text:
5.1. Terrorist Safe Havens
Terrorists operate without regard to national boundaries. To effectively counter terrorists, we are working to strengthen our regional and transnational partnerships and increasingly operate in a regional context. Denying safe haven plays a major role in undermining terrorists' capacity to operate effectively and forms a key element of U.S. counterterrorism strategy.
Terrorist safe havens are defined in this report as ungoverned, under-governed, or ill-governed areas of a country and non-physical areas where terrorists that constitute a threat to U.S. national security interests are able to organize, plan, raise funds, communicate, recruit, train, and operate in relative security because of inadequate governance capacity, political will, or both. Physical safe havens provide security for terrorist leaders, allowing them to plan acts of terrorism around the world.
Global communications and financial systems, especially those created by electronic infrastructure such as the internet, global media, and unregulated economic activity, further allow terrorists to carry out activities, particularly the dissemination of propaganda and misinformation, without the need for a physical safe haven. These "virtual" havens are highly mobile, difficult to track, difficult to control, and are not based in any particular state. This part of the report, however, will not address virtual safe havens, and will focus instead on physical safe havens.
Defeating the terrorist enemy requires a comprehensive effort executed locally, nationally, regionally, and globally. Working with partner nations, we must eliminate terrorist leadership, but incarcerating or killing terrorists will not achieve an end to terrorism. Over the last several years we've been working with partners on regional strategies to break up terrorist networks, eliminate terrorist safe havens, and disrupt those activities that support terrorists. The latter include funding, facilitation of terrorist travel, communications, and intelligence and information collection by terrorists seeking to identify potential targets. Finally, and most challenging, we must address the underlying conditions that terrorists exploit by offering a positive agenda focused on modernization and strengthening the rule of law. This includes programs based on economic liberalization, institutional reform, and democratization that would bring at-risk populations closer to the mainstream of the global system. We must continue to enlist the support and cooperation of a growing network of partners. If we are to be successful, we must all work together toward our common goal in a strategic and coordinated manner.
Somalia. A small number of al-Qa'ida (AQ) operatives remain in East Africa, particularly Somalia, where they pose a serious threat to U.S. and allied interests in the region. Although these elements were disrupted as a result of Ethiopian and Somali Transitional Federal Government military actions, AQ operatives continued to operate in Somalia and elsewhere in East Africa. Somalia remains a concern given the country's long, unguarded coastline, porous borders, continued political instability, and proximity to the Arabian Peninsula, all of which provide opportunities for terrorist transit and/or safe haven. AQ remains likely to make common cause with Somali extremists, most notably al-Shabaab, which has expanded its area of control during a protracted anti-Ethiopian/Transitional Federal Government (TFG) insurgency over the past two years.
The Trans-Sahara. Remote areas of the Sahel and Maghreb regions in Africa serve as terrorist safe havens because of limited government control in sparsely populated regions. The threat to U.S. and Western interests from Islamic extremists increased in 2007 as a result of the 2006 AQ merger with the Algerian-based Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC), which was subsequently renamed al-Qa'ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). AQIM has subsequently conducted a number of attacks, primarily on Algerian targets, but also including Western interests. In contrast, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group's (LIFG), November 2007 merger with AQ has yielded few successful attacks to date, reflecting the depleted capabilities of LIFG within Libya. AQIM has used the Sahel to train Islamic militants in small arms, use of explosives, and guerilla tactics for the last several years. Training appears to take place on the move or in makeshift facilities in remote areas outside government control. While Libyan extremists have trained in AQIM-run camps, a goal of their preparations was also to join anti-Coalition fighting in Iraq, particularly during 2007. AQIM taps into already existing smuggling networks in the Sahel to obtain weapons, explosives, and supplies to support its operations.
The Sulu/Sulawesi Seas Littoral. Southeast Asia includes a safe haven area composed of the Sulawesi Sea and Sulu Archipelago, which sit astride the maritime boundary between Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines. The geography of the thousands of islands in the region made the area difficult for authorities to monitor. Worker migration, tourism, trade, and other non-terrorist activities, both licit and illicit, that occur in this maritime region pose another challenge to identifying and countering the terrorist threat. Although Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines have improved their efforts to control their shared maritime boundaries, this expanse remains difficult to control. Surveillance is partial at best, and traditional smuggling and piracy groups provided an effective cover for terrorist activities, such as movement of personnel, equipment, and funds. The Sulu/Sulawesi Seas Littoral represents a safe haven for the Jemaah Islamiya (JI) terrorist organization and the Philippine Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG).
The Southern Philippines. The southern Philippines, specifically the Sulu archipelago and Mindanao, serve as terrorist safe havens. The government's control in this area is weak due to rugged terrain, weak rule of law, poverty, and local Muslim minority resentment of central governmental policies. In addition to a few Jemaah Islamiya (JI) fugitives and the Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG), the area hosts several terrorist and insurgent groups including the Communist Party of the Philippines/New People's Army and the Rajah Solaiman Movement.
Iraq. Iraq is not currently a terrorist safe haven, but terrorists, including Sunni groups like al-Qa'ida in Iraq (AQI), Ansar al-Islam (AI), and Ansar al-Sunna (AS), as well as Shia extremists and other groups, view Iraq as a potential safe haven. The Iraqi government, in coordination with the Coalition, made significant progress in combating AQI and affiliated terrorist organizations. The threat from AQI continued to diminish in 2008. AQI, although still dangerous, has experienced the defection of members, lost key mobilization areas, suffered disruption of support infrastructure and funding, and been forced to change targeting priorities. A number of factors have contributed to the substantial degradation of AQI. The alliance of convenience and mutual exploitation between AQI and many Sunni populations has deteriorated. The Baghdad Security Plan, initiated in February 2007, along with assistance from primarily Sunni tribal and local groups, has succeeded in reducing violence to late 2005 levels, has disrupted and diminished AQI infrastructure, and has driven some surviving AQI fighters from Baghdad and Anbar into the northern Iraqi provinces of Ninawa, Diyala, and Salah ad Din. Though AQI remained a threat, new initiatives to cooperate with tribal and local leaders in Iraq have led Sunni tribes and local citizens to reject AQI and its extremist ideology. The continued growth, professionalism, and improved capabilities of the Iraqi forces have increased their effectiveness in rooting out terrorist cells. Iraqis in Baghdad, Anbar and Diyala Provinces, and elsewhere have turned against AQI and were cooperating with the Iraqi government and Coalition Forces to defeat it.
Northern Iraq. The Kurdistan Worker's Party (PKK) maintained an active presence in northern Iraq, from which it coordinated attacks in the predominantly ethnic Kurdish areas of southeastern Turkey and provided logistical support to forces that launched attacks into Turkey, primarily against Turkish security forces, local Turkish officials, and villagers who opposed the organization. In October 2007, the Turkish Parliament overwhelmingly voted to extend the authorization for cross-border military operations against PKK encampments in northern Iraq. On November 19, 2008, Iraq, Turkey, and the United States renewed their formal trilateral security dialogue as one element of ongoing cooperative efforts to counter the PKK. Iraqi leaders, including those from the Kurdistan Regional Government, continued to publicly state that the PKK was a terrorist organization and would not be tolerated in Iraq.
Lebanon. Hizballah remained the most prominent and powerful terrorist group in Lebanon, with deep roots among Lebanon's large Shia community, especially in southern Lebanon, which comprises at least one third of Lebanon's population. The Lebanese government continued to recognize Hizballah, a U.S.-designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, as a legitimate "resistance group" and political party. Hizballah maintained offices in Beirut and military-style bases elsewhere in the country and was represented by elected deputies in parliament.
An increasing number of AQ-associated Sunni extremists are also operating within the country. AQ likely views Lebanon as an opportunity to expand its jihad into the Levant, especially after the 2006 conflict between Israel and Hizballah. The organization uses the Palestinian refugee camps as staging grounds for recruitment, training, planning, and facilitating transit of foreign fighters to and from Iraq. The camps, run by Palestinian authorities inside the camps, continue to be no-go zones for the Lebanese Armed Forces and safe havens for armed Sunni extremists. See Chapter 3, State Sponsors of Terrorism, for information on Iran and Syria, which provided safe haven to Hizballah and Palestinian terrorist groups and were used as safe havens by AQ-linked operatives and groups.
Yemen. The security situation in Yemen continued to deteriorate in 2008. Yemen experienced several setbacks to its counterterrorism efforts as al-Qa'ida in Yemen (AQY) carried out several attacks against tourism and U.S and Yemeni government targets. The most notable was the September 17 attack against the U.S. Embassy in Sanaa that killed 18 people. A half a dozen other attacks occurred in Yemen in 2008 including a January attack that killed two Belgian tourists and two Yemeni drivers in the southern governorate of Hadramaut. Despite an August raid on an AQY cell that resulted in the death of its leader, the Government of Yemen has been unable to disrupt other AQY cells and its response to the terrorist threat was intermittent. Yemen continued to increase its maritime security capabilities, but land border security along the extensive frontier with Saudi Arabia remained a problem, despite increased Yemeni-Saudi cooperation on bilateral security issues. The Yemeni government's focus on the al-Houthi rebellion in the Sada'a governorate in the North of the country and internal security concerns distracted its forces from adequately focusing on counterterrorism activities.
Afghan-Pakistan Border. Despite the efforts of both Afghan and Pakistani security forces, instability along the Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier continued to provide al-Qa'ida (AQ) with leadership mobility and the ability to conduct training and operational planning, targeting Western Europe and U.S. interests in particular. Numerous senior AQ operatives have been captured or killed, but AQ leaders continued to plot attacks and to cultivate stronger operational connections that radiated outward from Pakistan to affiliates throughout the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe.
