text:
Patent application title: Synchronizing Program Presentation
Mark David Francisco (Clarksburg, NJ, US)
IPC8 Class: AH04N504FI
USPC Class:
Class name: Television synchronization
Publication date: 2014-03-13
Patent application number: 20140071344
Sign up to receive free email alerts when patent applications with chosen keywords are published SIGN UP
Systems and methods that may facilitate synchronizing the presentation of
a program on multiple devices are disclosed. Synchronization information
related to a program may be exchanged via a two-way communications
channel. Amounts by which each device may delay its presentation of a
program may be calculated and/or exchanged.
1. A method comprising: receiving, at a first device, content that is
made available to a plurality of devices via a first communications
channel; exchanging synchronization information over a second
communications channel; and synchronizing presentation of the content
from the first device with presentation of the content from a second
device using the synchronization information.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein synchronizing presentation of the content comprises: using the synchronization information, calculating a length of time by which to shift the content; and delaying presentation of the content from the first device by at least the calculated length of time.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein calculating the length of time by which to shift the content comprises: identifying a length of time by which to shift synchronization information from the first device relative to synchronization information from the second device in order to align the synchronization information from the first device and the second device.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the synchronization information comprises a fingerprint of audio of the content.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the fingerprint comprises an indication of an amplitude of the audio of the content at a plurality of points in the content.
6. The method of claim 2, wherein the synchronization information comprises an indication of a time at which a portion of the content was received.
7. The method of claim 2, wherein delaying presentation of the content from the first device by at least the calculated length of time comprises: buffering the content as it is received; and playing the content from the buffer after at least the calculated length of time has passed since the content was received.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the second communications channel is a two-way communications channel.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the content comprises audio and video; wherein exchanging synchronization information comprises receiving, at the first device, an audio stream that comprises the audio of the content over the second communications channel; and wherein synchronizing presentation of the content comprises aligning the video of the content received over the first communications channel with the audio of the content received over the second communications channel.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein synchronizing presentation of the content comprises: outputting, from the first device, the audio stream received over the second communications channel and the aligned video of the content received over the first communications channel.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the content is made available to the plurality of devices simultaneously via the first communications channel.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the first communications channel comprises a channel of a distribution network.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein the content is made available as part of a communications stream.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein presentation of the content from the first device comprises outputting the content from the first device to a separate display device.
15-19. (canceled)
20. A method comprising: distributing a stream of content to a plurality of devices, wherein the stream of content comprises synchronization information configured to be exchanged among the plurality of devices to synchronize presentation of the content.
21. The method of claim 20, further comprising: receiving, at a first device of the plurality of devices, the synchronization information from a second device of the plurality of devices; determining, at the first device, a timing at which the second device received a particular portion of the content that is received by the first device based on the synchronization information; and determining, at the first device, whether to delay presentation of the content based on the timing.
22. A method comprising: receiving, at a first device, content comprising timing information; receiving, at the first device, an indication of when a second device received the timing information; and using the indication of when the second device received the timing information to synchronize presentation of the content at the first device with presentation of the content at the second device.
23. The method of claim 22, further comprising: sending, from the first device to the second device, at least one user input received at the first device from a user of the first device; receiving, at the first device, at least one user input from the second device; and presenting, at the first device, the at least one user input from the second device simultaneously with the content.
24. The method of claim 23, wherein the at least one user input from the second device comprises audio data.
25. The method of claim 23, wherein the at least one user input from the second device comprises visual markups to be drawn on a screen.
26. The method of claim 22, wherein synchronizing presentation of the content comprises: determining a length of time between when the timing information is received at the first device and when the timing information is received at the second device; and if the first device received the timing information before the second device received the timing information, increasing an amount of time by which presentation of the content is delayed at the first device by the determined length of time.
[0001] If two friends are remote from one another, but watching the same television show, they may engage in an online chat or a voice conversation, and may wish to discuss the events of the show while they watch. Unfortunately, video distribution systems, such as "over the air" television or cable television, may not distribute a programming feed to all receivers in perfect synchronization. The programming feed delivered to some devices may be delayed by a greater amount of time than the feed delivered to other devices for a variety of reasons. For example, a programming feed of the Super Bowl football game in New Orleans, La., may be delivered to user A in Baton Rouge, and to user B in London, England. The difference in geographic (and network) distance may result in user A seeing events before user B sees the event. User A and user B may also receive the programming at different times, due to, for example, differing delays caused by local advertising insertion systems, differing distribution network delays, and possibly different times of initial transmission. Differences in reception times may cause undesirable side effects in the users' conversation. User A may react to a scene that user B has not yet received, and user A's reaction on the phone or in the chat may wind up spoiling the viewing experience for user B. Accordingly, there is a need to offer better synchronization and a better shared experience for users.
[0002] Some aspects of the disclosure relate to methods and systems that may facilitate synchronizing presentation of content on multiple different devices. According to one aspect of the disclosure, a presentation may be sent to a device via a distribution network.
[0003] According to another aspect of the disclosure, synchronization information may be exchanged over a two-way communications channel that is independent of the channel used to transmit the content. The synchronization information may comprise, for example, a portion of a program, a fingerprint of a program or a portion thereof, an indication of when certain portions of a program were received, an indication of an amount by which to delay output of a program, or a variety of other types of information.
[0004] According to a further aspect of the disclosure, a device may configure itself to delay its output of a program based on information contained within a program.
[0005] According to yet another aspect of the disclosure, a device may buffer or otherwise delay output of programming content in order to synchronize its output of the programming content with the output of another device.
[0006] According to a still further aspect of the disclosure, the length of time by which a device may delay its output of programming content may be calculated using synchronization information.
[0007] According to an additional aspect of the disclosure, a two-way communications channel may be used to facilitate joint consumption of content, or other experiences, of a program that is synchronized across devices. Examples of joint consumption of content include text, audio and/or video chats and sharing visual markups, such as a user drawing on a screen or presenting a document, such as a website, while the joint viewers are viewing (or otherwise consuming) a particular item of content, such as video content.
[0008] The preceding presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the disclosure. The summary is not an extensive overview of the disclosure. It is intended neither to identify key or critical elements of the disclosure nor to delineate the scope of the disclosure. The summary merely presents some concepts of the disclosure in a simplified form as a prelude to the description below.
[0009] The present disclosure is illustrated by way of example and is not limited in the accompanying figures.
[0010] FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a communications network architecture.
[0011] FIG. 2a illustrates a method of synchronizing a program across devices by adjusting a configurable delay.
[0012] FIG. 2b illustrates a method of synchronizing a program across devices by sharing synchronization information between the devices.
[0013] FIG. 2c illustrates a method by which a device may adjust its delay based on a received program.
[0014] FIG. 3a illustrates example timing according to which a program may be received at several devices.
[0015] FIG. 3b illustrates example timing according to which the program may be output from several devices.
[0016] FIG. 3c illustrates an example method of calculating an amount of delay to synchronize a program across devices.
[0017] FIG. 4a illustrates timing with which several fingerprints may be received by a device or transmitted to a device.
[0018] FIG. 4b illustrates how fingerprints may shifted so that corresponding portions of the fingerprints are aligned in time.
[0019] FIG. 4c illustrates a method for calculating an amount of time by which to shift a fingerprint in order to align it with another fingerprint.
[0020] FIG. 4d illustrates a method for aligning multiple fingerprints with one another.
[0021] FIGS. 4e-4h illustrate examples of how fingerprints may be shifted relative to one another.
[0022] FIG. 5 illustrates another example of how a device may align output a program with another device.
[0023] FIG. 6 illustrates a method for synchronization during a collaborative experience of a program.
[0024] FIG. 7 illustrates an example computing device having hardware and software on which various methods and devices of the disclosure may be implemented.
[0025] In the following description of various illustrative embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which is shown, by way of illustration, various embodiments in which aspects of the disclosure may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized, and structural and functional modifications may be made, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
[0026] FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a network architecture. In this example one or more items of content, such as programs, from content source 100 may be distributed over one or more distribution networks to devices 140-153 in premises 130-137, such as homes, businesses, institutions, etc. A program may be, for example, an audio presentation, such as a radio broadcast; a video presentation, such as a slide show; or an audio and video presentation, such as a television show, movie, video game, or other content. In this example, a program is transmitted over links 180 to regional distributors 110 and 111. The program is then transmitted to local distributors 120 and 121 over links 181 and to local distributors 122 and 123 over links 182. Finally, the local distributors may distribute the program to premises 130-137 over links 183-186. In each premises, or around the premises if extended by, e.g. a wireless network, one or more devices (140-153) may be connected by links 187-194. Examples of links 180-195 may include fiber optic cabling, coaxial cabling, Ethernet cabling, telephone lines, satellite transmissions, cellular transmissions, "over the air" television transmissions, and any other type of wired or wireless link.
