text:
Dear Beautiful Soul,
Welcome to my website! We are BRAND NEW and in our Pre-launch mode. I wanted to invite you to receive a free audio gift . We will be adding more information to our Events page, Workshop page, Lectures page and our Soul Store very soon. So be sure to check back with us often. It is our goal to help people see the best of themselves and live ignited with self-love, unconditional love, inner peace and gratitude.
We are so thrilled you are here " make yourself at home" you are part of our family now. Let us know how we can serve you. If you feel inclined to share our Brand New Website on Facebook and Twitter or email a link to your friends and family and let them know about our free audio gift " Live Ignited with Self-Love and Inner Peace " & complementary subscription to our newsletter" go right ahead we encourage you to share away. We love it when you share, comment and give us feedback.
If you will please join us in prayer as we dedicate this new website to global service. We would greatly appreciate it:
Dear God,
Bless this brand NEW website.
allow us to be a beacon of light & love and hope in dark places.
As we endeavour to be of service to many please use us
to share love, hope , encouragement and inspiration with a open-heart to everyone that visits
our website.
We dedicate this space to you God.
Help us to be a friend to friendless and may all those hurting and seeking a better way find us.
Thank you for this opportunity to serve our global community in a greater way.
Bless our efforts,offerings, products and services and may they raise the awareness and consciousness of Infinite love and help people see the best of themselves.
Bless all our events, workshops, intensives and all those that participate with divine love, transformation & illumination.
Remove all blocks and fear as we live as a true expression of our authentic self.
With Gratitude & thanksgiving in our hearts always,
And so it is….
Marie Cornelio & Staff
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


text:
Solve problems - It's Free
Create your account in seconds
Email address
Between 5 and 30 characters. No spaces please
Notify me of new activity in this group:
Keep me informed of the latest:
This thread has been closed due to inactivity.
Start a new thread here
Start a new thread here
If you're looking for UNIX - General Discussions help, sign up and take advantage of 32,933 UNIX professionals who are here to help you.
- Changing the output of the /etc/group command
- How to find the missing files by using 'find' command
- System shutdown by user?
- Script required to list the users who don't have thier own home directories in unix environment
- Executing the commands based on the usage
- How to search for all files ending with 'tp' in a particular directory
- Get Start time of a Process
- undelete files in linux
- 3 Ways to Integrate Active Directory with SaaS
- Increasing Operational Efficiency: Enabling End-To-End Change
- The State of IT Automation
- Gartner Webinar: Evolution of WA

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Well since getting my laptop with an E450 which plays things like COD MW and L4D2 reasonably well, the A8-3850 should suffice for most current games at 720p which will be fine on my 37" TV, really not coming close to using the horsepower of my 2500k at 4.6ghz whatsoever, don't even encode these days as I have my PC hooked up to my xbox for streaming and a direct connection to the TV via hdmi for anything the xbox won't play
Can any of you help me? I got my old copy of red alert out and tried to play it, and all that happens is a little message comes up telling me windows can only run x86 or x64 software is there a way to fix this?
Yes, I set it to windows 95 (the system requirement) and it didn't change a thing I don't see why it shouldn't run as far as I'm aware I meet all the requirements 75Mhz proccesor 8MB of Ram 1MB Video Card Direct X 3
So who in the right mind would buy a 500Gb hard drive for £257.99 and not a penny less... Ebuyer Error
Logitech MX Performance mouse, 1 year, how much would you pay for one of those? I am thinking that I should be paying £20-40 for it, but not too sure exactly how much. Points of reference: £70 if I buy new form Logitech, and G700 is £57 from Amazon.
the MX currently £42.99 from argos though if the G700 can be had for £57 then id just go with that instead
He told me "you can just use it, and when I need it I shall collect it back" after my "improved" offer. #winning
Well, if I am cooking might as well cook for my flatmates to get points. I get to flame them when they annoy me
Don't cook period, even for girls.... it's not that i can't but they get so much moar good stuff with me they can do the cooking
yeah.... since the laptop only supports Sata II, I was looking at getting a OCZ Agility 3 or Petrol. 120Gb Agility 3 costs less then £100. bit pointless getting a M4 for this as i cant use it at its full potential


text:
Quick Consultant: The Importance of Being Your Own Advocate
Nobody cares more about your business than you. Or at least, that's the way it should be. Your company's success is your responsibility, so John Stewart cautions that business owners should use caution when placing vital elements of running that...
This past August reminds me of the opening line from "A Tale of Two Cities," by Charles Dickens – "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity…"
As for the "best of times," I was able to help an owner salvage a business with $3.2 million in sales and $3.9 in expenses. The owner had already loaned his company $90,000 and by the time he contacted me he had just sunk another $75,000 into the business—the latter coming from the education funds for his two daughters. In this case, my advice was free, and I was able to point out some immediate problems that could resolve the crisis and hopefully turn the business around. More on this later.
What about "the worst of times?" Well, I spent the entire month of August with a high level of anxiety, anger, and frustration. Somehow, somewhere I contracted a serious staph infection called MRSA. MRSA is resistant to most antibiotics, and those that can be used to treat the disease have many strong side affects. Left untreated or misdiagnosed you can die from an MRSA infection. As the month of August progressed, and as I sought out help from general practitioners and orthopedic surgeons, it became clear that I had reached, as Dickens said, "the epoch of incredulity."
A Comedy of Errors
During the month of August I discovered that my family physician is only good for writing prescriptions, and wouldn't know how to incise a small infection if he tried. I encountered an orthopedic surgeon who declined to treat the infection and suggested instead that I visit the emergency room at the local hospital. He then had the nerve to invoice the insurance company for $375 for this worthless piece of advice.
When I told my doctor I wanted a second opinion he recommended another surgeon upstairs. When I called that office to make sure my appointment had been made the nurse told me they don't treat MRSA patients and that I should visit an infectious disease specialist instead. By the time I saw the latter, it had become a comedy of errors and the infection had gotten worse! The infectious disease specialist basically told me that the drugs I had been prescribed at the dosages given had been totally inadequate for treating MRSA. Instead of getting better it was getting worse. Consequently, I now needed five days of infusion with an antibiotic 100 times stronger than what I was taking orally.
As I sit here today typing this column, my anxiety and frustration levels are still at an all time high. I completed the infusion a few days ago, but I am now back to double doses of another antibiotic. At high dosage levels, antibiotics can cause numerous side effects, including high levels of anxiety.
By the way, don't ever let anyone ever tell you that you can't detect if you have high blood pressure. Hogwash! I can. And despite taking blood pressure medication, I can tell you my blood pressure is probably 160/90 as I write this column—all of this as a result of the drugs and frustration of trying to fight a serious infection and find competent doctors.
Anyway, the primary lesson I learned from this episode also applies to the "best of times" portion of this column that follows. While undergoing treatment for MRSA, I was told time and again by both other patients and nurses that patients need to become their own healthcare advocates. You need to be very knowledgeable regarding all medication and treatments that are prescribed, and don't hesitate to ask questions.
Ironically, that's the same advice I ended up giving to my $3.2 million printer who called me for help. I told him he needed to be a much better advocate for his own company or he would surely fail. He was relying far too much on second hand information from his managers, and was allowing others to dictate how his financial statements should look.
It Was the Best of Times
- « Previous Page
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next Page »


text:
Great location at the base of Cannon Mountain in Franconia Notch - same exit as Echo Lake. Reminds me a little of the Overlook Hotel in The Shining. There are lots of interesting, old pictures from its hey day. The hotel rambles you can see where each addition was made to the property. Place could really use a full restaurant.... More
- Also Known As:
- Mittersill Alpine Hotel
- Mittersill Alpine Hotel Franconia
- Mittersill Alpine Resort Franconia, NH - White Mountains
- Official Description (provided by the hotel):
- Mittersill Alpine Resort - is a four-seasons lodging, vacation rental & ownership resort in scenic Franconia Notch, New Hampshire, offering affordable vacations with quality accommodations. Your vacation home away from home. Nestled in a quiet, private, exclusive Alpine village; relaxing & quiet, a perfect location for a quality, self-directed vacation. Experience the beauty of Northern New Hampshire in the heart of the White Mountain National Forest. Something for everyone - enjoy the nature of all seasons, bike trails, hiking, skiing, golf and many other area attractions nearby. Mittersill Alpine Resort has been devoted to vacation ownership since 1979. ... more less


text:
Cooking with Linux - Exciting Arcade Action in Glorious ASCII
Three frames per minute? Yes, François, I would call that pretty bad performance. While I admire your desire to reuse old hardware to build your Linux desktop, I have to say that your new system might be a little underpowered for running FlightGear. Of course, mon ami, it is a great game, but you need a more powerful system and an accelerated 3-D graphics card. Now, don't look so sad, François. Our guests will be here shortly, and tonight's menu features some great games that you can run on the most basic of systems. Non, you must wait until our guests arrive.
Mon Dieu! They are approaching as we speak. Prepare yourself, François. Welcome, everyone, to Chez Marcel, home of fine wines and excellent Linux and open-source software. Our wine cellar, as you know, is one of the world's finest, and yet, even our selection pales in comparison to the number of great open-source projects. Luckily, there is a wine for all packages. Please sit, mes amis, while François makes his way to the wine cellar. Please, François, bring back the 2002 Chassagne-Montrachet "Champ Gains". While we wait for the wine, let's talk about great gaming action with minimal resources.
Playing fast-paced arcade games doesn't necessarily require high-end hardware. In fact, you can find games that don't require a graphics card at all. I know what you are thinking. Chef Marcel has been sampling a little more wine than usual today. Although that may be true (a little joke, non?), it hasn't clouded my judgment. The items on tonight's menu are all text- or ncurses-based games, and all you need to play them is your Linux system and an open terminal window. Now, you aren't likely to find most of these packages in your favorite distribution's repository, but never fear. Given the simplicity of these packages, you'll find they pretty much compile without fuss and without the need for a lot of extra libraries—just use the extract-and-build five-step.
