text:
TUESDAY, January 12, 1869.The Senate met at two o'clock, p. m., Lieutenant Governor Cumback in the Chair.
The journal of yesterday was read.
Mr. JOHNSTON of Montgomery, presented the credentials of Hon. James M. Hanna, Senator elect from the counties of Putnam and Clay.
Mr. Hanna came forward and was sworn in by the President.
The special order being suspended for the purpose--
Mr. GREEN introduced a bill [S. 1] to fix the time for holding the Courts of Common Pleas in the fourteenth Judicial District--composed of the counties of Hamilton, Tipton, Howard and Grant.
On his motion the constitutional restriction was dispensed with--yeas 44, nays 2--The bill was read the second time and passed the Senate by yeas 47, nays 0.
The regular order of business being further suspended--
Mr. GIFFORD introduced a bill [S.2] to fix the times of holding Circuit Courts in the counties of Fayette, Franklin, Union, Rush, Shelby, Decatur and Dearborn.
On his motion the constitution restriction was dispensed with--yeas 41 nays 5.--The bill was again read and passed by yeas 47, nays 0.
Mr. JOHNSTON of Montgomery, asked leave to introduce a bill, but
Mr. BELLAMY objected.
Mr. HUGHES called up the special order--being his resolution to appoint the standing committees of the Senate. He stated that he looked upon the vote the other day on the question of its postponement as in some sense a test, and he would not surrender his resolution into the hands of the majority.
The resolution was adopted.
The LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR announced the next thing in order to be the business pending at the adjournment yesterday, and requested the Senator from Madison [Mr. Robinson,] to take the Chair during its consideration.
The CHAIRMAN stated the question to be on the motion to indefinitely postpone the resolution offered yesterday, calling upon the Governor for alledged corrupt correspondence between his Excellency and the Lieutenant Governor.
Mr. HUGHES opposed the motion for the purpose of offering an amendment to the resolution. I will say to the Senate, in reference to this resolution, that while like other Senators, I had heard of such a resolution before its introduction, I had very little knowledge of the facts or charges upon which it is predicated. I know enough of the origin of the resolution, however, to relieve the Democratic members on this floor of its paternity. I know that the resolution did not originate in a partizan attack emanating from the Democratic party or any of its members. I know, or have reason to believe, that it originated in good faith with Republican Senators, who desired simply to discharge their duties and arrive at the truth. When I say this much, sir, I disclose to the Senate all the knowledge I had concerning the resolution up to the...of its introduction here and its discussion...feeling it to be my duty, as a member of... page: 46[View Page 46] body, to make myself acquainted with the subject matter of so grave a charge, I have taken some pains since the adjournment to arrive at a conclusion as to whether this matter ought to be pursued or not. I felt some embarrassment, and it had been my purpose in the first instance to sit quietly by and take no part in this debate--simply voting according to the lights that should be elicited--from the fact that it might be considered indelicate on my part, owning to the circumstance that my name has been mentioned sometimes in connection with an office in the gift of this General Assembly. On that point I desire to say, upon reflection, I have arrived at this conclusion: that the member of this body who is a candidate for the United States Senate, and who permits his candidacy to be paramount to the Considerations of duty in this body, or trammel him in the discharge of his duties here, ought to resign his seat. It is the duty of every Senator to represent his constituents without fear, favor or affection, and if he thinks more of his candidacy for another office than his duty here, he ought to resign his seat here and take his chances for that other office. The delicacy ought to be the other way, and no Senator ought to shrink from the discharge of his duty on this floor, because it may happen to injure his prospects for election to another office. I propose to discharge my duty here, and if it should impair or utterly destroy whatever prospects I have for another office, let those prospects go. As long as I sit upon this floor I propose to discharge my duty to my constituents fearlessly as well as I can, according to my ability; and especially do I feel free to take this course, when I presume it is well known that my candidacy has been more nominal than real. I do not think there could be half a dozen members of this Legislature found that could say I, in person, by letter, or through a third party solicited their votes. And if I ever live to be a United States Senator, I shall continue to pursue that course. It is not an office to be sought in that way. So much in reference to that matter.
Now, sir, I do not like the phraseology of this resolution. I should be glad to see it amended, and I hope the Senate wtll give me an opportunity to offer an amendment to it. Before I sit down I will read my proposed amendment for the information of Senators. I would like to see this resolution stripped of that aspect, which, to some extent is a prominent feature in it, and which has been adverted to by the Senator from Switzerland, [Mr. Bellamy,] connecting it with a party contest. The principal point the Senate has to deal with must certainly be the official conduct of the parties.
If I understand the matter aright it is alledged from some source, responsible or irresponsible, that the Lieutenant Governor while acting as such--being President pro tem., of the Senate--wrote a letter to the Governor of the State, proposing to secure his own appointment to a prospective vacancy in the United States Senate, upon consideration that he would withdraw from the field as opposition candidate for Governor elect, and would support him [the Governor,] and that this proposition was rejected by the Governor. If this be so, in my judgment, it is a matter of the highest importance, and should be inquired into by the Senate, regardless of who it may affect; because the proposttion was made directly to influence the Governor of the State in the discharge of a high official duty, by motives no man can pronounce other than corrupt. Are we as Senators to pass by a charge of such a grave character and cover up, because the resolution happens to be introduced by a member of the minority upon this floor, or because we happen to have on individual prejudices in this matter? The honor of the State, the credit of the Governor the credit of the Lieutenant Governor, and the character of the Senate forbids such a conclusion. I hope and trust that the inquiry may result in the vindication of the honor of a parties concerned.
I would not from any personal motive ambition, rivalry or other consideration deal unfairly or unjustly by the Lieutenant Governor or the Governor, nor would I deal unfairly by the Senate or the State. In the disposition of this question in my opinion, the path of duty is to come to a direct vote upon this resolution, resort to no dilitory motions or measures,--no unfair tactics--but meet the question fairly and squarely and say whether the Senate will permit such a thing to pass without investigation.
And I am bound to say, that while I hope--and I say it in all sincerity--that this investigation may result in a perfect vindication of all parties concerned, candor compels me to say I do not believe it will so result. Why? Because I believe the charge is true. And when Senators state upon this floor, that the charge proceeds from irresponsible sources, or from party newspapers, to that I answer, that after due investigation--knowing not sufficiently of the matter when up before to conffirm or deny one way or the other--I stand here today the endorser of the charge as a Senator upon this floor; and I say to the friends of the Lieutenant Governor that it will not do for them, directly or indirectly, to evade, or seek to evade investigation. It will not do, and no real friend, no intelligent friend of his, it seems to me, would desire to pursue that course.
The Senator from Parke [Mr. Rice] stated by authority of the Lieutenant Governor, and in his presence, that he was authorized to re- page: 47[View Page 47] lieve the Governor of the State from the obligation of privacy or secresy in this matter, and it seems to me that the Senator from Parke opposed the resolution upon the ground that it emenated from a mere newspaper article. I hope now the Senator from Parke will extend to me the same consideration I would extend to him under similar circumstances; and, as I, a member of this body, standing as an indorser of this charge, that he will open the doors to an investigation.
The Senator from Porter and Lake [Mr. Church] objected to the resolution as a rumor in the newspapers, and said it appeared that there was a bargain somewhere, or a clique. It is not always those who first begin to cast imputations of this sort that are most free from them. And, as far as the duty of this Senate is concerned , it matters little whether the inquiry originated with a clique, party, or otherwise. The question for the Senate is, to inquire whether it is founded on truth? Is there a probably and reasonable cause for proceeding in this matter? I have satisfied myself that there is. What other Senators may think I know not.
For these reasons, Mr. President, I shall after the motion to indefinitely postpone shall be voted down, and this resolution comes before the Senate for its action, offer an amendment, which I will now read for the information of the Senate:
WHEREAS, One of the newspapers taken by this body, and daily laid upon the desk of its members, has specifically charged that some written correspondence of an improper and corrupt character has taken place between the late acting Lieutenant Governor, and now presiding officer of this body, Hon. Will. Cumback, and his Excellency Governor Conrad Baker, wherein it is alleged that propositions of an improper nature touching the appointment of Lieutenant Governor Cumback to a prospective vacancy in the Senate of the United States, were submitted to Governor Baker, and by him indignantly repelled.
AND WHEREAS, No authorized denial of said charges has yet been made public.
AND WHEREAS, member of this body has declared in debate, in the presence of the Lieutenant Governor Cumback to say that so far as he is concerned all restraint and obligations of privacy as to said correspondence are removed and withdrawn therefore,
RESOLVED, That Governor Baker be requested to communicate to this body for its information all and any correspondence in writing, and the endorsement thereon, heretofore had by and between Lieutenant Governor Cumback and himself relative to the subject matter before mentioned.
In the discussion on Saturday, while the debate was progressing, the Lieutenant Governor himself, or any other person, could have gone down stairs and brought up the correspondence, and if there is nothing in it could have exploded these charges in ten minutes. And they could do it yet. If they fail to do it the Senate ought to look into it. The presumptions will be against it. It will not satisfy me, sir, that a public functionary says he is willing the world should know all that can be found out. When a charge is made against a member of this body I would expect him, if the information is in his power, and he stands above reproach, to present it to his friends. I hope the correspondence will come in some form before the Senate, if not voluntary, by the action of the body; and if it comes in the shape that is specifically charged, it will involve a matter of a grave character, and one in which, in some shape or other, this body should take action, regardless of any election outside of the spoils of office.
Mr. RICE. Mr. President: I had hoped that this resolution would have passed off today, by the good sense of the Senator from Daviess [Mr. Turner] withdrawing the resolution, and let the Senate go forward to the discharge of the duties devolving upon it and which we are especially pledged to do, as the Senator from Monroe says. I had hoped that the friends of the Lieutenant Governor, and I may say the friends of this Senate would not have been called upon to-day to enter into a further discussion of this resolution. As the Democratic party is not the father of it, and the responsibility as to the paternity of this resolution is now known to this Senate, it assumes a different aspect, but I have got to see the reason why the Senate of Indiana, at the very threshhold of the session, when important business is pressing--why a resolution of this kind should be thrust upon this body in disregard of all demands for legislation. I do not see why a resolution of this character should be introduced here when there is no senatorial candidate before us; and no person is authorized to name candidates for that body. What is this resolution? I take it from the papers.
[Mr. R. here read the resolution as printed on page 35.]
Who is taking charge of the interests and reputation of the Lieut. Gov. upon this floor? Who put that article in the paper? A friend of Mr. Cumback? Who thrust it upon this Assembly? A friend of Mr. Cumback? No sir. It comes from the opposite side of this Senate first, and after the war has been carried into Africa then it is assumed and justified upon this floor, and that by a gentleman pretending to be the special guardian of the Lieutenant Governor's prospects for the Senate of the United States. I say in all deference to the Senator from Monroe [Mr. Hughes] and his high abilities, and known reputation as a debater that I fail yet to see the reason why an imputation of this kind should be thrust upon this Assembly at this particular time. He says that it affects the reputation of the Senate--its dignity--and we can't let it go by; the Senate has got into possession of it, and page: 48[View Page 48] therefore it should be put through. Suppose any man puts in the papers a printed statement derogatory to the character of a member on this floor, and some Senator introduces a resolution of this kind, the argument then is, as the Senate has got hold of it, some fellow has put it into the papers, and some gentleman has introduced it on this floor, therefore it should be investigated. If this question affected either the Governor or the Lieutenant Governor in an official character, then the Senate could inquire justly into these facts; then the report could be run down and the facts elicited. But is there any charge against the Lieutenant Governor as to corrupt practices in the discharge of his duties as President of the Senate, or since he has been inaugurated into office? If that were the case then the gentleman from Switzerland was right yesterday when he said a Committee should be appointed to investigate the facts. But that is not the case. It comes up because the Lieutenant Governor is spoken of as a candidate for the United States Senate, and therefore the Senate should drag in his private correspondence. I ask the Senator from Monroe, or any other prominent politician if he would like to have his private correspondence paraded before the world? I say it is an insult, and I do not say it with any disrespect to the Senator from Monroe, to drag such a question as this before the Senate and require an investigation; and as far as my consent is concerned to let these facts come up, I stand where I did yesterday, and am not in favor of it.
Mr. CRAVENS, in explanation of the votes he was about to cast said: It is to be deplored that such resolutions as the one under consideration should be introduced, but it is far more to be deplored that there is any real or apparent cause for their introduction. My friend asks: Who has this measure here? I say the State of Indiana has it. Plow came it here he asks? A Senator on my right introduced it. That Senator is the peer of myself or the Senator from Parke [Mr. Rice] though in the minority here, and we have no right to question his motives. Is it a proper matter for investigation? My friend says it is a private correspondence. I deny it. All we know is it is a rumor, and if rumor affects the reputation of a public officer, that rumor is entitled to investigation at the hands of this body,which is the representative of the people.
Mr. RICE (interposing.) Would you trust that rumor to a Committee of the Senate, when there is no charge of impeachment?
Mr. CRAVENS. I propose to answer that. The publication in the newspaper is that a corrupt correspondence has been had with reference to a public matter; and that has come to us in no questionable form. A Senator on this floor brings in a resolution asking that this correspondence be had because it affects the character of not only one but two of the citizens of Indiana occupying the two highest positions in the State. I say the reputation of all the officers of State are matters that belong to us all; we are here to protect the reputation of those men, and we will be faithless to thai trust if we do not. It is no private correspondence as far as rumor is concerned.
Mr. GRAY (interposing.) When is it alledged to have taken place?
Mr. CRAVENS. I am ignorant as to that, my opinion is within the last year or eighteen months.
Mr. CHURCH called for the reading of the article in the newspaper, upon which the resolution was based.
Mr. CRAVENS. I will ask if any Senator has the newspaper article referred to.
Mr. Stein handed a copy of the Evening Mirror to Mr. Cravens, who passed it to the Secretary, requesting that officer to read, which he did as follows:
"Governor Conrad Baker has in his possession a letter which he cannot withhold from the public without doing gross injustice to every citizen who has the capacity to enjoy a good thing--a cheeky thing--an impudent thing. Its absolute raciness is something unapproachable. Hon. (Lieutenant Colonel that was, Major that is,) Will. Cumback also has in his possession a good thing--a sharp, tart thing, with a bit of sting in it--which he can not longer withhold from the public without a positive injustice to every one of his constituents who has the faintest appreciation of indignant humor and "sourcasm." Strange as it may appear, these two good things, out of which the public have been swindled by the over-sensitive scrupulousness of one party and the false modesty of another, are intimately connected with each other. One is a letter written by Hon. Major Will. Cumback to Governor Conrad Baker just before the February Convention, and the other is the Governor's reply. Mr. Cumback's letter to the Governor was a modest request that he withdraw from the contest for the Gubernatorial nomination, and take that for Lieutenant Governor, promising to get himself elected to the United States Senatorship and thus leave Baker Governor in fact, though not in name. Strange as it may appear; Governor Baker didn't see it in the same light as the Hon. Major who was once a Lieutenant Colonel for a short time, We regret to say that Conrad lost his temper, and, not being so much of a "Christian statesman" as the modest warrior who made the request, dd around quite briskly for a short time, and then wrote a very spicy letter in answer. We call for the publication of these two State papers Governor Baker holds Cumback's letter to be confidential. In fact page: 49[View Page 49] it was so marked. Therefore we entreat the modest warrior and Christian statesman to absolve him from the obligation. But the Governor's answer was not confidential, and he can do as he pleases with it. We call for its publication in any event, whether the modesty of honorable Will. is overcome or not."
Mr. HUGHES asked permission to make an explanation.
Mr. CRAVENS yielded the floor for that purpose and--
