text:
Jo McGowan April 9, 2012 - 10:36am
The current debate over health insurance and contraception has raised interesting questions for people of faith, particularly Catholics. I'm past menopause, and so contraception is not an issue for me. Yet I'm interested in it—in the same way I remain interested in pregnancy or childbirth. Avoiding or embracing pregnancy is the stuff of real life—the vivid centerpiece of youth and middle age. As a woman, a mother, and a Catholic, I'm part of it. I remember the drama, the excitement, the fear. Pregnancy, childbirth, and breastfeeding are intense experiences. For the sustained nature of the physical bond, nothing compares. But it begins with sex, and sex is never simple.
And so it is unsettling when men who may never have experienced sex feel qualified not just to speak about it but to pronounce on it with certainty. In an article in the New York Times (February 18), Fr. Roger Landry, a priest in my old diocese of Fall River, Massachusetts, is quoted as saying, "What happens in the use of contraception, rather than embracing us totally as God made the other, with the masculine capacity to become a dad, or the feminine capacity to become a mom, we reject that paternal and maternal leaning."
Well, no, Fr. Landry, we don't. We don't reject it. We make a decision about it. We recognize that pregnancy is a possibility, and we decide whether this is the right time for us to have a baby. We acknowledge that we are more than just potential (or actual) parents. One of the surest signs of youth—in any profession—is an unswerving adherence to literal interpretations. New teachers cling to the curriculum, whether or not the class is getting it. Young doctors focus on the clear x-ray, unable to see the patient in front of them writhing in pain. Parish priests preach the letter of the law, while their parishioners refuse to follow rules created without reference to the reality they know. But the rules aren't just unrealistic. They are often irrelevant, based on incorrect or incomplete information.
Fr. Landry goes on to say, "Contraception…make[s] pleasure the point of the act, and any time pleasure becomes the point rather than the fruit of the act, the other person becomes the means to that end. And we're actually going to hurt the people we love." At one level, this is insightful and nuanced. When he laments how frequently such objectification happens to women in sexual relationships, Fr. Landry sounds almost feminist. And he is right that a relationship that's only about the pursuit of pleasure is demeaning and ultimately hurtful.
He is wrong, though, to assume that using contraception automatically makes "pleasure the point of the act." This is how adolescents think. Teenagers dream of constantly available sex, uninhibited by any possibility of pregnancy. That priests would talk the same way about sex between a husband and wife who have chosen to use contraception reflects inexperience and adolescent projection.
Adults understand that good sex, with or without contraception, goes deeper than pleasure. It is complex and demanding. And pleasure isn't necessarily a part of it. Any human encounter requiring honesty and surrender has the potential for both revelation and pain. The communication, healing, and strengthening that good sex ensures is foundational to a marriage. Pure pleasure the point of the act? What is Fr. Landry talking about?
Distrust of pleasure is one hallmark of the church's teaching about sex. This is odd because, as Catholics, we also believe that "eye has not seen nor ear heard the wonders God has prepared for those who love Him." But that aside, what is the church's antidote to the dread prospect of people having too much fun in bed? Children.
The thing is, children are also a deep source of pleasure, joy, and fun. The bishops, while recognizing this truth, nonetheless focus on babies as natural results of the biological act, as consequences and responsibilities—not as persons who are sought after and gladly welcomed. (Indeed, people who seek too vigorously to have children are also criticized as trying to play God, to control what should be divinely ordained.)
I understand what is behind the bishops' anxiety over designer parenthood—the demand for too much control over what kind of children we have. And I agree that sexual license is a serious threat to happiness, order, and the good of the human community.
But every human activity has the potential to become unbalanced. Having children mindlessly, year after year, as former generations of Catholics did, is just as harmful to the social good as the refusal to connect sex with pregnancy. Visit India, Fr. Landry. Talk with the women here who are treated purely as producers of sons.
To defend contraception within marriage is not to defend sexual license. Married couples who have pledged a lifetime of commitment to each other and their families have the right and the duty to make their own decisions about contraception. The church's role is to help them arrive at the decision that is right for their lives. It is not to dictate one-size-fits-all rules that have no foundation in practical experience.
The church has made a spectacle of itself by promoting an immature version of sexuality that is missing the sinew of lived experience. It used to frighten people into submission. Now it simply makes them smile a little sadly. I'm a prolife Catholic who practiced only Natural Family Planning. But I'm smiling, too. Because I'm sad for my church.
Commenting Guidelines
Wow, that final paragraph is a doozy. I can say up front that I too am an older, prolife Catholic who practiced only Natural Family Planning, and yet I too find what passes today for Church teaching on sex and marriage too often simplistic, "doctrinaire," based on assumptions, so often circular, that theologians of the past would have dismissed as opinion, not at all relevant to "natural law." And yes, little of it helps Catholic couples forge a true and lasting marriage bond amid the financial and health-related struggles we all face over a lifetime of bearing and raising children. Women, whose health issues have only relatively recently in history come to be treated effectively thanks to medical techniques, find it especially hard to fathom why men in the Church seem to think our bodily functions, which so often serve as a source of pain and dis-ease, must be considered the moral yardstick for what God intends, and an absolute yardstick at that.
My wife and I after 50 years of marriage agree with you exactly. One concern is the number of Fr. Landrys pontificating authoritatively from altar, confessional, counseling room, and assorted media with irrelevant, incorrect, or incomplete information, not even aware of the damage they may have done and still be doing.
In a related vein, a proposed amendment to Canon Law is that no man is qualified to become a bishop who has not slept every night for nine months with the same pregnant woman. Then, let him speak to us about marriage, sexuality, and humanity.
Bravo, Jo McGowan for a most ensightful and revealing article on the reality of marriage and procreation and the unreasonable and "adolescent projection" of the Church in proclaiming Humanae Vitae as the absolute moral truth. I enjoyed and was impressed with its honesty, clarity and right-reasoned conclusions.
I am a retired Catholic. In 1978, my wife and I (now married 40 years) had two children and wanted no more for good reasons. I discussed contraception with my parish priest and he told me that a decision of my informed conscious along with good reasons (as Pius XII proclaimed in his Address to the Mid-wives) was sufficient and not immoral. Contraception, while a teaching of the Church, was also controversial.
Moral philosophy has always been my interest, but about 6 years ago I began anew a thorough education in this subject. My cousin, a Challancllor of a Diocese in Florida, referred me to Janet Smith as he could not answer my questions in the detail I expected. After several email exchanges with theologian Janet Smith, I was not convinced about the Church's teaching. She offered a challenge that I wanted to prove or disprove. She asserted "if only Catholics would read Humanae Vitae and learn the Church's teachings, they would know the truth". To end a long story, I begain with the objective of reading the top 100 books on the subject of moral theology and sexual ethics. However, I needed to have mentors, so I engaged two of the most prominent moral theologians representing both sides of the theological divide. I wanted my mind to be open to each argumentation. I am now on my 67th book and an equal number of articles. I have been in frequent communications, at times several times of week, with my moral theological mentors for more than 2 years now.
My objective is to make a small contribution to my Church, to move the conversation forward, perhaps only one small step, but that was my deepest inspiration. I am near that goal, God willing.
While I write using the language of the Church, moral philosophy and theology, anthropology, etc., you write with the depth of human experience and your practical reason. Your argument is the most compelling.
I will not go into details about my own disagreements with the Church's teachings on sexual ethics, but I will offer a few additional thoughts for reflection.
1. When a teaching such as contraceptoin is in tension with human experience and deemed unreasonable and in many cases insensible to the majority of the laity, it is not received. With respect to contraception it has not been received by most of the laity and theologians, many bishops and about 40% of priests. While a teaching that is not convincing does not mean it is not true, it does mean that the teaching does not possess any power to change behavior. What is often ignored and not fully understood is this fact: All Church teachings taught for centuries as the moral truth, and not received, were eventually reformed.
2. The Church's strategy, in the case of contraception, ignores the suffereing, moral dilemma and conflict that their teaching causes most Catholics. Below are two examples.
> A young married woman who has 3 childern and whose life is threatened by another pregnancy is told that her decision to safe-guard her life by choosing to take the pill or be sterilization is immoral. She must practice "risky" NFP-Periodic Continence, or celibacy. In this case, the hierarchy of values is turned upside down. The prudent and most effective means to safe-guard her life is morally irrelevant to a decision to ensure that every marital act has a procreative meaning.
2. A seropositive husband cannot use a condom to protect his spouse from the deadly disease of HIV-AIDS. He must practice celibacy that not only threatens his marriage but is a violation of justice and charity towards his spouse.
3. In the above two cases, celibacy is an answer the Church believes is reasonable and moral for the sufferings of many Catholic couples. However, celibacy is a gift from God given to the very few. Many candidates for the priesthood are not blessed with this gift and drop out. Celibacy must be freely choosen; it cannot be imposed by authority. Imposed or forced celibacy does not work, yet the Church proclaims that this is a reasoned response to Catholics who suffer under consequences of this proposed teaching and the weight of the moral dilemma that it causes. Such answers are nothing more than stoic insensibility, not the absolute moral truth.
The central principle in Humanae Vitae is proclaimed to be "moral absolute" which means that the teaching is true and that contraception is immoral and intrinsically evil regardless of circumstances, intentions, or ends.
Thank God for our informed conscious and practical reason, as ilustrated by Jo McGowans article.
What some columnists don't understand about contraception -- or the Church's teachings thereon.
Talk about "promoting an immature version of sexuality." This article of misunderstanding does that quite well.
A very well done article and a stunning rebuttal of priests after the fashion of Fr Landry.
Fr Landry says " Contraception…make[s] pleasure the point of the act, and any time pleasure becomes the point rather than the fruit of the act, the other person becomes the means to the end'.. I guess he thinks it was God's mistake to make it so damn pleasurable.
Fr L ought to talk to the 20% of couples who are infertile and who have, in trying too hard to conceive that they have almost obliterated the pleasure and bonding that goes with sex..
and God knows what he is doing because He has been in the creation business for a long long time.
The scathing truth is that it was power considerations by the papacy that decided the promulgation of HV, not the merits of the issue itself, i.e. contraception.
Jack Barry is so right about the damage the teaching has brought to so many lives.
Michael Barberi: "The prudent and most effective means to safe-guard her life is morally irrelevant to a decision to ensure that every marital act has a procreative meaning."
When pinned down, defenders of Church teaching cannot say every marital act has to have a "procreative meaning," since that can't be the case when either or both spouses are infertile, either temporarily or long-term. "Theology of the body" moralists say only that every such act has to be left "open" to the possibility of procreation...even though, again, in reality most marital acts, even among the normally fertile, aren't "open" since a woman is naturally infertile most days of her life. What they're really saying is that it's wrong to purposively "close off" the sexual act from procreation...as long as it's a freely chosen act and within marriage: A very complicated argument. No wonder so many on both sides prefer generalities to what the Church really teaches: They're much easier to understand.
'Having children mindlessly, year after year, as former generations of Catholics did, is just as harmful to the social good'
Wow, patently false. New human life can never be harmful to the social good, else abortion becomes licit.
The sliver lining of the bishops' making spectacles of themselves over contraception / religious freedom is that the faithful will finally again start illuminating the irrationality of the stand in the first place. This teaching has not been received. It is circular. It has nothing to do with natural law. It needs to be publicly challenged so it can be reformed.
To quote my daughter, speaking of the bishops, "If they want to lead in the real world, they need to live in it."
Superb rebuttal, Jo. Miserably, there are a growing number of "Father" Landrys out there, patronzing, condescending and pontificating endlessly and arrogantly about issues they have no knowledge of. It was funny to me to hear you say Roger "sounds almost feminist...," since it was a few personal encounters with this man that actually MADE me a feminist, and none more powerfully than when I read one of his homilies in which he says that ordination is a form of transubstantiation. For me, that was IT. And you are completely on target when pointing out the inherent immaturity in the stance these men take and the strikingly adolescent tone they sound when spouting what they take to be undisputed wisdom. Sad smiles are understandable, but there is a deep, unsmiling sadness in the fact that the new generation of "John Paul II priests" are hardly the servant-leaders our fractured church so deperately needs right now. But let's revert to something totally laughable: does anyone ever wonder how these celibate guys KNOW SO MUCH about sexual activity and its many complexities? They have an astonishing store of "facts" about it...how is it that they KNOW all this??? Simply and unutterably ridiculous.
I doubt that there are any married men who can honestly say that they understand what it is to be a woman, but we stand a much better chance than any man who has not been married.
" New human life can never be harmful to the social good." (Bruce @9:40 am)
The implications of that statement are profound, implying that men and women are nothing but unthinking animals -- baby factories. This cannot possibly be what God intended.
Goethe: Nothing is more terrifying than ignorance in action.
Thank you, Jo McGowan.
I think I first heard the argument against artificial contraception as a teenager (I'm now in my sixties). The question immediately raised in my mind was, why then don't we have to tear down all the dams, as rivers are patently designed to flow freely to the sea. Well, we are breaching some dams now for environmental considerations, so maybe my teenage take on the absurdity wasn't nuanced enough. Still, though, I think it was correct. It will be a long time if ever before we can remove all the dams in the real world.
On the naivete of celibate priests pronouncing on marriage and sex: they may make up in breadth of experience (from counseling, confessions, training) what they lack in immediacy. I doubt that as a class they are as naive as some facile diatribes would have it. That certain individual priests are ignorant is no more surprising than that certain politicians are.
I've often wondered if abstinence wasn't a form of birth control (at least subconsciously in the preaching of the church) in the pre-pill and pre-condom days. I don't know how old the condom is, but latex is a fairly recent invention. At any rate, the contraceptive options before the pill were certainly more limited. For simplicity, I don't mention the iud etc.
Carolyn Disco, could you elaborate please? ("it was power considerations by the papacy that decided the promulgation of HV"). Thanks.
JOH: I have to wonder if the breadth of "experience" you mention has ever exposed priests repeatedly to contracepting couples who see their use of contraception as "objectification" and harm of their partner? Is this REALLY their experience? Highly doubtful. Do you really think the "experience" of a Roger Landry includes serious encounters with couples whose married lives have been hurt by contraception? Again, I doubt it. These men merely parrot the party line and use as examples the minority of couples who "follow church teaching" on this issue and are fulfilled in that. Their insistence that all couples who contracept are harming and objectifying each other cannot be beased on any real experience----of serious, adult encounter----with these couples. Sure, anyone can figure out the mechanics of sexual intercourse; but can these men actually say with certainty that they KNOW contraception harms married sexual love in all cases and under all circumstances? How can they possibly know this, especially when the experience of the overwhelming majority of Catholics simply contradicts it? The teaching makes no sense to most normal people. The fact that the experience of thoughtful, faithful married people was excluded ultimately in the promulgation of Humanae Vitae is the root of the issue: these celibate men simply do not know what they are talking about, nor do they listen to those who do.
Janet, I think you overlooked my exclusion of ignorant priests from the class of priests I was discussing.
JOH: I hardly think that the Rogers of the church see themselves as ignorant! Do you think a man humble enough to know his own ignorance on these matters would ever attempt to write such things (in The NY Times, no less!)? The truly "ignorant" person would seek to learn from those who DO know what they are talking about. And methinks they would change their minds quite readily once they had heard the real experience of real people. But if you already know everything, why would you bother even ask anyone else what the truth might be? But don't worry: one of his priest friends assured me, with the same smug "certainty" you see evidenced in the Times article: "Roger WILL be a bishop."
And that's what we have to look forward to...
In response to JOH's: Carolyn Disco, could you elaborate please? ("it was power considerations by the papacy that decided the promulgation of HV"). Thanks.
Many have written at length about the focus on papal power and its possible diminuition as a result of any change in the teaching on artificial contraception. Garry Wills comes to mind immediately. In capsule form, however, here is a relevant letter from a professor of neurology who served on the Birth Control Commission:
Truth and authority
I read your wide coverage of Humanae Vitae (26 July) with interest as I was one of the original six members of the Papal Commission on Birth Control appointed by Pope John XXIII and confirmed by Paul VI. The outstanding feature of the Commission was its dedication to the discovery of the truth. Every argument was carefully analysed and sifted to determine its weight. The other striking feature was the attitude of Pope Paul VI. Because of the international political implications of the Church's teaching on contraception, the Commission was set up by the Secretary of State, not by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) as might have been expected. The Secretary General of the Commission, the Swiss Dominican, Henri de Reidmatten, reported directly to the Pope. When it became clear that fundamental questions were being raised, the response of the Pope was to continue the study with diligence and integrity.
It was only after the Commission had completed its report and been disbanded that the CDF swung into action, persuading the Pope not to change the teaching for <i><b>fear of the damage this would do to papal authority.</i></b> It failed to envisage the greater damage to be caused by maintaining a teaching which is unsustainable. The CDF set up a secret commission entirely of priests to produce a new report. This gives an insight into the curial mindset to think that a group of celibate priests, handpicked for their orthodoxy, would have a better understanding of marriage than a commission of cardinals, bishops, priests and lay people, married couples and single people, drawn from all five continents and embracing a wide range of sacred and secular disciplines.
The fundamental difference between the Commission and the CDF lies in the understanding of the nature of sexual intercourse in marriage. As Charles Curran ("Dangers of certitude", 26 July) succinctly explained, the hierarchical Church identifies the morality of sexual intercourse with its physical aspects. It would hotly deny this, but the fact that a couple are allowed to choose an act that is nonprocreative but may not make an act non-procreative shows that it is the physical aspect that is sacrosanct. The Commission, looking at the evidence, took a wider view of sexual intercourse, seeing it as part of the wider relationship, expressing and fostering love.
The Commission anticipated that a change in teaching would be a great pastoral challenge and prepared a pastoral document of four chapters, one largely the work of the French Jesuit Père de Lestapis, the finest account of married love I have ever read. What a pity that none of this was ever published.
There have been many tragic consequences of Humanae Vitae, but none greater than that referred to in "A mother's story – 1" (26 July). For the Popes, especially John Paul II, to teach, in season and out of season, that contraception is wrong and the overwhelming majority of the faithful to reject this undermines the integrity of the Church and weakens its witness in many areas. I hope that your coverage of this issue will promote more open and honest discussion which is so badly needed.