Way back when your humble Chef spent his hard-earned quarters at the video arcade, he particularly enjoyed defending Earth from invading aliens. The year was 1978, and the game was Space Invaders. Even today, Space Invaders is still a hugely popular game. I actually ran across two versions of the old Space Invaders game—one somewhat more text-heavy than the other. The first is Thomas Munro's ASCII Invaders (Figure 1). This one is definitely the textiest (is there such a word?), and it's very true to the spirit of the original game. Visit his site at www.ip9.org/munro/invaders/index.html.
My guess is that I don't have to tell you how to play this game. There's a gun platform at the bottom of the screen that you move left and right with cursor keys. Press the spacebar to fire and try to get all the aliens before they come down and blow you away. Occasionally, flying saucers will sail overhead. These are worth more, so make sure you get those when you can. It's easy to play, but hard to win. Keep moving and stay alive long enough to fight the next wave.
Before we move on to the next text-based game, let's look at yet another Space Invaders clone, mostly because it's handled a little differently to provide alternative graphics. This one is called nInvaders (Figure 2), and it comes to us from Thomas Dettbarn and friends over at ninvaders.sourceforge.net.
Do you remember a game called Boulder Dash and its hero, Rockford? The premise of the game involved a prospector searching for diamonds and other gems underground (another, similar game available for your Linux system is Rocks & Diamonds). To get to the gems, our hero needed to dig his way through the ground, avoiding falling rocks and cave-ins, both of which spelled certain doom. Tom Rune Flo's very cool Cavez of Phear (Figure 3) is available from www.x86.no/cavezofphear.
To start the game, run the program, phear. An ASCII underground cave system will be created for you, complete with diamonds located in hard-to-reach places with boulders ready to cave in on your Z-head if you aren't careful. The game screen tracks your score, lives and, most important, the number of diamonds you need to collect in order to advance to the next screen (Figure 4).
Cursor keys let you navigate through the caves. If you get totally trapped in a cave, which can happen with a cave-in, pressing the K key provides you with an easy way to commit suicide (your ASCII self, not you). Collect bombs (which appear as % symbols), pressing B to place them and T to detonate them. Bombs, as I'm sure you know, can help you get out of otherwise impossible situations. Oh yes, there also are the monsters (shown as letter Ms). Whatever you do, don't let the monsters touch you, because they will kill you. Did I mention that Cavez of Phear even has sound? Simply press S to toggle sound on and off.
The final item on tonight's menu is a bit of an overkill when it comes to ASCII games. Featuring client/server network play, complex, fast-paced 16-color animation, multiple weapons, exploding characters and gushing blood, the aptly named Overkill takes ASCII games to their sane limit. Written by Karel Kulhavy, Petr Kulhavy and others, Overkill promises that "you'll learn what a horror man can see in ASCII". You'll find Overkill at artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~brain/0verkill. Of the games mentioned here, Overkill is the one game you might find in your distribution's repositories. If you are using Ubuntu Linux, for instance, you can install it with apt or Synaptic. The site also provides binaries, if you don't want to compile the program.
Because this is a client/server game, you need to start by running the server program. In the packaged version, the program is actually called overkill-server. Now, open up another terminal window and run the client, a program called 0verkill (overkill in the package). The startup screen scrolls some interesting statements at the bottom and gives you a hint of what you can expect (Figure 5).
All you need now to start the game is to connect to a running server, press S, then enter the hostname or IP address. Overkill comes with both male and female characters. Those characters, in turn, can be customized by giving them a unique color scheme. To change the color, press the up or down arrow while at the connect screen. To change from male to female, cycle through the 16 colors. Once you have selected a character, press the N key to give it a name.
Everything is controlled via keystrokes. Press the left and right arrow keys to move left and right. Press the up key to jump or climb. As you work your way through the various levels, you'll collect weapons and ammunition; to use a different weapon, press the 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 keys. If and when you get killed, an event that occurs in truly gruesome, blood-curdling ASCII, you can respawn your character by pressing the spacebar. If you get stuck, press H for a handy help menu. You can still have fun playing on your own, but to get your heart really pumping, invite a friend (or two or three) to connect for great multiplayer action (Figure 6). The game even remembers what has come before, as you'll notice when the corpses start to pile up (shudder). It's great, heart-thumping and fast network fun.
Speaking of fast, is it possible that time has gone by so quickly? Mon Dieu! It is nearly closing time. Perhaps we can convince François to refill your glasses a final time, which will give you just enough time for another ASCII deathmatch, with or without aliens, before you go. Raise your glasses, mes amis, and let us all drink to one another's health. A votre santé! Bon appétit!
Linux has become a key foundation for supporting today's rapidly growing IT environments. Linux is being used to deploy business applications and databases, trading on its reputation as a low-cost operating environment. For many IT organizations, Linux is a mainstay for deploying Web servers and has evolved from handling basic file, print, and utility workloads to running mission-critical applications and databases, physically, virtually, and in the cloud. As Linux grows in importance in terms of value to the business, managing Linux environments to high standards of service quality — availability, security, and performance — becomes an essential requirement for business success.
Sponsored by Red Hat
If you already use virtualized infrastructure, you are well on your way to leveraging the power of the cloud. Virtualization offers the promise of limitless resources, but how do you manage that scalability when your DevOps team doesn't scale? In today's hypercompetitive markets, fast results can make a difference between leading the pack vs. obsolescence. Organizations need more benefits from cloud computing than just raw resources. They need agility, flexibility, convenience, ROI, and control.
Stackato private Platform-as-a-Service technology from ActiveState extends your private cloud infrastructure by creating a private PaaS to provide on-demand availability, flexibility, control, and ultimately, faster time-to-market for your enterprise.
Sponsored by ActiveState
New Products | Dec 20, 2013 |
Non-Linux FOSS: Let's Make Music Together | Dec 19, 2013 |
Best. Cake. Ever. | Dec 18, 2013 |
AIDE—Developing for Android on Android | Dec 18, 2013 |
Two Pi R | Dec 17, 2013 |
A Handy U-Boot Trick | Dec 16, 2013 |
- GlusterFS will not work good
2 hours 45 min ago - Thankyou
8 hours 13 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
15 hours 33 min ago - Hair
1 day 6 hours ago - Why choose a Flash based product?
1 day 6 hours ago - Lilypond
1 day 18 hours ago - Thankyou
2 days 11 hours ago - Thanks for clearing that up.
2 days 16 hours ago - Nice coding on the cake. I
3 days 4 hours ago - Baker's identity
3 days 8 hours ago
Featured Jobs
Linux Systems Administrator | Houston and Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
Senior Perl Developer | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
Technical Support Rep | Houston and Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
UX Designer | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
Web & UI Developer (JavaScript & j Query) | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |


text:
Dog Brothers Public Forum
Return To Homepage
. Please
December 09, 2013, 11:25:03 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search
Welcome to the Dog Brothers Public Forum.
Posts in
Topics by
Latest Member:
Dog Brothers Public Forum
Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities
Politics & Religion
« previous
next »
Topic: Ukraine (Read 2262 times)
Power User
Posts: 28094
November 18, 2008, 11:06:12 AM »
Ukjraine would not be on my radar screen but for the analyses of Stratfor in the past few years. Beginning today Stratfor is starting an extended analysis of the situation in Ukraine, its pivotal role in US-Russia and Euro- Russian relations and so I begin this thread.
Part 1: Instability in a Crucial Country
Stratfor Today » November 18, 2008 | 1205 GMT
Ukraine is a country at a crossroads. Not only is it among those being hit hardest by the current global financial crisis, but it is now flirting with actual dissolution. The countrys economy is fundamentally weak, and ongoing political strife has made economic reforms necessary but impossible. Furthermore, the country is the cornerstone of the geopolitical battle between the West and Russia. Its weakness makes Ukraine dependent on outside powers, but outside powers appear to be working to pull the country apart.
Editors Note: This is the first part of a series on Ukraine.
Of all the countries being hit by the global financial crisis, Ukraine is one of the most profoundly affected because it is already coping with failing financial institutions, a collapsing economy and a domestic political scene too shattered to handle much of anything. On top of that, it is unfortunate enough to be the centerpiece of the geopolitical turf war between Russia and the West. In short, Ukraine is so deeply troubled that it cannot exist or remain united as a state unless an outside power enables it. And right now, outside powers are doing just the opposite.
The Current Financial Crisis
Ukraine is fundamentally unprepared to weather the global financial crisis. The countrys budget deficit is 2.8 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) and is likely to increase before it decreases, as declining industrial output triggered by the global recession will inevitably reduce expected tax receipts. Confounding the budget deficit is the parliaments promise to increase minimum wages in 2009 a promise that no party will want to back out of publicly when parliamentary and presidential elections could be held soon.
Related Link
Countries in Crisis
Ukrainian currency problems are also quite severe. Foreign investment has been leaving Ukraines equity markets (it declined almost 80 percent so far in 2008; only Iceland experienced a larger drop) and speculators have been attacking the currency, the hryvnia. The hryvnia has lost 20 percent of its value in the last month alone, and there are fears that a devaluation is on the way. As confidence inside Ukraine slides, bank runs are taking place; Ukraines Central Bank President Vladimir Stelmakh estimated that customers withdrew almost $3 billion approximately 4 percent of the countrys total deposits from accounts within a week.
As the hryvnias decline continues, all loans both business and private taken out in foreign currencies (whether Swiss franc, euro or dollar) will begin appreciating, creating a very real possibility of defaults that domestic banks will not be able to cover.
This brings up the issue of total public and private sector debt. Ukraines debt is not exorbitant (private sector debt is at $80 billion and public is $20 billion; combined, it is a moderately high 66 percent of GDP), but it is the speed with which it has accumulated over the past two years that is worrying. With the decline in the hryvnia and upcoming debt service payments (around $46 billion due next year for private sector and $1.6 billion for public), Ukrainian total foreign currency reserves totaling $37 billion could begin drying up fast, particularly if the government continues to try to use the reserves to prop up the hryvnia.
