text:
From Sept. 9 to 13, 1971, prisoners took control of the Attica Correctional Facility in the most well-known prison uprising of the 20th century. They made a series of demands to prison administrators and held about 40 people as hostages. Their demands were included in a Manifesto that began:
We, the men of Attica Prison, have been committed to the New York State Department of Corrections by the people of society for the purpose of correcting what has been deemed as social errors in behaviour.
The program which we are submitted to under the façade of rehabilitation are relative to the ancient stupidity of pouring water on a drowning man, inasmuch as we are treated for our hostilities by our program administrators with their hostility as medication.
In our peaceful efforts to assemble in dissent as provided under this nation's U.S. Constitution, we are in turn murdered, brutalized, and framed on various criminal charges because we seek the rights and privileges of all American People.
In our efforts to intellectually expand in keeping with the outside world, through all categories of news media, we are systematically restricted and punitively remanded to isolation status when we insist on our human rights to the wisdom of awareness. [See full Manifesto of Demands in Attica Prison Uprising 101: A Short Primer.]
As Howard Zinn explains in A People's History of the United States:
The most direct effect of the George Jackson murder was the rebellion at Attica prison—a rebellion that came from long, deep grievances. . . . 54% of the inmates were black; 100% of the guards were white. Prisoners spent 14 to 16 hours a day in their cells, their mail was read, their reading material restricted, their visits from families conducted through a mesh screen, their medical care disgraceful, their parole system inequitable, racism everywhere.
After four days of fruitless negotiations, Gov. Nelson Rockefeller ordered that the prison be retaken; 39 people were killed in a 15-minute assault by state police.
The New York State Special Commission on Attica (also known as the McKay Commission) appointed to investigate the uprising suggested: "With the exception of Indian massacres in the late 19th century, the State Police assault which ended the four-day prison uprising was the bloodiest one-day encounter between Americans since the Civil War."
The uprising did not come out of nowhere. In September 1971 at Attica prison, there were over 2,200 people locked up in dehumanizing conditions in a facility built to accommodate 1,600.
In 1970, there were 48,497 people in federal and state prisons in the U.S. By 2009, there were 1,613,740 individuals locked up in our federal and state prisons.
This exponential growth of the prison population means that the events of Attica are as relevant today as they were in 1971; perhaps even more so. There is a continued need to investigate the conditions of our prisons today and to advocate for an end to mass incarceration. [Adapted from the introduction to Attica Prison Uprising 101: A Short Primer.]
Resources for Teaching About the Attica Prison Uprising
|Attica Prison Uprising 101: A Short Primer
Free and downloadable. Produced by Project NIA.
|A Story of Attica
Short version of the primer listed above. Free.
|Eyes on the Prize features a segment on Attica ("A Nation of Law? (1968-71)") with primary documents, interviews, and video.
Attica, a 1974 documentary film by Cindy Firestone. Ghosts of Attica, a 2001 documentary by David Van Taylor and Brad Lichtenstein, narrated by Susan Sarandon.
Democracy Now! broadcast about Frank "Big Black" Smith, a prisoner who was tortured after the rebellion.
Additional resources below, including Blood in the Water: The Attica Prison Uprising of 1971 and Its Legacy.


text:
I will recommend this product
Would use this product for my toiletries when travelling. The only thing I expected it to be a little bigger, however it is of good quality. I love Kipling merchandise.
5-7 business days (if ordered by 12pm EST)
2 business days (if ordered by 12pm EST)
1 business day
Click here for details
Click here for details
*Rates and delivery times for the 48 continuous United States
Returns must be made within 30 days of delivery for a refund of the purchase price, minus the shipping, handling, gift box fee and other additional charges.
Would use this product for my toiletries when travelling. The only thing I expected it to be a little bigger, however it is of good quality. I love Kipling merchandise.
This bag is very small. I m happy I bought only one and not in all the colors.
New york
Although this bag was smaller than I expected, it is still quite functional. I like that it has a hook and can be hung up. It will hold travel sized toiletries but my hair brush won't fit in it. It is much easier to find things in this bag than my previous "catch all". Would love Kipling to make this in a larger size for 5 stars!
Cincinnati, Ohio
Bought this bag for travel but ended up using it for the first time when I was hospitalized after a C-section. It held everything I needed without spilling and the hanging hook kept it within reach, which was perfect because my mobility was very limited. If the bottom had an outside zip around that rolled out to hold makeup and brushes then I wouldn't need my makeup bag when I travel. Wish I could've monogrammed it though. Overall it's a perfect toiletry bag.
St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands
Love this bag! I use it every time I travel. Nothing spills and all my travel items fit! Great buy!
Round Rock, Tx
My friend found this bag but the one that comes with a pink travel suite case the one thats different colors i NEED THAT COLOR BAG OR AT LEAST SHOULD BE MORE COLORS AVAILABLE LIKE PINK OR TORQUIOSE THOSE BRIGHT PRETTY COLORS
Mission Tx
Would love this in dk navy, magenta green, mustard yellow ...
Jersey City, NJ

subset: commoncrawl


text:
You are about to enter a website that may contain content of an adult nature.
Hello everyone, this is Indian cam girl Pearl_Melons here. I'm 45 year old Female speak English in the Indian live sex chat action. Huge titsMulti orgasmic0. I love to travel, to be wined & dined. I love to have a good time & to listen to all your fantasies & make things cum true. I am very multiorgasmic & give a great BJ. i love to eat spunk. is my expertise and also what I will do in Indian live sex private show. I have Green eyes, Medium Brown hairs and my measurements are 36-2-38. For Turn ons: I need to have my pussy fucked & filled, I can be very very naughty. I get so wet & god do I orgasm. I need to see you hard & make you explode.I love to see cum flowing out of a cock.. For TurnsOff: Impoliteness. If you prefer kinks, then are mine. I'm just hungry for a HARD cock, can't wait to see u in my Indian webcam sex chat room! :)
Show more models
This website contains indian cams, desi sex chat, hindi cam sex and tamil sex chat related sexually explicit content.
You must be at least 18 years of age to enter this website. © Since 2012 myindiansexcams.com Indian Sex Chat Network All Rights Reserved
AllHosts1 - AllHosts2 - AllHosts3 - AllHosts4 - AllHosts5 - AllHosts6 - AllHosts7 - AllHosts8 - AllHosts9 - AllHosts10 - AllHosts11 - AllHosts12


text:
One More Chance To Run
In the wake of Mott, former Medicine Head frontman John Fiddler, Morgan Fisher, Dale Griffin, Ray Majors and Overend Watts formed "British Lions". This is their first album, now remastered with eight previously unreleased bonus tracks including a John Peel radio session from May 1978.
The "Lions" were hampered by the musical climate in the UK (punk) and in spite of several support slots (to the likes of AC/DC and Status Quo) and a USA trip they folded.
This Japan/USA only release is complemented by extensive notes by drummer Dale Griffin and the "Lions" saga will continue with the forthcoming release of "Trouble With Women", the original album plus bonus tracks.
This album will particularly appeal to Mott The Hoople fans, but also to lovers of a distinctly British brand of good-time rock 'n' roll.
...They cut a fine, if occasionally workmanlike, album together...with eight previously unreleased tracks bolstering the nine original cuts (including a Peel session, a live performance, and a clutch of demos), British Lions emerge a lot stronger than memory likes to make them out...
Jo-Ann Greene, Goldmine (July 2000)
I haven't played my vinyl copy of British Lions for quite some time and I'd forgotten just how good an album it is. From the opening adrenaline surge of One More Chance To Run to the humourous closer Eat the Rich...theis album features great songs and great playing and quite possibly is the strongest post MTH album featuring Messrs Watts, Griffin,Fisher and Majors. A lot of that was down to the great songwriting of the new secret ingredient, John Fiddler, of course....
As well as great songs this album also contains some marvellous performances that highlight the instrumental power of this band...
In addition to the album's original nine songs there are 8 previously unreleased bonus tracks...
The set comes complete with a sixteen-page booklet...sound quality is excellent...this release is long overdue.
Two Miles From Heaven Issue 2
...The secret to enjoying The British Lions album is to try and forget that three fifths of the group were once members of arguably one of the best English power-glam groups of their time, Mott The Hoople...The playing is superb...The liner notes are complete and the original albums' nine tracks are augmented by an additional eight, live/John peel and demo tracks. Mott fans will want to add this to their collection and glam aficionados should take note as well. Something of an undiscovered rough gem.
Jeff Monk, Mohair Sweets (November 2000)
They purveyed a hard eged yet melodic Power Pop/Soft Rock all accompanied by inspirational and very memorable riffs…an album of the finest quality Rock. By 1978 the British Lions were no more but this excellent album is a timely reminder of the fact that there was some fine traditional Rock around in the 70's amidst the gob and the Oi!
Steve Ward, Wondrous Stories (March 2002)
Too early for its new wave touches, too late for its glam and classic rock background British Lions didn't fare as well as it should have done…Its first time on CD, the album is bolstered by eight previously unreleased live and demo tracks, plus the usual Angel Air trimmings. Fans of the band and of rock from the time will certainly enjoy it.
Joe Geesin, Record Collector (May 2002)
...a raw, gritty rock album which still stands the test of time
Classic Rock Society (June 2009)