Pakistan. AQ terrorists, foreign insurgents, and Pakistani militants have broadened and strengthened their safe havens in portions of Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), North-West Frontier Province (NWFP) and Baluchistan in 2008. AQ and others use the FATA to launch attacks in Afghanistan, plan operations worldwide, train, recruit, and provide propaganda. Other extremists, including Taliban and traditionally Kashmir-focused organizations such as Hizb-e-Islami Gulbuddin or Hizb-e-Islami Khalis, use the area for safe haven and share short term goals of eliminating Coalition presence in Afghanistan. They exploit the local sympathetic populations to recruit, train, and conduct cross-border raids and bombings in Afghanistan. Islamist Deobandi groups and many local tribesmen in the FATA and the NWFP continue to resist the government's efforts to improve governance and administrative control at the expense of longstanding local autonomy.
Extremists led by Pakistani Taliban commander Baitullah Mehsud and other AQ-related extremists re-exerted their hold in areas of South Waziristan and captured over 200 government soldiers, who were later released after a local peace deal collapsed. Extremists have also gained footholds in the settled areas bordering the FATA, including Swat, Tank, and DI Khan. Pakistani security forces continue to fight militant leader Maulana Fazlullah in Swat, a settled area in NWFP. The Government of Pakistan maintains approximately 120,000 troops, including Army and Frontier Corps (FC) units, along the Afghanistan border. The United States plans to help modernize and increase the capacity of the FC so they can become a more effective force against extremists.
In order to increase the central government's writ in the FATA and eliminate safe havens throughout Pakistan, the Government of Pakistan seeks to implement a comprehensive approach with three prongs: political, security, and development. For the political prong, the government seeks to bolster effective governance by empowering local officials. For the security prong, Pakistan's objective is to increase the capacity and efficacy of local security forces. For the development prong, the Pakistani government has designed a comprehensive sustainable development plan for the region. The plan concentrates on four sectors – basic human services, natural resources, communication infrastructure, and economic development – and, if fully implemented, would cost $2 billion. The plan was developed with the extensive grassroots participation of all stakeholders to provide essential economic and livelihood opportunities while upgrading and expanding social services to a population at risk for recruitment by terrorist organizations.
Afghanistan. The Afghan government, in concert with ISAF/NATO forces and the international community, continued efforts to eliminate terrorist safe havens and to bring and build security on the Afghan side of the border. The border areas remained contested, however, with ongoing insurgent and terrorist attacks, including AQ activity. Attacks by the Taliban and other insurgent groups and criminal networks, along with those of extremist movements such as Hizb-e-Islami Gulbuddin (HIG) and the Haqqani network, continued throughout Afghanistan. Criminal networks and narcotics cultivation remained particularly prevalent in the south and east of the country, constituting a source of funding for the insurgency in Afghanistan. AQ maintained its support to militants inside Afghanistan, providing funding, training, and personnel to facilitate terrorist and insurgent operations. Anti-Coalition organizations such as HIG continued to operate in coordination with AQ, Taliban, and other insurgent groups, primarily in the east.
Colombia Border Region. The regions adjacent to Colombia's borders with Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru, Panama, and Brazil include rough terrain and dense forest cover. These conditions, coupled with low population densities and weak government presence, create potential areas of safe haven for insurgent and terrorist groups, particularly the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). Brazil, Peru, and Panama have often adopted a tacit policy mix of containment and non-confrontation with Colombian narcoterrorist groups, although some confrontations do occur. Much depends on local decisions and cross-border relations. Ecuador increased its controls and demonstrated a willingness to militarily confront encroaching foreign narcoterrorists. The FARC has used areas in neighboring countries near Colombia's border to rest and regroup, procure supplies, and stage and train for terrorist attacks.
Venezuela. Corruption within the Venezuelan government and military; ideological ties with the FARC; and weak international counternarcotics cooperation have fueled a permissive operating environment for drug traffickers and an increase in drug transit to the United States and Europe.
The Tri-Border Area (Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay). No corroborated information shows that Hizballah, HAMAS, or other Islamic extremist groups used the Tri-Border Area (TBA) for military-type training or planning of terrorist operations, but the United States remains concerned that these groups use the region as a safe haven to raise funds. Suspected supporters of Islamic terrorist groups, including Hizballah, take advantage of loosely regulated territory and the proximity of Ciudad del Este, Paraguay and Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil to participate in a wide range of illicit activities and to solicit donations from within the sizable Muslim communities in the region and elsewhere in Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay. The Argentine, Brazilian, and Paraguayan governments have long been concerned with arms and drugs smuggling, document fraud, money laundering, trafficking in persons, and the manufacture and movement of contraband goods through this region. In the early years of this decade, the governments of Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay invited the United States to participate in the Three Plus One Group on Tri-Border Area Security to focus on practical steps to strengthen financial and border controls and enhance law enforcement and intelligence sharing. The USG has been part of the "3+1" since 2002, and our law enforcement agencies are very active in the region. Despite their view that concrete evidence does not exist of terrorist financing in their countries or in the TBA, Brazil, Argentina, and Paraguay have made notable strides in launching initiatives to strengthen counterterrorist and law enforcement institutions and cooperation, including developing financial intelligence units, broadening border security cooperation, augmenting information sharing among prosecutors responsible for counterterrorism cases, and establishing trade transparency units.
5.1.a. International Conventions and Protocols Matrix
5.1.b. STRATEGIES, TACTICS, TOOLS FOR DISRUPTING OR ELIMINATING SAFE HAVENS
The Regional Strategic Initiative. The State Department's Bureau of Counterterrorism (S/CT) has developed the Regional Strategic Initiative (RSI) in key terrorist theaters of operation to collectively assess the threat, pool resources, and devise collaborative strategies, action plans, and policy recommendations. The RSI promotes cooperation between our counterterrorism partners, for example, between Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines as they confront terrorist transit across the Sulawesi Sea; or among Mauritania, Algeria, Morocco, Niger, Chad, and Mali, to counter al-Qa'ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). Terrorists are highly adaptable. Defeating them requires both centralized coordination and field authority. Resources and responses must be applied in a rapid, flexible, and focused manner. The RSI helps achieve this coordinated approach. In 2008, RSI strategy groups were in place for South East Asia, Iraq and its neighbors, the Eastern Mediterranean, the Western Mediterranean, East Africa, the Trans-Sahara, South Asia, and Latin America.
Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the United States has acted to block funding of terrorists and their supporters, and to promote international cooperation against them. On September 23, 2001, the President signed E.O. 13224, giving the United States a powerful tool to impede terrorist funding. This Executive Order (EO) provides a means to disrupt the financial support network for terrorists and terrorist organizations by authorizing the USG to designate and block the assets of foreign individuals and entities that commit, or pose a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism. The EO prohibits transactions between U.S. persons and designated individuals and entities. In addition, because of the pervasiveness of the financial base of foreign terrorists, the order authorizes the USG to block the assets of individuals and entities that provide support, offer assistance to, or otherwise associate with designated terrorists and terrorist organizations. The order also covers their subsidiaries, front organizations, agents, and associates.
The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, also has the authority to designate groups as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended. These designations play a critical role in U.S. counterterrorism efforts and are an effective means of curtailing support for terrorist activities and pressuring groups to get out of the terrorism business. As a consequence of such a designation, it is unlawful for U.S. citizens or any persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to provide material support or resources to a designated FTO. U.S. financial institutions are also required to freeze the funds of designated FTOs.
2008 Designations under E.O. 13224 (FTO Designations are discussed in Chapter 6):
REWARDS FOR JUSTICE (RFJ). Through the RFJ program, the Secretary of State offers and pays rewards for information that prevents or successfully resolves an act of international terrorism against United States persons or property. Reward offers of up to $25 million have been authorized for information leading to the capture of Usama bin Ladin and other key terrorist leaders. Since its inception in 1984, RFJ has paid more than $82 million to over 50 people who provided credible information.
In 2008, the RFJ program added the following six terrorists to its Most Wanted list.
All of these reward offerings are listed in greater detail on the www.rewardsforjustice.net website.
International cooperation remained essential to initiatives in fields ranging from intelligence and law enforcement coordination, to targeted financial sanctions, and to norms and standards of financial regulation, particularly because most funds used to support terrorism are located outside the jurisdiction of the United States.
Throughout the year, the United States worked closely with multilateral partners in numerous counterterrorist financing efforts, including the Counterterrorism Committee of the United Nations, the Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and FATF-style regional bodies, the G8's Counterterrorism Action Group (CTAG), and international financial institutions. In addition, the United States continued its regular dialogue on terrorist financing with the European Union. Since its launch in September 2004, the dialogue has served as a framework for ongoing exchanges to promote information sharing and cooperation on joint issues of concern, and on technical assistance issues.
European nations and international partners are active participants in a variety of multilateral fora that contributed to counterterrorist efforts, including the G8, NATO, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum, the ASEAN Regional Forum, and the Organization of American States. The United States and its partners worked through these organizations to establish and implement best practices, build the counterterrorism and law enforcement capabilities of "weak but willing" states, and to institutionalize global counterterrorism. The World Bank and International Monetary Fund have pledged to provide countries with training to increase their capacity to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.