Ukraines public sector debt, currently only 10 percent of GDP, could also begin to rise as the domestic banks face liquidity pressures and the government is forced to intervene as well as it can, though it cannot afford bailouts like those in the United States, Europe and Russia. The countrys sixth largest bank, Prominvestbank which holds 4 percent of the market share in Ukraines banking sector was already bailed out by the government on Oct. 8 to the tune of $1 billion, and the Ukrainian economys overall weakness indicates that more domestic lenders could follow suit.
However, much as in Central Europe, it could be the foreign banks that create havoc for Ukraines economy. Foreign banks already own roughly 50 percent of the countrys banking system: Austrias Raiffeisen owns Bank Aval, Italys UniCredit owns Ukrsotsbank and the French BNP Paribas owns UkrSibbank. These banks both foreign and domestic were particularly active in bringing about the Ukrainian explosion of mortgages and retail loans, most of which were made in foreign currencies (euro and Swiss francs) so as to take advantage of a lower interest rate.
Ukraine is right behind the troubled Hungary, Croatia and Romania in terms of the percentage of total loans made in foreign currencies (roughly 50 percent of all loans in Ukraine). As the hryvnia depreciates, consumers and businesses will be less able to service these foreign-currency-denominated loans. This will lead to a potential mountain of unserviceable debt that could collapse domestic banks and spread the contagion to the rest of emerging markets and potentially to foreign bank headquarters.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has offered Ukraine a $16.5 billion loan. However, Ukraines internal political chaos has suspended the countrys ability to meet the IMFs conditions or even make a decision on the IMFs terms.
Fundamentally Weak
Beyond the current financial crisis, Ukraines economy is volatile at best leaving little hope for the country to pull itself out of any difficulty. One problem is that each region in Ukraine is highly dependent on a specific industry for money; so when that industry fails, the entire region tends to fail. Furthermore, most of Ukraines lucrative business is based in the eastern half of the country, which typically gives that half (and Russia) a bit more political and economic power. Although Ukraine mainly depends on its metallurgical industry, it also gains much revenue from grain, military exports and energy transit. However, each of these sectors is suffering from deep problems that could not be easily fixed even if the country had the proper tools.
(click image to enlarge)
Ukraine is one of the worlds top 10 steel-producing and iron-ore-producing nations and is the third-largest exporter of steel. The metallurgical industry accounts for 40 percent of Ukraines exports, nearly 30 percent of its GDP and 12 percent of its tax revenues and it employs more than half a million people.
However, the metallurgical industry is exceedingly inefficient and outdated. It is also highly dependent on expensive natural gas from its neighbor, Russia, making the cost of Ukrainian steel already 25 percent higher than its Russian and Chinese competitors. To make matters worse, demand and prices for many metals, especially steel, are collapsing globally. Prices for steel soared for the past year, prompting many steel-producing countries such as Brazil, India, Russia, China and Australia to overproduce, creating a global surplus. This leaves Ukraine horribly exposed since anyone who would have previously agreed to pay for the more-expensive Ukrainian steel now has several other options.
Ukraines Industry Ministry has officially declared the metallurgical sector to be in crisis, with 17 of the 36 steelmaking furnaces closed. Moreover, many of the metals heavyweights in Ukraine are foreign-owned by firms such as ArcelorMittal and Rusal and are already discussing massive layoffs. This will also greatly increase Ukraines account deficit. The bottom line is that Ukraine simply cannot compete on a global level in metallurgy, though much of its economy is dependent on it.
Ukraine saw an increase in revenues from an abundant grain harvest and exporting; in the third quarter of 2008, Ukraines exports outpaced imports. Grains account for approximately 6 percent of the countrys exports and brought in more than $2 billion the summer of 2008. The problem with grain is that the revenue it generates is cyclical, and thus Ukraine will not see any more cash from it until mid-2009. That, combined with severe credit constriction which will stress farmers in the upcoming planting season makes any dependency on the grain sector shaky.
Military Exports
Ukraine also depends on military exports to bring in cash. During and after the collapse of the Soviet Union, military units (including nuclear forces) were moved from Ukraine back inside Russia proper, but Kiev retained and commanded a great deal of Soviet military hardware and production facilities. Since around the mid-1990s, Kiev has sold that used equipment to countries as diverse as China, Sierra Leone, Kenya and even the United States. Though Ukraine retains significant stocks of such equipment, those stocks continue aging and slipping further toward obsolescence, and there is a (rapidly approaching) limit to how far the Soviet military legacy can carry Ukraine. There are a few discrepancies in estimates of how much money military exports bring in for Kiev. The official estimate by the Ukrainian Defense Ministry is around $1 billion a year; however, there are many within the government who claim it generates three times that amount but some equipment is sold under the table to other parties (such as Georgia) that Kiev does not want to be formally connected with.
Energy Transit
The only other really substantial moneymaker for the country is energy transit. Eighty percent of Russias energy exports of oil and natural gas to Europe transit through Ukraine. Currently, Ukraine receives approximately $1.9 billion a year simply for transiting Russian and Central Asian natural gas to Europe, along with some compensation on its own domestic purchases be that a small bartered amount in payment or discounted natural gas. Ukraine announced Nov. 5 that it is planning on raising the amount it transports in 2009 in hopes of raising its revenues. However, the energy game is tricky for Ukraine because it also has to import 90 percent of its own domestic supplies of natural gas something that typically gets the government into a $2 billion debt to Moscow every quarter and Russia is considering raising its prices to Ukraine in the new year.
Tell Stratfor What You Think
Power User
Posts: 28094
Re: Ukraine
Reply #1 on:
November 19, 2008, 10:39:04 AM »
November 19, 2008 | 1204 GMT
Within Ukraine there are several forces that, in theory, could steer the country in one direction or another. However, the political forces have been locked in a battle for control for the past four years. Meanwhile, Ukraines oligarchs and other forces with both economic and political clout are too distracted by the current global financial crisis to take action. Thus, Ukraine has been left with no ability to handle its own crisis or determine its own future.
Editors Note: This is the second part of a series on Ukraine.
Ukraines government is simply far too shattered and chaotic to handle the countrys current financial and economic problems or make any of the reforms needed in its defunct financial, economic, military and energy sectors. Kiev has been a confused and chaotic mass of shifting coalitions and governments since the 2004 Orange Revolution, which was supposed to herald a new era in which Ukraine would be part of the West rather than a Russian satellite.
From the Orange Revolution through today, Ukraines political scene has been dominated by three main parties (though there are myriad smaller parties):
Our Ukraine: The vehemently pro-Western party under current Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko
Bloc Yulia Timoshenko: A coalition of parties under current Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko that can flip to either the pro-Western or pro-Russian side; and
Party of Regions: The vehemently pro-Russian party led by former Ukrainian Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovich.
Our Ukraine and Timoshenkos bloc were the parties behind the Orange Revolution, though all three major parties have flip-flopped into different coalitions half a dozen times in the past four years. Most of the breaks and alliances among the three groups have not necessarily come about because of changes in ideology; rather, they are driven by the personalities and egos of Yushchenko, Timoshenko and Yanukovich. Typically, with each turnover in the government and coalitions, the laws and reforms passed by the former ruling group are either undone or ignored. This has seriously retarded any restructuring or improvement in almost any sector or institution in the country.
Furthermore, each political group generally controls a certain region of the country, so the parties look out for those industries, oligarchs and regional economics that pertain to their regions. This means that if a political party is booted from power, any restructuring or deals in place for its favorite region, industry or business can be overturned. The result is a business environment as chaotic and confusing as the political environment.
Ukraine is still suffering from political chaos. There has been one small internal shift: So many political figures outside of the big three personalities are so worn down from the constant bickering that they have started a wave of new political parties and groups. Parliamentary elections could be held in December of January, with a presidential election in late 2009 or early 2010. And with 72 percent of Ukrainians saying they are tired of the political infighting, these new smaller parties could end up changing the political landscape and making Ukraines political future even more unpredictable.
The Oligarchs
As in neighboring Russia, Ukraine also has the political and economic force of the oligarchs those who swooped in after the Soviet era to snatch up certain enterprises and businesses, making themselves incredibly wealthy and powerful very quickly. The oligarchs are very politically active. Some started out in politics and then seized wealth and position to become oligarchs; others began by securing wealth and position to use as leverage in politics. Just as in Russia, Ukraines oligarchs either back certain political forces paying for campaigns and receiving kickbacks once their chosen players are in power (such as the oligarchs backing Yushchenko and Yanukovich) or they establish their own political parties as a means to influence distribution of resources and advantageous business deals (as with Timoshenko). This has helped fuel the constant government chaos and sustained a level of distrust in Ukrainian businesses and those who run them.
But at the moment, the oligarchs are unable to shape the political or economic landscape in Ukraine because they are being crushed by the economic crisis. According to some records, Ukrainian oligarchs assets have lost some 90 percent of their value in the past few months. For example, Viktor Pinchuk (a Timoshenko backer), who controls Ukraines leading steel company Interpipe, has lost $2 billion. Sergei Taruta (a Yanukovich backer), who controls another metallurgical giant ISD, has lost $4.8 billion.
While Ukraines oligarchs are scrambling to keep their businesses and wealth intact, they are too preoccupied to be as politically active as usual. With two critical elections looming, there could be a shift in that the oligarchs will not be able to dole out cash as easily as in the past. For example, Timoshenko has already heard from one of her financial backers Konstantin Zhevago, who owns Financial and Credit Group and iron producer Poltavsky that he will not be dishing out his usual funding because he recently lost most of his wealth. The crisis among the oligarchs has led both Timoshenko and Yanukovich to try to postpone elections, knowing they do not heave enough cash to run full campaigns.
Rinat Akhmetov
The one Ukrainian oligarch who is not absent from the political scene is the wealthiest in the country Rinat Akhmetov, who owns assets in energy, steel, coal, banking, hotels, telecommunications, media and soccer. Most Ukrainian oligarchs are worth only a fraction of what Akhmetov is worth. Much of his wealth was not in the hard-hit equity markets, and so he has only lost a reported $7 billion of his $36 billion in the economic slowdowns; thus, he still has quite a bit of influence to wield in politics and economics.