Mr. HUGHES said: I do not know that I ever read that article. I do not endorse it. I have said that I endorse the charge: So I do. and that is : that the Lieutenant Governor made a proposition to the Governor, in anticipation that a vacancy was about to occur in the United States Senate, that if he, the Governor, would appoint him, the Lieut. Gov., he, the Lieutenant Governor, then a candidate against the Governor, would withdraw and support him for that office. That is the charge I make before the Senate.
Mr. CRAVENS (resuming.) And I do not endorse the article read, nor any of it. If I know anything about the facts the article read by the Secretary was in part the foundation of the resolution, and it is the resolution that I propose to speak to. I was going on to say this: that it should not be regarded in the light of a private correspondence and for this reason: If the charge has any foundation, or is worthy of investigation, by whom has this correspondence been conducted, and about what? It certainly has not been by a private citizen directed to a private citizen. I know of no private citizen who has in his gift the filling of any public office. If I understand it, it purports now to be a letter written by the Lieutenant Governor, (by virtue of which office he is President of the Senate,) to the Governor of the State with reference to an office belonging to the Senate to be filled perhaps by that Governor. If this is a private correspondence then I do not know what a private correspondence consists of. It is wholly conducted by public functionaries, about a public office; and I say the people of the State should have an interest in their char-a right to an investigation.
In view of the facts, and of this being on this floor and it being my duty to sit in judgment, how shall I act to discharge my duty to myself and my constituents? Suppose I say by my vote that I wish this thing indefinitely postponed, what do I say? Why, that I am in favor of suppressing this investigation. This thing has gone upon the wings of the wind--the lightning has carried it all over the country, and what will be the result? Those who have heard of it, and know nothing of the facts, have a right to suppose things are infinitely worse than represented; therefore, if this Senate vote to suppress this investigation and say that this correspondence shall not be had--then we authorize everybody to infer that there is something corrupt and improper in this correspondence. I trust in God, when this correspondence comes to light, that not only Governor Baker but Lieutenant Governor Cumback will be fully, completely and entirely vindicated. There is another view of this case: Mr. Cumback is a prominent candidate for the United States Senate, and in all human probability this Legislature will commission him for that high office. There are Senators on this floor like myself, who know nothing about this correspondence except from rumor, and how will these Senators vote with these charges of corruption, impropriety, or whatever else you call it, ringing in their ears? Will they be discharging their duty when they vote for a man under such circumstances, and when they themselves vote for suppress this investigation? I say I would not be discharging my duty to myself, or to those I represent, in doing so.
I wish it investigated. If it is false let us say so to the world. If it be true we ought to be cautious where and upon whom we bestow the honors of the great State of Indiana. I say I trust, upon investigation, that this thing will be found false and without foundation; and for these reasons, without longer detaining the Senate, I propose to vote against postponement and in favor of the resolution. If the resolution had not been brought in here, and I had been consulted, with the lights I now have I would say Let it go; but as the public know that these charges are made, and still more, that a resolution has been before us proposing to investigate the charge, I say it would be unjust to them, unjust to ourselves, and unjust to the people we represent to push this thing out of the way, and pass over and cover it up.
Mr. TURNER. Mr. President: I desire to say as far as the article is concerned I never saw it. I did see a notice in another paper but not in the same style or terms. I desire to be consistent with my remarks on yesterday, and to be so I have to say that I did not know the resolution I presented had its paternity with the majority. Had I known it had its paternity there, perhaps I should not have presented it. The resolution was handed to me by those of my own faith.
Mr. CHURCH. Mr. President: I hardly thought of speaking on this resolution to-day, and probably would not except for some remarks dropped by the Senator from Jefferson, [Mr. Cravens.] My idea of what now ought to be done is just what he thinks if the resolution had not been introduced. He says if it had not been introduced, and he knew as much as he does now, he would say Let it go. page: 50[View Page 50] He is one of the gentlemen on this floor who is acquainted with the charge of corruption, if it he a charge, and yet if he knew all about it he now knows, and the resolution was not before the House he would say Let it go!
Apparently persons from a distance would think that this resolution originated with the friends of Mr. Cumback. But it is advocated by persons not friendly to Mr. Cumback.
Mr. Church read from the original resolution as follows:
WHEREAS, It has been published in one of the newspapers of this city that the Hon. Will. Cumback Lieutenant Governor elect, made certain corrupt and dishonorable propositions to his Excellency, Governor Baker, which were promptly declined; and,
WHEREAS, This charge is injuriously affecting the reputation and prospects of Mr. Cumback now a prominent candidate for the United States Senate.
Mr. CHURCH (continuing.) A friend of Mr. Cumback introduced this resolution because this charge is affecting his chances for an election to the United States Senate, would be the natural inference of a stranger. I now inform the Senator from Jefferson and the Senator from Monroe that Mr. Cumback and his friends will endeavor to take care of his reputation as a man and a statesman.
Mr. Church read from the resolution again as follows:
AND, WHEREAS, It is due to the Senate and parties implicated, that the facts of this case be known.
Mr. CHURCH. Due to the party implicated! I will inform these gentlemen that Mr. Cumback's friends will step in the breach and try to get what is due to the presiding officer of this chamber.
I would much prefer that this resolution should have emenated--as we have reason to presume it did--from the Democratic party because we all know that it has become a custom for politicians to be constantly endeavoring to charge that upon the other which would injure their prospects for office. We could have overlooked this had it come from that side but the child this morning comes from another parent.
This matter has been said to be charge against the Lieutenant Governor. Where an the charges? I have failed to see any charge here: [holding in his hand a copy of the Mirror newspaper from which the Secretary read the article printed in Mr. Cravens speech on page 48.] Such a paper would not have been filed in a court of Justice.
[Here Mr. Church read the Mirror article again.]
Yesterday I thought the Senate ought not to entertain this resolution for a moment. It is not claimed by any person advocating this resolution that there is anything official in it. But it is claimed by the Senator from Monroe that the Lieutenant Governor proposed to withdraw from the canvass and work in the ranks, that he might be appointed United States Senator. The Senator from Monroe comes with another--
Mr. HUGHES (interrupting.) There was another paper that charges the matter as I have stated. The charge is not endorsed in the shape set forth in the article just read.
Mr. CHURCH. I suppose a very near relative of the other presented this paper. I said yesterday that I do riot believe we have anything to do with the matters spoken of in this resolution. I do not know how much this might bring before the Senate about the wives and children of those who manage affairs at the head of this government. There might be something however small, like that between husband wife, that they might not want to come before the Senate. I am as ready to condemn any official misconduct as any gentleman.
I do not believe it would raise me in the opinion of anybody were I to declaim how honest I am in occupying this seat. When I act otherwise than as a Senator should; when I use my position in any manner not warranted in the charter, it will be time enough when charged to defend myself. I am not a candidate for office, but I can see how I could bu and retain a position upon this floor, and be honorable and honest.
The Senator from Monroe [Mr. Hughes] desires to change the whole issue. He don't rely upon the newspaper article, but comes in and produces a new bill of indictment, and even in that he does not charge anything officially wrong. The Senate has no right to consider the question. It is not claimed that either of the gentlemen were acting in an official capacity when the letters were written, or that it was an official letter. It is a private correspondence. I don't know what the letters may be or what there is in them. But how would the opposition like to have the Senate call for the correspondence that might page: 51[View Page 51] have taken place between Senator Hendricks and the chairman of the Democratic State Central Committee? or how would the gentlemen from Monroe and Jefferson, if they were active in the last campaign, like all their letters to the Republican Committee made public? When they file these letters alleged to be corrupt, with the signatures of the gentlemen attached, I for one will be willing to go into their investigation, and if they are found to be corrupt, as ready as any one to condemn them.
I am here as a Senator on my oath, and I do not find it necessary to announce the sincerity of my motives, or purity of my intention. Let my acts speak for that. The Senator from Jefferson [Mr. Cravens] says the lightning has carried these charges abroad, and I would reply to him, that not only that, but the lightning has carried back responses of indignant condemnation and protest against this attempt. If he goes outside he will find the condemnation of the public written upon every act connected with this matter. The lightning has been employed by some persons, but we have heard from the lightning? as it came back
Mr. CRAVENS (interrupting.) To whom does the Senator refer?
Mr. CHURCH. Not to him if the gentleman has not been employing it. I would not feel so delicate about this if the charges were not made against an officer of this body. There is one thing certain, the friends of the Lieutenant Governor have not been employing the lightning to scatter this. I allude to some persons on the floor or outside of it, unfriendly to the Lieutenant Governor. Now the gentleman asks, what will persons think who hear of our action? When the gentleman from Jefferson votes they will think he voted for the resolution, simply because it got in here in a manner he does not approve; while he himself announces-- and he is an honorable Senator--that if the resolution were not here, and he knew as much as he does now, he should lock the door against its introduction. When the Senator from Porter and Lake [Mr. Church] votes against the resolution, the people will know that he voted against it because the resolution as it now stands is wholly wrong and unjustifiable; and for the simple and plain reason that he does not believe the Senate has any business with it; that the Senate has no right, nor is it its duty to follow up side rumors in opposition papers however much the enemies of the government inside of the party may do it. So the Senator from Porter will vote to indefinitely postpone this resolution as the quickest way of disposing of a thing wrongfully here.
If I were to indulge in suspicions I should say that this resolution would not have been heard of, nor the matters contained in it, were it not that Mr. Cumback's chances for the Senatorship stood in the way of the personal and selfish ends of some gentlemen on this floor;-- if the friends of some persons anxious for the position had not been tolerably well satisfied that there is danger of his being elected.
Mr. GRAY. Mr. President: While I am as anxious to maintain the dignity of the Senate as any gentleman who occupies a seat on this floor, yet I do think we are giving this question much more consideration than it deserves, especially in the form in which it is before the Senate. The Senator from Monroe [Mr. Hughes] proposes to offer a resolution of a different character from the one before the Senate. We have a resolution that is based simply upon a newspaper article. It contains no specific charge against the Lieutenant Governor. It does not say when the communication was written. It does not say it was while he occupied the chair, presiding over the Senate. It does not alledge anything against the official character or dignity of the presiding officer of the Senate. It is simply grounded upon the fact, and that fact asserted as having grown out of a rumor, that the Lieut. Gov. made a proposition to the Governor about who should occupy his place upon the ticket in the political race about to come off. That is a common thing among political men. Suppose I should have written a letter to some man saying "If you will draw off the track and allow me to be a candidate for the State Senate, I will do all I can to help you to Congress;" now after I am elected is it worthy the consideration of this body how I conducted that correspondence.
As long as the resolution remains as it does now I shall vote for indefinite postponement; and I, as a Senator anxious to maintain the dignity of the Senate, am not afraid to take that responsibility. To take a proposition of this kind and demand that the Governor shall furnish that correspondence upon the basis of this resolution, is something I cannot do. I have no doubt it is against his wishes to bring a private correspondence between these two gentlemen before the Senate and the world. It being purely of a private character, I repeat we are giving it more consideration than it deserves. I think there is business of the people of the State demand shall be prosecuted by us of much more consideration than this. Why, sir, if the Senate is to inquire into the private character and standing and private correspondence of every one who aspires to the position of United States Senator, we will have a very considerable amount of business upon our hands. There is nothing to hinder any Senator here from introducing a resolution of inquiry into the private affairs of every man mentioned in connection with that high position. Shall the Senate consume its time in that way? Shall we make such in- page: 52[View Page 52] quiries, especially when the resolution is founded simply upon idle rumor, taken from a newspaper of the opposite party, and that published during the heat and strife of a canvass? I am not afraid as a Senator to vote for indefinite postponement.
Mr. ANDREWS. I have been a silent listener and acknowledge to some change having come over my mind in regard to the resolution under discussion. When it was first introduced I thought it savored too much of party, and was not therefore strictly entitled to the consideration of the Senate, consequently I was disposed to vote against it but now, sir, no matter what the motive for the introduction of it, after all that has been said upon it, and especially after the Senator from Parke, as a special friend of the Lieutenant Governor, has removed all obligations of secresy upon Governor Baker, and declared here that the Lieutenant Governor has said nothing in that correspondence but what he is willing should be published to the world. I am disposed to vote in favor of the resolution, and shall therefore vote against the indefinite postponement of it. If we now, at this stage of the proceedings, suppress the investigation and refuse to publish the correspondence, there are many who will think there is much more in it than what there really is. They will imagine many prejudicial things, and much to the prejudice of the parties concerned.
For my own part I am not as particularly acquainted, personally with either the Governor or the Lieutenant Governor, as many Senators, but I feel toward them no other sentiment than that of respect and friendship, and I imagine there will be nothing found that is really unfavorable to them; nothing that is prejudicial to the character of either the Governor or the Lieutenant Governor in the whole matter, therefore I think we owe it in justice both to the Governor and the Lieutenant Governor, and in justice to ourselves as their friends, to call for this correspondence and let the publication be made, that the world may know all about it. If there is anything in it that is reprehensible and that concerns the public, the public ought to know it and act advisably. If there is nothing in it that concerns the public, I imagine the public will pass it by with indifference, and would have no unfavorable effect upon the parties concerned. I say let the publication be made.
Mr. HUGHES. Mr. President: Presuming the vote on this motion will be a test vote, I beg leave to say a very few words more. I desire to vote for this investigation, but I do not wish to be compelled to do so in the form of the original resolution, though, rather than stifle investigation I would vote "aye" for that resolution. But I think it due to the Senate to put our inquiry in the most acceptable terms, therefore I desire to see the motion to indefinitely postpone voted down so the resolution can be amended.
Mr. President, there was a good deal said by a gentleman who spoke by authority of the Lieutenant Governor, about friends and enemies, and parties on one side or the other. I have not spoken in this discussion as the enemy of the Lieutenant Governor nor as his friend. I speak as a Senator upon this floor, representing a constituency, and I shall not permit myself to be inspired in the discharge of my duties with the friends or the enemies of any man.
As to the paternity of this resolution I know very little about it. The first time it was presented to me, not liking its phraseology, I declined to present the original resolution. I know it originated in the Republican party, There is no charge of conspiracy that need alarm the Lieutenant Governor's friends about this matter that I am aware of. I regret the defense,the opposition to the proposition-made by his friends, as to the admission of the truth of the charge in the form which I have stated it. Has one single gentleman rising on that side of the House denied the truth of the charge? Not one. Not one but what pleads abandonment or dilitory motions.
Now the question comes to this: Conceding the charge to be true, does the Senate consider it unworthy of its vote? If we do, we might just as well indefinitely postpone it. Then the Senate will have said to the world: A charge of this character is one we do not choose to investigate. What is the charge? That the acting Lieutenant Governor of the State addressed a letter to the Governor of the State, proposing that if the Governor in the exercise of one of the highest official acts of his office to-wit: the appointment of a United States Senator; would trade for that appointment, he could secure his nomination for Govornor. I believe the charge is true, and I presume every Senator here does; and if the friends of the Governor on this floor have availed themselves of information within their reach they know the charge to be true.
Mr. RICE (in his seat.) I do not believe it.
Mr. HUGHES. Ten minutes of time and a request of Mr. Cumback would bring these papers from the Governor.
Mr. CHURCH (interposing.) By what authority would he deliver them?
Mr. HUGHES. By the authority of common sense. [Laughter.] I presume Governor Cumback has rights in this correspondence and I presume Governor Baker is a just man and would not withhold the correspondence from him. If no other Senator desires to discuss this matter
