text:
The meeting was convened in the Commission of Fine Arts offices in the National Building Museum, 401 F Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20001, at 10:18 a.m.
Members present:
Hon. Earl A. Powell, Chairman
Hon. Pamela Nelson, Vice-Chairman
Hon. Diana Balmori
Hon. John Belle
Hon. Michael McKinnell
Hon. Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk
Hon. Witold Rybczynski
Staff present:
Thomas E. Luebke, Secretary
Frederick J. Lindstrom, Assistant Secretary
Eve Barsoum
Sarah Batcheler
Kay Fanning
Mary Konsoulis
Jose Martinez
Susan Raposa
Tony Simon
I. Administration
A. Approval of the minutes of the 17 September meeting. Mr. Luebke reported that the minutes of the September meeting were circulated to the Commission members in advance. Upon a motion by Mr. Powell with second by Ms. Plater-Zyberk, the Commission approved the minutes. Mr. Luebke said that the minutes will be made available on the Commission's website.
B. Dates of next meetings. Mr. Luebke presented the regularly scheduled dates for upcoming Commission meetings: 19 November, 21 January, and 18 February; no meeting is scheduled in December.
C. Report on acquisition by the Freer Gallery. Mr. Luebke reported that the Freer Gallery had acquired a new work at auction in September: a stoneware storage jar for tea leaves, created in China in the 13th or 14th century and imported to Japan. He said the ceremonial container is layered with inscriptions describing the rank of its Japanese owners; few such pieces exist outside of Japan. Chairman Powell said that he approved the acquisition on behalf of the Commission because of the impending auction date, based on a meeting with the museum's curator. Mr. Luebke clarified that only the Chairman's approval is needed pursuant to the stipulation of Charles Freer, the museum's original donor.
II. Submissions and Reviews
A. Appendices
Mr. Luebke introduced the three appendices for Commission action. Drafts of the appendices had been circulated to the Commission members in advance of the meeting.
Appendix I – Direct Submission Consent Calendar: Mr. Lindstrom reported that there were no changes to the draft consent calendar nor the report of delegated items. Upon a motion by Ms. Plater-Zyberk with second by Ms. Nelson, the Commission approved the Direct Submission Consent Calendar.
Appendix II – Shipstead-Luce Act submissions: Ms. Batcheler reported two changes to the draft appendix. The recommendation for case number SL 09-110, the enlargement of a canopy at the Woodward Building, was changed to be favorable based on modifications to the design. The recommendation for case number SL 09-112, concerning 2400 Tilden Street, NW, has been refined based on supplemental information and remains favorable. She also noted three cases that were initially submitted by the D.C. government as Shipstead-Luce Act cases, but are instead being treated as direct submissions for D.C. government projects; two were listed on Appendix I, while the New York Avenue public art submission was withdrawn and will be resubmitted. Upon a motion by Ms. Plater-Zyberk with second by Ms. Nelson, the Commission approved the revised appendix. (See item II.E for an additional Shipstead-Luce Act submission.)
Appendix III – Old Georgetown Act Submissions: Mr. Martinez reported several changes to the draft appendix. The negative recommendations for three cases have been changed to be favorable based on the receipt of supplemental information; additional minor updates were made to other listings in response to supplemental information. He said that the recommendation for the project at 3314 Reservoir Road, NW, would be finalized when the full permit application package is received that conforms to the initial supplemental drawings that were provided. [This project was subsequently postponed at the request of the applicant.] Upon a motion by Mr. Belle with second by Ms. Plater-Zyberk, the Commission approved the revised appendix.
B. Department of the Treasury / U.S. Mint
Mr. Luebke said that the two submissions from the U.S. Mint would be presented in the reverse of the order listed on the agenda, beginning with the medal honoring Constantino Brumidi and then the medal honoring Women Airforce Service Pilots (WASP). He noted the presence of audience members wishing to address the Commission concerning the Brumidi medal. Mr. Simon described the papers being distributed to the Commission members: several letters from members of the public concerning the Brumidi medal, with most letters supporting alternative #2 for the obverse and #2 for the reverse; and a revised alternative for one of the WASP designs. He introduced Kaarina Budow from the U.S. Mint to present the medal designs.
2. CFA 15/OCT/09-2, Congressional Gold Medal for Constantino Brumidi. Design for a gold medal and bronze duplicates. Final. Ms. Budow provided reproductions of two renowned frescoes by Brumidi—Liberty and The Apotheosis of George Washington—that were used as models for the design alternatives. She described the legislation authorizing the medal and summarized Brumidi's biography. He was born in Rome in 1805 to Italian and Greek parents and later became a U.S. citizen; he painted many frescoes and murals in the U.S. Capitol beginning in 1855, including committee rooms, major offices, corridors, and the rotunda interior. She described his artistic inspirations in Classical and Renaissance art and his devotion to the United States. Ms. Budow presented three alternatives for the obverse design, each with a portrait of Brumidi, as well as four alternatives for the reverse containing details of his artwork and inscriptions of varying length.
Mr. Luebke summarized the approximately eight letters from the public that were recently received and distributed to the Commission members, with most letters supporting CB-O-02 and CB-R-02, with some support for CB-O-03 due to the inclusion of brushes beside the portrait to indicate Brumidi's work as an artist. Chairman Powell recognized Joe Grano, chair of the Constantino Brumidi Society. Mr. Grano said that this society has worked for ten years to promote Brumidi to the Congress and the public. He said that the portrait in CB-O-02 is best because Brumidi is looking at the viewer, appears happy, and gives an "emotional feeling." He added that CB-O-03 would also be a satisfactory alternative, noting the inclusion of the artist's brushes.
The Chairman recognized Ann Martinez, who has painted several portraits of Brumidi. She agreed with Mr. Grano's support of the portrait in CB-O-02, commenting on the "virile" and happy expression as well as the shorter beard. Mr. Powell commented that the beard in CB-O-03 gives Brumidi the appearance of Robert E. Lee; Ms. Budow said that another review committee had made the same comment.
Ms. Balmori emphasized that the Commission's role is to comment on the aesthetic merits of the alternatives. She commented that the composition of CB-O-01 is best, due to the wide circular border and its relation to the top of Brumidi's head; she added that CB-O-02 has the appearance of a photograph inserted into the design.
Mr. Rybczynski supported alternative CB-O-03, expressing opposition to the wide decorative border in the other two obverse designs. He said that CB-O-03 has an admirable simplicity, the appropriate inclusion of brushes, and a pose that is closer to a profile which is more successful than head-on views in coins and medals. Ms. Balmori expressed regret that CB-O-03 is not more fully in profile; Mr. Rybczynski agreed that a true profile would be preferable. Mr. Belle and Mr. McKinnell also supported CB-O-03.
Ms. Plater-Zyberk said that the comments from the Commission members as well as the public suggest the desirability of recommending a new obverse design. She supported the overall composition of CB-O-01 and the facial expression of CB-O-02, while objecting to this design's placement of Brumidi's name across his chest. She added that the overall design of both sides of the medal is also a consideration, and CB-O-03 is most compatible with a reverse design. Chairman Powell confirmed that the Commission does not need to support one of the submitted alternatives; Mr. Luebke said that it may be useful for the Mint if Commission could provide comments on a first and second choice among the designs.
Ms. Nelson commented that the portrait in CB-O-01 is the more familiar and recognizable image of Brumidi, agreeing that the portrait in CB-O-03 could easily be mistaken for Robert E. Lee. Mr. Powell supported the portrait in CB-O-02 but the composition in CB-O-01, which avoids the problem of placing lettering across Brumidi's chest. He added that the bow tie in CB-O-01 appears to be placed inappropriately low. He therefore proposed a recommendation of the composition of CB-O-01 and the portrait of CB-O-02; Ms. Plater-Zyberk agreed. Mr. Powell clarified that this recommendation would include placing Brumidi's name along the circular border as in CB-O-01; Ms. Budow noted that the rightward position of the portrait in CB-O-02 might necessitate reconfiguring all of the text toward the left side. Mr. Powell said that the portrait position could be adjusted from CB-O-02 as long as the text is removed from the chest; he acknowledged that placing the text along the lower rim could also be feasible. Ms. Plater-Zyberk supported this recommendation, commenting that the comparative continuity of the decorative border in CB-O-01 is preferable to its complete interruption by the top of Brumidi's head in CB-O-02. Mr. Rybczynski reiterated his dissatisfaction with the decorative border and declined to support Mr. Powell's recommendation.
Chairman Powell summarized the Commission's partial consensus to support a composite of the first two obverse designs, acknowledging that the Commission's letter could also include reference to Mr. Rybczynski's dissenting opinion. Ms. Balmori emphasized that the decorative border is based on Brumidi's own artwork; the design of CB-O-01 is therefore representative of Brumidi's decorative style as well as being well composed. Chairman Powell suggested that the Commission's comments be conveyed to the Mint without a formal action to approve or disapprove any particular alternatives.
The Commission then discussed the four reverse alternatives. Ms. Balmori commented that CB-R-01 is the most balanced design, while CB-R-02 has the appearance of cutting or deforming the circular artwork. She said that the artwork used in the remaining two reverse alternatives is unsatisfactory. Ms. Plater-Zyberk suggested that, as with the obverse, the Commission could recommend a combination of the first two alternatives: the composition of CB-R-01, including the curved lettering at the bottom, combined with the central phrase "Artist of the Capitol" from CB-R-02. Ms. Nelson agreed that this proposal would combine the superior design of CB-R-01 with the simple text of CB-R-02.
Ms. Budow noted that the three-inch-diameter format for this medal would provide the opportunity for extensive relief and detail. Mr. Grano offered support for the Commission's consensus, emphasizing the iconic national importance of the artwork, The Apotheosis of George Washington, in alternatives CB-R-01 and CB-R-02, as well as the appropriateness of the phrase "Artist of the Capitol" which was used to describe Brumidi during his lifetime. He agreed with the Commission that a lengthy quotation, as in CB-R-01 and CB-R-03, would be objectionable on a medal.
