many ways, Bolsonaro poses a far more serious threat to everyone who is not white, wealthy, male, straight, Christian and pro-imperialist.
I want to emphasize that attention to on-the-ground political events in Brazil is incredibly important. Yet, it's important to look not just at the crisis of his election as an event, but at the conditions that enabled him to be elected, and liberals' and leftists' efforts to regroup in the aftermath. To do that, I think that we must look at a crucial component of how politics play out in the public sphere: memes. Brazil has the world's fourth-highest number of internet users, and social media is a primary sources of news, especially among young people. Last year, Datafolha, Brazil's largest polling institute, reported that only 10% of people aged 16 to 24 have faith in the press. Meanwhile, 66% get their news from social media. As in the US, for many of Brazil's youth, news comes in the form of personal social networks, online videos, and above all, memes. In this context, it becomes important to pay attention to the tweet above, to the irony that masks disillusionment.
Brazilians have plenty of reason to be disillusioned with their political system. A massive government corruption scandal known as Operation Car Wash (Lava Jato) culminated in the imprisonment of dozens of high-profile politicians and businessmen, including, in July 2017, beloved former Workers' Party (PT) president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, popularly known as Lula. The arrests marked not just a political upheaval, but an ideological collapse. Lula and the PT represented hope and grassroots change for much of Brazil's population, especially the urban working class.
The unveiling of rampant corruption and bureaucracy dealt a shattering blow to the PT's legacy. Amid huge protests, President Dilma Rousseff, Lula's protégé, was impeached in 2016. These protests, which began in 2013, and are collectively referred to as "Come to the Streets" (Vem Pra Rua), showcased the immense power of social media in the public sphere. The protests were predominantly organized on Facebook by the Free Brazil Movement (Movimento Brasil Livre or MBL), which billed itself as a non-partisan, anti-corruption movement. They received broad popular support across the political spectrum, with hundreds of thousands turning out in cities across Brazil to protest high bus tariffs, bureaucratic excess, and nepotism. Online, the protests coincided with the explosive popularity of Brazilian Corruption Memes (Corrupcão Brasileira Memes), a Facebook meme page that heavily echoed MBL rhetoric.
As the protests progressed, they became increasingly partisan and anti-PT, and by early 2015, the MBL was the driving force in Dilma's impeachment. A report from Vice revealed that not long afterwards, MBL leaders actually bought control of Brazilian Corruption Memes from the non-MBL administrators (the irony of an anti-corruption page being paid off is palpable). As a mouthpiece for the MBL, the page underwent a massive shift in demographics. The non-partisan base, as well as left-wingers who had initially supported an anti-corruption agenda, left in disgust, while ultraconservatives found themselves in possession of a forum with immense social media clout. Even though these memes were never explicitly endorsed by politicians, there is no doubt that the increased social media presence had real-world effects: in November 2018, one of MBL's founders, 23-year-old Kim Kataiguri, was elected to Congress under the Bolsonaro regime.
Kataiguri's bizarre political trajectory is not the only case where memes and social media have facilitated the co-opting of popular movements by the far-right. Last month, a YouTube video went viral of 72-year-old Nilson Papinho ecstatically playing with his first successful batch of "slime," a squishy goop used to make 'oddly satisfying' online videos. What began as an innocuous video of a cute, elderly man quickly turned sour as Twitter posts began to circulate claiming that Slime Grandpa (Vovô da slime) was a serial child molester. Others quickly made posts denying these accusations, all claiming to know Papinho personally. At the same time, Brazilian Corruption Memes began churning out posts portraying Slime Grandpa as a fervent Bolsonaro supporter, or "Bolsominion." The catch, as reported by The Intercept Brasil, is that all of these accusations and accounts were fake: they were created en masse by Bolsonarist internet users hoping to stir up controversy. The damage had already been done, though, as several prominent left-wing accounts began posting warnings against Papinho's ultraconservatism and pedophilia. This, in turn, gave MBL pundits the opportunity to decry the Left's smear campaign against a sweet old slime-making man.