Mr. STEIN. Mr. President: It was not page: 53[View Page 53] my original intention to speak either on the resolution or the pending motion, but as I am to be called upon in, a few minutes to cast a vote, and a vote which happens to be a test vote upon this question, and as within the last few minutes I have been implicated in the delivery of a newspaper from which premises might arise, I will ask the indulgence of the Senate for a few minutes.
With reference to the newspaper handed to the Senator from Jefferson, [Mr. Cravens,] alluded to by the Senator from Porter, [Mr. Church,] it was handed to me this morning by a young gentleman, and I retained possession of it, and happened to have it when called for. I am aware that it is not the only paper that alluded to the subject;--that other newspapers have made it the subject of remark, I anticipated that the resolution would create an embarrassing discussion.
Old friendships are still in existence here, and other considerations have tended to make this a matter of embarrassment. I was relieved when the Senator from Parke announced in the name of Mr. Cumback, that the Governor was at liberty to divulge any correspondence between him and Mr. Cumback in reference to this matter. This being done by the principal parties, for I perceived Mr. Cumback in the room and near the Senator, we were relieved from the further discussion of this question. I imagine all the debate which has sprung up has originated in the self-contradictory positions assumed by those friends opposing this resolution. While by their mouths they declare the door is open, they say they will oppose our advance to the door. If they are obeying the wish of their principal in the first instance, they are disobeying him in the last. The two propositions which they advance before the Senate are self-contradictory. They cannot say that they desire this correspondence published and at the same time lock the door which would give access to it.
The question is argued upon the grounds of delicacy and power. My relations with the Lieutenant Governor, have been of the most pleasant kind, but what has mere delicacy to do with the calling out of this correspondence? and what limit is there to our power over this question? It is denied that we have a right to do this thing. Have we not all the omnipotence of the English Parliament in our hands except as limited by the constitution of this State and of the United States? Show me the word that limits our power in this matter. Show me the precept of parliamentary law that limits our power in this matter. It is my understanding that we have the right to call upon any officer of the government for anything that will enlighten our minds upon our duty.
Mr. CHURCH (interposing.) Does the gentleman believe that this Senate has the power of calling for the confidential communications from a gentleman to his wife?
Mr. STEIN. That is a question outside of the Senate. Who talks about confidential communications? Does the resolution refer to any confidential communications? If it was a confidential correspondence that will appear in answer to the resolution.
Mr. HUGHES (interposing.) Does not the gentleman understand that this confidential character has been distinctly waived?
Mr. STEIN. I do. I understand that express liberty has been given to the Governor to disclose it. Every man has his own standard of honor. In the course of a few days we will be called upon to elect a successor to the Hon. Thomas A. Kendricks. Is it not pertinent to that business to know something of this charge? It occurs to me that it is. And if the correspondence is of the character charged, I deny that it is private.
I cannot solicit the Governor for office except upon high and honorable grounds. It is charged that there has been an inducement offered to the appointing power, personal to the appointing power, seeking to beguile the appointing power to confer something upon the applicant for a consideration.
I desire to have it distinctly understood by Senators that I talk upon my own individual responsibility as a Senator of Indiana. I desire no person to be held responsible for what I say. I am aware it is well known that I have my choice among the candidates for the high office of United States Senator. It is at no instigation of any candidate that I act in this matter. From the first I have been known to espouse the individual interest of one gentleman. I say this because I think it likely that my motives will be misunderstood and misrepresented.
It is not much of a compliment to me,but I desire to say that I am individually responsible for what I say. From an early age I have held myself my own master. I stand here as a Senator of Indiana, and a representative of the Republican party, and in the words of the Senator from Whitley, [Mr. Hooper,] I say the Republican party cannot smother this inquiry and acquit itself with honor. These walls fade away from me, and the two millions of people of Indiana look upon me; the eyes of the people whose servant I am are upon me, and the people of Indiana are the tribunal to which we hold ourselves amenable. I am not afraid to face the people with the vote I propose to deliver to-day. I shall vote against postponement and for the amendment of the gentleman from Monroe [Mr. Hughes.] I hope my friend [Mr. Cumback] page: 54[View Page 54] will come out with clean garments from this inquiry.
Mr. GRAY. Mr. President: Like the Senator who has just had the honor of addressing the Senate, I speak for myself. I am not here as an advocate in this matter for either the Governor or the Lieutenant Governor. We have just been told by the gentleman, or, rather, it was a re-utterance of the words of the Senator from Switzerland, that the Republican party cannot afford to smother this thing up. Now if these gentlemen are honest in this declaration, and I suppose they are, I would like to ask the gentleman who has just addressed the Senate why was it necessary that the Democratic party should introduce that resolution into this body? Was there not ability enough among Senators who have this matter in their keeping to present this resolution? Were they not sufficiently acquainted with parliamentary law to do it? Did they not sufficiently understand their rights here? Why, I ask, did they not introduce the resolution? Why was it handed over into the hands of the Democratic Senators? Why was the keeping of the honor and dignity and faithfulness of the Republican party handed over into the keeping of one of our Democratic friends? I think the Republican party was abundantly able to take care of its own reputation as a party, and also the reputation of its candidates.
Now, sir, let us look a little farther into this question. This article published in a newspaper, and which has undoubtedly been the cause of bringing this question before the Senate, was reproduced the other day in a Democratic paper in this city. Why was that? Why was it republished--an article that was published in the last campaign? Why, that it might be the means of aiding gentlemen in introducing this resolution.
I am going to vote for indefinite postponement for this reason: If we pass this resolution we set a precedent here. If we have the power to draw forth the private correspondence of any Senator here simply by introducing a resolution, I want to know if there is a Senator here to-day, that has any private correspondence safe from exposure. In the contest between Clay and Adams there was a disposition to draw out private correspondence but it was not done.
Mr. SHERROD. Mr. President: I think the debate has taken a wide range, but as I shall be called upon to give my vote on this question I desire to make a single remark in explanation. It is not a question with me whether this matter is before the Senate justly or unjustly. It is here, and as has been justly remarked by the Senator from Whitley [Mr. Hooper] we cannot smother this question. I have the highest respect for the Lieutenant Governor. He is a courteous gentleman and an elegant presiding officer. My relation with him are of the best character, but as a friend of that gentleman I would say to him it will not do for his friends to cover up this tiling in its present shape.
The Senator from Randolph [Mr. Gray] alluded to the affair between Henry Clay and Adams, What was the conduct of Mr. Clay in that affair? He came into the United States House of Representatives and demanded of that body an investigation. He called for a Committee of his political enemies, and what was the result? There was an investigation had and Henry Clay was acquited.
I cannot agree that these charges are true. I do not believe they are, though some Senators have intimated very strongly that they are. But whether true or not, I would say to the Lieutenant Governor, to demand an investigation, send it out to the country, and vindicate his honor before the Senate and the world, I have no party feelings in this matter--none in the world--but as a Senator I feel it due to the honor of this body, and to its presiding officer that this foul charge be hurled back.
Mr. CHURCH (interrupting.) Does the gentleman allude to the charge in the Evening Mirror?
Mr. SHERROD. No, sir. And I will say that that paper is neutral in politics. The principal owner of that paper is a straight out and out Radical or Republican, which ever you choose. No, sir; I take the question as it is before the Senate; the Senator from Monroe [Mr. Hughes] makes this charge direct, yet I say I hope it is not true and that our presiding officer will be vindicated. This question can be settled in a few moments. If Mr. Cum back is innocent, let the country know it; if guilty let the country know it. I shall vote for the resolution.
Mr. HAMILTON. Mr. President: As a junior member I have but little disposition to take part in this discussion, but I feel it due to myself to review some of the arguments brought to bear upon this question. The fact that Senators do not defend the way this resolution got in here is of itself enough to justify its being kicked out. Mr. H. argued against the investigation of charges founded merely on rumor; introduced an incident which transpired in the canvass made by him last fall of a very amusing character, and resumed his seat amid roars of laughter.
The motion to indefinitely postpone the resolution was then rejected by yeas 20; nays 25, as follows:
YEAS--Messrs. Armstrong, Bellamy, Case, Caven, Church, Colley, Elliott, Gifford, Gray, Hadley, Hamilton, Houghton, Jaquess, Johnson of Spencer, Lasselle, Rice, Robinson of Madison, Robinson of Decatur, Scott and Wood--20.
NAYS--Messrs. Andrews, Beardsley, Bradley, Car-
page: 55[View Page 55]son, Cravens, Fisher, Fosdick, Green, Henderson, Hess, Hooper, Huey, Huffman, Hughes, Humphreys, Johnston of Montgomery, Kinley, Lee, Morgan, Reynolds, Sherrod, Stein, Taggart, Turner and Wolcott--25.
Pending the roll call--
Mr. COLLEY, in explanation of the vote he was about to cast, said: I shall vote "aye," but my mind was yesterday and is still, that to do justice to everybody concerned we should have peremptorily returned this paper from where it came unceremoniously.
So the motion to indefinitely postpone did not prevail.
Mr. CHURCH asked and obtained leave to withdraw his amendment.
[Leave of absence was asked and obtained for Mr. Hanna and Mr. Bird.]
Mr. HUGHES offered the following amendment:
WHEREAS, One of the newspapers taken by this body and daily laid upon the desks of its members, has specifically charged that some written correspondence of an improper and corrupt character has taken place between the late acting Lieutenant Governor, and now presiding officer of this body, Hon. Will. Cumback, and his excellency Governor Conrad Baker, wherein it is alleged that propositions of an improper nature touching the appointment of Lieutenant Cumback to a prospective vacancy in the Senate of the United States, were submitted to Governor Baker, and by him indignantly repelled.
AND WHEREAS, No authorized denial of said charges has yet been made public.
AND WHEREAS, A member of this body has declared in debate, in the presence of the Lieutenant Governor, that he was authorized by Lieutenant Governor Cumback to say that as far as he is concerned all restraints and obligations of privacy as to said correspondence are removed and withdrawn: therefore,
RESOLVED, That Governor Baker be requested to communicate to this body for its information all and any correspondence in writing, and the endorsements thereon, heretofore had by and between Lieutenant Governor Cumback and himself relative to the subject matter before mentioned.
Mr. HUGHES demanded the previous question, and the demand being seconded by a majority of the Senate. Under its operation the amendment was agreed to by yeas 26, nays 19, as follows:
YEAS--Messrs. Andrews, Beardsley, Bradley, Carson, Cravens, Fisher, Fosdick, Green, Henderson, Hess, Hooper, Huey, Huffman, Hughes, Humphreys, Johnston of Montgomery, Kinley, Lasselle, Lee, Morgan, Reynolds, Sherrod, Stein, Taggart, Turner and Wolcott--26.
NAYS--Messrs. Armstrong, Bellamy, Case, Caven, Church, Colley, Elliot, Gifford, Gray, Hadley, Hamilton, Houghton, Jaquess, Johnson of Spencer, Rice, Robinson, of Madison, Robinson of Decatur, cott and Wood--19.
Pending the roll call--
Mr. BELLAMY, when his name was called said: I desire to offer a substitute for this amendment. I believe there is nothing charged in that amendment but that the Lieutenant Governor asked the Governor to give him an appointment to an office in which there was no vacancy and when there was nothing to give. There was no appointment to be made but he said something to the Governor about the office, and. therefore we are to adopt this resolution. I vote "no."
So the amendment was agreed to.
The resolution, as amended, was adopted upon a division--affirmative 25; negative not counted.
Lieutenant Governor Cumback resumed the chair.
Mr. Hooper gave notice that, to-morrow, he would move to amend the eighth standing rule of the Senate, so as to provide for the appointment of a standing committee on the House of Refuge.
The Lieutenant Governor, With the consent ot the Senate I desire to announce the standing committees of the Senate.
They were read by the Secretary, as follows:
On Elections--Messrs. Robinson of Madison, Scott, Case, Stein, Howk, Taggart and Reynolds.
On Finance--Messrs. Wolcott, Gray, Jaquess; Morgan, Turner and Fisher.
On the Judiciary--Messrs. Caven, Rice, Robinson of Madison, Hanna, Howk, Scott and Stein.
On Education--Messrs. Bellamy, Kinley, Carson, Wood, Stein, Hanna and Turner.
On Benevolent Institutions--Messrs. Church, Green, Reynolds, Bradley, Rice, Gifford and Huffman.
On Agriculture--Messrs. Reynolds, Johnson of Montgomery, Robinson of Decatur, Lee, Gifford, Humphreys and Jaquess.
On Roads--Messrs. Robinson of Decatur, Armstrong, Huey, Hess, Andrews, Johnson of Montgomery, and Johnson of Spencer.
On Corporations--Messrs. Rice, Gray,Green, Hooper, Hanna, Sherrod and Carson.
On Banks--Messrs. Gray, Wolcott, Hooper, Hamilton, Fisher, Sherrod and Morgan.
On Manufactures--Messrs. Armstrong, Beardsley, Andrews, Johnson of Spencer, Henderson, Lee and Sherrod.
On Public Printing--Messrs. Fisher, Hadley, Beardsley, Colley, Taggart, Lasselle and Humphreys.
On Public Buildings--Messrs. Houghton, Colley, Fosdick, Bellamy, Huey, Lee and Sherrod.
On Prisons--Messrs. Andrews, Armstrong, Houghton, Jaquess, Denbo, Smith and Johnson of Spencer.
On Canals and Internal Improvements Messrs. Cravens, Hughes, Smith, Fisher, Howk, Armstrong and Wood.
On State Library--Messrs. Wood, Fisher, Bellamy, Henderson, Huffman, Andrews and Bird.
On Town of Indianapolis--Messrs. Green, Fosdick, Hess, Turner, Taggart, Elliott and Huey.
page: 56[View Page 56]On Claims--Messrs. Jaquess, Hess, Cavin, Denbo, Hooper, Bradley, and Johnson of Montgomery.
On Military Affairs--Messrs. Hadley, Jaquess, Kinley, Bird, Hamilton, Sherrod and Lasselle.
On Phraseology, Arrangement of Bills and Enrolled Bills--Messrs. Hooper, Colley, Denbo, Hadley, Hanna, Howk and Robinson of Madison.
On Unfinished Business--Messrs. Elliot, Cravens, Green, Fosdick, Carson, Henderson and Turner.
On Organizations of Courts--Messrs. Stein, Robinson of Madison, Scott, Green, Smith, Denbo and Hanna.
On Federal Relations--Messrs. Scott, Robinson of Decatur, Cravens, Reynolds, Gifford, Humphreys and Lasselle.
On Expenditures--Messrs. Hughes, Kinley, Houghton, Armstrong, Beardsley, Henderson and Lee.
On Swamp Lands--Messrs. Hess, Gray, Hadley, Hamilton, Case, Lasselle and Huffman.
On Temperance--Messrs. Kinley, Rice, Church, Robinson of Decatur, Taggart, Armstrong and Bradley.
On County and Township Business Messrs. Case, Colley, Hughes, Jaquess, Gifford, Lee and Denbo.
On the Rights and Privileges of the Inhabitants of the State--Messrs. Johnson of Spencer, Caven, Hughes, Stein, Carson, Huffman and Bradley.
On Emigration--messrs. Fosdick, Church, Johnson of Spencer, Huffman, Lee, Henderson, Andrews and Scott.
On Congressional Apportionment--Messrs. Hamilton, Robinson of Madison, Hess, Case, Church, Scott, Morgan, Denbo, Cravens, Elliott and Hadley.
On Legislative Apportionment--Messrs. Colley, Green, Bird, Beardsley, Reynolds, Hughes, Jaquess, Sherrod, Gifford, Robinson of Decatur and Stein.
Mr. BELLAMY offered the following resolution which was adopted:
RESOLVED, That a Committee of three be appointed to refer the Governor's message to appropriate Committees.
The LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR makes the Committee to consist of Messrs. Bellamy, Fosdick and Sherrod.
The following described bills were introduced, read the first time and passed to the second reading:
By Mr. CARSON, [S. 3] to repeal section 1 of an act in relation to the applying of certain funds therein named to the payment of public debt and raising revenue for the support of common schools, approved March 9, 1861, and to legalize all taxes levied and assessed under the provisions of said act.
By Mr. JOHNSON of Spencer, [S. 4] authorising the Superintendent of Public Instruction to adopt a uniform system of book keeping for township trustees.
By Mr. REYNOLDS, [S. 5] to amend the first section of an act entitled "An act to declare abandoned certain unfinished railroads, and to provide for their completion; to declare forfeited the franchises of certain railroad companies, and for the assessment of the value thereof; for the organization of new companies and for making annual settlements, approved March 11, 1867," and the failure of any companies to have formed the preliminary organizations contemplated by the first section of an act entitled "An act to provide for the organization of railroad companies, approved May 11, 1852," shall not invalidate such organizations if otherwise in conformity to law.
By Mr. JOHNSTON of Montgomery, [S, 6] an act to authorize appraisers of real estate to appoint deputies and legalize appointments already made, and to fix the pay of appraisers and depuiies.
By Mr. BELLAMY, [S. 7] an act to fix the compensation of appraisers of real estate, authorizing the appointment of deputies, extending the time for making such appraisement, making the appraisement of 1863 the basis of taxation until said appraisement is completed, and repealing all laws in conflict therewith, and declaring an emergency.
By Mr. ARMSTRONG, [S. 8] an act declaring prize fighting a felony, and providing punishment therefor (including reporters and other lookers on.)
By Mr. HUFFMAN, [S. 9] an act to amend section 27 of an act to provide for a general system of common schools, the officers and duties, and matters properly connected therewith, and prescribing the fees for certain officers therein named, and for the establishment and regulation of township Libraries, and to repeal all laws inconsistent therewith, providing penalties therein prescribed, approved March 6, 1865.
By Mr. HUMPHREYS, [S. 10] an act to repeal an act entitled "An Act providing for the redemption of real property, or any interest therein, sold on execution or order of sale, and providing for the issuing of certificates of purchase in such cases, and the execution of conveyances, and repealing all laws in conflict therewith, approved June 4, 1861.
And then--
The Senate adjourned till two o'clock p, m, to-morrow.