Upon a motion by Ms. Balmori with second by Ms. Nelson, the Commission recommended the composite design described by Chairman Powell, with the central text of CB-R-02 placed within the overall design of CB-R-01.
1. CFA 15/OCT/09-1, Congressional Gold Medal for Women Airforce Service Pilots. Design for a gold medal and bronze duplicates. Final. Ms. Budow described the legislation authorizing a medal to issue a single gold medal that commemorates the Women Airforce Service Pilots (WASP) who served in World War II. She said that these women were the first to fly U.S. military aircraft, overcoming biases and injustices to serve their country; their service became a catalyst for later revolutionary reforms in the U.S. armed forces, including the permanent acceptance of women for military pilot training beginning in the 1970s.
Ms. Budow presented three alternative designs for the obverse, depicting various compositions of women pilots and airplanes with the dates "1942-1944." She then presented the two alternatives for the reverse, noting the corrected version of design WP-R-01 that adds the airplane number to the nose as well as body of the AT-6 airplane. She said that both designs include the WASP wings insignia.
Ms. Plater-Zyberk asked if the lettering of "W.A.S.P." on design WP-R-02 is a logo of that period; Ms. Budow confirmed that the lettering is based on a pin that WASP members wore on their uniforms, and the wings insignia is based on another pin. Ms. Nelson noted that this text on the reverse would be redundant with the "WASP" text on obverse design WP-O-03; Ms. Budow responded that one of these elements could be eliminated.
Ms. Budow said that the many living WASP members have been polled and have expressed overwhelming support for obverse WP-O-02 and reverse WP-R-01, noting the preference for the group of airplanes in this reverse design. Ms. Balmori said that WP-R-01 is the better composition of the two reverse alternatives but commented that the wings insignia is awkwardly placed, with the bottom of the image cut off. Ms. Plater-Zyberk commented that WP-R-01 conveys more information; Mr. Powell and Ms. Balmori agreed. Mr. Belle also supported WP-R-01 but described it as only "marginally acceptable," commenting that all three of the airplanes are tied to the rim even though the theme should be free movement in space.
Ms. Budow noted that the large format of the medal—with a three-inch diameter—would allow for detailed sculpting of the airplane wings, with the background planes modeled in low relief. Mr. Powell acknowledged the sculptural potential and reiterated his support for WP-R-01. Mr. Belle suggested redesigning the wings insignia; Ms. Plater-Zyberk said that this insignia is the historic symbol of the group but suggested that the horizontal edge separating this insignia from the sky scene could be eliminated. Mr. Belle agreed that the insignia could float within the sky area. Ms. Plater-Zyberk added that elimination of this horizontal edge would avoid the intersection of the lower airplane's wing with the lower border.
Mr. Luebke said that members of the audience have requested the opportunity to address the Commission. Chairman Powell recognized Angie Knappenberger from the staff of Senator Barbara Mikulski, who co-sponsored the legislation for the medal. Ms. Knappenberger introduced Roxi Dolphin from the staff of Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, another co-sponsor. Ms. Knappenberger said they had spoken with former WASP members who perceived the symbolism in WP-R-01 of the airplane wings extending into the border as "breaking through the barriers" and "pushing the boundary" rather than being tied back. She added that the WASP members are proud of having earned their wings and supported the inclusion of the wing pin insignia in the medal design.
Ms. Dolphin said that the WASP members support WP-O-02 because the composition of several women makes it easier for the WASP members to envision themselves in the setting; the goggles are a well-liked feature; the design is well composed in a classic manner; and the foreground woman's gaze is reminiscent of their own flying experience. She indicated the airplane crossing the border circle in this design, again symbolizing the women "breaking the glass ceiling." She said that one of the WASP members commented that the goggles and hat would actually not have been used by pilots flying the depicted AT-6 plane, which had a canopy enclosing the cockpit.
Ms. Balmori supported WP-O-02, commenting that it is the best composition among the obverse alternatives. Mr. Powell agreed, commenting that the design has a character reminiscent of the 1940s. Mr. Rybczynski commented that the combination of WP-O-02 and WP-R-01 would result in excessive repetition of airplanes breaking barriers. He supported the first obverse design, depicting a small portion of an airplane, which would relate well to the complete airplanes depicted on the reverse in WP-R-01. Mr. McKinnell opposed alternative WP-O-01, commenting that the drawing of the figure is "very confused."
Mr. Powell reiterated his support for WP-O-02, commenting that technical skill will be required to sculpt the expression in the portrait as depicted in the drawing. Ms. Nelson said that the clouds behind the foreground woman's head would also require skillful sculpting as a distinct low-relief layer. Ms. Balmori recommended that the cloud be eliminated from the design; Ms. Plater-Zyberk suggested that the cloud shape could instead be refined.
Chairman Powell summarized the Commission's consensus to support alternatives WP-O-02 for the obverse, subject to revision of the cloud; and WP-R-01 for the reverse, subject to revision at the lower part of the coin to continue the circular border and set the wings insignia onto the field of the sky. Ms. Budow said that the Mint could work with the artist in responding to this recommendation. Chairman Powell clarified that the recommendation does not involve removal of the entire border, but includes adjusting the position of the lower airplane to avoid the placement of the nose tip directly adjacent to the border. Mr. McKinnell commented that placing the entire wings insignia within the adjusted border would require further shifting of the lower airplane's position; Mr. Belle suggested shrinking this airplane, while Ms. Balmori suggested shrinking the wings insignia. Ms. Plater-Zyberk commented that the circular border could pass behind the wings insignia in an overlapping format. Chairman Powell included these comments as part of the Commission's support for WP-R-01 with adjustments to the design. Upon a second by Mr. Belle, the Commission adopted this recommendation.
At this point the Commission returned to the order of the agenda with item II.C.
C. Department of Veterans Affairs
CFA 15/OCT/09-3, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 50 Irving Street, NW. Master Plan. Final. (Previous: CFA 17/SEP/09-5.) Ms. Batcheler said that the submission attempts to address the Commission's comments on the draft master plan that was reviewed the previous month. She introduced Mike Dunfee, associate director of the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), to begin the presentation. Mr. Dunfee said that the introductory part of the presentation would be similar to the previous month's, while the remaining images would focus on the changes to the proposed master plan. He introduced architect Jim Curran of Ellerbe Becket to present the proposal.
Mr. Curran summarized the VAMC site and its context, including the views from the site and its relationship to the North Capitol Street axis. He emphasized the many potential changes to the context in the next 10 to 15 years, including redevelopment of the adjacent portion of the Armed Forces Retirement Home and new development around a reconfigured intersection at the cloverleaf interchange of North Capitol and Irving Streets. He described the existing main hospital building, varying from two to four above-ground levels plus a mechanical penthouse. He indicated the existing surface parking areas which generally surround the main building, as well as the research building, community living center, daycare center, and three-story parking garage.
Mr. Curran said that the master plan is intended to address the VAMC needs over the next ten years. The existing 900,000 square feet of facilities would nearly be doubled through a combination of large and small projects. Due to desired functional relationships with existing facilities, the main clinical expansion would be on the west side of the main building, the research expansion would be adjacent to the existing research building, and the community living center expansion would extend from that existing facility in a location currently occupied by the parking structure. Two new parking structures are proposed to meet current needs more adequately as well as to accommodate the increased need generated by the planned additional facilities; these parking structures would allow for the existing surface parking areas to be used as building sites. He emphasized that public transportation is encouraged and the amount of proposed parking is therefore less than recommended by health-care industry standards.
Mr. Curran described the responses to the Commission's previous comments. He said that the project team discussed extensively the recommendation to line the parking structures with additional uses; however, the conclusion was that the Department of Veterans Affairs cannot lease space to an outside entity unless the space is not needed by the federal government, which he called "an impossible task to prove" on this constrained site with extensive planned expansions. In order to address the Commission's concern about the pedestrian experience along First Street, the proposed parking structures have been shortened from nearly 500 to 300 feet in length; this will result in additional parking levels, some of which could potentially be located below grade. As an additional improvement to the urban context, he indicated the elimination of the previously proposed entrance drive paralleling First Street, leading to a new main entrance; instead, the main entrance to the hospital would remain in its existing location to the northwest and a simpler driveway configuration would lead to it, allowing the expansion on the west side of the main building to move closer to First Street. The result would be an even building alignment along First Street—maintaining the security requirement of a fifty-foot setback—as well as the opportunity to create lightwells or courtyards in other parts of the hospital building.
Mr. Curran presented the revised proposal for roadways throughout the campus, indicating the vehicle-free areas of the courtyards, the relationship of the main entrance drop-off area to the north parking structure, drop-off access to the proposed Fisher House, and the ambulance drop-off area which would be shielded by a screen wall. He indicated the transportation center along First Street near the main entrance. It would be served by Metro buses, simplifying the current complex bus route through the multiple hospitals in the area, and would provide a covered waiting area for passengers as well as accommodating the turning movements of buses. Mr. Rybczynski asked about the additional traffic connections indicated on the circulation diagram; Mr. Curran responded that the dashed lines indicate routes that would be available for emergency vehicles or the VAMC's internal operations, but these routes would be designed primarily as pedestrian areas and would not be available for public vehicular traffic.
Ms. Balmori asked about vehicular access to the daycare center, located near the proposed south parking structure which is intended for staff use. Mr. Curran responded that much, although not all, of the daycare center's users are the children of staff members, making this location convenient for drop-off; he indicated the driveway within the courtyard to serve the daycare center. Ms. Balmori asked about other driveways in the courtyard; Mr. Curran responded that the only other vehicular route would be the continuation of this drop-off loop.
