text: This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-04-720T entitled 'Terrorism Insurance: Effects of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002' which was released on April 28, 2004. This text file was formatted by the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this document to firstname.lastname@example.com. This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material separately. Testimony: Before the Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises and the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Financial Services, House of Representatives: United States General Accounting Office: GAO: For Release on Delivery Expected at 10:00 a.m. EDT: Wednesday, April 28, 2004: Terrorism Iinsurance: Effects of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002: Statement of Richard J. Hillman, Director, Financial Markets and Community Investment: GAO-04-720T: GAO Highlights: Highlights of GAO-04-720T, a testimony before the House Financial Services Committee, Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government-Sponsored Enterprises and the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. Why GAO Did This Study: After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, insurance coverage for terrorism largely disappeared. Congress passed the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) in 2002 to help commercial property-casualty policyholders obtain terrorism insurance and give the insurance industry time to develop mechanisms to provide such insurance after the act expires on December 31, 2005. Under TRIA, the Department of Treasury (Treasury) caps insurer liability and would process claims and reimburse insurers for a large share of losses from terrorist acts that Treasury certified as meeting certain criteria. As Treasury and industry participants have operated under TRIA for more than a year, GAO was asked to describe how TRIA affected the terrorism insurance market. What GAO Found: TRIA has enhanced the availability of terrorism insurance for commercial policyholders, largely fulfilling a principal objective of the program. In particular, TRIA has benefited commercial policyholders in major metropolitan areas perceived to be at greater risk for a terrorist attack. Prior to TRIA, we reported concern that some development projects had already been delayed or cancelled because of the unavailability of insurance and continued fears that other projects also would be adversely impacted. We also conveyed the widespread concern that general economic growth and development could be slowed by a lack of available terrorism insurance. Since TRIA's enactment, terrorism insurance generally has been widely available, even for development projects in perceived high-risk areas, largely because of the requirement in TRIA that insurers "make available" coverage for terrorism on terms not differing materially from other coverage. Although the purpose of TRIA is to make terrorism insurance available, it does not directly address prices. As part of its assessment of TRIA's effectiveness, Treasury is engaged in gathering data through surveys that should provide useful information about terrorism insurance prices in the marketplace. Despite increased availability of coverage, limited industry data suggest that most commercial policyholders are not buying terrorism insurance, perhaps because they perceive their risk of losses from a terrorist act as being relatively low. The potential negative effects of low purchase rates, in combination with the probability that those most likely to be the targets of terrorist attacks may also be the ones most likely to have purchased coverage, would become evident only in the aftermath of a terrorist attack and could include more difficult economic recovery for businesses without terrorism coverage or potentially significant financial problems for insurers. Moreover, those that have purchased terrorism insurance may still be exposed to significant risks that have been excluded by insurance companies, such as nuclear, biological, or chemical contamination. Meanwhile, although insurers and some reinsurers have cautiously reentered the terrorism risk market to cover insurers' remaining exposures, little progress has been observed within the private sector toward either finding a reliable method for pricing terrorism insurance or developing any viable reinsurance alternatives to TRIA once it expires. What GAO Recommends: GAO recommends that the Secretary of the Treasury, as part of Treasury's study of the effectiveness of TRIA and after consultation with insurance industry participants, identify for Congress alternatives that may exist for expanding the availability and affordability of terrorism insurance after TRIA expires. These alternatives could assist Congress during deliberations on the insurance industry's capacity to provide terrorism insurance. [End of section] Mr. Chairman, Madam Chairwoman, and Members of the Subcommittees: I am pleased to be here today to discuss our report on the implementation of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (TRIA) and the act's impact on the economy.[Footnote 1] The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, drastically changed the way insurers viewed the risk of terrorism. An industry that had considered the risk of terrorism so low that it did not identify or price terrorism risk separate from property and casualty coverage will ultimately pay approximately $40 billion for losses arising from September 11, according to industry experts. Responding to terrorism risk after September 11, reinsurers began excluding terrorism from coverage as contracts between reinsurers and insurers came up for renewal.[Footnote 2] Without reinsurance, insurers retained greater levels of risks than they could responsibly carry, and their reaction was to exclude these risks from commercial policies as they were renewed. In short, believing that neither the frequency nor magnitude of terrorism losses could be estimated, insurance companies withdrew from the market. In the aftermath of September 11, we reported that terrorism insurance was disappearing in the marketplace, particularly for large businesses and those perceived to be at some risk.[Footnote 3] We also reported significant concern that some development projects had already been delayed or cancelled because of the unavailability of insurance and fears that others would follow. Furthermore, there was widespread concern that general economic growth and development would be slowed by a lack of insurance availability and uncertainty in the marketplace. Because of concerns about the lack of available and affordable terrorism insurance, Congress passed TRIA, which took effect on November 26, 2002. TRIA is currently scheduled to expire at the end of 2005. Our report on the implementation of TRIA has two objectives. First, we describe the progress made by Treasury and insurance industry participants in implementing TRIA. We found that Treasury has made significant progress in implementing the provisions of TRIA, but has important work to complete in order to comply with all its responsibilities under the act. Second, we discuss the changes in the market for terrorism insurance coverage under TRIA. As requested, my testimony today focuses on the second of these two objectives. That is, how TRIA has affected the market for terrorism insurance and, more generally, the economy. Additionally, I have included appendixes to this statement that provide background information on TRIA and describe completed and ongoing engagements that GAO has undertaken for this Committee that relate to increasing the insurance industry's capacity to provide insurance for terrorism and natural catastrophe risks. In summary, it appears that Congress's first objective in creating TRIA--to ensure that business activity did not materially suffer from a lack of available terrorism insurance--largely has been achieved. Since TRIA was enacted in November 2002, terrorism insurance generally has been available to businesses. But most commercial policyholders are not buying the coverage. According to insurance industry experts, purchases have been higher in areas considered to be at high risk of another terrorist attack. However, many policyholders with businesses or properties not located in perceived high-risk locations are not buying coverage because they view any price for terrorism insurance as high relative to their perceived risk exposure. Further, those that have bought terrorism insurance remain exposed to significant perils because insurers have broadened longstanding policy exclusions of nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) events. Congress's second objective--to give private industry a transitional period during which it could begin pricing terrorism insurance and develop ways to cover losses after TRIA expires--has not been achieved yet. Industry sources indicated that under TRIA, insurance market participants have made no progress to date toward the development of reliable methods for pricing terrorism risks and little movement toward any mechanism that would enable insurers to provide terrorism insurance to businesses without government involvement. In conducting this work, we reviewed and analyzed relevant information concerning state legislation and publicly available and proprietary industry data and studies on the terrorism insurance market. We interviewed officials at Treasury, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), and state insurance regulators from six states with high insurance sales volumes. We also interviewed representatives of insurance companies, reinsurance companies, brokers for insurance and reinsurance companies, industry associations, property owners and developers, and insurance filing services and credit rating agencies.[Footnote 4] In our discussions with these organizations, we endeavored to gain an understanding of their experience in implementing TRIA requirements, obtain their views on the effects of TRIA on the terrorism insurance market, and identify developments within the industry to address terrorism risks after TRIA expires. We conducted this work in Chicago, New York City, and Washington, D.C., from January 2003 through April 2004 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Although Available, Few Are Buying Terrorism Insurance and the Industry Has Made Little Progress Toward Post-TRIA Coverage: While TRIA has improved the availability of terrorism insurance, particularly for high-risk properties in major metropolitan areas, most commercial policyholders are not buying the coverage. Limited industry data suggest that 10 - 30 percent of commercial policyholders are purchasing terrorism insurance, perhaps because most policyholders perceive themselves at relatively low risk for a terrorist event. Some industry experts are concerned that those most at risk from terrorism are generally the ones buying terrorism insurance. In combination with low purchase rates, these conditions could result in uninsured losses for those businesses without terrorism coverage or cause financial problems for insurers, should a terrorist event occur. Moreover, even policyholders who have purchased terrorism insurance may remain uninsured for significant risks arising from certified terrorist events--that is, those meeting statutory criteria for reimbursement under TRIA--such as those involving NBC agents or radioactive contamination. Finally, although insurers and some reinsurers have cautiously reentered the terrorism risk market, insurance industry participants have made little progress toward developing a mechanism that could permit the commercial insurance market to resume providing terrorism coverage without a government backstop. TRIA Has Improved the Availability of Terrorism Insurance, Particularly for Some High-Risk Policyholders: TRIA has improved the availability of terrorism insurance, especially for some high-risk policyholders. According to insurance and risk management experts, these were the policyholders who had difficulty finding coverage before TRIA. TRIA requires that insurers "make available" coverage for terrorism on terms not differing materially from other coverage.[Footnote 5] Largely because of this requirement, terrorism insurance has been widely available, even for development projects in high-risk areas of the country. Although industry data on policyholder characteristics are limited and cannot be generalized to all policyholders in the United States, risk management and real estate representatives generally agree that after TRIA was passed, policyholders--including borrowers obtaining mortgages for "trophy" properties, owners and developers of high-risk properties in major city centers, and those in or near "trophy" properties--were able to purchase terrorism insurance. Additionally, TRIA contributed to better credit ratings for some commercial mortgage-backed securities. For example, prior to TRIA's passage, the credit ratings of certain mortgage-backed securities, in which the underlying collateral consisted of a single high-risk commercial property, were downgraded because the property lacked or had inadequate terrorism insurance. The credit ratings for other types of mortgage-backed securities, in which the underlying assets were pools of many types of commercial properties, were also downgraded but not to the same extent because the number and variety of properties in the pool diversified their risk of terrorism. Because TRIA made terrorism insurance available for the underlying assets, thus reducing the risk of losses from terrorist events, it improved the overall credit ratings of mortgage-backed securities, particularly single-asset mortgage- backed securities. Credit ratings affect investment decisions that revolve around factors such as interest rates because higher credit ratings result in lower costs of capital. According to an industry expert, investors use credit ratings as guidance when evaluating the risk of mortgage-backed securities for investment purposes. Higher credit ratings reflect lower credit risks. The typical investor response to lower credit risks is to accept lower returns, thereby reducing the cost of capital, which translates into lower interest rates for the borrower. To the extent that the widespread availability of terrorism insurance is a result of TRIA's "make available" requirement, Treasury's decision on whether to extend the requirement to year three of the program is vitally important. While TRIA has ensured the availability of terrorism insurance, we have little quantitative information on the prices charged for this insurance. Treasury is engaged in gathering data through surveys that should provide useful information about terrorism insurance prices. TRIA requires that they make the information available to Congress upon request. In addition, TRIA also requires Treasury to assess the effectiveness of the act and evaluate the capacity of the industry to offer terrorism insurance after its expiration. This report is to be delivered to Congress no later than June 30, 2005. Most Policyholders Have Not Bought Terrorism Insurance: Although TRIA improved the availability of terrorism insurance, relatively few policyholders have purchased terrorism coverage. We testified previously that prior to September 11, 2001, policyholders enjoyed "free" coverage for terrorism risks because insurers believed that this risk was so low that they provided the coverage without additional premiums as part of the policyholder's general property insurance policy. After September 11, prices for coverage increased rapidly and, in some cases, insurance became very difficult to find at any price. Although a purpose of TRIA is to make terrorism insurance available and affordable, the act does not specify a price structure. However, experts in the insurance industry generally agree that after the passage of TRIA, low-risk policyholders (for example, those not in major urban centers) received relatively low-priced offers for terrorism insurance compared to high-risk policyholders, and some policyholders received terrorism coverage without additional premium charges.[Footnote 6] Yet according to insurance experts, despite low premiums, many businesses (especially those not in "target" localities or industries) did not buy terrorism insurance. Some simply may not have perceived themselves at risk from terrorist events and considered terrorism insurance, even at low premiums (relative to high-risk areas), a bad investment.