text:
Oooops. MLB Financial Statements Leaked
There's about a year-and-a-half or two years to go on the current collective bargaining agreement between Major League Baseball and its union, so soon we should begin hearing the drumbeat of competitive balance, teams losing money and the need for a salary cap (i.e. cost control for the owners).
Historically, MLBPA has pushed management to open its books and show these losses, something MLB has been loathe to do.
Well now, the financial statements from the Pirates, Marlins, Mariners, Angels and Rays have all been put out there in the ether by those rascals at Deadspin.
A lot of it is pretty opaque, at least to my non-accountant's eye, but Maury Brown has already looked at the Pirates and has begun looking at the rest of the treasure trove.
How is this Yankee-related? Well, any cost containment system is really, by default, a "Yankee tax." So, for comparison's sake, I for one hope the next round of financial data that comes out is the Yankees, or, if the Bombers brass were interested in message control and framing the debate, I'd be interested in seeing them voluntarily open their books.
Several years ago there were reports the Yankees were losing between $50 and $85 million, figures that if true and disclosed would give the Yankees a bat and ball to play with when discussions of more revenue sharing and luxury taxes come up.


text:
Sysco Corporation and each of its operating subsidiaries and affiliates adopting these terms is committed to protecting the privacy of visitors to www.Sysco.com, www.eSysco.net and to each of their respective websites (individually and collectively the "sites"). References to "Sysco", "we" and "our" are to each of Sysco Corporation and each of its operating subsidiaries and affiliates, including various redistribution centers that maintain separate web sites, that adopt the privacy policy below. References to "you" and "your" refer to the individuals visiting our sites as well as the organizations or businesses that they represent. However, when we refer to "personal information" we only mean information about an identifiable natural person, but not information concerning name, title or business address or telephone number of an employee of an organization or sole proprietorship or passwords associated with the use of eSysco or Onelink.
This is only a supplement to our Terms of Use, which is incorporated by reference and made a part of this Privacy Policy. You should consult the Terms of Use for terms and policies other than privacy relating to information that you submit. (For example, you should review Submission of Information; No Improper Use; Indemnity prior to submitting any information to us.) This Privacy Policy relates only to certain information obtained by or through our sites; it does not relate to any other information that we may collect or obtain.
Our sites may have policies specific to them concerning the use of information that you may provide through the sites or that we may obtain when you visit them. Absent a specific policy to the contrary relating to a site (which will be accessible from that site), the following policies apply to all of our sites:
1. General
In general, you can visit one of our sites without telling us who you are and without giving any personal information about yourself. There are times, however, when we or our partners or suppliers may need information from you. We try to make sure that the personally identifying information you provide us remains private. We will not sell, rent, trade or otherwise disclose the personally identifying information you provide to anyone outside of Sysco Corporation, its operating companies, except as otherwise provide in this policy or other policies relating to specific sites. However,
2. Arrangements with Third Parties
We may make information covered by this Privacy Policy available to third parties in a variety of circumstances:
3. Marketing by Us
4. Human Resources
Some of the pages associated with our sites may relate to employment opportunities or human resources. They usually will be captioned "Careers" or "Career Opportunities" or will have similar labels or captions clearly indicating the employment opportunity subject matter (the "Careers Pages") and such pages may be co-branded with third party service providers. For example, we have contracted with PeopleClick, Inc. to provide us with an Internet-based, recruitment tracking system that enables us to manage our recruitment process. PeopleClick, Inc. collects and maintains a database of applicant data and processes data for us. Any personal information that you submit through Careers Pages will be collected in the United States and will be reviewed by our employees or consultants to evaluate your qualifications and experience for job opportunities in the United States. Your personal information will not be disclosed to third parties other than PeopleClick, Inc. or other third parties who provide services to us. We will (and each of our third party service providers with access to such information, including PeopleClick, Inc., will agree with us they will) take any legally required steps to secure your personal information. We will use your personal information for recruitment purposes, and if you are offered a job or become employed by us, for other employment-related purposes. By submitting information through Careers Pages, you agree that we may use the information for recruitment and employment purposes (including transferring the data to other countries, transferring your information to other companies authorized to perform specific services, and/or other processing relevant to recruitment purposes).