Mr. Belle asked for clarification of the proposed consolidation of parking. Mr. Curran responded that the two proposed parking structures would each have eight levels of which two or three could be below grade; he emphasized that the parking structures would be lower than the nearby hospital building due to the shorter height of each floor. Mr. Belle questioned the placement of the parking at the periphery of the site, which creates additional circulation problems. Mr. Curran said that alternative locations were considered for the parking structures, and the current proposal was chosen due to the desirable relationships to building entrances and to First Street, minimizing the need for vehicular circulation within the campus. Mr. Belle commented that some people coming to the campus would have limited mobility, suggesting the desirability of locating the parking closer to the hospital facilities; Mr. Curran responded that the proposed locations are relatively close, and he emphasized the drop-off areas directly adjacent to the main entrance. He also indicated the potential location of a pedestrian bridge that would connect the north parking structure to the upper portion of the two-story atrium at the main entrance. Mr. Dunfee added that the VAMC already provides valet parking and anticipates continuing this program; a person with very limited mobility could therefore drive up to the main entrance and leave the vehicle with the valet staff. Mr. Belle commented that the actual destination for patients would likely be deep within the large hospital building, adding to the travel distances. Mr. Curran confirmed that all patients would arrive at the main entrance area regardless of their destination within the building, and the design goal is therefore to relate the parking configuration to the main entrance area. Ms. Plater-Zyberk asked if visitors to facilities at the south end of the campus, such as the community living center, could park in the south parking structure and walk to that facility; Mr. Curran confirmed that this would be permissible, with some complexity in the likely actual use of the parking facilities.
Mr. Belle reiterated his dissatisfaction with the distant siting of the parking structures; Ms. Plater-Zyberk noted that the problem may result from the large area occupied by the hospital building. Ms. Nelson said that patients could arrive at the main entrance and then use a wheelchair if necessary to reach a distant destination in the hospital building. Mr. Dunfee confirmed that this is the current arrangement for people arriving at the main hospital; he added that greeters are available at the entrance or in the parking lot to assist people in reaching their destinations. Mr. Curran added that the current configuration of extensive surface parking lots results in many people having longer walking distances than would result from the proposed parking structures.
Mr. Curran described the circulation spine of the main hospital and the proposal to terminate it at the proposed southern courtyard area; the result would be a clear connection between the main entrance and the courtyard. He indicated the grade change which would allow this courtyard to have elevated views toward the U.S. Capitol and a potential connection downward 10 to 15 feet to the Michigan Avenue sidewalk, which would offer the opportunity to connect to planned development of retail and park space at the McMillan Reservoir filtration site to the south; this opening could be designed as a gap between building wings of the community living center.
Ms. Balmori commented that the south courtyard is awkwardly shaped as a public open space, having the character of a series of corridors. She indicated the proposed research facility expansion that cuts into the courtyard and asked if any of this new program could be constructed above the existing building rather than spreading outward from it. Mr. Curran responded that an option was considered to relocate the entire research function to another part of the campus, but the investment in the existing building has been substantial and relocation would be too costly. Vertical expansion of the existing building was also considered but would not be structurally feasible. He said that the resulting proposal is therefore the best functional location for the research expansion, and he noted that the courtyard would be 120 feet wide at its narrowest location. Ms. Balmori said that the proposed northern open space area on the campus appears to be more successfully configured but commented that the sequence of partially separated larger spaces to the south results in an awkward configuration that lacks a sense of continuity.
Ms. Plater-Zyberk suggested that the southern courtyard be treated instead as a series of smaller places. Ms. Balmori agreed, suggesting that each space be shaped, and emphasized the value of including the open spaces, even if relatively small, in order to provide a sense of orientation for people within the hospital. She noted that the southern courtyard would be particularly valuable as an amenity for the community living center and asked about access from the hospital to the courtyard; Mr. Curran indicated the proposed connection from the main corridor. Several Commission members supported this connection, commenting that it would result in a successful courtyard.
Mr. Curran presented perspective views of the south courtyard area. Mr. Belle asked for clarification of the proposed massing for the community living center; Mr. Curran responded that the opening for the southward connection could be spanned by a high sunscreen, and would potentially have corridors to connect the upper-level floors. He explained that the evolving model for such facilities may allow for a set of separate buildings that could have plazas and courtyards between them. Ms. Balmori asked if the sunscreen could be designed as an accessible green roof, perhaps extending across the entire community living center; Mr. Curran responded that this would be possible and Mr. Belle commented that such a gesture would justify the creation of this large open roof feature.
Mr. Curran presented additional views of the proposed building massings at the prominent corner of North Capitol Street and Michigan Avenue and along the curve of North Capitol Street at the termination of the Capitol's north axis; he indicated the architectural emphasis that the master plan recommends for these locations. He said that the proposed one-floor addition to the existing two-story community living center would provide an opportunity to re-clad the entire facade, allowing for the revised treatment of the North Capitol Street features as well as improved massing and a more open character. He added that the dramatic view southward to the Capitol is an asset of the VAMC site and "should be taken advantage of"; he suggested that the community living center's day room, conference room, educational center, or library could occupy the location that enjoys this view, and a roof terrace is proposed above.
Mr. Curran presented a view of the massing along First Street, indicating the security fence that is required around the site; he noted that the existing fence is of poor quality, and the proposal would be an improvement. He described the proposed emphasis on glass in the facades of the hospital's expanded patient room wings, which he said is feasible and desirable in modern hospital design. Ms. Balmori reiterated the Commission's preference for retail space rather than a fence along this edge. Mr. Curran responded that this would be desirable but is not possible due to the rules of the Department of Veterans Affairs: the required fifty-foot standoff distance must be separate from buildings and must keep people as well as cars away from the VAMC buildings. He said that treating a retail building itself as the fence was considered but would be infeasible. He emphasized that these conclusions were reached after extensive but unsuccessful discussions with the Department of Veterans Affairs. Mr. Powell offered thanks for the design team's efforts to address this concern.
Mr. Curran presented four diagrams of the proposed phasing for implementation of the master plan, beginning with a series of relatively small projects. Mr. McKinnell asked if the remnants of the surface parking areas that appear in the illustrations of the later phases are an indication that landscaping will not occur until after the building construction phases. Mr. Curran clarified that landscaping would occur in conjunction with the appropriate phases, although the presentation diagrams illustrate only the massing of the buildings in each phase; he acknowledged that some existing site features and buildings to be demolished are inadvertently shown in later phasing diagrams.
Ms. Plater-Zyberk asked for a further description of the design character of the building along the center of the VAMC's First Street frontage, particularly the lower floors beneath the extensive glass facade areas that were described for the patient rooms on the upper floors. Mr. Curran responded that this new wing is designated as clinical expansion; the lower two floors would be an extension of functions such as examination rooms, imaging departments, and operating rooms, while the upper two floors would serve in-patients. He acknowledged the concern about whether these lower floors could have windows, and said that the design team is recommending that the areas immediately behind the facades on these floors be used for public circulation and secondary waiting areas for the clinical rooms, which would allow for including windows to provide natural light to these areas. Ms. Plater-Zyberk emphasized the importance of windows as a means of enlivening the facade along the street.
Mr. Curran presented a view of the proposed transportation center, indicating a possible pedestrian bridge spanning First Street and connecting the VAMC hospital with the Washington Hospital Center. He said that some staff need to move between these campuses, and collisions between cars and pedestrians occur at this location. Ms. Nelson asked about the extent of interaction between the two hospital campuses, such as shared laboratories. Mr. Dunfee responded that staff crossover is limited, less than is typical at major medical centers; most VAMC physicians work entirely at the VAMC, while some residents and other trainees make use of both campuses.
Ms. Plater-Zyberk suggested that the intersection designated as a transportation center could be configured with a circle, which would serve as a turnaround for buses as well as facilitate the distribution of traffic, including emergency vehicles. Billy Farella of Ellerbe Becket responded that the project team has discussed this solution with the D.C. Department of Transportation, which will respond further. Ms. Plater-Zyberk commented that the introduction of a traffic circle could affect the shape of the parking garage, and she recommended that the master plan proposals not preclude a later decision to treat the intersection as a circle.
Ms. Plater-Zyberk asked if it would be possible to accommodate parking beneath the community living center, which was presented as having a main level that would be elevated substantially above the Michigan Avenue sidewalk. Mr. Curran acknowledged that the space beneath the main level could be put to some use, but that parking would not be permitted beneath the building due to security requirements. He confirmed that the security setback requirement also precludes siting the wellness center to abut the north parking garage. Mr. Luebke noted that the master plan allows for future development sites at the north edge of the campus, facing Irving Street; Mr. Curran said that there is a development zone along that edge which could potentially include retail space, but this would be subject to security and access requirements as well as the regulations concerning the leasing of facilities to outside uses. Chairman Powell commented that the submission is a master plan, and such adjustments may be accommodated later in a final design.
Mr. McKinnell commented that a master plan should include a statement of the intended character of the site's buildings and open spaces; he regretted that this issue is not addressed in this submission. He offered the example of providing a recommended character for the open spaces, such as ground-floor colonnades under which patients could sit, or for mitigating the appearance of the parking garages through techniques such as screens. He said that the only design guidance in the presentation was that the upper-floor facades of the clinical expansion would be primarily glass—a questionable proposal for this west-facing facade; he asked if the master plan provides any overall strategy for energy conservation. He emphasized that his recommendation concerns the need for the master plan to provide guidance on basic strategies rather than specific architectural design. He offered further examples of whether buildings would have green roofs—particularly for roofs that are visible from other buildings—and whether the top level of each parking garage would have features such as pergolas. He acknowledged the master plan's attention to resolving the hospital's internal issues, which he said is apparently accomplished, and supported the master plan's next step of proposing the creation of open spaces, but reiterated that the master plan stops short of proposing the character of these spaces. He noted that the treatment of these issues in the master plan can serve as a useful reminder to the client of the necessary costs in implementing these concepts.
