text:
Less is more when it comes to designing a front garden, writes Justin Newcombe.
How much time do you spend at the front of your property? You probably just drive up the road, pull into your driveway, maybe pause to check the mail for the letter congratulating you on your incredibly good fortune because you are the winner of $10 million and to "qualify" you just need to invest in an Albanian Government-approved pyramid scheme. The rest is just bank statements, Inland Revenue letters and parking fines. I'm always surprised just how much of it the snails in my letterbox can eat.
Back to the smart front, the point is you don't spend very much time at all looking at the front of your house from the street and nor does anybody else. If someone did spend more than a minute or two looking at the front of your house, you'd probably take down their rego as a precaution.
Which leads me to the design of the front yard. How much garden can we take in during the 10 seconds or so of cursory glance that form first impressions, street appeal or what the Yanks call "kerb culture"? No matter what your tastes, life philosophy or budget, your front garden is what represents your property - even if the rest of it is an unholy mess. In my case I'm guilty of being a winter garden sloth, so this year the unholy mess basically started at the front and, as far as I could tell when I bothered to look, went right to the back. There are some nice plants in the front of my place and the fence still looks okay. Although, to rub salt into the wound, just as I began writing this story my fence was tagged.
The thing that is missing is good continuity. It is all a bit directionless, as over the years I have just banged in a few plants here and there. Quite honestly, it looked like it. Remedying this unfortunate state of affairs has required me to take stock and apply my top five front yard or "kerb culture" tips to myself.
1. Less is more.
When creating street appeal, the person viewing your property doesn't have a lot of time to take in the information in front of them. It is important that they view the garden as complete, so having lots of different plants as eye candy or different materials thrown in is distracting. Your front garden will look ... wait for it ... distracted. On the other hand, a restricted plant choice with maybe one hard landscape material is easy to "get", giving the viewer a sense of coherence.
2. Clean lines are easy and quick to evaluate, again adding to the sense of coherence.
There are plenty of examples of seemingly random elements looking quite good from the roadfront. But look more closely and I'll bet you'll find the best examples of these have some sort of logic or linear sequence, which makes them stand out as "well designed".
3. Work with the surrounding landscape.
This is an excellent way to develop ideas and tie your property into its environment. Look for materials and plants that appeal and think about the geography of your property. If you're near the beach, look for plantings or materials that complement the natural plants you see around you.
4. Be realistic about maintenance.
No matter how good your ideas are, if your good idea has gone bad it looks like a bad idea. My main problem has always been weeds, so I've applied a huge amount of mulch over cardboard to suppress them. To keep in the mulch, I built a small retaining wall to hold back the mulch.
5. Be practical first and decorative second.
The best place to start is with the practical things. If you solve things like maintenance, access and privacy, you can dress up your section in any way you want. What you will end up with is a front garden that is that is functional as well as appealing.


text:
ZANOBI: I believe it is well, since the discussion ought to be changed, that Battista take up his office, and I resign mine; and in this case we would come to imitate the good Captains, according as I have already learned here from the Lord, who place the best soldiers in the front and in the rear of the Army, as it appears necessary to them to have those who bravely enkindle the battle, and those in the rear who bravely sustain it. Cosimo, therefore, begun this discussion prudently, and Battista will prudently finish it. Luigi and I have come in between these. And as each one of us has taken up his part willingly, so too I believe Battista is about to close it.
BATTISTA: I have allowed myself to be governed up to now, so too I will allow myself (to be governed) in the future. Be content, therefore, (my) Lords, to continue your discussions, and if we interrupt you with these questions (practices), you have to excuse us.
FABRIZIO: You do me, as I have already told you, a very great favor, since these interruptions of yours do not take away my imagination, rather they refresh it. But if we want to pursue our subject I say, that it is now time that we quarter this Army of ours, since you know that everything desires repose, and safety; since to repose oneself, and not to repose safely, is not complete (perfect) repose. I am afraid, indeed, that you should not desire that I should first quarter them, then had them march, and lastly to fight, and we have done the contrary. Necessity has led us to this, for in wanting to show when marching, how an army turns from a marching formation to that of battle, it was necessary first to show how they were organized for battle. But returning to our subject I say, that if you want the encampment to be safe, it must be Strong and Organized. The industry of the Captain makes it organized: Arts or the site make it Strong. The Greeks sought strong locations, and never took positions where there was neither grottoes (caves), or banks of rivers, or a multitude of trees, or other natural cover which should protect them. But the Romans did not encamp safely so much from the location as by arts, nor ever made an encampment in places where they should not have been able to spread out all their forces, according to their discipline. From this resulted that the Romans were always able to have one form of encampment, for they wanted the site to obey them, and not they the site. The Greeks were not able to observe this, for as they obeyed the site, and the sites changing the formation, it behooved them that they too should change the mode of encamping and the form of their encampment. The Romans, therefore, where the site lacked strength, supplied it with (their) art and industry. And since in this narration of mine, I have wanted that the Romans be imitated, I will not depart from their mode of encamping, not, however, observing all their arrangements: but taking (only) that part which at the present time seems appropriate to me. I have often told you that the Romans had two Legions of Roman men in their consular armies, which comprised some eleven thousand infantry of forces sent by friends (allies) to aid them; but they never had more foreign soldiers in their armies than Romans, except for cavalry, which they did not care if they exceeded the number in their Legions; and that in every action of theirs, they place the Legions in the center, and the Auxiliaries on the sides. Which method they observed even when they encamped, as you yourselves have been able to read in those who write of their affairs; and therefore I am not about to narrate in detail how they encamped, but will tell you only how I would at present arrange to encamp my army, and then you will know what part of the Roman methods I have treated. You know that at the encounter of two Roman Legions I have taken two Battalions of six thousand infantry and three hundred cavalry effective for each Battalion, and I have divided them by companies, by arms, and names. You know that in organizing the army for marching and fighting, I have not made mention of other forces, but have only shown that in doubling the forces, nothing else had to be done but to double the orders (arrangements).
Since at present I want to show you the manner of encamping, it appears proper to me not to stay only with two Battalions, but to assemble a fair army, and composed like the Roman of two Battalions and as many auxiliary forces. I know that the form of an encampment is more perfect, when a complete army is quartered: which matter did not appear necessary to me in the previous demonstration. If I want, therefore, to quarter a fair (sized) army of twenty four thousand infantry and two thousand cavalry effectives, being divided into four companies, two of your own forces and two of foreigners, I would employ this method. When I had found the site where I should want to encamp, I would raise the Captain's flag, and around it I would draw a square which would have each face distant from it fifty arm lengths, of which each should look out on one of the four regions of the sky, that is, east, west, south and north, in which space I would put the quarters of the Captain. And as I believe it prudent, and because thus the Romans did in good part, I would divide the armed men from the unarmed, and separate the men who carry burdens from the unburdened ones. I would quarter all or a greater part of the armed men on the east side, and the unarmed and burdened ones on the west side, making the east the front and the west the rear of the encampment, and the south and north would be the flanks. And to distinguish the quarters of the armed men, I would employ this method. I would run a line from the Captain's flag, and would lead it easterly for a distance of six hundred eighty (680) arm lengths. I would also run two other lines which I would place in the middle of it, and be of the same length as the former, but distant from each of them by fifteen arm lengths, at the extremity of which, I would want the east gate to be (placed): and the space which exists between the two extreme (end) lines, I would make a road that would go from the gate to the quarters of the Captain, which would be thirty arm lengths in width and six hundred thirty (630) long ((since the Captain's quarters would occupy fifty arm lengths)) and call this the Captain's Way. I would then make another road from the south gate up to the north gate, and cross by the head of the Captain's Way, and along the east side of the Captain's quarters which would be one thousand two hundred fifty (1250) arm lengths long ((since it would occupy the entire width of the encampment)) and also be thirty arm lengths wide and be called the Cross Way. The quarters of the Captain and these two roads having been designed, therefore the quarters of the two battalions of your own men should begin to be designed; and I would quarter one on the right hand (side) of the Captain's Way, and one on the left. And hence beyond the space which is occupied by the width of the Cross Way, I would place thirty two quarters on the left side of the Captain's Way, and thirty two on the right side, leaving a space of thirty arm lengths between the sixteenth and seventeenth quarters which should serve as a transverse road which should cross through all of the quarters of the battalions, as will be seen in their partitioning. Of these two arrangements of quarters, in the first tents that would be adjacent to the Cross Way, I would quarter the heads of men-at-arms, and since each company has one hundred and fifty men-at-arms, there would be assigned ten men-at-arms to each of the quarters. The area (space) of the quarters of the Heads should be forty arm lengths wide and ten arm lengths long. And it is to be noted that whenever I say width, I mean from south to north, and when I say length, that from west to east. Those of the men-at-arms should be fifteen arm lengths long and thirty wide. In the next fifteen quarters which in all cases are next ((which should have their beginning across the transverse road, and which would have the same space as those of the men-at-arms)) I would quarter the light cavalry, which, since they are one hundred fifty, ten cavalrymen would be assigned to each quarter, and in the sixteenth which would be left, I would quarter their Head, giving him the same space which is given to the Head of men-at-arms. And thus the quarters of the cavalry of the two battalions would come to place the Captain's Way in the center and give a rule for the quarters of the infantry, as I will narrate. You have noted that I have quartered the three hundred cavalry of each battalion with their heads in thirty two quarters situated on the Captain's Way, and beginning with the Cross Way, and that from the sixteenth to the seventeenth there is a space of thirty arm lengths to make a transverse road. If I want, therefore, to quarter the twenty companies which constitute the two regular Battalions, I would place the quarters of every two companies behind the quarters of the cavalry, each of which should be fifteen arm lengths long and thirty wide, as those of the cavalry, and should be joined on the rear where they touch one another. And in every first quarter of each band that fronts on the Cross Way, I would quarter the Constable of one company, which would come to correspond with the quartering of the Head of the men-at-arms: and their quarters alone would have a space twenty arm lengths in width and ten in length. And in the other fifteen quarters in each group which follow after this up the Transverse Way, I would quarter a company of infantry on each side, which, as they are four hundred fifty, thirty would be assigned to each quarter. I would place the other fifteen quarters contiguous in each group to those of the cavalry with the same space, in which I would quarter a company of infantry from each group. In the last quarter of each group I would place the Constable of the company, who would come to be adjacent to the Head of the light cavalry, with a space of ten arm lengths long and twenty wide. And thus these first two rows of quarters would be half of cavalry and half of infantry.