The United Nations (UN). The Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC) was established by Security Council Resolution 1373 after September 11, 2001, with the goal of enhancing the ability of UN member states to combat terrorism. The Counter-Terrorism Committee's Executive Directorate (CTED), established by Resolution 1535 in 2004, became fully operational in 2005. CTED's mandate is to enhance the Committee's ability to monitor the implementation of Resolution 1373 and to advance capacity-building work by facilitating technical assistance to member states and promoting closer cooperation and coordination with international, regional, and sub-regional organizations. It also conducts visits to member states to assess the implementation of Resolution 1373. CTED visited six states in 2008: Niger, Jamaica, Saudi Arabia, Cambodia, the Lao People's Democratic Republic, and South Africa. UN Security Council Resolution 1805 (March 20, 2008) extended CTED's mandate until December 31, 2010, and affirmed the CTC's endorsement of a revised organizational plan for CTED.
The Counterterrorism Implementation Task Force (CTITF) brought together 24 UN entities across the UN system, which work under mandates from the General Assembly, the Security Council, and various specialized agencies, funds, and programs to implement the historic Global Counterterrorism Strategy, which was agreed to by all 192 member countries in September 2006. In 2007, the Task Force developed a program of work and established working groups to carry forward a first set of initiatives to implement the Strategy. A compilation of activities undertaken by the Task Force entities in implementing the strategy was issued in a report by the Secretary General in July 2008.
The United Nations Security Council 1540 Committee on non-proliferation was established after in the adoption of Resolution 1540 "that all States shall refrain from providing any form of support to non-State actors that attempt to develop, acquire, manufacture, possess, transport, transfer or use nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons and their means of delivery." The United States co-sponsored UN Security Council Resolution 1810, which extended the work of the 1540 Committee for three years until April 2011; highlighting a shift in emphasis from reporting to implementation (national action plans) and consideration of options for developing and making more effective existing funding mechanisms to enhance overall technical assistance efforts.
UN Specialized Agencies are also involved in the work of fighting terrorism. For example, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) adopted passport security standards, and the UN Office on Drugs and Crime's (UNODC's) Terrorism Prevention Branch and Global Programme Against Money Laundering continued to provide assistance to countries in the legal and related aspects of counterterrorism. UNODC's mandate in the area of counterterrorism is specifically focused on building the legal framework necessary for member states to become party to and implement the international counterterrorism conventions and protocols. The Terrorism Prevention Branch also focused on strengthening the capacity of the national criminal justice systems to apply the provisions of these instruments in compliance with the principles of rule of law and on providing substantive input on counterterrorism issues to intergovernmental bodies.
International organized crime networks and members can provide support to terrorist organizations and facilitate their activities. The UN Convention on Transnational Organized Crime (CTOC) is the main international instrument to counter international organized crime. The UNODC's implementation of the CTOC and its Protocols, specifically the Protocol on Human Smuggling, contributed to the global efforts to counter terrorism by providing technical assistance and training, and strengthening countries' legal systems and law enforcement and border control capabilities. Building the capacity of countries to control their borders helps disrupt terrorist mobility.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) continued to implement its Nuclear Security Plan (2006-2009) for combating the threat of terrorism involving nuclear and other radioactive material. IAEA promoted its member states' ratification and implementation of international instruments relating to nuclear security, including the Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material, and the non-binding IAEA Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources. The IAEA Nuclear Security Series is a framework of guidance documents designed to help states establish a coherent nuclear security infrastructure.
The United States has been working with and through the IAEA to enhance security over at-risk, vulnerable nuclear, and other radioactive materials within the IAEA's 144 Member States to reduce the risk that such materials could be used in a terrorist event.
In 2008:
The IAEA continued to work with States to improve global controls for radioactive sources, particularly national regulatory infrastructures and export controls. Efforts included urging States to make political commitments to follow the non-binding IAEA Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security for Radioactive Sources and the associated Guidance on the Import and Export of Radioactive Sources, the latter of which represents the first international export control framework for radioactive sources. To date, 92 States have made a commitment to follow the Code of Conduct and 46 States to follow the import/export Guidance. In May, the IAEA held a meeting attended by experts from 88 Member States that sought to harmonize implementation of global export controls for sources, as provided in the guidance.
The IAEA continued, upon request, to assist States in developing and implementing measures to prevent incidents of nuclear terrorism at major public events. Drawing on ITDB reporting, the IAEA provided information support and advice in the areas of detection, interdiction, and response. In addition, training courses, workshops, and exercises were conducted and detection equipment purchased and supplied. In 2008, working in close cooperation with the Global Threat Reduction Initiative (GTRI), the IAEA, drawing on its successful nuclear security programs at the 2004 Olympics in Greece and at the Pan American Games in Rio de Janeiro, successfully implemented a major nuclear security program leading up to and during the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games in China.
ITDB also continued to expand its membership and now includes 100 countries. The ITDB is a voluntary program whereby states confirm incidents of illicit trafficking or other unauthorized activities involving nuclear and radioactive material. The ITDB collects authoritative information on illicit trafficking events and helps participating states better understand illicit trafficking events and trends. Additionally, the ITDB is an authoritative database for tracking nuclear and radioactive materials that have fallen outside of legitimate control and that could be used in potential actions of terrorism.
Group of Eight (G8) Counterterrorism Actions. The Group of Eight (G8), composed of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, continued to develop and promote effective counterterrorism standards and best practices throughout the year.
Japan hosted the 2008 annual G8 Summit in Toyako Hokkaido, where G8 Leaders committed to take action on a range of counterterrorism issues, including:
G8 Leaders condemned all terrorist acts as criminal and unjustifiable, particularly the tactics of suicide bombings, the recruitment of the young or disadvantaged to carry out such bombings, and hostage taking. G8 Leaders also committed to economic and social development along with counterterrorism in the Afghanistan and Pakistan border regions.
Counterterrorism Action Group (CTAG). At the June 2003 Evian Summit, G8 Leaders adopted a plan to build political will and capacity to combat terrorism globally, and established the Counterterrorism Action Group (CTAG) to implement this plan. CTAG supports the UN Counter-Terrorism Committee's efforts to monitor and promote implementation of UNSCR 1373 by developing an active forum for donors to coordinate counterterrorism cooperation with, and assistance to, third countries. It promotes counterterrorism by prioritizing needs and targeting and coordinating assistance to expand counterterrorism capacity in recipient countries; and encourages all countries to meet their obligations under UNSCR 1373 and, for states party to them, the 13 international counterterrorism conventions and protocols.
Under the leadership of the rotating G8 presidency, CTAG meets two times per year with the active participation of G8 member states, the European Commission, and other donor countries and organizations. Coordination meetings hosted by the local embassy of the G8 presidency were also held among CTAG members' diplomatic missions in recipient countries, and in coordination with the UN Counterterrorism Executive Directorate's country visits.
Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and FATF-Style Regional Bodies (FSRBs). The United States continued to play a strong role in developing new initiatives within FATF as well as throughout the entire FATF network to meet evolving anti-money laundering and counterterrorism financing threats. In 2008, the United States delegation continued its contributions to the Plenary on issues of policy as well as to the Working Groups on issues of implementation. The United States continued its co-chair role, with Italy, on the International Cooperation Review Group to address jurisdictional anti-money laundering/counterterrorism financing systemic deficiencies and threats. The United States also participated in major FATF work comprising examination, negotiation, and implementation of Special Recommendation IX on cash couriers for supranational entities, examination of proliferation finance, and discussion of the inclusion of the FATF-style regional bodies in the FATF network. In 2008, additional work contributed by the United States included outreach to the private sector, public-private partnerships, development of guidance for non-financial businesses and professions, hosting mutual evaluation assessor training, and participating in FATF mutual evaluations. The United States played a similar and equally active role in the FSRBs, supporting FSRB-executed training and typologies workshops and providing technical assistance not only to members, but to the Secretariats themselves, as well as taking part in Contact Groups, mutual evaluations, and Expert Review Groups, and providing advice upon request with an eye to increasing the capacity and transparency of the Secretariats.
European Union (EU). The United States and the EU cooperated closely on combating terrorism. At the June 2008 U.S.-EU Summit, both parties recognized the need to play an active role in multilateral counterterrorism efforts at the UN and to ensure effective implementation of the UN Global Counterterrorism Strategy. The EU Counterterrorism Coordinator, Gilles de Kerchove, coordinated the counterterrorism work of the Council of the European Union, composed of representatives from all 27 EU Member States. De Kerchove participated in regular dialogues with U.S. counterterrorism officials.
The U.S. and EU have deepened cooperation in the area of domestic security, including reciprocally participating in each others' domestic response exercises. The European Council Secretariat attended the TOPOFF 4 (Top Officials) exercise to test U.S. "all-hazards response" capabilities. Likewise, the United States recently participated in the European Council's review of its emergency and crisis coordination arrangements. The United States and EU continued to collaborate on techniques for identifying terrorist travel. U.S. experts have met with EU counterparts on a number of occasions to exchange lessons learned on the development of passenger prescreening systems, including the use of Passenger Name Records.
In September, the European Court of Justice held that EU implementation of asset freezes required by the United Nations sanctions regime against al-Qa'ida, the Taliban, and their associates, violated procedural and property rights enshrined in European Community law. The Court annulled the regulation (insofar as it applied to the two plaintiffs), but gave the EU three months to revise it to rectify these defects. There are several other similar challenges to the EU's implementation of counterterrorism sanctions pending before the European Court of Justice. EU officials are working to remedy issues raised in the September ruling while preserving a strong counterterrorism effort that complies with UN obligations.