[Footnote 7] According to insurance sources, other policyholders may have deferred their decision to buy terrorism insurance until their policy renewal date. Some industry experts have voiced concerns that low purchase rates may indicate adverse selection--where those at the most risk from terrorism are generally the only ones buying terrorism insurance. Although industry surveys are limited in their scope and not appropriate for market-wide projections, the surveys are consistent with each other in finding low "take-up" rates, the percentage of policyholders buying terrorism insurance, ranging from 10 to 30 percent. According to one industry survey, the highest take-up rates have occurred in the Northeast, where premiums were generally higher than the rest of the country. The combination of low take-up rates and high concentration of purchases in an area thought to be most at risk raises concerns that, depending on its location, a terrorist event could have additional negative effects. * If a terrorist event took place in a location not thought to be a terrorist "target," where most businesses had chosen not to purchase terrorism insurance, then businesses would receive little funding from insurance claims for business recovery efforts, with consequent negative effects on owners, employers, suppliers, and customers. * Alternatively, if the terrorist event took place in a location deemed to be a "target," where most businesses had purchased terrorism insurance, then adverse selection could result in significant financial problems for insurers. A small customer base of geographically concentrated, high-risk policyholders could leave insurers unable to cover potential losses facing possible insolvency. If, however, a higher percentage of business owners had chosen to buy the coverage, the increased number of policyholders would have reduced the chance that losses in any one geographic location would create a significant financial problem for an insurer.[Footnote 8] Tighter Exclusions Leave Policyholders Exposed to Significant Perils: Since September 11, 2001, the insurance industry has moved to tighten long-standing exclusions from coverage for losses resulting from NBC attacks and radiation contamination. As a result of these exclusions and the actions of a growing number of state legislatures to exclude losses from fire following a terrorist attack, even those policyholders who choose to buy terrorism insurance may be exposed to potentially significant losses. Although NBC coverage was generally not available before September 11, after that event insurers and reinsurers recognized the enormity of potential losses from terrorist events and introduced new practices and tightened treaty language to further limit as much of their loss exposures as possible. (We discuss some of these practices and exclusions in more detail in the next section.) State regulators and legislatures have approved these exclusions, allowing insurers to restrict the terms and conditions of coverage for these perils. Moreover, because TRIA's "make available" requirements state that terms for terrorism coverage be similar to those offered for other types of policies, insurers may choose to exclude the perils from terrorism coverage just as they have in other types of coverage. According to Treasury officials, TRIA does not preclude Treasury from providing reimbursement for NBC events, if insurers offered this coverage. However, policyholder losses from perils excluded from coverage, such as NBCs, would not be "insured losses" as defined by TRIA and would not be covered even in the event of a certified terrorist attack. In an increasing number of states, policyholders may not be able to recover losses from fire following a terrorist event if the coverage in those states is not purchased as part of the offered terrorism coverage. We have previously reported that approximately 30 states had laws requiring coverage for "fire-following" an event--known as the standard fire policy (SFP)--irrespective of the fire's cause. Therefore, in SFP states fire following a terrorist event is covered whether there is insurance coverage for terrorism or not. After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, some legislatures in SFP states amended their laws to allow the exclusion of fire following a terrorist event from coverage. As of March 1, 2004, 7 of the 30 SFP states had amended their laws to allow for the exclusion of acts of terrorism from statutory coverage requirements.[Footnote 9] However as discussed previously, the "make available" provision requires coverage terms offered for terrorist events to be similar to coverage for other events. Treasury officials explained that in all non-SFP states, and the 7 states with modified SFPs, insurers must include in their offer of terrorism insurance coverage for fire following a certified terrorist event because coverage for fire is part of the property coverage for all other risks. Thus, policyholders who have accepted the offer would be covered for fire following a terrorist event, even though their state allows exclusion of the coverage. However, policyholders who have rejected their offer of coverage for terrorism insurance would not be covered for fire following a terrorist event. According to insurance experts, losses from fire damage can be a relatively large proportion of the total property loss. As a result, excluding terrorist events from SFP requirements could result in potentially large losses that cannot be recovered if the policyholder did not purchase terrorism coverage. For example, following the 1994 Northridge earthquake in California, total insured losses for the earthquake were $15 billion--$12.5 billion of which were for fire damage. According to an insurance expert, policyholders were able to recover losses from fire damage because California is an SFP state, even though most policies had excluded coverage for earthquakes. Reinsurers Have Cautiously Returned to the Market, but Many Insurers Have Not Bought Reinsurance: Under TRIA, reinsurers are offering a limited amount of coverage for terrorist events for insurers' remaining exposures, but insurers have not been buying much of this reinsurance. According to insurance industry sources, TRIA's ceiling on potential losses has enabled reinsurers to return cautiously to the market. That is, reinsurers generally are not offering coverage for terrorism risk beyond the limits of the insurer deductibles and the 10 percent share that insurers would pay under TRIA. In spite of reinsurers' willingness to offer this coverage, company representatives have said that many insurers have not purchased reinsurance. Insurance experts suggested that the low demand for the reinsurance might reflect, in part, commercial policyholders' generally low take-up rates for terrorism insurance. Moreover, insurance experts also have suggested that insurers may believe that the price of reinsurance is too high relative to the premiums they are earning from policyholders for terrorism insurance. The relatively high prices charged for the limited amounts of terrorism reinsurance available are probably the result of interrelated factors. First, even before September 11 both insurance and reinsurance markets were beginning to harden; that is, prices were beginning to increase after several years of lower prices. Reinsurance losses resulting from September 11 also depressed reinsurance capacity and accelerated the rise in prices.[Footnote 10] The resulting hard market for property- casualty insurance affected the price of most lines of insurance and reinsurance. A notable example has been the market for medical malpractice insurance.[Footnote 11] The hard market is only now showing signs of coming to an end, with a resulting stabilization of prices for most lines of insurance. In addition to the effects of the hard market, reinsurer awareness of the adverse selection that may be occurring in the commercial insurance market could be another factor contributing to higher reinsurance prices. Adverse selection usually represents a larger-than-expected exposure to loss. Reinsurers are likely to react by increasing prices for the terrorism coverage that they do sell. In spite of the reentry of reinsurers into the terrorism market, insurance experts said that without TRIA caps on potential losses, both insurers and reinsurers likely still would be unwilling to sell terrorism coverage because they have not found a reliable way to price their exposure to terrorist losses. According to industry representatives, neither insurers nor reinsurers can estimate potential losses from terrorism or determine prices for terrorism insurance without a pricing model that can estimate both the frequency and the severity of terrorist events. Reinsurance experts said that current models of risks for terrorist events do not have enough historical data to dependably estimate the frequency or severity of terrorist events, and therefore cannot be relied upon for pricing terrorism insurance. According to the experts, the models can predict a likely range of insured losses resulting from the damage if specific event parameters such as type and size of weapon and location are specified. However, the models are unable to predict the probability of such an attack. Even as they are charging high prices, reinsurers are covering less. In response to the losses of September 11, industry sources have said that reinsurers have changed some practices to limit their exposures to acts of terrorism. For example, reinsurers have begun monitoring their exposures by geographic area, requiring more detailed information from insurers, introducing annual aggregate and event limits, excluding large insurable values, and requiring stricter measures to safeguard assets and lives where risks are high.[Footnote 12] And as discussed previously, almost immediately after September 11 reinsurers began broadening NBC exclusions beyond scenarios involving industrial accidents, such as nuclear plant accidents and chemical spills, to encompass intentional destruction from terrorists. For example, post- September 11 exclusions for nuclear risks include losses from radioactive contamination to property and radiation sickness from dirty bombs. As of March 1, 2004, industry sources indicated that there has been little development or movement among insurers or reinsurers toward developing a private-sector mechanism that could provide capacity, without government involvement, to absorb losses from terrorist events. Industry officials have said that their level of willingness to participate more fully in the terrorism insurance market in the future will be determined, in part, by whether any more events occur. Industry sources could not predict if reinsurers would return to the terrorism insurance market after TRIA expires, even after several years and the absence of further major terrorist attacks in the United States. They explained that reinsurers are still recovering from the enormous losses of September 11 and still cannot price terrorism coverage. In the long term and without another major terrorist attack, insurance and reinsurance companies might eventually return. However, should another major terrorist attack take place, reinsurers told us that they would not return to this market--with or without TRIA. Conclusions: Congress had two major objectives in establishing TRIA. The first was to ensure that business activity did not suffer from the lack of insurance by requiring insurers to continue to provide protection from the financial consequences of another terrorist attack. Since TRIA was enacted in November 2002, terrorism insurance generally has been widely available even for development projects in high-risk areas of the country, in large part because of TRIA's "make available" requirement. Although most businesses are not buying coverage, there is little evidence that development has suffered to a great extent--even in lower-risk areas of the county, where purchases of coverage may be lowest. Further, although quantifiable evidence is lacking on whether the availability of terrorism coverage under TRIA has contributed to the economy, the current revival of economic activity suggests that the decision of most commercial policyholders to decline terrorism coverage has not resulted in widespread, negative economic effects. As a result, the first objective of TRIA appears largely to have been achieved. Congress's second objective was to give the insurance industry a transitional period during which it could begin pricing terrorism risks and developing ways to provide such insurance after TRIA expires. The insurance industry has not yet achieved this goal. We observed after September 11 the crucial importance of reinsurers for the survival of the terrorism insurance market and reported that reinsurers' inability to price terrorism risks was a major factor in their departure from the market. Additionally, most industry experts are tentative about predictions of the level of reinsurer and insurer participation in the terrorism insurance market after TRIA expires. Unfortunately, insurers and reinsurers still have not found a reliable method for pricing terrorism insurance, and although TRIA has provided reinsurers the opportunity to reenter the market to a limited extent, industry participants have not developed a mechanism to replace TRIA. As a result, reinsurer and consequently, insurer, participation in the terrorism insurance market likely will decline significantly after TRIA expires. Not only has no private-sector mechanism emerged for supplying terrorism insurance after TRIA expires, but to date there also has been little discussion of possible alternatives for ensuring the availability and affordability of terrorism coverage after TRIA expires. Congress may benefit from an informed assessment of possible alternatives--including both wholly private alternatives and alternatives that could involve some government participation or action. Such an assessment could be a part of Treasury's TRIA-mandated study to "assess…the likely capacity of the property and casualty insurance industry to offer insurance for terrorism risk after termination of the Program.": Recommendation for Executive Action: As part of the response to the TRIA-mandated study that requires Treasury to assess the effectiveness of TRIA and evaluate the capacity of the industry to offer terrorism insurance after TRIA expires, we recommend that the Secretary of the Treasury, after consulting with the insurance industry and other interested parties, identify for Congress an array of alternatives that may exist for expanding the availability and affordability of terrorism insurance after TRIA expires. These alternatives could assist Congress during its deliberations on how best to ensure the availability and affordability of terrorism insurance after December 2005. Mr. Chairman, Madam Chairwoman, this concludes my statement. I would be pleased to respond to any questions that you or other members of the Subcommittees may have. Contacts and Acknowledgements: For further information regarding this testimony please contact Richard J. Hillman or Davi M. D'Agostino, Directors, or Lawrence D. Cluff or Wesley M. Phillips, Assistant Directors, Financial Markets and Community Investment, (202) 512-8678. Individuals making key contributions to this testimony include Sonja Bensen, Rachel DeMarcus, Tom Givens III, Jill Johnson, Barry Kirby, Caitlyn Lam, Tarek Mahmassani, Angela Pun, and Barbara Roesmann. [End of section] Appendix I: TRIA Background: Under TRIA, Treasury is responsible for reimbursing insurers for a portion of terrorism losses under certain conditions. Payments are triggered when (1) the Secretary of the Treasury certifies that terrorists acting on behalf of foreign interests have carried out an act of terrorism and (2) aggregate insured losses for commercial property and casualty damages exceed $5,000,000 for a single event.[Footnote 13] TRIA specifies that an insurer is responsible (that is, will not be reimbursed) for the first dollars of its insured losses--its deductible amount. TRIA sets the deductible amount for each insurer equal to a percentage of its direct earned premiums for the previous year.[Footnote 14] Beyond the deductible, insurers also are responsible for paying a percentage of insured losses. Specifically, TRIA structures pay-out provisions so that the federal government shares the payment of insured losses with insurers at a 9:1 ratio--the federal government pays 90 percent of insured losses and insurers pay 10 percent--until aggregate insured losses from all insurers reach $100 billion in a calendar year (see fig. 1). Thus, under TRIA's formula for sharing losses, insurers are reimbursed for portions of the claims they have paid to policyholders. Furthermore, TRIA then releases insurers who have paid their deductibles from any further liability for losses that exceed aggregate insured losses of $100 billion in any one year. Congress is charged with determining how losses in excess of $100 billion will be paid. Figure 1: Prerequisites for and Limits of Coverage Under TRIA: [See PDF for image] [A] The percentage of direct earned premiums increases each year: 7 percent in 2003, 10 percent in 2004, and 15 percent in 2005. [End of figure] TRIA also contains provisions and a formula requiring Treasury to recoup part of the federal share if the aggregate sum of all insurers' deductibles and 10 percent share is less than the amount prescribed in the act--the "insurance marketplace aggregate retention amount." TRIA also gives the Secretary of the Treasury discretion to recoup more of the federal payment if deemed appropriate.