Resumes should include information relevant to your employment history and education (degrees obtained, places worked, positions held, relevant awards, and so forth). We recommend that you do not disclose sensitive personal characteristics (e.g. gender, height, weight, religion, philosophical or political beliefs, financial data, marital status) in your initial resume or letters. Please note that your information will be processed and/or stored in U.S. databases. By submitting your resume, you are consenting to the export of your information to the U.S. for processing and storage.
Except where you instruct us to remove your resume, we will keep the information for other consideration. If you need to update or otherwise make changes to you resume, simply resubmit a new resume. If you wish to have your resume completely removed from our systems (or the PeopleClick system), please send an e-mail to: email@example.com. To aid us (and PeopleClick) in locating your resume, please be sure and include your name, email address and phone number as submitted with your resume.
5. Other Sites
Our sites may be linked to the web sites of others, as well as co-branded or other sites of our business partners, which may have privacy practices that differ from those at our sites. A co-branded site typically is operated by a third-party and displays the third-party's name or logo along with our name or logo. When you click on links that take you to such external or co-branded sites, you will be subject to their privacy policies. Please note that the privacy policies relating to our sites apply solely to information collected by or on behalf of us our those sites; we are not responsible for the privacy practices of third parties, including our business partners, and the uses that they may make of such information.
6. Your Consent
By accessing or using any of our sites, you consent and agree to (a) the terms and conditions set forth in this Privacy Policy, the policies that may specifically relate to the particular sites that you may visit, and the Terms of Use, all of which are an integral part hereof, and (b) the collection and use of information as described herein and therein. We may revise this Privacy Policy or the policies that may specifically apply to certain of our sites, as well as the Terms of Use, at any time by updating postings to our sites, and you agree to be bound by any such revisions in effect at the time of your accessing or use of any of our sites. Therefore, you should periodically visit our sites to determine the then current policies in effect.
More Features
You now have options to:

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Cheap Shoulder Rig Gets a Look
If you're in need of a shoulder rig for your DSLR (or video camera if you roll that way), the DSLR Film Noob has one he's been testing for awhile. Found under many names (Spider Rig, X-Rig, Movie Rig), this articulating creature can form into just about about any configuration you can come up with. Not only that, but it folds up into a small package that you can fit into your camera bag. For all the details, watch Deejay's video. He covers everything and more.
Monday, September 26, 2011
Weekly Recap Link List 9-26-11
Matthew Ramsey's PVC rig
Cam Pagan's DIY linear camera dolly
Kevin Lane's DIY camera rig
How simple changes make your camera look better
Make a monster softbox
DIY follow focus
What does a feature film for the web look like?
Emilio Jose Espinosa's DIY softbox
Bicky Bickford's PVC camera rig
Cheap flexible focus gears for your follow focus
Dom Vadino's PVC camera rig
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
What Does a Feature Film for the Web Look Like?
Here's a question: what is Film 2.0?
With my goal of making and releasing a "web feature" looming in the near future, I am beginning to question even the very nature of what that means. We all know what a traditional feature film looks like, and we can still see them in the theater, on TV, on DVD and streamed to our computer or smartphone. They are still viable forms of entertainment and creative satisfaction (with the potential for profit) for the filmmaker. So why am I worried?
I've had this nagging at the back of my brain that, for the microbudget creator, we need to do something different that hasn't really been done yet. It seems that while we acknowledge that the internet is still the Wild West with all kinds of possibilities, we still want to shoehorn old models into it. I strongly believe in a free web release of whatever project I end up making, but why should that project come from the same box that I'm trying to escape with an unorthodox release model?
In other words, if I want to try new and unusual distribution methods, shouldn't the project itself be new and unusual?
This idea makes me question everything about what I already know about filmmaking. Narrative structure. Character development. Presentation. Running time. I'm not saying I should throw everything out and reinvent the wheel. Not at all. It would not only be stupid and arrogant (who am I to say that over a hundred years of filmmaking history is wrong for the web?) but crazy. We should learn and adapt what we already know, taking the best things about story, character, training and experience and letting them inspire us to take chances and be adventurous.
Take YouTube for example. Right now, it's the best place to host content. Sure, Vimeo may look slightly better, but YouTube offers the chance to make a little money from what we are doing. You make partner and the doors of time open wide open and the profit window cracks a bit. No other service can claim this. Not only that, but the annotation feature is a creative embryo that practically dares us to do something really cool. Linking to other videos and director's commentaries is just scratching the surface. We need to scratch harder.