EU Justice and Home Affairs Ministers approved a change to the existing EU Framework Decision on Terrorism. Among other changes, the Ministers added incitement and terrorist training as criminal offences under the EU legal framework. The United States and the EU's Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust) have improved cooperation and information exchange among investigators and prosecutors. Pursuant to the U.S.-Eurojust Cooperative Agreement, a U.S. National Liaison Prosecutor, resident in Brussels, assists with operational cases that include several EU member states and assists in mutual legal assistance or extradition issues involving member states. The United States and all but three EU Member States (Belgium, Greece, and Italy) have ratified the U.S.-EU Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance Agreements; in November 2008, Eurojust hosted a seminar for law enforcement practitioners from the United States and EU Member States on implementation of the agreements.
The United States and EU have established a roadmap toward mutual recognition between the EU Authorized Economic Operator provisions and the U.S. Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism, which are based on a risk management approach to cargo security. A Secure Freight Initiative pilot project in Southampton, UK was concluded in 2008 and provided valuable lessons that will assist in determining how best to execute the 9/11 Implementation Act's requirement for 100 percent scanning of maritime cargo containers.
The United States and EU organized an experts' seminar in December 2008 on enhancing the control of explosives. The forum focused on two high-priority shared challenges: improvised liquid or "home-made" explosives and response issues. Discussions are underway to expand existing transatlantic cooperation on research and development to include security research.
Despite this progress, EU concerns about privacy protection in the United States continue to present an operational and political obstacle to further collaboration. However, the High Level Contact Group created in 2006 to assess this problem has made considerable progress. On June 10, 2008, the EU-U.S. Summit recognized that the fight against transnational crime and terrorism requires the ability to share personal data for law enforcement purposes while fully protecting the fundamental rights and civil liberties of both sides' citizens and residents. At the December 2008 Justice and Home Affairs Ministerial, the United States and EU reaffirmed their commitment to a series of basic privacy principles and moved closer to consensus on their application in transatlantic data transfers.
The United States and the EU continued to cooperate on combating terrorist financing, including:
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). The United States worked with the OSCE through its Action against Terrorism Unit (ATU) to encourage cooperation and to address existing gaps in the capabilities and legal frameworks of the OSCE's 56 participating States. In July, the OSCE hosted an expert meeting to identify areas where the OSCE could contribute to the enhancement of protection from terrorist attacks of Critical Energy Infrastructure (CEI). The meeting highlighted various global threats to CEI, as well as potential responses, including using the OSCE as a platform to enhance information sharing, facilitate cooperation with relevant international organizations, and promote public private partnerships. In September, the OSCE organized a high-level political conference, a joint initiative of the United States and the Russian Federation, on Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs). The conference highlighted the fact that effective solutions to fighting terrorism require integrated approaches that harness the expertise of all sectors of society by bringing them together in close public-private cooperation. Over 250 participants from 54 OSCE participating states and Partners for Cooperation, and 45 civil society and business community participants, as well as representatives from 18 international organizations, discussed ways to best draw upon the capacity of businesses and civil society to help governments fight terrorism. In October, the OSCE hosted a workshop on countering violent extremism and radicalization to discuss terrorist recruitment methods. The OSCE also continued its considerable efforts to provide technical capacity-building assistance to help participating states detect and prevent the use of fraudulent and counterfeit travel documents, to make it more difficult for terrorists and other criminals to forge or counterfeit them, and to encourage the reporting of lost and stolen travel documents to INTERPOL. The OSCE Helsinki Ministerial issued a decision supporting the G8 Leaders' statement of counterterrorism principles and called upon participating states, inter alia, to implement the UN Global Counterterrorism strategy, promote PPPs, and enhance cooperation in countering violent extremism and radicalization, and continue to support the implementation of UNSCR 1540.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). NATO leads International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) stability operations against radical insurgents in Afghanistan. NATO also conducts Operation Active Endeavor (OAE), a naval mission that aims to combat terrorism by monitoring Mediterranean maritime traffic. The Alliance is engaged in a far-reaching transformation of its forces and capabilities to better deter and defend against 21st Century threats, including terrorism, and is working closely with partner countries and organizations to ensure interoperability of forces, thus enhancing security and broadening cooperation.
NATO adopted its Military Concept against Terrorism in 2002, fielded a Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) defense battalion in 2004, and established a special Terrorist Threat Intelligence Unit. Efforts were underway to enhance Allied protection against the potential attempts to disrupt critical infrastructure (energy, cyber) systems. Through NATO's Defense Against Terrorism (DAT) program, the Alliance is developing 10 cutting-edge technologies to protect troops and civilians against terrorist attacks. In December 2008, NATO Foreign Ministers condemned all terrorist acts as unjustifiable and criminal and deplored tactics such as suicide bombing and hostage taking, as well as the recruitment of the young and disadvantaged to conduct terrorist activities. NATO's 26 Allies and 24 Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council Partners have all submitted initial reports as called for by UN Security Council Resolution 1540. NATO also supported a UNSCR 1540 regional implementation seminar in June in Croatia.
Trans-Sahara Counterterrorism Partnership (TSCTP). The Trans-Sahara Counterterrorism Partnership (TSCTP) is a multi-faceted, multi-year strategy to combat violent extremism and defeat terrorist organizations by strengthening individual-country and regional counterterrorism capabilities, enhancing and institutionalizing cooperation among the region's security and intelligence organizations, promoting democratic governance, and discrediting terrorist ideology. The overall goals are to enhance the indigenous capacities of governments in the pan-Sahel (Mauritania, Mali, Chad, and Niger, as well as Nigeria and Senegal) to confront the challenge posed by terrorist organizations in the trans-Sahara, and to facilitate cooperation between those countries and our Maghreb partners (Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia). (See Chapter 2, Country Reports, Africa, for further information on the TSCTP.)
The African Union (AU). The African Union (AU) has several counterterrorism legal instruments including a Convention on the Prevention and Combating of Terrorism (1999), a 2002 Protocol to the Convention, and a 2004 Plan of Action. The Addis Ababa-based AU Commission provided guidance to its 53-member states and coordinated limited technical assistance to cover member states' counterterrorism capability gaps. In 2005, with Danish funding, the AU hired a consultant to draft a counterterrorism Model Law to serve as a template to assist member states in drafting language to implement counterterrorism commitments. In December 2006, an AU-sponsored group of experts drafted counterterrorism language, which was in the process of being legislated. The group of experts decided to retain options for both broad and specific laws and determined that new legislation was needed to combat money laundering and other financial crimes. In August, the AU Peace and Security Council requested the AU Commission to expedite the development of the African Anti-Terrorism Law. Some AU member states maintained that Africa's colonial legacy made it difficult to accept a definition of terrorism that excluded an exception for "freedom fighters." Nonetheless, the AU is on record strongly condemning acts of terrorism. In August 2008, the Peace and Security Council issued a statement condemning "unreservedly acts of terrorism, wherever they occur." (See Chapter 2, Country Reports, Africa, for further information on the AU.)
Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). In January 2007, the Heads of State of the ten-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations, comprising Brunei, Burma, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam, signed a new convention on counterterrorism cooperation. The new ASEAN treaty recognized the importance of having a global legal framework to combat terrorism, as established by the universal conventions on terrorism. The treaty further recognized that terrorism offenses such as hijacking, hostage-taking, and bombing are not political offenses, and terrorists cannot hide behind political justifications to evade justice. Under the new Convention, ASEAN members agreed to cooperate to prevent terrorist attacks, terrorist financing, and terrorist movement across national borders. They also agreed to cooperate to enhance intelligence exchanges, promote public participation in counterterrorism efforts, and strengthen preparedness for dealing with chemical, biological, and nuclear terrorism. The United States worked closely with ASEAN to enhance counterterrorism cooperation. The United States actively participated in counterterrorism-related activities of the 26-member ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), including the annual meetings on counterterrorism and transnational crime.
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). The 21 member economies of APEC (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, the United States, and Vietnam), are committed to creating a safe environment for the movement of goods, services, and people throughout the region. Since 2001, APEC has worked to secure the region's economic, trade, investment, and financial systems from terrorist attack and/or abuse by proliferators. The APEC Counterterrorism Task Force (CTTF) was established in 2003 to coordinate implementation of Leaders' and Ministers' statements on counterterrorism and non-proliferation, promote information sharing, and develop counterterrorism capacity in the region. APEC also leverages its relationship with the private sector to promote public-private partnerships in counterterrorism and secure trade.
In 2008, APEC Leaders' recognized that joint counterterrorism efforts are based on a common understanding that all terrorist acts are criminal and unjustifiable, and must be unequivocally condemned, especially when they target or injure civilians, or use the abhorrent practices of suicide bombing and hostage taking. The United States continued its work within APEC to dismantle transnational terrorist groups and to eliminate the severe and growing danger posed by proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery. The United States also led capacity-building work to counter biological and chemical terrorism, completing a joint pilot project with Peru to implement the APEC Food Defense Principles. The United States promoted APEC efforts to counter terrorist financing and to help member economies implement the Financial Action Task Force Special Recommendations on Terrorist Financing. Lastly, the United States actively supported APEC initiatives to strengthen aviation, land, and maritime security, and support trade recovery following an attack.