[Footnote 15] Commercial property-casualty policyholders would pay for the recoupment through a surcharge on premiums for all the property-casualty policies in force after Treasury established the surcharge amount; the insurers would collect the surcharge. TRIA limits the surcharge to a maximum of 3 percent of annual premiums, to be assessed for as many years as necessary to recoup the mandatory amount. TRIA also gives the Secretary of the Treasury discretion to reduce the annual surcharge in consideration of various factors such as the economic impact on urban centers. However, if Treasury makes such adjustments, it has to extend the surcharges for additional years to collect the remainder of the recoupment. Treasury is funding the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program (TRIP) office operations--through which it administers TRIA provisions and would pay claims--with "no-year money" under a TRIA provision that gives Treasury authority to utilize funds necessary to set up and run the program.[Footnote 16] The TRIP office had a budget of $8.97 million for fiscal year 2003 (of which TRIP spent $4 million), $9 million for fiscal year 2004, and a projected budget of $10.56 million for fiscal year 2005--a total of $28.53 million over 3 years. The funding levels incorporate the estimated costs of running a claims-processing operation in the aftermath of a terrorist event: $5 million in fiscal years 2003 and 2004 and $6.5 million in fiscal year 2005, representing about 55 - 60 percent of the budget for each fiscal year. If no certified terrorist event occurred, the claims-processing function would be maintained at a standby level, reducing the projected costs to $1.2 million annually, or about 23 percent of the office's budget in each fiscal year. Any funds ultimately used to pay the federal share after a certified terrorist event would be in addition to these budgeted amounts. [End of section] Appendix II: Summary of Completed and Ongoing GAO Work Related to Insurance for Terrorism and Natural Catastrophe Risks: Terrorist attacks and natural catastrophes---such as hurricanes and earthquakes---pose unique challenges to insurers. Forecasting the timing and severity of such events is difficult and the large losses associated with catastrophes can threaten insurer safety and soundness. Insurers also frequently respond to catastrophic events by cutting back coverage significantly or substantially increasing premiums for policyholders. Over the years, several approaches have been suggested to expand the capacity of the insurance industry to cover catastrophic events. These approaches include securitization of catastrophe risk, changing tax and accounting treatment of catastrophe risk, and permitting risk-retention groups to cover property as well as liability exposures. At the request of the Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee and others, we have completed reports that address some of these issues or have work ongoing in these areas. Our work may assist the Committee in its oversight of the insurance industry and consideration of the industry's ability to both insure against and respond to catastrophic events. Securitization of Catastrophe Risk: Given the enormous financial losses associated with catastrophic events and questions about insurers' ability to cover such losses, interest has been generated in transferring some of these risks to the capital markets, which had total value of about $29 trillion as of the first quarter of 2003. Since the mid-1990s, some insurance companies, reinsurance companies, and capital market participants have developed various financial instruments, the most prevalent of which are catastrophe bonds. [Footnote 17] These bonds offer a relatively high rate of return to investors that are willing to accept some of the substantial risks associated with catastrophes. In two previous reports, we assessed the development of the catastrophe bond market.[Footnote 18] We found that some insurance companies view catastrophe bonds as an important component of their overall strategy for managing natural catastrophe financial risks. In addition, representatives from some institutional investors we contacted expressed positive views about catastrophe bonds because they offer attractive yields compared to traditional investments and help diversify investment risks. However, other insurers and investors are not willing to issue or purchase catastrophe bonds because they are more costly than traditional reinsurance, too risky, or illiquid. We also reported that developing catastrophe bonds to cover terrorism risks in the United States is considered challenging for many reasons, including the difficulties associated with developing computer models to predict the frequency and severity of terrorist attacks. Sophisticated models have been developed to predict the frequency and severity of natural catastrophes--particularly hurricanes--that have facilitated the development of catastrophe bonds covering such risks. Tax and Accounting Treatment of Catastrophe Risk: We are currently conducting follow-up work on potential tax and accounting issues raised in our previous reports that might affect the use of catastrophe bonds. As we reported in September 2002, most catastrophe bonds are issued offshore--for example, in Bermuda--rather than in the United States due to favorable tax considerations. Some insurance industry groups have argued for changes in U.S. tax laws to encourage insurers to issue catastrophe bonds onshore to lessen transaction costs and afford regulators greater scrutiny over these activities. As part of our ongoing work, we are reviewing the tax treatment of catastrophe risk coverage in selected European countries. Furthermore, in 2003 we reported that the Financial Accounting Standards Board had issued guidance that may require insurers or investors to list catastrophe bond assets and liabilities on their balance sheets. We reported that this guidance had the potential to limit the appeal of issuing catastrophe bonds but that insurers and financial market participants were not certain of the impact of this guidance. We are continuing to investigate developments on these tax and accounting issues and will discuss them in an upcoming report. Some believe removing accounting and tax barriers that prevent U.S. insurance companies from establishing tax-deductible reserves to cover the financial risks associated with potential natural catastrophes and terrorist attacks would supplement private-sector capacity. Under current U.S. accounting standards and tax law, insurers must build any reserves for events that have not yet occurred from after-tax income (retained earnings). As a result, insurers do not usually establish reserves in anticipation of catastrophic events, such as hurricanes. Therefore, insurers attempt to limit their exposure to catastrophic risks through the underwriting process, the purchase of reinsurance, or issuance of catastrophe bonds, among other alternatives. There is considerable disagreement about the appropriateness and effectiveness of tax-deductible reserving. Advocates believe that allowing insurers to establish such reserves would provide increased capacity at lower cost. On the other hand, critics of tax-deductible reserving have argued that, in addition to lowering federal tax receipts, there is no assurance that insurers would actually increase their catastrophe insurance capacity, but rather either shield existing capital from taxes or substitute tax-deductible reserves for reinsurance. At the Chairman's request, we are currently reviewing the tax treatment of catastrophe risk reserves in selected European countries---France, Spain, Germany, Switzerland, and Italy. We continue to review these practices and will comment on them in a forthcoming report. In addition to discussing reserving practices, we are gathering information on general approaches to insuring against catastrophic risks in these countries. Implementation of the Liability Risk Retention Act: Congress enacted the Liability Risk Retention Act of 1986 (Act) to facilitate the formation of risk-retention groups (RRGs) and risk- purchasing groups (RPGs), insurance entities initially established to increase the availability and affordability of liability insurance during the 1980s.[Footnote 19] As authorized by the Act, these groups may only provide commercial liability insurance. An RRG is simply a group of businesses with similar risks that join to create an insurance company to self-insure their risks. An RPG, on the other hand, is a group formed to purchase insurance as a single entity from a traditional insurer. The majority of our ongoing work focuses on RRGs because, as insurers, they have the potential to provide new insurance capacity. A wide variety of groups, such as professional groups (doctors, attorneys), institutions (universities, hospitals), and businesses (trucking firms, homebuilders) have created RRGs. As of mid- April 2004, about 150 RRGs were operational and approximately 72 were formed in the last year and half.[Footnote 20] In contrast to most other insurers, an RRG can sell insurance in as many states as it chooses but is to be regulated by only one state--the state in which it is chartered. [Footnote 21] Our ongoing work focuses on assessing the extent to which RRGs have met the Act's intent that they increase the availability and affordability of liability insurance. We will also assess how the unique regulatory structure of RRGs--where only one state serves as regulator--has promoted the establishment of RRGs and if this structure has resulted in uneven or ineffective regulation. The recent failure of four RRGs has resulted in some regulators questioning the efficacy of having a single-state regulator and the standards used by some states to charter and regulate RRGs. If we identify any problems as part of our work, we will evaluate what legislative or regulatory changes might be needed. These changes, if needed, could be important whether or not, as some advocates have suggested, the Act is expanded to include commercial property insurance. Finally, in the event the Act were expanded to include property insurance, we also are exploring the potential of RRGs to provide additional capacity for terrorism insurance. [End of section] Appendix III: Prior GAO Reports and Testimonies Related to Insurance for Terrorism and Natural Catastrophe Risks: U.S. General Accounting Office, Terrorism Insurance: Implementation of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, GAO-04-307 (Washington, D.C.: Apr. 23, 2004). U.S. General Accounting Office, Catastrophe Insurance Risks: Status of Efforts to Securitize Natural Catastrophe and Terrorism Risk, GAO-03- 1033 (Washington, D.C.: Sep. 24, 2003). U.S. General Accounting Office, Catastrophe Insurance Risks: The Role of Risk-Linked Securities, GAO-03-195T (Washington, D.C.: Oct. 8, 2002). U.S. General Accounting Office, Catastrophe Insurance Risks: The Role of Risk-Linked Securities and Factors Affecting Their Use, GAO-02-941 (Washington, D.C.: Sep. 24, 2002). U.S. General Accounting Office, Terrorism Insurance: Rising Uninsured Exposure to Attacks Heightens Potential Economic Vulnerabilities, GAO- 02-472T (Washington, D.C.: Feb. 27, 2002). U. S. General Accounting Office, Terrorism Insurance: Alternative Programs for Protecting Insurance Consumers, GAO-02-199T (Washington, D.C.: Oct. 24, 2001). U.S. General Accounting Office, Terrorism Insurance: Alternative Programs for Protecting Insurance Consumers, GAO-02-175T (Washington, D.C.: Oct. 24, 2001). U.S. General Accounting Office, Insurers' Ability to Pay Catastrophe Claims, GAO/GGD-00-57R (Washington, D.C.: Feb. 8, 2000). FOOTNOTES [1] U.S. General Accounting Office, Terrorism Insurance: Implementation of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, GAO-04-307 (Washington, D.C.: Apr. 23, 2004). [2] Reinsurance is a mechanism that insurance companies routinely use to spread risk associated with insurance policies. Simply put, it is insurance for insurance companies. Reinsurance is a normal business practice that satisfies a number of needs in the insurance marketplace, including the need to expand capacity and obtain protection against potential catastrophes. [3] U.S. General Accounting Office, Terrorism Insurance: Alternative Programs for Protecting Insurance Consumers, GAO-02-175T (Washington, D.C.: Oct. 24, 2001), and Terrorism Insurance: Rising Uninsured Exposure to Attacks Heightens Potential Economic Vulnerabilities, GAO-02-472T (Washington, D.C.: Feb. 27, 2002). [4] Filing services perform many services for insurance companies, including submitting to state insurance regulators the documents required to sell a line of insurance. [5] TRIA defines "make available" to mean that the coverage must be offered for insured losses arising from terrorist events and that coverage not differ materially from the terms, amounts, and limitations applicable to coverage for losses arising from other types of events. However, TRIA gives Treasury the option of determining whether the "make available" requirement should be extended through 2005, the third year of the act, and gives the agency until September 1, 2004, to do so. [6] According to industry experts, the insurers that provided "free" terrorism insurance likely did so for policies already in place at the time TRIA was enacted and may have deferred operational changes and difficult pricing decisions because they lacked the resources to do so. [7] Howard Kunreuther, Erwann Michel-Kerjan, and Beverly Porter, Assessing, Managing and Financing Extreme Events: Dealing with Terrorism (National Bureau of Economic Research: December 2003), 13. [8] Casualty Actuarial Society, Foundations of Casualty Actuarial Science, 4th ed. (United Book Press, Inc.: 2001), 51, 86. [9] According to the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, and Virginia have amended their standard fire policies to allow for exclusion of terrorism from statutory fire coverage. State legislators in Massachusetts have introduced a similar bill. [10] Capacity is the amount of reinsurance or insurance that is available for a defined risk. [11] U.S. General Accounting Office, Medical Malpractice Insurance: Multiple Factors Have Contributed to Increased Premium Rates, GAO-03-702 (Washington, D.C.: June 27, 2003). [12] Christian Brauner and Georges Galey, "Terrorism Risks in Property Insurance and Their Insurability after 11 September 2001," (Swiss Reinsurance Company: 2003), 25. [13] Aggregate insured losses are the sum of insured property and casualty losses from all commercial policyholders that result from a certified act of terrorism. [14] Section 102(4) of TRIA defines direct earned premiums as "a direct earned premium for property and casualty insurance issued by any insurer for insurance against losses …" Treasury provided further clarification that direct earned premiums are "earned as reported to the NAIC in the Annual Statement in column 2 of Exhibit of Premiums and Losses (commonly known as Statutory Page 14)" and cover all risks, not only for risks from terrorism. The percentage of the direct earned premium allowed as an insurer deductible varies over the program years: 7 percent in 2003, 10 percent in 2004, and 15 percent in 2005. [15] According to Treasury officials, the formula for the mandatory portion of the recoupment is intended to ensure that the insurance industry is financially responsible for a prescribed level of the first dollars of losses. The prescribed loss levels are as follows: $10 billion in 2003, $12.5 billion in 2004, and $15 billion in 2005. Therefore, if the sum of insurers' aggregate payments for deductibles and the 10 percent share--the amounts paid by industry--is less than the level prescribed for that year, then a recoupment would be required to collect the difference. On the other hand, if the amounts paid by industry exceed the prescribed level, then a recoupment would not be needed. [16] "No-year money" is budget authority that remains available for obligation until expended, usually until the objectives for which the authority was made available are attained. [17] Catastrophe bonds are an example of risk-linked securities. This statement focuses on catastrophe bonds that are privately placed securities sold to institutional investors under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 144A. In general, a qualified institutional investor under Rule 144A owns and invests on a discretionary basis at least $100 million in securities of issuers that are not affiliated with the investor. [18] See U.S. General Accounting Office, Catastrophe Insurance Risks: Status of Efforts to Securitize Natural Catastrophe and Terrorism Risk, GAO-03-1033 (Washington, D.C.: Sep. 24, 2003) and Catastrophe Insurance Risks: The Role of Risk-Linked Securities and Factors Affecting Their Use, GAO-02-941 (Washington, D.C.: Sep. 24, 2002). [19] The Product Liability Risk Retention Act of 1981 established these groups but limited them to providing product liability insurance. In 1986, in response to another shortage of liability insurance, Congress amended the Act and allowed these groups to offer most types of commercial liability insurance. [20] Data estimates were provided by the Managing Editor, Risk Retention Reporter. [21] The McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945 left regulation and taxation of the insurance market to the states. (15 U.S.C. 1011) As a result, states have primary responsibility for regulating the insurers operating in their states and each state has its own insurance department.


