text:
Congratulations to the Bob Emig Foundation, inspiring young athletes, transforming lives. On Oct. 4 there was a Bob Emig Memorial Celebration, celebrating leaders in youth sports. This event was held at Horizontal Harry's in St. Louis.
The deceased, Bob Emig, was a sports reporter at the Metro East Journal in East St. Louis from 1966 until it closed in 1979. Emig was the director of competition of the Prairie State Games from 1994 to 2001. In 2001 Emig was named to the IHSA Hall of Fame for his media contributions. Emig coached youth baseball, basketball and soccer.
The welcome was given by Camille Emig-Hill, Emig's wife and chairman of the Bob Emig Foundation. Camille's son, Aaron Emig, gave a review of the foundation. Belleville great Joe Wiley was the master of ceremonies. Wiley was a former Belleville West and St. Louis University basketball star. Joe is in many Hall of Fames. Joe was recently selected in the list of "100 athletes who shaped St. Louis sports."
My brother, Russell Krause, directors Norman Miller, chaperones, eight R.J. Krause All-Stars, and I, had a great time.
Brett Swip, Charles "C.J." Jones, Juergen Huettner, Craig Virgin and I received awards. I received the Cathy Hill Volunteer Award. She was a super-volunteer who died in 2002. I received the award for helping the young people from East St. Louis for almost 50 years. Thank you.
Richard "R.J." Krause
East St. Louis


text:
Irish Books
General Books
1 matching titles
HARRISON, John.
Belfast: Ullans Press, 2009 (facsimile reprint of original edition of 1888). 115 pages. Paperback.
Contents: The Scot gains a Footing in County Down, The Scot settles North Down and County Antrim, The Great Plantation in Ulster, The Scot brings with him his Scottish Church, The Scots and the Irish Rebellion of 1641, Ulster from the Restoration to the Union, The Scottish Blood in the Ulster Men of To-day. (facsimile reprint of original edition of 1888).
NEW. A fine copy.
Inventory #: 28459 Quantity Available: 5 ISBN: 1905281153 Price: £ 4.99
Shipping Information | Currency Converter
12 Bayview Road, Bangor, County Down, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom BT19 6AL Telephone: +44 (0)28 9147 0310 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Apple CEO Tim Cook's 2012 comp package plummets
Apple boasts that Cook is paid 'significantly below the median'; doesn't ding him for Maps debacle
Computerworld - Apple raised CEO Tim Cook's salary by 55% for 2012 and awarded him a $2.8 million bonus, but said the chief executive's pay was still "significantly below the median" of comparable companies.
"Mr. Cook remains significantly below the median annual cash compensation level for CEOs at peer companies," Apple said in a preliminary proxy statement filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) last week.
"Companies use the proxy to communicate with shareholders," said Don Lindner, the executive compensation practice leader at WorldatWork, an association of human resources professionals. "By saying Cook's pay is below the median, that gets a big positive from the shareholders."
But even taking into account Apple's size and its high-revenue year, Cook's compensation was certainly adequate, Lindner argued. "The single biggest factor in executive pay is the size of company, and Apple obviously is huge," Lindner said. "But Cook has not been in the job very long. It may take a period of years for him to be paid at the median."
He called that thinking typical of compensation committees and corporate boards.
Although Cook, 52, has been with Apple since 1998, he only assumed the CEO role in August 2011, just weeks before co-founder and former CEO Steve Jobs died of pancreatic cancer.
Another compensation expert saw Apple's boast of low CEO pay differently. "That's not something companies typically brag about, but it's part of the culture of Apple, that you work for the long-term benefit of the company," said Bob Buford, a Portland, Ore.-based compensation consultant.
Cook's compensation was drastically lower than the year before: His 2012 package was down 99% from 2011's.
That year's total was skewed by a massive retention grant of 1 million Apple shares. At the time, those shares were worth $376 million, the bulk of his $378 million total.
As of Monday's market close, the 1 million shares were worth over $532 million.
Because the shares, officially dubbed "restrictive stock units" (RSU), vest in equal parts in 2016 and 2021 -- and then, only if Cook is still with the company -- they're intended to keep him at Apple.
Cook's pay package was considerably less than four of his subordinates, who received large stock awards worth between $66.2 million and $83.1 million. Cook didn't receive stock for 2012 because of the large award he was granted when he was promoted to CEO.
"There was no competitive reason for [awarding stock this year]," said Buford. "They're already married to the guy for 10 years."
Both Buford and Lindner thought Cook would be awarded stock in 2014, the next time Apple will issue grants to its top executives. "They took him out of the normal cycle because of the mega-grant," said Lindner. "But I expect he'll be back in the cycle next time."
- iOS 7 now powers 3 out of 4 Apple devices
- Black Friday bargains prompt consumers to self-gift iPad Air
- Free Mavericks sets OS X adoption record
- Apple ditches discounts, goes with gift cards for Black Friday sale
- Apple takes first small step to return iWorks' chopped features
- PrimeSense buy would open 'world of apps and services' for Apple
- Still got a first-gen iPad? Don't ditch it yet
- As promised, Apple adds real-time collaboration to iWork for iCloud
- Apple brings 'warrant canary' into Patriot Act info request coal mine
- Apple tries to calm stormy iWork waters with pledge to restore 18 features
- 18 Hot IT Certifications for 2014
- CIOs Opting for IT Contractors Over Hiring Full-Time Staff
- 12 Best Free iOS 7 Holiday Shopping Apps
- For CMOs Big Data Can Lead to Big Profits
- Slideshow: 5 ways to lock down your mobile device
- Slideshow: 10 mistakes companies make after a data breach
- How to rob a bank: A social engineering walk through
- Which smartphone is the most secure?
- IT Certification Study Tips
- Register for this Computerworld Insider Study Tip guide and gain access to hundreds of premium content articles, cheat sheets, product reviews and more.
- Managing Technology Before It Manages You: What Manufacturers Must Know Insights from a webcast titled, Information Management: What Manufacturers Must Know. How mobile, social, cloud and big data analytics are changing the future...
- See the Possibilities Utilizing Data Visualization An easy-to-use interface enables users of all skill levels to visually explore all their data, execute analytic correlations to understand what the data...
- BYOD Invasion: A Computerworld Report on the Consumerization of IT We profile three companies that aren't just coping, but learning valuable lessons. If, like them, you're thinking about mobile device management our definitive...
- IBM PureFlex System Ready for Cloud Expert integrated systems have emerged as a crucial opportunity for enterprises and service providers to streamline cost effective deployment of cloud infrastructure environments.
- Live Webcast The Network as a Business Growth Engine View Now
- Live Webcast Move Beyond Point Solutions to Enterprise Mobility Management Mobile Minute: Moving to enterprise mobility management.
- Live Webcast The Freedom to Run Your Business Your Way Vendors are challenged to create flexible systems that customers can tailor to particular business strategies and industry needs. But the flexibility should not...
- Integrated Infrastructure: Simplify Operations, Speed Deployments and Reduce Costs George Weiss, Gartner Vice President and Analyst, and Praveen Akkiraju, CEO of VCE, provide practical information regarding the various aspects of Integrated Infrastructures...
- HR and Finance Were made for Each Other View now >> All Management White Papers | Webcasts
Does your organization offer extensive benefits, cool perks, competitive salaries, opportunities for training and advancement? Then get it recognized!
Nominate your company or another deserving organization for Computerworld's 2014 Best Places to Work in IT list now through Dec. 20, 2013.


text:
Return to Public Comments
Previous Comment Letter
Next Comment Letter
Senior Officers Compensation Disclosures - ANPRN - Fall 2010
It has come to my attention that the comment letter originally provided to you on March 17th was incomplete due to a scanning error. We ask that you please accept the attached as a replacement for the March 17th transmittal.
If you have questions regarding this, please contact Paul Kohls, AgStar Assistant General Counsel, at 952-997-1270, or me at 507-345-5652. Thank you.
AgStar Financial Services, ACA
AgStar Financial Services, FLCA
AgStar Financial Services, PCA
Joyce R. Rohrbaugh
Senior Paralegal
1921 Premier Drive
Mankato, MN. 56001
Direct Line: (507) 345-5652
Toll Free:Ā (866) 577-1831
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and/or privileged.Ā Any review,Āretransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by personsĀor entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.Ā If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.Ā Thank you for your cooperation.
-----Original Message-----
From: Joyce Rohrbaugh [
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 7:51 AM
To: Rohrbaugh, Joyce
This E-mail was sent from "RNPB8DEF6" (Aficio MP 3500).
Scan Date: 03.23.2011 08:50:42 (-0400)
- 20110323085042579.pdf