Ms. Plater-Zyberk offered further comments on the treatment of proposed structures along First Street. She acknowledged the usefulness of pedestrian bridges but said that they are often unattractive and appear tacked on to the buildings. Parking garages, in the absence of design guidance in the master plan, are often constructed expeditiously with a typical pre-cast concrete system that does not readily accommodate connections to other structures. The new facade of the expanded hospital building would have its own design character, as would the small structure at the bus waiting area. She contrasted the utilitarian emphasis of this approach with the emerging trend to treat hospitals as an integral part of the wider community and its daily life. She emphasized that the hospital's image and experience of arrival are important to the well-being of its users—staff as well as patients and families—some of whom interact with the hospital for many years under potentially unpleasant circumstances. She acknowledged the project team's responsiveness to the Commission's comments in a short time, as well as the value of creating the proposed courtyards, but said that the overall perception of the campus remains a concern. She recommended a more holistic treatment of the entire First Street frontage of the campus, with an emphasis on a character that is more welcoming and even elevating. She noted that old hospitals successfully integrated connecting bridges, open spaces, and sun rooms using traditional styles such as Gothic or Georgian; she suggested that the master plan provide at least a brief statement in support of such a unified and welcoming character, which could be implemented in whatever style would be appropriate.
Mr. Curran responded that the design team has encouraged the Department of Veterans Affairs to take such an approach in the realization of the master plan. He reiterated that the master plan establishes the needed amount of parking, the advantages of consolidating it into structures, and the reasons for the proposed locations of the two garages. He agreed that utilitarian pre-cast concrete garages would not be a desirable result. He added that the master plan does generally establish a more open design character for the main building, which currently has an internal focus that is relieved only by a double-height glass atrium. The massing of new construction illustrated in the master plan provides many opportunities for a more pedestrian-friendly character, natural light, and a new image for the campus. He acknowledged the desirability of a unified architectural concept for the entire west face of the campus, including consideration of sustainability issues in the design of the hospital building's new west facade.
Ms. Plater-Zyberk said that the additional design statement in the master plan should include these principles and should further state that the VAMC's First Street frontage should be a visually enjoyable backdrop for a future retail area that will likely be developed eventually on the west side of the street—retail space whose customers will include the VAMC community. She contrasted these principles with the currently submitted master plan's simple designation of parking garages.
Chairman Powell complimented the design team's efforts to accommodate the Commission's recommendations from the previous month and said that the master plan has improved. He suggested that the Commission's comments be incorporated into the next phase of the VAMC's development, a request that could be included in a motion to approve the final master plan; the comments would also become part of the record of the Commission's approval. Mr. Belle suggested that the Commission's action include a request that a response be included in the next submission; Chairman Powell agreed. Upon a motion by Ms. Plater-Zyberk with second by Mr. Belle, the Commission approved the master plan subject to the comments provided and their treatment in a revised final document.
D. Department of Agriculture
CFA 15/OCT/09-4, U.S. National Arboretum, New York Avenue and Bladensburg Road, NE. National Bonsai and Penjing Museum. Sign Master Plan. Concept/Final. Mr. Lindstrom introduced Nancy Luria, director of education and visitor services at the National Arboretum, and Faye Harwell of the landscape architecture firm Rhodeside & Harwell to present the proposed master plan for signs. Ms. Luria described the Arboretum's National Bonsai and Penjing Museum, a collection of living plants in an array of interior and exterior galleries. The collections include galleries for Japanese, Chinese, North American, and other international plants, as well as a lecture-demonstration center and staff offices. She said that the sign master plan will help to unify the museum's facilities and is the second phase of a landscape design prepared by Rhodeside & Harwell; the first phase, providing accessibility improvements, has already been completed. The scope includes wayfinding, building identification, and interpretive signage.
Ms. Harwell described the components of the proposed sign system. The entry area would include a fence-mounted sign at the entry gate. A series of panels, including an informational map, would be located near the first pavilion along with a moveable brochure rack. Smaller wall-mounted panels would provide changeable information about special events and temporary exhibits; small changeable signs would describe the individual plants being exhibited. Donor recognition signage would be consolidated to a single interior location. Each pavilion would be labeled with wall-mounted lettering to improve on the current unclear identification.
Ms. Harwell described the materials and design of the signs, which would typically be mounted by a cable system. Materials would include simple banners, porcelain enamel signs, stainless steel frames, and pin-mounted lettering. The colors would primarily be pale gray tones, intended to provide a recessive character within the stone and wood of the museum setting; an insignia would be in red to denote the Asian influence. The lower portion of many signs would include a gray curve that is part of the Arboretum's logo. The building lettering would include the appropriate Asian characters as well as each building's English name. Ms. Balmori asked about the material of these letters; Ms. Harwell said they would be anodized bronze, with a height of 3 5/8 inches, and would be mounted one inch in front of the wall to generate a shadow.
Ms. Harwell presented photographic simulations of the signs in the existing museum setting. She indicated the pattern of wall staining at the Japanese pavilion; in accordance with the Japanese aesthetic tradition of "wabi-sabi," this patina of aging would be left undisturbed but may be affected by a future renovation of the Japanese pavilion that is currently under consideration. Ms. Nelson expressed support for retaining the stain pattern; Ms. Harwell said that issues of long-term maintenance and structural stability may affect the decision.
Ms. Harwell described the proposed signs at the entrance to the lecture-demonstration center. Vinyl paste-on panels would be placed on the glass door to indicate "Welcome" during public events or "Staff Only" at other times; an adjacent wall-mounted frame would hold changeable banner signs to describe events. Changeable free-standing signs on heavy steel-plate bases could be moved to additional locations as needed. She presented the interior donor panel signs, which would use the same system—stainless steel, cable rails, and porcelain panels—as the exterior signs. She confirmed that these signs could be replaced as needed to recognize additional donors.
Ms. Harwell presented the proposed labeling of the specimens. The existing system of clip-on signs along the wood display racks would be retained for the new signs. Different color bands would be used to distinguish between the Japanese, Chinese, North American, and special collections. She noted the proposed "Do Not Touch" sign that is regrettably needed at each specimen. For the exterior specimens mounted on stone plinths, the labeling would be clipped onto small steel pins drilled into the stone. She indicated the potential to include extensive background information in the labeling, such as the story of the person who crafted the specimen, in addition to the standard labels indicating the species, country of origin, year, creator, and donor, as well as the telephone number for a cell-phone tour. She described the interior exhibit of stones in the international pavilion, noting that the base of each specimen is an important part of the display; the proposed labeling would be placed on the wood display shelves, away from the bases, and would again use a clip-on system that would be angled slightly to improve legibility.
Ms. Nelson commented that the proposed gray background color, while appropriate for the other settings, appears too cool when placed against these interior wood shelves; she recommended a warmer gray tone that would be more complimentary. Ms. Harwell responded that a variety of tones was considered but the goal was to choose a consistent color so that exhibits and labels could be moved between indoor and outdoor display areas, adding that the tree displays are normally moved seasonally between indoor and outdoor locations. She offered to give further consideration to the selection of a single tone that addresses all of these situations, agreeing that the goal is to make the labels as inconspicuous as possible with emphasis being on the exhibits themselves. She said that an interior interactive computer system would provide more extensive information to visitors, reducing the need to place extensive information on the labels.
Ms. Balmori expressed support for the proposal, commenting that it is well coordinated. However, she questioned the proposal for the vinyl paste-on signs, characterizing them as "excessively utilitarian" compared to the refinement of the other proposed signs. Ms. Harwell offered to give further consideration to these vinyl signs.
Chairman Powell noted that the project is listed as both a concept and final submission. Mr. Lindstrom clarified that this is the Commission's first review of the proposal, but the design is sufficiently developed that final approval could be appropriate. Mr. Luebke noted that the staff had previously met with the project team, and the submission is responsive to the staff concerns—particularly the treatment of donor recognition. Ms. Harwell added that the donor recognition issue is being coordinated with the National Capital Planning Commission, which is currently restudying its guidelines on this topic; the result may be an opportunity to propose additional donor information signs in the future.
Mr. Rybczynski observed that some of the photographic simulations of building entrances include wall-mounted building names adjacent to signs that repeat the name; he commented that this arrangement seems redundant, and recommended a reduction in the graphics. Ms. Harwell confirmed that this situation occurs at several locations and offered to reconsider the wording on the signs.
Ms. Plater-Zyberk questioned the proposed mounting of signs within the columns of the arbor building, describing it as a "disturbing" configuration; she said that the wall-mounted or free-standing locations for this bracket and cable system are not problematic. She added that the grouping of three sign panels at this location creates a display that is inappropriately comparable in size to the adjacent building entrance; she suggested consolidating these signs into a single panel in order to relate better to the modest scale of the building.
Ms. Harwell offered to adjust the design in response to all of the Commission's comments as the project moves from 75 to 100 percent of the design process. Chairman Powell observed that the current status of the project is between the concept and final stages. Upon a motion by Mr. Powell with second by Ms. Nelson, the Commission approved the sign master plan subject to the comments provided, which will be incorporated into the final proposal.
E. D.C. Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs—Shipstead-Luce Act
SL 09- 115, United Unions Building, 1750 New York Avenue, NW. Additions and alterations. Revised concept. (Previous: SL 09-106, 17 Sept. 09.) Ms. Batcheler said that the revised concept is submitted in response to the Commission's comments the previous month. She introduced Walter Wise, representing the United Unions, Inc., to begin the presentation. Mr. Wise said that the building houses the headquarters of three unions, including ironworkers, sheet metal workers, and firefighters. He said that, as an ironworker, his work involves turning the visions of the design community into a reality. He described the goals of the project as modernizing the building and portraying recent trends in the trades of the occupants. He acknowledged the Commission's previous comments which he said have been considered in preparing the revised submission. He introduced Anik Jhaveri of Mancini Duffy Architects to present the design.
