text:
Charles Schwab Advisor Services announced late Tuesday that following the receipt of a no-action letter from the SEC in February, it is endorsing DTCC's Alternative Investment Products service to facilitate the custody of alternative investments for advisors.
"We know advisors are increasingly using these alternatives," said Schwab Executive VP Bernie Clark in an interview Wednesday, "but more will use them; having DTCC step into this void will greatly accelerate" both the custody of alternatives and, perhaps, advisors' embrace of alternative investments.
As Clark, who heads SAS, explains it, the no-action letter "brings some closure to a long process" that he said began in 2008, when "we recognized this asset class was growing in importance and in complexity," and DTCC was already working on a pilot program for alternatives custody, modeled on Fund/Serve, its mutual fund settlement service. Since DTCC was "going down the same path, we spent the last two-plus years to get the SEC to give a no-action letter" that would clear AIP for being the platform that would comply with a broker's possession and control requirements.
DTCC, Clark said, as an expert in settlement procedures was already building the technology, but with the no-action letter, "the solution has now been empowered."
The benefit to advisors who have clients in alternative investments is clear. Adam Langley (right), chief compliance officer at Aspen Partners, an RIA and a commodity pool operator, said in an interview Wednesday that "at least for us," the Schwab announcement and the no-action letter "will be hugely important." He noted that from an administrative standpoint, there are "lots of challenges on holding alternative investments" in a client's portfolio, mentioning as well that "when someone wants to invest in some type of alternative investment, like a commodity pool or a hedge fund of funds, you'd be amazed at how archaic the process is."
For example, he says that even though it's only March 7, Aspen is already working on the paperwork for clients who want to make an investment in various alternatives by April 1. Since many hedge funds, for instance, only accept investments once a month, often on the first of the month, it takes weeks to complete the nearly all-manual process of an investor filling out a subscription document and the money manager receiving and accepting that document before a wire transfer of the funds can happen. Moreover, pricing and valuation of the investment has to be done every month by custodians like Schwab, again manually, since alternative pricing doesn't rely on a publicly available NAV.
"AIP will automate" that process instead, suggests Langley, and all parties will be "speaking the same language" and transmitting data through AIP to the custodians, significantly decreasing the processing time for new investments, but also reducing errors. "It will provide everybody with more flexibility," he said, making the process "faster and more accurate than ever before; it will benefit the fund sponsors, the custodians, and the investors," not to mention advisors.
Clark said that, so far, some 100 alternatives sponsors are either members of AIP or in the membership pipeline. There is no membership charge for sponsors, according to the DTCC; fees for the sponsor are based on trading volume. Clark says that "AIP two years ago was a lesser-known concept–it didn't have the empowerment of the no-action letter to make it more meaningful." Langley agrees, saying that "with the SEC saying it's OK, and with Schwab behind it," it's likely AIP will be embraced more by alternatives sponsors.
As for Schwab's role, Clark said the company was pleased to "have been the cheerleader here," and pointed out that AIP would "work for all custodians" now that the SEC has said AIP will be an acceptable control location. He estimated that the agreement "would benefit about a third of our clients" who have allocated at least some end client assets to alternatives.
Over a year ago, Clark said, Schwab hired Mike Wood, director of alternative investments, whose job it is to create awareness of the platform; Wood will continue to educate both advisors and encourage sponsors to become AIP members. "In reality, if you think about any asset class," said Clark, "this is how it should evolve from manual processes," and that DTCC has now "systematized" the process to everyone's benefit.


text:
Select your language:
Total items:
View cart and checkout
Continue Shopping
Braun Multiquick hand blenders are versatile, effortless and indispensable kitchen helpers at your service.
MultiQuick 5 Fit Hand Blender MQ5064BK
MultiQuick 9 Hand blender MQ9087X
Whether you are seeking ultimate perfection or simply the quickest way through your pile of ironing, Braun has just the steam iron for you.
TexStyle 3 Steam Iron SI 3054
For those who appreciate German technology and quality, Braun introduces the new
CareStyle 5: It has the potential to become your wardrobe's best friend! Whatever
your ironing needs or expectations, the clever iCare technology actually thinks and
works for you with smart textile protection to make your ironing experiences quicker and easier.
CareStyle 5 Steam Station IS 5145BK
CareStyle 7 Pro steam station - IS 7156
CareStyle 7 steam station - IS 7144
View all products
Conceived and designed for durability, superb gliding and perfect final results.
Discover More
The new TexStyle iron range.
Textile protector - TP7
Sign up to receive a 10% discount code, plus special offers, private sales events, exciting news and fun tips
You're in! You will receive an email with your special discount code shortly. *Only one promotion code can be applied per order. Promotion codes are not applicable to "Clearance" or "Factory Second" products.
DeLonghi Australia Pty Limited ABN 49 104 012 857
Postal Address: PO Box 4540 Casula Mall NSW 2170 Australia
Address: Unit 3, 43 Lyn Parade Prestons NSW 2170 Australia
Ph:1800 126 659 Fax:1800 007 289
Braun is a registered trademark of Braun GmbH, Germany used under license by De'Longhi Appliances S.r.l

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Though these authors have received the attention of numerous biographers, Cheever fills a gap by showing us how they lived together, spent time in one another's company, and either helped or hindered each other's work. Through their letters and literary works, we also gain a deep appreciation of Concord, Mass., where all of these authors lived at various times. In this town, as Cheever says, "these men and women fell desperately in and out of love with each other, tormented each other in a series of passionate romantic triangles, edited each other's work, talked about ideas all night, and walked arm in arm under Concord's great elms."
In her opening remarks to American Bloomsbury, Cheever promises to tell us the story of these people and their struggles, not only their literary and political battles, but their love triangles and troubles rearing children, their friendships, and their failures in friendship. Here is a bold promise indeed, but one on which Cheever makes good.
She does so in part by the remarkable way in which she blends the lives of all these protagonists. They intersect in the two decades before the Civil War when Emerson, one of the few of these writers whose essays and lectures actually brought him a living, enticed the Alcotts and the Hawthornes to come to Concord by giving them houses either rent-free or low in rent.
Bronson Alcott's ideas regarding communal farming grew to "their looniest ripeness" while Margaret Fuller brought to bear sexual magic on Emerson and Hawthorne. Cheever traces the gradual dissolution of this community, the result of the ravages of age and growing differences in political opinions.
Especially fascinating are the passages devoted to Louisa May Alcott, an author whose work Cheever has admired since girlhood. Cheever makes us feel the struggles of the young Alcott, when she and her family lived constantly on the brink of poverty, passing from Concord to Boston and then to Dedham, starting schools and doing odd jobs in their efforts to find some stability. During the Civil War Alcott served briefly as a nurse in Washington, D.C.; she had the ill luck to arrive just as the bloody Battle of Fredericksburg took place. The strain of nursing the wounded and the dying round the clock ruined her health within weeks. She returned home an invalid, yet nevertheless wrote Little Women and pulled her family out of its financial quagmire. According to Cheever, Alcott also "exalted the everyday in women's literature and gave it greatness."
Though Cheever writes with great sympathy for all these protagonists — her account of Emerson in particular made me want to learn more about the man other than the few essays I'd read long ago in school — she does not hesitate to criticize them. We read at length of Louisa May Alcott's drug addiction. We see that Hawthorne in his relationships with women is "a man of secret lives, of doubleness, whose understanding of deceit and betrayal perfumes his greatest scenes." We learn how poorly Thoreau and Bronson Alcott function in the world in terms of earning a living. Both men were continually dependent on Emerson for their food and lodging.
American Bloomsbury also captures the attention certain writers received in New England's literary circles. When Emerson was an old man, for instance, his house caught fire, and though he and his friends managed to save many of his possessions, he faced the prospect of financial ruin. Friends raised by solicitation enough money to send him on a tour to England, and in a sort of 19thcentury version of "Extreme Makeover," they rebuilt his house in his absence exactly as it had been. Emerson returned home to an enormous celebration that included a mob of his friends, bands, a choir of schoolchildren, and an impromptu parade to his restored home.
In her last chapter, Cheever writes that she had intended the book as an introduction to Concord so "that the reader will come to love it as I have." Her lovely book should entice all of its readers to explore this town which its writers once regarded as their own personal Eden.
Local author James Cox has recently published The Christmas Curmudgeon: A Christmas Story for Guys, a novel about excessive consumerism at Christmas and the efforts of two brothers to change their attitudes toward the holiday and toward life. To order this book, call your local bookshop or 1-877-BUY BOOK.
The Thomas Wolfe Festival will take place the first weekend in October. The festival includes tours of the Wolfe home, of various gravesites in Riverside Cemetery, a play and a film about Wolfe, and several other events. If you haven't read Wolfe or visited the historic site in Asheville, now is the perfect time to acquaint yourself with one of North Carolina's greatest authors. For more information and a complete schedule of events, log on to www.wolfememorial.com.


text:
Your Search Results
401(K) Matching, Free Daily Meals, Recreational Clubs, Relocation Assistance, Open door policy, Team owned deliverables, Time allotted for learning, 51 - 200 employees, 1-100K amount
0 Companies
Ah shucks, we have no results for your search.
Try using less filters. Here's some helpful links to help too.