text:
- Hotel Details
- Member Reviews
- Photos
Abba Sants Hotel Barcelona
4 StarsCalle Numancia 32 Barcelona ES-08029
The Abba Sants is close to the popular attractions of the Palau Nacional e Museu Nacional d'Art de De Cataluyna as well as the hilltop vantage point of the Castell de Montjuic, all situated within a peaceful park.
Rooms at the Abba Sants are available as standard, executive, and family rooms; there are also standard rooms with wireless Internet access. All rooms despite their grading offer air conditioning, satellite TV, mini bar, hair dryer, safe, and en suite facilities.
The Amamlur restaurant is open daily for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and specialises in Basque cuisine. International dishes are also available.
The Abba Sants Hotel is a good choice for guests who prefer to stay outside the very centre of the city and yet still have easy links to the sights. Hotel facilities include wireless Internet access, and for guests without a computer the hotel also offers a cyber corner, parking facilities, and a welcoming cafe bar area.
Additional Information
- 10 km to the airport (Barcelona EL Prat)
Hotel Facilities
- Banquet Facilities
- Cafe
- Currency Exchange Services
- Faxing Facilities
- Laundry Facilities
- Non-Smoking Rooms
- Photocopying Facilities
- Room Service
- Spa / Wellness Centre
- Bar / Lounge
- Concierge
- Disabled Facilities
- Gym / Fitness Facilities
- Lift / Elevator
- Parking Facilities
- Reception
- Safe Deposit Box
- Tour Desk
- Business Centre
- Conference Facilities
- Doctor On Call
- Internet Access - Wireless
- Lobby
- Parking Facilities (At Cost)
- Restaurant
- Secretarial Services
Room Facilities
- Air Conditioning
- Ensuite / Private Bathroom
- Mini Bar
- Telephone
- Cable / Satellite TV
- Hairdryer
- Pay-per-view Movies
- Disabled Facilities
- Internet Access
- Safe
Abba Sants Hotel Barcelona Guest Reviews (16)
A great hotel. We arrived in Barcelona on the early Friday morning flight and after getting the bus into town to a metro stop, we found that our hotel was only a couple of stops from the bullring. When we came out of the metro we fell into the Hotel. It's location to the metro is perfect. The Hotel staff were very friendly and nothing seemed to much trouble. We were expecting to drop of the cases and come and book in later, but to our surprize they said we could have our room early without any charge. We did not eat in the Hotel as we felt the local bar Panet on the otherside of the road offered good coffee and a snack first thing. We felt that the hotel was very clean and the rooms very acceptable. There is no coffee making facilities but who really needs that now. The mini bar does the rest.The shower and bathroom is clean and the rooms were made to look perfect every day. Checking out is not until midday so no need to rush inf you are on tthe late Sunday night flight to Bristol and they will look after your luggage all day without extra cost. On the whole we found this hotel to be good value for money a good quiet location and perfect for getting around the whole of the city.
Nick D wrote on December 4, 2012
Well located, clean, competent personnel. Our group was very satisfied with service and cleanness of this hotel.
Lucho wrote on June 23, 2012
A friend I was visiting in Barcelona suggested that I stay at Abba Sants because it's close to transportation and in a good neighborhood. What I found was better than I could have imagined! The room was perfect! It was modern, large, well equipped, good air-conditioning, with lots of drawer and closet space. The bathroom was also very large and well-designed, everything new and clean. The staff was courteous, helpful, and informative. The lobby was large and comfortable, the bar and restaurant very nice. Transportation by metro and train was only steps away from the hotel. I was able to get to every destination in minutes. The neighborhood felt safe and there were many cafes and shops nearby. I was pleased to find that the Diagonal was only a few blocks away. I will definitely stay there again when I return to Barcelona.
Meryl wrote on October 19, 2011
Decent hotel. 3-4 star. About a 100 ft. walk to the metro, which was excellent. Good value hotel for Barcelona. There is a dog park out back, which is amusing if you like dogs, but could be annoying if you're trying to siesta mid-day.
daftwankie wrote on October 17, 2011
Excellent location as we just took the train from airport to Sants station and hotel is easy 5min walk. We had room on 7th floor with large balcony that overlooked city !!!! so ask for room on 7th floor. There is a great pastry shop across street for breakfast for about 10 euros. Hotel is in very nice location and we walked 1/2 mile down to Pl Espanya train station to catch train to Montserrat (a must do day trip) Also take funicular to the old fort on top of the hill near Olympic park for a great view of the city of Barcelona.
Dacougr wrote on October 16, 2011
Other Recommended Hotels
U232 Hotel Barcelona | 4 Stars |
Astoria Hotel Barcelona | 3 Stars |
Balmes Hotel Barcelona | 3 Stars |
HCC Covadonga Hotel Barcelona | 3 Stars |
Med Aparts Bas Barcelona | 4.5 Stars |
Porta Fira Hotel Barcelona | 4.5 Stars |
Expo Hotel Barcelona | 4 Stars |
Attica 21 Barcelona Mar | 4 Stars |
Condes De Barcelona Hotel | 4 Stars |