This begs another issue--interactivity. Give the user (again, within YouTube so you can make a little bit of money) something else to do other than watch and they won't click away (or to another point in the timeline). Keep them involved. Become a partner with them in the story. Make them part of the story. Make them the story.
Video games. Alternate Reality Gaming. Role Playing Games. Choose Your Own Adventure books. It's all interactive storytelling. What can we learn (read: "steal") from these sources?
Another important component in all this is still cost. I don't want to trash frugality. Having some grandiose idea that takes years to fund and implement is a giant step backward. Use the inexpensive tools we have at our disposal to create. We can't compete with Hollywood and big corporations, but we aren't bound by their rules and formulas, either. Make something they won't in a way they wouldn't touch and begin carving a place for yourself.
Obviously, I don't have all the answers. This is more of a rant to get us all thinking. I want to hear your ideas.
For a continued discussion on this topic, click here for part 2.
Monday, September 19, 2011
Weekly Recap Link List 9-19-11
DIY Steadicam - ladder bracket
Selling Your Film Without Selling Your Soul
Director's commentary using YouTube annotations
Unpaid crew vs. under-paid crew
DIY LED ring light
Can you hang a lav mic?
DIY shoulder rig
Small DIY camera rig
Movie of the Web: "The Waiting List"
DIY sound "pop" filter
External monitor you already have
Sheri Candler on "Selling Your Film Without Selling Your Soul"
In the Cut, part 2: A Dash of Salt
Edit your videos with YouTube
Friday, September 16, 2011
Movie of the Web: "The Waiting List"
Released by Front Ave. Productions. Comedy-drama written and directed by Mike Vogel. Featuring Teresa Decher, Amanda Englund, Bryce Flynt-Sommerville, Jayme S. Hall, Audrey Walker and Mercedes Rose. Would be rated "R" for language and adult situations. Available for free on YouTube.
A motley group of parents must spend the night in a highly-regarded preschool to insure their child's attendance. A waiting list is dictates the pecking order of who will get in and who won't. The catch: if anyone leaves, they lose their spot in line.
The Waiting List is an above-average ensemble piece that puts together an interesting mix of characters and then stirs the pot for some nice chemistry. There's the teenager Ella (Decher), who's holding a spot for her sister and may be pregnant herself. Sexy Kathryn (Englund) is the no-nonsense divorced mother who will do anything to get her daughter into the school. Ben (Flynt-Sommerville) is Kathryn's college boyfriend whose own marriage is on the rocks. Chris (Hall) is the punk of the group, who apparently has no filter between his brain and his mouth. Very pregnant Audrey (Walker) is the most experienced parent, with two kids and one one the way.
Confining all your characters in one place with nothing to do except talk could spell disaster to a lesser project, but Vogel and company are up to the challenge. An intelligent script has some great observations about parenting and human nature (what Disney characters are you attracted to?) and demonstrate a mature talent at work. The actors also do a fine job bringing their various characters to life and they are all strong enough to make me forget I was watching a movie and connect to them emotionally. When they all separate at the conclusion of the film, I was a bit sad to see them go.
While the subject matter does deal with kids, this is not a kids movie. There is profanity (I always cringe when I hear the F-bomb in the first line of dialogue) and some pretty frank adult-speak, so don't say I didn't warn you. If you find even the idea of this offensive, steer clear. To be totally honest, I felt a couple scenes did go too far, but not enough to dissuade me from a recommendation.
The film is technically strong. Vogel and his cinematographer, Brian Mohr, do a great job visually. Shots are composed well and lit properly. The editing works well. The sound is clear. Nice appropriate transition graphics help bridge scenes together. If I had any complaints, it's that some scenes remain on a wide shots too long. I really wanted to see the actor's faces better. In Vogel's commentary (see below) he explains why he did this (and one time he wish he didn't), but I cared enough to want to look them in the eye more often.
There are several traditional microbudget elements at work in The Waiting List, all of which serve the plot and save the filmmakers some money. There is one main location (an actual preschool, so production design was built in). The time frame is short (one 24 hour period) which means only one costume per character. The running time is a tight 80 minutes and doesn't overstay its welcome. These "limits" work well together and demonstrate the potential of our medium.