Mr. Jhaveri summarized the concept of introducing "a series of programmatic follies" on the exterior of the existing building at 18th and E Streets and New York Avenue. He described the Commission's previous comments as falling into three categories: to reduce the number of new elements; to strengthen the remaining elements in order to intensify their boldness; and to reconsider the articulation of the canopy in comparison to the other proposed elements. He said that the current submission includes three options that address various combinations of these comments—Option A providing simplification, Option B for simplification and intensification, and Option C that also revises the canopy. He presented images from the previous submission, indicating the building entrance, the entrance to a proposed restaurant with a canopied exterior seating area, a vertical sculptural element, and landscape forms, benches, and ramps. The purpose of the new elements is to enliven the street, engage pedestrians, and identify the building and its entrance.
Mr. Jhaveri described the modifications to the previous submission. The benches previously proposed for the plaza have been deleted; the proposed ramp has been simplified to a straight configuration; the proposed larger trees are now shown as smaller plantings; and the proposed landscape form on the south side of the building has been eliminated. A plaza area remains designated for a sculpture, which could be the loan of a significant artwork. He said that Option A consists only of these changes, emphasizing the goal of simplification.
Mr. Rybczynski asked for clarification of the proposed entrance addition. Mr. Jhaveri responded that the proposal is to create a vestibule that would provide an appropriate sense of entry to the building, as well as a weather buffer. The proposed design includes a gallery space as part of the vestibule, where a smaller sculpture could be displayed; he said that the trades whose unions occupy the building have generated numerous sculptures that could be featured at this location overlooking the adjacent Corcoran Gallery of Art.
Mr. Jhaveri then presented Option B, which includes additional revisions to intensify the design of the entry forms. He described the constraints on the proposed restaurant entrance vestibule—the property line immediately adjacent and the office windows above—and the resulting moderate enlargement to the vestibule design. He indicated the three-foot increase in height and the additional undulations of the metal form to provide more dynamism. Similar revisions are included for the building entrance vestibule in Option B, reaching a total height of eighteen feet; the plate metal would be thicker and would taper toward the edges. He noted that the restaurant vestibule would be lower than the building vestibule in order to provide the appropriate hierarchy.
Mr. Belle indicated the rendering of the restaurant entrance in Option B and asked why the lettering of the restaurant name would be partially on and partially off the metal vestibule. Mr. Jhaveri responded that this depiction was not intended as an important design feature, with the lettering only serving as a placeholder for the future restaurant's name. He confirmed that the letters are depicted as hanging down rather than mounted against the metal, and their appearance against the folded metal plate would shift as the viewer approaches the vestibule.
Mr. Jhaveri presented Option C which incorporates revisions to the canopy structure at the restaurant's outdoor seating area. He indicated the original concept of glass umbrella forms, which the Commission had suggested treating in a more architectural manner that reinforces the other proposed structures. He said that the initial response was to intensify the faceting, but this resulted in an overly heavy appearance. The revised design instead uses a pre-oxidized metal mesh with two layers of glass above, one of which would be frosted, providing diffuse daylight for the restaurant tables.
Mr. Jhaveri concluded with a view across the plaza from the corner of the site. Ms. Nelson asked if views have been drawn from across the street or further along the block. Mr. Rybczynski emphasized the lack of such context in the presentation, with all of the nearby buildings indicated merely as gray boxes, resulting in difficulty evaluating the effect of the proposal on the surroundings. Chairman Powell agreed that additional images could be provided. Mr. Jhaveri provided additional explanation of the adjacent streets and buildings as well as Rawlins Park. Mr. Belle commented that these surroundings are apparently not a major influence on the design, which is more concerned with defining its own location by attaching new objects to a large building. Mr. Jhaveri said that the program of the new construction is small—totaling 1,200 square feet—and the design approach is to provide a landscape solution rather than a major architectural intervention to the strong form of the existing building. The proposal intentionally contrasts with the existing setting through the introduction of sculptures and follies.
Ms. Plater-Zyberk emphasized that the plaza provides the opportunity to tie together the many disjointed elements of the wider context, while the proposed design addresses only the context of the existing United Unions building. She offered the example of the selection and placement of trees, which she said could be determined in relation to the larger context—rather than the proposed reduction in the size of plantings in order to improve their relationship to this project's new structures.
Mr. Rybczynski commented that follies are typically associated with large landscapes without visible neighboring buildings. He questioned the concept of introducing follies into an urban context, particularly in central Washington, and emphasized that the existing United Unions building is attractive and should be respected.
Ms. Balmori commented that the proposed structures appear to have little relation to the landscape. She acknowledged the design intent to create forms that contrast with the building but said that the resulting structures are not comfortable as entrances nor as landscape elements. She also expressed dissatisfaction with the proposed canopy at the restaurant, commenting that the dropping glass forms do not contribute to shaping the space nor have any apparent rational basis. She suggested a single large planting area that would make more sense of the space and would provide shade to a portion of the plaza. She said that such design gestures in the landscape would be more sympathetic to the character of the existing building. Mr. Jhaveri acknowledged that the smaller planted areas could be combined with the larger one; Ms. Balmori emphasized the need for this revision. Mr. Jhaveri said that the intention is to create a landscape buffer between the restaurant area and the more public portion of the plaza. He said that the smaller plantings were a response to the Commission's advice to simplify the plantings; Ms. Balmori said that the simplification is desirable.
Mr. Powell said that the landscape would be critical to the success of the project but isn't depicted well; he encouraged further development of the landscape features. He agreed that the concept of introducing follies is problematic, commenting that this is perhaps the wrong terminology for the proposed additions to the building. He noted the difficulty of the project due to the building's entrance being in an unexpected location; Mr. Belle and Ms. Balmori agreed.
Mr. McKinnell commented on the bold scale of the surrounding landscape, contrasting it to the "very fussy" scale of the proposal; he encouraged a more direct design response to the boldness of the context. Mr. Jhaveri offered to return to some of the previous submission's bolder concepts for the landscape, which had been simplified in response to the Commission's comments.
Ms. Nelson acknowledged the bolder forms and increased height of the proposed vestibules but questioned the continued emphasis on twisted forms to contrast with the rigid geometry of the existing building. She said that such contrast is difficult to achieve successfully and commented that the additional height is not helpful, with the vestibules lacking the welcoming feeling of entrances. She said that the twisting form of the proposed restaurant canopy is more successful but still appears merely attached to the building rather than being well connected.
Mr. Rybczynski asked for further clarification of the vista toward the west. Mr. Jhaveri indicated Rawlins Park and the sequence of open spaces leading to the Kennedy Center in the distance. Mr. Luebke clarified that the Kennedy Center, while approximately on the east-west axis of the park, is not visible from the site due to the rise in the land; the highway ramps of I-66 also intervene with the vista. Ms. Plater-Zyberk noted that the United Unions entrance more directly faces the entrance to the American Institute of Architects headquarters across New York Avenue. She suggested that the plaza landscaping be designed to relate to the AIA entrance and screen some of the rear exposure of the Corcoran Gallery; Mr. Jhaveri indicated the existing large trees that would remain. Ms. Plater-Zyberk emphasized that the United Unions plaza is part of these larger spaces and should have a unified relationship with the AIA headquarters and Rawlins Park; she recommended that this intention be supported with a presentation that depicts this larger context.
Mr. Luebke summarized the Commission's consensus that the landscape should be considered further in relation to the larger context; he asked if there is a consensus about the concept of introducing folded-metal elements. Mr. Rybczynski requested that a much simpler option be developed; Ms. Balmori agreed. Chairman Powell summarized the Commission's concern that the proposed forms are not compatible with the existing building.
Ms. Balmori acknowledged that drawing attention to the entrance is a valid design goal, but commented that the new vestibules should not "play at being sculpture" or be treated as follies. Mr. Jhaveri said that an earlier design study was more consistent with the building's form, but the unexpected locations of the entrances resulted in difficulty creating simple additions in the character of the building. He said that the resulting choice was between a fully symmetrical axial addition or a sharply contrasting design; the resulting decision was a proposal that would provide a contrast in form, mass, and scale, and would not compete with the building. Mr. Belle questioned the claim that the proposed design does not compete with the building; Mr. Jhaveri emphasized the intended contrast of forms. Ms. Balmori said that the design of the structures is an architectural problem that requires an architectural solution and not a sculptural one, which she said would be inappropriate for this building.
Ms. Plater-Zyberk said that the discussion would be influenced by the decision whether to include a separate major sculpture on the plaza; if so, the design goal would be to avoid competing with this artwork. She noted the three sculptures that were presented as examples, commenting on the difficult of envisioning any of them within the context of the proposed plaza design. She suggested the goal that either the sculpture or the other design elements should contrast with the building, becoming a prominent element in the larger context, and the other landscape components should contribute to the background support of the overall surroundings. Ms. Nelson added that a prominent steel sculpture might suggest that steel not be used in the restaurant canopy, in order to avoid diluting or competing with the sculpture's strength. Mr. Powell agreed with this concern but noted that the permanent installation of a major sculpture would be unlikely due to budget constraints. He acknowledged the difficulty of choosing a design strategy when the long-term presence of a sculpture is uncertain; Ms. Plater-Zyberk agreed.
Mr. Powell suggested that the design could be improved regardless of these uncertainties; he agreed with Ms. Nelson that the proposed canopy looks like an unrelated attachment to the building and urged better resolution of this design, adding that the proposed use of weathered steel as part of the canopy is acceptable. Mr. Luebke summarized the consensus that the proposal for the additional elements is acceptable but their articulation needs further study to determine whether they should be in opposition to the architecture or more sympathetic to it.
Mr. Rybczynski recalled the previous discussion of the building's problems, including its lack of identity, but said that the building's site is a remarkable benefit—a rare long-distance vista toward the west and a context of distinguished architecture. He recommended that the proposal address this interesting and challenging site rather than add odd elements to the front of the building. He described the proposed design as more appropriate to a dull suburban context and criticized the gray depiction of all surrounding buildings in the presentation drawings; he recommended that the facades of nearby buildings be shown so that the design could be evaluated in relation to them. He acknowledged the awkward entrance location of the building but said that this is an architectural problem that could be solved. He expressed enthusiasm for the concept of introducing a restaurant on the terrace that would enjoy the westward vista across Rawlins Park. Mr. Jhaveri agreed that the site has many advantages but is underutilized.