OAS Inter-American Committee against Terrorism (CICTE). On March 12, 2008, at the Eighth Regular Session of CICTE in Washington DC, the Member States adopted the Declaration of Reaffirmation of the Hemispheric Commitment to Fighting Terrorism, which acknowledged that terrorism constitutes a grave threat to the lives, well-being, and fundamental freedoms of all people, threatens international peace and security, and undermines the values and principles underlying the inter-American system, democratic institutions, and the freedoms enshrined in and promoted by the Charter of the OAS, the Inter-American Democratic Charter, and other international instruments. The CICTE Ministers also reaffirmed their commitments and conclusions adopted in the Declaration of Panama on the Protection of Critical Infrastructure in the Hemisphere in the Face of Terrorism, in the Declarations adopted at the six previous regular sessions of CICTE, as well as the importance of the United Nations Global Counterterrorism Strategy, and the relevance of the implementation of these in the fight against terrorism; and the importance of the efforts of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and its commitment to implement and promote internationally its 40 Recommendations on Money Laundering and Nine Special Recommendations on Terrorism Financing. CICTE operates as the counterterrorism policy body for the hemisphere, with its experts representing and advising the 34 member state governments on how to meet the requirements of the international conventions and protocols relating to terrorism, UN Security Council Resolutions (especially 1373, 1267, and 1540), and the Inter-American Convention against Terrorism (IACAT).
In 2008, the Secretariat received over $4.8 million in voluntary contributions, a 300% increase over 2007. It conducted 115 activities, training courses and technical assistance missions, benefiting over 2,800 participants through nine programs in five areas: border control, critical infrastructure protection, counterterrorism legislative assistance and terrorist financing, crisis management of emerging terrorist threats, and international cooperation and partnerships. Key achievements included the development of new methodologies—workshops on best practices and crisis management exercises—and the expansion of international partnerships.
Tri-Border Area (Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay). The Governments of the Tri-Border Area (TBA) – Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay – have long been concerned with arms and drugs smuggling, document fraud, money laundering, trafficking in persons, and the manufacture and movement of contraband goods through this region. In the early 1990s, they established a mechanism to address these illicit activities. In 2002, at their invitation, the United States joined them in what became the "3+1 Group on Tri-Border Area Security" to improve the capabilities of the three to address cross-border crime and thwart money laundering and potential terrorist financing activities. The United States remained concerned that Hizballah and HAMAS sympathizers were raising funds in the TBA by participating in illicit activities and soliciting donations from sympathizers within the sizable Muslim communities in the region. There was no corroborated information, however, that these or other Islamic extremist groups had an operational presence in the TBA.
The Antiterrorism Assistance Program (ATA) provides partner countries with the training, equipment, and technology needed to increase their capabilities to find and arrest terrorists, building the kind of cooperation and interactivity between law enforcement officers that has a lasting impact. During fiscal year 2008, the State Department delivered over 280 training activities and technical consultations, and trained over 5,600 participants from 68 countries. Over the course of its 25-year existence, the ATA program has trained more than 66,500 students from 154 countries, providing programs tailored to the needs of each partner nation and to local conditions.
ATA training subjects included:
All courses emphasized advanced law enforcement techniques under the rule of law. Successful ATA programs include:
The Terrorist Interdiction Program (TIP) assisted priority countries at risk of terrorist activity to enhance their border security capabilities. TIP provided participating countries with a computerized watch listing system to identify suspect travelers at air, land, or sea ports of entry. TIP further promoted expanded cooperation, data sharing, and close liaison with host governments in the areas of rule of law, anticorruption, and law enforcement. Since 2001, the State Department has provided TIP assistance to more than 20 countries at 110 ports of entry, assistance that was instrumental in impeding and interdicting terrorist travel. High-priority countries participating in the program include Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Thailand, and Kenya. While the primary focus of TIP is on constraining terrorist travel, thousands of individuals traveling on stolen passports in Pakistan, as well as wanted criminals, narcotics smugglers, and human traffickers have been identified and intercepted worldwide. The TIP complements other counterterrorism-related U.S. efforts to enhance aviation, border, cyber, maritime, and transportation security.
Counterterrorist Finance Training (CTFT) The State Department chaired the interagency Terrorist Finance Working Group (TFWG), which met biweekly to develop and coordinate USG CTF capacity-building efforts, and worked to expand its counterterrorist financing (CTF) capacity-building efforts in key partner nations. Although our CTF programs retained their global focus, we expanded our CTF training programs for North and West Africa in 2008. The CTF capacity-building program includes training and technical assistance in the legal, financial regulatory, financial intelligence, financial investigation, and judicial, prosecutorial, and asset forfeiture fields; as well as task force development to build interagency cooperation between the fields.
CTF 2008 programs included:
The roles and responsibilities of our five Department of Justice Resident Legal Advisors were expanded with bilateral and regional responsibilities. The RLAs have conducted training workshops, assisted with the drafting of laws and regulations, and conducted outreach to parliamentarians.
Under the auspices of the TFWG, we have worked with the Department of Homeland Security and our interagency partners to expand our bulk cash smuggling training programs. This included conducting a highly successful Regional Operational Cash Courier Training program in South East Asia and bulk cash smuggling training in a variety of countries, including Nigeria and Iraq.
Increasing Economic Development. Poverty, unemployment, weak institutions, and corruption can turn nations of great potential into recruiting grounds for terrorists. Development is central to the President's National Security Strategy and long-term U.S. economic growth. Well-conceived, targeted aid is a potential leveraging instrument that can help countries implement sound economic policies and improve the conditions that terrorists might otherwise exploit.
The Millennium Challenge Account (MCA), established by Congress in 2004, represents a new model for achieving transformational development by providing assistance to those countries that rule justly, invest in their people, and encourage economic freedom. The prospect of an MCA Compact provides a powerful incentive for the poorest countries to reform.
U.S. private sector flows to the developing world, including net trade and investment ($672 billion in 2007), dwarf our foreign aid ($21.8 billion). Unutilized capital in developing countries, owing to weak policies and poor property rights, is estimated to be as high as $9 trillion.
Debt relief for the poorest is another element of our development strategy. Our long-standing support for the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative, as well as for the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) introduced in 2006, promotes debt sustainability, reduces the likelihood of debt distress, and enables the poorest countries to devote additional resources to reducing poverty and promoting economic growth. USAID's humanitarian aid programs and its activities in the areas of economic growth, agriculture, trade, health, democracy, and conflict prevention, address the conditions that terrorists exploit for recruitment.
The Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI).
In 2008, MEPI provided support to reformers and civic activists to expand political participation, build education systems responsive to 21st Century challenges, assist developing economies, and empower women. Working in 16 countries and in the Palestinian territories, MEPI invested in programs ranging from broadcast media to women's entrepreneurship.


text:
s&p syndicate pcl (SNP:Bangkok)
Last 27.00 THB
Change Today +0.25 / 0.93%
Volume 4.2K
SNP On Other Exchanges
As of 4:12 AM 10/9/15 All times are local (Market data is delayed by at least 15 minutes).
BOARD MEMBERS AFFILIATED WITH Varakorn Raiva *
*Data is at least as current as the most recent Definitive Proxy.
|Recently Viewed
MOST CONNECTED PEOPLE TO Varakorn Raiva
|John Scott Heinecke
|34 Relationships
|Aviruth Wongbuddhapitak
|28 Relationships
|Sophavadee Uttamobol
|22 Relationships
|Cattleya Saengsastra
|21 Relationships
|Pravesvudhi Raiva
|20 Relationships
Sponsored Financial Commentaries
Sponsored Links
Report Data Issue
To contact S&P SYNDICATE PCL, please visit . Company data is provided by Capital IQ. Please use this form to report any data issues.
Please enter your information in the following field(s):
Your requested update has been submitted
Our data partners will research the update request and update the information on this page if necessary. Research and follow-up could take several weeks. If you have questions, you can contact them at firstname.lastname@example.com.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Intervurt to play late Sunday slot at Bestival
John Bownas on 31 August 2005
VF's Top Tip for Bestival
We have
just learnt that Intervurt
have been promoted to playing an evening slot on the Sunday at Bestival - evidence that the event organisers have recognised
a good thing when they hear it!
Following the fantastic feedback that the band have already had from playing at Guilfest, Tin Pan Alley, Beautiful Days and Get Loaded this summer (courtesy of our DISCOVERED! project, supported by the Trades Union, Amicus) it isn't surprising that Intervurt are starting to get people to sit up and take notice of their blistering electro-rock. We knew we had backed a winner when the lunchtime crowds in front of the main stage at Beautiful days were galvanised in their hundreds to rush to the barriers for the bands CD.
As well as Intervurt, Bestival is also providing a stage for Whitestar and The Seen - two London bands who at times came close to taking the lead in our download chart and who both deserve your attention. They will both be playing the JD Set Lounge on Saturday and Sunday lunchtimes, and like Intervurt, they have been getting great feedback from their shows throughout this summer. Whitestar were likened recently to New Order with greater depth to their songwriting, whilst The Seen will swirl you away on a psychedlic rock-trip.
Bestival is one of the last chances to party at a festival in the UK, so get your act together and get down to the Isle of Wight on the 9th, 10th and 11th of September to join us for the end to another fantastic festival season!


text:
Your Help Is Needed Today
The primary aim of the Global White Lion Protection Trust (WLT http://www.whitelions.org/) is to re-establish White Lions in their natural distribution range, in the way they once occurred naturally and in strict accordance with current scientific methods.
The White Lions natural habitat is at the epicenter of one of the world's most important natural game regions: KRUGER TO CANYON BIOSPHERE, declared by the United Nations as the 'third largest biosphere region in the world'. As a unique contribution to the biodiversity of this region – and as iconic animal revered by the indigenous people here and around the globe – the White Lion must be protected for future generations.
Not Albino
The White Lions of this region are not albinos (Cruikshank and Robinson 1997), but a genetic rarity of Panthera leo, which occurred naturally in one location only on earth. They are one of the rarest and most endangered animals in Africa. Born in the Timbavati region at the centre of the Kruger to Canyon Biosphere, they were artificially removed because of their beauty and rarity, and became technically extinct for nearly two decades before the Global White Lion Protection Trust initiated a world-first re-establishment of White Lions within their unique endemic range, based on successful reintroduction techniques of social bonding White Lions with resident wild tawny lions of the region. We have successfully re-established two prides of high genetic integrity that are hunting self-sufficiently in their natural endemic habitat.
