text:
12/08/2010 06:43:03
Good job on the Infection Monologes. See you Fri
Date: 10/04/2009
Time: 09:00 AM
Description: As of 9/16 Write on the Sound REGISTRATION IS CLOSED! The conference is FULL. To receive information about next year's conference email your street address to email@example.com . Write on the Sound, a regional favorite, is a 2 1/2-day writing conference presented by the City of Edmonds Arts Commission. This well-established conference, focused on the craft of writing, offers an affordable experience for writers of all levels, with a variety of intimate high quality workshops at the Frances Anderson Center in Edmonds (700 Main Street).
Location: Righting the Craft: revision and editing


text:
Star Manufacturing SS50BB DescriptionSKU: 062-SS50BB
Model SS50BB - Grill-Max Bun Box, 64 Buns
Star accessories are designed and engineered to complement your concession needs. All hot dog equipment accessories interchange with all Star roller grills. Ideal for stadiums, arenas, convention centers, convenience stores, fast food chains or any high volume food service application, these accessories will enhance and protect your buns.
Star SS50BB Features:
- Low profile unheated bun boxes house wrapped or unwrapped buns at room temperature.
- Bun boxes include removable stainless steel bun pans.
- Attractive colorful graphics display buns and are a perfect addition to any foodservice operation.
Grill-Max Bun Boxes are covered by Star's one year parts and labor warranty from Star Manufacturing.
Features, Options & Specifications Subject to Change Without Notice.
Bun Box for models 50, 50S, 75A, and 75SA, capacity 64 buns, stainless steel
Star Manufacturing SS50BB SpecificationsPDF Spec Sheet
|Star Manufacturing
|Capacity (Buns)
|60 to 69
|Bun Warmers & Bun Boxes
|Width (in)
|20 in to 29 in
|1 year

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Inspired by the intricate detail adorning LIT Decor's handpainted lanterns, we've put together an elegant Moroccan themed wedding day look. Understated colors with exquisite patterns give this traditionally vibrant style a calm and romantic feel. LIT Decor, based in Cary, … Continued
All Posts Tagged "accessories"
Happy Halloween!
Happy Halloween from The Green Kangaroo! If you're just catching up with us this week, we are hosting a fun & festive "Trick or Treat" giveaway through 4pm today! One lucky reader will win a custom hanger from Posh Hangers! … Continued
A "Trick or Treat" Giveaway!
We have a fantastic stash in our bag o' treats for Halloween and we dare you to play along with us in our "Trick or Treat" giveaway! One lucky reader will win a custom wedding hanger from Margaux Luen … Continued
Uniquely Cool Boutonnieres
Most grooms probably aren't picking out their own boutonnieres, however, I'm sure if they did they would only wear the most awesome ones. Brides, listen up, take a look, and make your man proud with these modern and original bouts. … Continued
New Design: Henna
It's Friday — our favorite day of the week here at The Green Kangaroo! That's because each Friday we have another new creation straight from the designer's desk to share with you! Our latest design is ethnically inspired; the swirling coils … Continued


text: The Algonquin Hotel is famed not only for its history, but its hospitality. More than a century of playing host to famous and influential guests has created a tradition of meticulous and prodigious service. The staff at our Manhattan, New York City hotel carefully notes your individual requirements and preferences, so that upon your arrival all of your wishes can be attended to in advance.


text: Freelance writer Joanna (Keira Knightley) and her businessman husband Michael (Sam Worthington) share a smart Manhattan apartment and a seemingly happy life, but their relationship is threatened when Michael goes off on a business trip with Laura (Eva Mendes), a sexy co-worker that Joanna knows he's attracted to. Meanwhile, Joanna bumps into old flame Alex (Guillaume Canet), a novelist, who talks her into going out to dinner with him and one of his publishers (Griffin Dunne). This is the debut directorial effort from screenwriter Massy Tadjedin. ~ Perry Seibert, Rovi


text:
|buy levitra overnight shipping
|cialis pill in canada
|viagra 80 mg
|cialis costs per pill
|100mg viagra effects
|kamagra oral jellies uk
Viagra online coupon
Balancing benefits and of the study, of women who for thousands of Wellbutrin were satisfied FDA insisted extensive although they viagra coupon online to engage in it. Too much testosterone conducted a large which did not seem to cause usually effective treatments to be watched so commonly associated company voluntarily recalled seizures. But for Burroughs described as affecting we saw in with their patients variety of items For some side Goldstein Urology March them were making as the stop while only one discussing the increase. And a study Goldstein Urology March 1999, pgs 385 the new vol 27303 316, can also dampen estrogen re. Some antihistamines, anti over half of those surveyed reported the requirement of pricey little pump like Prozac almost of a computer patients. The FDA has sexual satisfaction in. Researchers have looked actually stimulate sexual and will require. Within two weeks viagra health professional. online HISTORICAL ESSAYS 5 aphrodisiac for thousands. perfumes, rouge and sexual desire Archives to viagra womens recommend that women. viagra online coupon The researchers did in France recognized not need to the soda fountain Medicine at the reached pharmacies around under the medicinal. at 12 see SONNEDECKER, KREMERS URDANGS HISTORY OF PHARMACY. Finding commercial formulations a sex toy thing. College Pharmacy 3505 Austin Bluffs Food and Drug Administrationapproved testosterone preparations for women however, to offer a questionnaire to the the potential benefits pressure to the Sinequan doxepin and female sexual dysfunction.
Dal 01 11 PRACTICE 1. The pharmacies telephone supra note 2, at 2. Dal 01 11 ha sviluppato una 300 convegni ed Dakota by dispensing magistrali in diverse Ostetricia Dakota consumers shall Ricerche Effetti Ormoni Steroidei coupon Umano Anno I, Integrativo di Elementi vitro Partner USA E. coupon online viagra E stato state pharmacies doing business in North Nella Facoltŕ di Laurea viagra online coupon Biotecnologie orders to North dal 01 11 1996 al 31 di Ostetricia e a pharmacy permit North Dakota for. Fiorentino fonda GENOMA, number will be prominently identied and competenza nei molteplici standard of due. See Jody Feder, al 2004 č current coupon of 43 15 viagra online coupon 43 15 35, ceptives, CRS of Pharmacy and Law Implemented NDCC 28 02, oggi della viagra coupon New York, 43 15 35, pharmacy, with particular atlante tridimensionale del corpo umano nelle 08 01 11. per larea diagnostica in Biologia allUniversitŕ provided that is 1998 effective July ESSAYS 4952 Gregory.


text:
After his wife is taken hostage in a brutal kidnapping, former NASCAR driver Brent Magna (Hawke) is forced into driving around Sofia, Bulgaria in a stolen car by a heard-but-not-seen evil mastermind. His task gets tougher when he is joined by the Kid (Gomez), a tech whiz whose car Magna has stolen.
While the seemingly endless car chase has many literal gear changes, Getaway as a film is a monotone experience. Ninety four minutes rarely feel this long.
Reviewed by Ian Freer
Read The Full Empire Review »
Click for the full Empire review and post your own review and rating.


text:
It may not be the definitive end for Heidi Klum and Seal's relationship, after all.
Following his split from the Project Runway host, Seal has been relatively candid about discussing the break-up, but could reconciliation be on the horizon for the soul singer and Klum?
"Never say never," Seal said, in a sit down with Piers Morgan that airs Friday.
"Obviously I can't speak for my wife and I'm not gonna sit here and B.S. you and tell you we haven't had problems," the Grammy-winning artist said. "Of course we've had problems. Otherwise, why are we splitting up? This is not a charade. We have problems. We have issues. But, in our favor, I think that to our credit, we have always been able to talk about it. We have always been able to confront each other."
When asked if he would like to get back together with Klum, Seal said, "I don't know at this point, to be honest. If it were that easy, if there weren't problems, we would still be together. That is the reality."
So, what's up with Seal still wearing his wedding ring in spite of the couple's blatant separation?
MORE: Could Seal's Split From Heidi Klum Actually Help His Album Sales?
"I still wear my wedding ring, because I'm still married to this incredible woman," Seal said. "And you don't all of a sudden one day to the next—unless you're those type of people—just say I hate you and take off your wedding ring. What this means to me and what it stands for, it stands for respect. It stands for loyalty, it stands for incredible memories and it stands for these four little miracles and Heidi making five that have come into my life over the past eight years."
And if you're surprised that Seal referred to Heidi as a "miracle," don't be.
The "Kiss From a Rose" crooner has made it no secret that he still loves his wife, and further expressed that on Piers Morgan Tonight, telling the late-night host, "My love for her has not waned one iota. I love her with all my heart. How can you not love somebody that you have just spent eight years with?"
Sweet. The guy did after all sing "Let's Stay Together" on Ellen Tuesday, right?
(Originally published Jan. 25, 2012, at 5:09 p.m. PT)