Akhmetov is looking to take advantage of others economic misfortune and wants to expand his reach over more assets (especially in coal and electricity) not only in Ukraine, but also in Russia, Poland, Romania and Hungary. He has long been the puppet master behind the Party of Regions and Yanukovich; Stratfor has learned from sources that he also holds a great deal of leverage over Yushchenko and Timoshenko. Long kept in the shadows, Akhmetov is considering running for the presidency, knowing he has the financial capabilities, political backing from his leash holder (Russia) and enough clout against the big three political leaders to possibly really shake things up.
Other Forces
The only other forces in Ukraine that can affect the political or economic landscapes are the military, intelligence services and organized crime. As stated earlier, Ukraines military much like its stockpile of Soviet weaponry is seriously deteriorating without the political or economic backing needed to push for and coordinate modernization and reforms.
Ukraines intelligence and security apparatus mainly the Security Service of Ukraine is currently tangled in an identity crisis stemming from its break with its former master, the Soviet KGB, and the constant restructuring and leadership changes. Ukraines intelligence and security services consist of seven agencies and institutes that are responsible for identifying threats to Ukraine both at home and abroad, collecting intelligence and analyzing data. All agency heads are appointed by and report to the president, but the parliament must approve the appointments which means the intelligence and security services are another casualty of the political chaos as the president and prime minister fight for control.
Organized crime is another major political and economic force in Ukraine, having proliferated since the country gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. Ukrainian organized crime started off as a function of physical security for the oligarchs who controlled Ukraines resources and backed favored politicians, but expanded because the countrys weak central government was unable to effectively police criminals. Organized crime became a pillar of the state through the political-criminal nexus in which politicians, businessmen and criminals provided each other with services and favors. It has branched out considerably, with Ukrainian organized crime groups forming partnerships or acting alone in countries throughout Eastern and Central Europe and because Ukraine remains essentially a weak state dependent on outside patronage, foreign organized criminal elements have found a market there for illicit goods and human trafficking. But organized crime, just like other businesses, is suffering during the economic and financial crisis as criminal groups lose funds in foreign banks and customers have less cash to spend on services and goods.
Power User
Posts: 28094
Re: Ukraine
Reply #2 on:
November 20, 2008, 10:27:46 AM »
Part 3: Outside Intervention
Stratfor Today » November 20, 2008 | 1201 GMT
Because Ukraine is vital to Russias defense and survival as any kind of world power, it has become the cornerstone of the geopolitical battle between Russia and the West. Russia has many levers it could use to influence the course of Ukraines future, though the West is not without its tools. The eventual outcome of the battle for Ukraine is uncertain.
Editors Note: This is the third part of a series on Ukraine.
Since Ukraine is essentially too internally shattered to make sweeping changes or reforms, its future is at the whim of foreign powers. Because of this and because of Ukraines geographic location the country is now the chief arena for the struggle between Russia and the West.
Related Links
Countries in Crisis
Part 1: Instability in a Crucial Country
Part 2: Domestic Forces and Capabilities
The Cornerstone
Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the West (particularly under the guises of the European Union and NATO) has pushed eastward, making its way toward Russias doorstep. As the West tries to continue its advance and as Russia tries to stave it off, Ukraine has become paramount to both sides not just as a potentially lucrative territory, but because Ukraine is the key to Russias defense and survival as any sort of power.
(click image to enlarge)
Although Ukraine hosts the largest Russian community in the world outside of Russia, the battle for Ukraine is about far more than ethnic kin. Even before the Soviet era, Ukraine was integrated into Russias industrial and agricultural heartland, and eastern Ukraine remains integral to the Russian heartland to this day. Furthermore, Ukraine is the transit point for Russian natural gas to Europe and a connecting point for nearly all meaningful infrastructures running between Russia and the West whether pipeline, road, power or rail.
Without Ukraine, Russia could not project political or military power into the Northern Caucasus, the Black Sea or Eastern Europe, and Russia would be nearly entirely cut off from the rest of Europe. Ukraine also goes deep into former Soviet territory, with borders a mere 300 miles from either Volgograd or Moscow, and the Ukrainian port of Sevastopol on the Black Sea has long been the Russian militarys only deep, warm-water port.
To put it simply, as long as Ukraine is in its orbit, Russia can maintain strategic coherence and continue on its path of resurging in an attempt to resume its superpower status. Without Ukraine, Russia would face a much smaller set of possibilities.
This is why the 2004 Orange Revolution that brought in Ukraines first pro-Western government was Russias deepest nightmare. Russia knows that the Orange Revolution was a U.S.-backed project, supported by U.S. allies such as Poland. Since that color revolution, Moscow has been content with simply destabilizing Ukraine in order to ensure it does not fully fall into the Wests sphere.
Russias Levers
Russia has a slew of levers inside Ukraine to keep the country unstable. It also has quite a few tools it could use to either pull the country back into Moscows fold or break the country apart.
Politics: Russia is the very public sponsor of Viktor Yanukovich and his Party of Regions; though in the past three months, Moscow has also started granting its favor to Yulia Timoshenko breaking the Orange Coalition and isolating President Viktor Yushchenko and his party. The topic of how to respond to a strengthening Russia has been a constant point of contention in Ukraines different coalitions and governments.
Energy: Since Russia supplies 80 percent of Ukraines natural gas, energy is one of Moscows favorite levers to use against Kiev. Moscow has proven in the past that it is not afraid of turning off the heat at the height of winter in Ukraine to not only hurt the country but also to push Kiev into the heart of a firestorm as European countries supplies get cut off when Russia cuts supplies to Ukraine. The price Russia charges Ukraine for natural gas is also constantly being renegotiated, with Kiev racking up billions of dollars in debt to Moscow every few months.
Economics: Russia controls a large portion of Ukraines metals industry, owning factories across the eastern part of the country, where most of Ukraines wealth is held. Russia also controls much of Ukraines ports in the south.
Oligarchs: Quite a few of Ukraines oligarchs pledge allegiance to Russia because of relationships from the Soviet era, because of assets held in Russia or because Moscow bought or supported certain oligarchs during their rise. Rinat Akhmetov is the most notable pro-Russian oligarch; not only does he do the Kremlins bidding inside Ukraine, but he is also rumored to have recently helped the Kremlin during Russias financial crisis. Moscow controls many other notable Ukrainian oligarchs, such as Viktor Pinchuk, Igor Kolomoisky, Sergei Taruta and Dmitri Firtash. This has allowed the Kremlin to shape much in these oligarchs business ventures and have a say in how these oligarchs support certain politicians.
Ships from Russias Black Sea Fleet during the celebration of the fleets 225th anniversaryMilitary: Russias Black Sea Fleet is headquartered and based in Ukraines Crimea region, in Sevastopol. Compared to Kievs small fleet, Russian naval power in the Black Sea is overwhelming. Russias Black Sea Fleet also contributes to the majority of the Crimea regions economy. Though imposing a military reality on Ukraine would be another thing entirely from imposing a military reality on South Ossetia and Georgia, there is little doubt that Russia and the ethnic Russian majority in the Crimea is committed to retaining the decisive hand in the fate of the Crimea, even if the Russian Fleet withdraws in 2017, when its lease expires.
Intelligence: Ukraines intelligence services were essentially born from Russias heavy KGB presence in the country before the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Security Service of Ukraine originated in Moscows KGB presence in Ukraine, and the Foreign Intelligence Service of Ukraine sprung forth from Russias SVR foreign intelligence agency. Many of the senior officials in both agencies were actually KGB trained and worked for them during the early days of their careers. Russias current spy agency, the Federal Security Service (a descendant of the KGB), has a heavy presence within Ukraines intelligence agencies. This gives the Russians a big opening they can use to serve their own interests in Ukraine.
Organized crime: Russian organized crime is the parent of Ukrainian organized crime and is still deeply entrenched in the current system (even among the oligarchs). Russia has been especially successful in setting up shop in the Ukraine involving shady natural gas deals, the arms trade, the drug trade and other illicit business arrangements. Population: Ukraine is dramatically split between a population that identifies with Russia and a population that identifies with the West. It has a complex and multifaceted demography: A large Russian minority comprises 17.3 percent of the total population, more than 30 percent of all Ukrainians speak Russian as their native language and more than half of the country belongs to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church under the Moscow Patriarch. Geographically speaking, Ukrainians living east of the Dnieper River tend to identify more with Russia than with the West, and those in Crimea consider themselves much more Russian than Ukrainian. This divide is something Russia can use not only to keep the country in chaos, but to split the country in half should the need arise.
The Wests Levers and Concerns
The West, on the other hand, is split over what exactly to do with Ukraine. In 2004, during the Orange Revolution, it was the United States time to push up against Russia; but other Western heavyweights such as Germany have never really liked or trusted any government in Kiev. Berlin would love to see a pro-Western government in Kiev to work with, but the Germans know that meddling in Ukraine costs them something, unlike the Americans. This was seen in 2006, when Russia cut off natural gas supplies to Ukraine, which led to the lights going out in quite a few European countries as well. So the Europeans see the upheaval of Ukraine as yet another mess the Americans have gotten them into.
Since the Orange Revolution, the West has used two main levers cash and protection to try to keep Kiev on a pro-Western path. It has thrown cash at Ukraine, but there are two problems with this move. First, whoever has been in charge in Kiev has squandered and mismanaged any cash given to Ukraine rather than working to alleviate the economic, financial, institutional and systematic problems the country is facing. For example, the West is offering Ukraine an International Monetary Fund (IMF) loan of $16.5 billion with only a few strings banking reform and an end to government squabbling attached, but Kiev cannot manage these changes, and now the IMF is considering withdrawing its offer. Second, as the West faces its own financial crisis, it is not in any position currently to offer Kiev any more help.
The Wests other move again championed by Washington is to pull Ukraine into NATO. Ukraine is ill-qualified as a potential member of the Atlantic alliance, but the move would permanently break Russias hold over Ukraine.