Genetic Marker
Unfortunately, trophy hunting still takes place in the White Lions' natural distribution range and the captive breeding in unethical / canned hunting operations has put the genetic pool under duress. To date, the genetic marker for the White Lions has not been established. The Global White Lion Protection Trust has therefore embarked on ground-breaking research to identify this rare genetic code, in collaboration with international genetic specialists in South Africa as well as in the UK and USA. Preliminary genetic studies were done in collaboration with Swansea University (UK) and more recently collaboration has been initiated with the National Cancer Institute-Frederick Research Foundation (USA). This research will be used to classify the White Lion as genetically distinct and therefore provides a necessary foundation to have the White Lions listed on CITES, the Schedule of Threatened and Protected Animals of National Importance and IUCN Red Data List.
Unfortunately, the orthodox view of many scientists in South Africa has led them to be slow in recognizing the importance of these unique variants ("regional polymorphisms"), and thereby made our urgent efforts for their protection all the more challenging. The Global White Lion Protection Trust is following the international precedent of the Kermode Bear (Ursus americanus kermodei) in British Columbia (Western Canada), whereby this rare white variant of the Black Bear (Ursus americanus) has been declared a critically endangered subspecies due to its conservation and cultural value, such that the Kermode Bear is being used as a flagship species for protecting a 4000 000 ha wilderness area. As with the Kermode Bear, by protecting the white lions the entire lion population within their endemic area will be protected – since the white gene is within the tawny lion population the entire lion population would be declared a protected subpopulation / subspecies.
Preserving Genetic Integrity
Trophy hunting still takes place in the White Lions' natural distribution range and the captive breeding in canned hunting operations has put the genetic pool under duress. The WLT's Scientific Research Centre has acquired key individual White Lions of the highest genetic integrity to participate in the genetic research and preservation program. The WLT initiated the White Lion Protection Plan™ , and presented this survival plan to the South African Parliament in February 2008. The outcome was extremely positive, with the Parliamentary Committee resolving to support the WLT's conservation efforts. A copy of the parliamentary presentation is available on www.pmg.org.za.
Declare the White Lions a Protected Animal
In 2002, the Global White Lion Protection Trust initiated the White Lion Protection Plan™. Since commercial lion trophy hunting has reached an all-time record, we have appealed to the South African government to declare the White Lion as a protected animal, at least within their natural habitat of the Timbavati Region.
The White Lions are not only of national importance, they are a global heritage. All conservation issues today are global issues – and it is not the decision of private landowners or individual governments, for that matter, to decide whether a species or variant lives or perishes. With many species, including many of the big cats, on the brink of extinction, immediate international conservation measures need to be implemented to ensure their survival. In many cases there are no longer viable populations in the wild and carefully conducted scientific 'rewilding / reintroduction programs' are necessary. It is the intention of the Global White Lion Protection Trust that our initiative in re-establishing and having the White Lions protected within their natural distribution range, will act as a precedent to assist related causes to save critically endangered species, subspecies or variants.
MSc Wildlife Management


text:
Note 1: All external links on the excerpted email have been deactivated due to suspected malware at the source.
Note 2: (January 2011) Comments on this post are permanently closed. Please do not contact me with questions about the Readers' Digest Sweepstakes. I am NOT connected with Readers' Digest and I do NOT have additional information about the sweepstakes. Neither will I direct inquiries to them on your behalf. If you have issues with the marketing methods used by Readers' Digest, please direct them to your own RD country representative and not to me.
Note to everyone who is scam-prone: read this, and be wiser about how to see right through flimsy scams such as the one I shall expose below, the Reader's Digest Sweepstakes Scam.
Oh, what a comedown for a magazine everyone used to think was top-notch reading material back in secondary school. Is Reader's Digest really so desperate for money? Are they so confident in the trust and goodwill of their customers that they can afford to abuse it? Today, I got this email:
POTENTIAL FINALIST TO WIN S$225,000 IN THE THIRD AND LAST STAGE OF THE READER'S DIGEST SWEEPSTAKESTo: Mint KangAn Official Access Code has been issued in your name. It confirms that ONLY YOU, Mint Kang, may activate the 4 Sweepstakes Entry Numbers held on reserve for you. If you're lucky and any one of your entries is drawn winner, you'd have sole claim to a cash amount worth S$225,000!
You may be surprised to know that in all of Singapore, less than 5% of the households have been selected to receive this incredible chance. While many of your neighbours will never be selected, you have already been lucky enough to clear two of the three stages there are to becoming a winner in our Sweepstakes!
Now it's all up to you, Mint Kang — make the most of your chance! Simply click for your Official Access Code and activate your 4 Sweepstakes Entry Numbers.
Confirm your Finalist Status NOW – you'll be pleased you did!
Benjamin Soh
Prize Award Administrator
P.S. When people receive a Sweepstakes invitation — like the one you now have — they often decide to discard it, thinking, "no one ever really wins." And it is a fact that if you choose to ignore your 4 Sweepstakes Entry Numbers, you will NEVER WIN ANYTHING in our Sweepstakes. Don't let this guaranteed chance slip away, just click for your Official Access Code and you could win S$225,000. Act quickly!
* Reader's Digest will send you emails from time to time, to inform you about our latest activities and promotions, because we value you as our customer. However, you may discontinue this at any time – just send an email to firstname.lastname@example.com with the subject header <Unsubscribe> and we will remove you from our emailing list promptly.
Sweepstakes Rules | Privacy
I opened it because the email domain was rdasia.com.sg, which is the legitimate Reader's Digest domain. What I found was shoddy, suspicious and downright shabby. For instance, who is Benjamin Soh, Prize Award Administrator? I searched the Reader's Digest website and found him listed nowhere. I couldn't even find him on LinkedIn. What gives him the authority to dispense such large amounts of money? And how about this: the images in the email are not hosted by Reader's Digest, not even the logo itself. They derive from the postdirect.com domain, which is an email marketing company. Absurd! Reader's Digest claims to be giving away so much money, yet they are going through third parties to do so?
I decided to follow this up. I clicked on the link. It brought me to a page where I could "verify my details" and confirm my "official access code". What details were being verified? My title, full name and email address. So I ran a test. I entered "Testing Testing" in the name field and clicked confirm. It took me to a page with a progress bar that said my details were being confirmed. Ahem. Some confirmation that must have been, because I next saw:
GREAT NEWS, Ms Testing Testing!
You're just a few clicks away from being registered as a guaranteed Finalist in the Selection of Winners Stage of the Reader's Digest S$620,000 Sweepstakes.
On a hunch, I clicked back to the progress bar page and examined the code. What did I see? An animated GIF and a javascript timer. Confirmation, indeed.
Now I was curious: what was Reader's Digest trying to get out of this poorly executed bit of flimflam? I proceeded. I received a set of sweepstakes entry numbers: RV137164, JL530116, MS632634, KG206518.
I clicked back to the previous page and tried again. Hey, look! I got ANOTHER absolutely free set of different sweepstakes entry numbers! PG353042, MD931014, SJ558272, LC885166! Maybe they were holding not four, but EIGHT numbers in reserve for me!
I proceeded. Activate! And I was promptly presented with three brand-new cars I had a chance at winning. A "Sukuzi Swift", a "Volkwagen New Beetle" or a "Peugeot 207". Apparently I had been offered a decoder card that would let me win one of them. It came up…the Peugeot! The only one spelled correctly? Must be coincidence.
Next, I saw this.
Bonus – you qualify to CLAIM A FREE GIFT!
Click on the image when you see a 'GIFT BOX'
– and discover your Free Gift.
Just for fun, I clicked on everything but the gift box, and got my gift anyway. How generous. But all this still doesn't tell me what Reader's Digest is hoping to achieve, apart from wasting my time. I kept clicking. Aha!
GREAT NEWS, Ms Testing Testing!
You're just a few clicks away from confirming your chance to win a Peugeot 207 1.6 Sports 5DR (A) and S$5,000 Bonus – on top of your chance to win the S$225,000 Super Grand Prize and Bonus – when you take advantage of our music offer today!
What followed was a long advertisement for a 5-CD country music collection. I get an idea what they're up to now. Selling music CDs. Closer inspection reveals that unless I purchase this 5-CD set, I cannot have my "reserved" numbers entered in the sweepstakes; I cannot have a chance to win that brand-new Peugeot; I cannot even get my "free gift".
Here's a final, funny twist. There's a form to fill in before proceeding: title, full name, address 1, address 2, city, postal code, email, telephone (home) and telephone (mobile). In a fit of perversity, I fill myself in as Dr Bull Shit, address either Scammer Heaven or Scammer Hell, city Do I look that stupid?, postal code 000000, email email@example.com, both phone numbers 6666 6666.
Good Lord! The form accepted that!
And then promptly redirected me to "READER'S DIGEST EXPRESS PAYMENT PAGE", where I had a choice of using MasterCard or Visa to pay S$129.00 for…well, by now I'm not sure just what I'm paying for. The privilege of being a sucker? And to top everything off, the "Customer Service Department" email was listed as firstname.lastname@example.com – the mass-mail automatic address that sent me this shabby scam in the first place. It's painfully obvious from all this that the people who set up this scheme don't care about anything but money – any way, any time, at any price.
Shame on you, Reader's Digest. Shame on you.


