text:
Mr. CHABOT. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Mr. Speaker, the Supreme Court's unfortunate decision to uphold ObamaCare doesn't mean it's the right thing for this country. It's not. It was bad public policy when it was forced upon the American people 2 years ago, and it's bad public policy today.
Last Friday, the Department of Labor announced that millions are still out of work across this country and that businesses are still struggling to keep their doors open. It is unfortunate that this President doesn't seem to recognize that this law is hurting American workers and those looking for work. Businesses will be hit with more than $500 billion in new taxes--and the Supreme Court has said what it is, a tax--a maze of burdensome red tape, and mandates that could cause the loss of 1.6 million additional jobs. We can't afford that.
And for what?--a law that puts government ahead of people, a law that consolidates power into the hands of a group of 15 unelected bureaucrats, a law that has already increased health care costs and will limit Americans' access to quality, affordable health care.
There is a better way forward.
This misguided law must be replaced with patient-centered reforms that allow families to make their own health care choices and to visit the doctors they want to visit. Health care decisions should be made at home, around kitchen tables all across the country, not in the back rooms on Capitol Hill.
Mr. Speaker, we do not need health care reform like this, but we do need health care reform. This law is not the answer. It's a Big Government power grab. That's what it really is. What history has shown time and again is that Big Government makes things more expensive, more bureaucratic, and less effective. It is time to repeal this law and to get our economy moving again and to get Americans back to work.
Source: http://thomas.loc.gov


text:
Our Research Support Specialists are highly experienced with academia and eye tracking as well as being technically knowledgeable and capable. Staff consists of former faculty and graduates of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vision Sciences, Reading and Psychology, with extensive expertise in all aspects of eye tracking research. We are keenly aware of the research methods and considerations involved in obtaining the highest quality data possible.
During Onsite Training, one of our Research Support Specialists will visit your lab, set up the EyeLink equipment, and train you and your colleagues on best practices for collecting eye movement data. The training session can be tailored to your research goals, and often includes creation of an initial Experiment Builder project that can be used immediately to start collecting usable data. Typical site visits are one and a half days.
Onsite installation is highly recommended for MRI and MEG to ensure the system is functioning optimally in these highly variable environments.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
24married and looking
Expand Messages
- Nov 20, 2008I'm a married blond lady I get bored a lot. I enjoy role playing as well as flirting and playing with guys I meet online.
We can exchange pics or dirty chat or even talk on the phone. I like to keep certain aspects discreet but if you are in a similar situation it's easier to be more open with you.
I love playing dressup and picture taking. If you want to see my pics, my cam or exchange pics with me you can do so here
I'll attach one of my pics below :)


text:
Results 1 to 5 of 94
March 9th, 2010 05:14 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 462
my husband's NEW list - narrowed down!
Hey once again Berries:)
We moved up our big ultrasound and it is now less than 2 weeks from today! I know it's not necessary to have a name picked by then, but since this has been causing so much stress, I really would like to. Otherwise I'm afraid I will get to the u/s, find out it's a girl and instead of being happy and excited I will be like, "crap! what am I going to name her????"
So I got dh to sit down today and using my master name list he chose 3 names he would agree on today, and 4 that he thinks I could persuade him to like.
I'd love your opinions on the list! You'll remember, big sister is Isla Hope.
His Favorites:
Ashlyn - I think this is gorgeous, but so wish it were spelled the Celtic way, Aislinn. I think that way gives it so much more. . .meaning? This way seems a little too trendy to me, but it's very pretty sounding. . .
Runners Up:
Middle name will most likely be one of these names, depending on which sounds best with the fn,
Thanks for your help!!
March 9th, 2010 05:17 PM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Posts
- 201
March 9th, 2010 05:26 PM #5
Re: my husband's NEW list28 year old name nerd, dreaming of a future:
Claudie, Lilac, Hadley, Thea, Phoebe, Mirabelle, Penelope & Clementine.
Otto, Quentin, Xavier, Ace, Lennox, Byron, Rafferty & Harlan.
March 9th, 2010 05:34 PM #7Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 1,738
Re: my husband's NEW list
I think Aislin or Audrey go best with Isla Hope (A beautiful name, might I add. I also share yours and your daughters middle name, I'm Chloe Hope)
I think Joy would definitely work best ion the middle spot, as it is easy to match with any name on your list, and it is another virtue name to connect her to you and your other daughter.
Good luck!
March 9th, 2010 05:39 PM #9