text:
Sign up to get notified when this product is back in stock
|Design House
|Victoria Secret
|Year Introduced
|Eau de Parfum (EdP)
|Fragrance Notes
|peony, freesia, orange, bergamot, juniper berries, lily of the valley, artemisia, violet leaves, vetiver, neroli, vanilla, musk
|Recommended Use
|License Info
|Samples are hand decanted from the original licensed design house fragrance. Samples are not a licensed design house product. the customer will receive the original Fragrance hand poured into a sterile glass vial. MyPerfumeSamples is not affiliated with design house in any manner.
by ASHLEY on Dec 22, 2015
by Danielle on Jan 23, 2015


text:
Perfect Hairstyles Blogs
Full of cute trendy haircut ideas for boys and guys. Browse our pictures gallery modern, latest.. hairstyles, curly, wavy hair, straight hair, punk hair, emo, mullet, scene, formal, Japanese, butch,.. and many more.
Owner: campion
Listed in: Arts
Other Tags: Mens Hairstyles, Cool Hairstyles, Hairstyle Tips, Best Hairstyle
Hairstyles Pictures, Fashion And Celebrity News
Owner: Robert_Kiyomori
Listed in: Fashion
Other Tags: hairstyles, haircut, short hairstyles, long hairstyles, fashion


text:
Susan asked about
When a link becomes broken, can I still use the document to which the link pointed? Or do I need to re-find the document in question?
2 answers
26234 views
Any document which has ever been available in e-Readings can be made available again.
Email requests to firstname.lastname@example.com
Hi Susan,
Not sure if DRR see these questions, and I don't think I know the answer to this question, so perhaps it's a good idea to email the DRR folks at - email@example.com - they'll have a good answer for you.
Sorry for the extra work entailed,


text:
02 4334 3838
About Us
Our Team
Contact Us
Make an Enquiry
Make an Enquiry
Long Jetty Vet Clinic offers pet care without compromise, tending to our four-legged friends when they are not well. We are a boutique practice run by highly qualified and friendly staff and we pride ourselves on delivering excellent customer service.
We have a well-equipped Central Coast veterinary practice, which allows us to conduct routine consultations as well as general surgery and dermatology services. We administer veterinary medicine and general pet care advice. Long Jetty Vet Clinic also provides orthopaedic surgery and a range of pathology services.
Our veterinarian performs desexing and implants registered microchips for your pet. We can also vaccinate against parvovirus, distemper and hepatitis in dogs, as well as enteritis and feline calici virus for your cats. We also conduct a range of dental services, including tartar and plaque removal.
Long Jetty Vet Clinic stocks a variety of foods, flea and tick treatments and worming tablets to ensure the health of your pet. We supply Royal Canin, Hills Science Diet, Sentinel and Feliway products. Our certified vet nurses can recommend the ideal food for your pet from the quality brands we stock, whether they need something with a higher fibre content or food designed to protect the teeth.
When you need pet care advice, routine check-ups or even in-depth surgery, call Long Jetty Vet Clinic. Our friendly and professional team will make sure that your pet receives the highest standard of care, no matter what their age or ailments.
Call our friendly team to
book an appointment
Senior Vet and Practice Owner
I'm John. I graduated from Sydney University with my Vet Degree in 1990. My First job was as a large animal vet in the Canadian Prairies where it was cold and flat. I then went onto work and travel in the UK where it was still cold but anything but flat! When I returned home I began working in mixed small and large practice here on the central coast but it wasn't long before I followed my now wife to work as a locum vet in a variety of practices in Melbourne. It was because of all the locum work and travelling I did that my skills as a small animal vet grew and I found out what it was that made vet clinics a great place to work and visit. When the opportunity came for Samantha and I to move back to the coast and close to family we jumped at the chance and I took over as owner at Long Jetty Vets, I love the clinic because our employees, clients and patients are all like family. My special interests include orthopedics, dermatology, general surgery and wildlife care. At home I have my beautiful family including my wife Samantha, son Hamish and our fur kids Basil the cat and Jesper our French Bulldog.
Senior Vet
Hi I am Ann I have been a practicing vet for over 25 years and still to this day love what I do. I have done a lot of Locum work over the years which has ensured i continue to learn and expand on my skills as a companion animals vet. My favourite part of the job would have to be working with geriatric patients and watching the way their characters develop, there is something so special about the loyalty and commitment pets and their families share. I also enjoy soft tissue surgery, dental work and cytology. At home I have an array of animals including my 3 dogs Bodger, Teddy and Mini, 4 cats Thelma, Birdie, Murphy and Pinky Pie and 3 chooks, Simone, Simone 2 and Flaps but I hope to one day move to property where I can open my home to many more.
Senior Vet Nurse and Practice Manager
Hi I'm Hayley. I have been with the team at Long Jetty since 2008. I am a fully qualified Veterinary nurse and have my additional qualifications in emergency nursing, canine and feline behaviour and companion pet nutrition. I absolutely adore all animals especially dogs and cats! I live in Blacksmiths with my husband and am the proud mum to my 9 dogs, 10 cats, 2 rabbits and 1 human son, we also try to do as much fostering and rescue work as I can.
Vet Nurse
I am Sarah I have been nursing at Long Jetty Veterinary Clinic since 2009. Friends and Family have always known me to be the "Animal Lover" and working with them was always a path I was destined to take, I could not imagine doing anything else. I love what I do and helping all sorts of furry friends. At home i have 1 cat who is my pride and joy named Donald.
Junior Veterinary Nurse
Hi my name is Josh. I am the newest junior nurse at Long Jetty Veterinary Clinic. At home I have 1 dog named Leea who is a bouncy and loveable Bulldog x Cattle Dog. Animals have always been my passion and so i aspire to help all the animals that I can.


text: Register or log in To register or log in, just enter your email address below. You will receive an email with a link, which you can visit to log in. There is no username or password to remember, just your email address. The link will expire in a few hours, but you will stay logged in until you choose to log out. However, be careful not to share it, as it will allow anyone to log in to your account. Your email address Log in


text:
The Forward Bend in Yoga
In yoga, the forward bend is an extremely relaxing pose, because you stretch your back and legs. These step-by-step instructions demonstrate the forward bend. From here, you want to pick up a book, rent a video, or take a class to obtain guidance on how long to hold these poses, how often to repeat them, and how to combine them with other poses.
1Start in a sitting position, with your legs out in front of you in a V, toes pointed up toward the ceiling.
Use whatever width of V is comfortable for you. Pull up on your butt so that you are resting on your pelvic bone.


text:
Great Memories Are Our Business
At Mojopro we believe that every image is unique, and that some are even GREAT, and we pride ourselves on helping you turn those GREAT images into personalised Photo Books, Canvas Prints or Calendars that will be loved and cherished as memories for years to come.
Who should use our services?
Any professional photographer or photo enthusiast that is taking seriously GREAT images, and wants to pay a seriously GREAT price, for seriously GREAT quality, and get a seriously GREAT turnaround time.
What are our products?
We offer a range of Personalised Photo Books, Canvas Prints and Calendars. These are available in a full range of sizes for each product. From 20cm x 20cm photo books to 100cm x 150cm Canvas prints – you name it and we have it.
What is the Mojopro difference?
The big difference for Mojopro is our brilliant desktop application software called "Mojo Creation ". Most photo product websites make you spend masses of time uploading your images onto their websites as low/medium resolution Jpegs, and then you create your product in the cloud.
Not so with Mojopro. It's an easy four step process with us and it's all done on your desktop
A Bigger Range of file types to use
Being able to use Flattened PSD files means you will be able to enjoy clearer, crisper images and sharper, more defined text as well.
Pricing Calculator
Latest printing technology used


text:
GateFic is a Stargate community site that offers a large fan fiction archive, video and photo galleries, art gallery and discussion forum. It's a great place for Stargate fans to meet and mingle! Every year GateFic gives out awards to recognize the fantastic writers and artists who help contribute to the fandom.
SpaceGypsies is proud to announce that our very own SpaceGypsyMama has been nominated for several awards for her outstanding Daniel/Vala fan fiction! Starting July 4th, viewers can head on over to GateFic and vote for their favorites.
Want to check out SpaceGypsyMama's amazing fan fiction? The pieces below were nominated for GateFic awards. Click on the titles below to check them out!
Halloween: It's All About the Costume
How to Get an Archeologist to Ask You on a Date 1
What Part of Non Interference Don't You Understand
If you like her fic, please take a moment to cast your vote for SpaceGypsyMama!