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Arthur Pochon (a.k.a. Art Bleek) started studying piano at the age of 6. He enrolled in the conservatory at age 9 to study saxophone and music theory. He graduated from the prestigious institution 12 years later. During his years of study, Arthur played in various musical ensembles, ranging from chamber groups to full orchestras. He listened primarily to classical, jazz, world as well as electronic music and started composing original material on a 4-track tape recorder. In 1996, he left to Boston's Berklee College Of Music on a full scholarship to attend their summer music program. This trip proved to be a life-changing experience and gave direction to Arthur's artistic choices. Starting in 1997, he found employment in major Paris recording studios where he developped his knowledge of the recording and mixing processes. At that time he began equipping his home recording studio with audio gear. This allowed him to produce his own music at home, which projects ranging from atonal, experimental work to electro and nu-jazz sonorities. He also scored music to short films, documentaries and contemporary plays during that period.
In 2001, his music drew the attention of several recording labels (among them Le Maquis) which released tracks on various compilations under the name Art Bleek. He started actively performing on the Paris club scene as a saxophonist alongside deejays and with various projects. At this time, he also started spinning an eclectic blend of jazz, nu-jazz, broken beats, bossa-nova, world and electro-jazz records in hip Parisian bars and restaurants. Towards the end of 2004, Arthur signed a recording contract with British label Loungin' Recordings. The label is releasing his first LP and a single taken from the album, including remixes. Towards the second half of 2007, two EP's and a remixes album were released.
In addition to being an accomplished musician and producer, Arthur also wrote the screenplay for his first short film, which he directed in 2004. He also wrote the original score for it.
Tracks on "The Time"