text:
Two councillors had to be pulled apart after nearly coming to blows following a meeting of Erewash Borough Council on Thursday.
Labour councillor John Booth and Conservative Steve Bilbie had to be separated after an argument spilled out into the car park of Ilkeston Town Hall.
The fracas came about after Mr Booth occupied the mayor's seat following the controversial adjournment of a full council meeting.
Mr Booth claimed he was called a "monkey" by Tory councillor Kevin Miller – who later insisted to the Derby Telegraph: "I absolutely did not."
Mr Bilbie was not available for comment.
Mr Booth said: "I thought what happened was wrong.
"When the meeting had finished I went outside to Councillor Kevin Miller to question what was said.
"My parents came out of the meeting and had a word with him and asked why he said that.
"Councillor Miller apologised to my mum for calling me a monkey.
"In the meantime, Councillor Bilbie, who was at the side of me, was pointing his finger under my nose. I asked him 'do you mind not pointing your finger under my nose?'
"He said I was being disrespectful to the mayor for wanting to carry on the meeting and I said: 'Look, you are being disrespectful to me now.'
"And as soon as I said that, Councillor Bilbie was right in my face and said 'what are you going to do about it?' speaking through his teeth. He was trying to be aggressive. I said pardon?
"He said something and I got irate. I stood back, took my jacket off and he did not do anything and backed down.
"He was being threatening towards me."
But Mr Miller said: "I apologised to his mum [fellow Labour councillor Michelle Booth] for the trouble caused because I felt sorry for her for the way things had gone.
"We [the Conservative group] acted in our normal dignified manner. Outside the meeting I saw nothing at all."
Asked whether the behaviour of the councillors was "professional", Mr Booth said: "It's not professional but at the same time people expect us to have a voice as a councillor. You have to make a decision on the spot."
The heated exchanges that resulted in the argument came about after the meeting was controversially halted.
The Mayor of Erewash, Councillor Kewal Singh Athwal, adjourned the meeting after the Labour group had insisted that the minutes of a previous meeting should be changed.
Leader of the Labour group Councillor Alex Phillips had asked that the minutes of the appointments panel be altered to show that Labour councillors had decided to not be part of the meeting.
They said they had taken legal advice over procedural rules which they felt had not been followed.
Mr Phillips told the meeting: "There had been serious serious concerns about the process. On taking independent legal advice we decided not to be part of the meeting."
Council chief executive Jeremy Jaroszek told the mayor that it would not be possible for minutes to be changed by the council as they were not at the meeting to see what had happened.
Mr Athwal told the meeting: "In light of what has happened and questioning the legal advice of my officers today, I adjourn the meeting to another time and place."
At this point the mayor and the other officers walked up and left the meeting along with the Conservative group.
It was at that point that Mr Booth took the seat that had been vacated by the mayor, loudly banging the gavel.
Leader of Erewash Borough Council and the Conservative group Chris Corbett said: "I think there was a storm in a teacup. From the very little I saw, there was a little bit of an argument between a couple of councillors but I don't think it amounted to anything.
"I think Councillor John Booth and his father were trying to make a mountain out of a molehill."