One reason behind these convoluted transitions from popular to political to far-right is the versatility and easy distribution of memes. An image template can be easily re-captioned or re-worded to mean something entirely different than how it was originally intended. Perhaps in an effort to avoid these appropriations, several leftist meme pages have sprung up in the aftermath of Bolsonaro's election that are dedicated to hyper-specific content. For example, Barbie and Ken, Good Citizens (Barbie e Ken Cidadãos de Bem) is an account that only posts images of Barbie and Ken dolls captioned with far-right slogans like, "A good citizen is an armed citizen!" It's a satirical portrayal of Bolsonaro supporters as elitist, vapid, and overwhelmingly white, effectively turning their own rhetoric against them. Another popular page is simply a daily update on whether Bolsonaro has finally ended government corruption; the answer is always some variation on "no."
Other pages, rather than aiming for specificity, have tried to appeal to a broad audience. The Brazil that Worked Out (O Brasil que deu certo) is one of the largest meme pages, with over 2 million likes on Facebook. The page purports to share images of quintessentially Brazilian culture. A recent post, for instance, was a picture of a detention slip for dancing samba while reciting the national anthem. Of course, what makes something 'quintessentially Brazilian' is up for debate, and the page definitely relies on certain cultural tropes to craft a national narrative. Yet according to Gabriela Lunardi, a PhD candidate at the Queensland University of Technology, these generalizations are a key trait. Lunardi, who wrote her thesis on Brazilian memes, argued in an interview that "it is the lack of a structured cultural identity that shapes Brazilian humour on memes. One of my findings is that Brazilian memes work as national identity shapers." Memes allow young people on both ends of politics to work out new definitions of 'Brazilian-ness' that may be different from those prescribed by the traditional media.
Nevertheless, the subjects around which these identities revolve are changing. Matheus Laneri, one of two admins for The Brazil that Worked Out, told The College Hill Independent that he has noticed a general shift in the scope of memes after Bolsonaro's election: "Memes didn't play the strongest role [on their own] in the recent elections; the real influence was fake news," Laneri says. "Now that we have an elected president, all the memes are focused on Bolsonaro. Both to praise him and to critique him. What used to be scattered is now focused." It is nearly impossible to produce content that does not reckon with Bolsonaro, whether in the post or in the comment section. And while The Brazil that Worked Out is not explicitly political, Laneri emphasized that memes of all kinds provide a relief from the crises of current politics. "We are unbelievers, politically speaking, so the only thing left to do is poke fun at yourself." He noted, "I think it's an escape valve, because if we don't laugh, we'll just be living to live."
This idea of an emotional "escape valve" was echoed by a recent study at FGV-RJ, measuring posting activity by various political groups during the impeachment proceedings against ex-president Dilma. On the average day, there was a mix of posts by an anti-impeachment base, a pro-impeachment fringe and a 'neutral' press corps. However, on days of important events in the proceedings—culminating in the actual impeachment decision—a fourth group emerged: people posting memes and satirical content in the "native language of the internet." Pedro Lehnard, the author of the study, told Nexo Jornal that it was a way to "depressurize" political emergencies: "since we have to talk about it, since we can't not talk about it, let's talk about it in a lighter way."
It is important to note that this lightheartedness often co-exists with a deep frustration and resentment for the political system. This is a sentiment expressed by some of the more radically leftist meme pages, like Capitalism that Worked Out (Capitalismo Que Deu Certo). The memes are faster, cruder, and more pointed: a recent Twitter repost reads, "I'm not great at telling jokes but let me give it a shot: The United States offering humanitarian aid." Oliver Lani, a 21-year-old from São Paulo, is the admin. Throughout our conversation, he noted the exhaustion induced by living in a capitalist society under a far-right regime: "Most young people are tired of their routine and are just trying to get home alive by the end of the night. Through online content, you try to forget the depression and the stress and the anxiety, and to find people like you and with similar ideas." He claims that this political fatigue and the need for emotional rather than intellectual connections feeds into the aesthetic style of many Brazilian political memes. "Nobody wants to spend more than 30 seconds trying to understand a meme. Our brains don't want to strain, so it's easier to place your bets on emotion. And laughing or finding something funny is the best emotion you can offer."