text:
Dr. Máirtín Brennan
B Dent Sc.(Dub. U.), MSD (Indiana U., USA)
Restorative, Implant and Laser Dentistry
Tel: 01 496 7661
Welcome to the Belgrave Dental Clinic
Thank you for logging onto our website which we hope you find helpful in your search for quality dental care.
The ethos of our practice is to provide you with care and attention in a calm, caring and professional environment.
The clinic, which is located in Rathmines Dublin 6, is run by Dr Máirtín Brennan.
Using the most current clinical procedures combined with the latest technology, Dr. Brennan aims to provide dental treatment of the highest standard, making every effort to satisfy the functional and aesthetic needs of his patients.
Dr. Brennan is committed to continuous professional development and dedicated to teaching by way of giving lectures and workshops to other dental professionals.
A restorative specialist, Dr. Brennan has built a reputation for creating beautiful smiles.
Please refer to the Treatment Photos for examples of treatments by Dr. Brennan and to the Testimonials for comments from our patients.
"To provide dental treatment of the highest standard making every effort to satisfy the functional and aesthetic needs of my patients."
Treatments available at the practice include:
• Porcelain Veneers and Crowns
• Dental Implants
• Composite Dentistry - White Fillings
• Gun Contouring - Crown Lengthening
• Tooth Whitening
• The Teenage Patient
• Treatment After Orthodontics
• Bridgework
• Maryland Bridges
• Treatment of Tooth Wear
• Laser Dentistry
• Smile Design
• Fillings
• Bone and Sinus Grafting
• Dentures
• Dentures Supported by Dental Implants
• Full Mouth Reconstruction
• A Combination of Porcelain and Composite
|Belgrave Dental Clinic
1 Belgrave Square East, Rathmines, Dublin 6
Tel: 01 496 7661 | Email:
Copyright © 2009 Dr Máirtín Brennan at Belgrave Dental Clinic, Dublin, Ireland