text:
Class 3 Question
I don't know much about NFA and Class 3 weapons and this may be a stupid question sorry if it is. I saw a 10 round mag conversion at Cabelas for my Mossberg 500 12 gauge is it normal rules or will it make it a destructive device? Just want to check before I spend all that money.
Destructive Device: NO
That mag extension kit will not make your shotgun a destructive device.
It will make it illegal to hunt migratory game birds !:eek:
You only have to worry about making it a NFA weapon when you cut down the barrel.
A shotgun that has a barrel < 18 inches or the overall length is < 26 inches.
|All times are GMT. The time now is 08:37 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


text:
December 01, 1996
A closely divided U.S. Supreme Court has extended the emerging pattern of condemnation of race-based remedies1 to a state's failed efforts to comply with the federal Voting Rights Act in two recent cases involving majority-minority districts in North Carolina and Texas.2
In Shaw v. Reno3 the court by a 5-4 vote rejected the finding of the District Court that while North Carolina had classified voters on the basis of race the policy survived strict scrutiny because it was narrowly tailored to meet the state's compelling interests in complying with Sections 2 and 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
The majority decision by Chief Justice Rehnquist was joined by Justices O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas. Dissents by Justices Souter and Stevens were joined by Justices Ginsburg and Breyer. The elusiveness of the Reno analysis was quickly demonstrated as the Court attempted to apply it in Bush v. Lawson which addressed three majority-minority districts in Texas. Here the same five votes found the creation of the districts in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. While agreeing on an outcome, the five were unable to agree on the analysis. Justice O'Connor wrote an opinion that was joined by the Chief Justice and Justice Kennedy that recognized the possibility for constitutional episodes involving states deliberately creating majority-minority districts. Justice Kennedy also wrote a separate concurrence expressing his reservation with Justice O'Connor's position that strict scrutiny should not be applied to every case of intentionally created majority-minority districts. Justice Thomas was joined by Justice Scalia concurring in the outcome, but repudiating O'Connor's analysis denying the universal application of strict scrutiny to majority-minority districts. Justice Stevens was joined by Justices Ginsburg and Breyer, and found error in the repudiation of the Texas districts. Stevens argued that the Court had ignored its own standards for racial gerrymandering by failing to consider the complex factors of political and geographic interests while improperly focusing on race alone.
The cases together cast a grave constitutional shadow over majority-minority districts while ultimately providing insecure guidance because of the dispute over the key issue of whether strict scrutiny must be applied in every case, and how to weigh the other political and geographic factors in the evaluated districts.
Both Shaw and Bush involved southern states required to comply with the Voting Rights Act preclearance procedures under which the federal Justice Department reviews redistricting plans for their adverse and unlawful effects on minority voters. In both cases the states had redrafted their plans to gain Justice Department approval. In each case the state effort had been judged under the then-prevailing maximization standard being promoted by the Justice Department. This procedure rejected state plans unless they created the maximum number of majority-minority districts.
The Supreme Court later rejected the Justice Department's analysis of sections 2 and 5 of the Voting Rights Act that served as a basis of maximization demand.4 The Court favored a more narrow reading of the Voting Rights Act that only prohibited state action that reduced minority political power from a prior level but did not require the state to increase that power to its highest possible level. The question presented to the Court in Shaw and Bush was whether the state's attempt to comply with the Justice Department's requirement served as a separate and validating reason for the use of race in classifying citizens. Justice Stevens would have accepted this logic arguing that the states were not motivated by race-based animus but by a desire to avoid litigation and comply with federal law. Justice Stevens would have added either a good faith defense to the facial use of race or incorporated a motive--to effect harm based on race--in addition to an intent requirement.
Justice Stevens would have held that the plaintiffs had suffered no harm by the state's maximization of minority voting power because it could not be shown that the state had injured the majority, which could still fully participate in the political process. The majority, however, found that the state's attempt to comply with the Justice Department's demands for a maximum number of districts where minority electoral prospects were enhanced was sufficient to meet the Miller requirement. The use of race in drafting districts violates the Constitution where race was a predominant factor in drawing the district lines.
The majority refused to recognize the state's good faith attempt to comply with federal law as interpreted by an authoritative federal agency. Instead, the Voting Rights Act would only serve as a shield for state action where the Court later agreed with the federal interpretation of the Act. Because Congress is not presently expected to pass legislation adopting the maximization standards for reading sections 2 and 5, the case provides little direct insight on Congressional power to achieve such an objective. Under prior case law, the Fourteenth Amendment was viewed as limiting state action but granting broad, if not unrestricted, remedial powers to Congress.
In attacking the administrative process through which statutory language is applied, the Court has challenged Congress to either openly affirm a controversial political proposition or let the reading die. Whether this holding reveals a true shift in the Court's thinking on Congressional power to effect race-based remedies, or merely a demand for accountability, is uncertain.
The citation in both Shaw and Bush to Adarand indicates that the majority is attempting to structure a uniform and highly critical system for evaluation of race-based classification that will tolerate few exceptions. This would suggest that when the Court undertakes review of education cases the majority might be willing to extend the rule to limit affirmative action previously authorized by Bakke. However, Justice O'Connor's recognition of some circumstances appropriate for the use of race-based classification for voting districts undermines the vision of a general rule, and suggests an emerging period of revision and conflict on the Court.
1. In Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, the Court held that even benign or remedial use of race in classifying citizens is constitutionally suspect.
2. Both cases involved responses by state legislatures to federal Justice Department demands that they create congressional districts that maximize minority political power. The Voting Rights Act required preclearance of these districts. Subsequent to the states' compliance with federal agency demands the court held the Voting Rights Act did not require maximization.
3. In the case's first trip to the Court, Shaw v. Reno, (Shaw 1), the Court held that a valid equal protection claim was set out where the plaintiff alleged deliberate racial segregation of voters into bizarre-looking districts.
4. Miller v. Johnson, 515 U.S. ___ (1995).
Joseph E. Broadus is a professor of law at the George Mason University Law School in Virginia.