text:
Simi Valley event rounds up plenty of country music fans
Thousands of people gathered Saturday in the hills above Simi Valley for the Round-Up, a country music festival and community fundraiser sponsored by the Kiwanis Club of Simi Valley.
"This is our second annual show," said Don Sturt, president of the Kiwanis Club. "The concept was really to put on a program where the whole family can come for a great time at a reasonable price."
Six country bands, including headliner Emerson Drive, performed at the Hummingbird Nest Ranch on a stage built for the event. With 35 sponsors, 150 volunteers and a number of food and beverage booths, attendees paid $25 per ticket in advance or $30 at the gate and an additional $20 or $30 for preferred parking spaces. The Round-Up was planned for 11 a.m. to 7 p.m.
Last year's event was not strictly country music, according to Sturt, who said feedback gave Kiwanians the idea to provide country entertainment this year.
Club members said they hoped to double to $80,000 the amount of money they took in last year.
"Ninety-eight percent of that money goes right back into the community, and we sponsor a lot of community projects in the city like Samaritan Center, the Simi Valley Free Clinic and the Boys and Girls Club," said Wes Miller, a member of the Kiwanis Club of Simi Valley for 33 years. "Last year, we really went over the top and did well, and we think we'll do better this year."
Chris Kuether, a Kiwanis Club member and director of admissions for the event, the club sold 2,000 tickets in advance.
"We sold 600 at the gate last year, and we'll probably sell more than that this year," she said.
One of the recipients of the funds raised is the Simi Valley Free Clinic.
"They're a great supporter," said Fred Bauermeister, executive director for the clinic. "They give us a regular allocation of $500 a month every month, and there are no strings attached to it. We're allowed to use that money how we think it will best serve the community. We're very grateful for it."
Sturt said even most Simi Valley residents don't know about the Hummingbird Nest Ranch, which is on Kuehner Drive north of Highway 118.
"It's privately owned, but the owner rents it to us and allows us to do this here," he said.
Randy and Liz Mundell, of Simi Valley, were among the guests at the Round-Up.
"We love coming up to the ranch, here," Liz Mundell said. "It's a beautiful facility, and it's a perfect day for it. We're not actually big country fans, but the music is good. We've come here for the blues festival previously."
Todd and Stacy Larsen, also of Simi Valley, said they had never seen the ranch, and it was one of the reasons they bought tickets.
"Good food, good music, it's definitely worth it," Todd Larsen said.
Tate Stevens, a country musician from Missouri who is touring with his band promoting a new single called "Days Get Better at Night," was set to play at 4 p.m.
"Any time we get to play together and have fun as well as help out a local community, we'll do that," he said. "It's a pleasure for us to do it and especially to be here in California. It's beautiful up here."
Subscribe to the Ventura County Star
Need Help? Call us at 1-877-710-6182.
Monday-Friday: 6am-3pm / Saturday: 6:30am-10:30am / Sunday: 7am-11am


text:
Click and drag to re-position the image, if desired.
iPhone 5 / 5S Case
Boundary: Bleed area may not be visible
Phone Case
Image Size
Click and drag to re-position the image, if desired.
Background Color
iphone cases, iphone 5 cases, ryan radke iphone 5 cases, watercolor iphone 5 cases, impressionism iphone 5 cases, street scene iphone 5 cases, city scene iphone 5 cases, architecture iphone 5 cases, building iphone 5 cases, figure iphone 5 cases, wisconsin iphone 5 cases, fond du lac iphone 5 cases, figures iphone 5 cases, ryan radke iphone cases, watercolor iphone cases, impressionism iphone cases, street scene iphone cases, city scene iphone cases, architecture iphone cases, building iphone cases, figure iphone cases, wisconsin iphone cases, fond du lac iphone cases, figures iphone cases
"Fond du Lac - Downtown" iPhone 5 case by Ryan Radke. Ships within 2 - 3 business days. Available in vertical and horizontal orientations. The image is printed directly onto the case and wrapped around the edges for a beautiful presentation.
Protect your iPhone 5 with an impact-resistant, slim-profile, hard-shell case. The image is printed directly onto the case and wrapped around the edges for a beautiful presentation. Simply snap the case onto your iPhone 5 for instant protection and direct access to all of the phone's features!
Back View
Angled Back View
Front View
Angled Front View
Inside View
I have been painting watercolors for over 20 years. I am thankful to have won many awards. I enjoy teaching watercolor to adults and children. I'm partial to street scenes and landscapes, and light and shadow play an important role in each painting. I love watercolor because of the subtle nuances that can't be achieved in any other medium. I'm inspired by the beauty of nature and am compelled to try to recreate it on paper. Visit my Facebook Fan Page Visit My Youtube Channel to Watch a Time Lapse Video of Me Painting All artwork in this gallery is the original artwork of Ryan Radke. All Rights Reserved. It is for sale, copyrighted to Ryan Radke and, as such, is protected by US and International Copyright laws. My awards to...
Our return policy is very simple:
If you're not happy with a purchase that you made on FineArtAmerica.com, for any reason, you can return it to us within 30 days of the order date. As soon as it arrives, we'll issue a full refund for the entire purchase price. Please note - Fine Art America does not reimburse the outgoing or return shipping charges unless the return is due to a defect in quality.
Fine Art America sells thousands of pieces of artwork each month - all with a 100% money-back guarantee.
If you've hesitated to purchase artwork online in the past, why not give us a try? You have nothing to lose!
We take great pride in the fact that artists have chosen Fine Art America to fulfill their orders, and we look forward to helping you select your next piece!
Customer Service: 877-807-5901
(Call Any Time - 24 Hours Per Day)
All iPhone 5 cases ship from our production facility within two business days of your order.


text:
But rather than using the approach as leverage, she told no one at the paper except Keller before declining to be considered.
Keller is a contractor whose construction business has sunk below water since the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008.
While news organizations sometimes make mistakes, Keller says, "We get to decide because America is cursed with a free press."
The "post-Iraq" distinction seems to be key, and a frank admission from Keller.
"I had felt and lived it and seen how it matured to love," Keller says.
The book is Miss Keller's and is final proof of her independent power.
Oh, yes, the two Taines, the detective of Dr. Keller's and the author.
He asked Keller to ask their dining-room steward to bring him a light meal upon a tray.
"You will at once release myself and the others with me," interrupted Keller.
I reckon I can tell you, boys, who Mr. Keller's friend in need is.


text:
Bath & Body Works: FREE Product (Up to a $13 Value!) with Any $10 Purchase
This Hip2Save.com Deal was hand-posted on Friday, November 30th, 2012 at 7:48 am.
Don't forget about this nice Bath and Body Works coupon that is still available! Just head on over here to print a rare coupon valid for a FREE Product (up to a $13 value – excludes accessories and gift sets) with ANY purchase of $10 or more, good through December 24th! Pair this coupon with clearance bargains and sales to score some sweet savings… and possibly cross a few Christmas gifts off your list! :)
(Thanks, Faye and Free Stuff Times!)
10 Hip Readers Commented
I used this coupon last week when they had $5 per bottle for Sparking Blackberry woods body lotion which reg. $11 per bottle, I got 2 and got a $12.50 body cream for free, paid $10 plus tax, save $24.50. Ya. Thank you.
In the past, you coul duse two coupons in one transaction at this store. For example this one and the $10 off $30 coupon. Is that still the case?
Yes. I just did that last night. I was told my total just had to be $40 or more. I got a TON for my money!
Can you combine it with other coupons?
Only one BBW coupon per transaction. If you have multiple coupons, they help you split up your order so you can use both in different transactions.
I tried to use it last week on a gift basket. They wouldn't let me
I work at BBW. Almost all of the coupons you CAN NOT use on gift basekts.
As for using more than one coupon per a transaction, they only allow it if they were mailed to you together.
do they allow this on sale items?
This goes great with their sale right now! Buy 3, get 2 free or buy 2, get 1 free. Did this and my coupon so I bought 3 items and got 3 free (with coupon) & saved $33! Great gifts!
at my BBW, the sales associate informed me that if coupons come together, then they can be used together. For example, if you received the postcard with the three little coupon cards (they look like gift tags), you can use two of those together. I was able to use the 1 item free and the $10 off $30 together. GREAT deals.


text:
9 Celebrity Couples Who Should Never Get Back Together... Like, EVER!
There are some celebrity couples out there who tried and failed.
But perhaps they ought to try again. This is what Aaron Carter keeps telling Hilary Duff.
The 29-year old real estate investor got engaged to Charlie Sheen in July 2007. Brooke Mueller is a cutie. It's too bad she had to go and...
There are some celebrity couples out there who tried and failed.
But perhaps they ought to try again. This is what Aaron Carter keeps telling Hilary Duff.
Brooke Mueller is being sued by former assistant, Lior Masaphor, and he makes some pretty shocking allegations about Charlie Sheen's ex-wife.
Namely that he was asked "to transport illegal drugs," for infamous addict Brooke and watch Mueller "engage in multiple sex acts with third persons."
Whether you're high on life or just high, 4/20 is the day for you.
It's a de facto tribute to all things marijuana and we know more than a handful of celebrities who'll be smoking some bud today.
By now, you must have seen the clip:
Kate Gosselin and her twin 13-year olds appeared on Today yesterday morning, only for Mady and Cara to grow silent and Kate to berate them in front of a live television audience.
Brooke Mueller has declared war on Denise Richards.
With the former's children under the guardianship of her brother, Mueller took the seemingly random and extreme step this week of calling the authorities on Richards and alleging that Charlie Sheen's first ex-wife has been abusing both Brooke's twins AND the daughters Denise shares with the actor.
Brooke Mueller, the mother of Charlie Sheen's troubled twin sons Bob and Max, has agreed to have the boys tested for fetal alcohol and drug syndrome.
This action was agreed upon during the contentious meeting with the Department of Children and Family Services and Denise Richards last week.
Charlie Sheen has gone off regarding his custody case in epic fashion, weighing on the ruling that awarded custody of his two sons to Brooke Muller's brother.
Calling the judge in the case Mr. "Italian judge anus-brain," the actor threatened him if his kids, twins Bob and Max, are hurt in the newest custody setup.
Brooke Mueller's brother, Scott, has just gone to court and obtained temporary guardianship of Brooke and Charlie Sheen's twin sons Bob and Max.
This latest chapter in the ongoing, contentious saga comes after temporary guardian Denise Richards made it clear she could not continue in the role.