text:
Once&future, the technique should work equally for trigears as for taildraggers.
First trick is to judge getting your tail as close to the fence as possible as you come around followed by full power at a point about 20deg from takeoff direction (varies with aircraft and thrust).
The idea is you already have overcome tyre/wheel rolling resistance plus start and acceleration of the 'mass' and the bonus is that the prop is being moved into undisturbed/clean air, rather than turbulant/dirty air as in holding brakes and releasing, plus as noted, no rock damage.


text:
The Promise consultation has now
A huge 'thank you' to everyone who took the time to share their ideas with us.
Are you safe online? Make sure you read the new
Guides web
safe code!
Share your favourite unit activity ideas with other Guides on our message board.
Register your interest in guiding on the main Girlguiding website!
In 2013, become Girls in Action, and make a difference to the lives of girls and young women in the UK and around the world.


text:
Senior nutrition
Senior Connections offers hot, nutritious meals Monday-Friday for people 60 or older.
Senior Connections offers hot, nutritious meals Monday-Friday for people 60 or older. Meals are delivered to homebound individuals and are served at congregate sites in Douglas County. A $3.50 contribution is requested per meal but no one is denied because of inability to pay. Call 715-394-3611 or 800-870-2181. Next week's menu includes:
March 25: Baked ham,
Au Gratin potatoes, glazed carrots, wheat dinner roll, strawberry shortcake.
March 26: Meatloaf, baked potato, sour cream, spinach, wheat bread, peach cobbler.
March 27: Chicken salad
on wheat bread, potato chowder, banana.
March 28: Meat sauce, rotini, mixed green salad, dressing, green beans, breadstick, gelatin jewels.
March 29: Offices closed; no services available.
Make reservations 24 hours in advance for meal sites at 11:30 a.m. at Phoenix Villa, 218-591-3553; Amnicon Senior Center, Tuesday-Thursday, 715-364-2316; Solon Springs Community Center, Tuesday-Friday, 715-378-4546; Senior Center, Monday-Friday, 218-591-0001; Lake Nebagamon Village Auditorium, Tuesday-Friday, 715-374-3101; and Gordon Town Hall, Tuesday-Friday, 715-376-4683; noon Tuesday and Thursday at Northland Community Center, Dairyland, 715-244-3354; and 11:15 a.m. Monday-Thursday at Holy Assumption Parish, 715-394-7919; 715-399-2311 and Kro Bar and Grill, Brule, Tuesday-Friday, 715-372-8424.
Tags: community, seniors, health, food


text:
London Academy of Diplomacy
The London Academy of Diplomacy(LAD)
The London Academy of Diplomacy (LAD) at UEA London has developed a number of postgraduate qualifications to meet the needs of members of the London Diplomatic Corps, staff of various ministries, staff of multinational corporations, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), the media and graduates aspiring to an international career.
Our diplomacy programmes distinguish themselves by responding to the professional learning needs of governments, organisations and multinational corporations, who need better trained officials to help them achieve their objectives in promoting business and trade. The teaching of economic diplomacy, management, inter-cultural bilingual communication, protocol and etiquette, as well as ethics are essential to the training of diplomats and managers in the corporate sector.
Our professional courses lead to the award of one of the following Masters Degrees:
MA/Postgraduate Diploma/Postgraduate Certificate in International Diplomacy
MA/Postgraduate Diploma/Postgraduate Certificate in International Business and Diplomacy
MA/Postgraduate Diploma/Postgraduate Certificate in International Security and Diplomacy
MA/Postgraduate Diploma/Postgraduate Certificate in International Communication and Diplomacy
Short courses and executive programmes in the above disciplines are also available.
London Academy of Diplomacy courses are validated and awarded by the University of East Anglia and all courses at UEA London operate within the same quality assurance framework as those at the main UEA campus in Norwich.
Research & Research Degrees (MPhil & PhD)
LAD staff are involved in a variety of research areas such as diplomacy, culture, the media, religion, political and social history, foreign policy, law, management and international security. The above Masters degrees will help you to develop independent investigation, reporting, conceptual analysis and research skills which are necessary requirements for those who wish to read for MPhil and PhD degrees in the future. Supervisors of the MPhil and PhD research degrees include staff drawn from UEA Schools of Social Sciences and Arts and Humanities.
Some of the PhD Degrees successfully completed and supervised by LAD staff include:
- The Conflict in the Western Sahara
- A Critical Study of Hamlet's Arabic Translations
- The Construction and Representation of the European Union's International Identity
- The Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic and Consular Relations and State Practice: a Critical Analysis
- A New Conceptual Approach to Conflict Resolution in the Post Cold War World with Reference to the Dayton Agreement
- Regional Integration and Co-operation in Sub-Saharan Africa
- Towards an E-Government: The case of Dubai
- Diplomatic Negotiations: Romania's Accession to the European Union, a case study.
- Effective Diplomacy and Nation-Building: A critical study of the Tribal Diplomacy adopted by three Arabian Gulf clans and its contribution to the Establishment of two modern nation states (1716-1826).
- Paradigms in Caribbean Trade Diplomacy: Negotiating the Economic Partnership with the EU
- Sudanese Literature in English Translation: a Historical and Analytical Study
Research Candidates, Supervisors, and Staff at the Post Graduate Research Day, School of Political, Social and International Studies, Norwich, June 13th, 2012.
More Information about Diplomacy Programmes
Our programmes incorporate a blend of academic studies and professional training; providing you with the opportunity to choose from a range of modules to broaden your knowledge in specific fields of study to enhance your career prospects and overall employability. Each programme combines compulsory modules in subject-specific and research skills and options to reflect your chosen fields of specialism.
The inclusion of modules such as, Media Communication Strategies; the Dynamics of International Business; Religion, Diplomacy, and Security; International Liaison and Public Diplomacy; Global Economic Governance; Science Technology and International Policy and Cultural Awareness also provides opportunities for governments and the corporate sector to obtain training in specific areas through the availability of individual CPD modules.
In addition, the course involves a one week optional educational European field trip to visit international and regional organisations such as NATO,the European Union, the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court.
Teaching staff
The London Academy of Diplomacy benefits from the experience and expertise of Professor Nabil Ayad, Director of the Academy and a team of academics, experts and professionals with proven track records in running courses and training programmes in International Diplomacy.
You will be assessed on coursework, oral presentation and written examination. You will also be required to submit a dissertation of about 12,000 words on an approved topic.
The above courses will help you to develop independent investigation, reporting, conceptual analysis and research skills which are necessary requirements for those who wish to read for an MPhil and PhD degrees in the future.
How to apply
Postgraduate Research Degrees (PhD, MPhil):
Use the UEA Online Application Form.
Postgraduate Taught Degrees (MA):
Please download the application form
Print and fill in the application form and send to:
The Manager
The London Academy of Diplomacy
University of East Anglia , London Campus
102 Middlesex Street
London E1 7EZ
Tel 00 44 (0) 20 7059 4437 / 4481
Fax 00 44 (0) 20 7247 9246
For further information please contact:


text:
The Great Dunn Fell is situated in Cumbria
Starting from Dufton,
the Great Dunn Fell ascent is 9 km long. Over this distance, you climb 689 heightmeters.
The average percentage thus is 7.7 %.
Look for other sides to climb the Great Dunn Fell.
profile Great Dunn Fell - click to open in new window
open big profile of the Great Dunn Fell in a new window
Special thanks to salite.ch.
Find all information on climbs and cycling in Cumbria and find all climbs in Cumbria on a map. |
Other climbs close to the Great Dunn Fell: within 10 km - within 20 km - within 50 km |
Tell us your story too! Or send your story in your own language:
Did you climb the Great Dunn Fell? Please send your cycling story, description or comments. You can also send us video's or send us pictures on the Great Dunn Fell.
open big profile Great Dunn Fell in new window
© climbbybike™ All rights reserved 2005 -


text:
The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.
brboy1 said:Just seen hansen & owen oozing 'bout the r.s its toe cringing t.v.
"Theres not many players in the world who can pass like stevie". Snigger,snigger.
"he's like Messi,Suarez" Stop it,my sides.
"chance of Champs league" Medic.!!
brboy1 said:Its gotta be the producers,40-50 year olds,living in the past,supporters during the 70s & 80s.
Always said refs were of the same era.Gotta soft spot for the whinging c-unts.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


text:
This function is for anyone wanting to get the resolution of their player's screen with one simple function. It will only work for people who use an interface file (.DMF). Also it should be noted that this will work safely with any window at all in your interface file.
How It Works
This function works by preparing a window to be rapidly expanded. When it reaches the limit of the player's screen it will stop and record how far it got in two player variables (mob/var).
Namely : currentResX & currentResY
After the process is done it will return the window back to the way it was. Now, you can use any window you like. If you choose to use any non-transparent windows then please not that there will be a 'visual flash'. You can personally stop this from happening by adding a transparent window to your interface file and calling the function on that window. For example getResolution("transparent").
To make a transparent window for this purpose, set the window's background color to something unique such as bright cyan. Then set the transparent color property of that window to the same color. It will become invisible and you're done. Now just switch your call to that window and you won't experience a flash.
mob |
The Code
Simply copy paste this code into your project, it won't clash with anything you have. Now you can use it like in the example above.
Also, please note that the player's resolution variables will only update when this function is called.
mob |


text:
You are here: Home
Making Faces: Tudor to Modern
Come and visit us over the festive period. The Museum shop has a range of unique gift ideas for your friends and family this Christmas.
Join us for half term fun for all the family. Drop-in to enjoy art and craft activities from our popular activity cart. Don't miss Monday's Big Draw event. Book now for our special spooky after dark Halloween tours of the Museum!
The first event connected with our Making Faces: Tudor to Modern exhibition took place on Saturday 12 October 2013, offering visitors a chance to be part of a growing archive of portraits of local people and to receive their own professional digital portrait.
As part of our current 'Reading Connections' project we are creating a web resource, in which material from the collections will be viewable online. A major part of this work involves the Museum's Reading Chronicle collection of over 20,000 images taken between 1938 and 1962.
This year the Museum is running behind the scenes tours of the Museum store on 12th and the Abbey Quarter on 13th and 14th. We are also hosting a vintage style event 'Here's Heritage Fashion' on the 13th September.
Copyright Reading Borough Council 2013
Content management system from web labs
General Info
Reading Museum The Town Hall Blagrave Street Reading Berkshire RG1 1QH Telephone: +44(0)118 937 3400 Fax: +44(0)118 937 3481
Museum Search:
Quick search:
Find Your Interests:
Jump to section: Collections --> What to see in our Museums --> Archaeology --> Social History --> Art --> Natural History --> World Collections --> Reserve collections - find out more Get Involved --> Berkshire Archaeology --> Friends of Reading Museums --> Reminiscence --> Volunteering --> Projects and consultation Schools --> Loan Boxes --> Membership and Prices --> Sessions --> Teachers' Resources --> Projects --> Learning and Loans Venue Hire --> Conferencing and Venues --> Weddings and Civil Partnerships
What's On at a Glance:


text: HiRead your interesting post - you have certainly been through the mill - a pity that you did not seek a second opinion after the first fall - however, thats all water under the bridge.You have made good progress in the last twelve months and assume that you have made adjustments to your daily life - Every day is a blessing and one hopes that you gain more and more strenght in your quadriceps. Have you returned to work? are you allowed to drive? Best wishesJohnK/ Manchester UK


text: 500 pts Music Trivia #2 <NewsTalk VIP Club According to this article, what pop star may have dissed Rihanna? Click here for the answer. Sign in to Participate Category: Trivia Ends: Wednesday January 9 at 10:59PM CST Visit our sponsor: Click here for the answer! Share on Facebook Share on Twitter More Leave a comment Send to a friend! Print this page Pin it! Reddit This! Share on Tumblr! More Ways To Get and Use Points How Much Do You Know About Santa? [QUIZ]News Talk Trivia – Amazon DronesThe Economics of Christmas – How Much Are Americans Spending?Dyson Heater$500 Hotel Gift Card$500 Target Gift Card


text:
Guys, Saturday, April 20th is Record Store Day.
Celebrate by heading on down to Randy Now's Man Cave.
There will be a free, all-ages Cryptkeeper Five concert at 1:00, but also free man cave hot dogs. And rare vinyl. And free hot dogs.
Head down to 15 Park Street, Bordentown, NJ any time between 9 AM and 6 PM.
Last year, PRBuddy Tom wrote an awesome blag post all about how Record Store Day completely changed his life.* You should definitely read it.**
*This is not what Tom's article is about. But he mentions High Fidelity in a self-deprecating kind of way, so you should still check the article out.
**There will be free hot dogs at Randy Now's Man Cave. I just want to reiterate that fact.


text:
The Occupational Therapy Department at the University of Louisiana at Monroe is located in Caldwell Hall, on University Avenue. The OT department offers an Associate of Science in Occupational Therapy and the OTA to MOT (Master's) Program.
Occupational Therapy is a health profession which evaluates and treats people with developmental, social, emotional, or physical problems and helps these individuals develop the skills to overcome the challenges of a disability. The aim is to enable those who are temporarily or permanently disabled to be as independent as possible in the areas of work, home, self-care, and leisure skills while recovering from or adapting to their disability.
Occupational therapy services are provided by occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants. An occupational therapist is responsible for the evaluation and treatment of individuals with disabilities. An occupational therapy assistant contributes to the evaluation and treatment of an individual under the supervision of and in collaboration with an occupational therapist.
Occupational Therapy Assistants work in such places as schools, nursing homes, hospitals, outpatient centers, private practice, rehabilitation centers, and mental health centers.
The Occupational Therapy Assistant Program (OCTA) consists of:
Graduates of the program will be eligible to sit for the national certification examination for the Occupational Therapy Assistant administered by the National Board for Certification in Occupational Therapy (NBCOT).
After successful completion of this examination, the individual will be a Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA). Many states require licensure in order to practice; however, the majority of state licenses are usually based on the results of the NBCOT Certification Examination.
NOTE: Applicants who acknowledge a felony conviction are warned that the National Board for Certification in Occupational Therapy and Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners may bar persons with a felony record from taking the certification examination or from state licensure.
You may contact these organizations for further information:
National Board for Certification in Occupational Therapy (NBCOT)
http://www.nbcot.org/ (an Early Determination review is available)
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
Results of the OTA National Certification Examination, which is required for practice following completion of educational programming, reveal the following pass rates:
Year | Number of Program Graduates | Percentage of Program Graduates | Number of first-time test takers | Number of first-time test takers who passed the exam | Percentage of first-time test takers who passed the exam |
2010 | 28 | 87.5% | 23 | 22 | 96% |
2011 | 28 | 90% | 26 | 23 | 88% |
2012 | 31 | 100% | 42 | 35 | 83% |
Total 3-year | 87 | 92.5% | 91 | 80 | 88% |