text:
Amos marked a decade of successful toy-making with the Amos Generic Character Brand Store Collection at its pop-up space in Japan. With the retail space now come and gone, the London-based brand has revealed that they will conclude their work on this note: "We are proud of what we've achieved over the last 10 years and we feel the Amos Generic Character Brand is a perfect way to add a full stop to what we've accomplished." This is sad news considering all the lovely toys they've given us over the years. Happy 10th anniversary Amos, and goodbye.
Source: HYPEBEAST.cc


text:
Des Moines Register Poll:
Jonathan Roos' "Huckabee new GOP leader in Iowa Poll" LINK
Thomas Beaumont's "Obama pulls ahead for Democrats in Iowa Poll" LINK
2008: Republicans: Huckabee:
ABC News' KEVIN CHUPKA: "Huckabee Rebuts Romney, Talks Taxes" LINK
New York Times' Adam Nagourney: "Lonely No More, Huckabee Faces Hurdles" LINK
Los Angeles Times' Richard Fossett: "A Different Kind of Jesus Juice" LINK
Los Angeles Times Don Frederick: "Insight on Huckabee from One Who's Watched him for a While" LINK
USA Today's Susan Page: "In Unsettled GOP Field, Huckabee Finds Footing" LINK
Wall Street Journal's LAURA MECKLER: "Republican 'Regular Guy' Rises Fast" LINK
Washington Times' Donald Lambro: "A sting from Huckabee" LINK
Chicago Tribune's Rick Pearson and Tim Jones: "Quiet tone speaks to many Iowans" LINK
2008: Republicans: Romney:
Boston Globe's Michael Levenson: "Pressed, Romney to speak on his Mormonism" LINK
ABC News' John Berman: "Romney to Give Speech on Mormon Faith" LINK
Washington Post's Michael D. Shear: "Romney Plans Speech on his Mormon Faith" LINK
New York Times' Michael Luo: "Romney to Address his Mormonism" LINK
USA Today's David Jackson and Matt Kelley: "Romney to Address Mormon Faith in Speech this Week" LINK
ABC News' Jake Tapper: "Will 'Pulling a JFK' Be Enough for Romney?" LINK
2008: Republicans: Giuliani:
Rudy Giuliani's: "The Meaning of Fiscal Conservatism" LINK
Washington Post's Howard Kurtz: "Stung by Politico Report, Giuliani Puts Up His Dukes" LINK
Associated Press: "Giuliani takes aim at Dems' tax plans" LINK
New York Magazine's Chris Smith: "Rudy Has Seen the Enemy and He Is...Us" LINK
2008: Republicans: McCain:
Washington Post's Chris Cillizza: "McCain Picks up Union Leader Endorsement" http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2007/12/mccain_picks_up_union_leader_e.html New York Daily News' DAVE GOLDINER: "John McCain, James Carville to appear on 1st Don Imus show" LINK
2008: Republicans: Paul:
Los Angeles Times' Leslie Hoffecker: "The Sunday Shows: A Bold Prediction" LINK
Newsweek's Gretel C. Kovach: "Highway To Hell?" LINK
Concord Monitor's SHIRA SCHOENBERG: "Paul sticks to his guns, and the Constitution" LINK
Salon's Michael Scherer: "Ron Paul is a baby elephant" LINK
2008: Democrats:
Des Moines Register's Thomas Beaumont: "Democrats Split on Licenses for Illegal Immigrants" LINK