text:
Becoming a member of your public television station is one way you can play an active role in insuring that quality television and educational outreach will continue to be a part of your community.
Whether you contribute to receive a gift from a quality PBS series or you join at the basic membership level, your financial support will help us continue our mission of providing quality public television.
Planned Giving
You can insure your contributions will support the station for years to come by including us in your estate planning. Contact us for more information.
On-Air Sponsorships/Program Underwriting
Sponsoring programming is another way you can support public television. It's similar to advertising, allowing your company (or even you as an individual), to get your message out to the customers you're looking for, our viewers. To find out more, contact Brian Flath at (618) 453-4286.
What's on my public television station right now? What exciting program am I missing? Our members are not left with a remote and no where to go! We urge you to participate and show your support for your public television station by becoming a member.
Your membership investment today will purchase next year's programs on YOUR public television station.
For almost 15 years this station has been a trusted community partner. You know we broadcast consistently high quality national and local television programs…programs that entertain, enliven, and inform…all without commercial interruption.
The future of the station is now up to viewers like you…folks who watch, use, and enjoy public television. Please participate by becoming a member and secure the future by making a pledge of financial support.
You can control your own viewing destiny. You can maintain the programs and series that you and your family view every day by participating right now!
Thank you for your interest in YOUR public television station!


text:
Ask most preservationists what they think of Virginia's Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program, and you'll hear them proudly say it's one of the most generous, if not the most generous, programs in the country, leading to the rehabilitation of thousands of historic properties. Indeed, since the program's inception in 1997, the state has awarded nearly $700 million in tax credits to homeowners and developers. "This is free money," writes Charlottesville architect Brian Broadus, who has specialized in historic building projects for over 20 years. "Why don't more homeowners come and grab it?"
Site, recipient, tax credit
Banister-Shackleford House owned by Shackleford House LLC - 513 Dice Street - $52,470The James D. Nimmo House at 208 Hartman's Mill Road - Howard and Linda Carey - $25,000Hardware Store building owned by Octagon Partners - 316 East Main Street - $878,823Home of Kevin & Beverly Sidders (since sold) - 1214 Rugby Road - $463,453Office building owned by Richmond-based Seventh Street Properties - 425 7th Street - $171,690Office building owned by Richmond-based Seventh Street Properties - 413 7th Street - $118,365
The home of Paul & Melanie Miller - 528 Locust Avenue - $38,361
Home of Mr. & Mrs. Robert Hardie - 8 Dogwood Lane in Farmington - $637,295
Kenridge, the home to L.F. & Susan Payne - 2447 Ivy Road - $196,397
Monticola owned by Dunterry LLC - Howardsville - $266,552
Seven Oaks, a home of Coran Capshaw - Rockfish Gap Road in Greenwood - $81,284
Blue Ridge Farm, the home to Charles & Kimberlee Cory - Ortman Road in Greenwood - $183,054
Unlike the rehab tax credit's federal counterpart, a property does not have to be income-producing– it can be home sweet home. As long as an owner can spend more than 25 percent of the most recent assessment on restoring an old house (sorry, sweat equity doesn't count, just cash), he or she can win a 25 percent credit for the restoration's "qualifying" expenses.What qualifies as an expense? Just about everything. Furniture and window treatments, additions, and kitchen appliances are about the only things that don't. The old house doesn't even have to be on the Virginia Landmarks Register or contribute to a historic district to qualify. If a registered architect deems it "register eligible," it's in. An owner can even paint the old house any color she wants, sell the tax credits, or sell the old house itself– and still keep the tax credits.Understandably, the Virginia Department of Historic Resources is proud of its rehab tax credit program, which has been in place since 1997. According to a Virginia Commonwealth University study, the program– aptly called "Prosperity through Preservation"– has led to $1.5 billion in private investment that has ostensibly saved approximately 2,000 Virginia landmark buildings, created more than 10,000 jobs, and generated $46 million in state revenue.What's more, Virginia has led the way among the 50 states in the number of historic districts and individual properties added to the national register. In 2008, Virginia ranked second overall in that category. "I think that Virginia's rehabilitation tax credit program, like the Federal counterpart, is excellent public policy," says Broadus. "The idea is to bring a sad asset back into the open stock of buildings."Like most things that sound too good to be true, it comes with a catch: you need to spend money to get money. And according to records obtained from the VDHR, only 12 property owners in Charlottesville and Albemarle County have taken advantage of the program since 2005."The difficult issue with state and federal tax credits is that you have to spend quite a bit of money in order to benefit from them," says Eryn Brennan, an architectural historian who sits on the Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review, "so this does not help the average homeowner."For Preservation Week this year, event organizers had wanted to feature a selection of modest historic rehabs that had used the tax credit program. But according to Steven Meeks, president of the Albemarle Charlottesville Historical Society, there weren't any."It appears in this area only the bigger projects are applying for tax credits," Meeks says.Indeed, of those 12 historic rehabs, only two could be described as modest, and even they cost their owners at least $100,000 or more. In fact, many of the rehabs were so extensive that the amount of tax credits the owners received were more than most people could dream of paying for a house.Investor Robert D. Hardie, a member of the UVA Board of Visitors (he was appointed by former Gov. Tim Kaine), received over $600,000 in rehab tax credits for fixing up his home at 8 Dogwood Lane in Farmington. That's no surprise to some."I'd be willing to bet that in most cases the biggest share of historic tax credits go to those who already have a lot of money and could afford to remodel or renovate on their own without taxpayers helping them," says former Albemarle teacher Mark Crockett. "In that sense, those credits constitute welfare for the rich. Pure and simple."
Crockett is no fan of the equally generous state conservation easement tax credit program either, which rewards mostly wealthy landowners for preserving open space, even if you were an investor in, say, Biscuit Run hoping to turn a profit on a massive development, but later decided to "donate" the land to the state for use as a park when the real estate market went south, collecting million in state tax credits in the process.
Crockett has called that program "socialized capitalism for the rich" and points out that roughly 60 percent of the land in the County is also under a local land use program, the Land Use Valuation program, which reduces the amount of local taxes landowners must pay.
But whoa! Welfare for the rich? Asked to respond to that characterization of the historic tax credit program, Hardie's wife, Molly, who secured a historic eligibility designation of the couple's house (designed by a relatively unknown architect named Marshall Swain Wells, who, according to the survey, was "deserving of more than a passing note.") from the VDHR in 2009, declined to comment.Brennan, however, thinks it's overly simplistic to say that the program benefits only the rich. Technically, it's available to everyone, she points out, and it has helped to restore public treasures like the Paramount Theater."Renovating historic properties has a community benefit and value for both adjacent neighbors and the larger community," she says.Still, Crocket notes and VDHR officials confirm that homeowners like the Hardies bear no obligation to open their supposedly historic homes for community scrutiny, despite the community tax subsidy support.Of course, others think it's simply naive to expect tax credit programs to be "fair.""When government offers tax credits, it's always the rich who take advantage," says political activist Randolph Byrd. "Want it to be fair? Then do away with all tax credits. The way it is now, it's not a sin; it's just the way the government set it up." Still, if the purpose of the program is to encourage the preservation of historic structures, creating hurdles for typical homeowners to participate seems to run counter to the spirit of equal opportunity. Rehab credit fan Broadus admits that navigating the process can be confusing and requires paperwork to demonstrate compliance with the standards imposed by the Virginia Historic Resources Department. Rich folks can hire lawyers or accountants to help handle such matters.For instance, the most modest rehab on the local list, the renovation of the Nimmo House on Hartman's Mill Road, wouldn't have received historic tax credits if Preservation Piedmont hadn't stepped in to help the owners by surveying the historic property, guiding the owners through the application process, providing a grant for legal fees, and even helping them find a contractor willing to take on the historic renovation. Ironically, the couple who owned the dilapidated structure had purchased it for the land (it cost a mere $18,000 in 1994), on which they hoped to build a house for their daughter. But their application for a demolition permit was denied because the building was one of a handful of historic residential properties individually protected by city preservation ordinance.In fact, it was Preservation Piedmont that emerged to oppose the demolition. The couple said they did not have the means to renovate the old structure, an unusual Gothic Revival house built in 1870 by an enterprising carpenter named James D. Nimmo. So they decided to put the house on the market. Under Charlottesville ordinance, if they didn't get a buyer within a year, they would be allowed to demolish.Today, the house stands beautifully restored (by Lithic Construction), after the couple received nearly $25,000 in historic tax credits. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for many other historic houses in Charlottesville and Albemarle County, including the Compton House at 124 Maury Avenue, more commonly known as Beta House, now home to the Jefferson Scholars Foundation.Like the couple on Hartman's Mill Road, Foundation executives had not purchased the property to save the house– a Eugene Bradbury-designed residence-turned-fraternity. Because it was unprotected by law, they didn't have to.Considering the fact that the Foundation amassed $21 million to spend on the new headquarters, it might have netted a bundle of historic tax credits by going that route. The demo was a blow to the preservation community, and prompted the city to develop regulations that have strengthened oversight of historic properties.Indeed, some think regulations, not tax credits, are the way to really preserve our stock of historic structures. While the 12 local properties were rehabilitated under the rehab tax credit program in the last five years, seven times that many have been lost.As Mary Joy Scala, the city's preservation planner, told City Councilors after the Compton house affair, "A successful historic preservation program must rely on regulation to prevent worst-case scenarios like destruction of the Beta House."The Historic Resources Department reports that over 50 significantly historic properties have been demolished since the mid-1970s, a trend that has picked up in recent years. According to photo-documentation from historic resources staff, since 2004, demolition of over 50 historic or potentially historic structures has occurred in the County– where policies to prevent it are virtually non-existent– and over 26 in the City.In the City's Fifeville district alone, seventeen 100-plus-year-old properties have been demolished since 2006, including two in January of this year. Some notable losses include the Frank Ix building, the Terrace Theater, Belmont Hall, and the Charlottesville Lumber building on Avon Street.In surrounding Albemarle County, notable losses include several turn-of-the-nineteenth-century houses in the Free State Community on Rio Road, one of the earliest free black communities in the state, and the place where Sally Hemings' sister Critta was supposed to have lived (the former Community is now the site of the Dunlora and Belvedere developments).Looking at photos of historic structures that County preservation staff have manged to collect, a reporter is struck by the beauty of some of the places, like a 1920s farmhouse on Wildon Grove Road, or the old Town & Country Motel, an icon of popular roadside architecture and one of local architect Stanislaw Makielski's last designs.Unfortunately, Broadus says, there's no political will to simplify the process of obtaining rehab tax credits because of a fear among cultural resource professionals that the credit might be removed or reduced.Indeed, the state of Virginia loves its Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program so much that officials have been shaken by a March 2011 4th U.S. Circuit Court decision concerning the program. In that complicated case, the court ruled that the IRS was correct in arguing that the tax credits investors received were income and should be taxed as such. (The Virginia program allows developers/property owners to form investment partnerships for a rehabilitation project for which they receive tax credits worth more than the dollar amounts of their investments, essentially a fixed rate of return.) As the court pointed out, the arrangement allowed investors to avoid "true entrepreneurial risk."State officials claim the tax credit program is now "under siege" and that the court ruling has "created a firestorm" in the business and preservation communities by having a "paralyzing effect" on existing and new projects; i.e. investors will be less inclined to invest if they have to report their tax credits as income. In fact, as the numbers have already suggested, preservation is big business in Virginia."I have heard from people all over the country regarding the decision," said DHR Director Kathleen Kilpatrick. "It is damaging here and also in other states. It will have a profoundly chilling effect on investment in historic rehabilitation and thus on our ability to achieve our policy goals for stewardship in Virginia." In other words, no more "free money" for investors.Of course, the program itself created a firestorm recently when a Richmond developer was found to be stealing millions from investors and taxpayers through the program. Justin Glynn French– recently sentenced to 16 years in jail– inflated the rehabilitation costs of his projects, thereby receiving unwarranted tax credits, which he turned around and sold to investors.Still, you don't have to commit fraud to make a killing in the rehab tax credit game. You just need to have made a killing already: the list of 12 rehab tax credit recipients reads like a who's who of the local rich and powerful. In addition to the Hardies, Biscuit Run investor Coran Capshaw, who, along with fellow investor Hunter Craig, received millions in conservation tax credits for donating the failed development to the state for use as a park, received nearly $100,000 in tax credits to spruce up his Seven Oaks estate.L.F. Payne, the former Fifth District congressman who was the first to inform former Gov. Tim Kaine of Craig and Capshaw's desire to donate the Biscuit Run property, received nearly $200,000 in rehab tax credits for his home at 2447 Ivy Road. (As husband of Susan Payne, Craig's PR representative and fellow board member at Virginia National Bank, L.F. was in a unique position to suggest the deal.)Octagon Partners, the development group that built the Gleason condominiums, received nearly $900,000 in rehab tax credits for renovating the Hardware Store building on the Downtown Mall.In addition, four of the 12 properties went up for sale or lease after receiving rehab credits, including the William Hall Goodwin House on Rugby Road, a Eugene Bradley-designed residence whose owners, hedge fund manager Kevin Sidders and his wife Beverly, received $463,000 in rehab tax credits and then sold the house for $4 million last year. Over in Greenwood, the owners of Blue Ridge Farm, a 12,000-square-foot private estate, received nearly $200,000 for rehabilitating a show barn and an ice house.The owners of two historic Court Square office buildings currently for lease, who received nearly $300,000 in state tax credits, also tout the program in advertisements for the space. Further south, rehab tax credits are used as a selling point for Monticola, a Greek Revival mansion in Howardsville currently on the market for $2.9 million, whose owner received $266,552 in taxpayer money. In all, local owners have reaped $3.1 million in just the past five years.While there's no doubt that 12 beautiful properties have been preserved thanks to the program, was it worth the $3.1 million?"The bottom line is still that other taxpayers are subsidizing these renovations," says Crockett. "And what do they get out of it? They don't get to use the homes. I guess, like conservation easements and the county land use tax subsidy program, people can drive by and enjoy the view."
CORRECTION: An earlier online version of this story referred to the ACE (Acquisition of Conservation Easements) program, which is specifically designed to prohibit development and protect natural resources, but it should have been the Land Use Valuation program.
So this is why there's no money to give state workers raises for 5 years--wealthy people needed to remodel their homes. Politicians are 50 times richer on average than other Americans--we must stop electing these douche bags, no matter what party they're in.
I agree with you 110%. The problem is you have to be rich to run for office...any office. Look what happened with Jeff Clark. I don't know what the answer is. Maybe an "American Spring" ??