Vogel has also put some things into place that take advantage of web delivery. The first is releasing on YouTube. Anyone with a computer or smartphone screen can watch The Waiting List. Nothing frustrates me more than reading about an interesting film, then learning that I can't see it anywhere because it's playing in an obscure festival somewhere waiting for a distribution deal. Vogel made the film very accessible and I applaud him for that.
The other thing he's done is taken advantage of YouTube annotations and created a text-based director's commentary. I've seen these on DVDs that utilize a subtitle track, but Mike's film is the first I've seen to do the same on YouTube. It's entertaining, educational and fun. It makes the movie that much better and adds a nice level of re-playability.
So, if you're looking for an entertaining movie this weekend and don't mind the more adult-oriented content, check out The Waiting List. It's a solid film that transcends it's microbudget roots and involves you in the story and characters, especially if you have kids of your own. It's well worth your viewing time that you "can never get back".
If you like this film, be sure to check out Mike Vogel's blog and his YouTube channel. There is a lot more that he has done (and is working on) that should please anyone satisfied with this movie. Especially good is a web series called Did You Cast Anyone? which was used to crowdfund his latest project, Did You Kiss Anyone? Very funny stuff, especially if you are an actor or director.
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
Can You Hang a Lav Mic?
I'm a little late on this one (Dave posted it last week), but it's still a good video and worth noting. This time Knoptop takes Quick FX in an audio direction, testing the theory that you can hang an inexpensive lav mic and get better sound than the normal position on clothing. He gets this from the stage, where actors typically get the ol' "mic on the forehead" trick which Dave sort of replicates here.
It's an interesting experiment, but I think this proves that below the mouth is still the best position for a lav. Actually, I think it sounds better mostly because it's closer to the mouth than the hung version. Even when hidden under the hairline, the mic has less distance to the mouth then when suspended just above the frame. That's one "secret" of good audio. Get the mic as close to the speaker's mouth as possible, no matter where the mic may be.
Monday, September 12, 2011
Weekly Recap Link List 9-12-11
DIY motion control dolly
Variable filter ND comparison
Small DIY camera rig
DIY camera rig
Episode workflow
Free camera stabilizer
3D rig
What is a scissor clamp?
"Bad is Bad" - A rather good full length feature on Vimeo for FREE
Twitter tips for crowdfunders
Adjustable tripod mount for your field recorder
Poor man's painter pole adapter
DIY camera rig on location
Thursday, September 8, 2011
What is a Scissor Clamp?
Knoptop has a new segment! Departing slightly from his Quick FX format, Dave shares with us things we didn't know, we didn't know. In this first episode, he shows us what a scissor clamp does and how we can hang lights from it. Okay, you have to have "real" lights for this to work (my hacked work lights won't cut it here), but if you didn't know you could hang lights from a drop ceiling, now you do.
Wednesday, September 7, 2011
Episode Workflow
After a barrage of emails asking me all kinds of different questions about various tidbits concerning the show, I get proactive. Today's episode is about my episode process and what goes into it. If you can't find anything you want to emulate here, consider it a lesson in things you don't want to do.
Camstudio screen capture software
Exporting with Vegas for Vimeo HD
Tuesday, September 6, 2011
Variable ND Filter Comparison
The DSLR Film Noob returns with a valuable side-by-side of two variable ND filters in different price ranges. A basic ND filter will restrict the amount of light entering your camera, relieving your aperture to do other things (like adjust depth of field). These come in different levels of light restriction, which means you have to unscrew and screw them on to adjust the amount of light you want coming in.
A variable ND filter lets you make these changes on the fly. One variable filter handles the same job as three normal ones. You pay for this convenience, but it it is handy. Deejay gives us the skinny on how well the cheap version holds up to the more expensive one.