text:
- About Us
About Visix
Visix browser-based digital signage software allows you to create, manage and deliver messages, media and alerts from anywhere to anywhere.
We offer digital signage applications, interactive meeting room signs, and targeted messaging publishers to send content to desktops and RSS readers. Each product works independently or can be integrated into a scalable system, from a single display to a large network.
We want to help communicators to better reach their audience, so we develop products that are easy to use and access to improve the quality of organizational communications and involve more people in the communications process.
We aim to provide everything you need for successful deployment with software-only or bundled solutions, as well as multi-tier service and support options to help you manage and maintain your digital signage system.
Everything we do is to help organizations communicate better.
To accomplish our Why, we follow these guidelines:
- Democratize communications – Help more people have access to good communications tools and knowledge.
- Make it simple – Make our technologies fast, easy and intuitive to use.
- Maximize the benefits – Make sure our clients are comfortable with our products and help them in every step of the communications process.
- Keep it exciting – Constantly explore and innovate to excite ourselves and our customers.
- See long term results – Make sure relationships are tangible and lasting.
We analyze each organization and recommend products and services that simplify and unify their communications:
- Digital Signage Communication Tools
- Desktop and Mobile Device Communication Tools
- Knowledge Transfer Services
- Creative Services
- Technical Services
Company History
Visix is a privately held software development firm based in Technology Park/Norcross, outside Atlanta, Georgia, with field sales offices in Boston, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Dallas, Minneapolis, Charlotte, San Francisco and Denver. The company was founded in 1980 as Tech Electronics, Inc. (TEi) to provide hardware solutions for audiovisual integrators in unique environments.
In 2000, we began the transition to digital signage software development. AxisTV, our first messaging application, has evolved in its efficiency, security and functionality over the years to serve as the cornerstone for our growing line of visual communications products. To emphasize the shift in focus, the company's name was changed to Visix in November 2006.
Visix has become a software solutions company with an emphasis on digital signage for organizational communications for corporate, education, healthcare and government facilities. The company has now deployed more than 2000 visual communications systems on three continents, and over 1000 higher education campuses use Visix digital signage software.
- Management Team
Management Team
Edward D. Matthews III, Chairman
Ed has nearly 50 years of experience in the professional audiovisual industry. He began his career as a Service Manager for the Ampex Video Company, a major manufacturer of video products for the Broadcast Television Industry. In 1969, he joined the Calhoun Company, which later became Technical Industries, Inc. MCSi acquired Technical Industries in 1999, and Ed transitioned to the role of President, MCSi Southeast Region. In 2004, Ed returned to Atlanta to run Tech Electronics, Inc., which changed its name to Visix, Inc. in November of 2006. During Ed's distinguished career, he has been involved with Technical Industries' design and installation of the International Broadcast Center (IBC) for the 1996 Summer Olympics, as well as the IBC and all 19 venues for the 1998 Winter Olympics in Nagano, Japan. With MCSi, Ed played an integral part in the design and installation of the IBC, Olympic Stadium and Superdome venue control rooms for the 2000 Olympics in Sydney, as well as the Japan Olympic Consortium for the 2002 Winter Games in Salt Lake City, Utah. Ed is an active member of ICIA, ITVA, SMPTE and PMI. He received an associate degree in Electronics and attended Southern Technical Institute in Atlanta, Georgia.
Sean Matthews, President/CEO
Sean guides the company's progress on a daily basis through management and oversight. He has guided Visix through a comprehensive corporate reorganization and expansion, including a name change, establishing field offices, outsourcing non-essential activities, introducing new award-winning products and services, growing revenues by more than 350% and quadrupling the number of employees to provide better products and services. Sean has over 20 years of experience in the visual communications industry. He started as an Account Executive with Technical Industries, Inc. before moving to Tech Electronics, Inc. as Executive Vice President. Here, Sean displaced a negative equity position with not only positive equity, but reduced its debt by 70%, outsourced its manufacturing processes, increased revenues by 50% and introduced two new product lines. He then returned to Technical Industries just prior to its acquisition by MCSi. After the merger, he served as both Vice President of Marketing and Vice President of Strategic Initiatives for MCSi before moving to the position of President, Western Region. Sean received his undergraduate degree from the College of Charleston, and his graduate studies were at Georgia State University. He served in the United States Marine Corps and the Marine Corps Reserve between 1985 and 1992, and is a veteran of the Persian Gulf War. Sean also served with the United States Treasury Department as a Special Agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms from 1991 to 1993.
Christy Greer, Chief Financial Officer
Christy provides analysis of all financial aspects of the company, participates in key management decisions, and formulates a variety of company policy. She is responsible for development and management of internal company systems, including administrative, accounting and human resource policies and procedures. In just a few years, Christy has managed to substantially reduce the company's debt, renegotiate banking relationships and terms, reduce DSO, and improve cash flows through managed equity. Prior to working for Visix, Christy held key management and finance positions with an established supplier of audiovisual equipment and a rapidly-growing construction firm. She has a Bachelor of Science in Business Management from Florida State University.
Trey Hicks, Chief Sales Officer
Trey is responsible for company sales globally, and manages the Visix sales team and reseller partner relationships. He substantially contributes to Visix marketing, product management and planning through industry and technology research, as well as customer feedback. Trey has been with the company since 1994, when he joined Tech Electronics, Inc. as Marketing Manager. He moved into sales after 14 months and was Western U.S. Sales Manager for three years, and Director of Sales and Marketing for seven years. He was promoted to Chief Sales Officer in March 2012 after holding the position of Vice President, Sales since December 2005. Trey grew up in North Georgia and has a degree in Economics from Emory University.
Tony Martin, Chief Operating Officer
Tony oversees all technical operations for Visix including implementation, support, development, quality assurance, production, technical documentation, support escalations and internal infrastructure. Tony joined Visix in 2012 with over 10 years of business management experience in both the public and private sectors with a deep knowledge of LEAN tools, project and personnel management, and process controls. He earned a Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering from the University of South Carolina and a Masters in Business Administration from Augusta State University.
Tonya Dennis, Technical Services Manager
Tonya is responsible for overseeing the Software Support Team, which provides helpdesk and implementation support for all Visix customers. Tonya joined Visix in 2006 with over 16 years of experience in technical support, training and management with a strong focus on customer service. Tonya also has eight years of experience in videoconferencing for the the AV industry. She holds a Bachelor of Science from Georgia Southern University.
Jill Perardi, Creative Services Manager
Jill oversees all creative services projects for Visix including quoting, client consultation, design planning and overall project management. She works with a team of designers and contractors to develop and expand our creative product offering through new products and services, and also spearheads Visix's social media efforts. Jill has over 15 years of experience in marketing. She began her professional career as a Marketing Manager for MCSi. Prior to joining Visix, she spent seven years in marketing and support in the financial services industry. She graduated from Southern Illinois University with a Bachelor of Science in Communications.
Debbie DeWitt, Marketing Communications Manager
Debbie designs and executes all marketing and communications campaigns at Visix, including corporate and product branding, promotions and advertising, newsletters, web, sales tools, and event planning. Debbie has over 20 years of marketing and events planning experience. Prior to joining Visix in 2004, she spent three years as a Marketing Manager for MCSi, and four years as Marketing Coordinator and Event Production Manager for an audiovisual company. She previously spent nine years in the concert audio and lighting industry. She holds Bachelor of Science degrees in Marketing and Accounting from Wright State University.
Ellyce Kelly, Public Relations Specialist
Ellyce works as a Visix Communications Consultant and is our liaison to local, industry and national media. She pursues joint public relations initiatives with partners, resellers and clients. Ellyce has over 10 years of experience in sales, marketing, and public relations. She began her professional career as a sales associate with The Florida Marlins (MLB). In 1998, she joined Mitsubishi's Diamond Vision Group as a marketing associate and later served as Public Relations Manager for Barco, Inc. Ellyce launched her own PR firm, Kudzu Publicity, LLC in 2004. She holds a Bachelor of Science in Media Communications from Kennesaw State University.
- Careers
Join Our Team
Visix is one of the most sought out employers in the digital signage industry. We offer competitive compensation with a comprehensive benefits package.
Our benefits include:
- Major medical, vision and dental (70% company funded)
- Healthcare Spending Accounts
- 401(k) with matching company contributions
- Industry certification reimbursement
- Professional employee training (ILT and online)
- Sabbaticals for veteran employees
- Voluntary life and disability insurance
- Direct Deposit
- Employee Assistance Program (24 hours)
- Commuter Benefits
- Personal Discounts
For over 30 years, our privately managed pool of talented and energetic sales, marketing, software development and support professionals have sought to improve the power of visual communications. We adapt the thoughts, ideas and concerns of the market and work as a team to create products and services that empower people to show, share and view visual ideas in action.
Visix employees are not confined to the corporate headquarters in Atlanta. We have employees in Philadelphia, Denver, Knoxville, Boston, and Prague. Using our IP-based telephone system, you can work anywhere in the world.
Visix is a client of ADP, a Professional Employer Organization (PEO) that enables Visix to share and manage many employer-related liabilities and responsibilities. ADP provides services in human resources, employee benefits, payroll administration and workers' compensation. Because of this partnership, Visix is able to match the benefits that much larger companies provide.
Want to work in a creative, energetic environment? Contact us.


text:
- Text Size:
- ASmall Text
- AMedium Text
- ALarge Text
AAA Hawaii is offering its free Tipsy Tow service from 6 p.m. Tuesday on New Year's Eve until 6 a.m. Wednesday on New Year's Day.