"Over in Greenwood, the owners of Blue Ridge Farm, a 12,000-square-foot private estate, received nearly $200,000 for rehabilitating a show barn and an ice house."
Not that it matters but THAT gets my knickers in a twist (as does the rest of the article). Yes, the horse business is a > $1 billion industry in Virginia, but $200K for a HORSE barn.
Okay, lets say that someone working on that barn makes $40K per year (probably quite high an estimate but whatever). In looking at my latest pay stub it appears Virginia income tax is in the neighborhood of 4.25%. So that means 40K times 4.25% = $1700 per year in Virginia income tax. Divide that into 200K and you get 117.6 (something). Somehow I doubt that 117 people worked on that barn for a year. I know there was sales tax on the materials used (of course an argument could be made that contractors are tax exempt). Taxes paid on labor to produce the materials but much of that would be distributed among many other states (if even in the US).
Yes the argument can be made that the wages paid to those workers helped the overall economy but this still get my knickers in a BIG twist. Most middle class Americans are mostly working just to eat and make a house payment so I don't see them being able to spend any money in order to receive this tax benefit. So, as the article alludes to, this is nothing but yet more welfare for the rich. But hey, there is that trickle down theory - yeah right.
"Indeed, some think regulations, not tax credits, are the way to really preserve our stock of historic structures. While the 12 local properties were rehabilitated under the rehab tax credit program in the last five years, seven times that many have been lost"
If the Government wants to regulate someones right to preserve or not preserve a home that is "eminent domain" and the government needs to pay. They either need ot allow people to bulldoze what they bought and paid for or offer an incentive not to.
This program needs simplifying and transparancy but is nessasary under the law if we want to have old houses around. forever.
The article should have been more forthcoming with numbers and how much people recieved as a ratio to their own spending.
I tend to agree with you. And considering the cost of some of the tax breaks, the tax payer would do just as well to buy these properties out.
You made a mistake in the paragraph where you said: "roughly 60 percent of the land in the County is also under a local land use program, the ACE (Acquisition of Conservation Easements) program, which reduces the amount of local taxes landowners must pay."
I believe you've mixed up two very different programs. One, ACE, is a Purchase of Development Rights program which prohibits future subdivision and provides for resource protection, and the other, Land Use Valuation, does not prohibit subdivision nor does it place any real protections for natural resources. Also, under land use, you can leave the program at will, and you only have to pay back taxes for five years. Land use causes the county to tax the property at a lower rate than what it pays the city, meaning that not only is it lost tax revenue but they also lose money on each property in the program. In contrast, ACE saves money because it is future infrastructure that need not be built and money no longer owed via revenue sharing. Plus as a PDR program (as opposed to a donation of development rights), tax credits may not apply, although the property owner does a permanant reduction in property taxes.
It's worth noting that Biscuit Run was receiving Land Use for many many years, and was still ultimately developed. If it had been under ACE, then there would have been no development to collapse and be donated to the State nor countless taxpayer dollars wasted on a property, some of which is still going to be developed. I believe was proposed at one point by Slutzky that no property in the growth area should qualify for Land Use Valuation, but that was shot down. Speaking just for myself, I think it'd be a good common sense rule to be reconsidered.
Robert Hardie's application to get tax credits reads like a comedy. It is amazing that an affluent person feels no remorse in taking money for renovating a multimillion dollar estate.
I think the key to this issue is to understand what the recent 4th Circuit case actually said. There are many small businesses who benefit greatly from this tax credit, not just rich homeowners. These businesses, however, often do not have such a large tax liability that they can use all the credits, so they sell the credits to investor partnerships on the cheap. The investor partnerships then sell the credits to people who need to offset their state tax liabilities. The investor partnerships make a profit on this sale. The IRS simply said that if the investor partnerships are going to be selling these credits at a profit, they have income which needs to be reported on their Federal tax returns.
The investor partnerships are just trying to avoid paying taxes on the profits they make from buying and selling these tax credits. The small businesses (or the wealthy people) who actually do the historic rehabilitation are not affected. They still can get the tax credits and sell them, but the court said that the investor partnerships are not true partnerships for the people buying the tax credits. That means that the investor partnerships have taxable income to the Federal government and must pay taxes on that income, just like the small businesses must pay taxes on their income.
It's not the rich people who take advantage of tax credits who offend me. It's the people who buy up tax credits after doing no work on the rehabilitation, sell the credits, make millions, and then act like the whole historic preservation system will fall apart if they are forced to pay taxes on the millions they make. The investor partnerships are still free to act like they are the people actually making historic preservation possible. They just need to pay federal taxes on all the money they make while pretending to care about historic rehabilitation.
@PW thanks for this info . Appears from your explanation that in this case the courts are protecting the people of the Commonwealth and not wealthy investors.
Historic buildings lost are historic buildings lost forever. Don't throw out the baby with the bath water (well maybe a rich baby or two). You need strong incentives to remodel and preserve historic structures. We'll all be living in places that look like Hollymead Town Center and forget what life can also look like.
Give me a break...this is a fleecing of the tax payers of Virginia. The very notion that owners of a Farmington estate received more than half a million dollars in tax breaks to renovate their personal home is a travesty. Perhaps they should open up their home to the public one day per week.
This is just utterly disgusting! Helping to renovate wealthy peoples homes that aren't even open to the public? I can understand the Paramount for the fact that it is a public venue, however this is just sad when the rich get renovations when teachers get laid off and the poor cannot even afford to run thier airconditioners! What a waste, just goes to show the public servants elected to office just help thier donaters more than the general public!
The program in essence is a rough partnership between private ownership and state to retain the rich heritage of Virginia . The public seed money benefits all in the overall scheme of things by spreading capital around and circulating it while the restoration is taking place and benefiting the story of a special area of North America . These buildings last longer than people the continunity and stability provide economic and social benefits . Well off folks are generally responsable stewarts of a nations treasures . They are also ingenious at getting revenue streams taped from both private and public sources . This is a good program if it has the end result of restoring and retaining the great works of prior generatons hard work . Those who feel left out of the program and wish to be included need only to organize their situation individually or in groups so they would be eledgible to participate .
"You need strong incentives to remodel and preserve historic structures." Probably unfortunately, in Europe the preservation of many small and moderate-sized towns are required by law. While attracting a lot of tourists maybe, it certainly has caused many towns to provide a way of life resembling midieval times.
Many people are tering homes such as those in Fifeville because people tend to prefer open space floor plans which are not historic and therefore the renovations do not qualify for historic preservation tax credits.
Most of the houses deleted from Fifeville's historic fabric in the last decade were razed for development projects subsequently shut down by the recession. Those projects differed in various ways but had in common outsized footprints and volume that would have left precious little open space in an already densely packed landscape. Ironically, the destruction wrought by so many demolitions has left too much open space where houses ought to be.
As for interior open space plans, no preservation regulation affects any such thing unless an applicant is applying specifically for support of interior renovation. That is, a property owner applying for tax credit support for exterior work must conform to strict preservation guidelines only in respect to that exterior work. Inside, that owner can knock out all the walls he or she wants -- unless, of course, the law of gravity prohibits..
Otherwise, this whole discussion reminds me of many a conversation I had with the late, very much lamented Bill Stevens (William Temple Stevens, principal in Stevens & Co. Realtors). We both loved Virginia, its history, and its built heritage. We both wanted to see that heritage preserved. But we differed mightily on how to ensure that preservation.
Bill's plan was simple. Find a bedraggled property with good bones and a story to tell, advertise appropriately, and sell it to a rich buyer who would hire Milton Grigg to make it solid and stately again (albeit with all modern coveniences inside). I, on the other hand, supported ordinances and incentives.
I do not, however, support what the law of unintended consequences has made of those incentives in recent years. They have become yet another way that those with means can further profit at public expensive, yet another way a human value (the preservation of heritage) can be turned into a commodity. It seems to me that substituting outright grants -- means-tested grants -- for tax credits would go a long way to righting the obvious wrongs here. History belongs to everyone. The opportunity to preserve smaller and humbler, though not less important, pieces of it should belong to everyone, too.
Ms Rhodes, your comments on this issue are spot on. As I'm sure you're aware, an opening on the Planning Commission has just been announced. It's now a good time to begin a robust dialog about where we want to go as a city.
Regarding interior rehabs, there are many historic homes in Cville, both small and large, that have modern open floor plans.
What I find tragic is that so many of our modest historic structures have been razed to be replaced by developments that are shoddy or ugly, or developments that have never occurred at all. A particularly egregious example in recent years was the demolition of two houses on Dale Ave, outlined in this excellent article. http://www.readthehook.com/82334/onarchitecture-belmont-hall-beta-house-... The developer responsible is possibly running for Council, so caveat emptor.
The affluent can do a service by restoring these houses if they chose. However, the commonwealth should not be paying substantial parts of the bill for excessive living.
Let\'s keep in mind that these excessive wealthy people chose to live extravagantly and are not restoring these homes for the enjoyment of the tax paying citizens or the preservation of Virginia. They are doing restoring multi-million dollar homes for their own pleasure and enjoyment.
You caught my sentiments exactly. These are private homes. I spent a great deal of time renovating my own private residence, over the course of many years because it was where I wanted to live. These homes are not open to the public.
I am glad a lot of this is finally getting attention, as we hear tons of cries from our Congressional Reps and Senators to cut entitlements, yet all we hear is how we need to cut into medicare or SS which the working public has paid for. We never hear about these sorts of tax cuts, which are NOT paid for.
@ Richy Rich...great point, well thought out. You might want to have that mouse button looked at...
Small is Enough:
Thank you for what you said about what I said. But about what else you said:..
Given the trends in Planning Commission appointments and behaviors over the last decade or so, "a robust dialogue about where we want to go as a city" isn't likely to break out any time soon. Indeed, those trends have gone a long way toward quashing even basic debate on the issues that arise one by one. (Have you noticed that members of the public who speak before PC are now not only limited to three minutes, but also have to endure an arrogant, insulting, distracting, and just plain rude 15-second warning from the Chairman?)
More and more, Planning Commissioners are selected as though they were being hired for professional openings rather than being appointed to stand in for their fellow citizens. As a result, more and more those who are appointed have professional interests in how existing rules are applied and how new rules are made. Specifically, they have professional interests in more new structures being built with fewer restrictions and according to their own tastes and theories. That being the case, they are more and more dismissive of mere citizens who do not share their professional goals, tastes, and theories.
That's why, of course, PC saw fit to "review" the critical slopes ordinance enacted barely four years earlier after a great deal of public involvement and a great deal of public consensus. The public made it clear that steep slopes should be protected. Since then, Planning Commissioners have made it clear via a stunning number of steep-slope waivers that they do not agree. Commissioner Rosensweig, a self-interested member of the ever larger and more powerful and more affluent capital-letter Affordable Housing Industry, actually opined that not all steep slopes are deserving of protection, i.e. that intended purpose could and should trump physics. Never mind that not even the mighty Charlottesville Planning Commission can waive the Law of Gravity, to which water always conforms.
Even though Planning Commissioners are being selected like professionals for hire, however, they are not subject to the restraints that a public employee would be. Nor,although they wield considerable political power, are they subject to the restraints that an elected official would be. They cannot be fired by the City. They cannot be recalled or voted out by the citizens.
Considering that the single most uttered phrase at PC meetings is, "We'd like to see..." and that those who repeat it can in fact enforce their likes, I think we're at a pretty scary point vis a vis where we're going as a city.
Well said Antoinette. Please apply for the opening on the PC now available with the chairperson, Jason Pearson's departure. We desperately need a citizen advocate like Bill Emory and John Santoski to provide balance to that board.
Thank you for the supportive thought, but I won't be applying.
For one thing, as I've said before when being encouraged to do such things, I am physically and psychologically incapable of participating in night meetings that can and do run into the next morning.
For another thing, there wouldn't be a snowball's chance in Hadensville in July of my being appointed if I did apply. I applied for a couple of appointive posts -- posts for which I was particularly well qualified -- some years ago. In one case, it was for a neighborhood task force during the year-long preliminary phase of which I had been the only citizen of any address who had showed up for every single meeting and activity, filled out every questionaire, etc. But I was rejected in favor of, among others, a developer's longtime business partner who had moved to the county during the white flight of the '60s and a "neighbor" who had already moved his business to the county, intended to move his residence there shortly, and who had not even applied.
That all happened under the auspices of a City Councilor who was about to be Mayor. More recently, I've been evaluated by two more Mayors. One, in the course of a City Council meeting, labeled neighborhood initiatives of which I was a prime mover "dysfunctional" Another, in a public forum, labelled me personally "negative and destructive."
But of course I agree with you completely that we desperately need not just one but more citizen advocates on PC. Planning Commissioners are supposed to reflect the community and apply consistently and disinterestedly rules that the community has made. They are not supposed to impose on the community their personal and/or professional goals, tastes, theories, schemes, or anything else. I was very, very sorry when Bill Emory resigned. His was an immensely valuable voice and perspective.
We need to elect City Councilors that reflect the interests of the citizens and not the development community.
We need to stop paying for farmington and rugby road elite to live in million dollar mansions. The out of touch elite that get tax credits while unemployment increases and educational programs suffer from reduced funding reaks of financial injustice.
Because the exterior renovations of old houses are far less costly than the interior renovations of publing, heaating, kitchens and baths, staircases and windows, most people renovation these homes obviously do not feel it worth their time to apply for tax credits just for exterior renovations.
Bill Marshall,
The article states that the tax credits received amounts to 25 percent of the eligible rehabilitation costs...not too hard to figure out from there how much people received as a ratio to their own spending.
8 Dogwood Lane built 1941 is an example of 15 of the homes in Farmington Wells d 1974 designed. These 1940s homes are so historic, that was 70 years ago people, ancient times we are talking about... and there are only 15 houses designed by Wells d 1974 in Farmington. All 15 deserve 600,000 each to preserve them, that will only be 9 million in tax credits to do the other 14.