And as I want ((as I told you in its place)) these cavalry to be all effective, and hence without retainers who help taking care of the horses or other necessary things, I would want these infantry quartered behind the cavalry should be obligated to help the owners (of the horses) in providing and taking care of them, and because of this should be exempt from other activities of the camp, which was the manner observed by the Romans. I would also leave behind these quarters on all sides a space of thirty arm lengths to make a road, and I would call one of the First Road on the right hand (side) and the other the First Road on the left, and in each area I would place another row of thirty two double quarters which should face one another on the rear, with the same spaces as those which I have mentioned, and also divided at the sixteenth in the same manner to create a Transverse Road, in which I would quarter in each area four companies of infantry with the Constables in the front at the head and foot (of each row). I would also leave on each side another space of thirty arm lengths to create a road which should be called the Second Road on the right hand (side) and on the other side the Second Road to the left; I would place another row in each area of thirty two double quarters, with the same distances and divisions, in which I would quarter on every side four companies (of infantry) with their Constables. And thus there would come to be quartered in three rows of quarters per area the cavalry and the companies (of infantry) of the two regular battalions, in the center of which I would place the Captain's Way. The two battalions of auxiliaries ((since I had them composed of the same men)) I would quarter on each side of these two regular battalions with the same arrangement of double quarters, placing first a row of quarters in which I should quarter half with cavalry and half infantry, distant thirty arm lengths from each other, to create two roads which I should call, one the Third Road on the right hand (side), the other the Third on the left hand. And then I would place on each side two other rows of quarters, separate but arranged in the same way, which are those of the regular battalions, which would create two other roads, and all of these would be called by the number and the band (side) where they should be situated. So that all this part of the Army would come to be quartered in twelve rows of double quarters, and on thirteen roads, counting the Captain's Way and the Cross Way.
I would want a space of one hundred arm lengths all around left between the quarters and the ditch (moat). And if you count all those spaces, you will see, that from the middle of the quarters of the Captain to the east gate, there are seven hundred arm lengths. There remains to us now two spaces, of which one is from the quarters of the Captain to the south gate, the other from there to the north gate, each of which comes to be, measuring from the center point, six hundred thirty five (635) arm lengths. I then subtract from each of these spaces fifty arm lengths which the quarters of the Captain occupies, and forty five arm lengths of plaza which I want to give to each side, and thirty arm lengths of road, which divides each of the mentioned spaces in the middle, and a hundred arm lengths which are left on each side between the quarters and the ditch, and there remains in each area a space left for quarters four hundred arm lengths wide and a hundred long, measuring the length to include the space occupied by the Captain's quarters. Dividing the said length in the middle, therefore, there would be on each side of the Captain forty quarters fifty arm lengths long and twenty wide, which would total eighty quarters, in which would be quartered the general Heads of the battalions, the Chamberlains, the Masters of the camps, and all those who should have an office (duty) in the army, leaving some vacant for some foreigners who might arrive, and for those who should fight through the courtesy of the Captain. On the rear side of the Captain's quarters, I would create a road thirty arm lengths wide from north to south, and call it the Front Road, which would come to be located along the eighty quarters mentioned, since this road and the Cross Way would have between them the Captain's quarters and the eighty quarters on their flanks. From this Front road and opposite to the Captain's quarters, I would create another road which should go from there to the west gate, also thirty arm lengths wide, and corresponding in location and length to the Captain's Way, and I should call it the Way of the Plaza. These two roads being located, I would arrange the plaza where the market should be made, which I would place at the head of the Way of the Plaza, opposite to the Captain's quarters, and next to the Front Road, and would want it to be square, and would allow it a hundred twenty one arm lengths per side. And from the right hand and left hand of the said plaza, I would make two rows of quarters, and each row have eight double quarters, which would take up twelve arm lengths in length and thirty in width so that they should be on each side of the plaza, in which there would be sixteen quarters, and total thirty two all together, in which I would quarter that cavalry left over from the auxiliary battalions, and if this should not be enough, I would assign them some of the quarters about the Captain, and especially those which face the ditch.
It remains for us now to quarter the extraordinary pikemen and Veliti, which every battalion has; which you know, according to our arrangement, in addition to the ten companies (of infantry), each has a thousand extraordinary pikemen, and five hundred Veliti; so that each of the two regular battalions have two thousand extraordinary pikemen, and a thousand extraordinary pikemen, and five hundred Veliti; so that each of the two regular battalions have two thousand extraordinary pikemen, and a thousand extraordinary Veliti, and the auxiliary as many as they; so that one also comes to have to quarter six thousand infantry, all of whom I would quarter on the west side along the ditches. From the point, therefore, of the Front Road, and northward, leaving the space of a hundred arm lengths from those (quarters) to the ditch, I would place a row of five double quarters which would be seventy five arm lengths long and sixty in width: so that with the width divided, each quarters would be allowed fifteen arm lengths for length and thirty for width. And as there would be ten quarters, I would quarter three hundred infantry, assigning thirty infantry to each quarters. Leaving then a space of thirty one arm lengths, I would place another row of five double quarters in a similar manner and with similar spaces, and then another, so that there would be five rows of five double quarters, which would come to be fifty quarters placed in a straight line on the north side, each distant one hundred arm lengths from the ditches, which would quarter one thousand five hundred infantry. Turning then on the left hand side toward the west gate, I would want in all that tract between them and the said gate, five other rows of double quarters, in a similar manner and with the same spaces, ((it is true that from one row to the other there would not be more than fifteen arm lengths of space)) in which there would also be quartered a thousand five hundred infantry: and thus from the north gate to that on the west, following the ditches, in a hundred quarters, divided into ten rows of five double quarters per row, the extraordinary pikemen and Veliti of the regular battalions would be quartered. And so, too, from the west gate to that on the south, following the ditches, in exactly the same manner, in another ten rows of ten quarters per row, the extraordinary pikemen and Veliti of the auxiliary battalions would be quartered. Their Heads, or rather their Constables, could take those quarters on the side toward the ditches which appeared most convenient for themselves.
I would dispose the artillery all along the embankments of the ditches: and in all the other space remaining toward the west, I would quarter all the unarmed men and all the baggage (impedimenta) of the Camp. And it has to be understood that under this name of impedimenta ((as you know)) the ancients intended all those carriages (wagons) and all those things which are necessary to an Army, except the soldiers; as are carpenters (wood workers), smiths, blacksmiths, shoe makers, engineers, and bombardiers, and others which should be placed among the number of the armed: herdsmen with their herds of castrated sheep and oxen, which are used for feeding the Army: and in addition, masters of every art (trade), together with public wagons for the public provisions of food and arms. And I would not particularly distinguish their quarters: I would only designate the roads that should not be occupied by them. Then the other spaces remaining between the roads, which would be four, I would assign in general to all the impedimenta mentioned, that is, one to the herdsmen, another to Artificers and workmen, another to the public wagons for provisions, and the fourth to the armorers. The roads which I would want left unoccupied would be the Way of the Plaza, the Front Road, and in addition, a road that should be called the Center Road, which should take off at the north and proceed toward the south, and pass through the center of the Way of the Plaza, which, on the west side, should have the same effect as has the Transverse Road on the east side. And in addition to this a Road that should go around the rear along the quarters of the extraordinary pikemen and Veliti. And all these roads should be thirty arm lengths wide. And I would dispose the artillery along the ditches on the rear of the camp.
BATTISTA: I confess I do not understand, and I also do not believe that to say so makes me ashamed, as this is not my profession. None the less, I like this organization very much: I would want only that you should resolve these doubts for me. The one, why you make the roads and the spaces around the quarters so wide. The other, which annoys me more, is this, how are these spaces that you designate for quarters to be used.