John Marshall
Emeritus Professor of Neurology
University of London
I should have noted the letter appeared in the Tablet.
implying that men and women are nothing but unthinking animals -- baby factories. jbruns
If humans are made in the image and likeness of God then nothing could be further from the truth.
Carolyn Disco, Thanks for elaborating.
Janet, as I agree with Jo McGowan's entry, I think I may have chosen a poor place to make the point that celibacy does not make one a stonehearted blockhead. I've heard stories of people explaining clearly, forcefully, agonizingly to priests where the condemnation of contraception leaves them. That no priest could learn anything there is contradicted by my own experience with what I'll call Vatican-II era priests. My experience with what I'll call JP2-era priests is extremely limited, but I fear it would be less happy, given the centralizing and authoritarian trends.
For the young who were not around in the 60s and want to know about some background noises about the BC controversy after Vat II, the Crowleys of Chicago and the Christian Family Movement leaders who were on the Papal commission, voted on the majority side of the BC Papal commission The majority side was rejected by Pope Paul VI. Our San Francisco parish pastor was so upset by the Crowleys' vote he chased CFM out of the parish by declaring at a homily that "as far as he was concerned CFM stood for Communist Front Movement" And these were the good ole days!
Beverly Balley:
The definition of contraception is "any voluntary human physical act that is performed before, during, or after marital sexual intercourse, that prevents such acts, foreseen to have procreative consequences, from having those consequences, and is a decision done for that reason."
The problem is that there is little difference between NFP-PC and Contraception, as follows:
Abstaining from marital sexual intercourse, at times foreseen to have procreative consequences, and the plotting of temperature and examination of cervical mucus to determine when sexual intercourse will be infertile are deliberately chosen, physical acts that result in rendering procreation impossible during sexual intercourse.
Contraception and PC are both programs of controlling fertility in order to avoid potentially fertile intercourse, and both are reliant upon activities that take place before marital intercourse. Thus, it is very difficult for the average person to see any difference between them.
Either both NFP-PC and Contraception violate Humanae Vitae or they do not.
There is also the Church argument that NFP-PC treats the person and his/her fertility as subject; while contraception treats the person and his/her fertility as an object to be manipulated. It is hard to imagine how PC , with physical acts such as the plotting of temperature and cervial mucus is not itself a form of manipulation.
Finally, one last reflection. The good reasons that Pius XII said spouses could use for avoiding procreation are the same reasons most couples have who practice PC and contraception. However, when it comes to birth regulation, NFP-PC is the only licit method based on the Church's claim that this is God's procreative plan. However, NFP-PC was only determined to be morally licit in 1951. If this was truly God's procreative plan, why did he wait thousands of years to tell us?
If Bishops paid as much attention to the real problems in the church like the abuse of power and the abuse of children as they do to preaching about sex, they might do a lot more good for the church and the people.
This is the best article on the subject of contraception I've ever read.
Sevral years ago I saw a survey conducted by Reginald Bibby (he teaches at the University of Lethbridge and specialises in surveys on religious topics) among those who consider, for reasons of faith, that procreation is the primary or sole purpose of having sex. He discovered that they had sex with the intention of conception on fewer than 5% of occasions. That is, 19 times out of 20, they had sex with some other intention. We have to be grateful, of course, that, whatever their other intention(s), it wasn't procreation, or the world would be vastly more overpopulated than it is.
Bruce, Exactly the point. And that is why we, as thinking human beings, should apply our intelligence in all our activities, including conception. Why would God expect us to exercise dominion over nature, except in this one instance?
Michael Barberi:
abstaining from and act is not an act.
In general, I can only offer my personal experience as a married man. I have been married almost 17 years, we only used NFP, we had the number of children we wanted, we never had any problem, we are very happy. Tell me again what's the big deal about Humanae Vitae?
Carlo: Easy peezy. God is perfection. We are not God. That we strive to be pleasing in God's eyes makes sense. At any moment to assume "pleasing" is synomous or even close to perfection does not make sense. It quite simply is not possible. To suggest guilt is at times appropriate even useful in moderation is defensible. To suggest we mere mortals parcel out damnation is ludicrous. Again, we are not God. Perhaps you heard the rumors. Mother Teresa had moments of profound doubt but not on the issue of her own intimate involvement with reproduction. She chose to marry far outside what I believe I can reasonably say is for most not an option. Just too challenging. Wise or not, for her questions specific to reproduction were never to be among the amazing challenges she faced so well. Short of all women following that remarkable women in her choice and short of demanding perfection, how exactly do we deal with this issue?
JOH: I understand and certainly I agree: there are many priests who can/do learn from others and are changed by those experiences. Of course. But priests like Roger (and I have had the great misfortune of encountering several of them in amazingly contentious situations) are not the ones of whom we speak. Could they develop the humility necessary to listen and learn from others who do know better than they about different areas of human/Christian life? Of course. But if the general tenor of their formation is that they already know everything and only need spout the ready-made formulae (no matter how defective), why would it ever occur to them that they might have something new to learn? Remember: this is a guy who openly preached that the ordained are transubstantiated. My, my! What COULD such an exalted being learn from those so far beneath him? Folks here might see this as unrelated to the contrqception issue, but I do not. This is the new "vanguard" of priests. It's what JPII wanted. The church is all the worse for it. Pick any topic at all; choose any difficult issue that burdens and vexes God's people and shames the Church's witness; the response will be the same: simply a new version of pray, pay and obey. It is miserable.
There is nothing wrong with NFP. There is also nothing wrong with contraception for good reasons. Many couples, especially those with irregular cycles, find NFP-PC unreliable. According to the most recent research, there is a 25% failure rate with PC based on acual usage. If you have had success with PC, and were happy, good for you. Most couples who practice contraception, for spacing children and to avoid conception after having children, are equally happy.
The act of abstinence is an act, and this act is brought about and preceeded by two voluntary deliberate physical acts: the measurement of temperature and the examination of cervical mucus, all plotted with the intention to limit sexual intercourse to infertile times, rendering procreation impossible during sexual intercourse.
As for me, I have been married to the same woman for 40 years and have two wonderful children. We pracitced contraception and are happy.
In the original NYT article, the reporter writes "Fr. Landry argues that contraception can be the gateway to exploitation." I suspect that there are few people who would disagree that contraception can be a gateway for objectification and gratuitious self-indulgence. That it must lead to it is not the lived experience of many in the church, both before and after Humanae Vitae. By adopting this extreme position that ran counter to what people in the midst of good relationships knew to be true, the church ceased to speak with an effective, credible voice on any issues of sexuality or marital relations . I wonder with sadness where we might be now had Pope Paul accepted the wisdom of those on the Papal Commission and taken the more moderate and more defensible position on responsible parenthood outlined by the Commission. Perhaps the Church would have been better positioned to speak with authority when real exploitation took place, and to do as Ms McGowan suggests is their proper role, to help families find the right decisions regarding family planning.
Who cares? Most Catholics pay no attention to what the Catholic Church says about birth control. And, consequently, they pay little attention to what the Catholic Church has to say about anything related to sex. And because the Church lacks credibilty in this everyday aspect of human life, they lack credibility in so many other important aspects of Catholic moral teaching. I remember when HV came out. I was young and newly married. I thought at the time that HV would drive many Catholics out of the Church and Unfortunately, I was right. I know what the Church's reasoning is behind their decision to ban articifial birth control. But for most people, it is abstract gibberish that bears little or no relationship to how married life is actually lived. Can we get the Bishops to talk seriously and forcefully about economic issues? Almost 50% of Americans are counted as either poor or low income. People are dying without health care. We have wasted trillions of dollars on wasteful and violence producing wars. We have an obscene concentration of wealth in this country. Really, who cares about some arcane arguments about natural law and the other fine philosophical distinctions?
Infertile couples can have sex continuously and it's biologically not "open to life". However, a woman on the pill or a man with a condom CAN be open to life if they accept that a failure of method may result in a pregnancy and they are ready to embrace that pregnancy. Many more contradictions of this sort exist.
Excellent point, Juliana. The Church's witness has been terribly damaged and its voice muted so badly due to the arrogance and fear that motivates so many of its teachings on sexual morality (and its obsession with those issues to the neglect of so many others). Add to that the largely inadequate and hugely tardy response to the abusive clergy-bishop scandal...the voice is hollow and utterly unconvincing.
The primary purpose of sex between married partners is to deepen the love between them. As for procreation, the Church teaches that artificial means of birth control cannot be used to prevent that possibility. The reason everyone should know that the use of artificial birth control is always and in every circumstance wrong is the fact that it's a doctrine of the Church. The Church doesn't "make up" doctrine any more than scientists make up the speed of light. These truths just are. They are part of God's created order. Whether or no we like bishops or popes, whether or not we like the Church, whether or not we understand the "why" of doctrine, whether or not these doctrines fit our lifestyles has nothing to do with the truth of doctrine and our obligation to assent to the truth. The Church has the authority and mandate from Christ to teach, preach, interpret, and defend Divine revelation. Having free will we can ignore God's revelation of the truths necessary for our salvation, but we do so at our peril.
Where is divinely revealed that contraception is inherently evil, and why did Paul VI even consider looking again at the issue if it is, indeed, a "doctrine"? Sorry, Ed, but your argument is a silly loop, circling around itself with nowhere to go.
So sex is either for becoming a dad/ mom or for pleasure? I think that this is where the problem is. I had hoped that by now the leaders of the Church would have been able to move beyond the Augustanian model of sex. The issue is much broader than what this priest seems to say. Sex can be about an expression of a deep, loving connection, even in search of that connection. It can also be about meeting a need and helping another to meet a need. To limit it to always needing to be open to creating life, I believe, is seeing sex thru a very narrow lens; one that does not take into consideration how multi-level it really is. Certainly there are dangers to sex. I don't mean to discount these dangers, but to deal with the dangers by ignoring so much that is good and healthy about sex is very troubling.
Did someone mention Natural Family Planning? To plan not to conceive, couples must abstain from intercourse six to nine days during the wife's fertile period. Couples normally also abstain from intercourse during the wife's menstrual period which means another five to seven days of abstinence. So we have eleven to sixteen days per month of abstinence. These numbers are not often presented in NFP seminars.
I disagree with the implication that couples should not have too much sex. Shared sexual pleasure is central to the married life. It is blessed by God in its very act which is a key sign of their being Sacrament + the Real Presence of Christ.
I do not agree that somehow celibacy belongs in marriage. Sexual intercourse is not the only way couples can express and strengthen their love. But ordinarily, making love is the fullest way couples can nourish their marriage. As such, as another writer put it, "the vast majority of the time, couples should no more avoid intimate sexual intercourse than they should avoid celebrating an intimate Eucharist."
Michael Barberi:
I too find arguing an essential difference between NFP and contraception a fool's task, but those who do see the "act" of contraceptive intercourse purposively closed off from its creative potential while an "act" chosen during a woman's infertile period remains morally "open" to life, no matter how many physically demanding techniques are required to determine that it's, in fact, infertile.
I think such reasoning confirms what Birth Control Commission member John Marshall said in his recent letter, "the hierarchical Church identifies the morality of sexual intercourse with its physical aspects. It would hotly deny this, but the fact that a couple are allowed to choose an act that is nonprocreative but may not make an act non-procreative shows that it is the physical aspect that is sacrosanct."
Moralists who defend HV always say they're not basing their view of natural law on the mere physical or biological functioning of sex and procreation, that this is a matter of human acts, not biology, but in the end, as Marshall says, biology seems to matter most.
All that's necessary for us ot know that a teaching is infallible is for the Church to say so. Period. If you don't understand that, you don't understand the nature of Christ-given Church authority. But the Church doesn't just leave things at the "accept or else" stage. it lays out reasons. Doctrine doesn't have to be explicitly stated in scripture. All doctrine can be derived from scripture and Tradition just as all the theorems in Euclid's 13 books of geometry can be derived from those 5 little axioms and a handful of definitions found in Book 1, Page 1. Paul VI didn't have doubts about the moral evil of artificial contraception. He gathered as much information as he could, pro and con on the issue, so that his pronouncement - Humanae Vitae - would be encompassing. On what basis do you argue against infallibility? You've reached the point of inconvenient truth? if you want to talk about silly reasoning, check out all the silly comments here on Fr. Landry, as if anything about his character has the smallest thing to do with the infallible truth of the doctine that artificial contraception is always and in every circumstance is wrong.
"The Church doesn't 'make up' doctrine any more than scientists make up the speed of light."
Seriously? All church doctrine as well as the church itself was totally made up many years ago and has been adjusted and refined by the magesterium ever since. Jesus did not found the church; his followers did; and I'm not aware that Jesus ever dictated a policy on contraception!
Wonderful article, Jo, ably articulating what so many of us Catholics think about this issue!
I disagree. NFP does not make contraception impossible, just very unlikely.
Anyway, at end of the day NFP can be as "wrong" (your choice of words) as contraceptive pills, if it is used selfishly, in order to achieve absolute certainty that a marital act cannot channel the gift of life to a new human being. The crucial moral issue is not the instrument but the disposition of the heart, whether when we give ourselves away to our spouses we are also giving ourself away to God's will, which in this case includes the possibility of a baby.
As my non-Catholic husband always said: when the Pope helps to pay for feeding, clothing, housing and educating our children, that's when he can tell us how many children to have.
I have spent four full years, 24/7, researching and writing about HV. I will not go into a lot of detail, unless asked, but these are my conclusioins.
1. The central principle of HV that changed sexual ethics for the next 44 years, was the "inseparability prinicple", that you cannot separate the unitive and procreative meanings of the marital act because it is the Divine Plan of God. This principle was taken "word for word" from Karol Wojtyla's 1960 book "Love and Responsibility", and from the conclusions of his Krakow Commission formed and directed by Cardinal Wojtyla shortly after the PBCC gave their reports to Paul VI. No other pope, theologian or bishop before 1960 has ever spoken, written or proclaimed as a teaching or moral principle a inseparability principle.
2. One of the reason Paul VI gave for rejecting the conclusions of the Majority Report of the PBCC was that "there was not a complete agreement among the members". Yet, in contradiction, Paul VI embraced the philosophy and theology on marriage and procreation of one-man, Karol Wojtyla, and a one-country commission in Krakow limited to Polish clergy and theologians. HV also includes Wojtyla's consequences of contraception and his interpretation of Divine Law.
3. JP II claimed that his personalism, and his Theology of the Body, was not based on biology or physicalism. It was based on the order of nature, created by God, manifested in the language of the body, in its fertility-infertility nexus. God's procreative plan was based on speculation about anthropology, in the Genesis story, and symbolism. This symbolism is an exaggeration of analogy: it goes something like this...Christ's love for his Church is inseparable and one; by analogy, spouses are inseparable and one flesh, as well as the unitive and procreative meanings of their marital acts are inseparable. The fallacy of such a philosophy and theology of marraige and procreation is that speculation and symbolism is a weak moral theory and no one knows God's procreative plan.
4. A more nuanced version of argumentation in defense of HV, in particular of the thesis of Martin Rhonheimer, is that NFP-PC is a virtue of chasity-temperance; while the choice of contraception makes superfluous the choice of this virtue. How insane! According to this post-Vertitatis Spendor argument, there can be no virtue in the choice of contraception regardless of circumstances, intentions and ends. I will not waste the space in this blog for the counter-argument.
5. Lastly, as many have pointed out, the reality of marriage and procreation is anything but what the Church asserts, especially the unrealistic and exaggerated consequences of contraception. They want us to believe that contraception has caused the increase in: abortion, spousal abuse, unwed mothers, and promiscurity. We all recognize that our modern culture has grown more liberal and exploitative. However, this does not mean that all who disagree with the teaching about contraception, or who practice it, are infected with the evil of the secular world or who are invincible ignorant....as the Church claims.
Is it possible that the celibate Roman Curia teaches what they have not learned, proclaims as truth what is contradicted by human experience, and who claim they listen, but have not heard? While the Church repeats their narrative in the hope of an epiphany, what goes without remedy are the sufferings, moral dilemma and conflict that their teachings on sexual ethics cause millions of Catholics. In the end, it is not to enough to ignore the teachings, but to do all in our individual and collective power to move the conversation forward in the hope that our Church will solidify a divided Church and resolve a Crisis in Truth
Ed: WOW. Breathtaking. Is that REALLY why PPVI called the Commission? Seriously? Hmmm...you might want to get a little education on this. Did you read the letter from John Marshall on Page 2 of these comments? He was actually on the Commission...maybe he could be of help to you in getting some things straight. Now, eating meat on Fridays and exacting interest were also once taught as intrinsically evil---as mortal sin. Were these also revealed "doctrines"? And if so, what HAPPENED to them? Are they in the "revealed doctrine" trash can? Or did the Church make a mistake? Or what? WOW.
PS to ED: IS the teaching of HV considered "infallible" under the strict qualifications of that term? Really? Since when? It is my understanding that the magisterium has produced only two infallible doctrines in modern times: the Assumption and the Immaculate Conception. Where is it stated that HV is "infallible" teaching? Are you super-duper, infallibly sure of this??? Hmmm...you might be the only person in the church privy to this info. That is special!
PPS to Ed (I am so stunned that I keep forgetting what I need to say): the "inconvenient (alleged) truth" of the teaching of HV is not inconvenient for me in the least, as I am a celibate for God. It has no direct impact on my life at all. But I sure do love my married brothers, sisters and friends, and I respect their experiences and do not cast aspersion on their hearts or motives when they make adult decisions about the most intimate aspect of their lives. Lies are the inconvenience here, and blessed be those who love the truth and listen to their consciences.
Michael B: Excellent post. And while I agree that, ideally, we should all do what we can "to move the conversation forward," the reality is that there IS no conversation...when do the bishops listen and advocate for the people? Where is the conversation happening---and happening between the true partners (in this case, married people and the bishops)? There simply is no conversation---or even the possibilty of a conversation. Instead, we get the pontifications of Roger Landry and his ilk. They talk; they don't listen; and exhausted, disgusted Catholics turn away.
Matthew 23:4
Luke 11:46
Related articles
About the Author
Jo McGowan, a Commonweal columnist, writes from Deradoon, India.