subset: commoncrawl


text:
NOMU offers a range of simple, practical ingredients that help you to create wonderful, flavoursome dishes and drinks for any occasion. Whether you're a novice or expert, every NOMU product is convenient and easy to use. You'll love their rubs and stocks, their works-every-time baking kits and their decadent hot chocolate — a firm customer favourite.
NOMU products have an average rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars from 444 reviews.
Our customers love NOMU's Hot Chocolate. Made from 60% UTZ certified cocoa and less sugar, it's rich and creamy and tastes great even without milk.Shop Hot Chocolate
We only deliver gift registry purchases to addresses in South Africa.
Need help? Contact firstname.lastname@example.com


text:
How do your nerves manifest? Recently I had the opportunity to present to a very large audience on a controversial topic. While I am not typically very nervous in public speaking situations, I will admit that I approached the session with some trepidation and nervousness.
While waiting for my introduction, my mouth became dry. My breathing started to accelerate. Thankfully, no one could see this happening and I had some silent solutions to use. (see below*)
Some presenters' anxiety manifest in ways that are more visible. Recently I attended an international conference with a keynote session. The audience was 10,000+ and there were large screens throughout the room so that everyone could see well. What we saw was a keynote presenter who paced as a way to deal with nervousness. He continually walked from one side of the large stage to the other and back. For the viewer, it was an uncomfortable distraction from his important message.
Movement on a stage should be purposeful to be powerful. Extraneous movement is a waste of energy and a distraction. If this is how your nerves manifest, the first step is to become aware of it. Videotape yourself to see what physical ticks or traits you demonstrate. The second step is to find another purposeful outlet for your excess energy – hand gestures, vocal variation, dancing – whatever supports your message.
*My Silent Solutions
For dry mouth, gently bite the sides of your tongue. This generates saliva to moisten your mouth and throat.
For a racing heart, take three deep breaths. The extra oxygen has been proven to help the emotional centers of your brain and calm you down.
For more ideas on managing the butterflies, check out my book "Caffeinated Learning."
6/28/2016 04:01:12 am
This article is truly very inspiring. I was always nervous while giving a presentation, but your article helped me a lot to overcome this issue. Its obvious that no one would be impressed by a presentation that rambles. It could be five people in a boardroom or 500 in the audience, but if you are the presenter the spotlight is on you. You'll either be the hero or the goat.
6/28/2016 05:36:12 am
A great article indeed. I always had a fear of presenting myself in front of a mass of people. Queasy stomach, sweaty palms, my mind always going blank are some of the traits I develop before the moment I present myself. I was searching for some techniques which could help me overcome my nervousness. But then I came across your article which helped me a lot to overcome my nervousness issues.
Leave a Reply.
For even more ideas...
Anne Beninghof is passionate about teaching and learning.
May 2020
var switchTo5x=true; >


text:
While the phrase "Ballet Hero Fantasy featuring Steven McRae" may conjure up images of a red-haired Byronic smoulderer in tights, sweeping you off your feet, and down into a fish dive, as his lips brush sensuously against… ok, ok, enough. It's not that type of fantasy. We're talking manga. And no, grandad, that's not a fruit; it's a Japanese cartoon. Gramilano reported on … [Read more...] about Interview with Steven McRae and Takafumi Adachi, creators of 'Ballet Hero Fantasy', now available in English
Man arrested for chopping off ballet teacher's thumb
In a most bizarre story from Tokyo, a man has been arrested after having chopped of the thumb of a ballet teacher in her dance studio. Hiroaki Hashimoto is a 41-year-old chiropractor who used to study at the school. His motivation, according to The Japan Times, was that, "She harassed me by not informing me of lesson schedules since last August... she wouldn't let me … [Read more...] about Man arrested for chopping off ballet teacher's thumb
Dancer Steven McRae morphs into a Japanese manga character
Dance firsts are rare: Albrecht nude? Seen it. Swan Lake in the round? Been there. But ballet manga is something new, at least when it involves a real dancer. What is manga? I hear the balletomanes cry who never venture far from the local opera house. Well, Wikipedia defines it thus: Manga are comics created in Japan, or by Japanese creators in the Japanese language, … [Read more...] about Dancer Steven McRae morphs into a Japanese manga character
So tonite I lost it: Johan Kobborg's heartbreaking departure from the Royal Ballet
Johan Kobborg has given his last performance with the Royal Ballet, in Tokyo. The last performance was due to have been tomorrow evening for the opening of Swan Lake but he and Alina Cojocaru cancelled. Yesterday, the Royal Ballet announced: Friday will see the first of five performances of Swan Lake, although unfortunately Alina Cojocaru and Johan Kobborg announced today they … [Read more...] about So tonite I lost it: Johan Kobborg's heartbreaking departure from the Royal Ballet
Jonas Kaufmann cancels Japan trip to make time for surgery to remove a node
Due to surgery Jonas Kaufmann has had to cancel his trip to Japan in September. He was scheduled to sing several performances of "Carmen" with the company of the Teatro Comunale di Bologna and of "Lohengrin" in the Bayerische Staatsoper production . His last appearance before the operation will be in Stockholm on September 2 where he is scheduled to sing in the Jussi Björling … [Read more...] about Jonas Kaufmann cancels Japan trip to make time for surgery to remove a node


text:
April 2018
What is your name?
How old are you?
Four and I'm a big girl.
I'm going to, grow and grow
When is your birthday?
After Christmas
How old is mummy?
Don't know can you tell me?
35, oh 35, she a lovely mummy and so cute
What is your favourite colour?
What is your favourite food?
Jam sandwich and biscuit too
Who is your best friend?
Mummy, Meta and Poppy
What is your favourite song?
3 little monkeys jumping on the bed
What is your favourite animal?
What are you scared of?
What makes you happy?
Me and mummy and my friends
Where is your favourite place to go?
To the park
What do you want to be when you grow up?
What is mummy's favourite thing to do?
Washing up things
What do you like to do?
Playing in the garden
Where does money come from?
From the shop
What's mummy's favourite colour?
Who's mummy's best friend?


text:
$ 18.00
These are replacement leather tabs, which fit our Waxed Canvas and Leather Laptop Messenger Bags, are used for closures on the front pockets.
Available in Wine or Black.
Oberon Design • 1817 Empire Industrial Ct. Santa Rosa, CA. • 95403 firstname.lastname@example.com
Sign up for the Oberon Dispatch to get the latest on sales, new releases and more …
© 2020 Oberon Design.
Designed by Out of the Sandbox.
Website hosting by Shopify


text:
Country View Woodworking
Truly "handcrafted, beautifully American!"
Country view offers a new line of solid wood, American made furniture with finish and style options. 100% American-made, handcrafted furniture to satisfy nearly every taste in home furnishings.
Our Amish-built lines feature both traditional classics, such as our Hampton, New Classic Mission, and Queen Victoria Dining Room Collections and more contemporary styles.