Dave McNair wrote:
"The article states that the tax credits received amounts to 25 percent of the eligible rehabilitation costs...not too hard to figure out from there how much people received as a ratio to their own spending."
So that means those people spent $800,000 to "renovate" a fricking horse barn. I understand that it is their money and they are free to spend it how they wish but it just infuriates me that taxpayers funded 1/4 of the job.
Does it infuriate anyone else?
The Hardies Farmington house is about as historic as many old Charlottesville homes. They did not deserve more than 600 thousand dollars in tax credits to perform a multimillion dollar renovation of their personal Farmington estate.
However, such people are out of touch with reality.
People like this feel as though they deserve the money of Virginia tax payers most of whom will never have $600,000 in their lives.
The article is very one sided and does not at all represent the benefits of historic tax credits. The author should educate himself and the readers can develop a better understanding:
Monica thank you for that link.
See you at the Farmington country club for tea tomorrow.
Monica all programs like this start out well intentioned.
The reporter is calling attention to abuses to the system. You will note that Ms Hardie had a chance to tell her side of the story but chose not too. What a pity.
What an interesting comment by Randolph Byrd, who said "When government offers tax credits, it's always the rich who take advantage. Want it to be fair? Then do away with all tax credits. The way it is now, it's not a sin; it's just the way the government set it up."
So, Byrd acknowledges that taxpayers are subsidizing the wealthy through historic preservation tax credits, just as the taxpayers have done with Republican supply-side economic policies, and just as Albemarle county taxpayers continue to subsidize big land owners through the county's land use tax subsidy program (which is simply adored by conservative Republicans like Ken Boyd).
Monica Lynch writes to complain that the story is one-sided, and she offers up a link to the "merits" of historic preservation tax credits written by the Virginia Department of Historic Resources to "prove" it. But, the VDHR explanation of tax credit "merits" is a one-sided document that says not one word about how utilizes the credits and what the cots to taxpayers is.
Monica Lynch has some experience with tax credits and historic properties, much of it in converting these properties into commercial and "high end" or "premium" rental units. In other words she works with developers to help plan and restore older properties (a former cigar factory, for example, or a former ice warehouse), with taxpayer subsidies, for private commercial gain. I suppose one can argue the pros and cons of such arrangements, but the fact is that the taxpayer subsidies go to private profit.
Here is the National Register of Historic Places application for a cigar factory in Norfolk, VA. Scroll through the application and see if you can discern who the "current owner" and developer of the property is (it's at #11).
Here's another example. In this case the owner of the Virginia Ice & Freezing Corporation Cold Storage Warehouse (at Riverview and Southampton avenues in Norfolk) sought historic status in his plan to sell the warehouse for conversion to "high end rental units" (Monica Lynch's words) complete with rooftop pool. The owner of the company, Paul Battaglia of Riverview Realty Corporation, shut down the company last year. When queried about the closing and the loss of jobs and the sale of the building to developers (who are seeking funding insured by the Department of Housing and Urban Development...not to mention the tax credits), Battaglia told a reporter for the Virginian-Pilot, "I really don't want to discuss it. It's a personal matter."
Perhaps the 4th Circuit Court ruling that " tax credits investors received were income and should be taxed as such" should, indeed, shake up those who use (and abuse) them. As reporter Dave McNair pointed out, the 4th Circuit decision said that the tax credit "arrangement allowed investors to avoid 'true entrepreneurial risk'."
Oops. The last sentence of the third paragraph (above) should read:
"But, the VDHR explanation of tax credit "merits" is a one-sided document that says not one word about WHO utilizes the credits and what the COST to taxpayers is.
so if a poor person gets food stamps section 8 free school lunches free Schip medical care and erned income tax credits are they "taking advantage" or abusing the system or are they "entitled"
Every level has its tax breaks.. The diffeence is that at least the rich pay someting in to get something back.
I own an 1895 Victorian in Fifeville and need to replace the existing metal roof. I could replace it with an asphalt shingle roof for half what a new metal roof will cost. However we choose to go back with a metal roof to preserve the character of the house. I looked into the tax credits, but was amazed to find out I'd have to spend 25% of the assessed value to get any help.
We'll find a way to borrow the money and get the metal roof, but another homeowner might have opted for shingles. Clearly this program is not helping those who could use it most.
Thank you for being willing to make the extra effort to do the right thing.
We empathize. Our Oak Street house (NOT in Fifeville, but next door to Fifeville) -- built before 1853 and enlarged about 1883 -- needs considerable exterior work including a new metal roof on the rear extension. (We sprang for one on the front 10 years ago when we found an independent country roofer who gave us a price we could manage, then let us lower the bill further by doing the clean up and such ourselves.) But 25 precent of our absurd current assessment would be almost double what our house actually cost us -- which is to say, more than we could possibly muster.
As you say, "Clearly this program is not helping those who could use it most." And grotesque overassessments aggravate the problem.
Mr Marshall
The rich are not entitled to live in subsidized 5 million dollar mansions. Thank god mother Theresa did not share your disdain for the poor and downtrodden.
Albemarle's marraige bonds/licenses dating back to 1790s are falling apart (not all but quite a few) some torn in half sitting in folders. Albemarle still has its old Chancery cases going back to the 1890s folded and stuffed in metal drawers etc. Va spends $600,000 to restore a 1941 house at Farmington and lets it old Court records rot at the Court house. Pretty Poor preservation
Bill marshall
Warren Buffett and Bill Gates have come to realize the obligation to better society. Farmington mansion restoration does not do that.
@Sam: You are correct about that. The way Albemarle County treats its records is scandalous. I've been in there many times to see torn pages from 19th century deed books on the floor with footprints all over them. The books themselves are piled up haphazardly. Albemarle County should be ashamed of itself.
Sam and Small is Enough note the deplorable conditions of Albemarle County's historic records...and yet, Albemarle doles out $20 million a year in tax relief to its biggest, and mostly wealthiest, landowners through the land use tax subsidy program.
And, of course, their are the tax credits that the wealth can take for "historic" preservation, and "conservation" easements...this article leads off with a picture of Blue Ridge Farms, and reporter Dave McNair notes that "the owners of Blue Ridge Farm, a 12,000-square-foot private estate, received nearly $200,000 for rehabilitating a show barn and an ice house."
Here's the county land records site:
Under name of owner just follow the directions and enter the name(s) of the owner of Blue Ridge Farms, and then peruse the various properties listed (there are six). At the top of the listing for each property is a "Now Showing" box, and the first piece of information is a summary of the property. Other categories include "land value information," "improvements," "assessments," and more.
Notice that for five of the six properties, there is a conservation easement. Here's what the Virginia Outdoors Foundation says about the tax benefits of conservation easements:
And her is some of what the Outdoors Foundation says about the public "benefits" of such easements:
* "Open-space easements allow land to continue to be privately owned but restricted to serve and protect land for the public good."
* "An open-space easement is a legal document made between a landowner and a public body, such as the Virginia Outdoors Foundation. The easement limits present and future property development rights. It allows you to live on the property and use it for its traditional use..."
* "A gift of a qualified open-space easement in perpetuity may qualify as a non-cash charitable gift which may yield a deduction for federal income tax purposes and a credit for state income tax purposes. In addition, there may be local property tax reductions and federal estate tax exemptions."
One way to look at this is if you buy an expensive, landed estate, and you want to get a tax exemption on it (perhaps even if zoning regulations prohibit development), there's a way to do it.
It is difficult to believe that any person with a reasonable moral compass would find tax credits of hundreds of thousands of dollars for private residences to be acceptable use of state funds.
This is a loophole that needs to be closed. Moreover, those who cheated the system should return the money or make a charitable gift to the commonwealth.
This was good investigative journalism to expose those among us who bilk the system.
"Thank god mother Theresa did not share your disdain for the poor and downtrodden." Did she campaign for government run entitlement programs? I didn't detect any disdain in his statement for the "poor and downtrodded." BTW, who are the "poor and downtrodden" and how do they qualify to be labeled so?
Albemarle/Charlottesville could have funded a preservation position at the Court house say $40K a year plus actually funding their pension (which Va. doesn't do) and bought supplies all for say 60 K a year and funded this position for 10 years rather than using 600K in tax credits to fund restoration of a 1941 house in Farmington (one of 15 done by the architect). Charlottesville destroyed it old Maplewood Cemetery book, (by rumour) threw out all its old building permits dating back to 1880s. Its old marraige bonds, their perserve policy is don't make copies don't digitize them just get a cardboard box, put them in it and shipp them to the Va. State Library. Albemarle for its part uses the same policy: get a box, Fed Ex label, and ship to Va. State Libary, (except if it is a will book or deed book) then first let the DAR restore it and then if no choice fix it. Back in the 1970s Albemarle sent its old Chancery cases to Va. State libarary. They still are not available on line. The chancery cases Albemarle still have may have ended in the 1890s but some date back to 1850s. (There are slave lists and a civil war slave rent out book in the oldest case still at the Court house) If Albemarle does not put all its old marraige licenses/ bonds in preservation plastic soon there won't have them in 20 years from now. (either the DAR or Alb. have done some of the very oldest ones).
While Dave McNair's headline, "Extreme Makeover RICH Edition: state program benefits those who need it least" is certainly attention grabbing, it is not entirely accurate. Despite the headline, I am glad he wrote the article, giving some publicity to tax credits which help homeowners make interior and exterior renovations that will benefit owners well into the future.
Let's clarify the facts, the state program does not just benefit the rich. The City of Charlottesville has nine National Register Districts and 60 individually listed properties. Our newest National Register District is Woolen Mills, which adds 94 structures. So, there are literally over a thousand properties in Charlottesville that qualify for the program, some grand, most less so.
Any interested property owners must be doing a renovation equal to 25% of their most recent assessed building value, which does not include the land value. For example, a neighbor's assessment is $400K, but the home, or "improvement" is assessed at $138K. So a remodel of this home would require spending $35K on the remodel, of which $9K, or 25% would be reimbursable by the state. The article says you have to spend a lot to receive the credits, but that is true only if your home is worth a lot.
However, any remodel must meet all standards of the National Park Service, or it doesn't qualify, at all, for the state program. Plaster must be replaced with plaster, roofs must be replaced with like materials to what was original, and many other specific requirement. If the owner want to make other changes, then they simply do not qualify for the tax credit.
The process isn't easy to navigate- plenty of documentation is required, and you do have to hire an accountant to certify your expenses. However, this is to ensure that the program only pays for qualifying expenses, and that remodels are in fact done to National Park Service standards. As the article points out, if you are not sure where to start, Charlottesville is filled with people willing to help. Check with groups like Preservation Piedmont, contact UVa for grad students who can help, etc.
Finally, when you receive the tax credit, the state does not cut the owners a check. You are credited the amount against your VA income tax liability. For example if your employer withholds money for VA taxes in your paycheck, you would be refunded that amount each year.
Not only do homeowners benefit from the credit. The inclusion of Martha Jefferson Hospital on the National Register, helped attract it's buyer, Octagon Partners, who is planning on using credits for the redevelopment. The independent, local, roofers, plumbers and electricians also benefit by getting work that may not otherwise be available.
I invite Mr. McNair and the Hook to write a follow up article on how the good residents living in our newest districts like The Woolen Mills, Fifeville, and Martha Jefferson can get help through this program, which is not just for the rich.
FairTax is the solution to all of this mess. You buy, you pay. Your rich, you buy more, you pay more. Simple.
does that make everyone feel better. Blame "the rich" because we all know it's all their fault.
How incredibly biased is that? I really think the Hook is not worthy of reporting stories like this one. They should be ashamed of themselves.
Just to clarify my comment: I am the former Chairman of the Board of Historic Resources for Virginia, BTW. The government has long used tax deductions/write-offs to promote investment in areas of special interest. Home ownership? Mortgage interest deductions. Oil well drilling? Oil well depletion allowances. Energy conservation? Tax credits for replacing your old appliances with modern energy-efficient appliances. Every time the government offers an incentive through their tax code, someone is left out and treated unfairly. And that's wrong. Are you a renter? Then you pay your landlord's mortgage, but they get the mortgage interest deduction. Only homeowners buy large appliances, so you're out of luck for that deduction if you are not a homeowner. The richer you are, the more deductions you can get. Period! Most renters are not rich. Most rich people own their own homes. But this isn't about rich vs not-rich. Want to promote having babies? There's a tax deduction for not only dependent children, but also a child-care tax credit. Childless couples and singles are paying for the tax relief given to child bearers. The government has NO BUSINESS using the tax system to promote special interests no matter how well-intentioned. Take our money; pay for education, police, military, fire/rescue, the arts, whatever you want. But promote one business over another, one interest group over another, through the tax code, and this is what you get. And to those commenting herein, quit picking on just one tax credit phenomenon and help fix the entire problem by telling the government to offer only one deduction: FOR POVERTY. Eliminate all the rest. It is the very reason the wealthy pay taxes at a lower actualized percentage rate than the upper middle class: they have more deductions! We do not need to raise taxes, we need to remove the deductions which will increase revenues paid to the government and simultaneously fix our broken tax code and make it fair for everyone.
@ democracy: since you and I are frequently on opposite political poles, I would like you, especially, to weigh in on my comment, above. I value your opinion.
In reviewing the article, it appears that the research done centered around historic preservation areas consisting of large estate property types. Unfortunatley it skews the facts and realities of how historic tax credits are most commonly used. Our firm has spent the last 10 years revitilizing distressed urban areas by utilizing the historic tax credit program. We have had the experience in some case of combining both historic and low income tax credits to offset the cost of bringing dilapidated structures back on line into a use that is sustainable long term. The structures usually require extensive abatement and renovation in order to meet the secretary interior standards for historic tax credits. The construction in most cases is more costly than building new, however the credits offset the extra cost and allow for the adasptive reuse of structures that most likely would have been demolished to make way for new construction. In essence, the program allows for historic structures to be recyled by offseting the higher cost of renovation VS. new construction. Urban renewal advocates consider this smart growth, because it allows for the preservation of land by slowing down urban sprawl and consumption of natural land resources. By lowering the cost it allows for developers who use the program to deliver multi-family housing, to pass the savings on to tenants who are usually working class individuals which makes the housing more affordable to them. As economist will tell you, the construction industry is 1 of the leading drivers in our economy, and the goal is to keep construction starts up to help the economy recover. Therefore, I believe more research should be done in order to accertain the full scope of the program and how it effects our economy, before inadvertantly inciting advocation against the program.