Years of concerted, focused and well-funded military reform could move Kiev meaningfully toward eligibility, but there appears to be no firm consensus especially with Germany and France against it on pushing for Ukrainian admittance into the membership action plan. Also, NATOs members have neither troops available to be stationed in the country nor the defense dollars to support such an expensive modernization and reform program.
The battle for the soul of Ukraine is on. The country is shattered internally in nearly every possible way: politically, financially, institutionally, economically, militarily and socially. The global financial crisis is simply showing the problems that have long existed in the country. In the near future, there is no conceivable or apparent way for any force within the country to stabilize it and begin the reforms needed. It will take an outside power to step in which leads to the larger tussle between the West and Russia over control of one of the most geopolitically critical regions between the two. Russia has far more tools to use to keep Ukraine under its control, but the West has laid a lot of groundwork in order to undermine Moscow, leaving the future of Ukraine completely uncertain.
Last Edit: November 20, 2008, 10:31:55 AM by Crafty_Dog
Power User
Posts: 28094
Pay up or else!
Reply #3 on:
November 20, 2008, 10:52:19 AM »
PS: Russian President Dmitri Medvedev told energy company Gazprom to collect Ukraines $2.4 billion natural gas debt either voluntarily or compulsory in line with current laws and within the framework of bilateral relations, Interfax reported Nov. 20.
Power User
Posts: 28094
Russian Gas Trap
Reply #4 on:
January 14, 2009, 08:26:04 AM »
By Peter Zeihan
At the time of this writing, the natural gas crisis in Europe is entering its 13th day.
While the topic has only penetrated the Western mind as an issue in recent years, Russia and Ukraine have been spatting about the details of natural gas deliveries, volumes, prices and transit terms since the Soviet breakup in 1992. In the end, a deal is always struck, because Russia needs the hard currency that exports to Europe (via Ukraine) bring, and Ukraine needs natural gas to fuel its economy. But in recent years, two things have changed.
First, Ukraines Orange Revolution of 2004 brought to power a government hostile to Russian goals. Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko would like to see his country integrated into the European Union and NATO; for Russia, such an evolution would be the kiss of death.
Ukraine is home to most of the infrastructure that links Russia to Europe, including everything from pipelines to roads and railways to power lines. The Ukrainian and Russian heartlands are deeply intertwined; the two states industrial and agricultural belts fold into each other almost seamlessly. Eastern Ukraine is home to the largest concentration of ethnic Russians and Russian speakers anywhere in the world outside Russia. The home port of Russias Black Sea Fleet is at Sevastopol on Ukraines Crimean Peninsula, a reminder that the Soviet Unions port options were awful and that Russias remaining port options are even more so.
Ukraine hems in the south of European Russia so thoroughly that any hostile power controlling Kiev could easily threaten a variety of core Russian interests, including Moscow itself. Ukraine also pushes far enough east that a hostile Kiev would sever most existing infrastructure connections to the Caucasus. Simply put, a Ukraine outside the Russian sphere of influence transforms Russia into a purely defensive power, one with little hope of resisting pressure from anywhere. But a Russified Ukraine makes it possible for Russia to project power outward, and to become a major regional and potentially global player.
Related Links
Part 1: Instability in a Crucial Country
Part 2: Domestic Forces and Capabilities
Part 3: Outside Intervention
The Russo-Georgian War and the Balance of Power
Russia and Rotating the U.S. Focus
Europe: Feeling the Cold Blast of Another Russo-Ukrainian Dispute
Global Market Brief: Europes Long-Term Energy Proposal
Related Special Topic Page
Russian Energy and Foreign Policy
The second change in recent years is that Russia now has an economic buffer, meaning it can tolerate a temporary loss in natural gas income. Since Vladimir Putin first came to power as prime minister in 1999, every government under his command has run a hefty surplus. By mid-2008, Russian officials were regularly boasting of their $750 billion in excess funds, and of how Moscow inevitably would soon become a global financial hub. Not surprisingly, the 2008-2009 recession has deflated this optimism to some extent. The contents of Moscows piggy bank already have dropped by approximately $200 billion. Efforts to insulate Russian firms and protect the ruble have taken their financial toll, Russias 2009 budget is firmly in deficit, and all talk of a Russian New York is on ice.
But Russias financial troubles pale in comparison to its neighbors problems not in severity, but in impact. Russia is not a developed country, or even one that, like the states of Central Europe, is seriously trying to develop. A capital shortage simply does not damage Russia as it does, say, Slovakia. And while Russia has not yet returned to central planning, rising government control over all sources of capital means the Russia of today has far more in common economically with the Soviet Union than with even the Russia of the 1990s, much less the free-market West. In relative terms, the recession actually has increased relative Russian economic power and that says nothing about other tools of Russian power. Moscows energy, political and military levers are as powerful now as they were during the August 2008 war with Georgia.
This is a very long-winded way of saying that before 2004, the Russian-Ukrainian natural gas spat was simply part of business as usual. But now, Russia feels that its life is on the line, and that it has the financial room to maneuver to push hard and so, the annual ritual of natural gas renegotiations has become a key Russian tool in bringing Kiev to heel.
And a powerful tool it is. Fully two-thirds of Ukraines natural gas demand is sourced from Russia, and the income from Russian natural gas transiting to Europe forms the backbone of the Ukrainian budget. Ukraine is a bit of an economic basket case in the best of times, but the global recession has essentially shut down the countrys steel industry, Ukraines largest sector. Russian allies in Ukraine, which for the time being include Yushchenkos one-time Orange ally Yulia Timoshenko, have done a thorough job of ensuring that the blame for the mass power cuts falls to Yushchenko. Facing enervated income, an economy in the doldrums and a hostile Russia, along with all blame being directed at him, Yushchenkos days appear to be numbered. The most recent poll taken to gauge public sentiment ahead of presidential elections, which are anticipated later this year, put Yushchenkos support level below the surveys margin of error.
Even if Yushchenkos future were bright, Russia has no problem maintaining or even upping the pressure. The Kremlin would much rather see Ukraine destroyed than see it as a member of the Western clubs, and Moscow is willing to inflict a great deal of collateral damage on a variety of players to preserve what it sees as an interest central to Russian survival.
Europe has been prominent among these casualties. As a whole, Europe imports one-quarter of the natural gas it uses from Russia, and approximately 80 percent of that transits Ukraine. All of those deliveries now have been suspended, resulting in cutoffs of various degrees to France, Turkey, Poland, Germany, Italy, Hungary, Romania, Austria, the Czech Republic, Greece, Croatia, Macedonia, Bosnia, Serbia and Bulgaria in rough order of increasing severity. Reports of both mass power outages and mass heating failures have been noted in the countries at the bottom half of this list.
A variety of diversification programs have put Europe well on its way to removing its need for Russian natural gas entirely, but these programs are still years from completion. Until then, not much can be done for states that use natural gas for a substantial portion of their energy needs.
Unlike coal, nuclear energy or oil, natural gas can be easily shipped only via pipeline to previously designated points of use. This means the decision to link to a supplier lasts for decades and is not easily adjusted should something go wrong. Importing natural gas in liquid form requires significant skill in cryogenics as well as specialized facilities that take a couple of years to build (not to mention a solid port). Alternate pipe supply networks, much less power facilities that use different fuels, are still more expensive and require even more time. All European countries can do in the immediate term is literally rely upon the kindness of strangers until the imbroglio is past or a particularly creative solution comes to mind. (Poland has offered several states some of its share of Russian natural gas that comes to it via a Belarusian line.) Some Central European states are taking the unorthodox step of recommissioning mothballed nuclear power plants.
Because Russias goal in all this is to crack Kiev, there is not much any European country can do. But one nation, Germany, is certainly trying. Of the major European states, Germany is the most dependent upon Russian resources in general, and energy in particular.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Putin spent three nights this past week on the phone with each other discussing the topic, and the pair has a two-day summit set for later this week. The Germans have three primary reasons for cozying up to the Russians at a time when it seems they should be as angry as anyone else in Europe.
First, because most of the natural gas Germany gets from Russia passes not through Ukraine, but through Belarus and because the Russians have not interrupted these secondary flows the Germans desperately want to avoid rocking the boat and politicizing the dispute any more than necessary. The Germans need to engage the Russians in discussion, but unlike most other players, they can afford not to be accusatory, because they have not been too deeply affected so far. (Like all the other Europeans, the Germans are working feverishly to diversify their energy supplies away from Russia, but while Berlin can keep the lights on, it doesnt want to ruffle any more feathers than it needs to.)
Second, as any leader of Germany would, Merkel recognizes that if current Russian-Western tensions devolve into a more direct confrontation, the struggle would be fought disproportionately with German resources and perhaps even on German soil. Germany is the closest major power to Russia and would therefore be the focus of any major action, Russian or Western, offensive or defensive. France, the United Kingdom and the United States enjoy the buffer of distance and in the case of the last two, a water buffer to boot.
German national interest, therefore, is not to find a way to fight the Russians, but to find a way to live with them. Germany traditionally has been Russias largest trading partner. Every time the two have clashed, it has been ugly, to say the least. In the German mind, if Ukraine (or perhaps even adjusting the attitude of Poland) is what is necessary to make the Russians feel secure, so be it.
Third, Germany has a European angle to think about. To put it bluntly, Merkel is always on the lookout for any means of easing Germany back into the international community with a foreign policy somewhat more sophisticated than the Im sorry that has reigned since the end of World War II. After the war, France successfully hijacked German submission and used German economic strength to achieve French political desires. Since the Cold Wars end, Germany has slowly wormed its way out of that policy straitjacket, and the natural gas crisis raises an interesting possibility. If Merkels discussions with Putin result in restored natural gas flows, then not only will Russia see Germany as a partner, but Germany might win goodwill from European states that no longer have to endure a winter without heat.