Washington Times' Donald Lambro: "Obama edging past Hillary in Iowa polls" LINK
New York Post's GEOFF EARLE: "HILL GOES ON BARACK ATTACK" LINK
The Atlantic Monthly's Marc Ambinder: "Teacher and Apprentice" LINK
2008: Democrats: Clinton:
Boston Globe's Megan Woolhouse and Noah Bierman: "Signs of normalcy return after N.H. hostage crisis" LINK
ABC New' Eloise Harper: "Clinton Doesn't Want a One-Night Stand" LINK
Washington Post's Anne E. Kornblut: "Losing Ground in Iowa, Clinton Assails Obama" LINK
Washington Post's Alex MacGillis: "Campaign Soldiers on the 'Front Lines'" LINK
New York Times' Patrick Healy: "The Buddy System" LINK
New York Times Adam Nagourney: "Clinton is Pressed to Help Immigrants Fast" LINK
Associated Press' Stephen Ohlemacher: "Clinton Leads 'Super Delegates' but Many Still Undecided" LINK
USA Today's Susan Page: "Clinton Urges Foreclosures Moratorium" LINK
Wall Street Journal's CHRISTOPHER COOPER: "Housing to the Fore: Clinton" LINK
2008: Democrats: Obama:
Wall Street Journal's JACKIE CALMES, MONICA LANGLEY and CHRISTOPHER COOPER: "Obama's Gains Show Volatility Of Iowa Contest" LINK
Chicago Sun Times' Lynn Sweet: "Obama's Chicago-style plan doesn't play in Iowa" LINK
New York Sun's JOSH GERSTEIN: "Obama Draws Clinton's Ire Over Early Ambition" LINK
2008: Democrats: Edwards:
ABC News' Raelyn Johnson: "Edwards on Reporter's Access: 'My Campaign Is Open and Transparent'" LINK
New York Times' Jeff Zeleny: "Edwards Wins a Key Iowa Backer" LINK
Los Angele's Times' Scott Martelle: "Heavy doubt for Edwards' big promises" LINK
Des Moines Register's TONY LEYS: "Edwards: Democrats can attract Christians" LINK
2008: Democrats: Richardson:
Washington Times: "Bill Richardson" LINK
Concord Monitor's MEG HECKMAN: "A heated term as chief of energy" LINK
2008: Democrats: Biden:
Des Moines Register's ABBY SIMONS: "Illegal-immigration answer starts in Mexico, Biden says" LINK
2008: Democrats: Dodd:
Des Moines Register's NIGEL DUARA: "Dodd portrays Iowa polls as unimportant" LINK
2008: Democrats: Black and Brown Debate:
ABC News' ELOISE HARPER, RAELYN JOHNSON and SUNLEN MILLER: "Democratic '08ers Take On Minority Issues" LINK
2008: Early States:
Washington Times' Gary Andres: "The Iowa Bounce" LINK
Union Leader's GARRY RAYNO: "Dems OK NH date, penalize Michigan" LINK
New York Times' Jeff Zeleny: "Only a Month Left to Iowa" LINK
2008: Presidential Race:
Los Angeles Times' Peter Nicholas and Peter Wallsten: "Romney, Clinton shake up tactics" LINK
Los Angeles Times' Seema Mehta: "A voter walks into a bar . . ." LINK
Washington Times' Jennifer Harper: "Celebrity nods provide little star power" LINK
Newsweek's Richard Wolffe: "Putting On Their Game Faces" LINK
The Nation's Tom Hayden: "How the Peace Movement Can Win: A Field Guide" LINK
Imus' Return:
New York Sun's NICHOLAS WAPSHOTT: "Could Don Imus Emerge As an Election Wild Card?" LINK