text:
Julia Roberts Goad
Staff Writer
WILLIAMSON - A woman arrested for harboring a fugitive has been arrested by West Virginia State Police.
According to court records, WV State Trooper J.R. Tupper obtained information that Darrell Steele, who had several outstanding warrants including a felony for conspiracy, was inhabiting the residence of Keisha Cook. Tupper, along with officers from the Welch WVSP detachment, went to the Cook residence to serve the warrants on Steele.
Tpr. Tupper found the front door to the residence had been padlocked from the outside. After he forcibly entered the building, Tupper found Steele hiding under a bed.
When troopers tried to retrieve him, Steele allegedly kicked them in the arms and chest areas.
Steele was repeatedly ordered to stop resisting arrest and refused to comply.
After being subdued, Steele was arrested on the original charges, along with two counts each of assault on a trooper, battery on a trooper and obstructing.
Steele allegedly told the trooper Keisha Cook had locked him in the house while she was at work.
Cook was charged with misdemeanor accessory after the act and arraigned by Magistrate Dee Sidebottom.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
|Newegg Daily Deals
|Thread Tools
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 56,685
Belief and certainty in global warming on the rise
A growing majority of the American public thinks that the world's temperature is rising, according to the latest telephone survey conducted by the Associated Press and German market research group GfK.When asked whether the world's temperature has been increasing over the last century, 78 percent of respondents thought that this probably had been the case, up from 75 percent when the same question was posed in 2009. Falling in the midst of the e-mail controversy at theUniversity of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit and following a number of harsh winters, the 2009 figure marked a 15-year low.More dramatic is the swing in certainty. Among those who think global warming has occurred, 57 percent describe themselves as either extremely or very sure, compared to 43 percent in 2009.
Despite these numbers, there is still a core group who refuses to accept the extensive evidence that the world has gotten warmer. The proportion of those who believed warming had probably not been happening was 18 percent, down from 22 percent. And their belief is getting shakier: theircertainty was down to 31 percent from 52 percent in 2009.
Another significant change since 2009 is among the 32 percent of respondents (up from 30 percent) who have little to no trust in scientists on environmental matters. Among this group, 61 percent now believe global temperatures have increased over the last century, up from 47 percent.
Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments
|Thread Tools