Aside from comedic relief, Lani believes that meme communities offer a space for young, radically-minded Brazilians to collectively re-examine notions of cultural identity. "People today have a much better notion of our history, we really understand our reality. Many people with liberal and leftist tendencies have stopped idealizing the 'American Dream.' By informing ourselves, we can see things in Brazil as they really are, and abandon European social norms and behaviors, and begin to relearn and construct our own identity." In fact, some meme pages have become spaces for reviving Brazil's left in the wake of Bolsonaro's rise to power, for salvaging socialism and social justice as legitimate ideologies in the political sphere. Brazilian Revolutionary Memes, for instance, is particularly adept at moving seamlessly between political and cultural commentary, exemplified by an image of a chart showing "Things that Brazilians don't understand the concept of: communism, fascism, feminism, express lane—15 item maximum." Others, like Leftist Menes [sic] (Menes da Esquerda) and Socializing (Socializando), are equal parts entertaining and educational posting both memes and videos explaining concepts in Marxist, feminist, and critical race theory.
Despite these advances, though, there is a deep anxiety among leftist meme-makers about the potential consequences of their content. Part of this is a concern for their immediate liberty and safety, as "the authoritarian attitudes of the current government make the opposition more apprehensive," says meme researcher Lunardi. But there is also the danger of memes being co-opted, of posts repeating the errors of Brazilian Corruption Memes and Slime Grandpa. "The way Bolsonaro's campaign happened, based on fake news shared mostly on WhatsApp groups, has made the Brazilian Internet community (at least the left-wing supporters) rethink the weight and power of creating memes that will circulate among people from different social classes and levels of digital literacy." Lunardi explains. "The average Brazilian uses the internet to be informed and may not get the irony of certain memes that criticize the government." Indeed, all of this means little to the large chunk of the Brazilian population without internet access. And though Lani himself makes memes, he remains wary of how easily they can be exploited: "Memes become ideological tools for misinformation. The best way to transform a truth into a lie, is to transform the truth into a joke."
It remains to be seen, then, how leftist movements will regain footholds under the Bolsonaro regime. Especially with Bolsonaro's support from far-right governments abroad, it will be an uphill battle. And memes may do more harm than good in this struggle, as "tools for misinformation" for a government built on misinformation. Yet, across the Brazilian web, pockets of resistance have formed. They are places to express, through humor, a resistance to the toll that politics takes on the minds and bodies of the people it neglects. As Lani puts it, "Nowadays people in Brazil are thinking more about politics. They feel indignant, and in the end this has united a lot of people and made them realize their realities and convictions. They don't want to change the world. The want the world to change for them and become a place that's less lethal and unequal." So, while memes are unlikely to directly incite political action, they are a small, bizarre, unapologetic demand for a different world, a demand that may, perhaps, grow into a clamor.
ADAM FERTIG B/RISD'19 wants you to join the U.S. Network for Democracy in Brazil.


text:
Pouligny St Pierre
Pouligny St Pierre is a small village north-west of Le Blanc in the Brenne regional natural park, which is famous for its fine cheese; one of the rare goats' milk cheeses to have an appellation d'origine controllee (AOC) label.
The cheese is a pyramid-shape, with a fine and slightly blueish crust.
page revision: 1, last edited: 09 Feb 2008 13:29


text:
There are more offensively worded attacks on your character than someone asking you, "Are you sure this is the hill you want to die on?". By that I mean only that none of the individual words in this sentence is, in itself, offensive. I believe these words put together are either one of the most loathsome of underhanded comments, or one of the most hilarious of sarcastic verbal smack downs.
The Death of Persuasion
Nowadays, when people look at that timeless picture of an ambiguous (old woman? young woman?), they see only one woman and it's impossible to persuade them that a second woman exists. This, I'm afraid, represents the death of persuasion and, unfortunately, the end of humankind.