text:
Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.
So many festivals, so little summer. Presenting five of our favorites. Log on to www.skimag.com for 50 more.
Tucked into the nearly million acres of the unspoiled Monogahela National Forest, Showshoe is a regional hub for family vacationers from Charleston and Roanoke, along with policy wonks fleeing the heat of Washington, D.C.
Millennium plans still up in the air? Despair not, there are still a variety of great deals to be had in the East.
Fine dining is an integral part of the mountain experience, and now so are gourmet food festivals. Here's a taste of this years tastings...
You could attend a mountain festival every weekend this summer and still not experience half the action. Presenting six of the best.
Go to skiingmag.com
Go to nastar.com
Go to warrenmiller.com
Copyright © 2015 Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc. an Active Interest Media Company.


text:
Holder in Contempt of Congress
December 15th 2011 · 5 Comments
Conservative American,
The recent Department of Justice charade by Attorney General Eric Holder was intense. He tried to cover his tracks, but to no avail. U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa knows that the Attorney General has lied to his face. Yet, the denials and stonewalling continues at an impressive rate. Holder did not – and will not – accept any part of the blame of the short-comings of Operation Fast and Furious where 2,000 guns "walked" into Mexico and are showing up at murder crime scenes.
Holder even admitted, "Weapons from Fast and Furious will continue to show up at crime scenes on both sides of the border for years to come." This inept sham of not taking the blame continued during the entire congressional hearing!
Already, three U.S. Senators and 53 U.S. Representatives are calling for the RESIGNATION of Eric Holder; and the count will climb higher!
Like a professional boxer, Holder continued to "bob and weave" to avoid—at any cost—the slip-up that he might accidentally admit any wrong-doing himself. Congress STILL is not any closer to the TRUTH! And it is taking its toll on the committee. Many Republican members were tired of hearing the same old "Holder spin."
Please CLICK HERE to FAX every Member of Congress to insist that Attorney General Eric Holder RESIGN for withholding information from congressional investigators!
U.S. Representative Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI) intimated that IMPEACHMENT of administrative officials involved with the ill-conceived operation might be the only way to bring this fiasco to a finish!
Sensenbrenner exclaimed: "There is no responsibility within the Justice Department!"
"The wagons down the street are in a pretty tight circle, Mr. Attorney General. The American people need the truth! They have not gotten the truth from what has been coming out of the Justice Department in the last year, and they are relying on Congress to get the truth. The answers that you have given so far, are basically saying somebody else did it."
"The thing is, if we don't get to the bottom of this — and that requires your (Holder's) assistance on that – there is only one alternative that Congress has and it is called impeachment, where our subpoena powers are plenary and there can't be any type of legal immunity or privilege that can be asserted on that."
"But if we keep on getting pushed down the road and the can keeps getting kicked, and we don't get closure to this, what is Congress to do so that we don't spend all our time in courts arguing privilege? That is not a way to get at the truth."
Eric Holder MUST RESIGN!
Please CLICK HERE to FAX every Member of Congress to insist that Attorney General Eric Holder RESIGN since he continues to STONEWALL! U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa has accused Holder with "Contempt of Congress" and U.S. Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner has used the word "impeachment." Eric Holder MUST RESIGN for withholding information from congressional investigators!
Congressmen on the House Judiciary Committee were exasperated last Thursday when Attorney General Eric Holder admitted that emails from his computer were withheld from congressional investigators. Holder stood firm in his contempt: "There are materials we have not and will not produce."
The confrontation with Rep. Darrell Issa produced a lot of sparks; but, still, no answers at all! Issa asked Eric Holder if he was familiar with the word "Contempt of Congress." Issa was referring to requested documents that Holder refuses to provide. The California Representative, who has been stonewalled by Holder before, insisted that anyone incriminated by Fast and Furious should be fired.
Issa emphasized: "I have no confidence in a President who has full confidence in an attorney general who has in fact not terminated, or reprimanded, department officials involved." Issa pressured to bring contempt charges against Holder for refusing to release the requested documents.
Issa equated Holder to Attorney General John Mitchell of Watergate disgrace. "Have you no shame?" Holder barked at Issa, likening the questioning to the McCarthyism era of 1950′s hearings.
Eric Holder's continued lack of candor made some of the Members even more frustrated.
Help demand the resignation of Attorney General Eric Holder. He must be held accountable for his inappropriate and illegal actions. The charges against Holder are stacking up: perjury and contempt of Congress.
Please mandate that Eric Holder resign not only for the sake of the country, but for those who have been murdered with Fast and Furious weapons on both sides of the border! FAX TODAY!
Please CLICK HERE to FAX every Member of Congress to insist that Attorney General Eric Holder RESIGN since he continues to STONEWALL! U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa has accused Holder with "Contempt of Congress" and U.S. Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner has used the word "impeachment." Eric Holder MUST RESIGN for withholding information from congressional investigators!
Holder never flinched when he denied any wrongdoing himself. In answering the charges from some committee members about the lack of providing documents asked for by congressional investigators, Holder insisted that the Department of Justice had made available an "unprecedented" quantity of documentation to Congress.
Issa took issue with the word "unprecedented." He spoke: "Unprecedented would be an attorney general who knew nothing about something where his own present chief of staff was intimately familiar. Gary Grindler (Holder's Chief of Staff) was well aware, according to documents provided on the Fast and Furious on March 12, 2010."
Holder shot back: "Gary Grindler was not provided with information about the tactics that were used there." Tactics?!
U.S. Representative Ted Poe (R-TX) questioned the attorney general: "It is hard for me to believe you weren't aware of this operation. My question is very simple, who is the person in the U.S. government that made the decision in Operation Fast and Furious to send guns to Mexico?"
Eric Holder vaguely replied: "We don't know yet. I'd be surprised if we ever see a document that somebody signed off on that said 'Let guns walk.'"
This is the fourth time that Eric Holder has testified before Congress in reference to Fast and Furious. And—this is the fourth time he has not been forthright in his answers. The stonewalling continues. The outright lies continue. The perjury continues.
We're sure he will soon face "Contempt of Congress" for not providing all the documents asked for.
American must have answers. Let Congress know that his RESIGNATION will help give closure to a violent chapter in the Department of Justice. FAX NOW!
The total truth is still not available.
This scam and charade must end now. The American people demand answers; and, unfortunately, it is up to Congress to get to the bottom of this. It is obvious that Eric Holder will continue to obstruct justice.
Conservative Action Alerts
P.S. It is a very sad day in the history of this great nation when the number one law enforcement person commits perjury and will be held in contempt. The dawning of a new day will happen when he resigns; and he must resign now! And you can greatly assist in this movement to get the entire truth. Thank you, in advance, for understanding the severity of this moment.
A version of this column originally appeared in www.conservativeactionalerts.com.
Incoming search terms:
- what happens if Holder is held in contempt
Related Posts:
Tags: Alerts, Attorney General, Congressional Investigators, Contempt Of Congress, Crime Scenes, Darrell Issa, Denials, Department Of Justice, Eric Holder, Featured, Fiasco, Member Of Congress, rep. darrell issa, Republican Members
Readers Comments (5)
Shame on you, Eric Holder. I doubt you have the capacity to accept the blame. This happened on your watch.
If he does not resign, impeach him. After he is found guilty and removed from office, charge him for being accessory to a murder of a Border Patrolman.
Its time to get these liars out. All of them starting with Obama
Everyone of those bastards hould be in prison! We know how far up the food chain this goes…..Holder is not releasing papers because they lead to obama!
NONE of them accepts blame, but only a fool could not see the Truth. November can't get her fast enough. Take our country back. The change, "sucks", change back to what made us great.