[0027] A program distributed from content source 100 may arrive at different devices at different times. The devices may be associated with the same premise or the devices may be associated with different premises. For example, device 141 may receive a portion of a program a few seconds before the same portion is received at device 147. This difference may occur, for example, due to delays at any point in the distribution process. For example, the time required to transmit the program across any of links 180-194 may differ. Differing delays may be introduced by regional distributors 110 and 111, local distributors 120-123, the equipment in premises 130-137, or other factors.
[0028] Devices 140-153 may be connected, wired or wirelessly, to two-way communication system 160 via two-way links 195. Links 195 may allow data to be sent from and received by a device. Examples of two-way links include telephone lines, coaxial cable, optical fiber, hybrid optical fiber/coax, and wireless links (cellular, satellite, etc.). Examples of devices that may form part of two-way communication system 160 include cable modems, optical termination units, network gateways, wireless routers, set-top-boxes, etc. that can serve to facilitate communications between devices. Two-way communications enable a variety of communication options, such as, for example, a multi-user chat. Links 180-194 may be one-way or two-way links.
[0029] Users of devices 140-153 may wish to share the experience of consuming a program. For example, the users of devices 141, 147, and 153 may wish to watch a football game while voice chatting with one another, or otherwise collaborate while consuming the program. That the program may reach devices 141, 147, or 153 at different times may impede this experience. For example, one user may comment on a play before another user sees the play. Similarly, if the program is a comedy, one user may laugh at or repeat a joke before another user hears the joke.
[0030] Problems associated with a program reaching different devices at different times may be minimized or eliminated by synchronizing each device's output of the program. Thus, each user will experience identical portions of the program at the same time.
[0031] Synchronization may be achieved by delaying output of the program at the devices that receive the program before other devices. The delay may be implemented so that the devices that receive the program before other devices may delay output of the program until the other devices receive the program. Alternatively, all of the devices associated with a collaborative experience of a program, including the device that received a portion of the program last, may delay output of the program. This may be preferred, for example, because it allows for smooth presentation of the program on all devices, even if delivery of the program to a device becomes more delayed than when the synchronization began due to, for example, network jitter. Various methods for synchronizing a program across devices are explained in more detail below with reference to FIGS. 2-5. At least some of these methods may be applied to any item of content, including programs that were not designed to facilitate synchronization or collaborative experiences.
[0032] The communications architecture of FIG. 1 is an example. A greater or fewer number of program sources, distributors, premises, devices, and two-way communication systems may exist. For example, a program may pass through a greater or fewer number of distributors before reaching a device. The use of homes to symbolize premises 130-137 is merely exemplary. A program may be transmitted to offices or other structures or locations, such as nodes, radio frequency communications devices, such as cellular towers, etc. Further, users connected to varying distribution networks may experience a program collaboratively in some embodiments. For example, device 154 of FIG. 1 may be connected to a distribution network (not shown) that is separate from the distribution networks shown in FIG. 1. Device 154 may synchronize its presentation of a program with the presentation from another device by, for example, communicating synchronization information over the two-way communication system 160.
[0033] Examples of devices 140-154 include any user devices, such as televisions, audio systems, personal computers, tablet computers, mobile smart phones, and any other device that may present a video and/or audio stream to a user. Further examples of devices 140-154 include devices that output a video and/or audio stream to a device that may present the stream to a user. For example, the functionality of devices 140-154 may be embodied in a dedicated device, a digital video recorder, a "set-top-box," etc.
[0034] In addition to a voice chat, further examples of how a program may be collaboratively experienced include video chatting while the program is presented, exchanging text or graphics while the program is presented (for example, a text chat, allowing users to mark areas of a screen with, for example, a virtual marker, or allowing users to present graphics, documents, or websites), and sharing control over inputs to an interactive program (such as an interactive television program or a video game). Users may also allow other users or collaborators to control presentation of the program. For example, devices 141, 147, and 153 in the previous example may allow one user's decision to pause the program to cause the program to be paused for all three users.
[0035] Methods for synchronizing a program will be explained below with reference to FIGS. 2-5. Then, methods for initiating and maintaining program synchronization during a collaborative experience of a program will be discussed with respect to FIG. 6.
[0036] FIGS. 2a-2c illustrate three methods for synchronizing a program across devices. Any one (or more) of these methods, alone or in combination, may be used. FIG. 2a illustrates a method of synchronizing a program across devices by adjusting a configurable delay. In step 201, two or more devices begin or continue receiving a program. Each device may delay the program by a configurable amount of time prior to outputting or presenting the program, so that the outputting is synchronized with the presentation by the other device(s). The configurable delay may be zero or near zero for the device that receives a program last. If the configurable amounts of time are currently sufficient to synchronize the presentation of the program, as determined in step 202, then nothing more is done (step 204). However, if the presentation is not synchronized, then the configurable delay on one or both of the devices may be adjusted (step 203) until the presentation is synchronized. The configurable delay may be adjusted incrementally, randomly, or otherwise, until synchronization is achieved. Synchronization may be achieved without using a two-way communications system that is connected to the devices. For example, two users may synchronize the output of their devices using the method of FIG. 2a while communicating with one another, e.g., over a telephone or another communication medium that is not connected to the devices being synchronized. In this example, a device may determine if the presentation of the program is synchronized (step 202) by prompting a user to indicate whether the presentation is currently synchronized. A device may also determine if the presentation is synchronized by examining timing information, fingerprints, or other information received from another device, as described in more detail below. Alternatively, the devices may communicate with one another over two-way communications system 160 to exchange synchronization data. These steps are described in greater detail below.
[0037] If the devices share a connection with one another, they may share information that helps to determine if the presentation of the program is synchronized on both devices. For example, the audio output associated with the program for one device may be transmitted to the other via the two-way communications system 160. This allows the audio output associated with the program from both devices to be compared. The comparison may be performed by a user, such as an installation technician or a consumer, or a computing device may perform the comparison and adjust the configurable delay automatically. Transmitting the audio of the program via the two-way communications system 160 may be performed to facilitate calibration of a device's adjustable delay, but might not performed in other situations, such as a normal collaborative presentation of a program, e.g. in a social setting. In other embodiments, video or other aspect(s) of a program, e.g., metadata, may be transmitted over the two-way communication system instead of, or in addition to, audio to determine synchronization and/or configurable delay.
[0038] When a device is added to a distribution network, the method of FIG. 2a may be used to synchronize the newly-added device with a reference device or an already-calibrated device. If this is done, then, after the calibration described with reference to FIG. 2a is completed, each device on the network will be in sync with each other device on the network. A reference device may be preconfigured with a large enough delay that the longest propagation delay for the distribution network does not exceed the preconfigured delay. This may guarantee that the program will be received by a device before the time it needs to be output to synchronize with the reference device. Synchronization may be facilitated by providing an application or utility designed to simplify determining if synchronization has been achieved, such as a repeating pattern of tones. However, any program may be used to synchronize two or more devices.
[0039] FIG. 2b illustrates a method of synchronizing a program across devices by sharing synchronization information between the devices. In step 210, the program is received. In step 211, synchronization information is extracted from the received program or otherwise received. In step 212, synchronization information is exchanged or otherwise shared. In step 213, the synchronization information is used to identify the amount by which to delay the program so that its output (e.g. its presentation at a device or its display) will be synchronized. A device may perform the identification of step 213 by performing a calculation based on synchronization information. Alternatively, the calculation may be performed at another location, such as another device or a server, and the device may perform the identification of step 213 by parsing a message that indicates the amount of delay. Examples of specific types of synchronization information and methods for identifying amounts of delay based on the synchronization information are discussed below with reference to FIGS. 3a-c, 4a-d, and 5.
[0040] The synchronization information exchanged in step 212 may take many forms, depending, for example, on where the calculation of the delays takes place. In some systems, each device may calculate the amount of delay required independently. In other systems, only one of the synchronized devices may calculate the delays. In still other systems, the delays may be calculated by a computing device (e.g., a server or other system) besides the devices being synchronized. The methods for calculating delay discussed below with reference to FIGS. 3a-c, 4a-d, and 5 may be used regardless of where the calculation takes place.
[0041] A device may receive synchronization information related to when other devices received the program. For example, the device may receive information that indicates what point in the program is currently being presented on one or more other devices. The device may use this information to calculate the amount by which to delay its own output of the program. The device may also send synchronization information that indicates the amount by which other devices should delay the program. Alternatively, or in addition, the device may send synchronization information related to when it received the program, thereby facilitating calculation of delay amounts by other devices. A device that does not calculate the amount by which to delay the program may transmit synchronization information related to when it received the program and then receive synchronization information containing indications of the amount by which it should delay the program. The synchronization information sent and/or received in step 212 may be communicated over a two-way communication channel, such as two-way communication system 160 of FIG. 1.