text:
|Actuarial Discussion
|Preliminary Exams
|CAS/SOA Exams
|Around the World
Salary Surveys
Health Actuary Jobs
Actuarial Recruitment
Casualty Jobs
|Investment / Financial Markets Old Exam MFE Forum
|Thread Tools
|Search this Thread
|Display Modes
Corporate finance question - refinancing with tax shield
This comes from Corporate Finance (Berk/Demarzo/Strangeland), the recommended study text:
Richmond Industries plans to issue 1.5 million new shares of equity to raise $50 million to finance a new investment. After making the investment, Richmond expects to earn free cash flows of $10 million each year. Richmond currently has 5 million shares outstanding, and it has no other assets or opportunities. Suppose the appropriate discount rate for Richmonds future free cash flows is 8%, and the only capital market imperfections are corporate taxes and financial distress costs.
a. What is the NPV of Richmonds investment?
b. What is Richmonds share price today?
Suppose Richmond borrows the $50 million instead and thus there are only 3.5 million shares outstanding. The firm will pay interest only on this loan each year, and it will maintain an outstanding balance of $50 million on the loan. Suppose that Richmonds corporate tax rate is 40%, and expected free cash flows are still $10 million each year.
c. What is Richmonds share price today if the investment is financed with debt?
__________________________________________________ ____
a is pretty straightforward. It's just -50 + 10/0.08 = 75 million (present value of perpetuity less initial investment). For b, you divide 75 million by 5 million to get $15/share.
I'm having trouble with c. I get that the leveraged value of the firm should be the unleveraged value plus the tax shield. So I add 75 + 0.4 * 50 = 95 million. To get the share price, we subtract the debt from the leveraged value to get the equity, then divide by the number of shares. This gives (95 - 50)/3.5 = $12.86/share. But it's my understanding that (when there's a tax shield involved) the share price is supposed to go up when debt is increased.
In the solutions manual, the solution is (75+0.4 * 50)/5 = $19 per share. This makes no sense to me, as there are only 3.5 million shares in the leverage scenario (not 5 million).
Where am I going wrong?
|Thread Tools
|Search this Thread
|Display Modes
Linear Mode