text:
Am ambitious animated undertaking of one the bestselling inspirational works of all time has landed an impressive voice cast. Liam Neeson, Salma Hayek, John Krasinski, Frank Langella, Alfred Molina and Quvenzhané Wallis will lend their voices to The Prophet, an adaptation of Kahlil Gibran's collection of writings. Roger Allers (The Lion King) will write and direct an original narrative story based on Gibran's work. The picture is scheduled to be complete by spring of 2014. Hit the jump for more.
Deadline reported on the voice cast of The Prophet, as well as some additional animation directors who will be tackling the film's individual chapters. The international team of directors includes Tomm Moore (The Secret of Kells), Joan Gratz (Mona Lisa Descending a Staircase), Bill Plympton (Guard Dog and Your Face), Nina Paley (Sita Sings the Blues), Joann Sfar (The Rabbi's Cat), Paul and Gaetan Brizzi (Fantasia 2000), Michal Socha (Chick) and Mohammed Harib (Freej).
Here's the description of The Prophet (via Amazon):
Originally published in 1923, The Prophet continues to inspire millions worldwide with its timeless words of love and mystical longing. Writing with insight, hope, and a remarkable compassion for the human condition, Kahlil Gibran explores ideas of joy and sorrow, friendship, good and evil, pleasure, reason and passion, expressing humanity's yearning for a Unity of Being, only achieved through love.


text:
Why 1 in 10 women endure painful sex (and keep it a secret)
A study shows that 1 out of 10 women endure sexual pain.
Sexual pain is often kept a secret, explains clinical sexologist Dr Eve.
They don't talk to their health care providers or, disturbingly, their own partners about it.Dr Eve, clinical sexologist
Research found that sexual pain is experienced most by women between 16 and 24 years old and women above 50.
Dr Eve says the reality of first-time sexual encounters is very different from the images which dominate mainstream media.
She advises that many women normalise painful penetration as they have no other reference.
The 16-24 age group is suffering with painful penetration because they believe that painful sex is the norm.Dr Eve, clinical sexologist
Reasons for staying silent about pain include:
- shame around sexual pain
- fear of 'ruining the mood'
- fear of hurting their partners ego
- fear of forced sexual violence
Reasons for painful sex are complex and varied. The most common reasons include:
- sexually transmitted infections (STIs) , such as chlamydia and herpes
- thrush
- endometriosis (which causes pelvic inflammation)
- previous traumatic sexual experiences
- anxiety
- lack of lubrication
- oral contraceptives
She advises that women who experience sexual pain should consult with gynecologist, and a sexual health care provider.
Dr Eve explains the discomfort and fields questions and comments from callers.
Visit Dr Eve's blog to learn more.
Take a listen:
@Dr_Eve as a man I'm really informed now I have a better understanding as to why my grlfrnd might nt want to have sex,smething to talk over— TheGarrry_ (@NEYO_GG77) February 3, 2017
This article first appeared on CapeTalk : Why 1 in 10 women endure painful sex (and keep it a secret)


text: VexedGlory Posted February 9, 2015 Share Posted February 9, 2015 I had ordered a sample of this ages ago when I had first discovered LPMP but hadn't really gotten around to trying it until now. On me, LP Original displays volumes of vanilla, amber, and patchouli but is rounded out by a warmth and spice that was completely unexpected. I think I previously imagined it to be sweeter and more delicate than it turned out to be. I see this scent as being ageless but has a sophistication that I associate with Chanel fragrances and such. It immediately sent my mind whirring to try and figure out what pheros to pair with it and now that I've realized how great LP: Original is, I will definitely be wearing it more! I can't believe it took me so long to get around to trying my sample! Link to post Share on other sites


text:
President Donald Trump mostly spent his extended holiday vacation on the golf course or at fancy dinner parties, but he couldn't keep from making some news. He had the usual number of insulting "tweets," several insulting sound bites, and sat down for an impromptu interview with The New York Times that still worth noting after several days.
The interview is so full of eyebrow-raising quotes that one hardly knows where to begin, but we might has well start with the one that got the most attention from the media during a slow and little-watched news cycle. Asked an inevitable question about special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russia's role in the last presidential election, Trump surprised many by saying that "It doesn't bother me, because I hope he's going to be fair. I think that he's going to be fair. There's been no collusion. But I think he's going to be fair."
Which is surprising because Trump has frequently characterized the investigation as a "witch hunt," and "witch hunts" are by definition unfair, while his most loyal allies in Congress and the conservative media have lately maintained that the investigators are biased and out to get the president. Perhaps it was a holiday spirit that had Trump so hopeful about Mueller's fairness, perhaps he was taking the high road with confidence his surrogates would take the low, and he perhaps he believes that Mueller might as susceptible to flattery as himself, but in any case it provided fodder for speculation.
When asked about the possibility of re-re-opening an investigation former Democratic rival Hillary Clinton's e-mail practices Trump replied that "I have absolute right to do what I want with the Justice Department, but for purposes of hopefully thinking I will be treated fairly, I've stayed uninvolved in this particular matter." Which is worrisome on a number of levels.
Aside from the fact that a President of the United States speaks such un-parseable English, there's something chillingly Nixonian about Trump's insistence that he can use federal law enforcement to persecute his political enemies, and something more chilling yet about his apparent confession that isn't do so only in hopes of currying favor with the special counsel. Just in case a reader might reach a more generous interpretation, Trump also had some strange praise for former Attorney General Eric Holder that made his rather authoritarian views of presidential power explicitly clear.
"I don't want to get into loyalty, but I will tell you that — I will say this: Eric Holder protected President Obama. Totally protected him. When you look at the IRS scandal, when you look at the guns for whatever, when you look at all of the tremendous, ah, real problems they had — not made up problems like Russia collusion, these were real problems — when you look at the things they did, and Holder protected the president. And I have great respect for that. I'll be honest, I have great respect for that."
Aside from mangled syntax and the failure to recall the name of the "Fast and Furious" scandals or come up with any other of the many Obama scandals, Trump is saying that his predecessor committed serious crimes and was allowed to do so by an Attorney General who put personal loyalty ahead of loyalty to the rule of law, and that he wishes his own Attorney General were just as unethical. All of Trump's allies in Congress and the conservative media used to loathe Holder for doing what Trump respects, and when they get back to work today it will be interesting to see if they recant their past criticisms. We're sure they'll come up with something to say, and fully expect that their ongoing attacks on Mueller's character will continued despite Trump's hopefulness for fair treatment.
There was plenty of Trump's widely-ridiculed braggadocio, too, as he claimed Chinese President Xi Jiping treated him "better than anybody's ever been treated in the history of China," that he understands tax law "better than the greatest CPA" and the details of health care policy "better than most." He also claimed to have vaulted candidate Luther Strange from fifth place to second after endorsing in his Alabama's Republican primary for a Senate race, even though there were only three major candidates in the race, and the numbers he claimed in Strange's surge were simply made-up. As usual he could not get through an interview with about bragging about his electoral college victory, which as usual he claims is much harder for a Republican to win than the popular vote, even the Republicans are three-and-two in the past five electoral votes but only one-for-five in the popular vote.
Trump also used a barnyard epithet to describe the Democrats' opposition to the tax bill, while unnecessarily insulting potential Democratic ally Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, a state that Trump claims to have single-handedly restored to economic greatness.
The weirdest part, though, was Trump's prediction that the mainstream media — those "very bad people" and purveyors of "Fake News" who have been Trump's favorite target since he launched his campaign — are going to carry him to an easy reelection victory in 2020. "Because without me, their ratings are going down the tube. Without me, The New York Times will indeed be not the failing New York Times but the failed New York Times. So basically they have to let me win. And eventually, probably six months before the election, they'll be loving me because they're saying, 'Please, please don't lose Donald Trump.'"
Which is to say that the American public only reads or watches the news to hear about Trump, and will lose interest in public affairs all together if he's not around, and that's pretty arrogant even by Trumpian standards. He also expects that the news outlets that have seen their readerships and viewerships rise with the constant criticisms of Trump will commence six months of unrelenting praise so that they can go back to luring readers and viewers once he's safely re-installed in office, which strikes us as worrisomely crazy even by Trumpian standards.
Trump is probably lucky the interview was published when people had better things to do than read or watch the news, but today the holidays are over and the government is back to work and people will once again be paying attention. Our advice is that he avoid impromptu interviews for a while.
— Bud Norman


text:
drapry at Mississippi state - 12/22/14
If you looking rental from MS state .
Premier Event Rentals
email : email@example.com
tysha :601-502-6864
830 Wilson Drive, Ridgeland Mississippi 39157
Dont belive i do go anywhere to set up . take 11 round trip to drive .
will come back sunday pick up another 11 hrs drive .
Leave a Reply.
November 2018
Hi . this gigi .I like my business .I have been doing linen business and wedding drapery over 10 years .of cause we are profession .please give our opportunity to creative your dream wedding come trun
Benefits of joinig
the angel linen associate Membership
1:10% discount off all orders. Cleaning Services also included in the 10% discount.
2:Get a free listing on our web-site. This will increase your business visibility.
3:Free sample kit (Including 80 Satin Sashes, 80 Organza Sashes along with a Satin and Organza Color Charts
Angel linens Associate Membership Requirements:
1:A current Business License
2:$200 Annual Fee
Membership Cancellation Terms
If you choice to cancel your membership just send back the samples in a month and $180.00 of the $200.00 membership will be returned to you..