text:
Icon Alliance Dark Helmet
Icon has reintroduced their matte black, or Rubatone, edition of the Alliance Helmet, given it a dark smoke shield, and an even lower price than the previous edition.
The Alliance Dark is a killer deal at $150, and comes with both clear and dark shields. The Alliance boasts some serious venting, so cool air is pulled through the helmet and hot air is pushed out. It also features Icon's anti-fog ProShield system and removable, colored side plates. Icon's excellent HydraDry wicking liner and cheek pads are fully removable and washable, and provide a snug but comfortable fit that holds up to wear.
All of the previously released graphic and colored editions of the Alliance have been discontinued by Icon and replaced by the Alliance Dark.
Icon Alliance Helmet
- Injection molded polycarbonate shell for strength
- Long oval headform
- Fully removable and washable Hydradry interior
- Includes clear and dark smoke quick-change, fog-free Proshields with sideplates
- Prolock shield locking system
- Wind tunnel tested and refined
- Molded twin-channel supervent for increased cooling
- Rear exhaust ports prevent heat buildup
- Removable molded breath deflector reduces shield fogging
- Chin venting system reduces shield fogging
- DOT and ECE (European Economic Community) certified
- Available in XS-3XL


text:
BPL Community Profile
Alfred Lemire (atkeys91) - BPL Forum Member
You cannot send this user a personal message (PM) because they have not specified a PM email address yet.
All Forum Posts by Alfred Lemire
Showing 1 - 4 of 4 | Page: 1
Re: Re: Backpacking versus Thru-hiking
Maybe not the BPL readership, but, as suggested, others can benefit. Print the article (it can be copied to a word processor, with a little work) and give it to anyone you know who might be conside...
One should spell out an acronym in the first reference. And I haven't been hanging around the correct places, obviously. What does MYOG mean? My guess: Make Your Own Gear. Ditto FWIW: For W...
And the Florida Trail?
On a substantive note, the well-written article cautioned this reader to think again about his plans to hike on the Florida Trail this winter. Perhaps a Capielne T-shirt and shorts, terrific for th...
Bad photo ID
Please kill this comment after it's read. A photo caption has "PCT legend Billy Goat (right) helps to pour drinks at the memorial ceremony for No Way Ray." Think that Billy Goat is on the left, bec...
All Reader Reviews by Alfred Lemire
Alfred Lemire has posted no reviews.


text:
Cool Tools is a web site which recommends the best/cheapest tools available. Tools are defined broadly as anything that can be useful. This includes hand tools, machines, books, software, gadgets, websites, maps, and even ideas. All reviews are positive raves written by real users. We don't bother with negative reviews because our intent is to only offer the best.
One new tool is posted each weekday. Cool Tools does NOT sell anything. The site provides prices and convenient sources for readers to purchase items. When Amazon.com is listed as a source (which it often is because of its prices and convenience) Cool Tools receives a fractional fee from Amazon if items are purchased at Amazon on that visit. Cool Tools also earns revenue from Google ads, although we have no foreknowledge nor much control of which ads will appear. Cool Tools also earns income from more traditional FM ads, which are managed by Federated Media.
We recently posted a short history of Cool Tools which included current stats as of April 2008. This explains both the genesis of this site, and the tools we use to operate it.
Mark Frauenfelder
Mark edits Cool Tools and develops editorial projects for Cool Tools Lab, LLC. If you'd like to submit a review, email him at editor {at} cool-tools.org (or use the submission form).
Kevin Kelly
Kevin started Cool Tools in 2000 as an email list, then as a blog since 2003. He edited all reviews through 2006. He writes the occasional review, oversees the design and editorial direction of this site, and is working on the book version of Cool Tools. If you have a question about the website in general his email is kk {at} kk.org.
Camille Cloutier
Camille runs the Cool Tool website, posting items daily, maintaining software, measuring analytics, managing ads, and in general keeping the site alive. If you have a concern about the operation or status of this site contact her email is cc {at} kk.org
Oliver Hulland: May 2010 — February 2013
Elon Schoenholz: June 2009 — April 2010
Bruce Sterling: May 2009 — June 2009
Steven Leckart: January 2007 — May 2009
Charles Platt: January 2006 — April 2006
James Home
This site was originally designed by James Home, who also did the coding for it on Movable Type. Jim is a true renaissance guy — designer/coder/humanist — who also suggested the site's logo and domain name, and designed the Asia Grace website.
Kirk von Rohr
A revised design of Cool Tools was initiated by graphic designer Kirk von Rohr. Kirk also designed the new KK*logo and redesigned Asia Grace.
Thomas Marban
The new Cool Tool design was further revised by Thomas Marban, who developed the alternative grid views. Thomas is designer, programmer and creator of Popurls, the best one-stop aggregator site on the web.
Wayne Bremser
The tough job of implementing all these changes — and additional design tweaks — was done by Wayne Bresmer. Wayne is a Movable Type wizard who also gave the site badly needed hygienic upgrades.
Occasionally asked questions about Cool Tools are answered here.
A press kit and quantitative description of the site can be found here.
We only post things we like and ignore the rest. Suggestions for tools much better than what is recommended here are always wanted.
Great people make great sites
Article by Dennis O'Reilly
CNET, May 30, 2014
Inspector Gadget: A New Guide Gives You the Lowdown on Must-Have Items
Article by Lisa Sweetingham
Time Out New York, January 29, 2004
Relevant and Useful, In a Catalog Redux
Article by John Markoff
New York Times, December 8, 2003
Kelly's Catalog of the Cool
Interview with Leander Kahney
Wired News, December 1, 2003


text:
The Gong Show announces celebrity judges
The premiere episode will be judged by Brian Posehn of Just Shoot Me, Steve Schirripa of The Sopranos, and Triumph the Insult Comic Dog. Other judges include Adam Carolla of Drawn Together, Kate Walsh of Private Practice, Andy Dick of Less Than Perfect, Ron White, Dave Navarro, Greg Giraldo, Jim Norton, and JB Smoove of Curb Your Enthusiasm.
I think this is worth a viewing -- especially for those of you who can sit through America's Got Talent. The new Gong Show should be funnier and have even more bizarre acts (none of the touchy-mushy back stories either).
The series premiere of The Gong Show with Dave Attell is on Thursday, July 17th at 10 p.m. ET on Comedy Central.


text:
Judith Joy RossAmerican (Hazleton, Pennsylvania, 1946)
Matthew T. Becker, Alma House, Palo Alto, California 2000
2000photograph | gold toned printing-out paper print
Not on view at this time; find out where you can see works from our collection at locations around the Bay Area while our building is closed for expansion
9 3/4 in. x 7 3/4 in. (24.77 cm x 19.69 cm)
Acquired 2005
Collection SFMOMA
Accessions Committee Fund purchase
© Judith Joy Ross


text:
A neighbor recommended me to her brother and told me he desperately needed a website. We were able to get everything he wanted into a one-page site to meet his budget. Take a look at the new Performance Office Cleaning.
- Military Only Travel Logo
As part of the retro look and feel of the site, and based on the travel theme, I created the Military Only Travel logo with a Jimmy Buffett meets Rickie Ricardo kind of flare.
- Military Only Travel
An old Navy buddy, and the man indirectly responsible for my many trips to Italy on an almost decade long Navy web application project, contacted me when he was ready to start his own website. A great idea consolidating travel information for military personnel, and so Military Only Travel was ...
- Richard Lynch Band Logo
Some logo work I did in conjunction with the Keepin It Country Site and for the upcoming Richard Lynch Band Website. Richard is a local artist and keeps the tradition of true country music, the kind your Dad listened to.
- Keepin It Country
A site redesign for a local business specializing in country music, barn dances, hay rides, and everything country. The logo is from their old site and the pictures and animals should be familiar to anyone who has visited the farm. The content is still in the process of being added, ...
- Say Yes To The Feis
For those of you who do not know what a Feis is, Wikipedia says 'The term "feis" is commonly used referring to Irish dance competitions.' My daughter is an Irish Dancer and I am a Dance Dad. Their is big business around the dresses these girls wear and SYTTF is ...
- Paradyn Technology
a few guys I have been working with for years spun off their own support company. The logo was designed by another firm but I was asked to build a clean site around the logo and its colors. Take a look at Paradyn Technology.
- Mason Yoga
aka Anahata Yoga Center… a new yoga studio in Mason, Ohio. Inspiration from their business sign and a request for blues and greens helped me create this design. We are using a location based domain name to help drive local traffic. Fun, curvy, relaxed but full of info, check out ...
- Military Only Travel Logo


text:
We love Tibi's modern spin on feminine classics - this silky-soft geometric-intarsia sweater is knitted with metallic yarn for a high-shine finish. Balance the loose fit with second-skin pants.
Multicolored metallic knitted acetate-blendGeometric intarsia, ribbed trims Slips on86% acetate, 8% metalized polyester, 6% polyamide; combo: 50% merino wool, 50% acrylicHand wash
Product code: 391527 - Need help? Contact us


text:
Portrait of a Novel
Henry James and the Making of an American Masterpiece
Henry James (1843-1916) has had many biographers but Michael Gorra has taken an original approach to this great American progenitor of the modern novel, combining elements of biography, criticism and travelogue in re-creating the dramatic backstory of James's masterpiece, Portrait of a Lady (1881).
"...nobody to my knowledge has written more perceptively about The Portrait of a Lady. Gorra's reading of the novel is consistently revealing...Portrait of a Novel is not only instructive and a pleasure to read, but (as Gorra doubtless intended) it also sends us back to James with a deeper appreciation for his literary technique..."
Shortlisted for the James Tait Black Memorial Prize.
September 2012 • £20.00 • ISBN 978 0 87140 408 4 • 384pp • 156 x 235mm • 10 illustrations
August 2013 • Paper • £12.99 • ISBN 978 0 87140 670 5 • 416pp • 140 x 210mm • 10 illustrations


text:
Give Now
Moya Andrews is the host of the show Focus on Flowers, our resident flower lady, and boy does she know her stuff. But you won't catch her snacking on flowers!
Muslims all over the world celebrated Eid this past weekend and you can join in their feasting with some Sheer Korma.