FABRIZIO: You know that I made all the roads thirty arm lengths wide, so that a company of infantry is able to go through them in order (formation): which, if you remember well, I told you that each of these (formations) were twenty five to thirty arm lengths wide. The space between the ditch and the quarters, which is a hundred arm lengths wide, is necessary, since the companies and the artillery can be handled here, through which booty is taken, (and) when space is needed into which to retire, new ditches and embankments are made. The quarters very distant from the ditches are better, for they are more distant from the fires and other things that might be able to draw the enemy to attack them. As to the second question, my intention is not that every space designated by me is covered by only one pavilion, but is to be used as an all-round convenience for those who are quartered, with several or few tents, so long as they do not go outside its limits. And in designing these quarters, the men must be most experienced and excellent architects, who, as soon as the Captain has selected the site, know how to give it form, and divide it, and distinguishing the roads, dividing the quarters with cords and hatchets in such a practical manner, that they might be divided and arranged quickly. And if confusion is not to arise, the camp must always face the same way, so that everyone will know on which Road and in which space he has to find his quarters. And this ought to be observed at all times, in every place, and in a manner that it appears to be a movable City, which, wherever it goes, brings with it the same roads, the same houses, and the same appearance: which cannot be observed by those men who, seeking strong locations, have to change the form according to the variations in the sites. But the Romans made the places strong with ditches, ramparts, and embankments, for they placed a space around the camp, and in front of it they dug a ditch and ordinarily six arm lengths wide and three deep, which spaces they increased according to the (length of) time they resided in the one place, and according as they feared the enemy. For myself, I would not at present erect a stockade (rampart), unless I should want to winter in a place. I would, however, dig the ditch and embankment, not less than that mentioned, but greater according to the necessity. With respect to the artillery, on every side of the encampment, I would have a half circle ditch, from which the artillery should be able to batter on the flanks whoever should come to attack the moats (ditches). The soldiers ought also to be trained in this practice of knowing how to arrange an encampment, and work with them so they may aid him in designing it, and the soldiers quick in knowing their places. And none of these is difficult, as will be told in its proper place. For now I want to pass on to the protection of the camp, which, without the distribution (assignment) of guards, all the other efforts would be useless.
BATTISTA: Before you pass on to the guards, I would want you to tell me, what methods are employed when others want to place the camp near the enemy, for I do not know whether there is time to be able to organize it without danger.
FABRIZIO: You have to know this, that no Captain encamps near the enemy, unless he is disposed to come to an engagement whenever the enemy wants; and if the others are so disposed, there is no danger except the ordinary, since two parts of the army are organized to make an engagement, while the other part makes the encampment. In cases like this, the Romans assigned this method of fortifying the quarters to the Triari, while the Principi and the Astati remained under arms. They did this, because the Triari, being the last to combat, were in time to leave the work if the enemy came, and take up their arms and take their places. If you want to imitate the Romans, you have to assign the making of the encampment to that company which you would want to put in the place of the Triari in the last part of the army.
But let us return to the discussion of the guards. I do not seem to find in connection with the ancients guarding the camp at night, that they had guards outside, distant from the ditches, as is the custom today, which they call the watch. I believe I should do this, when I think how the army could be easily deceived, because of the difficulty which exists in checking (reviewing) them, for they may be corrupted or attacked by the enemy, so that they judged it dangerous to trust them entirely or in part. And therefore all the power of their protection was within the ditches, which they dug with very great diligence and order, punishing capitally anyone who deviated from such an order. How this was arranged by them, I will not talk to you further in order not to tire you, since you are able to see it by yourselves, if you have not seen it up to now. I will say only briefly what would be done by me. I would regularly have a third of the army remain armed every night, and a fourth of them always on foot, who would be distributed throughout the embankments and all the places of the army, with double guards posted at each of its squares, where a part should remain, and a part continually go from one side of the encampment to the other. And this arrangement I describe, I would also observe by day if I had the enemy near. As to giving it a name, and renewing it every night, and doing the other things that are done in such guarding, since they are things (already) known, I will not talk further of them. I would only remind you of a most important matter, and by observing it do much good, by not observing it do much evil; which is, that great diligence be used as to who does not lodge within the camp at night, and who arrives there anew. And this is an easy matter, to review who is quartered there, with those arrangements we have designated, since every quarter having a predetermined number of men, it is an easy thing to see if there are any men missing or if any are left over; and when they are missing without permission, to punish them as fugitives, and if they are left over, to learn who they are, what they know, and what are their conditions. Such diligence results in the enemy not being able to have correspondence with your Heads, and not to have co-knowledge of your counsels. If this had not been observed with diligence by the Romans, Claudius Nero could not, when he had Hannibal near to him, have departed from the encampment he had in Lucania, and go and return from the Marches, without Hannibal having been aware of it. But it is not enough to make these good arrangements, unless they are made to be observed by great security, for there is nothing that wants so much observance as any required in the army. Therefore, the laws for their enforcement should be harsh and hard, and the executor very hard. The Roman punished with the capital penalty whoever was missing from the guard, whoever abandoned the place given him in combat, whoever brought anything concealed from outside the encampment; if anyone should tell of having performed some great act in battle, and should not have done it; if anyone should have fought except at the command of the Captain, if anyone from fear had thrown aside his arms. And if it occurred that an entire Cohort or an entire Legion had made a similar error, in order that they not all be put to death, they put their names in a purse, and drew the tenth part, and those they put to death. Which penalty was so carried out, that if everyone did not hear of it, they at least feared it. And because where there are severe punishments, there also ought to be rewards, so that men should fear and hope at the same time, they proposed rewards for every great deed; such as to him who, during the fighting, saved the life of one of its citizens, to whoever first climbed the walls of enemy towns, to whoever first entered the encampment of the enemy, to whoever in battle wounded or killed an enemy, to whoever had thrown him from his horse. And thus any act of virtu was recognized and rewarded by the Consuls, and publicly praised by everyone: and those who received gifts for any of these things, in addition to the glory and fame they acquired among the soldiers, when they returned to their country, exhibited them with solemn pomp and with great demonstrations among their friends and relatives. It is not to marvel therefore, if that people acquired so much empire, when they had so great an observance of punishment and reward toward them, which operated either for their good or evil, should merit either praise or censure; it behooves us to observe the greater part of these things. And it does not appear proper for me to be silent on a method of punishment observed by them, which was, that as the miscreant was convicted before the Tribune or the Consul, he was struck lightly by him with a rod: after which striking of the criminal, he was allowed to flee, and all the soldiers allowed to kill him, so that immediately each of them threw stones or darts, or hit him with other arms, of a kind from which he went little alive, and rarely returned to camp; and to such that did return to camp, he was not allowed to return home except with so much inconvenience and ignominy, that it was much better for him to die. You see this method almost observed by the Swiss, who have the condemned publicly put to death by the other soldiers. Which is well considered and done for the best, for if it is desired that one be not a defender of a criminal, the better remedy that is found, is to make him the punisher of him (the criminal); for in some respects he favors him while from other desires he longs for his punishment, if he himself is the executioner, than if the execution is carried out by another. If you want, therefore, that one is not to be favored in his mistakes by a people, a good remedy is to see to it that the public judged him. In support of this, the example of Manlius Capitol that can be cited, who, when he was accused by the Senate, was defended so much by the public up to the point where it no longer became the judge: but having become arbiter of his cause, condemned him to death. It is, therefore, a method of punishing this, of doing away with tumults, and of having justice observed. And since in restraining armed men, the fear of laws, or of men, is not enough, the ancients added the authority of God: and, therefore, with very great ceremony, they made their soldiers swear to observe the military discipline, so that if they did the contrary, they not only had to fear the laws and men, but God; and they used every industry to fill them with Religion.
BATTISTA: Did the Romans permit women to be in their armies, or that they indulge in indolent games that are used to day?
FABRIZIO: They prohibited both of them, and this prohibition was not very difficult, because the exercises which they gave each day to the soldiers were so many, sometimes being occupied all together, sometimes individually, that no time was left to them to think either of Venery, or of games, or of other things which make soldiers seditious and useless.
BATTISTA: I like that. But tell me, when the army had to take off, what arrangements did they have?
FABRIZIO: The captain's trumpet was sounded three times: at the first sound the tents were taken down and piled into heaps, at the second they loaded the burdens, and at the third they moved in the manner mentioned above, with the impedimenta behind, the armed men on every side, placing the Legions in the center. And, therefore, you would have to have a battalion of auxiliaries move, and behind it its particular impedimenta, and with those the fourth part of the public impedimenta, which would be all those who should be quartered in one of those (sections of the camp) which we showed a short while back. And, therefore, it would be well to have each one of them assigned to a battalion, so that when the army moved, everyone would know where his place was in marching. And every battalion ought to proceed on its way in this fashion with its own impedimenta, and with a quarter of the public (impedimenta) at its rear, as we showed the Roman army marched.
BATTISTA: In placing the encampment, did they have other considerations than those you mentioned?