text:
Boris Diaw had 23 points, nine rebounds and nine assists, reserve Shannon Brown scored five of his 14 points in the second overtime, and the Charlotte Bobcats continued their surprising recent domination of the Los Angeles Lakers by beating them 117-110 on Tuesday night.
The win was the Bobcats' fifth in their last six games against the Lakers, who got 38 points from Kobe Bryant before the Los Angeles star fouled out for the first time this season in the final minute of the first overtime.
Raymond Felton had 22 points, a career-high 11 rebounds and nine assists, Raja Bell added 17 points and Gerald Wallace scored 15 before leaving late in the fourth quarter after a flagrant foul by Andrew Bynum knocked him to the floor.
Bryant had eight rebounds and five assists to go with his 38 points. Bynum added 24 points and 14 rebounds and Derek Fisher scored 14 for the Lakers (35-9), who had their four-game winning streak snapped while losing for just the fourth time in 27 home games.
Brown's 3-pointer with 2:14 remaining put the Bobcats on top 110-107, and they led the rest of the way. Okafor scored four points around a three-point play by Bynum and Felton added two foul shots with 25.2 seconds left, giving Charlotte (19-26) a 116-110 lead and clinching the victory.
The Lakers rallied from a seven-point deficit in the final 2 1/2 minutes to force the first overtime, and got two baskets from Bryant and another from Bynum to begin the first extra period up 99-93 lead with 2:55 left.
But the Bobcats came back, and a 3-pointer by Diaw with 32.2 seconds to play tied the game at 103. Bryant was out of the game at that stage, having fouled out with 39.8 seconds left after scoring eight points in the first overtime.
Neither team got a good shot off after that, forcing the second overtime.
Diaw scored seven points during a 9-0 run that gave the Bobcats a 90-83 lead before seven points by Bryant and a 3-pointer by Fisher with 14 seconds left in the fourth quarter tied the game at 93. Felton missed a 22-footer as time expired to force the first overtime.
Neither team led by more than four points in the third quarter until Charlotte scored six straight for a 70-63 lead with 3 1/2 minutes left in the period. The Bobcats led 76-70 entering the fourth quarter.
The Bobcats outscored the Lakers 10-3 for a 36-26 lead midway through the second quarter. Gasol had shot 2-of-10 and Bryant was 0-of-5 at that stage.
Bryant scored for the first time on a jumper with 5:20 left in the period, and added 10 more points before halftime, helping the Lakers outscore the Bobcats 22-13 to draw within one point.
Lakers forward Trevor Ariza left with 4:52 left in the second quarter after suffering a concussion and didn't return. He's not expected to miss any playing time.
Notes:@ The game was the Lakers' first overtime contest of the season, leaving New Orleans as the only team that hasn't gone into overtime. ... The Lakers' 16 first-quarter points tied a season-low. ... The Lakers, who've played an NBA-high 27 home games and a league-low 17 road games, open a six-game trip Friday night at Minnesota. They're 23-4 at home and 12-5 away. They'll play 22 of their next 31 games on the road. ... The Lakers are 4-5 overall against the Bobcats, who joined the NBA as an expansion team in 2004. ... The Bobcats are 12-10 since acquiring Diaw and Bell from Phoenix last month. ... The Lakers have a 12-6 record against Eastern Conference teams this season and the Bobcats are 9-6 against the West.