text:
Moderator: Welcome to the Applied Radiology Prefilled Syringe Focus Group. This panel has been assembled with people who are interested in and have experience with prefilled syringes. I'd like to thank our host, Applied Radiology, for allowing us to discuss this issue. My name is Dave Enterline and I will serve as the Moderator of this discussion. I'm a radiologist in the Department of Radiology at Duke University Medical Center in North Carolina. I'm primarily a neuroradiologist, and I also perform interventional neuroradiology and head our emergency radiology areas. In our department, we have six spiral CT scanners at our principal hospital. We do approximately 3,000 CT patient examinations per month, so it is a fairly high-volume department. Each of our CT scanners has some variety of injector built in, and we have products from several different vendors. Currently, we don't use prefilled syringes at our primary site, although two of our associated hospitals are using prefilled syringes for CT scanning. At this point, I'd like to have the rest of the panel introduce themselves and briefly comment on their use of prefilled syringes.
CC: Cynthia Caporuscio, I am the Section Head for CT Scanning at Centre Community Hospital, in State College, PA. We are a small community hospital with 200 beds. We do use prefilled syringes. We do a high volume of CT studies for the amount of beds we have in the hospital, so it is a necessity to use the prefilled syringes.
GG: Gary Goble, Chief Technologist from Aston Ambulatory Care Center in Dallas, TX. Aston is an outpatient center, and we do between 1,000 and 1,200 CT exams per month. We've been using prefilled syringes since I came aboard in March 2000. There were financial considerations that led to that decision, but also morale issues with the staff to help keep the technologists happy.
RL: Richard Ligi, Director of Radiology and Imaging Services at St. Francis Hospital and Health Center, Poughkeepsie, NY. We're a Level 2 trauma center. At the present time, we have a very active radiology organization, and prefilled syringes are very necessary in a trauma center, as well as in an interventional setting, where volume is extremely high. We anticipate our yearly volume at around 14,000 examinations in CT, and 3,000 in interventional procedures.
MM: Matt Merical, Department Supervisor at Dickinson County Memorial Hospital in Spirit Lake, IA. For our hospital and for the regional imaging centers for some rural areas in Iowa, we switched to prefilled syringes about 18 months ago when we went from axial scanning to helical. We made the change for reasons of patient throughput and ease of use.
JP: Jeff Pulliam, CT/MRI Supervisor of Summit Medical Center in Nashville, TN. We average about 1,300 to 1,400 CT scans per month, and we've been using prefilled syringes for about 2 years. The change was made for financial reasons and for efficiency of the technologists. We've been extremely happy with the results on both the financial end and on throughput.
RR: Robbin Roberts, CT Scan Technologist at Howard Community Hospital, Kokomo, IN. We've been using prefilled syringes for close to 4 years now, ever since we went from axial scanning to helical scanning. With the increased throughput of patients with prefilled syringes and helical scanning, it's just much better, more efficient and faster.
DR: Dawn Ross, X-Ray Supervisor at Modesto Imaging Center in Modesto, CA. We switched to a helical scanner about 9 months ago. Our technologists were having to come in half an hour earlier to start their shifts to get the Medrad syringes filled to do their patients for the day; and they were complaining about having to do this. At the same time, our patient load increased by about 10 patients a day, so it made more sense to get the prefilled syringes. They're ready to go and you don't have as much set up time, so using prefilled syringes helped us increase our patient volume.
LT: Lanis Taylor, CT Supervisor at Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN. At Holston Valley we average 2,000 CT scans per month. Switching to prefilled syringes was a throughput issue for us; we're busting at the seams. Once we changed, we more than made back the additional cost. We love it; it cuts down on our time and cuts down on the stress.
CW: Casey Watson, Staff Technologist at Eastern Idaho Regional Medical Center in Idaho Falls. At our facility we probably do an average of 30 to 45 CT scans a day. I think the decision to use prefilled syringes was weighted heavily on time efficiency and ease of use of the product from the technologist's standpoint.
Moderator Presentation
Our principal purpose of this focus group is to discuss CT contrast utilization and to address some of the advantages and disadvantages of prefilled syringes at individual institutions. More specifically, we'd like to hear about the panel members' experiences. How do you feel about prefilled syringes overall, and what are their pros and cons?
Figure 1 is a picture of one of our CT rooms, with a light speed scanner and a Medrad injector system. The conventional equipment we use for CT injection consists of a syringe vial for drawback of contrast, a device to draw back the contrast, and a connection to the patient (Figure 2). The prefilled syringe in essence is a single device, except for the actual connection to the patient. It has an interlocking bottom that's mated to a particular injector (Figure 3). Each of the injectors is optimized for individual patient use.
Medrad-compatible prefilled syringes were first introduced in 1997. Prefilled syringe vendors have teamed with one of the injector companies. The major manufacturers of prefilled syringes offer various contrast concentrations and volumes optimized for different scanning protocols. This has really been a growth area for the contrast companies, reporting growth of 20% to 40% annually. I think it's an area that will continue to grow.
There are some goals I'd like to present for this focus group.
1) To discuss the decision process in each of your departments; how did you get to the point of saying, "that's why I want to use prefilled syringes."
2) Are you using prefilled syringes all the time, or only in selected patient populations or situations? If you are using them selectively, please let us know how (such as for emergency patients, outpatients, combative patients, or patients on weekends, etc.).
3) The initial decision to use prefilled syringes is made based on perceived benefits. Now that you are using them, please share your views on the actual advantages and disadvantages.
4) Have you increased patient throughput? Are you able to schedule additional patients as a result of using prefilled syringes?
5) How has the use of prefilled syringes factored into employee satisfaction? As we're approaching a technologist shortage, does it make a more pleasant environment for technologists to work in?
6) Are there other benefits? Does the fact that the patient sees a single syringe that they know you're loading individually become a benefit to your overall institution?
Transition to prefilled syringes
There are many different considerations in making a transition to or using prefilled syringes, and I've divided them into categories (Table 1).
Technologist ease of use: There is certainly an inherent efficiency and ease of use that comes with prefilled syringes. A technologist can also minimize contact with contrast agents, which is especially a concern in cases of contrast allergy. You can decrease the amount of spillage. These are issues of interest to all technologists.
Safety issues: The safety issues are related primarily to labeling and misadministration. When contrast is drawn into syringes from a bottle, are those syringes labeled? How are you sure what the patient is getting? Needle sticks and glass breakage are also safety issues. In drawing contrast up from bottles, the safety issue is related to removing the cap, and tearing off the actual metal rim.
JCAHO regulations: We should also discuss medication sterility and contamination. Recently, JCAHO came out with compliance issues related to all medications. We know that hospitals are very concerned with JCAHO compliance. Table 2 lists the regulation pertinent to our discussion. There are two points associated with this regulation: 1) All medication must be labeled appropriately, safely, and in a standardized method; and 2) Medications should be dispensed in the most ready-to-administer form possible, to minimize opportunities for error. How do these compliance issues figure into your decision to use prefilled syringes?
Cost effectiveness: Clearly, cost effectiveness is a very complex issue, and is relevant to the decision to use prefilled syringes. Clearly, the prefilled syringes cost more than the cost of a bottle of contrast, since there's more involved in manufacturing the prefilled syringe. So, which factors influenced your decision to use this product? Is it really a cost-effective venture? A time effectiveness study and cost effectiveness study would be valuable in defining if the issue is simply the cost of the prefilled syringe versus the cost of a bottle of contrast and the actual injector. Which factors, if any, offset the overall cost to the institution?
Table 3 lists the direct and indirect costs associated with using prefilled syringes. All of these factors must be accounted for in a cost-effectiveness analysis. Contrast waste is certainly an indirect cost. Are there situations in which contrast is loaded into a syringe and not used for a patient? How many ccs of contrast are wasted in drawing it up into a syringe? These are all indirect costs relevant to cost effectiveness. In addition to the cost and space for the additional supplies that must be purchased and stored, how do you dispose of those additional items? Is there a cost associated with their disposal? Finally, if a product helps you increase efficiency, is that efficiency translated into overall savings? These savings can account for the ability to scan additional patients, but also the ability to use a CT scanner more efficiently. Does it save you from having to order another CT scanner or from having to hire an additional full-time-equivalent (FTE)? Is the additional cost of prefilled syringes offset by increased throughput, patient satisfaction, technologist satisfaction, or any other issue?
Contrast Use and Participant Experience
Moderator: Let's talk about some of the issues relevant to each of your CT Departments and your use of contrast in general. How long have you used prefilled syringes? What is your comfort level with them?
GG: We use prefilled syringes across the board. As far as our examination mix, it ranges from CT head, abdomen, pelvis, and chest, for the most part, with some extremity scans. So, they are not all contrast-enhanced exams. But 75% to 80% of each day's exam mix uses contrast. It becomes a morale issue with the staff when the schedule changes. Throughout the day we have a set schedule written on a dry-erase board, with exams scheduled in 30-minute slots. Once we start getting add-on exams between the 30-minute slots, it ends up stomping on the technologists' mental well being. When they arrive in the morning and they look at that schedule, they say, "Well, at least I don't have to work every single second all day, I'll be able to go to lunch." That evaporates by about 10:30 with the add-ons. But everyone in an American hospital or clinic system knows that, to a great extent, we're handcuffed with what we can do with raises, incentives, or bonuses. So I considered that switching to prefilled syringes would be one of the perks for the staff. It did have to be fought for, because there is a premium attached to using prefilled syringes. But, that premium really shrinks once you start going through the practical applications and its impact on the staff and patients. Then, the premium shrinks to almost an insignificant level.
Moderator: Rich, how do you use contrast in your department and what is your scan mix? Do you use all prefilled syringes?
RL: At St. Francis, the majority of our contrast media is delivered through prefilled syringes, specifically because we're a Level 2 Trauma center. We have one CT scanner at the moment, and the time schedule is very limited. Our situation is similar to what Gary described, you have a half-hour slot, you're trying to get a procedure accomplished, and you don't have the advantage of having additional time slots. We're basically under the gun when it comes to time. In the course of our day with scheduling outpatients and doing inpatients, when a multiple trauma comes in it just throws a wrench into the entire day. When prefilled syringes came into play, and into interventional radiology and CT scanning, I found it to be a benefit, almost like the remote control on a TV. It did an awful lot to the system, and this is important where I am. We deliver Isovue 300 at St. Francis, mostly for our chest and abdomen scans. We usually use 150 mL. But prefilled syringes are a necessity in our environment.
Moderator: Jeff, how do you use contrast at your institution?
JP: Probably 95% of our CT studies are contrast injected, we do very few nonenhanced studies. It's almost all Isovue 300, the 150 mL syringe. For the head studies, we use the 370. But, in terms of the change to prefilled syringes, it came down to efficiency and time management for the technologists. One tech would come in first thing in the morning before we got the prefilled syringes and spend 30 to 40 minutes loading syringes, having to initial the syringes, label what was in the syringes, what type of contrast it is, and date it. It got very time consuming. You had to guess how busy you were going to be, but you filled 5 or 10 more syringes than you knew you needed from the schedule. Now, if something happened during the day and you got busier than that, you had to take time in the room to fill the syringes. Then, that room stopped, you couldn't scan patients in that room and fill syringes at the same time.
Moderator: How long does it take to fill the syringe itself?
RL: For each syringe, including the time to label it in indelible marker, probably 3 to 5 minutes. Then you've got all the bottles and all the syringes that you've opened up laying across the counter. If two techs can do it, it could be a team effort. But, some people don't have that luxury. Then at the end of the day, if you didn't use all that contrast, you just had to toss it, and that is a cost issue. I'd say at the end of the day we would throw away anywhere from 4 to 6 filled syringes, or 600 to 900 ccs of contrast. So, it was a win-win situation all the way around to switch to prefilled syringes. The techs love it; it doesn't matter how busy you are now, you've got plenty on hand. You can reach into the contrast warmer or wherever the syringes are stored, pop it on, and off you go. If you do 50 scans a day, or 75, or just 15 a day, the speed is always there. My techs love it and I love it.
Moderator: Robbin, you've recently moved to a helical scanner and have a very efficient operation. Can you tell us a little bit about that?
RR: Before we started using prefilled syringes, we were just doing axial scanning, and we were only doing 8 or 9 patients a day. It took a little bit of time first thing in the morning just to get all of the supplies lined up and ready. That's time that you don't have patients in the room and you're not scanning. When you're only scanning 8 or 9 patients a day, any time that you could have somebody in there makes a big difference. Now, we're scanning from 25 to 30 or 35 exams a day, and I just can not imagine doing this without the prefilled syringes. Because when you're getting a patient up off of the table, your finger is on the button, and you're rolling the injector down and getting ready for that next prefilled syringe. If you had to take time and draw that contrast up every morning or you have 10 syringes drawn up already, and then you get 3 more add-ons...that's just time wasted and taken away from patients. We use Isovue 300 on all of our studies, and 95% of our studies are contrast-injected studies. For a chest, abdomen, and pelvis combination, we use 150 mL; for a standard scan, like a chest or a head, we use 100 mL.
DR: We've been using the prefilled syringes for about 4 months. Before that we were using the Tri-Paks. We got our injector about 3 or 4 years ago. The technologists had to come in, take the contrast out of the bottle, open the Tri-Pak, and put it in a Medrad syringe. So the chance of contamination was higher by doing that. With filling them up first thing in the morning according to the number of patients you had scheduled, when we had a no show (cancellation), we'd have to throw that syringe away. We'd have 2 or 3 patients a day that didn't show up. Or even if an add-on patient took their place, it might not be a contrast study. So we were wasting contrast on a daily basis. From my viewpoint, since I do the purchasing, it's easier for me to just order that one prefilled syringe instead of having to order the contrast bottles and Tri-Paks. Plus, we had to have a place to store all that, and we're busting at the seams for space. So just having the prefilled syringes and the transfer set made it a lot easier for me in purchasing all our supplies. So I enjoyed the change to prefilled syringes myself, and it also makes the technologists very happy.
Moderator: How do you staff your CT scanners, and has it changed since your transition to prefilled syringes?
DR: Our chief technologist scheduled herself to do the CT patient load everyday and she had to come in early and fill the syringes. For about 4 months, she asked me to "please find some prefilled syringes." When I did, she was very happy, and if you make your chief technologist happy, it works better for me too.
Moderator: Lanis, in your department, how have the issues of contrast and CT injectors panned out?
LT: We've been injecting contrast for years. We had to go through the cumbersome process of filling the syringes, which means risking possible contamination and storing two products instead of one on the shelf. This time is money. When we started using prefilled syringes it was instant gratification, and a big morale boost for everyone. We have improved patient throughput. It gives an employee a little time to give back to the patients, which is a very important in building a network with those patients. Not only have we decreased the use of our FTEs by not having an additional person come in early in the morning to fill the syringes, but the turnaround time, or prep time, in the room has been cut dramatically. Instead of 4 or 5 minutes loading up the syringe, you can re-prep the table, and get ready to go.
We run three machines practically all the time. We run two machines 16 hours a day, and we have one in the ER open 24 hours a day and we've also had to off-load ambulatory patients onto that machine.
We exclusively use the 300 concentration. For brain scans, we use 100 ccs and we still spike a bottle. We're not heavy into arterial scanning right now, but we expect to be soon. We are doing a lot of scanning for PEs.
Moderator: Yes, I think it's a growth area that everyone has seen. Casey, how do you use contrast and your injectors in your department?
CW: Currently, we do three-quarters of our studies using contrast and we've been using prefilled syringes for about 2 years now. We have just the 150 mL Isovue 300 available to us, and that's used for all of our routine studies, with the exception of head scans. We use 75 mL of the 370 for head scans. I think the most dramatic thing that I can think of with regard to using prefilled syringes is, as Richard mentioned, that an outpatient schedule doesn't account for multiple traumas. We're the major trauma center for the region. So any time that we're able to save helps us from keeping outpatients waiting, and I think that is a great benefit for them. In the past, we've had a number of patients walk away because of the wait. So, in terms of the number of patients you can scan, it's a great benefit for the technologist and the patient waiting to get in.
In addition to cutting down patient waiting time, we've also been able to cut down on the technologists' time to turn around a room. As everyone has mentioned, that does wonders for the technologists' morale as well. You don't feel quite as rushed, and you can get an adequate history.
Advantages of prefilled syringes
Moderator: If you had to choose, which are the primary advantages to using prefilled syringes?
CC: We use prefilled syringes exclusively, and we're extremely happy. We've been using them from the beginning, I think since the very first day they came out. For our injector, we used to have empty syringes that we filled, and now with the prefilled it's simple, it's easy. Also, I've noticed less reaction to the contrast.
I've also noticed a big difference in patient throughput. Every month the head of my department has congratulated us for hitting a new total. This is in a 200-bed hospital, and for the last 4 months we've gone from 934 patients to 956, to 1,051, to 1,081 patients per month. That floors us, we don't know how we are doing it; it's just move, move, move. We schedule 35 to 40 patients a day, in 15-minute time slots. That means that abdominal and pelvis exams are 30 minutes each, and head scans are 15 minutes.
With the prefilled syringes, we have more time to actually sit down and talk with the patients while we're injecting them. It also seems that the patient isn't aware as much of that part of the procedure.
Moderator: That makes a big difference to the patients. They're often very anxious, and obviously the more time you can talk with them, it really makes an impact.
CC: Oh, yes. Some of them are really apprehensive and it makes a big difference and puts them at ease, if you can talk with them. You have to remember that this scan is your daily routine, it's just another person to you. But to them this might be the only time in their life they go through this, and they tend to remember the experience.
RL: I'm really happy that Cynthia brought up the issue of patient apprehension, because that's something I really think about. Going back, a radiologist would walk in the room with two 50-cc syringes with needles. For patients, that was quite scary. Now with this system, it makes it a lot easier. I think that's a big plus that hasn't really been considered.
JP: I think it is reassuring to the patients if the tech can stay with them. Everyone who comes in for a CT scan is always sure they've got cancer. It doesn't matter what they're there for; they "know" they're going to find cancer. But if you're in there with the patient when the contrast is going in, I think it has a calming effect. The patient is nervous. You've told them that they're going to feel hot or get a funny taste in their mouth, but if you're able to stand there beside the scanner, they can see you and hear you. It makes the test go that much easier for them.
It also eases the patient's mind to see the tech just walk over to a contrast warmer, grab that syringe, and walk back to pop it on the injector head. For the patient to see you ready to go like that, is so much better than if they see you making what seems to be a witch's brew while you're drawing up the syringe, running back and forth to get the supplies. I think it gives the patient peace of mind, and makes the techs a little more friendly to the patients.
Disadvantages of prefilled syringes
Moderator: We've talked a lot about the benefits, and we'll talk about cost-effectiveness. But have you found any disadvantages of the product?
CW: Quite frankly, I can't think of any disadvantages of the prefilled syringe. If we carried a wider range of volumes, we'd use them even more.
CC: I can't think of any disadvantages, either.
LT: No. At our institution, we have yet to have a prefilled syringe fail. That's pretty remarkable, given the numbers that we've done with them.
JP: I can't think of any disadvantages. As far as the way the syringe is itself, no. But as far as the day-to-day usage, I haven't seen any problems. I think it's as close as you can get to having a safe and effective system.
Moderator: That's a very important point. How many people are aware of any misadministration, either at your own institution or have heard of any at other? I know it happened in our area. This can be aspiration or any other form of misadministration.
MM: We've been lucky in our hospital; that hasn't happened to us.
JP: In my facility, a technologist drew an empty syringe back in the injector, and just failed to take it off the injector head. The next technologist came in with a trauma patient, thought the syringe was loaded up, and injected air into the patient. Luckily the patient was okay, but the technologist was traumatized, when he realized how close he came to killing a patient. In avoiding misadministration, these prefilled syringes are actually lifesavers.
GG: I think most of the people here would agree that, more than any other modality, CT techs are probably the hardest hit individuals for taking call. If you have someone who does their 8-to-10 shift, non stop, with one patient right after the other, and then they're on call until the next morning when they start their next shift, you have someone who is a zombie at times. This is especially a problem when you have a trauma situation. Matt told me that their volume doubles and triples during tourist season in the Spirit Lake area. If the CT tech is called in at night, they still have to perform the next day. When you have someone almost nodding off at the console, you're setting yourself up for problems. You want as error-free a situation as possible.
LT: The procedures can be so monotonous for the tech; you're doing the same thing 30 times a day, and you lock into your routine. It's very easy to make mistakes in that situation.
JP: This is especially a problem with the traditional syringe, if you were loading them through the injector, sometimes the technologist can get distracted, and then he's loaded partial contrast and a big bubble of air in there. So, he's got to take the time to stop and push the air back out. It seems to me that if you sucked room air into those syringes, you've contaminated the syringe and the contrast, to a point. It was an uncomfortable feeling. But, at the same time, you were under such stress to get patients in and get them out, to go so hard and so fast. But, you can't afford to make that mistake.
Moderator: Approximately 60% of the panel are aware of misadministration. I think they're very isolated situations, but they are significant. The consideration is, of course, how many problems like that are tolerable? I think everyone would agree that in safety issues, zero tolerance is certainly the goal. What about the sterility issue; have people had any problems with that? Jeff, you've mentioned drawing back air, and one of the things that all prefilled syringes have is a little bit of air right at the top. To a certain degree, when you tilt the injector down you can see that air bubble move, and that tells you that you're truly loaded.
JP: Yes. All of my technologists are concerned enough to make sure even that air bubble at the top is gone before they turn the injector head. I've seen some facilities where you see the injector at just a slight angle. At my facility, I preach to them to make sure that injector head is turned completely pointing up and down, to make sure there are no air bubbles whatsoever. It's as close to 100% as you're going to get that way and you can eliminate the technologist making a mistake.
Moderator: The small bubbles we see all the time in IVs coming from the patient floor are inconsequential. But what we're talking about are really the dramatic or the multiple cc injections that are extremely detrimental, particularly in precarious patients, or in patients that have right-to-left shunts in the heart. Those are the patients that really get into trouble.
MM: Our facility is small enough that we don't have the luxury of being able to staff a dedicated CT tech, so all of our techs have to take call and cover CT. It can be really stressful for a tech to be in OR one week and CT the next. Just concentrating on the patient, getting the scan right for the radiologist, and doing the MIPs and the MPRs is hard enough, let alone having to worry about contaminating the contrast. So from my standpoint, making the process as easy and foolproof as possible was important just in relieving their stress.
Using the prefilleds has also allowed us to standardize patient contrast dosage. We got the radiologists to agree on dosages and concentrations. We use both 300 and 370 at our facility, and we power inject and use the prefilled syringes for all of our contrast cases. It does ease the techs' anxiety, because they're anxious about being in CT a little bit, especially those that are new to the modality. So, we can relieve a little bit of anxiety in providing the prefilled syringes, and that makes it easier for them. Also, there's only one technologist in that department. When we went from axial scanning to helical, our volume went up about 28%. So, since we are still staffing one technologist, we have to make the workflow as efficient as possible and the prefilled syringes help us do that. From a cost standpoint, using prefilled syringes is a little more expensive, but throughput has increased. If you use the Medrad syringe or power injector, you need to use the Tri-Paks to load your own contrast. The Tri-Paks are not inexpensive, and if you couple that with the cost of a vial of contrast, it's not that much less expensive than buying the prefilleds.
Moderator: Have any of you changed your staffing? Either scheduling or the total number of technologists, since you've made the transition from syringes that you load yourself to the prefilled syringes?
MM: It hasn't really changed our staffing. However, it has allowed us to be able to increase our patient volume and still staff just one technologist.
RL: At St. Francis it was the same. It doesn't reduce the staff, but it increases your volume and just one technologist is pretty much the norm.
GG: We eliminated coming in 30 minutes early before a shift to set up the room. The bulk of prep time was setting up syringes and filling them, and then you had to take the trash out, because you just filled the container with the residue from the set-up. So, in that way, it just trimmed 30 minutes off. But it's a significant 30 minutes, because the techs had to come in before their shift really started.
CC: My radiologists didn't like the fact after we filled the syringes, they would lay on the counter until they were used. The radiologists didn't like the fact that the patients could see them, or that they might think they could be tampered with, or somebody had actually touched them and contaminated them. So, it eliminated a lot of that concern, also.
Moderator: So, now that you've gone to the prefilled syringes, how do the radiologists feel about that?
CC: I've had no complaints. You just snap it off and throw it away, and you put a fresh one on. The patient can see you pulling the sterile top off and getting ready for the next patient, and they know everything is contained and sterile.
RR: With us, our shift starts at 7 am. When we had to draw up our own syringes and fill them in the morning, it took the first 30 to 45 minutes. So, it just took away patient time. Now we get patients in starting at 7:15. By 7:30, we're doing our first patient. As Jeff said, it's an opportunity to get inpatients down that were added on and start your day earlier.
DR: We still have one technologist. But it's cut down on the overtime we had to pay when she had to clock-in early. We're now back to an 8-to-5 schedule for our CT scanner. Even 5 minutes in the medical field is golden, any way that you can cut your time is good. If we can just save 5 minutes here or there, by doing something differently, that might allow you to get up and go to the bathroom or go get a cup of coffee or something.
LT: We have changed the way we staff. We used to have a tech come in at 6 am, and that was to prep the rooms, warm up the scanner, and draw up all the syringes. So, now we've cut out the time to draw the syringes.
Moderator: Casey, as a technologist, what are your perceptions as far as room prep, set-up time, etc.?
CW: I have a really high appreciation for the product because I work a night shift, and I'm there by myself for the majority of my shift. That means I have to take time for transporting patients and getting reports ready. So, with prefilled syringes, I have just one less thing that I have to worry about for the day. So, it's great.