FABRIZIO: I tell you again, that in their encampments, the Romans wanted to be able to employ the usual form of their method, in the observance of which, they took no other consideration. But as to other considerations, they had two principal ones: the one, to locate themselves in a healthy place: to locate themselves where the enemy should be unable to besiege them, and cut off their supply of water and provisions. To avoid this weakness, therefore, they avoided marshy places, or exposure to noxious winds. They recognized these, not so much from the characteristics of the site, but from the looks of the inhabitants: and if they saw them with poor color, or short winded, or full of other infections, they did not encamp there. As to the other part of not being besieged, the nature of the place must be considered, where the friends are, and where the enemy, and from these make a conjecture whether or not you can be besieged. And, therefore, the Captain must be very expert concerning sites of the countries, and have around him many others who have the same expertness. They also avoided sickness and hunger so as not to disorganize the army; for if you want to keep it healthy, you must see to it that the soldiers sleep under tents, that they are quartered, where there are trees to create shade, where there is wood to cook the food, and not to march in the heat. You need, therefore, to consider the encampment the day before you arrive there, and in winter guard against marching in the snow and through ice without the convenience of making a fire, and not lack necessary clothing, and not to drink bad water. Those who get sick in the house, have them taken care of by doctors; for a captain has no remedy when he has to fight both sickness and the enemy. But nothing is more useful in maintaining an army healthy than exercise: and therefore the ancients made them exercise every day. Whence it is seen how much exercise is of value, for in the quarters it keeps you healthy, and in battle it makes you victorious. As to hunger, not only is it necessary to see that the enemy does not impede your provisions, but to provide whence you are to obtain them, and to see that those you have are not lost. And, therefore, you must always have provisions (on hand) for the army for a month, and beyond that to tax the neighboring friends that they provide you daily, keep the provisions in a strong place, and, above all, dispense it with diligence, giving each one a reasonable measure each day, and so observe this part that they do not become disorganized; for every other thing in war can be overcome with time, this only with time overcomes you. Never make anyone your enemy, who, while seeking to overcome you with the sword (iron), can overcome you by hunger, because if such a victory is not as honorable, it is more secure and more certain. That army, therefore, cannot escape hunger which does not observe justice, and licentiously consume whatever it please, for one evil causes the provisions not to arrive, and the other that when they arrive, they are uselessly consumed: therefore the ancients arranged that what was given was eaten, and in the time they assigned, so that no soldier ate except when the Captain did. Which, as to being observed by the modern armies, everyone does (the contrary), and deservedly they cannot be called orderly and sober as the ancients, but licentious and drunkards.
BATTISTA: You have said in the beginning of arranging the encampment, that you did not want to stay only with two battalions, but took up four, to show how a fair (sized) army was quartered. Therefore I would want you to tell me two things: the one, if I have more or less men, how should I quarter them: the other, what number of soldiers would be enough to fight against any enemy?
FABRIZIO: To the first question, I reply, that if the army has four or six thousand soldiers more or less, rows of quarters are taken away or added as are needed, and in this way it is possible to accommodate more or fewer infinitely. None the less, when the Romans joined together two consular armies, they made two encampments and had the parts of the disarmed men face each other. As to the second question, I reply, that the regular Roman army had about twenty four thousand soldiers: but when a great force pressed them, the most they assembled were fifty thousand. With this number they opposed two hundred thousand Gauls whom they assaulted after the first war which they had with the Carthaginians. With the same number, they opposed Hannibal. And you have to note that the Romans and Greeks had made war with few (soldiers), strengthened by order and by art; the westerners and easterners had made it with a multitude: but one of these nations serves itself of natural fury, as are the westerners; the other of the great obedience which its men show to their King. But in Greece and Italy, as there is not this natural fury, nor the natural reverence toward their King, it has been necessary to turn to discipline; which is so powerful, that it made the few able to overcome the fury and natural obstinacy of the many. I tell you, therefore, if you want to imitate the Romans and Greeks, the number of fifty thousand soldiers ought not to be exceeded, rather they should actually be less; for the many cause confusion, and do not allow discipline to be observed nor the orders learned. And Pyrrhus used to say that with fifteen thousand men he would assail the world.
But let us pass on to another part. We have made our army win an engagement, and I showed the troubles that can occur in battle; we have made it march, and I have narrated with what impedimenta it can be surrounded while marching: and lastly we have quartered it: where not only a little repose from past hardship ought to be taken, but also to think about how the war ought to be concluded; for in the quarters, many things are discussed, especially if there remain enemies in the field, towns under suspicion, of which it is well to reassure oneself, and to capture those which are hostile. It is necessary, therefore, to come to these demonstrations, and to pass over this difficulty with that (same) glory with which we have fought up to the present. Coming down to particulars, therefore, that if it should happen to you that many men or many peoples should do something, which might be useful to you and very harmful to them, as would be the destruction of the walls of their City, or the sending of many of themselves into exile, it is necessary that you either deceive them in a way that everyone should believe he is affected, so that one not helping the other, all find themselves oppressed without a remedy, or rather, to command everyone what they ought to do on the same day, so that each one believing himself to be alone to whom the command is given, thinks of obeying it, and not of a remedy; and thus, without tumult, your command is executed by everyone. If you should have suspicion of the loyalty of any people, and should want to assure yourself and occupy them without notice, in order to disguise your design more easily, you cannot do better than to communicate to him some of your design, requesting his aid, and indicate to him you want to undertake another enterprise, and to have a mind alien to every thought of his: which will cause him not to think of his defense, as he does not believe you are thinking of attacking him, and he will give you the opportunity which will enable you to satisfy your desire easily. If you should have present in your army someone who keeps the enemy advised of your designs, you cannot do better if you want to avail yourself of his evil intentions, than to communicate to him those things you do not want to do, and keep silent those things you want to do, and tell him you are apprehensive of the things of which you are not apprehensive, and conceal those things of which you are apprehensive: which will cause the enemy to undertake some enterprise, in the belief that he knows your designs, in which you can deceive him and defeat him. If you should design ((as did Claudius Nero)) to decrease your army, sending aid to some friend, and they should not be aware of it, it is necessary that the encampment be not decreased, but to maintain entire all the signs and arrangements, making the same fires and posting the same guards as for the entire army. Likewise, if you should attach a new force to your army, and do not want the enemy to know you have enlarged it, it is necessary that the encampment be not increased, for it is always most useful to keep your designs secret. Whence Metellus, when he was with the armies in Spain, to one who asked him what he was going to do the next day, answered that if his shirt knew it, he would bum it. Marcus Crassus, to one who asked him when he was going to move his army, said: "do you believe you are alone in not hearing the trumpets?" If you should desire to learn the secrets of your enemy and know his arrangement, some used to send ambassadors, and with them men expert in war disguised in the clothing of the family, who, taking the opportunity to observe the enemy army, and consideration of his strengths and weaknesses, have given them the occasion to defeat him. Some have sent a close friend of theirs into exile, and through him have learned the designs of their adversary. You may also learn similar secrets from the enemy if you should take prisoners for this purpose. Marius, in the war he waged against Cimbri, in order to learn the loyalty of those Gauls who lived in Lombardy and were leagued with the Roman people, sent them letters, open and sealed: and in the open ones he wrote them that they should not open the sealed ones except at such a time: and before that time, he called for them to be returned, and finding them opened, knew their loyalty was not complete. Some Captains, when they were assaulted have not wanted to go to meet the enemy, but have gone to assail his country, and constrain him to return to defend his home. This often has turned out well, because your soldiers begin to win and fill themselves with booty and confidence, while those of the enemy become dismayed, it appearing to them that from being winners, they have become losers. So that to whoever has made this diversion, it has turned out well. But this can only be done by that man who has his country stronger than that of the enemy, for if it were otherwise, he would go on to lose. It has often been a useful thing for a Captain who finds himself besieged in the quarters of the enemy, to set in motion proceedings for an accord, and to make a truce with him for several days; which only any enemy negligent in every way will do, so that availing yourself of his negligence, you can easily obtain the opportunity to get out of his hands. Sulla twice freed himself from his enemies in this manner, and with this same deceit, Hannibal in Spain got away from the forces of Claudius Nero, who had besieged him.
It also helps one in freeing himself from the enemy to do something in addition to those mentioned, which keeps him at bay. This is done in two ways: either by assaulting him with part of your forces, so that intent on the battle, he gives the rest of your forces the opportunity to be able to save themselves, or to have some new incident spring up, which, by the novelty of the thing, makes him wonder, and for this reason to become apprehensive and stand still, as you know Hannibal did, who, being trapped by Fabius Maximus, at night placed some torches between the horns of many oxen, so that Fabius is suspense over this novelty, did not think further of impeding his passage. A Captain ought, among all the other actions of his, endeavor with every art to divide the forces of the enemy, either by making him suspicious of his men in whom he trusted, or by giving him cause that he has to separate his forces, and, because of this, become weaker. The first method is accomplished by watching the things of some of those whom he has next to him, as exists in war, to save his possessions, maintaining his children or other of his necessities without charge. You know how Hannibal, having burned all the fields around Rome, caused only those of Fabius Maximus to remain safe. You know how Coriolanus, when he came with the army to Rome, saved the possessions of the Nobles, and burned and sacked those of the Plebs. When Metellus led the army against Jugurtha, all me ambassadors, sent to him by Jugurtha, were requested by him to give up Jugurtha as a prisoner; afterwards, writing letters to these same people on the same subject, wrote in such a way that in a little while Jugurtha became suspicious of all his counsellors, and in different ways, dismissed them. Hannibal, having taken refuge with Antiochus, the Roman ambassadors frequented him so much at home, that Antiochus becoming suspicious of him, did not afterwards have any faith in his counsels. As to dividing the enemy forces, there is no more certain way than to have one country assaulted by part of them (your forces), so that being constrained to go to defend it, they (of that country) abandon the war. This is the method employed by Fabius when his Army had encountered the forces of the Gauls, the Tuscans, Umbrians, and Samnites. Titus Didius, having a small force in comparison with those of the enemy, and awaiting a Legion from Rome, the enemy wanted to go out to meet it; so that in order that it should not do so, he gave out by voice throughout his army that he wanted to undertake an engagement with the enemy on the next day; then he took steps that some of the prisoners he had were given the opportunity to escape, who carried back the order of the Consul to fight on the next day, (and) caused the enemy, in order not to diminish his forces, not to go out to meet that Legion: and in this way, kept himself safe. Which method did not serve to divide the forces of the enemy, but to double his own. Some, in order to divide his (the enemy) forces, have employed allowing him to enter their country, and (in proof) allowed him to take many towns so that by placing guards in them, he diminished his forces, and in this manner having made him weak, assaulted and defeated him. Some others, when they wanted to go into one province, feigned making an assault on another, and used so much industry, that as soon as they extended toward that one where there was no fear they would enter, have overcome it before the enemy had time to succor it. For the enemy, as he is not certain whether you are to return back to the place first threatened by you, is constrained not to abandon the one place and succor the other, and thus often he does not defend either. In addition to the matters mentioned, it is important to a Captain when sedition or discord arises among the soldiers, to know how to extinguish it with art. The better way is to castigate the heads of this folly (error); but to do it in a way that you are able to punish them before they are able to become aware of it. The method is, if they are far from you, not to call only the guilty ones, but all the others together with them, so that as they do not believe there is any cause to punish them, they are not disobedient, but provide the opportunity for punishment. When they are present, one ought to strengthen himself with the guiltless, and by their aid, punish them. If there should be discord among them, the best way is to expose them to danger, which fear will always make them united. But, above all, what keeps the Army united, is the reputation of its Captain, which only results from his virtu, for neither blood (birth) or authority attain it without virtu. And the first thing a Captain is expected to do, is to see to it that the soldiers are paid and punished; for any time payment is missed, punishment must also be dispensed with, because you cannot castigate a soldier you rob, unless you pay him; and as he wants to live, he can abstain from being robbed. But if you pay him but do not punish him, he becomes insolent in every way, because you become of little esteem, and to whomever it happens, he cannot maintain the dignity of his position; and if he does not maintain it, of necessity, tumults and discords follow, which are the ruin of an Army. The Ancient Captains had a molestation from which the present ones are almost free, which was the interpretation of sinister omen to their undertakings; for if an arrow fell in an army, if the Sun or the Moon was obscured, if an earthquake occurred, if the Captain fell while either mounting or dismounting from his horse, it was interpreted in a sinister fashion by the soldiers, and instilled so much fear in them, that when they came to an engagement, they were easily defeated. And, therefore, as soon as such an incident occurred, the ancient Captains either demonstrated the cause of it or reduced it to its natural causes, or interpreted it to (favor) their own purposes. When Caesar went to Africa, and having fallen while he was putting out to sea, said, "Africa, I have taken you": and many have profited from an eclipse of the Moon and from earthquakes: these things cannot happen in our time, as much because our men are not as superstitious, as because our Religion, by itself, entirely takes away such ideas. Yet if it should occur, the orders of the ancients should be imitated. When, either from hunger, or other natural necessity, or human passion, your enemy is brought to extreme desperation, and, driven by it, comes to fight with you, you ought to remain within your quarters, and avoid battle as much as you can. Thus the Lacedemonians did against the Messinians: thus Caesar did against Afranius and Petreius. When Fulvius was Consul against the Cimbri, he had the cavalry assault the enemy continually for many days, and considered how they would issue forth from their quarters in order to pursue them; whence he placed an ambush behind the quarters of the Cimbri, and had them assaulted by the cavalry, and when the Cimbri came out of their quarters to pursue them, Fulvius seized them and plundered them. It has been very effective for a Captain, when his army is in the vicinity of the enemy army, to send his forces with the insignia of the enemy, to rob and burn his own country: whence the enemy, believing they were forces coming to their aid, also ran out to help them plunder, and, because of this, have become disorganized and given the adversary the faculty of overcoming them. Alexander of Epirus used these means fighting against the Illirici, and Leptenus the Syracusan against the Carthaginians, and the design succeeded happily for both. Many have overcome the enemy by giving him the faculty of eating and drinking beyond his means, feigning being afraid, and leaving his quarters full of wine and herds, and when the enemy had filled himself beyond every natural limit, they assaulted him and overcome him with injury to him. Thus Tamirus did against Cyrus, and Tiberius Gracchus against the Spaniards. Some have poisoned the wine and other things to eat in order to be able to overcome them more easily. A little while ago, I said I did not find the ancients had kept a night Watch outside, and I thought they did it to avoid the evils that could happen, for it has been found that sometimes, the sentries posted in the daytime to keep watch for the enemy, have been the ruin of him who posted them; for it has happened often that when they had been taken, and by force had been made to give the signal by which they called their own men, who, coming at the signal, have been either killed or taken. Sometimes it helps to deceive the enemy by changing one of your habits, relying on which, he is ruined: as a Captain had already done, who, when he wanted to have a signal made to his men indicating the coming of the enemy, at night with fire and in the daytime with smoke, commanded that both smoke and flame be made without any intermission; so that when the enemy came, he should remain in the belief that he came without being seen, as he did not see the signals (usually) made to indicate his discovery, made ((because of his going disorganized)) the victory of his adversary easier. Menno Rodius, when he wanted to draw the enemy from the strong places, sent one in the disguise of a fugitive, who affirmed that his army was full of discord, and that the greater part were deserting, and to give proof of the matter, had certain tumults started among the quarters: whence to the enemy, thinking he was able to break him, assaulted him and was routed.
In addition to the things mentioned, one ought to take care not to bring the enemy to extreme desperation; which Caesar did when he fought the Germans, who, having blocked the way to them, seeing that they were unable to flee, and necessity having made them brave, desired rather to undergo the hardship of pursuing them if they defended themselves. Lucullus, when he saw that some Macedonian cavalry who were with him, had gone over to the side of the enemy, quickly sounded the call to battle, and commanded the other forces to pursue it: whence the enemy, believing that Lucullus did not want to start the battle, went to attack the Macedonians with such fury, that they were constrained to defend themselves, and thus, against their will, they became fighters of the fugitives. Knowing how to make yourself secure of a town when you have doubts of its loyalty once you have conquered it, or before, is also important; which some examples of the ancients teach you. Pompey, when he had doubts of the Catanians, begged them to accept some infirm people he had in his army, and having sent some very robust men in the disguise of infirm ones, occupied the town. Publius Valerius, fearful of the loyalty of the Epidaurians, announced an amnesty to be held, as we will tell you, at a Church outside the town, and when all the public had gone there for the amnesty, he locked the doors, and then let no one out from inside except those whom he trusted. Alexander the Great, when he wanted to go into Asia and secure Thrace for himself, took with him all the chiefs of this province, giving them provisions, and placed lowborn men in charge of the common people of Thrace; and thus he kept the chiefs content by paying them, and the common people quiet by not having Heads who should disquiet them. But among all the things by which Captains gain the people over to themselves, are the examples of chastity and justice, as was that of Scipio in Spain when he returned that girl, beautiful in body, to her husband and father, which did more than arms in gaining over Spain. Caesar, when he paid for the lumber that he used to make the stockades around his army in Gaul, gained such a name for himself of being just, that he facilitated the acquisition of that province for himself. I do not know what else remains for me to talk about regarding such events, and there does not remain any part of this matter that has not been discussed by us. The only thing lacking is to tell of the methods of capturing and defending towns, which I am about to do willingly, if it is not painful for you now.
BATTISTA: Your humaneness is so great, that it makes us pursue our desires without being afraid of being held presumptuous, since you have offered it willingly, that we would be ashamed to ask you. Therefore we say only this to you, that you cannot do a greater or more thankful benefit to us than to furnish us this discussion. But before you pass on to that other matter, resolve a doubt for us: whether it is better to continue the war even in winter, as is done today, or wage it only in the summer, and go into quarters in the winter, as the ancients did.