Monday, September 5, 2011
Weekly Recap Link List 9-5-11
Frugal Filmmaker Retail Resources
Wacom's new "inkling" looks mighty handy for storyboarding
Z Yar Khan's DIY dead cat
Litepanels is trying to block the sale of LED photo/video lighting in the US
Not caring
DIY dolly
Alaska Filmmakers - Series 2 (Kickstarter campaign)
DIY ultimate vlogging rig


text:
Accidental Rep Theater Presents ADAMS' APPLES, Closes 6/5
The Accidental Repertory Theater's (ART) production of ADAMS' APPLES inspired by Chekhov's CHERRY ORCHARD, written and directed by John Strasberg and being presented at the Living Theatre, will close on June 5, 2011. Tickets can be purchased at SmartTix.com or by calling (212) 868-4444. The Living Theatre is located at 21 Clinton Street, between East Houston and Stanton in NYC.ADAMS' APPLES, inspired by THE CHERRY ORCHARD, honors Chekhov's spirit of writing about contemporary life and people in the world around him. The Adams are characters of today with the attitudes, beliefs, and problems that affect us all -- problems of our economy, the environment, questions about what we mean by success and freedom and whether they are more than material success, greed, and license. The times change, but the questions are the same. What is success? What rules the world, power or love? Can they co-exist in a healthy way? In ADAMS' APPLES every character wants love, and is afraid of not finding it. Audiences familiar with THE CHERRY ORCHARD will recognize the roots of ADAMS' APPLES as they bec! ome involved in the lives and problems of our contemporary characters. And, those who aren't familiar with "The Cherry Orchard" will encounter a play filled with humor, truth, and the comedy and tragedy that make our lives what they are. Director/Writer John Strasberg's international career continues the artistic tradition of the Strasberg family. He co-founded the Mirror Repertory Company where he directed, PARADISE LOST by Clifford Odets, INHERITORS by Susan Glaspell, RAIN, VIVAT! VIVAT! REGINA!, and Ibsen's GHOSTS, working with artists like Geraldine Page, whom he met at the Actors' Studio, where he worked alongside her, Paul Newman and JoAnne Woodward, Al Pacino, Marilyn Monroe, Dustin Hoffman, Robert DeNiro, Harvey Keitel, and Elia Kazan. He also co-directed ALICE IN WONDERLAND on Broadway with Eva LeGallienne. He has conceived, designed, and directed productions of Pirandello, Ibsen, O'Neill, Lope De Vega, and Beckett, among others. In Europe, productions included Shakespeare's RICHARD III, Aristophanes, THE ASSEMBLYWOMEN, in S! pain, the latter as a musical play for the Festival de Merida, and CYRANO DE BERGERAC by Edmund Rostand. The John Strasberg Studios is an international center for creative development and theater arts research which opened in New York in 1996. His first book is entitled Accidentally On Purpose: Reflections on Life, Acting and the Nine Natural Laws of Creativity. A documentary, Accidentally On Purpose, won Best Education Documentary at the Los Angeles International Independent Film Festival in 2000. Accidental Repertory Theater(ART) was founded in 2005 by Artistic Director John Strasberg as a practical expression of the Organic Creative Process. Weekly professional workshops are a key component of the company, providing an opportunity for each participant to work on his or her creative process and to establish a common vocabulary and way of working. Past works by the company include BRECHT ON BRECHT, Ibsen's A DOLL'S HOUSE, as well as a contemporary version of the play called PLAYING HOUSE. ART produced two works for its Arts-In-Education outreach: The WORLD OF WRITERS (WOW) series, Tennessee Williams: THE WRITER AND HIS WORLD, based on the plays and letters of Tennessee Williams and his mother, EdwIna Williams; and STORY TRAIN, an Arts-In-Education residency, developed by working with NYC public school second graders to develop their own ! theater presentations based on New York City landmarks. Both works are available to schools and libraries throughout the tri-state area. For more information visit www.accidentalrep.org.


text:
Last night's Bulls-Magic game was a three-overtime thriller marked by plenty of big shots, but it would just have been a standard 101-99 Bulls win if not for Jameer Nelson and his big balls. Here we see Nelson tying the game with a jumper in the closing seconds of the fourth quarter, and then hitting us with the classic Sam Cassell.
Nelson is the first player to bust out this particular celebration since Marco Belinelli did it last May. Nelson's a bit more committed to the gesture than Belinelli was, which is appreciated, although it will likely earn him a larger fine than the $15,000 the league slapped Belinelli with. Maybe Nelson will reach the $25,000 mark, which is the amount Eddie House earned after brandishing his fake nuts with serious gusto in 2011.
If NBA players have taught us one thing over the years, it's that no amount of monetary punishment can keep them from doing the big balls dance, and we dig that. The big balls dance is great. Long live the big balls dance.