How Prefilled Syringes Are Used
Moderator: Is anyone selectively using prefilled syringes? Is there a mixture of patients in whom you use prefilled syringes and nonprefilled? I know some of you are at or close to 100% prefilled usage now.
RL: I'm pretty close to 100% usage. I would just say pediatric patients would be the only patients that we don't regularly use them for since we need less volume.
JP: Yes. We use 100% prefilled.
Moderator: How quickly was the curve between getting a couple samples, going to selective use, and then going to 100%?
MM: We started off with just the Tri-Paks. We were getting our contrast from another vendor, and thought we would just use the Tri-Paks. But, they were cumbersome, and the Tri-Paks are not inexpensive. So, we tried the prefilled syringes. We probably used the Tri-Paks for 4 or 5 months. Then we switched to prefilleds and never went back. Now I don't think the technologist would let us go back.
Also, I think the technologists know that prefilleds are a little bit more expensive, and they appreciate the fact that we're willing to invest that to make their job a little bit easier.
RL: As an administrator, you have to remember that you need to give your technologist the necessary tools to perform a procedure. By giving them a prefilled syringe, I feel a lot more confident than I used to, because I don't have to worry about all the intangibles and risks involved with measuring volumes by hand. I think prefilled syringes are a much better tool to provide your technologist.
RR: We're 100% prefilled syringes, other than pediatrics. In children, we just draw a syringe from a bottle; we still keep a couple of those on hand, to get the smaller volumes.
Moderator: From a department manager's standpoint, is there an advantage in the transition to prefilled syringes? How do you go about making those transitions?
MM: I think if the techs are used to using the Tri-Paks and filling their own syringes, the transition is relatively easy. It doesn't take much training to learn how to snap a syringe on and flush the air. So, I think it's a fairly easy transition.
Moderator: Does anyone want to comment on the overall scheme of contrast utilization in the department and how they use prefilled syringes versus bottled syringes?
CC: By doing away with the bottles and having to fill syringes, we've gone down almost 100% in needle sticks. It just stops the whole department if someone gets a needle stick. You have to fill out the paper work and send them to the emergency room. Then, you're on your own for a while, and all kind of things can happen while they're getting the needle stick checked. It's done away with that almost 100 percent.
GG: Also, in most medical facilities now, there are two trash cans: the regular trash and the red-bag medical wastetrash. The red-bag trash is expensive to dispose of, because it goes by weight. If someone is filling syringes from bottles and throws the glass bottles in the red-bag trash, even though they shouldn't, that gets very expensive. But not too many people are going to harangue a tech about the trash. He's already sweating bullets trying to keep up with the patient load, not getting lunch, and barely getting a restroom break. So, that's one of those little things you don't really think about, unless you're actually observing the operation of the CT tech. All these intangible things add up to be pretty significant, and that affects your bottom line.
RL: I totally agree. You also don't have multiple bottles anymore. We used to pop the tops all the time and put them into an injector warmer. That also created a problem; it wasn't very safe. Many technologists would get their fingers caught on the rims of those metal bottle tops. Having something that you know is safe to handle, especially with the fears of cross-contamination today, is very important.
JP: With prefilled syringes, you've eliminated a lot of the possibilities of an accident to your technologist and to your patient.
Rationale for the Use of Prefilled Syringes: Presentation by Gary Goble
There were several factors involved in the decision-making process to go to prefilled syringes rather than the multi-component system, as I call it. Primarily, I initiated the decision process in response to several issues. At our clinic we had one CT technologist performing 16 to 24, up to 30 exams per day. This includes a lot of add-on exams, which created a problem, not the least of which was an unsatisfied CT technologist.
I drew up a list of the possible ways to address this problem. 1) Hire an additional technologist. That would be difficult, as well as expensive. 2) Hire a tech assistant, which of course that is still another addition to the staff. 3) Turn down clinicians' requests for add-ons, which is simply not possible in today's environment. 4) Find a way to increase productivity.
I knew our goal had to be to increase productivity to solve this problem. I found that the prefilled syringes have many advantages associated with them, and they don't impact just one aspect of our scanning department (Table 4).
Decreased inventory and storage: One of the biggest impacts was a direct benefit to me personally, because there's decreased inventory. There is just one unit versus three to four units in a multi-component system. So, I spent less time conducting inventory. It's also a lot easier to manage space. With the prefilled syringes, the room inventory is reduced as well. So, you have that storage space allocation that gets freed up for other uses.
Decreased ordering time: There is also the issue of the time spent ordering the multi-component systems. When I came to Aston in March, we had a three-part system. If you notice, the syringes come in a 50-piece unit, the tubing is an 100-piece unit, and the contrast is 10- to 12-piece unit. It's like buying hot dogs, there are 8 hot dogs to a pack, but 12 buns in a pack. That's an exact corollary to the multi-component system, because these people were either very, very smart about how they're packaging their product or they don't have a clue about the practical use of their product. There's no match-up in amounts.
Technologists' time: Of course, the technologist's time has been the prime consideration throughout this discussion. The bulk of the time that can be cut is the daily room prep time. The consensus seems to be that it's a 30-minute allocation to load up the multi-component systems for the day. Granted, that's the techs' quiet part of their day. But that's still a half-hour that could represent one or two more exams.
Cindy mentioned scheduling 15-minute slots. My hat's off to you! I don't think we could accommodate that and deal with add-on exams. As sure as the sun rises in the East, if we went to a full 15-minute slot schedule, we would still be doing add-on exams.
Staff training: Another issue mentioned was orienting staff. Matt rotates his staff through the departments. So, you have someone in CT one week, and in other departments for the next few weeks. So, when they come back to CT, they should be able to come back into an environment where they don't have to remember where the pieces are and how to do each step. With the prefilleds, they just go over, open a pack, and load it up on the injector. It's simpler for the techs to learn and remember.
Time management: We're all being asked to manage our time more efficiently. As managers, we have to manage our staff's time as well as our own time. This can be difficult, to say the least. Using prefilled syringes, we spend less time ordering the multi-component systems and we save time by fewer compliance problems. I personally get informed when the CT technologist gets behind schedule. These delays are usually related to starting an IV or a patient who needed reassurance. It's a human-interaction issue.
With the helical scanners today, the amount of time that the patient's in the room may only be 15 to 18 minutes. So, you have a very narrow window of interaction between the technologist and the patient. Lanis brought up an important point about a lot of the patients' perceptions. They come in to get a CT scan, and almost no matter what the scan is for, they're thinking: cancer. The patient is coming in for what they may consider the most important exam of their life. It's nice to know that the technologist may be able to spend 3 to 4 minutes actually talking to and touching the patient, rather than having their back to them while they hook little plastic pieces to mount into this other strange-looking machine. So, I think that personal touch is very, very important.
Cost factors: It's clear that today a predominant factor is money. Yes, there is a premium associated with using prefilled syringes. But, that premium is offset by the other benefits.
Rationale summary: I didn't begin with the assumption that we would move to prefilled syringes. That wasn't my decision-making process at all. Rather, I considered: what is the problem and how are we going to solve it? The big factors were inventory, the time associated with managing and stocking that inventory, and training. As never before, we're in an environment in which it's very rare to find a radiology department that has been staffed by the same people for the last 10 to 15 years. Many of the longest-term staff is in the 5- to 7-year range. So, when you have that type of revolving staffing, you need to streamline almost everything: your paperwork, your scan protocols, and, especially, your room prep for patient scanning.
Of course, I had to submit my decision to the people with the sharp pencils, and I had to do a little bit of convincing. Basically, I told them we would increase expenses a little bit. But that it could be offset by increased patient throughput, kicking in another two add-ons without that increasing the technologist's overtime. There's always a tradeoff in everything we do nowadays. The decision to switch to prefilled syringes was a positive one, and we have not regretted that decision to this date.
Moderator: Thank you very much, Gary, for the insights into your decision process in converting to prefilled syringes. I'd like to hear some of the factors involved in others' decision process to switch to prefilled syringes. Who was involved in the decision process? What were some of the perceptions you faced from business standpoint? Which factors were involved in the final decision?
CC: The technologists and the chief technologist began the decision process in our hospital. First, we looked at the cost factor. But the ultimate decision finally came down to the technologist and the radiologist.
GG: At our facility, once I collected the information and set up my argument for making the change, I submitted that to my director. Then, I wrote out the criteria I used to make that decision with offsetting points on both sides, and that went to a budget analyst. The increase in expenses had to be approved, not so much with what we would be getting out of this, although that was included in my proposal. Purposely on my part, I did not want to paint us into a corner by saying, "If we switch to this system, you'll see 18 more exam units done per month," because the technologist has no control over what the patient volume is. If you notice, through our entire conversation about prefilled syringes, the consistent theme has been keeping your people happy and keeping them employed at your facility. There's surely direct cost related to losing personnel.
RL: I have to agree with Gary, the points that he touched upon were exactly the points that determined our move to prefilled syringes. Going back to the technologists, I think the greatest consideration is giving them the necessary tools to perform a service that will benefit not only the institution, but also the patient. To me, it's just another state-of-the-art excellence that is necessary to deliver the system to the patient.
Moderator: How did you bring the decision to your boss, to the department, and, finally to the hospital administration, for approval?
RL: Looking at it from an administrative standpoint, they want to see the pros and the cons, to see exactly what the benefits are. Basically, I put all the positives in one category and the negatives in another and looked at the negative that would impact the institution, which was finance, of course. But after someone sees all these positives, I think the financial end of it becomes very trivial and doesn't have much impact.
MM: When we went from axial to spiral scanning about 18 months ago, we looked at injectors. The first thing we looked at was injector ease of use and dependability, and we selected the Medrad injector. So, then we had to make a decision about contrast. Obviously, Bracco makes prefilled syringes for the Medrad. We started off with the Tri-Paks and then switched to the prefilled syringes. I agree that the cost is secondary to ease of use. Luckily, we're an independent hospital, so we can look at all the different contrast vendors and products available. Of course, you have to look at department revenue versus the little bit extra that you're going to spend for the prefilled syringes. I weighed all those things and then went to my director and presented the case and he agreed. I think the issue that finally made the decision was ease of use. We have one technologist, and it's important to make the process as simple as possible, eliminating as many chances for error as possible.
JP: Our process actually started when my chief technologist happened to come in the room when we were stopped between cases and trying to load syringes. Patients were backed up, sitting outside the door waiting, and we were wasting valuable room time. If the table goes cold, you're not making money. But our chief tech mentioned that Bracco had these prefilleds, and would I be interested in them? I said, "Sure." So, the Bracco rep showed up, and after one day of just trying it, I was sold. We were willing to take the hit of however much it added to our costs at that time, because we could bring in more patients. It might be two, four, or six more patients; everybody can give different numbers on their throughput improvement. But it still boils down to ease of use. The technologist was comfortable with it, and it was very safe. It was almost a no-brainer decision to go to that point.
Our radiologists were not involved in the decision-making whatsoever, and, in fact, they didn't even realize that we had changed. We did it strictly for technologists' ease of use and the technologist throughput. It was strictly between the chief tech and myself, deciding it. She was aggressive enough to take it to administration and, even for them, it made perfect sense.
Moderator: Did you have to do a lot of financial analysis?
JP: Not very much. They asked about what we thought we could do, how it would improve throughput. It took me maybe an hour to jot down some numbers to show what I thought we could do. The decision-making process for our hospital probably took less than 2 or 3 days. It's a minor hit to your bottom line, and, even with managed care, you can make up that difference with one or two patients. That's why our hospital looked at it.
RR: Our process to move to prefilleds was actually started by the sales rep. One day, he and my director came in while I was in the process of filling syringes to get ready for the rest of the afternoon. My director said, "Do you have a patient waiting?" I said, "Yes, but I've got to get this done. I've got to get a couple more syringes drawn up." He said, "I think I have something that you're going to be interested in." That's when he and the rep told me they had the prefilled syringes and he arranged to get a box to try them out. As Jeff said, it was just a matter of 2 or 3 days, and we automatically switched over. The radiologists were not involved in the decision at all. As soon as we started using them, we knew we wanted to switch
Moderator: I think it's easy to convince the technologists. It's harder to sell the departmental administrators. How did you bring it to them?
RR: Something that worked to our benefit was that we had just switched from the axial scanner to a helical scanner. So, they knew they were going to be making more money because of our increased patient throughput. We could slip in this extra contrast that we wanted because of eliminating technician time to get that ready. It just made it all a nice transition.
GG: I evaluated our CT scanner's throughput, averaged that out for a week, and then extrapolated that out for a whole year. So, I determined a year's average volume and the revenue generated. Then I took the same figures for the costs to start an IV, and the whole three-part system. Once I had those numbers together, I figured the contrast costs, which was a whole separate column. I ended up with separate columns totaling the cost for us to operate on a yearly basis. I reserved our FTE, because even more than contrast, that's your biggest expense for running the department. Once I looked at those figures, I took a prefilled syringe scenario and figured what the variance would be. I didn't offset that variance with the things that I observed, such as throwing the bottles in the red-bag trash, because that's such a tenuous argument. While I presented those issues informally, they weren't numbers on a sheet for the accounting person to analyze. But it was a close enough variance that once I presented the figures, I addressed the intangibles, such as the tech's time. I said, "I'll let you figure out what it costs me to pay this tech for 30 minutes of straight time or 30 to 45 minutes of overtime to do the add-ons." So, I didn't just present it as "we want to do this; what do you say?" and then it just passed through. There were some hard numbers associated with it, and in a large facility, you're talking huge amounts of money.
I got really close on the dollar margin for the variants and said, "Here's what we're looking at." I even broke it down to dollar per patient, and said, "This is how much more it costs per patient to do it this way." Then, I offset that dollar amount with the advantages and let them figure it in their head. I did not even mention misadministration costs. If you have one misadministration, you potentially blew your whole contrast budget for 3 years.
JP: What sometimes gets left out of consideration is the technologist. You can give them the latest helical scanner and all the latest equipment. But they can still be pushed to the limit. It's important to remember the benefit of eliminating one more stress that they're facing. It's one more thing they don't have to take the time to do. Sometimes that gets lost in all the discussion about money and the bean counters just want three more patients, or ten more. But if you can even give the perception to the people that work for you that you're trying to make their job easier, they're going to be more willing to push to do two or three more patients.
GG: Even those considerations, though, are convertible into financial terms. We're talking retention. If the administration says it costs you $3,000 just to run an ad for a technologist...you're avoiding that by keeping a happy camper here. The techs are getting the message that they are important to us. But, at the same time, we know we'll be able to put some more patients through here. But, the techs are not even seeing that aspect of it. They're just seeing the fact that we shaved some hassle out of the day.
JP: Yes! I don't have to stop if I'm out of syringes, especially if I've got a bad trauma that's came in, with blood everywhere. In that case you really don't want to have to spend 2, 3, or 5 minutes loading the syringe, you can always argue that. That takes that stress off the technologist, they're under the gun to begin with.
MM: Probably the worst time to draw up a syringe is when you're half awake at 3 o'clock in the morning. It's much easier to use the prefilled.
JP: This eliminates so much, and it makes the technologists happier. Then they're going to be willing to do a little more in the department, maybe, to keep the radiologist happy. The films come through quicker; everything goes just a little bit quicker. You've eliminated some time.
Moderator: Dawn, you're in charge of purchasing and medical supplies. What was the decision process that was important in your case in going through those justifications?
DR: Actually, I was pretty lucky because our chief technologist is a working technologist who is scheduled just the way the other technologists are. We put in our new helical scanner about 9 months ago, and she was the first one trained on it. Since we were short on technical staff, she had to do the scanning every day for months until the other techs were trained. Since she's the chief technologist, she wanted to find a way to make the process faster. She asked me about buying prefilled syringes. All we had to do was prove to the medical director that the image quality was going to be the same if we switched to the prefilled syringes, which it was. There were no additional reactions because we switched; it was the same as before.
From my standpoint, the ordering is easier. We don't have a computer system that I use to order, and I don't have anything written down, it's all in my head. I order for the whole facility, the film, the contrast, the needles, everything; and that's for the CT, MRI, mammography, ultrasound, and X-Ray departments. So, it makes a big difference to take one thing off my list that I have to order. I don't have a set time for ordering, I have to supervise the X-ray department all day long. I just have to get away, look at the supplies, write it down, order it, and send out the purchase order (PO). So, if there's one thing that I can take off of that list, it helps me get back to the X-Ray Department quicker and do my job.
MM: That's my point about trusting the people that you have in power in the hospital. I think you have to be accountable for the decision and be ready to account for the increase in the budget.
DR: I was ready to account for it, but I was never asked to. It's been there for us, and there were never any questions asked because we never had any problems since we switched.
Moderator: Great. Lanis, what input do you have as far as the decision process and how it came to pass?
LT: Well, it was an idea that all of the techs had batted around. We crunched the numbers for the system director who is the director of the four hospitals, and we're very lucky to have him on board in our hospital. We knew there was a price difference. Our ultimate goal was to keep the backlog of scheduled patients to 2 days, who otherwise may not get in for 3 to 4 days. With that, even though using prefilleds was going to cost a little more, we felt from the standpoint of our image to the community, it was worth it. Our throughput was worth a few dollars, and that's how we presented it.
Moderator: So, you sold it on reducing the backlog?
LT: Yes, we did. I always said, "You can have the biggest cannon on the battlefield. But if you don't have enough people to get the cannon balls up there, you might as well have a pop-gun." That's the same as the IV contrast issue. You can have the biggest machine. But if you have to fumble around for 5 minutes, and it takes you as long to load the contrast as it does to do a scan, then you have really, really lost.
Moderator: Have you had to cost-justify that time? Have they been happy with the result?
LT: Yes. They questioned us up front, and we have showed them the numbers about every month.
Moderator: Great. One of the issues that's been raised is JCAHO compliance. Was that a factor in anyone's decision for this?
MM: We're a JCAHO-accredited facility, and I think being in compliance is important. It didn't play into our decision-making process, however, because there were so many positives.
Moderator: Now, what about those who don't have a contract with a specific contrast manufacturer? Does it make the transition to a prefilled syringe any easier or more difficult?
LT: We're out of the system. We do have a contract, but it isn't with the company that we presently use for contrast. Everyone likes the contrast that we're presently using, so we went outside the system. We're allowed a certain percentage of the total purchase of that product outside the system.
MM: Our purchasing group doesn't have an exclusive agreement with Bracco. We have arrangements with several different vendors. So, even though our purchasing group had that alliance, we went with the product after looking at different products.
RL: Our facility does not have a purchasing group that has a contract with Bracco. But it wasn't hard to get the approval to get the prefilleds.
Moderator: So, it's a factor, but probably not an overwhelming factor at this point?
RL: As we go down the list of indirect costs, especially those that revolve around the technologists; we've talked about the factors involving efficiency. But I think the actual decision is easier, because I think the benefits of prefilled syringes already outweigh the negatives, including the cost.
Prefilled syringes easily deliver a product, and it's a safe product, number one. With all the fears everyone has with the so-called epidemics of transmittable diseases, I think this is very important. Many times patients do ask about it; they look around and see the equipment that you're using. So, when you come in with a filled syringe, just place it on the injector, and then they're injected, it is easier for them to know that what they're getting has not been given to someone else. You're getting something sterile.
MM: I agree. In these days of competitive health care, patients are much more aware of the medications that they're being given. They're less likely to be completely trusting of any healthcare facility. So, you have to be certain you're doing a good service. But patients do question things more than they used to. I think that's good; it's good to be educated.
CW: With regard to approaching administration with a rationale for prefilled syringes, it's clear there's a direct and indirect increase in patient care and benefit to the patient. I'm sure that everyone's facility has a mission statement and the first sentence talks about wanting to bring a higher standard of care to their patients.
Moderator: Absolutely, that's universal now. Have HMO contracts, or other contracts, gotten in the way of this decision process in any way?
CC: No, not at all. I have noticed that patients are much more educated and knowledgeable, especially in my area, which is a college town. They want to know what's going on, what you're doing step by step. They don't want to just be the patient anymore. They want to be part of it.
Moderator: What advice would you give to people that are about to make this decision process to move from filling syringes for their contrast injector to using prefilled syringes?
CC: I would say it's a no-brainer. When you sit down and study what is really important, technologist safety and the patient benefits, and you realize the exam numbers will go up...even with the extra cost, you almost have to do it. You have no other choice.
GG: I think the process should include the technologists, so you are empowering them and allowing their decision to play a part. In my particular circumstance, one of the CT technologists did not think it was necessary. But, within a month of implementation, if I'd told him we were switching back to a multi-component system, I think he might start crying!
RL: I think that someone who does not use prefilled syringes would just have to take time to think about all the positives, and they're too overwhelming. I think they will definitely dominate any thinking of an administrator or CEO. Maybe not a CFO but, I'm sure, for anyone directly looking at patient care, it shouldn't be a problem.
GG: You can't really associate a dollar amount with the fact that your technologist is going to be happier. So, the variance that I dealt with was specifically related to a lot of the things that the administrator would not even be aware of. They're not going to be thinking of things like misadministration, and you could almost quantify that factor...allocate 20¢ or so to that for that little bit of piece of mind.
But, you can try to account for cost of heavy glass bottles contrast comes in ending up in the medical waste. Every place that I've worked, I've observed those in the red-bag trash. Especially in a hospital setting with multiple scanners set up, all that additional weight is very expensive, since the hospital is charged by weight. So, that certainly needs to be minimized, and there is a penny percentage that you could associate with that. Once I came in within less than a dollar of the cost variance associated with prefilled syringes, then the intangibles that are hard to quantify kicked it over.
It wasn't a decision solely based on keeping that technologist happy and efficient, even though that's been a preponderance of our discussion. To me, there was a direct trade-off in the dollar amount.
JP: But if you had just one misadministration or error, the administrators would have to open up the checkbook and that patient's family would own part of that hospital.
MM: But, that's hard to quantify when you're doing your analysis.
JP: Exactly, but all it takes is one problem, and you've got a black eye that you're never going to recover from, because that family is going to tell its circle of friends, and those friends are going to make the story even worse.
GG: But, the CFO would not know that. So, you have to say it bluntly. "Do you realize that we have an individual that performs exams, works their 8- to 9-hour day, frequently without lunch, and then is on call with the potential for having the 16 hours that belong to them interrupted at 2-hour intervals? Do you realize that person has to come back in the next day and is responsible for starting an IV and administering contrasts into a patient's bloodstream?" Then a light bulb goes on, that we're not just an assembly line putting people in a machine, pushing the button and saying, "Hold your breath," then bringing in the next one. It's a reminder that there is the possibility of human error that wouldn't be quantified exactly.
Moderator: Have you found switching to prefilleds is budget-neutral or an actual cost savings?
GG: We have such a competitive atmosphere and we're a clinic. I know others here are on a 24- or 16-hour schedule in a hospital. We are pretty much limited to 7.5- to 9-hour scanning schedule. Part of that is because you can't inject if you don't have support staff on hand in case of an adverse reaction. We have that little niche of time, and I have not gone back to analyze what we're doing since the switch to prefilleds, how much we've increased patients. But if I were asked, it would not be difficult to do. I have been asked generally "How is that going?" My response has always been, "Well, we're shaving off room prep time. We're able to accommodate add-ons almost without thought." So, it would not be difficult to point out how many exams were directly related to the 20 or 30 minutes of room prep time that we saved by using prefilled syringes. I don't even bring up the savings in storage space or time to count the inventory, because that's my function.
DR: We are owned by such a big corporation, and are one of their highest facilities in patient load. So, I don't think they mind giving us the little extra that we need to keep up our productivity and increase in financial standings for them. Because we are their biggest facility, they give us what we need to keep going, to keep bringing in the patients. So, we haven't had any problem justifying it.
MM: That's our situation, too. As the department administrator looking at prefilled syringes, the first and foremost thing you have to think about is: "Will this benefit our patients?" That's what we're there for, not just "How much money can we make?" Then, you have to look at: "Is the department profitable? Will it continue to be profitable if we use prefilled syringes?" If the answers to both those questions are yes, then you need to try this product. Then you can see if it will benefit your patients, reduce your risk of litigation, and be good for the technologist. We have to keep patient care in mind first.
Moderator: I'd like to thank you all for coming and sharing your experiences, opinions, and insights into the use of prefilled syringes. I think this product will certainly be a wave of the future. Applied Radiology should also be recognized for hosting this panel discussion and recognizing the impact that this product will make in each of our individual practices. Thank you all.