FABRIZIO: Here, if there had not been the prudence of the questioner, some part that merits consideration would have been omitted. I tell you again that the ancients did everything better and with more prudence than we; and if some error is made in other things, all are made in matters of war. There is nothing more imprudent or more perilous to a Captain than to wage war in winter, and more dangerous to him who brings it, than to him who awaits it. The reason is this: all the industry used in military discipline, is used in order to be organized to undertake an engagement with your enemy, as this is the end toward which a Captain must aim, for the engagement makes you win or lose a war. Therefore, whoever know how to organize it better, and who has his army better disciplined, has the greater advantage in this, and can hope more to win it. On the other hand, there is nothing more inimical to organization than the rough sites, or cold and wet seasons; for the rough side does not allow you to use the plentitude (of your forces) according to discipline, and the cold and wet seasons do not allow you to keep your forces together, and you cannot have them face the enemy united, but of necessity, you must quarter them separately, and without order, having to take into account the castles, hamlets, and farm houses that receive you; so that all the hard work employed by you in disciplining your army is in vain. And do not marvel if they war in winter time today, for as the armies are without discipline, and do not know the harm that is done to them by not being quartered together, for their annoyance does not enable those arrangements to be made and to observe that discipline which they do not have. Yet, the injury caused by campaigning in the field in the winter ought to be observed, remembering that the French in the year one thousand five hundred three (1503) were routed on the Garigliano by the winter, and not by the Spaniards. For, as I have told you, whoever assaults has even greater disadvantage, because weather harms him more when he is in the territory of others, and wants to make war. Whence he is compelled either to withstand the inconveniences of water and cold in order to keep together, or to divide his forces to escape them. But whoever waits, can select the place to his liking, and await him (the enemy) with fresh forces, and can unite them in a moment, and go out to find the enemy forces who cannot withstand their fury. Thus were the French routed, and thus are those always routed who assault an enemy in winter time, who in itself has prudence. Whoever, therefore, does not want the forces, organization, discipline, and virtu, in some part, to be of value, makes war in the field in the winter time. And because the Romans wanted to avail themselves of all of these things, into which they put so much industry, avoided not only the winter time, but rough mountains and difficult places, and anything else which could impede their ability to demonstrate their skill and virtu. So this suffices to (answer) your question; and now let us come to treat of the attacking and defending of towns, and of the sites, and of their edifices.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Add a banner image to my Email Marketing campaign
Note: This article applies to GoDaddy Email Marketing. If you're creating a marketing email in Websites + Marketing, here's how to add a banner image.
The banner image is the graphic that goes right at the top of your email campaign. It's your reader's first impression, so you want your banner image to fit your company brand, or your newsletter's vibe. You can often grab something from your own archives, but if you don't have anything readily available there are plenty of free resources out there. If you're starting with a raw image, consider spending some time in your favorite image editor cropping, and adding text. You want your banner image to capture the right tone.
Note: Save your image to 590 pixels wide for the most efficient rendering and loading. The height of the banner is up to you.
- If you haven't already, log in to your GoDaddy Email Marketing account. (Need help logging in?)
- In your GoDaddy Email Marketing account, click Campaigns.
- Click Edit under the campaign you want to work on, or Compose to create a new campaign.
- In the sidebar, under the Images, click Add an image to find your banner image file.
- Locate and open the image file you want as your banner. Click Upload Image.
- Once the image is uploaded, you'll see a thumbnail of the image in the Images sidebar. Drag the image from the sidebar and drop it onto the banner area.
- You'll be prompted to add a link to your banner image. It's highly recommended that you make your banner clickable. Enter your URL, and click Save.
- Click Save at the top or bottom of the composer page, to save your progress.
- Click Preview in the top right corner, to see your campaign as your readers will see it.
Note: Create a professional-looking image using the Content Creator. The best dimensions are 590 x 175 pixels. When you're done designing, save your image as a PNG file.
We always recommend using a banner images, but if you have a campaign that calls for something a little different, you can skip the banner image by leaving the banner space blank. Your campaign will start at the first module in your layout, and won't display anything for a banner.


text:
— Loss Prevention Assistant
Loss Prevention Assistant – Scarborough – 30 hrs (019186)
As a Loss Prevention Assistant you will be supporting the store team in the delivery of excellent customer service and to ensure that the store, staff and stock remain safe and secure. You will advise on how to reduce stock loss and assist in the training of security procedures. You will implement company loss prevention policies and best practices and help to identify, support and maintain the stores stock loss action plan. You will also be responsible for the store opening and closing and emergency call out procedures.
You will be a highly proactive individual who has a logical and organised approach, good communication skills (both written and verbal) and the ability to manage shifting priorities. You should be confident in dealing with stock loss issues, be able to deter and detect theft, and ideally have knowledge of Data Protection and legislation covering theft i.e. PACE. You must be PC literate. The ability to operate CCTV is preferred.
The role can involve the opening and closing of the store as well as being available for emergency call outs, therefore flexibility with working hours is vital. This is a fully flexible role and will require you to work up to 5 out of 7 full days per week for which rotas will be provided 4 weeks in advance (including weekends & bank holidays). The days and times for each shift may vary depending on the business needs. Occasionally we will close vacancies prior to the published expiry date if we receive high volumes of applications; therefore to avoid disappointment we recommend that you submit your application early.
30 hrs
£7.60 – £8.10 per hour


text:
VIENNA (REUTERS) - Afghanistan needs more financial assistance for its anti-narcotics fight after opium cultivation hit a record high last year, a government minister said on Wednesday, as international forces prepare to leave the country.
Afghanistan is the world's top cultivator of the poppy, from which opium and heroin are produced.
Despite more than a decade of efforts to wean farmers off the crop, fight corruption and cut links between drugs and the Taliban insurgency, poppy expanded to 209,000 hectares in 2013, up 36 per cent from the previous year.
"To convince the Afghan farmers to stop cultivating poppy we need to provide them with alternative livelihoods," Din Mohammad Mobariz Rashidi, minister of counter narcotics, said after talks with U.N. anti-drugs chief Yury Fedotov. "More financial resources are needed to combat this phenomenon more effectively," he told Reuters, estimating that US$7 billion (S$8.9 billion) had been spent on the issue in the past 12 years.
He said there was also a need for "severe punishment" of traffickers, adding: "I hope that in 2014 we will witness a declining trend in both cultivation and production of opium." It remains to be seen how donors will react to Afghanistan's funding request. Fedotov said a donor conference would be held in Tokyo later this year.
Last year's increase in the crop was caused by factors including greater insecurity as foreign troops pull back in preparation for withdrawing, a high opium price and a lack of Afghan political will to tackle the problem.
But Fedotov said he was "very encouraged" by his meeting with the Afghan minister at the Vienna headquarters of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).
"I appreciate his seriousness, his political commitment to face this challenge of illicit drugs in Afghanistan," he said, saying the minister had new ideas for working with neighbouring nations and promoting new livelihoods in Afghanistan.
Fedotov said there had been some positive experiences in Afghanistan in switching to other high-value crops, such as saffron, but acknowledged that the overall picture was "bleak".
Afghanistan's allies have tried to build infrastructure, develop markets and provide farmers with alternatives. But insecurity and graft have largely stymied rural development while poppy eradication has been patchy.
Almost 12 years after US-led forces invaded Afghanistan, large swathes are under Taliban control and Afghan troops still rely heavily on foreign air support, especially in remote areas.
The Afghanistan Opium Survey for 2013, published by the UNODC and the counter-narcotics ministry in December, said poppy growing households in Afghanistan continued to have a higher cash income than non-poppy growers. Per-hectare gross income from opium cultivation amounted to US$4,500, it said.


text:
all saints sweater, deletta top, zara jeans, tory burch sandals, zara clutch, essie firecracker nail polish
So it's not the gold clutch from Zara that I was desperately trying to find in last weeks blog post. But it is the exact same clutch (size, style, made by Zara) this time it's pastel sequins - which may be cool for summer.
It reminds me of a mermaid and I kinda like that.


text:
For the gradient I used the technique of layering all the colors on a cosmetic sponge and then sponging them on all at once. I'm so in love with this technique that now I look for any excuse to do a gradient. I stamped using Wet 'n Wild Black Creme and Bundle Monster plate BM-223. I then matted the whole thing using Essie Matte About You. The matte topcoat smudged the stamped pattern a bit, so in hindsight I probably should have used a regular top coat first and then the matte.The good news is that the smudges are only visible up close :)
Colors used (left to right): Wet 'n Wild Caught Red Handed, Color Club Wham! Pow!, Almost Famous, Twiggie, Chelsea Girl and Pucci Licious. I love this collection when I need primary colors for a manicure. The only thing it is missing in my opinion is a good red hence why I had to use a Wet 'n Wild Polish. The set contains two pinks instead which I didn't use for this manicure. You can see the cosmetic sponge that I used and my "palette" to dab on. The purple didn't actually make it onto my nails since they were too short. Guess there is always next time :D
I would love to know what you think of this! What kind of unnatural animal would you have created?
Thanks for looking!
Anutka :)


text:
British Highlights
Your budget-friendly tour of Britain will be the highlight of your travelogues for years to come. You'll set out from London to the Welsh capital of Cardiff. On the way, you'll visit mysterious Stonehenge and stop in the elegant Georgian city of Bath. You'll travel through the lovely Cotswold Hills with their honey-colored limestone villages to Shakespeare's Stratford-upon-Avon. Your tour of Britain's highlights includes a drive into the tranquil Lake District, often considered to be the finest of England's national parks. Then, visit Gretna Green, where the blacksmith used to wed runaway couples before making your way through the history-steeped Lowland Hills to Edinburgh. Visit Edinburgh Castle and see the Scottish Crown Jewels, known as the Honours of Scotland. Departures 0729 and 0819 include a special treat: a performance of the world-renowned Military Tattoo—Scottish pipe bands en masse, performing on the esplanade of Edinburgh Castle. Your value-minded Britain vacation is one to remember for years to come.