text:
TDP politburo meeting: RS seat to Union Minister Suresh Prabhu - ABN
Mon, May 30, 2016, 06:33 AM
TDP national president N Chandrababu Naidu participated in the party politburo meeting held at a hotel in Tirupati over finalising candidates for Rajya Sabha elections. It is learnt that Union Railway Minister Suresh Prabhu might get elected to Rajya Sabha from TDP quota. The top party leaders said that Union Minister Sujana Chowdary likely to get renewal. The TDP leaders like BT Naidu, Hemalatha, Lalitha Kumari, Padmaja, B Mastan Rao and Pushparaj are in race for third RS seat. The party sources said that Chandrababu Naidu might give chance to BC or SC leader from Rayalaseema region.


text:
Corlink DWDM-XENPAK-38.19-COR Cisco Compatible 10GBASE-DWDM XENPAK 1538.19 nm (100-GHz ITU grid) 80km SMF SC (DWD-XPK-3819-COR)Item#: 13985396 | Model#: DWD-XPK-3819-COR
- Price:
- $2,119.99
$6.99 Shipping
- Shipping:
- Temporarily out of stock. Order today and we'll deliver when available. (Details)
Additional Resources
Corlink Cisco Compatible 80km DWDM 1538.19nm XNPK Product Details
Additional Resources: Product Manuals
Related Items
Product TagsDWD-XPK-3819-COR DWD-XPK-3819-COR DWD-XPK-3819
Manufactured by: Corlink
Warranty provided by: Corlink
UPC No: 849171041999
Mfg Part No: DWD-XPK-3819-COR
Box Size:
( Length:7, Width:3, Depth:2)
Shipping Weight: 0.6000 pound(s)
Click here for full warranty and support information
- Corlink logos are registered trademarks of Corlink. All others trademarks and copyrights mentioned herein are the property of their respective owners.


text:
Current Highlights on Broadway
Find a show or venue
Order by phone
Your independent guide to the best shows in New York
50 West 13th Street, New York, NY 10011
If you're looking to make a night of it and spend the night take a look at our favourite selection of hotels and accommodation convenient for the 13th Street Repertory Theater. If you can't find what you're looking for below, please try our main New York City Theater hotels page for more choices.
The Jade Hotel
0.05 mi away at 52 West 13th Steet
4 Star, Prices from $187
Hyatt Union Square New York
0.36 mi away at 134 Fourth Avenue (corner of 13th Street and Fourth Avenue)
4 Star, Prices from $233
W New York - Union Square
0.37 mi away at 201 Park Avenue South
5 Star, Prices from $213
Gramercy Park Hotel
0.56 mi away at 2 Lexington Avenue
5 Star, Prices from $349
Wyndham Garden Hotel Manhattan Chelsea West
0.56 mi away at 37 West 24th Street
4 Star, Prices from $128
Dream Downtown
0.59 mi away at 355 West 16th Street
4 Star, Prices from $245
Gansevoort Meatpacking
0.59 mi away at 18 9th Avenue
4 Star, Prices from $245
The Standard - East Village
0.61 mi away at 25 Cooper Square
4 Star, Prices from $275
The Maritime Hotel
0.61 mi away at 363 West 16th Street
4 Star, Prices from $235
Please note: The term 13th Street Repertory Theater as well as all associated graphics, logos, and/or other tradermarks, tradenames or copyrights are the property of the 13th Street Repertory Theater and are used herein for factual descriptive purposes only. We are in no way associated with or authorized by the 13th Street Repertory Theater and neither that entity nor any of its affiliates have licensed or endorsed us to sell tickets, goods and or services in conjunction with their events.


text:
Are you looking for magic at a Walmart price?
Do you want a real person to ask questions and advice on items prior to purchase?
Do you want...
Read More ->
Their service is great!!! Their response to your questions are quick and friendly. I couldn't see myself going anywhere else for my magic.
Read More ->


text:
David Arquette Says New Galpal Christina McLarty Is "Adorable"
David Arquette told Howard Stern today (September 29th) that he's seeing Joe Francis' ex-wife and Entertainment Tonight correspondent, Christina McLarty. "She's adorable," Arquette said of McLarty, who he met on a "boat party," according to People. "I'm not one to run around with different girls," Arquette said. "I like someone that makes me feel good and that I can make feel good." Arquette split from wife Courtney Cox last October.
What I want to know is why McLarty and Francis were only married for two months, other than the obvious reasons: Francis is nuts. Francis always looks…paranoid. Francis seems like kind of a d-bag.
Remember When Joe Francis Mauled Jayde Nicole Like A Tiger?
Do you think these two make a cute couple? Let us know what you think by tweeting us at @socialitelife or posting to our Facebook page.