text:
FAQsDoes the Henrico Citizen publish a print edition?
Yes, the Henrico Citizen newspaper is published 24 times a year – on the first and third Thursdays of each month.
Where can I pick up a copy of the print edition?
The Henrico Citizen is a free publication and is available at more than 120 locations throughout the county and region. For the full list, click here.
How long has the Citizen been in existence?
The Henrico Citizen was founded in 2001 and published its first issue Sept. 20, 2001.
Who owns the paper?
The Henrico Citizen was founded and is owned and operated by T3 Media, LLC.
Do you publish any other newspapers?
No, the Henrico Citizen is the only newspaper published by T3 Media, LLC.
Does the Henrico Citizen have Twitter or Facebook accounts?
Yes, you may friend us on Facebook here and follow us on Twitter here.
How can I submit news items, news tips, article ideas or letters to the editor to you?
You may e-mail these items to us at
How do I submit my event listing to you?
You may e-mail your events to us at
Can I fax information to you?
Yes; our fax number is (804) 577-1230.
How can I place a classified ad?
Can I subscribe to the Henrico Citizen print edition?
How can I learn more about display advertising in the Henrico Citizen or on HenricoCitizen.com?
What forms of payment do you accept?
We accept payment by cash, check, Visa, Mastercard and American Express.
What is your mailing/physical address?
We are located at 6924 Lakeside Avenue, Suite 307, Henrico VA 23228. You may send mail to us at the same address.
How many weeks before an event should I submit it to you?
Because we publish only twice each month, we recommend submitting your events as early as possible to ensure they appear at least once in print. Ideally, we would like to receive submissions 45-60 days prior to the date of the event.
I submitted an event but it didn't appear in print. Why not?
We receive numerous events each month and are unable to publish each one. We attempt to publish a wide variety of event notices from various organizations, giving preference to those that take place in Henrico and have a wide-reaching appeal to our readers. If your event was not included, we may have received it too late or simply lacked available space to include it this time. We do make every effort to include as many events as possible in our online calendar of events, which you may view here.
What other items may I submit to you?
How can I purchase reprints of photos or pages?
We offer a number of published and unpublished photos for sale, as well as page reprints. You may view them and order items by clicking here.
How can I obtain a copy of a back issue?
Do you accept freelance articles or other unsolicited columns?
How can I sign up to receive your twice-weekly e-mail news updates?
Donate 'cast-offs' for Henrico CASA
Citizen Staff Reports 08/04/2015
Are you doing some summer cleaning? Wondering what to do with all those items you no longer need? Consider donating your valuable items to benefit CASA's kids.
Henrico CASA and Susan's Selections are partnering to present an online auction beginning Sept 12. Proceeds will benefit Henrico CASA. Any item with a $50 or more resale value – from pottery to furniture and everything in between – can be donated.
Bring goods to Susan's Selections, 4909 W Marshall St. in Richmond between Aug. 13-26. Weekday drop-off hours will be 10 a.m. until. 4 p.m.; Saturdays 10 a.m. until 3 p.m, and Sundays 1 p.m. until 3 p.m. > Read more.
10th annual Filipino Festival coming in August
The 10th Annual Filipino Festival will be held Aug. 7-8 at Our Lady of Lourdes Church, 8200 Woodman Rd., beginning with opening ceremonies at 5 p.m. Friday and continuing with live entertainment, food and exhibits until 10 p.m. On Saturday the festival will take place from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. with a full schedule of performances featuring traditional Filipino dance, music and song.
Filipino cuisine, including BBQ, pansit, lumpia, adobo, halo-halo, lechon, empanada and leche flan, will be available for purchase. The festival will also feature a children's area, church tours, exhibits, and health screenings. > Read more.
ZZ Top, The Beach Boys, O.A.R., others to play Innsbrook
Innsbrook After Hours will welcome ZZ Top, The Beach Boys, O.A.R. and other performers this month.
On Aug. 12, Tyler Farr, with special guest Parmalee, will perform at 6 p.m., with gates opening at 5 p.m. Farr began his career with years of formal voice training with the OAKE National Choir but at 21, he moved to Nashville. Tickets are $15 to $99.
On Aug. 13, Innsbrook After Hours will present ZZ Top, with special guest Blackberry Smoke, at 6 p.m. > Read more.
Henrico Police to host Community Day Aug. 1
Henrico County property transactions, June 22-28
3 community meetings planned about September UCI championship cycling races
Three Henrico students participating in 8-day James River Expedition
CASA volunteers sworn in
- More News
Print Edition
Jul. 16, 2015Click here to read the print edition.
ZZ Top, The Beach Boys, O.A.R., others to play Innsbrook
Weekend Top 10
Minion mania
Weekend Top 10
Weekend Top 10
- More Entertainment
Obituary – Bernice Lauterbach
Obituary – Marion P. Breschel
Obituary – Marian S. Blankenship
- More Obituaries
Donate 'cast-offs' for Henrico CASA
10th annual Filipino Festival coming in August
CMoR reopens at new Short Pump site
- More Community
The greatest love of all
My daughters' other dads
All hail to mothers and the hardest job of all
- More Opinions
Athlete of the Week – July 3: Kayla Sell
Athlete of the Week – June 19: Sydney Whitaker
Steward School's Enright drafted by NY Mets
- More Sports
Reader Survey | Advertising | Email updates
ClassifiedsDISH Network. Starting at $19.99/month PLUS 30 Premium Movie Channels FREE for 3 Months! SAVE! & Ask About SAME DAY Installation! CALL - 888-714-7955
Full text
Place an Ad | More Classifieds
CalendarThe Autism Society of Central Virginia will be the beneficiary of Buz and Ned's "Helping Hams for Charity" program every Monday in August from 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. Buz… Full text