text:
Here's the text of a presentation I just did for a student group at UC Davis. The Powerpoint slides are linked here.
• You shouldn't be here.
• What I'm going to say is just going to ruin everything.
• You should be in church.
• Seriously, some of you really should go to church instead.
• Ok, I warned you.
What you believe:
The chances are very good that you consider yourself to be a Christian.
If you are a Christian, then you believe that Jesus was a real person.
So you probably also believe that Jesus was resurrected from the dead.
That is, Jesus was a supernatural being of some sort and the most important event concerning him was his execution then his magical revival from the dead.
But believing that Jesus was resurrected is irrational for you.
Believing in Jesus' Resurrection is Irrational for You:
The body of evidence is small, weak, and riddled with unanswered questions.
There are other alleged supernatural events about which you have far more substantial evidence, yet you reject those beliefs on the grounds that there is insufficient evidence.
So by rejecting those better supported claims and accepting the magical claims about Jesus, you are employing a grossly inconsistent epistemic standard.
You engage in an ad hoc lowering of the bar about Jesus, yet in other comparable cases you sustain a higher level of proof that would lead you reject Jesus.
My goal: to get you to acknowledge that your continued believing in the resurrection of Jesus is unreasonable and inconsistent with your epistemic policies.
What's the evidence we have concerning the resurrection?
The Gospels: some history
Jesus is thought to have been executed about 35 A.D.
The first four books of the New Testament, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are our only source of information about the events.
Mark was written around 65 A.D.
Matthew was written between 70-100 A.D. and Luke was written around 70 A.D. The agreement is that they were based largely on Mark and another source, now lost, called the Q source.
John was written around 90-100 A.D.
None of these works were written by eyewitnesses, and none of them were written by the disciples Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John.
The authors of the books heard the stories from others. We do not know how many people the stories passed through from the events to their being recorded. It could have been 2, 20, or 200.
Problem #1: The Paucity of Evidence
So if we are being careful about what we know and what we don't, this is what we have:
3 hearsay sources (Mark, Q, and John) written 30-90 years after the fact with an unknown number of transmissions before.
This picture is brief and rough; the discussion of the details is vast.
#2: The 3 Stories are Surprisingly Contradictory:
Luke: Mary Magdalene, Joanna, and Mary (James' mother) and other women go to the tomb, find it open, talk to two men in shining garments, and then go tell what they saw to the other disciples.
Mark: Mary Magdalene, Mary (James' mother), and Salome go to the tomb, find it open, and find one man sitting there in white inside. They talk to him, then they run away in fear and they do not say "any thing to any man; for they were afraid."
Matthew: Mary Magdalene and the other Mary go to the tomb. A great earthquake opens it by rolling the stone away. They go inside and find an angel of the Lord in white. Then they leave with fear and joy and run to bring the disciples word.
John: Mary Magdalene (by herself) finds the tomb open. She goes and gets Simon Peter and the other disciple "that Jesus loved." The two of them go to the tomb and find it empty. They leave, but Mary stays crying. Then two angels appear to her. Then Jesus himself appears to her. She talks to him and then goes to tell the rest of the disciples.
#3: Probability, Reliability and Transmission:
Suppose the police must escort $10,000 in drug money across the country from New York to Los Angeles.
The money will be in police custody for the whole trip, but it will change hands between three different cops for different legs of the journey.
There is corruption in their police departments so that the general likelihood that a given cop is honest is .8.
If a corrupt cop gets custody of the drug money, he or she will take some.
If an honest cop gets custody, he or she will deliver it to the next leg of the trip without taking any of it.
Question: What are the odds of all the money arriving in Los Angeles?
Answer: .51. (.8 x .8 x .8)
If you add two more cops at the .8 honesty rate it goes down to .32 (And that's despite the fact that majority of cops in each department are honest.)
That is, even if the links in the transmission chain are individually probably reliable, the cumulative effect quickly undermines the result.
The cops here represent the people who transmitted the Jesus story from the alleged eyewitnesses to the authors of the Gospels.
How Reliable are Eyewitnesses to Miracles?
What about the original reports of Jesus' resurrection? (Do we have $10,000?)
Can we determine the reliability of eyewitness miracle testimony?
We can.
Lourdes, France: 80,000 pilgrims a year for over a century= more than 8 million people.
Suppose, charitably, that half experienced something they took to be supernatural.
66 miracles have been declared to be real by the official investigating body of the Catholic church.
Miracle testimony reliability= 66/4,000,000 or .0000165
(A probability needs to be greater than .5 to be reasonable.)
Odds on the Jesus Story?
Now we can improve our account:
.0000165 x .8 x .8 x .8= .000008
That's about 8 in 1 million.
If we reduce the number of "real" miracles at Lourdes, as we should, to a still generous 5, and lower the reliability of the transmitters or add a few more links, then the result is
.000000021 or about 1 in 5 million.
The point: our confidence in the Jesus story is orders of magnitude smaller than it needs to be for us to take it seriously. Given what we know about the original reporting and the transmission of these stories it is exceedingly unlikely that they are true.
It Gets Worse
Question: Would the early followers of Jesus have been more or less reliable about reporting miraculous events than the people at Lourdes?
Answer: Much less reliable.
#4: You reject supernatural claims with more evidence:
We have even more reasons to doubt the reliability of the original believers because of who they were and when they lived.
Several important differences between them and us undermine their reliability even more:
Supernatural Belief Threshold
How disposed is a person, in general, to accept or reject claims about supernatural entities, forces, or events?
Low SBT = they are more readily disposed to believe that supernatural claims are true. Their error rate with regard to supernatural claims would be high: they would conclude that miracles were more common than they really are, for example.
If there were supernatural ideas circulating about that were false or unfounded, this person would be more likely to believe them and repeat them.
The person with a low SBT would mislead you in the direction of accepting more of those claims than are true and well-supported.
If someone is largely ignorant of the important background information concerning a topic, then their lack of information reduces their reliability.
So my ignorance about it should diminish the confidence you have about one of those claims being true, all other things being equal.
That's why you shouldn't believe me when I insist that the Detroit Lions will win the Superbowl.
And that's why you shouldn't get your political views from Lindsay Lohan.
Religiousness and supernaturalism are inversely related to education:
We have good empirical evidence that as a person's education level increases, their belief in survival of the soul, miracles, heaven, the resurrection, the virgin birth, hell, the devil, ghosts, astrology, and reincarnation drop off dramatically. (http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?pid=359)
Gallup Polls have consistently found similar results. (http://www.gallup.com/poll/109108/Belief-God-Far-Lower-Western-US.aspx)
Religiousness, superstition, and supernaturalism are positively correlated with ignorance. When people have more education, they are less likely to believe.
We can make the same sort of projection back across time:
Consider the difference between your education level, or the general level of knowledge that the average American with a K-12 education has and the level of ignorance of a simple fisherman or a beggar living in the first century in Palestine.
Almost all of the information that you take for granted, the technology, and the methods for acquiring information were unavailable to them.
A tiny fraction of the population would have been literate.
Their mathematical abilities would have been worse than today's average 3rd grader.
They did not know that the Earth moves, or what the Sun was.
They did not know what electricity, hydrogen are.
They did not know what caused disease, or pregnancy, or death.
If religiousness, superstition, and supernaturalism rise as education goes down, then they must have been rampant among the people who had contact with Jesus (if he was real at all.)
Were they skeptical?
How much skepticism, doubtfulness, or disposition towards critical scrutiny does a person have?
If a person habitually reflects on the evidence carefully, makes a conscious and careful effort to gather the broadest body of relevant evidence, and actively seeks out disconfirming grounds for a claim, that, all other things being equal, is favorable with regard to their trustworthiness as a source of information.
If a person whose skepticism is high becomes satisfied that X is true, then you could be more confident that it is true, all other things being equal, than you would be if your source for the same claim was someone who is generally gullible, uncritical, and who does not reflect or seek out disconfirming evidence.
The Point
The early believers would have had a low Supernatural Belief Threshold, a high level of Ignorance, and a low level of Skepticism.
SBT: For Iron Age people 2,000 years ago, the world would have been full of mysterious forces, magical events, spiritual entities, stories about supernatural happenings. Hundreds of the events that you observe every day and know the causes of would have been complete mysteries to them. For all they knew, headaches were caused by magic. The possibility that someone could come back from the dead would have seemed like common sense to them. (Bereavement hallucinations)
Ignorance: They were ignorant of the information that we have concerning religious tendencies, religious group dynamics, psychology, alternative explanations for paranormal beliefs.
They were ignorant of the 2,000 years of examples of allegedly supernatural events that turned out to be easily explainable in natural terms.
In that 2,000 years, we have learned a staggering amount about how human psychology works, errors in reasoning, problems in eye-witness reports, gullibility, mistakes, social-religious phenomena, and so on.
Skepticism: They would have been much less skeptical overall than many people who are good sources of information now are.
They would not have been trained or practiced or even familiar with the notions of disconfirming evidence, alternative explanations, bias, and justification.
They were deeply committed religious converts.
#5: You already reject supernatural claims with more evidence
The early Christian stories are often defended as reliable on the grounds that:
there were multiple eyewitness accounts,
the story would have been too difficult to fake given the public nature of Jesus' execution,
the witnesses would not have had any ulterior motives about reporting something that would get them persecuted,
the followers were so convinced that they gave up their jobs and their possessions,
many of the events of the New Testament have been historically corroborated: the reign of Herod, the destruction of the temple, the growth of the early church.
and so on
The Salem Witch Trials
Between 1692 and 1693, dozens of people were accused, arrested, stood trial, and were tortured or hanged for "Sundry acts of Witchcraft," possession by devils, and other supernatural ill deeds.
Strange behavior in some little girls fed suspicions. They would dash about, freeze in grotesque postures, complain about biting and pinching sensations, and have violent seizures.
Ultimately over 150 people were accused.
William Phips, the governor of Massachusetts got involved. A court was established.
Thorough investigations were conducted. Witnesses were carefully cross-examined.
Evidence was gathered. Many people confessed.
The entire proceedings were carefully documented with thousands of sworn affidavits, court documents, interviews, and related papers.
In the end, 19 people, including Sarah Goode, and Rebekah Nurse had been sentenced and executed.
Today, the Salem Witch Trials are a frightening example of how enthusiasm, hysteria, social pressure, anxiety, and religious fervor can be powerful enough to lead ordinary people to do such extraordinary and mistaken things. "Witch hunt" has come to be synonymous with an irrational and emotionally heated persecution.
What evidence do we have that the women in Salem were really witches?
First, hundreds of people were involved in concluding that the accused were witches.
They testified in court, signed sworn affidavits, and demonstrated their utter conviction that the accused were witches.
Furthermore, they came from diverse backgrounds and social strata.
They included magistrates, judges, the governor of Massachusetts, respected members of the community, husbands of the accused, and so on.
These people had a great deal to lose by being correct—men would lose their wives, children would lose their mothers, community members would lose friends they cared about. It seems very unlikely that they could have had ulterior motives.
The trials were thorough, careful, exhaustive investigations. They deliberately gathered evidence, and made a substantial attempt to objectively sort out truth from falsity. In the court trials, they attempted to carefully discern the facts.
That there were witch trials in Salem and that many people were put to death has been thoroughly corroborated with a range of historical sources.
We have a great deal of historical evidence about Salem
The trials were a mere 300 years ago, not 2,000.
We have the actual documents; we do not have any of the original Gospels, only copies from centuries later.
We have the actual, sworn testimony of people claiming to have seen the magic performed; the Gospel stories are retellings of stories that were passed by word of mouth through an unknown number of people.
For the Salem witch trials, we have enough evidence to fill a truck. Some of the original documents: http://etext.virginia.edu/salem/witchcraft/texts/transcripts.html
Evidence for Magic in Salem >> than Evidence for Magic in Jerusalem
By any reasonable measure of quantity and quality, the evidence we have for concluding that there were real witches in Salem is vastly better than the evidence we have for concluding that Jesus was magical.
Yet it is simply not reasonable to believe that the women in Salem really were witches or really performed magic.
It is obvious to any reasonable person that even though they were tried, convicted, and executed for witchcraft, they were not witches and they did not perform any magical acts. You don't think they were witches.
Nor do I need to defend any particular alternative explanation, such as the rotten rye grain/hallucination theory, in order to reasonably conclude that they weren't witches. I can be sure that they weren't witches even if I don't know all of what really happened.
The Salem Witch Trials show that it is possible to meet an even heavier burden of proof than what we have for the resurrection of Jesus, and it remains unreasonable to believe that anything magical happened.
No clear headed person should accept the claim that the historical evidence makes it reasonable to believe that Jesus came back from the dead.
Conclusion: Believing in Jesus' Resurrection is Irrational for You
The evidence you have smaller, weaker, and too riddled with unanswered questions.
We have good reasons to think that the people who originally told the stories were not reliable. 1/ 5 million.
If you think it is reasonable to believe that Jesus came back from the dead, you're employing a grossly inconsistent double standard: There are many other alleged supernatural events that you have better evidence for, yet you adopt a high level of skepticism and proof and reject them. (Salem Witch Trials)
It is unreasonable to engage in an ad hoc lowering of the bar about Jesus, and accept a tiny, tenuous group of hearsay stories from a group of Iron Age religious converts about outrageous magical events.
The Problems:
Problem 1: Only three hearsay sources.
Problem 2: The stories about the resurrection are contradictory.
Problem 3: The probability of a claim equals the factorial of the reliability of all points of its transmission
Problem 4: The early believers would have been highly receptive to supernatural claims, their ignorance of relevant alternative explanations would have been high, and they would have had a low level of skepticism.
Religiousness and supernaturalism are inversely related to education.
We can make the same sort of projection back across time.
Problem 5: Your evidence for magic in Salem (and other supernatural events) is better than your evidence for magic in Jerusalem. (Reject them both!)
Thursday, April 30, 2009
The Case Against Christ
Here's the text of a presentation I just did for a student group at UC Davis. The Powerpoint slides are linked here.
Sunday, April 26, 2009
Putting Odds On Jesus
Suppose several police departments are transferring $10,000 of drug money across country from New York to Los Angeles. Along the way, the money will change hands three times. We have independent evidence that there is corruption in the three police departments that the cops are from. On the whole, the likelihood that a cop from any of those departments is honest is .8. If a corrupt cop gets custody of the money, then he or she will take some. If an honest cop gets custody, they will deliver it to the next leg of the journey without taking any.
Question: What are the odds of all of the money arriving in Los Angeles?
Probability theory says that the answer is .51. Or .8 x .8 x .8. If we add two more cops at the .8 honesty rate it goes down to .32. And that's despite the fact that majority of cops in each department are honest.
The majority of Americans consider themselves to be Christians. And if you consider yourself to be a Christian, then you believe that Jesus was a real person and he was resurrected from the dead.
Your only source of information about this event is the first four books of the Christian New Testament, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Jesus is alleged to have come back from the grave around 35 AD. Mark was written about 30 years later at 65 AD. The consensus seems to be that Matthew and Luke were written between 70-100 A.D. John was written around 90-100. How many links in the chain of transmission are there between the events in question and when the authors of these books wrote down the story? We don't know. They were not eyewitnesses; they heard the stories by word of mouth, most scholars believe, and there could have 2, 20, or 200 links between them and the original events. How reliable was each one of those links? We do not know.
We do know this. Eye witnesses are quite poor, especially when they are extraordinary events.
They mix the orders up, the miss important details, they revise, they augment, they embellish, and so on. Even moments after an event, they make serious mistakes.
What do we know about testimony? We know that when a person testifies that some claim is true and all we have to evaluate is the testimony, we can attach a value to the probability that what they are saying is true. In general, when people assert that x is true, and they mean it, we can and should ask, what is the probability that it is true, given that Smith, for instance, asserts that it is. For most of us, it would mean something for Smith to say it earnestly. And if Smith says he is utterly convinced of its truth—he says he's 100% certain that it is true—then that should count for a lot in my assessment of whether or not x actually is true.
What do we know about people's confidence levels and the real accuracy of their claims? In general, people are over-confident. They will claim to be accurate and certain more often than they are. In one study, subjects were asked to spell a word and then indicate how confident they were that they had spelled it correctly. When they were "100% certain" in fact they only spelled the word correctly 80% of the time. You've had this feeling of certainty many times about a spelled word. When you have it, it would be very hard to dissuade you without substantial proof, that you were wrong. But there are the real rates. (Adams and Adams, "Confidence in the recognition and reproduction of words difficult to spell," American Journal of Psychology, 73, 544-552)
Other recent work has shown a remarkable level of change and choice blindness in test subjects. Have subjects pick the most attractive person from a group of pictures of people, surreptitiously switch the picture on them, and then ask them to explain why they think the switched picture is of the most attractive person, and they don't miss a beat. They start explaining why without even noticing the switch. Have shoppers taste a range of tea samples and have them pick their favorite. Then switch it without their knowing and ask them to taste it again and explain why they think it is the best. Even when you replace their favorite, say apple cinamon, with a completely different flavor, 2/3 of the subjects don't notice the change and the confabulate a justification for why that's their favorite.
The data in change blindness cases is even more remarkable. Here's a video of two teams of people passing a basketball, one group in white shirts and one group in black shirts. Watch the video carefully and try to count the number of times that the white team passes the ball. http://viscog.beckman.illinois.edu/flashmovie/15.php
A surprising number of subjects do not notice what should be obvious. In some of these studies, 75% of the subjects do not notice. (Change Blindness)
So robust empirical evidence shows us that change and choice blindness, and overconfidence cast substantial doubt on the reliability of eye witness testimony. Volumes of other studies document the problems with eye witness accounts.
Do we have any way to attach a reliability estimate to the first person in the chain, the individuals who are alleged to have witnessed the resurrected Jesus himself? We do. Every year at the shrine at Lourdes, France, more than 80,000 pilgrims visit. The spring waters there are alleged to have healing powers, after a woman claims to have seen the Virgin Mary. Over the course of a century, then, that is more than 8 million visitors.
The official representatives of the Catholic church have been conservative about the real occurrence of miracles there. They have officially recognized 66. Let's be generous and grant that 66 real miracles have actually occurred there.
Let's also be conservative and suppose that of the 8 million visitors, half of them felt that they had observed or felt a real supernatural or spiritual event. This number is conservative because the vast majority of people going there do so with the strong expectation that miracles have occurred there in the past, and that they will be miraculously healed as well.
So for the visitors at Lourdes, what is their reliability for reporting miraculous events? 66/4,000,000 or .0000165. That is, even setting the number of felt miracles low and agreeing with the church about the number of real miracles, the probability that the miracle claim from any given pilgrim is true is .0000165.
Should we think that the general reliability of the early Christians who spread the Jesus story was greater or less than the pilgrims at Lourdes? I should think it would be much lower. The pilgrims are modern, educated, scientific era people. Many of them are doctors, lawyers, and scientists, people who are trained in making good decisions and being skeptical. They have the benefit of 2,000 years of investigations into the natural causes of allegedly supernatural events. The early Christians, by contrast, would have been largely illiterate, poor, uneducated. They would not have the benefit of the huge body of scientific and empirical knowledge that we take for granted.