text:
By Chris Temelkos
With the growing popularity of 3-D films like Avatar, 3-D TVs our now being sold across Canada in hopes of replacing the common 2-D viewing experience. Despite their amazing graphics and jaw dropping effects, 3-D televisions can pose a health risk.
3-D works by using 3-D glasses, these glasses cause both the left and right eye to shutter 60 times per second which can cause dizziness, lightheadedness, eye and muscle twitching, cramps and nausea in some people. Experts are warning pregnant women, the elderly, those in bad physical condition or in need of sleep, or those who have been drinking to avoid 3-D due to the risks involved.
I have personally not seen a 3-D film as of yet and don't plan on buying a 3-D television anytime soon. However, I feel that when are health is being jeopardized for entertainment purposes, we may be pushing technology too far and this is our bodies way of telling us enough is enough.
Whether you choose to buy into the 3-D fad, be aware of the potential risks and if you experience any of the side effects I mentioned, step back and reenter the world of 2-D.
The Globe and Mail


text:
Bono awarded France's highest cultural honor
It was a beautiful day for U2 frontman Bono, who received France's highest cultural honor in a ceremony in Paris Tuesday. Paul Hewson (best known by his stage name, Bono) was presented the Commander of the Order of Arts and Letters by French culture …
Bono Receives France's Highest Culture AwardRollingStone.com
Bono Awarded France's Highest Honor for ArtistsBillboard
Bono receives France's highest cultural honourFox News
Reuters -Irish Independent
all 37 news articles
Source: france – Google News
Sharing information is key – France News in UK. Social Commerce and Social Media Management playing a big part. Suaju Ltd


text:
Reviews - Riad Linda3
93 Derb Jamaa Derb Dabach, Marrakech, 40000
Customer Reviews
Our reviews are from genuine LateRooms.com customers. We verify that the customer has stayed before leaving a review.
Very Good
0% would recommend it to a friend
Customer service
Food quality
Room quality
Marrakesh Riad Experience
A bit of a culture shock as we were led down the alleyways to Riad Linda.
The staff are very welcoming & this is a significant plus for this tired old building. Felt it could do with some repair & didn't reflect the photos shown on the site.
The bathroom was very basic & taps were loose from the wall.
On a positive note Rachid, the manager, & staff were on hand to attend to our every need & would be my reason for returning to Riad Linda. With ought them I would not recommend it to others.
Read More Less
Response from hotel
Thank you very much for your review and for your comments. We are delighted to hear that our lovely staff made sure that you were well looked after.
Marrakech can be a bit of a culture shock and staying in a riad offers guests an opportunity for an authentic cultural experience. We are going to be carrying out some planned renovation works over the next few months with our bedrooms and bathrooms. We hope you will come back and visit us to see our sparkling new rooms.
- < previous
- 1
- page 1 of 1
- > next


text:
Empty Ever After: A Moe Prager Mystery
In the dark, compelling fifth Moe Prager mystery from Anthony-winner Coleman (after 2007's Soul Patch ), the PI and former New York City cop pays a heavy price for a choice he made in the late 1970s after locating the missing Patrick Maloney. Prager had decided to preserve both the secret of Patrick's whereabouts and sexual orientation from Patrick's sister, Katy. When Prager marries Katy years later, the shadow of his deception weighs heavily over him, and Katy's eventual discovery of the truth—after Patrick's death—costs him her love. The divorced pair reunite after an unknown enemy launches a complicated campaign of terror against them, aided by a seemingly resurrected Patrick. The occasionally overly convoluted plot and a heavy reliance on earlier books make this less accessible to newcomers, who may also not be as moved as old-timers by the downbeat ending. While this appears to be the end of the series, fans of well-written PI novels will hope to see more of Prager. (Apr.)
Release date: 04/01/2008