[0042] FIG. 2c illustrates a method by which a device may adjust its delay based solely or in part on the received program and/or information associated therewith. This method may be used to synchronize a device with the other devices on a distribution network without the aid of any of the other devices on the network. In step 220, the device receives a program. The program may indicate the time at which a certain portion of the program is to be output (e.g. presented) from a device. This presentation time is extracted in step 221. The device may then calculate the time difference between the current time and when the portion of the program is to be output (step 222), and sets its adjustable delay to the calculated time (step 223).
[0043] The indication of when a certain portion of the program is to be output from the device may come in a variety of formats. For example, the time when a portion of the program is to be output may be part of the visual or audio information of the program, such as, for example, audio cue tones. Alternatively, this time may be included in a data stream that carries the program. For example, a presentation time may be placed as user data in an MPEG-2 transport stream, as timed text tracks in MP4 streaming formats, or in any other suitable location. A presentation time may be in a format that indicates a show's title, season number, episode number, and/or a time offset from any fixed reference point (e.g., the start of the episode or the start of the series). A variety of other formats may also be used.
[0044] Times or markers when a portion of a program is to be output or presented from a device may be inserted periodically throughout a program, such as, for example, every ten seconds or at the beginning of various independently-coded pictures, such as i-frames. Calculating the delay needed to output the portion of the program at the indicated time (step 222) requires that the device have an accurate clock. This may be achieved by connecting to a time server using, for example, network time protocol, receiving GPS timing information (either from a GPS sensor or from another source, such as data from a distribution network or from two-way communication system 160), or a variety of other methods.
[0045] Each device that adjusts its output delay in one of the manners described above synchronizes its output with each other device that also adjusted its output delay in a different but compatible manner or an identical manner. Thus, the above-described methods may be used to synchronize many devices with one another without requiring communication between some or all of the devices. For example, device 140 may synchronize with device 141, and device 141 may synchronize with device 142. As a result, devices 140 and 142 are synchronized despite not having communicated any information between one another. Assuming the delay between a program source and a device does not change, the synchronization may be maintained indefinitely. Alternatively, synchronization may be established periodically, such as at random intervals, after network changes, or each time a program is collaboratively experienced.
[0046] FIG. 3a illustrates an example of timing according to which a program may be received at three devices. The program may include, for example, time stamp 310 and time stamp 311. As shown in FIG. 3a, time stamp 310 and time stamp 311 are distributed along elementary stream(s) 315. Elementary streams 315 may be, for example, audio and/or video streams. Time stamps 310 and 311 may indicate the time within the program. For example, time stamp 310 may indicate that 4 seconds of the program have passed, and time stamp 311 may indicate that 6 seconds of the program have passed. Examples of known time stamps formats include program clock references (PCR), presentation time stamps (PTS), decode time stamps (DTS), etc.
[0047] As shown in FIG. 3a, device 2 receives time stamp 310 first at time T0. Device 1 receives time stamp 310 second at time T1, and device 3 receives time stamp 310 third at time T2. As illustrated, these three devices receive the program at slightly different times. For example, time T0 may occur a few seconds before time T2.
[0048] FIG. 3b illustrates an example of timing according to which the program may be output (e.g. for presentation on an associated display device) from three devices. In FIG. 3b, all three devices output time stamp 310 at time T2. This is an instantaneous or nearly-instantaneous transmission for device 3, which also received time stamp 310 at time T2. Another way to view device 3's delay is that device 3 delays transmission of the program by T2-T2, which equals zero. Device 2 delays transmission of the program by T2-T0. Device 1 delays transmission of the program by T2-T1.
[0049] An additional delay may be built into the simultaneous output of the program from devices 1-3. For example, time stamp 310 may be output from each device at time T3 (or any other time). The delay for each device would be the same as the delays discussed above with reference to FIG. 3b, but increased by T3-T2.
[0050] FIG. 3c illustrates a method of calculating the amount of delay required to synchronize a program across devices by using information indicating when a common portion of the program was received or otherwise processed at the devices. The method described with reference to FIG. 3c may also be viewed as a method of calculating the amount of delay required to align or synchronize the synchronization information received from each device.
[0051] In step 330, the device that will perform the calculation receives an indication of timing, e.g., the times when a common portion of the program was received, from each device. In the example of FIG. 3a, the common portion of the program was time stamp 310. Other common portions may also be used, such as time stamp 311. The common portion need not be a time stamp, and can instead be a marker or a segment of the show, a predefined image from the show, an audio sound, etc. A common portion may be identified by any suitable identifier, such as a frame number. In the example of FIG. 3a, the times when the common portion of the program was received were time T1 for device 1, time T0 for device 2, and time T2 for device 3. These times may be explicitly indicated in the received information. Alternatively, each device may calculate, if needed, and send a notification when it receives the common portion of the program. The device that receives the notification may identify times T0, T1, and T2 based on when the notifications are received. Corrections for any delay between when the notifications were sent and received may be applied, if needed. Such corrections may be made using techniques such as those used by network time protocol (NTP).
[0052] In step 331, the latest time when a common portion of a program was received is identified. In the example of FIG. 3a, this is time T2, which is later than times T0 and T1.
[0053] In step 332, a minimum delay is calculated for each device by subtracting the time when the common portion of the program was received at the device from the latest time. In the example of FIG. 3a, this is T2-T1 for device 1, T2-T0 for device 2, and T2-T2 for device 3.
[0054] In step 333 an additional delay beyond the minimum delay is added to the time calculated in step 332. An additional delay is not required but may be used for the reasons discussed below. One alternative way of adding additional delay is to add the additional delay to the latest time identified in step 331 prior to performing step 332. One example of a reason to include an additional delay is to allow for variations in program delivery time. Even if a device begins receiving the program at a later time than it initially received the program, the device can still output the program in unison with the other devices by reducing the additional delay. Another example of a reason to include an additional delay is to allow additional devices to synchronize their output without interrupting the already-synchronized devices. For example, after devices 1-3 have synchronized their outputs, a fourth device may need to synchronize with the first three devices. The fourth device may receive time stamp 310 at a time after time T2. The fourth device may synchronize its output with the first three devices so long as the time the fourth device receives time stamp 310 does not exceed time T2, plus the additional delay.
[0055] The amount of delay required to synchronize a program across devices may be calculated without utilizing prior knowledge of which portions of a program are common to one another, and without prior definitions of portions at all. This may be done by taking a fingerprint from the program as it is received at each device, and using the fingerprints to calculate the amount of delay required to synchronize a program across the devices. For example, as will be explained below, a sound bite (e.g., 10 seconds) can be recorded and used as a defined common portion, and the device determining offsets may look for when this same sound bite was displayed at the other devices to determine a time offset.
[0056] FIG. 4a illustrates three audio fingerprints 401, 402, and 403. These fingerprints correspond to the program as received by devices 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The devices may transmit the fingerprints to one another or to another location, or otherwise share the information, to facilitate calculating delays required to synchronize a program across the devices.
[0057] In the example of FIG. 4a, the audio signal from a program is illustrated by sound wave 400. The fingerprint in this example is the amplitude of the sound wave, as measured at several points in time. This is only one example of a fingerprint, which may be any characteristic extracted from a program that can be used to synchronize presentation of the program. Although FIG. 4a illustrates the sound wave within the lines illustrating the amplitude of the sound wave for clarity, transmission of any information in addition to the fingerprint is optional.
[0058] Any type of fingerprint may be used, and it may be digital or an analog. An analog sound wave itself, instead of its amplitude, may be used. The frequency of a sound wave, as measured at several points in time, is another example of a fingerprint. Additional examples include information about a video frame, such as its hue, contrast, brightness, or any other such information.
[0059] Corresponding portions of fingerprints 401-403 have been identified in FIG. 4a for clarity. The portion of the fingerprint received by (or from) device 2 at time T0 represents the same portion of program audio as the portion of the fingerprint received by (or from) device 1 at time T1. The portion of the fingerprint received by (or from) device 3 at time T2 also represents the same portion of program audio. Although the above three fingerprints represent the same portion of program audio, the fingerprints may not be identical due to, for example, sampling error or noise in the signal received by one or more of the devices.
[0060] FIG. 4b illustrates fingerprints 401, 402, and 403 shifted in time so that corresponding portions of the fingerprints are aligned in time. The shift in time between FIG. 4a and FIG. 4b is illustrated by arrows 411 and 412. Output of the program from devices 1, 2, and 3 may be synchronized by delaying the program by the magnitude of these shifts. For example, shift 411 indicates the amount by which device 1 may delay the program, and shift 412 indicates the amount by which device 2 may delay the program in order to synchronize output of the program from device 1, 2, and 3.