Still, it will be a tough sell: the European states between Germany and Russia have always lived in dread that one power or the other or, God forbid, both will take them over. But Germany is clearly at the center of Europe, and all of the states affected by the natural gas crisis count Germany as their largest trading partner. If Merkel can muster sufficient political muscle to complement Germanys economic muscle, the resulting image of strength and capability would go a long way toward cementing Berlins re-emergence.
Power User
Posts: 28094
Strat: Ukraine for sale
Reply #5 on:
February 10, 2009, 12:27:41 AM »
The Russian Finance Ministry announced Feb. 9 that its Ukrainian counterpart requested a $5 billion loan from Moscow to cover Kievs budget deficit. Coupled with the International Monetary Funds wariness of disbursing a second tranche ($1.9 billion) of a $16.5 billion loan agreed upon in November 2008, this move indicates the seriousness of Ukraines financial state. It also highlights Ukraines more fundamental economic problems, showing that Kiev ultimately will fall into the orbit of whichever country can come to its aid financially.
Ukraine made an official request to Russia on Feb. 9 for a $5 billion loan to make up for a decrease in budget revenues, the Russian Finance Ministry announced. Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko has also asked the leaders of the worlds richest countries for emergency loans, citing the difficulties her country faces as a result of the global financial crisis.
Kiev began its frantic search for loans from powerful and financially stable countries after a visit by an International Monetary Fund (IMF) delegation the week of Feb. 1 that did not go well at all. The IMF typically works by doling out loans to troubled countries in tranches, usually attached with strict conditions designed for macroeconomic stabilization. Ukraine received its first such tranche of $4.5 billion (out of a total loan of $16.5 billion) in November. But Kiev has failed to live up to the loans requirements, which include a deficit-free budget for 2009 the budget has a 3 percent deficit and a curtailing of social spending. The latter is an especially dangerous task politically, with Ukrainian unemployment figures soaring above the 1 million mark (out of a population of 46 million) and presidential elections slated for early 2010. Because of Ukraines shortcomings, the IMF delegation made no promises that a second tranche would be coming in the near future.
But Ukraine as a country is fundamentally broken, and its economy which was far from stable even before the global economic crisis will not be fixed easily with loans from the IMF, Russia or the West. The Ukrainian government is essentially at odds with itself, split between the pro-Russian and pro-Western movements. The countrys political and economic institutions need more than small tweaks, and until they are radically reformed which would be tremendously difficult to pull off socially Kiev cannot do without outside assistance. And whoever provides this assistance will hold the most influence over Ukraine.
This reality is only intensified by the financial crisis. Kiev depends heavily on manufacturing and industry for its government revenues, and as of December 2008, industrial production had dropped more than 26 percent year on year. Ukraines currency has fallen dramatically since last summer, losing nearly a third of its value, and the countrys gross domestic product for 2009 is expected to contract 5 percent.
Financial assistance does not necessarily need to come from the Russians; Kiev simply needs to find whoever will help its economy survive. Previously, Russias influence in Ukraine was underwritten by natural gas prices that were well below what the Europeans were charged. However, Russia raised those prices significantly, causing a monthlong standoff that affected much of Europe and created more economic problems for Kiev. Though Kiev paid its natural gas bill for January, a representative of Ukrainian energy giant Naftogaz said the renegotiated prices will cause Ukraine to go bankrupt. Currently, the Europeans are in no financial position to bail out Ukraine, so Kiev is calling on Moscow to alleviate Ukraines financial pains.
To be able to proceed, with the IMFs assistance, in trying to tackle its myriad economic problems, Ukraine must first take care of its budget deficit hence the request to Russia for a $5 billion loan, which would roughly cover the deficit. Any Russian assistance, however, will come with strings attached. While the natural gas situation remains shaky and tense, a $5 billion loan would effectively draw Kiev further into Russias orbit. And with political infighting and instability the norm in Ukraine, Russia will be sure to take advantage of Kievs financial weaknesses in any way that it can. This essentially means that Ukraine will be divorced from its Western leanings and will move firmly into Russias sphere of influence, both economically and politically.
Power User
Posts: 28094
Stratfor: Upcoming elections, part 1
Reply #6 on:
January 13, 2010, 09:31:15 AM »
Ukraines next presidential election is scheduled for Jan. 17. All of the leading candidates are pro-Russian. This means that the last vestiges of pro-Western government brought on by the 2004 Orange Revolution will be swept away and Russias ongoing consolidation of power will become evident in Kiev.
Editors Note: This is the first part of a three-part series on Ukraines upcoming presidential election.
Related Link
Ukraine: More than a Religious Schism
STRATFORs 2010 Annual Forecast said, For Russia, 2010 will be a year of consolidation the culmination of years of careful efforts. Moscow will purge Western influence from several countries in its near abroad while laying the foundation of a political union enveloping most of the former Soviet Union. Although that union will not be completed in 2010, according to our forecast, by years end it will be obvious that the former Soviet Union is Russias sphere of influence and that any effort to change that must be monumental if it is to succeed.
Ukraine is one country where Russias consolidation will be obvious, mainly because the most important part of reversing the 2004 pro-Western Orange Revolution will occur: the return of a pro-Russian president in Kiev. Ukraines presidential election is slated for Jan. 17, and all the top candidates in the race are pro-Russian in some way.
Russia considers Ukraine to be vital to its national interests; indeed, of all the countries where Moscow intends to tighten its grip in 2010, Ukraine is the most important. Because of its value to Moscow, Ukraine has been caught for years in a tug-of-war between Russia and the West. Since the Orange Revolution, Russia has used social, media, energy, economic and military levers not to mention Federal Security Service assets to break the Orange Coalitions hold on Ukraine and the coherence of the coalition itself. Russia even managed to get a pro-Russian prime minister placed in Kiev for more than a year. However, the presidency remained in the hands of pro-Western Viktor Yushchenko. And in Ukraine, it is the president who controls the military (including the military-industrial sector and its exports), the secret services (which, while littered with Russian influence, are still controlled by a pro-Western leader) and Ukraines foreign policy.
Typically, STRATFOR does not focus on personalities because long-term trends in geopolitics act as constraints on human agency, limiting the value of individual-level analysis in forecasting. However, the Ukrainian election is a critical part of Russias resurgence, and STRATFOR will shed light on the colorful and complicated world of Ukrainian politics and offer clarity on the personalities that will lead Ukraine back into the Russian fold and explain how Moscow has ensured their loyalty.
The candidates STRATFOR will examine are not all front-runners, necessarily, but they are the most important candidates in the race. Yushchenko is running for re-election but, according to polls from the past year, has support from only 3.8 percent of Ukrainian voters, which is little more than the margin of error. Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovich who won Ukraines initial 2004 presidential election but was swept from power in the re-vote sparked by the Orange Revolution has always been staunchly pro-Russian and stands a good chance of victory on Jan. 17. Current Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko is also in the running. She was Yushchenkos partner in the Orange Revolution, but Russias growing influence in Ukraine persuaded her to make a deal with Moscow, and she is now running on a relatively pro-Russian platform. The last candidate we will examine is Arseny Yatsenyuk, a young politician once thought to be free of both pro-Western and pro-Russian ties. However, STRATFOR sources have said that Yatsenyuk is not exactly what he seems, and that much more powerful forces with Russian ties are behind this Ukrainian wild card.
Power User
Posts: 28094
Ukraine- part 2
Reply #7 on:
January 14, 2010, 11:18:42 AM »
On Jan. 17, Ukraine is scheduled to hold a presidential election that will sweep the last remnant of the pro-Western Orange Revolution Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko from power in Kiev. Yushchenkos presidency has been marked by pro-Western moves on many levels, including attempts to join the European Union and NATO. However, the next government in Kiev pro-Russian though it may be could still have a place for Yushchenko.
Editors Note: This is the second part of a three-part series on Ukraines upcoming presidential election.
Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko is the last remnant of the pro-Western Orange Revolution. Now that his popularity has plummeted and his coalition partner, Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko, has turned pro-Russian, he is set to be swept aside by Ukraines Jan. 17 presidential election.
Yushchenko led the Orange Revolution, and his presidency kept Russia from completely enveloping Ukraine. Although the upcoming presidential election will deliver Ukraine into Russias hands, Yushchenko might not be ejected from Kiev altogether.
Yushchenko entered the government in 1999 when he was nominated as prime minister by then-President Leonid Kuchma after a round of infighting over the premiership. As prime minister, Yushchenko a former central bank chief helped Ukraine economically and helped keep relative internal stability for two years. Yet even while he served in the government, Yushchenko partnered with Timoshenko his deputy prime minister and started a movement against Kuchma. When a vote of no confidence ended Yushchenkos premiership in 2001, he and his coalition partners accelerated their anti-Kuchma movement, aiming to make Yushchenko president in 2004 with Timoshenko as his prime minister. In the 2004 election, Yushchenko faced another of Kuchmas prime ministers, Viktor Yanukovich.
Yushchenko became the Wests great hope during the 2004 presidential campaign, as he vowed to integrate Ukraine with the West and seek membership in NATO and the European Union. Although the West fully supported Yushchenko, other parties were not as thrilled with his candidacy. During the campaign, he was poisoned with dioxin, a carcinogenic substance whose outward effects include facial disfigurement. Yushchenkos camp charged that Russian security services were behind the poisoning.
When the presidential election was held, Yanukovich was declared the winner. However, voter fraud reportedly was rampant, and mass protests erupted across the country in what would become known as the Orange Revolution. Ukraines top court nullified the results of the first election, and when a second election was held, Yushchenko emerged victorious.
Yushchenko has acted against Russia on many levels during his presidency from calling the Great Famine of the 1930s an act of genocide engineered by Josef Stalin to threatening to oust the Russian navy from Crimea and even trying to break the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and Russian Orthodox Church apart. He also tried to fulfill his promises that Ukraine would join NATO and the European Union (but these ideas proved too bold for some Western states, particularly Germany, since accepting Ukraine into either organization would enrage Russia). Most importantly, Yushchenko and his Orange Revolution were able to keep Ukraine from falling completely into Russias hands for at least five years. Yushchenko used the presidents control over foreign policy and Ukraines secret service and military to stave off Russias attempts to assert control over the country.