Mr. McKinnell emphasized the need for plans that address the wider site context rather than only the design of the plaza. He said he is more accepting than other Commission members of the concept of introducing folded metal plates but commented that he does not prefer the rusted surface of the proposed steel. He suggested a white or aluminum finish that would have a lighter appearance, suggesting an analogy to the artwork of Alexander Calder rather than Richard Serra. He said that this delicate appearance would contrast with the heaviness of the building.
Chairman Powell acknowledged the lack of a clear consensus on the design direction. Ms. Plater-Zyberk noted the consensus to develop the design in relation to its larger context—both influenced by it and influencing it. She noted that the context is not currently activated along its edges, providing an opportunity for this project to improve the setting by creating such activation. Mr. Belle commented that the design process has generated numerous alternatives of varying character, but these design alternatives have not yet been applied to the site conditions; he recommended this as the next step in the process, which would help to refine the design of the entry pavilions.
Chairman Powell summarized the Commission's interest in developing other options, such as considering a lighter type of metal than the proposed weathered steel while still relating to the union trades. Ms. Balmori emphasized the desirability of treating the metal structures as architecture rather than sculpture, designed to solve the problem of working as entrances. Chairman Powell emphasized the Commission's acceptance of the overall concept for the proposal but its discomfort with the realization of the concept.
Mr. Belle asked for clarification of the private plaza spaces and public sidewalk areas. Mr. Jhaveri indicated the property line and confirmed that the restaurant seating area is within the private property; Ms. Balmori noted that this arrangement provides a good opportunity. Mr. Luebke noted that the design can include proposed changes within the public right-of-way, such as the benches in the previous proposal; he noted that further consideration of the context, as recommended by the Commission, might result in such design features.
Ms. Nelson noted the Commission's traditional reluctance to allow attention-getting signage on buildings with a strongly resolved design character; she suggested that the new feature for the restaurant be designed to emphasize its role as an entrance rather than as a display of signage. She commented on the importance of maintaining the city's dignity by de-emphasizing commercial elements, while acknowledging that the result should not be dull. She said that the difficult review process for this project reflects the Commission's great concern for the design; Mr. Powell emphasized the importance of the building and its location.
The discussion concluded without an action. Chairman Powell requested that the staff summarize the Commission's comments in the letter and work further with the project team.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 2:17 p.m.
Thomas E. Luebke, AIA


text:
Muramatsu DS
Handcrafted Muramatsu flute, model DS
Headjoint: Sterling 925 silver
Body: Sterling 925 silver
Keywork: Sterling ring keys, choose between options
By: Muramatsu
Price from
Model: B13DSRCEO
Handcrafted Muramatsu flute, model DS made from Sterling silver.
- Off-set or in-line with E-mechanism
- C-foot or B-foot with gizmo
- C# trill
- Heavy wall
- Tsubasu headjoint
- Includes case and cleaning accessories
Featured Recommendations
You might also want
Others also bought
There is no reviews yet. Be the first to write us your opinion
Visit us in Copenhagen
Our shop has been located in the centre of Copenhagen since 1796.
Mon-Fri: 10:00 - 17:00
Saturday: 10:00 - 13:00
Sunday: Lukket

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Melissa Schollaert
Melissa Schollaert is a Holistic Health & Nutrition Counselor and founder of Real Nutritious Living. She's been an on-camera expert for ABC, NBC, and GoodDayLive, with her writing published on a number of healthy living and nutrition websites. Melissa also teaches cooking classes and workshops at Whole Foods and various other retail outlets. She's an avid yogi, always improving surfer, and a firm believer in faith, love, and the healing power of green juice. She's got a heart for helping others achieve their health goals to attain their healthiest, happiest life.


text:
ARE YOU ALL IN FOR LEAD SCHOLARS? YOU can help build momentum for the causes you care most about by saving the image below and sharing it on your social media sites to show your Bronco pride!
Founded in 2003, the LEAD Scholars Program ensures the success of first-generation college students (students whose parents did not graduate from a four-year university) by focusing on academic success, relationship building and community engagement. The LEAD Scholars Program provides academic and vocational development opportunities, holistic advising, peer mentoring, and community building through a variety of courses, programs, and support networks. For more info about LEAD, please visit: https://www.scu.edu/lead/.
Our students:
Have high financial need. 78% of them receive federal Pell Grants.
Are high achievers. 83% graduate in four years, higher than the general SCU population.
Are diverse. 56% are Latino, 17% Asian, 13% African American, 9% White, and 4.4% Multiracial.
Your donation will make an impact by funding:
Scholarships to provide students with funding for tuition, room and board, and other school expenses.
Microgrants to help students with emergency and living expenses, including replacing broken computers, rent and food.
Fellowships to fund student participation in study abroad, undergraduate research, unpaid internships, community-based learning, immersion programs, and summer school.
LEAD Scholars share how LEAD funding has impacted them:
"Being a part of a real research team as an undergraduate student has prepared me for graduate school and beyond. Doing research has developed my creativity, strengthened my professional skills, and fostered my innovation and critical thinking."
--Alejandra '18; received fellowship to participate in undergraduate research in Psychology
"Thanks to the financial support from the Koret Fellowship, I had the opportunity to study abroad in Seville, Spain, through CIEE's Summer Language & Culture program. This experience has made me a lot more confident in my Spanish communication skills, and I can definitely see myself using these skills to connect with and help more people as an aspiring doctor."
--Jason '18; received fellowship to study abroad in Spain
"The LEAD Scholars Program has been like an extended family on campus. As a student who works multiple part-time jobs, the LEAD Scholarship helped me continue attending SCU!"
--Dominic '19; received a scholarship to fund his SCU tuition
Questions? See our FAQ.
Or you can contact us at email@example.com.


text:
Hello Mommas! The identified booby traps and their solutions come to us today from a very special person! She was my personal birth class instructor, breastfeeding class instructor, doula and is a close friend of my family. She gives the most amazing hugs and has the most comforting soul on the face of the planet. She speaks with such grace and authority. I know you will enjoy this article from her and learn a lot!
Hello, dear, dear Snap Moms—Becki here… passionate advocater / supporter of all things Pregnancy / Birth / Breastfeeding! May I just congratulate you on making the choice to nourish and nurture (because breastfeeding is more than just about the milk!!!) your babies in the very way your body was created! Your choice has HUGE social, health, economic and environmental impact that will affect you AND your babies' worlds for lifetimes to come. That said, let's "dig in" to some of the "Booby Traps".
Booby Traps:
- Lack of preparation: Women planning to breastfeed should work to develop a network of support waaaaaaaaaay before the baby arrives… this is probably THE most important thing a woman can do to prepare for a successful breastfeeding experience.
- Lack of support: Before you even get pregnant, begin developing a network of support: Get to a full 4 part La Leche League series (find them here: LLLI.org) Find folks who breastfed successfully and begin developing relationships with them. I've never met a breastfeeding mother who is not willing to help others who desire to breastfeed. Find a supportive pediatrician (ask him / her what percentage of their babies are being breastfed by the AAP recommendations successfully (AAP Guidelines are 6 months exclusive breastfeeding and 1 year breastmilk, and for as long as mutually agreeable after that)
- Bad advice/info from well-meaning family/friends/doctors: Advice comes in two types — Anecdotal (story based on a particular experience) and Evidence-Based (shown to be true by research). Always evaluate the "advice" based on the question, "Is this their "truth" (Anecdotal) or is this "The Truth" (Evidence-Based). Next, develop (and rehearse with a trusted supporter!) an "elevator speech" (30-60 spiel) that expresses your philosophy on breastfeeding and parenting. Repeat as often as necessary to the naysayers in your life (those folks who are determined to undermine your best efforts with their stories of why it can't work and how hard it is and how unfair to everyone it is — remember, these are their anecdotal experiences, and although they *believe* them, you do not have to do so.
- Bad latch leading to sore/bleeding/ cracked nipples: The following are important principles to the establishment of a healthy breastfeeding relationship between mom / baby… (including latch / milk supply / etc) Baby left with mother skin-to-skin for at least 1-2 hours following delivery. Rooming in with baby encouraged to nurse whenever he/she is willing. Avoid ALL artificial nipples (bottles/pacifiers/etc) for at least the first month. If breastfeeding hurts, something is wrong!!! Don't wait till your nipples are sore / bleeding / cracked!!! Get help immediately (lactation consultant = IBCLC) ***Warning! Many nurses are well-meaning, but have not been adequately trained and give wrong information! Ask for an IBCLC (International Board Certified Lactation Consultant)!
- Supplementing leading to low supply and perceived supply: Mother should avoid ALL artificial nipples (pacifiers and bottles) for first 4-6 weeks. Baby should be given free access to the breast during this time. This will help ensure a plentiful milk supply. If you are concerned baby is not getting enough milk, consult with a breastfeeding professional (IBCLC) who will work with you and your pediatrician to develop a plan for your baby's nutritional health.
- TT/LT or high palate – If you suspect either one, request a visit from an IBCLC as soon as possible. (Click here to read about Tongue Tie and Lip Tie)
- Returning to school/work and not able to pump enough to keep up with supply: Pumping and feeding baby with bottle should be avoided until baby is 4-6 weeks old. This helps to ensure a plentiful milk supply. Then, when Mom does begin pumping, she should be able to pump enough to provide for her baby's needs. Some considerations before the baby comes include talking with her employer / school about where she will pump and how often. The Affordable Care Act, signed into law in 2010, provides for adequate breaks and private places to pump for breastfeeding moms. Also, purchasing (or renting) a double-sided electric pump helps to ensure adequate milk volume pumped. (click here to purchase a snap mom approved pump)
- Colic: (characterized by uncontrollable crying for extended periods of time in babies who are feeding well and gaining weight. That said, there are some considerations to think about if one is breastfeeding and has a fussy baby) (click here for colic calm)
- feeding one / both breasts at every feeding
- does the mother have an over-active MER (Milk Ejection Reflex or letdown)
- foreign proteins in mom's milk (one of the most common culprits is dairy in mom's diet)
Finally, if your healthcare provider is not supportive (with accurate information!!!), find one who is!