text:
Norcross property: From ho's to hoes to homes
One of historic downtown's last brick warehouses is about to be overhauled, and the property– once the site of Charlottesville's upscale brothel– has some unusual tales to tell.
Recently known as the Norcross building, as a giant mid-century paint-on-brick sign attests, the 1924 structure hugging the south side of the CSX railroad tracks has long tempted developers with its large windows and easy proximity to the fashionable Downtown Mall.
"I think it's wonderful and good for downtown," says Buddy Thach, who's selling the building to developers. "It's an antique," says Thach, "and I'm an antique also."
The 80-year-old Thach says that when he bought the building in 1977, Norcross Transfer and Storage was his thriving tenant. After the firm folded a few years ago, the four-story structure went dormant, except for a large parking lot which he rented to commuters.
Under that parking lot lies one of Charlottesville's biggest brushes with fame. But first the plans.
Developer Bill Dittmar says he and Hunter Craig have hired architect Michael Stoneking to create 32 apartments in the 32,000 square-foot brick and timber building with occupancy slated for November. Next, Dittmar says, a new building will begin rising on the Fourth Street side with 32 more apartments to come on line in the spring. There are even plans for a third structure facing Garrett Street with another 24 units.
The 1.5-acre complex, says Dittmar, will have a "Georgetown-type feel with an internal courtyard with grass areas with verandas and trees– and parking for 106 cars."
Now for the brothel. For the first half of the 20th century, next to the warehouse stood a whorehouse– well, a mansion that served as a brothel called "Marguerite's." After being raided by city police, it closed in 1949 and subsequently served as a rest home. Its big claim to fame, however, came upon its demolition in the early 1970s.
Newspaper clippings filed at the Charlottesville Albemarle Historical Society show a sturdy, multi-columned brick mansion surrounded by a stone-and-iron fence. When serving as Marguerite's, it was said to have 23 swanky teak-furnished rooms and a beveled-glass front door.
But like all the houses around it, the structure was doomed by the then-popular concept of "urban renewal." When the wrecking ball began pounding on November 21, 1972, Marguerite's– already infamously derided as UVA's off-grounds "student center"– wrote another chapter in local history.
"The girls had been stuffing money in the walls," laughs Thach. "When demolition crews took the building down, money was flying everywhere."
Word quickly spread about cash stashes. Soon, more than 100 wide-eyed locals, toting hoes and shovels, were clambering through the ruins.
Indeed, the crane operator demolishing Marguerite's allegedly found $700, according to a contemporary account in the Daily Progress. Sixteen-year-old Darlene Harris told the Washington Post she and her brother found $8,000 in a rusty metal box.
Officials never tallied the total recovery, but some losses were evident. The Garrett Street redevelopment ended up wiping several streets– including South Fifth Street, where Marguerite's stood– from Charlottesville maps. Thach notes his warehouse still bears an address of 401 South Street– even though South Street ceased to reach south of the CSX tracks after the urban planners of the '70s finished with the neighborhood. Today, a low-income housing complex, best known as Garrett Square but recently redubbed Friendship Court, occupies much of that urban renewal zone.
Dittmar says the conversion presents some "challenges" such as preserving the original casement windows and massive wooden beams and maple floors.
"We didn't want to strip and gut it," says Dittmar, who hopes his preservation efforts earn approval from the Department of the Interior, whose blessing can help earn tax credits.
The new one- and two-bedroom apartments (some with lofts) will range from $900 to $1,500.