text:
How Ceramic Coffee Drippers Stack Up
You've likely seen the highly manual array of brewers migrate to the front bars of the best cafes: a small army of ceramic cones perched on a rack above what's soon to be your own custom cup of coffee. But as the choices multiply—and don't these things look just like the plastic Melitta cone in the back of your cupboard anyway?—which one is the best for your brew? More


text:
Is Another Ultimate Fighter Comeback Season on the Horizon?
Is Another Ultimate Fighter Comeback Season on the Horizon? | MMAWeekly.com
One idea that may come up in the near future would be a do over of the infamous fourth season of the reality show in which the UFC welcomed in a group of past fighters to compete with the grand prize being a title shot at a current champion.
Fighters on the fourth season of The Ultimate Fighter dubbed The Comeback, included Matt Serra, Chris Lytle, Patrick Cote, Travis Lutter, Charles McCarthy, Din Thomas, Jorge Rivera, and Shonie Carter.
What no one could have predicted, however, is that one of the winners actually went on to defeat an incumbent champion.
People keep asking me about the comeback. It was a great season, and the craziest part of that whole season is Matt Serra wins it and actually wins the title. It was crazy, said White recently.
Serra defeated Georges St-Pierre in one of the biggest upsets in UFC history at UFC 69 in 2007 to claim the welterweight title.
The popularity and discussion about that season of the show has continued all the way until now, and the prospect of doing another Comeback season seems like something the UFC and White might be interested in doing.
But the answer is yeah, were looking to do a lot of different stuff now with The Ultimate Fighter Live and that would be a fun one, White stated.