Click here to read birth stories
About Becki:
Becki Neely, RN BSN IBCLC, is a Board Certified Lactation Consultant, Registered Nurse and Certified Childbirth Educator. Having graduated from University of Florida (Go Gators!) College of Nursing in 1981, she practiced nursing for 5 years, until the birth of her first child. Becoming a mother unveiled her passion for all things Pregnancy-Birthing-Breastfeeding and she owned a Childbirth Education business in the Florida Keys for 15 years. Following relocation to Central Florida in 2004, she taught childbirth and breastfeeding classes at a local hospital, during which time she prepared for and attained international board certification as a Lactation Consultant (IBCLC). She was recruited by a national nursing education provider to teach lactation seminars to nurses around the United States, but has now returned to her true passion – advocating for and providing one-to-one breastfeeding support to mamas and babies.


text:
Cobie Smulders to Play Wonder Woman… in 'The Lego Movie' [Comic-Con 2013]
Posted on Saturday, July 20th, 2013 by Angie Han
Warner Bros. has been trying to get Wonder Woman to the big screen for years, and they're finally on the verge of success. The catch? She'll be rendered in Lego bricks rather than flesh and blood.
We've known for some time that Lego Batman and Superman would appear in the upcoming The Lego Movie, played by Will Arnett and Channing Tatum, respectively. During today's Warner Bros. panel at San Diego Comic-Con, directors Phil Lord and Chris Miller and co-director Chris McKay revealed that they'd also be joined by Justice League teammates Lego Wonder Woman, voiced by Cobie Smulders, and Green Lantern, voiced by Jonah Hill. Hit the jump for more updates from the panel.
Lord and Miller declined to give away too much about which other well-known Lego characters might appear in the movie. "Warners has a robot installed in our hearts and it'll explode if we tell you," Lord joked after one fan's inquiry about the Lego Ninja Turtles voice cast. They would say only that other Warner Bros. properties could make "special cameos," so speculate as you will.
Additionally, they'll draw from the classic Lego sets they played with growing up. That includes Lego City and Lego Wild West, along with the actual set that one of the directors played with as a child, which his mother sent over to the production.
The Lego Movie opens February 7, 2014.


text:
Thank you for your purchase
You will receive an email shortly which will contain an encrypted download link for this product. This link will remain valid for 24 hours.
Random Search Terms
The WordPress Logo
For your information. The WordPress fonts are as follows: the old WP logo was Dante, the new one is Mrs....
WordPress 2.8 beta 2 now available
WordPress announced the release of 2.8 beta 2, download it or check out the changes since beta 1.
Simple double listed columns
I've been asked before on how to display categories in multiple columns. Well, WPRecipes has posted a code snippet for...
WP Web Host launches WPMU hosting plans
Just announced by the WPWebHost Team, they have launched a brand new hosting plan for WordPress MU: WP Buddy Plan:...
Top Articles
powered by WassUp
Recent Posts: Fully Net Worth . com
Alex Scott Net Worth: How Rich is Alex Scott Actually?
Alex Scott is a former English footballer who is best known for her three stints at Arsenal as a right back. Moreover, she is the second most capped player in the history of the Women's English national team with a total of 140 appearances for them. As of 2019, Alex Scott net worth is estimated […]
Reanne Evans Net Worth: How Rich is the English Snooker Player?
Reanne Evans is an English snooker player and the current World Women's Snooker Champion. She has held the title a record 12 times, with 10 consecutive titles coming between 2005 and 2014. Evans is currently ranked number one on the World Women's snooker Tour. As of 2019, Reanne Evans net worth is estimated to be £500,000. Evans was […]
Sasha Velour Net Worth: How Rich is the Drag Queen Actually?
Alexander Hedges Steinberg also known by the stage name Sasha Velour is an American drag queen and artist. Velour is best known for winning the 9th season of RuPaul's Drag Race. As of 2019, Sasha Velour net worth is estimated to be $2.5 million. Velour was born on June 25, 1987, in Berkeley, California as the only child of Mark […]


text: As we head into Spring, there are things you should do to prepare your home for the change in weather. Check out my video below sharing some of those ideas that you can do with your home as we enter Spring. I have also included a couple of articles that have additional ideas that may be useful to your situation. Please enjoy!


text:
Following five successful year's publishers of Asian Sunday now launch their weekly news title – Asian Standard. Asian Sunday first published in summer 2011 and has gone from strength to strength as the UK's leading FREE Sunday newspaper. In 2015, Managing Editor, Fatima Patel resigned from her post, as Editor due to illness and took on a more behind the scenes role as Head of Business for the Bradford based publishing house, RF Publishing Ltd.
Since taking on her new role as Head of Business Fatima re-launched the successful FREE lifestyle magazine – Asian Style Magazine, helped develop the companies first online TV programme – The Desi Kitchen and took Asian Sunday to a national audience.
From the beginning, Asian Sunday set a bench mark within the Asian print media industry by offering a publication which focused on issues affecting British Asians living and working in the UK, with a particular vision to reach out to the wider community to offer a platform to learn more about the British Asian community's interests, aspirations, business and lifestyle in the UK.
Asian Sunday has always been at the forefront of breaking news affecting the Bradford community and the Asian community at large.
The new FREE weekly paper, Asian Standard will continue raising the bar for the British Asian media industry, with a primary focus on quality, innovative content and above all responsible reporting.
The launch edition of Asian Standard was released last week and has been welcomed by readers and businesses, with many touting it to be the best British Asian newspaper in Europe.
Asian Standard will be delivered every week to 8,000 businesses nationally, while Asian Sunday, will build and focus on the organisation's digital strategy launching its video news portal along with regular programmes, such as The Desi Kitchen from the company's in-house production team.
The Desi Kitchen, is a chat show, where the host is a traditional Asian Aunty, who invites guests to her kitchen to cook for her. Host Aunty K, takes great pleasure in quizzing her guests, whilst also making them do the 'roti (chapati) challenge'
The pilot show was aired in June, with current Green Party Leader Natalie Bennett as the first guest. The full season of The Desi Kitchen is set to begin later this year.
Speaking about the new platforms, Fatima said:
"It's been hard work, but in order to meet with audience demand, it's important to offer platforms that are engaging and innovative and I am pleased that the new look of our brand, the launch of Asian Standard and more focus on video news, puts us in a unique position compared to all other British Asian media outlets.
"The new structure will consolidate and build upon the organisation's existing reputation as THE leading British Asian Media catering to the needs and aspirations of Asian communities across the UK and beyond. Not only do I want to position our organisation as the expert on the British Asian community across the country covering a full range of issues affecting them from politics to media to finance, to the arts and culture to lifestyle, fashion and more, I want to also ensure that we are using the most up to date technologies and platforms to reach out to our readers whether they are online, in print or through video platforms.
"I am confident my reporters and columnists will keep the British Asian community updated on top news stories affecting them as well as keeping them abreast of current thinking and topical issues, viewpoints and debates that matter to them.
"In today's times the British Asian influence is definitely being felt and we want to ensure those who are interested in engaging or are a part of this community can come to us as their main source of news. I also want our organisation to be at the forefront of opportunities. We want to help nurture talent creating the next generation of business leaders, politicians, newspaper owners, artists, entrepreneurs and more".
If you didn't manage to grab a copy of the launch issue of Asian Standard, you can read it online here:
The next issue of Asian Standard will be out on Tuesday 30 August and every week thereafter.
Readers will be able to enjoy video news content on www.asiansunday.co.uk from Monday 29 August and can enjoy reading about fashion, beauty, lifestyle and Bollywood on www.asianstylemagazine.com with FREE monthly glossy magazine from 9 September.


text:
This content has been marked as final. Show 12 replies
Re: It is December, Party Time.CorpCons08 Dec 2, 2007 7:31 PM (in response to LUCKIEST)
I don't know. I have found myself working just as hard as always and not finding many distractions interrupting me this year.
How about everybody else on this site? Are you feeling the holiday interruptions?
Re: It is December, Party Time.slavaret Dec 2, 2007 9:43 PM (in response to CorpCons08)I think if you work from home and your office is in cybespace, most interruptions are self-made and it's a matter of self-discipline to minimize them.
When I was a stock broker, we used to get training on how to minimize office interreptions: if someone comes into your office, you don't offer them a seat and/or stand up yourself, if the phone rings - you excuse yourself that you have to take the important call, if they sit down - you get up while talking and start walking out of the office so they will follow you out, keep the chairs in front of your desk cluttered with stuff that you clear up for scheduled appointments, etc.
I would be curious to hear about new "virtual"/home office interruptions and how people are handling them.
Re: It is December, Party Time.CorpCons08 Dec 2, 2007 10:46 PM (in response to slavaret)
Thank you for your comment slavaret.
"I would be curious to hear about new "virtual"/home office interruptions and how people are handing them."
Before I leased my space in my office building, I had a home office in which I mainly operated. I honestly think I had less interruptions with my home office than I do at my new office space. The reason is, family is more understanding of your time than your employees are. Your employees constantly are interrupting you with questions or problems. They want to know if they can have time off, or if they can come in late one day. I sometimes take work home and do it at my home office because I can get more done. lol
Re: It is December, Party Time.Ed O'Gee Dec 3, 2007 7:48 PM (in response to LUCKIEST)Virtual distractions:
1.) This online community; I enjoy the responses and posts so much I sometimes check end and spend time on the site when I need a brain break - sometimes that brain break takes 30 -45 minutes, LOL!