text:
OTTAWA — The B.C. NDP, shell-shocked by the May election debacle and leader Adrian Dix's intention to resign got a welcome dose of enthusiasm Tuesday when four federal MPs from B.C. said they'll consider bids to lead the provincial party.
They include Nathan Cullen, the federal NDP House leader who ran a surprising third in the 2012 federal NDP leadership vote won by Tom Mulcair, and Jinny Sims, the firebrand former B.C. Teachers' Federation leader.
Peter Julian and Fin Donnelly have also expressed interest in a job that will involve the headache of rebuilding the B.C. NDP for the 2017 election.
"It's surprising," said Norman Ruff, a political observer and University of Victoria professor emeritus. Ruff said the B.C. NDP is in "complete disarray" and isn't ready for a leadership battle as it deals with the "post-traumatic" impact of a stunning campaign collapse in May.
Kennedy Stewart, a federal NDP MP and former Simon Fraser University political scientist, said all four of his caucus colleagues have strengths.
But to be successful, he said, the winner would have to sell a convincing vision to a provincial party that might be suspicious of a solution from Ottawa.
"The challenge for a federal MP is, 'What's your unique vision for the provincial party?'" Stewart said.
Ruff said the charismatic Cullen would have plenty to offer.
"His main advantage among party activists and public alike is his lack of any kind of baggage from B.C. politics of the 1990s."
Sims has a considerable advantage in her links to the Indo-Canadian community and the labour movement, both crucial NDP constituencies. But Ruff said the former BCTF leader would be a "red flag" for Clark's Liberals.
"The demonization of Dix could seem like kindergarten play compared to what would be hurled at Sims," Ruff said. He said the NDP under her leadership could be hurt because critics of unionized teachers have "falsely" labelled them out for themselves rather than students.
"She has a fiery style but she would put Liberals in a frenzy. And she would rise to the bait."
Former federal MP Ian Waddell, who served in the provincial NDP cabinet in the 1990s, said Ottawa-based politicians don't always have an easy transition to Victoria.
Waddell said MLAs on both sides of the B.C. legislature would direct "he's too Ottawa" comments his way: "It's an uphill fight for an Ottawa person, but may be different this time as the party searches for new blood."
Cullen told The Sun he's talked about the leadership with Mulcair and B.C. party members who are urging him to consider a bid to replace Dix.
"I'm taking the time to seriously consider this with friends and family," he said.
The list of potential contenders includes provincial MLAs John Horgan and Mike Farnworth, who ran unsuccessfully against Dix in 2011.
Sims, 61, wouldn't discuss her candidacy beyond confirming her interest.
"I've been approached by a lot of people and I'm giving it serious consideration," said Sims, who served as BCTF leader when Clark was premier Gordon Campbell's education minister.
Julian, the NDP's caucus chair and one of Mulcair's strongest House of Commons performers, said he's being courted by New Democrats inside and outside the provincial caucus.
He said his strengths include a strong background as a business manager, his experience as an oil refinery labourer who later worked closely with unions when he ran the Council of Canadians advocacy group, and representing what he calls the most ethnically diverse riding in Canada.
"More than 100 languages are spoken, so I've got a lot of those communities approaching me," he said. "I think all of the potential candidates have some real strengths. So I think over the next few weeks we're going to see folks having conversations, and after that we'll see how decides to step forward."
Donnelly, who like Cullen is closely aligned with the environment movement, confirmed his interest in a leadership bid but wouldn't elaborate.
Dix and the NDP suffered a crushing defeat in the May election, causing some in the party to look for a fresh outsider to lead a party renewal.
A B.C. NDP leadership contest is expected sometime in the first half of 2014.
A move to B.C. politics would be financially costly for most MPs. Clark's salary is $193,532, while Dix's is $152,788.
Cullen, with his $39,800 stipend for serving as House leader, earns a total of $200,000. Julian, who gets a smaller bonus for serving as caucus chair, earns $171,500. Donnelly and Sims get the base salary of $160,200.
Federal MPs also have a more attractive pension plan than MLAs.
But Ruff said he doesn't believe politicians make major leadership decisions based on personal finances.
Cullen said if he runs he'll seek a mandate to renew the party's operations – and its relationship with organized labour.
He cited research from a previous federal election indicating that union members don't show a higher rate of support for the NDP than other demographic groups.
"We're seen to be close allies and we get some benefits and some negatives from that, and yet we're not getting their votes, and that doesn't help us nor the labour movement."
However, he didn't spell out what form the new relationship between the provincial party and the B.C. labour movement would take.
Cullen, first elected in 2004, is a former environment critic who is closely associated with opposition to Enbridge Inc.'s proposed Northern Gateway pipeline to Kitimat that runs through his riding.
Former B.C. provincial campaign director Brian Topp, in an internal analysis of the failed May election strategy, argued that the NDP tends to be hurt by giving high profile to environmental issues, since that helps draw attention to the Green party.
Topp's analysis also discussed the damage caused to Dix's credibility by the mid-campaign decision to oppose Kinder Morgan's proposed expansion of its pipeline from Alberta to Burnaby.
The Toronto-born Cullen, a former small businessman who didn't become a party member until he sought the nomination in 2004, portrayed himself during the federal leadership race as someone on the centre-right within the NDP.
He noted that he hasn't yet taken a public position on the Kinder Morgan proposal.
Julian said he wouldn't alter the party's relationship with the NDP, and said he's firmly opposed to the Kinder Morgan proposal as currently formulated because raw bitumen is destined for overseas markets rather than for local refineries.