[0061] FIG. 4c illustrates a method for calculating the amount of time by which to shift a fingerprint in order to align it with another fingerprint. In general terms, the two received fingerprint patterns may be shifted in time with respect to one another to find the shift that results in the best match or most similarity. In step 451, the degree of correlation between a first fingerprint and a second fingerprint is calculated or otherwise determined. The correlation may be calculated over a limited time horizon. The degree of correlation may be, for example, the correlation coefficient between the amplitude values of each fingerprint. An example of a time horizon over which the correlation may be calculated is illustrated by beginning and ending times 421 and 422 in FIGS. 4a and 4b. A limited time horizon may be useful to reduce the complexity of the calculations and also to avoid calculating correlations between times when a data for one or more of the fingerprints may not be present.
[0062] In step 452, the first of the two fingerprints being compared is shifted. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 4e, fingerprint 401 may be shifted forward. The shift may be, for example, 200 milliseconds. In some embodiments, the amount of the shift and/or the direction of the shift may vary depending on the magnitude of previously calculated correlations or the trend in previously calculated correlations. For example, low correlations or correlations that are trending downward may result in larger shifts between calculations, whereas higher correlations or correlations that are trending upward may result in smaller shifts between correlations. Adjusting the amount of the shift in this manner may reduce the total number of calculations required to find the shift for which the correlation is highest.
[0063] In step 453 it is determined if a limit on the amount by which a fingerprint will be shifted has been reached. For example, FIG. 4f may illustrate the limit on the amount by which fingerprint 401 will be shifted. The limit may be, for example, the maximum expected amount of difference between when the program will reach two different devices. The limit may also be, for example, the maximum amount by which a fingerprint can be shifted without being shifted past the time horizon over which the correlation is calculated. (An example of such a time horizon is illustrated by beginning and ending times 421 and 422 in FIGS. 4a and 4b.) The limit may also be an arbitrary amount or an amount that adjusts over time, as will be explained in more detail below. If the limit has not been reached, then processing returns to step 451. If it has been reached, then the position of the first fingerprint is reset (i.e. any previous shifts to the first fingerprint are undone) in step 454 and the second fingerprint is now shifted in step 455. For example, fingerprint 401 is returned to its original position, as illustrated in FIG. 4g, and fingerprint 402 will be shifted instead.
[0064] In step 456, the degree of correlation between the first fingerprint and the second fingerprint is calculated or otherwise determined, e.g., as it was in step 451, above. In step 457 it is determined if a limit on the amount by which a fingerprint will be shifted has been reached. If the limit has not been reached, then processing returns to step 455. If it has been reached, then the correlations that were calculated in steps 451 and 456 are searched and the highest correlation is identified. The fingerprint being shifted and the amount of the shift associated with that correlation are identified in step 458. The identified shift represents the amount of delay that will best align the fingerprints and therefore the programs used to generate the fingerprints. FIG. 4g illustrates an example of the shift identified in step 458.
[0065] Several variations on the method described with reference to FIG. 4c are possible. For example, only one fingerprint may be shifted. The shift of the fingerprint may range from a maximum negative amount to a maximum positive amount. The negative amounts would represent a positive shift of the other fingerprint. An example of a negative shift is shown in FIG. 4h.
[0066] Another variation of the methods described above is dynamically adjusting the limit of the shift. For example, the correlations for a narrow range, such as shifts of up to 400 ms, may be determined. If one of those correlations is high, then the method may end, but if the calculated correlations are not sufficiently high, then the steps illustrated in FIG. 4c may be repeated using a wider range of shifts, such as shifts of up to 800 ms or more. Similarly, the process may end immediately if a sufficiently high correlation is identified. A sufficiently high correlation may be, for example, a correlation coefficient of 0.98 or above. In addition to the methods and variations mentioned above, any suitable pattern matching technique may be used.
[0067] The FIG. 4c method may result in aligning two fingerprints. FIG. 4d illustrates a method for expanding this to align additional fingerprints, such as a third, fourth, fifth, etc. fingerprint. First, in step 461, the first two fingerprints are aligned with each other by shifting one of the two fingerprints. This may be performed using, for example, the method described above with reference to FIG. 4c.
[0068] In step 462, one of the first two fingerprints is selected for use in further comparisons with a third (or the next) fingerprint. The selected fingerprint and the next (unaligned) fingerprint are then aligned in step 463. The method described above with reference to FIG. 4c may be used to perform step 463. Other methods of pattern matching may be used as well.
[0069] If the fingerprint selected in step 462 was shifted as a result of the alignment in step 463, then, in step 465, each or a set of the fingerprints that were previously aligned with the fingerprint selected in step 462 are shifted by the same amount. This helps ensure that all of the previously-aligned fingerprints remain in alignment.
[0070] If there are more fingerprints to align (such as a fourth fingerprint), steps 463-465 may be repeated until all of the fingerprints are aligned (step 466).
[0071] Instead of selecting a single fingerprint in step 462, a composite of the one or more aligned fingerprints may be produced and used for the comparison in step 463. For example, the amplitude measurements of each of the aligned fingerprints may be averaged to create a composite fingerprint. Similarly, the alignment of step 463 may be calculated with reference to some or all of the already-aligned fingerprints instead of just a selected one. For example, several correlation coefficients may be calculated for each shift amount--one for each of the already-aligned fingerprints. The best alignment with all of the previously-aligned fingerprints may be identified in step 463. For example, the shift for which the average of the several correlation coefficients is highest may be identified in step 463.
[0072] In some embodiments, a device may be able to influence or control the timing with which a program is delivered or the timing with which a program is transmitted from another device. For example, the program may be delivered from storage media, such as the media in a digital video recorder, or from an on-demand source, such a video on demand server. In these embodiments a device may continue to synchronize its output with other devices by buffering the received program and outputting the received program from the buffer after the appropriate amount of time. However, a device may also alter the timing with which the program is delivered to the device by altering the timing of its requests for the content. Both of these techniques, and others described herein, may be used together. For example, a target amount of buffered data may be maintained, and the timing of requests for content may be altered in order to maintain that target amount. The magnitude of the alteration to the timing with which a program is requested may be calculated using the same techniques discussed above with reference to calculating the magnitude of delay in outputting the program.
[0073] FIG. 5 illustrates another example of how a device may output a program such that the presentation of the output is synchronized with another device. In step 501, a program is received on a first channel (e.g. a communication path, a frequency range, a signal, a logical or physical connection, etc.). Using the example of FIG. 1, the program may be received via one of links 187-194.
[0074] In step 502, a portion of the program is received on a second channel. Using the example of FIG. 1, the portion of the program may be received via link 195. The program may be, for example, a movie; and the portion of the program received via link 502 may be the audio of the movie. The portion of the program received in step 502 may be comingled with other data. For example, audio received in step 502 may include not only the audio feed of the movie, but also the microphone feed of a member of a collaborative chat.
[0075] The device performing the method of FIG. 5 may also transmit the audio feed received from the first channel to another device on the second channel. Additional data, such as a microphone feed from the device performing the method of FIG. 5, may also be transmitted on the second channel. In this example, the device performing the method of FIG. 5 may transmit on the second channel both the audio feed of a movie (as received, for example, on the first channel) as well as the microphone feed from a user of the device performing the method of FIG. 5.
[0076] In step 503, the device aligns its output of the program with the portion of the program received from the second channel. For example, the device may delay its output of the video of a movie in order to align the video with the audio received on the second channel. The device may output the aligned video and the audio received on the second channel. The audio received on the second channel may replace the audio received on the first channel. The alignment of the video and the audio received on the second channel may be achieved, for example, by examining time references embedded in the video and audio feeds and aligning the time references. A technique similar to the technique described above with reference to FIGS. 3a-c may be used.
[0077] Another benefit of the method of FIG. 5 is that it may help to reduce audio echoes. Echoes may occur due to the audio output of a program being picked up by a first user's microphone. The copy of the program's audio output that is picked up by the microphone may be transmitted to a second user. The second user would then hear both the original audio output of the program and also the copy of the program's audio output transmitted from the first user. That two copies of the same audio are being output may be unnoticeable if the delay between when each copy is output is small enough. However, if the copies of the program's audio are output with enough delay (for example, more than 100 ms), then the second user may perceive this delay as an echo.
[0078] Echoes may be minimized using a variety of techniques. For example, directional microphones may be used to minimize retransmission of the program's audio. The method described above may help to reduce or eliminate echoes by keeping multiple copies of the program's audio from being output. For example, the device performing the method of FIG. 5 may not output the program's original audio feed as received on the first channel. Instead, the device performing the method of FIG. 5 outputs only the program's audio feed as received on the second channel. Because the audio feed received on the first channel is not output, a delay between this audio feed and the audio feed received on the second channel does not cause an echo. The audio received on the second channel may include both the audio of the program and the contents of a voice chat.