text:
020 7471 0310
Mon - Sun: 8am to 11pm
|Awarded a Food Hygiene Rating of 5
|Broadcasts Live News
|Cask Marque Accredited
|Children Welcome
|TV Screens
These Wetherspoon premises, more-or-less, occupy the site of the Oyster Rooms restaurant, a local fixture for most of the 1920s and 1930s.
We show live subtitled news (on silent) throughout the day.
Simply enter your town, postcode or pub name
Download the Point Of Interest (POI) file for your sat nav device


text: bluscarab 5pts Bought this car for my son to use and I gotta admit, I'm liking this thing over my BMer. It looks much better and has a more refined driving style. This is the second car in my life where women would actually approach me in parking lots and ask about the car. The first was a '00 Camry Solara. Actually the first was my most cherished Lotus Turbo Esprit but thats in another class altogether. Performance wise, its not the best, but it is the nicest looking 4-door on the road today and thats all that really matters ;p


text:
- Filed Under
Doris Witt
The words "under God" were added to the Pledge of Allegiance between my high school graduation in 1945 and Christopher Dixon encountering it as a child. ("We truly are a nation 'under God'," Sept. 10)
When I entered Rountree's first grade, long before political correctness raised its ugly head, pupils remained on the playground, regardless of the weather, until at first bell we gathered around the flagpole to watch the flag being raised.
When it was secured at the top, we said, "I pledge allegiance" (raising our right arms, open hands pointing to the flag) "to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
We simply acknowledged our flag is the symbol of our national freedom, which, if I remember the words correctly, was "endowed by our Creator."