Callers simply tell the AAA operators, "I need a Tipsy Tow," to receive the free tow of up to five miles plus a ride home.
This service does not include passengers.
The number to call is 1-800-222-4357.
Click here to see the top places in the U.S. for New Year's Eve celebrations.


text:
MA4 Pesticides
() Acute Effects of Methoprene on the American lobster, Homarus americanus.
Horst, M1, Walker, A1, Wilson, T2, Bush, P3, Chang, E4, Miller, T5, 1 School of Medicine, Mercer University, Macon, GA, USA2 Department of Entomology , Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA3 Agricultural and Environmental Service Lab, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA4 Bodega Marine Lab, University of California at Davis, Bodega Bay, CA, USA5 Darling Marine Center, University of Maine, Walpole, ME, USA
ABSTRACT- As a result of the massive die-off of lobsters in the Western Long Island Sound in the fall of 1999, we have examined the acute effects of methoprene, an IGR pesticide included in a cocktail of pesticides directed against mosquitoes during a West Nile virus outbreak earlier that year. We have studied toxicity, bioaccumulation and biochemical effects of methoprene on all life stages of H. americanus. Larval forms of the lobster are more sensitive than postlarval forms while adults appear to be the least sensitive. The apparent 72 h LC50 for stage 2 larvae is 2.8 ppb; no anatomic cause of death is evident by routine light microscopy. While postlarvae survive exposure to 25 ppb methoprene, we observe increased rates of molting and death during molting at concentrations as low as 5 ppb. Treatment of explant cultures prepared from postmolt juvenile lobsters with methoprene causes alteration in a specific group of shell proteins, identified on Western blots by Tomato lectin binding. SDS-PAGE analysis of epithelial proteins showed that methoprene treatment causes alterations in the phosphorylation state of specific cellular proteins. In vivo and in vitro metabolic studies with 35S Translabel indicate that 50 ppb methoprene blocks hepatopancreatic protein synthesis by 90%, and also causes alterations in expression of specific stress proteins (Hsp 70, 72/3, Erk 1-2, heme oxygenase). Exposure of adult intermolt lobsters to 50 ppb methoprene leads to bioaccumulations of up to 250-fold in specific tissues: integumentary epithelium, hepatopancreas and gonads as measured by GC/MS. Most significantly, we observed 1,200-fold accumulation of methoprene in eyestalks. Exposure of day 1, stage 1 larvae to increasing concentrations of methoprene for 4 hours was followed by homogenization and analysis of relevant enzyme activities. Analyses of chitin synthase and esterase activities, as well as HSP alterations, are ongoing. This work was supported by a grant from the NY-CT WLIS Lobster Initiative Sea Grant Program.
Key words: crustacean, bioaccumulation, IGR pesticides, cuticle biosynthesis
Internet Services provided by
Allen Press, Inc. | 810 E. 10th St. | Lawrence, Kansas 66044 USA
e-mail firstname.lastname@example.com | Web www.allenpress.com
All content is Copyright © 2004 SETAC


text:
Tag Archives: West Sacramento
Woodie Guthrie show on stage
A "City Theatre" production of "Woodie Guthrie's American Song" is on stage at the Black Box Theater in the West Sacramento Community Center, 1075 W Capitol Avenue.
The play celebrates one of America's greatest songwriters and storytellers, with a cast of 24 and a live band. Guthrie was a folk singer who stood up for America's underdogs, and whose songs include "This Land is Your Land" and other classics.
Shows are at 8 p.m. on March 30, 31, April 6, 7, 13, 14, 20, 21, 27 & 28, and at 2 p.m. on April 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 & 29. $15 general ($13 for 2 p.m. shows) with some discounts available. Visit www.citytheatre.net or call 558-2228.
Copyright News-Ledger 2012
River City HS girls soccer
On March 20, River City High School girls soccer faced Cosumnes Oaks in a league game.
The RCHS junior varsity team lost by a final score of of 5-0; while the RC varsity lost 2-0.
Two days later, the varsity soccer squad from RCHS faced Union Mine, losing 4-0, while the j.v. dropped their game 1-0.
The team plays at home next against Galt on April 10.
(Facebook members can find up-to-the-minute info on RCHS sports at contributor De'Onna Jack's Facebook page. Click here.)
Support local journalism, support this website, and see all the News-Ledger's articles every week! Subscribe to the News-Ledge newspaper. It's only $20 per year within West Sacramento – once a week, delivered to your mailbox.
You can even try it for free for two months if you live in West Sacramento. Just send your name and mailing address to firstname.lastname@example.com (offer open to new subscribers in West Sacramento ZIP codes 95691 & 95605).
Copyright News-Ledger 2012
Curious about fostering kids?
Interested in learning more about becoming a foster parent?
Attend a free introductory workshop from 6:30-9:30 p.m. on Tuesday, April 3, at Woodland Community College, Room 727. For information, call (530) 574-1964 or visit www.yolofostercare.com. Spanish-speakers may call Marcia, 956-9299.
Sac Gold wins on RCHS field
The semi-pro Sacramento Gold soccer team beat the Eureka Tsunami 5-1 on Saturday, earning a spot in the North west Conference finals.
The Gold will play the Bay Area Ambassadors at 7 p.m. Sat., March 31, at the River City High stadium. Tickets are $5 (children under six free). Children in soccer uniforms also enter free.
Copyright News-Ledger 2012
Committee: don't sell school land
A citizen's committee charged with studying the real estate owned by Washington Unified School District has recommended that the district not sell off any "surplus" property at this time.
But the committee recommended that WUSD "evaluate the advantage of consolidation of site usage or joint facility usage to make any future liquidation easier."
"For example," it told district officials, "if the District Administrative Offices (at 930 Westacre Road) were moved from their current location, the city block they vacate would become more marketable for development. . . (T)he District Offices, the Yolo Education Center, and surrounding properties hold a higher potential for development based on the proximity to transit and city services."
Committee members were Carrie Buchmiller, Dani Langford, Ron Morazzini, Karri Pina, Diane Smith, Matthew Wilkins, Patricia Flint, Larry Langford, Don Stauffer, Henry Walker and Dave Blake.
Copyright News-Ledger 2012
Track meet at River City High
Last Wednesday, River City High's track team took the field to host a track meet at the school. Visiting were El Dorado and Vista Del Lago.
(Facebook members can find up-to-the-minute info on RCHS sports at contributor De'Onna Jack's Facebook page. Click here.)
Support local journalism, support this website, and see all the News-Ledger's articles every week! Subscribe to the News-Ledge newspaper. It's only $20 per year within West Sacramento – once a week, delivered to your mailbox.
You can even try it for free for two months if you live in West Sacramento. Just send your name and mailing address to email@example.com (offer open to new subscribers in West Sacramento ZIP codes 95691 & 95605).
Copyright News-Ledger 2012
What do you want from your library?
GUEST COMMENTARY from the March 7, 2012 News-Ledger:
By Patty Wong
Yolo County Librarian
When I came to Yolo County Library as the County Librarian, I got to know people from grass-roots community groups that have supported the Library for over one hundred years. Each branch of the Yolo County Library has local residents who contribute their time and energy to support their local library. All of us at the Yolo County Library want to ensure this on-going community involvement in public libraries. To reach this goal, we've begun our first-ever strategic planning process.
I'd like to invite all residents to participate in a survey that will help shape the future of Yolo County Public Libraries. The survey is part of a strategic planning process that includes research, public comment, interviews and discussion sessions with community leaders and library staff. Some of the questions I'd like folks to think about are: What makes Yolo County a unique community? Why is Yolo County a great place to live, work and raise a family? Through your comments, we'll learn about our community's needs and vision for the future. We'll use this information to build a stronger public library.
In many ways the public library is an integral part of the quality of life in Yolo County. It serves the information needs of all residents, including recreational reading, research, online computer access, ready for kindergarten and adult literacy programs, volunteer opportunities and much more. Small business owners use the public library to work and read up on new management publications. Parents bring their children to the library for free events, homework help and a constant source of new books to read. Programs for older adults help answer their questions about financial issues and health care.
Our communities have changed too, and library services are needed more than ever in our rural areas such as Knights Landing and Yolo. These small libraries help close the digital divide in rural areas where information is harder to access because of distance, scarcity of community gathering places and the lack of high speed cable. These libraries also provide access to resources for rural residents to live happy and productive lives in a complex and ever-changing world.
I invite you to participate in the Yolo County Library planning process by completing the survey or by contacting Elizabeth Gray, Assistant County Librarian (530) 666-8084 or firstname.lastname@example.com, with your input.
The survey will be available soon online at www.yolocountylibrary.org and will be available in hard copy format in all Yolo County branch libraries. Those who complete the survey may choose to be entered in a raffle to win a book or tote bag.
The Yolo County Library needs your help in shaping the future direction of our public libraries. Please join us in the endeavor.


text:
Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.
Final Results from Aspen/Snowmass on Tuesday, January 31, 2006
Tanner Hall comes off a Major Injury to Foil Simon Dumont's Threepeat Bid in Skiing SuperPipe Men's Final.
It's a myth that in high-speed falls, a speedskier's suit can melt to his skin. In most cases, the suit's fine. It's the skin that melts.
As friends and neighbors prayed for Regine Cavagnoud in her home village in the Alps, German and French ski officials argued over responsibility for her fatal collision with a German coach.
Former ski greats joined thousands of others in a final tribute to Regine Cavagnoud in her Alpine village amid debate over dangerously high speeds in the sport.
Go to skiingmag.com
Go to nastar.com
Go to warrenmiller.com
Copyright © 2015 Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc. an Active Interest Media Company.