text:
Book Clubs & Writers' Groups
Library Branch
Join a circle of poets & writers who unite to share their artistic energy. Registration required. Call 416-396-8920 for more information.
Mon Jan 27
Mon Feb 24
Mon Mar 31
Join us and share the joy of reading Chinese books at each monthly meeting. For more information or to register, contact the branch at 416-396-8890.
Mon Jan 13
Mon Feb 10
Mon Mar 10
Mon Apr 14
Join us for a lively group discussion of a specific book at each meeting. For more information or to register visit the branch or call 416-396-8890.
Wed Jan 22
Wed Feb 26
Wed Mar 26
Members discuss a book read by the group. Call 416-396-8920 to register.
Mon Jan 13
Mon Feb 10
Mon Mar 10
Mon Apr 14
Afternoon Book Club meets at 2:00 p.m., the fourth Friday of every month and is open to all interested book lovers in the community. For more information or to register visit the branch or call 416-396-8890....
Fri Jan 24
Fri Feb 28
Fri Mar 28
Join us for stimulating conversation. You and your fellow book club members decide in advance what books you want to read. New members are always welcome.
Thu Jan 30
Thu Feb 27
Thu Mar 27
Discuss a book read by the group. Space is limited. Call 416-396-8920 to register.
Wed Jan 08
Wed Feb 05
Wed Mar 05
Wed Apr 02