City Highlights
STONEHENGE Visit the prehistoric monumentBATH Visit the elegant Georgian citySTRATFORD-UPON-AVON Discover Shakespeare's home townLLANGOLLEN Visit the picturesque villageLAKE DISTRICT Drive through the UNESCO World Heritage landscapeGRETNA GREENEDINBURGH Guided sightseeing, visit Edinburgh Castle
Full English breakfast daily; 1 dinner with choice of menus
Touring by private, first-class, air-conditioned motorcoach with free Wi-Fi


text:
I was prompted to write this by the BBC, as part of their Have Words. This was a weekly series which promoted discussion of current issues. The issue for the week of July 12, 1999, was the London International Church of Christ, a new religious movement that frequently finds itself at the heart of controversy. Free and democratic societies cherish religious liberties. We espouse the view that people should be able to worship according to the dictates of their conscience. And yet, we are troubled when people worship in ways that are different than our own. When a family member or friend takes a different path, we are concerned that their religious involvement is healthy and beneficial, and that they have chosen to do so of their own free will. The recruitment efforts of some groups cause us to question just how healthy their organization is. Stories surrounding the London Church of Christ and its affiliates (Boston Church of Christ, etc.) illustrate the issues that society must consider in balancing the virtues of individual choice with the desire to assure the safety of society and its constituents. People who study religious groups commonly list several warning signals, which suggest that a group may not be healthy for its members or for society. These warning signs typically include various characteristics of the group's leader, its position regarding social accountability, and an ultimate violent overthrow of the status quo. Here is one such list of characteristics that warrant caution. Regarding the group's leadership:
Finally, the group typically expects a literal fight for God against the forces of evil that grip society. The fight is expected to come soon, and the group is preparing for it. Preparations may even include stockpiling weapons or other items for the impending battle. The challenge for society is to find a balance between protecting individuals from groups that threaten people's health and safety, while maintaining the liberty of allowing individuals to choose their religious affiliations. This is made all the more difficult because there is no clear demarcation between groups that are "safe" and those that are "harmful". For example, stories of people who have experienced such groups may describe the group as dictating what foods should and should not be eaten, when they should be eaten, when the person should sleep and wake, and so forth. Commands from the leader may be expected to be carried out quickly, without delay. These appear consistent with the warning signs I mentioned earlier... but so, too, do stories of people who have experienced military life in the service of their country. The presence of a few, or even several, of these characteristics is not by itself enough to merit action against the group. The characteristics themselves do not establish the group's harmfulness; we also must consider the value society places on the group and our willingness to support the group. Ultimately, it is a societal decision. For reasons such as these, the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion has issued a statement on the use of brainwashing in new religious groups. The statement indicates that there is not yet any reliable scientific evidence establishing that such groups use 'mind control' or 'brainwashing' in their activities. This does not mean that the groups are healthy, nor does it indicate that such brainwashing techniques never occur. It does suggest, however, that dispassionate scientific research has not yet found them to occur. The techniques that are used appear to be similar to those used by other social groups. In some cases, they may be more intensively applied, but the nature of the techniques appears to be no different than those found in other segments of society. These are difficult and important questions that society must address. The difficulty is exacerbated when we find our loved ones becoming involved with groups or people that appear not to share our own values. I hope that we can find peaceful ways of reconciling our desire to have religious freedom with our desire to maintain a safe society. Too much of one, with too little of the other, attacks the core values of our free societies. |
Back to Psychology & Religion Home Page ...or.... Top of this file ...or... send feedback to Dr. Nielsen


text:
There are few things more boring in tech than computer keyboards, right? Dull, grey clacky products which typically feature all the charisma of a dead halibut. However every now and then we're surprised by one of these things, at which point we sit up and take notice, which is what happened with this impressive and versatile new Bluetooth keyboard.
The KBTalKing Pro Bluetooth Keyboard may look like just another keyboard, but it has a very cool trick up its sleeve. It provides a professional grade wireless keyboard for just about every BT gadget you own. In fact we haven't been this impressed since our Uncle Albert won a pint of cockles on Margate pier just after our Janet's Susan was born. But that's another story.
But first let's get one important fact out of the way. This is a 'proper' mechanical based keyboard, it's not one of those flimsy backstreet stall-holder products. It's solid, and quite clearly made for robust use…think old IBM style and you're close. It's heavy, sturdy, and the keys clack very reassuringly as you type, giving you the kind of old school satisfaction that Pitman typists obsess about.
The real joy of the thing, however, lies in its versatility. This is not just a PC keyboard, it works with any device that sports Bluetooth. What's more, it's instantly swappable between devices, which is perfect if you're one of those who surrounds themselves with gadgets that demand input at odd moments during the day.
The secret lies in the sophisticated Bluetooth pairing software, which lets you assign each device to a key shortcut on the number pad. What this means is you can have your Apple iPad on Fn-0, your smartphone on Fn-1, laptop on Fn-2 etc etc. You get the picture. The keyboard has enough slots to map (i.e. handle) up to 10 Bluetooth devices, which should be enough for even the most ardent gadget lover.
Pairing each device is fairly straightforward, just select your keyboard shortcut location, press the reset button on the back of the keyboard and the unit is in pairing mode. Your device can then be paired without a passkey and that's it. To select the device, press the Fn key and the number you chose and you're ready to go.
Switching from device to device takes a couple of seconds, after which you're able to use it as you wish. The package even includes a dinky little smartphone or tablet holder you can use to set up your system properly on the desk. The keyboard also has a standard wired USB mode, so if you connect up a cable to your computer you can switch to that mode by hitting Fn-Enter on the number pad. Simple.
This is a very clever solution to a problem that many people have…how to use a 'really proper' keyboard with their tablet, phone or smart TV, without all the hassles of plugging and unplugging them etc. With this product all you do is carry the keyboard to your desired location, connect wirelessly and type. It's clearly not designed as pocket friendly, but that's not the point. If you want to do serious work on a portable device, this keyboard will let you do it.
The only quibble we have is we would have thought that a touchpad or mouse function of some sort would be integrated onto the product, because as it is, you're stuck with having to use an additional mouse or trackpad to complete your input tasks. Maybe that's something the designers should consider for Mk 2? Anyway the keyboard costs $159.00, runs off two AA batteries and is available to order now. In the meantime here's a very dodgy video of the product in action in some stress test lab or other.


text:
Lucia Vega Jimenez was picked up by Transit police in December for not paying her fare. She was placed in a holding cell at YVR, unwatched, to await deportation. When officials later checked in on her, she was hanging unconscious from a shower curtain.
A Mexican woman desperate to remain in Canada hung herself in the Canada Border Services Agency holding cells of Vancouver International Airport rather than face deportation.
Lucia Vega Jimenez, 42, used a shower curtain to strangle herself on Dec. 20, a day after being placed in the stark holding facility. She died eight days later at Mount St. Joseph's Hospital in Vancouver.
She left no suicide note.
Vega Jimenez had previously made a refugee claim in Canada that was rejected in 2010. It is not known whether she was deported, but she was back in Canada shortly before Christmas when she was picked up by Transit police.
She had not paid her bus fare and when police learned of her identity, they called Border Services, said Father Eduardo Quintero, the priest who administered her last rites.
"She was being deported at the airport and she took her own life," Quintero said. He did not know Vega Jimenez but was contacted by her family in Mexico when they found out she was dying. They wanted him to visit the hospital, anoint Vega Jimenez and provide spiritual comfort to her sister Martha, who had travelled from Mexico to be by her side.
She had no contact with relatives in Mexico or friends in Vancouver while in detention, Quintero said.
Immigration lawyer Phil Rankin said lawyers are not allowed to visit YVR's holding cells, which are run by the Canada Border Services Agency, and in 15 years he has only been able to get in one time.
"It's a very lonely, isolated place out there," he said. "No one gets in or out. It's very impersonal, very secure (and) very private. There's no John Howard Society, no visits from family or lawyers. They want to move these people without fuss or muss. There's no oversight by nonofficials."
Rankin said if someone was distraught, there would be little opportunity for an outsider to come to their aid.
Josh Paterson, executive director of the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, said the watchdog is "very troubled" by the death in custody.
"We have a lot of questions and very few answers," Paterson said. "Nobody should die while they are in the custody of law enforcement. The Canada Border Services Agency must be accountable for this tragic death of a woman who was in their care and custody. The public needs answers. How did this happen? Could this tragedy have been prevented?"
There is no independent oversight of the agency's operations, he said, unlike other law enforcement agencies in B.C.
A spokeswoman for the Canada Border Services Agency, Amitha Carnadin, refused to answer Vancouver Sun questions emailed to her regarding the policies and procedures in place at the YVR holding cells. Nor would she confirm which security agency is contracted with CBSA to work there.
Carnadin said Richmond RCMP investigated and determined the matter was not criminal in nature.
"The health and safety of those in our care is of paramount concern," Carnadin said in an email. "We take this responsibility very seriously and it is important to determine the circumstances surrounding any loss of life."
The national vicepresident of the Customs and Immigration Union said he was "shocked" to hear about the death, via the media.
"None of my members (federal law enforcement officers with CBSA) are involved in this case," said Jason McMichael. "(Vega Jimenez) was not in my members' custody. I can only speculate she was in the custody of the contractors.
"I should have been briefed by the CBSA, but that is their prerogative." Rankin said he assumes the private security contract CBSA has at the airport is with Genesis Security, since that firm also does the CBSA contract for the immigration holding cells at 300 West Georgia in Vancouver. But, Rankin added, when he visited YVR's holding cells recently, it was very clear to him that federal corrections officers from CBSA were in charge and the security staff, likely from Genesis, were not doing anything without their oversight.
