text:
READ about Piers Morgan's long career in journalism here.
Whether you fell asleep early, stayed out too late, or simply want to watch it again, we realize it's not always possible to get your entire "Piers Morgan Live" fix from television. As an answer to this, we offer the below labor of love – "Piers Morgan Live, Rewind" – dedicated and designed to getting you caught up and connected to the conversation.
Following Wednesday's news of the arrest of three new suspects in relation to the Boston bombing investigation, "Piers Morgan Live" spoke to former Boston police commissioner Bill Bratton who shared his thoughts on the new developments.
"Today was a moment of clarification," said Bratton about the case. "We had three additional suspects now coming into the picture after the fact."
"We will learn more, certainly, as the investigation goes forward," continued Bratton. "But right now we have to deal with the clarification that we received today, which had a lot of detail."
Also on the program, former attorney general Mike Mukasey added his thoughts on the culpability of the 3 suspects saying, "They acted fairly deliberately. I think they knew from their - from their roommate what the nature was of the material that they were trying to dispose of."
"Oddly, they picked a backpack that contained the remains of some fireworks," noted Mukasey. "They picked a computer. They picked Vaseline. Now, I don't know whether Vaseline is or is not involved in bombmaking. If it is, that, of course, makes it yet more sinister."
For the next edition of "Piers Morgan Live," watch CNN every night at 9.
» Follow "Piers Morgan Live" on Twitter
» Follow "Piers Morgan Live" on Instagram
A WHOLE PAGE of him!
Compares Benghazi with The Alamo,and doubtless Hillary Clinton is General Custer!
It's a smorgasbord of subjects with a dearth of responses!
A pie of piety!
fightcorrupter,FIND ANOTHER BLOG!
And you'll be President,right?
{sm could be First Lady)
Come out of your tinkerbell and pixie Fantasy world. You want so badly to play the Hero dont you!
Idiot?YOU,Mr Fightcorrupter,think the Alamo is analogous with Benghazi?
Did the cow jump over the moon?
Should you find another blog?
(Evening,First Lady,glad to see you two getting along:La Pierre gunning for Piers,next week interesting...)
Fightcorrupter's gonna the Doldrums...
It's hard to accept someone as decent as Hillary Clinton would be complicit in any skulduggery re the death of an honorable,well respected man;also I saw footage on the runway when he arrived home to be laid to rest in America:palpable grief,are you implying that's fake 'cos I'm only illustrating why that's hard to swallow?
Guess you're sticking around,are you?Well,you've taken a lot on the chin(VERY polite)–welcome to the family,just have to put up with Her bad spelling...
Here Be Dragons~Hydra.
So you're not voting for Hillary,then?
(Vote sm!Have 2 tech hir Inglish thirst...)
Lanza:140 rounds,hollow points,close range,Bushmaster AR – 15.
Hamilton:Uzi,unknown ammunition type/amount expended.(Ask La Pierre:he was discussing velocities in mph THE DAY AFTER Sandy on MSNBC–the host was irate.)
What do you think should happen with the AR – 15?Can't get an Uzi here–Edinburgh–for love nor money,churning
factories in the sticks with you like some Frank Herbert dystopia...
I reckon it's going in batches of 10:9 lock them away(Scare The Pilgrims was SELLING guns on here a month or so ago–
dunno if Captain Morgan knows–but he locks em in a bank safe with one key.)
Who's the one-in-ten?We only find out when we're cleaning up glass and blood,always the same.
Does ANYONE want a future comprising of that?It's all observatorial not critical–you've got STP,you've got Nicky Lanza.
Where is the NEXT Nicky Lanza?
Do YOU know?
Who's this guy,cr,says Thomas Hamilton only used handguns.Mendacious.Like the NRA in California at gun shows–a guy
was on here saying–putting it around Lanza just used Glocks.Are you in Edinburgh too?
No,Aberdeen.cr might be NRA therefore.Watch him.Remember Glasgow Allan:we never sleep.They hardly mention
Dunblane in US,wish they did so more 'cos they're usually respectful,and they're a polite bunch MOST the time so I wish
overall it was mentioned more.But cr...he comes on here now and then.
Thanks for post,regards to The Granite City!
We got tae support Piers this week:La Pierre,and Dana Losch–dunno who she is,but she seems very nice–both gunning
for him,and goading him.I can't help thinking of 19 American child-corpses mutilated beyond recognition,and our boy.
And they're celebrating.
I've just heard of this Dana Losch,an FDR[Female Drone Rebel]saying nasty-wasty things about you,Piers!
Anyway,she goes on to mention she has 3.5million–probably Drones–following on Twitter.Well,I went and had a wee
peek,Piersy-Wiersy,AND IT'S ONLY 117,000!
Piers,you need to flog them harder,harder–the whip,Captain Morgan–and this other FDR[Female Drone Rebel],Tabitha
Hale(THERE'S a name,eh Piers?I prefer #CB193746036584D[Colonnus Britannicus Drone]!)–hunts down "commies" on
the Internet!I play Angry Birds!