text:
Monday | NJ.com
Pennsylvania driver not cited after low-hanging wires pulled down in Raritan Township
RARITAN TWP. - A driver from McKeesport, Pa., was pulling a tractor-trailer onto Timberwick Drive on Thursday, Dec. 5, when his rig pulled down low-hanging wires , police said.
Could you pass a US citizenship test?
When should animal testing be legal?
Salvation Army giving slower this year
It isn't just the retail industry that's having tough sledding in the shortened weeks between Thanksgiving and Christmas.
Trial Postponed For Woman Accused Of Kidnapping Newborn
The trial for a woman accused of kidnapping a newborn baby from Magee-Womens Hospital last year has been postponed.
In Brief: UPMC says worker wrongly viewed patient records
The motive for viewing the records was not clear. The employee told officials that she did not store or use the information for financial gain.
Pa. hospital: Worker wrongly viewed 1,300 records
A hospital system in western Pennsylvania is notifying nearly 1,300 patients that their records were viewed inappropriately by an employee.
UPMC says patients' records were viewed inappropriately
Officials with UPMC said Wednesday that they plan on alerting more than 1,000 people treated at various locations over the past year that their records were viewed inappropriately.
College costs outplace family earnings
ADVANCED FOR SATURDAY, NOV. 23, 2013, AND THEREAFTER University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg senior Mimi Maccarelli, of Penn, walks to Chambers Hall on campus near Greensburg on Oct. 24, 2013.
Angel or Devil? Meet Duane Michals, the photographer who invented himself
Photographer and artist Duane Michals is the comedy star of a recent biographical documentary film titled "Duane Michals: The Man Who Invented Himself."
14 managers sue Family Dollar for forcing overtime without pay
As a store manager for Family Dollar, Arthur Moses expected he'd be responsible for making employee schedules, doing training, hiring and figuring out the store budget.
Man 'tipped' by Pa. lawmaker waives gambling case
A western Pennsylvania man who was heard on wiretaps being tipped off by a state lawmaker about an investigation into his alleged illegal video poker operation has waived those charges to court.
Better Know a Branch Campus: Penn State Greater Allegheny
There are 24 campuses in the Penn State system. The one that gets the most attention is University Park, but what about the other 23? That's where we come in with our newest 23 part series, Better Know a Branch Campus, inspired by Stephen Colbert's Better Know a District .
Schools to get nearly $27,000 in grants
From support for a STEM Day in McKeesport, to funds to create graphic comic books in West Jefferson Hills, to helping to promote character education in West Mifflin, the Consortium for Public Education's recent round -- more than $26,000 worth -- of Great Idea Grants is funding varied learning opportunities.
11-19-13 - Kane Introduces Telemedicine; Glen Hazel Center Will Be First RAVEN Participant
Kane, Allegheny County's skilled nursing and rehabilitation centers, will be introducing telemedicine at its locations in Glen Hazel, McKeesport and Ross Township.
Area firefighter meets challenge
Chris Cerci competes in the Scott Firefighter Combat Challenge national championships in Alabama, where he placed 18th overall and fourth in his age group.
Ken Konias' $2K per night escort testifies during trial
A "high-level" escort used the $2,000 Ken Konias Jr. gave her every night in exchange for sex to pay for drugs, the woman testified Thursday.
Icy conditions cause crash, one person ejected from SUV
The driver of an SUV lost control of the vehicle due to icy conditions Wednesday morning and crashed by the McKeesport Duquesne Bridge.
New Survey Says One-Quarter Of Drivers Surf The Web
Stand on any side of the road and it's likely you'll see drivers with a cell phone against their ear.
How Safe Is The Glass Used In Doors And Window?
But that lunch never happened. The 69-year-old retired art professor from Slippery Rock University fell through the glass door of Bob's Sub and Sandwich in Slippery Rock.
Jeannette Robbers Get More Than They Bargain For
"I was making dinner," Margie, the resident said. "I heard this loud crash and thought the ceiling caved in.