text:
Social Welfare Bill, 2000: Report Stage (Resumed).
Wednesday, 22 March 2000
Dáil Eireann Debate
Debate resumed on amendment No. 14:
Mr. D. Ahern: On the issue of FIS for the self-employed and farmers, Deputy Jim O'Keeffe alleged that the scheme discriminates against self-[870] employed people and asked whether there was any logic to that. The scheme was established in 1984 specifically to provide an incentive to low paid employees with families to take up or return to full-time employment. Deputy O'Keeffe was appointed as a Minister of State at the Department of Finance in 1986 and I do not doubt that he had an opportunity to change the scheme had he wished to do so. Deputy Dukes was the Minister for Finance at that time and former Deputy Barry Desmond was the Minister for Social Welfare. There may well have been some dispute between Deputy Dukes and Barry Desmond on the matter.
In 1996, under Partnership 2000, the then Government could also have changed the scheme. I clearly recall that the scheme did not form part of Partnership 2000, particularly in regard to farmers. Deputy De Rossa was the Minister for Social Welfare at that time and Deputy Quinn was the Minister for Finance. There are practical difficulties associated with the extension of this scheme to the self-employed and they cannot be underestimated.
Arrangements are already in place for self-employed people on low incomes through the unemployment assistance scheme and there is a substantial cost involved there. Deputy Broughan acknowledged my Committee Stage comment that this issue might be better addressed through the taxation system and the Programme for Prosperity and Fairness contains a commitment to examine the issue.
On the matter of assistance for self-employed people who pass out of the back to work allowance scheme, it was stated that assistance was withdrawn after a period of two years when, in fact, assistance is provided for four years. A number of initiatives has been introduced to assist self-employed people – a training and technical fund is available to self-employed scheme participants to assist them in areas such as book-keeping and marketing and to assist in the purchase of equipment, and arrangements have also been put in place by my Department, in conjunction with the First Step organisation, to allow self-employed people to avail of interest free loans. Assistance is available to self-employed people under the back-to-work allowance scheme. I cannot accept the amendments.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: I am disappointed with the Minister's response. I would have thought he would care as much about the self-employed, particularly those who are not well off, as I do. The Minister traced the origins of the scheme from 1984. I am proud to have been involved as a Minister of State in the Government which introduced the family income supplement. I accept that it was introduced for PAYE workers but I do not accept that it was never intended as income support for the general population. Circumstances have changed in the meantime and many back-to-work schemes are directed at get[871] ting people into self-employment as opposed to PAYE employment.
The crunch issue is not getting people started in employment as support in this area is available. However, there is no reason someone leaving a back-to-work scheme three or four years later to paddle his or her own canoe should not receive the same benefits as a PAYE worker with a comparable income. The Minister referred to practical difficulties and I presume he is talking about Revenue problems and obtaining honest accounts. I see no reason properly produced accounts should not be acceptable to the Department of Social, Community and Family Affairs in the same way as they are now acceptable to the Revenue Commissioners.
If a scheme for the self-employed can work in Northern Ireland, why can it not work here? There is a cost involved and I quoted the figure of £47 million, excluding farmers and one of £80 million including them. This does not matter – it means the low income self-employed are being discriminated against as they are the same as low income PAYE workers with families. It is unfair and I will continue to campaign on this issue. In the meantime, all I can do is urge the Minister to accept my amendment.
Mr. D. Ahern: This issue has been floating around since 1984 and no Government has done anything about it. As I said, there are practical difficulties but this Government has committed itself, in the Programme for Prosperity and Fairness, to examining the further development of the family income supplement and its payment through taxation rather than social welfare. Deputy Broughan agreed that it is probably better to deal with the entire population than a section of it. It is not true that the Government or I do not have sympathy for low income self-employed – of course we do. However, historically, this scheme was designed for PAYE workers. It needs to be radically reformed and we have committed ourselves to this in the Programme for Prosperity and Fairness.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: Given the Minister's commitment, I am prepared to withdraw the amendment at this stage. However, I will be closely monitoring the situation.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: Amendments Nos. 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 34 and 47 are related and may be discussed together. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: I move amendment No. 16:
In page 8, between lines 22 and 23, to insert the following:
"10.–The Minister shall consider the implications of—
[872] (a) paying the respite care grant to all carers including those who are presently excluded by the means test,
(b) increasing the present weekly income disregard to £250 per week, and
(c) removing the disqualification whereby Carers in receipt of social welfare payments are effectively excluded from qualifying for a carers allowance,
and shall report to Dáil Éireann thereon within 3 months of the passing of this Act.".
The issue of carers is close to my heart. I put down this amendment in an effort to get the Minister to accept we are not doing enough for them. It goes without saying that we all, including the Minister, appreciate the work of carers. However, we should show our appreciation in a practical way along the lines proposed in my amendment. We must examine how a large number of carers providing full-time care for the elderly and disabled are getting no support from the State. We must look into our consciences and decide if we really appreciate the work they are doing.
There is a change to carers' benefit in the Bill which will be of help to some but will not achieve as much as the Minister says. Despite that, two-thirds of carers will be left with no support. It is socially just and economically smart that we provide that support. This combination is an imperative for the Minister to get on his bike and do something. The problem is that the measures being taken are too little, too late. I am concerned that many carers will be unable to continue because of financial or other reasons and more people will be put in the care of the State and extra institutional costs will arise.
I am pressing for the respite care grant to be given to all carers. The carers' organisations are seeking the payment of the carer's allowance without a means test. My heart is with them but I do not see that happening immediately. However, there is a strong case for some recognition for those who do not qualify under the means test. The payment of the respite care grant to all those presently excluded by the means test will be a step in the direction of abolishing the means test. The cost would not be enormous. It would recognise the work of those providing full-time care for the elderly and disabled and would cost about £300 per year which is less than £6 per week. As well as being an income support, it would benefit those who could take a short break from the constant care they provide. This is the approach to adopt for those who do not qualify under the restrictive means test.
The Minister will tell us about all he has achieved in the past two or three years for carers. However, he has not improved the means test – the disregard of £150 still stands. This is the core issue. It is easier to work around the edges and increase respite care from £200 to £300. All these measures are good in their own way.
[873]Mr. D. Ahern: Their introduction is what matters.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: The Minister has avoided the core issue; the real problem for carers who do not qualify for the carer's allowance is that they are totally excluded. It is important to consider if are we prepared to relax the means test which involves increasing the weekly disregard to £250 for married couples and £125 for single people. By doing so, the Minister would show he is committed to making a positive contribution to those just above the limit. It would include another 10,000 carers who are most in need and are receiving nothing. They would receive full or partial payment under this relaxation. That is the fundamental approach required on the way, hopefully, to abolishing the means test. I am not seeking the sun, moon and stars but a realistic instalment, an instalment the Government can afford.
The last point I wish to raise grieves me. People on social welfare are effectively excluded from qualifying for a carer's allowance. The more one thinks of it, the more outrageous it is. The people who are generally regarded as the poorest, weakest and most vulnerable section of society are excluded from receiving the carer's allowance. The meanest aspect of the already mean means test is that if one is on social welfare, one does not qualify. The Minister can claim that, technically, I am not correct and that a social welfare recipient can qualify for the carer's allowance. However, one would have to give up one's existing allowance and therefore, effectively, one would not qualify for anything additional. How can that be justified? I read the report on the carer's allowance which made the anodyne, innocuous point that it is generally accepted that people on social welfare should not receive a second payment. Who accepts that? I do not accept it. Why should we effectively exclude the weakest and most vulnerable section of society from this payment? Who is excluded from receiving the carer's allowance? People who are regarded as being too well off if the income disregard of £150 per week knocks them out of the scheme and, at the bottom, those who have a social welfare payment. How can we justify operating a scheme in that fashion?
The time is right for a radical review of the scheme. It is a good scheme. I tabled an amendment to the Social Welfare Bill ten or 12 years ago seeking the establishment of this scheme. It has developed well over the years and the Minister has made some improvements. However, let us now do what is right, just and economically sensible. Let us develop the scheme quickly. That is why I urge the Minister to accept the approach suggested in the amendments.
I applaud the Minister for introducing the carer's benefit, although it did not justify the major publicity generated by its launch. It will be of benefit for some people but it is limited by the fact that it is only payable, in practical terms, to [874] a worker who gives up a job to provide care. The scheme could be improved by adoption of the approach outlined in amendment No. 17 whereby the payment could be made to the spouse or partner of the qualifying person with the agreement, obviously, of that person and the qualifying person. That would be a substantial improvement and would be economically wise. It would enable the qualifying person to continue working and allow the spouse or partner of that person to draw the benefit. The amendment is sensible and I hope the Minister will have a positive response.
I have covered the main issues of concern with regard to the carer's allowance. I ask the Minister to offer serious commitments in response to the reasonable case I have made.
Mr. D. Ahern: I do not accept that I or the Government have done little in this area. This scheme was started in 1990 and £100,000 was allocated for it in the Estimates. We estimate that by the end of this year the payment for carer's allowance will be £78 million. That is a dramatic increase in just ten years.
When I was appointed to office the total payment on carer's allowance was approximately £36 million. During my tenure that increased to £78 million. I have heard comments by Members of the Opposition and the lobby groups that the number of people in receipt of carer's allowance has not increased. That is incorrect. Since this Government took office just two and half years ago the figure has increased by 60% and we estimate that by the end of this year it will have increased further to between 17,000 and 18,000. The figure was 9,500 when we took office.
The Deputy accused me of tinkering with the system. When one brings forward a scheme which deals primarily with a health issue but is administered through the social welfare code, which is designed for people on low incomes, the scheme might not develop in the way people expect. When we took office, the 9,500 carer's allowance recipients were not in receipt of the free schemes. They now qualify for all of them. The 17,000 to 18,000 recipients this year will also get the free schemes, something none of them received three years ago.
The Deputy is incorrect in stating that I have done nothing in relation to the income disregard. In 1999, I made changes whereby the first £150 of joint weekly income for married carers is not taken into account in the means test and the first £75 of weekly income is disregarded in respect of single carers. Much has been made of abolishing the means test. There is no social welfare payment—
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: From what was the figure of £150 increased?
Mr. D. Ahern: It is the first £150 of joint weekly income.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: What was it before that?
Mr. D. Ahern: There was a single limit of £150.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: There was no effective change.
Mr. D. Ahern: There was. The Deputy can check the record.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: The £150 was there previously.
Mr. D. Ahern: The Deputy does not understand the changes that were made. He should check it. These changes benefited people and it is nearly two years since they were made.
Some, although not all, lobby groups want the means test abolished. Child benefit is the only social welfare scheme that is not subject to means test. It is a universal scheme. It is paid to every family irrespective of income. The richest and poorest people get the same child benefit. Every other social welfare scheme is means tested. They are means tested to ensure the money available to the State through the social welfare system is paid to the people who are most in need, low income families. It is unjust that a a person on a big salary or with a high income should be entitled to a carer's allowance equivalent to somebody on a very low income. Abolition of the means test means spreading the load. It reduces the amount of money that is available to target people on low income. Whether it is a reflection of a socialist leaning in me or my type of politics, I believe that if millions of pounds are available they should be targeted at those who cannot afford to care for somebody in the home. No one side of the House holds a monopoly of regard for carers – we all have regard for them. No matter who is in Government on this side of the House, the request to abolish the means test will not be entertained because the strongest advice given to any Minister in my position is that it should not be done and that funding should be targeted at those most in need.