[0079] FIG. 6 illustrates a method for initializing and maintaining program synchronization during a collaborative experience, e.g., multiple devices and/or users consuming the program at the same time. In step 601, a group of devices involved in the collaborative experience are identified. By identifying the devices involved, communication between the devices over a two-way communications channel is enabled, or a previously existing communication path, e.g., one provided by a service provider, may be identified and used. This may be performed in a variety of ways. For example, a user who wishes to collaboratively experience a program may input or select IP addresses, domain names, user names, phone numbers, or any other identifier related to the group of other users with which the program will be experienced. After one user inputs such information, other users may receive an invitation to join the group. The identifiers entered or selected by a user may be resolved to network addresses that each user's device can use to send messages directly to one another. Each device may also connect to one or more servers or other computing devices. The servers (or other computing devices) may inform each member of the group of network address or other identifiers needed to facilitate direct communication between the member of the group. Alternatively, each device may communicate with the server (or other computing device), and the server (or other computing device) may act as an intermediary for some or all of the communications between the devices involved in the collaborative experience.
[0080] Once the devices involved in the collaborative experience are identified in step 601, the program that is to be collaboratively experienced is selected in step 603. Step 603 may be performed prior to or concurrently with step 601. For example, an invitation to a collaborative viewing experience may specify the program that is to be viewed. Alternatively, users may choose a program collaboratively by, for example, nominating one or more programs and voting on the programs.
[0081] Playback control may be specified in a similar manner in step 605. For example, the users collaboratively experiencing a program may nominate one user to control when the program is rewound, fast-forwarded, paused, etc. Alternatively, each user may retain control over the presentation of the program. For example, any one user pausing the program may cause the program to be paused for the other users in the collaborative experience. Alternatively, a certain number of the users (such as 50% of the users or all of the users) may have to press pause before playback will pause. An indication of the number of users that wish to pause the program may be displayed on each user's screen. Each user's vote to pause the program may expire after a set amount of time, such as, for example 5 seconds. The amount of time after which a vote to pause the program expires may be a function of the number of users in the collaborative experience. For example, the time period after which votes to pause expire may be 4 seconds, multiplied by the number of users that are collaboratively experiencing the program. The control schemes above may apply not just to pausing the program, but also to rewinding (including instant replays), fast-forwarding, or other ways of controlling the program.
[0082] Another example of a playback control scheme is that some actions, such as rewinding or fast-forwarding, will cause a user's device to lose synchronization with the other devices. For example, a user may choose to re-watch a section of the program without affecting the playback of the program for the other users. A user may be able to return playback to the schedule being used by the other devices by entering a command. Rules for when one user's actions may affect playback of the program on another device may be selected by each user individually, or the rules may be selected as a group. In some systems, these rules may be specified by default.
[0083] Each device may identify the available methods for synchronizing output of the program in step 607. For example, each device may indicate whether or not the copy of the program being received includes presentation time stamps or other time stamps. If the copy of the program received by all of the devices includes compatible time stamps, then the output of the program may be synchronized using, for example, the method described above with reference to FIGS. 3a-c. However, if one or more of the devices does not include a compatible time stamp, then another synchronization method may be used, such as the method described above with reference to FIGS. 4a-h. The devices may compare the types of fingerprints that each device is capable of providing and select one or more types of fingerprints that are compatible with all of devices. Similarly, the devices may determine whether to calculate delay amounts individually, to have one device of the group calculate delay amounts for all of the devices in the group, or to rely on a server or other external computing device to calculate the delay amounts. These options may be determined based on the capabilities of each device. For example, a relatively low-powered devices that may not have processing power to calculate delay amounts may request that the calculations be performed on another device, such as a server. Each device may calculate delay amounts individually absent such a request. Where it is needed for the selected synchronization algorithm, the devices may synchronize their clocks using, for example, network time protocol.
[0084] The synchronization method negotiated in step 607 is performed in step 609. In step 611, it is determined if the available methods for synchronization have changed. For example, a new device may have joined the collaborative experience, or the content of the program received by a device may have changed. Another example is that a user stopped using one device and began using another device to collaboratively experience the content. Under any of these scenarios, steps 605-609 may be repeated to ensure synchronization between the users.
[0085] In step 613, the synchronization step (609) may be repeated if a manual resynchronization request is received or a timer expires. A manual resynchronization request may occur because, for example, a user believes the program is not being presented simultaneously to all of the users in the group. A timer may expire where resynchronization is configured to occur periodically. Where a timer is used to cause periodic resynchronization, the length of time between resynchronizations may be adjusted depending on, for example, the capabilities of the devices in the group, the frequency with which manual resynchronizations have been requested, a rate with which transmission errors have been detected, or any other factor.
[0086] In some embodiments, resynchronizations will not interfere with a user's experience once it has started. For example, the resynchronization process may determine that one device is presenting the program 500 ms before another device. This difference in output times may be ignored so long as the difference is under a certain threshold. Where an immediate adjustment to a device's output delay is not made, an adjustment may be made at an inconspicuous time. For example, the 500 ms adjustment may be made when a user pauses, rewinds, or fast-forwards the program. Differences over a certain threshold may cause an immediately adjustment in a device's output delay.
[0087] Resynchronization may also occur when certain events occur in a program. For example, a resynchronization may occur after commercial breaks. Commercial breaks may be identified, for example, by audio queue tones or metadata packaged with the program, including, for example, time stamps included with the program. Resynchronizing after commercial breaks may be advantageous because each user in the collaborative experience may be presented with different commercials. The different commercials may result in the programming being received by the devices in the group with different delays after the commercials are over.
[0088] Resynchronization may also occur, for example, if a user changes the channel or otherwise selects a different program than the first program that was experienced collaboratively. The devices may store a separate delay amount for each program. This may allow for group "channel surfing" without needing to resynchronize each time the channel is changed.
[0089] FIG. 7 illustrates an example of general hardware and software structures that may be used to implement any of the various computing elements discussed above, such as any of devices 140-154. The computing element 700 may include one or more processors 701, which may execute instructions of a computer program to perform any of the features described herein. The instructions may be stored in any type of computer-readable medium or memory, to configure the operation of the processor 701. For example, instructions may be stored in a read-only memory (ROM) 702, random access memory (RAM) 703, removable media 704, such as a Universal Serial Bus (USB) drive, compact disk (CD) or digital versatile disk (DVD), floppy disk drive, or any other desired electronic storage medium. Instructions may also be stored in an attached (or internal) hard drive 705. The computing element 700 may include one or more output devices, such as a display 706 (or an external television), and may include one or more output device controllers 707, such as a video processor. There may also be one or more user input devices 708, such as a remote control, keyboard, mouse, touch screen, microphone, etc. The computing element 700 may also include one or more network interfaces, such as input/output circuits 709 (such as a network card) to communicate with an external network 710. The network interface may be a wired interface, wireless interface, or a combination of the two. In some embodiments, the interface 709 may include a modem (e.g., a cable modem). Network 710 may include communication lines such as optical cables, coaxial cables, Ethernet cables, satellite or other wireless links (including cellular links), etc. Computing element 700 may connect to a plurality of networks simultaneously. Network Interfaces 709 may have dedicated hardware for each network, or some or all of the hardware may serve multiple networks simultaneously. The computing element 700 may also include one or more clocks 711. A clock may interface with processor 701, network 710, and/or other communications devices to ensure that it is set accurately, as was discussed above.
[0090] One or more aspects of the disclosure may be embodied in computer-usable or readable data and/or executable instructions, such as in one or more program modules, executed by one or more processors or other devices as described herein. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types when executed by a processor in a computer or other device. The modules may be written in a source code programming language that is subsequently compiled for execution, or may be written in a scripting language such as (but not limited to) HTML or XML. The computer executable instructions may be stored on a computer readable medium, as described above. As will be appreciated by one of skill in the art, the functionality of the program modules may be combined or distributed as desired in various illustrative embodiments. In addition, the functionality may be embodied in whole or in part in firmware or hardware equivalents such as integrated circuits, field programmable gate arrays (FPGA), and the like. Particular data structures may be used to more effectively implement one or more aspects of the disclosure, and such data structures are contemplated within the scope of executable instructions and computer-usable data described herein.
[0091] Aspects of the disclosure have been described in terms of illustrative embodiments thereof. While illustrative systems and methods as described herein embodying various aspects of the present disclosure are shown, it will be understood by those skilled in the art, that the disclosure is not limited to these embodiments. Modifications may be made by those skilled in the art, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings. For example, each of the features of the aforementioned illustrative examples may be utilized alone or in combination or subcombination with elements of the other examples. For example, any of the above described systems and methods or parts thereof may be combined with the other methods and systems or parts thereof described above. For example, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the steps described above may be performed in other than the recited order, including concurrently, and that one or more steps may be optional in accordance with aspects of the disclosure. It will also be appreciated and understood that modifications may be made without departing from the true spirit and scope of the present disclosure. The description is thus to be regarded as illustrative instead of restrictive on the present disclosure.