text:
|Thread Tools
Dumbbell Shrug The Key To Building Huge Traps
Well developed traps are an instant sign of strength & power for any bodybuilder or power-lifter. The good news is that you don't need an array of specialised equipment to develop your traps, your dumbbell set is all you need.
The 'traps' are large muscles in the middle of the upper back that are used to support the arms as well as lift and rotate the scapula.
The most visible part of the trapezius muscle is the superior region which extends out from the neck and creates a "hump" on top of the shoulders. The muscle is named so as the pair form a shape similar to a trapezoid.
Why Build Massive Traps?
Although not one of the largest muscles (visibly) on the body, well developed traps go a long way to enhancing the appearance of size & power.
For this reason, many WWE wrestlers put extra work into developing huge trap muscles.
A prize example is Brock Lesnar (pictured above). His huge traps enhance his already massive frame, making him look exceptionally powerful.
Now when it comes to training, traps usually respond very well for most people. There are many different ways to train the traps, you can use a barbell, traps bar, or even cables.
By far my favourite exercise for training traps is the dumbbell shrug which uses nothing more than a pair of dumbbell weights.
Dumbbell Shrugs - The Downside
First, let me point out the one downside of dumbbell shrugs, perhaps a minor issue, but nevertheless it can cause a degree of problems for some.
When using dumbbell weights, you have to lift the dumbbells off the floor to get started. This may not initially be an issue but youll be surprised how quickly youll increase the dumbbell weight used.
Lifting a pair of 60kg (132lbs) dumbbells off the floor is no mean feat.
This can be especially so if youre one of those gym trainees that has shyed away from the squat (I do hope youre not)
However, this one downside is more than made up for by the advantages the dumbbell shrug gives you.
The Advantages Of Using Dumbbells
The biggest advantage of dumbbell shrugs over most other shrug exercises is the arm positioning. Dumbbells allow your arms to hang from your body in their more natural position, by your side.
The barbell shrugs requires you to hold a bar thats positioned in front of the body. This forces the shoulders slightly forward in a rounded position. This is non optimal position for the traps in terms of applicable strength so youre unable to train them to their fullest.
The dumbbell shrug allows your arms to hang by your side in a more natural position, thus allowing you to push your traps to their maximum.
True the trap bar does allow for the same natural arm position but its not a common piece of gym equipment. If you train at home, its quite an expense for a one-exercise piece of equipment.
Performing The Dumbbell Shrug
Here's an excellent video demonstration for you.
My Top Tips For Performing The Dumbbell Shrug
When it comes to building huge traps, the dumbbell set really is the #1 piece of equipment. Follow my tips above, training your traps once a week and youll be surprised just how quickly they grow.
Dumbbells are also relatively cheap and exceptionally versatile - they make a sound investment for any home gym.
Bodybuilding visual to motivate, inform & amuse
|dumbbell, shrugs
|Thread Tools


text:
Topic: Proper Oil Sampling Techniques
Presenter: Bill Quesnel, WearCheck Canada, Inc.
Meeting Location
The Scottish Rite
4 Queen Street South
Hamilton, Ontario L8P 3R3
Phone: (905) 522-1622
5:15-6:15 p.m. Hospitality Hour
6:15-7:15 p.m. Dinner
7:15-8:15 p.m. Speaker
$35.00 for members
$40.00 for non-members
$25.00 for students
Note: It's also Pop-A-Balloon Night! Join us and you could win a prize.
Payment is accepted at the meeting. Registration can be done through Membership Chair, Chris Webb. You can contact him at (905) 536-4402 or via email at email@example.com.
See our Yearly Program below to view all our upcoming events.


text:
Toggle: English / Spanish
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a mental health condition in which a person has long-term patterns of unstable or turbulent emotions. These inner experiences often result in impulsive actions and chaotic relationships with other people.
Personality disorder - borderline
Cause of borderline personality disorder is unknown. Genetic, family, and social factors are thought to play roles.
Risk factors for BPD include:
This personality disorder tends to occur more often in women and among hospitalized psychiatric patients.
Persons with BPD are often uncertain about their identity. As a result, their interests and values can change rapidly. They also tend to view things in terms of extremes, such as either all good or all bad. Their views of other people can change quickly. A person who is looked up to one day may be looked down on the next day. These suddenly shifting feelings often lead to intense and unstable relationships.
Other symptoms of BPD include:
BPD is diagnosed based on a psychological evaluation that assesses the history and severity of the symptoms.
Individual talk therapy may successfully treat BPD. In addition, group therapy can sometimes be helpful.
Medications have less of a role in the treatment of BPD. But in some cases, they can improve mood swings and treat depression or other disorders that may occur with this condition.
Outlook of treatment depends on how severe the condition is and whether the person is willing to accept help. With long-term talk therapy, the person often gradually improves.
See your health care provider if you or someone you know has symptoms of borderline personality disorder. It is especially important to seek help right away if you or someone you know is having thoughts of suicide.
Blais MA, Smallwood P, Groves JE, Rivas-Vazquez RA. Personality and personality disorders. In: Stern TA, Rosenbaum JF, Fava M, Biederman J, Rauch SL, eds. Massachusetts General Hospital Comprehensive Clinical Psychiatry. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2008:chap 39.
A.D.A.M., Inc. is accredited by URAC, also known as the American Accreditation HealthCare Commission (www.urac.org). URAC's accreditation program is an independent audit to verify that A.D.A.M. follows rigorous standards of quality and accountability. A.D.A.M. is among the first to achieve this important distinction for online health information and services. Learn more about A.D.A.M.'s editorial policy, editorial process and privacy policy. A.D.A.M. is also a founding member of Hi-Ethics and subscribes to the principles of the Health on the Net Foundation (www.hon.ch)
The information provided herein should not be used during any medical emergency or for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. A licensed medical professional should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. Call 911 for all medical emergencies. Links to other sites are provided for information only -- they do not constitute endorsements of those other sites. © 1997- 2013 A.D.A.M., Inc. Any duplication or distribution of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited.


text:
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
An impressive run by the Green Wave baseball team ended abruptly last week.
Summerville went 10-0 during its region schedule this season to claim the top playoff seed for Region 8-AAAA and the home field advantage that accompanies it. But the Wave was eliminated from the playoffs with consecutive losses to Conway and Richland Northeast.
"We accomplished a lot this season," Summerville coach Burt Bazzle said. "We had 15 wins in a row and won both the region title and the HIT championship. Unfortunately, we then ran into a very good third-place team in Conway and could not get back on track. We had a great group of young men and it was a pleasure to coach them."
On Friday, Grant Holmes pitched a one-hitter and GK Young smashed two homeruns as Conway handed Summerville a 5-1 loss in the opening round of the Class AAAA playoffs.
"We got some big hits in some big situations and Grant took care of the rest for us," Conway coach Anthony Carroll said.
Young hit a two-run homer to center field to give the Tigers the lead in the third inning. Summerville played small ball in the fourth to push a run across and cut the lead in half.
Then in the top of the fifth Young sent a three-run homer over the centerfield fence for the 5-1 score.
"When we got it to 2-1 I thought we had a chance but the second homer was a big blow," Bazzle said.
The Green Wave created a couple of scoring opportunities afterwards, but didn't capitalize after it loaded the bases in the bottom of the fifth or when it put two runners on in the seventh.
Holmes, who is verbally committed to the University of Florida, got out of the fifth-inning jam with a strikeout and ended the seventh-inning threat by striking out two batters and getting a third to pop up.
Summerville's sole hit was a double by first baseman Billy Peatross in the seventh.
On Saturday, Richland Northeast handed Summerville a 3-2 loss in the second round. Ryne Maness had the win on the hill as Richland Northeast improved to 12-12 on the season. Summerville dropped to 18-8.
TJ Hopkins hit a homerun for Summerville and Michael Powell had a double and single and scored the Wave's other run off a Matty Powell hit.
Summerville will lose five seniors to graduation and four of them are starters. However, the Wave should return its entire pitching staff, minus senior Craig Lilenthal, as well as some of its top hitters.
The team should also be able to pull a few quality players up from the Wave JV team that won this year's JV HIT championship and the Wave B-team that finished its season with an 11-4 record.
Contact Roger Lee @ 873-9424 ext. 213 or email@example.com
The Journal Scene is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. We do not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The Journal Scene.
If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full terms and conditions.
© 2015 The Journal Scene an Evening Post Industries company. All Rights Reserved.
Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Parental Consent Form.