text:
To provide you with the best experience, cookies are used on this site. Find out more here.
Skip To Main Content
Welcome to the Itinerary Planner. Use this tool to build your own journey or choose from an exciting range of specially selected tours.
To build your own Itinerary, click to add an item to your Itinerary basket.
You are here What's on Christine Hope - Hope og Hingsten
Map Link
Samarbeidsrådet for
Postboks 444
E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com
Photos from Sunnhordland
The local tourist offices can give you good and useful information.
Find your local tourist information office.
About Us
Use of cookies
Copyright © 2020 Visit Sunnhordland
Ratings & Reviews
Powered By


text:
South Carolina event includes a bomb relay race and a robot obstacle course
About 20 teams from throughout the Southeast are taking part this week in the South Carolina Bomb Squad Olympiad, a three-day event designed to let bomb technicians sharpen their skills while having a little fun,
The events include a relay race with participants decked out in 80- to 100-pound bomb suits, a "Hook and Line" event in which contestants must remove a fake bomb from a car, and an obstacle course that tests the crews' ability to direct a robot through a course in a simulated bomb call.
Bomb squad robots have been around for years, used for defusing bombs but also for navigating other dangerous situations. Police in Washington, D.C., for instance, used a robot in a standoff with a van driver before President George W. Bush's second inauguration, CNET reported. Nebraska started using them in 2004.
The people at Pixar Studios, in fact, based the title character in the movie "Wall-E" at least partly on a robot used by the San Mateo County, Calif., Bomb Squad, according to Tuan Nguyen of ABC News. The idea of testing them in competition has been tried before, too. Earlier this year, bomb squads in and around New Mexico honed their skills at the Robot Rodeo, an event that included having the robots make pancakes via remote control, according to the Associated Press.
At the South Carolina event, robots were included as part of the bomb squad teams, although the olympiad focused more on the people who remove and defuse bombs for a living. Teams from police departments in the Southeast took part, as did teams from the Army and Air Force.
The event may be fun, but the serious side of the occupation wasn't far from the minds of the participants. Richard Walker of the Times and Democrat in Orangeburg, S.C., reported that several teams from Georgia canceled after receiving news that a comrade had been killed in Afghanistan by a roadside bomb.
"You still feel like you lost a brother," Kevin Jordan, a bomb tech with the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, told Walker. "It's still a family. You know the sacrifices he made for his country, and for his brother. We shed a tear over that guy."
About the Author
Kevin McCaney is a former editor of Defense Systems and GCN.
E-Mail this page
Printable Format
Working with the local Code for America brigade, Baltimore's Health Department built a new contact management system that saves hundreds of hours when checking in on senior care centers during emergencies.
To better monitor veterans' mental health, especially during the pandemic, the Department of Veterans Affairs is relying on data and artificial intelligence-based analytics.
Advanced Search


text:
A Bicycling Company
We're proud to provide a selection of over 50 different cruiser bikes in a variety of colors for men, women, and childen to choose from.
If what you're looking for isn't in carried by our store or online, you have the option to create your own custom bike. You design it, we'll build it.
Once you receive yout new beach cruiser, feel free to take it for a test ride. If you're not happy with it or would like to get a better bike, go ahead and send it back free of charge.
What's better than riding along the beach, through your park or neighborhood on nice sunny day on a beach cruiser? Not much, and that's where Beachbikes comes in.
If you happen to be in the area, stop by our retail store to get your bike. Don't see your dream bike in our store? Order online and you can come and pick it up when it's ready.


text:
Loveline with Special Guests
This week there will be some special celebrity guests on Loveline, so if you've ever wanted advice from these folks, tune in and give them a call!
Monday: Linkin Park
Tuesday: Dita Von Teese
Thursday: Incubus
The Dream Live Chat
Tuesday, April 17 at 1p PT/4p ET
Prolific songwriter and recording artist The Dream will be live from the Jam'n 94.5 Studio to answer fan questions and say hi! Be sure to tune in to ask him about anything from writing Rihanna's hit song "Umbrella," to his upcoming reality show for MTV!
StyleMint Chat with Mary-Kate Olsen
Friday, April 20 at 9a PT/12p ET
Calling all fashionistas! Mary-Kate Olsen and special guests will be live for the first-ever StyleMint shopping event with expert style advice, exclusive deals and sneak peeks.
B.o.B Live from the Hard Rock Cafe
Friday, April 20 at 1p PT/4p ET
Jam'n 94.5 will be streaming B.o.B's performance at the Hard Rock Cafe in Boston! He'll also be sitting down with the station for a Q&A. [clear here]
Karmin Live from the Hard Rock Cafe
Saturday, April 21 at 2p PT/5p ET
Karmin will be performing live from the Hard Rock Cafe in Boston on KISS 108's channel. With their debut album hitting stores May 8, viewers will probably get a chance to hear some upcoming tracks off the album as well as some old favorites.
Schedule of Games
Puerto Rico Islanders v. FC Edmonton
Thursday, April 19 at 4:30p PT/7:30p ET
Tampa Bay Rowdies v. Carolina RailHawks
Thursday, April 19 at 4:30p PT/7:30p ET
Atlanta Silverbacks v. Tampa Bay Rowdies
Saturday, April 21 at 4:30p PT/7:30p ET
Puerto Rico Islanders v. Carolina SeaHawks
Saturday, April 21 at 4:30p PT/7:30p ET
San Antonio Scorpions v. Ft. Lauderdale Strikers
Saturday, April 21 at 5:30p PT/8:30p ET
UFC 145 Presser
Wednesday, April 18 at 10a PT/1p ET
UFC Fight Club Q&A w/ Chael Sonnen
Friday, April 20 at 11a PT/2p ET
UFC 145 Weigh-Ins
Friday, April 20 at 1p PT/4p ET
UFC 145: Jones vs. Evans
Saturday, April 21 at 7p PT/10p ET
AFL Games
Friday, April 20-Saturday, April 21
The Arena Football League's entire 2012 season is live on Ustream! This week, see games between the Georgia Force and Orlando Predators, Pittsburgh Power and New Orleans VooDoo, Tampa Bay Storm and Philadelphia Soul, and more!
Live Coverage from NAB
Monday, April 16-Wednesday, April 18
The NAB Conference is in Las Vegas this week, and Ustream has live coverage from our partners at NewTek, TWiT, Panasonic, and more! Be sure to check out the superchannel where you can see all of the amazing live events scheduled.
PandoMonthly with Sarah Lacy
Thursday, April 19 at 7p PT/10p ET
Technology superstar Sarah Lacy and PandoDaily have started a monthly chat with startup founders and tech titans in Silicon Valley. The small, cozy "fireside chats," feature a live audience in San Francisco, and Lacy asks the questions most of us are dying to know. Former guests have included Michael Arrington and Path founder Dave Morin.
Speaker Boehner Press Conference
Tuesday, April 17 at 7a PT/10a ET
Speaker Boehner will hold a press conference with GOP leaders on Tuesday morning. Ustreamers can tune in and see it live via his official channel page.
#TaxDay: Citywide Day of Action
Tuesday, April 17 at 1p PT/4p ET
Occupy Wall Street is heating up again, and they've planned a Citywide day of action on #TaxDay. Tune in to see OWS Ustreamers cover the protests.
PETA's Breaking Undercover Investigation
Wednesday, April 18 at 10a PT/1p ET
PETA, the world's largest animal rights organization will announce its latest undercover investigation live on Ustream.