But all was not well in Kiev during Yushchenkos presidency. His coalition with Timoshenko collapsed barely nine months after Timoshenko was named prime minister. Furthermore, Yushchenko was feeling the pressure of being a pro-Western leader in a country where much of the population remained pro-Russian or at least ambivalent enough that mere promises of pro-Western reform would not sway their vote. Yushchenko tried to find a balance in his government by naming Yanukovich prime minister in 2006, but this led to a series of shifting coalitions and overall instability in Kiev. It also stripped Yushchenko of much of his credibility as a strong pro-Western leader. His popularity has been in decline ever since.
Even though his polling numbers are currently at 3.8 percent, which places him behind five other candidates at the time of this writing, Yushchenko is trying for re-election. Unless he cancels the election which would cause a massive uprising this is the end of his presidency and of the Orange Revolution.
However, it might not be the end of his work inside the government. STRATFOR sources in Kiev have said that Yushchenko, Yanukovich and Russian officials are in talks that could lead Yushchenko to a relatively powerless premiership in Ukraine a move to block Timoshenko and appease the Western-leaning parts of the country. There are regions in Western Ukraine that feel no allegiance to Russia. The Orange Revolution was strongest in the area around Lviv, a part of Ukraine that feels much more oriented toward neighboring Poland and the West. This region could very well become restive with the reversal of the Orange Revolution. A pro-Russian president, therefore, might have to include Yushchenko in the government to prevent fissures within the country. Though such a decision could create the same kind of political drama Kiev has seen in the past few years, Moscow will want to ensure that if such political chaos does occur Yushchenko will know his and Ukraines place under Russia.
Power User
Posts: 28094
Stratfor: The Election and Russian Resurgence
Reply #8 on:
January 26, 2010, 08:48:42 AM »
Ukraine's Election and the Russian Resurgence
January 26, 2010
By Peter Zeihan
Ukrainians go to the polls Feb. 7 to choose their next president. The last time they did this, in November 2004, the result was the prolonged international incident that became known as the Orange Revolution. That event saw Ukraine cleaved off from the Russian sphere of influence, triggering a chain of events that rekindled the Russian-Western Cold War. Next weeks runoff election seals the Orange Revolutions reversal. Russia owns the first candidate, Viktor Yanukovich, outright and has a workable agreement with the other, Yulia Timoshenko. The next few months will therefore see the de facto folding of Ukraine back into the Russian sphere of influence; discussion in Ukraine now consists of debate over the speed and depth of that reintegration.
The Centrality of Ukraine
Russia has been working to arrest its slide for several years. Next weeks election in Ukraine marks not so much the end of the post-Cold War period of Russian retreat as the beginning of a new era of Russian aggressiveness. To understand why, one must first absorb the Russian view of Ukraine.
Related Special Topic Page
The Russian Resurgence
Since the break-up of the Soviet Union, most of the former Soviet republics and satellites found themselves cast adrift, not part of the Russian orbit and not really part of any other grouping. Moscow still held links to all of them, but it exercised few of its levers of control over them during Russias internal meltdown during the 1990s. During that period, a number of these states Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria and the former Czechoslovakia to be exact managed to spin themselves out of the Russian orbit and attach themselves to the European Union and NATO. Others Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine attempted to follow the path Westward, but have not succeeded at this point. Of these six, Ukraine is by far the most critical. It is not simply the most populous of Russias former possessions or the birthplace of the Russian ethnicity, it is the most important province of the former Russian Empire and holds the key to the future of Eurasia.
First, the incidental reasons. Ukraine is the Russian Empires breadbasket. It is also the location of nearly all of Russias infrastructure links not only to Europe, but also to the Caucasus, making it critical for both trade and internal coherence; it is central to the existence of a state as multiethnic and chronically poor as Russia. The Ukrainian port of Sevastopol is home to Russias Black Sea fleet, and Ukrainian ports are the only well-developed warm-water ports Russia has ever had. Belarus only waterborne exports traverse the Dnieper River, which empties into the Black Sea via Ukraine. Therefore, as goes Ukraine, so goes Belarus. Not only is Ukraine home to some 15 million ethnic Russians the largest concentration of Russians outside Russia proper they reside in a zone geographically identical and contiguous to Russia itself. That zone is also the Ukrainian agricultural and industrial heartland, which again is integrated tightly into the Russian core.
These are all important factors for Moscow, but ultimately they pale before the only rationale that really matters: Ukraine is the only former Russian imperial territory that is both useful and has a natural barrier protecting it. Belarus is on the Northern European Plain, aka the invasion highway of Europe. The Baltics are all easily accessible by sea. The Caucasian states of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia are on the wrong side of the Caucasus Mountains (and Russias northern Caucasus republics remember Chechnya? arent exactly the cream of the crop of Russian possessions). It is true that Central Asia is anchored in mountains to the south, but the region is so large and boasts so few Slavs that it cannot be controlled reliably or cheaply. And Siberia is too huge to be useful.
Without Ukraine, Russia is a desperately defensive power, lacking any natural defenses aside from sheer distance. Moscow and Volgograd, two of Russias critically strategic cities, are within 300 miles of Ukraines eastern border. Russia lacks any natural internal transport options its rivers neither interconnect nor flow anywhere useful, and are frozen much of the year so it must preposition defensive forces everywhere, a burden that has been beyond Russias capacity to sustain even in the best of times. The (quite realistic) Russian fear is that without Ukraine, the Europeans will pressure Russia along its entire western periphery, the Islamic world will pressure Russia along its entire southern periphery, the Chinese will pressure Russia along its southeastern periphery, and the Americans will pressure Russia wherever opportunity presents itself.
Ukraine by contrast has the Carpathians to its west, a handy little barrier that has deflected invaders of all stripes for millennia. These mountains defend Ukraine against tanks coming from the west as effectively as they protected the Balkans against Mongols attacking from the east. Having the Carpathians as a western border reduces Russias massive defensive burden. Most important, if Russia can redirect the resources it would have used for defensive purposes on the Ukrainian frontier whether those resources be economic, intelligence, industrial, diplomatic or military then Russia retains at least a modicum of offensive capability. And that modicum of offensive ability is more than enough to overmatch any of Russias neighbors (with the exception of China).
When Retreat Ends, the Neighbors Get Nervous
This view of Ukraine is not alien to countries in Russias neighborhood. They fully understand the difference between a Russia with Ukraine and a Russia without Ukraine, and understand that so long as Ukraine remains independent they have a great deal of maneuvering room. Now that all that remains is the result of an election with no strategic choice at stake, the former Soviet states and satellites realize that their world has just changed.
Georgia traditionally has been the most resistant to Russian influence regardless of its leadership, so defiant that Moscow felt it necessary to trounce Georgia in a brief war in August 2008. Georgias poor strategic position is nothing new, but a Russia that can redirect efforts from Ukraine is one that can crush Georgia as an afterthought. That is turning the normally rambunctious Georgians pensive, and nudging them toward pragmatism. An opposition group, the Conservative Party, is launching a movement to moderate policy toward Russia, which among other things would mean abandoning Georgias bid for NATO membership and re-establishing formal political ties with Moscow.
A recent Lithuanian power struggle has resulted in the forced resignation of Foreign Minister Minister Vygaudas. The main public point of contention was the foreign ministers previous participation in facilitating U.S. renditions. Vygaudas, like most in the Lithuanian leadership, saw such participation as critical to maintaining the tiny countrys alliance with the United States. President Dalia Grybauskaite, however, saw the writing on the wall in Ukraine, and feels the need to foster a more conciliatory view of Russia. Part of that meant offering up a sacrificial lamb in the form of the foreign minister.
Poland is in a unique position. It knows that should the Russians turn seriously aggressive, its position on the Northern European Plain makes it the focal point of Russian attention. Its location and vulnerability makes Warsaw very sensitive to Russian moves, so it has been watching Ukraine with alarm for several months.
As a result, the Poles have come up with some (admittedly small) olive branches, including an offer for Putin to visit Gdansk last September in an attempt to foster warmer (read: slightly less overtly hostile) relations. Putin not only seized upon the offer, but issued a public letter denouncing the World War II-era Molotov-Ribbentrop Treaty, long considered by Poles as the most outrageous Russian offense to Poland. Warsaw has since replied with invitations for future visits. As with Georgia, Poland will never be pro-Russian Poland is not only a NATO member but also hopes to host an American Patriot battery and participate in Washingtons developing ballistic missile defense program. But if Warsaw cannot hold Washingtons attention and it has pulled out all the stops in trying to it fears the writing might already be on the wall, and it must plan accordingly.
Azerbaijan has always attempted to walk a fine line between Russia and the West, knowing that any serious bid for membership in something like the European Union or NATO was contingent upon Georgias first succeeding in joining up. Baku would prefer a more independent arrangement, but it knows that it is too far from Russias western frontier to achieve such unless the stars are somewhat aligned. As Georgias plans have met with what can best be described as abject failure, and with Ukraine now appearing headed toward Russian suzerainty, Azerbaijan has in essence resigned itself to the inevitable. Baku is well into negotiations that would redirect much of its natural gas output north to Russia rather than west to Turkey and Europe. And Azerbaijan simply has little else to bargain with.
Other states that have long been closer to Russia, but have attempted to balance Russia against other powers in hopes of preserving some measure of sovereignty, are giving up. Of the remaining former Soviet republics Belarus has the most educated workforce and even a functioning information technology industry, while Kazakhstan has a booming energy industry; both are reasonable candidates for integration into Western systems. But both have this month agreed instead to throw their lots in with Russia. The specific method is an economic agreement that is more akin to shackles than a customs union. The deal effectively will gut both countries industries in favor of Russian producers. Moscow hopes the union in time will form the foundation of a true successor to the Soviet Union.
Other places continue to show resistance. The new Moldovan prime minister, Vlad Filat, is speaking with the Americans about energy security and is even flirting with the Romanians about reunification. The Latvians are as defiant as ever. The Estonians, too, are holding fast, although they are quietly polling regional powers to at least assess where the next Russian hammer might fall. But for every state that decides it had best accede to Russias wishes, Russia has that much more bandwidth to dedicate to the poorly positioned holdouts.