text:
A Belated Congratulations to our Black Belt Vivian Coulson who is also a Proud New Grandma.
We all Welcome into this New World
John Lucas Klemm
Born November 4, at 5:40 PM . 7 Lbs 6 oz and 19 3/4 Inches Long.
Born To her Son Bill and Daughter in Law Julie.
27 members
26 members
7 members
There are no birthdays today
East West Karate Academy is located in beautiful Sussex County NJ, being centrally located close to the border of Lafayette and Sparta on Rt 15. We study the Isshinryu form of Karate, which is an Okinawan style emphasizing speed, simplicity, and practical self defense.
Learn more about our amazing programs.
Posted by SUZANNE WEEKS on November 2, 2013 at 1:46pm 1 Comment 1 Like
2013 - 2014 NJ AAU Pre-State Karate Tournament The New Jersey AAU District is proud to host the 2013-2014 AAU Pre-States New Jersey Junior and Adult Karate Tournament sanctioned by the Amateur Athletic Union. The tournament… |
Posted by Shannon and Nicholas LoBue on October 25, 2013 at 12:01am 2 Comments 1 Like
Posted by Scott Klinger on October 7, 2013 at 5:19pm 1 Comment 0 Likes
It was our deepest regret that we share our sincere Condolence to the Schlomann Family for the loss of her Dad Mr. Walter Miller.
Walter F. Miller
AGE: 97 • Newton
Walter F. Miller passed away at Morristown Memorial Hospital on Friday, October 4, 2013. He was 97. Born in Teaneck NJ on June 26, 1916 to the late Garfield and Evelyn (Wolfe) Miller, he was a resident of Sparta since 2006. He previously resided in Mendham for 43 years. Mr. Miller was an electrical engineer…
ContinuePosted by Scott Klinger on September 20, 2013 at 3:04pm 1 Comment 3 Likes
Shiai will be at Sparta Middle School and the Banquet will be Held at The Lake Mohawk Golf Club.
Started by Scott Klinger in General Discussion. Last reply by Michelle Sabella Aug 24. 2 Replies 0 Likes
What were your favorite things about Karate camp? Share some of your memories, thoughts and experiences with others here!…Continue
Started by Donna Facer in General Discussion. Last reply by Donna Facer Jun 6. 6 Replies 0 Likes
I am a white belt, and as such, I am experiencing an internal fight between what I know is right, peacefulness, and my desire to learn karate and ultimately understand conflict. This is similar to the fight between work and family. Sometimes we have…Continue
Started by Scott Klinger in General Discussion. Last reply by Donna Facer May 17. 3 Replies 5 Likes
Here is an insight to Mr. Ryan Beebe's interview process as he completes his Senior year at Pope John High School. You will find this discussion very interesting. The opportunity to take part in an art comes once in a lifetime, let alone it being…Continue
Started by Scott Klinger in General Discussion. Last reply by Linda A. Peoples Feb 26. 8 Replies 0 Likes
Share your favorites with others here!Continue
© 2013 Created by Scott Klinger. Powered by


text:
Parent Resources at the Student Resource Center is here to assist you with the transition of your student from year to year by serving as a resource as you navigate the many offices, services, and resources of the university. There is no doubt you will have questions and concerns as your student makes his college journey. We're here to help with those questions and connect you with information, offices and colleagues throughout the university.
At NYU, we understand your desire to be there to assist and provide for your student, and understand how crucial a role you play in the life of your student. However, our goal is to assist you in helping your student navigate the resources available to them that will help him/her develop as a young adult and make the daily decisions that are a part of their new life.
We see the parent's role to now be one of support (not just financially) – not doing for them – but helping them to do for themselves. And when they can't, to know where to ask for help. As a parent, you can support your student by being involved and supportive, and empowering your student to make new friends, stay on top of coursework, and utilize University resources. You can also provide support by directing your student to a variety of University resources when needed and encouraging your student to reach out for assistance.
The undergraduate schools and programs at NYU offer varying support resources specifically for parents of students in their programs. The following are links to currently available information available for parents. For those schools and programs not listed, please refer to the Calendars and Contacts link above for a Directory of contacts.
Phone: 212.998.4219
Email: email@example.com
Helpline Hours:
Mon-Fri: 9am to 5pm EST*
*Note that the Parent Helpline phone is only answered when the University is open. For emergencies at anytime, please contact NYU's Department of Public Safety at 212.998.2222 or call 911.
Sponsored by the NYU Student Resource Center. Click here to meet the Staff!
We're making it easier to find important dates, deadlines, resources, and services. Bookmark NYU StudentLink for quicker access to the links you need.
Read More


text:
Select a tag to browse associated projects and drill deeper into the tag cloud.
GLPI is the Information Resource-Manager with an additional Administration Interface. You can use it to build up a database with an inventory for your company (computer, software, printers, etc). It has enhanced functions to make the daily life for the administrators easier, like a
Copyright © 2013 Black Duck Software, Inc. and its contributors, Some Rights Reserved. Unless otherwise marked, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License . Ohloh ® and the Ohloh logo are trademarks of Black Duck Software, Inc. in the United States and/or other jurisdictions. All other trademarks are the property of their respective holders.


text:
Hi, I just a new WD My book world edition 1TB. I have multiple users using it and i was wondering if andyone knew how to partition it. It is a network drive so i am not sure how to partition it. Any ideas?
What is the partition currently? Probably NTFS... Well to partition, get some tool Such as Partition magic, or Gparted, which is a free tool.
It is NTFS but when i use that tool will i be able to partition it thourgh the network. It is setup as a network drive and is connected to my Router.
BTW, here is the tool you want... http://gparted.sourceforge.net/ Any Ubuntu live disk also has it built in!
So can i partition it by connecting to my computer or taking out the drive and putting in my comp and partitioning it that way?
My instructions: Make the CD Plug in Drive through USB / ESATA Boot to CD Partition drive to liking Tell me it worked so I will be happy
Instead of USB could i connect the enthernet cable from the My book to my computers ethernet and then partition it that way? The usb port it has is the kinda of port that you would find on a computer.
Plug into that... ETHERNET WILL NOT WORK I HAVE TRIED. It will fail worse than epic fail. Edit: And I know epic fail...
It doesnt come with the right USB adapter you cannont plug it into the HDD and the computer. The point of the USB is to connect to routers that have a USB support.
Umm... then I don't think it is possible... but once again... Not gonna work over ethernet... You have to have a USB cable... you can take it to the store and ask for the correct cable.
I have installed a similar network hard drive for my uncle. You don't make partitions, but make users accounts and each user account will have their own independent folder, which will act like a partition to the client (to each user). NDAS > NAS I got this ximeta NDAS storage, and it is flawless installation, and it emulates a local scsi hard drive, so you can actually make multiple partition. But the feature i like on the NAS is the usb ports, so you can make it a print server, or extend the storage (usually limited to 4gb and/or has to be fat32).
Nice idea... That might actually work. But one thing is that Fat32 is not used on the WD drives as the reason you listed... I forgot to mention that to him.
http://www.megamodo.com/images/westerndigital/mm_wdfMyBook_Pro_NC1.jpg Look at that image, that is the back of it. Look at the USB port.
So is there a converter i can get that has 2 USB A. It is impossible to connect to computer. http://cgi.ebay.com/USB-ver-2-0-A-t...ameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem#ebayphotohosting
As i stated, fat32 is only used when you extend the storage. You can plug thumb drives and other external usb drives, but usually they are very limited for some reason.
I don't think such thing is made, as that is a MALE A port to a MALE A port... which is not made... and if you pluged it in the wires would be switched around... Edit: I switched around the wires once BTW... gave the drive 5 volts wrong side, broke it got hot and died... It was a hot death.
NO! you don't have usb transfer functionality on that NAS drive, you can only use for two things... 1) Extend your storage to thumb drive or another usb hard drive 2) use as a usb print server.


text:
40 CFR Part 257 - CRITERIA FOR CLASSIFICATION OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES AND PRACTICES
- SUBPART A — Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices (§§ 257.1 - 257.4)
- SUBPART B — Disposal Standards for the Receipt of Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG) Wastes at Non-Municipal Non-Hazardous Waste Disposal Units (§§ 257.5 - 257.30)
- Appendix I to Part 257 - Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs)
- Appendix II to Part 257
44 FR 53460, Sept. 13, 1979, unless otherwise noted.
Title 40 published on 2012-07-01
no entries appear in the Federal Register after this date.
This is a list of United States Code sections, Statutes at Large, Public Laws, and Presidential Documents, which provide rulemaking authority for this CFR Part.
This list is taken from the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules provided by GPO [Government Printing Office].
It is not guaranteed to be accurate or up-to-date, though we do refresh the database weekly. More limitations on accuracy are described at the GPO site.


text:
Search Templates & Tools
5 Franchise Tips If you are thinking about purchasing a franchise, keep the following 5 tips in mind. | View |
5 Tips for Writing a Business Plan For a Loan 5 Tips for Writing a Business Plan For a Loan | View |
5 Tips on Finding Angel Investors and Venture Capitalists 5 Tips on Finding Angel Investors and Venture Capitalists | View |
What is an FDD? A franchisor will send you the company's Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) once you have filled out an application and indicated serious interest in the franchise. The FDD very clearly defines what the franchisor will do for you and what s/he expects of you. There are 23 important parts... | View |
Should I Buy a Franchise? When most of us think about franchises, we are referring to the business-based franchise like the top 500 franchises published in Entrepreneur magazine each year. Entrepreneur's 75 different categories range from automotive to services, but they all have one thing in common—a... | View |
Selecting the Right Franchise In Part 1, you checked out your franchise options and decided to purchase a franchise. You have decided which one of the 75 franchising industries is right for you and have narrowed it down to maybe three or four different companies. The big decision now is to select the one franchise... | View |
Growing the Franchise You, the franchisee, have supported this system with your royalties and initial purchase price and it now will be one of your biggest assets as you decide to grow your business. | View |
5 Tips on Budgeting 5 Tips on Budgeting | View |
60-Second Guides: Establishing a Revolving Line of Credit In just 60 seconds, we'll show you how to determine if an RCL is right for you. | View |
60-Second Guides: Managing Cash Flow In just 60-seconds, we'll show you how to be vigilant about cash flow. | View |


text:
The Stage 7 Biff, Chip and Kipper Stories, written by Roderick Hunt and illustrated by Alex Brychta, provide a rich story context to help develop language comprehension and decoding skills. Stories, More Stories A and More Stories B involve familiar situations and a variety of fantasy settings... read more
We're hiding the errata, movie connections, books that influenced this book, books influenced by this book, books that cite this book and books cited by this book sections. If you would like to add content to them, you must first make them visible.


text:
Avenir Men's 100 Series Hybrid Saddle
Play Video
Be sure to select a color, size and quantity below
Item # 4271074
Take 20% off Your Entire Order! (see promotion details) |
Eligible for Free Shipping on Orders $49 or More! (see promotion details) |
Members of The League get 5% back when you spend $100! (see promotion details) |
Product Details
The Avenir® men's 100 series hybrid saddle features a zone-cut shell with a full cutout that relieves pressure for long-distance comfort. Its soft foam padding is comfortable and lightweight, and the steel rails have a handsome satin finish.
Features- Men's hybrid bicycle saddle
- Steel rails with a satin finish
- Soft foam padding is comfortable and lightweight
- Zone-cut shell features full cutout all the way through saddle and cover to relieve pressure