text:
You are here
Daily Debrief: What Happened Today
Legitimate to expect disclosures on rebates for bond sales: MAS
Some form of disclosure on rebates for bond sales by private banks is important, and a legitimate expectation, Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) managing director Ravi Menon said.
- Singapore stepping up misconduct probes, central bank chief says
- Singapore won't ease real estate curbs 'anytime soon,' MAS says
- "Early indications" that Zika could have small economic impact in Singapore: Menon
PM Lee, Philippine President Duterte hold first bilateral meeting
Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte reaffirmed the "long and close" bilateral ties in their first such bilateral meeting since the latter took office in late June this year.
Singapore, Australia to share data to reduce tax evasion
Your feedback is important to us
Tell us what you think. Email us at firstname.lastname@example.com
Singapore and Australia have taken another step to jointly support greater tax transparency and fight tax evasion.
Singapore matchmaking startups Glints, Lunch Actually raise Series A funds
Two homegrown companies said on Tuesday that they have raised venture capital to expand their services - coincidentally, both are in matchmaking.
China Environment responds to SGX queries, says assets are greater than liabilities
China Environment, which manufactures air pollution control and treatment systems in China, said on Tuesday that the group's current assets are greater than its current liabilities after taking in an impairment charge of 356 million yuan (S$72.3 million).
Tourist influx brings no joy to Singapore hotels amid room glut
An influx of tourists to Singapore this year has brought little joy to the city's hoteliers, as a glut of rooms sends a key revenue measure to a six-year low.
The STI Today
Singapore shares close 1.6% higher on Tuesday
Share prices on the Singapore bourse closed higher on Tuesday with the key Straits Times Index up 44.81 points or 1.6 per cent at 2,896.55.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes


text:
Since gaining prominence in the mid-2000s the usage of social media across the globe has rocketed. In America, the birthplace of the internet, usage of social media has increased by over 800% from 2005 to 2015, with young adults being most engaged. Thus, 16 years into the new millennium, the usage of social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and WhatsApp, has become a common phenomenon.
Social media has had immense positive impact. It has been able to bring people on opposite ends of the world closer together; coordinate relief work in times of disaster; and even topple corrupt governments. However, this article will not bore you with platitudes on the advantages of social media, that many have internalized. Rather it will focus on the organizations in Sri Lanka that have shunned the usage of social media.
In Sri Lanka numerous institutions and individuals have embraced this technology, albeit rather slowly, to further their varying needs. However, some Sri Lankan primary and secondary educational institutions have shunned and deplored the usage of social media and the internet in general; even to the extent of threatening students who use social media with expulsion.
One leading school in Sri Lanka that has adopted prohibitionist policies is Lyceum International. I myself have faced these policies while schooling at Lyceum throughout the last decade. During our weekly assemblies we were warned on the restrictions on social media, and our parents were regularly reminded the same via monthly newsletters. This practice has continued, though it seems to have become stricter.
These educational institutions sight the dangers of pedophilia, unwanted romantic relations, cyberbullying and addiction as reasons behind their ban. While indeed these concerns are legitimate, I believe that the way they have chosen to tackle these issues is counter productive.
Numerous psychological studies have shown that banning something makes it more alluring. History has shown that prohibitions, such as those on soft drugs and alcohol, were unable to reduce their usage. Similarly, heavy restriction on social media for adolescents would only increase their desire to bite on this forbidden fruit, even if simply out of curiosity. Clearly, no amount of restriction, especially on something that is believed as advantageous by wider society, could prevent students from accessing social media.
Thus, what these educational institutions should do, by the virtue of the field they are in, is to educate their pupils on how to be smart about the internet and social media. And here are some of the ways they can do this.
Schools should help their students learn how to:
- use social media appropriately by providing guidelines, such as regulations on the upload of content related to their school.
- maintain their privacy and abstain from divulging personal information.
- access and share useful information, such as gaining real-time news via twitter.
- avoid falling prey to the evils of social media, such as being targeted by pyramid schemes, and unknown individuals with fake identities who may end up being pedophiles.
- tap into the power of social media to advance and work towards social causes that they are passionate about.
- utilize social media platforms, like LinkedIn, to boost their career prospects once they enter the real world.
- use social media in emergency situations – be it if one is being stalked in a dark alley, or is trapped in one's house during a flood.
Indeed in a world with new professions like social media specialists, if schools fail to educate their students, they will become ignorant folk who will find it very difficult to navigate themselves in the 21st century. Therefore, I implore all schools in Sri Lanka to act smart and teach their students the power of social media – both the bad and the good.


text:
T-minus 36 hours until the long weekend of Lincoln, love and lust. Take two to toast the #ThursdayTease, a titillation alliteration as LFF talks it up with Twinky Boots, a tasty delight making his boylesque debut Saturday night.
Name: Twinky Boots
Social Media:
Twitter: @twinkyboots – launching soon!
How did you start in boylesque?
I started in Burlesque/Boylesque through Jerry Mitchell and his charity event Broadway Bares which benefits Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS. I stumbled across the @BCEFA event on YouTube when I was still in college and was immediately drawn to this sexy event that wasn't raunchy but still seemed taboo for a kid raised in central Kentucky. When I moved to the city one of my goals was to be involved in the show whatever way possible. I started go-go dancing and eventually became involved in a full scale strip number for their 25th anniversary.
Why Badapple Boylesque?
I went to one of their shows, and after the first number my date turned to me and said "you should be doing that." I took that in for a moment, and then said "Yes I should, and I will." I reached out to Bad Apple Boylesque the next day, and was drafting my first number by the end of the week. I'm the newest member of the troupe, and the group has been incredibly welcoming.
Tell us about your boylesque name.
Sloppi Chulo, one of the members of Bad Apple Burlesque helped collaborate on my name. I wanted something quirky that pointed to my connection to theatre and defined how I've never seemed to grow out of being a twink.
How do you define badass?
Having the strength of character to put yourself out there even if it could be a total failure. Making the effort to try, that's badass!
Best advice since you started performing.
Don't try to focus on too many ideas at once for your numbers. Focus on one, polish it to your liking, and then you can start on another.
What do you do when you are not boylesquing?
I'm relatively normal when I'm not onstage. I watch a LOT of movies, read a lot of books, take dance class, try to date, work one of my other performance jobs (backup dancing for drag queens like Miss Fame, Katya, Ginger Minj, Sherri Vine and Pandora Boxx).
Your favorite Valentine?
I'm going to answer this like you asked my favorite Valentine treat, haha, because I have a sweet tooth and LOVE cookies. But in all honesty I also kind of miss those Valentine cards you had to give out in elementary school. If they made them for adults I would want Kristen Wiig ones that say things like "I'm so…freaking excited you're my Valentine!" or "Happy Valentine's Day, you're APPROVED!" Someone needs to get on that.
What's next for Twinky Boots?
First up is my Boylesque debut with Bad Apple Boylesque this Saturday, February 13 at 7 PM at The Triad NYC. If that all goes well, then you'll be seeing more of me at Bad Apple Boylesque in their monthly series at The Triad.
* * *
Love Me If You Dare kicks off at 9PM on Saturday, but why not head to The Triad a little early for a boylesque appetizer with Twinky and the rest of the Bad Apples? Two hot shows on a cold night!
Sign up for news and discounts!


text:
This creamy broccoli mac and cheese recipe features broccoli, Cheddar-American cheese, and a delicious breadcrumb topping.
How to Make It
Melt 2 tablespoons butter in a large saucepan over medium heat, and whisk in all-purpose flour; cook, whisking constantly, 2 minutes.
Whisk in milk gradually; cook, whisking constantly, 5 minutes or until mixture thickens. Remove from heat. Add shredded cheese, salt, and pepper, stirring until cheese melts. Stir in broccoli and pasta. Pour into a lightly greased 11- x 7-inch baking dish. Sprinkle with breadcrumbs; dot with remaining 2 tablespoons butter.
Bake at 350° for 25 to 30 minutes.
To lighten: Substitute equal portions reduced-calorie margarine, 2% reduced-fat milk, and 2% reduced-fat shredded sharp Cheddar cheese, and reduce salt to 1/4 teaspoon. Cook as directed, and pour into baking dish. Stir together remaining margarine, melted, and breadcrumbs; sprinkle over pasta mixture. Bake as directed, and let stand 5 minutes before serving.
Chef's Notes
Stir in chopped chicken if you want some meat in this dish.


text:
LA Times FOB Blogger Worked For Free
They say its gauche to talk about who's getting paid what. But it's our business to be noisy, so we're going to talk about it anyway. Apparently, at the LA Times, blogging an event is the new "unpaid internship." The exchange for one blogger we talked to was the prized Green Room Access at the Festival of Books. Other bloggers were paid at a set rate, but not all. So the Jacket Copy blog was fleshed out by free content providers.
Last year, one of the bloggers was not paid by the newspaper. They did not receive a check. They were given a byline but they worked for free. This year that same blogger was given access to the green room and was not expecting pay again this year. About 15 minutes after we contacted the LA Times for comment on this post, the blogger was sent an email saying "the dust had settled" and the blogger will get $25 a post.
Then spokesperson for LAT told FBLA, "That's not the case. All The Times' freelance bloggers will be paid." In an email we asked if they were told that. "Yes, they were," she replied.
Which still means LAT didn't pay a blogger last year and we'll assume they just had a change of heart this year. Wonder if they'll change even further and pay the blogger for their posts from last year too.