text:
Neural and Behavioral Sciences at Penn State College of Medicine
The mission of the Department of Neural and Behavioral Sciences is to develop new knowledge about the normal nervous system so that we can understand ourselves and the pathological nervous system so that we can develop new ways to treat neurological disease.
Welcome to the Department of Neural and Behavioral Sciences of Penn State College of Medicine. The department was created in 2006 by the amalgamation of the Department of Neuroscience and Anatomy with the Department of Behavioral Science. In addition to their own research programs, our faculty members have strong collaborations with many other basic science and clinical departments.
We also have strong educational programs and serve as the home for the anatomy and neuroscience graduate programs that provide opportunities for both master's and doctoral students.
The nervous system is the organ of sensation and response that regulates and integrates all our bodily functions and behaviors, and studies of its structure and function are among the most exciting areas of biology today.
The dramatic growth in techniques and knowledge in the areas of genomics, proteomics and metabolomics combined with increasingly sophisticated electrophysiological and behavioral methods are giving unprecedented opportunities to discover how the nervous system works and how it communicates with the rest of the body as well as with the outside world. As we continue to expand the department we are hiring new faculty who can take advantage of these new approaches and opportunities.
Patricia Sue Grigson, MS, PhD
Chair, Neural and Behavioral Sciences
Penn State College of Medicine


text:
Bronze was an alloy that combined copper with another kind of metal, such as tin.
On Earth, bronze was first used during the Bronze Age of Human civilization. It has since been used in decorations, jewelry and sculptures. During the 24th century the Mintakans and Takarians were considered to be at a Bronze Age-level of development. (TNG: "Who Watches The Watchers"; VOY: "False Profits")
Captain Jean-Luc Picard delivered a thirteenth century bronze horse statue, from Earth's Sung Dynasty, to Lutan, the leader of Ligon II, in 2364. (TNG: "Code of Honor")
Among the artifacts returned by Vash from the Gamma Quadrant was a bronze and gold dagger, measuring twenty-five centimeters in length. (DS9: "Q-Less")
In 2373, a bronze and triptin statue was found on board an old derelict freighter near the Bajoran system. Quark acquired the statue, and sold it to a sartorially-gifted Bolian for one bar and three strips of latinum. (DS9: "In the Cards")
Leonardo da Vinci invited Kathryn Janeway to join him on a delivery of a bronzetto (bronze statue) to the monks at Santa Croce. (VOY: "Scorpion") Leonardo later had plans for a great bronze horse in Milan, Italy, but he never got around to finishing it; in 2374, this was used by Janeway to illustrate to the Da Vinci hologram how often he had given up. (VOY: "Concerning Flight")
In 2376, B'Elanna Torres asked Kelis to obtain a piece of metal consisting of three parts tin to five parts bronze, with one side coated with gold, so that she could repair the subspace transmitter on the crashed Delta Flyer. (VOY: "Muse")


text:
Ed Bullins, (born July 2, 1935, Philadelphia, Pa., U.S.), American playwright, novelist, poet, and journalist who emerged as one of the leading and most prolific dramatists of Black theatre in the 1960s.
A high-school dropout, Bullins served in the U.S. Navy (1952–55) before resuming his studies in Philadelphia and at Los Angeles City College, San Francisco State College, and other schools. He ultimately completed his education at Antioch University, Yellow Springs, Ohio (B.A., 1989), and at San Francisco State University (M.F.A., 1994).
Bullins made his theatrical debut in August 1965 with the production of three one-act plays: How Do You Do?; Dialect Determinism; or, The Rally; and Clara's Ole Man. After helping to found a Black cultural organization and briefly associating with the Black Panther Party, Bullins moved to New York City.
His first full-length play, In the Wine Time (produced 1968), examines the scarcity of options available to the Black urban poor. It was the first in a series of plays—called the Twentieth-Century Cycle—that centred on a group of young friends growing up in the 1950s. Other plays in the cycle are The Corner (produced 1968), In New England Winter (produced 1969), The Duplex (produced 1970), The Fabulous Miss Marie (produced 1971), Home Boy (produced 1976), and Daddy (produced 1977). In 1975 he received critical acclaim for The Taking of Miss Janie, a play about the failed alliance of an interracial group of political idealists in the 1960s.
Sharing the tenets of the Black Arts movement, Bullins's naturalistic plays incorporated elements of Black nationalism, "street" lyricism, and interracial tension. His other notable works include the plays Goin' a Buffalo (produced 1968) and Salaam, Huey Newton, Salaam (produced 1991), as well as the short-story collection The Hungered One (1971) and the novel The Reluctant Rapist (1973).


text:
It's Halloween, which means that the kids will be dressing up in costumes and getting lots of goodies. But, I say, why should the kids have all the fun? Moms deserve to dress up, too! However, I suggest something much prettier than a witch or a skeleton costume. How about a gorgeous dress from Shabby Apple?! If you love vintage dresses, you're going to love shopping at Shabby Apple! Check out some of their beautiful styles:
Their shirtdresses, like the one below, are so cute!
And I just adore this lovely lace dress!
The designs shown above are just a small peek at the huge selection of dresses at Shabby Apple. From casual dresses to retro dresses and everything in-between, you're sure to find just the right style to make you feel pretty for your next gathering!
DISCOUNT CODE: For the next month, when you shop at www.shabbyapple.com, you can enjoy a 10% discount off your purchase when you use the code: susanheim10off. Enjoy!
One lucky winner will receive a $75 gift card to spend at Shabby Apple! At the sponsor's request, we will not be using Rafflecopter for this giveaway. Instead, you have the opportunity to gain four possible entries by doing the following:
Mandatory entry: Visit www.shabbyapple.com, pick a favorite item, and tell us about it in the comment section on this post!
Optional entries (you must do the mandatory entry first):
1. Like Shabby Apple on Facebook. Leave your Facebook name in a comment.
2. Tweet about the giveaway with the hashtag #shabbyapplegiveaway. Leave the URL of your tweet in a comment.
3. Post on your blog about this giveaway. Leave the URL to your post as a comment.
Contestants must have a USA shipping address to be eligible for entry. This giveaway ends at 11:59 PM ET on Wednesday, October 31, 2012.
CONTEST CLOSED. Congratulations to the winner: Sarah H.!
Now hop around to the other blogs participating in the Hoppin' Halloween Giveaway Hop for the opportunity to win more great prizes!
Disclaimer: Shabby Apple is responsible for prize fulfillment. I received no compensation or products in exchange for this post. All opinions are 100% mine.


text:
Fredi says J-Hey running a sight to behold
LAKE BUENA VISTA, Fla. -- Manager Fredi Gonzalez saw one of his favorite sights in baseball on Friday morning -- outfielder Jason Heyward running the bases.
"He wasn't even going full speed," Gonzalez said. "He's my favorite player I've ever seen run the bases. I love watching him run [out] triples or go from first to third."
On Friday the Braves hit the ground running, as Gonzalez began the full-squad workout with a baserunning exercise.
"It's part of the conditioning that we've tried to implement," he said. "We implemented last year, and it worked well. It also helps them run the bases and [with] the conditioning at the same time. We'll do this every couple of days."
Heyward, who stands 6-foot-5 and weighs 245 pounds, wowed his manager of three seasons with the kind of athleticism that made him so valuable as the leadoff hitter late last season.
"Beautiful, graceful, the way he runs the bases," Gonzalez said. "He cuts it."


text:
FORT MEADE — Authorities have identified a 19-year-old Marine found dead in his barracks room at Fort Meade.
The Marine Corps Combat Development Command identified him Friday as Pvt. Anthony Romanocaruso of Alamance, N.C.
Romanocaruso was an active-duty Marine assigned since February to the Defense Information School at Fort Meade. His body was found Wednesday afternoon.
The Naval Criminal Investigative Service is investigating his death. NCIS investigates all non-combat deaths of Navy and Marine Corps members that are not the result of disease or natural causes.
Col. Sean Gibson says that since the death is under investigation, he can't provide any details about it. He says Romanocaruso received recruit training at Parris Island, S.C., and combat training at Camp LeJeune, N.C.


text:
The Statistical Institute of Catalonia (Idescat) offers information in relation to the names and surnames of the whole population resident in Catalonia, data from the Population Register of Catalonia. This information is similar to that provided by other statistical institutes in Europe, which include the Belgium's National Institute of Statistics, Norway's National Statistics Institute, and the Spanish National Statistics Institute (INE).
This database shows the frequency of the different names and surnames of men and women residing in Catalonia. The data can be viewed in order of frequency of each name or surname. You can also make a specific search for any name or surname and find out how frequently it appears in the population. This information can be obtained for the whole of Catalonia and by counties, and also in the case of names by year of birth.
It should be explained that the source used to produce the database contains the names in capital letters without accents so that , in some cases it is not possible to differentiate between names in Catalan and Spanish, when the accent is the only differentiating feature. In these cases the two options are presented together (Maria/María, Àlex/Álex) and surnames do not carry accents (Sole, Vila, Garcia).


text:
This is my last blog entry on 'jespintanzania'. I'm about to leave.
Tomorrow Lidet and I will jump into our Toyota Landcruizer Prado and leave Dar behind us on our safari north. If everything goes as planned, we will arrive in Denmark about three months from now – after 16000 kilometers and after visiting 13 countries.
You can read more about our overland journey through Africa and Europe on my new blog, huku na huko. If you understand Danish, you might also want to check out Omveje I Afrika, my blog on Politiken online.
Thank you to all who visited, read, commented, asked, suggested, criticized, ridiculed and encouraged. It was all appreciated. Hopefully we'll meet again on my new blog.