2.) Text messages - my kids are teenagers and involved in afterschool activities, I believe they have forgotten how to use a telephone so I get text messages from 3-6 telling me where they are and when they need to be picked up.
3.) I check email on the fly, so it is not just email from clients, my virtual assistant, or my wife, it is the 101 email newsletters I subscribe to, the Lands End email specials and my all time favorite alerts from USC sports (the real USC - University of South Carolina class of 88', Go Gamecocks!)
4.) Shopping online - I haven't been to a mall this year. I finished my Christmas shopping all online, on Black Friday.
Re: It is December, Party Time.CorpCons08 Dec 3, 2007 7:58 PM (in response to Ed O'Gee)Ed, as always, great post.
You are right, this community distracts me quite often.
I think I spend more time responding to posts than paying attention to my family sometimes.
Do they make a Small Business Community Anonymous?
Best regards buddy.
Re: It is December, Party Time.LUCKIEST Dec 3, 2007 9:41 PM (in response to CorpCons08)CorpCons. My wife says the same thing about me She says that I spend more time responding to emails
than paying attention to her or choirs and she loves it.
Re: It is December, Party Time.CorpCons08 Dec 3, 2007 9:46 PM (in response to LUCKIEST)We're just a couple of workaholics...
Re: It is December, Party Time.slavaret Dec 4, 2007 10:38 AM (in response to CorpCons08)I tend to agree that online comunites are addicitve. In addition to this one and Yahoo Answers (which brought me here), I also run a stock picking message board (http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TradingZoom/)
- from which I also grew a trading data subscription business; plus recently somebedy here suggested http://www.ezinearticles.com/ (I wanted to thank them but could not find the post) so I got hooked on that one too (http://ezinearticles.com/?expert=Slav_Fedorov); but apart from that I think I am in the minority here:
I am in the stock trading business, and with the exception of some intense moments when I have to stay completely focused (no phone calls, emails, or conversations with wife), I have to sit around and wait for the stocks to do what I bought them to do - so I have plenty of time to kill. I am still watching the market but basically I have to DISTRACT myself from overmanaging and overtrading, so these online communites are a perfect fit for me. I have to be careful and not spread myself too thin but this community is clearly well run, with quality people.
There are also periods when I spend a lot of time doing research, and online communites help me get my mind off what I am doing and take a break.
Re: It is December, Party Time.Lighthouse24 Dec 4, 2007 2:23 AM (in response to LUCKIEST)
We nearly always have client projects with year-end milestones, and about 80 percent of the technical work seems to get done in the last 20 percent of the available time. So right up until Christmas, we still have too much work left to do to be distracted.
My teams are mostly telecommuters and independent contractors, so we tend not to have the interruptions, festive atmosphere, or other pre-holiday "distractions" you find in a typical workplace. (Unfortunately, we don't have all the homemade treats, either!) Those with school age kids definitely have more activities to fit in this time of year, but as I noted in another thread, we mainly work toward project deliverables, not a time clock -- so I think the flexible schedule helps them be where they need to be.
I love Christmas and the spirit that accompanies it. For me personally, though, outdoor summertime activities present more of a distraction. As the weather cools off and it gets dark earlier, I find it easier to be inside and focused on work.
Re: It is December, Party Time.BDS INC Dec 4, 2007 7:15 PM (in response to LUCKIEST)I will have to concur about this board. It is so much more active now than when I first joined it is truly a community. What blows me away is just how in depth the responses are - you folks really care from DomainDiva to Lighthouse, Luckiest, CorpCons08, Ed and the rest, the responses are great!
What distracts me more than anything is email. I have brokers send me emails for way more properties than I could conceivable or would even want to buy.
Re: It is December, Party Time.CorpCons08 Dec 4, 2007 2:29 PM (in response to BDS INC)BDS,
Thank you for that wonderful compliment. I really appreciate the recognition. I feel we work together as a great team and help the end user a great deal.
Re: It is December, Party Time.BDS INC Dec 4, 2007 7:22 PM (in response to CorpCons08)No problem at all. It's all true - I truly learn a lot from the members of this board!
Go to original post
Reply to original post
Go to work, put in an 8 hour or more day. Barely get anything done.
Endless interruptions and distractions, Planning days off, shopping online.
Is this the start of the holiday season, so it is ok to spin our wheels and not feel guilty.
Wait until next year, LUCKIEST
Endless interruptions and distractions, Planning days off, shopping online.
Is this the start of the holiday season, so it is ok to spin our wheels and not feel guilty.
Wait until next year, LUCKIEST


text:
I'm going to treat you all to a trip out today as realise I never quite finished taking you around Lewtrenchard Church with John Betjeman and I've returned to reading Trains and Buttered Toast the latest Betjeman anthology. I think we'll arrive by virtual steam train. The nearest station at Coryton was opened in 1865, it would surely have been known and used by Sabine Baring Gould.Now a private home but they won't mind.
Cast your mind back or click here and you will recall that the bookhound and I stopped by at Lewtrenchard recently to experience for ourselves and on Betjeman's advice "the loveliest thing in the village", the church of St Petroc.I think you'll agree with him too.
"when you open the door, the full glory of a great rich Devonshire screen bursts upon you, Encrusted with saints and vines and leaves, it cuts across the whole church and through it you may glimpse the altar and monuments"
The original sixteenth century screen was demolished in 1832 but a replica was made from a painting. Money was collected from 1885 and the work finally completed in 1915. Bickford Dickinson's excellent little guide book to the church reveals that all this money was raised locally without the need for a single bazaar or begging letter.The carving was done in its entirety by the Misses Pinwell of Plymouth.
How could I pass on such a Betjeman-esque sight as this stove at the back of the church? How does it go..."The bells of waiting Advent ring, The Tortoise stove is lit again"
And here's the exact view, albeit probably as dark as in his day, that
Sabine Baring Gould must have had as he banged the pulpit with his fist
and uttered surely the most memorable line to end any sermon
"The thing is - do you want to be a cabbage or not?"
Nor can I resist sharing this perfect little corner of this most perfect of Devon churches
There was one mystery, Betjeman notes "A lovely chandelier from
Malines shines from the chancel like gold.." but it shines no more.The
15th century chandelier was bought by Sabine Baring-Gould from the
church of St Jacques, Malines in Belgium in 1880 and installed at
Sadly,100 years later it was stolen. I hope whoever has it enjoys it as much as we would have done had we seen it.


text:
Montoyis & Reese talk Playoff Picks, Cowboys Fans in Houston, New Show Review, Working Legs Out, Jazmine Barnes Twist, Showing out at the Funeral, Building the Wall or Nah, Cyntoia Brown, CES, Voicemail, Drake kissing young girls & More!
Subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher Radio, Google Play Music and wherever you get your Podcasts! Reach us at @FromThe_Hip on Twitter. The website is www.Shootfromthehip.xyz! Email us at email@example.com. The Facebook page is www.facebook.com/ShootFromTheHipShow/ and the voicemail line is (559)825-SHOT! #SFTH #PODCAST #HTOWN


text:
The health and wellbeing of our community and our employees is our priority. With this in mind, we have temporarily closed our facilities and Customer Service Centre until further notice. If you have been impacted by COVID-19 and need support, please call our dedicated number on 9688 0434 from 9am-5pm, Monday to Friday. For general enquiries, please call 9688 0200.
Find out more about Council's response to COVID-19 here
Senior and social groups meet regularly at this site which encourages community connection.
Regular user groups include: Italian Pensioner Club, Pontiaki Gonia, West Footscray & District Gardening Club, West Footscray Senior Citizens, West Footscray Seniors Craft Group.
If you have a hire enquiry, please contact RecWest via firstname.lastname@example.com
or 9689 1322
Cnr Essex and Market Streets, West Footscray 3012 View Map
Cnr Essex and Market Streets ,
West Footscray 3012
We acknowledge the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples of this nation. We acknowledge the people of the Kulin nation as traditional custodians of the lands on which Maribyrnong City Council is located and where we conduct our business. We pay our respects to ancestors and Elders, past and present. We are committed to honouring Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples' unique cultural and spiritual relationships to the land, waters and seas and their rich contribution to society.
(03) 9688 0200
After hours (03) 9688 0200


text:
What is the primary purpose of your insurance agency website?
If your answer is 'To sell policies,' it's time to re-evaluate your website strategy.
Modern consumers go online to find answers to their specific, in-the-moment problems. They're looking for a helpful, personalized connection. Not a stuffy sales pitch.
If you want your insurance agency website to drive business, you must do one thing. Use content on each page on your site to build a bridge between consumers' needs and the solutions you offer.
The Most Powerful Tool in the Shed
If you're trying to grow your agency online, content is your biggest difference-maker.
Content that puts consumers first helps your agency earn online trust, and ultimately business. Effective content can improve your search rankings, word-of-mouth referrals and branding. It can also help you close more of the leads you get through the web.
Best of all, content doesn't have to cost you an arm and a leg. A small investment of time can pay big dividends when your website becomes a sales powerhouse.
The Hardest Part is Getting Started
'But I write policies, not webpages,' you say.
I hear you. But the good news is you don't have to be Ernest Hemingway to improve your website's content.
Join me on Thursday October 20th at noon Central (that's 1 p.m. Eastern, 11 a.m. Mountain and 10 a.m. Pacific) for my latest Masters of Marketing webinar "A Bridge to Success: How to Craft Effective Content for Your Insurance Website."
I will dive into several strategies that can improve your content and attract more leads, including
• Thinking consumer-first
• Touting benefits over features
• Localizing your message
• Creating an emotional connection
This is a webinar you won't want to miss. Sign up today!
About the AuthorFollow on Twitter Follow on Linkedin More Content by Dylan Brooks