Friday the 13th: If You're Not Superstitious, You Might Be a Sociopath
WARNING: this article contains explicit content that might jinx you. If you're a superstitious person, read on with caution, or stop reading immediately. If you're still reading at this point, you're probably not that superstitious about bringing misfortune upon yourself, or others. Still reading even now? Well, not being superstitious in any way whatsoever might be an indication that you're a sociopath.
Continue reading "Friday the 13th: If You're Not Superstitious, You Might Be a Sociopath"
The Latest, Jian Ghomeshi Trial
I have not waded through the public evidence in the Jian Ghomeshi case, nor do I claim to be a subject matter, or legal expert on this trial. I'm not going to publicly convict, nor exonerate Mr. Ghomeshi of the charges laid against him. What I am going to do is comment on a sentiment that is being shared in the media and in my personal life. Despite my lack of knowledge of the legal system and criminal code, limited expertise about sexual assault, and only glancing familiarity with the Ghomeshi case, I'm confident that I can settle any arguments you may be having about whether victims of a sexual assault should be blamed for what happened to them.
Lotto Libido
In terms of your chances of winning "the" lottery, you're more likely to get struck by lightning, while drowning, after being attacked by a shark, in an above ground swimming pool, in Iceland. (Or something along those lines).


text:
Zyflamend & Wholemega – A Comprehensive Approach to Heart Health January 28, 2012
New Chapter Zyflamend combined with Wholemega for a comprehensive approach to heart health*
Zyflamend modulates enzymes to promote a healthy inflammation response.* Wholemega Cardio extra-virgin whole fish oil helps to restore the natural balance of Omega-3 and Omega-6 fatty acids; a key heart health marker.* Both formulas combine to deliver a powerful and natural approach to help maintain a balanced inflammation response and promote heart health.*
Recent research suggests that a factor in predicting heart health is gauging the amount of inflammation in the arteries. Maintaining a healthy cardiovascular system is strongly linked to a healthy inflammation response.* Zyflamend® is the #1-selling herbal in the U.S.‡ for healthy inflammation response.* It contains hundreds of bioactive constituents from ten of the most researched botanicals that promote a healthy inflammatory response making it a compelling choice for promoting heart health.*
Omega 3, 5, 6, 7 and 9's belong to a group of fatty acids often referred to as "good fats." The benefits of these oils are numerous – they serve to nourish brain, heart, eye and kidney tissues.* For optimal benefit, fish oil must become incorporated into cell membranes where it serves to modulate cell signal events (e.g. modulate inflammation) and increases membrane fluidity.* Wholemega Cardio Fish Oil combines clinically researched, naturally pure whole fish oil with tonic herbs that target cardiovascular health support.* The result is a whole-food heart health formula designed to protect and promote a healthy cardiovascular system.*
For your convenience, this new combination product has been added to the store. Buy Now.


text:
One thing that many students don't understand is that they have time by their side. The moment you understand this fact then you should know you are on the right path. If you desire to avoid the vicious cycle that comes with overworking in your early life then you ought to do one thing – INVEST!
How to invest while in college
As a student, you are always focused on books in order to get the necessary skills and get 'a good job' in order to live a full life. However, sooner than later you realize that it was not what you envisioned. In some cases, you go back to college to get additional certifications in order to get high pay from your employer in order to make ends meet. Little do you know you are slowly but steadily getting trapped in corporate rat race. Time fly's by and sooner you're focusing on your family rather than your personal life. Here are some tips for you to invest while in college;
- Start as soon as you can and if you can save on jobs that you come by then it will be much better for you. In all cases, time favors you and you have nothing to lose in the long run.
- Do a thorough research on companies you desire to invest in and diversify your investment. Remember, smaller fixed investments overtime will give you high returns. You can do this on a monthly basis or quarterly basis based on what you want to achieve.
- Choose a highly reputable brokerage firm that has a proven track record of excellent results. In fact, it is highly advisable to consult with market experts who are ready to take responsibility on handling your investments.
- Pay high-interest debts as you invest because this will cater for losses just in case your investments do not offer returns as expected.
- Strike a balance between investing and other expenses in order to get the best out of your college life.
Practice is key – create a rhythm
It can be quite difficult to start investing but if you create a rhythm it becomes as easy as counting 123. In fact, it becomes a habit and this is one the best elements that will help you perfect the art of investing over time. Further, take advantage of the free advice that is offered by regulated industry player, use technology that makes investment easier, and get an ideal plan that will help you meet your specified goal.
How much should you invest? This is one of the frequently asked questions asked by young investors. In as much as it is important, it should not deter you from following your dreams. The answer to this question is simple and pretty straight forward- start with what you have! Remember, you are targeting to be financially stable after college and you can only invest when you have at hand.
Pool resources with like-minded students
It can be a little bit difficult to get over $50,000 to invest at one-go but if you pool your resources together and diversify your investments. In this case, it is advisable to invest both as an individual and as a group. If you do this you ca never go wrong.
Classical Case
One of the best examples of starting to invest early in life is Warren buffet who presently averages $ 66 billion. He started investing early but it was in college that he was greatly influenced by David Odd and Benjamin Graham (top security analyst). He has remained focused and steadfast ever since. Of course this is one of the success stories you can consider for inspiration as a young investor.
It is important to contact and share this information with friends you think can have the same dream. You'll be surprised how much money you can raise in a short time to get started-save time because time is money.
finding money for college guide
end of post idea
view home improvement ideas at our Photo Remodeling center
Helpful article? Leave us a quick comment below.
And please share this article within your social networks.


text:
WASHINGTON (AP) — Washington Wizards shooting guard Bradley Beal will miss the rest of his rookie season with a right leg injury.
The Wizards announced before their game at the Toronto Raptors on Wednesday that Beal has a stress injury in his right fibula and is expected to resume basketball-related activities in about six weeks.
Entering Wednesday, Washington was 28-46, with eight games left in the regular season.
Beal, the No. 3 overall pick in last year's draft out of Florida, averaged 13.9 points, 3.8 assists and 2.4 rebounds this season. He earned Eastern Conference rookie of the month honors in December and January.
Beal played 27½ minutes in Washington's 90-86 victory over Chicago on Tuesday night, his second game back after missing time with a left ankle injury.
He had been bothered by the right leg, too, and an MRI exam Wednesday showed the stress injury.
Beal already had been sidelined for a total of 18 games this season: 11 because of the left ankle, five because of a sprained right wrist, and two because of a sore back.
When healthy, Beal and point guard John Wall — the No. 1 overall pick in the 2010 draft — gave the Wizards a glimpse of what could be their backcourt of the future.


text: Adapt, recharge, and go further with your Nexus 7 (2013) Convenient detachable USB cable connects your Nexus 7 (2013) Auto current detection adjusts to local standards and grids worldwide Extra compact and light for an easy fit anywhere at home and on the move Complete peace of mind when using your Nexus 7 (2013) as the battery never runs out! Shop Modal header Adapt, recharge, and go further with your Nexus 7 (2013) Technology keeps getting more compact and more convenient, but is still held back by the need to lug around a clunky power adapter to recharge devices. No more. Take power into your hands with a slim and compact adapter that works with almost every portable PC out there, plus takes in smartphones and tablets thanks to a dedicated USB charging point. Just drop it in your bag or even pocket and get going – no need to carry anything else, as power is always within easy reach. Available in US/EU/UK/AUS Plug type


text:
- Font:
- +
- -
MONTERREY, Mexico, April 15, 2011 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Mexican airport operator Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V., known as OMA (Nasdaq:OMAB), (BMV:OMA), announces that its Annual Shareholders' Meeting approved the payment of a Ps. 400 million cash dividend and elected a new Chairman and two new members to its Board of Directors, among other actions.
The Shareholders' Meeting approved a cash dividend of Ps. 400,000,000, corresponding to Ps. 1.00 per share, to be paid in four quarterly installments of Ps. 0.25 per share each. The dividend payment dates will be July 15, 2011, October 17, 2011, January 16, 2012, and April 16, 2012.
The Shareholders' Meeting also noted with appreciation the leadership of Bernardo Quintana, who stepped down as Chairman of the Board after serving in that position since 2005.
The Shareholders approved the proposal of the Board of Directors that José Luis Guerrero Álvarez, the CEO of Empresas ICA, be the new Chairman of the Board. The shareholders also elected Diego Quintana Kawage as a director and Cristina Gil White as an independent director.
A summary of the resolutions approved by the Shareholders' Meeting may be found on the Investor Relations page of OMA's website, http://ir.oma.aero .
This press release may contain forward-looking information and statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts. These statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and projections about future events. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "target," or similar expressions. While OMA's management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, investors are cautioned that forward-looking information and statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and are generally beyond the control of OMA, that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those discussed in our most recent annual report filed on Form 20-F under the caption "Risk Factors." OMA undertakes no obligation to publicly update its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
About OMA
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V., known as OMA, operates 13 international airports in nine states of central and northern Mexico. OMA's airports serve Monterrey, Mexico's third largest metropolitan area, the tourist destinations of Acapulco, Mazatlán, and Zihuatanejo, and nine other regional centers and border cities. OMA also operates a hotel and commercial areas inside Terminal 2 of the Mexico City airport. OMA employs over 1,000 persons in order to offer passengers and clients, airport and commercial services in facilities that comply with all applicable international safety, security standards, and ISO 9001:2008. OMA's strategic shareholder members are ICA, Mexico's largest engineering, procurement, and construction company, and Aéroports de Paris Management, subsidiary of Aéroports de Paris, the second largest European airports operator. OMA is listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange (OMA) and on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (OMAB). For more information, please visit us at:
- Website: http://www.oma.aero
- Twitter:http://twitter.com/OMAeropuertos
- Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/OMA/137924482889484
CONTACT: Jose Luis Guerrero Cortes OMA, CFO +52.81.8625.4300 ext.308 firstname.lastname@example.com Daniel Wilson Zemi Communications +1.212.689.9560 email@example.com
© Copyright 2012, GlobeNewswire, Inc. All Rights Reserved


text:
Read: Proverbs 22:17 – 24:22
In many Bibles there is a section in Proverbs 22-24 that has the title "Thirty Sayings of the Wise." All Bibles are not sectioned off the same way and in searching through several I realized that some do not have this particular heading at the beginning of Proverbs 22:17. It is a reminder that through the ages the words of scripture have not changed but they have been translated, organized and numbered to make them easier to read and easier to turn to specific passages. Most of the chapters and verses of the Bible were added in the 1400's and 1500's.
The book of Proverbs is one of those books of the Bible that can be divided up in many different ways. The short concise nuggets of wisdom and direction are not written in a certain flowing manner. For some this makes it harder to read, but others find it refreshing. In some ways Proverbs is the Bible's version of twitter, most of the sayings actually are 140 characters or less.
In verse 17 of Proverbs 22 these 30 sayings begin with…. "Pay attention and turn your ear to the sayings of the wise; apply your heart to what I teach, for it is pleasing when you keep them in your heart and have all of them ready on your lips." In this world of constant media and information it is important for us to weed out the wise council from the unwise council. Not everything that is stated on Facebook and Twitter is true. Some of them are opinions, some are facts, some are rumors, and others are just folly.
As followers of Jesus we need to be careful to discern the wise direction from the folly. The way that we do that is by testing it with God's Word. Our culture will not always lead us down the path that God has for us, in fact our culture will often tempt us to try alternate paths. That is not new of course, it is why Solomon wrote these wise sayings in the first place. He wanted others to learn from his mistakes.
Saying 12 in Proverbs 23:12 says, "Apply your heart to instruction and your ears to words of knowledge." That is great council in a world that is filled with so many opinions and worldviews. It is also a wonderful reminder of why we need to be engaged in God's Word each and every day. God has helpful instruction for us and wonderful words of knowledge that keep us headed down the straight and narrow path.
Make it personal: As you watch the news on T.V., listen to talk radio, and read various books and magazines, test everything you see and hear with the words of Jesus and the Word of God. Don't be led astray by opinions that are in direct conflict with God and his plan and purpose for us as his followers.
Have a great week, Glen Rhodes, Arthur Mennonite Church