But let's be exceedingly charitable and grant that the early Christians were 10 times more reliable about reporting miraculous events than the modern visitors to Lourdes. And let's suppose that there are only 3 steps of transmission between the events in 35 A.D. across 30 years to when Mark first wrote the story down. And let's suppose that those three links were much more reliable than the cops in the story above. What are the odds that the resurrection story is true:
.00165 x .9 x .9 x .9 = .00012
That is, on a vastly charitable estimate, there is a one in ten thousand chance that the story is true.
Should we be that charitable? No. We should not be generous about the 66 miracles at Lourdes. Many of the cases in support would crumble under any serious, objective scrutiny. I would be surprised if 5 of them didn't have an obvious natural explanation. And I suspect that many more people than 4,000,000 thought they felt or saw something spiritually significant there. If there have been 6 million of them, and 5 real miracles, then the reliability rating of Lourdes pilgrims is 0.00000083333. And the reliability rating for early Christians should be much lower given that they did not have the advantage of 2,000 years of science and a modern education to augment their analysis of miracles. Nor should we grant that all of the tranmission links in the story to Mark would have a .9 reliability. There are too many unanswered questions, too many doubts, and the human propensities to embellish, omit, revise, and confabulate are too great.
Still granting only 3 steps, a more reasonable estimate is:
.000000833 x .7 x .7 x .7 = 0.0000002858
or about 1 in 5 million. According to the U.S. National Weather Service, the odds of your being struck by lightning in your lifetime are 1 in 5,000.
When people take the Jesus stories seriously and make comments like, "Why would the early Christians lie?" or "what incentive could that have for making it all up?" or "how could they have perpetrated such a deception?" they are simply ignoring the strength of the tendency in the human mind to see miracles or events of spiritual or supernatural origin at every turn. We don't need to have a better, alternative explanation to be quite sure that Jesus was not resurrected from the dead. The reliability of the information transmitted in those stories to us is just too low.
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Dead as a Doornail
Here are the slides for a presentation at CSUS this week. I argue that the prospects for using out of body or near death experiences as evidence for the existence of some transcendental realm are very dim. People often have OBEs when they are clinically dead (18%!), but brain activity can continued then since "clinical death" only means that heartrate and respiration have stopped. If someone had an OBE during complete brain death, it would be important, but no one comes back from complete brain death, and even if they did we would have a Timing Problem.
Dead as a Doornail
UCDavis presentation
Friday, April 10, 2009
The God Projector
At this point in the many decades that I have been contemplating the question, the non-existence of God or any other gods is quite clear to me. I'm as confident about that conclusion as I am about any philosophical, abstract, or non-observable matter. God's non-existence seems as sure as oxygen's existence. Perhaps that is the result of my being too impressed with the power of my own logic. But there are some other powerful indicators that I take as corroboration. In the last 50 years, serious theistically minded philosophers, for the most part, have abandoned evidential or "natural" approaches to the problem. The emergence of alternative characterizations of religious belief like process theology, existential theology, fideism, reformed epistemology, mystical and religious experience accounts, Wittgensteinian accounts, and others all implicitly or explicitly concede the point that attempting to gather evidence or produce arguments that are sufficient to render belief in God reasonable is doomed to fail. It is also clear that neither arguments nor evidence were the source of it in the first place. They never led people to love, tithe, build cathedrals, sacrifice themselves, strap on suicide bombs, go to war, or embrace cults. Religious beliefs do, however. That is to say that whatever is going on in the vast majority of people who are religious, it is not a matter of thoughtful reflection on the evidence. They became religious without that, and the sustain a high level of belief withou it. I also take the widespread consensus among my philosophy of religion students over the years to be significant: in their view, the whole philosophical project of inquiring into the evidence that could provide epistemic justification for the existence of God is perverse and alien. Many of them were 22 or 25 or older before they had ever heard someone even pose the question, "What is the evidence that we have that would make believing in God reasonable?" That strikes them as odd because that never had anything to do with God beliefs that they knew of.
So to sum up, these reasons lead me to think that belief in God for most people is not a matter of accepting a reasonable conclusion based on an evaluation of the evidence: first, there are lots of powerful arguments for thinking that there is no God that I have detailed in scores of blog posts; second, even the theologians and philosophers have abandoned evidential or natural approaches to belief in God; third, the level of devotion (and insanity) that is common among religious believers suggests that something more passional or psychological is going on; and fourth, most people, including believers, seem to think that religious belief is a matter of faith, or personal preference, or disposition, but not reasoning.
That all leaves us facing an incredible question: why then do so many people believe, and believe and act they way they do about God? Our inquiry into possible rational grounds has not produced any results that can reflect the passionate commitment, or the consuming power of religious belief in the human psyche. So we are left with trying to suss out the non-rational causes of belief, the psychological, sociological, neurobiological, and evolutionary forces that have shaped this monster in the human mind. Many of my recents posts have pursued these hypotheses. Here's an interesting possibility.
The human visual system is constructed to produce a stunning illusion when it is confronted with a rotating mask of a face. As the mask rotates and the back, concave side comes into view, it will appear at first that the inside of the mask curves out away from you. But as it continues to rotate, the inner surface that should be curved away suddenly pops forward so that it looks like the face is bulging out normally towards you. What should be the inside looks like a normal face looking at you. Look at this example: http://www.michaelbach.de/ot/fcs_hollow-face/index.html
The cognitive dissonance of the effect is striking because you know that the inner surface is curving away and that the nose should be in reverse image, but it looks just like a normal convex face. And no matter what cognitive effort you exert, you can't not see the face sticking out. You are unable to look at the inside of a mask and see it as the inside.
Daniel Dennett (Breaking the Spell, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, Explaining Consciousness, Sweet Dreams) has argued that evolution has equipped the human mind with an intentionality projector, a mind endower, or a self broadcaster. We are highly prone to endow other entities, particularly ones with complex and difficult to predict behavior, with a mind. We don't just see another organism as an object that moves, we see a self there, a being with a perspective. There is some way that the world appears to it and it has plans, desires, knowledge, and beliefs. Modeling other entities behavior in terms of its possessing intentionalilty has enormous predictive value. If I can think about what the wolf wants, what it knows, what plans it has, and what it will do next then I have a much better chance of thwarting those plans. (That's good if it wants to eat me.) I don't recall Dennett putting the point this way, but isn't this propensity to endow certain kinds of entities with an intentional mind very difficult to supress? Isn't it very hard to us to not see certain kinds of beings as possessing a mind? It would be very hard, for example, to see another human being who is talking to me and acting normally the way I would see a tree blowing in the wind, or a rock sitting on the path. I can't help but see you as a self—a center of consciousness that is navigating the same world I inhabit but by a different path and set of experiences.
What if believing in God, feeling God, or experiencing God in the world and in our lives is a forced cognitive illusion that is a product of our wiring the way the rotating mask illusion is? What if we can't help but believe, or experience God or some near analog?
Many people find this new agey idea quite charming—there's the same element of the divine in everyone. We should see all different religions and spirituals experiences as manifestations of the same divine inspiration in all of us. All different spiritualities are accessing the same fundamental force or energy. Of course, when the point is put this way, it is celebratory. Religious feelings are a good thing to be encouraged in all, and the common thread to them all is a confirmation that there is something larger and more powerful than all of us.
I am suggesting a darker analysis. The God Illusion (yes, that's very close to Dawkins' The God Delusion) is a cognitive error, a throw back, side effect, or kludgey by product of our believing and perceptual systems. We are naturally endowed with propensity to project God out into the world as one of the things we experience, or an answer to our questions, or the cause of some events. We're like a cavefish that dangles a glowing light in front of its own face, but has no clue that its coming from its own head. Everywhere we go, we keep seeing or feeling God, or arriving at God as the underlying cause or explanation of it all. "Surely God is great, powerful, and omnipresent!" Every time something tragic happens, our thoughts turn to God. And when something great befalls, then God must be praised and thanked. "God is infinitely wise and has a plan for me. And God is unimaginably good too. We should praise him!"
But those feelings and beliefs are illusions. He's not really there. There is no face pointing out at you, but you just can't help but think that there is. You can't not think God is real.
Saturday, April 4, 2009
The Forbidden Conclusion
Human beings are psychologically incapable of simultaneously holding two contradictory propositions in mind at once and having an attitude of assent or belief towards both of them. That is, we can't believe an outright contradiction. Nor do we have much voluntary control over which claims we believe. We can't, through the force of our will, start believing something new or stop believing something that we previously assented to. Try it. Get yourself to actually believe that Barack Obama is not the president of the United States, 2 + 2 = 5, or that Matthew McConaghey is not the sexiest man alive. Ok, just kidding on the last one.
"But people believe contradictory, irrational things all the time!" will be the objection. Here's what's really going on. An occurrent belief is one that is in conscious awareness now. In many cases, we have an occurrent belief that contradicts with some other claim that we believe or believed, but it is not occurrent. There are all sorts of things buried in my mind that I am not currently thinking about that could conflict with something that I am thinking about, but I just haven't made the connection and seen the problem. In other cases, a pair of beliefs we have are only implicitly contradictory. The two claims are not an outright contradiction, but were we to supply some other beliefs and draw out some of the logical implications of them, a genuine contradiction would emerge. But again, if I haven't thought it all out, I won't have an occurrent contradictory belief pair.
There are other sources of cognitive tension. Some groups of propositions are probabilistically contradictory--one asserts what another declares to be exceedingly improbable. If I won the lottery three days in a row, it would strike me as exceedingly improbable that the lottery was really a fair, million to one game.
Now some relevant points from neuroscience and philosophy of mind. The current picture of the world that occupies consciousness from moment to moment is a construction where what I am seeing, hearing, feeling, or thinking now is threaded together with my memories of the recent and not so recent past. What I am sensing now with the keyboard under my fingers is not the same as what I was feeling 10 minutes ago, but consciousness builds a continuous narrative that bridges those sensations and makes causal and psychological sense of the transitions. There was an entity, the I, who was in the kitchen then, and after that, I walked up the stairs and sat down at the computer. A world of continuous, causally regular objects that is also inhabited by the continuous subject is constructed (unbeknownst to me) out of the meaningless raw feels of thought and sensation.
This fleeting, perpetually forward rolling window of consciousness is discontent, as we have seen, with a picture of the world and the self that doesn't make sense. It abhors contradictions in the story of the world and the self that it creates. Concerning the world, this disposition manifests as a set of expectations that events and objects are regular, predictable, and sensible. The aversion to contradiction creates a forbidden conclusion about the self. It is profoundly disturbing for us to think of our selves as irrational. Seeing contradictions in the words and actions of others comes easy--consider how starkly some conflict between two claims from your husband or girlfriend leapt out at you the last time you were in an argument. Now consider how it felt when she accused you of first saying X was true and then contradicting yourself 5 minutes later by saying not-X. When you heard those two claims put together, your mind scrambled for an account that would diminish the seeming conflict. You quickly found an explanation whereby saying both of those things makes perfect sense. See? It is profoundly difficult, if not impossible to acknowledge about oneself that your own beliefs are at deep logical odds with each other. "I am irrational," is the forbidden conclusion that we cannot face, even when it is plainly obvious.
Experimentally, the refusal to accept it displays itself in revisions, confabulations, memory editing, and misrepresentations. In one study, subjects were asked to pick the most attractive person from a stack of pictures. Then the subject's choice was swapped for another picture without their knowledge. The researchers then asked the subjects why they picked that picture instead of the others. Without missing a step, and without even knowing they did so, subjects promptly confabulated a justification for why the new picture was of their most attractive original pick. The fact they cannot accept: I made a mistake--the picture I picked is not the most attractive one in the stack. Goethals, G. R., & Reckman, R. F. (1973). The Perception of Consistency in Attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(6), 491-501.
In another study, high school students were tested to determine their attitude about a topic. Then a confederate in the study discussed the topic with them and subtley affected an attitude change in them. The subjects were assessed again and it was found that as a result of the confederate, they had a different view about the topic. But when asked to recall their view from before, they recounted their original position to make it consistent with their new one. Unknowingly, they made recall errors that rendered the new views as the one that they had believed all along. The perception of consistency in attitudes, George R. Goethals and Richard F. Reckman
In a now famous study by Nisbett and Wilson, shoppers were asked to evaluate various clothing items for quality. Multiple trials and randomization revealed that no matter what the arrangement of the articles of clothing, the subjects had a bias for the right hand items. When they were asked to justify their choice, however, they would construct an explanation on the basis of various features of the item. That is, subjects tended to pick the right item no matter which one was put there, and then they would make up a story about why it was the best one. Nisbett, R.E. and Wilson, T.D. "Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes".Psychological Review, Vol 84 pp 231-259.
Other studies show that when people have a strong conviction that a claim is true, they will heavily filter the evidence to make it fit. They will accept evidence that appears to confirm their view readily and with little scrutiny, but they will subject disconfirming evidence to high levels of criticism and analysis. So when they encounter contrary evidence to what they believe, it tends to actually reinforce their view and polarize them further into it. Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence, Charles G. Lord, Lee Ross, and Mark R. Lepper. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, Vol. 37, No. 11, 2098-2109
Ziva Kunda, a psychologist from Princeton, describes two impulses that are at odds in us. We have a motivation to be accurate--to form correct views about the world. But we also possess substantial motivation to arrive at particular favored conclusions. She says, "There is considerable evidence that people are more likely to arrive at conclusions that they want to arrive at, but their ability to do so is constrained by their ability to construct seemingly reasonable justifications for these conclusions." The Case for Motivated Reasoning, Psychological Bulletin 1990, Vol. 108, No. 3, 480-498.
What's the relevance of all of this to religious beliefs? Nowhere in our lives is the powerful conflict between a set of desires or psychological needs on one side and the goal of having an accurate, coherent, justified description of the world on the other more evident than it is about God. We want God to exist. We want the religious doctrine of our childhood to be the correct picture of reality. From the numbers, it is nearly impossible for us to shake off the transcendental temptation. But we can't accept about ourselves that this belief is the product of some invisible forces in our nature, or that it is driven more by desire than by reason. So we go through logical gymnastics and contortions of reason to fabricate "seemingly reasonable justifications." If we find ourselves believing it, we can't help but construct a back story that render that belief a reasonable one. If we didn't, we'd have to face the forbidden conclusion. (Thanks to Randy Mayes for the idea and the title.)
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Employee of the Month: God
We have a more comprehensive empirical picture of how humans form beliefs now than we have ever had in history. There are countless pitfalls and errors that we fall into, and detecting them can be very difficult, particularly since we are using our cognitive faculties to evaluate the reliability of our faculties. Despite the difficulties, there are a number of procedural questions that we can ask about a particular case where we search for evidence, evaluate it, and draw a conclusion about it. Considering these questions as part of the evidence gathering and evaluation procedure can dramatically improve the accuracy of the resulting conclusion. Habitually considering these issues can develop the epistemic virtues that will make a person a far better thinker and decision maker. Here are the questions, in no particular order.
Is there any data?
What exactly is the data?
Have I conducted an exhaustive search?
If there were significant counter evidence, would my search have found it?
What else could it be?
What would disprove the hypothesis?
Has my enthusiasm for any particular hypothesis affected the evidence I have searched for or emphasized?
Have I adequately considered other alternatives?
Has search satisfaction led me to stop looking prematurely?
Have I thought about it long enough?
Has my enthusiasm for a hypothesis led me to relax evidential standards for it or increase them for competing hypotheses?
Am I prepared to change my mind in light of new or different evidence?
If there are personal, psychological, or social factors that tilt my evaluation of the evidence, would I be aware of it?
Have I given more or less important pieces of information their appropriate amount of weight?
Has the order of my consideration of the evidence affected my evaluation when it shouldn't have?
Has the recency or remoteness of some evidence in time affected my evaluation when it shouldn't have?
Is my memory supplying me with a representative picture of the relevant experiences?
Are there external factors that may be giving me a tilted picture of the facts?
Am I applying principles of justification here that are consistent with the ones I use normally?
Did I sustain a high level of open-mindedness during the search and evaluation phase?
Are the estimates of likelihoods or probabilities that I am employing accurate or realistic?
Would the conclusion drawn withstand a reasonable level of skepticism?
There is no question that the systematic application of these standards of evidence and inference will produce better justifications and better conclusions. Consider ten types of belief formation that would benefit:
A doctor gathers and evaluates diagnostic evidence in order to identify and treat a life threatening disease.
A jury member tries to decide whether or not a defendant is guilty of a capital offense.
A mechanic considers a potentially costly problem in the engine of a car.
A student reflects on which college to attend.
An investor decides how best to spend investment capitol on the stock market.
A couple tries to buy a house that best suits their various needs.
A wife considers what appears to be evidence that her husband is cheating.
A historian attempts to determine the sequence of events surrounding an important battle in an ancient war.
A journalist gathers evidence about a corporation's involvement in bribery of a corrupt politician.
A plumber tries to figure out what's wrong with the sink.
This all appears to be belaboring the obvious, but there's a larger point here concerning religious belief. In every ordinary circumstance, it is trivially obvious that the questions concerning evidence gathering and belief formation from above make the difference between a good and bad decision, or a rational or irrational belief formation. It is also trivially obvious that in the vast majority of cases, a person's belief in God would fail horribly by the same measures. That is, for most people who believe in God, that belief and the procedure that produced it would not pass muster for the minimally acceptable standards that we employ everywhere else in our lives. The anomaly is even more conspicuous when we consider that the God belief is, arguably, the single most important decision that a person can make in their life. For the most profound question, we employ the worst procedure for finding an answer. If your doctor, mechanic, investment broker, or plumber drew conclusions in the fashion that you drew your religions conclusions, you'd fire them without hesitation. If a jury member, wife, or journalist made decisions that way, they would do irreparable harm.
At a minimum, the believer needs to close the gross double standard gap here. At a minimum, if the believer wants the rest of us to take them seriously, he needs to subject his belief to the same general standards of justification that are vital everywhere else. Suppose the boss is romantically involved with a woman in the office who is, by most accounts, one of the worst employees. And it appears that as a result of her special relationship, she gets raises, special benefits, time-off, and lowered performance expectations. Then the boss announces that she has earned the Employee of the Month award, and he expects the rest of us to acknowledge her worthiness for the honor. Imagine how much worse it would be if there were no grounds at all for the award, but he insisted that we should all take it on faith that she is truly the most outstanding employee.
The hanky panky between you and your God is obvious to the rest of us, but you haven't been able to get your head clear and see the situation with sufficient objectivity.