That's what they are!
Carry on!
P.S.There's a Dana on here(hmm...),and Tabitha Hale should be in jail,and one day may be out on bail as dumb as a doornail as slow as a snail or a ship you sail–eh,Here Be Dragons?
Impeachment of a Clinton would appear to be a tall order;so do you think her grief was manufactured when the
Ambassador was flown home?Seemed genuine to me...
The end of time?Who are you,the immortal blogger?Of COURSE they're corrupt–they're politicians!
Don't you watch the news?
(Buying duckhouses over here...)
Heard David Frost not long ago on the BBC listening to old tapes,and talking of THAT interview;I wrote the following,here's an excerpt:
'...talking of his mother hopelessly nursing his brothers dying of tuberculosis,watching all this from a corner of the
room,as she cradles one then another,wracked by his sobs,making it sound as moving as she was maternal,but
always coherent to a room,a dinner of some kind where you could hear a pin drop,repeatedly calling her a saint,
retorting accusingly that no-one's writing books about her.If you could have THIS Richard Nixon,without the hubris,
Coulda Shoulda
Knowing the appropriate question to ask is actually significantly more imperative as compared to having a ready response. Perfect questions challenge your own planning. Studies are rather clear that we value people that listen to us. Our mission and goals are certainly at the heart of who we are and who we want to be. In the simplest sense, proper questions are our tool for supporting to see the true inescapable fact around us instead of shadowy representations of it. Request fundamental questions about the things that everybody else takes for certain. Everyone is merciful. They want to enjoy an excellent conversation together with you. We accomplish things for many distinctive objectives. When you ask somebody as to what satisfies them, it opens the door to discovering an issue that is definitely exclusively to that individual. It could be a miraculous instance for others once you bring in them to talk about their goals together with you. There are instances when you don't need to provide assistance.


text:
CHRIS POWELL: Adept judicial choices; The real wage gap
Has any group of judicial nominations in Connecticut ever been more politically adept than the 16 put forth this week by Governor Malloy?
Superior Court Judge Christine E. Keller was nominated for the Appellate Court. While she is the wife of former House Speaker Thomas D. Ritter, D-Hartford, who is now a lobbyist, she has put in 10 years as a trial judge and has handled difficult cases well.
Former state Sen. Andrew Roraback, the Goshen Republican narrowly defeated two months ago for Congress in the 5th District by Elizabeth Esty, wife of the governor's environmental protection and energy commissioner, was nominated for the Superior Court, ending a long political career with enough of a triumph that he won't be getting in the way of Esty's re-election.
Also nominated for the Superior Court were two other former state legislators, the father of a state legislator, the son of two former state legislators, the daughter of a former Democratic state chairman, and, along with the usual assistant attorney general and deputy prosecutors, two prominent and sometimes controversial but certainly able criminal defense lawyers -- Karen A. Goodrow of the Connecticut Innocence Project and Hope C. Seeley. As judges the latter two may be especially protective of civil liberty.
By the governor's explicit design the nominees will make Connecticut's judiciary, mostly white and male, more diverse, six of the 16 nominees being women and four being black or Hispanic. Of course competence remains far more important than appearances, but with this batch Malloy may have gotten both.
Unfortunately just hours before making the judicial nominations the governor offered a heap of liberal ideological posturing. He announced that the state Labor Department will study the supposed wage disparity between the sexes in Connecticut's workforce.
It is an article of liberal faith that sexual discrimination causes women to earn only 75 percent or so of what men earn in the United States. But this faith is little more than resentment that -- whether on account of biology, gender temperament, or oppression by husbands or (welfare policy having nearly destroyed marriage) boyfriends - women tend to sacrifice careers more than men do in favor of child rearing. Adjusted for this sacrifice, the wage gap mostly dissipates.
Salary discrimination is already illegal where it can be proved in specific cases. So Connecticut might address the wage gap better by removing the incentives of welfare policy for childbearing outside marriage, which is the main impediment to women's careers, having induced so many to presume to raise children alone on various government stipends before obtaining the education and skills necessary to support themselves and children.
But even after last year's record state tax increase and with another billion-dollar state budget deficit on the way, Connecticut still can't do enough to discourage the private economy. With its salary discrimination study the Malloy administration is looking to contrive cause for still more government intervention in the workplace. Connecticut probably will get rid of wage discrimination but only by driving away the remainder of the private economy.
The governor's pledge not to propose tax increases in the budget he is to present next month seems to be weakening fast. Now he and House Speaker J. Brendan Sharkey are calling another tax increase a "last resort."
That is, anyone now can safely bet his life that somehow the "last resort" of raising taxes will be reached long before, say, repeal of collective bargaining for public employee unions and binding arbitration of their contracts or even cancellation of their paid day off on Columbus Day.
In Connecticut raising taxes is never the "last resort." The "last resort" is getting enough value out of the government that it starts serving the public more than its own employees.
Chris Powell is managing editor of the Journal Inquirer in Manchester, Conn.

subset: commoncrawl