Patent applications by COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Patent applications in class SYNCHRONIZATION
Patent applications in all subclasses SYNCHRONIZATION
User Contributions:
Comment about this patent or add new information about this topic:


text:
Engage your quadriceps and sharpen your focus to find a sense of balance in this sequence of stretches. Read »
Tone your core and improve your posture with these simple, strength-building stretches. Read »
Practicing some basic hip opening postures can increase overall flexibility while releasing tight muscles and reducing everyday anxiety. Mallory Stuchin demonstrates how. Read »
Stretching for a few minutes at home will help to increase your flexibility while...View gallery »
Stretching for a few minutes at home will help to increase your flexibility while reducing the aches and pains that are a daily part of NYC life. Yoga instructor Mallory Stuchin offers a few poses and tips. Read »
The wall is an sturdy and convenient aid in stretching thigh and hip muscles -- here's the overview from LA Times. Read »

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Hi. I have a broken nose from a fight one and a half years ago. Luckily, the cartilage tip etc. is all intact, however the bone itself is not fitting straight and is going to one of the sides, which brings the cartlage etc. with it. It wont fit, they tried 2 times, it still goes to one of the sides. Is it possible to "cut" the bone in half, attach a implant to the top part in order to make it fit with the lower part of my "forehead" where the break is or whatever its called. Can anyone do this?
Crooked Nose - Nose Implant Possible?
Doctor Answers 10
Crooked Nose - Nose Implant Possible?
Photos would help in the evaluation of your nose. If you're saying that you've had two prior Rhinoplasty Surgeries and that after these your nose is still crooked, you would need to explain what was done during these prior Rhinoplasties for meaningful recommendations. Crooked, nasal bones require osteotomies to re-break and move the crooked nasal bones together in the midline. Crooked cartilage can't be re-broken and moved, like bone, and requires shaving or rasping. Layering a bone/cartilage implant over crooked bone or cartilage would not make the nose straight IMO. Be sure your Rhinoplasty Surgeon understands and follows the proper aesthetics of facial (and nasal) beauty for the creation of a naturally, more attractive nose and face.
Learn more: http://www.thepalmercodeinstitute.com
Implant for crooked nose
While nasal implants are possible, it is best to use the patient's own cartilage when possible. If the nose has been completely depleted of cartilage, ear cartilage would be the next best choice. It is important to have full osteotomies of the nasal bones with realignment of the nasal pyramid to give symmetric dorsal aesthetic lines. Look for a surgeon who has lots of experience and has dedicated his practice to rhinoplasty and revision rhinoplasty before embarking on this difficult endeavor.
Learn more: http://seattlefacial.com
Crooked nose
straightening a crooked nose can be a challenging and frustrating problem in plastic surgery. a surgeon may straighten the nose at the time of surgery, only to have it veer off to one side during the weeks or months following the procedure. There are many strategies to straighten a crooked nose and sometimes a graft on the bridge may be necessary. My best advice is to consult with some surgeons who specialize in revision rhinoplasty and who have experience dealing with this problem. Your case may require a more complex solution working with both the bone and cartilage to achieve the result you desire.
Learn more: http://edelsonplastic.com/face/rhinoplasty/
You might also like...
Rhinoplasty revision
Without photos or a face to face examination it is impossible to say what would help. If you have had 2 operations that failed to correct the problem you certainly do not want to waste your time and money on a third one that fails to deliver. If you go to another surgeon you need to bring copies of your operative reports and previous photos so that the next operation can be successful.
My response to your question/post does not represent formal medical advice or constitute a doctor patient relationship. You need to consult with i.e. personally see a board certified plastic surgeon in order to receive a formal evaluation and develop a doctor patient relationship.
Nasal fracture and implant
If you need dorsal augmentation, an implant can be helpful. But, I woudl straighten the nose first before doing so.
Proper reconstruction of nasal bones
Correction of a crooked nose is a challenge, especially for less experienced surgeons, but even in the hands of experts may produce a great deal of difficulty. The use of grafts and implants should be reserved for final refinement, rather than a basic method to achieve a straight well functioning nose.
Correcting a crooked nose.
With a markedly crooked nose, it may never be exactly straight but with a combination of different types of osteotomies to cut and straighten the bones and your own cartilage grafts to help straighten the crooked cartilage or to hide the defect, much improvement should be seen. I stay away from foreign material in the nose as it seems too easily to get infected, especially in a nose with multiple other surgeries. See a board certified plastic surgeon with expertise in Rhinoplasty to explain all the options.
Persistent nasal deviation after surgery
Implant seems like an unusual option here.
Rather than seeking a different surgery, I might try a different surgeon in your case.
A full comprehensive procedure including septum and onlay or spreader grafts should work. Osteotomy variations such as nasofrontal, intermediate, or perforating double lateral should be able to make your bone fit into the right place.
Best of luck
Learn more: http://www.newfaceny.com
Rhinoplasty and foreign implants vs. cartilage for the crooked nose..
Rhinoplasty and foreign implants vs. cartilage for the crooked nose. Foreign materials can get infected so for 35 years I have used the patient's own tissues to onlay grafts to fix this problem.
Crooked nose and option of nasal implant
There are a number of rhinoplasty options, for someone who has a crooked nose secondary to trauma. These options include cutting the nasal bones (osteotomy), onlay grafts of one's own cartilage, and nasal implants to hide the defect. Seek out a board certified plastic surgeon in your area who routinely performs rhinoplasty.
Learn more: http://www.VincentLeporeMD.com
These answers are for educational purposes and should not be relied upon as a substitute for medical advice you may receive from your physician. If you have a medical emergency, please call 911. These answers do not constitute or initiate a patient/doctor relationship.


text:
by John Vannie
Michigan's defense is similar to Georgia Tech's in that both have a veteran front seven and a young secondary led by a top cornerback. The Wolverines are bigger and have more depth than the Yellow Jackets, however, and will be more difficult to wear down than either of Notre Dame's first two opponents. The Irish have yet to establish an effective running game this season, and are unlikely to find much room again this week.
This game is likely to be another low scoring contest. Brady Quinn will once again face considerable pressure up the middle, as this is the method of attack proven to be most successful against Notre Dame in the Weis era. The Wolverines shut down the Irish in the second half of last year's contest with this type of pressure, and Penn State had some success with a similar approach during the third quarter last week.
The Wolverine defense boasts an impressive front four led by end LaMarr Woodley and huge tackles Terrance Taylor and Alan Branch. The linebackers are also big and have adequate speed. David Harris holds down the middle while leading the team in tackles, and Prescott Burgess teams with Shawn Crable on the outside.
Leon Hall is the leader of the secondary, while fellow cornerbacks Charles Stewart and Morgan Trent may become the targets of Quinn's passes should they be forced to cover Jeff Samardzija or Rhema McKnight without help. Safeties Ryan Mundy, Brandent Englemon and Willis Barringer will also attempt to hold down tight end John Carlson and the rest of the Irish aerial attack.
Notre Dame must protect Quinn, perhaps by rolling him out or moving the pocket, and generate enough rushing yards to keep Michigan's defense from dominating the game. The Irish may not get very many scoring opportunities, so they must avoid drive-killing penalties and get into the end zone by taking advantage of their more experienced pass receivers against the Wolverine cover men. Darius Walker should also have some success as a receiver in this game.
When Michigan has the ball, they will run it until someone stops them – which admittedly may not happen. Surprisingly, their offensive line is only adequate except for left tackle Jake Long, but they are blessed with three talented and diverse running backs in Mike Hart, Kevin Grady and Brandon Minor. Expect the Wolverines to attack the right side of the Irish defense on the ground and attempt to hit them with play action passes when safeties Tom Zbikowski and Chinedum Ndukwe creep toward the line of scrimmage.
Quarterback Chad Henne is a three year starter, but he has hit only 50% of his passes this season despite weak competition. If he is sharp, Notre Dame could be in trouble. Michigan's receivers are fast and dangerous, but consistency has been a problem and Henne misfires more often than a veteran passer should.
Still, the trio of Mario Manningham, Steve Breaston and Adrian Arrington can burn opponents from anywhere on the field. Doug Dutch and Carl Tabb will also see playing time without a significant drop-off in production. The Wolverines have always featured an excellent tight end, and this year is no different. Tyler Ecker fills the role for this year's team, although he may not be at full strength this week.