text:
10 Reasons Why You Should Consider Renting Out Your Vacation Property
Renting out your vacation property is a financial decision that makes a whole lot of sense, and one that can earn you a nice chunk of additional income. In some instances, the rent amount may not cover the mortgage payments but regardless, the tax benefits and income generated from a rental property is almost always worthwhile.
Furthermore, this is often a better option than selling a home. You could be using an idle piece of property to generate some extra income. With this in mind, we will take a look at why you need to consider renting out your vacation property and some common benefits from the process.
For many vacation property owners, there is simply no way to be in two places at the same time. This will mean that the property is sitting idle and going to waste. Similarly, it is often the case that an owner is unable to sell this property for a sufficient price and hence, renting out their vacation property is a much more sensible solution. Some vacation property owners are simply looking for an easy way to improve cash flow and renting out a vacation property can be a highly profitable way to do so.
As you might expect, renting out a property requires a great deal of time and effort. Whether this refers to carrying out repairs or dealing with listings, the tasks are many and this is especially true in the case of ongoing maintenance or assisting renters. On the other hand, there is always the option of working with a property management firm who can take care of these issues.
Aside from the above, some property owners are concerned that the building or furnishings will incur damage from those staying at the home. Conversely, renting your vacation property is often a chance to improve conditions and keep on top of anything which needs attention.
Here are the 10 reason you should rent out your vacation property.
As already mentioned, renting out your vacation property will enable owners to offset their rent or income with tax breaks. However, this is also an opportunity to use the income from this rental property to cover other expenses such as insurance and mortgage payments.
Although some owners may not be able to sell up, renting out your vacation property is the perfect excuse to renovate the home. In fact, many of the expenses incurred during these improvements are likely to qualify as tax deductions. On a slightly different note, having tenants in the property is likely to help you or the property manager to keep tabs on the condition of the home.
As you may know, many vacation property owners choose to work with a property manager. For this reason, when it comes to listing the property, vetting guests, or carrying out maintenance, there is no need for the property owner to get involved. In this sense, for a small monthly fee, homeowners can generate an extra income without needing to lift a finger.
In fact, when renting out your vacation property, you never need to be there. From maintenance and bookings to inquiries and payments, property management firms can take care of all the business while you get on with your life.
If you rent out your vacation property for less than fifteen days in a calendar year, there is no requirement to file a report on your income taxes. At the same time, it must be remembered that if you do not file this same report, you will be unable to deduct any expenses from taxes.
Even though this is now treated as a rental property, you still have the option to stay in this home whenever you want. In this sense, the property is still your private hideaway and you simply choose to rent it out to earn some extra income throughout the year.
At a time when almost everything is online, there has never been a better opportunity for renting out your vacation property. That is to say, property management firms are extremely experienced when it comes to listing the property and finding renters. That being said, there is always the option to do this for yourself, although this is certainly a time-consuming task.
While there are several formalities for renting out your vacation property, this process of getting started in this business is pretty straight forward. You will need to inform the insurance company that this is now a rental property but otherwise, most of the work involved involves preparing and maintaining the home.
Renting out a property is often an option for owners who are unable to sell the property due to a low valuation. At the same time, there is a strong likelihood that the value of your property will grow over time and this effectively makes a vacation home a sound investment.
Needless to say, if you do not sell a vacation property, you will still have this as an option at retirement. However, if you ever did decide to sell your initial property, you will then have the opportunity to use this equity to pay off the mortgage on your vacation home. That being said, let us stay focused on the present and not so far down the road!
As you can see, there are many benefits to renting out your vacation property. While you can absolutely take full responsibility for the entire process, employing a property management firm can make this a rather seamless process. Moreover, it makes perfect sense to take advantage of the tax breaks and start generating an extra income as the value of your vacation property continues to grow.
If you're looking for an experienced vacation rental management company to help shoulder the busy work of renting and overseeing a vacation rental property, let Minnestay help!