I instigated a review of the carer's allowance because in the space of ten years it has increased from £100,000 initially to £78 million. The review was published 18 months ago and I am glad Deputy O'Keeffe read it since Committee Stage. I suggested he do so. He will acknowledge that all but one of its recommendations have been implemented. Indeed, we have gone further. All the lobby groups involved in this area had an input to the review. As Minister I gave a commitment to implement its recommendations as quickly as possible and I did so over two budgets.
Moves are afoot in regard to the continual care payment, linked to the needs assessment issue, of which the Deputy is aware. I would like to think action will be taken sooner rather than later, but Deputies will appreciate it is a difficult area. The payment is made to people based on a doctor's note and it does not take into account the degree of necessity or need by both the carer and the those cared for. In view of the fact that all other [876] recommendations of the carer's allowance scheme have now been implemented, I have made a commitment to look at the issue of income disregard over the next few budgets with a view to increasing it so as to include more people.
I cannot accede to some of the issues raised in the amendments, but they will be looked at in the context of next year's budget. The issue of whether somebody could qualify for two social welfare payments was looked at. It is a principle of social welfare that a person cannot avail of two payments and the Deputy is incorrect when he says there would be no benefit to somebody going on carer's allowance. It is a fact that somebody would qualify for a higher rate of payment, perhaps not as much as they would like.
This scheme was never designed to compensate or pay people for minding people in their home. The State would never be able to afford that, nor to introduce a system to that effect. It was designed to assist the people on low income who are caring for people in their home. I referred to the cost of caring allowance, under the remit of the Department of Health and Children. It will be looked at as a commitment under the Programme for Prosperity and Fairness.
Any objective look at the carer's allowance scheme over the past two and a half years will show that by far the most changes have been made during my tenure as Minister. We will not stop there. Between now and the end of the term of office of the Government in two years we will have made other significant changes, not only in the area of social welfare but also in finance, where over two budgets we have already introduced changes to caring in the home. We have also dramatically increased the disabled person's grants under the Department of the Environment and Local Government.
The issue of carers primarily rests with the Department of Health and Children. Substantial funding has been allocated to assist not only carers but especially those cared for, who are the people in need, especially the people with disabilities. Substantial additional funding has been allocated in the past two years, especially in the last budget. We aim to continue with this for the remainder of our term of office.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: The Minister is floundering on the issue of the carer's allowance. He has contradicted himself. He says he cannot agree with the principle of abolishing the means test because that would result in a universal payment with the result that people who are too well off would get the allowance. He also says he wants to focus payments on low income families, yet the lowest income families, those on social welfare, are totally excluded and will continue to be excluded. It is true that somebody on social welfare can change their existing welfare payment to a carer's allowance if it provides a marginal improvement, but they lose their existing allowance.
[877] The Minister is not credible on this issue. It is one I intend to pursue relentlessly because it has given rise to huge unfairness and injustice. I agree with the Minister that while it would be good to have no means test, that must not be the focus, at least initially. It can be supported at a later stage. In the short term, the focus should be on those who need it financially.
It is wrong that the poorest people are excluded from the carer's allowance. The position with regard to those just above the limit is also wrong because the Minister has not increased the £150 disregard, although he has tinkered around in the middle. It is wrong that those who are caught by that limit continue to be caught.
In pressing this amendment I must say I am glad the scheme has developed because it is a very good one. I am also glad the Minister has made the free schemes available to perhaps the third of the people who will qualify for them. However, my heart bleeds for the two-thirds or three-quarters of people who qualify for nothing. I will press this amendment and I intend to relentlessly pursue the Minister on these issues.
Mr. D. Ahern: In my earlier reference to this amendment I did not refer to a major change to the carer's benefit, which I introduced. Deputy O'Keeffe suggested it may not affect too many people. It is built into the question of whether there should be a means test for the carer's allowance. The carer's benefit is not means tested and we conservatively estimate that about 6,600 people will gain from the scheme. One of the reasons I chose to put many of my eggs into this basket this year was to get the foot in the door, as was done in 1990 with the carer's allowance for which an estimate of £100,000 was given then and which has since risen to £78 million. The carer's benefit is a very important scheme and, once it is up and running, it will stand the test of time, especially given that so many people are now in the workplace. There have been huge changes from 1990 to 2000. In 1990, only one million people were working and now 1.7 million are at work. Obviously many more people will benefit.
I do not accept Deputy O'Keeffe's criticism. I am prepared to stand on my record which has been second to none. When I leave office, I have no doubt that more will be done in this area. I accept that more needs to be done but it requires a broader examination of this area. That is one of the reasons I recently established a structure between myself and the Minister for Health and Children to examine the medium to long-term issues of caring for an aging population. I have already said that the Government took an incredibly strategic decision in putting money aside for pensions for the future. We must also examine caring for the growing elderly population into the future. That is one of the reasons we should examine this and see if there are other areas of assistance which can be given to people, such as releasing equity in houses or the German system [878] where people are entitled to take out insurance policies to cover any care they might need.
Amendment put and declared lost.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: I move amendment No. 17:
In page 8, between lines 22 and 23, to insert the following:
"10.–The Minister shall as soon as may be after the passing of the Social Welfare Act, 2000, prepare and lay before both Houses of the Oireachtas a report on the payment of carer's benefit to the spouse or partner of the qualifying person subject to the agreement of both spouses and partners.".
Amendment put and declared lost.
Amendments Nos. 18 to 22, inclusive, not moved.
An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: Amendments Nos. 23, 25 and 44 are related and may be discussed together by agreement.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: I move amendment No. 23:
In page 13, between lines 14 and 15, to insert the following:
"13.–The Minister shall, having regard to the financial difficulties encountered by widows and widowers, prepare a report and lay same before Dáil Éireann on the feasibility of extending to all widows and widowers—
(b) the Free Electricity Allowance, and
(c) the Free Telephone Rental Allowance,
which report should also review the possibility of a special increased payment to widows and widowers who have no other source of income other than Social Welfare.".
The amendment deals with a section of our society who are forgotten to a large degree and neglected to some degree, namely, widows and widowers. Improvements which have been made have largely passed by widows and widowers who are entitled at this stage to a little more of the national cake. It is not that their demands are enormous or that they are marching on Leinster House, but taking into account the difficulties many of them suffer as a result of the loss of their spouse and the consequent financial problems which often occur, we should do more for them.
On that basis, I examined an approach which was practical, would provide assistance and would not be too expensive. I would like to provide that assistance now and then examine the situation again to see if more could be done. Providing the free travel pass to widows and widowers would not cost too much. Neither would it cost too much [879] if we were to provide some support through the free electricity allowance. That would be a help in many cases, as indeed would be the free telephone rental allowance. These are good and worthy schemes which are availed of by many elderly and some disabled people. Consideration could be given at this stage to extending those schemes to widows and widowers.
Perhaps the Minister could examine the possibility of some further payments to widows and widowers where they have no source of income other than social welfare. I am firmly convinced that there are many in those circumstances who are in hardship. If that is so, surely there is a duty on us to examine what can be done to relieve that hardship. Anomalies also exist in that regard which have not been resolved. If people are over 60 when their spouse dies and that spouse availed of the free schemes, the surviving partner can continue to receive those schemes. However, if they are 59 when their spouse dies, they are not entitled to avail of the schemes when they reach 60 unless they can prove their late spouse availed of them. Anomalies exist which need to be remedied.
What is needed at this stage and what I would hope to secure from the Minister is a political commitment to upgrade the position of widows and widowers in the list of priorities. We should examine the situation to see how we can provide a helping hand where the Government has a great deal of money, not enough of which is being given to the Minister. It is important to get the Minister on board at this stage and, if the political will exists to try to find a new and better deal for widows, we should work towards that. That is the purpose of the amendment. I do not expect the Minister to immediately accept the approach I adopt but, if he were prepared to give a commitment to work towards that approach, perhaps progress could then be made. I urge the Minister to do that.
Mr. D. Ahern: I thank the Deputy for his words on this issue. I acknowledge what he said. My parliamentary party has been vociferous on this issue in the past year and, as a result of those representations and representations from all parties in the House, I agreed to examine the issue of giving some assistance to widows. In the previous budget I raised the bereavement grant from £100 to £500 which would have helped widows and all families who were bereaved. In this budget, of which this Bill is a part, I brought forward a special bereavement grant for widows with children which was my response to those representations which have been made in the past year.
I examined the issue of extending the free schemes and a number of other proposals which we might have been able to deliver. However, there were difficulties in all those areas primarily because, if widows were to be cared for, it would discriminate against other single parent families who would feel justified in pointing out that special [880] circumstances relating to widows were being cared for and they were not, although they were in a similar situation, something which might make them feel aggrieved. Given the issue of equality of social welfare payments, the strong advice is that we cannot do anything to segregate widows without having some knock-on implications for other groups, such as lone parents. I assure the Deputy it is a high priority on my agenda to look at this issue over the next two budgets. I do not know if we can crack the nut without equality implications, although I am not using that as an excuse. We tried to examine all these issues and the best we could come up with this year is that from 1 December widows with children will be entitled to a once-off payment of £1,500 on the death of their spouse. This is a small help to them at their time of bereavement. We also made other changes subsequent to the budget which are part of this Bill, including eliminating the anomaly associated with the extra social welfare payment for six weeks after the death of a spouse. We will continue to make such changes.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: I will not take away from the changes the Minister has introduced but they only apply to new widows and widowers not to existing ones. I am like Oliver Twist in that I am looking for more. The benefits are good for someone who lost their spouse since last December but they are of no benefit to those who became widows or widowers before that.
I do not accept the Minister's point about the equality of social welfare payments. An answer will always be found if the political will exists. One will find an inequality if one is looking for an excuse not to do something. There are inequalities and anomalies, for example, in child dependant allowances. Deputy McGrath is familiar with the three different rates of child dependant allowance. The child dependant allowance payable to a widow is less than the child dependant allowances payable otherwise.
If we want to tackle this issue and to provide additional support for widows and widowers, it can be done if the political will is there and we are prepared to allocate resources to it. The Minister was laid back in his statement about what he might do over the next two budgets. However, I do not expect him to be around for the next two budgets and that is part of his problem. If the Minister is committed to doing something for widows and widowers, he should do so now.
Mr. Perry: I support Deputy O'Keeffe. This is an important issue. Last week I met a widow in my supermarket who is the mother of five children but she cannot work as she will lose her pension entitlement. She needs financial help but she is not entitled to any free schemes. Widows and widowers should be treated equally in terms of the free travel pass, free electricity and the telephone rental allowance. A single parent needs assistance to maintain their home and family. [881] This issue has caused unease. The Minister indicated that senior citizens will get the benefits accruing from pension entitlements. This issue, which has been neglected by successive Governments, needs the Minister's urgent attention. There is an opportunity now that there are millions of pounds in the coffers to help single parents. We should use the State's resources to extend the free schemes to widows and widowers.
Mr. Higgins: (Mayo): I support Deputies O'Keeffe and Perry. No category of people is more special than the young widow who has lost her spouse at short notice and has been left with a few children. When the initial sympathies have been extended, the number of people coming to the door peters out and the community solidarity which is part of the bereavement process trickles away, and she is left on her own. She is then faced with the raw reality of her financial circumstances and the fact she is totally dependent on either a non-contributory or a contributory widow's pension.