The key for the Irish defense will be their ability to stop the run while containing Breaston and Manningham with corners Ambrose Wooden and Mike Richardson. While slowing down Penn State's deep threat receivers was the focus last week, Notre Dame must first slow down Hart to win on Saturday.
Special teams will also contribute significantly to the outcome, as field position will be at a premium. The Irish have played well in all aspects of returns and coverage so far this season, but Breaston is a dangerous return man who has burned Notre Dame in the past. Michigan's kicker is the reliable Garrett Rivas, who rarely misses a kick of less than 40 yards.
The overall matchups, as one might expect, are relatively even.
Position / Advantage
Quarterback – Notre Dame
Running Back – Michigan
Wide Receivers – Notre Dame
Tight Ends – Notre Dame
ND OLine vs. UM DLine – Michigan
UM OLine vs. ND DLine – Even
Linebackers – Michigan
Secondary – Notre Dame
Punting – Notre Dame
Kicking – Michigan
Return Teams – Even
Intangibles – Michigan
Michigan desperately needs this game for its program, and the Wolverines have circled it as a must win during the long off-season following a disappointing 7-5 campaign in 2005. The question is whether they can pressure Quinn enough to neutralize the advantage he holds over Henne.
Prior to the start of the season, I thought that this would be the September game the Irish would most likely lose. One disturbing statistic in the first two Irish games with Big-10 referees is that opponents have not been called for holding while Notre Dame has been flagged five times. Overall penalties are 17 for the Irish and nine for their opponents. If this trend continues and if Michigan's offensive linemen are allowed to use any means to keep Victor Abiamiri from Henne, anything can happen.
On balance, however, Notre Dame's preparation, playmakers and coaching should overcome Michigan's emotion in a hard fought contest.


text:
Lent & Easter
The Sun Slowly Rises
Neil PaynterBible readings, reflections and prayers for the days of Holy Week, and a large section of resources, all from members, associates and friends of the Iona Community. Learn More
Dancing in the Desert
Sally Foster-FultonReflections, meditations, prayers, activities and liturgies for Lent. Includes a liturgy for Mother's Day, worship for Ash Wednesday, an all-age service for Shrove Tuesday for making and sharing pancakes, and other all-age resources … Learn More
Step Gently in the World
Sally Foster-FultonReflections, meditations, prayers and liturgies for Holy Week following the journey of Jesus from Palm Sunday to Easter Day. A book which affirms that, even in the darkness of betrayal and denial and death, we can rise up and live different lives: where the justice, peace and love poured out in Christ's life can be resurrected in our own. Learn More
The Cross in the Marketplace
Dave BroomA series of resources and complete liturgies for the major services of Holy Week. The book began life in community on Iona, and includes an Easter pilgrimage. Can be used in a church or house group or for private reflection, to deepen the experience of Easter – and inspire action. Learn More
The Risen Dust
Rachel MannPowerful and moving readings, stories and poems for Easter. Rachel Mann writes with the voices of the characters involved in the biblical accounts of passion and resurrection, unafraid to explore the darkest aspects evoked by these events. Learn More
We Journey in Hope
Neil Paynter & Peter MillarA book for Easter that is about more than easy answers - that encourages us to seek signs of the continuing Passion of God in the world, not in abstract ideas but in our human bodies and souls. Learn More
Iona Dawn
Neil Paynter (ed)The dramatic events of the days leading up to Easter Sunday are expressed through biblical readings and the reflections of several well-known Iona Community members. Learn More
Fire and Bread
Ruth BurgessThis book of Eastertide resources covering the period from Easter Sunday to Trinity Sunday offers prayers, responses, liturgies, songs, poems, reflections, meditations, sermons and stories for a period of nearly two months, including Easter Day, Ascension Day, Pentecost, Trinity Sunday, Saints' days, Rogation days, environmental days and many more. Learn More
Eggs and Ashes
Ruth Burgess and Chris PolhillModern, relevant resources to accompany readers through Lent and Easter for many years, with material for Shrove Tuesday, Ash Wednesday, Mothering Sunday, Palm Sunday and Holy Week, as well as suggestions for a Lent discipline. Learn More
Stages On the Way
Wild Goose Worship GroupTraces Jesus' road to the cross through Lent, Holy Week and Easter, resourcing worship that enables people to sense the hope, apprehension and joy of Easter as felt by Jesus' friends. The range and diversity offers a unique source of elements for lay and clergy worship planners and enablers. Learn More


text:
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Yeah, that's my thought. I don't go to the movies much but if I start seeing 2/month, I'll more than make up for it. Had to convince my gf to get it too.
I'll just hold up the days it says since you're saying you were able to use it once you got the card. I'm guessing this is super worth it? Thanks, Rush!
ah, ok. I saw that you could do e-tickets not needing your card so I figured you could use it right away. How long did it take? Should I expect the card before next weekend?
Were you able to use it right away? I just signed up for it and it says to wait 5-7 bus days for your card. So am I understanding, I cannot use it until I receive the carD?
Hey, you still using moviepass?
Alright, thanks for letting me stay. Looking forward to it.
**** didn't see there was a sign in sheet. I'll quit the league and let the people who are signed up for it take my spot. Edit: I don't see an option to delete team so you will need to manually remove me.
I joined the league but it only shows 3 people are in it?
Gonna be in SD all weekend, so you'll have to make the GT for next Monday series. I'll start making them again next weekend.
So I'm back in now. Which is good, but I'll keep an eye out if there are any other problems with any of my posters./
Belt = Rally Killer
Cupid Stunt
Authentic Warriors Fan
PSD's Bad Hair Day
La Flama Blanca
sf giants mod
PSD's Road Rash


text:
Other Information
The Tutoring and Learning Center is a great place for students to work one-on-one with a tutor to review their math in any course at the College. Students can also work on math, whether or not they need help. It is a comfortable and supportive atmosphere for students to come together and study, in groups or individually.


text:
Buy Item $13.49 Retail:
Save 25% ($4.50) $17.99
Add To Cart
In StockStock No: WW501203
Crossway / 2009 / Paperback
Add To Cart
Add To Wishlist
|Format: Paperback
Number of Pages: 176
Vendor: Crossway
Publication Date: 2009
|Dimensions: 8.50 X 5.50 (inches)
If you've ever asked, "Why am I the way that I am? Why is life so hard? Is there any hope?" you'll find answers in Martyn Lloyd-Jones's study of Genesis.
Martyn Lloyd-Jones (1899-1981), minister of Westminster Chapel in London for 30 years, was one of the foremost preachers of his day. His many books have brought profound spiritual encouragement to millions around the world.


text: The American Music Ensemble is comprised of the top performing songwriters in the Bruce Hornsby Creative American Music Program at the Frost School of Music. This elite group of artists composes, arranges, and performs their own original music, accompanied by a contemporary, professional-level rhythm section made up of instrumentalist from all areas of the Frost School. There is a strong emphasis on performance skills and audience engagement.


text:
By over a ten to one margin, Canadians prefer their own health care system over ours (82%-8%). 70% of them are either fairly satisfied, or very satisfied with the system.
These are the results of a Harris/Decima poll published on July 5.
It points out an interesting phenomenon – if you asked any typical conservative, he would tell you that Canadians are plagued by waiting queues and flood down here to the states for fancy American medical care. They aren't, and they don't.
But most Americans have limited access to information about health care in other countries. The British, the French, Taiwanese, Canadians and Cubans — all of them all the way down the line don't want our system. But here in this country information is filtered, and we only hear of unhappy Canucks and Brits. I( doubt that the above survey gained a mention on any American TV network, and damned few newspapers.
Of course there are problems in each of these countries, and conservatives, who know very little of their systems, are quick to point out the problems. Canadians do have waiting queues for some non-critical procedures. That's a big complaint up there, but not so much that they want to sacrifice their system for ours. The British system is underfunded. Cuba is poor, and cannot afford expensive technology. But according to WHO, each is doing better than the US in delivering care.
By the way, Canada's health system is run at the provincial level, and the worst-performing province is Quebec. This is where most complaints about their system originate.


text:
I had ear cartilage(nose grafts) inserted in my nose to give the nose an extension and more definition. It's now been a almost five years since the procedure and after a few revisions here and there, my nose still looks unnatural. It looks very natural and well done in photographs, but in real life, it just for some reason looks fake. I'm not happy about it, and everywhere I go it's like a target on my face. What would happen if I take the grafts out of my nose? Will my nose look odd or worse?
Taking out Ear Cartilage (nose Grafts) from Previous Rhinoplasty Procedure?
Doctor Answers 7
It's important to know why your nose looks fake.
If you are still not satisfied with your nose aesthetics after rhinoplasy and "a few revisions here and there", and "it looks very natural and well done in photographs", you first want to be certain the next revision is warranted.