text:
The IRE Resource Center is a major research library containing more than 23,250 investigative stories — both print and broadcast. These stories are searchable online or by contacting the Resource Center directly (573-882-3364 or firstname.lastname@example.com) where a researcher can help you pinpoint what you need. Browse or search the tipsheet section of our library below. Stories are not available for download but can be easily ordered by contacting the Resource Center:
Search results for "low rates of interest on car deals" ...
Louisville car dealer has history of complaints
After constant complaints from customers who bought their cars from this car dealer, the Courier Journal in Louisville, KY began this investigation. A local car dealer, J.D.Byrider, was selling cars at high rates of interest and many a times these cars were not in a good condition. Though they advertised low rates of interest, and had no system to check the buyers credit history, the dealer in fact charged exorbitant prices for cars that had high mileage on them.
Tags: car dealers; car dealers in Louisville KY; NADA prices; J.D. Byrider; low rates of interest on car deals; checking buyers credit history


text:
Golf Accessories
Prices From: £2.43
Kildare Tee Wallet
A great promotional golf item containing Newbridge magnetic fork, chrome ball marker and five plain 54mm wooden tees. Full colour digital print on both sides of the wallet and full colour decal on the marker.
Prices From: £5.00
Wexford 3 Ball Tin
A great giveaway for a avid golfer! Printed full colour, encapsulated within a flat resin decal placed centrally on the lid. Contains three plain Wilson Ultra golf balls.
Prices From: £1.80
PVC Score Card Holder (Spot Colour Print)
A PVC score card holder complete with a handicap chart and one plain mini mechanical pencil with eraser.
Prices From: £3.67
Texas Tee Bar
Best Seller! One metal fork and one metal marker both printed to your design in a rubber tee bar with twelve plain wooden tees, one plain pencil and a silver chain for attachment to golf bag. Price includes a full colour logo.
Prices From: £4.59
Troon Leather Scorecard Holder
Quality Holder! Top quality leather scorecard holder foil printed one colour to your design with a handicap chart and a plain pencil.
Prices From: £3.25
Kensington Cap Clip
Quality Cap Clip! Best selling magnetic cap clip with an extra strong magnet and a detachable metal marker, printed to your design and domed.
Prices From: £28.09
Nike Men's Victory Polo
Great Nike Shirt! Solid knit collar. Open sleeves. UV protection to 30 UPF. This Nike Polo Shirt features Dri-Fit fabric helps to keep you dry and comfortable. Made from 100% Polyester with a fashionable flat rib knit collar with Spandex.
Prices From: £5.47
Vermont Gift Pack
Great Value Ball and Tee Gift Acetate tube containing nine wooden tees and two branded Top Flite golf balls all printed to your design.
Prices From: £3.45
Arizona Hinge Box
Great Value Box! One silver metal fork and one silver metal ball marker both printed to your design with three plain 54mm wooden tees in a hinge box.
Prices From: £3.35
Stirling Goody Bag
Great Value Bag! Golfer's quality nylon goody bag printed to your design, with a drawstring top and a clip for attachment to golf bag.
Prices From: £4.90
Cambridge Velour Golf Towel
Value in Velour! Top quality 420 grams velour golf towel embroidered or printed to your design, with a silver eyelet and a silver clip for attachment to golf bag. Embroidered up to 7,000 stitches
Prices From: £6.00
Oxford Tri-fold Golf Towel
The Best Towel! Top quality luxury 650 grams tri-fold velour golf towel embroidered to your design, with a silver eyelet and a silver clip for attachment to golf bag. Embroidered up to 7,000 stitches
Prices From: £3.67
Gloucester Tin of Tees (30 tees)
Handy Tin! Plain high quality satin silver window tin of tees accommodating approximately thirty 54mm wooden tees printed to your design.
Prices From: £3.19
Belgravia Magnetic Fork
Best Selling Fork! Luxury magnetic fork with a rear thumb recess and a detachable metal marker printed to your design and domed.
Prices From: £76.50
70 mm Wooden Tees
Best Selling Tees! Top quality 70mm wooden golf tees printed to your design. Best seller and great value, long enough tee for all drivers, exceptional value.Price per thousand tees.
Prices From: £4.39
Braemar Shoe Bag
Extra Wide Shoe Bag! Quality golfer's nylon shoe bag printed or embroidered to your design with a padded handle and an extra wide base to easily accommodate golf shoes.Printed or embroidered to your design.
Prices From: £5.40
Icon Metal Pitchmaster Fork
New Pebble Fork! Amazing new automatically retractable fork with a stylish ergonomic thumb mould. Made from black lightweight plastic casing and complete with a removable metal magnetic ball marker printed to your design and domed. Customised blister packaging is available at extra cost. This product is branded subtly with the Asbri brand name.
This ultimate corporate gift is made from high quality lightweight aluminium and is available in five stunning colours. The front of the fork is printed and domed to your design and accommodates a printed and domed magnetic ball marker to the rear.
Customised blister packaging is available at extra cost.
Prices on application
Titleist DT SoLo Golf Balls
Long distance with exceptional feel and cut-proof durability.Player Benefits :- Long Distance with Driver and Irons.Exceptional Feel on All Shots.Responsive Short Game Control.Cut-Proof Cover Durability.
Prices on application
Titleist Pro V1 Golf Balls
What the Pros Play! The Tour-proven Titleist Pro V1 golf ball is designed for golfers seeking long distance, consistent ball flight and soft feel along with Drop-And-Stop greenside control for improved scoring performance.Long distance with a consistent ball flight, soft feel and Drop-and-Stop greenside control for improved scoring performance.
Recognition Express
Suite 422, 41 Oxford StreetRoyal Leamington Spa, Warwickshire
0845 5441316