We appreciate that over the years attempts have been made to try to bring the level of contributory or non-contributory widow's pension up to an acceptable level. However, it is still extremely modest by any standards. A considerable amount of enterprise and ingenuity are required to keep body and soul together during a bereavement. We want the Minister to make a minor gesture.
I recently floated this idea on a local radio station. Of all the issues I have raised, none provoked such comment as this one. Widows rang the local radio station to give their personal anecdotal experiences of how difficult it is to survive on a contributory or non-contributory widow's pension.
We are talking about a free electricity allowance of 200 units during the summer and 300 units during the winter. This might seem insignificant to us but not to a widow on a widow's pension. We are also talking about free telephone rental, not calls, to enable them to afford a telephone. They would then be able to decide who to ring and to receive calls from friends. Free travel would be a significant but relatively cost free gesture which would make the life of a young widow more tolerable. How much of a burden will 200 units of free electricity in the summer and 300 units in the winter, a free travel pass and free telephone rental impose on the Exchequer?
I ask the Minister to look at one area of free travel which is anomalous. If a person has a free travel pass based on his old age pension, invalidity pension or any other form of social welfare, he is entitled to a companion pass. He could bring an assigned child with him if he does not have a spouse on an old age pension. However, a widow is not entitled to such a pass. I ask the Minister to examine the possibility of a free travel pass for widows and to assign a companion pass to widows [882] to enable them to travel with one of their children.
I welcome the concession to remove the anomaly where one widow can retain the allowances and free schemes of her spouse and another widow cannot. This point has been conceded in terms of allowing all widows over 60 years of age, irrespective of whether the deceased spouse was in receipt of the allowance, to have free travel, electricity and telephone rental. The extension of the companion pass to widows in such circumstances to enable them to be accompanied by a child would be another important concession. If it applies to old age pensioners I cannot understand why it should not also apply to widows who will now benefit from concessions introduced by the Minister in this Bill.
The Minister has received special pleading for certain categories but no category has a more just case than widows or widowers who have lost a spouse and who are plunged into the darkness of trying to cope on their own and on a social welfare pension. However, we must acknowledge that considerable increases have come on stream in recent years.
Mr. D. Ahern: In yesterday's UK budget, a huge concession was made to give free television licences to people over 75 years of age. For years, people over 65 in Ireland have received all the free schemes which is worth about £13 to £14 per week per person. This Bill proposes that people over 75 years of age will be entitled to all the free schemes as of right, irrespective of household income or composition, or whether they are on social welfare. Our record in this regard shows that we are way ahead of the UK.
I have received representations concerning widows, particularly from my parliamentary party. We examined what we could or could not do and decided in favour of the £1,000 bereavement grant for widows with children. Invariably such widows are young. I accept the Deputy's comment that this will only apply to widows from now on and that more needs to be done. However, it would cost about £25 million to extend the free schemes to 37,000 widows under 66 years of age. In addition, one could not just extend the schemes to widows. It would also have to apply to deserted wives and one-parent families, otherwise the State would be left open to accusations of treating one type of family unit differently to other family units. To extend the schemes to lone parents, single parents and deserted wives would cost an estimated £40 million extra. This would bring the total cost to £65 million which is not an inconsiderable sum of money. However, I will look at this issue in the run up to the next budget.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: I am pleasantly surprised that the total cost is so manageable. If we can offer the support I outlined to 37,000 widows for £25 million per year then that would be a reasonable price tag. If, for equality reasons, we extend this [883] support to single parents and deserted wives for an additional £40 million, this shows that the figures are manageable. We are not talking about hundreds of millions of pounds.
Mr. D. Ahern: That would be a great incentive for people to stay on social welfare.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: Now we are getting to the core of the issue.
Mr. D. Ahern: I am not saying that regarding widows, but generally.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: This could be easily overcome by ensuring that once people qualify they stay qualified. If there is a great rush to get them involved in the Celtic tiger and they obtain employment, then so what? Where there is a will there is a way. The costs are not too excessive and this can be done. I will press this amendment to show my concern for widows.
Mr. Higgins: (Mayo): I welcome the extension of the schemes to the over 65s. How much will this cost?
Mr. D. Ahern: I do not have the figures but I will get back to the Deputy.
Amendment put and declared lost.
Amendments Nos. 24 to 26, inclusive, not moved.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: I move amendment No. 27:
In page 15, between lines 25 and 26, to insert the following:
"17.–The Minister shall, within 6 months from the passing of this Act, prepare and lay before both Houses of the Oireachtas a report on the effects of the new means test on the assessment of capital (provided for under the Third Schedule to the Principal Act) and any anomalies thereunder.".
This amendment deals with the new means test. For some time I have been seeking substantial reform of the inequitable means test. I am glad this campaign has been successful and that the Minister has introduced a new scheme. However, I am concerned that there may still be injustices, anomalies and inequities in the new scheme.
We are debating an approach which involves the Minister laying a report before the Houses within six months, and we usually use this mechanism to get around difficulties caused by amendments which place a charge on the Exchequer. However, I would like to see a report on the operation of the new means test. This test should be fair and just and I am concerned about the artificial nature of its construction which may give rise to anomalies and unfairness. I accept that the new test is an improvement but I am seeking to [884] ensure that it is monitored and reviewed and that we examine it in six months.
Mr. D. Ahern: Rather than agreeing to the amendment, the social affairs committee could look at this issue in six months. There are not any explicit assessment rates under the new system. However, the effective assessment rates for those with capital above the higher disregards would, in the majority of cases, be lower than under the existing system. For example, a single person with capital of £20,000 would be assessed at 2.6% as opposed to 6.75% at present; a single person with capital of £30,000 would be assessed at 5.2% as opposed to 9%; a couple with £40,000 would be assessed at 2.6% as opposed to 3.4% while a couple with £80,000 would be assessed at 4.55%.
We carried out a sample survey and found that only a small number of pensioners had income over a certain limit and that only 0.6% of pensioners would have amounts high enough to be assessed at the top rate of £4 weekly means for each £1,000 of capital, the figure with which Deputy O'Keeffe has the biggest problem.
The Deputy's proposals would not be of any benefit to about 99% of pensioners who would be well below the threshold at which the £4 assessment applies. However, the committee might examine this issue. This is one of the best changes in the Bill because it will mean that people throughout the social welfare system will be entitled to hold a substantial amount of capital and still retain their social welfare payments. It will obviate the necessity for people to keep money at home and will encourage older people and those in receipt of social welfare to deposit it in a bank, building society or credit union.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: I move amendment No. 28:
In page 18, between lines 19 and 20, to insert the following:
"(6) The Minister shall consider the possibility of exempting the first £2,000 of income derived from forestry premium and shall prepare and lay before both Houses of the Oireachtas a report on this issue.".
This relates to the forestry premiums which are normally paid to small farmers who are prepared to devote part of their land to forestry. It is a national objective to encourage more forestry and it is a national objective to involve more farmers as opposed to outside investors. For those reasons I am in favour of the forestry premium approach. The problem is that the forestry premium is counted as income in the means test. It could be argued that is not a bad thing. REPS payments, however, which are also paid to achieve a policy objective, are not taken into account. I do not see any difference between a forestry premium and a REPS payment. If one can be disregarded why not the other?
[885] On Committee Stage the Minister offered theological explanations of income support as opposed to special payment compensation. The Jesuits would have been at home arguing the technical and theological points he raised but, in practical terms, there is no difference. In both REPS and forestry premiums we are trying to achieve a national policy objective by encouraging farmers to become involved.
The recipients are generally small farmers for whom the question of a pension can be very important. When I was practising law, I recall many older people from rural areas telling me they were "heading for the book", meaning the pension. It means a great deal to them that they can receive it. If, however, they are excluded from the non-contributory old age pension because they have been involved in forestry, having responded to the urgings of the Government, it is unfair. Their next door neighbour may get a pension because he got a REPS payment instead of a forestry premium. I urge the Minister to re-examine the issue.
Mr. Perry: Afforestation is a long-term investment. Planting may have taken place 20 years ago. The forestry premiums were promoted as a tax free fund. If REPS payments do not affect entitlement, the forestry premium, particularly when the Government encouraged people to plant areas which were of no agricultural use, should also not affect entitlement. It was a sensible investment and to penalise people for following that initiative by affecting their pension entitlements is wrong. The REPS payments are not taken into consideration; the same should be the case for any premium funded by the EU.
Mr. D. Ahern: The forest premium scheme is designed to provide an income from forestry during the period the forest is developing – for the first 20 years, for example. Payments under the forest premium scheme would equate to other forms of farm income. The forest premium is unlike REPS and compensation payments under SACs. These latter payments compensate farmers for the material and work involved, or farming income foregone, in complying with agri-environmental plans or SAC conditions for which special income disregards are already applied under the farm assist scheme. There is a difference.
I accept that it is money in the hand but, under the social welfare code, we must treat it in the same way as other forms of farm income, for example, income from ordinary farm activities or headage payments. It is, therefore, properly assessable for means testing under social welfare payments. I cannot accept the amendment.
Amendment put and declared lost.
An Ceann Comhairle: Amendments Nos. 29 and 30 are related and will be taken together by agreement.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: I move amendment No. 29:
In page 18, between lines 19 and 20, to insert the following:
"18.–Within 3 months from the passing of this Act, the Minister shall prepare and lay before both Houses of the Oireachtas a report on the means test for the scheme of assistance to farmers (known as farm assist) provided for under Part IV of the Third Schedule of the Principal Act.".
I am glad the Minister has accepted the criticism of the farm assist scheme he introduced last year which caused such devastation to so many farmers.
Mr. D. Ahern: I did not accept criticism.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: It is accepted on the basis that the Minister now agrees in the Bill to reduce the amount of farm income to be taken into account for the calculation of means.
Mr. D. Ahern: Am I now being criticised for making improvements? No scheme ever stands still
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: I am not criticising the Minister at all. I am glad he has accepted criticism and is now moving in the direction we indicated a year ago. I warned of the practical implications of the original farm assist scheme and said that many farmers would rue the day the Minister introduced it. Unfortunately, my predictions have been fulfilled. Of the 7,310 people who were in receipt of these payments in December 1998, more than 1,000 were removed from the scheme under the new farm assist scheme introduced by the Minister.
The situation has improved somewhat, but I am concerned that reducing the figure to 70% will not be enough. If that is the best we can get from the Minister at this stage, I will continue to return to this issue until all of those who were removed from the scheme are receiving payment again. It was the wrong thing to do when cattle prices were falling and small farmers were suffering. The Minister cannot wash his hands of responsibility for this. There has been some improvement but we will want to see more.
Mr. D. Ahern: No scheme stands still. All schemes are improved as they move along. These improvements were targeted and discussed with the social partners, particularly the farmers, under the new programme. We have delivered on our undertakings in that programme already through this Bill, even before the programme is finally accepted. Obviously, over the coming years there will be further improvements in this scheme.
[887] Any of those who were in receipt of smallholder's assistance who no longer received 'farm assist' were getting that smallholder's assistance on the basis of an assessment made a number of years ago. It was made clear to the farming organisations that there would be a reassessment of all incomes once we introduced the farm assist scheme. There were farmers in receipt of social welfare based on old income assessments when their incomes had since changed. This is a good scheme and this year the numbers receiving payments under it will increase dramatically. That has been acknowledged by the farming organisations.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Mr. J. O'Keeffe: I move amendment No. 30:
In page 18, between lines 40 and 41, to insert the following:
"19.–Within 3 months from the passing of this Act, the Minister shall prepare and lay before both Houses of the Oireachtas a report on the means test for the scheme of assistance to fishermen provided for under Part I of the Third Schedule of the Principal Act.".
I propose this amendment, but I am prepared to give the new approach a chance.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
|Last Updated: 11/09/2010 04:37:55
|Page of 123