text:
Style #:
For further details regarding our pricavy policies including the use of cookies please click here. For instructions on how to enable cookies please click here. If you need assistance one of our customer service representatives at 1-800-850-7463 would be glad to help.
Price: $109.95
Sale Price: $0.00 Save 100%
Select Your Size
Then, Select Your Width
Additional Views
Become a speed icon while feeling excellently connected to the ground when you run and work in this light and flexible pair of WLD5000 women's running shoe. Featuring synthetic and mesh, take your miles easily with it's removable spikes that provides you superior traction while allowing your each step cruising in comfort. Smart and functional, this shoe will offer you ideal support and ready to respond like feel with every stride.
No Customers Have Reviewed This Product Yet
Share your thoughts with other customers
Enter email address to join our mailing list


text:
What We Do
At VMware, we empower people and organizations by radically simplifying IT through virtualization software. Our talented and diverse teams work together to fulfill this vision and are architecting what's next for the company, the industry, and each other.
Learn more about our People at VMware and see how they are innovating every day.
What We Value
How we deliver on our vision comes through in our everyday actions. Our people are driven to create amazing innovations in a workplace that encourages and supports growth, learning and collaboration. Our core values guide what we do and how we do it. Take a look at EPIC 2 – Our Values. Your Journey.
Do It Together.
We debate, discuss, and then get things done as One VMware. We check our egos at the door and work together without compromising impact, quality or efficiency.
Challenge the Status Quo.
We are fueled by curiosity and the pursuit of the seemingly impossible to continuously make things better for our customers, products and each other.
Build Trust.
We say what we do then do what we say. We build and nurture relationships with one another, our customers, partners, shareholders, and community without taking anything for granted.
Make It Possible.
Our customers are core to our mission. We empower our customers by freeing them from constraints so they can meet their toughest technological challenges. We succeed when they succeed.
Give More.
We are all connected. We approach each other with open minds and humble hearts. We serve by dedicating our time, talent, and energy, creating a thriving community together.
Our workplace provides a great foundation for learning, teamwork, collaboration, openness and fun. While each workplace is different, several commonalities are found throughout our locations:
- Eco-friendliness
- Open doors
- Shared offices
- Comfortable communal spaces
- Game, relaxation and mother's rooms
- Wellness & community programs
- Free healthy snacks and drinks
- Onsite cafes and services
- Weekly social gatherings
- Quarterly all-hands meetings
What You Get
- Make an immediate impact on your career, VMware, our customers, our partners, the industry and the wider community.
- Voice your innovative ideas and work hand-in-hand with industry experts and an approachable leadership team to drive what's next in the market.
- Collaborate and grow in a company that is driven to empower people and organizations by radically simplifying IT through virtualization software.
- Competitive compensation (salary, equity and bonuses) and comprehensive benefits (health, financial, education)
- Paid time to give back through community service learning projects
- Learning and Development support through ongoing talent development and tuition reimbursement
- Wellness benefits and employee events through employee assistance programs, vacation time, flexible workdays, recognition program, green initiatives, employee-led celebrations, discount services and many greater workplace perks to enhance your total experience!


text:
Saturday, August 30, 2014
A 30-year-old Moncks Corner man is dead after a 2 a.m. car accident on Highway 45.
According to Berkeley County Deputy Coroner Darnell Hartwell, Andra Robinson of Moncks Corner was driving on Highway 45 when he ran off the right side of the roadway and hit a tree. He was pinned in the vehicle and was extricated by the Fire Department and Rescue Squad.
Mr. Robinson was then transported to a local emergency room and pronounced dead, Hartwell reported.
Hartwell has ruled the death as accidental and the cause of death is from injuries received from the accident.
The Berkeley County Coroners Office and the South Carolina Highway Patrol are investigating the accident.
The Berkeley Independent is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. We do not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The Berkeley Independent.
If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full terms and conditions.
© 2015 The Berkeley Independent an Evening Post Industries company. All Rights Reserved.
Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Parental Consent Form.


text:
Bush on a mission to take 'disorder' out of PTSD
Next video starts in : 7 Play
Bush on a mission to take 'disorder' out of PTSD
'Guardian Angel' Pilot Continually Flies Ailing Boy to Hospital, Forges Deep Bond
5:52Now watching Up next
Bush on a mission to take 'disorder' out of PTSD
Team Rubicon CEO Jake Wood on commitment of former president to troops
2:04Now watching Up next
'Guardian Angel' Pilot Continually Flies Ailing Boy to Hospital, Forges Deep Bond
The organization Angel Flight East paired pilot Craig Groff with Brayton Martin, a young boy suffering from a rare blood disease.
1:21Now watching Up next
Seattle CEO That Slashed His Own Pay Struggling to Make Ends Meet
Tom Llamas reports the stories people have been buzzing about all week.
1:52Now watching Up next
Bicyclists Are Increasingly Purchasing Helmet Cams for Protection
Helmet mounted cameras are capturing hit-and-runs and acts of assault against bikers.
1:14Now watching Up next
Surf Champion Mick Fanning Encounters Another Shark
Just weeks after a shark attacked the Aussie surfer, Fanning fled to shore after meeting another set of jaws.
1:24Now watching Up next
Growing Outbreak of Legionnaires Disease in New York Claims 4 Lives
City health officials warn people living in the South Bronx, the source of the latest outbreak, may be at risk.
1:53Now watching Up next
Zimbabwe Conservation Task Force Apologizes for Claiming Lion Jericho Has Been Killed
A newly released picture reveals the lion is alive and well, and the report had been a case of "mistaken identity."
1:55Now watching Up next
Officials Conclude Latest Debris Found in Indian Ocean is Not Part of MH370
The metal piece of debris found washed up on a beach is revealed to be a part of a ladder.
2:16Now watching Up next
Joe Biden Considering Potential Presidential Bid
If the vice president does decided to run, this will be his third attempt at the White House.
1:11Now watching Up next
FBI Investigates Explosions in Two New Mexico Churches
Small bombs in a trashcan and a mailbox disrupted worship in two churches, raising questions about church safety.


text:
Get Your Spurs Tickets
The San Antonio Spurs avenged their 2013 NBA Finals loss in 2014, defeating the Miami Heat in five games to win the franchise's fifth NBA title! Now Gregg Popvich and the Spurs will try to do something the Spurs have never done before -- win back-to-back NBA titles. Don't miss your chance to be there at the AT&T Center this season to watch the defending champs, check out the Spurs' 2014-15 schedule and get your Spurs tickets!
Spurs Fast Break Facts
Founded in 1967, the Spurs have a unique place in basketball history. The Spurs were originally members of the American Basketball Association, but joined the NBA in 1976, following the ABA-NBA merger. Though the Spurs never won an ABA championship, they are the only team from the ABA that has won an NBA title.
Since joining the NBA, the Spurs have missed the playoffs just three times in franchise history. Amazingly, the Spurs have won the NBA championship more times (five) than they have missed the playoffs entirely.
Naturally, the Spurs have developed rivalries over time. The Dallas Mavericks and Houston Rockets are Lone Star State rivals with the Spurs. All three Texas-based teams play in the Southwest division -- so there are plenty of chances for fans to get out to the arena and watch the rivalries intensify.
San Antonio also developed a rivalry with the Los Angeles Lakers in the early 2000s. The Spurs and Lakers' rivalry was fueled by both teams' dominance, as the Spurs won titles in 1999, 2003, 2005 and 2007, while the Lakers won the NBA championship in 2000, 2001, 2002 and again in 2009.
Make sure you head to the AT&T Center to root on the Spurs this season -- buy your Spurs tickets at Ticket Liquidator today!
|Eastern Conference
|Western Conference
|Atlanta Hawks Tickets
Boston Celtics Basketball Tickets
Bobcats Tickets
Chicago Bulls Game Tickets
Cleveland Cavaliers Schedule
Detroit Pistons Tickets
Indiana Pacers Basketball Tickets
Heat Tickets
Milwaukee Bucks Game Tickets
New Jersey Nets Schedule
New York Knicks Tickets
Orlando Magic Basketball Tickets
76ers Tickets
Toronto Raptors Game Tickets
Washington Wizards Schedule
|Dallas Mavericks Tickets
Denver Nuggets Basketball Tickets
Warriors Tickets
Houston Rockets Game Tickets
Los Angeles Clippers Schedule
Los Angeles Lakers Tickets
Memphis Grizzlies Basketball Tickets
Timberwolves Tickets
NO Hornets Tickets
Phoenix Suns Schedule
Portland Trail Blazers Tickets
Sacramento Kings Basketball Tickets
Spurs Tickets
Seattle Supersonics Game Tickets
Utah Jazz Schedule
|Your tickets will arrive before the event.
|Your tickets will be the ones you ordered, or better seats than you paid for.
|Our confidence in the sellers that list tickets on our exchange allows us to offer you this guarantee.