Having said this, if another revision is indicated, you may not need to have the graft completely removed but perhaps contoured to achieve your desired outcome.
Knowing why your nose looks "fake" in person is critical for you and your surgeon to make the right decision.
Removal of the grafts may cause the nose to look less defined
It is hard to know without seeing your nose and understanding what grafts were placed. In general, graft in the tip for Asian rhinoplasty provide some increased projection to the tip, either as an onlay graft or as a structure graft that allows your native tip cartilages to be repositioned more forward. In either case, if the graft(s) are removed you may lose some projection and refinement. Depening on the nose, a revision may be able to be performed to smooth contours or adjust the shape without losing projection or refinement. Hope this helps.
Removing Ear Cartilager Grafts after Rhinoplasty
You say that your nose looks "natural" in photographs; therefore the only way we can answer your question is to examine you. I suggest you have a consultation with somebody on this panel who is close to you.
You might also like...
Ear Cartilage Graft for Asian Rhinoplasty
Most of the ear cartilage used for Asian rhinoplasty is for augmenting and refining the tip. If after 5 years you are still unhappy with the result, it's best to seek a second opinion. What you describe is quite common after Asian rhinoplasty. Often it's because the nose itself looks fine but may not match well with rest of your facial features. It's critical when considering rhinoplasty to anticipate how it would match up with rest of your facial features.
Stewart Wang, MD FACS, Wang Plastic Surgery
Cartilage Grafts in Rhinoplasty
Cartilage grafts are frequently used in rhinoplasty surgery. The grafts can provide structural support or cosmetic contour. If they provide support then removing them could not only affect your appearance but also your nasal breathing. If the grafts are onlay grafts to refine the appearance only, then removing them should not affect your breathing. In general ear cartilage is not as strong as nasal septal cartilage or rib cartilage and therefore is not as commonly used when significant structural support is needed.
Removal of cartilage grafts
It depends on whether the cartilage grafts are providing support to you nose. Most likely there will be some changes either good or bad. See a Board Certified Surgeon who does rhinoplasty for an evaluation. Donald R. Nunn MD Atlanta Plastic Surgeon.
Learn more: http://www.atlplasticsurgeon.com/facial-surgery-atlanta/nose-surgery/
These answers are for educational purposes and should not be relied upon as a substitute for medical advice you may receive from your physician. If you have a medical emergency, please call 911. These answers do not constitute or initiate a patient/doctor relationship.


text:
BP Comment Quick Links
|Strength of Schedule Report
September 2, 2008
Under The Knife
We've got comments now at Baseball Prospectus, and I'll admit to some trepidation. For one thing, I'm an e-mail guy. It's quaintly old-fashioned to do e-mails today in a Twitter society, but it's also a bit more personal somehow-I can't tell you how many people I've come to know that initially e-mailed about something in one of my columns. Still, it was one of the most requested features here, and I'll do my best to participate. I also want to remind people that with roster expansion, the DL becomes a seldom-used tool. We'll see lots of injured players simply shuffled to the end of the bench rather than put on the DL, since any replacement will already be there and active, and there are some accounting reasons for teams that factor in as well. It does complicate things for me, as it's easier to 'hide' an injury and it skews the injury stats a bit. While it allows me some insight into the likely Dick Martin Award winner, it also reminds me that simple counting stats like days and dollars lost aren't the ideal statistics. The development of Injury Cost is a good first step, and hopefully not the last. Powered by La Quinta Inn, whose Tampa location went above and beyond for me on Sunday, on to the injuries:
Ben Sheets (7 DXL)
Jeff Kent (20 DXL)
Chris Carpenter (20 DXL)
Justin Upton (60 DXL)
B.J. Upton (0 DXL)
Ryan Spilborghs (60 DXL)
Andruw Jones (20 DXL)
Adam Jones (0 DXL)
Quick Cuts: The Playoff Odds Report says that the Twins only have a one-something percent chance at the wild card. My gut disagrees, but I know which one is wrong more often. ... Mike Lowell took batting practice, but there's still no exact timetable for his return. ... Here's the story of the Cardinals season-Joe Mather checked his swing, sprained his wrist, and is likely done for the year. ... Kevin Gregg has been shut down; the Marlins will go to a committee to replace him in the ninth. ... Mark Grudzielanek is done for '08 after images showed his ankle is still an issue. ... Mike Aviles did not break his finger when it was hit by a pitch this weekend, so he's expected back in the lineup this week. ... Jarrod Saltalamacchia is headed for imaging on his elbow. That should open the door to more playing time for Taylor Teagarden. ... Congrats to Phil Coke, who made his Yankees debut; he looked healthy to me.
17 comments have been left for this article.
BP Comment Quick Links
Re: The Playoff Odds Report says that the Twins only have a one-something percent chance at the wild card
Sep 02, 2008 11:11 AM
(Not sure that this exchange belongs in the comments section to Will Carroll's column, but here it goes...) The one-something percent is just the chance that they'll catch the Red Sox (or Tampa Bay) AND not win the division. They have a 40-percent chance to win the division, and I'm sure a number of those scenarios have them finishing with a better record than Boston.
Sep 02, 2008 11:27 AM
Well, look at the third order records of the two teams. The Playoff Odds Report knows that the Red Sox are the stronger team.
Sep 02, 2008 11:28 AM
I could have said it more clearly, but I'm obviously not the stats guy around here. It just surprises me, even knowing the reasons why, that the chance of the WC team coming from the Central is so small.
Sep 02, 2008 11:39 AM
Let's do like Joe Sheehan did for the Yankees' playoff chances and say that the Red Sox go nearly .500 the rest of the way. That puts them at 93-69.
Sep 02, 2008 15:37 PM
Mike Petriello
Will, re: Andruw Jones. While he is having soreness in his knees, it's been kind of an open secret around Dodgerville that he was sent down on a "rehab" less because he was hurt and more to get him off of the active roster. That's why he was recalled as soon as rosters expanded, though I don't expect him to play at all.
Sep 02, 2008 16:32 PM
Seth Cohen
Is BJ Upton's shoulder issue a cause for his decline in power from last season, or is it just a combination of the league catching up with him, and his improved plate discipline? What does "chronic shoulder laxity" mean and will it carry over into next season?
Sep 02, 2008 17:23 PM
Will, has BJ Ryan's season gone according to what you'd have expected? He's pitched pretty well given the quick return from Tommy John, though he's walking a lot of guys (common among pitchers who are returning from TJ). My question for you is can we expect him to return to the BJ of 2006 next season, and have you seen anything in his games this year that leads you to believe he's pitching with diminished "stuff"?
Sep 02, 2008 20:55 PM
Brian Oakchunas
Why is Justin Upton's DXL at 60? Does it include the time he missed before he came back? Also, in general, just a thought but it would be useful if the DXL was prorated for what they will miss in the future, rather than since the beginning of the injury. In the Upton example, I am more curious how much more time he is going to miss. To figure that out right now I have to go back to the beginning of his injury and count ahead by 60.
Sep 02, 2008 23:20 PM
I agree w/ Brian. The DXL is confusing and I have simply stopped paying attention to it. I'm interested in how much MORE time a guy will miss, not how much he has already missed.
Sep 03, 2008 06:46 AM
DXL is slightly confusing, but I don't think it's as difficult as some make it out to be. The reason I didn't put dates or countdowns into it is that in the original plan, we were going to have it feeding to the player page in the same way that some of TA feeds there. It's proven to be a much more difficult technical challenge and I felt to change the way we presented DXL mid-season would be even more confusing. I realize it's not ideal, but as a "quick look", I think it's a solid addition to UTK this year.
Sep 04, 2008 09:24 AM
Get rid of comments. God, please. I don't want to be a snob, but already the comments here look more like complaints. Do yourself a favor, Will, and don't even bother responding. Just pretend you read them by saying, "I was reading through the comments, and most of you are upset."
Sep 03, 2008 06:51 AM
Sep 03, 2008 07:27 AM
Peter Hood
I realize that he wasn't covered by recent UTK articles but I'm a little curious about Bonderman's status. The last I hard he was expected to be recovered by spring training. Is this still the case.
Sep 03, 2008 08:40 AM
Hi Will,
Sep 03, 2008 10:09 AM
This comment has been blocked due to inappropriate content. Click here to view anyway.
Fhccbfrqyl Ovt M qvqa'g jnag nal cneg bs gur qlr jvgu uvf ZEV orpnhfr vg jbhyq fuhg uvz qbja sbe 2 jrrxf. Qba'g erzrzore gung orvat zragvbarq jvgu erfcrpg gb Orpxrggg'f rknzvangvba. Qbrf gur hfr bs qlr va n ZEV perngr n erpbirel crevbq va naq bs vgfrys?
Sep 04, 2008 06:09 AM
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!