Calls to Genesis Security's president and vicepresident were not returned.
News of Vega Jimenez's death one month ago was only made public Monday.
Neither the Canada Border Services Agency nor the B.C. Coroners Service would say how Vega Jimenez died or provide any information about the circumstances of her death.
"The CBSA is not in a position to release further information while the B.C. Coroners Service investigation is ongoing," Carnadin said.
Coroners Service spokeswoman Barb McLintock said she couldn't confirm the cause of Vega Jimenez's death or even its classification.
McLintock said it's also not yet known whether a coroner's inquest will be held.
Rankin said he believes a coroner's inquest is necessary, particularly since the case could shed light on what goes on at YVR holding cells given the lack of civilian oversight.
Quintero said he believes it would be helpful if priests could regularly visit people in detention at YVR. While he was a priest in Mexico, he said, it was common for him to visit immigration centres there to provide spiritual support to detainees.
For more stories, go to www.vancouversun.com


text:
Purpose Built
Modeled after our 3-in-1 Patrol Jacket, the Aggressor Parka offers superior functionality and weather protection in a stylish design ideal for off duty, CCW, or covert wear. A high performance waterproof shell and a removable quilted fleece liner can be worn separately or together, providing adaptable weather protection for a wide range of climates. Hidden document pockets at the chest offer ample and covert storage along with Backup Belt System™ compatibility that allows you to customize your accessory storage quickly and easily. A waterproof hood, zippered handwarmer pockets, and hook and loop fastener storm cuffs guard against rain and cold, and integrated side zippers provide quick access to your bottom layer or can be used to improve ventilation when temperatures fluctuate.


text:
← Back to Squawk list
Huge spelling mistake on Cathay Pacific plane
(CNN) — Sometimes, a massive typo is right in front of your eyes and you can't see it. For Hong Kong-based airline Cathay Pacific, it was between the "i"s -- on the livery of its Boeing 777-367. In a move that's had the Internet asking "WTF?" ("Where's the F?"), photos emerged Wednesday morning appearing to show a plane on the tarmac at Hong Kong airport, proudly emblazoned with the words "CATHAY PACIIC." (www.cnn.com) More...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
Someone told Cathay Pacific to "F" off so they took it literally. At least the didn't spell it Cathay SPacific
HA HA HA....Brilliant!
"Cathay Pacific: When you really want to get the F out of there"
that's a really good one :)
I can definitely see this as an accident. Somewhere, someone typed "CATHAY PACIIC" into a program, and that's all she wrote. An enormous plotter started cutting out pieces of vinyl far too large to read as a whole, producing a stack of sections. The team applying it started at the right end so it could be aligned with the door and end of the windows, and worked backward through the name. The letters are 4' high, and the workers were within a foot or two handling the floppy material; they couldn't see more than a couple of letters at a time. Then, when done, they turned their backs and went on to their next tasks.
Honestly...it wouldn't surprise me if this was a marketing thing.....look at how much free publicity they are getting over it...


text:
Kevin Stefanski made a favorable first impression. Dressed impeccably, he came across lawyer-like, polished and articulate. He exuded confidence and passion.
Now, he's got to win.
In Cleveland, that's always the issue for coaches.
"I'm excited for this challenge," Stefanski said. "I'm ready for it."
The former Vikings offensive coordinator, who worked his way up the NFL ladder, was introduced Tuesday as the Browns' new coach, the 18th in the team's history and 10th since the team's expansion return in 1999. Stefanski, who was a candidate for Cleveland's job a year ago, is also the sixth hired in just the past eight years by owners Dee and Jimmy Haslam, whose atrocious track record with coaches and front office executives — along with bad draft picks — best explains the Browns' inability to win.
Maybe they got it right this time.
"We spent a lot of time with Kevin," Jimmy Haslam said. "His references were outstanding. We feel very comfortable with him. We're highly confident that he'll be our coach for a long time."
Stefanski, who spent one season running Minnesota's offense, inherits a talented roster that underachieved in 2019. The Browns went 6-10 last season amid a steady drizzle of drama that detracted from the few positives. Stefanski isn't concerned about the past or boarding a coaching carousel.
It's about today and tomorrow.
"The focus is 2020," he said. "We're not looking backward, we're moving forward. And I hope all of our players know that, too. When they walk in the building, whenever it is in April, we're moving forward. And anything that's happened in the past does not affect our future. So I'm just confident in the group that we have."
This is the first head coaching job at any level for Stefanski, who got his start as a low-level assistant in 2006 with Minnesota, where he learned a variety of jobs that prepared him as a leader. He worked under three head coaches during 14 seasons with the Vikings, and while experiencing change he developed the well-rounded skills that made him popular with players and appealed to the Browns.
Stefanski said personal connections are the key to success.
"My leadership style is to be authentic," he said. "I'm going to be me, and I think that's good enough. And, I'm going to be direct with our players and they are going to get to know me and I'm going to get to know them. I want to lead from a relationship standpoint. I want them to understand what I'm about. I'm ready and willing and excited to lead from out in front. And I'm also ready and willing to step back and let the success and the light shine on our players — where it should be."
Stefanski was joined at the news conference at FirstEnergy Stadium by his wife, Michelle and their three young children, Gabe, Will and Juliet, who struggled to stay awake while her daddy was at the podium.
After being settled for so long, the Stefanski family is dealing with the shock of moving.
"It's a tough 48 hours that we've been through and we've made some promises to these children," Stefanski said with a smile. "We're getting a dog. We're going to Disney World."
Stefanski was also accompanied by his mom, Karen, and dad, Ed, a longtime NBA executive who currently works as an adviser with the Detroit Pistons.
In describing the kind of coach he wants to be with the Browns, Stefanski said he wanted to use a basketball analogy "so my dad can understand this."
"I want to be the point guard for this organization," he said. "I want to bring the ball up and I want to share the basketball and let someone else get an easy bucket."
Stefanski was a finalist for Cleveland's job last year, when the team picked Freddie Kitchens after his successful half-season stint as offensive coordinator. Kitchens, though, proved to be the wrong hire and was fired a few hours after the Browns lost their season finale to Cincinnati.
Stefasnki's introduction came exactly one year after Kitchens' and the difference between the two was striking.
A year ago, Kitchens tapped into the unabashed passion of Cleveland's rabid fans by saying, "If you don't wear brown and orange," a signature phrase that faded with every loss and bad play call. Stefanski didn't make any proclamations or bold predictions, but he admitted being staggered by the Browns' rich history.
"I pinch myself to think that I'm going to talk to Jim Brown later today," he said referring to the Hall of Fame running back. "That's my dad's favorite player growing up, so I've heard all about Jim Brown. That's special to me."
Although Stefanski wasn't picked by the Browns last year, that didn't diminish his interest nor did the Browns' quick trigger with Kitchens.
"I'm undaunted," he said, adding he has already spoken to quarterback Baker Mayfield. "And I think the challenge is there and I can't wait to be a part of this change."
Stefanski is in the early phases of putting together his staff, and the Browns are in the process of hiring a new general manager to replace John Dorsey.
Jimmy Haslam said the team will be methodical in selecting a GM. The Browns have scheduled interviews with Eagles vice president of football operations Andrew Berry, who was in Cleveland from 2016-18, and Vikings assistant GM George Paton.


text:
DASIM Session BG1.2
Mon, Apr 4, 8:30 - 10:15
Nitrogen cycling in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems: microbiological processes, gas fluxes, modelling, atmospheric impacts and global change feedbacks
DASIM Session BG2.14
Mon, Apr 8, 14:00 - 15:45, room 2.25
Poster Session Mon, Apr 8, 10:45 - 12:30, Hall A
Nitrogen transformations in soil and sediments: processes and upscaling
International symposium on advances in quantification, small scale resolution, controlling factors and process-based modelling.
Soil transformation processes generating N2O and N2 play a key role in the soil N cycle due to their implication for losses of reactive N and emission of gaseous N oxides to the atmosphere. Despite being intensively studied for a long time and numerous recent technological progresses, we still lack a comprehensive, quantitative understanding of denitrification rates in soils. This is in part due to methodical difficulties in measuring N2 production and emission at ambient concentrations of 78%. But also the complexity of the processes itself with their intricate cellular regulation in response to numerous factors varying at a small scale in space and time in the soil matrix prevents robust prediction of gaseous emissions.
The effective control at the field scale and the spatial variability of transformation processes resulting in N2O and N2 on a landscape scale is still not satisfactorily clarified. Due to the lack of suitable data sets, process -based denitrification models have rarely been validated and results of their application on site and regional scales are highly uncertain.
Recent technological improvements of experimental and analytical tools like measurements of N2 fluxes, linking structure and activity of denitrifying microbial communities with denitrification rates, small scale resolution of soil structure, improved numerical methods and computational power offer new opportunities in this area.
Oral session "Denitrification in Agricultural Soils - Integrated control and Modelling at various scales"
DASIM Session BG2.17
Wed, Apr 11, 10:30 - 12:00, room 2.31
Poster Session Wed, Apr 11, 15:30 - 17:00, Hall A
Nitrous oxide and dinitrogen fluxes from soils - Advances in small scale resolution, quantification, controlling factors and process-based modelling