text:
Quick Links
Shop All Jewelry
BRB10026 In Stock
Sparkling little white cubic zirconia stones are set in sterling silver to create the magical romantic look of this twinkling cz sterling silver bangle bracelet. The light dances through the white CZ and the luster of the silver to create a mystical effect that draws the eyes. The bracelet measures 0.25 inches wide and approximately fits wrists around 7 inches. The sterling silver is rhodium finished giving this twinkling bangle bracelet the look of diamonds set in white platinum as well as ensures that the bracelet will not tarnish. This sterling silver bangle bracelet is a fine treasure for your collection.
Eve's Addiction.com wants you to be a happy customer. We want you to be completely satisfied with the sterling silver jewelry that you receive from us, as we only sell high quality silver and cubic zirconia cz jewelry. We do understand that you may not like your purchase for some reason.
You may return or exchange your jewelry within 60 days of purchase if you are not satisfied with it. The jewelry must be returned in its original condition for a refund or exchange. Engraved, personalized, photo, monogram, name and initial, chocolate and clearance items are not returnable or exchangeable.


text:
Ahn Young-joon, Associated Press
WASHINGTON — The U.S. called Thursday for North Korea to grant amnesty and immediately release a Korean-American sentenced to 15 years' hard labor for "hostile acts" against the state.
Kenneth Bae, 44, a Washington state man described by friends as a devout Christian and a tour operator, is at least the sixth American detained in North Korea since 2009. The others eventually were deported or released without serving out their terms, some after trips to Pyongyang by prominent Americans, including former presidents Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter.
Analysts say Bae's sentencing could be an effort by Pyongyang to win diplomatic concessions in the ongoing standoff over its nuclear program. But there was no immediate sign a high-profile envoy was about to make a clemency mission to the isolated nation which has taken an increasingly confrontational stance under its young leader Kim Jong Un.
State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell said the U.S. was still seeking to learn the facts of Bae's case. He said the Swedish Embassy in Pyongyang, which handles consular matters there for the U.S., did not attend Tuesday's Supreme Court trial and that there hasn't been transparency in the legal proceedings.
"There's no greater priority for us than the welfare and safety of U.S. citizens abroad, and we urge the DPRK authorities to grant Mr. Bae amnesty and immediate release," Ventrell told a news conference, referencing the socialist country's formal title, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
North Korea has faced increasing international criticism over its weapons development. Six-nation disarmament talks involving the Koreas, the United States, Japan, China and Russia fell apart in 2009. Several rounds of U.N. sanctions have not encouraged the North to give up its small cache of nuclear devices, which Pyongyang says it must not only keep but expand to protect itself from a hostile Washington. Tensions have escalated since it conducted its third nuclear test since 2006 in February.
Pyongyang's tone has softened somewhat recently, following weeks of violent rhetoric, including threats of nuclear war and missile strikes. There have been tentative signs of interest in diplomacy, and a major source of North Korean outrage — annual U.S.-South Korean military drills — ended Tuesday.
Patrick Cronin, a senior analyst with the Washington-based Center for a New American Security, called Bae's conviction "a hasty gambit to force a direct dialogue with the United States."
"While Washington will do everything possible to spare an innocent American from years of hard labor, U.S. officials are aware that in all likelihood the North Korean regime wants a meeting to demonstrate that the United States in effect confers legitimacy on the North's nuclear-weapon-state status," Cronin said in an email.
White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters traveling aboard Air Force One en route to Mexico that if North Korea is interested in discussion, they should live up to their obligations under the six-party talks.
"Thus far, as you know, they have flouted their obligations, engaged in provocative actions and rhetoric that brings them no closer to a situation where they can improve the lot of the North Korean people or re-enter the community of nations," Carney said.
The state-run Korean Central News Agency announcement of Bae's sentencing came just days after it reported Saturday that authorities would soon indict and try him. It referred to Bae as Pae Jun Ho, the North Korean spelling for his Korean name. The State Department had appealed Monday for his release on humanitarian grounds.
Bae, from Lynnwood, Wash., was arrested in early November in Rason, a special economic zone in North Korea's far northeastern region bordering China and Russia, state media said. The exact nature of Bae's alleged crimes has not been revealed.
- Job insecurity is the new normal. Here's how...
- 31 things you might not know about the Harry...
- Herbert pleads with Obama to stop any new...
- How government policy created ghettos,...
- Cake: The new favorite mode for American...
- 19 little-known facts about the Mission:...
- Illinois the top party school in the US; BYU...
- Comic Amy Schumer, Sen. Schumer call for...
- Cake: The new favorite mode for... 45
- Herbert pleads with Obama to stop any... 34
- Job insecurity is the new normal.... 33
- Abortion supporters get help from... 28
- Obama rule for power plants to compel... 23
- Trump's call for mass deportations runs... 21
- Some Americans refuse to give up on... 21
- Joe Biden for president? Allies mulling... 16


text:
Jets.com-an online charter broker that allows customers to bid on flights-has bestowed its latest Circle of Excellence awards on eight charter operators, based solely on surveys its customers complete after each flight. Survey criteria included condition and cleanliness of the aircraft, amenities, crew performance, luggage handling and flight readiness.
August 1, 2007
June 1, 2007
It took four years after the 9/11 attacks for the Department of Homeland Security to reopen Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport to general aviation traffic. These days, though, flying a business jet into the heart of the nation's capital is easier than you might think.
June 1, 2007
The $47.95 million Gulfstream G550 mates the latest bells and whistles to an airframe-engine combination that can deliver eight passengers and a crew of four to destinations up to 6,750 nautical miles away. That's Tokyo to Palm Beach nonstop in 12.5 hours, with reserves.
June 1, 2007
Bombardier's Learjet 45 is a study in contrasts. It is a breakthrough aircraft that had a troubled and lengthy gestation period, and its operators have a strong love-hate relationship with the airplane and its product support.
June 1, 2007
The so-called "smart" window isn't really smart, but it may well offer a smart alternative to cabin windows with manually or electrically operated shades. With the touch of a button, the "smart" window goes from clear to opaque and back-or anywhere in between.
June 1, 2007
The Dish: Roasted garlic toast points with a Caribbean shrimp seviche and candied lime. The Caterer: Fivestar Gourmet, Detroit, (248) 666-3630, http://www.pentastaraviation.com/private-jet-catering.html
June 1, 2007
Fractional owners opt out of their contracts early for many reasons. You may have sold an out-of-town business and so charter or a jet card may better serve your reduced needs. Maybe you're flying more than you expected and it makes sense for you to purchase a whole aircraft.
June 1, 2007
When I founded The Air Charter Guide in 1985, almost all charter companies expressed prices in dollars and cents per statute mile to the destination, with the operator's cost to return included. Operators found it easy to present prices that way. And passengers could look at any map, see the distance to their destination and calculate the cost.
June 1, 2007
A key advantage of owning an airplane is that it becomes an extension of your home. You can fill the cabin with all sorts of creature comforts, such as your daughter's favorite teddy bear or your son's video games. The cabin might also be host to one or more actual creatures, such as the prize Papillon dog your wife carries around in her large pink purse.
June 1, 2007
The oxygen mask drops from the ceiling. You know what to do because your pilots or flight attendant briefed you before takeoff. Give the lanyard a tug, place the mask over your mouth and breathe.
Related Channels
" While it may be tempting to use broad generalizations about the way business aircraft are most often used in America today, let's not neglect the importance of business aviation as a crucial competitive asset to companies, an economic driver and lifeline to communities large and small. "
-Ed Bolen, President of the National Business Aviation Association
Most Popular
July 1, 2015
July 5, 2015
July 21, 2015
June 29, 2015
July 13, 2015
July 19, 2015
June 30, 2015
July 13, 2015
July 1, 2015
July 7, 2015
February 1, 2012
January 12, 2012
December 1, 2011
May 30, 2013
December 5, 2012
November 26, 2012
April 30, 2012


text:
1-year limited warranty
List Price $20.00 Save $4.05 (20%)
Want it delivered 08-06-2015?
Order it in the next 2 hr and 8 min and choose Next Day Air Morning at checkout. Details
Average Customer Review4.0 (9 reviews)
Create an online reviewand share your thoughts with other customers
Things I liked:Works as advertised.
Things I would have changed:Paint chips off but you can tell by the sound if you hit the targets.
Things I liked:This target's title is simply wrong: it cannot be used with airguns, not rifles anyway. I tried with a .177 caliber at 900 fps, and a .22 caliber at 630 fps. Both were too powerful for the target. As a result, the swinging target would bounce off the bar on which it is supposed to rest, and return to a hanging position. On the rare occaision that the swinger stuck on the bar, hitting the second swinger was certain to bring both down.
Things I would have changed:But not all is lost. By removing the reset mechanism altogether (the bar and the reset target to which it is attached), I turned the targets into spinners. Hitting either target makes it spin around multiple times. So you still have a reactive target--well, a pair of reactive targets. Maybe this light-weight target would work properly with a very weak airgun or with an airsoft rifle, but it's not up to the job it claims to do.
What others should know:For just a couple of bucks more, I highly recommend the Birchwood-Casey GRT17 Airgun Gallery Resetting Target.
Things I liked:Fun, inexpensive.
Things I would have changed:Better set-up and use instructions to include trouble shooting tips.
Show Other ReviewsCreate an online review and share your thoughts with other customers
CheckoutSubtotal (USD):
does not include shipping and tax