Russia also has the opportunity. The United States is bogged down in its economic and health care debates, two wars and the Iran question all of which mean Washingtons attention is occupied well away from the former Soviet sphere. With the United States distracted, Russia has a freer hand in re-establishing control over states that would like to be under the American security umbrella.
There is one final factor that is pushing Russia to resurge: It feels the pressure of time. The post-Cold War collapse may well have mortally wounded the Russian nation. The collapse in Russian births has halved the size of the 0-20 age group in comparison to their predecessors born in the 1970s and 1980s. Consequently, Russian demographics are among the worst in the world.
Even if Russia manages an economic renaissance, in a decade its population will have aged and shrunk to the point that the Russians will find holding together Russia proper a huge challenge. Moscows plan, therefore, is simple: entrench its influence while it is in a position of relative strength in preparation for when it must trade that influence for additional time. Ultimately, Russia is indeed going into that good night. But not gently. And not today.
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
DBMA Martial Arts Forum
=> Martial Arts Topics
Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities
=> Politics & Religion
=> Science, Culture, & Humanities
DBMA Espanol
=> Espanol Discussion
Dog Brothers Information
=> Instructor Lists
=> Biographies & Instructor Details


text:
Rachel Nasvik Patricia Satchel, Handbag of the Day
Pick a color, any color - they are all gorgeous. Made from soft lambskin, the details are in the simple geometric folds, accented with just a touch of brass hardware. Generously sized and supported by large, flat straps, the bag has a nice wide bottom and the all-important protective brass feet . It has a zippered top opening and is lined in canvas. But which color? For me, it's a toss-up between the deep blue and the butterscotch. $462.


text:
This dancefloor-friendly mix covers a wide terrain of sonic landscapes, drawing rich influence from Balearic disco, jazz remixes, San Francisco house staples, percussion-heavy African breakbeats, re-edited disco/rare groove, and classic warehouse tracks from the late 80's and early 90's.
I made this on a whim for a road-trip up to San Francisco over New Year's Eve, and it came out so well I decided to put it out officially.
Click here to Download/Stream 'Synergy Lives' now
Also, 'Back' and 'LoveMusic' are midtempo/raregroove/leftfieldhouse and the rest of the mixes on the page are a wide variety of house music.
Enjoy and feel free to share with friends
Eric Rosen
USC Marshall School of Business
Director of Marketing
Jewlicious Festival 5.0
Feb.27-Mar.1, 2009 LA/Long Beach
"An event unlike any other weekend in Jewish history"


text: MODEL NO: RW0124/110 Free moissanite Sterling Silver Pendant worth £89 when you buy this item. In the event of returning, both items must be returned in order to qualify for a refund Features a spectacular 6.5mm round stone at the centre, with set shoulders either side. Each Moissanite piece is set in an 18 carat white gold band and handcrafted in the UK. Moissanite is a near colourless lab-created jewel with 2.4 times more fire than diamonds. Would make an ideal gift to celebrate a birthday, engagement or anniversary - or as an indulgence with real wow factor for someone special. Available in sizes H-V. Equivalent total diamond weight 110pt (1-carat = 100pt). Branded wooden gift box and certificate of authenticity included. |


text:
7 USC § 2274a - Firearm authority of employees conducting field work in remote locations
On and after December 8, 2004, the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to permit employees of the United States Department of Agriculture to carry and use firearms for personal protection while conducting field work in remote locations in the performance of their official duties.
(Pub. L. 108–447, div. A, title VII, § 742,Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2844.)
Prior Provisions
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:
Pub.L. 108–199, div. A, title VII, § 745,Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 37.
Pub.L. 108–7, div. A, title VII, § 753,Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 45.
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Wednesday, May 29, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.
7 USC | Description of Change | Session Year | Public Law | Statutes at Large |
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.


text:
Four Tech Stocks Mature
The huge number from Equinix bodes well for a continuation of the big data, big cloud secular growth stories. I regard EQIX, like F5(FRIV) , as an integral manager to all of the data on the Web and where it gets stored. Its robust earnings tell me that EMC (EMC) , Intel (INTC) and VMWare (VMW) are going to keep seeing more demand from these themes. Same with Citrix, which is the ultimate software-as-a-service cloud play. When it rallies, it tends to take Salesforce.com (CRM) with it.
You need Xilinx chips if your telco network is going to keep up with your cellphone features that sop of data and video. It was worrisome for a time when Xilinx didn't see that demand, part of a larger theme of carrier spending slowdown. That seems to have ended, although of course we know from Juniper(JNPR) that telco spending's been muted for some areas.
Finally Cirrus Logic, an up-and-down story, is definitely up this quarter. Cirrus makes the best sound chips and some energy regulation chips, both of which are in huge up cycles, the former benefiting from Apple's largesse.
All four of these companies provide a positive backdrop for areas of technology that always seem to be called into question -- demand for big data equipment, cloud software and better features for cellphones -- but have become tried and true sources of growth for the companies that play in their fields.


text:
Bormioli Cassiopeia Glassware Set
- New
- Free Shipping
- Overview
Glass act. Our crinkle-cut Cassiopeia glasses by Bormioli Rocco add texture and intrigue to your bar and table. The facets reflect light, lending a magical touch to meals and parties.
- Durable glass.
- Highly resistant to breakage, chipping and dishwashing wear.
- Set of 6.
- Dishwasher safe.
- Made in Italy.
- Details + Dimensions
- Cooler: 2.5"diam. x 4.25"h; 16 fl. oz.
- Double Old Fashioned: 2.5"diam. x 3"h; 14 fl. oz.
Dishwasher safe. - Shipping Info
Most purchases are shipped from our Distribution Center by UPS, to arrive in your home within 5 business days of order receipt.
Shipping Rates
The shipping rate varies depending on your order total and shipping options. View Shipping Rates and Options
Rush Delivery
For an extra charge of $15 per address, we can arrange for rush delivery to most destinations.
Return Policy
We take great pride in the quality of our merchandise. If for any reason you are not happy with your purchase, you may return the item(s) within 30 days of receiving the order for a full refund of the merchandise cost. After 30 days, we will replace or refund your purchase against manufacturer's defects ONLY. Please note that we cannot accept returns on final-sale merchandise, monogrammed/personalized items or on items damaged through normal wear and tear. We regret that we do not give price adjustments on previously purchased items.
For further assistance please call our customer service department at 1.888.922.4119 or send an email to email@example.com
Cooler (Set Of 6)
- Free Shipping
Double Old Fashioned (Set Of 6)
- Free Shipping


text:
Melton Market prides itself on being one of the largest auction centres of sheep in the country and certainly the largest outside the Welsh borders and north of England. With permanent penning for 6,500 sheep and a throughput for several weeks of the year at capacity, Melton is the envy of its competitors. Our reputation as 'Englands Premier Sheep Auction' is deserved.
Prime Lambs
With one complete side of the building devoted entirely to unloading docks, queuing is not an issue at Melton Market, whether you have 6 lambs or 300 to sell. They are quickly sorted and weighed, prior to penning, in batches up to 20 per lot. Our dedicated team of staff, many of whom are sheep farmers, will draw your lambs to meet our buyers requirements. After the sale you can draw your payment on the day. While any sheep stopping overnight will be watered, fed and bedded in our lairage facility.
Cull Ewes
As with pure lambs we offer the very best of service for your barren breeding sheep. These sales are also very well attended, with buyers from all over England regularly attending.
Finished sheep
The sale of Cull Ewes and Finished Lambs is on Tuesdays.
Finished Lambs
Sale time 9.45am
Breeding Sheep
Our seasonal sales of breeding sheep are the envy of our competitors and rival any of the famous northern sales for quality & price. Many farmers, who annually buy the very best of Mule Gimmers in Yorkshire, routinely sell their Theaves through Melton, with in excess of 1,000 head bead being offered on a weekly basis during September & October. After this we offer a steady supply of in-lamb sheep, until lambing time. The pens are then full well into May with ewes & lambs at foot.
Store Lambs
From mid July, store lambs feature very prominently in our sales schedule. By the time we get to late October we will be handling close to 3,000 store lambs every Tuesday. Many of these will later come back as finished.
Sale time 12.00 noon


text:
Everywhere you look the Mazda6 Touring wagon will excite. With its sporty design and brilliant versatility, it's the perfect solution for all your needs. Highlighted by the convenient 'Karakuri' seats and tonneau cover, which will ensure no matter how full your life gets, the Touring wagon will open up endless possibilities.
Diesel WagonThe performance of the Mazda6 Diesel wagon is impressive on its own. But when you consider the efficiency that comes with it then you're in for a real adventure. You won't need to compromise on style either, with its handy 'Karakuri' seats and tonneau cover, plus 17 inch alloy wheels and leather seat trim.
Touring HatchThe Mazda6 Touring hatch is one seriously good looking vehicle. Beyond its sleek styling and sporty handling, is a car that offers it all. Standard with front and rear parking sensors, leather seat trim, auto on/off headlamps and 17 inch alloy wheels, the Touring hatch spoils you in every way.
Luxury Sports HatchWith everything you'll need to get your blood pumping, Mazda6 Luxury Sports hatch ensures that driving is even more rewarding. Now standard with satellite navigation, plus power-sliding glass sunroof, a slick body kit and a stunning Bose® premium audio system, this Mazda6 is sure to get heads turning.
Diesel Sports HatchAthletic looks are backed up by enviable luxury with Mazda6 Diesel Sports hatch. The sharp response and impressive performance are sure to give you a thrill. Along with its slick body kit, premium audio system and now standard satellite navigation, it's nothing short of exhilarating.
Touring SedanWith an elegant design and a luxuriously inviting interior, the Mazda6 Touring sedan excites in every way possible. And thanks to a smooth and powerful 2.5-litre engine, plus sports handling, it's sure to get your senses going.