text:
We were here for a skiing holiday and much prefer to have a ski on/ski off option - this hotel provides this, just a few steps to the nursery slopes and lifts from where you can access the rest of the ski area. It is also a very easy short walk to the shops and restaurants in this lovely alpine... More
- Also Known As:
- Golfhotel Saaserhof Hotel
- Golfhotel Saaserhof Hotel Saas-Fee
- Golfhotel Saaserhof Saas Fee
- Official Description (provided by the hotel):
- The team of the ****Golfhotel Saaserhof lives the philosophy "Fulfil the guest's wishes". For this, we offer a first class cuisine, excellent wines from our wine cellar and a forthcoming service. Without forgetting the cosy atmosphere of our rooms and family-suites.A familiar and sporty 4-star hotel situated in the heart of one of the most imposing Alpine chain in the Alps. The cosy bar with its wood of old stables from the Wallis and the fire-place is always a meeting point for our international guests. Enjoy a glass of wine, an aperitif or a cocktail while listening to stories until late into the night…Tranquillity, relaxing and regeneration in the beautiful an car free Saas-Fee. The unique climate with its pure fresh altitude air as well as the quietness within the intact nature and the huge glaciers make sure that you will spend an unforgettable stay at the Golfhotel Saaserhof. ... more less
- Reservation Options:
- TripAdvisor is proud to partner with Booking.com, Expedia, Hotels.com, Priceline, Travelocity, Orbitz and Tingo so you can book your Golfhotel Saaserhof reservations with confidence. We help millions of travellers each month to find the perfect hotel for both holiday and business trips, always with the best discounts and special offers.