text:
My Completely Honest Review of the 2019 Ultimate Homemaking Bundle
Spring has sprung and with it our desire to whip our homes into shape after keeping them closed up all winter. Ultimate Bundles knows this and wants to help you make homemaking easier. Each spring they introduce a new Ultimate Homemaking Bundle and today is the day it is open for purchase!
This review is going to go over the nitty gritty of what the Ultimate Homemaking Bundle is and how it can help (or not help) you. I want this to be an honest review so I'll be covering who this bundle is for, who shouldn't buy it, my favorite products, and my final impressions.


text:
Your partner in M2M communication
Datamobile AG is the ideal companion on the way to the digital future. With a modular, scalable offering, powerful network infrastructure and data analysis, all services are available for digitization. Our core competence is connectivity, independent of the business model. In this area, we deliver integrated solutions for enterprise and medium-sized businesses. So you have an experienced contact for all M2M topics, who accompanies your project from the beginning. At the same time, an interdisciplinary team works daily to further improve technology and services and to develop innovative solutions for the future.
Technical support
Extensive support ensures fast implementation and smooth operation.
Latest technology guarantees the highest safety standards.
A large selection of partner networks allows best and stable connectivity.
Complete solutions
Our holistic approach reduces effort and costs.
Gerald Wirtl
Marion Reinhart
Andreas Buchinger