text:
Doc. 109.-the fight at Yazoo City.
Cairo, March 16, 1864.From an officer just arrived from Vicksburgh, who was in the recent fight at Yazoo City, we learn particulars concerning it. The fight was one of the best contested and most desperate of the war. [456] The Union force consisted of the Eleventh Illinois, Colonel Schofield, Colonel Coates's Eighth Louisiana, (colored,) and two hundred of the First Mississippi cavalry, Colonel Ed. Osband, (colored.) The enemy had eight regiments, under command of Ross and Richardson. The fight commenced at eight A. M., and lasted nearly till dark, when the enemy retired. Three hundred of the Eleventh Illinois were surrounded in a small fort of the bluff outside the town. A storm of shot and shell was poured upon them all day, when a summons was sent to them to surrender. They replied that they didn't know what surrender meant. The remainder of the Union force was in town, where they were met by the enemy, who had gained cover of some of the buildings. The contest raged for three hours, when the enemy retired. Two gunboats were in the river, but could render but little assistance. The colored soldiers fought bravely, and sometimes with desperation. The Eleventh Illinois lost twenty-five--nine of whom were killed. Among them was a lieutenant whose name we could not learn. The Eighth Louisiana lost nearly one hundred in killed, wounded, and missing. The First Mississippi cavalry lost two Lieutenants and several men. Our whole loss is set down at one hundred and thirty--that of the enemy at three hundred.
Lieutenant Ingersoll's account
camp Eleventh Illinois infantry, Vicksburgh, Mississippi, March 15, 1864.dear C.: I am not much in the mood for letter-writing to-day, but I will try and write a short one to you. My last was written, I believe, before we reached Yazoo City, on our way down from Greenwood. Colonel Coates received orders while at Sulon to proceed to Yazoo City, take possession of the place, and send to Vicksburgh for camp equipage. When within about six miles of the city, (by land, about fourteen by the river,) Colonel Osband's First Mississippi cavalry, A. D., was disembarked, with instructions to proceed by land to the rear of the town and take possession of all the roads leading, therefrom, in order to gobble up any persons that might attempt to escape, and also to reconnoitre and ascertain what was going on in the vicinity. Major Cook, with a detachment of the First Mississippi cavalry, went out on the Benton road, leading west from Yazoo City. When out about six miles, he came upon what he supposed to be a small scouting party, but which proved to be the advance pickets of General Ross's Texas brigade. He dashed upon them, driving them back into their camp, when they opened upon him with artillery. The Major, having only about sixty men, was forced to get out of that rather lively. A detachment of Ross's brigade followed him up, and they had a running fight till they reached the hills surrounding the city, where the Major made a stand, occupying a small redoubt on the Benton road just outside the city. A despatch having been received by the Colonel, giving a statement of affairs, the Eleventh Illinois, which had just disembarked, was ordered up to the front on the double-quick, and we arrived there none too soon. The enemy fell back as soon as they saw reinforcements coming up. We skirmished with them till dark, when they fell back to their camp. We remained in the fort all night. The Eighth Louisiana occupied a fort, or rather redoubt, (there are seven of them around the city,) to the right of us about three quarters of a mile. The next day company A was ordered to report at headquarters for provost-guard. This was the twenty-ninth of February. From that time up to the fifth of March, we skirmished with the enemy every day, and our cavalry pickets were drawn in nearly every night. A flag of truce was received by Colonel Coates from General Ross, on the fourth of March, asking if the fortunes of war should place some of his men in our possession as prisoners, what should be their treatment, etc. To which a reply was given, that such treatment depended upon the treatment our men (either white or black) received at his hands. About seven o'clock on the morning of the fifth of March, the enemy drove in our cavalry picket, and attacked the infantry picket, which had been strengthened during the night, in considerable force, but were unable to force them to retire, and were compelled to bring up their artillery to dislodge them. Our forces then retired into the fort, ready to welcome whoever or whatever might be sent. They had not long to wait. The enemy formed their lines, which consisted of General Ross's Texas brigade, and General Richardson's Tennessee brigade, (the latter had arrived during the night,) on the ridge northeast of the redoubt held by the Eleventh Illinois, commanded by Major McKee, and a detachment of the First Mississippi cavalry, under command of Major Cook, who occupied the trenches outside of the redoubt. All this time the enemy were peppering away at the fort with a battery of six rifled pieces, and doing some damage, planting the shell inside the fort with great accuracy. After the enemy had formed, they charged down the hill and across the ravine with a yell, our boys sending a shower of bullets among them, till they got under shelter of the bluffs around the fort. They took their position on three sides of the fort, under shelter of the bluff, and within one hundred to one hundred and fifty yards. About twelve o'clock General Ross sent a flag of truce with the demand for a surrender. Major McKee, not liking the style of the thing, returned it without an answer. When Major McKee started to meet the first flag of truce, Major Cook, supposing the flag to have been raised first on our side, called to Major McKee and said: "Major, for God's sake, what are you going to do? You are not going to surrender?" The Major's reply was: "Ask my men if I ever surrender." At the same time that General Ross took position around the fort, two regiments of General Richardson's command, the Fifteenth and Seventeenth [457] Tennessee, deployed to the right into a large corn-field, and on the low ground to the north of the city. Colonel Coates ordered company A out to meet them and check them as much as possible, while he sent to the Eighth Louisiana for reinforcements. We went out on the run. The men deployed in the outskirts of the town, getting behind the fences and buildings for protection. But we found two regiments most too heavy for our company, and fell back from one street to the other, the boys giving them the best they had. Prisoners taken say that they suffered severely coming through the town. We were driven back till on a line with headquarters, when we made a stand, having the advantage of a strong position, and having been reinforced by a detachment from the Eighth Louisiana, A. D., about one hundred and fifty strong, determined to hold it to the last. Company A being stationed to the best advantage, I went to headquarters to see what was going on there. Colonel Coates was in the street giving orders as cool as though nothing unusual was going on. The bullets were flying around him as thick as hail. The enemy had taken possession of the houses on both sides of the street above headquarters, and were firing from the windows and doors. The pillars in front of the building used for headquarters (formerly a bank) were speckled with the marks of bullets. It seems almost a miracle that the Colonel was not struck a dozen times. Hte escaped with only a couple of holes through his coat, and a slight scratch on the face. He was standing on the steps in front of headquarters, or in the street, all the time during the fight. About three o'clock the Colonel told Adjutant Dean and myself to take what men we could get together, go around to the left of the town and attack them on the flank, to make a diversion if possible from that part of the city. We took a few of company A that were the nearest, (the whole company being out skirmishing where they had been all day,) and a small squad from the Eighth Louisiana, with an officer from the same regiment. We went around to the left, attacking them on the flank and rear, yelling at the same time like so many Indians. Captain Kenyon (of the Colonel's staff, and Captain of company K, Eleventh Illinois,) took about twenty men that had been cut off from the fort while out skirmishing in the morning, and driven back into town, and attacked them on the right about the same time. The enemy thinking no doubt that we had been reinforced, started for the hills, every man for himself. We followed them as close as we thought advisable, considering our small force. Lieutenant Brewster moved up Main street with a twelve-pound rifled gun, which had been sent to us from one of the gunboats, with men to work it, (the captain of the gun had deserted it at the commencement of the fight, leaving it in the hands of the enemy; our men charged up the street and retook it.) From that time to the close of the fight, Adjutant Dean and Lieutenant Brewster handled the gun, sending to the gun boat for a new squad of men to work it, doing good execution. We had no idea of driving the enemy out of the town when we made the demonstration. We were expecting reinforcements from Liverpool; which had been sent for, and we wanted to keep them busy until they arrived. As soon as the enemy retreated out of the town, those attacking the fort gradually fell back, till out of cover of the bluffs, when they broke and ran, our boys having opened a heavy fire upon them. Thus ended our fight at Yazoo City. A second flag of truce was sent on the sixth instant, from Brigadier-General Richardson to Colonel Coates, stating that he had sent an ambulance surgeon and ambulance corps to bury his dead, and take care of the wounded, and proposing to Colonel Coates that each of them send a commissioner between the picket-lines to effect an exchange of prisoners, etc. The first point was answered that his dead had been decently buried, his wounded properly and tenderly cared for, consequently no necessity for his surgeon, etc., and declined receiving them. To the second proposition, would answer, that a cartel had been agreed upon, in which certain parties and places were named for such exchange, and as neither Brigadier-General Richardson, confederate States army, nor Colonel Coates, United States volunteers, were named as such parties, nor Yazoo City the point for such exchange, would respectfully decline your proposition. The gist of the joke in this last was, that at that time we had none of his men as prisoners! I don't hanker after any more street-fights. Our entire loss is about one hundred and twenty-five. The Eleventh lost ten killed, including one commissioned officer, and thirty-five wounded and missing. Company A lost five wounded and one missing. He was probably wounded and taken prisoner. Three of them were from Stephenson County. Sergeant C. H. Lutz in the wrist, Samuel Stoner in the leg, and L. Iman in the shoulder. They have been sent to St. Louis, together with "Joe" Pratt. They were all doing well when they left here. [Iman since reported dead.--Ed. Jour.] The morning after the fight orders came from Vicksburgh to embark immediately for that place. We left Yazoo City on the morning of the seventh, arriving there on the ninth. I have endeavored to give you a short sketch of the fight. You know my fondness for letter-writing, so it is entirely unnecessary for any apologies. Had it not been for the coolness and bravery of Major McKee, who had command in the fort, also Major Cook, First Mississippi cavalry A. D., who had command of a detachment from this regiment, and the determination of Colonel Coates to hold the place as long as he had a man to fight with, this letter would probably have been written in Libby prison and to a different metre. We learned by a gunboat officer who arrived here yesterday morning from Yazoo City, that the enemy reported having lost over four hundred killed, wounded, and missing. [458] They must have suffered severely in getting a position around the fort. While the rebs had possession of part of the town, (and it was the largest part too,) they plundered promiscuously. Lieutenant Brewster lost all his papers, and all his clothes but what he had on. He was lucky more than once that day in saving those and in being able to carry them off himself. It seemed as though he and Adjutant Dean were bullet-proof. Captain Kenyon and Lieutenant Perriont, both on the Colonel's staff, exposed themselves almost recklessly, and escaped without a scratch. You have got to see a street-fight to comprehend it. I can't describe it. Company A did itself credit, as it always tries to do.
Rebel account.
Demopolis, Ala., March 11, 1864General Lee telegraphs that Ross and Richardson attacked Yazoo City on the fifth instant, capturing many stores and destroying much cotton about being shipped. The enemy retired to the city and held it until reinforced. They were driven out of the city, which was recaptured, while stores were being destroyed. We have quite a number of prisoners. Our loss was about fifty killed and wounded. The enemy still occupy Yazoo City and Liverpool, intrenching at the latter place. Sherman issued a general order at Canton, in which he speaks of many regiments in his army entitled to furlough.
To Adjutant-General Cooper:
To Adjutant-General Cooper:
L. Polk, Lieutenant-General.