text:
Close Recently added item(s)
You have no items in your shopping cart.
SKU# Jaco105
Availability: In stock
* Required Fields
Click image above to magnify, and images below to enlarge
Worn by World Class Fighters like Joey "The Mexicutioner" Beltran, the Mexico Resurgence Fight Shorts don the Coat of Arms of Mexico and utilizes Jaco Clothings innovative technology to ensure they perform at the highest level of MMA competition.
Email to a Friend


text:
1978 Ford F250Rebuilt from the ground up Runs great Beautiful Custom paint Way too much to list.Orange Exterior Black Vinyl InteriorEquipped with a 8... More
1965 Ford F250 Good Humor Truck, Great truck refurbished this year. All new wiring, just painted and lettered. Truck runs and drives great. Too... More
A 400 ci V8 engine and 3-speed automatic transmission power this well-restored 4x4 pickup! It is in overall excellent condition, with 90,921 miles on... More
Rare sighting, a 1968 Ford 250, 390 Big Block Camper Special and a beauty! Nice straight rust free truck with great nostalgic colors. Extra... More
1977 Ford F250 Ranger XLT 2x4, Rare Ranger XLT Options! Fussy owner, always garaged and pampered, his pride and joy. Original Nice Red Finish... More
This 2006 Ford Super Duty F250 XLT Crew Cab 4WD pickup (Stock # B8090) is available in our Benicia, CA showroom and any inquiries... More
For sale is a 1978 Ford F250 4x4 pick up. Ford F-Series pickups are the highest selling vehicle in America and for good... More
S#6371955 FORD F-250; 223 6 CYL;4 SPEED;IT IS WHAT IT IS; WE PUT SOME NEW TUNE UP PARTS IN IT GOT IT RUNNING A... More
For sale is one of the nicest 1972 Ford F250 Sport Custom trucks we have ever seen come through the showroom! This is an... More
ONE OWNER! ACCIDENT-FREE HISTORY! Loaded up and SUPER CLEAN Ford F250 Super Duty Diesel: King Ranch Edition, 4 wheel drive, FX4 package, dual power/heated... More
Total Frame off restoration of Forth Generation Ford truck. The F Series was completely redesigned for 1961 with a wider look; Ford also introduced a... More
FORD: 1986 F-250 4x4, diesel, 127K original miles, raffling February 14, ticket $25, buy 5 get 6th free; benefiting Foundation Full Recovery in Watcom... More
FORD: 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT highboy, top line, 1 owner, rust-free western 4x4, 390 4-bbl, 4-speed, rare factory a/c, updated ps and disc brakes,... More


text:
Already a member?
You can't like your own messages.
Follow me on Twitter @Invisiblejacob, Bachelors degree in Business/Finance with a concentration in Accounting. I would like obtain employment in the finance industry, so if you know of any in's to any companies let me know! Follow me. Thanks!
Follow investors and traders that match your style and get a personalized stream of news, charts, and ideas.
I read & accept the StockTwits Terms of Service
Remember me
Forgot password?


text:
Rock Gardens Rafting
No Name exit 119 off I-70
1308 County Road 129
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Rock Garden books all of it's trips online! If you already have your trip details, click below to go directly to our booking system!
Highside Adventure Tours, Inc. (DBA Good Times Rafting, Colorado Adventure Center) operates under special use permits with the White River National Forest, Colorado State Parks (Arkansas River Headwaters Area), Bureau of Land Management (BLM Kremmling office), Clear Creek County and is an equal opportunity service provider.
All Lower Colorado River (Shoshone Rapids) and Roaring Fork trips offered through Rock Gardens Rafting a fully licensed and permitted outfitter.
Cancellation Policy | Customer Responsibility | | Employment Opportunities


text:
Fire in Tarrytown
Fire, police and EMS units rushed to 31 Loh Ave. about 9 a.m. after a neighbor called to report the blaze, officials told News12. They found the two-story house on the cul-de-sac engulfed in flames. (March 22, 2013)
advertisement | advertise on newsday
- | View all
Be the first to rate:Click to rate
More in News
- Notable sports deaths in 2013
- Snow hits LI
- LI notable deaths
- Snow, ice, freezing temps hit U.S.
- Dropping LBs: LIers before and after weight-loss stories
- America's health care reform through history
- U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand
- President Barack Obama
- John F. Kennedy assassination edition of Newsday
- Midwest tornadoes
- Whitey Bulger through the years
More photos
- Long Island and New York City's top photos Snow hits LI
- Yaphank church gutted by fire LI Holiday Benefit Pageant
- LI notable deaths Billy Joel now and then
- New York City parties Gingerbread house contest
- Meet Long Island's pageant queens LI people on the move! Promotions, new jobs
- Places we loved on Long Island Pearl Harbor anniversary remembered on Long Island
- LI pets pose with Santa Recent polar bear plunges in Suffolk
- Most expensive homes for sale on Long Island Smithtown pets for adoption
- Brentwood vs. Amityville St. Dominic vs. Oyster Bay
- An extravagant mini Christmas Village Car crashes into Trader Joe's in Oceanside
- Dropping LBs: LIers before and after weight-loss stories Help find these lost LI pets
- 73 celebrities remember life on Long Island Searching for a home with an unusual fireplace?


text:
© Anne-Marie Le Blé
With the Bayerische Staatsoper, Munich, Dorothea Röschmann has sung Zerlina, Susanna, Ännchen, Drusilla, Almirena, Marzelline, Anne Trulove and, most recently, Rodelinda. She is closely associated with the Deutsche Staatsoper, Berlin, where her roles include Elmira in Kaisers Croesus and the title role in Scarlattis Griselda, both with Jacobs, Ännchen with Mehta, Nannetta with Abbado, and Pamina, Fiordiligi, Susanna, Zerlina and Micäela (Carmen) with Barenboim. She has also sung at La Monnaie, Brussels, as Norina (Don Pasquale); at the Bastille, Paris, as Pamina; and recently made her débuts at the Royal Opera, Covent Garden, in the role of Pamina, at the Metropolitan Opera and Vienna Staatsoper as Susanna, and at the Ravinia Festival singing the role of Countess (Le nozze di Figaro) for the first time.
Her concert appearances include the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra, Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra and Concentus Musicus with Harnoncourt; the Accademia Nazionale di Santa Cecilia with Sawallisch; the London Symphony Orchestra with Pappano; the Berlin Philharmonic with Haitink, Harnoncourt and Barenboim; the Chicago Symphony also with Barenboim; and the Munich Philharmonic with Levine.
Her recital appearances include Antwerp, Lisbon, Madrid, Brussels, New York, London and the Amsterdam Concertgebouw.
Schumann: The Complete Songs
10CDs Boxed set (at a special price)
Schumann: The Complete Songs, Vol. 7 – Dorothea Röschmann & Ian Bostridge
Archive Service Only
Alphabetical listing of all musical works |
Myrthen, Op 25 (Schumann) |
Vier Duette, Op 34 (Schumann) |
Vier Duette, Op 78 (Schumann) |


text:
Granger: We've Taken a Tremendous Step
The Indiana Pacers began the season simply wanting to move up a spot or two in the Eastern Conference standings after getting a brief taste of the playoffs last season.
They've accomplished that and much more.
The latest turn in the Pacers' best season in eight years happened Thursday when they secured home court in the first round of the NBA playoffs by beating the Milwaukee Bucks 118-109 in a testy game at Bankers Life Fieldhouse.
"It's tremendous the step that we've taken in one season," Pacers forward Danny Granger said. "How we've had a complete turnaround. Now we're one of the best teams in the NBA. It's really fun to win like this."


text:
Home | Products | Search | Gadget of the Month | What's New | Gift Registry | Stores | Contact Us | My Basket
Hyacinth Placemat Grey (431033) |
$3.56 |
Add to Basket
Hyacinth placemats are actually made from sun-dried water hyacinth stems which are woven, dyed and sewn with cotton/poly thread. They are quite pleasing in both texture and appearance and simply wipe clean. They measure 13" x 18" and match the Hyacinth table runners and woven charger plates.


text:
15 USC § 6407 - Lobbying restrictions
No funds collected by the Council shall be used in any manner for influencing legislation or elections, except that the Council may recommend to the Secretary changes in this chapter or other statutes that would further the purposes of this chapter.
(Pub. L. 104–284, § 8,Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3375.)
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Wednesday, February 6, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.
15 USC | Description of Change | Session Year | Public Law | Statutes at Large |
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.