text:
Ossies Homestead Farmstay is located on a 40 acre heritage property, in the mid north of South Australia and until recently has been farmed by the Smart Family and descendents since 1912. The property was then known as "SunnyBrae".
Our goal is to create a small recluse for self contained caravaners and eventually offer house guests in our farmstay.
We are set amongst the rolling hills and cropping country with its vast vistas and seasonal myriad of colours.
We offer sites with power and water, or without power if you prefer.
In return you can enjoy our farm atmosphere.
We look forward to your visit. We are located 55kms north of Clare.


text:
It appears that your internet browser is out of date. For a better shopping experience,we recommend an update to the latest version.You can download browser updates from the official provider page free of charge.Please select:
Your shopping bag is empty
Pick your favourite items now!
Item number: 6847999
incl. VAT plus delivery costs
Shop around the clock at the Bogner Online-Shop! Search our inventory quickly and conveniently and order your favourites at the click of a button. Delivery is usually made within three to five days (DHL shipping). Valid only for in-stock items.
We charge a shipping fee of 9.95 £ per order. Should shipping take place in partial deliveries we will charge the shipping costs once only.
The modern material mix of fine suede leather and felt lends the Trois Vallées boots an urban look. The striking look is given a smart finish by the rear reflector strips and logo details, which enhance the combination of performance and style. Both the high-profile sole and the contrasting synthetic fur lining make this style a comfortable all-rounder in the snow.
Shell: Synthetic leather, WoolLining: SynthetikInsole: SynthetikSole: Gum
Premium blend of fine suede leather and textured felt
Item number: 194-0393-1584-041


text:
Plant Response to Natural Climate Change
To view the redistribution of more than 50 species of plants over the past 21,000 years, visit Pollen Viewer. Data and imagery provided by Williams, J.W., B.N. Shuman, T. Webb III, P.J. Bartlein, P.L. Leduc, 2004, Late Quaternary vegetation dynamics in North America: scaling from taxa to biomes, Ecological Monographs, 74:309-334.
Basics of DEW >


text:
In the not-so-distant future, Martians have invaded our world and laid waste to our civilization! Now, only Jonathan Raven - the gladiator known as Killraven - and his band of Freemen stand between Earth and utter annihilation! Dig sci-fi action? Love great visuals? Then grab your tub of popcorn and get ready for this modern classic from the great Alan Davis!
Collecting KILLRAVEN #1-6.
144 PGS./Rated T+ ...$19.99
Trim size: standard


text:
"captures the romance and charming atmosphere of the island"
The Palms Hotel is a landmark in the historic old town district of Key West, Florida and it captures the romance and charming atmosphere of this tropical island city. Surrounded by gracious Victorian and quaint "Conch" architecture, The Palms Key West Guesthouse is only a few minutes walk or bicycle ride from superb shops, delectable dining and a world of entertaining attractions- all exclusively Key West. Our historical Key West Inn is an enticing example of island architecture. The Main House - built in 1889 - features lace-like gingerbread trim and large wraparound verandahs. Here, you can relax in comfortable, Caribbean-style wicker chairs or settees and sink into the languid rhythm of the tropics. Inside, you'll find lovingly restored, tropically furnished Key West accommodations. Each comfortable room offers air conditioning and ceiling fans, color televisions with full cable access, direct-dial phone service, secured WI-FI , and private bath. Bringing your beloved pet with you on your Carribbean vacation? We are a Pet Friendly Hotel in Key West! Key West also offers great pet friendly bars and restaurants and pet friendly activities on and off the water.
Be the first to add a review to the The Palms Hotel.
The Palms Hotel
- Sun - Sat: 8:00 am - 10:00 pm
Is there a problem with this listing? Let us know.
Own or Manage This Location?
Claim this listing to keep your
information up to date.
Nearby Hotels
Related Trip Guides
Florida's haunted highway: I-4 from Tampa to Daytona
- 7 Places
- 03:05
- 182 mi
The most amazing campgrounds for stargazing with the kids
- 12 Places
Weekend Escape: A lazy and lush Gulf Shores getaway
- 15 Places
- 05:19
- 186 mi
Spring-hopping around Florida with the family
- 5 Places
- 04:37
- 260 mi


text:
GB Probst Verlag, Lichtenau, Deutschland.
German edition of "Windows of Opportunity" This book explores some essential nonspecific factors of child psychotherapy. It is based on video transcripts and discussions between four outstanding child therapists during a two-day conference in Copenhagen in June 2013, pinpointing the moments of meeting and moments of change irrespective of method.


text:
His day isn't over yet. After teaching all morning, he still has prep work to do, and tonight he's going to spend a few hours praying with the leaders of Calvary Chapel.
He's amazing. And sleepy.
Whenever he has a frustrating day at the school, he always tells me, "I wish I were a better teacher."
He never complains about problem students. He rarely talks about the terrible education system that's left most of his students years behind where they should be. No, it's always, "I can do better." This is one of the many reasons I love my husband.
Prishtina High School is full of people like him, who are just doing the best they can day after day. Almost all of them have to raise support from America to stay here, but they all give 110% at their jobs, giving up prep periods to sub for sick colleagues and staying long after school hours to grade projects and prep new material. Some of them even host weekly meals for the other teachers. Many volunteer with other ministries or have families to take care of. They are the hardest working people I've ever met, and they are a huge blessing to the people of Kosovo.
The school is currently in the process of being accredited, and a team from Ohio is coming this weekend to determine if it's up to American standards. If they are accredited, it'll be a huge step for the school, which has been growing despite a lack of resources and staff. Please join us in praying for this process. So much hard work has gone into making this school an excellent place. Pray that the teachers' sacrifices will be rewarded and that their spirits will be refreshed so they can make it to June.
I know one sleepy teacher who could use a win.
Liz (and Sam)
For more info on the school, check out their website.
As always, support can be sent to
Sam & Elizabeth Steere
3601 Ginger Creek Dr.
Springfield, IL 62711
Thank you!


text:
Branch details
60 Bath Street, CV31 3AE
Telephone: 01926 339340
Opening hours:
Monday: 9.00am - 4.45pm
Tuesday: 9.00am - 4.45pm
Wednesday: 9.30am - 4.45pm
Thursday: 9.00am - 4.45pm
Friday: 9.00am - 4.45pm
Saturday: 9.00am - 12.00pm
Sunday: Closed
Opening hours will vary on bank holidays. Please contact the branch for details.
Full counter service, paid parking available, induction loop, limited access, nearest alternative branch is Parade (Leamington), Warwick or Kenilworth.
Services provided:
Account opening


text:
If you're interested in Lamplight, the best thing to do is to arrange a walkthrough. We'll give you a login to a demo system and talk you through it, answer any questions you have, and help you to work out if Lamplight will be the right fit for you. And, obviously, there's no obligation and we won't hassle you afterwards!book a walkthrough
General enquiries
Phone: 020 7558 8793.
Support enquiries
You can find contact details for support queries on our support page.


text:
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Devcon in Sweden again?
Re: Devcon in Sweden again?
From: Peter D'Hoye <peter.dhoye_at_telenet.be>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:16:42 +0200
> > Seeing the 6th of June is the Swedish "national day" and thus
Can I vote for 27-29 june as a proposal?
Looking back at the time table of last year I see amiconn and pixelma
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew